Interactions among drugs for HIV and opportunistic infections

Cardiovascular risk factors, monitoring, and therapy for HIV-infected patients

Cardiovascular complications are important contributors to morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. These complications can usually be detected at subclinical levels with monitoring, which can help guide targeted interventions. This article reviews available data on types and frequency of cardiovascular manifestations in HIV-infected patients and proposes monitoring strategies aimed at early subclinical detection. In particular, we recommend routine echocardiography for HIV-infected patients, even those with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. We also review preventive and therapeutic cardiovascular interventions. For procedures that have not been studied in HIV-infected patients, we extrapolate from evidence-based guidelines for the general population.

Short-term exposure to low-dose ritonavir impairs clearance and enhances adverse effects of trazodone

Antiretroviral agents may participate in drug interactions that influence the efficacy and toxicity of other antiretrovirals, as well as pharmacologic treatments of coincident or complicating diseases. The viral protease inhibitor, ritonavir, may cause drug interactions by inhibiting the activity of cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) isoforms. In a single-dose, blinded, four-way crossover study, 10 healthy volunteer subjects received 50 mg of trazodone hydrochloride or matching placebo concurrent with low-dose ritonavir (four doses of 200 mg each) or with placebo. Compared to the control condition, ritonavir significantly reduced apparent oral clearance of trazodone (155 +/- 23 vs. 75 +/- 12 ml/min, p < 0.001), prolonged elimination half-life (6.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 14.9 +/- 3.9 h, p < 0.05), and increased peak plasma concentrations (842 +/- 64 vs. 1125 +/- 111 ng/ml, p < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). Coadministration of trazodone with ritonavir increased sedation, fatigue, and performance impairment compared to trazodone plus placebo; differences reached significance only for the digitsymbol substitution test. Three subjects experienced nausea, dizziness, or hypotension when trazodone was given with ritonavir; 1 of these subjects also experienced syncope. Thus short-term low-dose administration of ritonavir impairs oral clearance of trazodone and increases the occurrence of adverse reactions. The findings are consistent with impairment of CYP3A-mediated trazodone metabolism by ritonavir.

Ritonavir-enhanced pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir/M8 during rifampin use

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of successful protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) concomitant with rifampin.

CASE SUMMARY

In a 7-month-old male infant with tuberculosis and HIV-1 infection, tuberculosis therapy including rifampin and HAART containing the protease inhibitor nelfinavir 40 mg/kg every 8 hours was started. Intensive steady-state pharmacokinetic sampling from baseline to 8 hours revealed very low plasma concentrations of nelfinavir: area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-24)) <10% of adult population values for 750 mg every 8 hours and nonquantifiable concentrations of nelfinavir's principal metabolite (M8). Nelfinavir 40 mg/kg every 8 hours was then substituted with nelfinavir 30 mg/kg twice daily plus ritonavir 400 mg/m(2) twice daily. Intensive steady-state (0-12 h) pharmacokinetic sampling was repeated. Nelfinavir concentrations had improved, but remained low when compared with adult population values of 1250 mg every 12 hours: AUC(0-24) 21.9 versus 47.6 mg/L*h (46%) and 12-hour trough level (C(12)) 0.25 versus 0.85 mg/L (29%). However, concentrations of M8 considerably exceeded population values: AUC(0-24) 57.5 versus 13.6 mg/L*h (443%) and C(12) 1.35 versus 0.28 mg/L (482%). Since M8 concentrations were highly elevated, pharmacokinetic parameters for (nelfinavir + M8) were used rather than those for nelfinavir alone. Thus, AUC(0-24) (nelfinavir + M8) and C(12) (nelfinavir + M8) comprised 130% and 142%, respectively of the adult population values. This, in addition to good clinical response and tolerability, favored continuation of the regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In an infant, nelfinavir-containing HAART was successfully used with rifampin after the addition of ritonavir. Ritonavir resolved the pharmacokinetic interaction between rifampin and nelfinavir by boosting nelfinavir and, especially, M8 concentrations. More research is needed to confirm these results.

Recognizing and preventing drug interactions in older adults with HIV

Currently, adults older than 50 account for approximately 15% of the total number of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases. As baby boomers age, the number of older adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is expected to rise. This expected increase is due, in part, to an increase in the number of individuals newly diagnosed with HIV, and, in part, to improved efficacy of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) medications used to treat HIV/AIDS. Older individuals who are infected with HIV also are expected to seek treatment for common conditions associated with aging. Thus, a considerable risk for drug interactions between the medications used specifically for HIV treatment and those used for other conditions exists. This article is intended as a guide for gerontological nurses facing these complexities. It includes reviews of the goals of HAART therapy and of the mechanisms of drug interactions, as well as detailed discussions related to the effects of HAART and their potential interactions with medications used to treat conditions commonly found in aging populations.

The role of pharmacological enhancement in protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy

Having changed the landscape in the treatment of HIV infection, the functional efficacy of current protease inhibitors (PIs) remains limited by their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Complex metabolism by the cytochrome P450 system (particularly the 3A4 isoenzyme), action of membrane drug transporter elements (such as P-glycoprotein and multi-drug resistance-associated proteins) and activation of the nuclear receptor steroid xenobiotic receptor may alter exposures and compromise the antiretroviral activity of these drugs. These factors, as well as inadequate adherence, can facilitate the emergence of PI resistance and lead to regimen failure. Coadministration of ritonavir can enhance exposures of a primary PI by inhibiting CYP3A4 metabolism, P-glycoprotein activity and multi-drug resistance protein-1-mediated efflux. Adding ritonavir, however, is not without cost. Dyslipidaemia (possibly increasing the risk of cardiovascular events), gastrointestinal intolerance, multiple drug-to-drug interactions and activation of steroid xenobiotic receptor can all result and must be balanced against the pharmacokinetic improvement rendered by the addition of ritonavir. Understanding the pharmacological origins for the variations in exposures of PIs, both between and within patients, is important for the successful use of these agents.

The role of protease inhibitor therapy in children with HIV infection

In comparison with HIV infection in adults, higher HIV RNA levels in children with perinatal HIV infection, differences in the natural history of HIV disease progression, and the presence of a relatively immature immune system contribute to the more complex and problematic nature of pediatric antiretroviral therapy. Current US treatment guidelines for pediatric HIV infection advocate aggressive therapy with potent combination antiretroviral regimens, to achieve profound and durable suppression of viral replication and preservation of immune function. The combination of a protease inhibitor (PI) and dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is the most commonly recommended form of highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART). However, use of PI therapy in pediatrics has been constrained by the lack of suitable drug formulations, a paucity of pharmacokinetic and safety data, and drug intolerance. Pharmacokinetic studies of PIs demonstrate frequent differences between children and adults, and greater variability among children, which has led to subtherapeutic dosage regimens and the development of viral resistance. The optimal dosage of many PIs in younger children is not yet known. A therapeutically important drug interaction associated with PIs is that occurring between the various PIs themselves, which allows lower doses of PI at less frequent intervals. Dual PI regimens will probably become more common, as they permit a simpler antiretroviral regimen, lower pill/medication burden, fewer adverse effects and improved adherence. Poor adherence to antiretroviral therapy remains the greatest barrier to overall success in the treatment of HIV-infected children. The key to improving adherence in HIV-infected children is to find treatment regimens that are better suited to their normal life. With improvements in existing PIs and the development of newer ones, simplification of current antiretroviral therapy to once-daily regimens without loss of potency should be achievable. PI-containing HAART has transformed HIV infection into a chronic illness, and HIV-infected children now live longer.

Symptomatic orthostasis with extended-release nifedipine and protease inhibitors

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors are prone to drug interactions with other agents. As individuals with HIV infection live longer, the clinical significance of many interactions is becoming recognized. A 51-year-old man with HIV infection who was receiving extended-release nifedipine developed symptomatic orthostasis and heart block after starting antiretroviral therapy that included nelfinavir. He experienced dizziness, fatigue, and hypotension and developed complete heart block with a junctional escape rhythm. Electrocardiogram abnormalities abated within 24 hours of discontinuing antiretroviral therapy. The patient developed orthostatic symptoms after restarting nelfinavir. He was switched successfully to an efavirenz-based regimen. Subsequent administration of antiretroviral therapy containing ritonavir and indinavir with extended-release nifedipine resulted in recurrence of his orthostatic symptoms. Discontinuation of atenolol, and nifedipine dosage reduction by 50% were effective in managing his orthostatic changes. Careful monitoring by clinicians is necessary when concomitant administration of HIV protease inhibitors are prescribed with other agents that are metabolized through the cytochrome P450 system.

Evaluation and management of dyslipidemia in patients with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

Persons with HIV infection develop metabolic abnormalities related to their antiretroviral therapy and HIV infection itself. The objective of this study was to summarize the emerging evidence for the incidence, etiology, health risks, and treatment of dyslipidemias in HIV disease.

DESIGN

Systematic review of original research with quantitative synthesis.

MAIN RESULTS

Dyslipidemia is common in persons with HIV infection on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), but methodologic differences between studies preclude precise estimates of prevalence and incidence. The typical pattern includes elevated total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, which may be markedly elevated. The dyslipidemia may be associated with lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, and, rarely, frank diabetes mellitus. Exposure to protease inhibitors (PIs) is associated with this entire range of metabolic abnormalities. PI-naïve patients on nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) may develop lipodystrophy, insulin resistance, hypercholesterolemia, and possibly modest elevations in triglycerides but not severe hypertriglyceridemia, which appears to be linked to PIs alone. Most studies have not found an association between CD4 lymphocyte count or HIV viral load and lipid abnormalities. The pathogenesis is incompletely understood and appears to be multifactorial. There are insufficient data to definitively support an increased coronary heart disease risk in patients with HIV-related dyslipidemia. However, some of the same metabolic abnormalities remain firmly established risk factors in other populations. Patients on HAART with severe hypertriglyceridemia may develop pancreatitis or other manifestations of the chylomicronemia syndrome. Some of the metabolic derangements (particularly hypertriglyceridemia) may improve upon replacing a PI with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. The limited experience suggests that fibrates, pravastatin, and atorvastatin can safely treat lipid abnormalities in HIV-infected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HIV infection on HAART should be screened for lipid disorders, given their incidence, potential for morbidity, and possible long-term cardiovascular risk. Treatment decisions are complex and must include assessments of cardiac risk, HIV infection status, reversibility of the dyslipidemia, and the effectiveness and toxicities of lipid-lowering medications. The multiple potential drug interactions with antiretroviral or other HIV-related medications should be considered in lipid-lowering drug selection and monitoring.

Simultaneous determination of rifampicin and efavirenz in plasma

Complex drug interactions involving antiretroviral agents and drugs for the management of opportunistic infections demand the monitoring of plasma drug concentrations to prevent treatment failure. The high occurrence of tuberculosis in HIV-infected subjects makes the management of HIV treatment complex. Rifampicin, a potent inducer of the cytochrome P 450 metabolic pathway, is a very active antituberculosis drug that accelerates the metabolism of protease inhibitors. Regimens containing efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitor, could be an alternative, but efavirenz plasma concentrations may be altered after the coadministration of rifampicin. Efavirenz is also a cytochrome P 450 inducer and may alter rifampicin plasma levels. Due to the increasing need to monitor plasma concentrations in HIV patients with tuberculosis, a high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method has been developed to measure rifampicin and efavirenz at the same time in a small amount of sample. This HPLC method is highly sensitive and precise, suitable for pharmacokinetic studies or routine clinical monitoring of rifampicin and efavirenz simultaneously in HIV patients with tuberculosis.

Drug interactions: Proteins, pumps, and P-450s

The two major concerns in drug safety are adverse drug reactions and drug interactions. When multiple drug therapies are prescribed, drug interactions become an important consideration for patients and physicians. The life of a drug is reviewed with emphasis on absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic mechanisms for drug interactions are reviewed. The contributions of P-glycoprotein, pharmacogenetic variation, and genetic polymorphisms to drug interactions are highlighted. Prediction of drug interactions is possible with knowledge of which agents are likely to cause alterations in drug metabolism. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;47:467-84.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should have an understanding of the life of a drug. This knowledge should help predict important potential drug interactions.

Interrupting drug therapy in the perioperative period

Millions of patients undergo surgery each year and an increasing proportion of these patients are consuming therapeutic drugs. Drug therapy is often withheld in the immediate perioperative period and after major surgery, in particular, there is often a prolonged period of fasting. This may lead to withdrawal effects including recurrence or worsening of patients' disease symptomatology. These effects will occur during a period of physiological and pathophysiological stresses and render patients more vulnerable to drug withdrawal phenomena. Thus, patients may be exposed to greater and sometimes unnecessary risks in the perioperative period. There are relatively few studies that have investigated this problem. The ones that have, however, confirm that drug abstinence in the perioperative period is a relatively common phenomenon and one study has demonstrated an association between duration of drug abstinence and adverse outcomes. The pathophysiological effects of major surgery on gastrointestinal function, neuro-humoral and cytokine adaptive responses to surgical stress are under-appreciated. These responses can reduce the effectiveness of oral administration and exacerbate co-existing disease processes. These problems are compounded by a fragmented approach to perioperative drug therapy with no one group of healthcare professionals assuming responsibility for this aspect of care. This may in part be a consequence of the complexities of rationalising drug therapy in the perioperative period together with the lack of readily available and evidence based information strategies for individual drugs or drug classes. An additional problem relates to the formulations, inherent pharmacokinetics and limited routes of administration of many prescribed drugs. These can prevent a 'seamless' transition from preoperative to postoperative management. Consumers, health professionals, pharmaceutical companies and drug regulatory agencies must all play a part in rectifying this problem. There remains a need for further research to clarify the effects of abstinence on patient outcomes and also to identify optimum strategies to avoid unwanted drug abstinence.

Sinopulmonary complications of illicit drug use

Illicit drug use is frequently complicated by sinopulmonary illnesses. These complications fall into two major categories: (1) direct effects of drug exposure, and (2) indirect effects caused by HIV-induced immunosuppression. This article reviews the more common sinopulmonary syndromes associated with illicit drug use.

Reversible coma caused by risperidone-ritonavir interaction

Medications that act on the central nervous system are frequently used in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Actually, drug interactions are an important factor in the treatment of patients with (HIV) infection and because of the complexity of the current drug regimens, clinicians should be trained in order to recognize and manage drug interactions. Herein, we present an HIV infected male admitted for manic behavior and treated with risperidone who developed a profound coma secondary to increased levels of risperidone because of a possible drug interaction with ritonavir and indinavir. Subsequently, we discuss this interaction, rarely described in the literature. Risperidone is a cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) enzyme substrate and weak inhibitor and a CYP3A4 substrate. Possible interactions with CYP2D6 inhibitors (amiodarone, fluoxetine or ritonavir) and CYP3A4 inhibitors (indinavir and ritonavir) can increase its serum concentrations and produce significant adverse effects. In conclusion, this drug combination should be administered with caution and routinely examined for signs and symptoms of risperidone toxicity. Dosages should be reduced as needed. Finally, we think that in patients taking multiple medications, plasma levels of risperidone should be monitored especially if drug interactions are possible.

Alcohol use and HIV pharmacotherapy

Alcohol consumption by individuals infected with HIV is an important medical management issue with significant implications for the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy as well as an important evolving field of HIV research. Alcohol consumption is a risk factor for poor medication adherence and can modify liver drug metabolism, both of which can lead to the emergence of drug-resistant virus. Research indicates that alcohol consumption greater than 50 g/day (four or five drinks) is a risk factor for liver disease progression among patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. In addition, alcohol-induced cirrhosis can result in changes in drug metabolism in the liver through compromised liver function. More research studies are needed to elucidate the biological and molecular basis of the clinical changes induced by alcohol consumption in HIV-infected individuals and on the relationship of these changes to the effectiveness of HIV pharmacotherapy. Specifically, research areas that are of particular importance are (1) determining alcohol consumption levels and patterns and its impact on antiretroviral medication adherence, efficacy, and physician prescribing practices; (2) identifying behavioral interventions to enhance adherence to HIV medications and reduce alcohol consumption; (3) clarifying the relationships and interactions among alcohol metabolism, HIV drug metabolism, and pharmacogenetics; (4) elucidating the extent of liver toxicity due to antiretroviral therapy and drug-drug interactions in individuals who consume alcohol; and (5) delineating the contribution of alcohol consumption to end-stage organ damage, particularly in HIV/HCV coinfection.

Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, virology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, and clinical use of lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra, Abbott Laboratories).

DATA SOURCES

English-language MEDLINE and AIDSline searches were performed (1966-July 2001) using lopinavir, ABT-378, and Kaletra as key words. Abstracts from infectious diseases and HIV scientific meetings were identified. Abbott Laboratories provided additional published and unpublished information.

DATA EXTRACTION

All publications, meeting abstracts, and unpublished information were reviewed and relevant items included. In vitro and preclinical studies were included as well as Phase II and III clinical trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lopinavir/ritonavir is a fixed-dose protease inhibitor (PI) combination used for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Lopinavir, the active component of this combination, is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 and produces low systemic concentrations when used alone. Ritonavir potently inhibits CYP3A4 and is used to enhance the systemic exposure of lopinavir. This combination results in lopinavir concentrations that greatly exceed those necessary in vitro to inhibit both wild-type and PI-resistant HIV isolates. In clinical trials with antiretroviral naïve and experienced patients, lopinavir/ritonavir was effective at suppressing HIV-RNA and increasing CD4+ T cell counts. Compared with other PIs, lopinavir/ritonavir may have advantages in the areas of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and resistance. Toxicity, drug interactions, and medication adherence are important considerations surrounding its clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS

Lopinavir/ritonavir is an effective option for the treatment of HIV-1-infected individuals when used in combination with other antiretroviral agents. It may be used as a component of initial therapy or salvage therapy; future studies will better define its place in therapy.

Predicting death from HIV/AIDS: a case-control study from Florida public HIV/AIDS clinics

BACKGROUND

After markedly decreasing for 3 years, HIV/AIDS mortality declined only slightly in 1999.

METHODS

The authors conducted a case-control study in four Florida urban public health HIV clinics to evaluate modifiable factors associated with HIV/AIDS mortality in a non-research setting. Structured chart review was conducted for 120 case-patients who died in 1999 and for 240 randomly selected control-patients. Risk factors associated with death in univariate analysis were entered into three conceptually related, matched logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In the final multivariate model, homelessness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 9.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34-42.5), Medicaid insurance (AOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.43-6.74), having a documented adherence problem (AOR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.64-7.47), injection drug use (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.11-5.43), non-specific liver failure (AOR, 76.9; 95% CI, 6.79-870.9), interrupted highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) secondary to side effects (AOR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.46-10.9), and not receiving HAART (AOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.03-6.68) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to medical and clinical indicators, several sociobehavioral-demographic factors remained important throughout the multivariate analysis. Improvement in care should include a focus on social circumstances of infected people. Special attention to the homeless, those with adherence problems, and those with liver disease is clearly indicated.

[Recommendations of the Spanish AIDS Study Group (GESIDA) and the National Aids Plan (PNS) for antiretroviral treatment in adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in 2002]

OBJECTIVE

To provide an update of recommendation on antiretroviral treatment (ART) in HIV-infected adults.Methods. These recommendations have been agreed by consensus by a committee of the spanish AIDS Study Group (GESIDA) and the National AIDS Plan. To do so, advances in the physiopathology of AIDS and the results on efficacy and safety in clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetics studies published in biomedical journals or presented at congresses in the last few years have been reviewed. Three levels of evidence have been defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), case-control or cohort studies (level B) and expert opinion (level C). Whether to recommend, consider, or not to recommend ART has been established for each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, ART with combinations of at least three drugs constitutes the treatment of choice in chronic HIV infection. In patients with symptomatic HIV infection, initiation of ART is recommended. In asymptomatic patients initiation of ART should be based on the CD41/mL lymphocyte count and on the plasma viral load (PVL): a) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes < 200 cells/mL, initiation of ART is recommended; b) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes between 200 and 300 cells/mL, initiation of ART should, in most cases, be recommended; however, it could be delayed when the CD41 lymphocyte count remains close to 350 cells/mL and the PVL is low, and c) in patients with CD41 lymphocytes > 350 cells/mL, initiation of ART can be delayed. The aim of ART is to achieve an undetectable PVL. Adherence to ART plays a role in the durability of the antiviral response. Because of the development of cross-resistance, the therapeutic options in treatment failure are limited. In these cases, genotypic analysis is useful. Toxicity limits ART. The criteria for ART in acute infection, pregnancy and postexposure prophylaxis and in the management of coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C and B virus are controversial.

CONCLUSIONS

The current approach to initiating ART is more conservative than in previous recommendations. In asymptomatic patients, the CD41 lymphocyte count is the most important reference factor for initiating ART. Because of the considerable number of drugs available, more sensitive monitoring methods (PVL) and the possibility of determining resistance, therapeutic strategies have become much more individualized.

Pharmacologic treatment of mood disorders in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Mood disorders in HIV are common and can impact on the course of the illness. With the increasing use of newer psychopharmacologic and antiviral medications, clinicians need to take precautions while prescribing them. This paper gives an overview of the most recent literature describing the pharmacologic treatment of mood disorders in HIVpositive patients. The authors of this paper focus on antidepressants, mood stabilizers, neuroleptics, and psychostimulants, as well as on areas of controversy. The authors' own clinical experiences are also included.

Low-dose ritonavir for protease inhibitor pharmacokinetic enhancement

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of low-dose ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer for HIV protease inhibitors.

DATA SOURCES

Primary articles, review articles, and conference abstracts identified by MEDLINE search (1995-May 2001) and secondary sources.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Low-dose ritonavir (100-200 mg) is increasingly being combined with HIV protease inhibitors to improve their effectiveness and allow less frequent dosing. An evaluation of the clinical evidence supporting this practice was conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited outcome data exist for low-dose ritonavir-based regimens in general. Although preliminary data appear promising, more clinical evidence is needed to determine the optimal dosing, long-term safety, and relative effectiveness of this approach. The role of these regimens in early therapy remains to be defined.

The role of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children with HIV-1 infection

Over 1.4 million of the worlds' children are infected with HIV-1, mostly acquired in the perinatal period. Antiviral therapeutic options for children with HIV-1 infection have lagged behind those for infected adults. However, we now know that prevention of perinatal HIV-1 transmission to children is possible and that combination therapy for the management of infected children is efficacious. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are developing a more prominent role in combination therapy regimens, particularly as alternatives to protease inhibitors. They also have a role in preventing perinatal transmission, where it has been shown that only 2 doses of the NNRTI nevirapine can significantly reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1. This has major therapeutic implications, particularly in areas where combination therapy is not readily available. Palatable paediatric formulations of NNRTIs are available or are being developed. Whilst pharmacokinetic data regarding the use of antiretrovirals in children remain scarce, published clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of NNRTIs when used as part of combination regimens in the management of HIV-1 infected children. The toxicity profile of NNRTIs is relatively favourable; however, severe skin rash, hepatotoxicity and central nervous system adverse effects with various NNRTIs can lead to treatment cessation. The development of class resistance with single step mutations in the reverse transcriptase gene remains a major therapeutic problem with this class of antiretrovirals. Novel NNRTIs under development are of interest either because of improved pharmacodynamics, reduced toxicity profiles or because of action against NNRTI-mutation containing resistant virus. There are no data available yet on the use of these drugs in the paediatric population.

Simple rapid method for quantification of antiretrovirals by liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to develop a simple, fast and universal method for quantification of any combination of all currently marketed anti-HIV drugs in human plasma, using a LC-tandem mass spectrometer (API-2000, SCIEX, Toronto, Canada).

METHODS

80 microL plasma were spiked with internal standard (cimetidine), and protein precipitated with 200 microL acetonitrile. The sample was centrifuged and 30 microL aliquot was injected onto the HPLC column, where it underwent an online extraction with ammonium acetate. After that the automatic switching valve was activated, changing the mobile phase to methanol and thereby eluting the analytes into the tandem mass spectrometer. Stavudine, AZT and efavirenz were analyzed in the negative MS/MS mode, while all other drugs were analyzed in the positive mode. The high selectivity of a tandem mass analyzer allows determination of any combination of the drugs within a 4.5 min run.

RESULTS

Between-day precision was below 10% for all analytes at the concentrations tested. Accuracy ranged between 95% and 105% (n = 20). The method was linear over the measuring ranges of all analytes. Within-run precision gave a CV < 7% for all analytes. Good correlation with other analytical methods was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplicity, universality and high throughput of the method make it suitable for application in a clinical laboratory. The method has been implemented in our laboratory for routine use.

Practical psychopharmacology in HIV-1 and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

HIV-1 infection poses a challenge for psychiatrists of the medically ill. Many factors concerning the care of HIV-1-infected patients need to be considered when prescribing psychotropics. These include careful diagnosis, taking into account medical disorders associated with HIV-1 that can present with psychiatric symptoms, as well as medications that HIV-1 patients may be taking that can cause a variety of neuropsychiatric side effects. Another important issue is the potential for drug-illness interactions. In general, HIV-1 patients seem to be more sensitive to the development of adverse drug reactions than do non-HIV-1 patients, especially as the illness progresses. It is also important to be cognizant of the complex multidrug regimens that many HIV-1 patients are on to avoid known drug-drug interactions and be on the alert for other potential interactions when using psychotropic medications.

Pros and cons of therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral agents

Therapeutic drug monitoring has the promise to become a part of routine patient care in the treatment of HIV infection. It is known that plasma drug concentrations of protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are better predictors of antiviral response or toxicity than drug dose is. Furthermore, high interpatient variability is significant. In addition, therapeutic drug monitoring may be used as a direct and objective instrument to measure non-adherence. This review describes possibilities and limitations of therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV treatment.

HIV drug interactions: the good, the bad, and the other

Highly active antiretroviral therapy, involving treatment with three or four antiretroviral agents, has greatly improved the effectiveness of therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. It has also extended the number of possible drug interactions that may occur in treated patients. There are 105 possible two-drug interactions among the 15 currently approved antiretroviral agents. Well-characterized interactions involving inhibition of drug metabolism have been exploited to reduce dose size or frequency and to simplify treatment regimens. Many additional interactions are possible with other drugs used to treat or prevent complications of HIV infection. Interactions with methadone and other opiate abuse therapies are also of concern. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring for antiretroviral drugs remains controversial. However, drug measurements before introduction of an interacting drug can establish patient-specific targets that can guide subsequent dosing adjustment.

Pharmacokinetic and other drug interactions in patients with AIDS

A variety of medications are used in treating patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These medications are used to control viremia and to prevent and treat opportunistic infections. An individual is often required to take numerous drugs at the same time and thus clinicians are confronted with potential drug interactions, some of which are significant. Three different groups of anti-HIV drugs are used to treat patients. These groups include nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors, and protease inhibitors. This article reviews the most relevant drug interactions that occur during the treatment of HIV-infected patients with traditional and also alternative drugs. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in the routine management of HIV-infected patients is discussed.

Cardiovascular monitoring and therapy for HIV-infected patients

Cardiovascular complications are important contributors to morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. These complications can usually be detected at subclinical levels with monitoring, which can help guide targeted interventions. This article reviews available data on types and frequency of cardiovascular manifestations in HIV+ patients and proposes monitoring strategies aimed at early subclinical detection. In particular, we recommend routine echocardiography for HIV+ patients, even those with no evidence of cardiovascular disease. We also review preventive and therapeutic cardiovascular interventions. For procedures that have not been studied in HIV+ patients, we extrapolate from evidence-based guidelines for the general population.

Peptide mimetic HIV protease inhibitors are ligands for the orphan receptor SXR

The orphan nuclear receptor SXR coordinately regulates drug clearance in response to a wide variety of xenobiotic compounds. This signaling system protects the body from exposure to toxic compounds; however, it can also pose a severe barrier to drug therapy. We now demonstrate that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor ritonavir binds SXR and activates its target genes. This represents an example of a commonly used therapeutic agent that effectively activates SXR. We also show that other protease inhibitors are weaker (saquinavir) or unable to activate SXR (nelfinavir, indinavir) thus defining analogs that fail to induce SXR-regulated clearance pathways. Interestingly, HIV protease inhibitors are distinct from previously known SXR ligands in that they are peptide mimetic compounds. This expands the ligand specificity of SXR to include this unique chemical class whose pharmaceutical significance is expanding. Finally, we show that SXR ligands activate expression of multiple resistance protein 2, a critical regulator of bile flow and biliary drug excretion. These findings have important implications for the role of SXR in regulating drug clearance and hepatic disorders associated with impaired bile flow.

The 2nd International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy. April 2nd-4th 2001, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

The 2nd International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy was convened in Noordwijk, The Netherlands on April 2nd-4th, 2001. The purpose of this meeting was to present and discuss research related to antiretroviral drug interactions, drug distribution to sanctuary sites, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (i.e., the relationship between pharmacokinetics and efficacy, toxicity or drug resistance), inhibitory quotient (IQ) and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). There were 28 oral and 49 poster presentations accepted to this meeting. While most studies focused on protease inhibitors (PIs), insight into the pharmacology of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) was also gleaned. Herein, we highlight some of the research that was presented.