Effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl oestradiol in healthy female volunteers

Possible interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and valproic Acid exacerbates bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of exacerbated mania potentially related to an interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and valproic acid (VPA) and propose a mechanism of action for this interaction.

CASE SUMMARY

A 30-year-old man with bipolar disorder and HIV initiated treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. Prior to beginning therapy with these antiretrovirals, he was receiving VPA 250 mg 3 times daily, with his most recent VPA concentration measured at 495 micromol/L. Twenty-one days after starting antiretroviral treatment, he became increasingly manic. His VPA concentration at admission was 238 micromol/L, a 48% decrease. The daily VPA dose was increased to 1500 mg, and olanzapine was introduced. The VPA concentration following this dose escalation was 392 micromol/L, and the patient improved clinically.

DISCUSSION

Fifty percent of VPA is metabolized by glucuronidation, 40% undergoes mitochondrial beta-oxidation, and less than 10% is eliminated by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. Ritonavir can induce glucuronidation of several medications including ethinyl estradiol, levothyroxine, and lamotrigine. We believe that ritonavir-mediated induction of VPA glucuronidation resulted in a decrease in VPA concentrations and efficacy. An objective causality assessment suggested that the increased mania was probably related to the decrease in VPA concentration and that a possible interaction exists between lopinavir/ritonavir and VPA.

CONCLUSIONS

A potential interaction exists between VPA and all ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral regimens. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for a decreased VPA effect when these medications are given concomitantly.

Mechanism-based inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by therapeutic drugs

Consistent with its highest abundance in humans, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A is responsible for the metabolism of about 60% of currently known drugs. However, this unusual low substrate specificity also makes CYP3A4 susceptible to reversible or irreversible inhibition by a variety of drugs. Mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 is characterised by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen (NADPH)-, time- and concentration-dependent enzyme inactivation, occurring when some drugs are converted by CYP isoenzymes to reactive metabolites capable of irreversibly binding covalently to CYP3A4. Approaches using in vitro, in silico and in vivo models can be used to study CYP3A4 inactivation by drugs. Human liver microsomes are always used to estimate inactivation kinetic parameters including the concentration required for half-maximal inactivation (K(I)) and the maximal rate of inactivation at saturation (k(inact)). Clinically important mechanism-based CYP3A4 inhibitors include antibacterials (e.g. clarithromycin, erythromycin and isoniazid), anticancer agents (e.g. tamoxifen and irinotecan), anti-HIV agents (e.g. ritonavir and delavirdine), antihypertensives (e.g. dihydralazine, verapamil and diltiazem), sex steroids and their receptor modulators (e.g. gestodene and raloxifene), and several herbal constituents (e.g. bergamottin and glabridin). Drugs inactivating CYP3A4 often possess several common moieties such as a tertiary amine function, furan ring, and acetylene function. It appears that the chemical properties of a drug critical to CYP3A4 inactivation include formation of reactive metabolites by CYP isoenzymes, preponderance of CYP inducers and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, and occurrence of clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with coadministered drugs. Compared with reversible inhibition of CYP3A4, mechanism-based inhibition of CYP3A4 more frequently cause pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions, as the inactivated CYP3A4 has to be replaced by newly synthesised CYP3A4 protein. The resultant drug interactions may lead to adverse drug effects, including some fatal events. For example, when aforementioned CYP3A4 inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, cisapride or astemizole (all CYP3A4 substrates), torsades de pointes (a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation) may occur.However, predicting drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4 inactivation is difficult, since the clinical outcomes depend on a number of factors that are associated with drugs and patients. The apparent pharmacokinetic effect of a mechanism-based inhibitor of CYP3A4 would be a function of its K(I), k(inact) and partition ratio and the zero-order synthesis rate of new or replacement enzyme. The inactivators for CYP3A4 can be inducers and P-gp substrates/inhibitors, confounding in vitro-in vivo extrapolation. The clinical significance of CYP3A inhibition for drug safety and efficacy warrants closer understanding of the mechanisms for each inhibitor. Furthermore, such inactivation may be exploited for therapeutic gain in certain circumstances.

The management of HIV-1 protease inhibitor pharmacokinetic interactions

The HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) are widely used in combination antiretroviral therapy for the management of HIV-1 infection. Certain characteristics of the PIs, in particular their metabolism being mainly via the cytochrome P450 isoenzyme group and their gastric absorption being pH dependent, make them prone to clinically significant drug interactions with other antiretrovirals, concomitant medication and complementary treatments. Owing to the nature of the disease, individuals with HIV are frequently prescribed complex treatment regimens (both for the management of intolerance, toxicity and viral resistance to antiretroviral therapy, and in the management of co-morbid states) that may interact with PI therapy. For many of these potential interactions, few data are available. This review will focus on the current use of PIs, highlighting some important management issues encountered with common pharmacokinetic interactions seen in clinical practice.

Drug interactions in the management of HIV infection

The availability of antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. In addition, improved treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbidities common to patients with HIV is further prolonging the lives of patients. Improvement in the treatment of HIV has led to a significant increase in the number of medications which caregivers are able to utilise to manage HIV/AIDS. Antiretroviral medications, as well as many of the drugs used in the management of opportunistic infections and primary care (e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, cholesterol-lowering medications), are particularly prone to drug interactions. The interpretation of clinically significant interactions is complicated by the rate at which new information on drug metabolism and transport is becoming available. Management of drug interactions in HIV is further confounded by conflicting study results and differences between documented and theoretical inter-actions. The mechanisms and significance of interactions involving antiretrovirals, drugs used for opportunistic infections, and other medications commonly used in HIV patients will be reviewed.

The involvement of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 in the metabolism of 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol

The role of specific cytochrome P450 (P450) isoforms in the metabolism of ethinylestradiol (EE) was evaluated. The recombinant human P450 isozymes CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 were found to be capable of catalyzing the metabolism of EE (1 microM). Without exception, the major metabolite was 2-hydroxy-EE. The highest catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) was observed with rCYP1A1, followed by rCYP3A4, rCYP2C9, and rCYP1A2. The P450 isoforms 3A4 and 2C9 were shown to play a significant role in the formation of 2-hydroxy-EE in a pool of human liver microsomes by using isoform-specific monoclonal antibodies, in which the inhibition of formation was approximately 54 and 24%, respectively. The involvement of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 was further confirmed by using selective chemical inhibitors (i.e., ketoconazole and sulfaphenazole). The relative contribution of each P450 isoform to the 2-hydroxylation pathway was obtained from the catalytic efficiency of each isoform normalized by its relative abundance in the same pool of human liver microsomes, as determined by quantitative Western blot analysis. Collectively, these results suggested that multiple P450 isoforms were involved in the oxidative metabolism of EE in human liver microsomes, with CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 as the major contributing enzymes.

Contraception choice for HIV positive women

UNAIDS/WHO estimates that 42 million people are living with HIV/AIDS worldwide and 50% of all adults with HIV infection are women predominantly infected via heterosexual transmission. Women with HIV infection, like other women, may wish to plan pregnancy, limit their family, or avoid pregnancy. Health professionals should enable these reproductive choices by counselling and appropriate contraception provision at the time of HIV diagnosis and during follow up. The aim of this article is to present a global overview of contraception choice for women living with HIV infection including effects on sexual transmission risk.

Antiretrovirals, Part 1: Overview, History, and Focus on Protease Inhibitors

This column is the first in a series on HIV/AIDS antiretroviral drugs. This first review summarizes the history of HIV/AIDS and the development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and highlights why it is important for non-HIV specialists to know about these drugs. There are four broad classes of HIV medications used in varying combinations in HAART: the protease inhibitors, nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and cell membrane fusion inhibitors. This paper reviews the mechanism of action, side effects, toxicities, and drug interactions of the protease inhibitors.

Gynecologic issues in the HIV-infected woman

Science has made great strides in understanding the management of the many gynecologic conditions that affect HIV-positive women with an increased frequency. As HIV-infected women's life expectancy continues to lengthen, new treatments are necessary for recurring conditions, such as lower genital tract neoplasias. The medical field has much to learn about the interaction between sex steroids, HIV-infection, and the immune system. As knowledge grows, clinicians will be better equipped to counsel women about contraceptive issues, pregnancy, and menopause.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with nevirapine

Treatment of HIV infection is a multi-drug issue. Not only are there drugs for the treatment of HIV but also concomitant drugs for opportunistic infections, complications arising from the anti-retroviral therapy and other conditions related to a chronic disease. To have any understanding of drug-drug interactions in HIV treatment we need to appreciate the importance of key pharmacological areas including: 1) how each drug in a regimen is eliminated; 2) the potential for a drug to either induce or inhibit metabolic enzymes and/or transporters; 3) the therapeutic index of each drug. It is impossible to memorise all the possible drug-drug interactions in HIV, therefore understanding how drugs are metabolised/eliminated and the potential for a particular drug to modify the pharmacokinetics of another has predictive value even when substantive data are unavailable. NNRTIs interact with cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes both as substrates and inducers. Because of the inductive effects caution must be exercised when using with protease inhibitors (either boosted or un-boosted with ritonavir). In this situation therapeutic drug monitoring may play a role in optimising response. There needs to be care when using many drugs with NNRTIs e.g. methadone, oral contraceptives, rifampicin, and there are some definite contraindications. By understanding pharmacological principles, it is possible to optimise use of multi-drug regimens.

Interactions between antiretroviral drugs and drugs used for the therapy of the metabolic complications encountered during HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection with potent combination antiretroviral therapy has resulted in major improvement in overall survival, immune function and the incidence of opportunistic infections. However, HIV infection and treatment has been associated with the development of metabolic complications, including hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lipodystrophy and osteopenia. Safe pharmacological treatment of these complications requires an understanding of the drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and the drugs used in the treatment of metabolic complications. Since formal studies of most of these interactions have not been performed, predictions must be based on our understanding of the metabolism of these agents. All HIV protease inhibitors are metabolised by and inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Ritonavir is the most potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. Ritonavir and nelfinavir also induce a host of CYP isoforms as well as some conjugating enzymes. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor delavirdine potently inhibits CYP3A4, whereas nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. Drug interaction studies have been performed with HIV protease inhibitors and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Coadministration of ritonavir plus saquinavir to HIV-seronegative volunteers resulted in increased exposure to simvastatin acid by 3059%. Atorvastatin exposure increased by 347%, but exposure to active atorvastatin increased by only 79%. Conversely, pravastatin exposure decreased by 50%. Similar results have been obtained with combinations of simvastatin and atorvastatin with other HIV protease inhibitors. Thus, the lactone prodrugs simvastatin and lovastatin should not be used with HIV protease inhibitors. Atorvastatin may be used with caution. Although there are no formal studies available, calcium channel antagonists and repaglinide may have significant interactions and toxicity when used with HIV protease inhibitors because of their metabolism by CYP3A4. Sulfonylurea drugs utilise mainly CYP2C9 for metabolism, and this isoenzyme may be induced by ritonavir and nelfinavir with a resulting decrease in efficacy of the sulfonylurea. Losartan may have increased effect when coadministered with ritonavir and nelfinavir because of the induction of CYP2C9 and the expected increase in formation of the active metabolite, E-3174. Overall, well-designed drug-drug interaction studies at steady state are needed to determine whether antiretroviral drugs may be safely coadministered with many of the drugs used in the treatment of the metabolic complications of HIV infection.

Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents

HIV-infected individuals usually receive a wide variety of drugs in addition to their antiretroviral drug regimen. Since both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system, there is a considerable potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions when they are administered concomitantly with other drugs metabolised via the same pathway. In addition, protease inhibitors are substrates as well as inhibitors of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein, which also can result in pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are predominantly excreted by the renal system and may also give rise to interactions. This review will discuss the pharmacokinetics of the different classes of antiretroviral drugs and the mechanisms by which drug interactions can occur. Furthermore, a literature overview of drug interactions is given, including the following items when available: coadministered agent and dosage, type of study that is performed to study the drug interaction, the subjects involved and, if specified, the type of subjects (healthy volunteers, HIV-infected individuals, sex), antiretroviral drug(s) and dosage, interaction mechanism, the effect and if possible the magnitude of interaction, comments, advice on what to do when the interaction occurs or how to avoid it, and references. This discussion of the different mechanisms of drug interactions, and the accompanying overview of data, will assist in providing optimal care to HIV-infected patients.

Compliance and persistence with newer antihypertensive agents

Individuals with hypertension need to stay on therapy with antihypertensive medication to obtain the full benefits of blood pressure reduction. There are important differences in tolerability across antihypertensive drug classes, and these differences influence the extent to which patients are willing to continue taking their drugs. Three separate sources of evidence--postmarket surveillance studies, medical/prescription database studies, and discontinuation of study medication in long-term endpoint clinical trials--support the proposition that angiotensin II antagonists, the newest class of antihypertensives, are well tolerated, and that patients whose initial treatment is an angiotensin II antagonist are more likely to persist with therapy than patients who use other classes of antihypertensives. Recent landmark trials with losartan in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction [LIFE]) and in diabetes (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL]) demonstrated excellent tolerability, a high level of persistence, and clinical benefits exceeding those provided by blood pressure control alone for the prototype angiotensin II antagonist in clinical settings.

Influence of ritonavir on olanzapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

HIV infection and psychotic illnesses frequently coexist. The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and glucuronosyl transferases, both of which are induced by the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine. Fourteen healthy volunteers (13 men; age range, 20-28 years) participated in this open-label study. Subjects received olanzapine 10 mg and blood samples were collected over a 120-hour post-dose period. Two weeks later, subjects took ritonavir 300 mg twice daily for 3 days, 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, and 500 mg twice daily for 4 days. The next morning, after 11 days of ritonavir, olanzapine 10 mg was administered and blood sampling was repeated. Plasma samples were analyzed for olanzapine with HPLC. We compared olanzapine noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameter values before and after ritonavir with a paired Student t test. Ritonavir reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of olanzapine from 501 ng. hr/mL (443-582) to 235 ng. hr/mL (197-294) (p < 0.001), the half-life from 32 hours (28-36) to 16 hours (14-18) (p = 0.00001), and the peak concentration from 15 ng/mL (13-19) to 9 ng/mL (8-12) (p = 0.002). Olanzapine oral clearance increased from 20 L/hr (18-23) to 43 L/hr (38-51) (p < 0.001) after ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of olanzapine in volunteers. Patients receiving this combination may ultimately require higher olanzapine doses to achieve desired therapeutic effects.

CYP3A4 induction by drugs: correlation between a pregnane X receptor reporter gene assay and CYP3A4 expression in human hepatocytes

Induction of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) is determined typically by employing primary culture of human hepatocytes and measuring CYP3A4 mRNA, protein and microsomal activity. Recently a pregnane X receptor (PXR) reporter gene assay was established to screen CYP3A4 inducers. To evaluate results from the PXR reporter gene assay with those from the aforementioned conventional assays, 14 drugs were evaluated for their ability to induce CYP3A4 and activate PXR. Sandwiched primary cultures of human hepatocytes from six donors were used and CYP3A4 activity was assessed by measuring microsomal testosterone 6beta-hydroxylase activity. Hepatic CYP3A4 mRNA and protein levels were also analyzed using branched DNA technology/Northern blotting and Western blotting, respectively. In general, PXR activation correlated with the induction potential observed in human hepatocyte cultures. Clotrimazole, phenobarbital, rifampin, and sulfinpyrazone highly activated PXR and increased CYP3A4 activity; carbamazepine, dexamethasone, dexamethasone-t-butylacetate, phenytoin, sulfadimidine, and taxol weakly activated PXR and induced CYP3A4 activity, and methotrexate and probenecid showed no marked activation in either system. Ritonavir and troleandomycin showed marked PXR activation but no increase (in the case of troleandomycin) or a significant decrease (in the case of ritonavir) in microsomal CYP3A4 activity. It is concluded that the PXR reporter gene assay is a reliable and complementary method to assess the CYP3A4 induction potential of drugs and other xenobiotics.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between mefloquine and ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir and mefloquine.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers participated in two separate, nonfasted, three-treatment, three-period, longitudinal pharmacokinetic studies. Study 1 (12 completed): ritonavir 200 mg twice daily for 7 days, 7 day washout, mefloquine 250 mg once daily for 3 days then once weekly for 4 weeks, ritonavir restarted for 7 days simultaneously with the last mefloquine dose. Study 2 (11 completed): ritonavir 200 mg single dose, mefloquine 250 mg once daily for 3 days then once weekly for 2 weeks, ritonavir single dose repeated 2 days after the last mefloquine dose. Erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) was administered with and without drug treatments in study 2.

RESULTS

Study 1: Ritonavir caused less than 7% changes with high precision (90% CIs: -12% to 11%) in overall plasma exposure (AUC(0,168 h)) and peak concentration (Cmax) of mefloquine, its two enantiomers, and carboxylic acid metabolite, and in the metabolite/mefloquine and enantiomeric AUC ratios. Mefloquine significantly decreased steady-state ritonavir plasma AUC(0,12 h) by 31%, Cmax by 36%, and predose levels by 43%, and did not affect ritonavir binding to plasma proteins. Study 2: Mefloquine did not alter single-dose ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Less than 8% changes in AUC and Cmax were observed with high variability (90%CIs: -26% to 45%). Mefloquine had no effect on the ERMBT whereas ritonavir decreased activity by 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Ritonavir minimally affected mefloquine pharmacokinetics despite strong inhibition of CYP3A4 activity from a single 200 mg dose. Mefloquine had variable effects on ritonavir pharmacokinetics that were not explained by hepatic CYP3A4 activity or ritonavir protein binding.

Significant interactions with new antiretrovirals and psychotropic drugs

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update on relevant antiretroviral interactions and psychotropic medications for healthcare practitioners managing complex HIV-related pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

Information was retrieved via a MEDLINE search (January 1966-September 1998) using MeSH headings human immunodeficiency virus, drug interactions, psychiatry, psychotropics, psychiatric illness, and names of medications commonly prescribed for the management of HIV infection. Abstracts of international and national conferences (until February 1999), review articles, textbooks, and references of all articles also were searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Literature on pharmacokinetic interactions was considered for inclusion. Pertinent information was selected and summarized for discussion. In the absence of specific data, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were considered in order to predict the likelihood of potential drug interactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

All protease inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are substrates of the cytochrome P450 system and possess enzyme-inhibiting and/or -inducing properties. Psychotropic medications also possess similar metabolic characteristics and may interact with antiretrovirals. Modifications in drug selection, dose, or dosing regimen may be needed to ensure adequate antiretroviral concentrations and thus minimize the risk of incomplete viral suppression and/or development of drug resistance. In the absence of specific data, consideration of metabolic characteristics may assist practitioners in predicting the likelihood of possible interactions.

RESULTS

The incidence and implications of antiretroviral drug interactions are reviewed. Practical management strategies are also discussed. Comprehensive tables on clinically significant interactions with antiretroviral combinations and with psychiatric medications are provided.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the increasing use of multiple-drug therapy, the potential for drug interactions is extremely high. Drug interactions may lead to undesirable outcomes including subtherapeutic drug concentrations and risk of antiretroviral resistance. Practitioners need to consider pharmacokinetic, pharmacologic, therapeutic, and adherence factors when managing interactions with complex antiretroviral therapy.

Drug interactions of HIV protease inhibitors

All the currently available protease inhibitors are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. All are inhibitors of CYP3A4, ranging from weak inhibition for saquinavir to very potent inhibition for ritonavir. Thus, they are predicted to have numerous drug interactions, although few such interactions have actually been documented either in pharmacokinetic studies or in clinical reports. This article reviews the published literature with an emphasis on the magnitude of interactions and on practical recommendations for management. Many of the drugs commonly taken by patients with HIV have a strong potential to interact with the protease inhibitors. In particular, the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are also metabolised by CYPand have been shown to interact with protease inhibitors. Delaviridine is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, but nevirapine and efavirenz are inducers of CYP3A4. The protease inhibitors also interact with each other, and these interactions are being explored for their potential therapeutic benefits. Other commonly used drugs are also known to affect protease inhibitor metabolism, including inhibitors such as clarithromycin and the azole antifungals and inducers such as the rifamycins. Drugs that are known to be significantly affected by the protease inhibitors include ethinylestradiol and terfenadine; many other drugs have lesser or potential interactions. Although little specific data is available on the drug interactions of protease inhibitors, this lack of data should not be interpreted as a lack of interaction. Retrospective chart reviews have demonstrated that potentially severe drug interactions are frequently overlooked. Much more clinical data is needed, but pharmacists and physicians must always be vigilant for drug interactions, both those that are already documented and those that are predictable from pharmacokinetic profiles, in patients receiving protease inhibitors.

Ritonavir. Clinical pharmacokinetics and interactions with other anti-HIV agents

Ritonavir is 1 of the 4 potent synthetic HIV protease inhibitors, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1995 and 1997, that have revolutionised HIV therapy. The extent of oral absorption is high and is not affected by food. Within the clinical concentration range, ritonavir is approximately 98 to 99% bound to plasma proteins, including albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drug concentrations are low in relation to total plasma concentration. However, parallel decreases in the viral burden have been observed in the plasma, CSF and other tissues. Ritonavir is primarily metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isozymes and, to a lesser extent, by CYP2D6. Four major oxidative metabolites have been identified in humans, but are unlikely to contribute to the antiviral effect. About 34% and 3.5% of a 600 mg dose is excreted as unchanged drug in the faeces and urine, respectively. The clinically relevant t1/2 beta is about 3 to 5 hours. Because of autoinduction, plasma concentrations generally reach steady state 2 weeks after the start of administration. The pharmacokinetics of ritonavir are relatively linear after multiple doses, with apparent oral clearance averaging 7 to 9 L/h. In vitro, ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A. In vivo, ritonavir significantly increases the AUC of drugs primarily eliminated by CYP3A metabolism (e.g. clarithromycin, ketoconazole, rifabutin, and other HIV protease inhibitors, including indinavir, saquinavir and nelfinavir) with effects ranging from an increase of 77% to 20-fold in humans. It also inhibits CYP2D6-mediated metabolism, but to a significantly lesser extent (145% increase in desipramine AUC). Since ritonavir is also an inducer of several metabolising enzymes [CYP1A4, glucuronosyl transferase (GT), and possibly CYP2C9 and CYP2C19], the magnitude of drug interactions is difficult to predict, particularly for drugs that are metabolised by multiple enzymes or have low intrinsic clearance by CYP3A. For example, the AUC of CYP3A substrate methadone was slightly decreased and alprazolam was unaffected. Ritonavir is minimally affected by other CYP3A inhibitors, including ketoconazole. Rifampicin (rifampin), a potent CYP3A inducer, decreased the AUC of ritonavir by only 35%. The degree and duration of suppression of HIV replication is significantly correlated with the plasma concentrations. Thus, the large increase in the plasma concentrations of other protease inhibitors when coadministered with ritonavir forms the basis of rational dual protease inhibitor regimens, providing patients with 2 potent drugs at significantly reduced doses and less frequent dosage intervals. Combination treatment of ritonavir with saquinavir and indinavir results in potent and sustained clinical activity. Other important factors with combination regimens include reduced interpatient variability for high clearance agents, and elimination of the food effect on the bioavailibility of indinavir.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND

Because ritonavir, a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor, and clarithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic used in the treatment of disseminated infection caused by Mycobacterium avium complex, are likely to be administered concurrently for treatment of patients with HIV and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the drug interaction potential of these 2 agents was evaluated. Both clarithromycin and ritonavir are metabolized to a significant extent through cytochrome P450-mediated biotransformation and are potential inhibitors of these enzymes.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic effects of concomitant administration of multiple doses of ritonavir and clarithromycin.

METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study. Ritonavir alone (200 mg every 8 hours), clarithromycin alone (500 mg every 12 hours), and ritonavir and clarithromycin in combination were administered to 22 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected on day 4 for determination of ritonavir, clarithromycin, and its metabolite 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin.

RESULTS

Ritonavir practically completely inhibited the formation of 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for clarithromycin increased by 77% with concomitant ritonavir, and the harmonic mean terminal half-life increased from 5 hours to 14 hours. Statistically significant increases in peak plasma concentration (31%) and minimum plasma concentration (182%) were also observed. The effect of concomitant clarithromycin administration on ritonavir pharmacokinetics was statistically significant but small, with a 12.5% increase in mean AUC and a 15.3% increase in peak plasma concentration. The terminal half-life increased from 3.47 to 3.87 hours with concomitant clarithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

No adjustment of the ritonavir dose is necessary when administered with clarithromycin. In addition, no changes in clarithromycin dose are warranted in patients with normal renal function.