51
|
Speed TJ, Hanks L, Turner G, Gurule E, Kearson A, Buenaver L, Smith MT, Antoine D. A comparison of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia to standard of care in an outpatient substance use disorder clinic embedded within a therapeutic community: a RE-AIM framework evaluation. Trials 2022; 23:965. [DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06885-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Rates of substance use disorders (SUDs) continue to rise in the USA with parallel rises in admissions to outpatient SUD treatment programs. Insomnia symptoms reduce treatment adherence, trigger relapse, and generally undermine SUD recovery efforts. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line treatment recommended for chronic insomnia. No study has examined the effectiveness of CBT-I for individuals who recently entered an outpatient SUD treatment program embedded within a therapeutic community (i.e., long-term drug-free residential setting).
Methods
A randomized controlled trial conducted at a SUD program embedded in a therapeutic community aimed to compare group-based CBT-I (gCBT-I) (N = 10) with the standard of care (SOC) (N = 11) among individuals who have SUDs and comorbid insomnia. We present a RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework evaluation to provide empirical data on gCBT-I feasibility and facilitators and barriers of conducting an insomnia-focused clinical effectiveness study within a therapeutic community.
Results
Participants in both study arms reported moderately severe insomnia symptoms at admission and reductions in insomnia symptoms over time. Among participants who completed the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) beyond admission, ISI decreased to ≤ 8 (the clinical cutoff for mild insomnia) in 80% of individuals in the gCBT-I group compared with 25% of individuals in the SOC group. A RE-AIM framework evaluation showed initial success with Reach and Adoption while Implementation, and Maintenance were limited. Effectiveness was inconclusive because of challenges with recruitment, intervention integrity, and missing data that precluded meeting the planned recruitment and study aims and led to study termination. Coordination and communication with staff and leadership facilitated gCBT-I implementation, yet well-known CBT-I barriers including time- and resource-intensive sleep medicine training for interventionalists and maintenance of treatment integrity during an 8-week intervention limited gCBT-I sustainability.
Conclusions
This analysis supports the feasibility of conducting behavioral sleep medicine research in outpatient SUD treatment programs embedded within therapeutic communities. Implementation of an insomnia-focused intervention was widely accepted by patients and providers and has potential to address insomnia symptoms in early SUD recovery. Addressing patient- and organizational-level implementation barriers may enhance the sustainability and scalability of sleep interventions and provide new hope to effectively treat insomnia among people living with SUDs.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03208855. Registered July 6, 2017https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03208855?term=NCT03208855&draw=2&rank=1
Collapse
|
52
|
Christie LJ, Fearn N, McCluskey A, Lannin NA, Shiner CT, Kilkenny A, Boydell J, Meharg A, Howes E, Churilov L, Faux S, Doussoulin A, Middleton S. Remote constraint induced therapy of the upper extremity (ReCITE): A feasibility study protocol. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1010449. [DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1010449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDifficulty using the upper extremity in everyday activities is common after stroke. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has been shown to be effective in both sub-acute and chronic phases of stroke recovery and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines for stroke internationally. Despite reports of equivalence of outcome when stroke rehabilitation interventions are delivered using telehealth, there has been limited evaluation of CIMT when using this mode of delivery. ReCITE will (a) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of CIMT when delivered via telehealth to stroke survivors (TeleCIMT) and (b) explore therapists' experiences and use of an online support package inclusive of training, mentoring and resources to support TeleCIMT delivery in clinical practice.MethodsA prospective single-group, single blinded, study design with embedded process evaluation will be conducted. The study will be conducted at three outpatient services in Sydney, Australia. A multi-faceted therapist support package, informed by the Capabilities, Opportunity, Motivation- Behaviour model (COM-B), will be used to support occupational therapists to implement TeleCIMT as part of routine care to stroke survivors. Each service will recruit 10 stroke survivor participants (n = 30) with mild to moderate upper extremity impairment. Upper extremity and quality of life outcomes of stroke survivor participants will be collected at baseline, post-intervention and at a 4 week follow-up appointment. Feasibility of TeleCIMT will be evaluated by assessing the number of stroke participants who complete 80% of intensive arm practice prescribed during their 3 week program (i.e., at least 24 h of intensive arm practice). Acceptability will be investigated through qualitative interviews and surveys with stroke survivors, supporter surveys and therapist focus groups. Qualitative interviews with therapists will provide additional data to explore their experiences and use of the online support package.DiscussionThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid transition to delivering telehealth. The proposed study will investigate the feasibility and acceptability of delivering a complex intervention via telehealth to stroke survivors at home, and the support that therapists and patients require for delivery. The findings of the study will be used to inform whether a larger, randomized controlled trial is feasible.
Collapse
|
53
|
Macauda MM, Arent MA, Sakhuja M, Yelton B, Noblet S, Fedrick D, Zona D, New C, Isenhower WD, Wandersman A, Friedman DB. Elements for successful implementation of a clinic-based health literacy intervention. Front Public Health 2022; 10:977765. [PMID: 36388330 PMCID: PMC9650509 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.977765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Improving health literacy is a national public health priority. Given the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is even more critical for health and medical information to be clear and understandable for patients and their families. Clinic-based programs to improve health literacy need to be pragmatic, feasible, and helpful for the implementing clinic and patients. This paper describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a pragmatic, clinic-based health literacy intervention in a safety-net clinic that serves uninsured and indigent patients. Study methods are guided by a previous pilot study and components recommended for pragmatic interventions. An electronic readiness assessment was distributed to out-patient clinics affiliated with a statewide hospital association. The AskMe3 tool was used for the intervention as it is evidence informed and relatively easy to implement. Implementation included ongoing dialogue between the clinic and the academic research team. Within the implementing clinic, data collected from patients via verbally administered questionnaires was analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-squares. Interview data collected from the clinic director was analyzed qualitatively for themes. The implementing clinic had some of the lowest average scores of the 34 clinics who participated in the initial readiness assessment. Despite this, they were able to successfully implement the health literacy intervention during a global pandemic. Eighty-eight participants completed patient questionnaires at this clinic. Most patients (96%) agreed the AskMe3 questions helped them talk with the doctor or nurse at their current appointment. Most (99%) also perceived the AskMe3 tool to be very helpful when used in a clinical setting. The clinic director offered that the staff initially thought the intervention would be difficult to implement. However, implementation by clinic volunteers with encouragement and prioritization of health literacy by the clinic director contributed to success. When considering interventions for clinical settings, a pragmatic approach can help with selection and implementation of a program that fits with the realities on the ground. Further, frequent technical assistance can help resolve implementation barriers. Interventions utilizing tools such as AskMe3, because of their simplicity, allow creative solutions to capacity issues for clinics who see a need for health literacy improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark M. Macauda
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,Center for Applied Research and Evaluation, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,*Correspondence: Mark M. Macauda
| | - Michelle A. Arent
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Mayank Sakhuja
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Brooks Yelton
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Samuel Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States,Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| | | | - Diana Zona
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, United States
| | - Cyndi New
- South Carolina Hospital Association, Columbia, SC, United States
| | | | | | - Daniela B. Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
54
|
Electronic health record closed-loop referral ("eReferral") to a state tobacco quitline: a retrospective case study of primary care implementation challenges and adaptations. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:107. [PMID: 36209149 PMCID: PMC9548147 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00357-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health system change can increase the reach of evidence-based smoking cessation treatments. Proactive electronic health record (EHR)-enabled, closed-loop referral ("eReferral") to state tobacco quitlines increases the rates at which patients who smoke accept cessation treatment. Implementing such system change poses many challenges, however, and adaptations to system contexts are often required, but are understudied. This retrospective case study identified adaptations to eReferral EHR tools and implementation strategies in two healthcare systems. METHODS In a large clustered randomized controlled trial (C-RCT; NCT02735382) conducted in 2016-2017, 11 primary care clinics in two healthcare systems implemented quitline eReferral, starting with 1 pilot clinic per system followed by 2 phases of implementation (an experimental phase in 5-6 test clinics per system and then a system-wide dissemination phase in both systems). Adaptations were informed by stakeholder input from live trainings, follow-up calls and meetings in the first month after eReferral launch, emails, direct observation by researchers, and clinic staff survey responses. Retrospective, descriptive analysis characterized implementation strategy modifications and adaptations using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS). A pre- and post-implementation survey assessed staff ratings of eReferral acceptability and implementation barriers and facilitators. FINDINGS Major modifications to closed-loop eReferral implementation strategies included aligning the eReferral initiative with other high-priority health system objectives, modifying eReferral user interfaces and training in their use, modifying eReferral workflows and associated training, and maintaining and enhancing interoperability and clinician feedback functions. The two health systems both used Epic EHRs but used different approaches to interfacing with the quitline vendor and integrating eReferral into clinician workflows. Both health systems engaged in iterative refinement of the EHR alert prompting eReferral, the eReferral order, trainings, and workflows. Staff survey comments suggested moderate acceptability of eReferral processes and identified possible targets for future modifications in eReferral, including reducing clinician burden related to EHR documentation and addressing clinicians' negative beliefs about patient receptivity to cessation treatment. CONCLUSIONS System-wide implementation of tobacco quitline eReferral in primary care outpatient clinics is feasible but requires extensive coordination across stakeholders, tailoring to local health system EHR configurations, and sensitivity to system- and clinic-specific workflows. TRIAL REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov, NCT02735382 . Registered on 12 August 2016.
Collapse
|
55
|
Reach in a pragmatic hypertension trial: A critical RE-AIM component. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 121:106896. [PMID: 36029952 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension control is falling in the US yet efficacious interventions exist. Poor patient reach has limited the ability of pragmatic trials to demonstrate effectiveness. This paper uses quantitative and qualitative data to understand factors influencing reach in Hyperlink 3, a pragmatic hypertension trial testing an efficacious pharmacist-led Telehealth Care intervention in comparison to a physician-led Clinic-based Care intervention. Referrals to both interventions were ordered by physicians. METHODS A sequential-explanatory mixed methods approach was used to understand barriers and facilitators to reach. Reach was assessed quantitatively using EHR data, defined as the proportion of eligible patients attending intended follow-up hypertension care and qualitatively, via semi-structured interviews with patients who were and were not reached. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed via combined deductive and inductive content analysis. RESULTS Of those eligible, 27% of Clinic-based (n = 532/1945) and 21% of Telehealth patients (n = 385/1849) were reached. In both arms, the largest drop was between physician-signed orders and patients attending initial intended follow-up care. Qualitative analyses uncovered patient barriers related to motivation, capability, and opportunity to attend follow-up care. CONCLUSIONS Although the proportion of eligible patients with signed orders was high in both arms, the proportion ultimately reached was lower. Patients described barriers related to the influence of one's own personal beliefs or priorities, decision making processes, logistics, and patient perceptions on physician involvement on reach. Addressing these barriers in the design of pragmatic interventions is critical for future effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02996565.
Collapse
|
56
|
Rabin BA, Cakici J, Golden CA, Estabrooks PA, Glasgow RE, Gaglio B. A citation analysis and scoping systematic review of the operationalization of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). Implement Sci 2022; 17:62. [PMID: 36153628 PMCID: PMC9509575 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01234-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) was developed in 2008 as a contextually expanded version of the broadly used Reach, Adoption, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. PRISM provides researchers a pragmatic and intuitive model to improve translation of research interventions into clinical and community practice. Since 2008, the use of PRISM increased across diverse topics, populations, and settings. This citation analysis and scoping systematic review aimed to assess the use of the PRISM framework and to make recommendations for future research. Methods A literature search was conducted using three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) for the period of 2008 and September 2020. After exclusion, reverse citation searches and invitations to experts in the field were used to identify and obtain recommendations for additional articles not identified in the original search. Studies that integrated PRISM into their study design were selected for full abstraction. Unique research studies were abstracted for information on study characteristics (e.g., setting/population, design), PRISM contextual domains, and RE-AIM outcomes. Results A total of 180 articles were identified to include PRISM to some degree. Thirty-two articles representing 23 unique studies integrated PRISM within their study design. Study characteristics varied widely and included studies conducted in diverse contexts, but predominately in high-income countries and in clinical out-patient settings. With regards to use, 19 used PRISM for evaluation, 10 for planning/development, 10 for implementation, four for sustainment, and one for dissemination. There was substantial variation across studies in how and to what degree PRISM contextual domains and RE-AIM outcomes were operationalized and connected. Only two studies directly connected individual PRISM context domains with RE-AIM outcomes, and another four included RE-AIM outcomes without direct connection to PRISM domains. Conclusions This is the first systematic review of the use of PRISM in various contexts. While there were low levels of ‘integrated’ use of PRISM and few reports on linkage to RE-AIM outcomes, most studies included important context domains of implementation and sustainability infrastructure and external environment. Recommendations are provided for more consistent and comprehensive use of and reporting on PRISM to inform both research and practice on contextual factors in implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01234-3.
Collapse
|
57
|
Freyer-Adam J, Krolo F, Tiede A, Goeze C, Sadewasser K, Spielmann M, Krause K, John U. Proactive automatised lifestyle intervention (PAL) in general hospital patients: study protocol of a single-group trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065136. [PMID: 36123081 PMCID: PMC9486346 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The co-occurrence of health risk behaviours (HRBs, ie, tobacco smoking, at-risk alcohol use, insufficient physical activity and unhealthy diet) increases the risks of cancer, other chronic diseases and mortality more than additively; and applies to more than half of adult general populations. However, preventive measures that target all four HRBs and that reach the majority of the target populations, particularly those persons most in need and hard to reach are scarce. Electronic interventions may help to efficiently address multiple HRBs in healthcare patients. The aim is to investigate the acceptance of a proactive and brief electronic multiple behaviour change intervention among general hospital patients with regard to reach, retention, equity in reach and retention, satisfaction and changes in behaviour change motivation, HRBs and health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A pre-post intervention study with four time points is conducted at a general hospital in Germany. All patients, aged 18-64 years, admitted to participating wards of five medical departments (internal medicine A and B, general surgery, trauma surgery, ear, nose and throat medicine) are systematically approached and invited to participate. Based on behaviour change theory and individual HRB profile, 175 participants receive individualised and motivation-enhancing computer-generated feedback at months 0, 1 and 3. Intervention reach and retention are determined by the proportion of participants among eligible patients and of participants who continue participation, respectively. Equity in reach and retention are measured with regard to school education and other sociodemographics. To investigate satisfaction with the intervention and subsequent changes, a 6-month follow-up is conducted. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regressions and latent growth modelling are applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The local ethics commission and data safety appointee approved the study procedures. Results will be disseminated via publication in international scientific journals and presentations on scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05365269.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennis Freyer-Adam
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung eV, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Filipa Krolo
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung eV, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Anika Tiede
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung eV, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Christian Goeze
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Kornelia Sadewasser
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung eV, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marie Spielmann
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Kristian Krause
- Institute for Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ulrich John
- Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung eV, Greifswald, Germany
- Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
58
|
Konrad LM, Ribeiro CG, Maciel EC, Tomicki C, Brito FA, Almeida FA, Benedetti TRB. Evaluating the implementation of the active life improving health behavior change program "BCP-VAMOS" in primary health care: Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks. Front Public Health 2022; 10:726021. [PMID: 36172209 PMCID: PMC9511219 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.726021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The effective translation of evidence-based interventions has contributed to implementing actions that impact public policies and the population's health. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the factors associated with the successful implementation of these interventions. The Active Life Improving Health Behavior Change Program (BCP-VAMOS) uses behavioral strategies to promote an active and healthy lifestyle in the community. Characterized as a health innovation, it also provides health professionals with online training to implement the program in Primary Health Care (PHC). Our study describes a pragmatic trial that aims to evaluate the implementation of BCP-VAMOS, version 3.0, in PHC in southern Brazil. Methods and analysis A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (PRCT) of two arms comparing a group of PHC professionals who will participate in a traditional didactic approach (control group) vs. a group that will receive ongoing support (intervention group) for the implementation of BCP-VAMOS. The intervention will be available to adults (≥18 years old) registered at PHC. Program recipient's will be assessed at baseline and post-intervention (9 months after) to measure markers of physical activity and eating behavior (primary outcomes). Program's implementation process will be monitored for 12 months and will be evaluated using the RE-AIM and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks. Discussions The survey findings can be used widely throughout Brazil, guiding the work of health professionals, service planners and policy-makers. Also, the results may help to inform the national health promotion policy to plan interventions and improve the implementation of programs in PHC. This research results will provide practical guidance for researchers to develop similar protocols to implement and adapt public health interventions. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval has been granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil, under no. 1394492. Results will be published in full as open access in the UFSC library and main trial results and associated papers in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number RBR-2vw77q-Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - ReBEC (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisandra Maria Konrad
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Cezar Grontowski Ribeiro
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
- Department of Physical Education, Federal Institute of Parana, Palmas, Parana, Brazil
| | - Elaine Cristina Maciel
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Camila Tomicki
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Fabiana Almeida Brito
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Fabio Araujo Almeida
- Department of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Tânia Rosane Bertoldo Benedetti
- Research Center on Physical Activity and Health, Sports Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
59
|
Szefler SJ, Cicutto L, Brewer SE, Gleason M, McFarlane A, DeCamp LR, Brinton JT, Huebschmann AG. Applying dissemination and implementation research methods to translate a school-based asthma program. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:535-548. [PMID: 35569568 PMCID: PMC9590448 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Our school-based asthma program has reduced asthma exacerbations for youth with health disparities in the Denver metropolitan area, due partly to addressing social determinants of health, such as access to health care and medications. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) science approaches accelerate the translation of evidence-based programs into routine practice. D&I methods are being applied more commonly to improve health equity. The purpose of this publication was to give an overview of D&I research methods, using our school-based asthma program as an example. To successfully scale out our program across the state of Colorado, we are applying a D&I framework that guides the adaptation of our existing implementation approach to better meet our stakeholders' local context-the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. In a pragmatic trial design, we will evaluate the outcomes of implementing the program across 5 Colorado regions, with attention to health equity, using a second commonly used D&I framework-Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Our central hypothesis is that our program will have broad and equitable reach to eligible students (primary outcome) and will reduce asthma attacks and symptoms. This D&I approach accelerates dissemination of our program and is an applicable process for translating other effective allergy/asthma programs to address asthma and allergy-related disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanley J Szefler
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Children's Hospital Colorado Breathing Institute, Aurora, Colo; Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo.
| | - Lisa Cicutto
- National Jewish Health, Aurora, Colo; Clinical Science and College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo
| | - Sarah E Brewer
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo
| | - Melanie Gleason
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Children's Hospital Colorado Breathing Institute, Aurora, Colo
| | | | - Lisa Ross DeCamp
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Latino Research and Policy Center, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colo
| | - John T Brinton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Children's Hospital Colorado Breathing Institute, Aurora, Colo
| | - Amy G Huebschmann
- Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo; Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colo; Ludeman Family Center for Women's Health Research, Aurora, Colo
| |
Collapse
|
60
|
Hicklin K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S, Mayorga ME, Wheeler SB, Davis MM, Richardson LC, Tangka FKL, Lich KH. Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: What would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina? Prev Med 2022; 162:107126. [PMID: 35787844 PMCID: PMC11056941 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Healthy People 2020 and the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable established colorectal cancer (CRC) screening targets of 70.5% and 80%, respectively. While evidence-based interventions (EBIs) have increased CRC screening, the ability to achieve these targets at the population level remains uncertain. We simulated the impact of multicomponent interventions in North Carolina over 5 years to assess the potential for meeting national screening targets. Each intervention scenario is described as a core EBI with additional components indicated by the "+" symbol: patient navigation for screening colonoscopy (PN-for-Col+), mailed fecal immunochemical testing (MailedFIT+), MailedFIT+ targeted to Medicaid enrollees (MailedFIT + forMd), and provider assessment and feedback (PAF+). Each intervention was simulated with and without Medicaid expansion and at different levels of exposure (i.e., reach) for targeted populations. Outcomes included the percent up-to-date overall and by sociodemographic subgroups and number of CRC cases and deaths averted. Each multicomponent intervention was associated with increased CRC screening and averted both CRC cases and deaths; three had the potential to reach screening targets. PN-for-Col + achieved the 70.5% target with 97% reach after 1 year, and the 80% target with 78% reach after 5 years. MailedFIT+ achieved the 70.5% target with 74% reach after 1 year and 5 years. In the Medicaid population, assuming Medicaid expansion, MailedFIT + forMd reached the 70.5% target after 5 years with 97% reach. This study clarifies the potential for states to reach national CRC screening targets using multicomponent EBIs, but decision-makers also should consider tradeoffs in cost, reach, and ability to reduce disparities when selecting interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hicklin
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Meghan C O'Leary
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Maria E Mayorga
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Melinda M Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
61
|
Hartvigsen J, Kamper SJ, French SD. Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward? Pain Pract 2022; 22 Suppl 2:65-70. [PMID: 36109843 PMCID: PMC9545107 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-value care that wastes resources and harms patients is prevalent in health systems everywhere. METHODS As part of an invited keynote presentation at the Pain in Motion IV conference held in Maastricht, Holland, in May 2022, we reviewed evidence for low-value care in musculoskeletal conditions and discussed possible solutions. RESULTS Drivers of low-value care are diverse and affect patients, clinicians, and health systems everywhere. We show that low-value care for back pian, neck pain, and osteoarthritis is prevalent in all professional groups involved in caring for people who seek care for these conditions. Implementation efforts that aim to reverse low-value care seem to work better if designed using established conceptual and theoretical frameworks. CONCLUSION Low-value care is prevalent in the care of people with musculoskeletal conditions. Reducing low-value care requires behaviour change among patients and clinicians as well as in health systems. There is evidence that behaviour change can be facilitated through good conceptual and theoretical frameworks but not convincing evidence that it changes patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hartvigsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.,Chiropractic Knowledge Hub, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Steven J Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simon D French
- Department of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
62
|
Kuo GM, Trinkley KE, Rabin B. Research and Scholarly Methods: Implementation Science Studies. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2022; 5:995-1004. [PMID: 36212610 PMCID: PMC9534307 DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Traditional research focuses on efficacy or effectiveness of interventions but lacks evaluation of strategies needed for equitable uptake, scalable implementation, and sustainable evidence-based practice transformation. The purpose of this introductory review is to describe key implementation science (IS) concepts as they apply to medication management and pharmacy practice, and to provide guidance on literature review with an IS lens. There are five key ingredients of IS, including: (1) evidence-based intervention; (2) implementation strategies; (3) IS theory, model, or framework; (4) IS outcomes and measures; and (5) stakeholder engagement, which is key to a successful implementation. These key ingredients apply across the three stages of IS research: (1) pre-implementation; (2) implementation; and (3) sustainment. A case example using a combination of IS models, PRISM (Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability model) and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance), is included to describe how an IS study is designed and conducted. This case is a cluster randomized trial comparing two clinical decision support tools to improve guideline-concordant prescribing for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The review also includes information on the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), which is used for literature review and reporting of IS studies,as well as IS-related learning resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace M Kuo
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and Professor Emerita at University of California San Diego; Address: 1300 S. Coulter Street, Suite 104, Amarillo, TX 79106
| | - Katy E Trinkley
- University of Colorado Skaggs Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the Anschutz Medical Campus; Aurora, Colorado
| | - Borsika Rabin
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science and Co-Director of the UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center at University of California San Diego; La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
63
|
Harpin SB, Artmann ALA, Neal M, Robertson G, Barton AJ. Program implementation and outcomes from three cohorts of the nurse-family partnership nurse residency program. Public Health Nurs 2022; 39:1000-1008. [PMID: 35512237 DOI: 10.1111/phn.13089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this paper is to describe a Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) Nurse Residency Program (NRP) and program outcomes. METHODS Dual methods were used to evaluate the first three cohorts of the NFP NRP. Participants were new NFP nurses, most working in Colorado. Pre-(n = 42) and post-program (n = 26) surveys were completed using the Individual Workplace Perception Scale (IWPS) and endorsement of program objectives; key informant interviews were done with the initial cohort. Descriptive statistics and unpaired t-tests (for the IWPS) were used to explain program effectiveness and efficacy. RESULTS Forty-two NFP nurses participated in the program at the onset. There was consistent attendance (92% or more) among those who finished and modest individual attrition during the length of the program. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the content and meeting program objectives; there were no significant differences on pre- and post-program IWPS scores. CONCLUSIONS The program was well-received by program participants and has the potential to contribute to the professional development of new NFP nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B Harpin
- University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | | | | - Amy J Barton
- University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
64
|
Stevens M, Raat H, Ferrando M, Vallina B, Lucas R, Middlemiss L, Rédon J, Rocher E, van Grieken A. A comprehensive urban programme to reduce energy poverty and its effects on health and wellbeing of citizens in six European countries: study protocol of a controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1578. [PMID: 35986259 PMCID: PMC9389758 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13968-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nearly 11% of the European population is affected by energy poverty. Energy poverty is defined by the European Commission (2016) as the inability to afford basic energy services to guarantee a decent standard of living. Energy poverty is considered a complex, multidimensional problem that affects environment, housing, urban development, and health. Living in energy poverty conditions is associated with poorer human health and wellbeing. Hence, the WELLBASED intervention programme aims to design, implement and evaluate a comprehensive urban programme, based on the social-ecological model, to reduce energy poverty and its effects on the citizens’ health and wellbeing in six European urban study sites: Valencia, Spain; Heerlen, The Netherlands; Leeds, United Kingdom; Edirne, Turkey; Obuda, Hungary, and; Jelgava, Latvia. Methods A controlled trial is performed. A total of 875 participants are recruited (125–177 per study site) to receive the WELLBASED intervention programme for 12 months (intervention condition) and 875 participants act as controls (control condition). Data will be collected with a baseline measurement at inclusion (T0), and follow-up measurements after 6 months (T1), 12 months (T2), and 18 months (T3). In both study arms, effects of the WELLBASED intervention programme are measured: health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), mental health, frailty in older adults, self-perceived health, chronic conditions, and care utilization. At the same time points, household expenditure on energy and energy consumption are obtained. In the intervention arm, health-monitoring data (i.e. peak flow, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and heart rate) are obtained monthly and sleep quality with a three-month interval. Household data with regard to temperature, humidity and air quality are collected near real-time by home sensors. Qualitative interviews are conducted in each study site to evaluate the impacts of the WELLBASED intervention programme and to help explain findings. Discussion The WELLBASED intervention programme will provide new insights into the effectiveness of a comprehensive urban programme to tackle energy poverty and its effects on health and wellbeing across Europe. Hence, this study can contribute to European-wide replicable solutions for policy-makers and city practitioners to alleviate energy poverty. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number is ISRCTN14905838. Date of registration is 15/02/2022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13968-2.
Collapse
|
65
|
Mayberger J, Cera J, Rowland S, Struwe L, Barnason S. Implementation of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index to Improve Obstetric Triage. Nurs Womens Health 2022; 26:269-277. [PMID: 35809617 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2022.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare implementation and effectiveness of the Maternal Fetal Triage Index (MFTI) in an urban academic hospital and a suburban private hospital. DESIGN A pre-/postintervention, hybrid Type 3 effectiveness-implementation study design was used. Data collected 2 months preceding the intervention served as preintervention data. The MFTI was implemented for 2 months at each hospital, generating postintervention data for comparison. The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to guide the implementation and evaluation. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM The volume of and various reasons women present for emergency evaluation on maternity units requires systematic triage. Women are typically seen based on when they arrive with limited exceptions, rather than triaged according to acuity, hindering the responsiveness needed to address potentially life-threatening conditions. The term women refers strictly to the biological and anatomic female sex characteristics that are required for intrauterine pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS Medical records of pregnant women presenting for emergency evaluation and physician and nurse documentation were used for data collection. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS The intervention was triage with the MFTI, acuity level assignment, and screenings within predetermined time frames. Fidelity to protocols and the timeliness of nurse contact and screenings were measured. RESULTS Implementation across all shifts was associated with greater adherence. The MFTI was associated with a significant reduction in the time from arrival to registered nurse contact for all acuity levels and time to screening foracuity levels overall, as well as for "prompt" and "urgent" acuities independently. CONCLUSION This project provides a benchmark for quality obstetric triage and a roadmap for further exploration of the MFTI's clinical impact. Through systematic triage, the MFTI establishes effective prioritization and safety, supports favorable health outcomes, and is becoming the standard of practice for obstetric triage.
Collapse
|
66
|
Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Population-Wide Genomic Screening Program: Building the Base to Reach a Diverse Cohort of 100,000 Participants. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081228. [PMID: 36013178 PMCID: PMC9410232 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Genomic information is increasingly relevant for disease prevention and risk management at the individual and population levels. Screening healthy adults for Tier 1 conditions of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia using a population-based approach can help identify the 1−2% of the US population at increased risk of developing diseases associated with these conditions and tailor prevention strategies. Our objective is to report findings from an implementation science study that evaluates multi-level facilitators and barriers to implementation of the In Our DNA SC population-wide genomic screening initiative. Methods: We established an IMPACTeam (IMPlementAtion sCience for In Our DNA SC Team) to evaluate the pilot phase using principles of implementation science. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods approach to assess the Reach, Implementation, and Effectiveness outcomes from the RE-AIM implementation science framework during the pilot phase of In Our DNA SC. Quantitative assessment included the examination of frequencies and response rates across demographic categories using chi-square tests. Qualitative data were audio-recorded and transcribed, with codes developed by the study team based on the semi-structured interview guide. Results: The pilot phase (8 November 2021, to 7 March 2022) included recruitment from ten clinics throughout South Carolina. Reach indicators included enrollment rate and representativeness. A total of 23,269 potential participants were contacted via Epic’s MyChart patient portal with 1976 (8.49%) enrolled. Black individuals were the least likely to view the program invitation (28.9%) and take study-related action. As a result, there were significantly higher enrollment rates among White (10.5%) participants than Asian (8.71%) and Black (3.46%) individuals (p < 0.0001). Common concerns limiting reach and participation included privacy and security of results and the impact participation would have on health or life insurance. Facilitators included family or personal history of a Tier 1 condition, prior involvement in genetic testing, self-interest, and altruism. Assessment of implementation (i.e., adherence to protocols/fidelity to protocols) included sample collection rate (n = 1104, 55.9%) and proportion of samples needing recollection (n = 19, 1.7%). There were no significant differences in sample collection based on demographic characteristics. Implementation facilitators included efficient collection processes and enthusiastic clinical staff. Finally, we assessed the effectiveness of the program, finding low dropout rates (n = 7, 0.35%), the identification of eight individuals with Tier 1 conditions (0.72% positive), and high rates of follow-up genetic counseling (87.5% completion). Conclusion: Overall, Asian and Black individuals were less engaged, with few taking any study-related actions. Strategies to identify barriers and promoters for the engagement of diverse populations are needed to support participation. Once enrolled, individuals had high rates of completing the study and follow-up engagement with genetic counselors. Findings from the pilot phase of In Our DNA SC offer opportunities for improvement as we expand the program and can provide guidance to organizations seeking to begin efforts to integrate population-wide genomic screening.
Collapse
|
67
|
Merewood A, Burnham L, Berger J, Gambari A, Safon C, Beliveau P, Logan‐Hurt T, Nickel N. Assessing the impact of a statewide effort to improve breastfeeding rates: A RE‐AIM evaluation of CHAMPS in Mississippi. MATERNAL & CHILD NUTRITION 2022; 18:e13370. [PMID: 35509108 PMCID: PMC9218301 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Communities and Hospitals Advancing Maternity Practices (CHAMPS) is a public health initiative, operating in Mississippi since 2014, to improve maternal and child health practices and reduce racial disparities in breastfeeding. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, this study assessed CHAMPS, which used a Quality Improvement intervention at hospitals, and engaged intensively with local community partners. The study team assessed outcomes through quantitative data (2014–2020) from national sources, Mississippi hospitals, community partners and CHAMPS programme records, and qualitative data from focus groups. With 95% of eligible Mississippi hospitals enrolled into CHAMPS, the programme reached 98% of eligible birthing women in Mississippi, and 65% of breastfeeding peer counsellors in Mississippi's Special Supplemental Nutrition Programme for Women, Infants and Children. Average hospital breastfeeding initiation rates rose from 56% to 66% (p < 0.05), the proportion of hospitals designated Baby‐Friendly or attaining the final stages thereof rose from 15% to 90%, and 80% of Mississippi Special Supplemental Programme for Women, Infants, and Children districts engaged with CHAMPS. CHAMPS also maintains a funded presence in Mississippi, and all designated hospitals have maintained Baby‐Friendly status. These findings show that a breastfeeding‐focused public health initiative using broad‐based strategic programming involving multiple stakeholders and a range of evaluation criteria can be successful. More breastfeeding promotion and support programmes should assess their wider impact using evidence‐based implementation frameworks. The breastfeeding promotion programme successfully engaged with 95% of birthing hospitals in Mississippi to increase breastfeeding initiation and exclusivity, skin‐to‐skin and rooming rates and to decrease racial disparities in breastfeeding. Broad‐scale breastfeeding promotion and engagement initiatives can be successfully implemented and assessed using evidence‐based implementation science frameworks. Widespread change in health care practices is possible when implemented in partnership with diverse institutions and community groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Merewood
- Division of General Pediatrics Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Laura Burnham
- Division of General Pediatrics Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Jacqueline Berger
- Division of General Pediatrics Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Aishat Gambari
- Division of General Pediatrics Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Cara Safon
- Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
| | - Paige Beliveau
- Boston University School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
| | | | - Nathan Nickel
- Max Rady College of Medicine University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
| |
Collapse
|
68
|
Wilkinson A, Higgs C, Stokes T, Dummer J, Hale L. How to Best Develop and Deliver Generic Long-Term Condition Rehabilitation Programmes in Rural Settings: An Integrative Review. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:904007. [PMID: 36188934 PMCID: PMC9397970 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.904007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
People living rurally frequently experience health disparities especially if living with a long-term condition (LTC) or multi-morbidity. Self-management support is a key component of LTC management and commonly included in rehabilitation programmes to enhance ability to self-manage health and encourage physical activity. Such programmes are however often condition focussed and despite evidence for their effectiveness, are not always feasible to deliver in rural settings. Generic programmes are arguably more optimal in the rural context and delivery can be face to face or remotely (via telehealth). The aim of this explorative integrative review was to collate and present international evidence for development, delivery, integration, and support of community-based, generic LTC group rehabilitation programmes delivered rurally in person, or remotely using telehealth. Electronic databases were systematically searched using MeSH terms and keywords. For inclusion, articles were screened for relevance to the aim, and practical information pertaining to the aim were extracted, charted, and organized deductively into themes of Development, Delivery, Integration, and Support. Within each theme, data were synthesized inductively into categories (Theory, Context, Interpersonal aspects, and Technology and Programme aspects). Fifty-five studies were included. Five studies contributed information about community based programmes delivered via the internet. Development was the only theme populated by information from all categories. The theme of Support was only populated with information from one category. Our review has drawn together a large body of diverse work. It has focused on finding practical information pertaining to the best ways to develop, deliver, integrate, and support a community-based generic rehabilitation programme for people living with long-term health conditions, delivered rurally and/or potentially via the internet. Practical suggestions were thematically organized into categories of theory, context, interpersonal aspects, and technology and programme aspects. While the findings of this review might appear simple and self-evident, they are perhaps difficult to enact in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Wilkinson
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Chris Higgs
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Tim Stokes
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Jack Dummer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Leigh Hale
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- *Correspondence: Leigh Hale
| |
Collapse
|
69
|
Kohrt BA, Turner EL, Gurung D, Wang X, Neupane M, Luitel NP, Kartha MR, Poudyal A, Singh R, Rai S, Baral PP, McCutchan S, Gronholm PC, Hanlon C, Lempp H, Lund C, Thornicroft G, Gautam K, Jordans MJD. Implementation strategy in collaboration with people with lived experience of mental illness to reduce stigma among primary care providers in Nepal (RESHAPE): protocol for a type 3 hybrid implementation effectiveness cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2022; 17:39. [PMID: 35710491 PMCID: PMC9205129 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01202-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are increasing efforts for the integration of mental health services into primary care settings in low- and middle-income countries. However, commonly used approaches to train primary care providers (PCPs) may not achieve the expected outcomes for improved service delivery, as evidenced by low detection rates of mental illnesses after training. One contributor to this shortcoming is the stigma among PCPs. Implementation strategies for training PCPs that reduce stigma have the potential to improve the quality of services. DESIGN In Nepal, a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized controlled trial will evaluate the implementation-as-usual training for PCPs compared to an alternative implementation strategy to train PCPs, entitled Reducing Stigma among Healthcare Providers (RESHAPE). In implementation-as-usual, PCPs are trained on the World Health Organization Mental Health Gap Action Program Intervention Guide (mhGAP-IG) with trainings conducted by mental health specialists. In RESHAPE, mhGAP-IG training includes the added component of facilitation by people with lived experience of mental illness (PWLE) and their caregivers using PhotoVoice, as well as aspirational figures. The duration of PCP training is the same in both arms. Co-primary outcomes of the study are stigma among PCPs, as measured with the Social Distance Scale at 6 months post-training, and reach, a domain from the RE-AIM implementation science framework. Reach is operationalized as the accuracy of detection of mental illness in primary care facilities and will be determined by psychiatrists at 3 months after PCPs diagnose the patients. Stigma will be evaluated as a mediator of reach. Cost-effectiveness and other RE-AIM outcomes will be assessed. Twenty-four municipalities, the unit of clustering, will be randomized to either mhGAP-IG implementation-as-usual or RESHAPE arms, with approximately 76 health facilities and 216 PCPs divided equally between arms. An estimated 1100 patients will be enrolled for the evaluation of accurate diagnosis of depression, generalized anxiety disorder, psychosis, or alcohol use disorder. Masking will include PCPs, patients, and psychiatrists. DISCUSSION This study will advance the knowledge of stigma reduction for training PCPs in partnership with PWLE. This collaborative approach to training has the potential to improve diagnostic competencies. If successful, this implementation strategy could be scaled up throughout low-resource settings to reduce the global treatment gap for mental illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04282915 . Date of registration: February 25, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon A. Kohrt
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Elizabeth L. Turner
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - Dristy Gurung
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Pokhara, Nepal
| | - Xueqi Wang
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - Mani Neupane
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Pokhara, Nepal
| | - Nagendra P. Luitel
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Muralikrishnan R. Kartha
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764King’s Health Economics, IOPPN, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Anubhuti Poudyal
- grid.21729.3f0000000419368729Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY USA ,grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20036 USA
| | - Ritika Singh
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20036 USA
| | - Sauharda Rai
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Jackson School of International Studies and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - Phanindra Prasad Baral
- grid.500537.4Non-communicable Disease and Mental Health Section, Epidemiology and Disease Control Division (EDCD), Department of Health Services (DoHS), Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sabrina McCutchan
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - Petra C. Gronholm
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK ,grid.7123.70000 0001 1250 5688Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Heidi Lempp
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Crick Lund
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK ,grid.7836.a0000 0004 1937 1151Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Kamal Gautam
- Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal (TPO Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Mark J. D. Jordans
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Global Mental Health, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
70
|
Creswell PD, McCarthy DE, Trapskin P, Sheehy A, Skora A, Adsit RT, Zehner ME, Baker TB, Fiore MC. Can inpatient pharmacists move the needle on smoking cessation? Evaluating reach and representativeness of a pharmacist-led opt-out smoking cessation intervention protocol for hospital settings. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79:969-978. [PMID: 34951621 PMCID: PMC9171569 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hospitalization affords an opportunity to reduce smoking, but fewer than half of patients who smoke receive evidence-based cessation treatment during inpatient stays. This study evaluated a pharmacist-led, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated opt-out smoking cessation intervention designed to address this need. METHODS Analyses of EHR records for adult patients who smoked in the past 30 days admitted to an academic medical center in the upper Midwest were conducted using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. The reach of a pharmacist-led, EHR-facilitated protocol for smoking cessation treatment was assessed by comparing patients' receipt of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and tobacco quitline referral before and after implementation. χ2 tests, t tests, and multiple logistic regression models were used to compare reach across patient demographic groups to assess treatment disparities and the representativeness of reach. Adoption of the program by hospital services was also assessed. RESULTS Of the 70 hospital services invited to implement the program, 88.6% adopted it and 78.6% had eligible admissions. Treatment reach increased as rates of delivering NRT rose from 43.6% of eligible patients before implementation to 50.4% after implementation (P < 0.0001) and quitline referral rates rose from 0.9% to 11.9% (P < 0.0001). Representativeness of reach by sex and ethnicity improved after implementation, although disparities by race and age persisted after adjustment for demographics, insurance, and primary diagnosis. Pharmacists addressed tobacco use for eligible patients in 62.5% of cases after protocol implementation. CONCLUSION Smoking cessation treatment reach and representativeness of reach improved after implementation of a proactive, pharmacist-led, EHR-facilitated opt-out smoking cessation treatment protocol in adult inpatient services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Creswell
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle E McCarthy
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Philip Trapskin
- UW Health, University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ann Sheehy
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Amy Skora
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert T Adsit
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mark E Zehner
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Timothy B Baker
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael C Fiore
- UW Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention (UW-CTRI), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
71
|
Howard M, Pfaff K, Sattler D, Dolovich L, Marshall D, Zwarenstein M, Upshur R. Achieving holistic, quality-of-life focused care: description of a Compassion Care Community initiative in Canada. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:6631481. [PMID: 35788299 PMCID: PMC9255928 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The compassionate community movement as both a public health approach and a social model of care for various life stages is gaining traction in Canada and elsewhere. One example is the Windsor-Essex Compassion Care Community (WECCC), an evidence-based model and set of tools to improve the quality of life, health and wellness of vulnerable and aging populations by identifying and addressing upstream and downstream social and other risks to physical and mental health. This paper presents findings from the WECCC pilot evaluation. The WECCC initiative provided one-on-one volunteer-supported quality of life assessment, resource navigation and goals support program (Catalyzing Community Connections). This was augmented with public education sessions on social connection and loneliness (Importance of Being Connected) for the broader population. The RE-AIM framework was used to frame evaluation of WECCC through the first 4 years. Questionnaires were used to evaluate participant outcomes related to implementation and effectiveness. Interviews and focus groups were completed to understand impacts. From 2017 to 2020, WECCC has engaged over 2,500 individuals, 65 organizations and 400 volunteers combined in both programs. Nearly all (82% to 95%) participants reported positive changes to health, quality of life and/or social connections. This developmental phase of a compassionate community initiative has allowed piloting of an evaluation framework focusing on reach, adoption, implementation and early signals of effectiveness and maintenance. This demonstration provides information on feasibility, acceptability and potential impacts of this type of over-arching community initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Howard
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kathryn Pfaff
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Windsor, Windsor, Canada
| | | | - Lisa Dolovich
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Denise Marshall
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Division of Palliative Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Ross Upshur
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
72
|
Jones LK, Strande NT, Calvo EM, Chen J, Rodriguez G, McCormick CZ, Hallquist MLG, Savatt JM, Rocha H, Williams MS, Sturm AC, Buchanan AH, Glasgow RE, Martin CL, Rahm AK. A RE-AIM Framework Analysis of DNA-Based Population Screening: Using Implementation Science to Translate Research Into Practice in a Healthcare System. Front Genet 2022; 13:883073. [PMID: 35692820 PMCID: PMC9174580 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: DNA-based population screening has been proposed as a public health solution to identify individuals at risk for serious health conditions who otherwise may not present for medical care. The clinical utility and public health impact of DNA-based population screening is a subject of active investigation. Geisinger, an integrated healthcare delivery system, was one of the first healthcare systems to implement DNA screening programs (MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode) and clinical DNA screening pilot) that leverage exome data to identify individuals at risk for developing conditions with potential clinical actionability. Here, we demonstrate the use of an implementation science framework, RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance), to conduct a post-hoc evaluation and report outcomes from these two programs to inform the potential impact of DNA-based population screening. Methods: Reach and Effectiveness outcomes were determined from the MyCode research program, while Adoption and Implementation outcomes were measured using the clinical DNA screening pilot. Reach was defined as the number of patients who were offered and consented to participate in MyCode. Effectiveness of DNA screening was measured by reviewing MyCode program publications and synthesizing findings from themes. Adoption was measured by the total number of DNA screening tests ordered by clinicians at the clinical pilot sites. Implementation was assessed by interviewing a subset of clinical pilot clinicians about the deployment of and recommended adaptations to the pilot that could inform future program dissemination. Results:Reach: As of August 2020, 68% (215,078/316,612) of individuals approached to participate in the MyCode program consented. Effectiveness: Published evidence reported from MyCode demonstrates that DNA screening identifies at-risk individuals more comprehensively than clinical ascertainment based on phenotypes or personal/family history. Adoption: From July 2018 to June 2021, a total of 1,026 clinical DNA screening tests were ordered by 60 clinicians across the three pilot clinic sites. Implementation: Interviews with 14 clinicians practicing at the pilot clinic sites revealed motivation to provide patients with DNA screening results and yielded future implementation strategies. Conclusion: The RE-AIM framework offers a pragmatic solution to organize, analyze, and report outcomes across differently resourced and designed precision health programs that include genomic sequencing and return of clinically actionable genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laney K. Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Natasha T. Strande
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Evan M. Calvo
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Jingheng Chen
- Department of Human Genetics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Juliann M. Savatt
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Heather Rocha
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Marc S. Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Amy C. Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Adam H. Buchanan
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Russell E. Glasgow
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Christa L. Martin
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
| | - Alanna Kulchak Rahm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Alanna Kulchak Rahm,
| |
Collapse
|
73
|
Liu M, Simione M, Perkins ME, Price SN, Luo M, Lopez W, Catalan VM, Chen SYT, Torres C, Kwete GM, Seigel M, Edlow AG, Parra MY, Hunter ML, Boudreau AA, Taveras EM. Implementation Evaluation of HUGS/Abrazos During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Program to Foster Resiliency in Pregnancy and Early Childhood. Front Public Health 2022; 10:862388. [PMID: 35669744 PMCID: PMC9163339 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.862388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Early life adversity can significantly impact child development and health outcomes throughout the life course. With the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbating preexisting and introducing new sources of toxic stress, social programs that foster resilience are more necessary now than ever. The Helping Us Grow Stronger (HUGS/Abrazos) program fills a crucial need for protective buffers during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has escalated toxic stressors affecting pregnant women and families with young children. HUGS/Abrazos combines patient navigation, behavioral health support, and innovative tools to ameliorate these heightened toxic stressors. We used a mixed-methods approach, guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, to evaluate the implementation of the HUGS/Abrazos program at Massachusetts General Hospital from 6/30/2020-8/31/2021. Results of the quality improvement evaluation revealed that the program was widely adopted across the hospital and 392 unique families were referred to the program. The referred patients were representative of the communities in Massachusetts disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, 79% of referred patients followed up with the initial referral, with sustained high participation rates throughout the program course; and they were provided with an average of four community resource referrals. Adoption and implementation of the key components in HUGS/Abrazos were found to be appropriate and acceptable. Furthermore, the implemented program remained consistent to the original design. Overall, HUGS/Abrazos was well adopted as an emergency relief program with strong post-COVID-19 applicability to ameliorate continuing toxic stressors while decreasing burden on the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meisui Liu
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meg Simione
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Meghan E. Perkins
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sarah N. Price
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mandy Luo
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - William Lopez
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Viktoria M. Catalan
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Szu-Yu Tina Chen
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Carlos Torres
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Chelsea HealthCare Center, Chelsea, MA, United States
| | - Gracia M. Kwete
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Revere HealthCare Center, Revere, MA, United States
| | - Molly Seigel
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andrea G. Edlow
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | - Alexy Arauz Boudreau
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- MGH Chelsea HealthCare Center, Chelsea, MA, United States
| | - Elsie M. Taveras
- Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Kraft Center for Community Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
74
|
Chan SL, Lee JW, Ong MEH, Siddiqui FJ, Graves N, Ho AFW, Liu N. Implementation of prediction models in the emergency department from an implementation science perspective—Determinants, outcomes and real-world impact: A scoping review protocol. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267965. [PMID: 35551537 PMCID: PMC9097992 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of prediction models developed for use in emergency departments (EDs) have been increasing in recent years to complement traditional triage systems. However, most of these models have only reached the development or validation phase, and few have been implemented in clinical practice. There is a gap in knowledge on the real-world performance of prediction models in the ED and how they can be implemented successfully into routine practice. Existing reviews of prediction models in the ED have also mainly focused on model development and validation. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the current landscape and understanding of implementation of predictions models in the ED. This scoping review follows the Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will include studies that report implementation outcomes and/or contextual determinants according to the RE-AIM/PRISM framework for prediction models used in EDs. We will include outcomes or contextual determinants studied at any point of time in the implementation process except for effectiveness, where only post-implementation results will be included. Conference abstracts, theses and dissertations, letters to editors, commentaries, non-research documents and non-English full-text articles will be excluded. Four databases (MEDLINE (through PubMed), Embase, Scopus and CINAHL) will be searched from their inception using a combination of search terms related to the population, intervention and outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for inclusion and any discrepancy resolved with a third reviewer. Results from included studies will be summarized narratively according to the RE-AIM/PRISM outcomes and domains. Where appropriate, a simple descriptive summary of quantitative outcomes may be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Ling Chan
- Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jin Wee Lee
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marcus Eng Hock Ong
- Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Prehospital Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fahad Javaid Siddiqui
- Prehospital Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Graves
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrew Fu Wah Ho
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Prehospital Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nan Liu
- Health Services Research Centre, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Prehospital Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- SingHealth AI Health Program, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Data Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
75
|
Ramtekkar U, Maras M, Ell W, Nicol G, Young-Walker L. Academic-Community Partnership to Improve Pediatric Mental Health Access: Missouri Child Psychiatry Access Project. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:588-591. [PMID: 34470505 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Because of significant shortages in the behavioral health workforce, primary care providers (PCPs) have become the de facto mental health providers to address poor access to mental health care. Child psychiatry access programs (CPAPs) could support PCPs through case consultations. This column describes the innovative Missouri Child Psychiatry Access Project, highlighting the unique enhancements to existing CPAPs and the partnership between community and academic settings to support behavioral health access in primary care. Using an implementation science approach, the authors applied the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) framework to disseminate replicable steps for other systems; they also discuss future directions for expanding utility and scope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ujjwal Ramtekkar
- Department of Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Ramtekkar); Department of Psychology (Maras) and Department of Psychiatry (Ell, Young-Walker), University of Missouri, Columbia; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (Nicol). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Melissa Maras
- Department of Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Ramtekkar); Department of Psychology (Maras) and Department of Psychiatry (Ell, Young-Walker), University of Missouri, Columbia; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (Nicol). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Wendy Ell
- Department of Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Ramtekkar); Department of Psychology (Maras) and Department of Psychiatry (Ell, Young-Walker), University of Missouri, Columbia; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (Nicol). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Ginger Nicol
- Department of Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Ramtekkar); Department of Psychology (Maras) and Department of Psychiatry (Ell, Young-Walker), University of Missouri, Columbia; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (Nicol). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| | - Laine Young-Walker
- Department of Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio (Ramtekkar); Department of Psychology (Maras) and Department of Psychiatry (Ell, Young-Walker), University of Missouri, Columbia; Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (Nicol). Benjamin G. Druss, M.D., M.P.H., and Gail Daumit, M.D., M.H.S., are editors of this column
| |
Collapse
|
76
|
Rapid implementation of telegenetic services during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed continuing patient access, but not equally for all. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 12:839-844. [PMID: 35464100 PMCID: PMC9013520 DOI: 10.1007/s12553-022-00670-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Telegenetics is the use of telemedicine to deliver clinical genetic services to patients. During the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), telegenetics was essential for the Center of Personalized Genetic Healthcare (CPGH). This study reviews and analyzes in the context of the RE-AIM framework CPGH’s rapid implementation of telegenetics and its impact. We conducted a chart review of all out-patient telegenetics encounters scheduled in CPGH during the first five weeks of the COVID-19 PHE. Data analyzed included demographics; number of encounters scheduled; subspecialties and providers; outcome of encounter (completed, cancelled, no- show); and telehealth platform used. Data were compared to data for out-patient encounters in 2019. In the first five weeks of the COVID-19 PHE, 465 virtual visits were scheduled and 428 were completed, involving all six subspecialties and 86% of CPGH providers. The no-show plus cancellation rate was significantly lower than in 2019. By week four, CPGH’s virtual visit volume was 82% of its out-patient volume during the same time period in 2019. Patients over 60 and Black patients were significantly more likely to use phone-audio only appointments. CPGH rapidly implemented telegenetic services to continue providing care to patients. We identified success factors that enabled this. However, our analysis also identified a possible “digital divide” for Black and older patients.
Collapse
|
77
|
Kwan BM, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE, Morrato EH, Luke DA. Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health. Annu Rev Public Health 2022; 43:331-353. [PMID: 34982585 PMCID: PMC9260852 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052220-112457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Designing for dissemination and sustainability (D4DS) refers to principles and methods for enhancing the fit between a health program, policy, or practice and the context in which it is intended to be adopted. In this article we first summarize the historical context of D4DS and justify the need to shift traditional health research and dissemination practices. We present a diverse literature according to a D4DS organizing schema and describe a variety of dissemination products, design processes and outcomes, and approaches to messaging, packaging, and distribution. D4DS design processes include stakeholder engagement, participatory codesign, and context and situation analysis, and leverage methods and frameworks from dissemination and implementation science, marketing and business, communications and visualarts, and systems science. Finally, we present eight recommendations to adopt a D4DS paradigm, reflecting shifts in ways of thinking, skills and approaches, and infrastructure and systems for training and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany M Kwan
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA;
| | - Ross C Brownson
- Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Russell E Glasgow
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult & Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA;
| | - Elaine H Morrato
- Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health and Institute for Translational Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Douglas A Luke
- Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
78
|
Kolb WH, Bade MJ, Bradberry C. Implementation of clinical practice guidelines for low back pain: A case control cohort study of knowledge translation in a multi-site healthcare organization. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:288-302. [PMID: 34761482 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The benefits of clinical practice guideline (CPG) adoption for the management of patients with back pain are well documented. However, the gap between knowledge creation and implementation remains wide with few studies documenting the iterative process of comprehensive implementation in clinical settings. The objective of this study was to improve adherent physical therapy care according to CPG's for low back pain and describe the knowledge to action (K2A) process used in a rural healthcare organization. METHODS A prospective case control cohort design was used to evaluate physical therapy provider practice changes during an 18 month intervention. Four clinical sites were selected, two of which received multifaceted educational and process interventions tailored to feedback from ongoing K2A cycle outcomes. Overall program assessment included monthly charge code reports for adherence and a pre-post survey of confidence for guideline use. Pragmatic Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) criteria were used to complete the process evaluation. RESULTS A significant difference (p < 0.001, mean difference 13.5, CI [8.5,18.5]) for charge code adherence favoured education site-1 over control site-2 after implementation. Adherence scores remained above target at both education sites 18 months after implementation. Survey differences were significant for confidence scores at education sites in use of the cognitive behavioural category, overall treatment category use and guideline communication. Process evaluation supported multifaceted interventions tailored to education sites with average cost measured by staff education time of 15.5 h per therapist trained. CONCLUSION This study extends the literature of guideline implementation by describing the unique cycles required for promoting provider behaviour change within a rural healthcare system. Adherence and confidence results suggest increased provider CPG use which was supported by the process evaluation. This study demonstrates the importance of multiple site comparisons, long-term reporting and standardized frameworks for assessment of real-world CPG implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Kolb
- Department of Physical Therapy, Radford University Waldron College of Health Professions, Radford University Carilion Campus, Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael J Bade
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Caleb Bradberry
- School of Computing and Information Sciences, Radford University Artis College of Science and Technology, Radford, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
79
|
Markossian TW, Samra MK, Huisingh-Scheetz M, Wadhwa A. Framework to reduce frailty in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:1396-1399. [PMID: 35348749 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Talar W Markossian
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.,Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| | - Manpreet K Samra
- Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.,Department of Medicine, Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| | | | - Anuradha Wadhwa
- Department of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.,Department of Medicine, Hines Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
80
|
Aranda-Díaz A, Imbert E, Strieff S, Graham-Squire D, Evans JL, Moore J, McFarland W, Fuchs J, Handley MA, Kushel M. Implementation of rapid and frequent SARS-CoV2 antigen testing and response in congregate homeless shelters. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264929. [PMID: 35271622 PMCID: PMC8912252 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People experiencing homelessness who live in congregate shelters are at high risk of SARS-CoV2 transmission and severe COVID-19. Current screening and response protocols using rRT-PCR in homeless shelters are expensive, require specialized staff and have delays in returning results and implementing responses. Methods We piloted a program to offer frequent, rapid antigen-based tests (BinaxNOW) to residents and staff of congregate-living shelters in San Francisco, California, from January 15th to February 19th, 2021. We used the Reach-Effectiveness-Adoption-Implementation-Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the implementation. Results Reach: We offered testing at ten of twelve eligible shelters. Shelter residents and staff had variable participation across shelters; approximately half of eligible individuals tested at least once; few tested consistently during the study. Effectiveness: 2.2% of participants tested positive. We identified three outbreaks, but none exceeded 5 cases. All BinaxNOW-positive participants were isolated or left the shelters. Adoption: We offered testing to all eligible participants within weeks of the project’s initiation. Implementation: Adaptations made to increase reach and improve consistency were promptly implemented. Maintenance: San Francisco Department of Public Health expanded and maintained testing with minimal support after the end of the pilot. Conclusion Rapid and frequent antigen testing for SARS-CoV2 in homeless shelters is a viable alternative to rRT-PCR testing that can lead to immediate isolation of infectious individuals. Using the RE-AIM framework, we evaluated and adapted interventions to enable the expansion and maintenance of protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Aranda-Díaz
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
- Division of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Elizabeth Imbert
- Division of HIV, ID and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sarah Strieff
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Dave Graham-Squire
- UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jennifer L. Evans
- UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jamie Moore
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Willi McFarland
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Fuchs
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Margaret A. Handley
- UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF PRISE Center: Partnerships for Research in Implementation Science for Equity, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Margot Kushel
- UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
81
|
Viner AC, Okolo ID, Norman JE, Stock SJ, Reynolds RM. Training in Ultrasound to Determine Gestational Age in Low- and Middle- Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3:854198. [PMID: 35368997 PMCID: PMC8971706 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.854198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionEstablishing an accurate gestational age is essential for the optimum management of pregnancy, delivery and neonatal care, with improved estimates of gestational age considered a public health priority by the World Health Organization (WHO). Although ultrasound is considered the most precise method to achieve this, it is unavailable to many women in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), where the lack of trained practitioners is considered a major barrier. This systematic review explores what initiatives have previously been undertaken to train staff to date pregnancies using ultrasound, which were successful and what barriers and facilitators influenced training.MethodsThe systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the protocol registered (PROSPERO CRD42019154619). Searches were last performed in July 2021. Studies were screened independently by two assessors, with data extracted by one and verified by the other. Both reviewers graded the methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool. Results were collated within prespecified domains, generating a narrative synthesis.Results25/1,262 studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which were programme evaluations. Eighteen were undertaken in Africa, three in South-East Asia, one in South America, and three across multiple sites, including those in Africa, Asia, and South America. Five programs specified criteria to pass, and within these 96% of trainees did so. Trainee follow up was undertaken in 18 studies. Ten met recommendations for training outlined by the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) but only 1 met the current standards set by the WHO.DiscussionThis systematic review is the first to evaluate this topic and has uncovered major inconsistencies in the delivery and reporting of basic obstetric ultrasound training in LMICs, with the majority of programs not meeting minimum recommendations. By identifying these issues, we have highlighted key areas for improvement and made recommendations for reporting according to the RE-AIM framework. With an increasing focus on the importance of improving estimates of gestational age in LMICs, we believe these findings will be of significance to those seeking to develop and expand the provision of sustainable obstetric ultrasound in LMICs.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019154619, PROSPERO CRD42019154619.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra C. Viner
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Alexandra C. Viner
| | - Isioma D. Okolo
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jane E. Norman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah J. Stock
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca M. Reynolds
- Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
82
|
Maniago JD, Ngaya-an FV. Implementation Science of Paediatric Palliative Care in Lower-Middle-Income Countries in Southeast Asia: An Integrative Review. Indian J Palliat Care 2022; 28:80-87. [PMID: 35673376 PMCID: PMC9165462 DOI: 10.25259/ijpc_410_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an ongoing development in the paediatric palliative care (PPC) program in Southeast Asia (SEA). However, the implementation process has not been clearly understood among lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) in this region. The purpose of this paper is to review and synthesise research about the implementation process of 7 identified LMICs in the SEA: Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Lao PDR, the Philippines, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. An integrative review utilising Whittemore and Knafi’s five-stage process was employed. Electronic searches of CINAHL, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Google Scholar (no year restriction) were conducted. From the 7599 articles retrieved, only 11 met the eligibility criteria. Each article was appraised for methodological quality (QualSyst tool and AACODS checklist) and constant comparison methods were used. Two overarching themes emerged in this review - the gaps in PPC standards, practice framework, and guidelines and the PPC challenges and implementation strategies. Understanding the implementation science of PPC among LMICs in the SEA region addresses the gap between idealism and realism. It provides reliable information in the development of strategic work plans that will improve the implementation process and promote the translation of EBIs into practice significant to the quality of paediatric patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
83
|
D'Angelo H, Hohl SD, Rolland B, Adsit RT, Pauk D, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Reach and effectiveness of the NCI Cancer Moonshot-funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative. Transl Behav Med 2022; 12:688-692. [PMID: 35195268 PMCID: PMC9154282 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Smoking cessation results in improved cancer treatment outcomes. However, the factors associated with successful implementation of cessation programs in cancer care settings are not well understood. This paper presents the reach the reach and effectiveness of cessation programs implemented in NCI-Designated Cancer Centers in the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I). An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted among C3I Cancer Centers from July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019 (N = 38). Reach was calculated as the proportion of patients reporting current smoking that received cessation treatment and was analyzed overall and by organizational characteristics. Smoking abstinence rates were determined by the proportion of participants self-reporting smoking abstinence in the previous 7 and 30 days at 6 months after treatment. On average, nearly 30% of patients who smoked received any cessation treatment. In-person counseling was most implemented but reached an average of only 13.2% of patients who smoked. Although less frequently implemented, average reach was highest for counseling provided via an interactive voice response system (55.8%) and telephone-based counseling (18.7%). Reach was higher at centers with more established programs, electronic health record referral systems, and higher smoking prevalence. At 6-month follow-up, about a fifth of participants on average had not smoked in the past 7 days (21.7%) or past 30 days (18.6%). Variations in reach by organizational characteristics suggest that leadership engagement and investment in technology-facilitated programs may yield higher levels of reach. Understanding which implementation and intervention strategies facilitate greater cessation treatment reach and effectiveness could lead to improved outcomes among cancer patients who smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather D'Angelo
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sarah D Hohl
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Betsy Rolland
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Robert T Adsit
- Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Danielle Pauk
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael C Fiore
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Timothy B Baker
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
84
|
Andrick B, Tusing L, Jones LK, Hu Y, Sneidman R, Gregor C, Basu S, Lynch JP, Vadakara J. The impact of a hematopoietic cellular therapy pharmacist on clinical and humanistic outcomes: A RE-AIM framework analysis. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:334.e1-334.e9. [PMID: 35189400 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The hematopoietic cellular therapy (HCT) pharmacist is an essential member of the multidisciplinary care team. Yet, standardized incorporation of a pharmacist at transplant centers remains challenging. Implementation science uses theory-driven and systematic approaches to integrate interventions into clinical practice. We describe our experience implementing an HCT pharmacist at our center and conducted a program evaluation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of HCT pharmacist medication management services on allogeneic stem cell transplant patients utilizing the RE-AIM framework. STUDY DESIGN We implemented one full-time equivalent pharmacist to provide medication management services through a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) to the allogeneic transplant population at a medium-sized center in rural Pennsylvania over a two-year period. The HCT pharmacist documented all in-person and telephonic care encounters in the electronic medical record. A pharmacist intervention tool was developed to document identified medication related problems (MRPs) with corresponding interventions and magnitude of intervention. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was utilized to evaluate the impact of the HCT pharmacist. Summary statistics including frequency and percentages were presented for categorical variables in RE-AIM domain. RESULTS Over the 2-year period, the HCT pharmacist followed 40 allogeneic patients at our institution accounting for 1531 patient encounters. The average duration of follow-up was 299 days. The HCT pharmacist medication therapy services were able to reach all allogeneic transplants at our institute. The HCT pharmacist managed 388 medications and identified 2156 medication related problems for which the pharmacist provided 2959 interventions. Time in therapeutic range of immunosuppression was 74% when managed by the HCT pharmacist through a CPA. Of the 24 patients and 9 caregivers who completed the patient satisfaction survey, 25 (76%) were strongly satisfied with their care. Pharmacy services were gradually adopted and expanded to incorporate additional populations, including 121 autologous transplant and 272 hematology patient encounters. The role of the HCT pharmacist was justified with hospital administration and sustained as a designated pharmacist role at our center. CONCLUSION The implementation of an HCT pharmacist service can positively impact patient care. The RE-AIM framework provides a methodological approach for programmatic evaluation and generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Andrick
- Enterprise Pharmacy, Geisinger, Danville, PA; Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA.
| | - Lorraine Tusing
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Laney K Jones
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA; Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Yirui Hu
- Center for Population Health Research, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | - Christina Gregor
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | - Soumit Basu
- The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
85
|
Timely Palliative Care: Personalizing the Process of Referral. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041047. [PMID: 35205793 PMCID: PMC8870673 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Timely palliative care is a systematic process to identify patients with high supportive care needs and to refer these individuals to specialist palliative care in a timely manner based on standardized referral criteria. It requires four components: (1) routine screening of supportive care needs at oncology clinics, (2) establishment of institution-specific consensual criteria for referral, (3) a system in place to trigger a referral when patients meet criteria, and (4) availability of outpatient palliative care resources to deliver personalized, timely patient-centered care aimed at improving patient and caregiver outcomes. In this review, we discuss the conceptual underpinnings, rationale, barriers and facilitators for timely palliative care referral. Timely palliative care provides a more rational use of the scarce palliative care resource and maximizes the impact on patients who are offered the intervention. Several sets of referral criteria have been proposed to date for outpatient palliative care referral. Studies examining the use of these referral criteria consistently found that timely palliative care can lead to a greater number of referrals and earlier palliative care access than routine referral. Implementation of timely palliative care at each institution requires oncology leadership support, adequate palliative care infrastructure, integration of electronic health record and customization of referral criteria.
Collapse
|
86
|
Tucker PW, Bull R, Hall A, Moran TP, Jain S, Sathian U, Simon HK, Gioia GA, Ratcliff JJ, Wright DW. Application of the RE-AIM Framework for the Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Management Intervention: A Study Protocol for Program Evaluation. Front Public Health 2022; 9:740238. [PMID: 35252108 PMCID: PMC8891162 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.740238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Children who experience a mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) may encounter cognitive and behavioral changes that often negatively impact school performance. Communication linkages between the various healthcare systems and school systems are rarely well-coordinated, placing children with an mTBI at risk for prolonged recovery, adverse impact on learning, and mTBI re-exposure. The objective of this study is to rigorously appraise the pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation and Management (TEaM) Intervention that was designed to enhance diagnosis and management of pediatric mTBI through enhanced patient discharge instructions and communication linkages between school and primary care providers. Methods This is a combined randomized and 2 × 2 quasi-experimental study design with educational and technology interventions occurring at the clinician level with patient and school outcomes as key endpoints. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework will be utilized as a mix methods approach to appraise a multi-disciplinary, multi-setting intervention with the intent of improving outcomes for children who have experienced mTBI. Discussion Utilization of the RE-AIM framework complemented with qualitative inquiry is suitable for evaluating effectiveness of the TEaM Intervention with the aim of emphasizing priorities regarding pediatric mTBI. This program evaluation has the potential to support the knowledge needed to critically appraise the impact of mTBI recovery interventions across multiple settings, enabling uptake of the best-available evidence within clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula W. Tucker
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- *Correspondence: Paula W. Tucker
| | - Rachel Bull
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Alex Hall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tim P. Moran
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Shabnam Jain
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Usha Sathian
- Urgent Care and Community Care Services, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta: Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Harold K. Simon
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Gerard A. Gioia
- Division of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Children's National Hospital, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Jonathan J. Ratcliff
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - David W. Wright
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
87
|
AKDENİZ KUDUBEŞ A, BEKTAŞ M. Developing the Nausea and Vomiting Thermometer Scale in children with cancer. Turk J Med Sci 2022; 52:166-174. [PMID: 34544217 PMCID: PMC10734878 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2005-88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop the Nausea and Vomiting Thermometer Scale (NVTS) in children with cancer. METHODS This methodological study was conducted on 250 children with cancer at the research and training university hospital in Turkey between September 2019 and January 2020. The t-test, the ROC analysis, the Diagnostic index, and the Youden index were used for determining the scale of the cutting point. The regression analysis, the intra-class correlation coefficient, and the BlandAltman analysis were used for the data analysis. RESULTS The scale-level content validity index was .94, which was coherent. As a result of the ROC analysis, the cut-off point was determined as three points. The NVTS showed good reliability, with an intra-class correlation coefficient of .99. In the linear regression analysis, a model was created for chemotherapy drugs, nausea and vomiting type, vomiting status, and the number of children with cancer who vomited explained 44.9% of their nausea and vomiting status. The results of the Bland-Altman analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between the differences and the means was insignificant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aslı AKDENİZ KUDUBEŞ
- Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali University, Bilecik,
Turkey
| | - Murat BEKTAŞ
- Department of Pediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir,
Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
88
|
D'Lima D, Soukup T, Hull L. Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: An Updated Systematic Review and Exploration of Pragmatic Application. Front Public Health 2022; 9:755738. [PMID: 35155336 PMCID: PMC8826088 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background RE-AIM is one of the most widely applied frameworks to plan and evaluate the implementation of public health and health behavior change interventions. The objective of this review is to provide an updated synthesis of use of the RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation and Maintenance) planning and evaluation framework and explore pragmatic use (i.e., partial application of the framework) and how this is reported. Methods Systematic review. MEDLINE (R) and PsycINFO were searched, via the Ovid interface, between January 2011 and December 2017. Studies that applied RE-AIM as a planning and/or evaluation framework were included. Results One hundred fifty-seven articles met inclusion criteria. One hundred forty-nine reported using RE-AIM for evaluation, three for planning and five for planning and evaluation. Reach was the most frequently reported dimension (92.9%), followed by implementation (90.3%), adoption (89.7%), effectiveness (84.5%), and maintenance (77.4%). One hundred forty-seven/one hundred fifty-seven articles originated from high-income economy countries. Within a sub-set analysis (10% of included articles), 9/15 articles evaluated all dimensions. Of the 6/15 articles that did not evaluate all dimensions, five provided no justification for pragmatic application. Conclusions RE-AIM has gained increased use in recent years and there is evidence that it is being applied pragmatically. However, the rationale for pragmatic use is often not reported. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO (CRD42017054616).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle D'Lima
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tayana Soukup
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Hull
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Louise Hull
| |
Collapse
|
89
|
Irwin KE, Ko N, Walsh EP, Decker V, Arrillaga-Romany I, Plotkin SR, Franas J, Gorton E, Moy B. OUP accepted manuscript. Oncologist 2022; 27:518-524. [PMID: 35443045 PMCID: PMC9256021 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We define cancer equity as all people having as the same opportunity for cancer prevention, treatment, and survivorship care. However, marginalized populations continue to experience avoidable and unjust disparities in cancer care, access to clinical trials, and cancer survival. Racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals with low socioeconomic status, Medicaid insurance, limited health literacy, disabilities, and mental health disorders are more likely to experience delays to cancer diagnosis and less likely to receive guideline-concordant cancer care. These disparities are impacted by the social determinants of health including structural discrimination, racism, poverty, and inequities in access to healthcare and clinical trials. There is an urgent need to develop and adapt evidence-based interventions in collaboration with community partners that have potential to address the social determinants of health and build capacity for cancer care for underserved populations. We established the Virtual Equity Hub by developing a collaborative network connecting a comprehensive cancer center, academic safety net hospital, and community health centers and affiliates. The Virtual Equity Hub utilizes a virtual tumor board, an evidence-based approach that increases access to multi-specialty cancer care and oncology subspecialty expertise. We adapted the tumor board model by engaging person-centered teams of multi-disciplinary specialists across health systems, addressing the social determinants of health, and applying community-based research principles with a focus on populations with poor cancer survival. The virtual tumor board included monthly videoconferences, case discussion, sharing of expertise, and a focus on addressing barriers to care and trial participation. Specifically, we piloted virtual tumor boards for breast oncology, neuro-oncology, and individuals with cancer and serious mental illness. The Virtual Equity Hub demonstrated promise at building capacity for clinicians to care for patients with complex needs and addressing barriers to care. Research is needed to measure the impact, reach, and sustainability of virtual equity models for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E Irwin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi Ko
- Department of Medical Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Veronica Decker
- University of Central Florida College of Nursing, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Isabel Arrillaga-Romany
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott R Plotkin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Emily Gorton
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Corresponding author: Beverly Moy, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 9A, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
90
|
Cohen AJ, Russell LE, Elwy AR, Mitchell KM, Cornell PY, Silva JW, Moy E, Kennedy MA. Adaptation of a social risk screening and referral initiative across clinical populations, settings, and contexts in the Department of Veterans Affairs Health System. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:958969. [PMID: 36925883 PMCID: PMC10012714 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.958969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Identifying and addressing social risks and social needs in healthcare settings is an important step towards achieving health equity. Assessing Circumstances and Offering Resources for Needs (ACORN) is a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) social risk screening and referral model that aims to systematically identify and address social needs. Since initial piloting in 2018, our team has collaborated with clinical and operations partners to implement ACORN across multiple VA clinical settings while adapting and tailoring the initiative to meet the needs of different populations, specialties, and individuals administering screening. Given ACORN's complexity as a growing initiative with multiple partners and frequent real-time modifications within a large national healthcare system, we recognized a need to systematically document the rationale and process of adaptations over time. We looked to three implementation frameworks-RE-AIM, the Adaptome, and FRAME-to describe the rationale for adaptations, the nature of and context within which adaptations were made, and the details of each adaptation. In this manuscript, we uniquely interweave these three frameworks to document adaptations to ACORN across diverse VA clinical settings, with a focus on how adaptations support the promotion of heath equity in the Veteran population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia J Cohen
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Family Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Office of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Lauren E Russell
- Office of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
| | - A Rani Elwy
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Kathleen M Mitchell
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States
| | - Portia Y Cornell
- Center of Innovation in Long Term Services and Supports, VA Providence Healthcare System, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Jennifer W Silva
- Department of Veterans Affairs, National Social Work Program Office, Care Management and Social Work, Patient Care Services, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Ernest Moy
- Office of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Meaghan A Kennedy
- New England Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.,Department of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
91
|
Scheuer H, Kuklinski MR, Sterling SA, Catalano RF, Beck A, Braciszewski J, Boggs J, Hawkins JD, Loree AM, Weisner C, Carey S, Elsiss F, Morse E, Negusse R, Jessen A, Kline-Simon A, Oesterle S, Quesenberry C, Sofrygin O, Yoon T. Parent-focused prevention of adolescent health risk behavior: Study protocol for a multisite cluster-randomized trial implemented in pediatric primary care. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 112:106621. [PMID: 34785305 PMCID: PMC8802622 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Evidence-based parenting interventions play a crucial role in the sustained reduction of adolescent behavioral health concerns. Guiding Good Choices (GGC) is a 5-session universal anticipatory guidance curriculum for parents of early adolescents that has been shown to reduce substance use, depression symptoms, and delinquent behavior. Although prior research has demonstrated the effectiveness of evidence-based parenting interventions at achieving sustained reductions in adolescent behavioral health concerns, public health impact has been limited by low rates of uptake in community and agency settings. Pediatric primary care is an ideal setting for implementing and scaling parent-focused prevention programs as these settings have a broad reach, and prevention programs implemented within them have the potential to achieve population-level impact. The current investigation, Guiding Good Choices for Health (GGC4H), tests the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing GGC in 3 geographically and socioeconomically diverse large integrated healthcare systems. This pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial will compare GGC parenting intervention to usual pediatric primary care practice, and will include approximately 3750 adolescents; n = 1875 GGC intervention and n = 1875 usual care. The study team hypothesizes that adolescents whose parents are randomized into the GGC intervention arm will show reductions in substance use initiation, the study's primary outcomes, and other secondary (e.g., depression symptoms, substance use prevalence) and exploratory outcomes (e.g., health services utilization, anxiety symptoms). The investigative team anticipates that the implementation of GGC within pediatric primary care clinics will successfully fill an unmet need for effective preventive parenting interventions. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.govNCT04040153.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Scheuer
- Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 Third Ave. NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
| | - Margaret R Kuklinski
- Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 Third Ave. NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
| | - Stacy A Sterling
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Richard F Catalano
- Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 Third Ave. NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
| | - Arne Beck
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 2550 S. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO 80014, USA.
| | - Jordan Braciszewski
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Place, Suite 3A, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| | - Jennifer Boggs
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 2550 S. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO 80014, USA.
| | - J David Hawkins
- Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 Third Ave. NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
| | - Amy M Loree
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Place, Suite 3A, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| | - Constance Weisner
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Susan Carey
- Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, 9725 Third Ave. NE, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
| | - Farah Elsiss
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Place, Suite 3A, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| | - Erica Morse
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 2550 S. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO 80014, USA.
| | - Rahel Negusse
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Andrew Jessen
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, 2550 S. Parker Rd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO 80014, USA.
| | - Andrea Kline-Simon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Sabrina Oesterle
- Southwest Interdisciplinary Research Center, 201 N. Central Ave., 33rd Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
| | - Charles Quesenberry
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Oleg Sofrygin
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| | - Tae Yoon
- Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, 1 Ford Place, Suite 3A, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
92
|
Reininger BM, Mitchell-Bennett LA, Lee M, Yeh PG, Davé AC, Park SK, Xu T, Ochoa-Del Toro AG. Scaling a Community-Wide Campaign Intervention to Manage Hypertension and Weight Loss. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:661353. [PMID: 34881250 PMCID: PMC8645688 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.661353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Public health impacts can be achieved when evidence-based interventions are implemented to those most in need. Too often implementation never or slowly occurs. The community-wide campaign intervention Tu Salud ¡Si Cuenta! has evidence of improving health outcomes related to chronic disease among low-income, Latinos. Using the RE-AIM Framework, this study examined if the scaled-up version of the intervention is associated with improvements in hypertension and obesity in 12 locations. Each element of the RE-AIM framework was examined. For "Effectiveness," we examined outcomes overall and by implementing location. We used linear and logistic regression to assess if exposure in the intervention was associated with improvement in hypertension and weight loss. Participants were stratified into "low exposure" (2-3 outreach visits) vs. "high exposure" (4-5 outreach visits). Based on the RE-AIM Framework, the intervention "reached" its intended population of low-income Latinos, demonstrated "effectiveness" in improving hypertension and obesity, was "adopted" at a high level in all but one site, was "implemented" with fidelity to the intervention model with moderate success across locations, and showed high "maintenance" over time. For effectiveness specifically, we found that out of 5,019 participants, 2,508 (50%) had a baseline hypertensive blood pressure (BP) reading. Of the 2,508, 1,245 (49.9%) recovered to normal blood pressure or pre-hypertension stage by last follow-up. After adjusting for baseline BP and potential confounders in multivariable linear regression models, the high exposure group had significantly more reduction in systolic BP (adjusted mean difference in % change = -0.96; p = 0.002) and diastolic BP (adjusted mean difference in % change = -1.61; p < 0.0001) compared to the low exposure group. After controlling for baseline weight and other confounders, the high exposure group had significantly greater decrease in weight compared to the low exposure group (adjusted mean difference in % change = -1.28; p < 0.0001). Results from the multivariable logistic regression models indicated that compared to the low exposure group the high exposure group was more likely to achieve a clinically significant minimum 5% weight loss [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.97; p < 0.0001). This study contributes evidence that a Community-Wide Campaign model holds promise for addressing hypertension and obesity among low-income Latinos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda M. Reininger
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Hispanic Health Research Center, University of Texas School of Public Health in Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, United States
| | - Lisa A. Mitchell-Bennett
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Hispanic Health Research Center, University of Texas School of Public Health in Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, United States
| | - MinJae Lee
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Paul G. Yeh
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Hispanic Health Research Center, University of Texas School of Public Health in Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, United States
- Department of Physician Assistant Studies, College of Health Professions, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States
| | - Amanda C. Davé
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Hispanic Health Research Center, University of Texas School of Public Health in Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, United States
| | - Soo Kyung Park
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Tianlin Xu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Texas Health Science Center, University of Texas School of Public Health at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Alma G. Ochoa-Del Toro
- Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Hispanic Health Research Center, University of Texas School of Public Health in Brownsville, Brownsville, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
93
|
Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy. Protocol of a Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 13:363-373. [PMID: 34776384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
About 50% of patients with cancer are expected to need radiotherapy (RT), and the majority of these are older. To improve outcomes for older patients with cancer, geriatric assessment (GA) with management (GAM) is highly recommended. Evidence for its benefits is still scarce, in particular for patients receiving RT. We report the protocol of a cluster-randomised pilot study designed to test the effect, feasibility and health economic impact of a GAM intervention for patients ≥65 years, referred for palliative or curative RT. The randomising units are municipalities and city districts. The intervention is municipality-based and carried out in collaboration between hospital and municipal health services from the start of RT to eight weeks after the end of RT. Its main constituents are an initial GA followed by measures adapted to individual patients' impairments and needs, systematic symptom assessments and regular follow-up by municipal cancer nurses, appointed to coordinate the patient's care. Follow-up includes at least one weekly phone call, and a house call four weeks after the end of RT. All patients receive an individually adapted physical exercise program and nutritional counselling. Detailed guidelines for management of patients' impairments are provided. Patients allocated to the intervention group will be compared to controls receiving standard care. The primary outcome is physical function assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C-30. Secondary outcomes are global quality of life, objectively tested physical performance and use of health care services. Economic evaluation will be based on a comparison of costs and effects (measured by the main outcome measures). Feasibility will be assessed with mixed methodology, based on log notes and questionnaires filled in by the municipal nurses and interviews with patients and nurses. The study is carried out at two Norwegian RT centres. It was opened in May 2019. Follow-up will proceed until June 2022. Statistical analyses will start by the end of 2021. We expect the trial to provide important new knowledge about the effect, feasibility and costs of a GAM intervention for older patients receiving RT. Trial registration: ClinTrials.gov, ID NCT03881137, initial release 13th of March 2019.
Collapse
|
94
|
Baker TB, Bolt DM, Smith SS. Barriers to Building More Effective Treatments: Negative Interactions Amongst Smoking Intervention Components. Clin Psychol Sci 2021; 9:995-1020. [PMID: 35003904 PMCID: PMC8740936 DOI: 10.1177/2167702621994551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Meaningfully improved mental and behavioral health treatment is an unrealized dream. Across three factorial experiments, inferential tests in prior studies showed a pattern of negative interactions suggesting that better clinical outcomes are obtained when participants receive fewer rather than more intervention components. Further, relatively few significant main effects were found in these experiments. Modeling suggested that negative interactions amongst components may account for these patterns. This paper evaluates factors that may contribute to such declining benefit: increased attentional or effort burden; components that produce their effects via the same capacity limited mechanisms, making their effects subadditive; and a tipping point phenomenon in which those near a hypothesized "tipping point" for change will benefit markedly from weak intervention while those far from the tipping point will benefit little from even strong intervention. New research should explore factors that cause negative interactions amongst components and constrain the development of more effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy B. Baker
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, 5158 Medical Foundation Centennial Building, Madison, WI 53705
| | - Daniel M. Bolt
- University of Wisconsin, Department of Educational Psychology, 1025 W. Johnson St., Madison, WI 53706
| | - Stevens S. Smith
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, 5158 Medical Foundation Centennial Building, Madison, WI 53705
| |
Collapse
|
95
|
Guyatt S, Ferguson M, Beckmann M, Wilkinson SA. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to design and implement a perinatal education program in a large maternity hospital. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1077. [PMID: 34635125 PMCID: PMC8507156 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07024-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation science aims to embed evidence-based practice as 'usual care' using theoretical underpinnings to guide these processes. Conceptualising the complementary purpose and application of theoretical approaches through all stages of an implementation project is not well understood and is not routinely reported in implementation research, despite call for this. This paper presents the synthesis and a collective approach to application of a co-design model, a model for understanding need, theories of behaviour change with frameworks and tools to guide implementation and evaluation brought together with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHOD Using a determinant framework such as the CFIR provides a lens for understanding, influencing, and explaining the complex and multidimensional variables at play within a health service that contribute to planning for and delivering effective patient care. Complementary theories, models, frameworks, and tools support the research process by providing a theoretical and practical structure to understanding the local context and guiding successful local implementation. RESULTS This paper provides a rationale for conceptualising the multidimensional approach for implementation using the worked example of a pregnancy, birth, postnatal and early parenting education intervention for expectant and new parents at a large maternity hospital. CONCLUSION This multidimensional theoretical approach provides useful, practical guidance to health service researchers and clinicians to develop project specific rationale for their theoretical approach to implementation projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheridan Guyatt
- Physiotherapy Department, Mater Misericordiae Ltd, Level 2 Mater Hospital, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia.
- Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia.
| | - Megan Ferguson
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
- Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital Campus, Darwin, 0810, Australia
| | - Michael Beckmann
- Physiotherapy Department, Mater Misericordiae Ltd, Level 2 Mater Hospital, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4006, Australia
- Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
| | - Shelley A Wilkinson
- Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4101, Australia
- School of Human Movements and Nutrition Science, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
96
|
Price DW, Davis DA, Filerman GL. "Systems-Integrated CME": The Implementation and Outcomes Imperative for Continuing Medical Education in the Learning Health Care Enterprise. NAM Perspect 2021; 2021:202110a. [PMID: 34901778 PMCID: PMC8654469 DOI: 10.31478/202110a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David W Price
- University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine and the American Board of Family Medicine
| | - David A Davis
- AXDEV Group, University of Toronto and Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine & the Health Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
97
|
Tang PY, Duni J, Peeples MM, Kowitt SD, Bhushan NL, Sokol RL, Fisher EB. Complementarity of Digital Health and Peer Support: “This Is What’s Coming”. FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE 2021; 2:646963. [PMID: 36994335 PMCID: PMC10012094 DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.646963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PurposeThis study examined integration of peer support and a Food and Drug Administration-cleared, diabetes management app (DMA) in diabetes self-management support as a scalable model for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsTwo lay health Coaches delivered telephone-based self-management support to adults (N = 43) with T2DM recruited through a primary group practice. Those eligible were offered no-cost access to DMA for the entire 6-month study. Coaches introduced DMA and contacted individuals by phone and text with frequency dependent on participant needs/preferences. DMA supported monitoring of blood glucose, carbohydrate intake, and medication use, as well as messaging personalized to participants’ medication regimens. Clinical data were extracted from DMA, electronic medical records, and Coaches’ records. Structured interviews of 12 participants, 2 Coaches, and 5 project staff were analyzed using deductive pre-identified codes (regarding adoptability, patterns of use, value added, complementarity, and sustainability) utilizing standard procedures for qualitative analysis.ResultsOf the 43 participants, 38 (88.4%) enrolled in DMA. In general, participants used both DMA and lay health coaches, averaging 144.14 DMA entries (structured, e.g., medications, and free form, e.g., “ate at a restaurant” and “stressed”) and 5.86 coach contacts over the 6-month intervention. Correlation between DMA entries and coach contacts (r = .613, p < 0.001) was consistent with complementarity as were participants’ and coaches’ observations that (a) DMA facilitated recognition of patterns and provided reminders and suggestions to achieve self-management plans, whereas (b) coaching provided motivation and addressed challenges that emerged. Mean hemoglobin A1c (A1c) declined from 9.93% to 8.86% (p < 0.001), with no pattern of coaching or DMA use significantly related to reductions. Staff identified resources to coordinate coach/DMA interventions as a major sustainability challenge.ConclusionsDMA and peer support for diabetes management are compatible and complementary. Additional practice integration research is needed for adoption and scale-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Y. Tang
- Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Janet Duni
- Population Health Team, Vanguard Medical Group, Verona, NJ, United States
| | - Malinda M. Peeples
- Clinical Services and Research, WellDoc, Inc., Columbia, MD, United States
| | - Sarah D. Kowitt
- Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Nivedita L. Bhushan
- Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Rebeccah L. Sokol
- Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Edwin B. Fisher
- Peers for Progress, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Edwin B. Fisher,
| |
Collapse
|
98
|
Behrens L, Boltz M, Riley K, Eshraghi K, Resnick B, Galik E, Ellis J, Kolanowski A, Van Haitsma K. Process evaluation of an implementation study in dementia care (EIT-4-BPSD): stakeholder perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1006. [PMID: 34551782 PMCID: PMC8458006 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07001-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioral and psychological symptoms of distress in dementia (BPSD) are major drivers of poor quality of life, caregiver burden, institutionalization, and cost of care in nursing homes. The Evidence Integration Triangle (EIT)-4-BPSD in nursing homes was a pragmatic Hybrid III trial of an implementation strategy to help staff use evidence-based non-pharmacological interventions to prevent and manage BPSD. This study aimed to describe and explore the stakeholders' perceptions of the process to implement the EIT-4-BPSD strategy including its utility, and the barriers and facilitators to implementation in real-world settings. METHODS EIT-4-BPSD was a multi-layer implementation strategy that engaged nursing home stakeholder groups to define community specific goals towards reducing BPSD over a 12-month period. Stakeholder groups from nursing homes that completed all 12-months of the implementation strategy were invited to participate in this process evaluation study. Qualitative data from focus group transcripts were analyzed using a conventional content analysis. Emerging codes were sorted into categories, then organized in meaningful clusters based on the domains of the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. RESULTS The EIT-4-BPSD implementation strategy was completed in 21 nursing homes; 93 stakeholders participated in focus groups. Over half of participating nursing homes reported meeting their BPSD goals as expected or more. Challenges, facilitators, and contextual factors reported by stakeholder members explains variability in the implementation of EIT-4-BPSD strategy in 11 key categories: family; staff; organizational; staff, environmental, and resident outcomes; utility of EIT resources; adoption barriers and facilitators; care process adaptations; and future planning. CONCLUSION Stakeholders offered guidance on salient factors influencing the feasibility and utility of EIT-4-BPSD adoption and implementation to consider in future implementation research that aims to improve behavioral well-being in NH residents living with dementia. Engagement of family and staff at all levels of the organization (Management, leadership, and direct care); and measurement of staff, environmental, and resident outcomes were perceived as critical for future implementation success. While regulations, finances, and competing demands on staff time were perceived as reducing implementation success. TRIAL REGISTRATION The Testing the Implementation of EIT-4-BPSD study was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03014570 ) January 9, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza Behrens
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
| | - Marie Boltz
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Kiernan Riley
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Karen Eshraghi
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Barbara Resnick
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Galik
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeanette Ellis
- School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ann Kolanowski
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Kimberly Van Haitsma
- Ross and Carol Nese College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
99
|
Implementation of evidence-based, non-pharmacological interventions addressing behavior and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review focused on implementation strategies. Int Psychogeriatr 2021; 33:947-975. [PMID: 33190660 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610220001702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify the nature and effects of implementation strategies to increase the use of evidence-based, non-pharmacological interventions designed to reduce the frequency and/or severity of behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia, for people living in the community. DESIGN This was a systematic review of implementation studies. We searched six databases (in January 2019) and hand-searched reference lists of reports. Studies were included if they used quantitative methods evaluating the use of implementation strategies to increase the use of non-pharmacological interventions. These interventions had to have been tested in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and found to reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, for those living in the community. Studies needed to report the effect of the implementation on clinical practice, for example, a change in practice or the adoption of the intervention in community settings. RESULTS Twelve studies were included: 11 one-group pre-post design studies and 1 cluster RCT. All studies reported practice change - the majority implementing a new intervention, with six different types of interventions implemented. All studies reported including using partnerships, new funding, educational strategies, and ongoing support and consultation. Seven implementation studies reported positive outcomes for clients on some aspect of behavior or depression for the person with dementia. CONCLUSIONS Implementation studies using multiple implementation strategies to increase the use of non-pharmacological interventions have demonstrated improvements in behavioral and psychological symptoms common in people with dementia, when provided by clinicians as part of their everyday work routines.
Collapse
|
100
|
Robinson TN, Matheson D, Haydel KF, Flora J, Desai M. Packaging and Scaling the Stanford Pediatric Weight Control Program: A Family-Based, Group, Behavioral Weight Management Program for Children with Obesity and Their Families: Background, Rationale, and Design of the Stanford CORD 3.0 Project. Child Obes 2021; 17:S86-S92. [PMID: 34569840 PMCID: PMC8574198 DOI: 10.1089/chi.2021.0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Efficacious treatments for children with obesity have not been broadly disseminated. The Stanford Pediatric Weight Control Program (SPWCP) is grounded in behavioral theory and prior observations, follows a proven treatment model, and is consistent with the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations. It has shown high levels of participation and retention and reductions in BMI and percent of median BMI for age and sex comparable to many studied programs, as well as improvements in physiological risk factors, psychological measures, and diet, activity, and screen time behaviors in children with obesity when delivered as a real-world clinical program with sociodemographically diverse families in multiple clinic and community settings. The Stanford CORD 3.0 Project proposes to use technology, design, behavioral theory, and biomedical business innovation strategies to package and scale the SPWCP to reach low-income children throughout the United States. Efficacy and success of implementation of the new packaged program will be tested in a one-arm pilot implementation study when delivered by community partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas N. Robinson
- Stanford Solutions Science Lab and Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Address correspondence to: Thomas N. Robinson, MD, MPH, Stanford Solutions Science Lab, Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 3145 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Donna Matheson
- Stanford Solutions Science Lab and Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - K. Farish Haydel
- Stanford Solutions Science Lab and Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - June Flora
- Stanford Solutions Science Lab and Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|