International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis and eosinophilia: A rare case report

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis consists of a chronic liver disease whose etiology is unknown. It is comprised of relevant immunological aspects and of immune-mediated liver injury. Eosinophilia may be a considerable feature, particularly happening in male patients.

CASE SUMMARY

We report here a Crohn´s disease patient presenting with de novo hypergammaglobulinemia, circulating autoantibodies and elevated transaminase levels. He also had significant peripheral eosinophilia and elevated immunoglobulin E levels at diagnosis. The pathology findings from liver biopsy were compatible with autoimmune hepatitis with eosinophilic infiltration.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of autoimmune hepatitis with exuberant eosinophilic infiltration in the liver and bone marrow, described in a patient with Crohn’s disease.

[Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated inflammatory liver disease with an uncertain cause. The diagnosis of AIH is based on the characteristic clinical and laboratory findings (elevated liver enzyme and hypergammaglobulinemia), the presence of characteristic autoantibodies, and compatible histological abnormalities. AIH lacks a signature diagnostic marker, and the diagnosis requires the exclusion of other diseases (viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, drug-induced liver injury, Wilson's disease, and hereditary hemochromatosis). Therefore, collaboration between the clinical physician, laboratory medicine experts, and pathologists is important for a diagnosis. In December 2022, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) clinical practice guidelines were established. This review article summarizes the diagnosis part of these guidelines.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

The many faces and pathologic diagnostic challenges of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an immune-mediated chronic inflammatory liver disease, characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, the presence of specific autoantibodies, and typical abnormalities in liver histology. Prompt diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are necessary for both chronic and acute onset AIH to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease or fatal liver failure. However, the diagnosis of AIH is challenging mainly because of its heterogeneous clinical, serological and pathological features. Although portal lymphoplasmacytosis and interface hepatitis are the most typical histological features of AIH, many other histological features can be observed in AIH, including emperipolesis, hepatocyte rosettes, and Kupffer cell hyaline globules. Recent studies have questioned emperipolesis and hepatocyte rosette formation as typical features of AIH, and atypical clinical and histological presentations have also been recognized. This led an international working group to propose the modified AIH diagnostic criteria. However, it is well recognized that there are no pathognomonic characteristics that can be used to diagnose AIH and careful clinicopathological correlation is required to arrive at the correct diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize the histological features of AIH, its varied histopathologic spectrum, recent updates and major differential diagnoses in routine clinical practice.

Autoimmune serology testing in clinical practice: An updated roadmap for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is in most cases challenging for clinicians as there is not a single specific laboratory or histological marker to diagnose or exclude the presence of the disease. The clinical spectrum of AIH varies from completely asymptomatic to acute-severe or even rarely fulminant hepatic failure, while everybody can be affected irrespective of age, gender, and ethnicity. The old revised and the newer simplified diagnostic scores have been established by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) in 1999 and 2008, respectively, which are based on several clinical, laboratory and histological parameters. Additionally, a thorough differential diagnosis from other diseases mimicking AIH is absolutely indicated. In this context, autoantibodies detection in patients with suspected AIH is mandatory -even though not pathognomonic- not only for AIH diagnosis but furthermore, for AIH classification (AIH-type 1 and AIH-type 2). Although autoimmune serology can be supportive of AIH diagnosis in ≥95% of cases if testing has been performed according to the IAIHG guidelines, this is not the case under real-life circumstances in routine clinical laboratories. Clinicians should be careful both for the importance of the required testing and how to interpret the results and therefore, they should communicate and discuss with the laboratory personnel to achieve the maximum benefit for the patient. Herein, a detailed and updated review of the diagnostic work-up for AIH diagnosis under real-life conditions is given to minimize the underestimation and misdiagnosis of AIH which can result in progression of the disease and unfavourable outcomes.

HLA and Non-HLA gene polymorphisms in autoimmune hepatitis patients of North Indian adults

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic and progressive disease of the liver. This is a multifactorial autoimmune disease with both environmental factors and genetic factors playing a role in its pathogenesis. Certain environmental agents like viruses, drugs, etc., can trigger the disease in a genetically susceptible individual. The present study was aimed to explore the distribution of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1, Protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) polymorphisms in North Indian adult AIH patients and their associations with clinical and pathological characteristics associated with the disease. A total of 147 subjects with 47 cases and 100 healthy controls were enrolled. Diagnosis of AIH was made by Revised International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group scoring system. HLA-DRB1 Typing was done by Luminex-based reverse Sequence-Specific Oligonucleotide Probing (SSOP). Single nucleotide variant (SNV) genotyping for CTLA-4 and PTPN22 was done by simple probe-based SNP arrays. Results indicated SLA positive AIH patients are poor responders to therapy. A significant predispositional association of HLA-DRB1*03 was observed in AIH patients from the North Indian population (p= 0.0001, OR=4.83 (2.30-10.15). The frequency of the GG genotype of CTLA-4 CT 60 was significantly increased in AIH patients compared to controls. Multinomial analysis showed that CTLA-4 CT 60 is an independent predictor for cases.

Real-world evidence of autoimmune hepatitis following COVID-19 vaccination: A population-based pharmacovigilance analysis

Objective: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has occasionally been reported after administration of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. The present study aimed to investigate the reported rate and disproportionality of AIH following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) COVID Data Tracker and the Vaccines Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) were queried between 11 December 2020 and 15 March 2022. Reported rates were calculated by cases of AIH divided by the number of vaccinated people. Disproportionate pattern of AIH for COVID-19 vaccination was accessed based on the reporting odds ratio and empirical bayes geometric mean (ROR and EBGM, respectively). Results: A total of 53 reports of AIH were identified after administration of COVID-19 vaccine during the study period. The overall reported rate of COVID-19 vaccination-related AIH was 0.21 (95% CI 0.16-0.27) per million people. The results found no disproportionate reporting of AIH following COVID-19 vaccination in the VAERS (overall: ROR 1.43, 95% CI 0.52-3.96; EBGM05 0.37. mRNA: ROR 1.42, 95% CI 0.51-3.94; EBGM05 0.37. Virus vector: ROR 1.57, 95% CI 0.42-5.85; EBGM05 0.34). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine did not increase the risk of AIH. The number of AIH cases reported to VAERS does not suggest a safety concern attributable to COVID-19 vaccine at this time.

Calcineurin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Adult Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A considerable number of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients completely or partially fail on first-line treatment. Several studies on the use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in the treatment of AIH have been published without focusing on indication. The aim was to assess the efficacy of CNIs in the treatment of adult AIH patients, specifically focusing on indication: first-line intolerant and with first-line insufficient response (failure to achieve or maintain remission), and with second versus third-line treatment.

METHODS

A literature search included studies on the use of CNIs in adult AIH. Patients with past or present use of CNIs from the Dutch AIH group cohort were added. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission while using CNIs. Secondary endpoints were biochemical response, treatment failure, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Twenty studies from the literature and nine Dutch patients were included describing the use of cyclosporine in 59 and tacrolimus in 219 adult AIH patients. The CNI remission rate was 53% in patients with insufficient response to first-line treatment and 67% in patients intolerant to first-line treatment. CNIs were used as second-line treatment in 73% with a remission rate of 52% and as third-line treatment in 22% with a remission rate of 26%. Cyclosporine was discontinued in 13% and tacrolimus in 11% of patients because of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CNIs as rescue treatment in adult AIH patients are reasonably effective and safe both with insufficient response or intolerance to previous treatment. Prospective studies are needed.

Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Current pharmacotherapy options of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain under discussion and are now evaluated in this analysis. Needless to say, the use of the offending drug must be stopped as soon as DILI is suspected. Normal dosed drugs may cause idiosyncratic DILI, and drugs taken in overdose commonly lead to intrinsic DILI. Empirically used but not substantiated regarding efficiency by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the intravenous antidote treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with intrinsic DILI by N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) overdose. Good data recommending pharmacotherapy in idiosyncratic DILI caused by hundreds of different drugs are lacking. Indeed, a recent analysis revealed that just eight RCTs have been published, and in only two out of eight trials were DILI cases evaluated for causality by the worldwide used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), representing overall a significant methodology flaw, as results of DILI RCTs lacking RUCAM are misleading since many DILI cases are known to be attributable erroneously to nondrug alternative causes. In line with these major shortcomings and mostly based on anecdotal reports, glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immuno-suppressants may be given empirically in carefully selected patients with idiosyncratic DILI exhibiting autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while some patients with cholestatic DILI may benefit from ursodeoxycholic acid use; in other patients with drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) and coagulopathy risks, the indication for anticoagulants should be considered. In view of many other mechanistic factors such as the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 with a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis with toxicity of intracellular iron, and modification of the gut microbiome, additional therapy options may be available in the future. In summation, stopping the offending drug is still the first line of therapy for most instances of acute DILI, while various therapies are applied empirically and not based on good data from RCTs awaiting further trials using the updated RUCAM that asks for strict exclusion and inclusion details like liver injury criteria and provides valid causality rankings of probable and highly probable grades.

Vaccine-Related Autoimmune Hepatitis: Emerging Association with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Coincidence?

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing number of liver injury cases resembling autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, an association has not yet been established.

METHODS/MATERIALS

A literature review was performed to identify articles regarding the association of AIH with vaccination, emphasizing on SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and the proposed mechanisms. We then performed a literature search for AIH-like cases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and we evaluated the included cases for AIH diagnosis using simplified diagnostic criteria (SDC), and for vaccination causality using the Naranjo score for adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

We identified 51 AIH-like cases following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Forty cases (80%) were characterized as "probable", "at least probable", or "definite" for AIH diagnosis according to SDC. Forty cases (78.4%) were characterized as "probable", four (7.8%) as "possible", and three (5.8%) as "definite" for vaccine-related AIH according to the Naranjo score.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related AIH carries several phenotypes and, although most cases resolve, immunosuppressive therapy seems to be necessary. Early diagnosis is mandatory and should be considered in any patient with acute or chronic hepatitis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially in those with pre-existing liver disease.

The progression of chronicity and autoimmune hepatitis in recurrent drug-induced liver injury

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recurrent drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is not well documented. We retrospectively analysed the characteristics of patients who had a history of two separate DILI episodes due to different drugs.

METHODS

We collected data from 57 patients with recurrent DILI from 9582 confirmed DILI cases. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data from both episodes were collected and analysed to determine the relationship between recurrent DILI, chronic DILI, and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

RESULTS

The incidence rate of recurrent DILI in our cohort was 0.59%. Most of the 57 patients with recurrent DILI were female (73.68%). The latency period of the initial episode was 30 days, whereas that of the second episode was 13 days (P = 0.003). The pattern of liver injury was not significantly different between episodes (P = 0.52). Laboratory indicators, such as alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin, were significantly lower in the second episode than in the initial episode (P < 0.05). The incidence of chronic DILI was 43.86% during the initial episode and increased to 63.16% during the second episode. After the initial episode, 15 patients developed AIH during the second episode.

CONCLUSIONS

The latency period of recurrent DILI was gradually shortened. The clinical indices of liver injury tended to be less elevated during the second episode. Female post-menopausal patients with abnormal serum immunoglobulin G levels may be predisposed to AIH. The second DILI episode was more likely to have features of AIH.

Noninvasive biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disease of unclear etiology characterized by loss of self-tolerance that can lead to liver injury, cirrhosis, and acute liver failure. First-line treatment consists of systemic corticosteroids, or budesonide, and azathioprine, to which most patients are initially responsive, although predictors of response are lacking. Relapses are very common, correlate with histological activity despite normal serum transaminases, and increase hepatic fibrosis. Furthermore, current regimens lead to adverse effects and reduced quality of life, whereas medication titration is imprecise. Biomarkers that can predict the clinical course of disease, identify patients at elevated risk for relapse, and improve monitoring and medication dosing beyond current practice would have high clinical value. Herein, we review novel candidate biomarkers in adult and pediatric AIH based on prespecified criteria, including gene expression profiles, proteins, metabolites, and immune cell phenotypes in different stages of AIH. We also discuss biomarkers relevant to AIH from other immune diseases. We conclude with proposed future directions in which biomarker implementation into clinical practice could lead to advances in personalized therapeutic management of AIH.

Autoimmune hepatitis after COVID-19 vaccination

Vaccination is one of the most vigorous ways to intervene in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Cases of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination have been increasingly reported. Twenty-seven cases of AIH are summarized in this study, providing emerging evidence of autoimmune reactions in response to various COVID-19 vaccines, including in patients with special disease backgrounds such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), liver transplantation, and previous hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. Molecular mimicry, adjuvants, epitope spreading, bystander activation, X chromosome, and sceptical hepatotropism of SARS-CoV-2 may account for, to some extent, such autoimmune phenomena. Immunosuppressive corticosteroids perform well with or without azathioprine in such post-COVID-19-vaccination AIH. However, determination of the exact mechanism and establishment of causality require further confirmation.

Chronic hepatitis E in an elderly immunocompetent patient who achieved a sustained virologic response with ribavirin treatment

A woman in her late 70 s was diagnosed with liver injury at a health examination. Despite treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid at a nearby hospital, her transaminase levels elevated in two peaks. She was transferred to our hospital 77 days after the health examination. She weighed 42 kg and had a low body mass index of 19.8 kg/m². Viral markers, including immunoglobulin A (IgA) against hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV IgA), were negative. Drug-induced liver injury was negligible. We suspected autoimmune hepatitis because of the patient's female gender and positive antinuclear antibody. However, prednisolone and azathioprine failed to completely improve her hepatitis. On day 643, anti-HEV IgA was re-evaluated and found to be positive. She was diagnosed with autochthonous chronic hepatitis E because the virus strains in the preserved serum on day 77 and the serum on day 643 had identical nucleotide sequences (genotype 3a). Following prednisolone and azathioprine discontinuation, ribavirin (RBV) was administered for 3 months. HEV RNA disappeared and remained negative for more than 6 months after the cessation of RBV. The HEV RNA titer of 6.2 log₁₀ copies/mL on day 77 was unusually high 2.5 months after the onset, suggesting that hepatitis E had already been chronic before immunosuppressive treatment for possible autoimmune hepatitis. After getting married at 23 years old, she had been a housewife and had no comorbidities that might deteriorate her immunity. Chronicity should be kept in mind when encountering HEV infection in elderly and underweight patients.

Diagnostic value of screening methods for the determination of antinuclear antibodies using indirect immunofluorescence on HEp-2 cells and enzyme immunoassay in autoimmune liver diseases

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies that react with various components of the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. ANA is the main serological marker for autoimmune liver disease (AILD). The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of two methods of screening for the determination of ANA (indirect immunofluorescence reaction on HEp-2 cells (IIF -HEp-2) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the sera of AILD patients. The sera of 118 patients with AILD (51 with autoimmune hepatitis - AIH, 19 with primary biliary cholangitis - PBC, 48 with overlapping syndrome - OVERLAP), 30 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 30 healthy donors (HD) were studied. Determination of ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method was carried out by visual assessment of samples under an AXIOSKOP 40 microscope, by ELISA - on an Alegria automatic analyzer. A weak degree of agreement between the positive and negative results of the ANA screening study using IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA (Cohen's kappa coefficient æ=0.4) was noted. Screening determination of ANA in patients with AILD by the IIF-HEp-2 method was distinguished by greater diagnostic sensitivity (DS) (68.6%) and a lower frequency of false negative results (31.4%) compared with ELISA (35.6% and 64.4 % respectively, p<0.05). The overall diagnostic specificity (DS) of the ANA study in IIF-HEp-2 was lower than with ELISA (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively, p<0.05). Both screening methods for determining ANA (IIF-HEp-2 and ELISA) were useful for diagnosing AILD (positive likelihood ratio - LR+: 2.1 and 2.6, respectively). In terms of the negative likelihood ratio (LR-), screening for ANA by the IIF-HEp-2 method, in contrast to ELISA, served as a "useful" test to exclude the diagnosis of AILD (0.5 and 0.8, respectively). The determination of ANA using IIF-HEp-2 is the most sensitive and "useful" screening test for the diagnosis of AILD, and ELISA is classified as a less "useful" screening method due to low diagnostic sensitivity and a high false-negative rate.

Genetics of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare disease of the liver characterized by an autoimmune attack on the small bile ducts. PBC is a complex trait, meaning that a large list of genetic factors interacts with environmental agents to determine its onset. Genome-wide association studies have had a huge impact in fostering research in PBC, but many steps need still to be done compared with other autoimmune diseases of similar prevalence. This review presents the state-of-the-art regarding the genetic architecture of PBC and provides some thoughtful reflections about possible future lines of research, which can be helpful to fill the missing heritability gap in PBC.

The Inconvenient Truth of Primary Biliary Cholangitis/Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndrome

The term 'PBC/AIH-overlap' has been applied when features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), be they biochemical, serological or histological, coexist with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), either at first presentation or sequentially during disease course. Several treatment paradigms have been proposed, extrapolated from those of the primary conditions. However, there are no randomised studies showing improved survival with combination therapy compared to bile acid monotherapy. In the absence of high-quality evidence, multidisciplinary patient-specific approaches must be used to individualise treatment pathways, with appreciation that disease phenotypes are not always static, differ in treatment responses, and have the potential to evolve over time.

Hepatitis-associated Aplastic Anemia

Hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia (HAAA) accounts for 4% of autoimmune hepatitis in children. An episode of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis is followed a few days or months later by aplastic anemia or full aplasia. This autoimmune disease could be due to a regulation defect in the immune response to a viral trigger, in a genetically predisposed individual. Other causes of hepatitis or aplastic anemia have to be ruled out. Steroids and azathioprine usually control the liver damage but do not prevent the development of aplastic anemia. Aplastic anemia is treated with either hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with a sibling donor or anti-thymocyte globulins and cyclosporine. We propose guidelines to explore and treat this rare disease. We emphasize on the necessary close collaboration between hepatologists and hematologists.

Serum metabolic profiling of targeted bile acids reveals potentially novel biomarkers for primary biliary cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are two unexplained immune diseases. The golden standard for diagnosis of these diseases requires a liver biopsy. Liver biopsy is not widely accepted by patients because of its invasive nature, and atypical liver histology can confuse diagnosis. In view of the lack of effective diagnostic markers for PBC and AIH, combined with the increasingly mature metabolomics technologies, including full-contour metabolomics and target.

AIM

To determine non-invasive, reliable, and sensitive biochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of PBC and AIH.

METHODS

Serum samples from 54 patients with PBC, 26 patients with AIH and 30 healthy controls were analyzed by Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry serum metabolomics. The metabolites and metabolic pathways were identified, and the metabolic changes, metabolic pathways and inter-group differences between PBC and AIH were analyzed. Fifteen kinds of target metabolites of bile acids (BAs) were quantitatively analyzed by SRM, and the differential metabolites related to the diagnosis of PBC were screened by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

We found the changes in the levels of amino acids, BAs, organic acids, phospholipids, choline, sugar, and sugar alcohols in patients with PBC and AIH. Furthermore, the SRM assay of BAs revealed the increased levels of chenodeoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid (LCA), taurolithocholic acid (TLCA), and LCA + TLCA in the PBC group compared with those in the AIH group. The levels of BAs may be used as biomarkers to differentiate PBC from AIH diseases. The levels of glycochenodeoxycholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic sulfate, and taurodeoxycholic acid were gradually elevated with the increase of Child-Pugh class, which was correlated with the severity of disease.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that the levels of BAs could serve as potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis and assessment of the severity of PBC and AIH.

Missing Causality and Heritability of Autoimmune Hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis has an unknown cause and genetic associations that are not disease-specific or always present. Clarification of its missing causality and heritability could improve prevention and management strategies.

AIMS

Describe the key epigenetic and genetic mechanisms that could account for missing causality and heritability in autoimmune hepatitis; indicate the prospects of these mechanisms as pivotal factors; and encourage investigations of their pathogenic role and therapeutic potential.

METHODS

English abstracts were identified in PubMed using multiple key search phases. Several hundred abstracts and 210 full-length articles were reviewed.

RESULTS

Environmental induction of epigenetic changes is the prime candidate for explaining the missing causality of autoimmune hepatitis. Environmental factors (diet, toxic exposures) can alter chromatin structure and the production of micro-ribonucleic acids that affect gene expression. Epistatic interaction between unsuspected genes is the prime candidate for explaining the missing heritability. The non-additive, interactive effects of multiple genes could enhance their impact on the propensity and phenotype of autoimmune hepatitis. Transgenerational inheritance of acquired epigenetic marks constitutes another mechanism of transmitting parental adaptations that could affect susceptibility. Management strategies could range from lifestyle adjustments and nutritional supplements to precision editing of the epigenetic landscape.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune hepatitis has a missing causality that might be explained by epigenetic changes induced by environmental factors and a missing heritability that might reflect epistatic gene interactions or transgenerational transmission of acquired epigenetic marks. These unassessed or under-evaluated areas warrant investigation.

HLA-related genetic susceptibility in autoimmune hepatitis according to autoantibody profile

Although the prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis in first-degree relatives is small, the relationship between genetic markers, especially human leucocyte antigens (HLA), and susceptibility to this disease, has been studied for over three decades. The genetic susceptibility to AIH is believed to be different in the two subtypes of the disease, AIH type 1 and AIH type 2. Type 1 AIH has anti-smooth muscle and anti-nuclear antibodies as its main markers, while those of type 2 AIH are the anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 and anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibodies. The anti-soluble liver antigen/liver-pancreas antibodies, which, in addition to being present in both subtypes, mark an important number of patients without serological markers. Therefore, a third type of disease is questionable. The vast majority of immunogenetic studies compare the differences between the two main types and make no difference between which antibodies are present to define the subtype. This review seeks to analyze what was most important published in the AIH in this context, trying to relate the HLA alleles according to the AIH marker autoantibodies.

Autoimmune Hepatitis with Acute Presentation: Clinical, Biochemical, and Histological Features of 126 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease with a relevant inflammatory component and an unknown etiology. Evidence for clinical characteristics and risk factors in large cohorts of patients with acute AIH (AAIH) is lacking. We clinically characterized patients with AAIH, the prevalence of a combined adverse outcome (death or liver transplantation (LT)), and its risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with AAIH at three centers (Santiago, Chile; 2000-2018) was conducted. Clinical and laboratory characteristics were obtained. A liver biopsy was performed for all patients. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were admitted; 77% were female, 33 (26.2%) had a severe presentation, and 14 (11.1%) had a fulminant presentation. Overall, 24 patients (19.0%) lacked typical autoantibodies, and 26.2% had immunoglobulin G levels in the normal range. The most frequent histological findings were plasma cells (86.5%), interface hepatitis (81.7%), and chronic hepatitis (81.0%). Rosettes were uncommon (35.6%). Advanced fibrosis was present in 27% of patients. Combined adverse outcomes occurred in 7.9% of cases, all fulminant with histological cholestasis. Alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin less than 50% were independent risk factors for in-hospital death or LT (p value <0.05). Although corticosteroid treatment was associated with better outcomes (OR 0.095, p value = 0.013), more severe patients were less likely to receive this therapy. Discussion. In this large cohort of patients with AAIH, clinical characteristics differ from those reported in patients with chronic AIH. Fulminant hepatitis, histological cholestasis, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and prothrombin were associated with death/LT.

Comparison of the effect of reporting cytoplasmic patterns as anti-nuclear antibody positive and anti-nuclear antibody negative on reflex test ordering

Objective Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) patterns are classified as nuclear, cytoplasmic or mitotic. The International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) suggests three parameters for ANA reporting – assay type, results and advice for reflex testing – but has not yet reached a consensus on the reporting of cytoplasmic/mitotic patterns as ANA-negative or positive. We investigated the effect of ICAP’s two proposals for reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA-positive and negative with a view to the recommendation for reflex testing in a country that has no national reimbursement policies for automatic reflex testing.

Methods This non-interventional descriptive study included 1241 patients with positive cytoplasmic ANA patterns. 442 patients were reported as ANA-negative and 799 as ANA-positive. Patients were followed up for a two-year period to determine testing recommendations based upon nuclear and cytoplasmic patterns. For statistical analysis, the t-test was used, with a significance threshold of p-value<0.05.

Results Appropriate reflex orders were seen more commonly with cytoplasmic patterns reported as ANA-positive (27.30%) than with those reported as ANA-negative (5.51%, p-value<0.05). However, ANA-positive reports led to higher ordering of nuclear pattern reflex tests (12.97%) compared with ANA-negative reports (1.10%, p-value<0.05). A large group of patients (59.73% ANA-positive, 93.39% ANA-negative) did not receive reflex testing.

Conclusion Reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA-positive was considered more significant, but reading the result report without considering the pattern and recommendation notes could lead to inappropriate reflex testing. Besides reaching a consensus for reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA-negative or positive, it is important to consider solutions to reimbursement policies for automatic reflex testing to decrease the impediments in reporting cytoplasmic ANA patterns.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis

Management of primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis is challenging. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics including diagnostic methods, prognostic assessment, early detection of complications, optimal care pathways and therapeutic (pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical) options both in adults and children.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination can elicit a CD8 T-cell dominant hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis episodes have been described following SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination but their pathophysiology remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 52-year-old male, presenting with bimodal episodes of acute hepatitis, each occurring 2-3 weeks after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. We sought to identify the underlying immune correlates. The patient received oral budesonide, relapsed, but achieved remission under systemic steroids.

METHODS

Imaging mass cytometry for spatial immune profiling was performed on liver biopsy tissue. Flow cytometry was performed to dissect CD8 T-cell phenotypes and identify SARS-CoV-2-specific and EBV-specific T cells longitudinally. Vaccine-induced antibodies were determined by ELISA. Data were correlated with clinical laboratory results.

RESULTS

Analysis of the hepatic tissue revealed an immune infiltrate quantitatively dominated by activated cytotoxic CD8 T cells with panlobular distribution. An enrichment of CD4 T cells, B cells, plasma cells and myeloid cells was also observed compared to controls. The intrahepatic infiltrate showed enrichment for CD8 T cells with SARS-CoV-2-specificity compared to the peripheral blood. Notably, hepatitis severity correlated longitudinally with an activated cytotoxic phenotype of peripheral SARS-CoV-2-specific, but not EBV-specific, CD8+ T cells or vaccine-induced immunoglobulins.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 vaccination can elicit a distinct T cell-dominant immune-mediated hepatitis with a unique pathomechanism associated with vaccination-induced antigen-specific tissue-resident immunity requiring systemic immunosuppression.

LAY SUMMARY

Liver inflammation is observed during SARS-CoV-2 infection but can also occur in some individuals after vaccination and shares some typical features with autoimmune liver disease. In this report, we show that highly activated T cells accumulate and are evenly distributed in the different areas of the liver in a patient with liver inflammation following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Moreover, within the population of these liver-infiltrating T cells, we observed an enrichment of T cells that are reactive to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that these vaccine-induced cells can contribute to liver inflammation in this context.

Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies susceptibility loci for autoimmune hepatitis type 1

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare and chronic autoimmune liver disease. While genetic factors are believed to play a crucial role in the etiopathogenesis of AIH, our understanding of these genetic risk factors is still limited. In this study, we aimed to identify susceptibility loci to further understand the pathogenesis of this disease.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted a case-control association study of 1,622 Chinese patients with AIH type 1 and 10,466 population controls from two independent cohorts. A meta-analysis was performed to ascertain variants associated with AIH type 1. A single-nucleotide polymorphism within the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region showed the strongest association with AIH (rs6932730: OR = 2.32; p = 9.21 × 10^-73 ). The meta-analysis also identified two non-HLA loci significantly associated with AIH: CD28/CTLA4/ICOS on 2q33.3 (rs72929257: OR = 1.31; p = 2.92 × 10^-9 ) and SYNPR on 3p14.2 (rs6809477: OR = 1.25; p = 5.48 × 10^-9 ). In silico annotation, reporter gene assays, and CRISPR activation experiments identified a distal enhancer at 2q33.3 that regulated expression of CTLA4. In addition, variants near STAT1/STAT4 (rs11889341: OR = 1.24; p = 1.34 × 10^-7 ), LINC00392 (rs9564997: OR = 0.81; p = 2.53 × 10^-7 ), IRF8 (rs11117432: OR = 0.72; p = 6.10 × 10^-6 ), and LILRA4/LILRA5 (rs11084330: OR = 0.65; p = 5.19 × 10^-6 ) had suggestive association signals with AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies two novel loci (CD28/CTLA4/ICOS and SYNPR) exceeding genome-wide significance and suggests four loci as potential risk factors. These findings highlight the importance of costimulatory signaling and neuro-immune interaction in the pathogenesis of AIH.

Clinical Characteristics and Potential Mechanisms in Patients with Abnormal Liver Function Indices and Elevated Serum IgG4

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the etiological classification and clinical characteristics of patients with abnormal liver function indices and elevated serum IgG4 levels and investigated the effects of intrahepatic follicular helper T cell (Tfh) infiltration and serum IL-21.

METHODS

Clinical data (age, sex, past history, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment) and etiology of liver injury from 136 patients were analyzed. We compared the general condition, clinical characteristics, and laboratory tests of 19 AIH (autoimmune hepatitis) patients with elevated serum IgG4 levels with those of 20 AIH patients with normal serum IgG4 levels admitted at the same time. Five patients with AIH and elevated serum IgG4 levels and five AIH patients with normal IgG4 levels were matched by sex, age, and liver function, and Tfh infiltration in liver biopsy tissues of patients in both groups was determined by immunofluorescence staining. Five AIH patients with elevated serum IgG4 levels were selected for measurement of serum interleukin-21 (IL-21) levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), seventeen AIH patients with normal serum IgG4 were matched by sex, age, and liver function indices, and 29 physically healthy individuals matched by sex and age were selected as the control group. The changes in patients with IgG4-RD and abnormal liver function before and after glucocorticoid treatment were measured.

RESULTS

Patients (136) with abnormal liver function indices and elevated serum IgG4 levels were diagnosed with liver disease of different etiologies. IgG4-related disease was the most frequent, followed by AIH and malignancy. Abnormal liver function indices with high serum IgG4 were most commonly seen as elevated gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT). The AIH group with elevated serum IgG4 had increased intrahepatic levels of Tfh. IL-21 in AIH patients with elevated IgG4 was higher than in patients with normal IgG4 and healthy controls. Patients (n = 28) with abnormal liver function indices and IgG4-related disease received glucocorticoid therapy for six months, and ALT, AST, ALKP, GGT, TBil, DBil, IgG, IgG4, and IgE were significantly lower after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum IgG4 was seen in patients with abnormal liver function indices with diverse causes. Tfh infiltration and increased IL-21 production may be related to the pathogenesis of AIH with elevated serum IgG4. Glucocorticoid therapy is effective in patients with abnormal liver function indices and IgG4-related disease. Assessing immune function in patients with abnormal liver function indices and elevated serum IgG4 levels should facilitate diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

HLA, gut microbiome and hepatic autoimmunity

Genetic susceptibility to autoimmune liver diseases is conferred mainly by polymorphisms of genes encoding for the human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The strongest predisposition to autoimmune hepatitis type 1 (AIH-1) is linked to the allele DRB1*03:01, possession of which is associated with earlier disease onset and more severe course. In populations where this allele is very rare, such as in Asia, and in DRB1*03-negative patients, risk of AIH-1 is conferred by DRB1*04, which is associated with later disease onset and milder phenotype. AIH type 2 (AIH-2) is associated with DRB1*07. The pediatric condition referred to as autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis (ASC), is associated with the DRB1*13 in populations of Northern European ancestry. DRB1*1501 is protective from AIH-1, AIH-2 and ASC in Northern European populations. Possession of the DRB1*08 allele is associated with an increased risk of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) across different populations. DRB1*03:01 and B*08:01 confer susceptibility to primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), as well as DRB1*13 and DRB1*15 in Europe. The hepatic blood supply is largely derived from the splanchnic circulation, suggesting a pathophysiological role of the gut microbiome. AIH appears to be associated with dysbiosis, increased gut permeability, and translocation of intestinal microbial products into the circulation; molecular mimicry between microbial and host antigens may trigger an autoaggressive response in genetically-predisposed individuals. In PBC an altered enteric microbiome may affect intestinal motility, immunological function and bile secretion. Patients with PSC have a gut microbial profile different from health as well as from patients with inflammatory bowel disease without PSC.

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlapping Syndrome Complicated by Ulcerative Colitis

The case of a 28-year-old man who had primary sclerosing cholangitis and autoimmune hepatitis overlapping syndrome (PSC-AIH OS) complicated by ulcerative colitis (UC) is reported. First, he was diagnosed with PSC complicated by UC and initially treated with ursodeoxycholic acid and mesalazine. Twenty-four months later, liver damage reappeared, and we performed a liver biopsy, which showed the features of AIH. We eventually diagnosed him with PSC-AIH OS complicated by UC. If liver damage worsens in PSC patients, PSC-AIH OS should be considered. The optimum management approach for PSC-AIH OS should be established.

Metabolomic profiling for drug-induced liver injury with autoantibodies

BACKGROUNDS

Drug induced liver injury (DILI) is sometimes similar to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in serology and histology. Clinicians empirically screened DILI with significant autoimmune characteristics to implement clinical intervention. We tried to characterize DILI with autoantibodies by metabolomics.

METHODS

Untargeted metabolomics coupled with pattern recognition approaches were performed on sera samples including AIH (n = 59), DILI with autoantibodies (DILI^Ab+, n = 68), and DILI without autoantibodies (DILI^Ab-, n = 75). The differential metabolites and fingerprint metabolites between AIH and DILI^Ab- were screened by orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis and hierarchical clustering respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 388 annotated differential metabolites between AIH and DILI^Ab-, 74 fingerprint metabolites were screened. The eigenmetabolite compressed from the fingerprint possessed high discrimination efficacy (AUC:0.891; 95 %CI, 0.838-0.944). In the fingerprint-based PCA model, AIH and DILI^Ab- were separated into three regions: the "pure region" of AIH (Region 1), the "pure region" of DILI^Ab- (Region 3), the mixture region of AIH and DILI^Ab- (Region 2). After incorporated into the PCA model, DILI^Ab+ samples were distributed into the three regions, indicating that DILI^Ab+ samples had different etiological tendencies. Moreover, the fingerprint-based radar model verified the results of PCA model characterizing DILI^Ab+. Notably, the antibody titers of DILI^Ab+ in the three regions did not differ significantly, while the response rates for glucocorticoids were obviously different. The metabolic difference among DILI^Ab+ in different regions mainly lies in energy metabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of metabolic signature, DILI^Ab+ may not be a community of same pathogenesis, including AIH-inclined parts. Which deserves further study.

Autoimmune hepatitis in pregnancy: Pearls and pitfalls

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in pregnancy has many unique considerations. Evidence provided from single center studies with patient level data and nationwide population studies provide valuable insight into this complex situation. Because a planned pregnancy is a safer pregnancy, preconception counseling is a crucial opportunity to optimize care and risk stratify women with AIH. Women with chronic liver disease who receive preconception advice and counseling are more likely to achieve stable liver disease at conception and undergo appropriate variceal surveillance. Loss of biochemical response in pregnancy is associated with adverse outcomes in unstable disease. New onset AIH in pregnancy should be managed with classical treatment regimens. The continued use of immunosuppression in pregnancy, with the exception of mycophenolate mofetil, has not shown to adversely affect the rates of stillbirth or congenital malformation. Previously adopted immunosuppression withdrawal paradigms in pregnancy should no longer be considered advantageous, because remission loss postdelivery is likely (12%-86%). Population studies, report improved outcomes with preterm birth rates falling from 20% to 9%-13% in AIH pregnancies over a 20-year period. Newer data have also demonstrated an increased risk of gestational diabetes and hypertensive complications in AIH pregnancy, which has implications for management and preeclampsia prevention with aspirin use. This review aims to provide the framework to guide and manage pregnancy in AIH outlining pearls and pitfalls to ensure optimal outcomes for mother, baby and to reduce variation in practice.

Development of hepatitis triggered by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patient with cancer during immunotherapy: a case report

Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe COVID-19, and expert consensus advocates for COVID-19 vaccination in this population. Some cases of autoimmune hepatitis have been described after the administration of COVID-19 vaccine in the people in apparently good health. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are responsible for a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This article reports a case of hepatitis and colitis in a 52-year-old woman who was undergoing immunotherapy and was HBV positive 10 days after receiving the first Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine dose. Because both ICIs and the COVID-19 vaccines stimulate the immune response, the authors hypothesize that these vaccines may increase the incidence of irAEs during ICI treatment. There is a complex interplay between the immune-mediated reaction triggered by the vaccination and PD-L1 co-administration.

Autoimmune hepatitis with history of HCV treatment triggered by COVID-19 vaccination: case report and literature review

Although vaccines have been effective against the worldwide pandemic of Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19), some case reports have described autoimmune hepatitis triggered by COVID-19 vaccination. Meanwhile, hepatitis C virus (HCV) is known to be related to autoimmune diseases. Here, we report a case of autoimmune hepatitis with history of HCV treatment triggered by COVID-19 vaccination. An 82-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for severe liver injury. She had received a COVID-19 vaccination 7 days prior. She had a history of HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals 7 years previously. In her blood data, despite HCV antibody positivity, she was negative for HCV RNA by real-time RT-PCR. Anti-nuclear antibody was positive and IgG was elevated. Interface hepatitis and plasma cell infiltration were confirmed pathologically. She was diagnosed as autoimmune hepatitis and her liver injury quickly improved after initiation of steroid administration. This is a first case report of autoimmune hepatitis with history of HCV treatment triggered by COVID-19 vaccination.

Centrilobular zonal necrosis is a unique subtype of autoimmune hepatitis: A cohort study

BACKGROUNDS

Centrilobular zonal necrosis (CZN) is described as a histological feature present in a small number of autoimmune hepatitis (CZN-AIH) patients. CZN may be detected in the absence of significant interface hepatitis, which is the most important histological finding of AIH. The clinical and histopathological spectra of CZN-AIH were not homogeneous, and the concept of CZN-AIH as a distinctive subtype of AIH remains controversial, due to the rarity of CZN-AIH and the ambiguous definition of CZN.

METHODS

To elucidate the clinical and immunogenetic features of CZN-AIH, a total of 102 biopsy samples of AIH, obtained at The Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center and Jikei University Hospital from 2000 to 2018, were reviewed. The 32 patients whose biopsies showed CZN were selected as the CZN-AIH group, and the remaining 70 were grouped as the non-CZN-AIH controls (control AIH). Data on clinical, histopathologic, and immunogenetic features were statistically compared between the CZN-AIH and the control AIH group. Additionally, the impact of the onset pattern (acute or chronic) and coexistent significant interface hepatitis in CZN-AIH was determined.

RESULTS

In CZN-AIH, the frequency of acute-onset cases was significantly higher than that in control AIH (56.2% vs 32.9%; P < .05), and the number of cases with moderate-to-severe interface hepatitis in liver histology was significantly lower (37.5% vs 87.1%; P < .001). Compared to the control AIH, cases of CZN-AIH had lower immunoglobulin G level (P < .001), lower antinuclear antibodies titer (P < .001), and lower AIH score (P < .001). The immunogenetic disproportionate distribution of HLA-DR phenotypes in control AIH (increased HLA-DR4 and decreased HLA-DR9) was not found in CZN-AIH. Moreover, CZN-AIH was less frequently relapsed (P < .05). For the acute-onset CZN-AIH cases, the clinical features were hardly indistinguishable from the chronic CZN-AIH cases. Similarly, the existence of interface hepatitis did not influence on the pathophysiology of CZN-AIH. Moreover, the acute-onset CZN-AIH cases is clinically distinguishable from acute-onset control AIH.

CONCLUSION

CZN can characterize as a distinct AIH subtype, regardless of onset-pattern or coexistence of significant interface hepatitis. To further strengthen this hypothesis, collection of more CZN-AIH cases is needed.

Seronegative autoimmune diseases: A challenging diagnosis

Autoimmune diseases (AID) are increasingly prevalent conditions which comprise more than 100 distinct clinical entities that are responsible for a great disease burden worldwide. The early recognition of these diseases is key for preventing their complications and for tailoring proper management. In most cases, autoantibodies, regardless of their potential pathogenetic role, can be detected in the serum of patients with AID, helping clinicians in making a definitive diagnosis and allowing screening strategies for early -and sometimes pre-clinical- diagnosis. Despite their undoubted crucial role, in a minority of cases, patients with AID may not show any autoantibody, a condition that is referred to as seronegative AID. Suboptimal accuracy of the available laboratory tests, antibody absorption, immunosuppressive therapy, immunodeficiencies, antigen exhaustion, and immunosenescence are the main possible determinants of seronegative AID. Indeed, in seronegative AID, the diagnosis is more challenging and must rely on clinical features and on other available tests, often including histopathological evaluation and radiological diagnostic tests. In this review, we critically dissect, in a narrative fashion, the possible causes of seronegativity, as well as the diagnostic and management implications, in several AID including autoimmune gastritis, celiac disease, autoimmune liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune encephalitis, myasthenia gravis, Sjögren's syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and autoimmune thyroid diseases.

Diagnostic value of a liver biopsy in patients with an acute liver failure or acute liver injury

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic value of liver biopsy in patients with acute liver injury or acute liver failure (ALI/ALF) was investigated.

METHODS

Data from the initial event and follow-up visits were retrospectively analyzed in all patients with a liver biopsy during ALI/ALF from January 2010 to May 2020 at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 66 patients. Post-biopsy hemorrhage occurred in 2 of 66 but was self-limited. In five patients suspected liver involvement by a systemic extrahepatic disease was confirmed and excluded in eight patients. In 4 of 66 patients, the etiology of ALI/ALF remained unknown. Liver biopsy hinted at the etiology of ALI/ALF in 2 of 6 patients with rare diagnoses (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: 2 of 66; ischemic liver injury: 1 of 66, ALI/ALF due to a systemic infection: 3 of 66). In 31 of 34 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), histopathology suggested DILI; in further 2 patients, DILI was among the differential diagnoses. However, DILI was also the histopathologically preferred diagnosis in 12 of 15 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Only in 3 of 15 patients, histopathology was considered compatible with AIH. Serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and autoantibodies during ALI/ALF were higher in patients with AIH than with DILI. Patients with AIH did not show a more pronounced biochemical response to corticosteroids in the first 10 days of treatment than patients with DILI.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver biopsy is indispensable when liver involvement by an extrahepatic disease is suspected. To distinguish AIH from DILI in ALI/ALF, serum IgG, and autoantibodies seem more helpful than liver biopsy; long-term follow-up is needed in these patients.

Early predictors of corticosteroid response in acute severe autoimmune hepatitis: a nationwide multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To assess whether corticosteroids improve prognosis in patients with AS-AIH, and to identify factors at therapy initiation and during therapy predictive of the response to corticosteroids.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients with AS-AIH admitted to 13 tertiary centres from January 2002 to January 2019. The composite primary outcome was death or liver transplantation within 90 days of admission. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 242 consecutive patients enrolled (mean age [SD] 49.7 [16.8] years), 203 received corticosteroids. Overall 90-day transplant-free survival was 61.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.4-67.7). Corticosteroids reduced the risk of a poor outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.25; 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but this treatment failed in 30.5%. An internally validated nomogram composed of older age, MELD, encephalopathy and ascites at the initiation of corticosteroids accurately predicted the response (C-index 0.82; [95% CI 0.8-0.9]). In responders, MELD significantly improved from days 3 to 14 but remained unchanged in non-responders. MELD on day 7 with a cut-off of 25 (sensitivity 62.5%[95% CI: 47.0-75.8]; specificity 95.2% [95% CI: 89.9-97.8]) was the best univariate predictor of the response. Prolonging corticosteroids did not increase the overall infection risk (adjusted HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.3-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Older patients with high MELD, encephalopathy or ascites at steroid therapy initiation and during treatment are unlikely to show a favourable response and so prolonged therapy in these patients, especially if they are transplantation candidates, should be avoided.

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis: A minireview

Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a specific phenotype of drug-induced liver injury that may lead to the devastating outcome of acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Drugs implicated in DIAIH include antimicrobials such as nitrofurantoin and minocycline, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins as well as anti-tumor necrosis agents. The clinical features of drug-induced liver injury are indistinguishable from idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) as both may have positive AIH-related autoantibodies, elevated immunoglobulin G, as well as similar histopathological findings. In patients who show no clinical improvement, or there is progressive liver injury despite cessation of the suspected drug, a liver biopsy should be considered, whereby the presence of advance fibrosis on histology favors the diagnosis of idiopathic AIH. Empirical treatment with corticosteroids may be required in patients with non-resolving liver injury. A typical clinical scenario supportive of DIAIH includes a history of drug exposure with spontaneous resolution of liver injury after drug withdrawal and the absence of relapse after rapid steroid taper. In this article we report two cases of DIAIH secondary to Sorafenib and Atorvastatin along with a review of currently available literature. Early identification and treatment often lead to a favorable outcome in DIAIH.

Case Report: A Pediatric Case of Familial Mediterranean Fever Concurrent With Autoimmune Hepatitis

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is a hereditary, autoinflammatory disease that causes recurrent fever, arthritis, and serositis. The diagnosis of FMF is based on the presentation of typical clinical symptoms and the Mediterranean fever gene (MEFV) test. However, the challenge lies in diagnosing atypical cases. In this report, we have described a pediatric patient with complex FMF whose diagnosis required trio-whole exome sequencing (WES) and functional validation of a rare MEFV variant. A 3-year-old boy presented with recurrent episodes of elevated liver enzymes and arthralgia. He was diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), and his liver enzymes improved rapidly with steroid treatment. However, he exhibited recurrent arthralgia and severe abdominal attacks. Trio-WES identified compound heterozygous mutations in MEFV (V726A and I692del). Ex vivo functional assays of the patient’s monocytes and macrophages, which had been pre-treated with Clostridium difficile toxin A (TcdA) and colchicine, were comparable to those of typical FMF patients, thereby confirming the diagnosis of FMF. Although he was intolerant to colchicine because of liver toxicity, subsequent administration of canakinumab successfully ameliorated his abdominal attacks. However, it was ineffective against liver injury, which recurred after steroid tapering. Therefore, in this case, the pathogenesis of AIH was probably interleukin-1β (IL-1β)-independent. In fact, AIH might have been a concurrent disease with FMF, rather than being one of its complications. Nevertheless, further studies are necessary to determine whether FMF-induced inflammasome activation contributes to AIH development. Moreover, we must consider the possibility of mixed phenotypes in such atypical patients who present distinct pathologies simultaneously.

Acute Hepatitis A-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Introduction: The pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is little known. Previous case reports suggest that several viral hepatitis, including hepatitis A, can trigger AIH. Patient: A 55-year-old female showed general weakness and jaundice. The patient was diagnosed with acute hepatitis A and discharged after 14 days of hospitalization with improving liver function. However, blood tests performed 6 days after discharge revealed an increase in liver enzymes and high serum titers of an anti-nuclear antibody and immunoglobulin G. She was readmitted for liver biopsy. Diagnosis: Liver biopsy showed acute hepatitis A along with AIH. According to the revised international autoimmune hepatitis group scoring system, her score was 14 and she was diagnosed as AIH induced by acute hepatitis A. Intervention: Conservative treatments with crystalloid (Lactated Ringer’s Solution), ursodeoxycholic acid, and silymarin were administered. Outcomes: The patient has been followed up on an outpatient basis and neither symptom recurrence nor an increase in liver enzymes has been reported thus far. Lessons: After the treatment of acute hepatitis A, liver function needs to be carefully monitored over time, and the possibility of autoimmune hepatitis should be considered when liver enzymes increases.

Histopathologist and clinician interface in diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnosis of AIH is based on a combination of clinical, laboratory and histological information. It has been formalised by diagnostic scoring systems, to which liver biopsy contributes substantially. Diagnostic biopsy is thus, desirable in nearly all patients. An adequate biopsy size, provision by clinicians of adequate information to histopathologists and active discussion at regular meetings are all important for accurate histological diagnosis. Recently, the specificity of some features previously thought to suggest AIH has been questioned, and new recommendations for histological diagnosis have been proposed, although not yet validated. The histology of acutely presenting AIH and that of severe or fulminant AIH include some characteristic features. Primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease may co-exist with AIH on biopsy. Liver biopsy also enables grading of severity of inflammation and staging of fibrosis. Presence of cirrhosis is a poor prognostic marker. Repeat liver biopsy after achieving biochemical remission, although not performed routinely, enables assessment of (a) histological remission, a favourable prognostic indicator and (b) fibrosis progression. It can thus help determine further management.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: outcomes of pregnancy in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is common in females of childbearing age. Although some studies have provided information about the outcomes of pregnancy, there remains uncertainty regarding conclusions.

AIM

To comprehensively explore the interactions between pregnancy and AIH.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched to collect available studies in relation to pregnancy in AIH patients (from inception to 28 August 2021). Pooled data were calculated using a random effects model with standardised mean difference (SMD), or risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Twelve studies were considered eligible for meta-analysis. Data from 26 case reports/series were extracted for systematic review. AST level in AIH patients was significantly lower during pregnancy (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI = [-0.70, -0.12]; SMD = -1.60, 95% CI = [-2.76, -0.44]) and loss of biochemical remission occurred more frequently in post-partum (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.19, 0.52]). Patients with portal hypertension or without established remission before conception presented as high-risk subgroups and the incidence of pre-term delivery was higher in these groups compared to other AIH patients (RR = 9, 95% CI = [1.22, 51.1]; RR = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.004, 0.38]). In population-based comparison, pre-term birth (RR = 2.45, 95% CI = [1.66, 3.62]) also occurred more often in AIH patients compared with the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful pregnancy is a reasonable expectation in AIH. However, hepatic biochemistry should be monitored closely in both the puerperium and the post-partum period. Though some patients may present higher risk, with carefully selected therapeutic manipulation and multi-disciplinary care, the majority of mothers and infants should achieve uneventful outcomes.

Azithromycin-Induced Liver Injury in an Asthma Exacerbation Patient With Autoimmune Features

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the leading causes of acute liver failure in the United States. Antimicrobials are the most common class of drugs implicated in this pathology. Although azithromycin has been documented as a relatively safe drug, one of its rare and potentially fatal side effects is DILI. Diagnosing DILI is difficult because it is a diagnosis of exclusion. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may present similarly to DILI, and a liver biopsy may be needed to differentiate between the two conditions. We present a case of azithromycin-induced liver injury in an asthma exacerbation patient with features of AIH.

Growth differentiation factor 15 as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic marker for autoimmune hepatitis

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) has been reported to be associated with fibrosis and cancer in liver disease. Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is often difficult because of the lack of specific markers. We investigated whether GDF15 is useful for diagnosing AIH and determined its therapeutic effects. We enrolled 171 Japanese patients as follows: AIH (n = 45), hepatitis B (HB) (n = 17), hepatitis C (HC) (n = 15), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) (n = 20), and 74 healthy controls. Serum GDF15 levels were measured, and immunohistological analyses of GDF15 were performed using liver tissue of AIH patients. (1) GDF15 levels (pg/ml) were higher in AIH (1994.3 ± 1258.0) and HC (1568.0 ± 822.3) than in HB (953.2 ± 871.4), PBC (643.9 ± 247.0), and controls (475.3 ± 145.3) (p < 0.0001), as well as in cirrhosis patients (n = 31) than in non-cirrhosis patients (n = 66) (1926.6 ± 1026.0 vs. 1249.1 ± 1124.1, p < 0.0001). In non-cirrhosis patients, GDF15 levels were higher in AIH (1914.0 ± 1327.2) than in HC (955.7 ± 502.7), HB (519.3 ± 197.5), and PBC (643.9 ± 247.0) (p < 0.0001). (2) GDF15 was positively correlated with M2BPGi (r = 0.7728), total bilirubin (r = 0.6231), and PT-INR (r = 0.6332). (3) GDF15 levels could be used to distinguish AIH from other liver diseases in non-cirrhosis patients, with an area under the curve of 0.9373 (sensitivity 93.6%, specificity 79.3%, cut-off value 931.3). (4) GDF15 in AIH decreased after treatment. (5) Immunohistological analyses in AIH liver tissues revealed that GDF15 was strongly expressed in inflammatory cells, hepatic cytoplasm, and sinusoidal endothelial cells, but decreased after treatment. GDF15 is a novel diagnostic marker for AIH and is also expected to be a therapeutic marker for AIH.Clinical Trials Registration: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Kurume University (Approval No.: 19049).