The C-terminal domains of the GABA(b) receptor subunits mediate intracellular trafficking but are not required for receptor signaling

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.

CysLT2 receptors interact with CysLT1 receptors and down-modulate cysteinyl leukotriene dependent mitogenic responses of mast cells

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs) induce inflammation through 2 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), CysLT(1) and CysLT(2), which are coexpressed by most myeloid cells. Cys-LTs induce proliferation of mast cells (MCs), transactivate c-Kit, and phosphorylate extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Although MCs express CysLT(2), their responses to cys-LTs are blocked by antagonists of CysLT(1). We demonstrate that CysLT(2) interacts with CysLT(1), and that knockdown of CysLT(2) increases CysLT(1) surface expression and CysLT(1)-dependent proliferation of cord blood-derived human MCs (hMCs). Cys-LT-mediated responses were absent in MCs from mice lacking CysLT(1) receptors, but enhanced by the absence of CysLT(2) receptors. CysLT(1) and CysLT(2) receptors colocalized to the plasma membranes and nuclei of a human MC line, LAD2. Antibody-based fluorescent lifetime imaging microscopy confirmed complexes containing both receptors based on fluorescence energy transfer. Negative regulation of CysLT(1)-induced mitogenic signaling responses of MCs by CysLT(2) demonstrates physiologically relevant functions for GPCR heterodimers on primary cells central to inflammation.

Lateral diffusion of the GABAB receptor is regulated by the GABAB2 C terminus

GABAB (gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B) is a heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptor. The GABAB1 subunit, which contains an endoplasmic reticulum retention sequence, is only transported to the cell surface when it is associated with the GABAB2 subunit. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching studies in transfected COS-7 cells and hippocampal neurons revealed that GABAB2 diffuses slowly within the plasma membrane whether expressed alone or with the GABAB1 subunit. Treatment of cells with brefeldin A revealed that GABAB2 moves freely within the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting that slow movement of GABAB2 is a result of its plasma membrane insertion. Disruption of the cytoskeleton did not affect the mobility of GABAB2, indicating that its restricted diffusion is not due to direct interactions with actin or tubulin. To determine whether the C terminus of GABAB2 regulates its diffusion, this region of the subunit was attached to the lymphocyte membrane protein, CD2, which then exhibited a slower rate of lateral diffusion. Furthermore, co-expression of a cytoplasmically expressed soluble form of the GABAB2 C terminus increased movement of the GABAB2 subunit. We constructed forms of GABAB2 with various C-terminal truncations. Truncation of GABAB2 after residue 862, but not residue 886, caused a dramatic increase in its mobility, suggesting that the region between these two residues is critical for restricting GABAB2 diffusion. Finally, we investigated whether activation of GABAB might modulate its movement. Treatment of COS-7 cells with the GABAB receptor agonist baclofen significantly increased its mobile fraction. These data show that the restricted movement of GABAB at the cell surface is regulated by a region within its C terminus.

Dissociation and trafficking of rat GABAB receptor heterodimer upon chronic capsaicin stimulation

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors (GABAB) are G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate GABAergic inhibition in the brain. Their functional expression is dependent upon the formation of heterodimers between GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunits, a process that occurs within the endoplasmic reticulum. However, the mechanisms that regulate GABAB receptor oligomerization at the plasma membrane remain largely unknown. We first characterized the functional cytoarchitecture of an organotypic co-culture model of rat dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord. Subsequently, we studied the interactions between GABAB subunits after chronic stimulation of sensory fibres with capsaicin. Surface labelling of recombinant proteins showed a decrease in subunit co-localization and GABAB2 labelling, after capsaicin treatment. In these conditions, fluorescence lifetime imaging measurements further demonstrated a loss of interactions between green fluorescent protein-GABAB1b and t-dimer discosoma sp red fluorescent protein-GABAB2 subunits. Finally, we established that the GABAB receptor undergoes clathrin-dependent internalization and rapid recycling to the plasma membrane following activation with baclofen, a GABAB agonist. However, in cultures chronically stimulated with capsaicin, the agonist-induced endocytosis was decreased, reflecting changes in the dimeric state of the receptor. Taken together, our results indicate that the chronic stimulation of sensory fibres can dissociate the GABAB heterodimer and alters its responsiveness to the endogenous ligand. Chronic stimulation thus modulates receptor oligomerization, providing additional levels of control of signalling.

The role of GABA(B) receptors in the regulation of excitatory neurotransmission

GABA(B) receptors are the metabotrophic receptors for GABA. They are members of the G-protein coupled superfamily of receptors but are highly unusual as they are made up of a dimer of 7-transmembrane spanning subunits. The receptors are widely distributed throughout the central nervous system where they act post-synaptically to cause a long-lasting hyperpolarisation through the activation of a potassium conductance. They are also present pre-synaptically where they act as auto and heteroreceptors to inhibit neurotransmitter release. GABA(B) receptors play a complex role in the regulation of excitatory transmission and their activation can have both inhibitory and dis-inhibitory effects. This has profound physiological and behavioural consequences including modification of LTP and memory, regulation of seizure activity and nociception.

Reduced GABAB receptor subunit expression and paired-pulse depression in a genetic model of absence seizures

Neocortical networks play a major role in the genesis of generalized spike-and-wave (SW) discharges associated with absence seizures in humans and in animal models, including genetically predisposed WAG/Rij rats. Here, we tested the hypothesis that alterations in GABA(B) receptors contribute to neocortical hyperexcitability in these animals. By using Real-Time PCR we found that mRNA levels for most GABA(B(1)) subunits are diminished in epileptic WAG/Rij neocortex as compared with age-matched non-epileptic controls (NEC), whereas GABA(B(2)) mRNA is unchanged. Next, we investigated the cellular distribution of GABA(B(1)) and GABA(B(2)) subunits by confocal microscopy and discovered that GABA(B(1)) subunits fail to localize in the distal dendrites of WAG/Rij neocortical pyramidal cells. Intracellular recordings from neocortical cells in an in vitro slice preparation demonstrated reduced paired-pulse depression of pharmacologically isolated excitatory and inhibitory responses in epileptic WAG/Rij rats as compared with NECs; moreover, paired-pulse depression in NEC slices was diminished by a GABA(B) receptor antagonist to a greater extent than in WAG/Rij rats further suggesting GABA(B) receptor dysfunction. In conclusion, our data identify changes in GABA(B) receptor subunit expression and distribution along with decreased paired-pulse depression in epileptic WAG/Rij rat neocortex. We propose that these alterations may contribute to neocortical hyperexcitability and thus to SW generation in absence epilepsy.

Phospho-dependent functional modulation of GABA(B) receptors by the metabolic sensor AMP-dependent protein kinase

GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptors composed of R1 and R2 subunits that mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the brain by activating inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRKs) and inhibiting Ca(2+) channels. We demonstrate here that GABA(B) receptors are intimately associated with 5'AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK acts as a metabolic sensor that is potently activated by increases in 5'AMP concentration that are caused by enhanced metabolic activity, anoxia, or ischemia. AMPK binds the R1 subunit and directly phosphorylates S783 in the R2 subunit to enhance GABA(B) receptor activation of GIRKs. Phosphorylation of S783 is evident in many brain regions, and is increased dramatically after ischemic injury. Finally, we also reveal that S783 plays a critical role in enhancing neuronal survival after ischemia. Together our results provide evidence of a neuroprotective mechanism, which, under conditions of metabolic stress or after ischemia, increases GABA(B) receptor function to reduce excitotoxicity and thereby promotes neuronal survival.

Dimerization between vasopressin V1b and corticotropin releasing hormone type 1 receptors

1. Increasing evidence indicates that guanyl protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), including members of the vasopressin (VP) receptor family can act as homo- and heterodimers. Regulated expression and interaction of pituitary VP V1b receptor (V1bR) and corticotropin releasing hormone receptor type 1 (CRHR1) are critical for hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis adaptation, but it is unknown whether this involves physical interaction between these receptors.2. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) experiments using V1bR and CRHR1 fused to either Renilla luciferase (Rluc) or yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) at the N-terminus, but not the carboxyl-terminus, revealed specific interaction (BRET(50) = 0.39 +/- 0.08, V1bR) that was inhibited by untagged V1b or CRHR1 receptors, suggesting homo- and heterodimerization. The BRET data were confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation experiments using fully bioactive receptors tagged at the aminoterminus with c-myc and Flag epitopes, demonstrating specific homodimerization of the V1b receptor and heterodimerization of the V1b receptor with CRHR1 receptors.3. Heterodimerization between V1bR and CRHR1 is not ligand dependent since stimulation with CRH and AVP had no effect on coimmunoprecipitation. In membranes obtained from cells cotransfected with CRHR1 and V1bR, incubation with the heterologous nonpeptide antagonist did not alter the binding affinity or capacity of the receptor.4. The data demonstrate that V1bR and CRHR1 can form constitutive homo- and heterodimers and suggests that the heterodimerization does not influence the binding properties of these receptors.

Ts65Dn, a Mouse Model of Down Syndrome, Exhibits Increased GABAB-Induced Potassium Current

Down syndrome (DS) is the most common nonheritable cause of mental retardation. DS is the result of the presence of an extra chromosome 21 and its phenotype may be a consequence of overexpressed genes from that chromosome. One such gene is Kcnj6/Girk2, which encodes the G-protein-coupled inward rectifying potassium channel subunit 2 (GIRK2). We have recently shown that the DS mouse model, Ts65Dn, overexpresses GIRK2 throughout the brain and in particular the hippocampus. Here we report that this overexpression leads to a significant increase (∼2-fold) in GABAB-mediated GIRK current in primary cultured hippocampal neurons. The dose response curves for peak and steady-state GIRK current density is significantly shifted left toward lower concentrations of baclofen in Ts65Dn neurons compared with diploid controls, consistent with increased functional expression of GIRK channels. Stationary fluctuation analysis of baclofen-induced GIRK current from Ts65Dn neurons indicated no significant change in single-channel conductance compared with diploid. However, significant increases in GIRK channel density was found in Ts65Dn neurons. In normalized baclofen-induced GIRK current and GIRK current kinetics no difference was found between diploid and Ts65Dn neurons, which suggests unimpaired mechanisms of interaction between GIRK channel and GABAB receptor. These results indicate that increased expression of GIRK2 containing channels have functional consequences that likely affect the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal transmission.

Cbln1 is essential for interaction-dependent secretion of Cbln3

Cbln1 and the orphan glutamate receptor GluRdelta2 are pre- and postsynaptic components, respectively, of a novel transneuronal signaling pathway regulating synapse structure and function. We show here that Cbln1 is secreted from cerebellar granule cells in complex with a related protein, Cbln3. However, cbln1- and cbln3-null mice have different phenotypes and cbln1 cbln3 double-null mice have deficits identical to those of cbln1 knockout mice. The basis for these discordant phenotypes is that Cbln1 and Cbln3 reciprocally regulate each other's degradation and secretion such that cbln1-null mice lack both Cbln1 and Cbln3, whereas cbln3-null mice lack Cbln3 but have an approximately sixfold increase in Cbln1. Unlike Cbln1, Cbln3 cannot form homomeric complexes and is secreted only when bound to Cbln1. Structural modeling and mutation analysis reveal that, by constituting a steric clash that is masked upon binding Cbln1 in a "hide-and-run" mechanism of endoplasmic reticulum retention, a single arginine confers the unique properties of Cbln3.

GABA(B2) receptor subunit mRNA decreases in the thalamus of monoarthritic animals

Many studies have implicated GABA(B) receptors in pain transmission mechanisms, especially in the spinal cord. In the thalamus, mRNA expression of the GABA(B(1b)) isoform was shown to be regulated in relay nuclei in response to chronic noxious input arising from experimental monoarthritis. GABA(B(1a)) and GABA(B2) mRNA expression was here determined by in situ hybridisation in the brain of control, 2, 4, 7 and 14 days monoarthritic rats, to evaluate whether this expression was regulated by chronic noxious input in thalamic nuclei. mRNA labelling was analysed quantitatively in the ventrobasal complex, posterior, central medial/central lateral and reticular thalamic nuclei; the thalamic visual relay and dentate gyrus were examined for control. No mRNA expression was detected for GABA(B(1a)) in control and monoarthritic animals. Similarly, GABA(B2) mRNA was not found in the reticular nucleus. However, GABA(B2) mRNA expression was observed in the ventrobasal complex, posterior and central medial/central lateral nuclei of control animals. A significant decrease of 42% at 2 days and 27% at 4 days of monoarthritis was observed in the ventrobasal complex contralaterally, when compared with controls, returning to basal levels at 7 days of monoarthritis. In the ipsilateral posterior nucleus, there was a significant decrease of 38% at 2 days of monoarthritis. No significant changes were observed in central medial/central lateral nuclei. The data suggest that GABA(B2) mRNA expression in the ventrobasal complex and posterior nucleus is regulated by noxious input and that GABA(B) receptors might play a role in the plasticity of these relay nuclei during chronic inflammatory pain.

GABAB receptors and synaptic modulation

GABA(B) receptors modulate transmitter release and postsynaptic membrane potential at various types of central synapses. They function as heterodimers of two related seven-transmembrane domain receptor subunits. Trafficking, activation and signalling of GABA(B) receptors are regulated both by allosteric interactions between the subunits and by the binding of additional proteins. Recent studies have shed light on the roles of GABA(B) receptors in plasticity processes at excitatory synapses. This review summarizes our knowledge of the localization, structure and function of GABA(B) receptors in the central nervous system and their use as drug targets for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Glutamate receptors and endoplasmic reticulum quality control: looking beneath the surface

Glutamate is the principal excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system. The cellular regulation of glutamate receptor (GluR) ion channel function and expression is important for maintaining or adjusting target cell excitability to meet ever-changing demands, for example, in relation to developmental or use-dependent synaptic plasticity. Dysregulation of GluR function or expression may be a contributing factor in certain forms of epilepsy, stroke/ischemia, head trauma, cognitive impairments, and neurodegenerative disease. Recent years have seen substantial progress in understanding how GluRs operate in terms of their structural and functional properties, their synaptic targeting and membrane anchoring by PDZ-domain proteins, and their activity-dependent cycling at the plasma membrane. Yet precious little is known about the earliest events in GluR biogenesis or the mechanisms in place to ensure the GluRs that reach the cell surface are processed, folded, and oligomerized in an appropriate manner. Indeed, only a minor fraction of the GluR content of cells is expressed at any given time on the cell surface, whereas most of the remaining receptors exist in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The functional competence and significance of the ER fraction of receptors are presently unknown, but they are generally thought to represent immature, unassembled, or improperly assembled subunits. Some are ultimately destined for insertion in the plasma membrane. Others may be targeted for proteosomal degradation. Still others might provide a latent pool of fully functional receptors that can be recruited to enhance cell excitability in response to specific signals or under pathological conditions. This review will explore the structural and functional elements that regulate GluR assembly and export from the ER.

GABA(B) receptors in the centromedian/parafascicular thalamic nuclear complex: an ultrastructural analysis of GABA(B)R1 and GABA(B)R2 in the monkey thalamus

Strong gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B)) receptor binding has been shown throughout the thalamus, but the distribution of the two GABA(B) receptor subunits, GABA(B) receptor subunit 1 (GABA(B)R1) and GABA(B) receptor subunit 2 (GABA(B)R2), remains poorly characterized. In primates, the caudal intralaminar nuclei, centromedian and parafascicular (CM/PF), are an integral part of basal ganglia circuits and a main source of inputs to the striatum. In this study, we analyzed the subcellular and subsynaptic distribution of GABA(B) receptor subunits by using light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical techniques. Quantitative immunoperoxidase and immunogold analysis showed that both subunits display a similar pattern of distribution in CM/PF, being expressed largely at extrasynaptic and perisynaptic sites in neuronal cell bodies, dendrites, and axon-like processes and less abundantly in axon terminals. Postsynaptic GABA(B)R1 labeling was found mostly on the plasma membrane (70-80%), whereas GABA(B)R2 was more evenly distributed between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments of CM/PF neurons. A few axon terminals forming symmetric and asymmetric synapses were also labeled for GABA(B)R1 and GABA(B)R2, but the bulk of presynaptic labeling was expressed in small axon-like processes. About 20% of presynaptic vesicle-containing dendrites of local circuit neurons displayed GABA(B)R1/R2 immunoreactivity. Vesicular glutamate transporters (vGluT1)-containing terminals forming asymmetric synapses expressed GABA(B)R1 and/or displayed postsynaptic GABA(B)R1 at the edges of their asymmetric specialization. Overall, these findings provide evidence for multiple sites where GABA(B) receptors could modulate GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the primate CM/PF complex.

Molecular diversity, trafficking and subcellular localization of GABAB receptors

GABAB receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors for the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). While native studies predicted pharmacologically distinct GABAB receptor subtypes, molecular studies failed to identify the expected receptor varieties. Mouse genetic experiments therefore addressed whether the cloned receptors can account for the classical electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral GABAB responses or whether additional receptors exist. Among G-protein coupled receptors, GABAB receptors are unique in that they require 2 distinct subunits for functioning. This atypical receptor structure triggered a large body of work that investigated the regulation of receptor assembly and trafficking. With the availability of molecular tools, substantial progress was also made in the analysis of the receptor protein distribution in neuronal compartments. Here, we review recent studies that shed light on the molecular diversity, the subcellular distribution and the cell surface dynamics of GABAB receptors.

The M3/M4 cytoplasmic loop of the α1 subunit restricts GABAARs lateral mobility: A study using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

A crucial problem in neurobiology is how neurons are able to maintain neurotransmitter receptors at specific membrane domains. The large structural heterogeneity of gamma aminobutyric acid receptors (GABAARs) led to the hypothesis that there could be a link between GABAAR gene diversity and the targeting properties of the receptor complex. Previous studies using Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) have shown a restricted mobility in GABAARs containing the alpha1 subunit. The M3/M4 cytoplasmic loop is the region of the alpha1 subunit with the lowest sequence homology to other subunits. Therefore, we asked whether the M3/M4 loop is involved in cytoskeletal anchoring and GABAAR clustering. A series of alpha1 chimeric subunits was constructed: alpha1CH (control subunit), alpha1CD (Cytoplasmic loop deleted), alpha1CD2, and alpha1CD3 (alpha1 with the M3/M4 loop from the alpha2 and alpha3 subunits, respectively). Our results using FRAP indicate an involvement of the M3/M4 cytoplasmic loop of the alpha1 subunit in controlling receptor lateral mobility. On the other hand, inmunocytochemical approaches showed that this domain is not involved in subunit targeting to the cell surface, subunit-subunit assembly, or receptor aggregation.

GABA(B) receptors at glutamatergic synapses in the rat striatum

Although multiple effects of GABA(B) receptor activation on synaptic transmission in the striatum have been described, the precise locations of the receptors mediating these effects have not been determined. To address this issue, we carried out pre-embedding immunogold electron microscopy in the rat using antibodies against the GABA(B) receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). In addition, to investigate the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and glutamatergic striatal afferents, we used antibodies against the vesicular glutamate transporters, vesicular glutamate transporter 1 and vesicular glutamate transporter 2, as markers for glutamatergic terminals. Immunolabeling for GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) was widely and similarly distributed in the striatum, with immunogold particles localized at both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. The most commonly labeled structures were dendritic shafts and spines, as well as terminals forming asymmetric and symmetric synapses. In postsynaptic structures, the majority of labeling associated with the plasma membrane was localized at extrasynaptic sites, although immunogold particles were also found at the postsynaptic specialization of some symmetric, putative GABAergic synapses. Labeling in axon terminals was located within, or at the edge of, the presynaptic active zone, as well as at extrasynaptic sites. Double labeling for GABA(B) receptor subunits and vesicular glutamate transporters revealed that labeling for both GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) was localized on glutamatergic axon terminals that expressed either vesicular glutamate transporter 1 or vesicular glutamate transporter 2. The patterns of innervation of striatal neurons by the vesicular glutamate transporter 1- and vesicular glutamate transporter 2-positive terminals suggest that they are selective markers of corticostriatal and thalamostriatal afferents, respectively. These results thus provide evidence that presynaptic GABA(B) heteroreceptors are in a position to modulate the two major excitatory inputs to striatal spiny projection neurons arising in the cortex and thalamus. In addition, presynaptic GABA(B) autoreceptors are present on the terminals of spiny projection neurons and/or striatal GABAergic interneurons. Furthermore, the data indicate that GABA may also affect the excitability of striatal neurons via postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors.

Assembly-dependent surface targeting of the heterodimeric GABAB Receptor is controlled by COPI but not 14-3-3

Cell surface expression of transmembrane proteins is strictly regulated. Mutually exclusive interaction with COPI or 14-3-3 proteins has been proposed as a mechanism underlying such trafficking control of various proteins. In particular, 14-3-3 dimers have been proposed to "sense" correctly assembled oligomers, allowing their surface targeting by preventing COPI-mediated intracellular retention. Here we examined whether such a mechanism is involved in the quality control of the heterodimeric G protein-coupled GABAB receptor. Its GB1 subunit, carrying the retention signal RSR, only reaches the cell surface when associated with the GB2 subunit. We show that COPI and 14-3-3 specifically bind to the GB1 RSR sequence and that COPI is involved in its intracellular retention. However, we demonstrate that the interaction with 14-3-3 is not required for proper function of the GABAB receptor quality control. Accordingly, competition between 14-3-3 and COPI cannot be considered as a general trafficking control mechanism. A possible other role for competition between COPI and 14-3-3 binding is discussed.

Determination of the minimal functional ligand-binding domain of the GABAB1b receptor

In the mammalian central nervous system, slow inhibitory neurotransmission is largely mediated by metabotropic GABA(B) receptors (where GABA stands for gamma-aminobutyric acid), which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor gene family. Functional GABA(B) receptors are assembled from two subunits GABA(B1) (GABA(B) receptor subtype 1) and GABA(B2). For the GABA(B1) subunit, which binds the neurotransmitter GABA, two variants GABA(B1a) (GABA(B) receptor subtype 1 variant a) and GABA(B1b) have been identified. They differ at the very N-terminus of their large glycosylated ECD (extracellular domain). To simplify the structural characterization, we designed truncated GABA(B1) receptors to identify the minimal functional domain which still binds a competitive radioligand and leads to a functional, GABA-responding receptor when co-expressed with GABA(B2). We show that it is necessary to include all the portion of the ECD encoded by exon 6 to exon 14. Furthermore, we studied mutant GABA(B1b) receptors, in which single or all potential N-glycosylation sites are removed. The absence of oligosaccharides does not impair receptor function, suggesting that the unglycosylated ECD of GABA(B1) can be used for further functional or structural investigations.

Heterodimerization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Specificity and Functional Significance

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are cell surface receptors that mediate physiological responses to a diverse array of stimuli. GPCRs have traditionally been thought to act as monomers, but recent evidence suggests that GPCRs may form dimers (or higher-order oligomers) as part of their normal trafficking and function. In fact, certain GPCRs seem to have a strict requirement for heterodimerization to attain proper surface expression and functional activity. Even those GPCRs that do not absolutely require heterodimerization may still specifically associate with other GPCR subtypes, sometimes resulting in dramatic effects on receptor pharmacology, signaling, and/or internalization. Understanding the specificity and functional significance of GPCR heterodimerization is of tremendous clinical importance since GPCRs are the molecular targets for numerous therapeutic drugs.

Heterodimerization of μ- and δ-Opioid Receptors Occurs at the Cell Surface Only and Requires Receptor-G Protein Interactions

Homo- and heterodimerization of the opioid receptors with functional consequences were reported previously. However, the exact nature of these putative dimers has not been identified. In current studies, the nature of the heterodimers was investigated by producing the phenotypes of the 1:1 heterodimers formed between the constitutively expressed mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and the ponasterone A-induced expression of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) in EcR293 cells. By examining the trafficking of the cell surface-located MOR and DOR, we determined that these two receptors endocytosed independently. Using cell surface expression-deficient mutants of MOR and DOR, we observed that the corresponding wild types of these receptors could not rescue the cell surface expression of the mutants, whereas the antagonist naloxone could. Furthermore, studies with constitutive or agonist-induced receptor internalization also indicated that MOR and DOR endocytosed independently and could not "drag in" the corresponding wild types or endocytosis-deficient mutants. Additionally, the heterodimer phenotypes could be eliminated by the pretreatment of the EcR293 cells with pertussis toxin and could be modulated by the deletion of the RRITR sequence in the third intracellular loop that is involved in the receptor-G protein interaction and activation. These data suggest that MOR and DOR heterodimerize only at the cell surface and that the oligomers of opioid receptors and heterotrimeric G protein are the bases for the observed MOR-DOR heterodimer phenotypes.

Activation mechanism of the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor

The GABA(B) receptor was the first heteromeric G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) identified. Indeed, both GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits appear necessary to get a functional GABA(B) receptor. Soon after the cloning of both subunits, it was demonstrated that GABA(B2) was required for GABA(B1) to reach the cell surface. However, even a mutated GABA(B1) able to reach the cell surface is not functional alone despite its ability to bind GABA(B) ligands. This clearly demonstrated that GABA(B2) is not only required for the correct trafficking of GABA(B1) but also for the correct functioning of the receptor. In the present review article, we will summarize our actual knowledge of the specific role of each subunit in ligand recognition, intramolecular transduction, G-protein activation and allosteric modulation. We will show that the GABA(B) receptor is an heterodimer (not an hetero-oligomer), that agonists bind in GABA(B1), whereas GABA(B2) controls agonist affinity and is responsible for G-protein coupling. Finally, we will show that the recently identified positive allosteric modulator CGP7930 acts as a direct activator of the heptahelical domain of GABA(B2), being therefore the first GABA(B2) ligand identified so far.

Unravelling the unusual signalling properties of the GABA(B) receptor

GABA(B) receptors are the cornerstone receptors in the modulation of inhibitory signalling in the central nervous system and continue to be targets for the amelioration of a number of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. Unravelling the molecular identity of this receptor has spurred much research over the past five or so years and generated a renewed interest and excitement in the field. Many questions are being answered and lessons learnt, not only about GABA(B) receptor function but also about general mechanisms of G-protein-coupled receptor signalling. However, as questions are being answered as many new questions are being raised and many GABA(B)-related conundrums continue to remain unanswered. In this report, we review some of the most recent work in the area of GABA(B) receptor research. In particular, we focus our attentions on the emerging mechanisms thought to be important in GABA(B) receptor signalling and the growing complex of associated proteins that we consider to be part of the GABA(B) receptor "signalosome."

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors: past, present, and future

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal transduction has been studied for more than a century. Despite the intense focus on this class of proteins, a molecular understanding of what constitutes the functional form of the receptor is still uncertain. GPCRs have traditionally been conceptualized as monomeric proteins, and this view has changed little over the years until relatively recently. Recent biochemical and biophysical studies have challenged this traditional concept, and point instead to a mechanistic view of signal transduction wherein the receptor functions as an oligomer. Cooperative interactions within such an oligomeric array may be critical for the propagation of an external signal across the cell membrane and to the G protein, and may therefore underlie the mechanistic basis of signaling.

Evidence for a single heptahelical domain being turned on upon activation of a dimeric GPCR

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to form dimers, but the relevance of this phenomenon in G-protein activation is not known. Among the large GPCR family, metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors are constitutive dimers. Here we examined whether both heptahelical domains (HDs) are turned on upon full receptor activation. To that aim, we measured G-protein coupling efficacy of dimeric mGlu receptors in which one subunit bears specific mutations. We show that a mutation in the third intracellular loop (i3 loop) known to prevent G-protein activation in a single subunit decreases coupling efficacy. However, when a single HD is blocked in its inactive state using an inverse agonist, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP), no decrease in receptor activity is observed. Interestingly, in a receptor dimer in which the subunit that binds MPEP is mutated in its i3 loop, MPEP enhances agonist-induced activity, reflecting a 'better' activation of the adjacent HD. These data are consistent with a model in which a single HD is turned on upon activation of such homodimeric receptors and raise important issues in deciphering the functional role of GPCR dimer formation for G-protein activation.

Role of extracellular cysteine residues in dimerization/oligomerization of the human prostacyclin receptor

Prostacyclin activation of prostanoid IP receptors may result in pain sensation, inflammatory responses, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and vasodilation in vascular tissue. The prostanoid IP receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor. In the present study, we investigated the determinants responsible, at least in part, for the prostacyclin receptor (IP) dimerization/oligomerization. Using co-immunoprecipitation of differentially tagged IP expressed in COS-7 cells, we demonstrate that IP can form dimers and oligomers. Treatment of IP-expressing cells with the stable agonist carbaprostacyclin failed to alter the ratios of oligomeric/dimeric/monomeric forms of the receptor, suggesting that IP dimerization/oligomerization is an agonist-independent process. The reducing agents dithiothreitol and 2-mercaptoethanol were highly efficient in converting the receptor from its oligomeric form to the monomeric state, indicating the involvement of disulfide bonds in IP oligomerization. Immunoblotting of the osteoblastic MG-63 cell line lysates with an anti-IP specific antibody revealed the presence of endogenous IP oligomers which were converted to dimers and monomers upon treatment with dithiothreitol. Individual substitutions of the four extracellular IP Cys residues (Cys(5), Cys(92), Cys(165) and Cys(170)) for Ser resulted in greatly decreased receptor protein expression in COS-7 cells. The C92-170S double mutant showed receptor protein expression level similar to the individual mutants. However, expression of the C92-165S and C165-170S mutants was drastically reduced, suggesting that there was formation of disulfide bonds between Cys(5) and Cys(165), and between Cys(92) and Cys(170). The Cys receptor mutants showed altered oligomer/dimer/monomer ratios. Dimerization/oligomerization likely occurs intracellularly since these Cys receptor mutants could still form dimers/oligomers despite their lack of expression at the cell surface.

Functional consequences of 7TM receptor dimerization

7TM receptors work as signaling platforms that activate multiple signalling systems at the intracellular face of the plasma membrane. It is an emerging concept that 7TM receptors form homo- and hetero-dimers or -oligomers in vitro and in vivo. Numerous studies suggest dimerization is important for receptor function including agonist/antagonist affinity, efficacy, trafficking, and specificity of signal transduction, yet it remains unknown whether dimerization is a prerequisite for 7TM receptor signaling. The current review provides an overview of the biochemical support for 7TM homodimerization, followed by a discussion of the characteristics of homodimerization, with focus on dimer organization, and the functional consequences of dimerization. Heterodimerization will not generally be discussed in this review although we have included a few examples to illustrate specific points, and a table that summarises the current literature on this subject.

Characterization of GABA(B) receptors involved in inhibition of motility associated with acetylcholine release in the dog small intestine: possible existence of a heterodimer of GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) subunits

Characterization of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(B) receptor involved in the motility of dog small intestine was analyzed by application of the microdialysis method to the small intestine of the whole body of the dog. The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used. Intraarterial administration of muscimol induced acceleration of motility associated with acetylcholine (ACh) release, these responses being antagonized by bicuculline. Intraarterial administration of baclofen induced inhibition of motility associated with ACh release, these responses being antagonized by CGP62349. GABA induced inhibition of motility associated with decrease in ACh release. CGP62349 alone induced acceleration of motility associated with increase in ACh release. RT-PCR revealed the presence of mRNAs for both subunits of GABA(B) receptor, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), in the dog small intestine, although GABA(B1) subunits were 6 isoforms of GABA(B1) (GABA(B1(a)) - GABA(B1(g))), except GABA(B1(d)). Thus, the GABA(B) receptor located at cholinergic neurons as a heterodimer with subunits of GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) in the dog small intestine operates predominantly relative to the GABA(A) receptor in physiological motility.

The GABAB2 subunit is critical for the trafficking and function of native GABAB receptors

Studies in heterologous systems have demonstrated that heterodimerisation of the two GABA(B) receptor subunits appears to be crucial for the trafficking and signalling of the receptor. Gene targeting of the GABA(B1) gene has demonstrated that the expression of GABA(B1) is essential for GABA(B) receptor function in the central nervous system (CNS). However, the contribution of the GABA(B2) subunit in the formation of native GABA(B) receptors is still unclear, in particular whether other proteins can substitute for this subunit. We have created a transgenic mouse in which the endogenous GABA(B2) gene has been mutated in order to express a C-terminally truncated version of the protein. As a result, the GABA(B1) subunit does not reach the cell surface and concomitantly both pre- and post-synaptic GABA(B) receptor functions are abolished. Taken together with previous gene deletion studies for the GABA(B1) subunit, this suggests that classical GABA(B) function in the brain is exclusively mediated by GABA(B1/2) heteromers.

Independent maturation of the GABA(B) receptor subunits GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) during postnatal development in rodent brain

GABA(B) receptors mediate slow inhibitory GABAergic neurotransmission. They are encoded by two distinct subunits, GABA(B1) (GBR1) and GABA(B2) (GBR2), with two major isoforms of GBR1, GBR1a and GBR1b, arising from differential promoter usage. Heterodimerization of GBR1 and GBR2 is essential for GABA(B) receptor function, as shown in recombinant expression systems and in GBR1(-/-) mice. GABA(B) receptors are highly expressed during ontogeny, prior to synaptogenesis, but their developmental function remains elusive. Here we investigated the postnatal development of GABA(B) receptors in rodent brain, focusing on potential differences in the spatial and temporal expression pattern of GBR1 and GBR2. Immunohistochemistry with subunit-specific antibodies revealed a widespread staining for GBR1a and GBR2 in neonatal rodent brain. During the first 2 weeks, these two subunits exhibited largely overlapping regional distribution, but with profound distinctions in cellular and subcellular localization. The adult-like pattern was established during the third week, with a prominent up-regulation of GBR1b, extensively codistributed with GBR2. Several unexpected features were noted at early stages, notably, a selective GBR2 staining of axonal tracts, such as the corticothalamic projection, and a prominent GBR1 expression in astrocytes. The specificity of the antibody labeling was verified in GBR1- and GBR2-knockout mice. In addition, the analysis of these mutants revealed a partial preservation of GBR2 staining in GBR1(-/-) mice and vice versa. Altogether, the results suggest a functional role for GBR1 and GBR2 proteins in immature brain in addition to their contribution to dimeric GABA(B) receptor complexes.

An electron microscope immunocytochemical study of GABA(B) R2 receptors in the monkey basal ganglia: a comparative analysis with GABA(B) R1 receptor distribution

Functional gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(B) receptors are heterodimers made up of GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 subunits. The subcellular localization of GABA(B) R2 receptors remains poorly known in the central nervous system. Therefore, we performed an ultrastructural analysis of the localization of GABA(B) R2 receptor immunoreactivity in the monkey basal ganglia. Furthermore, to characterize better the neuronal sites at which GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 may interact to form functional receptors, we compared the relative distribution of immunoreactivity of the two GABA(B) receptors in various basal ganglia nuclei. Light to moderate GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity was found in cell bodies and neuropil elements in all basal ganglia nuclei. At the electron microscope level, GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity was commonly expressed postsynaptically, although immunoreactive preterminal axonal segments were also frequently encountered, particularly in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, where they accounted for the third of the total number of GABA(B) R2-containing elements. A few labeled terminals that displayed the ultrastructural features of glutamatergic boutons were occasionally found in most basal ganglia nuclei, except for the subthalamic nucleus, which was devoid of GABA(B) R2-immunoreactive boutons. The relative distribution of GABA(B) R2 immunoreactivity in the monkey basal ganglia was largely consistent with that of GABA(B) R1, but some exceptions were found, most noticeably in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, which contained a significantly larger proportion of presynaptic elements labeled for GABA(B) R1 than GABA(B) R2. These findings suggest the possible coexistence and heterodimerization of GABA(B) R1 and GABA(B) R2 at various pre- and postsynaptic sites, but also raise the possibility that the formation of functional GABA(B) receptors in specific compartments of basal ganglia neurons relies on mechanisms other than GABA(B) R1/R2 heterodimerization.

Molecular structure and physiological functions of GABA(B) receptors

GABA(B) receptors are broadly expressed in the nervous system and have been implicated in a wide variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. The cloning of the first GABA(B) receptor cDNAs in 1997 revived interest in these receptors and their potential as therapeutic targets. With the availability of molecular tools, rapid progress was made in our understanding of the GABA(B) system. This led to the surprising discovery that GABA(B) receptors need to assemble from distinct subunits to function and provided exciting new insights into the structure of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in general. As a consequence of this discovery, it is now widely accepted that GPCRs can exist as heterodimers. The cloning of GABA(B) receptors allowed some important questions in the field to be answered. It is now clear that molecular studies do not support the existence of pharmacologically distinct GABA(B) receptors, as predicted by work on native receptors. Advances were also made in clarifying the relationship between GABA(B) receptors and the receptors for gamma-hydroxybutyrate, an emerging drug of abuse. There are now the first indications linking GABA(B) receptor polymorphisms to epilepsy. Significantly, the cloning of GABA(B) receptors enabled identification of the first allosteric GABA(B) receptor compounds, which is expected to broaden the spectrum of therapeutic applications. Here we review current concepts on the molecular composition and function of GABA(B) receptors and discuss ongoing drug-discovery efforts.

Subcellular localization of GABAB receptor subunits in rat globus pallidus

The inhibitory amino acid gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major neurotransmitter in the globus pallidus. Although electrophysiological studies have indicated that functional GABA(B) receptors exist in rat globus pallidus, the subcellular localization of GABA(B) receptor subunits and their spatial relationship to glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses are unknown. Here, we use pre-embedding immunogold labeling to study the subcellular localization of GABA(B) receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), in globus pallidus neurons and identified populations of afferent terminals. Immunolabeling for GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) was observed throughout the globus pallidus, with GABA(B1) more strongly expressed in perikarya and GABA(B2) mainly expressed in the neuropil. Electron microscopic analysis revealed that the majority of GABA(B1) labeling was localized within the cytoplasm, whereas most of GABA(B2) labeling was associated with the plasma membrane. At the subcellular level, both the GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) immunogold labeling was localized at pre- and postsynaptic sites. At asymmetric, putative excitatory, synapses, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) immunogold labeling was found at perisynaptic sites of both pre- and postsynaptic specializations. Double immunolabeling, using the vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2), revealed the glutamatergic nature of most immunogold-labeled asymmetric synapses. At symmetric, putative GABAergic, synapses, including those formed by anterogradely labeled striatopallidal terminals, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) immunogold labeling was found in the main body of both pre- and postsynaptic specializations. These results demonstrate the existence of presynaptic GABA(B) auto- and heteroreceptors and postsynaptic GABA(B) receptors, which may be involved in modulating synaptic transmission in the globus pallidus.

The heptahelical domain of GABA(B2) is activated directly by CGP7930, a positive allosteric modulator of the GABA(B) receptor

The gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B (GABA(B)) receptor is well recognized as being composed of two subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). Both subunits share structural homology with other class-III G-protein-coupled receptors. They are composed of two main domains: a heptahelical domain (HD) typical of all G-protein-coupled receptors and a large extracellular domain (ECD). Although GABA(B1) binds GABA, GABA(B2) is required for GABA(B1) to reach the cell surface. However, it is still not demonstrated whether the association of these two subunits is always required for function in the brain. Indeed, GABA(B2) plays a major role in the coupling of the heteromer to G-proteins, such that it is possible that GABA(B2) can transmit a signal in the absence of GABA(B1). Today only ligands interacting with GABA(B1) ECD have been identified. Thus, the compounds acting exclusively on the GABA(B2) subunit will be helpful in analyzing the specific role of this subunit in the brain. Here, we explored the mechanism of action of CGP7930, a compound described as a positive allosteric regulator of the GABA(B) receptor. We showed that it activates the wild type GABA(B) receptor but with a low efficacy. The GABA(B2) HD is necessary for this effect, although one cannot exclude that CGP7930 could also bind to GABA(B1). Of interest, CGP7930 could activate GABA(B2) expressed alone and is the first described agonist of GABA(B2). Finally, we show that CGP7930 retains its agonist activity on a GABA(B2) subunit deleted of its ECD. This demonstrates that the HD of GABA(B2) behaves similar to a rhodopsin-like receptor, because it can reach the cell surface alone, can couple to G-protein, and be activated by agonists. These data open new strategies for studying the mechanism of activation of GABA(B) receptor and examine any possible role of homomeric GABA(B2) receptors.

Probing receptor structure/function with chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors

Owing its name to an image borrowed from Greek mythology, a chimera is seen to represent a new entity created as a composite from existing creatures or, in this case, molecules. Making use of various combinations of three basic domains of the receptors (i.e., exofacial, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic segments) that couple agonist binding into activation of effectors through heterotrimeric G-proteins, molecular pharmacology has probed the basic organization, structure/function relationships of this superfamily of heptahelical receptors. Chimeric G-protein-coupled receptors obviate the need for a particular agonist ligand when the ligand is resistant to purification or, in the case of orphan receptors, is not known. Chimeric receptors created from distant members of the heptahelical receptors enable new strategies in understanding how these receptors transduce agonist binding into receptor activation and may be able to offer insights into the evolution of G-protein-coupled receptors from yeast to humans.

Membrane trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate diverse physiological and behavioral signaling pathways by virtue of changes in receptor activation and inactivation states. Functional changes in receptor properties include dynamic interactions with regulatory molecules and trafficking to various cellular compartments at various stages of the life cycle of a GPCR. This review focuses on trafficking of GPCRs to the cell surface, stabilization there, and agonist-regulated turnover. GPCR interactions with a variety of newly revealed partners also are reviewed with the intention of provoking further analysis of the relevance of these interactions in GPCR trafficking, signaling, or both. The disease consequences of mislocalization of GPCRs also are described.

Hetero-oligomerization between GABAA and GABAB Receptors Regulates GABAB Receptor Trafficking

The neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediates inhibitory signaling in the brain via stimulation of both GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)R), which are chloride-permeant ion channels, and GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)R), which signal through coupling to G proteins. Here we report physical interactions between these two different classes of GABA receptor. Association of the GABA(B) receptor 1 (GABA(B)R1) with the GABA(A) receptor gamma2S subunit robustly promotes cell surface expression of GABA(B)R1 in the absence of GABA(B)R2, a closely related GABA(B) receptor that is usually required for efficient trafficking of GABA(B)R1 to the cell surface. The GABA(B)R1/gamma2S complex is not detectably functional when expressed alone, as assessed in both ERK activation assays and physiological analyses in oocytes. However, the gamma2S subunit associates not only with GABA(B)R1 alone but also with the functional GABA(B)R1/GABA(B)R2 heterodimer to markedly enhance GABA(B) receptor internalization in response to agonist stimulation. These findings reveal that the GABA(B)R1/gamma2S interaction results in the regulation of multiple aspects of GABA(B) receptor trafficking, allowing for cross-talk between these two distinct classes of GABA receptor.

The GABA(B) receptor subunits R1 and R2 interact differentially with the activation transcription factor ATF4 in mouse brain during the postnatal development

Gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptors (GABA(B)R) belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors that mediate synaptic actions by modulation of different ion channels. Here, we demonstrate that the receptor subunits GABA(B)R1 and GABA(B)R2 interact directly with the soluble activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) in different regions of the neonatal mouse brain. We found that about 5-12% of expressed ATF4 protein is involved in the complex formation with GABA(B) receptors. Confocal fluorescence microscopy showed that GABA(B)R and ATF4 are co-localized in several well-defined spots in neurons and in glial cells. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis also reveals that the interaction efficiency between GABA(B) receptors and ATF4 in the mouse brain markedly changed during postnatal development, and such changes in interaction were dependent on the GABA(B) receptor subtype.

Transport protein trafficking in polarized cells

In order to carry out their physiological functions, ion transport proteins must be targeted to the appropriate domains of cell membranes. Regulation of ion transport activity frequently involves the tightly controlled delivery of intracellular populations of transport proteins to the plasma membrane or the endocytic retrieval of transport proteins from the cell surface. Transport proteins carry signals embedded within their structures that specify their subcellular distributions and endow them with the capacity to participate in regulated membrane trafficking processes. Recently, a great deal has been learned about the biochemical nature of these signals, as well as about the cellular machinery that interprets them and acts upon their messages.

Molecular determinants involved in the allosteric control of agonist affinity in the GABAB receptor by the GABAB2 subunit

The gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor is an allosteric complex made of two subunits, GABAB1 (GB1) and GABAB2 (GB2). Both subunits are composed of an extracellular Venus flytrap domain (VFT) and a heptahelical domain (HD). GB1 binds GABA, and GB2 plays a major role in G-protein activation as well as in the high agonist affinity state of GB1. How agonist affinity in GB1 is regulated in the receptor remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that GB2 VFT is a major molecular determinant involved in this control. We show that isolated versions of GB1 and GB2 VFTs in the absence of the HD and C-terminal tail can form hetero-oligomers as shown by time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (based on HTRF technology). GB2 VFT and its association with GB1 VFT controlled agonist affinity in GB1 in two ways. First, GB2 VFT exerted a direct action on GB1 VFT, as it slightly increased agonist affinity in isolated GB1 VFT. Second and most importantly, GB2 VFT prevented inhibitory interaction between the two main domains (VFT and HD) of GB1. According to this model, we propose that GB1 HD prevents the possible natural closure of GB1 VFT. In contrast, GB2 VFT facilitates this closure. Finally, such inhibitory contacts between HD and VFT in GB1 could be similar to those important to maintain the inactive state of the receptor.

G Protein–Coupled Receptor Oligomerization

The cardiovascular system is richly endowed with G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), members of the largest family of plasma membrane-localized receptors. During the last 10 years, it has become increasingly clear that many, if not all, GPCRs function in oligomeric complexes, as either homo- or hetero-oligomers. This review explores the mechanistic implications of GPCR dimerization and/or oligomerization on receptor activation and interactions with G proteins. The effects of GPCR oligomerization on receptor pharmacology, GPCR-mediated signaling, and potential contributions to GPCR crosstalk will be considered in the context of receptors important in the cardiovascular system. Our evolving understanding of the structural and functional consequences of GPCR oligomerization may provide novel and more selective sites for pharmacological tuning of cardiovascular function.

Phosphorylation and chronic agonist treatment atypically modulate GABAB receptor cell surface stability

GABA(B) receptors are heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptors that mediate slow synaptic inhibition in the central nervous system. The dynamic control of the cell surface stability of GABA(B) receptors is likely to be of fundamental importance in the modulation of receptor signaling. Presently, however, this process is poorly understood. Here we demonstrate that GABA(B) receptors are remarkably stable at the plasma membrane showing little basal endocytosis in cultured cortical and hippocampal neurons. In addition, we show that exposure to baclofen, a well characterized GABA(B) receptor agonist, fails to enhance GABA(B) receptor endocytosis. Lack of receptor internalization in neurons correlates with an absence of agonist-induced phosphorylation and lack of arrestin recruitment in heterologous systems. We also demonstrate that chronic exposure to baclofen selectively promotes endocytosis-independent GABA(B) receptor degradation. The effect of baclofen can be attenuated by activation of cAMP-dependent protein kinase or co-stimulation of beta-adrenergic receptors. Furthermore, we show that increased degradation rates are correlated with reduced receptor phosphorylation at serine 892 in GABA(B)R2. Our results support a model in which GABA(B)R2 phosphorylation specifically stabilizes surface GABA(B) receptors in neurons. We propose that signaling pathways that regulate cAMP levels in neurons may have profound effects on the tonic synaptic inhibition by modulating the availability of GABA(B) receptors.

G-protein coupled receptor oligomerization in neuroendocrine pathways

Protein-protein interactions are fundamental processes for many biological systems including those involving the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). A growing body of biochemical and functional evidence supports the existence of GPCR-GPCR homo- and hetero-oligomers. In particular, hetero-oligomers can display pharmacological and functional properties distinct from those of the homodimer or oligomer thus adding another level of complexity to how GPCRs are activated, signal and traffick in the cell. Dimerization may also play a role in influencing the activity of agonists and antagonists. We are only beginning to unravel how and why such complexes are formed, the functional implications of which will have an enormous impact on GPCR biology. Future research that studies GPCRs as dimeric or oligomeric complexes will enhance not only our understanding of GPCRs in cellular function but will also be critical for novel drug design and improved treatment of the vast array of GPCR-related conditions.

Distribution of a GABAB-like receptor protein in the rat central nervous system

Using a homology-based bioinformatics approach we have identified the human and rodent orthologues of a novel putative seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, termed GABA(BL). The amino acid sequence homology of these cDNAs compared to GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) led us to postulate that GABA(BL) may be a putative novel GABA(B) receptor subunit. We have developed a rabbit polyclonal antisera specific to the GABA(BL) protein and assessed the distribution of GABA(BL) in the rat CNS by immunohistochemistry. Protein expression was particularly dense in regions previously shown to contain known GABA(B) receptor subunits. Dense immunoreactivity was observed in the cortex, major subfields of the hippocampus and the dentate gyrus. GABA(BL) labelling was very conspicuous in the cerebellum, both in the granule cell layer and in Purkinje cells, and was also observed in the substantia gelatinosa and ventral horn motor neurons of the spinal cord. GABA(BL) immunoreactivity was also noted in a subset of parvalbumin positive hippocampal interneurons. Our data suggest a widespread distribution of GABA(BL) throughout the rat CNS.

Somatostatin receptor subtypes in human pheochromocytoma: subcellular expression pattern and functional relevance for octreotide scintigraphy

The stable somatostatin analog octreotide has been successfully used for imaging and treatment of a variety of human tumors. In pheochromocytoma, data on somatostatin receptor subtyping have thus far been sparse. Pheochromocytomas often express more than one somatostatin receptor, and it is uncertain by which receptor subtype the functional responses of octreotide are mediated. Here, we have examined somatostatin receptor protein expression in a panel of 52 pheochromocytomas from 35 randomly selected patients by immunostaining with specific polyclonal anti-sst(1-5) and monoclonal mouse anti-SS-14 antibodies. Staining pattern, distribution and subcellular localization of somatostatin receptor subtypes were investigated. Seventeen patients received (111)In-octreotide scintigraphy. Although the vast majority of tumors (90%) showed positive immunohistochemical staining for sst(3), immunoreactive sst(2A) receptors were only seen in 13 tumors (25%). All other somatostatin receptor subtypes were less frequently detected. Interestingly, among sst(3)-positive tumors strikingly different subcellular distributions of immunoreactive sst(3) receptors were observed. In most cases, immunoreactive sst(3) receptors were distributed throughout the cytosol. Scintigraphic localization of tumors larger than 1 cm in diameter was always successful in the presence of immunoreactive sst(2A) receptors. In the absence of sst(2A), true-positive octreotide scintigraphy was only seen in the presence of membrane-associated sst(3) immunoreactivity. Our findings suggest that selective expression of functional membrane-associated sst(3) receptors is sufficient for high tracer uptake during octreotide scintigraphy in a subgroup of human pheochromocytomas. These tumors may represent a potential target treatment with somatostatin receptor agonists with improved sst(3) activity.

Monomers and Oligomers of the M2 Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Purified from Sf9 Cells

G protein-coupled receptors are known to form oligomers. To probe the nature of such aggregates, as well as the role and prevalence of monomers, epitope-tagged forms of the M(2) muscarinic receptor have been isolated as oligomers and monomers from Sf9 cells. Membranes from cells coexpressing the c-Myc- and FLAG-tagged receptor were solubilized in digitonin-cholate, and the receptor was purified by successive passage through DEAE-Sepharose, the affinity resin 3-(2'-aminobenzhydryloxy)tropane (ABT)-Sepharose, and hydroxyapatite. Coimmunoprecipitation of the two epitopes indicated the presence of oligomers at each stage of the purification up to but not including the fraction eluted specifically from ABT-Sepharose. The affinity-purified receptor therefore appeared to be monomeric. The failure to detect coimmunoprecipitation was not due to an ineffective antibody, nor did the conditions of purification appear to promote disaggregation. Receptor at all stages of purification bound N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine and [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate with high affinity, but the capacity of receptors that were not retained on ABT-Sepharose was only 4% of that expected from densitometry of western blots probed with an anti-M(2) antibody. Similarly low activity was found with oligomers isolated by successive passage of coexpressed receptor on anti-c-Myc and anti-FLAG immunoaffinity columns. M(2) muscarinic receptors therefore appear to coexist as active monomers and largely or wholly inactive oligomers in solubilized extracts of Sf9 cells. A different pattern emerged when coinfected cells were treated with quinuclidinylbenzilate prior to solubilization, in that ABT-purified receptors from those cells exhibited coimmunoprecipitation. Treatment with the antagonist therefore led to oligomers in which at least some of the constituent sites were active and were retained by ABT-Sepharose.

Modification of GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) receptor subunits in the somatosensory cerebral cortex and thalamus of rats with absence seizures (GAERS)

In the present study, we have investigated GABA(B) receptor expression in somatosensory cortex (S1) and the ventrobasal (VB) and reticular (Rt) thalamic nuclei of Genetic Absence Epilepsy Rats from Strasbourg (GAERS), which represent an animal model for the human absence epilepsy. We focused our attention on the thalamocortical network because it has been demonstrated that absence seizures are generated in this specific circuit, which is under the control of several inhibitory, e.g. GABA, and excitatory systems. Autoradiography data obtained with the GABA(B) receptor antagonist [3H]CGP62349 did not show any differences in Kd or Bmax values between control rats and GAERS. In situ hybridisation (ISH) results showed a significant increase in messenger RNA for GABA(B1) in the S1 and a decrease in the VB thalamic nucleus but not in the Rt thalamic nucleus. By contrast the immunocytochemical data revealed an increased expression of both GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) receptor subunits in all the regions examined, somatosensory cerebral cortex, VB thalamus and Rt nucleus in GAERS compared to controls. The main finding was an up-regulation of GABA(B) receptor protein in the corticothalamic circuit in GAERS compared to controls.

Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the largest gene families in the animal genome. These receptors can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common heptahelical domain. The family 3 (or C) GPCRs are receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, for Ca(2+), for sweet and amino acid taste compounds, and for some pheromone molecules, as well as for odorants in fish. Although none of these family 3 receptors have been found in plants, members have been identified in ancient organisms, such as slime molds (Dictyostelium) and sponges. Like any other GPCRs, family 3 receptors possess a transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation. However, most of these identified receptors also possess a large extracellular domain that is responsible for ligand recognition, is structurally similar to bacterial periplasmic proteins involved in the transport of small molecules, and is called a Venus Flytrap module. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain in one of these receptors, the metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed a unique mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities in the development of drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raise a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of the other GPCRs.

Pharmacological characterisation of a cell line expressing GABA B1b and GABA B2 receptor subunits

The gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA(B)) receptor has been shown to be a heterodimer consisting of two receptor subunits, GABA(B1) and GABA(B2). We have stably co-expressed these two subunits in a CHO cell line, characterised its pharmacology and compared it to the native receptor in rat brain membranes. Radioligand binding using [3H]CGP54626A demonstrated a similar rank order of potency between recombinant and native receptors: CGP62349>CGP54626A>SCH 50911>3-aminopropylphosphinicacid(3-APPA)>GABA>baclofen>saclofen>phaclofen. However, differences were observed in the affinity of agonists, which were higher at the native receptor, suggesting that in the recombinant system a large number of the receptors were in the low agonist affinity state. In contrast, [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies did not show any differences between recombinant and native receptors with the full agonists GABA and 3-APPA. Measurement of cAMP accumulation in the cells revealed a degree of endogenous coupling of the receptors to G-proteins. This is most likely to be due to the high expression levels of receptors (B(max)=22.5+/-2.5pmol/mg protein) in this experimental system. There was no evidence of GABA(B2) receptors, when expressed alone, binding [3H]CGP54626A, [3H]GABA, [3H]3-APPA nor of GABA having any effect on basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding or cAMP levels.