101
|
Ghoussaini M, Pharoah PDP, Easton DF. Inherited genetic susceptibility to breast cancer: the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2013; 183:1038-1051. [PMID: 23973388 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 07/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified 72 loci associated with breast cancer susceptibility. Seventeen of these are known to predispose to other cancers. High-penetrance susceptibility loci for breast cancer usually result from coding alterations, principally in genes involved in DNA repair, whereas almost all of the associations identified through genome-wide association studies are found in noncoding regions of the genome and are likely to involve regulation of genes in multiple pathways. However, the genes underlying most associations are not yet known. In this review, we summarize the findings from genome-wide association studies in breast cancer and describe the genes and mechanisms that are likely to be involved in the tumorigenesis process. We also discuss approaches to fine-scale mapping of susceptibility regions used to identify the likely causal variant(s) underlying the associations, a major challenge in genetic epidemiology. Finally, we discuss the potential impact of such findings on personalized medicine and future avenues for screening, prediction, and prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Ghoussaini
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Hu J, Peter I. Evidence of expression variation and allelic imbalance in Crohn's disease susceptibility genes NOD2 and ATG16L1 in human dendritic cells. Gene 2013; 527:496-502. [PMID: 23850724 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2012] [Revised: 06/17/2013] [Accepted: 06/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Human dendritic cells (DCs) play an important role in induction and progression of Crohn's disease (CD). Accumulating evidence suggests that viral infection is required to trigger CD pathogenesis in genetically predisposed individuals. NOD2 and ATG16L1 are among the major CD susceptibility genes implicated in impaired immune response to bacterial infection. In this study, we investigated gene expression and allelic imbalance (AI) of NOD2 and ATG16L1 using common variants in human monocyte-derived DCs. Significant AI was observed in ~40% and ~70% of NOD2 and ATG16L1 heterozygotes, respectively (p<0.05). AI of NOD2 was inversely associated with its expression level (p=0.015). No correlation was detected between gene expression and AI for ATG16L1. When infected with Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV), NOD2 expression in DCs was induced about four-fold (p<0.001), whereas ATG16L1 expression was not affected (p=0.88). In addition, NDV infection tended to lower the variance in AI among DC populations for the NOD2 gene (p=0.05), but not the ATG16L1 gene (p=0.32). Findings of a simulation study, aimed to verify whether the observed variation in gene expression and AI is a result of sample-to-sample variability or experimental measurement error, suggested that NOD2 AI is likely to result from a deterministic event at a single cell level. Overall, our results present initial evidence that AI of the NOD2 and ATG16L1 genes exists in populations of human DCs. In addition, our findings suggest that viral infection may regulate NOD2 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianzhong Hu
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
103
|
Bogdanova N, Helbig S, Dörk T. Hereditary breast cancer: ever more pieces to the polygenic puzzle. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2013; 11:12. [PMID: 24025454 PMCID: PMC3851033 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-11-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 09/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Several susceptibility genes differentially impact on the lifetime risk for breast cancer. Technological advances over the past years have enabled the detection of genetic risk factors through high-throughput screening of large breast cancer case-control series. High- to intermediate penetrance alleles have now been identified in more than 20 genes involved in DNA damage signalling and repair, and more than 70 low-penetrance loci have been discovered through recent genome-wide association studies. In addition to classical germ-line mutation and single-nucleotide polymorphism, copy number variation and somatic mosaicism have been proposed as potential predisposing mechanisms. Many of the identified loci also appear to influence breast tumour characteristics such as estrogen receptor status. In this review, we briefly summarize present knowledge about breast cancer susceptibility genes and discuss their implications for risk prediction and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Bogdanova
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Clinics of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sonja Helbig
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Breast cancer susceptibility associated with rs1219648 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) and postmenopausal hormone therapy use in a population-based United States study. Menopause 2013; 20:354-8. [PMID: 23435034 DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318268ca46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genomewide association studies have consistently found variants in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) to be associated with breast cancer. Recent reports suggest that postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use may modify the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 and breast cancer risk. We assessed the hypothesis that the association between rs1219648 (FGFR2) SNP and breast cancer risk is modified by postmenopausal HT use in a population-based case-control study. METHODS We evaluated rs1219648 SNP for an association with breast cancer risk using data obtained from 869 postmenopausal breast cancer cases diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 and from 808 postmenopausal community controls who participated in a study conducted in three US states. Detailed postmenopausal HT information was collected through a structured telephone interview, and DNA samples were collected by mail using an established mouthwash protocol. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression models adjusted for age and state of residence. RESULTS We observed a significant association between rs1219648 and breast cancer risk (per-allele odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.41; P = 0.007), which did not vary significantly by ever use of estrogen plus progestogen therapy (interaction P = 0.48). There was stronger evidence of an interaction between ever use of estrogen-only HT and increasing number of rs1219648 risk alleles to increase breast cancer risk (interaction P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with a risk association with FGFR2 but provide limited support for interaction with HT use. The study raises the possibility that the FGFR2 rs1219648 variant is more strongly associated with risk in estrogen-only hormone users, although this observation needs to be examined in larger studies.
Collapse
|
105
|
Alonso-Perez E, Fernandez-Poceiro R, Lalonde E, Kwan T, Calaza M, Gomez-Reino JJ, Majewski J, Gonzalez A. Identification of three new cis-regulatory IRF5 polymorphisms: in vitro studies. Arthritis Res Ther 2013; 15:R82. [PMID: 23941291 PMCID: PMC3978921 DOI: 10.1186/ar4262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2012] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Polymorphisms in the interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) gene are associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and other diseases through independent risk and protective haplotypes. Several functional polymorphisms are already known, but they do not account for the protective haplotypes that are tagged by the minor allele of rs729302. Methods Polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs729302 or particularly associated with IRF5 expression were selected for functional screening, which involved electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) and reporter gene assays. Results A total of 54 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the 5' region of IRF5 were genotyped. Twenty-four of them were selected for functional screening because of their high LD with rs729302 or protective haplotypes. In addition, two polymorphisms were selected for their prominent association with IRF5 expression. Seven of these twenty-six polymorphisms showed reproducible allele differences in EMSA. The seven were subsequently analyzed in gene reporter assays, and three of them showed significant differences between their two alleles: rs729302, rs13245639 and rs11269962. Haplotypes including the cis-regulatory polymorphisms correlated very well with IRF5 mRNA expression in an analysis based on previous data. Conclusion We have found that three polymorphisms in LD with the protective haplotypes of IRF5 have differential allele effects in EMSA and in reporter gene assays. Identification of these cis-regulatory polymorphisms will allow more accurate analysis of transcriptional regulation of IRF5 expression, more powerful genetic association studies and deeper insight into the role of IRF5 in disease susceptibility.
Collapse
|
106
|
Brady N, Chuntova P, Bade LK, Schwertfeger KL. The FGF/FGFR axis as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2013; 8:391-402. [PMID: 25400686 PMCID: PMC4228698 DOI: 10.1586/17446651.2013.811910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling is a vital component of both embryonic and postnatal mammary gland development, which has prompted researchers to investigate both its relevance to breast cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target. Deregulated FGFR signaling during breast cancer occurs through various mechanisms, including amplification of the receptor genes, aberrant ligand expression, receptor mutations and translocations. Recent experimental outcomes involving both animal models and human breast cancer cell lines have led to the initiation of multiple early clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of small molecule FGFR inhibitors. In this article we review both the most recent discoveries and the need for further investigation of the mechanisms through which FGF/FGFR signaling has emerged as an oncogenic driver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Brady
- Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Polly Chuntova
- Microbiology, Immunology and Cancer Biology Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Lindsey K Bade
- Molecular, Cellular, Developmental Biology and Genetics Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| | - Kathryn L Schwertfeger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St. SE, MMC 609, Minneapolis, MN 55455
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Pond AC, Bin X, Batts T, Roarty K, Hilsenbeck S, Rosen JM. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling is essential for normal mammary gland development and stem cell function. Stem Cells 2013; 31:178-89. [PMID: 23097355 DOI: 10.1002/stem.1266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2012] [Accepted: 09/25/2012] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling plays an important role in embryonic stem cells and adult tissue homeostasis, but the function of FGFs in mammary gland stem cells is less well defined. Both FGFR1 and FGFR2 are expressed in basal and luminal mammary epithelial cells (MECs), suggesting that together they might play a role in mammary gland development and stem cell dynamics. Previous studies have demonstrated that the deletion of FGFR2 resulted only in transient developmental defects in branching morphogenesis. Using a conditional deletion strategy, we investigated the consequences of FGFR1 deletion alone and then the simultaneous deletion of both FGFR1 and FGFR2 in the mammary epithelium. FGFR1 deletion using a keratin 14 promoter-driven Cre-recombinase resulted in an early, yet transient delay in development. However, no reduction in functional outgrowth potential was observed following limiting dilution transplantation analysis. In contrast, a significant reduction in outgrowth potential was observed upon the deletion of both FGFR1 and FGFR2 in MECs using adenovirus-Cre. Additionally, using a fluorescent reporter mouse model to monitor Cre-mediated recombination, we observed a competitive disadvantage following transplantation of both FGFR1/R2-null MECs, most prominently in the basal epithelial cells. This correlated with the complete loss of the mammary stem cell repopulating population in the FGFR1/R2-attenuated epithelium. FGFR1/R2-null MECs were partially rescued in chimeric outgrowths containing wild-type MECs, suggesting the potential importance of paracrine mechanisms involved in the maintenance of the basal epithelial stem cells. These studies document the requirement for functional FGFR signaling in mammary stem cells during development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Pond
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
108
|
Smits BMG, Haag JD, Rissman AI, Sharma D, Tran A, Schoenborn AA, Baird RC, Peiffer DS, Leinweber DQ, Muelbl MJ, Meilahn AL, Eichelberg MR, Leng N, Kendziorski C, John MC, Powers PA, Alexander CM, Gould MN. The gene desert mammary carcinoma susceptibility locus Mcs1a regulates Nr2f1 modifying mammary epithelial cell differentiation and proliferation. PLoS Genet 2013; 9:e1003549. [PMID: 23785296 PMCID: PMC3681674 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 04/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have revealed that many low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci are located in non-protein coding genomic regions; however, few have been characterized. In a comparative genetics approach to model such loci in a rat breast cancer model, we previously identified the mammary carcinoma susceptibility locus Mcs1a. We now localize Mcs1a to a critical interval (277 Kb) within a gene desert. Mcs1a reduces mammary carcinoma multiplicity by 50% and acts in a mammary cell-autonomous manner. We developed a megadeletion mouse model, which lacks 535 Kb of sequence containing the Mcs1a ortholog. Global gene expression analysis by RNA-seq revealed that in the mouse mammary gland, the orphan nuclear receptor gene Nr2f1/Coup-tf1 is regulated by Mcs1a. In resistant Mcs1a congenic rats, as compared with susceptible congenic control rats, we found Nr2f1 transcript levels to be elevated in mammary gland, epithelial cells, and carcinoma samples. Chromatin looping over ∼820 Kb of sequence from the Nr2f1 promoter to a strongly conserved element within the Mcs1a critical interval was identified. This element contains a 14 bp indel polymorphism that affects a human-rat-mouse conserved COUP-TF binding motif and is a functional Mcs1a candidate. In both the rat and mouse models, higher Nr2f1 transcript levels are associated with higher abundance of luminal mammary epithelial cells. In both the mouse mammary gland and a human breast cancer global gene expression data set, we found Nr2f1 transcript levels to be strongly anti-correlated to a gene cluster enriched in cell cycle-related genes. We queried 12 large publicly available human breast cancer gene expression studies and found that the median NR2F1 transcript level is consistently lower in 'triple-negative' (ER-PR-HER2-) breast cancers as compared with 'receptor-positive' breast cancers. Our data suggest that the non-protein coding locus Mcs1a regulates Nr2f1, which is a candidate modifier of differentiation, proliferation, and mammary cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart M. G. Smits
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Jill D. Haag
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Anna I. Rissman
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Deepak Sharma
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Ann Tran
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Alexi A. Schoenborn
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Rachael C. Baird
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Dan S. Peiffer
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - David Q. Leinweber
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Matthew J. Muelbl
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Amanda L. Meilahn
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Mark R. Eichelberg
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Ning Leng
- Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Christina Kendziorski
- Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Manorama C. John
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Patricia A. Powers
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Caroline M. Alexander
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Michael N. Gould
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Hicks C, Koganti T, Brown AS, Monico J, Backus K, Miele L. Novel Integrative Genomics Approach for Associating GWAS Information with Intrinsic Subtypes of Breast Cancer. Cancer Inform 2013; 12:125-42. [PMID: 23761956 PMCID: PMC3663490 DOI: 10.4137/cin.s11452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have achieved great success in identifying common variants associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, GWAS do not typically provide information about the broader context in which genetic variants operate in different subtypes of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether genes containing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, herein called genetic variants) are associated with different subtypes of breast cancer. Additionally, we sought to identify gene regulator networks and biological pathways enriched for these genetic variants. Using supervised analysis, we identified 201 genes that were significantly associated with the six intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. The results demonstrate that integrative genomics analysis is a powerful approach for linking GWAS information to distinct disease states and provide insights about the broader context in which genetic variants operate in different subtypes of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chindo Hicks
- Cancer Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS. ; Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
110
|
Seo JH, Li Q, Fatima A, Eklund A, Szallasi Z, Polyak K, Richardson AL, Freedman ML. Deconvoluting complex tissues for expression quantitative trait locus-based analyses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013; 368:20120363. [PMID: 23650637 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer genome-wide association studies have pinpointed dozens of variants associated with breast cancer pathogenesis. The majority of risk variants, however, are located outside of known protein-coding regions. Therefore, identifying which genes the risk variants are acting through presents an important challenge. Variants that are associated with mRNA transcript levels are referred to as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). Many studies have demonstrated that eQTL-based strategies provide a direct way to connect a trait-associated locus with its candidate target gene. Performing eQTL-based analyses in human samples is complicated because of the heterogeneous nature of human tissue. We addressed this issue by devising a method to computationally infer the fraction of cell types in normal human breast tissues. We then applied this method to 13 known breast cancer risk loci, which we hypothesized were eQTLs. For each risk locus, we took all known transcripts within a 2 Mb interval and performed an eQTL analysis in 100 reduction mammoplasty cases. A total of 18 significant associations were discovered (eight in the epithelial compartment and 10 in the stromal compartment). This study highlights the ability to perform large-scale eQTL studies in heterogeneous tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Heui Seo
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
111
|
Abstract
As RNA-seq is replacing gene expression microarrays to assess genome-wide transcription abundance, gene expression Quantitative Trait Locus (eQTL) studies using RNA-seq have emerged. RNA-seq delivers two novel features that are important for eQTL studies. First, it provides information on allele-specific expression (ASE), which is not available from gene expression microarrays. Second, it generates unprecedentedly rich data to study RNA-isoform expression. In this paper, we review current methods for eQTL mapping using ASE and discuss some future directions. We also review existing works that use RNA-seq data to study RNA-isoform expression and we discuss the gaps between these works and isoform-specific eQTL mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, Department of Genetics, Carolina Center of Genome Science, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Yijuan Hu
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:887-900. [PMID: 23462807 PMCID: PMC3590652 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There are no validated markers that predict response in metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) patients treated with sunitinib. We aim to study the impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that have recently been proposed as predictors of outcome to anti-VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic RCC in an independent cohort of patients. Methods: We genotyped 16 key SNPs in 10 genes involved in sunitinib pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and VEGF-independent angiogenesis in patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC treated with sunitinib as the first-line targeted therapy. Association between SNPs, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied by multivariate Cox regression using relevant clinical factors associated with PFS and OS as covariates. Results: In a series of 88 patients, both PFS and OS were associated significantly with SNP rs1128503 in ABCB1 (P=0.027 and P=0.025), rs4073054 in NR1/3 (P=0.025 and P=0.035) and rs307821 in VEGFR3 (P=0.032 and P=0.011). Progression-free survival alone was associated with rs2981582 in FGFR2 (P=0.031) and rs2276707 in NR1/2 (P=0.047), whereas OS alone was associated with rs2307424 in NR1/3 (P=0.048) and rs307826 in VEGFR3 (P=0.013). Conclusion: Our results confirm former communications regarding the association between SNPs in ABCB1, NR1/2, NR1/3 and VEGFR3 and sunitinib outcome in clear-cell RCC. Prospective validation of these SNPs is now required.
Collapse
|
113
|
French J, Ghoussaini M, Edwards S, Meyer K, Michailidou K, Ahmed S, Khan S, Maranian M, O’Reilly M, Hillman K, Betts J, Carroll T, Bailey P, Dicks E, Beesley J, Tyrer J, Maia AT, Beck A, Knoblauch N, Chen C, Kraft P, Barnes D, González-Neira A, Alonso M, Herrero D, Tessier D, Vincent D, Bacot F, Luccarini C, Baynes C, Conroy D, Dennis J, Bolla M, Wang Q, Hopper J, Southey M, Schmidt M, Broeks A, Verhoef S, Cornelissen S, Muir K, Lophatananon A, Stewart-Brown S, Siriwanarangsan P, Fasching P, Loehberg C, Ekici A, Beckmann M, Peto J, dos Santos Silva I, Johnson N, Aitken Z, Sawyer E, Tomlinson I, Kerin M, Miller N, Marme F, Schneeweiss A, Sohn C, Burwinkel B, Guénel P, Truong T, Laurent-Puig P, Menegaux F, Bojesen S, Nordestgaard B, Nielsen S, Flyger H, Milne R, Zamora M, Arias Perez J, Benitez J, Anton-Culver H, Brenner H, Müller H, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Meindl A, Lichtner P, Schmutzler R, Engel C, Brauch H, Hamann U, Justenhoven C, Aaltonen K, Heikkilä P, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Matsuo K, Ito H, Iwata H, Sueta A, Bogdanova N, Antonenkova N, Dörk T, Lindblom A, Margolin S, Mannermaa A, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen J, Wu A, Tseng CC, Van Den Berg D, Stram D, Lambrechts D, Peeters S, Smeets A, Floris G, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Nickels S, Flesch-Janys D, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Bonanni B, Sardella D, Couch F, Wang X, Pankratz V, Lee A, Giles G, Severi G, Baglietto L, Haiman C, Henderson B, Schumacher F, Le Marchand L, Simard J, Goldberg M, Labrèche F, Dumont M, Teo S, Yip C, Ng CH, Vithana E, Kristensen V, Zheng W, Deming-Halverson S, Shrubsole M, Long J, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Grip M, Andrulis I, Knight J, Glendon G, Mulligan A, Devilee P, Seynaeve C, García-Closas M, Figueroa J, Chanock S, Lissowska J, Czene K, Klevebring D, Schoof N, Hooning M, Martens J, Collée J, Tilanus-Linthorst M, Hall P, Li J, Liu J, Humphreys K, Shu XO, Lu W, Gao YT, Cai H, Cox A, Balasubramanian S, Blot W, Signorello L, Cai Q, Pharoah P, Healey C, Shah M, Pooley K, Kang D, Yoo KY, Noh DY, Hartman M, Miao H, Sng JH, Sim X, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Jaworska-Bieniek K, Durda K, Sangrajrang S, Gaborieau V, McKay J, Toland A, Ambrosone C, Yannoukakos D, Godwin A, Shen CY, Hsiung CN, Wu PE, Chen ST, Swerdlow A, Ashworth A, Orr N, Schoemaker M, Ponder B, Nevanlinna H, Brown M, Chenevix-Trench G, Easton D, Dunning A. Functional variants at the 11q13 risk locus for breast cancer regulate cyclin D1 expression through long-range enhancers. Am J Hum Genet 2013; 92:489-503. [PMID: 23540573 PMCID: PMC3617380 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2012] [Revised: 12/21/2012] [Accepted: 01/03/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Analysis of 4,405 variants in 89,050 European subjects from 41 case-control studies identified three independent association signals for estrogen-receptor-positive tumors at 11q13. The strongest signal maps to a transcriptional enhancer element in which the G allele of the best candidate causative variant rs554219 increases risk of breast cancer, reduces both binding of ELK4 transcription factor and luciferase activity in reporter assays, and may be associated with low cyclin D1 protein levels in tumors. Another candidate variant, rs78540526, lies in the same enhancer element. Risk association signal 2, rs75915166, creates a GATA3 binding site within a silencer element. Chromatin conformation studies demonstrate that these enhancer and silencer elements interact with each other and with their likely target gene, CCND1.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Binding Sites
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Case-Control Studies
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Chromatin/chemistry
- Chromatin/genetics
- Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11/genetics
- Cyclin D1/genetics
- Cyclin D1/metabolism
- Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
- Enhancer Elements, Genetic/genetics
- Female
- GATA3 Transcription Factor/antagonists & inhibitors
- GATA3 Transcription Factor/genetics
- GATA3 Transcription Factor/metabolism
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Humans
- Luciferases/metabolism
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics
- Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- RNA, Small Interfering/genetics
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Silencer Elements, Transcriptional/genetics
- ets-Domain Protein Elk-4/antagonists & inhibitors
- ets-Domain Protein Elk-4/genetics
- ets-Domain Protein Elk-4/metabolism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet D. French
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Maya Ghoussaini
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Stacey L. Edwards
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Kerstin B. Meyer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Shahana Ahmed
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Sofia Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki 00029, Finland
| | - Mel J. Maranian
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Martin O’Reilly
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Kristine M. Hillman
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Joshua A. Betts
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Thomas Carroll
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Peter J. Bailey
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Ed Dicks
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Ana-Teresa Maia
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Andrew Beck
- Harvard Medical School and Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Nicholas W. Knoblauch
- Harvard Medical School and Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Constance Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Daniel Barnes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - M. Rosario Alonso
- Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Daniel Herrero
- Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Daniel C. Tessier
- Centre d’innovation Génome Québec et Université McGill, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Daniel Vincent
- Centre d’innovation Génome Québec et Université McGill, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Francois Bacot
- Centre d’innovation Génome Québec et Université McGill, Montréal, QC H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Craig Luccarini
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Caroline Baynes
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Don Conroy
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Senno Verhoef
- Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sten Cornelissen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
| | | | | | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christian R. Loehberg
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Arif B. Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- University Breast Center Franconia, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julian Peto
- Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Isabel dos Santos Silva
- Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Nichola Johnson
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Zoe Aitken
- Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Elinor J. Sawyer
- Division of Cancer Studies, NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Michael J. Kerin
- Surgery, Clinical Science Institute, Galway University Hospital and National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Nicola Miller
- Surgery, Clinical Science Institute, Galway University Hospital and National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Frederik Marme
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
- Molecular Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pascal Guénel
- INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), U1018, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer Team, 94807 Villejuif, France
- University Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), U1018, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer Team, 94807 Villejuif, France
- University Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Laurent-Puig
- Université Paris Sorbonne Cité, UMR-S775 INSERM, 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
| | - Florence Menegaux
- INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), CESP (Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health), U1018, Environmental Epidemiology of Cancer Team, 94807 Villejuif, France
- University Paris-Sud, UMRS 1018, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Børge G. Nordestgaard
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Sune F. Nielsen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Genetic & Molecular Epidemiology Group, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - M. Pilar Zamora
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid 28046, Spain
| | | | - Javier Benitez
- Human Genotyping-CEGEN Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Program, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heiko Müller
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Alfons Meindl
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Lichtner
- Institute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Division of Molecular Gyneco-Oncology, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Justenhoven
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
| | - The GENICA Network
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
- University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelische Kliniken Bonn gGmbH, Johanniter Krankenhaus, 53113 Bonn, Germany
- Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66421 Homburg, Germany
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), 44789 Bochum, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn, 53123 Bonn, Germany
| | - Kirsimari Aaltonen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki 00029, Finland
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00029, Finland
| | - Päivi Heikkilä
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00029, Finland
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00029, Finland
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00029, Finland
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Hidemi Ito
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Aiko Sueta
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya 464-8681, Japan
| | - Natalia V. Bogdanova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Natalia N. Antonenkova
- N.N. Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, 223040 Minsk, Belarus
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biocenter Kuopio, Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Vesa Kataja
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biocenter Kuopio, Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
- Cancer Center, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Veli-Matti Kosma
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biocenter Kuopio, Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jaana M. Hartikainen
- Imaging Center, Department of Clinical Pathology, Kuopio University Hospital, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
- School of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biocenter Kuopio, Cancer Center of Eastern Finland, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Chiu-chen Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - David Van Den Berg
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Daniel O. Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Vesalius Research Center (VRC), VIB, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Peeters
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Smeets
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Multidisciplinary Breast Center, University Hospital Leuven and KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Nickels
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dieter Flesch-Janys
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology/Clinical Cancer Registry and Institute for Medical Biometrics and Epidemiology, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Preventive and Predictive Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT), 20133 Milan, Italy
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Domenico Sardella
- IFOM, Fondazione Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare, 20139 Milan, Italy
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Xianshu Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Vernon S. Pankratz
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Adam Lee
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
| | - Gianluca Severi
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
| | - Laura Baglietto
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic, and Analytic Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, The Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Brian E. Henderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Fredrick Schumacher
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Jacques Simard
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Mark S. Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada
| | - France Labrèche
- Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Département de santé environnementale et santé au travail, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3A 3C2, Canada
| | - Martine Dumont
- Cancer Genomics Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec and Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, 47500 Selangor, Malaysia
- Breast Cancer Research Unit, University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Cheng Har Yip
- Breast Cancer Research Unit, University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Char-Hong Ng
- Breast Cancer Research Unit, University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Vessela Kristensen
- Department of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, 0310 Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine (Faculty Division Ahus), University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Sandra Deming-Halverson
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Martha Shrubsole
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Department of Clinical Genetics and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Department of Clinical Genetics and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - Mervi Grip
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Julia A. Knight
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
- Prosserman Centre for Health Research, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5T 3L9, Canada
| | - Gord Glendon
- Ontario Cancer Genetics Network, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - Anna Marie Mulligan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics & Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Seynaeve
- Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research and Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| | - Stephen J. Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center & Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kamila Czene
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17 177, Sweden
| | - Daniel Klevebring
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17 177, Sweden
| | - Nils Schoof
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17 177, Sweden
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John W.M. Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3075 EA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J. Margriet Collée
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3008 AE Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Per Hall
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17 177, Sweden
| | - Jingmei Li
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Human Genetics Division, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
| | - Keith Humphreys
- Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 17 177, Sweden
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 200336, China
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Hui Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Angela Cox
- CRUK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK
| | - Sabapathy P. Balasubramanian
- CRUK/YCR Sheffield Cancer Research Centre, Department of Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK
| | - William Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Lisa B. Signorello
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Catherine S. Healey
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Mitul Shah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Karen A. Pooley
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Daehee Kang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea
| | - Keun-Young Yoo
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea
| | - Dong-Young Noh
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 110-799, Korea
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Hui Miao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Jen-Hwei Sng
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| | - Xueling Sim
- Centre for Molecular Epidemiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, u. Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jan Lubinski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, u. Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, u. Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
- Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Warsaw Medical University, ul. Żwirki i Wigury 61, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Durda
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, u. Polabska 4, 70-115 Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Valerie Gaborieau
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - James McKay
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
| | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Christine B. Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Drakoulis Yannoukakos
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, IRRP, National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos,” Athens 15310, Greece
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Colleague of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichong 40402, Taiwan, ROC
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chia-Ni Hsiung
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Pei-Ei Wu
- Taiwan Biobank, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shou-Tung Chen
- Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua City, Changhua county 500, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Anthony Swerdlow
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research and Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, London SM2 5NG, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Alan Ashworth
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Nick Orr
- Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
- Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW3 6JB, UK
| | - Minouk J. Schoemaker
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research and Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Bruce A.J. Ponder
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki 00029, Finland
| | - Melissa A. Brown
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland 4029, Australia
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
114
|
Abstract
Many SNPs associated with human disease are located in non-coding regions of the genome. A new study shows that SNPs associated with breast cancer risk are located in enhancer regions and alter binding affinity for the pioneer factor FOXA1.
Collapse
|
115
|
Li Q, Seo JH, Stranger B, McKenna A, Pe'er I, Laframboise T, Brown M, Tyekucheva S, Freedman ML. Integrative eQTL-based analyses reveal the biology of breast cancer risk loci. Cell 2013; 152:633-41. [PMID: 23374354 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 251] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2012] [Revised: 10/20/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Germline determinants of gene expression in tumors are infrequently studied due to the complexity of transcript regulation caused by somatically acquired alterations. We performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL)-based analyses using the multi-level information provided in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Of the factors we measured, cis-acting eQTLs accounted for 1.2% of the total variation of tumor gene expression, while somatic copy-number alteration and CpG methylation accounted for 7.3% and 3.3%, respectively. eQTL analyses of 15 previously reported breast cancer risk loci resulted in the discovery of three variants that are significantly associated with transcript levels (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.1). Our trans-based analysis identified an additional three risk loci to act through ESR1, MYC, and KLF4. These findings provide a more comprehensive picture of gene expression determinants in breast cancer as well as insights into the underlying biology of breast cancer risk loci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyuan Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
116
|
Reintjes N, Li Y, Becker A, Rohmann E, Schmutzler R, Wollnik B. Activating somatic FGFR2 mutations in breast cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60264. [PMID: 23527311 PMCID: PMC3603931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2012] [Accepted: 02/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
It is known that FGFR2 gene variations confer a risk for breast cancer. FGFR2 and FGF10, the main ligand of FGFR2, are both overexpressed in 5–10% of breast tumors. In our study, we sequenced the most important coding regions of FGFR2 in somatic tumor tissue of 140 sporadic breast cancer patients and performed MLPA analysis to detect copy number variations in FGFR2 and FGF10. We identified one somatic heterozygous missense mutation, p.K660N (c.1980G>C), within the tyrosine kinase domain of FGFR2 in tumor tissue of a sporadic breast cancer patient, which is likely mediated by the FGFR2-IIIb isoform. The presence of wild type and mutated alleles in equal quantities suggests that the mutation has driven clonal amplification of mutant cells. We have analyzed the tyrosine kinase activity of p.K660N and another recently described somatic breast cancer mutation in FGFR2, p.R203C, after expression in HEK293 cells and demonstrated that the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity of both mutant proteins is strongly increased resulting in elevated phosphorylation and activity of downstream effectors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of functional analysis of somatic breast cancer mutations in FGFR2 providing evidence for the activating nature of FGFR2-mediated signalling in the pathogenesis of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Reintjes
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Yun Li
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexandra Becker
- Department of Molecular Gynecology and Oncology, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Edyta Rohmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Department of Molecular Gynecology and Oncology, Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bernd Wollnik
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Germline allele-specific expression of DAPK1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. PLoS One 2013; 8:e55261. [PMID: 23383130 PMCID: PMC3557246 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
We previously reported a rare germline variant (c.1-6531) that resulted in allele–specific expression (ASE) of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) and predisposition to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We investigated a cohort of CLL patients lacking this mutation for the presence of ASE of DAPK1. We developed a novel strategy that combines single-nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE) with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, and detected germline DAPK1 ASE in 17 out of 120 (14.2%) CLL patients associated with a trend towards younger age at diagnosis. ASE was absent in 63 healthy controls. Germline cells of CLL patients with ASE showed increased levels of DNA methylation in the promoter region, however, neither genetic nor further epigenetic aberrations could be identified in the DAPK1 5′ upstream regulatory region, within distinct exons or in the 3′-UTR. We identified B-lymphoid malignancy related cell line models harboring allelic imbalance and found that allele-specific methylation in DAPK1 is associated with ASE. Our data indicate that ASE at the DAPK1 gene locus is a recurrent event, mediated by epigenetic mechanisms and potentially predisposing to CLL.
Collapse
|
118
|
Khurana A, Beleford D, He X, Chien J, Shridhar V. Role of heparan sulfatases in ovarian and breast cancer. Am J Cancer Res 2013; 3:34-45. [PMID: 23359864 PMCID: PMC3555198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 01/03/2013] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Endosulfatases HSulf-1 and -2 (also referred to as Sulf1 and -2) represent a family of enzymes that modulate heparin binding growth factor signaling. Heparan sulfatase 1 (HSulf-1) and heparan sulfatase 2 (HSulf-2) are two important 6-O endosulfatases which remove or edit 6-O sulfate residues of N-glucosamine present on highly sulfated HS. Alteration of heparan sulfatases have been identified in the context of several cancer types. Many cancer types either exhibit increased or decreased HSulfs expression at the transcript levels. Specifically, HSulf-1 was found to be downregulated in early-stage ovarian tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastatic breast cancer patients. HSulf-2 was found to be upregulated in ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma, whereas limited information is present about HSulf-2 expression in different stages of ovarian cancers. Here, we review the important role of these sulfatases play in ovarian and breast cancers in terms of tumorigenesis such as angiogenesis, chemoresistance, apoptosis, growth factor signaling, hypoxia and metastasis. These recent discoveries have added significant understanding about these sulfate editing enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwani Khurana
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of MedicineRochester, MN, USA
| | - Daniah Beleford
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of MedicineRochester, MN, USA
| | - Xiaoping He
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of MedicineRochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeremy Chien
- Department of Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical CenterKansas City, KS, USA
| | - Viji Shridhar
- Department of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of MedicineRochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Kim S, Dubrovska A, Salamone RJ, Walker JR, Grandinetti KB, Bonamy GMC, Orth AP, Elliott J, Porta DG, Garcia-Echeverria C, Reddy VA. FGFR2 promotes breast tumorigenicity through maintenance of breast tumor-initiating cells. PLoS One 2013; 8:e51671. [PMID: 23300950 PMCID: PMC3534701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2012] [Accepted: 11/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that some cancers contain a population of stem-like TICs (tumor-initiating cells) and eliminating TICs may offer a new strategy to develop successful anti-cancer therapies. As molecular mechanisms underlying the maintenance of the TIC pool are poorly understood, the development of TIC-specific therapeutics remains a major challenge. We first identified and characterized TICs and non-TICs isolated from a mouse breast cancer model. TICs displayed increased tumorigenic potential, self-renewal, heterogeneous differentiation, and bipotency. Gene expression analysis and immunostaining of TICs and non-TICs revealed that FGFR2 was preferentially expressed in TICs. Loss of FGFR2 impaired self-renewal of TICs, thus resulting in marked decreases in the TIC population and tumorigenic potential. Restoration of FGFR2 rescued the defects in TIC pool maintenance, bipotency, and breast tumor growth driven by FGFR2 knockdown. In addition, pharmacological inhibition of FGFR2 kinase activity led to a decrease in the TIC population which resulted in suppression of breast tumor growth. Moreover, human breast TICs isolated from patient tumor samples were found enriched in a FGFR2+ population that was sufficient to initiate tumor growth. Our data suggest that FGFR2 is essential in sustaining the breast TIC pool through promotion of self-renewal and maintenance of bipotent TICs, and raise the possibility of FGFR2 inhibition as a strategy for anti-cancer therapy by eradicating breast TICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungeun Kim
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
- * E-mail: (SK); (VAR)
| | - Anna Dubrovska
- The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America
| | - Richard J. Salamone
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - John R. Walker
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Kathryn B. Grandinetti
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Ghislain M. C. Bonamy
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Anthony P. Orth
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Jimmy Elliott
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
| | - Diana Graus Porta
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Venkateshwar A. Reddy
- Genomics Institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, San Diego, California, United States of America
- * E-mail: (SK); (VAR)
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Chen F, Chen GK, Stram DO, Millikan RC, Ambrosone CB, John EM, Bernstein L, Zheng W, Palmer JR, Hu JJ, Rebbeck TR, Ziegler RG, Nyante S, Bandera EV, Ingles SA, Press MF, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Deming SL, Rodriguez-Gil JL, Demichele A, Chanock SJ, Blot W, Signorello L, Cai Q, Li G, Long J, Huo D, Zheng Y, Cox NJ, Olopade OI, Ogundiran TO, Adebamowo C, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Simon MS, Hennis A, Nemesure B, Wu SY, Leske MC, Ambs S, Hutter CM, Young A, Kooperberg C, Peters U, Rhie SK, Wan P, Sheng X, Pooler LC, Van Den Berg DJ, Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Haiman CA. A genome-wide association study of breast cancer in women of African ancestry. Hum Genet 2013; 132:39-48. [PMID: 22923054 PMCID: PMC3749077 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-012-1214-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/31/2012] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in diverse populations are needed to reveal variants that are more common and/or limited to defined populations. We conducted a GWAS of breast cancer in women of African ancestry, with genotyping of >1,000,000 SNPs in 3,153 African American cases and 2,831 controls, and replication testing of the top 66 associations in an additional 3,607 breast cancer cases and 11,330 controls of African ancestry. Two of the 66 SNPs replicated (p < 0.05) in stage 2, which reached statistical significance levels of 10(-6) and 10(-5) in the stage 1 and 2 combined analysis (rs4322600 at chromosome 14q31: OR = 1.18, p = 4.3 × 10(-6); rs10510333 at chromosome 3p26: OR = 1.15, p = 1.5 × 10(-5)). These suggestive risk loci have not been identified in previous GWAS in other populations and will need to be examined in additional samples. Identification of novel risk variants for breast cancer in women of African ancestry will demand testing of a substantially larger set of markers from stage 1 in a larger replication sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Chen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
121
|
Fletcher MNC, Castro MAA, Wang X, de Santiago I, O’Reilly M, Chin SF, Rueda OM, Caldas C, Ponder BAJ, Markowetz F, Meyer KB. Master regulators of FGFR2 signalling and breast cancer risk. Nat Commun 2013; 4:2464. [PMID: 24043118 PMCID: PMC3778544 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2013] [Accepted: 08/16/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) locus has been consistently identified as a breast cancer risk locus in independent genome-wide association studies. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying FGFR2-mediated risk are still unknown. Using model systems we show that FGFR2-regulated genes are preferentially linked to breast cancer risk loci in expression quantitative trait loci analysis, supporting the concept that risk genes cluster in pathways. Using a network derived from 2,000 transcriptional profiles we identify SPDEF, ERα, FOXA1, GATA3 and PTTG1 as master regulators of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 signalling, and show that ERα occupancy responds to fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 signalling. Our results indicate that ERα, FOXA1 and GATA3 contribute to the regulation of breast cancer susceptibility genes, which is consistent with the effects of anti-oestrogen treatment in breast cancer prevention, and suggest that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 signalling has an important role in mediating breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael N. C. Fletcher
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- These authors contributed equally to this work
- Present address: Friedrich Miescher Laboratory of the Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 39, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mauro A. A. Castro
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- These authors contributed equally to this work
- Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2600, Anexo, 90035-003 Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Xin Wang
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Ines de Santiago
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Martin O’Reilly
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Suet-Feung Chin
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Oscar M. Rueda
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Bruce A. J. Ponder
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Florian Markowetz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Kerstin B. Meyer
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
122
|
Jara L, Gonzalez-Hormazabal P, Cerceño K, Di Capua GA, Reyes JM, Blanco R, Bravo T, Peralta O, Gomez F, Waugh E, Margarit S, Ibañez G, Romero C, Pakomio J, Roizen G. Genetic variants in FGFR2 and MAP3K1 are associated with the risk of familial and early-onset breast cancer in a South-American population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 137:559-69. [PMID: 23225170 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2359-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2012] [Accepted: 11/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Genome-Wide Association Studies have identified several loci associated with breast cancer (BC) in populations of different ethnic origins. One of the strongest associations was found in the FGFR2 gene, and MAP3K1 has been proposed as a low-penetrance BC risk factor. In this study, we evaluated the associations among FGFR2 SNPs rs2981582, rs2420946, and rs1219648; and MAP3K1 rs889312, with BC risk in 351 BRCA1/2-negative Chilean BC cases and 802 controls. All the SNPs studied were significantly associated with increased BC risk in familial BC and in non-familial early-onset BC, in a dose-dependent manner. Subjects with 3 risk alleles were at a significantly increased risk of BC compared with subjects with 0-2 risk alleles, in both familial BC and early-onset non-familial BC (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI 1.04-2.07, P = 0.026 and OR = 2.04 95 % CI 1.32-3.24, P < 0.001, respectively). In the haplotype analysis, the FGFR2 rs2981582 T / rs2420946 T / rs1219648 G haplotype (ht2) was associated with a significantly increased BC risk compared with the rs2981582 C / rs2420946 C / rs1219648 A haplotype in familial BC and in non-familial early-onset BC (OR = 1.32, 95 % CI 1.06-1.65, P = 0.012; OR = 1.46, 95 % CI 1.11-1.91, P = 0.004, respectively). When the FGFR2 ht2 and MAP3K1 rs889312 were evaluated as risk alleles, the risk of BC increased in a dose-dependent manner as the number of risk alleles increased (P trend <0.0001), indicating an additive effect. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of an interaction between FGFR2 ht2 and the MAP3K1 rs889312 C allele. These findings suggest that genetic variants in the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 genes may contribute to genetic susceptibility to BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian Jara
- Human Genetics Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences (ICBM), School of Medicine, University of Chile, Av. Independencia 1027, P.O. Box 70061, Santiago, Chile.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
123
|
Cen YL, Qi ML, Li HG, Su Y, Chen LJ, Lin Y, Chen WQ, Xie XM, Tang LY, Ren ZF. Associations of polymorphisms in the genes of FGFR2, FGF1, and RBFOX2 with breast cancer risk by estrogen/progesterone receptor status. Mol Carcinog 2012; 52 Suppl 1:E52-9. [PMID: 23143756 DOI: 10.1002/mc.21979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2012] [Revised: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 10/18/2012] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Genetic polymorphisms of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) have been demonstrated to be associated with breast cancer risk, presumably through elevation of FGFR2 expression. Fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) and RNA binding protein fox-1 homolog 2 (RBFOX2), which are functionally related to FGFR2, may also associate with breast cancer risk. We investigated the associations between breast cancer risk and the polymorphisms of FGFR2 rs2981582, FGF1 rs250108, and RBFOX2 rs2051579 among 839 incident breast cancer cases and 863 age-matched controls in the Guangzhou Breast Cancer Study. Stratified odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status using multivariate logistic regression. FGFR2 rs2981582 was confirmed to be significantly associated with the risk of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer. In contrast, FGF1 rs250108 was significantly associated with the risk of ER-negative breast cancer (OR (95% CI) = 1.68 (1.20-2.35) for CT + TT vs. CC genotype) but not ER-positive breast cancer. CA + AA genotypes at RBFOX2 rs2051579 were associated with a reduced risk of ER-negative (0.71 (0.52-0.97)) but not ER-positive breast cancer compared to the CC genotype. Similar results were observed when differentiating breast cancer cases by PR status. Neither of the pairs between the three SNPs had a significant interaction on breast cancer risk. Our findings show a suggestively stronger association between FGFR2 rs2981582 and ER-positive breast cancer risk and suggest a greater association of FGF1 rs250108 and RBFOX2 rs2051579 with ER-negative compared to ER-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Ling Cen
- The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China; The School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
124
|
Abstract
A wide variety of diseases have a significant genetic component, including major causes of morbidity and mortality in the western world. Many of these diseases are also angiogenesis dependent. In humans, common polymorphisms, although more subtle in effect than rare mutations that cause Mendelian disease, are expected to have greater overall effects on human disease. Thus, common polymorphisms in angiogenesis-regulating genes may affect the response to an angiogenic stimulus and thereby affect susceptibility to or progression of such diseases. Candidate gene studies have identified several associations between angiogenesis gene polymorphisms and disease. Similarly, emerging pharmacogenomic evidence indicates that several angiogenesis-regulating polymorphisms may predict response to therapy. In contrast, genome-wide association studies have identified only a few risk alleles in obvious angiogenesis genes. As in other traits, regulatory polymorphisms appear to dominate the landscape of angiogenic responsiveness. Rodent assays, including the mouse corneal micropocket assay, tumor models, and a macular degeneration model have allowed the identification and comparison of loci that directly affect the trait. Complementarity between human and animal approaches will allow increased understanding of the genetic basis for angiogenesis-dependent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Rogers
- Vascular Biology Program, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusettes, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
125
|
Gao C, Devarajan K, Zhou Y, Slater CM, Daly MB, Chen X. Identifying breast cancer risk loci by global differential allele-specific expression (DASE) analysis in mammary epithelial transcriptome. BMC Genomics 2012; 13:570. [PMID: 23107584 PMCID: PMC3532379 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2012] [Accepted: 10/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The significant mortality associated with breast cancer (BCa) suggests a need to improve current research strategies to identify new genes that predispose women to breast cancer. Differential allele-specific expression (DASE) has been shown to contribute to phenotypic variables in humans and recently to the pathogenesis of cancer. We previously reported that nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) could lead to DASE of BRCA1/2, which is associated with elevated susceptibility to breast cancer. In addition to truncation mutations, multiple genetic and epigenetic factors can contribute to DASE, and we propose that DASE is a functional index for cis-acting regulatory variants and pathogenic mutations, and that global analysis of DASE in breast cancer precursor tissues can be used to identify novel causative alleles for breast cancer susceptibility. RESULTS To test our hypothesis, we employed the Illumina(®) Omni1-Quad BeadChip in paired genomic DNA (gDNA) and double-stranded cDNA (ds-cDNA) samples prepared from eight BCa patient-derived normal mammary epithelial lines (HMEC). We filtered original array data according to heterozygous genotype calls and calculated DASE values using the Log ratio of cDNA allele intensity, which was normalized to the corresponding gDNA. We developed two statistical methods, SNP- and gene-based approaches, which allowed us to identify a list of 60 candidate DASE loci (DASE ≥ 2.00, P ≤ 0.01, FDR ≤ 0.05) by both methods. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of DASE loci revealed one major breast cancer-relevant interaction network, which includes two known cancer causative genes, ZNF331 (DASE = 2.31, P = 0.0018, FDR = 0.040) and USP6 (DASE = 4.80, P = 0.0013, FDR = 0.013), and a breast cancer causative gene, DMBT1 (DASE=2.03, P = 0.0017, FDR = 0.014). Sequence analysis of a 5' RACE product of DMBT1 demonstrated that rs2981745, a putative breast cancer risk locus, appears to be one of the causal variants leading to DASE in DMBT1. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrated for the first time that global DASE analysis is a powerful new approach to identify breast cancer risk allele(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Gao
- Cancer Epigenetics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
126
|
Betts JA, French JD, Brown MA, Edwards SL. Long-range transcriptional regulation of breast cancer genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012; 52:113-25. [PMID: 23077082 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2012] [Revised: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 09/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a major health problem and understanding the genetic basis of this disease is crucial for predicting risk and developing effective targeted therapeutics. Several breast cancer predisposing genes have been identified, but mutations in the coding regions of these genes only accounts for a small proportion of risk. Research now suggests that combinations of multiple non-coding changes in breast cancer susceptibility genes, which cause moderate alterations in gene expression, will be responsible for the remaining inherited risk. These non-coding changes will include variants in proximal and distal transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulatory elements and may affect the levels and function of trans-acting factors, including proteins and RNAs, which act on these elements. Somatic changes in such elements and factors have also been associated with breast cancer progression. With the recent advent of techniques allowing the detection of long-range DNA interactions spanning the human genome, it has become increasingly clear that long-range regulatory elements constitute an important mechanism for gene regulation. Recent studies have identified several such elements that are important for regulating genes involved in breast cancer, raising the possibility that defects in these sequences may contribute to breast cancer predisposition and progression. In this review, we discuss the emerging functions of cis-regulatory elements and a subset of trans-acting factors in breast tumorigenesis. We also discuss some recent progress in our understanding of how dysregulation in these transcriptional components may contribute to breast cancer, and the potential implications for molecular diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and the treatment of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Betts
- School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
127
|
The breast cancer susceptibility gene product fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 serves as a scaffold for regulation of NF-κB signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32:4662-73. [PMID: 22988296 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.00935-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 (FGFR2) has been identified in genome-wide association studies to be associated with increased breast cancer risk; however, its mechanism of action remains unclear. Here we show that the two major FGFR2 alternatively spliced isoforms, FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc, interact with IκB kinase β and its downstream target, NF-κB. FGFR2 inhibits nuclear RelA/p65 NF-κB translocation and activity and reduces expression of dependent transcripts, including interleukin-6. These interactions result in diminished STAT3 phosphorylation and reduced breast cancer cell growth, motility, and invasiveness. FGFR2 also arrests the epithelial cell-to-mesenchymal cell transition (EMT), resulting in attenuated neoplastic growth in orthotopic xenografts of breast cancer cells. Our studies provide strong evidence for the protective effects of FGFR2 on tumor progression. We propose that FGFR2 serves as a scaffold for multiple components of the NF-κB signaling complex. Through these interactions, FGFR2 isoforms can respond to tissue-specific FGF signals to modulate epithelial cell-stromal cell communications in cancer progression.
Collapse
|
128
|
Zhao H, Yang W, Qiu R, Li J, Xin Q, Wang X, Feng Y, Shan S, Liu Y, Gong Y, Liu Q. An intronic variant associated with systemic lupus erythematosus changes the binding affinity of Yinyang1 to downregulate WDFY4. Genes Immun 2012; 13:536-42. [PMID: 22972472 DOI: 10.1038/gene.2012.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Two recent genome-wide association studies of East Asian populations revealed three genetic variants in WDFY4/LRRC18 associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). To identify the gene contributing to this disease susceptibility, we examined the mRNA expression of WDFY4 and LRRC18 in patients with SLE and healthy controls. WDFY4 was significantly downregulated in SLE patients as compared with controls. We used allelic expression and dual-luciferase assays to identify the functional variant. Transcriptional activity was lower for the rs877819A than -G allele. Electrophoretic mobility shift and supershift assays revealed that the transcription factor Yinyang1 (YY1) binds to rs877819, with lower affinity to the A allele, which explained the reduced transcriptional activity. This effect was further confirmed by YY1 small interfering RNA knockdown, overexpression and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments. rs877819 in WDFY4 might be the functional site associated with SLE by reduced binding of YY1 and downregulating WDFY4 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Zhao
- Key Laboratory for Experimental Teratology of the Ministry of Education and Department of Medical Genetics, Shandong University School of Medicine, Shandong, PRC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
129
|
Association of common genetic variants with breast cancer risk and clinicopathological characteristics in a Chinese population. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 136:209-20. [PMID: 22965832 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2234-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Accepted: 08/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified various genetic susceptibility loci for breast cancer based mainly on European-ancestry populations. Differing linkage disequilibrium patterns exist between European and Asian populations, and thus GWAS-identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in one population may not be of significance in another population. In order to explore the role of breast cancer susceptibility variants in a Chinese population of Southern Chinese descent, we analyzed 22 SNPs for 1,191 breast cancer cases and 1,534 female controls. Associations between the SNPs and clinicopathological features were also investigated. In addition, we evaluated the combined effects of associated SNPs by constructing risk models. Eight SNPs were associated with an elevated breast cancer risk. Rs2046210/6q25.1 increased breast cancer risk via an additive model [per-allele odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-1.62], and was associated with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (per-allele OR = 1.39, 95 % CI = 1.20-1.61) and ER-negative (per-allele OR = 1.55, 95 % CI = 1.28-1.89) disease. Rs2046210 was also associated with stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 disease, with per-allele ORs of 1.38 (1.14-1.68), 1.48 (1.25-1.74), and 1.58 (1.28-1.94), respectively. Four SNPs mapped to 10q26.13/FGFR2 were associated with increased breast cancer risk via an additive model with per-allelic risks (95 % CI) of 1.26 (1.12-1.43) at rs1219648, 1.22 (1.07-1.38) at rs2981582, 1.21 (1.07-1.36) at rs2981579, and 1.18 (1.04-1.35) at rs11200014. Variants of rs7696175/TLR1, TLR6, rs13281615/8q24, and rs16886165/MAP3K1 were also associated with increased breast cancer risk, with per-allele ORs (95 % CI) of 1.16 (1.00-1.34), 1.15 (1.02-1.29), and 1.15 (1.01-1.29), respectively. Five SNPs associated with breast cancer risk predominantly among ER-positive tumors (rs2981582/FGFR2, rs4415084/MRPS30, rs1219648/FGFR2, rs2981579/FGFR2, and rs11200014/FGFR2). Among our Chinese population, the risk of developing breast cancer increased by 90 % for those with a combination of 6 or more risk alleles, compared to patients with ≤3 risk alleles.
Collapse
|
130
|
Ni Y, Hall AW, Battenhouse A, Iyer VR. Simultaneous SNP identification and assessment of allele-specific bias from ChIP-seq data. BMC Genet 2012; 13:46. [PMID: 22950704 PMCID: PMC3434080 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2012] [Accepted: 09/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with many aspects of human development and disease, and many non-coding SNPs associated with disease risk are presumed to affect gene regulation. We have previously shown that SNPs within transcription factor binding sites can affect transcription factor binding in an allele-specific and heritable manner. However, such analysis has relied on prior whole-genome genotypes provided by large external projects such as HapMap and the 1000 Genomes Project. This requirement limits the study of allele-specific effects of SNPs in primary patient samples from diseases of interest, where complete genotypes are not readily available. Results In this study, we show that we are able to identify SNPs de novo and accurately from ChIP-seq data generated in the ENCODE Project. Our de novo identified SNPs from ChIP-seq data are highly concordant with published genotypes. Independent experimental verification of more than 100 sites estimates our false discovery rate at less than 5%. Analysis of transcription factor binding at de novo identified SNPs revealed widespread heritable allele-specific binding, confirming previous observations. SNPs identified from ChIP-seq datasets were significantly enriched for disease-associated variants, and we identified dozens of allele-specific binding events in non-coding regions that could distinguish between disease and normal haplotypes. Conclusions Our approach combines SNP discovery, genotyping and allele-specific analysis, but is selectively focused on functional regulatory elements occupied by transcription factors or epigenetic marks, and will therefore be valuable for identifying the functional regulatory consequences of non-coding SNPs in primary disease samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunyun Ni
- Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
131
|
A study of the functional significance of epidermal growth factor in major depressive disorder. Psychiatr Genet 2012; 22:161-7. [DOI: 10.1097/ypg.0b013e3283539550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
132
|
Tenhagen M, van Diest PJ, Ivanova IA, van der Wall E, van der Groep P. Fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer: expression, downstream effects, and possible drug targets. Endocr Relat Cancer 2012; 19:R115-29. [PMID: 22508544 DOI: 10.1530/erc-12-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Cancer treatments are increasingly focusing on the molecular mechanisms underlying the oncogenic processes present in tumors of individual patients. Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) are among the many molecules that are involved in oncogenesis and are currently under investigation for their potential as drug targets in breast cancer patients. These receptor tyrosine kinases play a role in several processes including proliferation, angiogenesis, and migration. Alterations in these basal processes can contribute to the development and progression of tumors. Among breast cancer patients, several subgroups have been shown to harbor genetic aberrations in FGFRs, including amplifications of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR4 and mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR4. Here, we review in vitro and in vivo models that have partly elucidated the molecular implications of these different genetic aberrations, the resulting tumor characteristics, and the potential of FGFRs as therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tenhagen
- Department of Pathology Division of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
133
|
Fava C, Montagnana M, Guidi GC, Melander O. From circulating biomarkers to genomics and imaging in the prediction of cardiovascular events in the general population. Ann Med 2012; 44:433-47. [PMID: 21623699 DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2011.582511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In the last decades numerous markers have been considered and investigated for the prediction of CV events, but only a few of them resulted in improved global risk assessment beyond traditional risk factors when incorporated into coronary evaluation scores. Recent genetic studies have pointed out a few but consistent loci or genes which are independently associated with CV risk. The idea is fascinating that these genetic markers could lead to improved individual CV risk assessment and tailored pharmacological interventions. In this brief review we will not make a systematic review of all non-genetic and genetic markers of CV risk but we will try to make a brief overview of the most interesting ones with the aim to underline potential 'pros' and 'cons' of their implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Fava
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, University Hospital of Malmö, Sweden
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
134
|
Nissenbaum J. From mouse to humans: discovery of the CACNG2 pain susceptibility gene. Clin Genet 2012; 82:311-20. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01924.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2012] [Revised: 06/29/2012] [Accepted: 06/29/2012] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
135
|
Fu F, Wang C, Huang M, Song C, Lin S, Huang H. Polymorphisms in second intron of the FGFR2 gene are associated with the risk of early-onset breast cancer in Chinese Han women. TOHOKU J EXP MED 2012; 226:221-9. [PMID: 22374580 DOI: 10.1620/tjem.226.221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) plays an important role in tumor cell growth, invasiveness, motility, and angiogenesis. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the second intron of the FGFR2 gene are associated with the risk of breast cancer. In this study, we determined whether these SNPs of the FGFR2 gene are associated with early onset of non-familial breast cancer in a Chinese Han population. Recruited were 118 female breast cancer patients who were less than or equal to 35 years of age and without a family history of breast cancer, and 104 age-matched healthy controls. Six SNPs of the second intron of the FGFR2 gene, including rs2981428C/A (i.e., a change at this particular site from nucleotide C to A), rs11200014G/A, rs2981579C/T, rs1219648A/G, rs2420946C/T, and rs2981582C/T, were detected using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. The data showed that the homozygotes at each minor allele, rs11200014 (AA), rs1219648 (GG), rs2420946 (TT), and rs2981582 (TT), were significantly associated with an increased risk of early-onset non-familial breast cancer. The haplotype containing rs11200014A, rs1219648G, rs2420946T and rs2981582T also exhibited a significantly higher distribution in patients compared to controls (OR=1.784, 95% CI=1.161-2.744). In stratified analyses, each of the above four SNPs conferred a significantly greater risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, compared to estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer that is more resistant to treatment. Our data demonstrate that these four SNPs of the FGFR2 gene are associated with the risk of breast cancer at a young age in Chinese Han women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangmeng Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Union Clinical School, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, PR China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
136
|
Jain VK, Turner NC. Challenges and opportunities in the targeting of fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14:208. [PMID: 22731805 PMCID: PMC3446326 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway is a common event in many cancer types. Here we review the role of fibroblast growth factor receptor signalling in breast cancer, from SNPs in FGFR2 that influence breast cancer risk and SNPs in FGFR4 that associate with breast cancer prognosis, and potential therapeutic targets such as receptor amplification and aberrant autocrine and paracrine ligand expression. We discuss the multiple therapeutic strategies in preclinical and clinical development and the current and future challenges to successfully targeting this pathway in cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/metabolism
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Female
- Gene Amplification
- Humans
- Molecular Targeted Therapy
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Prognosis
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 1/metabolism
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/genetics
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3/metabolism
- Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4/genetics
- Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor/genetics
- Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor/metabolism
- Signal Transduction
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram K Jain
- GI Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK
- The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
137
|
Li X, Zhu C, Yeh CT, Wu W, Takacs EM, Petsch KA, Tian F, Bai G, Buckler ES, Muehlbauer GJ, Timmermans MCP, Scanlon MJ, Schnable PS, Yu J. Genic and nongenic contributions to natural variation of quantitative traits in maize. Genome Res 2012; 22:2436-44. [PMID: 22701078 PMCID: PMC3514673 DOI: 10.1101/gr.140277.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The complex genomes of many economically important crops present tremendous challenges to understand the genetic control of many quantitative traits with great importance in crop production, adaptation, and evolution. Advances in genomic technology need to be integrated with strategic genetic design and novel perspectives to break new ground. Complementary to individual-gene–targeted research, which remains challenging, a global assessment of the genomic distribution of trait-associated SNPs (TASs) discovered from genome scans of quantitative traits can provide insights into the genetic architecture and contribute to the design of future studies. Here we report the first systematic tabulation of the relative contribution of different genomic regions to quantitative trait variation in maize. We found that TASs were enriched in the nongenic regions, particularly within a 5-kb window upstream of genes, which highlights the importance of polymorphisms regulating gene expression in shaping the natural variation. Consistent with these findings, TASs collectively explained 44%–59% of the total phenotypic variation across maize quantitative traits, and on average, 79% of the explained variation could be attributed to TASs located in genes or within 5 kb upstream of genes, which together comprise only 13% of the genome. Our findings suggest that efficient, cost-effective genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in species with complex genomes can focus on genic and promoter regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianran Li
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
138
|
|
139
|
Maia AT, Antoniou AC, O'Reilly M, Samarajiwa S, Dunning M, Kartsonaki C, Chin SF, Curtis CN, McGuffog L, Domchek SM, Easton DF, Peock S, Frost D, Evans DG, Eeles R, Izatt L, Adlard J, Eccles D, Sinilnikova OM, Mazoyer S, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Gauthier-Villars M, Faivre L, Venat-Bouvet L, Delnatte C, Nevanlinna H, Couch FJ, Godwin AK, Caligo MA, Barkardottir RB, Chen X, Beesley J, Healey S, Caldas C, Chenevix-Trench G, Ponder BAJ. Effects of BRCA2 cis-regulation in normal breast and cancer risk amongst BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14:R63. [PMID: 22513257 PMCID: PMC3446398 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2011] [Revised: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cis-acting regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at specific loci may modulate penetrance of germline mutations at the same loci by introducing different levels of expression of the wild-type allele. We have previously reported that BRCA2 shows differential allelic expression and we hypothesize that the known variable penetrance of BRCA2 mutations might be associated with this mechanism. METHODS We combined haplotype analysis and differential allelic expression of BRCA2 in breast tissue to identify expression haplotypes and candidate cis-regulatory variants. These candidate variants underwent selection based on in silico predictions for regulatory potential and disruption of transcription factor binding, and were functionally analyzed in vitro and in vivo in normal and breast cancer cell lines. SNPs tagging the expression haplotypes were correlated with the total expression of several genes in breast tissue measured by Taqman and microarray technologies. The effect of the expression haplotypes on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers was investigated in 2,754 carriers. RESULTS We identified common haplotypes associated with differences in the levels of BRCA2 expression in human breast cells. We characterized three cis-regulatory SNPs located at the promoter and two intronic regulatory elements which affect the binding of the transcription factors C/EBPα, HMGA1, D-binding protein (DBP) and ZF5. We showed that the expression haplotypes also correlated with changes in the expression of other genes in normal breast. Furthermore, there was suggestive evidence that the minor allele of SNP rs4942440, which is associated with higher BRCA2 expression, is also associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72 to 1.00, P-trend = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Our work provides further insights into the role of cis-regulatory variation in the penetrance of disease-causing mutations. We identified small-effect genetic variants associated with allelic expression differences in BRCA2 which could possibly affect the risk in mutation carriers through altering expression levels of the wild-type allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Teresa Maia
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, Gambelas Campus, Building 7, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Martin O'Reilly
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Shamith Samarajiwa
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Mark Dunning
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Christiana Kartsonaki
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Suet-Feung Chin
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Christina N Curtis
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Medicine, University of Algarve, Portugal
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - EMBRACE
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Susan Peock
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Ros Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Rd, Belmont, Sutton Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, 7th floor, Borough Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Ward 10, 3rd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton, SO16 5YA, UK
| | - GEMO Study Collaborators
- GEMO Study Collaborators: Cancer Genetics Network "Groupe Génétique et Cancer", Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, France
| | - Olga M Sinilnikova
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France
- Unité Mixte de Génétique Constitutionnelle des Cancers Fréquents, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon/Centre Léon Bérard, 28 rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Sylvie Mazoyer
- INSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Université Lyon 1, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, 7 rue Guillaume Paradin, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Service de Génétique Oncologique, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75248 Paris cedex 05, France
- Unité INSERM U830, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75248 Paris cedex 05, France
- Université Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, 12, rue de l'Ecole de Médecine 75270 Paris Cedex 06, France
| | | | - Laurence Faivre
- Centre de Génétique, CHU Dijon, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon F-21000, France
- Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 Rue Professeur Marion 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Laurence Venat-Bouvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren, Limoges, France
| | - Capucine Delnatte
- Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod 44805 St Herblain Cedex, Nantes, France
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. BOX 700, 00029 HUS, Finland
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street Southwest Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, KS City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Maria Adelaide Caligo
- Division of Surgical, Molecular and Ultrastructural Pathology, Department of Oncology, University of Pisa and Pisa University Hospital, Lungarno Antonio Pacinotti, 43 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik 101, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Vatnsmýrarvegur 16, level 4 Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - kConFab Investigators
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett Street, Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - Xiaoqing Chen
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Sue Healey
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Carlos Caldas
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Bruce AJ Ponder
- Cambridge Research Institute - CRUK, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cancer Research UK, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
140
|
Liu R, Maia AT, Russell R, Caldas C, Ponder BA, Ritchie ME. Allele-specific expression analysis methods for high-density SNP microarray data. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1102-8. [PMID: 22355082 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
MOTIVATION In the past decade, a number of technologies to quantify allele-specific expression (ASE) in a genome-wide manner have become available to researchers. We investigate the application of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarrays to this task, exploring data obtained from both cell lines and primary tissue for which both RNA and DNA profiles are available. RESULTS We analyze data from two experiments that make use of high-density Illumina Infinium II genotyping arrays to measure ASE. We first preprocess each data set, which involves removal of outlier samples, careful normalization and a two-step filtering procedure to remove SNPs that show no evidence of expression in the samples being analyzed and calls that are clear genotyping errors. We then compare three different tests for detecting ASE, one of which has been previously published and two novel approaches. These tests vary at the level at which they operate (per SNP per individual or per SNP) and in the input data they require. Using SNPs from imprinted genes as true positives for ASE, we observe varying sensitivity for the different testing procedures that improves with increasing sample size. Methods that rely on RNA signal alone were found to perform best across a range of metrics. The top ranked SNPs recovered by all methods appear to be reasonable candidates for ASE. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION Analysis was carried out in R (http://www.R-project.org/) using existing functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruijie Liu
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
141
|
Cherdyntseva NV, Denisov EV, Litviakov NV, Maksimov VN, Malinovskaya EA, Babyshkina NN, Slonimskaya EM, Voevoda MI, Choinzonov EL. Crosstalk Between the FGFR2 and TP53 Genes in Breast Cancer: Data from an Association Study and Epistatic Interaction Analysis. DNA Cell Biol 2012; 31:306-16. [DOI: 10.1089/dna.2011.1351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nadezhda V. Cherdyntseva
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Evgeny V. Denisov
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Nicolay V. Litviakov
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Vladimir N. Maksimov
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetic Study of Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Elena A. Malinovskaya
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Natalia N. Babyshkina
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Elena M. Slonimskaya
- Department of General Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
- Department of Oncology, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| | - Mikhail I. Voevoda
- Laboratory of Molecular Genetic Study of Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
| | - Evgeny L. Choinzonov
- Department of Oncology, Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russian Federation
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
142
|
Hicks C, Kumar R, Pannuti A, Miele L. Integrative Analysis of Response to Tamoxifen Treatment in ER-Positive Breast Cancer Using GWAS Information and Transcription Profiling. BREAST CANCER-BASIC AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2012; 6:47-66. [PMID: 22399860 PMCID: PMC3292850 DOI: 10.4137/bcbcr.s8652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Variable response and resistance to tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer patients remains a major clinical problem. To determine whether genes and biological pathways containing SNPs associated with risk for breast cancer are dysregulated in response to tamoxifen treatment, we performed analysis combining information from 43 genome-wide association studies with gene expression data from 298 ER+ breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen and 125 ER+ controls. We identified 95 genes which distinguished tamoxifen treated patients from controls. Additionally, we identified 54 genes which stratified tamoxifen treated patients into two distinct groups. We identified biological pathways containing SNPs associated with risk for breast cancer, which were dysregulated in response to tamoxifen treatment. Key pathways identified included the apoptosis, P53, NFkB, DNA repair and cell cycle pathways. Combining GWAS with transcription profiling provides a unified approach for associating GWAS findings with response to drug treatment and identification of potential drug targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chindo Hicks
- Cancer Institute, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State Street, Jackson, MS 39216
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
143
|
Guo M, Liu W, Serra S, Asa SL, Ezzat S. FGFR2 isoforms support epithelial-stromal interactions in thyroid cancer progression. Cancer Res 2012; 72:2017-27. [PMID: 22345151 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-3985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Alternate splicing yields two distinct isoforms of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc varying their extracellular structure in human thyroid cancer, in which FGFR expression is commonly dysregulated. In this study, we characterized the function of these variants in modulating thyroid cancer behavior. Enforced expression of either FGFR2-IIIb or FGFR2-IIIc in thyroid epithelial cancer cells reduced expression of fibronectin, MAGE-A3 and MMP9, while increasing p21 and enhancing Rb dephosphorylation. Consistent with these tumor-suppressive properties, FGFR2-IIIb and FGFR2-IIIc each diminished invasive behavior in vitro and reduced tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Notably, these effects contrasted with those produced by expression of these FGFR isoforms in fibroblasts, in which they both stimulated cell growth. Moreover, in xenograft tumors generated by coimplantation of epithelial and fibroblast cells expressing that same isoform, there was no significant effect on tumor progression. Conversely, FGFR2-IIIb expression in epithelial cells yielded higher FGF4/FGF7 expression that, in the presence of FGFR2-IIIc-expressing fibroblasts, enhanced tumor progression. Together, our findings highlight the importance of cellular context in assigning growth properties to growth factor receptor isoforms. More specifically, they show how alternative splicing of FGFR2 yields heteroisoforms critical to the growth-promoting actions of FGFs that exert distinct epithelial-stromal effects in thyroid cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Guo
- The Ontario Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
144
|
Abstract
Abstract
Women treated at young ages with supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have a highly increased risk of breast cancer. For personalized advice and follow-up regimens for patients, information is needed on how the radiotherapy-related risk is affected by other breast cancer risk factors. Genome-wide association studies have identified 14 independently replicated common single nucleotide polymorphisms that influence breast cancer risk. To examine whether these variants contribute to risk of radiation-associated breast cancer in HL, we analyzed 2 independent case-control series, from the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, totaling 693 HL patients, 232 with breast cancer and 461 without. rs1219648, which annotates the FGFR2 gene, was associated with risk in both series (combined per-allele odds ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-2.02; P = .000111). These data provide evidence that genetic variation in FGFR2 influences radiation-induced breast cancer risk.
Collapse
|
145
|
Ahmad I, Iwata T, Leung HY. Mechanisms of FGFR-mediated carcinogenesis. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR CELL RESEARCH 2012; 1823:850-60. [PMID: 22273505 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2011] [Revised: 01/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/10/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In this review, the evidence for a role of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) mediated signalling in carcinogenesis are considered and relevant underlying mechanisms highlighted. FGF signalling mediated by FGFR follows a classic receptor tyrosine kinase signalling pathway and its deregulation at various points of its cascade could result in malignancy. Here we review the accumulating reports that revealed the association of FGF/FGFRs to various types of cancer at a genetic level, along with in vitro and in vivo evidences available so far, which indicates the functional involvement of FGF signalling in tumour formation and progression. An increasing number of drugs against the FGF pathways is currently in clinical testing. We will discuss the strategies for future FGF research in cancer and translational approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran Ahmad
- Beatson Institute for Cancer Research, Bearsden, Glasgow G61 1BD, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
146
|
Smits BMG, Traun BD, Devries TL, Tran A, Samuelson D, Haag JD, Gould M. An insulator loop resides between the synthetically interacting elements of the human/rat conserved breast cancer susceptibility locus MCS5A/Mcs5a. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:132-47. [PMID: 21914726 PMCID: PMC3245909 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2011] [Revised: 07/07/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Many low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility loci are found to be located in non-protein-coding regions, suggesting their involvement in gene expression regulation. We identified the human/rat-conserved breast cancer susceptibility locus MCS5A/Mcs5a. This locus has been shown to act in a non-mammary cell-autonomous fashion through the immune system. The resistant Mcs5a allele from the Wistar-Kyoto (WKy) rat strain consists of two non-protein-coding genetic elements that must be located on the same chromosome to elicit the phenotype. In this study, we show the presence of a conserved higher order chromatin structure in MCS5A/Mcs5a located in between the synthetically interacting genetic elements. The looped elements are shown to be bound by CTCF and cohesin. We identify the downregulation of Fbxo10 expression in T cells as a strong candidate mechanism through which the interacting genetic elements of the resistant Mcs5a allele modulate mammary carcinoma susceptibility. Finally, we show that the human MCS5A polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk are located at both sides of the looped structure and functionally interact to downregulate transcriptional activity, similar to rat Mcs5a. We propose a mechanistic model for MCS5a/Mcs5a in which a CTCF-mediated insulator loop encompassing the TOMM5/Tomm5 gene, resides in between and brings into closer physical proximity the synthetically and functionally interacting resistant genetic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Gould
- McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| |
Collapse
|
147
|
Fontanarosa JB, Dai Y. Using LASSO regression to detect predictive aggregate effects in genetic studies. BMC Proc 2011; 5 Suppl 9:S69. [PMID: 22373537 PMCID: PMC3287908 DOI: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-s9-s69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We use least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select genetic markers and phenotypic features that are most informative with respect to a trait of interest. We compare several strategies for applying LASSO methods in risk prediction models, using the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 exome simulation data consisting of 697 individuals with information on genotypic and phenotypic features (smoking, age, sex) in 5-fold cross-validated fashion. The cross-validated averages of the area under the receiver operating curve range from 0.45 to 0.63 for different strategies using only genotypic markers. The same values are improved to 0.69–0.87 when both genotypic and phenotypic information are used. The ability of the LASSO method to find true causal markers is limited, but the method was able to discover several common variants (e.g., FLT1) under certain conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel B Fontanarosa
- Bioinformatics Program, Department of Bioengineering (MC 063), University of Illinois at Chicago, 851 S, Morgan Street, 218 SEO, Chicago, IL 60607-7052, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
148
|
Teraoka SN, Bernstein JL, Reiner AS, Haile RW, Bernstein L, Lynch CF, Malone KE, Stovall M, Capanu M, Liang X, Smith SA, Mychaleckyj J, Hou X, Mellemkjaer L, Boice JD, Siniard A, Duggan D, Thomas DC, Concannon P. Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with risk for contralateral breast cancer in the Women's Environment, Cancer, and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study. Breast Cancer Res 2011; 13:R114. [PMID: 22087758 PMCID: PMC3326556 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2011] [Revised: 11/14/2011] [Accepted: 11/17/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Genome-wide association studies, focusing primarily on unilateral breast cancer, have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a number of genomic regions that have alleles associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer. In the current study we evaluate the contributions of these previously identified regions to the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer. The most strongly disease-associated SNPs from prior studies were tested for association with contralateral breast cancer. A subset of these SNPs, selected upon their main effects on contralateral breast cancer risk was further evaluated for interaction with treatment modalities and estrogen receptor (ER) status. Methods We genotyped 21 SNPs in 708 women with contralateral breast cancer and 1394 women with unilateral breast cancer who serve as the cases and controls in the Women's Environment, Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology (WECARE) Study. Records of treatment and ER status were available for most of WECARE Study participants. Associations of SNP genotypes and risk for contralateral breast cancer were calculated with multivariable adjusted conditional logistic regression methods. Results Multiple SNPs in the FGFR2 locus were significantly associated with contralateral breast cancer, including rs1219648 (per allele rate ratio (RR) = 1.25, 95%CI = 1.08-1.45). Statistically significant associations with contralateral breast cancer were also observed at rs7313833, near the PTHLH gene (per allele RR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.08-1.47), rs13387042 (2q35) (per allele RR = 1.19, 95%CI = 1.02-1.37), rs13281615 (8q24) (per allele RR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.04-1.40), and rs11235127 near TMEM135 (per allele RR = 1.26, 95%CI = 1.04-1.53). The A allele of rs13387042 (2q35) was significantly associated with contralateral breast cancer in ER negative first tumors while the A allele of rs11235127 (near TMEM135) was significantly associated with contralateral breast cancer in ER positive first tumors. Although some SNP genotypes appeared to modify contralateral breast cancer risk with respect to tamoxifen treatment or particular radiation doses, trend tests for such effects were not significant. Conclusions Our results indicate that some common risk variants associated with primary breast cancer also increase risk for contralateral breast cancer, and that these risks vary with the ER status of the first tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon N Teraoka
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0717, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
149
|
Yang Y, Graze RM, Walts BM, Lopez CM, Baker HV, Wayne ML, Nuzhdin SV, McIntyre LM. Partitioning transcript variation in Drosophila: abundance, isoforms, and alleles. G3 (BETHESDA, MD.) 2011; 1:427-36. [PMID: 22384353 PMCID: PMC3276160 DOI: 10.1534/g3.111.000596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2011] [Accepted: 09/11/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Multilevel analysis of transcription is facilitated by a new array design that includes modules for assessment of differential expression, isoform usage, and allelic imbalance in Drosophila. The ∼2.5 million feature chip incorporates a large number of controls, and it contains 18,769 3' expression probe sets and 61,919 exon probe sets with probe sequences from Drosophila melanogaster and 60,118 SNP probe sets focused on Drosophila simulans. An experiment in D. simulans identified genes differentially expressed between males and females (34% in the 3' expression module; 32% in the exon module). These proportions are consistent with previous reports, and there was good agreement (κ = 0.63) between the modules. Alternative isoform usage between the sexes was identified for 164 genes. The SNP module was verified with resequencing data. Concordance between resequencing and the chip design was greater than 99%. The design also proved apt in separating alleles based upon hybridization intensity. Concordance between the highest hybridization signals and the expected alleles in the genotype was greater than 96%. Intriguingly, allelic imbalance was detected for 37% of 6579 probe sets examined that contained heterozygous SNP loci. The large number of probes and multiple probe sets per gene in the 3' expression and exon modules allows the array to be used in D. melanogaster and in closely related species. The SNP module can be used for allele specific expression and genotyping of D. simulans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajie Yang
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0266
| | - Rita M. Graze
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0266
| | - Brandon M. Walts
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
| | - Cecilia M. Lopez
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0266
| | - Henry V. Baker
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0266
| | - Marta L. Wayne
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611-8525
| | - Sergey V. Nuzhdin
- Molecular and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2910
| | - Lauren M. McIntyre
- Genetics Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-3610
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0266
- Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8545
| |
Collapse
|
150
|
Sun S, Jiang Y, Zhang G, Song H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Liang X, Sun Q, Pang D. Increased expression of fibroblastic growth factor receptor 2 is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 2011; 105:773-9. [PMID: 22006548 DOI: 10.1002/jso.22120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2011] [Accepted: 09/21/2011] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although there is growing evidence supporting the hypothesis that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) is one of the few candidate genes linked with breast cancer susceptibility, the precise role of FGFR2 protein expression in breast cancer is still unknown. Our study examines FGFR2 protein expression in breast cancer and determines its associations with clinicopathological features and survival. METHODS Specimens from 125 invasive ductal carcinoma grade 2 (IDC2) breast cancer patients were investigated by immunohistochemistry for FGFR2 protein expression. Associations between the expression of FGFR2 and various clinicopathological features as well as survival status were studied. RESULT Cytoplasmic and nuclear FGFR2 were expressed in 64.8% and 56.8% of breast cancer patients, respectively. Cytoplasmic FGFR2 expression was significantly associated with tumor size and TNM stage. Furthermore, patients with high expression levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear FGFR2 showed much lower overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates than those patients with low FGFR2 expression. Cytoplasmic FGFR2 expression and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic factors for both DFS and OS by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS High FGFR2 expression is correlated with poor OS and DFS in breast cancer patients. It could be a biomarker for poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanshan Sun
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|