First-in-human phase 1 study of margetuximab (MGAH22), an Fc-modified chimeric monoclonal antibody, in patients with HER2-positive advanced solid tumors

Targeting HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas: What is new?

Gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas represent a biologically heterogeneous disease. The identification, in early eighties, of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, being present in 12 to 20% of the cases, marked a major milestone in the efforts of unraveling the molecular complexity of this disease. This led to the development of anti-HER2-therapies, trastuzumab being the first to demonstrate, in combination with cisplatin and 5FU/capecitabine chemotherapy, an improvement in response rate and survival in the first-line setting of patients with metastatic, HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas. Afterwards, during a decade, several studies have tried new strategies either to block HER2 pathway differently or to combine different anti-HER2, without efficacy. Everything changed with studies demonstrating additive effect between anti-HER2 and immune checkpoint inhibitors and leading to phase III clinical trials combining anti-HER2 and anti-PD-L1/PD1 therapies. Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, was recently granted by FDA an accelerated approval, in patients with HER2-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinomas, in combination with trastuzumab and platinum-based chemotherapy following meaningful improvement in overall response rate over standard treatment. Progression-free and overall-survival results are still awaited to change our first-line standard treatment. Furthermore, new HER2 inhibitors have been developed, blocking HER2-mediated pathway signaling via different mechanisms from pan-HER inhibition to anti-HER2 antibody drug conjugates with promising results in pretreated patients. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan has in particular showed interesting results in pretreated patients. We present here a review of the recent data and perspectives in HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

HER2-targeted advanced metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: treatment landscape and future perspectives

Recently, the global incidence of gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer has remained high. China is also a large country with a high gastric cancer (GC) incidence rate, where the cases of GC account for 40% of all cases worldwide. More than 90% of GEJ cancers are the adenocarcinoma pathological type. Patients with early-stage G/GEJ adenocarcinoma may have a better prognosis after surgery. In contrast, patients with advanced metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma usually choose comprehensive treatment based on systemic pharmacotherapy, but the subsequent long-term survival is not optimistic. The discovery of various biomarkers, especially microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), has led to the identification of an increasing number of targeted populations and has greatly improved the clinical efficacy of treatments for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The ToGA trial added trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy, showed improved survival of patients with HER2-positive advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma and brought these patients into a new era of HER2-targeted therapy. Moreover, many HER2-targeted agents have been developed and studied in patients with advanced HER2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes. However, many patients experience disease progression with HER2-targeted therapy; hence, new anti-HER2 drugs keep being developed, significantly reducing HER2 resistance. This paper reviews HER2-targeted drugs for advanced metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, potential resistance mechanisms and future directions.

HER2 Inhibition in Gastric Cancer-Novel Therapeutic Approaches for an Established Target

Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression of HER2 gene amplification is present in 20% of gastric cancers and defines a subset amenable to HER2-directed therapeutics. The seminal ToGA study led to routine use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab in conjunction to platinum-fluoropyridimine first-line chemotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancers as standard-of-care. Although limited progress was made in the decade following ToGA, there is now an abundance of novel therapeutic approaches undergoing investigation in parallel. Additionally, new data from randomised trials have indicated efficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan in chemorefractory patients and increased responses with the addition of first-line immune checkpoint blockade to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. This review will outline the data supporting HER2 targeting in gastric cancers, discuss mechanisms of response and resistance to HER2-directed therapies and summarise the emerging therapies under clinical evaluation that may evolve the way we manage this subset of gastric cancers in the future.

Harnessing natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: dispatching the first responders

Natural killer (NK) cells have crucial roles in the innate immunosurveillance of cancer and viral infections. They are 'first responders' that can spontaneously recognize abnormal cells in the body, rapidly eliminate them through focused cytotoxicity mechanisms and potently produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that recruit and activate other immune cells to initiate an adaptive response. From the initial discovery of the diverse cell surface receptors on NK cells to the characterization of regulatory events that control their function, our understanding of the basic biology of NK cells has improved dramatically in the past three decades. This advanced knowledge has revealed increased mechanistic complexity, which has opened the doors to the development of a plethora of exciting new therapeutics that can effectively manipulate and target NK cell functional responses, particularly in cancer patients. Here, we summarize the basic mechanisms that regulate NK cell biology, review a wide variety of drugs, cytokines and antibodies currently being developed and used to stimulate NK cell responses, and outline evolving NK cell adoptive transfer approaches to treat cancer.

Development of a variant of dinutuximab with enhanced anti‐tumor efficacy and reduced induction of neuropathic pain

Dinutuximab (ch14.18) was the first approved monoclonal antibody against the tumor‐associated antigen disialoganglioside GD2. Despite its success in treating neuroblastoma (NB), it triggers a significant amount of neuropathic pain in patients, possibly through complement‐dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). We hypothesized that modifying ch14.18 using antibody engineering techniques, such as humanization, affinity maturation, and Fc engineering, may enable the development of next‐generation GD2‐specific antibodies with reduced neuropathic pain and enhanced antitumor activity. In this study we developed the H3‐16 IgG1m4 antibody from ch14.18 IgG1. H3‐16 IgG1m4 exhibited enhanced binding activity to GD2 molecules and GD2‐positive cell lines as revealed by ELISA, and its cross‐binding activity to other gangliosides was not altered. The CDC activity of H3‐16 IgG1m4 was decreased, and the antibody‐dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity was enhanced. The pain response after H3‐16 IgG1m4 antibody administration was also reduced, as demonstrated using the von Frey test in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. In summary, H3‐16 IgG1m4 may have potential as a monoclonal antibody with reduced side effects.

From CD16a Biology to Antibody-Dependent Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity Improvement

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is a potent cytotoxic mechanism that is mainly mediated in humans by natural killer (NK) cells. ADCC mediates the clinical benefit of several widely used cytolytic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and increasing its efficacy would improve cancer immunotherapy. CD16a is a receptor for the Fc portion of IgGs and is responsible to trigger NK cell-mediated ADCC. The knowledge of the mechanism of action of CD16a gave rise to several strategies to improve ADCC, by working on either the mAbs or the NK cell. In this review, we give an overview of CD16a biology and describe the latest strategies employed to improve antibody-dependent NK cell cytotoxicity.

Molecular pathogenesis and emerging targets of gastric adenocarcinoma

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) is a devastating disease and is the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. This heterogeneous disease has several different classification systems that consider histological appearance and genomic alterations. Understanding the etiology of GC, including infection, hereditary conditions, and environmental factors, is of particular importance and is discussed in this review. To improve survival in GC, we also must improve our therapeutic strategies. Here, we discuss new targets that warrant further exploration.

Profile of Margetuximab: Evidence to Date in the Targeted Treatment of Metastatic HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer accounts for about 20% of all breast cancers and this subtype has been historically associated with worse prognosis. Margetuximab is a chimeric and Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody directed to HER2 that can enhance the activation of the innate and adaptive immune responses while maintaining trastuzumab’s antiproliferative effects. Margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy was approved by the US FDA in December 2020 for patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer who have received two or more HER2-targeted regimens. This approval was based on the results of the SOPHIA trial that showed a modest improvement in progression-free survival with margetuximab and chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab and chemotherapy. Ongoing studies are assessing the role of margetuximab in other settings and diseases such as early stage breast cancer and gastrointestinal malignancies. Here we review the rationale for the development of margetuximab, previous and ongoing clinical trials and current role in clinical practice.

Colorectal Cancer Heterogeneity and the Impact on Precision Medicine and Therapy Efficacy

Novel targeted therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer are needed to personalize treatments by guiding specific biomarkers selected on the genetic profile of patients. RAS and BRAF inhibitors have been developed for patients who become unresponsive to standard therapies. Sotorasib and adagrasib showed promising results in phase I/II basket trial and a phase III trial was planned with a combination of these RAS inhibitors and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Encorafenib and binimetinib were administered in phase II clinical trials for BRAF mutated patients. Pembrolizumab is now recommended in patients exhibiting microsatellite instability. Larotrectinib and entrectinib showed a fast and durable response with few and reversible adverse events in cases with NTRK fusions. Trastuzumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited promising and durable activity in HER-2-positive patients. In this review, the reasons for an extension of the molecular profile of patients were assessed and placed in the context of the advancements in the understanding of genetics. We highlight the differential effect of new targeted therapies through an ever-deeper characterization of tumor tissue. An overview of ongoing clinical trials is also provided.

Efficacy and safety of inetetamab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a subgroup analysis in the HOPES study

Background

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inetetamab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

A HOPES study was conducted on patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients were randomly divided into test group and control group at a 2:1 ratio. Among them, patients in test group received inetetamab plus vinorelbine. Concurrently, patients in the control group received vinorelbine. During the trial, safety evaluation was conducted every 4 weeks and efficacy evaluation was conducted every 8 weeks. As assessed by the Response Criteria Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 criteria, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was estimated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 2.0. Efficacy and safety of the postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup in the HOPES registry study of inetetamab was analyzed and compared with previous clinical studies of trastuzumab in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Results

In total, we included 315 patients. Among them, 114 patients in the postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup were assigned to the full analysis set (FAS) (test group, 72; and control group, 42). The test group significantly prolonged median PFS (mPFS) (11.1 vs. 3.3 months of the control group; P<0.0001). ORR and DCR were remarkably higher than the control group (ORR, 61.5% vs. 29.7% with an increase of 31.8%, P=0.0224; DCR, 93.8% vs. 59.4% with an increase of 34.4%, P=0.0003). Efficacy and safety of postoperative recurrent-metastases first-line subgroup in the HOPES study was comparable to previous clinical studies of trastuzumab as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Conclusions

Inetetamab has shown efficacy and safety equivalent to trastuzumab for patients in the first-line treatment of postoperative recurrence-metastases HER2-positive breast cancer, which confirms its important status and potential as first-line treatment. Inetetamab provides more first-line targeted therapy options for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Nanotechnology in the development of small and large molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer

The HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family which includes EGFR, HER3 and HER4. They are known to play critical roles in both normal development and cancer. A subset of breast cancers is associated with the HER2 gene, which is amplified and/or overexpressed in 20-25% of invasive breast cancers and is correlated with tumor resistance to chemotherapy, Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) and poor patient survival. The advent of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved the prognosis of HER2-postive breast cancers; however, HER2+MBC invariably progresses (acquired resistance or de novo resistance). The monoclonal antibody-based drugs (large molecule TKIs) target the extracellular binding domain of HER2; while the small molecule TKIs act intracellularly to inhibit proliferation and survival signals. We reviewed the modes of action of the TKIs with a view to showing which of the TKIs could be combined in nanoparticles to benefit from the power of nanotechnology (reduced toxicity, improved solubility of hydrophobic drugs, long circulation half-lives, circumventing efflux pumps and preventing capture by the reticuloendothelial system (mononuclear phagocyte system). Nanotherapeutics also mediate the synchronization of the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of multiple drugs incorporated in the nanoparticles. Novel TKIs that are currently under investigation with or without nanoparticle delivery are mentioned, and nano-based strategies to improve their delivery are suggested. Immunotherapies currently in clinical practice, clinical trials or at the preclinical stage are discussed. However, immunotherapy only works well in relatively small subsets of patients. Combining nanomedicine with immunotherapy can boost therapeutic outcomes, by turning "cold" non-immunoresponsive tumors and metastases into "hot" immunoresponsive lesions.

Immunotherapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Clinical Evidence and Future Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, and HER2-positive breast cancer accounts for approximately 15% of all breast cancer diagnoses. The advent of HER2-targeting therapies has dramatically improved the survival of these patients, significantly reducing their risk of recurrence and death. However, as a significant proportion of patients ultimately develop resistance to these therapies, it is extremely important to identify new treatments to further improve their clinical outcomes. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment and history of several cancer types, and it has already been approved as a standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Based on a strong preclinical rationale, immunotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer represents an intriguing field that is currently under clinical investigation. There is a close interplay between HER2-targeting therapies (both approved and under investigation) and the immune system, and several new immunotherapeutic strategies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cells and therapeutic vaccines, are being studied in this disease. In this narrative review, we discuss the clinical evidence and the future perspectives of immunotherapy for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Developments in the Management of Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Review

Approximately 20% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), providing an actionable target for many different therapies. In the metastatic setting, prognosis has improved greatly with the use of anti-HER2 drugs such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab-emtansine. In the third line setting and beyond, several emerging treatments have shown benefits, including novel small molecule targeted agents and antibody-drug conjugates. Systemic treatment of brain metastases in HER2-positive patients and the role of endocrine-based treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive disease remain areas of research interest. This article will review the current approach to systemic management of metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in Canada, and present novel treatments that may be available in the near future.

Margetuximab conjugated-PEG-PAMAM G4 nano-complex: a smart nano-device for suppression of breast cancer

Abstract

Breast cancer due to its high incidence and mortality is the second leading cause of death among females. On the other hand, nanoparticle-based drug delivery is one of the most promising approaches in cancer therapy, nowadays. Hence, margetuximab- and polyethylene glycol-conjugated PAMAM G4 dendrimers were efficiently synthesized for targeted delivery of quercetin (therapeutic agent) to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Synthesized nano-complexes were characterized using analytical devices such as FT-IR, TGA, DLS, Zeta potential analyzer, and TEM. The size less than 40 nm, - 18.8 mV surface charge, efficient drug loading capacity (21.48%), and controlled drug release (about 45% of drug release normal pH after 8 h) were determined for the nano-complex. In the biomedical test, the cell viability was obtained 14.67% at 24 h of post-treatment for 800 nM concentration, and IC₅₀ was ascertained at 100 nM for the nano-complex. The expression of apoptotic Bax and Caspase9 genes was increased by more than eightfolds and more than fivefolds after treatment with an optimal concentration of nanocarrier. Also, more than threefolds of cell cycle arrest was observed at the optimal concentration synthetics, and 27.5% breast cancer cell apoptosis was detected after treatment with 100 nM nano-complex. These outputs have been indicating the potential capacity of synthesized nano-complex in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells.

Graphic abstract

HER2 Low, Ultra-low, and Novel Complementary Biomarkers: Expanding the Spectrum of HER2 Positivity in Breast Cancer

HER2 status in breast cancer is assessed to select patients eligible for targeted therapy with anti-HER2 therapies. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP), the HER2 test positivity is defined by protein overexpression (score 3+) at immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene amplification at in situ hybridization (ISH). The introduction of novel anti-HER2 compounds, however, is changing this paradigm because some breast cancers with lower levels of protein expression (i.e. score 1+/2+ with no gene amplification) benefited from HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). Recently, a potential for HER2 targeting in HER2 "ultra-low" (i.e. score 0 with incomplete and faint staining in ≤10% of tumor cells) and MutL-deficient estrogen receptor (estrogen receptor)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers has been highlighted. All these novel findings are transforming the traditional dichotomy of HER2 status and have dramatically raised the expectations in this field. Still, a more aware HER2 status assessment coupled with the comprehensive characterization of the clinical and molecular features of these tumors is required. Here, we seek to provide an overview of the current state of HER2 targeting in breast cancers beyond the canonical HER2 positivity and to discuss the practical implications for pathologists and oncologists.

HER2 Aberrations as a Novel Marker in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

HER2 aberrations have been reported as a novel biomarker in HER2-directed therapy or as a prognostic marker in various tumor types. However, in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), there have been few studies regarding HER2 aberrations as a biomarker. We analyzed 121 advanced BTC patients who had been treated with Gemcitabine/Cisplatin (GP) as a 1st line therapy between November 2019 and April 2021. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), namely, HER2 aberrations was performed in all patients. The TruSight™ Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used for the NGS panel. Among 121 patients with advanced BTC, HER2 aberrations were observed in 18 patients (14.9%). For subtypes of HER2 aberrations, point mutation was observed in 5 patients (27.8%), gene amplification in 11 patients (61.1%), and both point mutation and gene amplification in 2 patients (11.1%). The frequency of HER2 aberrations was significantly different according to the primary tumor (p = 0.009). In gallbladder cancer, HER2 aberrations were observed at a relatively high frequency (36.4%). The tumor response to GP did not differ between patients with and without HER2 aberrations (33.3%, vs. 26.2%, respectively, p = 0.571). The median progression-free survival (PFS) to GP was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 5.5 months) in patients with HER2 aberrations and 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 8.8 months) without HER2 aberrations (p = 0.776). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached and not reached in patients with and without HER2 aberrations (p = 0.739), respectively. The univariate analysis for PFS to GP and OS showed that HER2 aberrations were not an independent factor for survival. This study showed that the HER2 aberrations were observed in 14.9% of advanced BTC and were not an independent biomarker for survival.

Heterogenous and Low Expression of HER2 in Breast Cancer Overcome by DS-8201a in a Heavily Treated Patient: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Breast cancer is highly heterogenous with temporal and spatial heterogeneity making it necessary for rebiopsy. DS-8201a, a new potential therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low expression breast cancer, had been proved that it could overcome heterogenous HER2 expression in a preclinical setting. In January 2014, a 23-year-old woman was presented with a lump in the right breast with bone metastasis, diagnosed as infiltrating ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor (ER)+, progesterone receptor (PR)+, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+, and fluorescence in situ hybridization negative. The patient received a series of therapies including surgery, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, target therapy, and chemotherapy. The longest progression-free survival was 17 months after surgery. Biopsy of liver metastasis in February 2020 showed triple negative (HER2-, ER-, PR-), which was quite different from the initial diagnosis in 2014, so retesting was performed and the results showed ER-, PR+ by 10%, HER2 IHC score of 1+, indicating heterogeneity of HER2 expression. In May 2020, DS-8201a treatment was initiated and continued for 10 cycles until November 2020. Remarkable relief in symptoms was observed after the first dose. A reduction in the metastatic lesion size (liver and brain) and improved liver function was observed during the therapy. This case indicated the heterogeneity of breast cancer, and impressive efficacy of DS-8201a in a heavily treated patient with HER2-low and HER2 heterogeneity.

A trispecific antibody targeting HER2 and T cells inhibits breast cancer growth via CD4 cells

Effective antitumour immunity depends on the orchestration of potent T cell responses against malignancies¹. Regression of human cancers has been induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, T cell engagers or chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies^2-4. Although CD8 T cells function as key effectors of these responses, the role of CD4 T cells beyond their helper function has not been defined. Here we demonstrate that a trispecific antibody to HER2, CD3 and CD28 stimulates regression of breast cancers in a humanized mouse model through a mechanism involving CD4-dependent inhibition of tumour cell cycle progression. Although CD8 T cells directly mediated tumour lysis in vitro, CD4 T cells exerted antiproliferative effects by blocking cancer cell cycle progression at G1/S. Furthermore, when T cell subsets were adoptively transferred into a humanized breast cancer tumour mouse model, CD4 T cells alone inhibited HER2⁺ breast cancer growth in vivo. RNA microarray analysis revealed that CD4 T cells markedly decreased tumour cell cycle progression and proliferation, and also increased pro-inflammatory signalling pathways. Collectively, the trispecific antibody to HER2 induced T cell-dependent tumour regression through direct antitumour and indirect pro-inflammatory/immune effects driven by CD4 T cells.

Network controllability solutions for computational drug repurposing using genetic algorithms

Control theory has seen recently impactful applications in network science, especially in connections with applications in network medicine. A key topic of research is that of finding minimal external interventions that offer control over the dynamics of a given network, a problem known as network controllability. We propose in this article a new solution for this problem based on genetic algorithms. We tailor our solution for applications in computational drug repurposing, seeking to maximize its use of FDA-approved drug targets in a given disease-specific protein-protein interaction network. We demonstrate our algorithm on several cancer networks and on several random networks with their edges distributed according to the Erdős-Rényi, the Scale-Free, and the Small World properties. Overall, we show that our new algorithm is more efficient in identifying relevant drug targets in a disease network, advancing the computational solutions needed for new therapeutic and drug repurposing approaches.

Emerging HER2-directed therapeutic agents for gastric cancer in early phase clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

HER2 positive gastric cancer is a distinct subgroup overexpressing the HER2 receptor. For a decade, first-line Trastuzumab was the only licensed HER2-directed therapy for HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer following results from the ToGA trial in 2010 demonstrating a survival benefit when added to chemotherapy. Within the last year, significant advances have taken place in the field of HER2-directed gastric cancer therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses pivotal clinical trial results and summarises current clinical trials of HER2-directed therapy in gastric cancer. Evidence for HER2-directed antibodies, immunotherapy, immune stimulating antibody conjugates, antibody-drug conjugates (including DESTINY trial results) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors are placed into clinical context. Key challenges including resistance mechanisms and drug toxicities are outlined. Search terms 'HER2' and 'gastric cancer' were entered into ClinicalTrials.gov, Pubmed and Google. Only English-language studies were included.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinical management of HER2 positive gastric cancer patients is likely to change significantly over the next 5 years. Checkpoint inhibition is likely to be used alongside HER2-directed therapy and chemotherapy first-line in advanced disease. Trastuzumab deruxtecan is likely to be offered second-line and beyond. The sheer number of clinical trials of HER2-directed therapy in gastric cancer are testament to progress and potential.

Current and future landscape of targeted therapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: redrawing the lines

BACKGROUND

Evidence to date supports continued human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) suppression beyond progression on HER2-directed therapy for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Data from several phase II and III trials evaluating HER2-directed therapy following second-line T-DM1 have recently become available.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of the published and presented literature to identify phase II and phase III trials assessing novel HER2-targeted agents as third-line therapy or beyond for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer using search terms 'breast cancer' AND 'HER2' AND 'advanced' AND ('phase II' OR 'phase III').

RESULTS

Eight clinical trials reporting efficacy outcomes on third-line or greater HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer were identified. In phase III trials, margetuximab and neratinib combinations demonstrated significant 1.3-month (hazard ratio, HR = 0.71, p < 0.001) and 0.1-month (HR = 0.76, p = 0.006) net improvements in median progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, with no significant improvements in overall survival (OS). Tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine demonstrated a significant 2.7-month improvement in median PFS (HR = 0.57, p < 0.00001) and a 5.5-month improvement in median OS (HR = 0.73, p = 0.004) in a randomized phase II trial, including significant clinical benefit for patients with brain metastases. Finally, trastuzumab-deruxtecan, zenocutuzumab, and poziotinib demonstrated benefit in phase II trials with the most robust overall response rate (62.0%) and median duration of response (18.2 months) observed for trastuzumab-deruxtecan among heavily pretreated patients.

CONCLUSION

Tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine significantly prolongs OS, and promising preliminary response outcomes for trastuzumab-deruxtecan suggest that sequencing of these regimens following second-line therapy is reasonable.

Role of Fcγ receptors in HER2-targeted breast cancer therapy

Several therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including those targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and CD20, mediate fragment crystallizable gamma receptor (FcγR)–dependent activities as part of their mechanism of action. These activities include induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), which are innate immune mechanisms of cancer cell elimination. FcγRs are distinguished by their affinity for the Fc fragment, cell distribution, and type of immune response they induce. Activating FcγRIIIa (CD16A) on natural killer cells plays a crucial role in mediating ADCC, and activating FcγRIIa (CD32A) and FcγRIIIa on macrophages are important for mediating ADCP. Polymorphisms in FcγRIIIa and FcγRIIa generate variants that bind to the Fc portion of antibodies with different affinities. This results in differential FcγR-mediated activities associated with differential therapeutic outcomes across multiple clinical settings, from early stage to metastatic disease, in patients with HER2+ breast cancer treated with the anti-HER2 mAb trastuzumab. Trastuzumab has, nonetheless, revolutionized HER2+ breast cancer treatment, and several HER2-directed mAbs have been developed using Fc glyco-engineering or Fc protein-engineering to enhance FcγR-mediated functions. An example of an approved anti-HER2 Fc-engineered chimeric mAb is margetuximab, which targets the same epitope as trastuzumab, but features five amino acid substitutions in the IgG 1 Fc domain that were deliberately introduced to increase binding to activating FcγRIIIa and decrease binding to inhibitory FcγRIIb (CD32B). Margetuximab enhances Fc-dependent ADCC in vitro more potently than the combination of pertuzumab (another approved mAb directed against an alternate HER2 epitope) and trastuzumab. Margetuximab administration also enhances HER2-specific B cell and T cell–mediated responses ex vivo in samples from patients treated with prior lines of HER2 antibody-based therapies. Stemming from these observations, a worthwhile future goal in the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer is to promote combinatorial approaches that better eradicate HER2+ cancer cells via enhanced immunological mechanisms.

FDA Approval Summary: Margetuximab plus Chemotherapy for Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

On December 16, 2020, the FDA granted regular approval to margetuximab-cmkb (MARGENZA), in combination with chemotherapy, for the treatment of adult patients with HER2-positive (HER2⁺) metastatic breast cancer who have received two or more prior anti-HER2 regimens, at least one of which was for metastatic disease. Approval was based on data from SOPHIA, a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active controlled study comparing margetuximab with trastuzumab, in combination with chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. SOPHIA demonstrated a 0.9-month difference in median PFS between the two treatment arms [5.8 vs. 4.9 months, respectively; stratified HR, 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.98; P = 0.0334)]. Overall survival (OS) was immature at the data cut-off date of September 10, 2019. Infusion-related reactions (IRR) are an important safety signal associated with margetuximab plus chemotherapy. In SOPHIA, 13% of patients treated with margetuximab plus chemotherapy reported IRRs, of which 1.5% were grade 3. The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (>10%) with margetuximab in combination with chemotherapy were fatigue/asthenia, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, headache, pyrexia, alopecia, abdominal pain, peripheral neuropathy, arthralgia/myalgia, cough, decreased appetite, dyspnea, IRR, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and extremity pain. Overall, the favorable risk-benefit profile for margetuximab when added to chemotherapy supported its approval for the intended indication.

Vaccinal antibodies: Fc antibody engineering to improve the antiviral antibody response and induce vaccine-like effects

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlights the urgent clinical need for efficient virus therapies and vaccines. Although the functional importance of antibodies is indisputable in viral infections, there are still significant unmet needs that require vast improvements in antibody-based therapeutics. The IgG Fc domain can be engineered to produce antibodies with tailored and potent responses that will meet these clinical demands. Engaging Fc receptors (FcRs) to perform effector functions as cytotoxicity, phagocytosis, complement activation, intracellular neutralization and controlling antibody persistence. Furthermore, it produces vaccine-like effects by activating signals to stimulate T-cell responses, have proven to be required for protection, as neutralization alone does not off the full protection capacity of antibodies. This review highlights antiviral Fc functions and FcRs' contributions in linking innate and adaptive immunity against viral threats. Moreover, it provides the latest Fc engineering strategies to improve the safety and efficacy of human antiviral antibodies and vaccines.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2+ advanced breast cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201), an anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, has shown significant clinical benefits in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients. In the phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, T-DXd demonstrated an objective response of 60.9% and median progression-free survival of 16.4 months, laying the foundation for accelerated approval in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients who have received two or more prior anti-HER2-based regimens in the metastatic setting. Moreover, T-DXd exhibited promising antitumor efficacy against HER2-low-expressing metastatic breast cancer. Its distinctive side effect was pneumonitis, with a 13.6% incidence. It is approved in the US with boxed warnings for interstitial lung disease and embryo-fetal toxicity. This review focuses on preclinical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on T-DXd and clinical evidence of its antitumor activity (both as monotherapy and in combination) and tolerability in metastatic breast cancer.

Cardiotoxicity of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Drugs for Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women and its incidence has been increasing over the years. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 or ErbB2) overexpression is responsible for 20 to 25% of invasive breast cancers, and is associated with poor prognosis. HER2-targeted therapy has significantly improved overall survival rates in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, despite the benefits of this therapy, its cardiotoxicity is a major concern, especially when HER2-targeted therapy is used in conjunction with anthracyclines. At present, the mechanism of this cardiotoxicity is not fully understood. It is thought that HER2-targeting drugs inhibit HER2/NRG 1 dimer formation, causing an increase in ROS in the mitochondria of cardiomyocytes and inhibiting the PI3K/Akt and Ras/MAPK pathways, resulting in cell apoptosis. Antioxidants, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, β-blockers, statins and other drugs may have a cardioprotective effect when used with ErbB2-targeting drugs. NT-proBNP can be used to monitor trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity during HER2-targeted treatment and may serve as a biological marker for clinical prediction of cardiotoxicity. Measuring NT-proBNP is non-invasive, inexpensive and reproducible, therefore is worthy of the attention of clinicians. The aim of this review is to discuss the potential mechanisms, clinical features, diagnostic strategies, and intervention strategies related to cardiotoxicity of ErbB2-targeting drugs.

Her2-Positive Cancers and Antibody-Based Treatment: State of the Art and Future Developments

HER2 positive breast cancer represent about 20% of all breast cancer subtypes and it was considered the subtype with the worst prognosis until the discovery of therapies directed against the HER2 protein. The determination of the status of the HER2 must be very precise and well managed to identify this subtype, and there are very specific and updated guides that allow its characterization to be adjusted. Treatment in local disease has been considerably improved with less aggressive and highly effective approaches and very high cure rates. In metastatic disease, average median survival rates of 5 years have been achieved. New highly active molecules have also been discovered that allow disease control in very complicated situations. This article reviews all these options that can be used for the management of this disease.

A review of molecularly targeted therapy in biliary tract carcinoma: what is the next step?

Patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) have a poor prognosis with a median overall survival of fewer than 12 months following systemic chemotherapy. In recent years, the identification of distinct molecular alterations with corresponding targeted therapies is modifying this therapeutic algorithm. The aim of this review is to present an overview of targeted therapy for BTCs, describing published available data and potential future challenges in ongoing trials. From clinicaltrials.gov online database all ongoing trials for BTCs (any stage) was examinated in July 2021, and data regarding study design, disease characteristics and type of treatments were registered. Oncogenic-driven therapy (targeted therapy) was investigated in 67 trials. According to research, 15 ongoing trials (22.4%) are investigating fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor (FGFR)-inhibitors in BTCs. Three (18.7%) are open-label randomized multicenter phase 3 trials, 8 (50%) are single-arm phase two trials, and 4 (25%) are phase one studies. Twelve (17.9%) clinical trials dealt with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 targeting therapy either in combination with cisplatin (Cis) and gemcitabine (Gem) as first-line treatment for BTCs or in monotherapy in patients with IDH1 mutant advanced malignancies, including cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Nine (13.4%) clinical trials tested human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 targeting therapy. Four (44.4%) studies are phase I trials, two (22.2%) are phase I/II trials, and three (33.3%) phase II trials. Rare molecular alterations in BTCs, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and v-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B1 (BRAF), are also under investigation in a few trials. Forty-four clinical trials (17.2%) are investigating not oncogenic-driven multitarget therapy like multireceptor tyrosin kinase inhibitors and antiangiogenetic agents. In conclusion, this review shows that BTCs management is experiencing important innovations, especially in biomarker-based patient selection and in the new emerging therapeutic approach. Many ongoing trials could answer questions regarding the role of molecular inhibitors leading to new therapeutic frontiers for molecular subcategories of BTCs.

Prevalence of HER2 overexpression and amplification in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The reported rates of HER2 positivity in cervical cancer (CC) range from 0% to 87%. The importance of HER2 as an actionable target in CC would depend on HER2 positivity prevalence. Our aim was to provide precise estimates of HER2 overexpression and amplification in CC, globally and by relevant subgroups. We conducted a PRISMA compliant meta-analytic systematic review. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane database, and grey literature for articles reporting the proportion of HER2 positivity in CC. Studies assessing HER2 status by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization in invasive disease were eligible. We performed descriptive analyses of all 65 included studies. Out of these, we selected 26 studies that used standardized American Society of Clinical Oncology / College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) Guidelines compliant methodology. We conducted several meta-analyses of proportions to estimate the pooled prevalence of HER2 positivity and subgroup analyses using geographic region, histology, tumor stage, primary antibody brand, study size, and publication year as moderators. The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 overexpression was 5.7% (CI 95%: 1.5% to 11.7%) I2 = 87% in ASCO/CAP compliant studies and 27.0%, (CI 95%: 19.9% to 34.8%) I2 = 96% in ASCO/CAP non-compliant ones, p < 0.001. The estimated pooled prevalence of HER2 amplification was 1.2% (CI 95%: 0.0% to 5.8%) I2 = 0% and 24.9% (CI 95%: 12.6% to 39.6%) I2 = 86%, respectively, p = 0.004. No other factor was significantly associated with HER2 positivity rates. Our results suggest that a small, but still meaningful proportion of CC is expected to be HER2-positive. High heterogeneity was the main limitation of the study. Variations in previously reported HER2 positivity rates are mainly related to methodological issues.

Key metrics to expanding the pipeline of successful antibody-drug conjugates

Although the recent FDA approval of six new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) is promising, attrition of ADCs during clinical development remains high. The inherent complexity of ADCs is a double-edged sword that provides opportunities for perfecting therapeutic action while also increasing confounding factors in therapeutic failures. ADC design drives their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and requires deeper analysis than the commonly used C_max and area under the curve (AUC) metrics to scale dosing to the clinic. Common features of current FDA-approved ADCs targeting solid tumors include humanized IgG1 antibody domains, highly expressed tumor receptors, and large antibody doses. The potential consequences of these shared features for clinical pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action are discussed, and key design aspects for successful solid tumor ADCs are highlighted.

Breast Cancer Treatments: Updates and New Challenges

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent cancer diagnosed in women worldwide. This heterogeneous disease can be classified into four molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HER2 and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)) according to the expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR), and the overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Current BC treatments target these receptors (endocrine and anti-HER2 therapies) as a personalized treatment. Along with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, these therapies can have severe adverse effects and patients can develop resistance to these agents. Moreover, TNBC do not have standardized treatments. Hence, a deeper understanding of the development of new treatments that are more specific and effective in treating each BC subgroup is key. New approaches have recently emerged such as immunotherapy, conjugated antibodies, and targeting other metabolic pathways. This review summarizes current BC treatments and explores the new treatment strategies from a personalized therapy perspective and the resulting challenges.

Hopes and failures in front-line advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer therapy

Human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2) was an important therapeutic target in gastric cancer. Through the last decade, strategy with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy remains the first-line standard of treatment in advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Based on the Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer trial, trastuzumab plus systemic chemotherapy of cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine as the backbone was established as the first-line therapy in advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer. Since then, studies have explored the optimization of the front-line strategy, including the dose of trastuzumab, chemotherapy regimen and maintenance therapy. A large number of clinical trials were conducted to explore the optimal front-line therapy regimens, such as lapatinib and pertuzumab. Safe and effective first-line regimens are still lacking. Recently, two phase II studies of combining immune checkpoint inhibitor in first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer showed promising results. The progress of immunotherapy has gradually promoted the development of front-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer to potential chemotherapy-free strategies. Therefore, this article reviewed these significant clinical trials and focus on the front-line treatment strategies for HER2-positive gastric cancer.

Trastuzumab Mechanism of Action; 20 Years of Research to Unravel a Dilemma

Trastuzumab as a first HER2-targeted therapy for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer patients was introduced in 1998. Although trastuzumab has opened a new avenue to treat patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and other types of cancer, some patients are not responsive or become resistant to this treatment. So far, several mechanisms have been suggested for the mode of action of trastuzumab; however, the findings regarding these mechanisms are controversial. In this review, we aimed to provide a detailed insight into the various mechanisms of action of trastuzumab.

Recent Advances in Systemic Treatments for HER-2 Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Despite recent improvements in treatment quality and options, advanced gastric cancer remains one of the hardest to cure cancers, with a median overall survival (OS) of 10–12 months and a 5-year OS of approximately 5–20%. There is an unmet need for further efforts to palliate disease-related symptoms, improve quality of life, increase tumor response rate, and prolong progression free and overall survival while balancing the toxicities of therapy. The most common type of GC is adenocarcinoma, which demonstrates morphological, biological, and clinical heterogeneity. A plethora of genomic alterations and the activation of numerous molecular pathways including human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 (FGFR2), mesenchymal epidermal transforming factor receptor (MET), and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are responsible for the complex heterogeneity of GC. Efforts to validate the therapeutic effects of inhibiting some of these aberrantly expressed pathways have failed to lead to a clinically meaningful outcome apart from the overexpression/amplification of the HER2 gene, inhibition of which has had a significant impact on clinical practice. The only available biomarkers to guide the effective treatment of patients with advanced GC are HER2 overexpression, MSI/PD-L1 status, and FGFR alterations. Various anti-HER2 agents have been evaluated after the success of the ToGA trial, but none led to a significant enough clinical improvement to be considered a viable alternative for HER2-targeted therapy in advanced GC until the global Keynote-811 trial, which added pembrolizumab to trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. This combination demonstrated a survival advantage for the first time in the 11 years since ToGA. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was also found to be effective in patients who had already received >2 previous lines of treatment. Despite these promising avenues, the optimal management of HER-2 positive GC still requires further development.

Harnessing biomarkers of response to improve therapy selection in esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma

Advanced esophago-gastric (OG) adenocarcinomas have a high mortality rate and new therapeutic options are urgently required. Despite recent advances in understanding the molecular characteristics of OG cancers, tumor heterogeneity poses a challenge in developing new therapeutics capable of improving patient outcomes. Consequently, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of systemic treatment, with the HER2 being the only predictive biomarker routinely targeted in clinical practice. Recent data indicate that immunotherapy will be incorporated into first-line chemotherapy, but further research is required to refine patient selection. This review will summarize the clinical strategies being evaluated to utilize our knowledge of predictive biomarkers with reference to novel therapeutics, and discuss the barriers to implementing precision oncology in OG adenocarcinoma.

Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: a review of clinical risk factors, pharmacologic prevention, and cardiotoxicity of other HER2-directed therapies

PURPOSE

Despite great success as a targeted breast cancer therapy, trastuzumab use may be complicated by heart failure and loss of left ventricular contractile function. This review summarizes the risk factors, imaging, and prevention of cardiotoxicity associated with trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies.

FINDINGS

Cardiovascular disease risk factors, advanced age, and previous anthracycline treatment predispose to trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity (TIC), with anthracycline exposure being the most significant risk factor. Cardiac biomarkers such as troponins and pro-BNP and imaging assessments such as echocardiogram before and during trastuzumab therapy may help in early identification of TIC. Initiation of beta-adrenergic antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may prevent TIC. Cardiotoxicity rates of other HER2-targeted treatments, such as pertuzumab, T-DM1, lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and margetuximab, appear to be significantly lower as reported in the pivotal trials which led to their approval.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk assessment for TIC should include cardiac imaging assessment and should incorporate prior anthracycline use, the strongest risk factor for TIC. Screening and prediction of cardiotoxicity, referral to a cardio-oncology specialist, and initiation of effective prophylactic therapy may all improve prognosis in patients receiving HER2-directed therapy. Beta blockers and ACE inhibitors appear to mitigate risk of TIC. Anthracycline-free regimens have been proven to be efficacious in early HER2-positive breast cancer and should now be considered the standard of care for early HER2-positive breast cancer. Newer HER2-directed therapies appear to have significantly lower cardiotoxicity compared to trastuzumab, but trials are needed in patients who have experienced TIC and patients with pre-existing cardiac dysfunction.

Current and Future Management of HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed and/or amplified in approximately 20% of breast cancers, conferring an aggressive tumor behavior but also an opportunity for targeted therapies. In the advanced setting, the prognosis of patients suffering from this disease has greatly improved after the introduction of new anti-HER2 drugs beyond trastuzumab. For most patients, a taxane combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the first-line setting, followed by trastuzumab-emtansine in second line, should be considered the standard of care today. However, chemo-free anti-HER2 strategies in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer could also be considered in selected patients. In the third-line setting and beyond, several emerging anti-HER2 therapies are becoming available, including tucatinib, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (DS-8201a), neratinib, and margetuximab-cmkb. In addition, new compounds and combinations are showing promising results in the late-line setting. The treatment landscape of HER2-positive advanced disease is evolving constantly, active drugs such as pertuzumab and trastuzumab-emtansine are moving to early-stage, many biomarkers, including quantification of HER2 itself, are being explored to improve patient selection, and patient populations with specific needs are emerging, such as those with brain metastasis. Here, we provide an overview of the current and future management of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Precision medicine in breast cancer: From clinical trials to clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and, despite the undeniable improvements in the outcome of these patients obtained in the last decade, the discovery and the validation of new actionable molecular targets represent a priority. ESCAT permits to rank molecular alterations in different classes according to their evidence of actionability in a specific cancer type, assisting clinicians in their therapeutical decisions. MAIN: ERBB2, PIK3CA and germline BRCA1/2 alterations are biomarkers prospectively validated in BC, driving the selection of targeted therapies, and are therefore classified in the highest level of evidence (Ia). Agnostic biomarkers, namely microsatellite instability, NTRK fusions and high tumor mutational burden, demonstrated similar activity across different tumor types and are consequently ranked in tier Ic. In tier II are classified alterations that still need confirmatory prospective studies but for which evidence of efficacy is available. Somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, germline PALB2 mutations, HER2-low expression, ERBB2 mutations, PTEN deletions, AKT1 mutations, ESR1 resistance mutations satisfy the requirements to be classified in this tier. In tier III are ranked various molecular alterations for which there is evidence of actionability in other tumors (IIIa) or that have similar functional impact in the same gene or pathway of a tier I alteration, without clinical data (IIIb). In tier IV are listed the molecular alterations for which only preclinical studies are available.

CONCLUSION

In this review we report the most relevant molecular targets in BC, ordered pursuant to their pathway and classified in concordance with ESCAT.

Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is not a top-10 malignancy in the United States but represents one of the most common causes of cancer death worldwide. Biological differences between tumors from Eastern and Western countries add to the complexity of identifying standard-of-care therapy based on international trials. Systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy all have proven efficacy in gastric adenocarcinoma; therefore, multidisciplinary treatment is paramount to treatment selection. Triplet chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer is now accepted and could represent a plateau of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy for localized disease. Classification of gastric cancer based on molecular subtypes is providing an opportunity for personalized therapy. Biomarkers, in particular microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutation burden, and Epstein-Barr virus, are increasingly driving systemic therapy approaches and allowing for the identification of populations most likely to benefit from immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Significant research opportunities remain for the less differentiated histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma and those without markers of immunotherapy activity.

HER2-targeted therapies in gastric cancer

Molecular targeted therapy of cancer has always been the focus of clinicians. Among those therapeutic targets, the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) signaling pathway is one of the most popular targets for translational research in cancer. However, unlike prospect in breast cancer, HER-2 inhibitor trastuzumab is the only molecular targeted drug approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first-line treatment of HER-2 positive advanced gastric cancer. On this basis, a variety of novel HER2- targeted drugs for gastric cancer are under development, and related clinical researches are in full swing, including small molecular kinase inhibitors (e.g., afatinib, neratinib, pyrotinib), antibody-drug conjugates (e.g., DS-8201a, RC48-ADC) and other novel therapies (e.g., ZW25, CAR-T, BVAC-B). In this study, we will summarize the recent advances in anti-HER-2 agents, potential mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-positive gastric cancer. We will also discuss the future prospects of potential strategies to overcome anti-HER-2 resistance and development of novel anti-HER-2 approaches for the treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer patients.

Efficacy of Margetuximab vs Trastuzumab in Patients With Pretreated ERBB2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Question

Does margetuximab plus chemotherapy prolong progression-free survival and/or overall survival of patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, relative to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy?

Findings

In the SOPHIA phase 3 randomized clinical trial of 536 patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer, margetuximab plus chemotherapy generated a statistically significant 24% relative risk reduction in the hazard of progression vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab, and final analysis of OS will be reported subsequently.

Meaning

This trial demonstrates a head-to-head advantage of margetuximab (an Fc-engineered ERBB2-targeted antibody) compared with trastuzumab in a pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer population.

Importance

ERRB2 (formerly HER2)–positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains typically incurable with optimal treatment undefined in later lines of therapy. The chimeric antibody margetuximab shares ERBB2 specificity with trastuzumab but incorporates an engineered Fc region to increase immune activation.

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab, each with chemotherapy, in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive ABC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The SOPHIA phase 3 randomized open-label trial of margetuximab plus chemotherapy vs trastuzumab plus chemotherapy enrolled 536 patients from August 26, 2015, to October 10, 2018, at 166 sites in 17 countries. Eligible patients had disease progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies and 1 to 3 lines of therapy for metastatic disease. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to October 2019.

Interventions

Investigators selected chemotherapy before 1:1 randomization to margetuximab, 15 mg/kg, or trastuzumab, 6 mg/kg (loading dose, 8 mg/kg), each in 3-week cycles. Stratification factors were metastatic sites (≤2, >2), lines of therapy (≤2, >2), and chemotherapy choice.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Sequential primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by central blinded analysis and overall survival (OS). All α was allocated to PFS, followed by OS. Secondary end points were investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate by central blinded analysis.

Results

A total of 536 patients were randomized to receive margetuximab (n = 266) or trastuzumab (n = 270). The median age was 56 (27-86) years; 266 (100%) women were in the margetuximab group, while 267 (98.9%) women were in the trastuzumab group. Groups were balanced. All but 1 patient had received prior pertuzumab, and 489 (91.2%) had received prior ado-trastuzumab emtansine. Margetuximab improved primary PFS over trastuzumab with 24% relative risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98; P = .03; median, 5.8 [95% CI, 5.5-7.0] months vs 4.9 [95% CI, 4.2-5.6] months; October 10, 2018). After the second planned interim analysis of 270 deaths, median OS was 21.6 months with margetuximab vs 19.8 months with trastuzumab (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.13; P = .33; September 10, 2019), and investigator-assessed PFS showed 29% relative risk reduction favoring margetuximab (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P < .001; median, 5.7 vs 4.4 months; September 10, 2019). Margetuximab improved objective response rate over trastuzumab: 22% vs 16% (P = .06; October 10, 2018), and 25% vs 14% (P < .001; September 10, 2019). Incidence of infusion-related reactions, mostly in cycle 1, was higher with margetuximab (35 [13.3%] vs 9 [3.4%]); otherwise, safety was comparable.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, margetuximab plus chemotherapy had acceptable safety and a statistically significant improvement in PFS compared with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in ERBB2-positive ABC after progression on 2 or more prior anti-ERBB2 therapies. Final OS analysis is expected in 2021.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02492711

HER2 Expression, Test Deviations, and Their Impact on Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results From the Prospective Multicenter VARIANZ Study

Trastuzumab is the only approved targeted drug for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive (HER2+) metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). However, not all patients respond and most eventually progress. The multicenter VARIANZ study aimed to investigate the background of response and resistance to trastuzumab in mGC.

Margetuximab: First Approval

The second-generation anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor2 protein (HER2) monoclonal antibody margetuximab (MARGENZA™, margetuximab-cmkb) is being developed for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, gastric cancer and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. The antibody has been engineered for increased binding to activating Fcγ receptor IIIA (CD16A) and decreased binding to inhibitory Fcγ receptor IIB (CD32B) relative to trastuzumab with the aim of improving response rates. Based on the results of the phase III SOPHIA trial margetuximab has been approved in the USA for use in combination with chemotherapy as treatment of previously-treated metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of margetuximab leading to this first approval.

Targeted and immunotherapy in the era of personalised gastric cancer treatment

Gastric cancer is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Advances in targeted medical treatment were scarce in the past and challenged by the marked spatial and temporal biological heterogeneity of gastric cancer. Recent molecular profiling studies have increased our understanding of genetic and epigenetic drivers, leading to better patient selection for drug development. Beyond that, immune-related biomarkers were identified, paving the way for future effective immunotherapy. We systematically reviewed articles from PubMed of the past 10 years, and abstracts from annual meetings of ESMO, ASCO and AACR to summarise the current knowledge about targeted and immunotherapy and outline pathways to future personalised therapy of gastric cancer.

Frontiers in HER2-positive breast cancer in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of HER2-positive breast cancer has seen tremendous advances in the last 2 years with largest number of new drugs in decades. The present review aims to summarize the cutting-edge research of the past 2 years and future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review will go over four new drugs, three of which have gained FDA approval within the past 18 months, in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. We will go over early and mature clinical data on these therapeutics and ongoing clinical trials further exploring their role in the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and HER2 low breast cancer. Will also discuss ongoing trials using immunotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the advanced HER2-positive setting.

SUMMARY

: The therapies described in this review have quickly become standard of care for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, they have the potential to change the landscape of breast cancer therapy further to include even patients with HER2 low breast cancer.

Engineering Anti-Tumor Monoclonal Antibodies and Fc Receptors to Enhance ADCC by Human NK Cells

Tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are the most widely used and characterized immunotherapy for hematologic and solid tumors. The significance of this therapy is their direct and indirect effects on tumor cells, facilitated by the antibody's antigen-binding fragment (Fab) and fragment crystallizable region (Fc region), respectively. The Fab can modulate the function of cell surface markers on tumor cells in an agonistic or antagonistic manner, whereas the Fc region can be recognized by an Fc receptor (FcR) on leukocytes through which various effector functions, including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), can be elicited. This process is a key cytolytic mechanism of natural killer (NK) cells. These innate lymphocytes in the human body recognize tumor-bound antibodies exclusively by the IgG Fc receptor CD16A (FcγRIIIA). Two allelic versions of CD16A bind IgG with either lower or higher affinity. Cancer patients homozygous for the higher affinity allele of CD16A have been reported to respond significantly better to mAb therapies for various malignancies. These studies revealed that mAb therapy efficacy positively correlates with higher affinity binding to CD16A. Approaches to enhance tumor antigen targeting by NK cells by modifying the Fc portion of antibodies or the FcR on NK cells are the focus of this review.