151
|
[Herpes zoster and subunit vaccine]. Uirusu 2021; 71:45-54. [PMID: 35526994 DOI: 10.2222/jsv.71.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes varicella (chickenpox) as primary infection, and latently infects neuronal cells in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Reactivation of VZV from DRG results in herpes zoster, often decades later. VZV is the only airborne human herpesvirus and the only herpesvirus whose symptoms (both varicella and herpes zoster) can be prevented by vaccination. Herpes zoster is significantly more common in patients with bone marrow transplants, hematological malignancies, oral Jak inhibitors, SLE, and the elderly. The brand new subunit vaccine, ShingrixⓇ, for preventing herpes zoster is a mixture of adjuvant and recombinant VZV glycoprotein gE, which is highly effective in preventing zoster even in elderly people. In this review, the author discuss the onset mechanism of zoster from the clinical findings and summarize the result of clinical trials of the subunit vaccine.
Collapse
|
152
|
Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Dörner T, Dougados M, Fleischmann RM, Geissler K, McInnes I, Pope JE, van der Heijde D, Stoffer-Marx M, Takeuchi T, Trauner M, Winthrop KL, de Wit M, Aletaha D, Baraliakos X, Boehncke WH, Emery P, Isaacs JD, Kremer J, Lee EB, Maksymowych WP, Voshaar M, Tam LS, Tanaka Y, van den Bosch F, Westhovens R, Xavier R, Smolen JS. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [PMID: 33158881 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis2020-218580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for use in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. With five agents licensed, it was timely to summarise the current understanding of JAKi use based on a systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety. METHODS Existing data were evaluated by a steering committee and subsequently reviewed by a 29 person expert committee leading to the formulation of a consensus statement that may assist the clinicians, patients and other stakeholders once the decision is made to commence a JAKi. The committee included patients, rheumatologists, a gastroenterologist, a haematologist, a dermatologist, an infectious disease specialist and a health professional. The SLR informed the Task Force on controlled and open clinical trials, registry data, phase 4 trials and meta-analyses. In addition, approval of new compounds by, and warnings from regulators that were issued after the end of the SLR search date were taken into consideration. RESULTS The Task Force agreed on and developed four general principles and a total of 26 points for consideration which were grouped into six areas addressing indications, treatment dose and comedication, contraindications, pretreatment screening and risks, laboratory and clinical follow-up examinations, and adverse events. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendations were determined based on the SLR and levels of agreement were voted on for every point, reaching a range between 8.8 and 9.9 on a 10-point scale. CONCLUSION The consensus provides an assessment of evidence for efficacy and safety of an important therapeutic class with guidance on issues of practical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Nash
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Dörner
- Dept. Med./Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite Univ. Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Hopital Cochin, Rheumatology, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Roy M Fleischmann
- Department of Medicine, Southwestern University of Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Iain McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Janet E Pope
- Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Michaela Stoffer-Marx
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Maarten de Wit
- Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds, UK
| | - John D Isaacs
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joel Kremer
- Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Eun Bong Lee
- Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Walter P Maksymowych
- Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lai-Shan Tam
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong Shaw College, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | - Ricardo Xavier
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
153
|
Gadina M, Chisolm DA, Philips RL, McInness IB, Changelian PS, O'Shea JJ. Translating JAKs to Jakinibs. THE JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY 2020; 204:2011-2020. [PMID: 32253269 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The discovery of JAKs and STATs and their roles in cytokine and IFN action represented a significant basic advance and a new paradigm in cell signaling. This was quickly followed by discoveries pointing to their essential functions, including identification of JAK3 mutations as a cause of SCID. This and other findings predicted the use of therapeutically targeting JAKs as a new strategy for treating immune and inflammatory diseases. This now is a reality with seven approved jakinibs being used to treat multiple forms of arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and myeloproliferative neoplasms, and numerous ongoing clinical trials in other settings. This story provides interesting insights into the process of translating basic discoveries and also reveals the need to return to basic work to fill gaps that now become apparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Gadina
- Translational Immunology Section, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Danielle A Chisolm
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Rachael L Philips
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Iain B McInness
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, United Kingdom; and
| | | | - John J O'Shea
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
| |
Collapse
|
154
|
Giles H, Pratt G. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors in the treatment of multiple myeloma: modulating the myeloma immune microenvironment. Br J Haematol 2020; 192:420-422. [PMID: 33341927 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Giles
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Guy Pratt
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
155
|
Hoff P, Walther M, Wesselmann H, Weinerth J, Feist E, Ohrndorf S. [Successful treatment of adult Still's disease with tofacitinib in a HIV-2 positive female patient]. Z Rheumatol 2020; 79:1046-1049. [PMID: 32816071 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-020-00853-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A 46-year-old female patient with a known HIV-2-infection suffered from adult onset Still's disease, which was initially complicated by a macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). The required glucocorticoid treatment induced a psychosis and the patient developed an aversion to glucocorticoids. After failure of treatment with anakinra, an alternative option with the JAK-inhibitor tofacitinib was introduced because of the short half-life and to reduce glucocorticoid exposure. A switch to tofacitinib was only successful after an overlapping treatment with anakinra and tofacitinib for 3 weeks. The patient is currently being treated with monotherapy with tofacitinib as well as NSAID on demand, is in stable remission and can continue working as normal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Hoff
- MVZ Endokrinologikum Berlin am Gendarmenmarkt, Friedrichstr. 76, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. .,Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - M Walther
- MVZ Endokrinologikum Berlin am Gendarmenmarkt, Friedrichstr. 76, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - H Wesselmann
- HIV-Ambulanz-Praxis, Ambulantes Gesundheitszentrum der Charité am Campus Virchow, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - J Weinerth
- MVZ Endokrinologikum Berlin am Gendarmenmarkt, Friedrichstr. 76, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - E Feist
- Helios Fachklinik Vogelsang-Gommern, Vogelsang-Gommern, Deutschland
| | - S Ohrndorf
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
156
|
Seeliger B, Prasse A. Immunomodulation in Autoimmune Interstitial Lung Disease. Respiration 2020; 99:819-829. [PMID: 33271551 DOI: 10.1159/000511200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) associated with autoimmune or systemic disease are increasingly recognized and our pathophysiological understanding rapidly expanding. Treatment modalities, however, are still mainly driven by established disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) where, despite decades of experience of their use in the underlying diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, mostly ret-rospective data exist informing their effect on the course of interstitial lung disease (ILD). In recent years, randomized trials investigating the effects of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) have been completed or are currently running, generating new treatment options for often relentlessly progressive diseases. Herein, we summarize the evidence and current use of both synthetic DMARDs and bDMARDs in the context of ILDs associated with autoimmune/systemic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Seeliger
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School and Biomedical Research in End-stage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany,
| | - Antje Prasse
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School and Biomedical Research in End-stage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
157
|
Hernandez-Rocha C, Vande Casteele N. JAK inhibitors: current position in treatment strategies for use in inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2020; 55:99-109. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
158
|
Damerau A, Gaber T, Ohrndorf S, Hoff P. JAK/STAT Activation: A General Mechanism for Bone Development, Homeostasis, and Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E9004. [PMID: 33256266 PMCID: PMC7729940 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21239004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway serves as an important downstream mediator for a variety of cytokines, hormones, and growth factors. Emerging evidence suggests JAK/STAT signaling pathway plays an important role in bone development, metabolism, and healing. In this light, pro-inflammatory cytokines are now clearly implicated in these processes as they can perturb normal bone remodeling through their action on osteoclasts and osteoblasts at both intra- and extra-articular skeletal sites. Here, we summarize the role of JAK/STAT pathway on development, homeostasis, and regeneration based on skeletal phenotype of individual JAK and STAT gene knockout models and selective inhibition of components of the JAK/STAT signaling including influences of JAK inhibition in osteoclasts, osteoblasts, and osteocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Damerau
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (A.D.); (S.O.); (P.H.)
- German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) Berlin, a Leibniz Institute, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Timo Gaber
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (A.D.); (S.O.); (P.H.)
- German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) Berlin, a Leibniz Institute, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Ohrndorf
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (A.D.); (S.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Paula Hoff
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, 10117 Berlin, Germany; (A.D.); (S.O.); (P.H.)
- German Rheumatism Research Centre (DRFZ) Berlin, a Leibniz Institute, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Endokrinologikum Berlin am Gendarmenmarkt, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
159
|
Bae D, Choi Y, Lee J, Ha N, Suh D, Baek J, Park J, Son W. M-134, a novel HDAC6-selective inhibitor, markedly improved arthritic severity in a rodent model of rheumatoid arthritis when combined with tofacitinib. Pharmacol Rep 2020; 73:185-201. [PMID: 33188511 DOI: 10.1007/s43440-020-00188-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although tofacitinib has shown highly significant efficacy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there are still a considerable number of patients that are non-responders owing to its limited effectiveness and various adverse effects. Thus, alternative options with better efficacy and lower toxicity are desired. Here, M-134, a recently developed HDAC6 inhibitor, was examined for its therapeutic potential when combined with tofacitinib in a rat model of RA. METHODS The single or combined administration of M-134 and tofacitinib was examined in complete Freund's adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) or collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rodent models. To evaluate the therapeutic and adverse effects, the following factors were observed: macroscopic or microscopic scoring of all four paws; the expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IP-10 in the joints and that of various cytokines and chemokines in the plasma; the weight of the thymus and the liver; and changes in hematological enzymes. RESULTS Combination treatment showed strong synergistic effects as measured by the clinical score and histological changes, without adverse effects such as weight loss in the thymus and increased liver enzymes (ALT and AST). Additionally, it also reduced ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and IP-10 expression in the joints, and M-134 increased the efficacy of tofacitinib by regulating various cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-17, and TNF-α, in the serum of AIA rats. Differences in the cytokine expression for each drug were found in the CIA model. CONCLUSIONS M-134 and tofacitinib combination therapy is a potential option for the treatment of RA through the regulation of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daekwon Bae
- Department of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.,Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngil Choi
- Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiyoung Lee
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Nina Ha
- Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghyeon Suh
- Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Jiyeon Baek
- Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsol Park
- Department of Pharmacology, CKD Research Institute, CKD Pharmaceutical Co, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Woochan Son
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
160
|
Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Rokuda M, Izutsu H, Kaneko Y, Fukuda M, Kato D. A pooled safety analysis of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated over a median of 2 years. Mod Rheumatol 2020; 31:543-555. [PMID: 33050760 DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1836789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of peficitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Asian patients. METHODS Safety data from one Phase 2b, two Phase 3, and one open-label long-term extension study [data cut-off 31 May 2018] were pooled into Phase 3 studies (peficitinib 100 and 150 mg/day, and placebo) and Phase 2/3 studies (all peficitinib-treated patients). Incidence rates per 100 patient-years (PY) of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were calculated. RESULTS Overall, 1052 patients received peficitinib for 2336.3 PY of exposure (median 2.1 years); four deaths occurred, including one death after the studies. AE incidence was similar across peficitinib 100 and 150 mg/day groups (Phase 3 studies). Respective peficitinib and placebo incidence rates (95% confidence interval) per 100 PY were 2.9 (1.9, 4.6) and 0.0 for serious infections, 5.7 (4.2, 7.9) and 2.3 (0.6, 9.4) for herpes zoster-related disease, and 0.6 (0.2, 1.6) and 1.2 (0.2, 8.3) for malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) (Phase 3 studies), and 0.1 (0.0, 0.3) for venous thromboembolism in all peficitinib-treated patients (Phase 2/3 studies). CONCLUSION Peficitinib was well tolerated in Asian patients with RA over a median of 2 years, with no observed dose or temporal dependency for AEs with prolonged administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
161
|
Pavelka K, Szekanecz Z, Damjanov N, Anić B, Tomšič M, Mazurov V, Maksimovic M, Nagy O, Świerkot J, Petranova T, Veldi T, Baranauskaitė A, Codreanu C, Andersone D, Fleischmann R. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab with background methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: a subgroup analysis of a phase III randomized controlled trial in Central and Eastern European patients. Drugs Context 2020; 9:dic-2020-7-5. [PMID: 33123205 PMCID: PMC7574850 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2020-7-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the randomized, phase III, global SELECT-COMPARE study, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated efficacy at week 12 versus placebo and adalimumab with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to MTX, which was maintained over 48 weeks. This post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE reports the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in Central and Eastern European (CEE) patients. Methods Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo, or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, and continued MTX. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 48 weeks. Primary endpoints were the achievement of ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 responses at week 12 for upadacitinib versus placebo. No statistical comparisons were conducted. Results A total of 596 patients from 12 CEE countries were randomized. At week 12, a numerically greater proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab achieved ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (72% versus 33% and 59%), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein <2.6 (26% versus 4% and 11%), low disease activity and remission, and improved physical function, with results maintained over 48 weeks. Upadacitinib treatment numerically inhibited structural progression versus placebo at week 26. Serious infection and herpes zoster rates were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab (2.7 versus 1.7 and 2.3 versus 1.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively) over 48 weeks. Conclusion Consistent with the global population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to MTX, in CEE patients, upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated clinical and functional improvements versus placebo and adalimumab, radiographic improvements versus placebo, and reasonable safety, over 48 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Zoltán Szekanecz
- Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Nemanja Damjanov
- University of Belgrade School of Medicine, Institute of Rheumatology, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Branimir Anić
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Matija Tomšič
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vadim Mazurov
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, St Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Orsolya Nagy
- AbbVie Global Medical Affairs, Rheumatology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jerzy Świerkot
- Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tzvetanka Petranova
- Department of Rheumatology, UMHAT St.Iv.Rilsky, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Tiina Veldi
- East-Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Asta Baranauskaitė
- Department of Rheumatology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Roy Fleischmann
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
162
|
Strand V, Kaine J, Alten R, Wallenstein G, Diehl A, Shi H, Germino R, Murray CW. Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther 2020; 22:243. [PMID: 33059710 PMCID: PMC7566034 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined the degree to which Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA) was driven by patient-reported assessments of pain (Pain), physical function, and fatigue in patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo, each with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Methods This post hoc analysis used data pooled from three randomized controlled trials in csDMARD-inadequate responder (csDMARD-IR) patients (ORAL Scan: NCT00847613; ORAL Standard: NCT00853385; ORAL Sync: NCT00856544). Using subgroup analysis from 2 × 2 tables, associations between PtGA and Pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) at month 3 were evaluated using Pearson’s Phi correlation coefficients. To support the main analysis, associations between select patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also evaluated in csDMARD-naïve (ORAL Start; NCT01039688) and biologic (b)DMARD-IR (ORAL Step; NCT00960440) patients. Results Across csDMARD-IR treatment groups, low disease activity (defined as PtGA ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in PtGA were associated with mild Pain (Visual Analog Scale score ≤ 20 mm), and moderate (≥ 30%) and substantial (≥ 50%) improvements from baseline in Pain; lack of Pain improvement was associated with little/no improvement in PtGA. In contrast, large proportions of csDMARD-IR patients who reported PtGA improvements did not report HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ normative values (≤ 0.25 and ≥ 43.5, respectively) or changes in HAQ-DI or FACIT-F scores ≥ minimum clinically important difference (≥ 0.22 and ≥ 4.0, respectively). Generally, PtGA and Pain outcomes were moderately-to-strongly correlated at month 3 in csDMARD-IR patients, with weaker correlations evident between PtGA and HAQ-DI/FACIT-F outcomes. Similar findings were generally evident in csDMARD-naïve and bDMARD-IR patients. Conclusions This analysis supports the role of Pain as a key driver of PtGA in RA; physical function and fatigue play lesser roles in patients’ perceptions of disease activity. These findings corroborate the importance of improved PROs and attainment of low symptom states for optimizing patient care. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00847613 (registered: February 19, 2009); NCT00853385 (registered: March 2, 2009); NCT00856544 (registered: March 5, 2009); NCT01039688 (registered: December 25, 2009); NCT00960440 (registered: August 17, 2009)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Kaine
- Independent Healthcare Associates Inc, Cullowhee, NC, USA
| | - Rieke Alten
- Schlosspark-Klinik, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
163
|
Clinical Aspects of Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in the Cardiovascular System in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21197390. [PMID: 33036382 PMCID: PMC7583966 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, a novel class of targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), have shown their safety and efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are being intensively tested in other autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Targeting several cytokines with a single small compound leads to blocking the physiological response of hundreds of genes, thereby providing the background to stabilize the immune response. Unfortunately, blocking many cytokines with a single drug may also bring some negative consequences. In this review, we focused on the activity of JAK inhibitors in the cardiovascular system of patients with RA. Special emphasis was put on the modification of heart performance, progression of atherosclerosis, lipid profile disturbance, and risk of thromboembolic complications. We also discussed potential pathophysiological mechanisms that may be responsible for such JAK inhibitor-associated side effects.
Collapse
|
164
|
Zahedi Niaki O, Anadkat MJ, Chen ST, Fox LP, Harp J, Micheletti RG, Nambudiri VE, Pasieka HB, Shinohara MM, Rosenbach M, Merola JF. Navigating immunosuppression in a pandemic: A guide for the dermatologist from the COVID Task Force of the Medical Dermatology Society and Society of Dermatology Hospitalists. J Am Acad Dermatol 2020; 83:1150-1159. [PMID: 32569797 PMCID: PMC7303642 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Dermatologists treating immune-mediated skin disease must now contend with the uncertainties associated with immunosuppressive use in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Although the risk of infection with many commonly used immunosuppressive agents remains low, direct data evaluating the safety of such agents in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are scarce. This article reviews and offers guidance based on currently available safety data and the most recent COVID-19 outcome data in patients with immune-mediated dermatologic disease. The interdisciplinary panel of experts emphasizes a stepwise, shared decision-making approach in the management of immunosuppressive therapy. The goal of this article is to help providers minimize the risk of disease flares while simultaneously minimizing the risk of iatrogenic harm during an evolving pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Zahedi Niaki
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Milan J Anadkat
- Division of Dermatology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Steven T Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lindy P Fox
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Joanna Harp
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Robert G Micheletti
- Departments of Dermatology and Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vinod E Nambudiri
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helena B Pasieka
- Department of Dermatology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Michi M Shinohara
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Misha Rosenbach
- Departments of Dermatology and Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph F Merola
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
165
|
George G, Shyni GL, Raghu KG. Current and novel therapeutic targets in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Inflammopharmacology 2020; 28:1457-1476. [PMID: 32948901 DOI: 10.1007/s10787-020-00757-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a multifactorial disease characterized by synovitis, cartilage destruction, bone erosion, and periarticular decalcification, finally results in impairment of joint function. Both genetic and environmental factors are risk factors in the development of RA. Unwanted side effects accompany most of the current treatment strategies, and around 20-40% of patients with RA do not clinically benefit from these treatments. The unmet need for new treatment options for RA has prompted research in the development of novel agents acting through physiologically and pharmacologically relevant targets. Here we discuss in detail three critical pathways, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), Th17, and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), and their roles as unique therapeutic targets in the field of RA. Some of the less developed but potential targets like nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain-like receptor containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genu George
- Biochemistry and Molecular Mechanism Laboratory, Agro-Processing and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, 695019, Kerala, India
| | - G L Shyni
- Biochemistry and Molecular Mechanism Laboratory, Agro-Processing and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, 695019, Kerala, India
| | - K G Raghu
- Biochemistry and Molecular Mechanism Laboratory, Agro-Processing and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, 695019, Kerala, India.
| |
Collapse
|
166
|
Harrington R, Al Nokhatha SA, Conway R. JAK Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence-Based Review on the Emerging Clinical Data. J Inflamm Res 2020; 13:519-531. [PMID: 32982367 PMCID: PMC7500842 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s219586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) Inhibitors are the latest drug class of disease-modifying medication to emerge for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They are a small molecule-targeted treatment and are the first oral option to compare favourably to existing biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib are the first 3 JAK inhibitors to become commercially available in the field and are the core focus of this review. To date, they have demonstrated comparable efficacy to tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in terms of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates and disease activity (DAS28) scores with similar cost to the benchmark adalimumab. This narrative review article aims to synthesise and distil the key available trial data on JAK inhibitor efficacy and safety, along with their place in the ACR and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines for RA. The novel mechanism of action of the JAK/STAT pathway is highlighted along with the potential effects of modulating each pathway. The rapid onset of action, role in attenuation of central pain processing and effect on structural damage and radiographic progression are also all examined in detail. We also explore the latest meta-analyses and comparative performance of each of the 3 available JAKs in an effort to determine which is most efficacious and which has the most favourable safety profile. Post marketing concerns regarding thromboembolism risk and herpes zoster infection are also discussed. Additionally, we review the cost-benefit analyses of the available JAK inhibitors and address some of the pharmacoeconomic considerations for real-world practice in the UK and US by detailing the raw acquisition cost and the value they provide in comparison to the benchmark biologic adalimumab and the anchor DMARD methotrexate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Richard Conway
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
167
|
Xie W, Yang X, Huang H, Gao D, Ji L, Zhang Z. Risk of malignancy with non-TNFi biologic or tofacitinib therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:930-937. [PMID: 32906027 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the risk of developing cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exposed to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics or tofacitinib therapy. METHODS Systematical search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library plus a hand search of conference proceedings were performed. Observational studies that reported cancer incidence in patients with RA treated with biologics or tofacitinib with active comparator of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or TNFi were eligible for inclusion. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with fix-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS Of 2,819 identified articles, a total of 10 studies involving over 40,587 patients with more than 87,622 patient-years of exposure to non-TNF inhibitors (TNFi) biologics and 2,221 patients with more than 4,506 patient-years of exposure to tofacitinib were included. Pooled analysis showed there was no increased risk of developing cancer in general or specific cancer types in RA patients receiving treatment with rituximab (pooled RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.03), tocilizumab (pooled RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.06), or tofacitinib, compared with those receiving csDMARDs or TNFi. But abatacept was associated with a slightly increased overall cancer risk (pooled RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.24) and non-melanoma skin cancer (pooled RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09-1.45), relative to csDMARDs or TNFi in RA patients. CONCLUSION Among RA patients, a small statistically significant increase in developing cancer was observed for abatacept exposure, while no increased cancer risk for rituximab, tocilizumab or tofacitinib, in comparison with csDMARDs or TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhui Xie
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - Xinlei Yang
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - Hong Huang
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - Dai Gao
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - LanLan Ji
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| | - Zhuoli Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8, Xishiku Street, West District, Beijing 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
168
|
Lichtenstein GR, Rogler G, Ciorba MA, Su C, Chan G, Pedersen RD, Lawendy N, Quirk D, Nduaka CI, Thorpe AJ, Panés J. Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Analysis of Malignancy (Excluding Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer) Events Across the Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020; 27:816-825. [PMID: 32766762 PMCID: PMC8128409 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izaa199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we performed an integrated analysis of malignancy events from the tofacitinib phase 3 UC clinical development program (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer [NMSC]). METHODS Data (up to May 2019) were pooled from two phase 3 induction studies, a phase 3 maintenance study, and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study, and analyzed as 3 cohorts: induction (N = 1139), maintenance (N = 592), and overall (induction, maintenance, and ongoing OLE study; N = 1124). Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events per 100 patient-years [PY] of exposure) for malignancies confirmed by adjudication were calculated. RESULTS The overall cohort consisted of patients who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib at 5 or 10 mg twice daily, for up to 6.8 years, with an exposure of 2576.4 PY. Of the 1124 overall cohort tofacitinib-treated patients, 20 developed a malignancy (excluding NMSC; IR, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.16), of which 17 occurred in patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily; importantly, more than 80% of patients predominantly received this dose. Furthermore, there was no apparent clustering of malignancy types, and IRs were stable over time. CONCLUSIONS In the tofacitinib UC clinical development program, malignancy events were infrequent, and rates were comparable with those in the tofacitinib rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis clinical development programs, and for biologic UC treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01465763, NCT01458951, NCT01458574, and NCT01470612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary R Lichtenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA,Address correspondence to: Gary R. Lichtenstein, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 400 Civic Center Boulevard, 753 Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, South Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. E-mail:
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Matthew A Ciorba
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Chinyu Su
- Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gary Chan
- Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Julian Panés
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
169
|
Mease P, Charles-Schoeman C, Cohen S, Fallon L, Woolcott J, Yun H, Kremer J, Greenberg J, Malley W, Onofrei A, Kanik KS, Graham D, Wang C, Connell C, Valdez H, Hauben M, Hung E, Madsen A, Jones TV, Curtis JR. Incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolic events reported in the tofacitinib rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis development programmes and from real-world data. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:1400-1413. [PMID: 32759265 PMCID: PMC7569391 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ulcerative colitis, and has been investigated in psoriasis (PsO). Routine pharmacovigilance of an ongoing, open-label, blinded-endpoint, tofacitinib RA trial (Study A3921133; NCT02092467) in patients aged ≥50 years and with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor identified a higher frequency of pulmonary embolism (PE) and all-cause mortality for patients receiving tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus those receiving tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and resulted in identification of a safety signal for tofacitinib. Here, we report the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), PE, venous thromboembolism (VTE; DVT or PE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) from the tofacitinib RA (excluding Study A3921133), PsA and PsO development programmes and observational studies. Data from an ad hoc safety analysis of Study A3921133 are reported separately within. Methods This post-hoc analysis used data from separate tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events per 100 patient-years’ exposure) were calculated for DVT, PE, VTE and ATE, including for populations stratified by defined baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. Observational data from the US Corrona registries (including cardiovascular risk factor stratification), IBM MarketScan research database and the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database were analysed. Results 12 410 tofacitinib-treated patients from the development programmes (RA: n=7964; PsO: n=3663; PsA: n=783) were included. IRs (95% CI) of thromboembolic events among the all tofacitinib cohorts’ average tofacitinib 5 mg and 10 mg twice daily treated patients for RA, respectively, were: DVT (0.17 (0.09–0.27) and 0.15 (0.09–0.22)); PE (0.12 (0.06–0.22) and 0.13 (0.08–0.21)); ATE (0.32 (0.22–0.46) and 0.38 (0.28–0.49)). Among PsO patients, IRs were: DVT (0.06 (0.00–0.36) and 0.06 (0.02–0.15)); PE (0.13 (0.02–0.47) and 0.09 (0.04–0.19)); ATE (0.52 (0.22–1.02) and 0.22 (0.13–0.35)). Among PsA patients, IRs were: DVT (0.00 (0.00–0.28) and 0.13 (0.00–0.70)); PE (0.08 (0.00–0.43) and 0.00 (0.00–0.46)); ATE (0.31 (0.08–0.79) and 0.38 (0.08–1.11)). IRs were similar between tofacitinib doses and generally higher in patients with baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors. IRs from the overall Corrona populations and in Corrona RA patients (including tofacitinib-naïve/biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-treated and tofacitinib-treated) with baseline cardiovascular risk factors were similar to IRs observed among the corresponding patients in the tofacitinib development programme. No signals of disproportionate reporting of DVT, PE or ATE with tofacitinib were identified in the FAERS database. Conclusions DVT, PE and ATE IRs in the tofacitinib RA, PsO and PsA programmes were similar across tofacitinib doses, and generally consistent with observational data and published IRs of other treatments. As expected, IRs of thromboembolic events were elevated in patients with versus without baseline cardiovascular or VTE risk factors, and were broadly consistent with those observed in the Study A3921133 ad hoc safety analysis data, although the IR (95% CI) for PE was greater in patients treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in Study A3921133 (0.54 (0.32–0.87)), versus patients with baseline cardiovascular risk factors treated with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in the RA programme (0.24 (0.13–0.41)).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Mease
- Rheumatology Clinical Research Division, Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Lara Fallon
- Inflammation and Immunology - Global Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada
| | - John Woolcott
- Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Huifeng Yun
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Joel Kremer
- Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Keith S Kanik
- Inflammation and Immunology TA, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA
| | - Daniela Graham
- Inflammation and Immunology TA, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA
| | - Cunshan Wang
- Statistics, Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA
| | - Carol Connell
- Clinical Development & Operations, Pfizer Inc, Groton, Connecticut, USA
| | - Hernan Valdez
- Global Product Development, Inflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | - Manfred Hauben
- Worldwide Safety, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eric Hung
- Worldwide Safety, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ann Madsen
- Global Medical Epidemiology, Pfizer Inc, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas V Jones
- Worldwide Medical and Safety, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
170
|
Harigai M, Honda S. Selectivity of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Other Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Is Expectation the Root of All Headache? Drugs 2020; 80:1183-1201. [PMID: 32681420 PMCID: PMC7395017 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01349-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) is a signal transducer and activator of a protein transcription system that transduces signals from cell surface cytokine and growth factor receptors to the nucleus. Recently developed JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) inhibit JAKs non-selectively or selectively and down-regulate the effects of corresponding ligands (i.e. cytokines and growth factors). JAKinibs are efficacious against rheumatoid arthritis and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and are being increasingly prescribed clinically. Regarding safety, JAKinib use is associated with common or unique changes in laboratory parameters; however, incidence rates of serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with these changes are low. Opportunistic and other infections, including tuberculosis, are the most critical ADRs of treatment with JAKinibs, and screening and monitoring of patients should be carefully performed. Incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients receiving JAKinibs are high in Japan and Korea, and modestly high in other countries. Filgotinib may not be associated with an elevated risk for HZ, but long-term safety data are lacking. Data from clinical development programmes and post-marketing surveillance have indicated no increased risk for malignancy or serious cardiac events; however, long-term observational studies are necessary. Despite the non-elevated risk of gastrointestinal perforations, patients with older age and/or a history of diverticulitis or receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be carefully evaluated to determine the risk-benefit balance. The incidence rates of venous thromboembolism with all approved doses are similar to that expected in the population, although there are discrepancies in the placebo-controlled portion of the baricitinib clinical development programmes. Regulatory agencies in the USA and Europe suggested a higher risk for thrombotic events in patients receiving JAKinibs. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that dose adjustment should be considered for JAKinib use in patients with moderate-to-severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, depending on the metabolism of each drug. Long-term observational studies enrolling patients with diverse clinical backgrounds are required to strike a risk-benefit balance in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayoshi Harigai
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Suguru Honda
- Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
171
|
Magro F, Estevinho MM. Is tofacitinib a game-changing drug for ulcerative colitis? United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:755-763. [PMID: 32552501 PMCID: PMC7435001 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620935732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing knowledge on ulcerative colitis' pathophysiology has contributed to the expansion of the therapeutic arsenal for this condition. However, to date, 25-40% of patients with ulcerative colitis remain primary or secondary non-responders to therapy, and up to 10% need to eventually undergo a colectomy. Janus kinase inhibitors block cytokine signalling involved in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory conditions. Tofacitinib is the first drug of this class approved for moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis in patients for whom disease worsened and those who did not improve with conventional therapy (aminosalicylates, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants) or monoclonal antibodies. We aimed to review the main aspects and concerns related to the current use of tofacitinib and to explore its future application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Magro
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Gastroenterology, São João Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
- MedInUP, Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, São João Hospital University Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Maria Manuela Estevinho
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho Hospital Center, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
172
|
Chatzidionysiou K. Beyond Methotrexate and Biologics in RA - Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors and their Place in the Current Treatment Armamentarium. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2020; 31:120-128. [PMID: 32676570 PMCID: PMC7361190 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.31.1.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Chatzidionysiou
- Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
173
|
Angelini J, Talotta R, Roncato R, Fornasier G, Barbiero G, Dal Cin L, Brancati S, Scaglione F. JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future. Biomolecules 2020; 10:E1002. [PMID: 32635659 PMCID: PMC7408575 DOI: 10.3390/biom10071002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) belong to a new class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs which have recently revolutionized the therapeutic panorama of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated diseases, placing alongside or even replacing conventional and biological drugs. JAKi are characterized by a novel mechanism of action, consisting of the intracellular interruption of the JAK-STAT pathway crucially involved in the immune response. The aim of this narrative review is to globally report the most relevant pharmacological features and clinical outcomes of the developed and incoming JAKi for RA, based on the available preclinical and clinical evidence. A total of 219 papers, including narrative and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, guidelines, and drug factsheets, were selected. The efficacy and safety profile of both the first generation JAKi (baricitinib and tofacitinib) and the second generation JAKi (upadacitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib and itacitinib) were compared and discussed. Results from RCTs and real-life data are encouraging and outline a rapid onset of the pharmacologic effects, which are maintained during the time. Their efficacy and safety profile are comparable or superior to those of biologic agents and JAKi proved to be efficacious when given as monotherapy. Finally, the manufacturing of JAKi is relatively easier and cheaper than that of biologics, thus increasing the number of compounds being formulated and tested for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Angelini
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Rossella Talotta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, AOU “Gaetano Martino”, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy
| | - Rossana Roncato
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Pordenone, 33081 Aviano, Italy;
| | - Giulia Fornasier
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
- Pharmacy Unit, IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo di Trieste, 34137 Trieste, Italy
| | - Giorgia Barbiero
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Lisa Dal Cin
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Serena Brancati
- Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; (J.A.); (G.F.); (G.B.); (L.D.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Francesco Scaglione
- Head of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Department of Oncology and Onco-Hematology, Director of Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
174
|
Wang F, Sun L, Wang S, Davis JM, Matteson EL, Murad MH, Luo F, Vassallo R. Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, and Upadacitinib for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95:1404-1419. [PMID: 32499126 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety profiles of different dosing regimens of tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, novel selective oral Janus activated kinase inhibitors, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib (5 and 10 mg twice daily) baricitinib (2 and 4 mg daily), and upadacitinib (15 and 30 mg daily) in RA were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 11, 2019. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled mean differences and relative risks (RRs). American College of Rheumatology 20%, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, adverse events, risk for infection, venous thromboembolic events, and malignancy were calculated. RESULTS Twenty trials with an overall low risk of bias involving 8982 patients were identified. Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib improved RA control as determined by American College of Rheumatology 20% (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.87 to 2.20) and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores (mean differences, -0.31; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.28) compared with placebo. Adverse events were more frequent with upadacitinib, 30 mg, daily (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.30); upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.27); and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.24). The risk for infection was highest with tofacitinib, 10 mg, twice daily (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.72 to 4.41), followed by upadacitinib, 15 mg, daily (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.60) and baricitinib, 4 mg, daily (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.45). Data for venous thromboembolic events were not available for tofacitinib or baricitinib, but there was no increase in risk with upadacitinib (15 mg daily: RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 0.34 to 15.92). CONCLUSION Tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib significantly improve RA control. Head-to-head Janus activated kinase inhibitor clinical trials are needed to further inform decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faping Wang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ling Sun
- Research Center of Regeneration Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shaohua Wang
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN
| | - John M Davis
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric L Matteson
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Fengming Luo
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Robert Vassallo
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
175
|
Al‐Ani AH, Prentice RE, Rentsch CA, Johnson D, Ardalan Z, Heerasing N, Garg M, Campbell S, Sasadeusz J, Macrae FA, Ng SC, Rubin DT, Christensen B. Review article: prevention, diagnosis and management of COVID-19 in the IBD patient. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52:54-72. [PMID: 32348598 PMCID: PMC7267115 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as a public health emergency. All nations are seriously challenged as the virus spreads rapidly across the globe with no regard for borders. The primary management of IBD involves treating uncontrolled inflammation with most patients requiring immune-based therapies. However, these therapies may weaken the immune system and potentially place IBD patients at increased risk of infections and infectious complications including those from COVID-19. AIM To summarise the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, review unique concerns regarding IBD management and infection risk during the pandemic and assess COVID-19 management options and drug interactions in the IBD population. METHODS A literature review on IBD, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 was undertaken and relevant literature was summarised and critically examined. RESULTS IBD patients do not appear to be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and there is no evidence of an association between IBD therapies and increased risk of COVID-19. IBD medication adherence should be encouraged to prevent disease flare but where possible high-dose systemic corticosteroids should be avoided. Patients should exercise social distancing, optimise co-morbidities and be up to date with influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. If a patient develops COVID-19, immune suppressing medications should be withheld until infection resolution and if trial medications for COVID-19 are being considered, potential drug interactions should be checked. CONCLUSIONS IBD patient management presents a challenge in the current COVID-19 pandemic. The primary focus should remain on keeping bowel inflammation controlled and encouraging medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysha H. Al‐Ani
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Ralley E. Prentice
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Clarissa A. Rentsch
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Doug Johnson
- Victorian Infectious Diseases UnitThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Zaid Ardalan
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Neel Heerasing
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Mayur Garg
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Sian Campbell
- Victorian Infectious Diseases UnitThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Joe Sasadeusz
- Victorian Infectious Diseases UnitThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Finlay A. Macrae
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| | - Siew C. Ng
- Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsInstitute of Digestive DiseaseState Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseasesLi Ka Shing Institute of Health ScienceThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong Special Administrative RegionChina
| | - David T. Rubin
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease CenterUniversity of Chicago MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Britt Christensen
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Royal Melbourne HospitalMelbourneVic.Australia
| |
Collapse
|
176
|
Chopra A, Shobha V, Chandrashekara S, Veeravalli SCM, Sharma R, Rao UR, Pandya S, Wagh S, Kadel JK, Thorat AV, Adhav C, Santos Estrella P, Yu W, Kwok K, Wouters A. Tofacitinib in the treatment of Indian patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A post hoc analysis of efficacy and safety in Phase 3 and long-term extension studies over 7 years. Int J Rheum Dis 2020; 23:882-897. [PMID: 32478474 PMCID: PMC7496174 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We characterized tofacitinib efficacy/safety in Indian vs rest of the world (ROW; excluding India) RA patients. METHODS Efficacy data were pooled for disease-modified antirheumatic drug (DMARD) inadequate responders from Phase (P)3 studies. For Indian patients, ORAL Solo and ORAL Scan; ROW (excluding India), these studies plus ORAL Step, ORAL Sync, and ORAL Standard. Safety data also included ORAL Start (P3; methotrexate-naïve) and ORAL Sequel (long-term extension [LTE] study; data cut-off March 2017) for Indian patients, and these studies plus A3921041 (LTE study; Japanese study) for ROW. Efficacy outcomes at months 3/6: American College of Rheumatology (ACR)20/50/70; Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission/low disease activity; change from baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events/100 patient-years) for adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were assessed throughout. Descriptive data underwent no formal comparison. RESULTS One-hundred-and-ninety-seven Indian and 3879 ROW patients were included. Compared with ROW patients, Indian patients were younger, had lower body mass index, shorter RA duration, and higher baseline disease activity; most Indian patients were non-smokers and all were biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve. Month 3 ACR20 rates with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily/10 mg twice daily/placebo were 67.4%/82.1%/40.9% (India) and 59.0%/66.1%/28.2% (ROW), and month 6 rates were 76.2%/92.1%/88.9% (India) and 69.0%/74.2%/66.5% (ROW). Month 3/6 improvements in other outcomes were generally numerically greater with tofacitinib vs placebo, and similar in both populations. Compared with ROW, Indian patients had numerically fewer AEs/serious AEs, and similar IRs for discontinuations due to AEs and AESIs, except that tuberculosis (TB) IR was higher in Indian (IR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.49, 2.49) vs ROW patients (IR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.11, 0.25). CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib efficacy/safety were similar in both populations, except TB IR, which was higher in Indian patients but in line with those in bDMARD-treated RA patients from high-risk countries (IR = 0.00-2.56; TB IR >0.05 [World Health Organization]). Limitations included the small Indian population and baseline differences between populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Chopra
- Arthritis Research and Care FoundationCenter for Rheumatic DiseasesPuneIndia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sapan Pandya
- Rheumatic Diseases ClinicVedanta Institute of Medical ScienceAhmedabadIndia
| | - Shrikant Wagh
- Jehangir Clinical Development CenterMaharashtraIndia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
177
|
Sunzini F, McInnes I, Siebert S. JAK inhibitors and infections risk: focus on herpes zoster. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2020; 12:1759720X20936059. [PMID: 32655703 PMCID: PMC7328488 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x20936059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, there is a growing interest in Janus kinase (JAK) intracellular
signalling since targeted inhibitors against these pathways are proving
effective in the treatment of a range of immune-mediated diseases, such as
rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), inflammatory
bowel disease and atopic dermatitis. In particular, post marketing experience
and the increasing development of new pharmacological inhibitors of broad and
increasingly selective JAK pathways provide new insights into the JAK pathway
role in viral infections as well as their pathogenic role in immune-mediated
inflammatory diseases. Herein we provide an overview of the biological role of
JAK signalling and its role in immunity against viruses, with particular regard
to herpes zoster reactivation. Thereafter, we will discuss the evidence
currently available on the principal JAK inhibitors and their association with
viral infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Sunzini
- University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Iain McInnes
- University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, 120 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Stefan Siebert
- University of Glasgow College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
178
|
Macaluso FS, Rodríguez-Lago I. JAK Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr Drug Metab 2020; 21:247-255. [DOI: 10.2174/1389200221666200310111409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background:
Inflammatory bowel disease, including both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are two
chronic and progressive disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Research on the molecular mechanisms of both
diseases has led to the introduction of targeted therapies which are able to selectively block the key inflammatory
mediators.
Methods:
Here, we discuss the current evidence about the mechanism of action with an up to date review of the
efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease.
Results:
Multiple small molecule drugs have been evaluated for their use in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s
disease. Janus kinase inhibitors represent the most important family of these drugs, as their particular mechanism of
action enables a simultaneous and effective blockade of multiple cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the
disease.
Conclusion:
Janus kinase inhibitors represent a promising therapeutic strategy, especially in ulcerative colitis. More
data are still necessary regarding its efficacy and safety in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iago Rodríguez-Lago
- IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Galdakao, Galdakao (Vizcaya), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
179
|
Singh S, Singh S. JAK-STAT inhibitors: Immersing therapeutic approach for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol 2020; 86:106731. [PMID: 32590315 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis is a world leading cause of musculoskeletal disease. With the introduction of biological agents as treatment alternatives the clinical possibilities have grown exponentially. Currently most common Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) treatment option involves intravenous or subcutaneous injection, and some patients struggle to respond to DMARDs or lose their primary reaction. An oral drug formulation with lowered costs of manufacturing and flexibility for healthcare workers to preferably perform treatment will result in decreased healthcare expenditures and increased medication compliance. The JAK-STAT inhibitors, a new class of small molecules drugs, fulfills these criteria and has recently shown efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. Here we give a summary of how JAK-STAT inhibitors function and a detailed review of current clinical trials. Convincing clinical results suggest that therapeutic inhibition of the JAK proteins can effectively modulate a complex cytokine-driven inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjiv Singh
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) Zandaha Road, Hajipur, Bihar, India.
| | - Shantanu Singh
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) Zandaha Road, Hajipur, Bihar, India
| |
Collapse
|
180
|
Colafrancesco S, Scrivo R, Barbati C, Conti F, Priori R. Targeting the Immune System for Pulmonary Inflammation and Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19 Patients. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1439. [PMID: 32655577 PMCID: PMC7324709 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In December 2019, following a cluster of pneumonia cases in China caused by a novel coronavirus (CoV), named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the infection disseminated worldwide and, on March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization officially declared the pandemic of the relevant disease named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In Europe, Italy was the first country facing a true health policy emergency, and, as at 6.00 p.m. on May 2nd, 2020, there have been more than 209,300 confirmed cases of COVID-19. Due to the increasing number of patients experiencing a severe outcome, global scientific efforts are ongoing to find the most appropriate treatment. The usefulness of specific anti-rheumatic drugs came out as a promising treatment option together with antiviral drugs, anticoagulants, and symptomatic and respiratory support. For this reason, we feel a duty to share our experience and our knowledge on the use of these drugs in the immune-rheumatologic field, providing in this review the rationale for their use in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Fabrizio Conti
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
181
|
Cantini F, Blandizzi C, Niccoli L, Petrone L, Goletti D. Systematic review on tuberculosis risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving inhibitors of Janus Kinases. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2020; 19:861-872. [PMID: 32552289 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1774550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Janus kinases inhibitors (anti-JAKs), including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib, represent a new class of synthetic targeted drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this review, the risk of active tuberculosis (TB) occurrence in patients receiving anti-JAKs was assessed. The literature on this topic, updated to 29 February 2020 was reviewed. Overall, 40 reports (22 tofacitinib, 10 baricitinib, 5 upadacitinib, 3 filgotinib) were examined. A low frequency, not exceeding 0.25%, of active TB cases in patients were exposed to anti-JAKs. Only 1 of 89 recorded cases in tofactinib and baricitinib exposure occurred in countries at intermediate or high TB risk, and most of the cases probably were due to first mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exposure. Although no cases were observed in patients receiving upadacitinib and filgotinib, long-term trials and data from real-life are required to more precisely address the TB risk associated with the two drugs. AREAS COVERED Discussion on the TB risk associated with anti-JAKs, and on the need for accurate evaluation of host-related risk factors in high risk countries. EXPERT OPINION Available data on anti-JAKs suggest a negligible risk of active TB occurrence in low endemic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Corrado Blandizzi
- Unit of Pharmacology and Pharmacovigilance, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa , Pisa, Italy
| | - Laura Niccoli
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital of Prato , Prato, Italy
| | - Linda Petrone
- Translational Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preclinical Research, "L. Spallanzani" National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI), IRCCS , Rome, Italy
| | - Delia Goletti
- Translational Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preclinical Research, "L. Spallanzani" National Institute for Infectious Diseases (INMI), IRCCS , Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
182
|
Aleisa AI, Plante JG, Hsia LLB. A case of aggressive squamous cell carcinoma with lymphovascular invasion during treatment with the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib. JAAD Case Rep 2020; 6:727-730. [PMID: 32715063 PMCID: PMC7369521 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad I Aleisa
- Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.,Department of Dermatology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - John G Plante
- Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Ling-Lun B Hsia
- Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
183
|
Shimizu H, Fujii T, Hibiya S, Motobayashi M, Suzuki K, Takenaka K, Saito E, Nagahori M, Ohtsuka K, Watanabe M. Rapid prediction of 1-year efficacy of tofacitinib for treating refractory ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 2020; 19:115-118. [PMID: 32516866 PMCID: PMC7873398 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2020.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshimitsu Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Hibiya
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maiko Motobayashi
- Department of Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohei Suzuki
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kento Takenaka
- Department of Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masakazu Nagahori
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Ohtsuka
- Department of Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mamoru Watanabe
- Institute of Advanced Study, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
184
|
Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Interim Analysis of OPAL Balance, an Open-Label, Long-Term Extension Study. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:553-580. [PMID: 32506317 PMCID: PMC7410915 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00209-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We report the interim safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tofacitinib in PsA patients in OPAL Balance, a 3-year, open-label, long-term extension study (data cut-off: August 2017; database not locked, data may change). Methods Eligible patients from two phase (P) 3 (P3) tofacitinib PsA studies (OPAL Broaden, NCT01877668; OPAL Beyond, NCT01882439) entered OPAL Balance ≤ 3 months after completing the P3 study or discontinuing for reasons other than study-drug-related adverse events (AEs). Patients received open-label tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), with adjustments to 10 mg BID permitted post-month (M) 1. Certain concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were allowed. Primary endpoints were incidence/severity of AEs and laboratory abnormalities, and changes from baseline in laboratory parameters (reported up to M36 and M30, respectively). Efficacy (clinical/patient-reported outcomes) was reported through M30. Results A total of 686 patients were treated; at data cut-off, 68.2% remained in the study. Mean (range) treatment duration was 641 (1–1032) days; total treatment duration was 1153.2 patient-years. By M36, 79.6, 13.8, and 8.6% of patients reported AEs, serious AEs, and discontinuations due to AEs, respectively. Five deaths occurred; one within the risk period (incidence rate [IR; patients with events/100 patient-years] 0.1). IRs for AEs of special interest were: all (non-serious and serious) herpes zoster, 1.7; serious infections, 0.9; opportunistic infections, 0.3 (all disseminated/multi-dermatomal herpes zoster); malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), 0.8; NMSC, 1.0; major adverse cardiovascular events, 0.3; pulmonary embolisms, 0.1; and arterial thromboembolisms, 0.4. No patients had deep vein thrombosis. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were elevated ≥ 3-fold the upper limit of normal in 4.0 and 2.2% of patients, respectively. Changes in laboratory parameters were generally stable over time, although lymphocyte counts decreased slightly. Efficacy was maintained through M30. Conclusions In this interim analysis of OPAL Balance, tofacitinib safety and efficacy in patients with PsA appeared to be consistent with those of the P3 studies. Efficacy was maintained over time. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01976364. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-020-00209-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. In many countries, tofacitinib is an approved medicine that can be used to treat psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In the study reported here (OPAL Balance), adult patients with PsA took tofacitinib for up to 3 years. We report a planned interim analysis, i.e., an analysis of information collected before the study finished. This early information suggests that the safety of tofacitinib, and how well it improved symptoms and quality of life (efficacy), was similar in this long study as in shorter studies. Information from the finished study will be reported later. OPAL Balance started on 17 February 2014. This interim analysis includes information collected by 31 August 2017. Before joining, patients had finished a 6-month or 12-month tofacitinib study (OPAL Broaden or OPAL Beyond). Patients in OPAL Balance took a 5 mg tofacitinib pill twice a day, but if PsA symptoms did not improve after 1 month, they could take a 10 mg pill twice a day. They could also take other medicines (including methotrexate or corticosteroids). Of the 686 patients who took tofacitinib, 546 (80%) experienced side effects over 3 years. These were considered serious for 95 patients (14%) and caused 59 patients (9%) to leave the study. Five patients died from causes not related to tofacitinib. Known tofacitinib side effects, including shingles (herpes zoster), serious infections (needing hospitalization), infections in patients with weakened immune systems, cancer, heart (cardiovascular) problems, and vein blockages (embolisms), were each reported by fewer than 20 patients. Most blood test results and tofacitinib efficacy were stable over 2.5 years.
Collapse
|
185
|
Affiliation(s)
- Akio Morinobu
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
186
|
Cohen SB. Safety profile of JAK inhibitors: a focus on baricitinib. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2020; 2:e313-e314. [PMID: 38273590 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30059-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
|
187
|
Olivera PA, Lasa JS, Bonovas S, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases or Other Immune-mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:1554-1573.e12. [PMID: 31926171 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 177] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAKs) are being developed for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and other immune-mediated diseases. Tofacitinib is effective in treatment of ulcerative colitis, but there are safety concerns. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety profile of tofacitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib, and baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases, psoriasis, or ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, through July 1, 2019. We performed a manual review of conference databases from 2012 through 2018. The primary outcome was incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. We also estimated incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, non-melanoma skin cancer, other malignancies, major cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, and mortality. We performed a meta-analysis, which included controlled studies, to assess the relative risk of these events. RESULTS We identified 973 studies; of these, 82 were included in the final analysis, comprising 66,159 patients with immune-mediated diseases who were exposed to a JAK inhibitor. Two-thirds of the included studies were randomized controlled trials. The incidence rate of AEs was 42.65 per 100 person-years and of serious AEs was 9.88 per 100 person-years. Incidence rates of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, and major cardiovascular events were 2.81 per 100 person-years, 2.67 per 100 person-years, 0.89 per 100 person-years, and 0.48 per 100 person-years, respectively. Mortality was not increased in patients treated with JAK inhibitors compared with patients given placebo or active comparator (relative risk 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.40-1.28). The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in risk of herpes zoster infection among patients who received JAK inhibitors (relative risk 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.37). CONCLUSIONS In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection among patients with immune-mediated diseases treated with JAK inhibitors. All other AEs were not increased among patients treated with JAK inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo A Olivera
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan S Lasa
- Gastroenterology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- INSERM NGERE and Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Lorraine University, Vandoeuvre-lés-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
188
|
Moving towards personalized treatments of immune-related adverse events. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:504-515. [DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0352-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
189
|
|
190
|
Nasonov EL, Avdeeva AS, Lila AM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (Part I). RHEUMATOLOGY SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2020-62-79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E. L. Nasonov
- V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
| | | | - A. M. Lila
- V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education, Ministry of Health of Russia
| |
Collapse
|
191
|
Re-establishment of efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral JAK inhibitor, after temporary discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2127-2137. [PMID: 32048083 PMCID: PMC7295730 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-04956-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction/objective Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post-hoc analysis evaluated the effect of temporary discontinuation and reinitiation of tofacitinib on disease control in patients with RA in the vaccine sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study ORAL Sequel (NCT00413699). Methods The sub-study of ORAL Sequel was a randomized, parallel-group, open-label study. Patients who received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for ≥ 3 months in ORAL Sequel were randomized to receive continuous (tofacitinib monotherapy/with methotrexate) or interrupted (tofacitinib withdrawn for 2 weeks post-randomization then reinitiated as monotherapy/with methotrexate) treatment. Efficacy assessments included ACR20/50/70 response rates, change from baseline (∆) in C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4 [ESR]), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Patient Global Assessment of arthritis (PtGA), Pain (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), and Physician Global Assessment of arthritis (PGA). Safety was assessed throughout. Results The sub-study included 99 patients each in the continuous and interrupted treatment groups. ACR20/50 response rates, ∆CRP, ∆HAQ-DI (day 15), ∆DAS28-4 (ESR), ∆CDAI, ∆PtGA, ∆Pain (VAS), and ∆PGA were significantly worse in interrupted vs continuous patients during dose interruption, but were generally similar to pre-interruption/continuous treatment levels 28 days post-reinitiation. A numerically higher proportion of interrupted patients reported adverse events (49.5%) vs continuous patients (35.4%). Conclusions Tofacitinib efficacy can be re-established after temporary withdrawal and reinitiation. The safety profile of patients who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib in the sub-study was consistent with previous tofacitinib LTE studies over 9 years. Clinical trial registration number NCT00413699Key Points • In this sub-study of the long-term extension (LTE) study, ORAL Sequel, the efficacy of tofacitinib was re-established after temporary withdrawal (2 weeks) and reinitation of treatment in patients with RA. • Patients with RA who temporarily discontinued tofacitinib had similar safety events to those reported in previous LTE studies. • The results of this sub-study were consistent with a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from two LTE studies, ORAL Sequel and A3921041, which assessed the efficacy of tofacitinib following a treatment discontinuation period of 14–30 days. |
Collapse
|
192
|
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, Dougados M, Kerschbaumer A, McInnes IB, Sepriano A, van Vollenhoven RF, de Wit M, Aletaha D, Aringer M, Askling J, Balsa A, Boers M, den Broeder AA, Buch MH, Buttgereit F, Caporali R, Cardiel MH, De Cock D, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, Edwards CJ, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Emery P, Finckh A, Gossec L, Gottenberg JE, Hetland ML, Huizinga TWJ, Koloumas M, Li Z, Mariette X, Müller-Ladner U, Mysler EF, da Silva JAP, Poór G, Pope JE, Rubbert-Roth A, Ruyssen-Witrand A, Saag KG, Strangfeld A, Takeuchi T, Voshaar M, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:685-699. [PMID: 31969328 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1622] [Impact Index Per Article: 405.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations to account for the most recent developments in the field. METHODS An international task force considered new evidence supporting or contradicting previous recommendations and novel therapies and strategic insights based on two systematic literature searches on efficacy and safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the last update (2016) until 2019. A predefined voting process was applied, current levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned and participants ultimately voted independently on their level of agreement with each of the items. RESULTS The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 12 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); glucocorticoids (GCs); biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and biosimilar (bs) DMARDs) and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs (the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib). Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering on sustained clinical remission is provided. Cost and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs are addressed. Initially, MTX plus GCs and upon insufficient response to this therapy within 3 to 6 months, stratification according to risk factors is recommended. With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD or JAK inhibitor should be added to the csDMARD. If this fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD is recommended. On sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered, but not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were mostly high. CONCLUSIONS These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on the management of RA with respect to benefit, safety, preferences and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes W J Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Rhumatologie B, Hopital Cochin, 27 rue du Fbg Saint-Jacques, Paris, France
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Iain B McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, and Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten de Wit
- EULAR Patient Research Partner; Department Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Aringer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - John Askling
- Department of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Servicio de Reumatologia Hospital Universitario La Paz, Instituto de Investigacion IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maya H Buch
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, University of Manchester; NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Free University and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, and IRCCS S Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Diederik De Cock
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven; Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center of Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Research Laboratory and Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine - University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Christopher John Edwards
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, NIHR Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings
- Department of Patient & Care and Department of Rheumatology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Emery
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Gossec
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris and Pitié Salpêtrière hospital, AP-HP, Rheumatology Department, Paris, France
| | - Jacques-Eric Gottenberg
- Strasbourg University Hospital and University of Strasbourg, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Immunopathologie, et Chimie Thérapeutique, Strasbourg, France
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tom W J Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marios Koloumas
- European League Against Rheumatism, Zurich, Switzerland.,Cyprus League against Rheumatism, Nikosia, Cyprus
| | - Zhanguo Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Beijing University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xavier Mariette
- Université Paris-Sud, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Ulf Müller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Campus Kerckhoff, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | | | - Jose A P da Silva
- Serviço de Reumatologia, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra Praceta Mota Pinto, and Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (i-CRB), Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Gyula Poór
- National Institute of Rheumatology & Physiology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Janet E Pope
- University of Western Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Medicine, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Kenneth G Saag
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Brmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Programme Area Epidemiology, Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Keio University School of Medicine, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - René Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven; Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
193
|
Solimani F, Meier K, Ghoreschi K. Emerging Topical and Systemic JAK Inhibitors in Dermatology. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2847. [PMID: 31849996 PMCID: PMC6901833 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Accumulating data on cellular and molecular pathways help to develop novel therapeutic strategies in skin inflammation and autoimmunity. Examples are psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, two clinically and immunologically well-defined disorders. Here, the elucidation of key pathogenic factors such as IL-17A/IL-23 on the one hand and IL-4/IL-13 on the other hand profoundly changed our therapeutic practice. The knowledge on intracellular pathways and governing factors is shifting our attention to new druggable molecules. Multiple cytokine receptors signal through Janus kinases (JAKs) and associated signal transducer and activators of transcription (STATs). Inhibition of JAKs can simultaneously block the function of multiple cytokines. Therefore, JAK inhibitors (JAKi) are emerging as a new class of drugs, which in dermatology can either be used systemically as oral drugs or locally in topical formulations. Inhibition of JAKs has been shown to be effective in various skin disorders. The first oral JAKi have been recently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Currently, multiple inhibitors of the JAK/STAT pathway are being investigated for skin diseases like alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis, dermatomyositis, graft-versus-host-disease, hidradenitis suppurativa, lichen planus, lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, and vitiligo. Here, we aim to discuss the immunological basis and current stage of development of JAKi in dermatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farzan Solimani
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katharina Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kamran Ghoreschi
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
194
|
Ehrenstein B. [Acute exacerbation of the underlying disease or infection : Which diagnostics are warranted in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases?]. Z Rheumatol 2019; 78:932-939. [PMID: 31511978 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-019-00705-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Infectious diseases always have to be considered in the differential diagnosis of new symptoms in patients with immunosuppressive treatment for established inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Knowledge about the specific frequency and type of infections that can be expected under immunosuppressive treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases as well as the diagnostic value of laboratory tests and imaging results can facilitate the often difficult differential diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Ehrenstein
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie, Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach, 93077, Bad Abbach, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
195
|
Dowty ME, Lin TH, Jesson MI, Hegen M, Martin DA, Katkade V, Menon S, Telliez J. Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis demonstrate similar profiles of in vitro cytokine receptor inhibition. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2019; 7:e00537. [PMID: 31832202 PMCID: PMC6857076 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as an effective class of therapies for various inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors function intracellularly by modulating the catalytic activity of JAKs and disrupting the receptor-mediated signaling of multiple cytokines and growth factors, including those with pro-inflammatory activity. Understanding the inhibition profiles of different JAK inhibitors, based on the associated cytokine receptors and downstream inflammatory pathways affected, is important to identify the potential mechanisms for observed differences in efficacy and safety. This study applied an integrated modeling approach, using in vitro whole blood cytokine inhibition potencies and plasma pharmacokinetics, to determine JAK-dependent cytokine receptor inhibition profiles, in the context of doses estimated to provide a similar clinical response in RA clinical trials. The calculated profiles of cytokine receptor inhibition for the JAK inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib and its metabolite, were generally similar when clinically efficacious doses for RA were considered. Only minor numerical differences in percentage cytokine receptor inhibition were observed, suggesting limited differentiation of these inhibitors based on JAK pharmacology, with each showing a differential selectivity for JAK1 heterodimer inhibition. Nevertheless, only robust clinical testing involving head-to-head studies will ultimately determine whether there are clinically meaningful differences between these JAK inhibitors. Furthermore, ongoing and future research into inhibitors with alternative JAK selectivity remains of clinical importance. Thus, all JAK inhibitors should be characterized via thorough preclinical, metabolic and pharmacological evaluation, adequate long-term clinical data, and when available, real-world experience.
Collapse
|
196
|
Wu J, Zhu Z, Yu Q, Ding C. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: phase I to Ⅱ clinical trials. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019; 28:1113-1123. [PMID: 31738612 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1692812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, refractory disorder caused by autoimmunity in the synovial joints. Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologicals offer remission in only two-thirds of RA patients within 3 months, hence new therapeutic approaches are necessary. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are newly developed small molecule drugs which have demonstrated encouraging results in this disease.Areas covered: The key findings from phase I and II clinical trials that have investigated the use of novel TKIs in the treatment of RA are discussed. We examined the literature published between January 2014 to January 2019 using electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar. Additional information about phase I and II trials on the ClinicalTrial.gov website up to January 2019 was also retrieved.Expert opinion: JAK inhibitors are promising drugs with sound efficacy and acceptable safety and may be beneficial to patients who do not respond to DMARDs and biologicals. The response rates among RA patients to TKIs are diverse; genetic and environmental factors may be involved in the varying responses which are closely related to the pathogenesis of RA. Future studies may reveal the underlying mechanisms of resistance and non-response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wu
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhaohua Zhu
- Clinical Research Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Qinghong Yu
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Changhai Ding
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Clinical Research Center, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
197
|
Miyoshi S, Krishnaswami S, Toyoizumi S, Nakamura H, Zwillich SH. Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Tofacitinib in Japanese Healthy Volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2019; 9:11-20. [PMID: 31713350 PMCID: PMC7003739 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ulcerative colitis in healthy Japanese volunteers, and to compare these outcomes with those of healthy Western volunteers. Twenty‐five volunteers (Japanese, n = 16; Western [white], n = 9) were randomized to receive either 3 escalating single doses of tofacitinib (1, 5, and 30 mg), single‐dose tofacitinib (15 mg) followed by multiple doses (15 mg twice daily for 5 days), or placebo. No significant differences in systemic exposure to tofacitinib were detected between the 2 ethnicities. Following single tofacitinib 1, 5, and 30 mg doses, mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity ratio (Japanese/Western) values were 96.6%, 93.5%, and 95.6%, respectively. Similarly, mean maximum observed plasma concentration ratio values were 99.5%, 118%, and 119%, respectively. Mean renal clearance was also similar, ranging across doses from 134 mL/min (5 mg) to 162 mL/min (1 mg) in Japanese volunteers, and 124 mL/min (30 mg) to 160 mL/min (1 mg) in Western volunteers. In both ethnicities, most adverse events were mild. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The pharmacokinetics of tofacitinib were well characterized in healthy Japanese volunteers and were similar to those in Western volunteers.
Collapse
|
198
|
Reed GW, Gerber RA, Shan Y, Takiya L, Dandreo KJ, Gruben D, Kremer J, Wallenstein G. Real-World Comparative Effectiveness of Tofacitinib and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors as Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2019; 6:10.1007/s40744-019-00177-4. [PMID: 31707603 PMCID: PMC6858427 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-00177-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION No published studies exist comparing the effectiveness of tofacitinib with other advanced therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice. Here, we report differences in effectiveness of tofacitinib compared with standard of care, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX), using US Corrona registry data. METHODS This observational cohort study included RA patients receiving tofacitinib (from 6 November 2012; N = 558) or TNFi (from 1 November 2001; N = 8014) with or without MTX until 31 July 2016. Efficacy outcomes at 6 months included modified American College of Rheumatology 20% responses, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Pain. Outcomes were compared between patients receiving TNFi and tofacitinib with or without MTX and by line of therapy. Outcomes within therapy lines were compared using propensity-score matching; between-group differences were estimated using mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS Patients receiving tofacitinib had longer RA duration and a greater proportion had previously received biologics than those receiving TNFi; other baseline characteristics were comparable. In patients receiving second- and third-line TNFi therapy, CDAI low disease activity/remission response rates were significantly better with concomitant MTX. Too few patients received tofacitinib as second line for meaningful assessment. No significant differences were observed in outcomes between tofacitinib as monotherapy and tofacitinib with concomitant MTX. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, TNFi efficacy is improved with concomitant MTX in the second and third line. In the third/fourth line, patients are likely to achieve similar efficacy with tofacitinib monotherapy, or TNFi or tofacitinib in combination with MTX. FUNDING Pfizer Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George W Reed
- Corrona Research Foundation, Albany, NY, USA.
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
199
|
Abstract
Janus kinases inhibitors (JAKI) are new orally administrable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), representing a treatment alternative equally effective as biological DMARD that is also classified equivalent in the guidelines. JAKI reversibly inhibit intracellular signal transduction from the cytokine receptor to the nucleus. Tofacitinib and baricitinib, two JAKI already approved for RA treatment, are taken once or twice a day, respectively, and two more are expected to receive approval next year. Tofacitinib is also approved for PsA. Generally, JAKI are initially used in combination with methotrexate (MTX) but are equally effective as monotherapeutic treatment if MTX is contraindicated. In terms of therapy safety, JAKI and bDMARD are generally comparable with one exception: JAKI are associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster infection. JAKI treatment requires laboratory blood tests, especially blood count, transaminases and creatinine. Due to hepatic metabolization, tofacitinib is associated with certain drug interactions. Altogether JAKI enhance treatment possibilities for diseases such as RA and PsA combining the same effectiveness and safety as bDMARD with the option of oral administration.
Collapse
|
200
|
Sandborn WJ, Panés J, Sands BE, Reinisch W, Su C, Lawendy N, Koram N, Fan H, Jones TV, Modesto I, Quirk D, Danese S. Venous thromboembolic events in the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical development programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019; 50:1068-1076. [PMID: 31599001 PMCID: PMC6899755 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). AIM To report incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in the tofacitinib UC programme. METHODS DVT and PE were evaluated from one phase 2 and two phase 3 induction studies, one phase 3 maintenance study and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (September 2018 datacut). Data were analysed in induction, maintenance and overall (patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg b.d. in any phase 2, 3 or OLE study) cohorts. RESULTS 1157 patients (2404 patient-years' exposure; ≤ 6.1 years' tofacitinib treatment) were evaluated in the overall cohort. In induction, one placebo-treated patient had DVT and one had PE; no tofacitinib-treated patients had DVT/PE. In maintenance, one placebo-treated patient had DVT and one had PE; no tofacitinib-treated patients had DVT/PE. In the overall cohort, one patient had DVT (incidence rate [patients with events/100 patient-years; 95% CI]: 0.04 [0.00-0.23]); four had PE (0.16 [0.04-0.41]); all received predominant dose tofacitinib 10 mg b.d.; all had venous thromboembolism risk factors alongside UC. CONCLUSIONS In this post hoc analysis of patients with UC, during tofacitinib exposure, one patient had DVT and four had PE, all during the OLE study, on predominant dose 10 mg b.d. (83% of overall cohort patients received predominant dose 10 mg b.d.) with venous thromboembolism risk factors. This analysis is limited by small sample size and limited drug exposure; further studies are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00787202, NCT01465763, NCT01458951, NCT01458574, NCT01470612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J. Sandborn
- Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaCalifornia
| | - Julian Panés
- Hospital Clínic de BarcelonaIDIBAPS, CIBERehdBarcelonaSpain
| | - Bruce E. Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of GastroenterologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Silvio Danese
- Division of GastroenterologyIBD CenterHumanitas UniversityRozzanoMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|