Two-year stability of personality disorder in older adolescent outpatients

[Personality disorders in adolescence: conceptual issues and treatment approaches]

Objective of this paper is to search for answers for the question if it is justified to use the diagnosis of personality disorder already in adolescence. Recent research data confirm that the stability of basic personality traits is only gradually lower in adolescence compared to adulthood. Using the diagnostic criteria of adults there is not much of a difference concerning prevalence rate and stability in adolescence and adulthood. Meta-analyses reveal that patients with personality disorders can successfully be treated with specalized treatment programs so that personality disorders should not be viewed as life-course persistent. It is argued that an early assessment with standardized procedures can help to identify adolescents with personality disorders so that specialized treatment approaches can be started. In adulthood there is empirical evidence for the use of Dialectical-Behavior Therapy DBT, Transference Focused Psychotherapy TFP, Mentalization-based Therapy MBT and Schema-focused Psychotherapy SFT for the use in patients with personality disorders. These treatment approaches have to be adapted to the special situation of adolescents so that their use can help to prevent these early developing disorders to become chronic.

Stability, change, and heritability of borderline personality disorder traits from adolescence to adulthood: a longitudinal twin study

Although personality disorders are best understood in the context of lifetime development, there is a paucity of work examining their longitudinal trajectory. An understanding of the expected course and the genetic and environmental contributions to these disorders is necessary for a detailed understanding of risk processes that lead to their manifestation. The current study examined the longitudinal course and heritability of borderline personality disorder (BPD) over a period of 10 years starting in adolescence (age 14) and ending in adulthood (age 24). In doing so, we built on existing research by using a large community sample of adolescent female twins, a sensitive dimensional measure of BPD traits, an extended follow-up period, and a longitudinal twin design that allowed us to investigate the heritability of BPD traits at four discrete ages spanning midadolescence to early adulthood. Results indicated that mean-level BPD traits significantly decline from adolescence to adulthood, but rank order stability remained high. BPD traits were moderately heritable at all ages, with a slight trend for increased heritability from age 14 to age 24. A genetically informed latent growth curve model indicated that both the stability and change of BPD traits are highly influenced by genetic factors and modestly by nonshared environmental factors. Our results indicate that as is the case for other personality dimensions, trait BPD declines as individuals mature from adolescence to adulthood, and that this process is influenced in part by the same genetic factors that influence BPD trait stability.

Orbitofrontal, amygdala and hippocampal volumes in teenagers with first-presentation borderline personality disorder

It is not known whether the fronto-limbic volume reductions found in adults with established borderline personality disorder (BPD) are present early in the disorder. The aim of the study was to investigate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), hippocampal and amygdala volumes in a first-presentation teenage BPD sample with minimal exposure to treatment. Groups of 20 BPD patients and 20 healthy control participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Hippocampal, amygdala, OFC and whole brain volumes were estimated and compared between the two groups. Analysis of variance revealed reversal of the normal (right>left) asymmetry of OFC grey matter volume in the BPD group, reflecting right-sided OFC grey matter loss in the BPD group compared with control participants. No significant differences were found for amygdala or hippocampal volumes comparing BPD with control participants. We identified OFC but not hippocampal or amygdala volumetric differences early in the course of BPD. Hippocampal and amygdala volume reductions observed in adult BPD samples might develop during the course of the disorder, although longitudinal studies are needed to examine this.

Persönlichkeitsstörungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter?

Durch die Fortschritte bei der Behandlung von Persönlichkeitsstörungen im Erwachsenenalter wird die Übertragung dieser Konzepte auf das Kindes- und Jugendalter heute intensiv diskutiert. Argumente für und gegen eine Vergabe von Persönlichkeitsstörungsdiagnosen im Kindes- und Jugendalter werden diskutiert. Es werden aktuelle Erkenntnisse zur Diagnostik und dem Verlauf von Persönlichkeitsstörungen berichtet. Das Pro und Contra einer Diagnosestellung wird vor diesem Hintergrund gegenübergestellt.

Psychiatric impairment among adolescents engaging in different types of deliberate self-harm

This retrospective chart review study of 227 participants examined the psychiatric profiles of outpatient adolescents ages 12 to 19 years (M = 15.08 years, SD = 1.72 years) engaging in different types of deliberate self-harm (DSH) behaviors. Participants were divided into four groups: no deliberate self-harm (NoDSH; n = 119), nonsuicidal self-injury only (NSSI only; n = 30), suicide attempt only (n = 38), and suicide attempt plus NSSI (n = 40). Those who attempted suicide were more likely to have major depressive disorder and/or posttraumatic stress disorder than those who engaged in NSSI only. Those who engaged in any type of DSH were more likely to have features of borderline personality disorder than those who did not engage in DSH. The suicidal ideation levels of those in the NSSI group were similar to those in the NoDSH group. Findings offer empirical support for the importance of distinguishing between suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm behaviors.

Fact or fiction: diagnosing borderline personality disorder in adolescents

Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) has long been considered a mental health problem that results in considerable costs in terms of human suffering and psychiatric expenses among adult patients. Although the diagnosis of BPD for adolescents is frequently used in clinical settings, the field of mental health has questioned whether one should diagnose BPD among adolescents. This paper reviews the recent empirical literature (identified through PsycINFO 1980 to present) to evaluate prevalence, reliability, and validity of a BPD diagnosis in adolescents. It is concluded that the features BPD diagnoses in adolescents are comparable to those in adults. Furthermore, there appears to be a legitimate subgroup of adolescents for whom the diagnosis remains stable over time as well as a less severe subgroup that moves in and out of the diagnosis. While caution is warranted, formal assessment of BPD in adolescents may yield more accurate and effective treatment for adolescents experiencing BPD symptomatology. More longitudinal research is necessary to further explicate the issues of diagnosing BPD in adolescents.

Diagnostik von Persönlichkeitsstörungen im Jugendalter nach SKID-II

Zusammenfassung: Fragestellung: Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war eine Überprüfung der Anwendbarkeit des Strukturierten Klinischen Interviews für DSM-IV, Achse II: Persönlichkeitsstörungen (SKID-II) im Jugendalter sowie eine Untersuchung zur Übereinstimmung zwischen SKID-II Diagnosen und klinischem Urteil. Zusätzlich wurde der Frage nachgegangen, welche Faktoren bei Patientinnen einer jugendpsychiatrischen Inanspruchnahmepopulation Persönlichkeitsstörungen (PS) prognostizieren. Methodik: Insgesamt wurden 110 stationär behandelte, jugendpsychiatrische Patienten im Alter von 14-18 Jahren mit dem SKID-II und dem Persönlichkeitsstil- und Störungsinventar (PSSI) untersucht. Ergebnisse: 32.7% der untersuchten Patienten zeigten nach SKID-II die Diagnose einer PS. Die Übereinstimmung zwischen kategorialem Urteil (PS liegt vor versus PS liegt nicht vor) des SKID-II und der klinischen Diagnose erwies sich insgesamt als niedrig. Lediglich für die histrionische PS und für die Borderline-PS ergaben sich annehmbare bis sehr gute Übereinstimmungen. Logistische Regressionsanalysen identifizierten «Anorexia nervosa (bulimisch)», «einfache Aktivitäts- und Aufmerksamkeitsstörung/Störung des Sozialverhaltens (ADHD/SSV)» und «Schicht» als relevante prognostische Faktoren für PS. Schlussfolgerungen: Das SKID-II, das primär für Erwachsene entwickelt wurde, ist für den Gebrauch bei Jugendlichen gut einsetzbar. Im jugendpsychiatrischen Bereich sind die Diagnosen Anorexia nervosa (bulimisch) und ADHD/SSV eng mit der Entwicklung einer PS assoziiert.

Prevention and early intervention for borderline personality disorder

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a severe mental disorder that is associated with substantial psychosocial impairment and morbidity, disproportionate use of health resources, a high suicide rate, and a reputation for being "untreatable". A diagnosis of BPD in young people has similar reliability, validity and prevalence to BPD in adults, and almost certainly has serious and pervasive negative repercussions over subsequent decades. Current data are inadequate to inform specific universal or selective prevention programs for BPD. However, they do support including BPD prevention as an outcome when evaluating universal and/or selective interventions for a variety of mental health problems and adverse psychosocial outcomes. The strongest data support early intervention for the emerging BPD phenotype. Early intervention programs will need to be realistic in their aims, require change in clinician attitudes and service systems, and must be mindful of the risk of iatrogenic harm.

Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization

This chapter reviews recent (2000-2005) personality disorder (PD) research, focusing on three major domains: assessment, comorbidity, and stability. (a) Substantial evidence has accrued favoring dimensional over categorical conceptualization of PD, and the five-factor model of personality is prominent as an integrating framework. Future directions include assessing dysfunction separately from traits and learning to utilize collateral information. (b) To address the pervasiveness and extent of comorbidity, researchers have begun to move beyond studying overlapping pairs or small sets of disorders and are developing broader, more integrated common-factor models that cross the Axis I-Axis II boundary. (c) Studies of PD stability have converged on the finding that PD features include both more acute, dysfunctional behaviors that resolve in relatively short periods, and maladaptive temperamental traits that are relatively more stable-similar to normal-range personality traits-with increasing stability until after 50 years of age. A new model for assessing PD-and perhaps all psychopathology-emerges from integrating these interrelated reconceptualizations.

Attrition bias in longitudinal research involving adolescent psychiatric outpatients

This study investigated whether the degree of difficulty contacting participants at follow-up in a longitudinal study of adolescent psychiatric outpatients is associated with baseline and/or follow-up Axis I and II psychopathology and sociodemographic variables. At baseline, 101 participants 15 to 18 years old were assessed using standardized diagnostic instruments, and 97 were reinterviewed, face-to-face, at 2-year follow-up. A hierarchical tracking strategy and meticulous follow-up contact log were used. More than one quarter of the sample required multiple tracking efforts to be located and interviewed. The presence and number of Axis I and II disorders at 2-year follow-up was significantly associated with follow-up contact difficulty. Baseline psychopathology and sociodemographic variables were not associated with follow-up contact difficulty. The findings indicate that longitudinal studies of adolescent outpatients that compare dropouts with completers utilizing baseline characteristics are likely to underestimate the extent of psychopathology at follow-up.

Cognitive function and symptoms in adolescents with schizotypal personality disorder

Cognitive deficits have been documented in schizophrenia and spectrum disorders. This study examines cognitive functioning and its relation to symptoms in adolescents with schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). Participants are 89 adolescents recruited for a study of youth at risk for Axis I disorders, especially psychosis. At intake, 34 met criteria for SPD, 38 for another Axis II disorder and/or conduct disorder (Other disorder-OD), and 17 did not currently meet criteria for any DSM-IV disorder (normal control-NC). At initial assessment, cognitive functioning was measured using subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scales and Wechsler Memory Scales (WMS), and symptoms were measured using the Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms (SIPS). At the time of this report, 50 were readministered the SIPS at 1-year follow-up (T2). The SPD group scored significantly below the NC group on the Arithmetic subtest of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales, but there was only limited evidence of group differences on the WMS. Poorer performance on the Wechsler Intelligence Scales was associated with greater severity of negative and disorganized symptoms. Deficits on the WMS were linked with more severe disorganized symptoms. The findings reported here are consistent with previous reports of limited cognitive deficits in adolescents with SPD, with the most marked deficits in mental arithmetic. The associations between symptoms and cognitive scores parallel those observed in adults with schizophrenia and spectrum disorder, and they are consistent with the notion that negative symptoms are more stable and partially reflect premorbid cognitive functions.