51
|
El-Hodhod MA, El-Shabrawi MHF, AlBadi A, Hussein A, Almehaidib A, Nasrallah B, AlBassam EM, El Feghali H, Isa HM, Al Saraf K, Sokhn M, Adeli M, Al-Sawi NMM, Hage P, Al-Hammadi S. Consensus statement on the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of cow's milk protein allergy in the Middle East: a modified Delphi-based study. World J Pediatr 2021; 17:576-589. [PMID: 34817828 PMCID: PMC8639571 DOI: 10.1007/s12519-021-00476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop an expert consensus regarding the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of cow's milk protein allergy (CMPA) in the Middle East. METHODS A three-step modified Delphi method was utilized to develop the consensus. Fifteen specialized pediatricians participated in the development of this consensus. Each statement was considered a consensus if it achieved an agreement level of ≥ 80%. RESULTS The experts agreed that the double-blind placebo-controlled oral challenge test (OCT) should be performed for 2-4 weeks using an amino acid formula (AAF) in formula-fed infants or children with suspected CMPA. Formula-fed infants with confirmed CMPA should be offered a therapeutic formula. The panel stated that an extensively hydrolyzed formula (eHF) is indicated in the absence of red flag signs. At the same time, the AAF is offered for infants with red flag signs, such as severe anaphylactic reactions. The panel agreed that infants on an eHF with resolved symptoms within 2-4 weeks should continue the eHF with particular attention to the growth and nutritional status. On the other hand, an AAF should be considered for infants with persistent symptoms; the AAF should be continued if the symptoms resolve within 2-4 weeks, with particular attention to the growth and nutritional status. In cases with no symptomatic improvements after the introduction of an AAF, other measures should be followed. The panel developed a management algorithm, which achieved an agreement level of 90.9%. CONCLUSION This consensus document combined the best available evidence and clinical experience to optimize the management of CMPA in the Middle East.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moustafa A. El-Hodhod
- grid.7269.a0000 0004 0621 1570Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt ,grid.412319.c0000 0004 1765 2101Faculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Mortada H. F. El-Shabrawi
- grid.7776.10000 0004 0639 9286Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt ,International Pediatric Association (IPA), Marengo, USA ,International Society of Tropical Pediatrics (ISTP), Manila, Philippines
| | | | | | - Ali Almehaidib
- grid.415310.20000 0001 2191 4301Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Ebtsam Mohammed AlBassam
- Nutrition Service Department, King Faisal Specialist and Research Center Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Hasan M. Isa
- grid.416646.70000 0004 0621 3322Pediatric Department, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain ,grid.411424.60000 0001 0440 9653Pediatric department, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Khaled Al Saraf
- Pediatrics Department, Dar Al Shifa Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait
| | - Maroun Sokhn
- grid.33070.370000 0001 2288 0342Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Department, Saint George University Medical Center, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Mehdi Adeli
- grid.467063.00000 0004 0397 4222Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Pierre Hage
- grid.33070.370000 0001 2288 0342Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Suleiman Al-Hammadi
- College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Building 14, 505055, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
52
|
Pilolli R, Van Poucke C, De Angelis E, Nitride C, de Loose M, Gillard N, Huet AC, Tranquet O, Larré C, Adel-Patient K, Bernard H, Mills ENC, Monaci L. Discovery based high resolution MS/MS analysis for selection of allergen markers in chocolate and broth powder matrices. Food Chem 2020; 343:128533. [PMID: 33183874 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Peptide marker identification is an important step in development of a mass spectrometry method for multiple allergen detection, since specificity, robustness and sensitivity of the overall analytical method will depend on the reliability of the proteotypic peptides. As part of the development of a multi-analyte reference method, discovery analysis of two incurred food matrices has been undertaken to select the most reliable peptide markers. Six allergenic ingredients (milk, egg, peanut, soybean, hazelnut, and almond) were incurred into either chocolate or broth powder matrix. Different conditions of protein extraction and purification were tested and the tryptic peptide pools were analysed by untargeted high resolution tandem mass spectrometry and the resulting fragmentation spectra were processed via a commercial software for sequence identification. The analysis performed on incurred foods provides both a prototype effective and straightforward sample preparation protocol and delivers reliable peptides to be included in a standardized selected reaction monitoring method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Pilolli
- Institute of Sciences of Food Production, CNR-ISPA, Bari, Italy
| | - Christof Van Poucke
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Melle, Belgium
| | | | - Chiara Nitride
- School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Marc de Loose
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Melle, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Karine Adel-Patient
- INRA-CEA, Service de Pharmacologie et d'Immunoanalyse, Laboratoire d'Immuno-Allergie Alimentaire, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Hervé Bernard
- INRA-CEA, Service de Pharmacologie et d'Immunoanalyse, Laboratoire d'Immuno-Allergie Alimentaire, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - E N Clare Mills
- School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Monaci
- Institute of Sciences of Food Production, CNR-ISPA, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
53
|
Blumchen K, DunnGalvin A, Timmermans F, Regent L, Schnadt S, Podestà M, Sánchez A, Couratier P, Feeney M, Hjorth B, Patel R, Lush T, Ryan R, Vereda A, Fisher HR, Fernández‐Rivas M. APPEAL-1: A pan-European survey of patient/caregiver perceptions of peanut allergy management. Allergy 2020; 75:2920-2935. [PMID: 32438514 DOI: 10.1111/all.14414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy (PA) is associated with marked quality-of-life (QoL) impairment. However, data are lacking on the experience and impact of living with PA from the perspectives of persons with PA (PwPA) and their caregivers. Allergy to Peanuts imPacting Emotions And Life study 1 (APPEAL-1) was a pan-European survey investigating these perspectives. This first of two articles reports clinical characteristics of PwPA and PA management practices. METHODS APPEAL-1 was a quantitative, online survey conducted in eight European countries, developed by eight representatives of patient advocacy groups and five healthcare professionals and researchers. Eligible participants included adults with PA and parents/caregivers of PwPA who responded by self-report and provided proxy-report for the PwPA under their care. Data were summarized using nonweighted descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 1846 completed/analysed questionnaires, 528 were from adults with PA (self-report); 437 by proxy for children with PA (34 aged 0-3 years, 287 aged 4-12 years, 116 aged 13-17 years) and 881 from parents/caregivers (self-report). Of PwPA (N = 965), 95% reported diagnosis by healthcare professionals, mostly by clinical history and peanut-specific allergy testing. Rates of allergic rhinitis, asthma and other food allergies in PwPA were 50%, 42% and 79%, respectively. Only 31% of PwPA received HCP advice/support following their worst allergic reaction, and 28% had not been prescribed an adrenaline auto-injector. Results were similar by country but varied by age group. CONCLUSIONS The APPEAL-1 findings contribute to greater understanding of PA impact on PwPA, caregivers and family members and the need for improved PA management across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Blumchen
- Division of Allergology, Pneumology and Cystic Fibrosis Department of Children and Adolescent Medicine University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
| | - Audrey DunnGalvin
- School of Applied Psychology and Department of Paediatrics and Child Health University College Cork Cork Ireland
- Paediatrics and Child Infectious Diseases First Moscow State Medical University Moscow Russia
| | - Frans Timmermans
- Nederlands Anafylaxis Netwerk ‐ European Anaphylaxis Taskforce Dordrecht The Netherlands
| | | | - Sabine Schnadt
- Deutscher Allergie‐ und Asthmabund, (DAAB) Mönchengladbach Germany
| | | | - Angel Sánchez
- Asociación Española de Personas con Alergia a Alimentos y Látex (AEPNAA) Madrid Spain
| | - Pascale Couratier
- Association Française de Prévention des Allergies (AFPRAL) Paris France
| | - Mary Feeney
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology Department of Paediatric Allergy King's College London, and Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen R. Fisher
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology Department of Paediatric Allergy King's College London, and Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK
| | - Montserrat Fernández‐Rivas
- Department of Allergy Hospital Clínico San Carlos Universidad Complutense de MadridIdISSCARADyAL Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Zhang Y, Jin T. Almond allergens: update and perspective on identification and characterization. JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE 2020; 100:4657-4663. [PMID: 32270879 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Almond (Prunus dulcis) is not only widely used as a human food as a result of its flavor, nutrients, and health benefits, but it is also one of the most likely tree nuts to trigger allergies. Almond allergens, however, have not been studied as extensively as those of peanuts and other selected tree nuts. This review provides an update of the molecular properties of almond allergens to clarify some confusion about the identities of almond allergens and our perspective on characterizing putative almond allergens. At present, the following almond allergens have been designated by the World Health Organization/International Union of Immunological Societies Allergen Nomenclature Sub-Committee: Pru du 3 (a non-specific lipid transfer protein 1, nsLTP1), Pru du 4 (a profilin), Pru du 5 (60S acidic ribosomal protein 2), Pru du 6 (an 11S legumin known as prunin) and Pru du 8 (an antimicrobial protein with cC3C repeats). Besides, almond vicilin and almond γ-conglutin have been identified as food allergens, although further characterization of these allergens is still of interest. In addition, almond 2S albumin was reported as a food allergen as a result of the misidentification of Pru du 8. Two more almond proteins have been called allergens based on their sequence homology with known food allergens and their 'membership' in relevant protein families that contain allergens in many species. These include the pathogenesis related-10 protein (referred to as Pru du 1) and the thaumatin-like protein (referred to as Pru du 2). Almonds thus have five known food allergens and five more likely ones that need to be investigated further. Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhu Zhang
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Pacific West Area, Western Regional Research Center, Albany, CA, USA
| | - Tengchuan Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
55
|
Wai CYY, Leung NYH, Leung ASY, Shum Y, Leung PSC, Chu KH, Kwan YW, Lee QU, Wong JSC, Lam ICS, Li PF, Xu KJY, Lam CY, Sun J, Wong GWK, Leung TF. Cell-Based Functional IgE Assays Are Superior to Conventional Allergy Tests for Shrimp Allergy Diagnosis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:236-244.e9. [PMID: 32931950 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis of shellfish allergy currently relies on patient history, skin prick test (SPT), and serum specific IgE (sIgE) quantification. These methods lack sufficient diagnostic accuracy, whereas the gold standard of oral food challenges is risky and burdensome. Markers of reactivity and severity of allergic reactions to shellfish will improve clinical care of these patients. OBJECTIVES This study compared the diagnostic performance of SPT, sIgE, basophil activation test (BAT), and IgE crosslinking-induced luciferase expression (EXiLE) test for shrimp allergy. METHODS Thirty-five subjects with documented history of shrimp allergic reactions were recruited and grouped according to results of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). In addition to routine diagnostics, BAT (Flow CAST) and EXiLE test with shrimp extract and tropomyosin were performed. RESULTS Of 35 subjects, 15 were shrimp allergic with pruritus, urticaria, and itchy mouth on DBPCFC, whereas 20 were tolerant to shrimp. Tropomyosin only accounted for 53.3% of sensitization among subjects with challenge-proven shrimp allergy. BAT using shrimp extract as stimulant showed the highest area under curve value (0.88), Youden Index (0.81), likelihood ratio (14.73), odds ratio (104), and variable importance (4.27) when compared with other assays and tropomyosin diagnosis. Results of BAT significantly correlated with those of EXiLE (r = 0.664, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS BAT is a more accurate diagnostic marker for shrimp allergy than SPT and shrimp sIgE, whereas the EXiLE test based on an IgE crosslinking assay is a good alternative to BAT. Tropomyosin may not be the most important shrimp allergen in Chinese, which warrants further investigation to search for other major allergens and diagnostic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Y Y Wai
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Nicki Y H Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Agnes S Y Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yuki Shum
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Patrick S C Leung
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California, Davis, Calif
| | - Ka Hou Chu
- School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yat Wah Kwan
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and Yan Chai Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Qun Ui Lee
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and Yan Chai Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Joshua S C Wong
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and Yan Chai Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Ivan C S Lam
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital and Yan Chai Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Pui Fung Li
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Kary J Y Xu
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Cheuk Yin Lam
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Jinlyu Sun
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatology and Immunological Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Diagnosis and Treatment on Allergic Diseases, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Gary W K Wong
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ting Fan Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| |
Collapse
|
56
|
Kaur N, Mehr S, Katelaris C, Wainstein B, Altavilla B, Saad R, Valerio C, Codarini M, Burton P, Perram F, Baumgart K, Barnes EH, Campbell DE. Added Diagnostic Value of Peanut Component Testing: A Cross-Sectional Study in Australian Children. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 9:245-253.e4. [PMID: 32942048 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.08.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut components are widely used in clinical practice; however, their utility to predict challenge outcome in the Australian children, outside of infants, is not well studied. OBJECTIVE Can peanut component testing predict outcome of challenge in peanut-allergic children. METHODS All children attending peanut challenges, regardless of previous allergic reactions to peanut or sensitization (skin prick test or peanut IgE) alone, were recruited. Serum collected before the challenge was analyzed for peanut IgE and Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 (ImmunoCap). RESULTS Of the 222 children recruited, 89 (40%) were allergic on oral food challenge. Ara h 2 and 6 performed similarly to peanut IgE and skin prick test in predicting challenge outcome (area under the curve, 0.84-0.87). No baseline clinical characteristics, including past history, predicted challenge outcome. By logistic regression, degree of polysensitization to Ara h 1, 2, or 3 increased the odds of allergic reaction at oral food challenge at 0.35 and 1.0 kUA/L cutoff levels (P < .001 for both). All 11 children sensitized (>0.35 kUA/L) to Ara h 1, 2, and 3 reacted to peanut challenge. Degree of polysensitization at more than 1.0 kUA/L was associated with a lower cumulative eliciting dose (P = .016) and with severity of allergic reaction on challenge (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, sensitization to the combination of Ara h 1, 2, and 3 was highly predictive of peanut allergy. Overall, only Ara h 2 as individual component most correlated with severity of reaction at challenge and adrenaline use. Ara h 8 and 9 were not useful in predicting challenge outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narinder Kaur
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, SCHN, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Child Health Program, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sam Mehr
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, SCHN, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Constance Katelaris
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brynn Wainstein
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Betina Altavilla
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Saad
- Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carolina Valerio
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, SCHN, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Miriam Codarini
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Pamela Burton
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Perram
- Camden and Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karl Baumgart
- Immunology, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth H Barnes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney Medical School, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dianne E Campbell
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, SCHN, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
57
|
Grabenhenrich L, Trendelenburg V, Bellach J, Yürek S, Reich A, Fiandor A, Rivero D, Sigurdardottir S, Clausen M, Papadopoulos NG, Xepapadaki P, Sprikkelman AB, Dontje B, Roberts G, Grimshaw K, Kowalski ML, Kurowski M, Dubakiene R, Rudzeviciene O, Fernández‐Rivas M, Couch P, Versteeg SA, Ree R, Mills C, Keil T, Beyer K. Frequency of food allergy in school-aged children in eight European countries-The EuroPrevall-iFAAM birth cohort. Allergy 2020; 75:2294-2308. [PMID: 32219884 DOI: 10.1111/all.14290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of food allergy (FA) among European school children is poorly defined. Estimates have commonly been based on parent-reported symptoms. We aimed to estimate the frequency of FA and sensitization against food allergens in primary school children in eight European countries. METHODS A follow-up assessment at age 6-10 years of a multicentre European birth cohort based was undertaken using an online parental questionnaire, clinical visits including structured interviews and skin prick tests (SPT). Children with suspected FA were scheduled for double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges (DBPCFC). RESULTS A total of 6105 children participated in this school-age follow-up (57.8% of 10 563 recruited at birth). For 982 of 6069 children (16.2%), parents reported adverse reactions after food consumption in the online questionnaire. Of 2288 children with parental face-to-face interviews and/or skin prick testing, 238 (10.4%) were eligible for a DBPCFC. Sixty-three foods were challenge-tested in 46 children. Twenty food challenges were positive in 17 children, including seven to hazelnut and three to peanut. Another seventy-one children were estimated to suffer FA among those who were eligible but refused DBPCFC. This yielded prevalence estimates for FA in school age between 1.4% (88 related to all 6105 participants of this follow-up) and 3.8% (88 related to 2289 with completed eligibility assessment). INTERPRETATION In primary school children in eight European countries, the prevalence of FA was lower than expected even though parents of this cohort have become especially aware of allergic reactions to food. There was moderate variation between centres hampering valid regional comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linus Grabenhenrich
- Department for Methodology and Research Infrastructure Robert Koch‐Institut Berlin Germany
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Valérie Trendelenburg
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Johanna Bellach
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Ernst von Bergmann Academic Educational Hospital Berlin Germany
| | - Songül Yürek
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Andreas Reich
- Epidemiology Unit German Rheumatism Research Centera Leibniz Institute Berlin Germany
| | - Ana Fiandor
- Department of Allergy Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain
| | - Daniela Rivero
- Department of Allergy Hospital Universitario La Paz Madrid Spain
| | - Sigurveig Sigurdardottir
- Department of Immunology Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
| | - Michael Clausen
- Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland
- Children's Hospital Reykjavik Reykjavik Iceland
- Department of Allergy Landspitali University Hospital Reykjavik Iceland
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection Immunity & Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Paraskevi Xepapadaki
- Allergy Department 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Aline B. Sprikkelman
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology & Pediatric Allergology University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Bianca Dontje
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology & Pediatric Allergology Emma Kinderziekenhuis AMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Graham Roberts
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Kate Grimshaw
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Units Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- Department of Dietetics Salford Care Organisation Salford UK
| | - Marek L. Kowalski
- Department of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology Medical University Łódź Poland
| | - Marcin Kurowski
- Department of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology Medical University of Łódź Łódź Poland
| | - Ruta Dubakiene
- Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | - Odilija Rudzeviciene
- Clinic of Children's Diseases Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Vilnius Lithuania
| | | | - Philip Couch
- School of Health Sciences Centre for Health Informatics University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Serge A. Versteeg
- Departments of Experimental Immunology Academic Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
| | - Thomas Keil
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
- State Institute of Health Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority Bad Kissingen Germany
- Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Santos AF, Barbosa‐Morais NL, Hurlburt BK, Ramaswamy S, Hemmings O, Kwok M, O’Rourke C, Bahnson HT, Cheng H, James L, Gould HJ, Sutton BJ, Maleki SJ, Lack G. IgE to epitopes of Ara h 2 enhance the diagnostic accuracy of Ara h 2-specific IgE. Allergy 2020; 75:2309-2318. [PMID: 32248566 DOI: 10.1111/all.14301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the discrepancy between IgE sensitization and allergic reactions to peanut could facilitate diagnosis and lead to novel means of treating peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE To identify differences in IgE and IgG4 binding to peanut peptides between peanut-allergic (PA) and peanut-sensitized but tolerant (PS) children. METHODS PA (n = 56), PS (n = 42) and nonsensitized nonallergic (NA, n = 10) patients were studied. Synthetic overlapping 15-mer peptides of peanut allergens (Ara h 1-11) were spotted onto microarray slides, and patients' samples were tested for IgE and IgG4 binding using immunofluorescence. IgE and IgG4 levels to selected peptides were quantified using ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic model comparisons were performed using likelihood-ratio tests between each specified nominal logistic regression models. RESULTS Seven peptides on Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 were bound more by IgE of PA compared to PS patients on the microarray. IgE binding to one peptide on Ara h 5 and IgG4 binding to one Ara h 9 peptide were greater in PS than in PA patients. Using ImmunoCAP, IgE to the Ara h 2 peptides enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of Ara h 2-specific IgE. Ratios of IgG4/IgE to 4 out of the 7 peptides were higher in PS than in PA subjects. CONCLUSIONS Ara h 2 peptide-specific IgE added diagnostic value to Ara h 2-specific IgE. Ability of peptide-specific IgG4 to surmount their IgE counterpart seems to be important in established peanut tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F. Santos
- Department of Women and Children’s Health (Paediatric Allergy) School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Children’s Allergy ServiceEvelina London Children's Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Nuno L. Barbosa‐Morais
- Faculdade de Medicina Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes Universidade de Lisboa Lisbon Portugal
| | - Barry K. Hurlburt
- US Department of Agriculture Southern Regional Research Center New Orleans LA USA
| | - Sneha Ramaswamy
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics King’s College London London UK
| | - Oliver Hemmings
- Department of Women and Children’s Health (Paediatric Allergy) School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Department of Women and Children’s Health (Paediatric Allergy) School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| | | | | | - Hsiaopo Cheng
- US Department of Agriculture Southern Regional Research Center New Orleans LA USA
| | - Louisa James
- Blizard Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
| | - Hannah J. Gould
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics King’s College London London UK
| | - Brian J. Sutton
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
- Randall Centre for Cell & Molecular Biophysics King’s College London London UK
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- US Department of Agriculture Southern Regional Research Center New Orleans LA USA
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children’s Health (Paediatric Allergy) School of Life Course Sciences Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine King’s College London London UK
- Children’s Allergy ServiceEvelina London Children's Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital London UK
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma London UK
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Hemmings O, Du Toit G, Radulovic S, Lack G, Santos AF. Ara h 2 is the dominant peanut allergen despite similarities with Ara h 6. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 146:621-630.e5. [PMID: 32298698 PMCID: PMC7482438 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Arachis hypogaea 2 (Ara h 2)-specific IgE is to date the best serologic marker to diagnose peanut allergy. Ara h 6 shares approximately 60% sequence identity and multiple epitopes with Ara h 2. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to assess the diagnostic utility and relative importance of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 in peanut allergy. METHODS A cohort 100 of children was studied. The cohort included chidren who had peanut allergy, children who were sensitized to but tolerant of peanut, and children who were neither sensitized nor allergic to peanut. Levels of specific IgE to peanut and individual allergens were quantified by using ImmunoCAP. ImmunoCAP inhibition experiments and mast cell activation tests in response to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were performed. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS version 14 and Prism version 7 software. RESULTS Ara h 2-specific IgE and Ara h 6-specific IgE showed the greatest diagnostic accuracy for peanut allergy when compared with specific IgE to peanut and other peanut allergens. Most patients with peanut allergy were sensitized to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6. Ara h 2 reduced Ara h 2-specific IgE binding more than Ara h 6 did (P < .001), whereas Ara h 6-specific IgE binding was inhibited to a similar degree by Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 (P = .432). In the mast cell activation test, Ara h 2 induced significantly greater maximal reactivity (P = .001) and a lower half maximal effective concentration (P = .002) than did Ara h 6 when testing cosensitized individuals. CONCLUSIONS Ara h 2-specific IgE and Ara h 6-specific IgE provide the greatest accuracy to diagnose peanut allergy. Ara h 2 is the dominant conglutin in peanut allergy in the United Kingdom, despite a degree of cross-reactivity with Ara h 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Hemmings
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - George Du Toit
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzana Radulovic
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom; Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Patil SU, Bunyavanich S, Cecilia Berin M. Emerging Food Allergy Biomarkers. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2020; 8:2516-2524. [PMID: 32888527 PMCID: PMC7479640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The management of food allergy is complicated by the lack of highly predictive biomarkers for diagnosis and prediction of disease course. The measurement of food-specific IgE is a useful tool together with clinical history but is an imprecise predictor of clinical reactivity. The gold standard for diagnosis and clinical research is a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge. Improvement in our understanding of immune mechanisms of disease, development of high-throughput technologies, and advances in bioinformatics have yielded a number of promising new biomarkers of food allergy. In this review, we will discuss advances in immunoglobulin measurements, the utility of the basophil activation test, T-cell profiling, and the use of -omic technologies (transcriptome, epigenome, microbiome, and metabolome) as biomarker tools in food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarita U. Patil
- Food Allergy Center, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Center for Immunological and Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Supinda Bunyavanich
- Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Department of Pediatrics; Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - M. Cecilia Berin
- Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Čelakovská J, Bukač J, Vaňková R, Cermakova E, Krcmova I, Krejsek J, Andrýs C. Cluster analysis of molecular components in 100 patients suffering from atopic dermatitis according to the ISAC Multiplex testing. FOOD AGR IMMUNOL 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2020.1776224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J. Čelakovská
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty Hospital and Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - J. Bukač
- Department of Medical Biophysic, Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech republic
| | - R. Vaňková
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty Hospital and Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - E. Cermakova
- Department of Medical Biophysic, Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech republic
| | - I. Krcmova
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty Hospital and Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - J. Krejsek
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty Hospital and Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - C. Andrýs
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Faculty Hospital and Medical Faculty of Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Pahlow Mose A, Mortz E, Stahl Skov P, Mortz CG, Eller E, Sprogøe U, Barington T, Bindslev‐Jensen C. The quest for ingested peanut protein in human serum. Allergy 2020; 75:1721-1729. [PMID: 31715004 DOI: 10.1111/all.14109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is mounting evidence that systemic uptake of food allergens is key to triggering anaphylaxis. However, direct proof for this theory is still lacking. The purpose of this study was to quantify the absorption and to determine the absorption kinetics of immunoreactive peanut protein in relation to the allergic response in human. METHODS Quantitative protein assays including mass spectrometry, dot blots and Western blotting were developed to determine the level of Ara h 2 absorption in human serum. The double monoclonal sandwich ELISA was applied to quantify absorbed Ara h 2 and 6, and the basophil histamine release assay and the human passive cutaneous anaphylaxis test were utilized to study the absorption kinetics of immunologically intact peanut proteins. RESULTS The protein assays worked but were not sensitive enough to trace the minute amounts of absorbed Ara h 2 in human serum. The level of Ara h 6 in serum was found to be up to 0.2 ng/mL, but Ara h 2 could not be detected with the ELISA. Both the in vivo and the in vitro methods were successful in demonstrating that: immunoreactive peanut protein was absorbed shortly after ingestion (≤5 minutes); the peanut protein concentration peaks between 1 and 4 hours; and peanut proteins can circulate for at least 48 hours in the bloodstream. CONCLUSION Ingested peanut protein is absorbed systemically and retains its immunoreactive capacity in human serum. However, the precise quantities and the implication for the elicitation of anaphylaxis remains to be elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Pahlow Mose
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | | | - Per Stahl Skov
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
- RefLab Aps. Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Charlotte Gotthard Mortz
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Esben Eller
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Ulrik Sprogøe
- Department of Clinical Immunology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Torben Barington
- Department of Clinical Immunology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Carsten Bindslev‐Jensen
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Rao H, Baricevic I, Bernard H, Smith F, Sayers R, Balasundaram A, Costello CA, Padfield P, Semic‐Jusufagic A, Simpson A, Adel‐Patient K, Xue W, Mills ENC. The Effect of the Food Matrix on the In Vitro Bio‐Accessibility and IgE Reactivity of Peanut Allergens. Mol Nutr Food Res 2020; 64:e1901093. [DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201901093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Rao
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
- College of Food Science and Nutritional EngineeringChina Agricultural University Beijing 100083 China
| | - Ivona Baricevic
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Hervé Bernard
- UMR Service de Pharmacologie et ImmunoanalyseCEAINRAUniversité Paris‐SaclayLaboratoire d'Immuno‐Allergie Alimentaire Gif‐sur‐Yvette F‐91191 France
| | - Frances Smith
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Rebekah Sayers
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Anuhradha Balasundaram
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Carol Ann Costello
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Philip Padfield
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| | - Aida Semic‐Jusufagic
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreWythenshawe Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester M23 9LT UK
| | - Angela Simpson
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreWythenshawe Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester M23 9LT UK
| | - Karine Adel‐Patient
- UMR Service de Pharmacologie et ImmunoanalyseCEAINRAUniversité Paris‐SaclayLaboratoire d'Immuno‐Allergie Alimentaire Gif‐sur‐Yvette F‐91191 France
| | - Wentong Xue
- College of Food Science and Nutritional EngineeringChina Agricultural University Beijing 100083 China
| | - E. N. Clare Mills
- School of Biological SciencesManchester Institute of BiotechnologyManchester Academic Health Sciences CentreUniversity of Manchester Manchester M1 7DN UK
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Johnson J, Malinovschi A, Lidholm J, Petersson CJ, Nordvall L, Janson C, Alving K, Borres MP. Sensitization to storage proteins in peanut and hazelnut is associated with higher levels of inflammatory markers in asthma. Clin Mol Allergy 2020; 18:11. [PMID: 32581655 PMCID: PMC7310284 DOI: 10.1186/s12948-020-00126-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sensitization to peanuts and hazelnuts is common among young asthmatics and can be primary or a result of cross-reactivity. Sensitization as a result of cross-reactivity to birch pollen is typically associated to tolerance or mild and local symptoms upon intake of peanut or hazelnut. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between IgE antibody responses against peanut and hazelnut components, airway and systemic inflammation markers, lung function parameters and reported food hypersensitivity in a cohort of asthmatic children and young adults. Methods A population of 408 asthmatic individuals aged 10-35 years were investigated. Information on hypersensitivity symptoms upon intake of peanut or hazelnut were recorded in a standardized questionnaire. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil count (B-Eos), spirometry, methacholine challenge outcome and IgE antibodies to peanut and hazelnut allergens were measured by standard clinical and laboratory methods. Results Subjects sensitized to any of the peanut (Ara h 1, 2 or 3) or hazelnut (Cor a 9 or 14) storage proteins were significantly younger (17.6 vs 21.2 years), had higher levels of FeNO (23.2 vs 16.7 ppb) and B-Eos (340 vs 170 cells/mcl) than those displaying only pollen-related cross-reactive sensitization. Levels of FeNO correlated with levels of IgE to storage proteins in children, but not in adults. Levels of B-Eos correlated with levels of IgE to all allergen components investigated in children, but only to levels of IgE to storage proteins in adults. Anaphylaxis and skin reactions upon intake of peanuts or hazelnuts were more often reported among subjects sensitized to the respective storage proteins than among those with only pollen-related cross-reactive sensitization. As compared to peanut, hazelnut was more often reported to cause gastrointestinal symptoms and less often oral cavity symptoms. Conclusions Sensitization to peanut and hazelnut storage proteins was associated with higher levels of inflammation markers and food hypersensitivity symptoms in this population of subjects with asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Johnson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andrei Malinovschi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Lennart Nordvall
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christer Janson
- Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kjell Alving
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Magnus P Borres
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
65
|
Gray LEK, Ponsonby A, Collier F, O'Hely M, Sly PD, Ranganathan S, Tang MLK, Carlin JB, Saffery R, Vuillermin PJ, Burgner D, Allen KJ, Pezic A. Deserters on the atopic march: Risk factors, immune profile and clinical outcomes of food sensitized-tolerant infants. Allergy 2020; 75:1404-1413. [PMID: 31853983 DOI: 10.1111/all.14159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A few studies have investigated the antecedents and outcomes of infants who demonstrate IgE sensitization to foods that they clinically tolerate. Improved understanding of this sensitized-tolerant phenotype may inform strategies for the prevention of food allergy. METHODS In an Australian birth cohort (n = 1074), assembled using an unselected antenatal sampling frame, participants were categorized as nonsensitized (NS), sensitizedtolerant (ST), or food allergic (FA) based on skin prick testing and food challenge at 12 months of age. Environmental exposures were recorded throughout. Cord blood regulatory T-cell populations were measured at birth. Subsequent childhood allergic disease was assessed by parent report, clinical examination, and repeat skin prick testing. RESULTS The covariates of interest varied between NS (n = 698), ST (n = 27), and FA (n = 61) groups as follows, suggesting that across these measures, the ST group was more similar to the NS than the FA group: family history of eczema NS 44.6%, ST. 44.6%, FA 65.6%; pet ownership at 12 months: NS 71.5%, ST 81.5%, FA 45.8%; eczema during the first 12 months: NS 19%, ST 32%, FA 64%; and aeroallergen sensitization at 4 years: NS 19.1%, ST 28.6%, FA 44.4%. At birth, a higher proportion of activated regulatory T cells was associated with ST (OR = 2.89, 95% CI 1.03-8.16, P = .045). CONCLUSION Food-sensitized-tolerance in infancy appears to be associated with a similar pattern of exposures, immunity, and outcomes to nonsensitized infants. In addition, we found some evidence that an elevated proportion of activated regulatory T cells at birth was specific to the sensitized-tolerant infants, which may be relevant to suppression of clinical disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence E. K. Gray
- School of Medicine Deakin University Geelong Vic. Australia
- Barwon Health Geelong Vic. Australia
| | - Anne‐Louise Ponsonby
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Fiona Collier
- School of Medicine Deakin University Geelong Vic. Australia
- Barwon Health Geelong Vic. Australia
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Martin O'Hely
- School of Medicine Deakin University Geelong Vic. Australia
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Peter D. Sly
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- University of Queensland South Brisbane Qld Australia
| | - Sarath Ranganathan
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
- The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Mimi L. K. Tang
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
- The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - John B. Carlin
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
- The Royal Children's Hospital Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Richard Saffery
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
- The University of Melbourne Parkville Vic. Australia
| | - Peter J. Vuillermin
- School of Medicine Deakin University Geelong Vic. Australia
- Barwon Health Geelong Vic. Australia
- The Murdoch Children's Research Institute Parkville Vic. Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
66
|
Hands CM, Sayers RL, Nitride C, Gethings LA, Mills ENC. A multiple reaction monitoring method for determining peanut (Arachis hypogea) allergens in serum using quadrupole and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2020; 412:2815-2827. [PMID: 32125467 PMCID: PMC7196080 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02508-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Peanut is a major cause of severe IgE-mediated food allergic reactions, which can be exacerbated by factors, such as exercise, that may increase allergen uptake into the circulation. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been used to determine allergen uptake into serum, but there are concerns over their specificity and a confirmatory method is required. Mass spectrometry (MS) methods have the potential to provide rigorous alternatives for allergen determination. A suite of peptide targets representing the major clinically relevant peanut allergens previously applied in food analysis were used to develop a targeted multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) method for determination of peanut in serum. Depletion of serum using affinity chromatography was found to be essential to allow detection of the peptide targets. A comparison of triple quadrupole and Q-TOF methods showed that one Ara h 2 peptide was only detected by the Q-TOF, the other peptide targets giving similar assay sensitivities with both MS platforms, although transitions for all the peptides were detected more consistently with the Q-TOF. The Q-TOF MRM assay detected peanut from spiked serum more effectively than the triple quadrupole assay, with Ara h 3 being detected down to 3 mg total peanut protein/L of serum, comparable with an Ara h 3-specific ELISA. The poor recoveries observed for both methods are likely due to loss of peanut immune complexes during the serum depletion process. Nevertheless, the Q-TOF MRM method has much promise to confirm the uptake of peanut proteins in serum samples providing immune complexes can be disrupted effectively prior to depletion. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte M Hands
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
| | - Rebekah L Sayers
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
| | - Chiara Nitride
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
| | - Lee A Gethings
- Waters Corporation, Stamford Avenue, Altrincham Road, Wilmslow, SK9 4AX, UK
| | - E N Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
67
|
Prasad KT, Muthu V, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Singh P, Sachdeva MUS, Chakrabarti A, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R. The utility of the basophil activation test in differentiating asthmatic subjects with and without allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses 2020; 63:588-595. [PMID: 32227377 DOI: 10.1111/myc.13081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma with Aspergillus sensitisation (ASA) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) are distinct clinical conditions, with different management strategies. OBJECTIVE To determine the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) in differentiating between asthmatic subjects with and without ABPA. METHODS We performed the BAT using flow cytometry for the basophil activation markers CD63, CD193, and CD203c in consecutive subjects with unsensitised asthma (UA), ASA and ABPA. The BAT was performed unstimulated (baseline) and after stimulation with peanut and Aspergillus fumigatus antigens. Stimulation indices (SI) for CD63, CD193 and CD203c were compared between the study groups. RESULTS We enrolled 82 (UA [n = 25], ASA [n = 25], ABPA [n = 32]) subjects. Only those subjects without peanut sensitisation on serological testing were included in further analyses (n = 50). The receiver operating characteristic analysis of SI for CD63, CD193 and CD203c for the diagnosis of ABPA vs other asthmatics (UA and ASA) showed an area under the curve of 0.577, 0.317 and 0.625, respectively. The SI CD203c at a cut-off of 1.2 (sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 88.9%) and the SI CD63 at a cut-off of 1.3 (sensitivity 42.9%, specificity 91.7%) also had limited utility for the diagnosis of ABPA. CONCLUSION The BAT cannot be used as a diagnostic test in distinguishing ABPA complicating asthma from ASA and UA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Valliappan Muthu
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Inderpaul Singh Sehgal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sahajal Dhooria
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Pawan Singh
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva
- Department of Hematopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Arunaloke Chakrabarti
- Department of Medical Mycology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ashutosh N Aggarwal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Ritesh Agarwal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Storni F, Zeltins A, Balke I, Heath MD, Kramer MF, Skinner MA, Zha L, Roesti E, Engeroff P, Muri L, von Werdt D, Gruber T, Cragg M, Mlynarczyk M, Kündig TM, Vogel M, Bachmann MF. Vaccine against peanut allergy based on engineered virus-like particles displaying single major peanut allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 145:1240-1253.e3. [PMID: 31866435 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy is a severe and increasingly frequent disease with high medical, psychosocial, and economic burden for affected patients and wider society. A causal, safe, and effective therapy is not yet available. OBJECTIVE We sought to develop an immunogenic, protective, and nonreactogenic vaccine candidate against peanut allergy based on virus-like particles (VLPs) coupled to single peanut allergens. METHODS To generate vaccine candidates, extracts of roasted peanut (Ara R) or the single allergens Ara h 1 or Ara h 2 were coupled to immunologically optimized Cucumber Mosaic Virus-derived VLPs (CuMVtt). BALB/c mice were sensitized intraperitoneally with peanut extract absorbed to alum. Immunotherapy consisted of a single subcutaneous injection of CuMVtt coupled to Ara R, Ara h 1, or Ara h 2. RESULTS The vaccines CuMVtt-Ara R, CuMVtt-Ara h 1, and CuMVtt-Ara h 2 protected peanut-sensitized mice against anaphylaxis after intravenous challenge with the whole peanut extract. Vaccines did not cause allergic reactions in sensitized mice. CuMVtt-Ara h 1 was able to induce specific IgG antibodies, diminished local reactions after skin prick tests, and reduced the infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract by eosinophils and mast cells after oral challenge with peanut. The ability of CuMVtt-Ara h 1 to protect against challenge with the whole extract was mediated by IgG, as shown via passive IgG transfer. FcγRIIb was required for protection, indicating that immune complexes with single allergens were able to block the allergic response against the whole extract, consisting of a complex allergen mixture. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that vaccination using single peanut allergens displayed on CuMVtt may represent a novel therapy against peanut allergy with a favorable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Storni
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Andris Zeltins
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | - Ina Balke
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | | | | | | | - Lisha Zha
- International Immunology Center of Anhui Agricultural Center, Anhui, China
| | - Elisa Roesti
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Engeroff
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Muri
- Neuroinfection Laboratory, Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Diego von Werdt
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Gruber
- Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mark Cragg
- Antibody and Vaccine Group, Centre for Cancer Immunology, Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Thomas M Kündig
- Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Monique Vogel
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Martin F Bachmann
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Neeland MR, Andorf S, Manohar M, Dunham D, Lyu SC, Dang TD, Peters RL, Perrett KP, Tang MLK, Saffery R, Koplin JJ, Nadeau KC. Mass cytometry reveals cellular fingerprint associated with IgE+ peanut tolerance and allergy in early life. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1091. [PMID: 32107388 PMCID: PMC7046671 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14919-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
IgE-mediated peanut allergic is common, often serious, and usually lifelong. Not all individuals who produce peanut-specific IgE will react upon consumption of peanut and can eat the food without adverse reactions, known as sensitized tolerance. Here, we employ high-dimensional mass cytometry to define the circulating immune cell signatures associated with sensitized tolerance and clinical allergy to peanut in the first year of life. Key features of clinical peanut allergic are increased frequency of activated B cells (CD19hiHLADRhi), overproduction of TNFα and increased frequency of peanut-specific memory CD4 T cells. Infants with sensitized tolerance display reduced frequency but hyper-responsive naive CD4 T cells and an increased frequency of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. This work demonstrates the utility and power of high-dimensional mass cytometry analysis to interrogate the cellular interactions that are associated with allergic sensitization and clinical food allergy in the first year of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie R Neeland
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Sandra Andorf
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Divisions of Biomedical Informatics and Allergy & Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Monali Manohar
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Diane Dunham
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Shu-Chen Lyu
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Thanh D Dang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel L Peters
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Saffery
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Ojiewo CO, Janila P, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Pandey MK, Desmae H, Okori P, Mwololo J, Ajeigbe H, Njuguna-Mungai E, Muricho G, Akpo E, Gichohi-Wainaina WN, Variath MT, Radhakrishnan T, Dobariya KL, Bera SK, Rathnakumar AL, Manivannan N, Vasanthi RP, Kumar MVN, Varshney RK. Advances in Crop Improvement and Delivery Research for Nutritional Quality and Health Benefits of Groundnut ( Arachis hypogaea L.). FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2020; 11:29. [PMID: 32153601 PMCID: PMC7046547 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Groundnut is an important global food and oil crop that underpins agriculture-dependent livelihood strategies meeting food, nutrition, and income security. Aflatoxins, pose a major challenge to increased competitiveness of groundnut limiting access to lucrative markets and affecting populations that consume it. Other drivers of low competitiveness include allergens and limited shelf life occasioned by low oleic acid profile in the oil. Thus grain off-takers such as consumers, domestic, and export markets as well as processors need solutions to increase profitability of the grain. There are some technological solutions to these challenges and this review paper highlights advances in crop improvement to enhance groundnut grain quality and nutrient profile for food, nutrition, and economic benefits. Significant advances have been made in setting the stage for marker-assisted allele pyramiding for different aflatoxin resistance mechanisms-in vitro seed colonization, pre-harvest aflatoxin contamination, and aflatoxin production-which, together with pre- and post-harvest management practices, will go a long way in mitigating the aflatoxin menace. A breakthrough in aflatoxin control is in sight with overexpression of antifungal plant defensins, and through host-induced gene silencing in the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. Similarly, genomic and biochemical approaches to allergen control are in good progress, with the identification of homologs of the allergen encoding genes and development of monoclonal antibody based ELISA protocol to screen for and quantify major allergens. Double mutation of the allotetraploid homeologous genes, FAD2A and FAD2B, has shown potential for achieving >75% oleic acid as demonstrated among introgression lines. Significant advances have been made in seed systems research to bridge the gap between trait discovery, deployment, and delivery through innovative partnerships and action learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris O. Ojiewo
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Pasupuleti Janila
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
| | - Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
| | - Manish K. Pandey
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
| | - Haile Desmae
- Research Program – West and Central Africa, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Bamako, Mali
| | - Patrick Okori
- Research Program – Eastern and Southern Africa, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - James Mwololo
- Research Program – Eastern and Southern Africa, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Hakeem Ajeigbe
- Research Program – West and Central Africa, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Kano, Nigeria
| | - Esther Njuguna-Mungai
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Geoffrey Muricho
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Essegbemon Akpo
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Wanjiku N. Gichohi-Wainaina
- Research Program – Eastern and Southern Africa, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Murali T. Variath
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
| | - Thankappan Radhakrishnan
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India
| | - Kantilal L. Dobariya
- Main Oilseeds Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University (JAU), Junagadh, India
| | - Sandip Kumar Bera
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Directorate of Groundnut Research (ICAR-DGR), Junagadh, India
| | | | - Narayana Manivannan
- National Pulses Research Center, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Pudukkottai, India
| | - Ragur Pandu Vasanthi
- Regional Agricultural Research Station, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU), Tirupati, India
| | - Mallela Venkata Nagesh Kumar
- Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University (PJTSAU), Hyderabad, India
| | - Rajeev K. Varshney
- Research Program – Genetic Gains, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Adverse events associated with peanut oral immunotherapy in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2020; 10:659. [PMID: 31959857 PMCID: PMC6971009 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-56961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
While peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) represents a promising treatment for peanut allergies in children, safety concerns remain a common barrier to widespread adoption. We aimed to systematically assess available evidence to determine the risk and frequency of adverse events occurring during POIT, and examine study-level characteristics associated with their occurrence and severity. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted through April 2019. Controlled and non-controlled studies evaluating POIT were eligible. Twenty-seven studies, involving 1488 subjects, were included. Adverse events to POIT were common and led to treatment discontinuation in 6.6% of children (95% CI 4.4–9.0; 27 studies, I2 = 48.7%). Adverse events requiring treatment with epinephrine occurred among 7.6% (4.5–11.4; 26 studies, I2 = 75.5%) of participants, at a rate of 2.0 per 10,000 doses (0.8–3.7; 15 studies, I2 = 64.4). Use of a rush treatment phase and targeting a higher maintenance dose were associated with a higher risk and frequency of epinephrine use, while using co-treatments in addition to POIT was associated with a lower risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. While adverse events to POIT are common, this study provides promising explorative evidence that certain modifications to existing treatment protocols could significantly improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
|
72
|
Novel Bead-Based Epitope Assay is a sensitive and reliable tool for profiling epitope-specific antibody repertoire in food allergy. Sci Rep 2019; 9:18425. [PMID: 31804555 PMCID: PMC6895130 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54868-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Identification of allergenic IgE epitopes is instrumental for the development of novel diagnostic and prognostic methods in food allergy. In this work, we present the quantification and validation of a Bead-Based Epitope Assay (BBEA) that through multiplexing of epitopes and multiple sample processing enables completion of large experiments in a short period of time, using minimal quantities of patients’ blood. Peptides that are uniquely coupled to beads are incubated with serum or plasma samples, and after a secondary fluorophore-labeled antibody is added, the level of fluorescence is quantified with a Luminex reader. The signal is then normalized and converted to epitope-specific antibody binding values. We show that the effect of technical artifacts, i.e. well position or reading order, is minimal; and batch effects - different individual microplate runs - can be easily estimated and eliminated from the data. Epitope-specific antibody binding quantified with BBEA is highly reliable, reproducible and has greater sensitivity of epitope detection compared to peptide microarrays. IgE directed at allergenic epitopes is a sensitive biomarker of food allergy and can be used to predict allergy severity and phenotypes; and quantification of the relationship between epitope-specific IgE and IgG4 can further improve our understanding of the immune mechanisms behind allergic sensitization.
Collapse
|
73
|
Birot S, Crépet A, Remington BC, Madsen CB, Kruizinga AG, Baumert JL, Brockhoff PB. Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons. Sci Rep 2019; 9:18206. [PMID: 31796875 PMCID: PMC6890679 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Peer-reviewed probabilistic methods already predict the probability of an allergic reaction resulting from an accidental exposure to food allergens, however, the methods calculate it in different ways. The available methods utilize the same three major input parameters in the risk model: the risk is estimated from the amount of food consumed, the concentration of allergen in the contaminated product and the distribution of thresholds among allergic persons. However, consensus is lacking about the optimal method to estimate the risk of allergic reaction and the associated uncertainty. This study aims to compare estimation of the risk of allergic reaction and associated uncertainty using different methods and suggest improvements. Four cases were developed based on the previous publications and the risk estimations were compared. The risk estimation was found to agree within 0.5% with the different simulation cases. Finally, an uncertainty analysis method is also presented in order to evaluate the uncertainty propagation from the input parameters to the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Birot
- DTU Compute, Richard Petersens Plads, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Amélie Crépet
- ANSES, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94701, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Benjamin C Remington
- The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte B Madsen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
| | - Astrid G Kruizinga
- The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph L Baumert
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Department of Food Science & Technology, University of Nebraska, 143 Food Industry Complex, Lincoln, Nebraska, 68583-0919, United States
| | - Per B Brockhoff
- DTU Compute, Richard Petersens Plads, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Abstract
Although the gold standard for diagnosis of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy is an oral food challenge, clinically relevant biomarkers of IgE sensitization, including serum-specific IgE and skin prick testing, can aid in diagnosis. Clinically useful values have been defined for individual foods. More recently, specific IgE to particular protein components has provided additional diagnostic value. In summary, food allergy diagnostics to evaluate IgE sensitization are clinically useful and continue to evolve to improve evaluation of IgE-mediated food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A LaHood
- Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 201, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarita U Patil
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Cox 201, Boston, MA, USA; Food Allergy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Shah F, Shi A, Ashley J, Kronfel C, Wang Q, Maleki SJ, Adhikari B, Zhang J. Peanut Allergy: Characteristics and Approaches for Mitigation. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2019; 18:1361-1387. [DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Shah
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Aimin Shi
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Jon Ashley
- International Iberian Nanotechnology LaboratoryFood Quality and Safety Research group Berga 4715‐330 Portugal
| | - Christina Kronfel
- Food Processing and Sensory Quality ResearchUnited States Dept. of Agriculture New Orleans LA 70124 USA
| | - Qiang Wang
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- Food Processing and Sensory Quality ResearchUnited States Dept. of Agriculture New Orleans LA 70124 USA
| | - Benu Adhikari
- School of ScienceRMIT Univ. Melbourne VIC 3083 Australia
| | - Jinchuang Zhang
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Sonntag HJ, Filippi S, Pipis S, Custovic A. Blood Biomarkers of Sensitization and Asthma. Front Pediatr 2019; 7:251. [PMID: 31275911 PMCID: PMC6593482 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Biomarkers are essential to determine different phenotypes of childhood asthma, and for the prediction of response to treatments. In young preschool children with asthma, aeroallergen sensitization, and blood eosinophil count of 300/μL or greater may identify those who can benefit from the daily use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). We propose that every preschool child who is considered for ICS treatment should have these two features measured as a minimum before a decision is made on the commencement of long-term preventive treatment. In practice, IgE-mediated sensitization should be considered as a quantifiable variable, i.e., we should use the titer of sIgE antibodies or the size of skin prick test response. A number of other blood biomarkers may prove useful (e.g., allergen-specific IgG/IgE antibody ratios amongst sensitized individuals, component-resolved diagnostics which measures sIgE response to a large number of allergenic molecules, assessment of immune responses to viruses, level of serum CC16, etc.), but it remains unclear whether these can be translated into clinically useful tests. Going forward, a more integrated approach which takes into account multiple domains of asthma, from the pattern of symptoms and blood biomarkers to genetic risk and lung function measures, is needed if we are to move toward a stratified approach to asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Joachim Sonntag
- Respiratory Division, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Filippi
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Spyros Pipis
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Department of Paediatrics, Aretaeio Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Adnan Custovic
- Respiratory Division, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
77
|
Brusca I, Barrale M, Onida R, La Chiusa SM, Gjomarkaj M, Uasuf CG. The extract, the molecular allergen or both for the in vitro diagnosis of peach and peanut sensitization? Clin Chim Acta 2019; 493:25-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
78
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to describe effective management strategies in nursery or school based upon research findings. RECENT FINDINGS The prevalence of food allergy and number of emergency department visits for food-related anaphylaxis are increasing in children and adolescents. As there is currently no cure, the most effective strategy to decrease allergic reactions is food allergen avoidance. However, allergic reactions are inevitable in both food allergic children as well as in first-time reactors. Misconceptions exist on the safety of products with advisory labels and questions remain on whether school-wide bans decrease the risk of allergic reactions in school. Recent legislation has prompted schools to consider requiring unassigned epinephrine autoinjectors to better manage those who have allergic reactions in nursery or school. SUMMARY A collective effort is required to keep children with food allergies safe at school. Families, healthcare providers, and school personnel should be informed on food allergen avoidance strategies, symptoms consistent with allergic reactions and anaphylaxis, how to respond to allergic reactions, and the impact the diagnosis of food allergy may have on quality of life for affected children and their families.
Collapse
|
79
|
Zambrano Ibarra G, Fuentes Aparicio V, Infante Herrero S, Blanca M, Zapatero Remon L. Peanut Allergy in Spanish Children: Comparative Profile of Peanut Allergy versus Tolerance. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019; 178:370-376. [DOI: 10.1159/000495579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
80
|
Frischmeyer-Guerrerio PA, Rasooly M, Gu W, Levin S, Jhamnani RD, Milner JD, Stone K, Guerrerio AL, Jones J, Borres MP, Brittain E. IgE testing can predict food allergy status in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2019; 122:393-400.e2. [PMID: 30639434 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 12/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosing food allergy in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is complicated by their high rate of asymptomatic sensitization to foods, which can lead to misdiagnosis and unnecessary food avoidance. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine whether food-specific (sIgE) or component immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels could predict allergic status in patients with moderate to severe AD and elevated total IgE. METHODS Seventy-eight children (median age, 10.7 years) with moderate to severe AD were assessed for a history of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut, wheat, and soy. The IgE levels for each food and its components were determined by ImmunoCAP. The level and pattern of IgE reactivity to each food and its components, and their ratio to total IgE, were compared between subjects who were allergic and tolerant to each food. RESULTS Ninety-one percent of subjects were sensitized, and 51% reported allergic reactivity to at least 1 of the 5 most common food allergens. Allergy to milk, egg, and peanut were most common, and IgE levels to each of these foods were significantly higher in the allergic group. Component IgEs most associated with milk, egg, and peanut allergy were Bos d8, Gal d1, and Ara h2, respectively. The ratio of sIgE to total IgE offered no advantage to sIgE alone in predicting allergy. CONCLUSION Specific IgE levels and the pattern of IgE reactivity to food components can distinguish AD subjects allergic vs tolerant to the major food allergens and may therefore be helpful in guiding the clinical management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marjohn Rasooly
- Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., NCI Campus, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Wenjuan Gu
- Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., NCI Campus, Frederick, Maryland
| | - Samara Levin
- Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Joshua D Milner
- Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Kelly Stone
- Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Anthony L Guerrerio
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph Jones
- ImmunoDiagnostics Branch, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia US Inc., Portage, Michigan
| | - Magnus P Borres
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Erica Brittain
- Biostatistics Research Branch, DCR, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Celakovská J, Bukac J, Ettler K, Vaneckova J, Krcmova I, Ettlerova K, Krejsek J. The occurrence of food hypersensitivity reactions and the relation to the sensitization to grass and trees in atopic dermatitis patients 14 years of age and older. Indian J Dermatol 2019; 64:346-354. [PMID: 31543527 PMCID: PMC6749770 DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_164_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:
Collapse
|
82
|
Germination results in reduced allergenicity of peanut by degradation of allergens and resveratrol enrichment. INNOV FOOD SCI EMERG 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
83
|
Datema MR, Eller E, Zwinderman AH, Poulsen LK, Versteeg SA, van Ree R, Bindslev-Jensen C. Ratios of specific IgG 4 over IgE antibodies do not improve prediction of peanut allergy nor of its severity compared to specific IgE alone. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 49:216-226. [PMID: 30269403 PMCID: PMC7379576 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Revised: 07/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background IgG4 antibodies have been suggested to play a protective role in the translation of peanut sensitization into peanut allergy. Whether they have added value as diagnostic read‐out has not yet been reported. Objective To evaluate whether (a) peanut‐specific IgG, IgG4 and/or IgA antibodies are associated with tolerance and/or less severe reactions and (b) they can improve IgE‐based diagnostic tests. Methods Sera of 137 patients with challenge‐proven peanut allergy and of 25 subjects that tolerated peanut, both with known IgE profiles to peanut extract and five individual peanut allergens, were analyzed for specific IgG and IgG4. Antibody levels and ratios thereof were associated with challenge outcome including symptom severity grades. For comparison of the discriminative performance, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used. Results IgE against Ara h 2 was significantly higher in allergic than in tolerant patients and associated with severity of reactions (P < 0.001) with substantial diagnostic capability (AUC 0.91, 95%CI 0.87‐0.96 and 0.80, 95%CI 0.73‐0.87, respectively). IgG and IgG4 were also positively associated albeit significantly weaker (AUCs from 0.65 to 0.72). On the other hand, ratios of IgG and IgG4 over IgE were greater in patients that were tolerant or had mild symptoms as compared to severe patients but they did not predict challenge outcomes better than IgE alone (AUCs from 0.54 to 0.89). Conclusion IgE against Ara h 2 is the best biomarker for predicting peanut challenge outcomes including severity and IgG and IgG4 antibody ratios over IgE do not improve these outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareen R Datema
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Medical Centre, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esben Eller
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Medical Centre, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lars K Poulsen
- Allergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital at Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Serge A Versteeg
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Machine learning to identify pairwise interactions between specific IgE antibodies and their association with asthma: A cross-sectional analysis within a population-based birth cohort. PLoS Med 2018; 15:e1002691. [PMID: 30422985 PMCID: PMC6233916 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between allergic sensitisation and asthma is complex; the data about the strength of this association are conflicting. We propose that the discrepancies arise in part because allergic sensitisation may not be a single entity (as considered conventionally) but a collection of several different classes of sensitisation. We hypothesise that pairings between immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to individual allergenic molecules (components), rather than IgE responses to 'informative' molecules, are associated with increased risk of asthma. METHODS AND FINDINGS In a cross-sectional analysis among 461 children aged 11 years participating in a population-based birth cohort, we measured serum-specific IgE responses to 112 allergen components using a multiplex array (ImmunoCAP Immuno‑Solid phase Allergy Chip [ISAC]). We characterised sensitivity to 44 active components (specific immunoglobulin E [sIgE] > 0.30 units in at least 5% of children) among the 213 (46.2%) participants sensitised to at least one of these 44 components. We adopted several machine learning methodologies that offer a powerful framework to investigate the highly complex sIgE-asthma relationship. Firstly, we applied network analysis and hierarchical clustering (HC) to explore the connectivity structure of component-specific IgEs and identify clusters of component-specific sensitisation ('component clusters'). Of the 44 components included in the model, 33 grouped in seven clusters (C.sIgE-1-7), and the remaining 11 formed singleton clusters. Cluster membership mapped closely to the structural homology of proteins and/or their biological source. Components in the pathogenesis-related (PR)-10 proteins cluster (C.sIgE-5) were central to the network and mediated connections between components from grass (C.sIgE-4), trees (C.sIgE-6), and profilin clusters (C.sIgE-7) with those in mite (C.sIgE-1), lipocalins (C.sIgE-3), and peanut clusters (C.sIgE-2). We then used HC to identify four common 'sensitisation clusters' among study participants: (1) multiple sensitisation (sIgE to multiple components across all seven component clusters and singleton components), (2) predominantly dust mite sensitisation (IgE responses mainly to components from C.sIgE-1), (3) predominantly grass and tree sensitisation (sIgE to multiple components across C.sIgE-4-7), and (4) lower-grade sensitisation. We used a bipartite network to explore the relationship between component clusters, sensitisation clusters, and asthma, and the joint density-based nonparametric differential interaction network analysis and classification (JDINAC) to test whether pairwise interactions of component-specific IgEs are associated with asthma. JDINAC with pairwise interactions provided a good balance between sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.87), and outperformed penalised logistic regression with individual sIgE components in predicting asthma, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94, compared with 0.73. We then inferred the differential network of pairwise component-specific IgE interactions, which demonstrated that 18 pairs of components predicted asthma. These findings were confirmed in an independent sample of children aged 8 years who participated in the same birth cohort but did not have component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) data at age 11 years. The main limitation of our study was the exclusion of potentially important allergens caused by both the ISAC chip resolution as well as the filtering step. Clustering and the network analyses might have provided different solutions if additional components had been available. CONCLUSIONS Interactions between pairs of sIgE components are associated with increased risk of asthma and may provide the basis for designing diagnostic tools for asthma.
Collapse
|
85
|
Magnusdottir H, Vidarsdóttir A, Ludviksson B, Clausen M, Lund S, Jensen A, Sigurdardottir S. Ara h 1 and Ara h 6 Sensitization Causes Clinical Peanut Allergy in Ara h 2-Negative Individuals. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2018; 178:66-75. [DOI: 10.1159/000493327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
86
|
Rao H, Tian Y, Fu W, Xue W. In vitro digestibility and immunoreactivity of thermally processed peanut. FOOD AGR IMMUNOL 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2018.1499710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Rao
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Tian
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenhui Fu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wentong Xue
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
Tong WS, Yuen AW, Wai CY, Leung NY, Chu KH, Leung PS. Diagnosis of fish and shellfish allergies. J Asthma Allergy 2018; 11:247-260. [PMID: 30323632 PMCID: PMC6181092 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s142476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Seafood allergy is a hypersensitive disorder with increasing prevalence worldwide. Effective and accurate diagnostic workup for seafood allergy is essential for clinicians and patients. Parvalbumin and tropomyosin are the most common fish and shellfish allergens, respectively. The diagnosis of seafood allergies is complicated by cross-reactivity among fish allergens and between shellfish allergens and other arthropods. Current clinical diagnosis of seafood allergy is a complex algorithm that includes clinical assessment, skin prick test, specific IgE measurement, and oral food challenges. Emerging diagnostic strategies, such as component-resolved diagnosis (CRD), which uses single allergenic components for assessment of epitope specific IgE, can provide critical information in predicting individualized sensitization patterns and risk of severe allergic reactions. Further understanding of the molecular identities and characteristics of seafood allergens can advance the development of CRD and lead to more precise diagnosis and improved clinical management of seafood allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Sze Tong
- School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Agatha Wt Yuen
- School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Christine Yy Wai
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China,
| | - Nicki Yh Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China,
| | - Ka Hou Chu
- School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Patrick Sc Leung
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
Howard R, Belgrave D, Papastamoulis P, Simpson A, Rattray M, Custovic A. Evolution of IgE responses to multiple allergen components throughout childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142:1322-1330. [PMID: 29428391 PMCID: PMC6170973 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of information about longitudinal patterns of IgE responses to allergenic proteins (components) from multiple sources. OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate temporal patterns of component-specific IgE responses from infancy to adolescence, and their relationship with allergic diseases. METHODS In a population-based birth cohort, we measured IgE to 112 components at 6 follow-ups during childhood. We used a Bayesian method to discover cross-sectional sensitization patterns and their longitudinal trajectories, and we related these patterns to asthma and rhinitis in adolescence. RESULTS We identified 1 sensitization cluster at age 1, 3 at age 3, 4 at ages 5 and 8, 5 at age 11, and 6 at age 16 years. "Broad" cluster was the only cluster present at every follow-up, comprising components from multiple sources. "Dust mite" cluster formed at age 3 years and remained unchanged to adolescence. At age 3 years, a single-component "Grass" cluster emerged, which at age 5 years absorbed additional grass components and Fel d 1 to form the "Grass/cat" cluster. Two new clusters formed at age 11 years: "Cat" cluster and "PR-10/profilin" (which divided at age 16 years into "PR-10" and "Profilin"). The strongest contemporaneous associate of asthma at age 16 years was sensitization to dust mite cluster (odds ratio: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-6.1; P < .05), but the strongest early life predictor of subsequent asthma was sensitization to grass/cat cluster (odds ratio: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.6-7.4; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS We describe the architecture of the evolution of IgE responses to multiple allergen components throughout childhood, which may facilitate development of better diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for allergic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Howard
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle Belgrave
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Panagiotis Papastamoulis
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Simpson
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Magnus Rattray
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adnan Custovic
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Santos AF, Lack G. Is the Prevalence of Food Allergy Not on the Rise After All? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2018; 4:721-2. [PMID: 27393781 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F Santos
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology, Department of Pediatric Allergy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gideon Lack
- Division of Asthma, Allergy & Lung Biology, Department of Pediatric Allergy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Renand A, Farrington M, Whalen E, Wambre E, Bajzik V, Chinthrajah S, Nadeau KC, Kwok WW. Heterogeneity of Ara h Component-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses in Peanut-Allergic Subjects. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1408. [PMID: 29988522 PMCID: PMC6026622 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the peanut-specific CD4 T cell responses in peanut-allergic (PA) subjects should provide new insights into the development of innovative immunotherapies for the treatment of peanut allergy. Although peanut-specific CD4 T cells have a TH2 profile in PA subjects, the immunogenicity of different Ara h components in eliciting specific CD4 T cell responses and the heterogeneity of these Ara h-reactive TH2 cells remains unclear. In this study, we investigated Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8-specific T cell responses in PA and sensitized non-peanut-allergic (sNPA) subjects, using the CD154 upregulation assay and the class II tetramer technology. In the PA group, T cells directed against Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6 have a heterogeneous TH2 phenotype characterized by differential expression of CRTH2, CD27, and CCR6. Reactivity toward these different components was also distinct for each PA subject. Two dominant Ara h 2 epitopes associated with DR1501 and DR0901 were also identified. Frequencies of Ara h-specific T cell responses were also linked to the peanut specific-IgE level. Conversely, low peanut-IgE level in sNPA subjects was associated with a weak or an absence of the allergen-specific T cell reactivity. Ara h 8-specific T cell reactivity was weak in both PA and sNPA subjects. Thus, peanut-IgE level was associated with a heterogeneous Ara h (but not Ara h 8)-specific T cell reactivity only in PA patients. This suggests an important immunogenicity of each Ara h 1, 2, 3, and 6 in inducing peanut allergy. Targeting Ara h 1-, 2-, 3-, and 6-specific effector-TH2 cells can be the future way to treat peanut allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amedee Renand
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States
| | | | - Elizabeth Whalen
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Erik Wambre
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Veronique Bajzik
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy Research at Stanford University, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy Research at Stanford University, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - William W Kwok
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States.,Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Garcia-Neuer M, Alenazy LA, Castells M. Anaphylaxis in the 21st century: phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers. J Asthma Allergy 2018; 11:121-142. [PMID: 29950872 PMCID: PMC6016596 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s159411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is the most serious of all allergic reactions and can be fatal. The diagnosis is frequently delayed, and misdiagnosis often occurs with asthma or urticaria. Biomarkers such as tryptase are not routinely checked, and appropriate treatment with epinephrine is not administered in a majority of cases, increasing the risk of poor outcomes. The objective of this review is to provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis with a description of phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers available in both the clinical and research settings. Expanding knowledge with regard to the presentation, causes, and triggers for anaphylaxis among health care providers will improve its diagnosis and management, increase patient safety, and decrease morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodorikez Wilfox Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
- PhD Program in Public Health, Medical and Surgical Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Marlene Garcia-Neuer
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leila A Alenazy
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mariana Castells
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to provide an update of recent advances in the epidemiology, clinical features and diagnosis, and management of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). RECENT FINDINGS Food allergy prevalence and FIA rates continue to rise, but FIA fatalities are stable. Basophil and mast cell activation tests promise more accurate identification of food triggers. Oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy can desensitize a significant portion of subjects. Epinephrine use for FIA remains sub-optimal. As the burden of food allergy continues to increase, it appears that the corresponding increase in research focused on this epidemic is beginning to bear fruit. The stable number of FIA fatalities in the face of an ongoing epidemic indicates lives have already been saved. The emergence of new diagnostic tests and interventional therapies may transform the management of FIA in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Parrish
- Department of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9063, USA.
| | - Heidi Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Fauquert JL, Michaud E, Pereira B, Bernard L, Gourdon-Dubois N, Rouzaire PO, Rochette E, Merlin E, Evrard B. Peanut gastrointestinal delivery oral immunotherapy in adolescents: Results of the build-up phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PITA study). Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 48:862-874. [PMID: 29665158 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 04/06/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy to peanut is effective in desensitizing patients but has significant side effects including anaphylaxis and gastrointestinal symptoms. In most protocols, peanut is administered in a vehicle food. OBJECTIVE In an exclusively adolescent population, we tested a new approach using sealed capsules of peanut (gastrointestinal delivery oral immunotherapy or GIDOIT) to bypass the upper gastrointestinal tract. The primary aim was to assess the efficacy of the oral build-up phase of GIDOIT and the secondary aim to analyse its safety. METHODS Adolescents with a history of a clinical allergic reaction after peanut ingestion were included in a 2-armed, parallel-design, individually randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial after a positive double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge (DBPCFC1). A central randomization centre used computer-generated tables to allocate treatments. Peanut (or placebo) capsules were ingested daily over a period of 24 weeks with increments every 2 weeks from 2 to 400 mg of peanut protein (pp). Primary outcome was tolerance of 400 mg of pp at DBPCFC2. RESULTS Thirty patients were included between September 2013 and May 2014. At DBPCFC2, unresponsiveness to 400 mg of pp was achieved in 17/21 peanut group patients (2 withdrawn patients) and 1/9 in the placebo group (Intention-to-treat analysis, P < .001, absolute difference = 0.7, 95%IC 0.43 0.96). Oropharyngeal symptoms were equally frequent in both groups. No dysphagia or other signs of eosinophilic oesophagitis occurred. Digestive adverse events (AE) were more frequent in the treated group (P = .02), but mild and without compliance issues. Only one severe advent event led to withdrawal in a patient who ingested twice the investigated treatment. Peanut-specific humoral immune responses were modulated. CONCLUSION The GIDOIT protocol demonstrated clinical and immunological efficacy and had an acceptable level of safety with weak oropharyngeal symptoms, no dysphagia, mild digestive events and few severe systemic AE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-L Fauquert
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Michaud
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Pereira
- Unité de Biostatistiques, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation (DRCI), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - L Bernard
- Département de Pharmacie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - N Gourdon-Dubois
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - P-O Rouzaire
- Service d'Immunologie, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Pharmacie, ERTICa, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Rochette
- INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Merlin
- Unité d'allergologie de l'enfant, CHU Estaing, Pole pédiatrique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,INSERM CIC 1405, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Médecine, UMR1019 UNH, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Evrard
- Service d'Immunologie, CHU Gabriel-Montpied, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,UFR Pharmacie, ERTICa, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
94
|
Santos AF, Couto-Francisco N, Bécares N, Kwok M, Bahnson HT, Lack G. A novel human mast cell activation test for peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142:689-691.e9. [PMID: 29731128 PMCID: PMC6080741 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Natália Couto-Francisco
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natalia Bécares
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Kwok
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| | - Henry T Bahnson
- Immune Tolerance Network, Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Wash
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Eigenmann PA. Do we still need oral food challenges for the diagnosis of food allergy? Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2018; 29:239-242. [PMID: 29240247 DOI: 10.1111/pai.12845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Food challenges are standard in the diagnosis in patients suspected of being allergic to food. However, their role is regularly questioned due to the time required to perform them, and to their cost and the inherent risk of severe reactions. Food challenges have been challenged by recent advances defining threshold values for food-specific IgE helping to predict the probability of having symptoms to the suspected food. Also, identification of major allergens to various highly allergenic foods such as peanuts or tree nuts has contributed to an increased accuracy of IgE testing. Altogether, these new data have contributed to a better definition of the role of oral food challenges in the diagnosis of food allergy. Oral food challenges are not outdated and remain the gold standard in the diagnosis of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe A Eigenmann
- Department of Child and Adolescent, Pediatric Allergy Unit, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Chinthrajah RS, Purington N, Andorf S, Rosa JS, Mukai K, Hamilton R, Smith BM, Gupta R, Galli SJ, Desai M, Nadeau KC. Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018; 121:69-76.e2. [PMID: 29709643 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reliable prognostic markers for predicting severity of allergic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) have not been established. OBJECTIVE To develop a predictive algorithm of a food challenge severity score (CSS) to identify those at higher risk for severe reactions to a standardized peanut OFC. METHODS Medical history and allergy test results were obtained for 120 peanut allergic participants who underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Reactions were assigned a CSS between 1 and 6 based on cumulative tolerated dose and a severity clinical indicator. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, peanut component IgE values, and a basophil activation marker were considered in a multistep analysis to derive a flexible decision rule to understand risk during peanut of OFC. RESULTS A total of 18.3% participants had a severe reaction (CSS >4). The decision rule identified the following 3 variables (in order of importance) as predictors of reaction severity: ratio of percentage of CD63hi stimulation with peanut to percentage of CD63hi anti-IgE (CD63 ratio), history of exercise-induced asthma, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio. The CD63 ratio alone was a strong predictor of CSS (P < .001). CONCLUSION The CSS is a novel tool that combines dose thresholds and allergic reactions to understand risks associated with peanut OFCs. Laboratory values (CD63 ratio), along with clinical variables (exercise-induced asthma and FEV1/FVC ratio) contribute to the predictive ability of the severity of reaction to peanut OFCs. Further testing of this decision rule is needed in a larger external data source before it can be considered outside research settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02103270.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Natasha Purington
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; School of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sandra Andorf
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jaime S Rosa
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kaori Mukai
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Robert Hamilton
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Bridget Marie Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois
| | - Ruchi Gupta
- Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephen J Galli
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Manisha Desai
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; School of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
97
|
Stiefel G, Anagnostou K, Boyle RJ, Brathwaite N, Ewan P, Fox AT, Huber P, Luyt D, Till SJ, Venter C, Clark AT. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of peanut and tree nut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 47:719-739. [PMID: 28836701 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Peanut nut and tree nut allergy are characterised by IgE mediated reactions to nut proteins. Nut allergy is a global disease. Limited epidemiological data suggest varying prevalence in different geographical areas. Primary nut allergy affects over 2% of children and 0.5% of adults in the UK. Infants with severe eczema and/or egg allergy have a higher risk of peanut allergy. Primary nut allergy presents most commonly in the first five years of life, often after the first known ingestion with typical rapid onset IgE-mediated symptoms. The clinical diagnosis of primary nut allergy can be made by the combination of a typical clinical presentation and evidence of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test. Pollen food syndrome is a distinct disorder, usually mild, with oral/pharyngeal symptoms, in the context of hay fever or pollen sensitisation, which can be triggered by nuts. It can usually be distinguish clinically from primary nut allergy. The magnitude of a SPT or sIgE relates to the probability of clinical allergy, but does not relate to clinical severity. SPT of ≥ 8 mm or sIgE ≥ 15 KU/L to peanut is highly predictive of clinical allergy. Cut off values are not available for tree nuts. Test results must be interpreted in the context of the clinical history. Diagnostic food challenges are usually not necessary but may be used to confirm or refute a conflicting history and test result. As nut allergy is likely to be a long-lived disease, nut avoidance advice is the cornerstone of management. Patients should be provided with a comprehensive management plan including avoidance advice, patient specific emergency medication and an emergency treatment plan and training in administration of emergency medication. Regular re-training is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Stiefel
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - K Anagnostou
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - N Brathwaite
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Ewan
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A T Fox
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Huber
- British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, London, UK
| | - D Luyt
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - S J Till
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Venter
- St. Mary's Hospital, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - A T Clark
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Brough HA, Kull I, Richards K, Hallner E, Söderhäll C, Douiri A, Penagos M, Melén E, Bergström A, Turcanu V, Wickman M, Lack G. Environmental peanut exposure increases the risk of peanut sensitization in high-risk children. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 48:586-593. [DOI: 10.1111/cea.13111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- H. A. Brough
- Paediatric Allergy Group; Department of Women and Children's Heath; School of Life Course Sciences; King's College London; Guys’ Hospital; London UK
- Children's Allergy Service; Guy's and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Paediatric Allergy Group; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences; King's College London; Guys' Hospital; London UK
| | - I. Kull
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Stockholm County Council; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science and Education; Södersjukhuset; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Sachs’ Children's Hospital; Södersjukhuset; Stockholm Sweden
| | - K. Richards
- Paediatric Allergy Group; Department of Women and Children's Heath; School of Life Course Sciences; King's College London; Guys’ Hospital; London UK
- Paediatric Allergy Group; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences; King's College London; Guys' Hospital; London UK
| | - E. Hallner
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Stockholm County Council; Stockholm Sweden
| | - C. Söderhäll
- Department of Biosciences and Nutrition; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre of Allergy Research; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Department of Women′s and Children′s Health; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - A. Douiri
- Division of Health & Social Care Research; King's College London; London UK
| | - M. Penagos
- Paediatric Allergy Group; Department of Women and Children's Heath; School of Life Course Sciences; King's College London; Guys’ Hospital; London UK
- Paediatric Allergy Group; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences; King's College London; Guys' Hospital; London UK
| | - E. Melén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Stockholm County Council; Stockholm Sweden
- Sachs’ Children's Hospital; Södersjukhuset; Stockholm Sweden
| | - A. Bergström
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine; Stockholm County Council; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre of Allergy Research; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - V. Turcanu
- Paediatric Allergy Group; Department of Women and Children's Heath; School of Life Course Sciences; King's College London; Guys’ Hospital; London UK
- Paediatric Allergy Group; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences; King's College London; Guys' Hospital; London UK
| | - M. Wickman
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
- Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland; Uppsala University; Eskilstuna Sweden
| | - G. Lack
- Paediatric Allergy Group; Department of Women and Children's Heath; School of Life Course Sciences; King's College London; Guys’ Hospital; London UK
- Children's Allergy Service; Guy's and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
- Paediatric Allergy Group; School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences; King's College London; Guys' Hospital; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Bahri R, Custovic A, Korosec P, Tsoumani M, Barron M, Wu J, Sayers R, Weimann A, Ruiz-Garcia M, Patel N, Robb A, Shamji MH, Fontanella S, Silar M, Mills ENC, Simpson A, Turner PJ, Bulfone-Paus S. Mast cell activation test in the diagnosis of allergic disease and anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018. [PMID: 29518421 PMCID: PMC6075471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background Food allergy is an increasing public health issue and the most common cause of life-threatening anaphylactic reactions. Conventional allergy tests assess for the presence of allergen-specific IgE, significantly overestimating the rate of true clinical allergy and resulting in overdiagnosis and adverse effect on health-related quality of life. Objective To undertake initial validation and assessment of a novel diagnostic tool, we used the mast cell activation test (MAT). Methods Primary human blood-derived mast cells (MCs) were generated from peripheral blood precursors, sensitized with patients' sera, and then incubated with allergen. MC degranulation was assessed by means of flow cytometry and mediator release. We compared the diagnostic performance of MATs with that of existing diagnostic tools to assess in a cohort of peanut-sensitized subjects undergoing double-blind, placebo-controlled challenge. Results Human blood-derived MCs sensitized with sera from patients with peanut, grass pollen, and Hymenoptera (wasp venom) allergy demonstrated allergen-specific and dose-dependent degranulation, as determined based on both expression of surface activation markers (CD63 and CD107a) and functional assays (prostaglandin D2 and β-hexosaminidase release). In this cohort of peanut-sensitized subjects, the MAT was found to have superior discrimination performance compared with other testing modalities, including component-resolved diagnostics and basophil activation tests. Using functional principle component analysis, we identified 5 clusters or patterns of reactivity in the resulting dose-response curves, which at preliminary analysis corresponded to the reaction phenotypes seen at challenge. Conclusion The MAT is a robust tool that can confer superior diagnostic performance compared with existing allergy diagnostics and might be useful to explore differences in effector cell function between basophils and MCs during allergic reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajia Bahri
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences & Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adnan Custovic
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Korosec
- Laboratory for Clinical Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University Hospital for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Marina Tsoumani
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Barron
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences & Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jiakai Wu
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences & Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Rebekah Sayers
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monica Ruiz-Garcia
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nandinee Patel
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abigail Robb
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Fontanella
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mira Silar
- Laboratory for Clinical Immunology & Molecular Genetics, University Hospital for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - E N Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Simpson
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul J Turner
- Section of Paediatrics, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Silvia Bulfone-Paus
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences & Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research (MCCIR), School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
100
|
Westwood M, Ramaekers B, Lang S, Armstrong N, Noake C, de Kock S, Joore M, Severens J, Kleijnen J. ImmunoCAP® ISAC and Microtest for multiplex allergen testing in people with difficult to manage allergic disease: a systematic review and cost analysis. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-178. [PMID: 27623692 DOI: 10.3310/hta20670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergy is a form of immune-mediated exaggerated sensitivity (hypersensitivity) to a substance that is either inhaled, swallowed, injected or comes into contact with the skin. Foreign substances that provoke allergies are called allergens. It has been claimed that multiplex allergen testing may help in diagnosing the cause of symptoms in patients with an unclear cause of allergy or who are allergic to more than one substance. OBJECTIVES To evaluate multiplex allergen testing [devices that can measure the presence of multiple immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies in a patient's blood at the same time], by assessing (1) clinical effectiveness (allergy symptoms, incidence of acute exacerbations, mortality, adverse events of testing and treatment, health-care presentations or admissions, health-related quality of life); (2) effects on treatment (diet, immunotherapy medications, other potential testing); (3) any additional diagnostic information provided by multiplex allergen testing; and (4) cost-effectiveness (cost of different assessment strategies). METHODS Fifteen databases were searched from 2005 to April 2015, including MEDLINE (via OvidSp), MEDLINE In-Process Citations, MEDLINE Daily Update, PubMed (National Library of Medicine), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, Science Citation Index (SCI), Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S), BIOSIS Previews, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) HTA programme, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); supplementary searches of conference proceedings and trials registries were performed. Review methods followed published guidance from the Cochrane Collaboration and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, UK. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using appropriate published tools or a review-specific tool designed by the project team. Studies were summarised in a narrative synthesis. Owing to a lack of data on the clinical effectiveness of multiplex allergen testing, no long-term cost-effectiveness model was developed. A conceptual model structure was developed and cost analyses were performed to examine the short-term costs of various possible diagnostic pathways. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included in the review. The very limited available data indicated that the addition of multiplex allergen testing [ImmunoCAP(®) Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC), Thermo Fisher Scientific/Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden] to standard diagnostic work-up can change the clinicians' views on the diagnosis, management and treatment of patients. There was some indication that the use of ImmunoCAP ISAC testing may be useful to guide decisions on the discontinuation of restrictive diets, the content of allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) prescriptions, and whether or not patients should receive SIT. However, none of the studies that we identified reported any information on clinical outcomes subsequent to changes in treatment or management. There was some evidence that ImmunoCAP ISAC may be useful for discriminating allergens that are structurally similar and are recognised by the same IgE antibody (cross-immunoreactive). No data were available for Microtest (Microtest Matrices Ltd, London, UK). Detailed cost analyses suggested that multiplex allergen testing would have to result in a substantial reduction of the proportions of patients receiving single IgE testing and oral food challenge tests in order to be cost-saving in the short term. CONCLUSIONS No recommendations for service provision can be made based on the analyses included in this report. It is suggested that a consensus-based protocol for the use of multiplex allergen testing be developed. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the proposed protocol should then be assessed by comparing long-term clinical and quality of life outcomes and resource use in patients managed using the protocol with those managed using a standard diagnostic pathway. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015019739. FUNDING This project was a Diagnostic Assessment Report commissioned by the NIHR HTA programme on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bram Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Shona Lang
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Caro Noake
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
| | | | - Manuela Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Severens
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|