Second-Line Tisagenlecleucel or Standard Care in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Cellular therapies in older adults with hematological malignancies: A case-based, state-of-the-art review

Cellular therapies, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), and chimeric antigen receptor- (CAR-) T cell therapies are essential treatment modalities for many hematological malignancies. Although their use in older adults has substantially increased within the past decades, cellular therapies represent intensive treatment approaches that exclude a large percentage of older adults due to comorbidities and frailty. Under- and overtreatment in older adults with hematologic malignancy is a challenge and many treatment decisions are influenced by chronologic age. The advent of efficient and well-tolerated newer treatment approaches for multiple myeloma has challenged the role of ASCT. In the modern era, there are no randomized clinical trials of transplant versus non-transplant strategies for patients ≥65 years. Nonetheless, ASCT is feasible for selected older patients and does not result in long-term compromise in quality of life. AlloHCT is the only curative approach for acute myeloid leukemia of intermediate and unfavourable risk but carries a significant risk for non-relapse mortality depending on comorbidities, general fitness, and transplant-specific characteristics, such as intensity of conditioning and donor choice. However, alloHCT is feasible in appropriately-selected older adults. Early referral for evaluation is strongly encouraged as this is the most obvious barrier. CAR-T cell therapies have shown unprecedented clinical efficacy and durability in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Its use is well tolerated in older adults, although evidence comes from limited case numbers. Whether patients who are deemed unfit for ASCT qualify for CAR-T cell therapy remains elusive, but the tolerability and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy appears promising, especially for older patients. The evidence from randomized trials is strong in favor of using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to reduce treatment-related toxicities and guide treatment intensity in the care for solid tumors; its use for evaluation of cellular therapies is less evidence-based. However, CGA can provide useful information on patients' fitness, resilient mechanisms, and reveal potential optimization strategies for compensating for vulnerabilities. In this narrative review, we will discuss key questions on cellular therapies in older adults based on illustrative patient cases.

Multicenter development of a PET-based risk assessment tool for product-specific outcome prediction in large B-cell lymphoma patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy

PURPOSE

The emergence of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fundamentally changed the management of individuals with relapsed and refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, real-world data have shown divergent outcomes for the approved products. The present study therefore set out to evaluate potential risk factors in a larger cohort.

METHODS

Our analysis set included 88 patients, treated in four German university hospitals and one Italian center, who had undergone 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (PET) before CAR T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel. We first determined the predictive value of conventional risk factors, treatment lines, and response to bridging therapy for progression-free survival (PFS) through forward selection based on Cox regression. In a second step, the additive potential of two common PET parameters was assessed. Their optimal dichotomizing thresholds were calculated individually for each CAR T-cell product.

RESULTS

Extra-nodal involvement emerged as the most relevant of the conventional tumor and patient characteristics. Moreover, we found that inclusion of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) further improves outcome prediction. The hazard ratio for a PFS event was 1.68 per unit increase of our proposed risk score (95% confidence interval [1.20, 2.35], P = 0.003), which comprised both extra-nodal disease and lymphoma burden. While the most suitable MTV cut-off among patients receiving tisagenlecleucel was 11 mL, a markedly higher threshold of 259 mL showed optimal predictive performance in those undergoing axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis demonstrates that the presence of more than one extra-nodal lesion and higher MTV in LBCL are associated with inferior outcome after CAR T-cell treatment. Based on an assessment tool including these two factors, patients can be assigned to one of three risk groups. Importantly, as shown by our study, metabolic tumor burden might facilitate CAR T-cell product selection and reflect the individual need for bridging therapy.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cell Therapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

This review focuses on the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy to treat non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a classification of heterogeneous malignant neoplasms of the lymphoid tissue. Despite various conventional and multidrug chemotherapies, the poor prognosis for NHL patients remains and has prompted the utilization of groundbreaking personalized therapies such as CAR-T cells. CAR-T cells are T cells engineered to express a CAR that enables T cells to specifically lyse tumor cells with extracellular expression of a tumor antigen of choice. A CAR is composed of an extracellular antibody fragment or target protein binding domain that is conjugated to activating intracellular signaling motifs common to T cells. In general, CAR-T cell therapies for NHL are designed to recognize cellular markers ubiquitously expressed on B cells such as CD19+, CD20+, and CD22+. Clinical trials using CAR-T cells such as ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM demonstrated promising results compared to standard of care and ultimately led to FDA approval for the treatment of relapsed/refractory NHL. Despite the success of CAR-T therapy for NHL, challenges include adverse side effects as well as extrinsic and intrinsic mechanisms of tumor resistance that lead to suboptimal outcomes. Overall, CAR-T cell therapies have improved clinical outcomes in NHL patients and generated optimism around their future applications.

Toxicities, intensive care management, and outcome of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in adults: an update

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells are a promising new immunotherapy for haematological malignancies. Six CAR-T cells products are currently available for adult patients with refractory or relapsed high-grade B cell malignancies, but they are associated with severe life-threatening toxicities and side effects that may require admission to ICU.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this short pragmatic review is to synthesize for intensivists the knowledge on CAR-T cell therapy with emphasis on CAR-T cell-induced toxicities and ICU management of complications according to international recommendations, outcomes and future issues.

Lisocabtagene maraleucel for second-line relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: patient-reported outcomes from the PILOT study

In the single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II PILOT study, second-line treatment with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) for whom hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was not intended resulted in high response rates, durable responses, and a safety profile consistent with previous reports. Here, we analyzed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients who received liso-cel in PILOT. Patients received liso-cel, an autologous, CD19-directed, 4-1BB CAR T-cell product administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells, for a total target dose of 100×10⁶ CAR+ T cells. HRQOL, a secondary endpoint of PILOT, was assessed as prespecified using three patient-reported outcome instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30; FACT-LymS; EQ-5D-5L). Evaluable datasets for the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-LymS, and EQ-5D-5L health utility index, and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) included 56 (92%), 49 (80%), 55 (90%), and 54 (89%) patients, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvement was achieved across most post-treatment visits for EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue and FACT-LymS. Overall mean changes from baseline through day 545 showed significant improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue, pain, and appetite loss, FACT-LymS, and EQ VAS. In within-patient analyses, clinically meaningful improvements or maintenance in scores were observed in most patients at days 90, 180, 270, and 365. HRQOL was maintained or improved in patients who received liso-cel as second-line therapy in PILOT. These findings support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment in patients with R/R LBCL not intended for HSCT (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03483103).

Real-world outcomes following third or subsequent lines of therapy: A Danish population-based study on 189 patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas

Outcome data of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) beyond the second line are scarce outside of clinical trials. Novel therapies in the R/R setting have been approved based on single-arm trials, but results need to be contextualized by real-world outcomes. Medical records from 3753 Danish adults diagnosed with DLBCL were reviewed. Patients previously treated with rituximab and anthracycline-based chemotherapy who received the third or later line (3 L+) of treatment after 1 January 2015, were included. Only 189 patients with a median age of 71 years were eligible. The median time since the last line of therapy was 6 months. Patients were treated with either best supportive care (22%), platinum-based salvage therapy (13%), low-intensity chemotherapy (22%), in clinical trial (14%) or various combination treatments (32%). The 2-year OS-/PFS estimates were 25% and 12% for all patients and 49% and 17% for those treated with platinum-based salvage therapy. Age ≥70, CNS involvement, elevated LDH and ECOG ≥2 predicted poor outcomes, and patients with 0-1 of these risk factors had a 2-year OS estimate of 65%. Only a very small fraction of DLBCL patients received third-line treatment and were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes were generally poor, but better in intensively treated, fit young patients with limited disease.

Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a currative treatment modality for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) because of the intrinsic graft-versus-lymphoma effect. However, limited information is available regarding which patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL are likely to benefit from allo-HSCT. We retrospectively analyzed data from 1268 DLBCL patients who received allo-HSCT. The overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 30.3% and 21.6% at 3 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that stable or progressive disease at transplantation, male patient, poorer performance status at transplantation, and shorter intervals from previous transplantation were associated independently with a lower PFS. Four prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic index for PFS, predicting 3-year PFS of 55.4%, 43.7%, 20.4% and 6.6%, respectively. The prognostic model predicted relapse rates following allo-HSCT accordingly (P < 0.0001), whereas did not predict transplantation-related mortality (P = 0.249). The prognostic index can identify a subgroup of DLBCL patients who benefit from allo-HSCT and it is worthwhile to evaluate whether this model is also applicable to patients undergoing allo-HSCT in cases of relapse after chimeric antigen receptor engineered T-cell therapy, although the application of allo-HSCT has been declining with the increase of novel immunotherapies.

SAMHD1 expression contributes to doxorubicin resistance and predicts survival outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a commonly diagnosed, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. While R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy is potentially curative, about 40% of DLBCL patients will fail, highlighting the need to identify biomarkers to optimize management. SAMHD1 has a dNTPase-independent role in promoting resection to facilitate DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair by homologous recombination. We evaluated the relationship of SAMHD1 levels with sensitivity to DSB-sensitizing agents in DLBCL cells and the association of SAMHD1 expression with clinical outcomes in 79 DLBCL patients treated with definitive therapy and an independent cohort dataset of 234 DLBCL patients. Low SAMHD1 expression, Vpx-mediated, or siRNA-mediated degradation/depletion in DLBCL cells was associated with greater sensitivity to doxorubicin and PARP inhibitors. On Kaplan-Meier log-rank survival analysis, low SAMHD1 expression was associated with improved overall survival (OS), which on subset analysis remained significant only in patients with advanced stage (III-IV) and moderate to high risk (2-5 International Prognostic Index (IPI)). The association of low SAMHD1 expression with improved OS remained significant on multivariate analysis independent of other adverse factors, including IPI, and was validated in an independent cohort. Our findings suggest that SAMHD1 expression mediates doxorubicin resistance and may be an important prognostic biomarker in advanced, higher-risk DLBCL patients.

Plasmablastic Lymphoma. A State-of-the-Art Review: Part 2-Focus on Therapy

The objective of this two-part review is to present a current and comprehensive understanding of the diagnosis and management of plasmablastic lymphoma. The first part, which was published previously, focused on the study of epidemiology, etiology, clinicopathological characteristics, differential diagnosis, prognostic variables, and the impact of plasmablastic lymphoma on specific populations. This second part addresses the difficult topic of the treatment of plasmablastic lymphoma, specifically examining both the conventional, consolidated approach and the novel therapeutic strategy.

Bispecific antibodies and CAR-T cells: dueling immunotherapies for large B-cell lymphomas

Despite recent advances in frontline therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), at least a third of those diagnosed still will require second or further lines for relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) disease. A small minority of these can be cured with standard chemoimmunotherapy/stem-cell transplant salvage approaches. CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-19) therapies are increasingly altering the prognostic landscape for rel/ref patients with DLBCL and related aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Long-term follow up data show ongoing disease-free outcomes consistent with cure in 30-40% after CAR-19, including high-risk patients primary refractory to or relapsing within 1 year of frontline treatment. This has made CAR-19 a preferred option for these difficult-to-treat populations. Widespread adoption, however, remains challenged by logistical and patient-related hurdles, including a requirement for certified tertiary care centers concentrated in urban centers, production times of at least 3-4 weeks, and high per-patients costs similar to allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are molecular biotherapies designed to bind and activate effector T-cells and drive them to B-cell antigens, leading to a similar cellular-dependent cytotoxicity as CAR-19. May and June of 2023 saw initial approvals of next-generation BsAbs glofitamab and epcoritamab in DLBCL as third or higher-line therapy, or for patients ineligible for CAR-19. BsAbs have similar spectrum but generally reduced severity of immune related side effects as CAR-19 and can be administered in community settings without need to manufacture patient-specific cellular products. To date and in contrast to CAR-19, however, there is no convincing evidence of cure after BsAbs monotherapy, though follow up is limited. The role of BsAbs in DLBCL treatment is rapidly evolving with trials investigating use in both relapsed and frontline curative-intent combinations. The future of DLBCL treatment is bound increasingly to include effector cell mediated immunotherapies, but further optimization of both cellular and BsAb approaches is needed.

CEAC (oral semustine, etoposide, cytarabine and cyclophosphamide) vs BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning regimen of autologous stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a post-hoc, propensity score-matched, cohort study in Chinese patients

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We have developed a novel conditioning regimen called CEAC (oral semustine 250 mg/m2 d-6, etoposide 300 mg/m2 d-5 ~ d-2, cytarabine 500 mg/m2 d-5 ~ d-2, and cyclophosphamide 1200 mg/m2 d-5 ~ d-2) In lymphoma patients in China. Here, we conducted a study to compare the conventional BEAM regimen with the CEAC regimen in 110 DLBCL patients. Propensity-score matching was performed in a 1:4 ratio (22 patients received BEAM and 88 received CEAC). Our results showed no significant difference in the overall response rate (95% vs 97%, P = 1.000) and complete response rate (66% vs 73%, P = 0.580) between the two cohorts. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), 5-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) for all patients were 72% (95% CI 62%-82%), 92% (95% CI 86%-97%), and 29% (95% CI 17%-38%), respectively. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (80% vs 70%, P = 0.637), 5-year OS (95% vs 91%, P = 0.496), and 5-year CIR (20% vs 30%, P = 0.733) between cohorts. In terms of safety, the CEAC cohort had a lower incidence rate of grade 1-2 gastrointestinal hemorrhage (P = 0.023) and severe nausea (P = 0.007) compared with the BEAM cohort. In conclusion, the CEAC regimen seems to be a suitable alternative to the BEAM regimen for ASCT in DLBCL patients.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies: Successes, challenges, and opportunities

The success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies has realized a longstanding effort toward harnessing the immune system to fight cancer in a truly personalized fashion. Second generation chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) incorporating co-stimulatory molecules like 4-1BB or CD28 were able to overcome some of the hindrances with initial CAR constructs resulting in efficacious products. Many second-generation CAR-T products have been approved in the treatment of relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies including multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, challenges remain in optimizing the manufacturing, timely access, limiting the toxicity from CAR-T infusions and improving sustainability of responses derived with CAR-T therapy. Here, we summarize the clinical trial data leading to approval CAR-T therapies in MM and NHL, discuss the limitations with current CAR-T therapy strategies and review emerging strategies for overcoming these limitations.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a cohort of a multicentre, single-arm, phase 1b/2 study

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma comprises nearly 30% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases and patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for stem-cell transplantation have few treatment options and poor prognoses. We aimed to determine whether the novel combination of polatuzumab vedotin in combination with rituximab and lenalidomide (Pola+R+Len) would provide a tolerable treatment option with enhanced antitumour response in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

This completed phase 1b/2, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (GO29834) evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pola+R+Len in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at 19 sites in three countries (USA, Spain, and UK). Patients (≥18 years old) were eligible for inclusion if they had histologically documented CD20-positive relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower, had received at least one previous line of chemoimmunotherapy, including an anti-CD20 agent, and were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. The dose-escalation phase (1b) used escalating doses of lenalidomide to find the recommended phase 2 dose. Patients received six 28-day cycles of induction treatment with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 and intravenous polatuzumab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg (all cohorts) plus oral lenalidomide at the following doses: 10 mg (cohort A); 15 mg (cohort B); and 20 mg (cohort C). Rituximab and polatuzumab vedotin were administered on day 1 and lenalidomide on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. During the dose-expansion phase (2), patients received six 28-day cycles of Pola+R+Len at the recommended phase 2 dose established during dose escalation. In both phases, patients with a complete response or partial response at the end of induction were eligible for post-induction therapy with rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and lenalidomide 10 mg/day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary safety objective of the dose-escalation phase was identification of the maximum tolerated dose through incidence of dose-limiting toxic effects. The primary efficacy outcome of the dose-expansion phase was Independent Review Committee-assessed complete response rate at end of induction, based on PET-CT. Analyses were conducted in the safety population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug, and the efficacy population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of any study drug at the recommended phase 2 dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02600897.

FINDINGS

Between July 11, 2017 and Feb 3, 2020, 57 patients were enrolled (median age 71 years [IQR 60-75]; 38 [67%] were male and 19 (33%) were female; 47 [82%] were not Hispanic or Latino; and the median previous lines of therapy was 2 [IQR 1-3]). 18 participants were included in phase 1b and 39 were included in phase 2. Phase 1b confirmed a 20 mg recommended phase 2 dose for lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 11·8 months (IQR 4·7-25·8), the complete response rate, as assessed by the Independent Review Committee, was 31% (90% CI 20-43). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (35 [61%] of 57) and thrombocytopenia (eight [14%] of 57). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (40%) of 57 patients and one patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event (neutropenic sepsis).

INTERPRETATION

Although the combination of Pola+R+Len did not meet the prespecified activity threshold, some patients derived clinical benefit and the regimen had a tolerable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

FUNDING

Genentech/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Geographic and Racial Disparities in Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells and Bispecific Antibodies Trials Access for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

We investigate the geographical and racial disparities in accessing CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials for DLBCL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ClinicalTrials.gov was searched, and 75 trials with at least 1 open site in the US were included. 2020 US Census Bureau data was used to obtain data on race and ethnicity. SPSS version 26 was used for analysis.

RESULTS

There were 62 CAR-T and 13 bispecific antibodies trials with 6221 enrolled or expected to enroll patients. Eighty-five percent of the clinical trials were only open in the US, and the majority 64% were pharmaceutical-funded. There were 126 unique study sites distributed over 31 states with 11 (0-51) mean number of trials per state and 4.5 (1-26) and 4.4 (1-24) mean number of CAR-T and bispecific antibodies trials per site, respectively. Southern states had the most number of trials 31%, followed by Midwestern 25%, Northeastern 24%, and Western 20%. The highest number of study locations were in California 13, New York 9, and Pennsylvania 9, while the highest number of open studies were in California 51, Texas 32, and New York 23. Twenty states had no open CAR-T or bispecific antibodies trials. Only 33% of African Americans (AA) lived in a county with a trial, and 7 out of 10 states with the highest proportion of AA residents (18.6%-41.4%) have no or less than 4 trial sites. Of the 62 counties analyzed, 92% were White predominant, while only 8% were AA predominant (P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies should be framed to address the observed disparities and to improve access.

Emerging Biomarkers for Monitoring Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized treatment of hematologic malignancies and holds promise for solid tumors. While responses to CAR T-cell therapy have surpassed other available options for patients with refractory malignancies, not all patients respond the same way. The reason for this variability is not currently understood. Therefore, there is a strong need to identify characteristics of patients as well as cellular products that lead to an effective response to CAR T-cell therapy.

CONTENT

In this review, we discuss potential biomarkers that may predict clinical outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy. Based on correlative findings from clinical trials of both commercially available and early-phase products, we classify biomarkers into categories of pre- and post-infusion as well as patient and product-related markers. Among the biomarkers that have been explored, measures of disease burden both pre- and post-infusion, as well as CAR T-cell persistence post-infusion, are repeatedly identified as predictors of disease response. Higher proportions of early memory T cells at infusion appear to be favorable, and tracking T-cell subsets throughout treatment will likely be critical.

SUMMARY

There are a growing number of promising biomarkers of CAR T-cell efficacy described in the research setting, however, none of these have been validated for clinical use. Some potentially important predictors of response may be difficult to obtain routinely under the current CAR T-cell therapy workflow. A collaborative approach is needed to select biomarkers that can be validated in large cohorts and incorporated into clinical practice.

Incorporating radiation with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter consensus approach

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) has revolutionized the outcomes of relapsed and/or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, CART is still limited by its availability, toxicity, and response durability. Not all patients make it to the CART infusion phase due to disease progression. Among those who receive CART, a significant number of patients experience life-threatening cytokine release syndrome toxicity, and less than half maintain a durable response with the majority relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present pre-CART. Radiation therapy stands as a promising peri-CART and salvage treatment that can improve the outcomes of these patients. Evidence suggests that bridging radiotherapy prior to CART controls the disease during the manufacturing period, augments response rates and local control, cytoreduces/debulks the disease and decreases the severity of cytokine release syndrome, and may prolong disease-free intervals and survival especially in patients with bulky disease. Consolidative radiotherapy for residual post-CART disease alters the pattern of relapse and improves local recurrence-free and progression-free survivals. Salvage radiotherapy for relapsed post-CART disease has favorable survival outcomes when delivered comprehensively for patients with limited relapsed disease and palliates symptoms for patients with diffuse relapsed disease. The biology of the disease during the peri-CART period is poorly understood, and further studies investigating the optimal timing and dosing of radiation therapy (RT) are needed. In this review, we tackle the most significant challenges of CART, review and propose how RT can help mitigate these challenges, and provide The Mayo Clinic experts' approach on incorporating RT with CART.

FDA-approved CAR T-cell Therapy: A Decade of Progress and Challenges

CAR T-cell therapy is a promising approach for cancer treatment, utilizing a patient's own T-cells (autologous cell) or T-cells from a healthy donor (allogeneic cell) to target and destroy cancer cells. Over the last decade, significant advancements have been made in this field, including the development of novel CAR constructs, improved understanding of biology and mechanisms of action, and expanded clinical applications for treating a wider range of cancers. In this review, we provide an overview of the steps involved in the production of CAR T-cells and their mechanism of action. We also introduce different CAR T-cell therapies available, including their implementation, dosage, administration, treatment cost, efficacy, and resistance. Common side effects of CAR T-cell therapy are also discussed. The CAR T-cell products highlighted in this review are FDA-approved products, which include Kymriah® (tisagenlecleucel), Tecartus® (brexucabtagene autoleucel), Abecma® (Idecabtagene vicleucel), Breyanzi® (lisocabtagene maraleucel), and Yescarta® (axicabtagene ciloleucel). In conclusion, CAR T-cell therapy has made tremendous progress over the past decade and has the potential to revolutionize cancer treatment. This review paper provides insights into the progress, challenges, and future directions of CAR T-cell therapy, offering valuable information for researchers, clinicians, and patients.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells. Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance. We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade ≥3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade ≥3. The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2% to 100%; I2 = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25.4% to 67.8%; I2 = 29%). The rates of any grade CRS and grade ≥3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I2 = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I2 = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade ≥3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I2 = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I2 = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise. Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.

Early failure is still a poor prognostic factor in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in the era of CAR T-cell therapy

Patients with refractory or relapsed (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) refractory to first-line chemotherapy or with early relapse have poor outcomes. While chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has impressive efficacy after two or more lines of chemotherapy, it's still uncertain if these outcomes remain consistent in the context of third-line CAR T-cell therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of 107 R/R LBCL patients. Patients with relapse 12 months or more after their first-line chemoimmunotherapy (late failure: n = 25) had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with refractory disease or relapse within 12 months (early failure: n = 82) (median OS: not achieved vs. 18.4 months; P < 0.001). Among patients who proceeded to autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), those with late failure had significantly longer event-free survival (EFS) than those with early failure (median EFS: 26.9 vs. 3.1 months; P = 0.012). However, no significant difference in EFS was detected among patients who underwent CAR T-cell therapy (median EFS: not reached vs. 11.8; P = 0.091). Cox regression with restricted cubic spline demonstrated that timing of relapse had significant impact on EFS in patients with auto-HSCT but not in patients with CAR T-cell therapy. Of patients who were scheduled for CAR T-cell therapy, those with late failure were significantly more likely to receive CAR T-cell therapy than those with early failure (90% vs. 57%; P = 0.008). In conclusion, patients with early failure still experienced poor outcomes after the approval of third-line CAR T-cell therapy.

How to integrate CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells with other CD19 targeting agents in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

About one third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a relapsing/refractory (R/R) disease after first line chemo-immunotherapy, with particularly poor outcomes observed in patients with primary refractory disease and early relapse. CD19 specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a game changer that results in durable and complete response rates in almost half of the patients with R/R DLBCL. Other emerging CD19-targeting therapies include monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibodies and targeting antibody-drug conjugates, which also show encouraging results. However, the timing and sequencing of different anti-CD19-targeting agents and how they might interfere with subsequent CAR T cell treatment is still unclear. In this review, we summarize the results of the pivotal clinical trials as well as evidence from real-world series of the use of different CD19-targeting approved agents. We discuss the effect of various therapies on CD19 expression and its implications for treatment sequencing.

Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: New Approved Options

Overall, around 40% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have refractory disease or relapse after the first line of treatment. Until relatively recently, the prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL was very poor and treatment options were very limited. In recent years, several novel therapies have been approved that provide more effective options than conventional chemotherapy and that have manageable toxicity profiles. CAR-T cell therapy has become the new standard treatment for patients with refractory or early relapsed DLBCL, based on the positive results of the phase 3 ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM clinical trials. This review addresses the role of CAR-T therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of these patients and other approved options for patients who are not candidates for transplant, such as the combinations of polatuzumab vedotin with bendamustine and rituximab, and tafasitamab with lenalidomide.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma: New Settings and Future Directions

In the last decade, anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy has led to a treatment paradigm shift for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, first with the approval for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphomas and subsequently for R/R mantle cell and follicular lymphoma. Many efforts are continuously being made to extend the therapeutic setting in the lymphoma field. Several reports are supporting the safety and efficacy of CAR-T cells in patients with central nervous system disease involvement. Anti-CD30 CAR-T cells for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma are in development and early studies looking for the optimal target for T-cell malignancies are ongoing. Anti-CD19/CD20 and CD19/CD22 dual targeting CAR-T cells are under investigation in order to increase anti-lymphoma activity and overcome tumor immune escape. Allogeneic CAR product engineering is on the way, representing a rapidly accessible 'off-the-shelf' and potentially more fit product. In the present manuscript, we will focus on recent advances in CAR-T cell therapy for lymphomas, including new settings and future perspectives in the field, reviewing data reported in literature in the last decade up to October 2023.

Management of aggressive lymphoma after CAR T-cell therapy failure

Several recent advances have affected the treatment landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the management of chemorefractory disease. Two randomized studies in early relapse disease have expanded the label to provide access to CAR T-cell therapy as early as second line for some patients. Despite the durable remissions that have been achieved, many patients will experience relapse. There is a growing population of patients previously treated with CAR T-cell therapy facing dismal outcomes. We review the prospective studies that inform treatment options in later lines and highlight the limited data examining outcomes with novel therapies after CAR T-cell failure. The treatment landscape is anticipated to continue to evolve with the emergence of bispecific antibodies that appear to be a promising approach, particularly after CAR T-cell therapy, although little is known about overlapping mechanisms of resistance. Enrichment for patients who have received prior CAR T-cell therapy on prospective trials is a critical unmet need to inform the preferred management for these high-risk patients.

Acute leukemias and complicated lymphomas: pearls to optimize management when patients stay local

Hematologic malignancies often present acutely with a constellation of infectious complications, pancytopenia, tumor lysis, and renal dysfunction. Acute leukemias and aggressive lymphomas often require hospitalization for rapid diagnostic evaluation, urgent management of complicating presentations, and timely management of intensive systemic therapies. There is an emerging paradigm whereby complex cancer care can be safely and effectively provided in the community, where the majority of cancer is treated. A substantive and effective network between local oncologists and their academic counterparts will enhance care for the patient, advance research, and help bring complicated therapies to local centers, thereby improving access. Here we present several cases that highlight a collaborative approach to complicated hematologic malignancies in the community.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a revolutionary therapy increasingly used in the treatment of non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. This review focuses on the use of CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive B-cell lymphoma including clinical indications, known short- and long-term toxicity, mechanisms of CAR T-cell efficacy and tumor resistance, and future directions in the treatment of aggressive lymphoma with CAR T-cell therapy.

Infections in haematology patients treated with CAR-T therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A registered (PROSPERO - CRD42022346462) systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of all-grade infections amongst adult patients receiving CAR-T therapy for haematological malignancy. Meta-analysis of pooled incidence, using random effects model, was conducted. Cochran's Q test examined heterogeneity. 2678 patients across 33 studies were included in the primary outcome. Forty-percent of patients (95% CI: 0.33 - 0.48) experienced an infection of any grade. Twenty-five percent of infection events (95% CI: 0.16 - 0.34) were severe. Late infections were as common as early infections (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.38 - 1.98). All-grade infections, bacterial and viral infections were highest in myeloma patients at 57%, 37% and 28% respectively. Patients with NHL more commonly experienced late infections. Pooled rate of invasive candidiasis/yeast infections was 2% in studies utilizing anti-yeast prophylaxis. This review identified a high rate of all-grade infections, moderate rate of severe infections, and myeloma as a high-risk haematological group.

CD19-directed CAR T cells as first salvage therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: towards a rational approach

The approval of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for the second-line treatment of high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has greatly affected salvage algorithms for this condition, and such therapies could have the potential to improve the course of relapsed or refractory LBCL. In this Review, we provide guidance for a rational management approach to the use of commercial CD19-directed CAR T cells in the second-line treatment of LBCL, addressing crucial questions regarding eligible histologies; age, comorbidity, and tumour biology restrictions; the handling of very aggressive tumour behaviour; and holding and bridging therapies. The guidance was developed in a structured manner and, for each question, consists of a description of the clinical issue, a summary of the evidence, the rationale for a practical management approach, and recommendations. These recommendations could help to decide on the optimal management of patients with relapsed or refractory LBCL who are considered for second-line CAR T-cell treatment.

Second-Line Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

First-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) achieves durable remission in approximately 60% of patients. In relapsed or refractory disease, only about 20% achieve durable remission with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The ZUMA-7 (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]) and TRANSFORM (lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]) trials demonstrated superior event-free survival (and, in ZUMA-7, overall survival) in primary-refractory or early-relapsed (high-risk) DLBCL with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) compared with salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT; however, list prices for CAR-T exceed $400 000 per infusion.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of second-line CAR-T versus salvage chemoimmunotherapy and consolidative ASCT.

DESIGN

State-transition microsimulation model.

DATA SOURCES

ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM, other trials, and observational data.

TARGET POPULATION

"High-risk" patients with DLBCL.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Health care sector.

INTERVENTION

Axi-cel or liso-cel versus ASCT.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (iNMB) in 2022 U.S. dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200 000 per QALY.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

The increase in median overall survival was 4 months for axi-cel and 1 month for liso-cel. For axi-cel, the ICER was $684 225 per QALY and the iNMB was -$107 642. For liso-cel, the ICER was $1 171 909 per QALY and the iNMB was -$102 477.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

To be cost-effective with a WTP of $200 000, the cost of CAR-T would have to be reduced to $321 123 for axi-cel and $313 730 for liso-cel. Implementation in high-risk patients would increase U.S. health care spending by approximately $6.8 billion over a 5-year period.

LIMITATION

Differences in preinfusion bridging therapies precluded cross-trial comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Neither second-line axi-cel nor liso-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $200 000 per QALY. Clinical outcomes improved incrementally, but costs of CAR-T must be lowered substantially to enable cost-effectiveness.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

No research-specific funding.

Subcutaneous epcoritamab monotherapy in Japanese adults with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Epcoritamab is a subcutaneously administered CD3xCD20 bispecific Ab that showed deep, durable responses with a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the global multicenter pivotal phase II trial EPCORE NHL-1. Here, we present results from the similar EPCORE NHL-3 phase I/II trial evaluating epcoritamab monotherapy in Japanese patients with R/R CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma previously treated with two or more lines of therapy. Epcoritamab was dosed subcutaneously in 28-day cycles; once weekly during cycles 1-3, every 2 weeks during cycles 4-9, and every 4 weeks from cycle 10 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) prophylaxis were used during treatment cycle 1. As of January 31, 2022, 36 patients received treatment with 48 mg epcoritamab monotherapy. At a median follow-up of 8.4 months, overall response and complete response rates by independent review committee were 55.6% and 44.4%, respectively. The median duration of response, duration of complete response, and overall survival were not reached at the time of data cut-off. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were CRS (83.3%), injection-site reactions (69.4%), infections (44.4%), neutropenia (38.9%), hypokalemia (27.8%), and decreased lymphocyte count (25.0%). Cytokine release syndrome occurrence was predictable; events were primarily low grade (grade 1-2), all resolved, and none led to treatment discontinuation. These encouraging results are consistent with previous findings and support the ongoing clinical evaluation of epcoritamab for the treatment of R/R DLBCL, including in earlier treatment lines.

The Role of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in the Era of Bispecific Antibodies

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies are a class of T-cell engaging immunotherapies that have demonstrated considerable promise for patients with blood cancers. In comparison with traditional cancer therapeutics, T-cell engaging therapies harness the power of the host immune system to attack malignant cells expressing a target antigen of interest. Although these therapies are altering the natural history of blood cancers, the availability of several products has created uncertainty regarding treatment selection. In this review, we discuss the role of CAR T-cell therapy in the emerging era of bispecific antibodies with a particular focus on multiple myeloma.

CD8+ chimeric antigen receptor T cells manufactured in absence of CD4+ cells exhibit hypofunctional phenotype

BACKGROUND

Cell culture conditions during manufacturing can impact the clinical efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell products. Production methods have not been standardized because the optimal approach remains unknown. Separate CD4+ and CD8+ cultures offer a potential advantage but complicate manufacturing and may affect cell expansion and function. In a phase 1/2 clinical trial, we observed poor expansion of separate CD8+ cell cultures and hypothesized that coculture of CD4+ cells and CD8+ cells at a defined ratio at culture initiation would enhance CD8+ cell expansion and simplify manufacturing.

METHODS

We generated CAR T cells either as separate CD4+ and CD8+ cells, or as combined cultures mixed in defined CD4:CD8 ratios at culture initiation. We assessed CAR T cell expansion, phenotype, function, gene expression, and in vivo activity of CAR T cells and compared these between separately expanded or mixed CAR T cell cultures.

RESULTS

We found that the coculture of CD8+ CAR T cells with CD4+ cells markedly improves CD8+ cell expansion, and further discovered that CD8+ cells cultured in isolation exhibit a hypofunctional phenotype and transcriptional signature compared with those in mixed cultures with CD4+ cells. Cocultured CAR T cells also confer superior antitumor activity in vivo compared with separately expanded cells. The positive impact of CD4+ cells on CD8+ cells was mediated through both cytokines and direct cell contact, including CD40L-CD40 and CD70-CD27 interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that CD4+ cell help during cell culture maintains robust CD8+ CAR T cell function, with implications for clinical cell manufacturing.

Evolving Role of CAR T Cell Therapy in First- and Second-Line Treatment of Large B Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the recent practice-changing trials of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies in large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) including phase 3 comparisons with second-line standard-of-care (SOC) and phase 2 investigations in transplant-ineligible patients or as part of first-line treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

ZUMA-7 found significantly improved overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) versus SOC of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. This represents the first such survival improvement in nearly 30 years for early-relapsed or refractory (r/r) LBCL. TRANSFORM demonstrated prolonged EFS for lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) versus SOC but BELINDA did not for tisagenlecleucel. Second-line CAR T cell was a viable curative-intent therapy in elderly (ZUMA-7; axi-cel) and/or transplant-ineligible (PILOT; liso-cel) patients. ZUMA-12 demonstrated effectiveness for axi-cel as part of first-line treatment for high-risk LBCL. These results support a role for CAR T cell therapy as new second-line SOC for r/r LBCL and highlight its potential evolution into future first-line treatment for high-risk disease.

Effective sequencing of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the treatment of LBCL in 2023

Over the last decade, CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has profoundly changed the management of relapsed/refractory large-B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). At present, there are three FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products for LBCL: axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Two of these (axi-cel & liso-cel) are approved for use in the second-line setting under certain conditions. As CAR T-cell therapy continues to define a new role in the treatment armamentarium for LBCL, questions remain regarding which product to use and how to sequence CAR T-cell therapy with other therapeutic options. Here we will briefly review the key features of each FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product and the data that led to regulatory approval for each. Next, we will focus on the recent landmark studies that have established the use of CAR T-cell therapy as second-line treatment. While no direct prospective head-to-head comparisons exist of the 3 constructs, we will review some retrospective studies that suggest some emerging differences between the products. Lastly, we will turn our attention to the horizon as we explore some of the ongoing questions of how to best leverage the curative potential of CAR T-cell therapy for the most effective management of LBCL. These areas include the consideration of CAR T-cell therapy in the frontline setting, the optimal timing for CAR T-cell referral, the optimal bridging approach, and how to continue advancing novel CAR T-cell approaches in the context of the current treatment landscape.

Infections after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapies have revolutionized the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple myeloma but come at the price of unique toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and long-term "on-target off-tumor" effects.

METHODS

All of these factors increase infection risk in an already highly immunocompromised patient population. Indeed, infectious complications represent the key determinant of non-relapse mortality after CAR-T cells. The temporal distribution of these risk factors shapes different infection patterns early versus late post-CAR-T-cell infusion. Furthermore, due to the expression of their targets on B lineage cells at different stages of differentiation, CD19, and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T cells induce distinct immune deficits that could require different prevention strategies. Infection incidence is the highest during the first month post-infusion and subsequently decreases thereafter. However, infections remain relatively common even a year after infusion.

RESULTS

Bacterial infections predominate early after CD19, while a more equal distribution between bacterial and viral causes is seen after BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy, and fungal infections are universally rare. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other herpesviruses are increasingly breported, but whether routine monitoring is warranted for all, or a subgroup of patients, remains to be determined. Clinical practices vary substantially between centers, and many areas of uncertainty remain, including CMV monitoring, antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis and duration, use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy, and timing of vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Risk stratification tools are available and may help distinguish between infectious and non-infectious causes of fever post-infusion and predict severe infections. These tools need prospective validation, and their integration in clinical practice needs to be systematically studied.

CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma: Why does it fail?

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with 3 CD19 targeting products now FDA-approved for this indication. However, up to 60% of patients ultimately progress or relapse following CAR-T cell therapy. Mechanisms of resistance to CAR-T cell therapy in patients with DLBCL are likely multifactorial and have yet to be fully elucidated. Determining patient, tumor and therapy-related factors that may predict an individual's response to CAR-T cell therapy requires ongoing analysis of data from clinical trials and real-world experience in this population. In this review we will discuss the factors identified to-date that may contribute to failure of CAR-T cell therapy in achieving durable remissions in patients with DLBCL.

Mature B-cell lymphomas in adolescents and young adults

Pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma includes over 30 histologies (many with subtypes), with approximately 800 cases per year in the US, compared to >60,000 cases of adult NHL annually. Improvements in survival in pediatric and adolescent mature B cell NHL over the past 5 decades align with the overall success of the cooperative trial model with dramatic improvements in outcomes through dose escalation of chemotherapy and, more recently, targeted therapy with rituximab. Pediatric dose-intense strategies carry risks of long-term consequences, but treatment failure is nearly universally fatal. By comparison, adult mature B cell lymphoma is typically less aggressive and treated with less intense chemotherapy. Optimizing therapy for adolescents and young adults remains a major challenge that requires creative solutions, including engineering study groups to combine biologically comparable adult and pediatric populations and developing effective salvage strategies that will ultimately be required for investigations of front-line dose reduction. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities for improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with high-grade mature B cell lymphomas, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma.

The shifting roles and toxicities of cellular therapies in B-cell malignancies

Cellular therapies provide a curative-intent option for patients with relapsedand refractory lymphomas. Current options including high dose chemotherapyfollowed by autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CD19 chimericantigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy. The indication varies according to lymphoma sub-type and line oftherapy. The sequencing of these therapies and their use in second-line orlater settings to manage these diseases is undergoing significant changes, withCD19 CAR T becoming a preferred option for relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma.The mechanism of both therapies causes significant yet distinctlymphodepletion, infectious, and inflammatory toxicities. The resulting patternand timing of immune reconstitution helps guide risk-mitigating strategies,revaccination, and infectious prophylaxis. In this review, we discuss theindication, efficacy, toxicity and immune reconstitution of autologoushematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR T therapy for use in thetreatment of lymphoma.

Optimizing CAR-T Therapy for Glioblastoma

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies have transformed the management of hematologic malignancies but have not yet demonstrated consistent efficacy in solid tumors. Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and remains a major unmet medical need. Attempts at harnessing the potential of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for glioblastoma have resulted in glimpses of promise but have been met with substantial challenges. In this focused review, we discuss current and future strategies being developed to optimize chimeric antigen receptor T cells for efficacy in patients with glioblastoma, including the identification and characterization of new target antigens, reversal of T-cell dysfunction with novel chimeric antigen receptor constructs, regulatable platforms, and gene knockout strategies, and the use of combination therapies to overcome the immune-hostile microenvironment.

COVID-19 after hematopoietic cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy

More than 3 years have passed since Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic, yet COVID-19 still severely impacts immunocompromised individuals including those treated with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapies who remain at high risk for severe COVID-19 and mortality. Despite vaccination efforts, these patients have inadequate responses due to immunosuppression, which underscores the need for additional preventive approaches. The optimal timing, schedule of vaccination, and immunological correlates for protective immunity remain unknown. Antiviral therapies used early during disease can reduce mortality and severity due to COVID-19. The combination or sequential use of antivirals could be beneficial to control replication and prevent the development of treatment-related mutations in protracted COVID-19. Despite conflicting data, COVID-19 convalescent plasma remains an option in immunocompromised patients with mild-to-moderate disease to prevent progression. Protracted COVID-19 has been increasingly recognized among these patients and has been implicated in intra-host emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Finally, novel SARS-CoV2-specific T-cells and natural killer cell-boosting (or -containing) products may be active against multiple variants and are promising therapies in immunocompromised patients.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are among the most frequent (about 30%) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Despite the aggressive behavior of these lymphomas, more than 60% of patients can be cured with first-line chemoimmunotherapy using the R-CHOP regimen. Patients with refractory or relapsing disease show a poor outcome even when treated with second-line therapies. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are emerging as an efficacious second-line treatment strategy for patients with LBCL. Three CD19-CAR-T-cell products received FDA and EMA approval. CAR-T cell therapy has also been explored for treating high-risk LBCL patients in the first-line setting and for patients with central nervous system involvement. Although CD19-CAR-T therapy has transformed the care of refractory/relapsed LBCL, about 60% of these patients will ultimately progress or relapse following CD19-CAR-T; therefore, it is fundamental to identify predictive criteria of response to CAR-T therapy and to develop salvage therapies for patients relapsing after CD19-CAR-T therapies. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluate bispecific CAR-T cells targeting both CD19 and CD20 or CD19 and CD22 as a tool to improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the number of refractory/relapsing patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma successfully treated with amplified natural killer therapy alone: A case report

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. The mainstay of treatment is multidrug combination chemotherapy, which has been associated with serious side effects. Amplified natural killer (ANK) cell therapy amplifies and activates natural killer (NK) cells to attack only malignant tumors. As ANK cells attack programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumor cells, ANK therapy is considered effective against adult T-cell lymphoma and malignant lymphoma.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein, we report a case of an older patient with advanced DLBCL who was successfully treated with ANK immunotherapy. A 91-year-old female visited our hospital with sudden swelling of the right axillary lymph node in April 2022. The patient was diagnosed with stage II disease, given the absence of splenic involvement or contralateral lymphadenopathy. ANK therapy was administered. Six rounds of lymphocyte sampling were performed on July 28, 2022. To reduce the occurrence of side effects, the six samples were diluted by half to obtain 12 samples. Cultured NK cells were administered twice weekly. The treatment efficacy was evaluated by performing computed tomography and serological tests every 1 or 2 mo. The treatment suppressed lesion growth, and the antitumor effect persisted for several months. The patient experienced mild side effects. PD-L1 immunostaining was positive, indicating that the treatment was highly effective.

CONCLUSION

ANK therapy can be used as a first-line treatment for malignant lymphoma; the PD-L1 positivity rate can predict treatment efficacy.

T-Cell Engaging Antibodies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma-An Update

Novel cellular immunotherapies such as T-cell engaging antibodies (TCEAbs) are changing the landscape of treatment for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), especially in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) setting. TCEAbs harness the power of the host immune system to induce killing of tumor cells by binding to both the tumor antigen and the T-cell receptor. Since the approval of blinatumomab for R/R acute lymphoblastic leukemia, there has been significant development in novel TCEAbs. Many of these novel TCEAbs have shown promising effectiveness in R/R DLBCL, with favorable response rates including complete remissions, even in heavily pretreated patients. There are unique therapy-related toxicities with TCEAbs, namely cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICANS), and it is important to both recognize and manage these side effects appropriately. This review examines the development and mechanism of action of these TCEAbs, and the available published data from clinical trials. Their role in the treatment of DLBCL, the management of therapy-related adverse events, and the mechanisms of resistance will also be discussed.

Location, location, location: mapping the lymphoma tumor microenvironment using spatial transcriptomics

Lymphomas are a heterogenous group of lymphoid neoplasms with a wide variety of clinical presentations. Response to treatment and prognosis differs both between and within lymphoma subtypes. Improved molecular and genetic profiling has increased our understanding of the factors which drive these clinical dynamics. Immune and non-immune cells within the lymphoma tumor microenvironment (TME) can both play a key role in antitumor immune responses and conversely also support lymphoma growth and survival. A deeper understanding of the lymphoma TME would identify key lymphoma and immune cell interactions which could be disrupted for therapeutic benefit. Single cell RNA sequencing studies have provided a more comprehensive description of the TME, however these studies are limited in that they lack spatial context. Spatial transcriptomics provides a comprehensive analysis of gene expression within tissue and is an attractive technique in lymphoma to both disentangle the complex interactions between lymphoma and TME cells and improve understanding of how lymphoma cells evade the host immune response. This article summarizes current spatial transcriptomic technologies and their use in lymphoma research to date. The resulting data has already enriched our knowledge of the mechanisms and clinical impact of an immunosuppressive TME in lymphoma and the accrual of further studies will provide a fundamental step in the march towards personalized medicine.

Predicting infections in patients with haematological malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. Strategies for preventing infections in CAR-T-treated patients rely on expert opinions and consensus guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aimed to identify risk factors for infections in CAR-T-treated patients with haematological malignancies.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search utilized MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until 30 September 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Trials and observational studies were eligible.

PARTICIPANTS

Studies required ≥10 patients treated for haematological malignancy to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either (a) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk factors for infections, or (b) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T-treated patients with infection.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search utilised MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until September 30, 2022. Eligibility/Participants/Intervention: Trials and observational studies were eligible. Studies required ≥ 10 patients treated for haematological malignancy, to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either A) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk-factors for infections, or B) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T treated patients with infection.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Bias assessment was undertaken according to Joanna Brigg's Institute criteria for observational studies.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 1522 patients across 15 studies were identified. All-cause infections across haematological malignancies were associated with lines of prior therapy, steroid administration, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity and treatment-emergent neutropenia. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cytokine profiles did not reliably predict infections. Predictors of viral, bacterial and fungal infections were poorly canvassed.

DISCUSSION

Meta-analysis of the current literature is not possible because of significant heterogeneity in definitions of infections and risk factors, and small, underpowered cohort studies. Radical revision of how we approach reporting infections for novel therapies is required to promptly identify infection signals and associated risks in patients receiving novel therapies. Prior therapies, neutropenia, steroid administration and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity remain the most associated with infections in CAR-T-treated patients.

CT radiomics can predict disease progression within 6 months after chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

AIM

To predict progression within 6 months after chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) patients by radiomic indexes derived from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy R/R B-NHL patients who underwent CECT before treatment with CAR T-cells were examined retrospectively. In total, 297 volumes of interest for lesions were segmented from CECT images. Patients without and with disease progression were assigned to groups 1 and 2, respectively. Radiomic and combined predictive models were constructed by three machine-learning algorithms using features from the training set, respectively. Furthermore, predictive models were constructed based on multi-lesion-based and largest-lesion-based radiomic features, respectively.

RESULTS

In the test set, no marked differences were observed between the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the combined and radiomic models for all three machine-learning algorithms (all p>0.05). Differences in machine-learning algorithms did not significantly affect the predictive performances of the models. Radiomics and combined models constructed with multi-lesion-based radiomic features showed better predictive performances than those applying largest-lesion-based radiomic features (all p<0.05 for comparisons between combined models).

CONCLUSION

CECT-based radiomic features may be applied to predict disease progression in R/R B-NHL patients within 6 months after CAR T-cell treatment, and radiomic features from multiple lesions may have better predictive efficacy. Different machine-learning algorithms may not show significant differences in prediction performance.