Cancer risk and low-penetrance susceptibility genes in gene-environment interactions

The p53 codon 72 proline allele is associated with p53 gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

The p53 gene plays a critical role in cell cycle control, the initiation of apoptosis, and in DNA repair. An Arg/Pro polymorphism at codon 72 of the p53 gene alters the ability of the p53 protein to induce apoptosis, influences the behavior of mutant p53, decreases DNA repair capacity, and may be linked with an increased risk of lung cancer. To further define the role of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism on DNA repair, lung cancer risk, and mutant p53 function, we examined the effect of this polymorphism on mutation of the p53 gene and patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumor and nonneoplastic (lung or lymphocyte) samples were collected from 182 patients with NSCLC. p53 mutations were detected by direct sequencing and/or the Gene Chip p53 assay in 93 of 182 (51%) tumors. p53 codon 72 polymorphisms were identified by PCR/RFLP analysis. p53 mutations were significantly (P = 0.01) associated with the number of codon 72 Pro alleles: Pro/Pro homozygotes, 17 of 26 (65%); Arg/Pro heterozygotes, 45 of 79 (57%); and Arg/Arg homozygotes, 31 of 77 (40%). The number of codon 72 Pro alleles was independently associated with p53 mutations (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.40; P = 0.01) in a multiple logistic regression model. The codon 72 polymorphism did not influence patient survival in either the entire patient group or among patients with p53 mutant tumors. In summary, the p53 Pro allele is associated with an increased frequency of p53 mutations in NSCLC.

Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and risk of primary lung cancer

Angiogenesis is an essential process in the development, growth, and metastasis of malignant tumors including lung cancer. DNA sequence variations in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene may lead to altered VEGF production and/or activity, thereby causing interindividual differences in the susceptibility to lung cancer via their actions on the pathways of tumor angiogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential association between three VEGF polymorphisms (-460T > C, +405C > G, and 936C > T)/haplotypes and the risk of lung cancer in a Korean population. VEGF genotypes were determined in 432 lung cancer patients and 432 healthy controls that were frequency matched for age and sex. VEGF haplotypes were predicted using Bayesian algorithm in the phase program. Compared with the combined +405 CC and CG genotype, the +405 GG genotype found associated with a significantly decreased risk of small cell carcinoma [SCC; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.36; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.17-0.78]. The 936 CT genotype and the combined 936 CT and TT genotype were also associated with a significantly decreased risk of SCC compared with the 936 CC genotype (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85 and adjusted OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.80, respectively). Haplotype CGT was associated with a significantly decreased risk of SCC (adjusted OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87), whereas haplotype TCC conferred a significantly increased risk of SCC (adjusted OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.14-2.33). None of the VEGF polymorphisms studied significantly influenced the susceptibility to lung cancer except SCC. However, haplotypes TCT and TGT were significantly associated with the risk of overall lung cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.60 and adjusted OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.00-7.76, respectively). These effects of haplotypes TCT and TGT on lung cancer risk were observed in three major histologic types of lung cancer. These results suggest that the VEGF gene may be contribute to an inherited predisposition to lung cancer.

Gene-environment interactions in asthma and other respiratory diseases

It is generally agreed that many lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have polygenic inheritance, and that the association of a specific genotype or genotypes with the disease is likely to vary between populations. Furthermore, it is recognized that the etiology of many lung diseases involves a complex interplay between genetic background and exposure to multiple environmental stimuli, and understanding the mechanisms through which genes and environment interact represents a major challenge for pulmonary researchers. We discuss experimental approaches and challenges that must be overcome to identify disease genes for asthma, COPD and chronic bronchitis, and occupational lung diseases. In particular, common polymorphisms in CD14, glutathione S-transferase, and tumor necrosis factor alpha have been found to be important in gene-environment interaction and asthma pathogenesis. An understanding of gene-environment interactions in complex lung diseases is essential to the development of new strategies for lung disease prevention and treatment.

Genetic Variants of DNA Repair Genes and Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study

As part of a population-based case-control study in Shanghai, China, we investigated whether variants in several DNA repair genes, either alone or in conjunction with other risk factors, are associated with prostate cancer risk. Genomic DNA from 162 patients newly diagnosed with prostate cancer and 251 healthy men randomly selected from the population were typed for five nonsynonymous DNA repair markers. We found that the XRCC1-Arg399Gln AA and the MGMT-Leu84Phe CT+TT genotypes were associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer [odds ratio (OR), 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.99-4.81 and OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.19-3.34, respectively]. In contrast, XRCC3-Thr241Met, XPD-Lys751Gln, and MGMT-Ile143Val markers showed no significant associations with risk, although due to the much lower frequency of their variant alleles in this population we cannot rule out small to modest effects. There was a significant interaction between the MGMT-84 marker and insulin resistance (P(interaction) = 0.046). Relative to men with the MGMT-84 CC genotype and a low insulin resistance (<0.097), those having the CT-TT genotype and a greater insulin resistance had a 5.4-fold risk (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 2.46-11.82). In addition, for the XRCC3-241 marker, relative to men with the CC genotype and a low intake of preserved foods (<12.7 g/d), those harboring the CT+TT genotype and having a higher intake of preserved foods (>12.7 g/d), which contain nitrosamines and nitrosamine precursors, had a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer risk (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.13-6.06). In contrast, men with the CT+TT genotype and a low intake of preserved foods had a 69% reduction in risk (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.96; P(interaction) = 0.005). These results suggest that genetic variants in the DNA repair pathways may be involved in prostate cancer etiology and that other risk factors, including preserved foods and insulin resistance, may modulate prostate cancer risk in combination with genetic susceptibility in these repair pathways. Replication in larger studies is necessary to preclude chance findings, particularly those among subgroups, and clarify the mechanisms involved.

XPC polymorphisms and lung cancer risk

Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may be associated with differences in the capacity to repair DNA damage and thereby influence an individual's susceptibility to smoking-related cancer. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential association of 7 XPC polymorphisms (-449G-->C, -371G-->A, -27G-->C, Val499Arg, PAT-/+, IVS11-5C-->A and Lys939Gln) and their haplotypes with lung cancer risk in a Korean population. XPC genotypes were determined in 432 lung cancer patients and 432 healthy controls frequency-matched for age and sex. XPC haplotypes were predicted using a Bayesian algorithm in the Phase program. The combined -27CG+CC genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk for overall lung cancer compared to the -27GG genotype (adjusted OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.22-3.17, p = 0.005). The other 6 polymorphisms were not significantly associated with overall risk of lung cancer. When lung cancer cases were categorized by tumor histology, the -371AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma compared to the combined -371GG and GA genotype (adjusted OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.09-4.00, p = 0.03). The PAT-/+, IVS11-5C-->A and Lys939Gln polymorphisms were associated with a significantly decreased risk of small cell carcinoma (SM) under a dominant model for the polymorphic allele (adjusted OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.82, p = 0.006; adjusted OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.36-1.00, p = 0.05; and adjusted OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, p = 0.04, respectively). Consistent with genotyping analyses, haplotype 4 (1112222) containing the PAT+/IVS11-5A/939Gln alleles was associated with a significantly decreased risk of SM (adjusted OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.85, p = 0.007 and Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.049), whereas haplotype 5 (1122111) containing the -27C allele was associated with a significantly increased risk of SM (adjusted OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.41-5.87, p = 0.004 and Bonferroni-corrected p = 0.028). These results suggest that XPC polymorphisms/haplotypes may contribute to genetic susceptibility for lung cancer.

Approaches to determine clinical significance of genetic variants

The clinical significance of genetic variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) has implications for risk assessment and also for predicting the outcome of a disease process, especially in response to intervention. Approaches to determine the clinical significance of genetic polymorphisms are now beginning to be developed. The technology tools and procedures currently available have significant potential in identifying and validating polymorphisms associated with environmentally sensitive phenotypes. Numerous concepts can now provide the methodology to selectively identify SNPs with the potential for impacting gene function. These include computational algorithms, biochemical assays, yeast mutagenicity assays, and epidemiological studies, either as a stand-alone screen, or in various combinations depending on the gene of interest. Proof of principle will ultimately depend on large-scale epidemiological and clinical studies, but will require intensive resources. Therefore, the use of the mouse as a preclinical biological model is paramount in helping screen valid SNPs or combinations of SNPs for human studies. But more importantly, mouse modeling will help answer the question of what role gene variants play in sensitivity or resistance to a wide variety of environmental insults ranging from toxic chemicals and carcinogens to more mundane and routine exposure items, such as dietary factors, air quality, over the counter and prescription medications, and ultraviolet light. Our focus on SNPs that result in an amino acid change is a matter of expediency because these variants are more amenable to the prescreening approaches currently available that are expected to help identify SNPs that affect protein function. The mouse models generated to evaluate the environmental relevance of selected SNPs will be extremely valuable biological tools to validate gene variant and environment interaction in a variety of settings. Informative mouse models will also provide the basis of pursuing relevant SNPs in epidemiological and clinical investigations.

Interaction between genetic susceptibility and early-life environmental exposure determines tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance

Gene-environment interactions are important determinants of cancer risk. Traditionally, gene-environment interactions are thought to contribute to tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance by facilitating or inhibiting the acquisition of additional somatic mutations required for tumorigenesis. Here, we demonstrate that a distinctive type of gene-environment interaction can occur during development to enhance the penetrance of a tumor-suppressor-gene defect in the adult. Using rats carrying a germ-line defect in the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (Tsc-2) tumor-suppressor gene predisposed to uterine leiomyomas, we show that an early-life exposure to diethylstilbestrol during development of the uterus increased tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance from 65% to >90% and tumor multiplicity and size in genetically predisposed animals, but it failed to induce tumors in wild-type rats. This exposure was shown to impart a hormonal imprint on the developing uterine myometrium, causing an increase in expression of estrogen-responsive genes before the onset of tumors. Loss of function of the normal Tsc-2 allele remained the rate-limiting event for tumorigenesis; however, tumors that developed in exposed animals displayed an enhanced proliferative response to steroid hormones relative to tumors that developed in unexposed animals. These data suggest that exposure to environmental factors during development can permanently reprogram normal physiological tissue responses and thus lead to increased tumor-suppressor-gene penetrance in genetically susceptible individuals.

Polymorphism in the P-glycoprotein drug transporter MDR1 gene in colon cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The P-glycoprotein, a product of MDR1 (multiple drug resistance 1) gene, is a membrane efflux pump localized in epithelial cells in the small and large intestine, a part of the gastrointestinal barrier that protects cells against xenobiotics from our diet, bacterial toxins, drugs and other biologically active compounds, possibly carcinogens. In the present study, an association of MDR1 gene polymorphism and the occurrence of colon cancer were evaluated.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 184 unrelated sporadic colon cancer patients and 188 healthy unrelated controls. Colon cancer patients were also subdivided into two subgroups, i.e., diagnosed before and after 50 years of age, and compared with age-stratified controls. The C3435T MDR1 gene polymorphism was identified using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method.

RESULTS

The distribution of wild-type and mutated genotypes was similar in the colon cancer patients and in the healthy controls. However, when patients diagnosed before 50 years of age were compared with the healthy population, carriers of MDR1 3435TT genotype or 3435T allele were at 2.7-fold (P<0.05) and 1.7-fold (P<0.05) higher risk of the disease development, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing for C3435T MDR1 gene polymorphism may be a suitable test to evaluate the risk for colon cancer in patients under 50 years of age.

Interleukin 1B gene (IL-1B) and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene (IL-1RN) polymorphisms in Helicobacter pylori-negative gastric cancer of intestinal and diffuse histotype

BACKGROUND

Polymorphisms in the interleukin 1beta gene (IL-1B-31T/C and IL-1B-511C/T single nucleotide changes) and in the interleukin 1 receptor anatagonist gene (IL-1RN2 variable number of tandem repeats) have been studied with respect to gastric cancer susceptibility. Available data support an aetiologic role of these genetic variants in the presence of concomitant Helicobacter pylori infection. Their contribution without H. pylori infection is still an open field of investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IL-1B and IL-1RN polymorphisms were investigated in 138 H. pylori-negative Italian patients with sporadic gastric cancer and 100 H. pylori-negative controls. Unconditional regression with odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), haplotype and linkage disequilibrium analyses were used to investigate the association of the polymorphisms with disease.

RESULTS

In all gastric cancer cases, carriers of the homozygous IL-1B-511T/T genotype showed a significant risk for the development of the disease (OR 3.2 with 95% CI 1.27-8.05). In cases with intestinal-type gastric cancer, however, both IL-1B-511T and IL-1RN2 alleles were associated with disease. In this subgroup, the odds ratio for carriers of both IL-1B-511T and IL-1RN2 was 6.49 (95% CI 2.07-20.4). Haplotype analysis supported the aetiologic contribution of these alleles in gastric cancer of the intestinal histotype.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, IL-1B-511T and IL-1RN2 may contribute to intestinal gastric cancer risk in the absence of concomitant H. pylori infection. In this setting, future epidemiologic studies should consider dietary habits and exposure to carcinogens interacting with pro-inflammatory host genotypes.

Association of amino acid substitution polymorphisms in DNA repair genes TP53, POLI, REV1 and LIG4 with lung cancer risk

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were searched for in 36 genes involved in diverse DNA repair pathways, and 50 nonsynonymous (associated with amino acid changes) SNPs identified were assessed for associations with lung cancer risk by a case-control study consisting of 752 adenocarcinoma cases, 250 squamous cell carcinoma cases and 685 controls. An SNP, Arg72Pro, of the TP53 gene encoding a DNA damage response protein showed the strongest association with squamous cell carcinoma risk (OR Pro/Pro vs. Arg/Arg = 2.2), while 2 other SNPs, Phe257Ser of the REV gene encoding a translesion DNA polymerase and Ile658Val of the LIG4 gene encoding a DNA double-strand break repair protein, also showed associations (OR Ser/Ser vs. Phe/Phe = 2.0 and OR Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile = 0.4, respectively). An SNP, Thr706Ala, in the POLI gene encoding another translesion DNA polymerase was associated with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma risk, particularly in individuals of ages < 61 years (OR Ala/Ala + Ala/Thr vs. Thr/Thr = 1.5 and 2.4, respectively). POLI is the human counterpart of PolI, a strong candidate for the Par2 (pulmonary adenoma resistance 2) gene responsible for adenoma/adenocarcinoma susceptibility in mice. The present results suggest that these 4 SNPs function as genetic factors underlying lung cancer susceptibility by modulating activities to maintain the genome integrity of each individual.

Ethics and research assessing the relative roles of genes and the environment

Research on the interaction of genes and the environment is revealing that many human diseases have both genetic and environmental components. Even traditional "environmental" diseases, such as infections, appear to interact with genetic components in the human host. Environmental genetics research will inevitably increase understanding of individual susceptibilities to toxic exposures in the environment and harmful side effects of medications; therefore, it has great promise for improving the prevention and treatment of human diseases. However, realizing the benefits of this research requires careful attention to ethical issues that are particularly relevant in this context. This article reviews some of the most pressing issues related to research design and methods, as well as from the application of research results (e.g., workplace genetic screening and legal toxic torts, personal medical responsibility, and the relationship between genetics and public health measures).

The etiology of alcohol-induced breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in the United States, and it is second among cancer deaths in women. Results of most epidemiologic studies, as well as of most experimental studies in animals, have shown that alcohol intake is associated with increased breast cancer risk. Alcohol consumption may cause breast cancer through different mechanisms, including through mutagenesis by acetaldehyde, through perturbation of estrogen metabolism and response, and by inducing oxidative damage and/or by affecting folate and one-carbon metabolism pathways. Alcohol-metabolizing enzymes are present in human breast tissue. Acetaldehyde is a known, although weak, mutagen. However, results of some studies with human subjects implicate this agent in the context of genetic susceptibilities to increased ethanol metabolism. Reactive oxygen species, resulting from ethanol metabolism, may be involved in breast carcinogenesis by causing damage, as well as by generating DNA and protein adducts. Alcohol interferes with estrogen pathways in multiple ways, influencing hormone levels and effects on the estrogen receptors. With regard to one-carbon metabolism, alcohol can negatively affect folate levels, and the folate perturbation affects DNA methylation and DNA synthesis, which is important in carcinogenesis. Some study results indicate that genetic variants of one-carbon metabolism genes might increase alcohol-related breast cancer risk. For all these pathways, genetic polymorphisms might play a role in increasing further a woman's risk for breast cancer. Additional studies are needed to determine the relative importance of these pathways, as well as the modifying influence by genetic variation.

hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and G:C-to-T:A mutations: no evidence for a role in tobacco-related non small cell lung cancer

Human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) plays a major role in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine, one of the major forms of DNA damage generated by reactive oxygen species in tobacco smoke. If left unrepaired by hOGG1, 8-hydroxyguanine can produce G:C-to-T:A transversions. Recent studies have suggested that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism is associated with both a decrease in enzyme activity and an increased risk of lung cancer. To define the interaction between tobacco carcinogens, hOGG1-mediated DNA repair and DNA damage, we examined the role of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism in mutation of the p53 gene in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumor and nonneoplastic DNA were collected from 141 cigarette smokers with NSCLC. p53 mutations were detected by direct dideoxy sequencing and/or the GeneChip p53 assay in 74 of the 141 (52%) tumors. hOGG1 codon 326 polymorphisms were identified by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The distribution of hOGG1 codon 326 genotypes was Ser/Ser, 90 of 141 (64%); Ser/Cys, 45 of 141 (32%); and Cys/Cys, 6 of 141 (4%). p53 mutations were significantly (p = 0.04) less common in NSCLC from patients with codon 326 Ser/Cys or Cys/Cys genotypes (21 of 51; 41%) than in NSCLC from Ser/Ser homozygotes (53 of 90; 59%). The decrease in p53 mutation frequency among carriers of the Cys allele was more evident in lung squamous cell cancer [7 of 17 (41%) for Cys/Cys and Ser/Cys vs. 27 of 38 (71%) for Ser/Ser; p = 0.04] than in nonbronchoalveolar adenocarcinoma [11 of 26 (42%) for Cys/Cys and Ser/Cys vs. 20 of 35 (57%) for Ser/Ser; p = 0.25]. The prevalence of G:C-to-T:A transversions was similar among hOGG1 codon 326 genotypes. In summary, the hOGG1 codon 326 Cys allele was associated with a decrease in p53 mutations and no effect on G:C-to-T:A transversions in NSCLC. This decrease in p53 mutations in vivo is not consistent with a decrease in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine among carriers of the hOGG1 codon 326 Cys allele in vitro.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are inherited from parents and they measure heritable events

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are extensively used in case-control studies of practically all cancer types. They are used for the identification of inherited cancer susceptibility genes and those that may interact with environmental factors. However, being genetic markers, they are applicable only on heritable conditions, which is often a neglected fact. Based on the data in the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database, we review familial risks for all main cancers and discuss the evidence for a heritable component in cancer. The available evidence is not conclusive but it is consistent in pointing to a minor heritable etiology in cancer, which will hamper the success of SNP-based association studies. Empirical familial risks should be used as guidance for the planning of SNP studies. We provide calculations for the assessment of familial risks for assumed allele frequencies and gene effects (odds ratios) for different modes of inheritance. Based on these data, we discuss the gene effects that could account for the unexplained proportion of familial breast and lung cancer. As a conclusion, we are concerned about the indiscriminate use of a genetic tool to cancers, which are mainly environmental in origin. We consider the likelihood of a successful application of SNPs in gene-environment studies small, unless established environmental risk factors are tested on proven candidate genes.

Genetic variation and exposure related risk estimation: will toxicology enter a new era? DNA repair and cancer as a paradigm

With the vast technological and informational resources increasingly available from investments in "genomics," toxicology and much of biological science, is faced with previously undreamed of opportunities and equally daunting challenges. The ability to generate the large quantities of data becoming routinely available could not be imagined a decade ago. The complexities of data analysis are increasingly the rate-limiting element in scientific advances. The expectations that these large scientific investments will reduce the incidence of human disease and improve health are very high. An emphasis on genetic variation and Toxicogenetics is expected to yield risk estimates for specific rather than average individuals and individuals with varied lifestyles and complex patterns of exposure. Examples from studies of polymorphic variation in DNA repair genes in the healthy population and cancer risk highlight the complexity and challenges of incorporating genetic variation into quantitative estimates of risk associated with environmentally relevant exposures. Similar issues exist in selecting the animal models most appropriate for predicting human risk from environmental exposures to toxic agents.

Genetic susceptibility to tobacco-related cancer

Although cigarette smoking is the dominant risk factor for several epithelial cancers, only a small fraction of individuals with tobacco exposure develop cancer. The underlying hypothesis is that genetic factors may render certain smokers more susceptible to cancer than others. Genetic alterations in critical regulatory pathways may predispose cells to carcinogenesis. These pathways include regulation of xenobiotic metabolism; control of genomic stability, including DNA repair mechanisms, cell-cycle checkpoints, apoptosis and telomere length; and control of microenvironmental factors, such as matrix metalloproteinases, inflammation and growth factors. In addition, epigenetic events, such as promoter hypermethylation and loss of imprinting, are also involved in carcinogenesis. In this review, we will summarize recent advances in genetic susceptibility to tobacco-related cancer. Emphasizing on risk assessment, we will describe how genetic variations in the above-mentioned genetic pathways modify the tobacco-related cancer risk. In addition, we will discuss how genetic variations may assist in predicting clinical outcome, such as the natural history of cancer and treatment response. The measurements of genetic susceptibility by both genotypic and phenotypic assays are covered in the text. Finally, we present a number of current concerns that need to be addressed as the exciting field of molecular cancer epidemiology advances rapidly.

Genetic research and health disparities

Alleviating health disparities in the United States is a goal with broad support. Medical research undertaken to achieve this goal typically adopts the well-established perspective that racial discrimination and poverty are the major contributors to unequal health status. However, the suggestion is increasingly made that genetic research also has a significant role to play in alleviating this problem, which likely overstates the importance of genetics as a factor in health disparities. Overemphasis on genetics as a major explanatory factor in health disparities could lead researchers to miss factors that contribute to disparities more substantially and may also reinforce racial stereotyping, which may contribute to disparities in the first place. Arguments that promote genetics research as a way to help alleviate health disparities are augmented by several factors, including research funding initiatives and the distinct demographic patterns of health disparities in the United States.

The Runx genes: lineage-specific oncogenes and tumor suppressors

The Runx genes present a challenge to the simple binary classification of cancer genes as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. There is evidence that loss of function of two of the three mammalian Runx genes promotes cancer, but in a highly lineage-restricted manner. In human leukemias, the RUNX1 gene is involved in various chromosomal translocation events that create oncogenic fusion proteins, at least some of which appear to function as dominant-negative inhibitors of the normal gene product. Paradoxically, evidence is mounting that structurally intact Runx genes are also oncogenic when overexpressed. All the three murine genes act as targets for transcriptional activation by retroviral insertional mutagenesis, and the oncogenic potential of Runx2 has been confirmed in transgenic mice. Moreover, the RUNX1 gene is often amplified or overexpressed in cases of acute leukemia. The state of progress in elucidating the oncogenic roles of the Runx genes is the subject of this review, and we draw together recent observations in a tentative model for the effects of Runx deregulation on hematopoietic cell differentiation. We suggest that lineage-specific factors determine the sensitivity to the oncogenic effects of loss or overexpression of Runx factors.

The Effect of Environment on Breast Cancer Risk

Environmental factors are believed to explain a large proportion of breast cancer incidence. Known risk factors for breast cancer, which are related to the reproductive life of women, and other factors, such as inheritance and socioeconomic status, explain only about half of the breast cancer cases in the US. Ionizing radiation is a well established environmental risk factor for breast cancer. Chemicals that induce mammary cancer in rodents have served as leads for studies in humans, but occupational and environmental exposure to these chemicals have for the most part lacked association with breast cancer risk. However, there is recent evidence in rats that cadmium at very low doses acts as an estrogen mimic, indicating a need to investigate the effects of metals on breast cancer risk. Studies suggest that circadian rhythm disruption is linked with breast cancer, but too few studies have been done to be conclusive. Over the years, cigarette smoking as a risk factor for breast cancer has remained controversial. However, recent research has found passive smoke exposure to be associated with increased breast cancer risk, which is hypothesized to be accounted for on the basis of an antiestrogenic effect of smoking. Solar radiation has been noted to be associated with reduced breast cancer, supporting the hypothesis that vitamin D plays a protective role in reducing this risk. Although, most of the environmental factors discussed in this review have not been convincingly found to influence breast cancer risk, research suggests that environmental exposure in combination with genetic pre-disposition, age at exposure, and hormonal milieu have a cumulative effect on breast cancer risk.

Chemopreventive drug treatment in subjects with genetic predisposition to cancer: prescriber liability and healthcare disparities

Advancements in pharmacogenomics and chemoprevention promise to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, but utilization will undoubtedly be accompanied with ethical and legal issues that largely remain unexplored or discussed. As pharmacogenomic information is assessed more comprehensively and inexpensively, it will influence decisions regarding when and to whom chemoprevention therapy will be initiated. Pharmacogenomics will change the manner in which the liability system will perceive and analyse risks. Management of the risks related to chemopreventive treatment will differ from traditional disease management. Knowledge about cancer susceptibility will need to consider environmental factors as they relate to healthcare disparities.

Searching for cancer-associated gene polymorphisms: promises and obstacles

Low-penetrance genetic variations appear to form the most essential component of the heritability of cancer risk. Search for relevant polymorphic candidates faces significant obstacles, due to both the high number of potentially promising single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the intrinsic difficulties in identification of weak gene-disease interactions. At present, extensive case-control studies can be applied only to a limited number of gene polymorphisms. Therefore, the choice of SNPs that deserve an exhaustive populational analysis is of primary importance. Preferences are usually given to those genetic pathways, whose variability and role in cancer causation have been already shown by prior studies. The available electronic databases and software tools may allow further SNP sorting, based on functional predictions. The design for the pilot study may need to be different from the one for large-scale case-control analysis. Some investigations justify non-random patient selection for preliminary assessment of low-penetrance effects, with the emphasis on particularly susceptible individuals (familial, early onset, multiple cancer cases). Other presumably accelerating approaches suggest a decisive exclusion of SNP candidates showing only marginal effects, relaxed formats for rapid dissemination of preliminary data, use of more demonstrative controls such as elderly tumor-free subjects, etc. These short-cuts cannot be properly validated for the time being, due to the paucity of identified low-penetrance risk modifiers. It is expected that the increasing capacities of available DNA collections, coupled with the rapid development of high-throughput genotyping technologies, will vastly accelerate the research on polygenic cancer susceptibility.

Familial risks of cancer as a guide to gene identification and mode of inheritance

Occurrence of cancer in parents and offspring may be due to dominant causes, whereas cancer affecting only siblings may indicate a recessive causation. Systematic comparisons of mode of inheritance have not been available for most types of cancer. Using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database, standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated for offspring whose parents or siblings were diagnosed with the same cancer. The degree of environmental causation was assessed by spouse correlation and by comparing risks among siblings of different ages. We identified reliable familial risks for all common neoplasms, SIRs ranging from 1.6 to 4.3 when only a parent was affected and up to 8.5 when only a sibling was effected. Risks between siblings were particularly high for renal cancer. Spouse correlation was found only for lung and stomach cancer, but the analysis of sibling risks by their age difference suggested that even for some other cancers environmental effects in childhood may contribute to familial aggregation. The results from these analysis suggest that familial cluster of cancer at most sites is heritable, caused by dominant effects; for renal cancer recessive effects may be most important.

Genetic susceptibility, biomarker respones, and cancer

A large number of studies have reported associations between polymorphisms of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) and various cancers. However, the carcinogenic exposures behind such findings have usually been unclear. Information on susceptibility to specific carcinogens could better be obtained by examining situations where the exposure and the endpoint studied are nearer in time, i.e., by studying biomarkers of carcinogen exposure and early (genotoxic) effect in exposed humans. For example, analyses of DNA adducts and cytogenetic endpoints have indicated an increased susceptibility of glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) null genotype to genotoxicity of tobacco smoking, supporting the view that the associations of the GSTM1 null genotype with bladder and lung cancer are partly related to smoking. In vitro genotoxicity studies with human cells offer an experimental tool that can be used, within the limits of the cell systems, to predict individual sensitivity and genotype-carcinogen interactions. In vitro sensitivity to the genotoxicity of 1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane, an epoxide metabolite of 1,3-butadiene has clearly been shown to depend on GSTT1 genotype, which has also been implicated to modify, along with GSTM1 genotype, the in vitro genotoxicity of 1,2-epoxy-3-butene, another epoxide metabolite of 1,3-butadiene. These genotypes appear to modulate the excretion of 1,3-butadiene-specific mercapturic acids, and influence genotoxicity biomarker levels in 1,3-butadiene-exposed workers. The excretion of specific mercapturic acids (PHEMA) in workers exposed to styrene has clearly been shown to depend on GSTM1 genotype, and GSTT1 genotype seems to modulate the excretion of one PHEMA diastereoisomer. These genotypes have also been implicated to modulate the in vitro genotoxicity of styrene. In general, the genetic polymorphisms potentially important for biomarker response largely depend on the exposing agent, biological material examined, and ethnicity of the population under study. Individual exposure level may vary a lot, and a reliable estimate of the exposure is essential for correct interpretation of genotype-exposure interaction. Besides XME polymorphisms, any polymorphisms that affect cellular response to DNA damage could, in principle, modify individual sensitivity to genotoxins. For instance, those concerning DNA repair proteins are presently being studied by many laboratories.

Smoking, DNA repair capacity and risk of nonsmall cell lung cancer

Tobacco-related carcinogens cause a variety of DNA damage that is repaired by different enzymatic pathways, suggesting that DNA repair plays an important role in tobacco-induced carcinogenesis. In a large hospital-based case-control study, we investigated DNA repair capacity (DRC) as a biomarker for susceptibility to nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and evaluated the possible interaction between DRC and tobacco smoke in 467 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients and 488 cancer-free controls. We measured DRC in cultured peripheral lymphocytes using the host-cell reactivation assay with a reporter gene damaged by an activated tobacco carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. The results showed that current smokers exhibited the highest DRCs as compared to former and nonsmokers both among patients and control subjects. There were no differences of DRC among 3 different histopathologic types of NSCLC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that suboptimal DRC and pack-years smoked were independent predictors of NSCLC risk. The overall 15.5% reduction in DRC observed in the cases (7.84%) compared to the controls (9.28%) (p<0.001) was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of NSCLC (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-2.42). There was a significant dose-response association between decreased DRC and increased risk of lung cancer. Furthermore, we observed a nonstatistically significant additive but not multiplicative interaction between DRC and pack-years smoked on lung cancer risk, particularly in the histopathologic types of NSCLC other than adenocarcinoma. The results suggest that suboptimal DRC is associated with increased risk of NSCLC and DRC may modulate the risk of lung cancer associated with smoking but the latter needs to be verified in larger studies.

Genetic testing for high-risk colon cancer patients

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States and is estimated to have affected 148,000 people in 2002. The cumulative lifetime risk for colon cancer is approximately 5%-6%, and this risk is influenced by hereditary and lifestyle factors. In fact, 20%-30% of all colon cancer cases have a potentially definable inherited cause, and 3%-5% of colon cancers occur in genetically defined high-risk colon cancer family syndromes. Although the genes responsible for the cases of moderate-risk colon cancer remain to be characterized, many of the genes responsible for the high-risk colon cancer cases have already been determined. These genetic discoveries have been translated into clinical practice and have led to improved risk assessment through the use of genetic testing. The introduction into clinical practice of genetic testing for the assessment of colon cancer risk has led to more effective management strategies for patients with potentially high-risk colon cancer and has presented new challenges to the clinician because of the unique issues involved with genetic testing. In this review, an overview of the colon cancer high-risk syndromes, with a focus on the availability and indications for genetic testing, is presented.

Food mutagens

Several lines of evidence indicate that diet and dietary behaviors can contribute to human cancer risk. One way that this occurs is through the ingestion of food mutagens. Sporadic cancers result from a gene-environment interactions where the environment includes endogenous and exogenous exposures. In this article, we define environment as dietary exposures in the context of gene-environment interactions. Food mutagens cause different types of DNA damage: nucleotide alterations and gross chromosomal aberrations. Most mutagens begin their action at the DNA level by forming carcinogen-DNA adducts, which result from the covalent binding of a carcinogen or part of a carcinogen to a nucleotide. However the effect of food mutagens in carcinogenesis can be modified by heritable traits, namely, low-penetrant genes that affect mutagen exposure of DNA through metabolic activation and detoxification or cellular responses to DNA damage through DNA repair mechanisms or cell death. There are some clearly identified (e.g., aflatoxin) and suspected (e.g., N-nitrosamines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or heterocyclic amines) food mutagens. The target organs for these agents are numerous, but there is target-organ specificity for each. Mutagenesis however is not the only pathway that links dietary exposures and cancers. There is growing evidence that epigenetic factors, including changes in the DNA methylation pattern, are causing cancer and can be modified by dietary components. Also DNA damage may be indirect by triggering oxidative DNA damage. When considering the human diet, it should be recognized that foods contain both mutagens and components that decrease cancer risk such as antioxidants. Thus nutritionally related cancers ultimately develop from an imbalance of carcinogenesis and anticarcinogenesis. The best way to assess nutritional risks is through biomarkers, but there is no single biomarker that has been sufficiently validated. Although panels of biomarkers would be the most appropriate, their use as a reflection of target-organ risk remains to be determined. Also even when new biomarkers are developed, their application in target organs is problematic because tissues are not readily available. For now most biomarkers are used in surrogate tissues (e.g., blood, urine, oral cavity cells) that presumably reflect biological effects in target organs. This article reviews the role of food mutagens in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis and how their effects are modified by heritable traits and discusses how to identify and evaluate the effects of food mutagens.

Environmental risk factors for breast cancer among African-American women

There are few unequivocably established environmental carcinogens for breast cancer in women. Nevertheless, environmental factors are believed to explain much of the international variation in breast cancer risk and possibly differences among racial/ethnic groups. Along with lifestyle, some adverse exposures may be higher in minority racial/ethnic groups and in underserved populations that experience higher ambient contamination. Associations have been found between environmental agents and breast cancer in subgroups of women who can be identified by common susceptibility traits as well as by timing of exposures at certain milestones of reproductive life. Susceptibility can be defined by social, environmental, and genetic modalities-factors that may predominate in certain racial/ethnic groups but that also transcend racial/ethnic boundaries. For example, genes involved in transcription and estrogen metabolism have rapid variants that are more prevalent among African-Americans, yet risk accompanying metabolic changes from these genes will prevail in all racial/ethnic groups. Lack of reliable exposure assessment remains a principal obstacle to elucidating the role of environmental exposures in breast cancer. Resources must be identified and consolidated that will enable scientists to improve exposure assessment and to assemble studies of sufficient size to address questions regarding exposure, susceptibility, and vulnerability factors in breast cancer. Breast cancer studies should be expanded to examine combinations of chemicals as well as competing or complementary exposures such as endogenous hormones, dietary intake, and behavioral factors.

Polymorphisms in DNA repair and environmental interactions

The repair of damage to DNA is critical to the survival of a cell. However, not all organisms nor all individuals express a similar response to challenges to their genetic material. Numerous polymorphisms in genes involved in DNA repair have been found in individuals with DNA repair-related disease as well as in the general population. Studies of these variants are critical in understanding the response of the cell to DNA damage. In some cases, these changes predispose the carrier to a greatly increased risk of cancer. In other cases, the effects are subtler and depend on interactions between the alleles of several genes, or with environmental factors. Consequently, the health effects of exposure to genotoxic or carcinogenic compounds or agents can depend on the variations in these genes. This review will highlight some of the effects that variants, found in many of the genes involved in human DNA repair pathways, have on the response to damage, and their role in susceptibility of the cell and organism to environmental genotoxins. This review will concentrate on the mismatch repair, nucleotide repair, base excision repair, strand break repair, and direct alkyl repair pathways.

Effects of glutathione S-transferase M1, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and environmental tobacco smoke on asthma and wheezing in children

The rise in childhood asthma prevalence suggests a role for environmental factors in the etiology of this evolving epidemic; however, genetics also influence the occurrence of asthma. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 may play a role in asthma and wheezing occurrence among those exposed to tobacco smoke, as it functions in pathways involved in asthma pathogenesis such as xenobiotic metabolism and antioxidant defenses. Effects of GSTM1 genotype, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and childhood environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure on asthma and wheezing were investigated in 2,950 children enrolled in 4th, 7th, and 10th grade classrooms in 12 Southern California communities. The effects of in utero exposure to maternal smoking on asthma and wheezing occurrence were largely restricted to children with GSTM1 null genotype. Among GSTM1 null children, in utero exposure was associated with increased prevalence of early onset asthma (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-2.5), asthma with current symptoms (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.8), persistent asthma (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4), lifetime history of wheezing (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5), wheezing with exercise (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), wheezing requiring medication (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.4), and emergency room visits in the past year (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.9-7.3). Among children with GSTM1 (+) genotype, in utero exposure was not associated with asthma or wheezing. Our findings indicate that there are important long-term effects of in utero exposure in a genetically susceptible group of children.

Pancreatic cancer genetics

Cancer is a multi-stage process resulting from accumulation of genetic changes in the somatic DNA of normal cells. Although in the majority of cases the changes occur only in the cancer cells there is a small proportion of cancers where a germline mutation confers an increased risk for cancer. Cancer susceptibility genes have effects that range from high to low penetrance with a corresponding high to lower likelihood for cancer in the carriers. Pancreatic cancer-prone families have been identified and some of the germline mutations responsible elucidated. Germline mutations in the BRCA2, CDKN2A/p16, hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, LKB1/STK1, and PRSS1 genes have been associated with increased risk for pancreatic cancer. The concept of screening high-risk groups for pancreatic cancer is emerging, preferably in specialised centres with a multidisciplinary team approach.

The Mayo Lung Cohort: a regression analysis focusing on lung cancer incidence and mortality

PURPOSE

The Mayo Lung Project has been interpreted as negative because it failed to demonstrate a significant mortality reduction among those randomized to chest x-ray and cytology. In contrast, survival suggests that screening is highly effective. This report was undertaken to analyze the trial as a closed cohort study, in an effort to identify predictors of lung cancer incidence and mortality, and to determine whether survival or mortality was unbiased.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Mayo Lung Cohort comprised all 9,192 randomized individuals. Cox proportional hazards regression was used both to determine predictors of incidence and mortality in the population and to identify predictors of mortality among cases. Survival analyses using intent-to-treat principles and measuring survival from randomization were used to evaluate length bias and lead-time bias. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the extent to which the data are consistent with overdiagnosis.

RESULTS

Cox regression demonstrates that, in addition to age and smoking, randomization to screening predicted increased lung cancer incidence (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.60). Predictors of mortality were similar, except randomization to screening was not significant (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.37). Among cases, survival was significantly superior in the experimental population. Higher incidence in the experimental group accounts for the mortality/survival discrepancy. Both lead-time and length biases can be excluded, because survival from randomization was superior in the experimental population. Overdiagnosis is eliminated because resection was the only significant multivariate predictor of survival. Overall, 50% of resected and 0% of unresected cases were cured.

CONCLUSION

Survival was superior in the screened population, and this advantage was not attributable to lead-time bias, length bias, or overdiagnosis bias. Mortality was biased, because incidence differences confounded the ability of mortality to reflect the true effect of screening. Indeed, survival provided an unbiased surrogate for cure in the Mayo Lung Cohort.

A review of genetic polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk

In this study, we review a variety of genetic polymorphisms that may have an etiologic role in prostate cancer. We include associations identified in molecular epidemiology studies and the consistency of findings reported to date. Suggestions for further research are also offered. For the purposes of this review, we identified relevant articles through a MEDLINE search for the period of January 1987 through March 2001. The searches were limited to articles published in English. Medical subject headings were used to scan titles, abstracts, and subject headings in the databases using the keywords "prostate neoplasms," "genetics," and "polymorphisms."

Skilled use of DNA polymorphisms as a tool for polygenic cancers

Association studies are assumed to be an efficient method of deciding whether a gene or its variant is important for cancer. Sequencing data on 30 000 human genes suggest that an average gene contains one to two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), and high through-put technologies have become available for fast genotyping. Because no functional data are available for most SNPs, the result of the large-scale genotyping effort will be a huge amount of data of unknown biological significance. We discuss here the approaches in study design and reporting that will reduce the spread of false positive data and optimize scientific progress in the genotyping field.

Molecular haplotyping of genomic DNA for multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms located kilobases apart using long-range polymerase chain reaction and intramolecular ligation

Genetic polymorphisms are well-recognized causes of interindividual differences in disease risk and treatment response in humans. For genes containing multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), haplotype structure is often the principal determinant of phenotypic consequences, and haplotype distribution represents the best approach for assessing patterns of linkage disequilibrium. To permit more widespread molecular determination of haplotypes, we developed a simple yet robust method to determine haplotype structure for multiple SNPs located up to 30 kb apart in genomic DNA using long-range polymerase chain reaction (LR-PCR) and intramolecular ligation. Complete concordance was shown between the new method and conventional approaches, such as family pedigree analysis or cloning and sequencing. The availability of a simple method to directly determine haplotype structure using genomic DNA, without family pedigree analysis, cloning or complex instrumentation, provides an important new tool for elucidating the genetic determinants of drug disposition and effects, disease risk, and molecular evolution.

Lung cancer--a philosophical, ethical, and personal perspective

Lung cancer is a formidable worldwide health problem causing more deaths than breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer combined. Eighty percent are non-small cell type (NSCLC) and less than one in five patients can have a curative resection. Decisionmaking in treating cancer, and lung cancer specifically, requires an understanding of the basic ethical principles as well as a prioritization of values beyond medical knowledge alone. Choosing a treatment plan can be difficult because of the multiple confronting dilemmas occurring simultaneously. Economic analysis also is required of every major treatment strategy proposed. Active patient involvement is helpful in making these important and difficult choices at the same time clinicians must be mindful of their roles as healers, educators, and innovators of knowledge in a disease that has a five year mortality rate of nearly 90%. Finally, because end of life care issues are so common with this illness, clinicians must be aware of their importance in making dying easier for so many individuals.

Susceptibility differences in chemical carcinogenesis linearize the dose-response relationship: threshold doses can be defined only for individuals

The debate on thresholds in dose-response relationships for chemical carcinogenesis concentrates on the question of mechanisms of action that come into play only at dose levels that overwhelm compensatory control mechanism, such as DNA repair or regulation of cell proliferation and death. In this article, individual susceptibility differences are introduced. It is postulated that one single threshold dose cannot be defined for a heterogeneous population because both the background rate of carcinogenesis and specific exposure-related effects differ between individuals. A threshold dose can therefore be defined only on an individual basis and for a given organ. Expressed as a time-to-tumor, the threshold dose results in tumor manifestation at exactly the end of the specified observation period. For those individuals who do not have cancer by the end of this period, the dose was below their individual threshold dose, for those who do have cancer, the dose was above their threshold dose. Based on this concept, a distinction between genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens is no longer required; both types modulate time-to-tumor. Although the present analysis does not allow to define a threshold dose for a population, the setting of a "limit value" for regulatory purposes can be considered if regulators are aware of the fact that this splits a population at some percentile into a group for which the chosen standard is protective and a group for which it might not be. Investigation of factors that confer particular susceptibility to individuals is the key to an understanding of the dose-response relationship at low dose.

Risk assessment: the importance of genetic polymorphisms in man

Many genetic polymorphisms in metabolism enzymes are important for the risk of cancer as shown in a large number of case-control studies. The relative risk estimates have shown large variations between such population studies. However, in most studies the relative risk estimates are in the range of 2. Some polymorphisms are effect modifiers, i.e. without exposure they have no consequence and the effect of exposure can appear independent of the genotype. Genetic polymorphisms in metabolism of environmental toxicants plays a significant role in exposures to traffic generated air pollution in Copenhagen, revealing statistically significant higher levels of chromosomal aberrations in non-smoking bus drivers with glutathion-S-transferase M1, GSTM1 null and N-acetyltransferase 2, NAT2 slow genotypes. Combined with cohort studies showing positive associations between high chromosomal levels and increased cancer risk, such results indicate effect modification regarding cancer risk. In risk assessment the safety 'factor' of 10 is generally accepted to allow for variation in individual susceptibility. Reviewing the literature justifies the factor of 10 when considering single polymorphisms. However in an individual with several susceptible metabolism genotypes as well as other determinants of susceptibility, e.g. defective DNA repair, poor-nutritional state, etc. the risk may increase far above a safety of 10.Historically, genetic polymorphisms have been taken into consideration in employment and currently the application in insurance situations is criticised.

The use of gene knockout mice to unravel the mechanisms of toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis

Metabolism of toxins and carcinogens is carried out by large groups of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes. These enzymes are generally considered to be required for elimination of xenobiotics such as drugs, dietary chemicals and environmental pollutants, and to be required for chemical toxicity and carcinogenicity. An important role for these enzymes in metabolism of endogenous chemicals has not been established. Mouse lines in which the genes encoding several xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes were knocked out were produced and are being used to determine the role of metabolism in carcinogenesis, and acute and chronic toxicities in vivo. Mouse lines lacking the P450s CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1 and CYP2E1, microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH), NADPH:quinone oxidoreductase and the glutathione S-transferase P1 have no deleterious phenotypes, indicating that these enzymes are not required for mammalian development and physiological homeostasis. However, when challenged with toxins and carcinogens, they respond differently from their wild-type (WT) counterparts. For example, mice lacking CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 are totally resistant to acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Mice lacking CYP1B1 or mEH are less responsive to tumorigenesis by 7,12-dimethybenz[a]anthracene. However, CYP1A2-null mice do not significantly differ from WT mice in their response to the hepatocarcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl. These and other studies indicate that the xenobiotic-metabolism null mice are of great value in the study of the mechanisms of chemical injury.

Modifier genes in mice and humans

An emerging theme of studies with spontaneous, engineered and induced mutant mice is that phenotypes often depend on genetic background, implying that genetic modifiers have a role in guiding the functional consequences of genetic variation. Understanding the molecular and cellular basis by which modifier genes exert their influence will provide insights into developmental and physiological pathways that are critical to fundamental biological processes, as well as into novel targets for therapeutic interventions in human diseases.