The association among renal insufficiency, pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in 6,427 patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease

Hospital performance and differences by kidney function in the use of recommended therapies after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and death; however, underuse of guideline-recommended therapies is widespread. The extent to which hospital performance affects the care of patients with CKD and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACSs) is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

81,374 patients with NSTE ACSs treated at 327 US hospitals.

PREDICTOR

Hospital performance, measured by quartiles of composite adherence to American Heart Association class I guidelines for therapy acutely (aspirin, beta-blockers, clopidogrel, heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) and at discharge (aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents) in eligible patients.

OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS

Use of each American Heart Association class I acute and discharge therapy stratified by continuous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Multivariable models were adjusted for demographics, clinical factors, and hospital features.

RESULTS

Better-performing hospitals had lower prescribing rates for most therapies (5 of 9) with lower levels of kidney function, whereas lower-performing hospitals were more likely to have similar prescribing rates across the eGFR spectrum, suggesting that prescribing patterns at these hospitals were insensitive to differences in eGFR.

LIMITATIONS

Observational design, selection bias of study cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lower levels of kidney function admitted with NSTE ACSs are less likely to receive evidence-based therapies. Treatment disparities related to CKD are most evident at top-performing hospitals.

Clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers in heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) Registry

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine associations between initiation of beta-blocker therapy and outcomes among elderly patients hospitalized for heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are guideline-recommended therapy for heart failure, but their clinical effectiveness is not well understood, especially in elderly patients.

METHODS

We merged Medicare claims data with OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure) records to examine long-term outcomes of eligible patients newly initiated on beta-blocker therapy. We used inverse probability-weighted Cox proportional hazards models to determine the relationships among treatment and mortality, rehospitalization, and a combined mortality-rehospitalization end point.

RESULTS

Observed 1-year mortality was 33%, and all-cause rehospitalization was 64%. Among 7,154 patients hospitalized with heart failure and eligible for beta-blockers, 3,421 (49%) were newly initiated on beta-blocker therapy. Among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) (n = 3,001), beta-blockers were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 0.87) for mortality, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.99) for rehospitalization, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.96) for mortality-rehospitalization. Among patients with preserved systolic function (n = 4,153), beta-blockers were associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84 to 1.07) for mortality, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.06) for rehospitalization, and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.91 to 1.06) for mortality-rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients hospitalized with heart failure and LVSD, incident beta-blocker use was clinically effective and independently associated with lower risks of death and rehospitalization. Patients with preserved systolic function had poor outcomes, and beta-blockers did not significantly influence the mortality and rehospitalization risks for these patients.

Admission NT-proBNP levels, renal insufficiency and age as predictors of mortality in elderly patients hospitalized for acute dyspnea

BACKGROUND

Assay of baseline B-type peptide (BNP and NT-proBNP) is useful for heart failure (HF) prognostication. In contrast, the prognostic value of NT-proBNP assay performed on admission of elderly subjects for acute dyspnea is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine the vital prognostic value of NT-proBNP assay and other relevant variables available on admission in elderly patients hospitalized for acute dyspnea.

METHODS

254 patients over 70 years of age who were initially hospitalized with acute dyspnea were prospectively studied. The log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to determine the prognostic value of NT-proBNP and creatinine clearance, measured within 24 h of initial admission, as well as age, gender, vascular risk factors and other clinical variables.

RESULTS

Mean age was 81+/-7 years, and 52% of the patients were women. During a median follow-up of 34 months, 134 patients (55%) died and 9 patients (4%) were lost to follow-up. The median survival time was 25 months, and almost half the deaths occurred during the first 6 months. In multivariate analysis the following three variables were independently associated with mortality (shown with their accompanying hazard ratios (HR)): NT-proBNP>2856 pg/mL (median), HR=1.6[95%CI:1.3-5.2]; creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, HR=1.7[95%CI:1.2-2.5]; and age>80 years, HR=1.7[95%CI:1.1-2.6]. The median survival time among patients with an admission NT-proBNP level of >2856 pg/mL (median) was 14 months, compared to >36 months in the rest of the population.

CONCLUSION

The admission NT-proBNP level, age, and creatinine clearance are predictive of vital outcome in elderly patients hospitalized for acute dyspnea.

Quality of care and outcomes among patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease: A Get With the Guidelines -- Heart Failure Program study

BACKGROUND

Both heart failure (HF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent conditions that often coexist; however, the quality of care received by hospitalized patients with both is not known.

METHODS

The Get With the Guidelines - HF registry and performance improvement program prospectively collects data on patients hospitalized with HF. Performance measures to improve treatment of patients with HF and inhospital mortality were examined by kidney function based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) categorized as normal (GFR > or = 90), mild (60 < or = GFR < 90), moderate (30 < or = GFR < 60), severe (15 < or = GFR < 30), and kidney failure (GFR < 15 or dialysis).

RESULTS

Nearly two thirds of hospitalized patients with HF (15,560 patients from 137 hospitals) also had CKD: moderate CKD (43.9%), severe CKD (14.2%), and kidney failure (6.6%). Inpatient mortality was higher for patients with more severe renal dysfunction. Those with kidney failure were significantly less likely to receive nearly all guidelines-based therapies. In contrast, those with moderate or severe CKD often received similar care when compared with those with normal kidney function, except for lower use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or receptor blockers (odds ratio 0.19 [0.13-0.28] and 0.47 [0.36-0.62], respectively) and lower proportions with blood pressure control (odds ratio 0.70 [0.58-0.85] and 0.52 [0.42-0.63], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large contemporary cohort of patients hospitalized with HF, we found that renal dysfunction was a highly prevalent comorbidity. Despite higher mortality rates, patients with increased severity of renal dysfunction were less likely to receive important guideline-recommended therapies. Further efforts are needed to improve the care of patients with HF and CKD.

Risks and benefits of antiplatelet therapy in uremic patients

Patients with renal insufficiency are at an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite being at a substantial risk for thrombotic events, patients with renal insufficiency also experience a greater number of hemorrhagic complications associated with antiplatelet therapy than individuals with normal renal function. This review focuses on the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy in patients with impaired kidney function suffering from an acute coronary syndrome.

Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in heart failure

Heart failure is common and is associated with a poor prognosis. Chronic kidney disease is common in heart failure and shares many risk factors with heart failure, such as age, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. Over half of all patients who have heart failure may have moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease. The presence of chronic kidney disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet it is also associated with underuse of evidence-based heart failure therapy that may reduce morbidity and mortality. Understanding the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease in heart failure is essential to ensure proper management of these patients.

Tricuspid regurgitation contributes to renal dysfunction in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

In heart failure (HF), renal dysfunction is associated with an adverse prognosis. Impaired renal perfusion from left ventricular dysfunction is thought to be a principal underlying mechanism. Less is known about the influence of venous congestion, including the potential contribution of tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Echocardiograms and a simultaneous (+/-1 day) blood sample from 196 HF patients were analyzed. Patients with at least moderate TR (n = 78) had larger right-sided cardiac cavities, higher right ventricular systolic pressure, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), higher serum urea nitrogen (SUN), and SUN/creatinine ratio than patients with less than moderate TR (n = 118). In multivariate linear regression analysis, TR severity (P = .003), older age (P < .001), and loop diuretic use (P = .008) were independently associated with lower eGFR, and use of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was associated with higher eGFR (P = .001). TR severity (P < .001) and older age (P < .001) were independently associated with higher SUN. TR severity (P = .004) and smaller left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P = .048) were independent predictors of a higher SUN/creatinine ratio (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a causal relationship cannot be proven, we suggest that significant TR contributes to renal dysfunction in HF patients, probably by elevation of central and renal venous pressure.

Statins and congestive heart failure

Despite many post hoc analyses of cardiovascular databases in recent years suggesting a benefit of statins in the prevention and treatment of congestive heart failure (HF), a prospective study of statin therapy on two clinically relevant end points--HF morbidity and survival--had not been reported until 2007. However, a large-scale prospective trial, Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Trial in Heart Failure (CORONA), has just reported its primary results. These results somewhat surprisingly show no survival benefit in a group of patients with ischemic systolic HF given low-dose rosuvastatin. In addition to this uncertainty generated by the results of CORONA, there remains additional uncertainty in the existing, predominantly retrospective data on statins because of the potential bias in study designs, use of post hoc subgroup analyses, and lack of mechanistic data. This review critically evaluates the recent literature in this area.

Myocardial infarction does not further impair renal damage in 5/6 nephrectomized rats

BACKGROUND

Recent observational studies show that reduced renal function is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Previously, we reported that myocardial infarction (MI) indeed enhanced mild renal function decline in rats after unilateral nephrectomy (NX) and that RAAS intervention inhibited this decline. The effects of an MI on pre-existing severe renal function loss and the effects of RAAS intervention interrupting this hypothesized cardiorenal interaction are however unknown and clinically even more relevant.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats underwent MI, sham MI, 5/6NX, or 5/6NX and MI. Six weeks later, the NX rats were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or vehicle for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

An MI did not significantly induce more proteinuria (303 +/- 46 versus 265 +/- 24 mg/24 h) and glomerulosclerosis (40 +/- 11 versus 28 +/- 4 arbitrary units) in 5/6NX+MI compared to 5/6NX, and ACEi therapy was equally effective in reducing renal damage in these groups. In the 5/6NX+MI group, decreased renal blood flow and creatinine clearance were observed compared to 5/6NX (2.2 +/- 0.6 versus 3.6 +/- 0.4 ml/min/kg and 2.1 +/- 0.3 versus 2.9 +/- 0.3 ml/min/kg), which both increased after ACEi to levels comparable found in the group that underwent 5/6NX alone.

CONCLUSIONS

MI does not further deteriorate structural renal damage induced by 5/6NX compared with 5/6NX alone. Furthermore, renal haemodynamic impairment occurs after MI, which can be improved applying ACEi therapy. Therefore, we conclude that treatment with ACEi should be optimized in patients with chronic kidney disease after MI to improve renal function.

Prevalence of moderate and severe renal insufficiency in older persons with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure in an academic nursing home

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of moderate and severe renal insufficiency in older persons in an academic nursing home.

DESIGN

The prevalence of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was investigated in older persons in an academic nursing home with either hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral arterial disease (PAD), ischemic stroke, or congestive heart failure (CHF).

SETTING

An academic nursing home.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and two persons (104 women and 98 men), mean age 73 years (range 50 to 98 years) residing in an academic nursing home.

MEASUREMENTS

Prevalence of a GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).

RESULTS

A GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was present in 60 (42%) of 143 persons with hypertension, in 30 (48%) of 62 persons with diabetes mellitus, in 28 (52%) of 52 persons with CAD, in 13 (50%) of 26 persons with PAD, in 10 (44%) of 23 persons with ischemic stroke, and in 15 (63%) of 24 persons with CHF.

CONCLUSION

Older persons with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CAD, PAD, ischemic stroke, or CHF have a high prevalence of moderate or severe renal insufficiency and should be treated optimally to reduce the increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in this high-risk population.

Achievement of therapeutic goals and utilization of evidence-based cardiovascular therapies in coronary heart disease patients with chronic kidney disease

To evaluate whether the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) influenced the rate of prescription of evidence-based cardiovascular preventive therapies and attainment of therapeutic goals in patients with stable coronary heart disease, 7,884 patients (mean age 65.4 years; 81.7% men; 22.4% with CKD) attended to in 1,799 primary-care centers and who had had a coronary event requiring hospitalization in the previous 6 months to 10 years were recruited. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the MDRD Study equation. Results indicated that patients with CKD received more diuretics (47.6% vs 32.8%; p = 0.034), calcium channel blockers (29.3% vs 23.2%, p = 0.027); and blockers of the angiotensin-renin system (76.4% vs 65.3%; p <0.001). The lower prescription rate of antiaggregants, beta blockers, and statins in subjects with CKD did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. A lower percentage of subjects with CKD achieved good control of blood pressure (39.2% vs 65.4%; p <0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin (43.9% vs 53.4%; p <0.001) relative to patients without CKD. Only 11.8% of patients with CKD had optimum control of all risk factors. Using multivariate analysis, the presence of CKD was inversely related to the degree of risk-factor control, especially in groups with low GFR. In conclusion, patients with stable coronary heart disease and CKD attended to in primary-care centers had poorer control of coronary heart disease risk factors than those with normal GFR despite receiving a similar rate of prescription of evidence-based cardiovascular disease preventive therapies.

Therapies for acute heart failure in patients with reduced kidney function: a community-based perspective

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist describing the management of patients with decreased kidney function at the time of hospital presentation for acute heart failure (HF).

STUDY DESIGN

Nonconcurrent prospective study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients hospitalized with clinical findings of decompensated HF (n = 4,350) at all 11 greater Worcester, MA, medical centers in 1995 and 2000. Patients were categorized into varying levels of kidney function based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

PREDICTOR

GFR estimates from serum creatinine levels measured at the time of hospital admission.

OUTCOMES

Hospital receipt of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers, digoxin, and diuretics.

MEASUREMENTS

Hospital charts were reviewed for prescribing of disease-modifying cardiac therapies, as well as therapies designed to provide symptomatic relief from HF.

RESULTS

Average eGFR in our study sample was 64.4 +/- 33.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and patients were categorized further into 3 eGFR levels of less than 30 (n = 569), 30 to 59 (n = 1,488), and 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or greater (n = 2,293) for comparative purposes. Patients with greater eGFRs (>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) were more likely to be treated with ACE inhibitors/ARBs (56% versus 39%) and digoxin (51% versus 46%) during hospitalization for HF than patients with lower eGFRs (<30 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < 0.05). Patients with lower eGFRs (<30 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) were more likely to be prescribed beta-blockers than patients with greater eGFRs (>or=60 mL/min/1.73 m(2); 46% versus 39%; P < 0.01). Use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs increased between 1995 and 2000 in 2 of the 3 eGFR groups examined: eGFRs less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (33% in 1995; 42% in 2000) and eGFRs of 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) or greater (51% in 1995; 59% in 2000). Use of beta-blockers increased appreciably in all 3 eGFR groups (<30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 27% in 1995; 58% in 2000; >or=60 mL/min/1.73 m(2): 25% in 1995; 49% in 2000). However, less than one third of all patients were treated with both disease-modifying therapies in 2000.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to classify patients into those with systolic versus diastolic HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that use of disease-modifying therapies for patients hospitalized with clinical findings of acute HF and decreased kidney function remains less than desirable. Educational programs are needed to enhance the management of patients with decreased kidney function who develop HF.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate, inflammation, and cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome

Both renal dysfunction and elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) are associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. However, it remains to be established whether the prognostic value of impaired estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains after accounting for markers of inflammation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation in 4178 patients with non-ST or ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, participating in the A to Z trial. The mean estimated GFR was 68 mL/min, with a median baseline CRP of 20.2 mg/L. Both an estimated GFR <60 mL/min (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.7-2.6) and a CRP in the fourth quartile (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-2.2) were strong univariate predictors of a CV event (composite of CV death, recurrent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke). After adjusting for baseline CRP, GFR <60 mL/min remained a strong multivariate predictor for CV death (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.1-2.97). Randomization to high-dose statin therapy was associated with a reduction in the CV composite (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.5-0.95) irrespective of baseline renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of patients without overt renal disease, moderate reductions in estimated GFR remain an important prognostic marker. This increased CV hazard associated with an estimated GFR <60 mL/min is independent and additive to markers of inflammation.

Acute cardio-renal syndrome: Progression from congestive heart failure to congestive kidney failure

Over the past few years, acute worsening of renal function has emerged as a powerful and independent predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes among patients hospitalized with acute heart failure exacerbation. This phenomenon has been recently termed acute cardio-renal syndrome. Acute cardio-renal syndrome is not uncommon, affecting roughly one third of acute decompensated heart failure patients. The mechanism of acute cardio-renal syndrome is poorly understood and difficult to elucidate in light of the complex and multifactorial comorbidities associated with acute heart failure syndrome. Acute cardio-renal syndrome is commonly explained by hypoperfusion of the kidney with intravascular volume depletion, hypotension and low flow state ("pre-renal syndrome"). This perception, however, is challenged by the actual hemodynamics present during acute cardio-renal syndrome characterized by hypervolemia, normal cardiac output, and elevated filling pressures of the systemic and venous circulation. This review discusses the long-standing and unnoticed evidence in support of the notion that right-sided failure with raised filling pressure of the renal vein by itself can indeed lead to acute worsening renal function with oliguria, azotemia, and reduced glomerular filtration rate.

Relation Between Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Cardiovascular Event Rate in People With Coronary Disease

Background— Higher levels of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) may be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. We examined the association between RDW and the risk of all-cause mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in a population of people with coronary disease who were free of heart failure at baseline.

Methods and Results— We performed a post hoc analysis of data from the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events study. Baseline RDW was measured in 4111 participants who were randomized to receive pravastatin 40 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 59.7 months. We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association between RDW and adverse clinical outcomes. During nearly 60 months of follow-up, 376 participants died. A significant association was noted between baseline RDW level and the adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio per percent increase in RDW, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.24). After categorization based on quartile of baseline RDW and further adjustment for hematocrit and other cardiovascular risk factors, a graded independent relation between RDW and death was observed ( P for trend=0.001). For instance, participants with RDW in the highest quartile had an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.28 to 2.47) compared with those in the lowest quartile. Higher levels of RDW were also associated with increased risk of coronary death/nonfatal myocardial infarction, new symptomatic heart failure, and stroke.

Conclusions— We found a graded independent relation between higher levels of RDW and the risk of death and cardiovascular events in people with prior myocardial infarction but no symptomatic heart failure at baseline.

Delivery patterns of recommended chronic kidney disease care in clinical practice: administrative claims-based analysis and systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been developed within the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI). Adherence patterns may identify focus areas for quality improvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied contemporary CKD care patterns within a private health system in the United States, and systematically reviewed literature of reported practices internationally. Five hundred and nineteen patients with moderate CKD (estimated GFR 30-59 ml/min) using healthcare benefits in 2002-2005 were identified from administrative insurance records. Thirty-three relevant publications in 2000-2006 describing care in 77,588 CKD patients were reviewed. Baseline demographic traits and provider specialty were considered as correlates of delivered care. Testing consistent with K/DOQI guidelines and prevalence of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) medication prescriptions were ascertained from billing claims. Care descriptions in the literature sample were based on medical charts, electronic records and/or claims.

RESULTS

KDOQI-consistent measurements of parathyroid hormone (7.1 vs. 0.6%, P = 0.0002), phosphorus (38.2 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.0001) and quantified urinary protein (23.8 vs. 9.4%, P = 0.008) were more common among CKD patients with versus without nephrology referral in the administrative data. Nephrology referral correlated with increased likelihood of testing for parathyroid hormone and phosphorus after adjustment for baseline patient factors. Use of ACEi/ARB medications was more common among patients with nephrology contact (50.0 vs. 30.0%; P = 0.008) but appeared largely driven by higher comorbidity burden. The literature review demonstrated similar practice patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery of CKD care may be monitored by administrative data. There is opportunity for improvement in CKD guideline adherence in practice.

Management of ischemic heart disease in patients with chronic kidney disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) have strikingly high mortality rates. In the general population, there has been a reduction in the mortality and morbidity rates for IHD through the implementation of effective risk-factor-reduction programs and better interventions for patients with established IHD. No such trend has been observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease. This review article addresses the following topics: (i) epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical CKD patients with IHD; (ii) diagnostic modalities for IHD and their limitation in CKD patients; (iii) medical treatment options and revascularization strategies for these high-risk patients; and (iv) optimal cardiovascular risk management. Generally, in CKD patients with IHD an aggressive approach to IHD is warranted, a low threshold for diagnostic testing should be employed, and awaiting a clinical trial targeting these patients they should be considered for all proven strategies to improve outcomes.

European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)

Other experts who contributed to parts of the guidelines: Edmond Walma, Schoonhoven (The Netherlands), Tony Fitzgerald, Dublin (Ireland), Marie Therese Cooney, Dublin (Ireland), Alexandra Dudina, Dublin (Ireland) European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG):, Alec Vahanian (Chairperson) (France), John Camm (UK), Raffaele De Caterina (Italy), Veronica Dean (France), Kenneth Dickstein (Norway), Christian Funck-Brentano (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Irene Hellemans (The Netherlands), Steen Dalby Kristensen (Denmark), Keith McGregor (France), Udo Sechtem (Germany), Sigmund Silber (Germany), Michal Tendera (Poland), Petr Widimsky (Czech Republic), José Luis Zamorano (Spain)

Document reviewers: Irene Hellemans (CPG Review Coordinator) (The Netherlands), Attila Altiner (Germany), Enzo Bonora (Italy), Paul N. Durrington (UK), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Simona Giampaoli(Italy), Harry Hemingway (UK), Jan Hakansson (Sweden), Sverre Erik Kjeldsen (Norway), Mogens Lytken Larsen (Denmark), Giuseppe Mancia (Italy), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Kristina Orth-Gomer (Sweden), Terje Pedersen (Norway), Mike Rayner (UK), Lars Ryden (Sweden), Mario Sammut (Malta), Neil Schneiderman (USA), Anton F. Stalenhoef (The Netherlands), Lale Tokgözoglu (Turkey), Olov Wiklund (Sweden), Antonis Zampelas (Greece)

Heart failure mortality in Southeast Asian patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Prognostic indicators and mortality in multiethnic Southeast Asian patients with heart failure (HF) may be different.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population comprised 225 inpatients with HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less who were discharged alive. Five years later, survival and causes of death were determined. Proportionally, more Malay and Indian patients were admitted compared with Chinese patients (P < .001). There were 55.6% in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV. Ischemic heart disease was the most common cause (85.8%). At 5 years, 152 patients (67.5%) had died. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed to 79.1% of patients on discharge. Cardiovascular causes accounted for 69.7% of deaths. Predictors of mortality include female gender (P = .046), age 70 years or more (P = .017), renal impairment (P = .008), NYHA class III or IV (P = .03), and non-use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (P = .005). On multivariate analysis, increasing age (P = .001) and renal impairment (P = .019) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality. Cardiovascular death was more likely with NYHA class III or IV (P = .004) and renal impairment (P = .012).

CONCLUSION

Mortality is unusually high in this group of patients despite treatment. Greater use of evidence-based therapies in HF-management programs may arrest this trend.

Benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and heart failure: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the association between antidiabetic agents and morbidity and mortality in people with heart failure and diabetes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies (randomised trials or cohort studies) evaluating antidiabetic agents and outcomes (death and admission to hospital) in patients with heart failure and diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases, manual reference search, and contact with investigators.

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers independently extracted data. Risk estimates for specific treatments were abstracted and pooled estimates derived by meta-analysis where appropriate.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. Three of four studies found that insulin use was associated with increased risk for all cause mortality (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.51; 3.42, 1.40 to 8.37 in studies that did not adjust for diet and antidiabetic drugs; hazard ratio 1.66, 1.20 to 2.31; 0.96, 0.88 to 1.05 in the studies that did). Metformin was associated with significantly reduced all cause mortality in two studies (hazard ratio 0.86, 0.78 to 0.97) compared with other antidiabetic drugs and insulin; 0.70, 0.54 to 0.91 compared with sulfonylureas); a similar trend was seen in a third. Metformin was not associated with increased hospital admission for any cause or for heart failure specifically. In four studies, use of thiazolidinediones was associated with reduced all cause mortality (pooled odds ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97, I2=52%, P=0.02). Thiazolidinediones were associated with increased risk of hospital admission for heart failure (pooled odds ratio 1.13 (1.04 to 1.22), I2=0%, P=0.004). The two studies of sulfonylureas had conflicting results, probably because of differences in comparator treatments. Important limitations were noted in all studies.

CONCLUSION

Metformin was the only antidiabetic agent not associated with harm in patients with heart failure and diabetes. It was associated with reduced all cause mortality in two of the three studies.

Long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative kidney function is prognostic

OBJECTIVE

End-stage renal disease is an independent predictor of mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Limited information exists, however, regarding the impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term outcome after bypass grafting. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of kidney function on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

We studied 931 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in a single center. Demographic and clinical data were collected preoperatively. Chronic kidney disease was defined preoperatively according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation as an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to determine the independent prognostic factors after bypass grafting. The primary outcome was a composite, combining death, acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and coronary or peripheral revascularization during follow-up. Secondary outcomes were overall causes of death and cardiovascular death, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke or transient ischemic attack.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen (12.2%) patients had preoperative chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate range, 20.5-59.8 mL x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2)). After a mean follow-up of 3.1 +/- 1.4 years (median, 3.3 years), chronic kidney disease was found to be an independent predictor of the composite outcome (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval, 1.46 [1.01-2.11]; P = .0467) and overall death (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval, 1.89 [1.16-3.07]; P = .0106).

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond the perioperative period, preoperative moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease is an independent long-term predictor of cardiovascular events and total mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Chronic kidney disease status should be incorporated into prediction models and clinical risk assessments.

Should a statin be prescribed to every patient with heart failure?

Chronic heart failure (HF) represents an emerging epidemic since its prevalence is continuously increasing despite advances in treatment. Many recent clinical studies have clearly demonstrated that statin therapy is associated with improved outcomes in HF irrespective of aetiology (ischaemic or not) or baseline cholesterol levels. Indeed, most of the conducted large statin trials and trials in HF have demonstrated a positive effect of statins in HF patients. Furthermore, the use of statins in HF seems to be safe as none of the recent trials has resulted in worse outcomes for HF patients treated with statins. Potential mechanisms through which statins could benefit the failing myocardium include non-sterol effects of statins, as well as effects on nitric oxide and endothelial function, inflammation and adhesion molecules, apoptosis and myocardial remodelling and neurohormonal activation. This review discusses the pathophysiological basis of statin effects on HF and focuses on clinical data for the benefit from statin use in this setting. Until today there are no official recommendations in both the American and the European guidelines regarding the use of statins in HF patients, as the available data come from small observational or larger but retrospective, non-randomised studies. Therefore, HF patients should be treated according to current lipid guidelines. Large randomised clinical trials are underway and will further delineate the role of statin therapy in HF patients. Until more data are available, we could not recommend statin use to every patient with HF irrespective of HF aetiology and baseline cholesterol levels.

Statins and clinical outcomes in heart failure

HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) are well-established therapies in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease, reducing all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in many disease states. Studies have also suggested that statins given to patients after myocardial infarction improve event-free survival even in short time frames; however, evidence for the benefit of statins in established HF (heart failure) has not been demonstrated with the same rigour of a randomized clinical trial setting. In fact, clinical data examining the effect of statins in HF have been limited by the retrospective or observational nature of these analyses, examination of incompletely validated surrogate end points, small prospective studies in subgroups of HF subjects, and non-uniform doses and different statins being used. In this review, we examine the evidence for the effect of statins on mortality in HF, taking into account theoretical arguments, appropriateness of surrogate markers, animal data and analysis of the predominantly retrospective clinical data that is currently available.

Underutilization of Evidence-Based Therapies in Heart Failure: The Pharmacist's Role

Utilization of evidence-based therapy in the heart failure population includes implementation of heart failure treatment guidelines, interventions to improve prescribing, and inclusion of pharmacists on the multidisciplinary team. Use of treatment guidelines eases the challenge of selecting the appropriate drug and dosage; quality interventions by pharmacists can ensure optimal prescribing of therapy; and provision of care by a multidisciplinary team can improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. Evidence-based therapy, however, remains underutilized in the heart failure population. Barriers to utilization include misperceptions that various heart failure subpopulations do not need certain medical therapies, a fear of polypharmacy, inappropriate assumptions about adverse effects and contraindications, and cost. In fact, optimal prescribing of evidence-based therapy can actually reduce costs. Clearly documented processes and systems are needed to ensure that evidence-based therapy and education are available to every patient.

Statin use was associated with reduced mortality in both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and in patients with implantable defibrillators: mortality data and mechanistic insights from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT)

BACKGROUND

Recent observations suggest statin treatment may be associated with lower mortality in heart failure (HF). The SCD-HeFT was a study of 2521 functional class II and III HF patients with left ventricular ejection fractions < or = 35% and ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy followed up for a median of 45.5 months. The study length, size, and degree of background HF, including the use of implantable defibrillator therapy, provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the impact of statin use in HF with mechanistic insights from subgroup analyses.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Statin use was reported in 965 (38%) of 2521 patients at baseline and 1187 (47%) at last follow-up. The relationships between statin use, randomization arm, disease category, and functional class and all cause mortality were assessed. Statin use was studied as a time-dependent covariate in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for imbalances between statin and no-statin groups. Mortality risk was significantly lower in those taking a statin (HR [95% CI], 0.70 [0.58-0.83]). Mortality risk was lower with statin use in all prespecified subgroups: ischemic cardiomyopathy (0.69 [0.56-0.86]), nonischemic cardiomyopathy (0.67 [0.47-0.96]), implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (0.66 [0.46-0.95], non-ICD (0.71 [0.57-0.87]), New York Heart Association II (0.62 [0.48-0.79]), and New York Heart Association III (0.79 [0.61-1.03]).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in HF patients. Statins appear to benefit patients with nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy similarly. Statin benefits are similar in ICD and non-ICD patients.

Renal dysfunction in heart failure patients: what is the evidence?

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is an increasingly common medical condition and the fastest growing cardiovascular diagnosis in North America. Over one-third of patients with heart failure also have renal insufficiency. It has been shown that renal insufficiency confers worsened outcomes to patients with heart failure. However, a majority of the larger and therapy-defining heart failure medication and device trials exclude patients with advanced renal dysfunction. These studies also infrequently perform subgroup analyses based on the degree of renal dysfunction. The lack of information on heart failure patients who have renal insufficiency likely contributes to their being prescribed mortality and morbidity reducing medications and receiving diagnostic and therapeutic procedures at lower rates than heart failure patients with normal renal function. Inclusion of patients with renal insufficiency in heart failure studies and published guidelines for medication, device, and interventional therapies would likely improve patient outcomes.

Simvastatin for secondary prevention of all-cause mortality and major coronary events in patients with mild chronic renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

A potentially modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with mild chronic renal insufficiency is dyslipidemia. Few studies examined the effects of statins on all-cause mortality and major coronary events in patients with renal dysfunction.

METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis from the Randomized Trial of Cholesterol Lowering in 4,444 Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study. Of 4,444 participants, 2,314 (52.1%) had mild chronic renal insufficiency defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 75 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (<1.25 mL/s), measured using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The primary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, simvastatin use was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.89) in the 2,314 participants with mild chronic renal insufficiency. Rates of major coronary events (adjusted HR, 0.67; CI, 0.56 to 0.79) and coronary revascularization (adjusted HR, 0.62; CI, 0.49 to 0.77) also were significantly lower in the simvastatin group. No significant decreases in stroke incidence were observed in the simvastatin group (adjusted HR, 0.88; CI, 0.55 to 1.39). The side-effect profile was similar between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin therapy appears to be effective and safe for the secondary prevention of all-cause mortality and major coronary events in patients with mild chronic renal dysfunction.

The epidemics of cardiovascular disease in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease--two facets of the same problem

There is increasing evidence that even mild renal dysfunction is a novel potent cardiovascular risk factor in the general elderly population. With more severe renal impairment, cardiovascular risk increases proportionately. This issue deserves attention, as chronic kidney disease (CKD) is predominantly a disease of the elderly, and the mean age of end-stage renal disease patients entering dialysis is growing constantly. In the dialysis population, when clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD) (particularly congestive heart failure) is present, survival is worse. Thus, every effort should be made to identify and treat cardiovascular risk factor in the early stages of CKD. However, elderly renal patients receive less proper cardiovascular therapy compared to non-renal subjects of the same age. This review deals briefly with the most significant data published in the last decade on CVD in elderly with CKD.

Anemia, chronic renal disease and congestive heart failure--the cardio renal anemia syndrome: the need for cooperation between cardiologists and nephrologists

Many patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) fail to respond to maximal CHF therapy and progress to end stage CHF with many hospitalizations, poor quality of life (QoL), progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) which can lead to end stage kidney disease (ESKD), or die of cardiovascular complications within a short time. One factor that has generally been ignored in many of these people is the fact that they are often anemic. The anemia in CHF is due mainly to the frequently-associated CKD but also to the inhibitory effects of cytokines on erythropoietin production and on bone marrow activity, as well as to their interference with iron absorption from the gut and their inhibiting effect on the release of iron from iron stores. Anemia itself may further worsen cardiac and renal function and make the patients resistant to standard CHF therapy. Indeed anemia in CHF has been associated with increased severity of CHF, increased hospitalization, worse cardiac function and functional class, the need for higher doses of diuretics, progressive worsening of renal function and reduced QoL. In both controlled and uncontrolled studies of CHF, the correction of the anemia with erythropoietin (EPO) and oral or intravenous (IV) iron has been associated with improvement in many cardiac and renal parameters and an increased QoL. EPO itself may also play a direct role in improving the heart unrelated to the improvement of the anemia--by reducing apoptosis of cardiac and endothelial cells, increasing the number of endothelial progenitor cells, and improving endothelial cell function and neovascularization of the heart. Anemia may also play a role in the worsening of acute myocardial infarction and chronic coronary heart disease (CHD) and in the cardiovascular complications of renal transplantation. Anemia, CHF and CKD interact as a vicious circle so as to cause or worsen each other- the so-called cardio renal anemia syndrome. Only adequate treatment of all three conditions can prevent the CHF and CKD from progressing.

Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Risk

Kidney failure and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are associated with accelerated cardiovascular disease, apparently because of a high burden of traditional vascular risk factors and possibly nontraditional risk factors such as inflammation, chronic volume overload, and abnormal calcium-phosphate metabolism. Although the burden of cardiovascular disease in CKD patients is well documented, potentially beneficial therapies appear to be underused in mild to moderate CKD and are relatively understudied in those with kidney failure. This review describes the epidemiology and pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease in CKD. We also discuss the clinical and public health implications of current knowledge and outline opportunities for further research.

Renal Damage after Myocardial Infarction Is Prevented by Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone-System Intervention

Recently, it was shown that myocardial infarction aggravates preexistent mild renal damage that is elicited by unilateral nephrectomy in rats. The mechanism behind this cardiorenal interaction likely involves the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system and/or vasoactive peptides that are metabolized by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi) as well as combined ACE/NEP inhibition with a vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) was investigated in the same model to clarify the underlying mechanism. At week 17 after sequential induction of unilateral nephrectomy and myocardial infarction, treatment with lisinopril (ACEi), AVE7688 (VPI), or vehicle was initiated for 6 wk. Proteinuria and systolic BP (SBP) were evaluated weekly. Renal damage was assessed primarily by proteinuria, interstitial alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) staining, and the incidence of focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS). At start of treatment, proteinuria had increased progressively to 167 +/- 20 mg/d in the entire cohort (n = 42). Both ACEi and VPI provided a similar reduction in proteinuria, alpha-SMA, and FGS compared with vehicle at week 23 (proteinuria 76 +/- 6 versus 77 +/- 4%; alpha-SMA 60 +/- 6 versus 77 +/- 3%; FGS 52 +/- 14 versus 61 +/- 10%). Similar reductions in systolic BP were observed in both ACEi- and VPI-treated groups (33 +/- 3 and 37 +/- 2%, respectively). Compared with ACEi, VPI-treated rats displayed a significantly larger reduction of plasma (41 +/- 5 versus 61 +/- 4%) and renal (53 +/- 6 versus 74 +/- 4%) ACE activity. It is concluded that both ACEi and VPI intervention prevent renal damage in a rat model of cardiorenal interaction. VPI treatment seemed to provide no additional renoprotection compared with sole ACEi after 6 wk of treatment in this model, despite a more pronounced ACE-inhibiting effect of VPI.

Statins in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of statin therapy in patients with established chronic heart failure (CHF) is a subject of much debate.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted three systematic literature searches to assess the evidence supporting the prescription of statins in CHF. First, we investigated the participation of CHF patients in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials designed to evaluate the efficacy of statins in reducing major cardiovascular events and mortality. Second, we assessed the association between serum cholesterol and outcome in CHF. Finally, we evaluated the ability of statin treatment to modify surrogate endpoint parameters in CHF. Using validated search strategies, we systematically searched PubMed for our three queries. In addition, we searched the reference lists from eligible studies, used the "see related articles" feature for key publications in PubMed, consulted the Cochrane Library, and searched the ISI Web of Knowledge for papers citing key publications. Search 1 resulted in the retrieval of 47 placebo-controlled clinical statin trials involving more than 100,000 patients. CHF patients had, however, been systematically excluded from these trials. Search 2 resulted in the retrieval of eight studies assessing the relationship between cholesterol levels and outcome in CHF patients. Lower serum cholesterol was consistently associated with increased mortality. Search 3 resulted in the retrieval of 18 studies on the efficacy of statin treatment in CHF. On the whole, these studies reported favorable outcomes for almost all surrogate endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Since CHF patients have been systematically excluded from randomized, controlled clinical cholesterol-lowering trials, the effect of statin therapy in these patients remains to be established. Currently, two large, randomized, placebo-controlled statin trials are under way to evaluate the efficacy of statin treatment in terms of reducing clinical endpoints in CHF patients in particular.

Drug Insight: immunomodulatory effects of statins—potential benefits for renal patients?

Statins inhibit 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, an enzyme crucial to cholesterol synthesis. Drugs of this class reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke, in large part through lipid modulation. Emerging evidence indicates that statins have additional modes of action. These actions, which encompass modification of endothelial function, plaque stability, thrombus formation and inflammatory pathways, are widely referred to as 'pleiotropic effects'. These pleiotropic effects indicate that the therapeutic potential of statins might extend beyond cholesterol lowering and cardiovascular disease to other inflammatory disorders or conditions such as transplantation, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic kidney disease. Experimental and clinical data provide evidence to support these broader applications of statins; however, more large-scale trials are needed to clarify the therapeutic benefit.

Statin use in heart failure: a cause for concern?

BACKGROUND

Statins are effective in the prevention of coronary events and the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. However, their efficacy and safety in patients with heart failure (HF) are unknown. In this review, we discuss the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy in patients with HF.

METHODS

We reviewed all original English-language, peer-reviewed journal articles published from 1985 to 2005 obtained from a search of the MEDLINE database. We focused on evidence for the efficacy and safety of statins based on data from patients with HF enrolled in major statin trials, analysis of the impact of statin use in patients with HF, and randomized clinical trials examining the effects of statins on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HF.

RESULTS

The major primary and secondary prevention statin trials largely excluded patients with HF. Statin use was also limited in randomized HF trials. Subgroup and retrospective analyses, and evidence from prospective cohort studies of statin use in patients with HF suggest statins improve cardiovascular prognosis in HF. The limited small randomized clinical trials also suggest statins improve symptoms, ejection fraction, and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with HF.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing weight of evidence suggests that statins have beneficial effects in HF. At this time, there is little evidence to support withdrawing or withholding statins from patients with HF. Ongoing randomized controlled trials that examine the efficacy of statin therapy in patients with HF should clarify the role of these agents in the context of HF.

Aspirin Use and Outcomes in a Community-Based Cohort of 7352 Patients Discharged After First Hospitalization for Heart Failure

Background— The safety of aspirin in heart failure (HF) has been called into question, particularly in those patients (1) without coronary disease, (2) with renal dysfunction, or (3) treated with low-dose angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and high-dose aspirin.

Methods and Results— We examined prescription patterns and outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission) in patients discharged from 103 Canadian hospitals between April 1999 and March 2001 after a first hospitalization for HF. Of 7352 patients with HF (mean age, 75 years; 44% without coronary disease and 29% with renal dysfunction), 2785 (38%) died or required HF readmission within the first year. Compared with nonusers, aspirin users were no more likely to die or require HF readmission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [0.91 to 1.16]), even in patients without coronary disease (HR, 0.98 [0.78 to 1.22]) or patients with renal dysfunction (HR, 1.13 [0.94 to 1.36]). On the other hand, users of ACE inhibitors were less likely to die or require HF readmission (HR, 0.87 [0.79 to 0.96]), even if they were using aspirin (HR, 0.86 [0.77 to 0.95]). There were no dose-dependent interactions between aspirin and ACE inhibitors.

Conclusions— In this observational study, aspirin use was not associated with an increase in mortality rates or HF readmission rates, and aspirin did not attenuate the benefits of ACE inhibitors, even in patients without coronary disease, patients with renal dysfunction, or patients treated with high-dose aspirin and low-dose ACE inhibitors.