Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Characterization of cell states in biliary tract cancers identifies mechanisms of therapeutic resistance in a phase II trial of DKN-01/nivolumab

Biliary tract cancers demonstrate profound therapeutic resistance, and broadly effective therapies for refractory disease are lacking. We conducted a single-arm, second-line phase II trial combining DKN-01, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), and nivolumab to treat patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (NCT04057365). No objective responses were seen. To identify mechanisms of treatment failure, we analyzed paired pre-treatment and on-treatment biopsies using scRNA-seq and constructed a detailed molecular classification of malignant and immune cells. We annotated five biliary tract cancer malignant cell states: classical, basal, mesenchymal, neural-like, and endothelial-like. Neural-like and endothelial-like states, which drive therapeutic resistance in other cancers, have not previously been described in BTC. Malignant cell states co-varied with distinct immune cell states, revealing diverse mechanisms of myeloid and T-cell mediated immune suppression, including M2 myeloid and terminally exhausted T cell programs that were induced by DKN-01/nivolumab. Here, we provide the first systematic classification of functionally annotated cell states in biliary tract cancer and provide new insight into resistance mechanisms to an immunotherapy combination that can inform the next generation of trials.

Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is relatively rare and comprises a spectrum of invasive tumors arising from the biliary tree. The prognosis is extremely poor. The incidence of BTC is relatively high in Asian countries, and a high number of cases are diagnosed annually in China owing to the large population. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the epidemiology and high-risk factors for BTC in China. The signs associated with BTC are complex, often require collaborative treatment from surgeons, endoscopists, oncologists, and radiation therapists. Thus, it is necessary to develop a comprehensive Chinese guideline for BTC.

METHODS

This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed following the process recommended by the World Health Organization. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. The full CPG report was reviewed by external guideline methodologists and clinicians with no direct involvement in the development of this CPG. Two guideline reporting checklists have been adhered to: Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT).

RESULTS

The guideline development group, which comprised 85 multidisciplinary clinical experts across China. After a controversies conference, 17 clinical questions concerning the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of BTC were proposed. Additionally, detailed descriptions of the surgical principles, perioperative management, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and endoscopic management were proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The guideline development group created a comprehensive Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of BTC, covering various aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. The 17 clinical questions have important reference value for the management of BTC.

Effectiveness, safety, and biomarker analysis of lenvatinib plus toripalimab as chemo-free therapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are currently limited. Chemo-containing regimens are the mainstay treatments but associated with notable toxicity, poor tolerance, and reduced compliance, necessitating exploration of alternative therapies. Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors has shown substantial clinical activity in preliminary studies. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus toripalimab (a novel PD-1 antibody) as chemo-free therapy in advanced ICC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive advanced ICC patients receiving lenvatinib plus toripalimab between February 2019 and December 2023. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Prognostic factors and exploratory analyses for genetic alternations were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 25.9 months. Median OS and PFS were 11.3 (95% CI: 9.5-13.1) and 5.4 (95% CI: 3.8-7.0) months, respectively. ORR was 19.2% and DCR was 75.6%. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 50.0%, with no grade 5 AEs reported. Patients with normal baseline CA19-9 levels exhibited a higher ORR (p = 0.011), longer PFS (11.5 versus 4.6 months; HR 0.47; p=0.005), and OS (21.0 versus 9.7 months; HR 0.43; p=0.003). The presence of IDH1 mutations correlated with increased ORR (60.0% versus 8.9%, p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib plus toripalimab represents an effective and well-tolerated chemo-free therapeutic option for advanced ICC. Baseline CA19-9 levels and IDH1 mutations may serve as predictive treatment-related biomarkers.

Exploring the impact of durvalumab on biliary tract cancer: insights from real-world clinical data

INTRODUCTION

This study assesses the effectiveness of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine for biliary tract cancers (BTC). It aims to confirm the TOPAZ-1 trial results in a real-world context and explore the link between BTC molecular profiles and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 102 BTC patients treated with durvalumab, platinum, and gemcitabine at five cancer centers in Austria and one in Germany from 2022 to 2024. Molecular profiling used targeted DNA and RNA assays. Clinical endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed using log-rank tests and Cox regression, with correlations to second-line molecular-targeted therapies.

RESULTS

Among 102 patients, 60.8% had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The treatment achieved a disease control rate of 71.57% and an overall response rate of 35.11%. Median PFS was 6.51 months, and OS was 13.61 months. Patients under 65 had significantly better OS. Alterations in chromatin remodeling or homologous recombination repair genes were not predictive of survival benefit (HR: 0.45; p = 0.851 and HR: 1.63; p = 0.26, respectively). Patients with molecular-informed second-line therapy showed a trend toward survival benefit (HR: 0.23; p = 0.052).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the phase 3 trial results of durvalumab with platinum and gemcitabine, providing a substantial real-world dataset with detailed molecular characterization. No specific patient subgroup showed a markedly better response to durvalumab based on conventional NGS panels. Further research is needed to explore the link between immunotherapy responses and molecular subgroups.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies plus GEMOX chemotherapy as non-first-line systemic therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported.

CONCLUSION

Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.

Advances in targeting tumor microenvironment for immunotherapy

The tumor microenvironment (TME) provides essential conditions for the occurrence, invasion, and spread of cancer cells. Initial research has uncovered immunosuppressive properties of the TME, which include low oxygen levels (hypoxia), acidic conditions (low pH), increased interstitial pressure, heightened permeability of tumor vasculature, and an inflammatory microenvironment. The presence of various immunosuppressive components leads to immune evasion and affects immunotherapy efficacy. This indicates the potential value of targeting the TME in cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, TME remodeling has become an effective method for enhancing host immune responses against tumors. In this study, we elaborate on the characteristics and composition of the TME and how it weakens immune surveillance and summarize targeted therapeutic strategies for regulating the TME.

Has Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Evolved with the Evidence? Trends and Practice Patterns from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) has advanced in recent decades, including randomized trial evidence supporting systemic therapy in the palliative and adjuvant setting. Mounting observational evidence suggests resection of IHC with multifocal disease (IHC-MF) or lymph node metastasis (IHC-LNM) should be limited. It is unknown how real-world practice has evolved in light of research advances. This study characterizes trends in management and outcomes of IHC without distant metastasis.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients treated for IHC without distant metastasis (M0) and identified subgroups with lymph node (cN1) or multifocal hepatic involvement (cT2b). Two-sided Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated trends in initial treating modality and perioperative chemotherapy. Logistic regression evaluated associations with choice of initial treating modality. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2020, 11,368 patients were treated for IHC without extrahepatic metastasis. Forty-three percent underwent resection. Initial management shifted from resection towards radiation or systemic therapy in IHC-MF and IHC-LNM. Use of perioperative chemotherapy increased from 39% pre-2010 to 70% in 2018-2020 (p < 0.001), most often delivered postoperatively. Across the entire cohort, median OS improved from 16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15-18) to 27 months (95% CI 26-29). More modest improvements were observed in IHC-MF and IHC-LNM.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of perioperative chemotherapy has been widely adopted, predating randomized trial evidence in the adjuvant setting. Initial management of IHC-MF and IHC-LNM has shifted from resection to systemic and/or radiation therapy. While OS has improved overall, outcomes of IHC-MF and IHC-LNM remain poor, warranting further investigation.

Advances in target drugs and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

After years of treatment stagnation in biliary tract cancers (BTC), there has been a notable shift with the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, leading to substantial progress in tackling this aggressive disease.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive overview of the target therapies that are already part of the treatment algorithm for BTC, such as FGFR, IDH, and HER2 inhibitors. Additionally, we delve into some less known targets that are being explored, such as KRAS proto-oncogene, MAPK cascade, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and novel molecules directed against P53, claudin, histones, and mitochondrial metabolism. Furthermore, we discuss agnostic drugs and analyze the efficacy data available for BTC specifically. We also examine the expanding world of immunotherapy, with an eye on predictive factors of response for immune checkpoint inhibitors, and on novel immune drugs such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T and vaccines.

EXPERT OPINION

In the expert opinion, we discuss the problem of the scarcity of patients eligible for target therapies and how can clinical trials be designed to overcome this challenge. We also summarize the most promising trials that have the potential to change clinical practice both for immunotherapies and target drugs.

Evolving therapeutic landscape of advanced biliary tract cancer: from chemotherapy to molecular targets

Biliary tract cancer, the second most common type of liver cancer, remains a therapeutic challenge due to its late diagnosis and poor prognosis. In recent years, it has become evident that classical chemotherapy might not be the optimal treatment for patients with biliary tract cancer, especially after failure of first-line therapy. Finding new treatment options and strategies to improve the survival of these patients is therefore crucial. With the rise and increasing availability of genetic testing in patients with tumor, novel treatment approaches targeting specific genetic alterations have recently been proposed and have demonstrated their safety and efficacy in numerous clinical trials. In this review, we will first consider chemotherapy options and the new possibility of combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment. We will then provide an overview of genomic alterations and their potential for targeted therapy especially in second-line therapy. In addition to the most common alterations such as isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations, fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, and alterations, we will also discuss less frequently encountered alterations such as BRAF V600E mutation and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor gene (NTRK) fusion. We highlight the importance of molecular profiling in guiding therapeutic decisions and emphasize the need for continued research to optimize and expand targeted treatment strategies for this aggressive malignancy.

Predictive MINT Pathologic Risk Score for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study in Thailand

PURPOSE

This study aims to clarify the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in resectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and develop a predictive risk score for treatment selection.

METHODS

Patients with resected CCA undergoing curative surgery, with or without AC, were identified from three centers in Thailand. Patients with R2 resection and 30 days postoperative death were excluded. Using the largest center as the discovery cohort, we generated propensity score matching (PSM). A predictive model for overall survival (OS) was identified, and a predictive risk score was developed from the PSM discovery cohort, classifying patients into high- and low-risk groups. The proposed risk score was validated in the other two centers.

RESULTS

In the discovery cohort, 493 patients were identified. After PSM, 328 patients were categorized into surgery (n = 164) and surgery + AC (n = 164) groups. The baseline characteristics in the PSM discovery cohort were well-balanced. In the validation cohort (n = 83), patients with positive lymph node 1 received AC more frequently than those under observation (47% v 18%; P = .02). A MINT pathologic risk score was developed from multivariate analysis for OS. The score includes margin, perineural invasion, pathologic nodal status, and pathologic tumor size. In the PSM discovery cohort, for the low-risk score group, the surgery group had significantly longer OS compared with the surgery + AC group (49.4 v 31.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.11 to 2.86]; P = .016). Conversely, for the high-risk score group, the surgery + AC group had better OS than the surgery group (18.8 v 8 months; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.79]; P < .001). The results were comparable in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with resected CCA with a high-risk MINT pathologic risk score were likely to benefit from AC, whereas those with a low-risk score were not. Further validation in a larger prospective cohort is warranted.

Clinical and Genomic Characterization of ERBB2-Altered Gallbladder Cancer: Exploring Differences Between an American and a Chilean Cohort

PURPOSE

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a biliary tract malignancy characterized by its high lethality. Although the incidence of GBC is low in most countries, specific areas such as Chile display a high incidence. Our collaborative study sought to compare clinical and molecular features of GBC cohorts from Chile and the United States with a focus on ERBB2 alterations.

METHODS

Patients were accrued at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) or the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC). Clinical information was retrieved from medical records. Genomic analysis was performed by the next-generation sequencing platform MSK-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients with GBC were included, 237 from MSK and 23 from PUC. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the patients identified at MSK and at PUC except in terms of lithiasis prevalence which was significantly higher in the PUC cohort (85% v 44%; P = .0003). The prevalence of ERBB2 alterations was comparable between the two cohorts (15% v 9%; P = .42). Overall, ERBB2 alterations were present in 14% of patients (8% with ERBB2 amplification, 4% ERBB2 mutation, 1.5% concurrent amplification and mutation, and 0.4% ERBB2 fusion). Notably, patients with GBC that harbored ERBB2 alterations had better overall survival (OS) versus their ERBB2-wild type counterparts (22.3 months v 11.8 months; P = .024).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of lithiasis seems to be higher in Chilean versus US patients with GBC. A similar prevalence of ERBB2 alterations of overall 14% and better OS suggests that a proportion of them could benefit from human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-targeted therapies. The smaller cohort of Chile, where the disease prevalence is higher, is a reminder and invitation for the need of more robust next-generation sequencing analyses globally.

Management of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Guidelines of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF)

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.

Evolving approaches in advanced gallbladder cancer with complete pathological response using chemo‑immunotherapy: A case report

The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) offers promising improvements in survival and response rates beyond traditional treatments. TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 have demonstrated the efficacy of combining immunotherapy (durvalumab and pembrolizumab) with chemotherapy, even in gallbladder cancer (GBC), with a complete response rate of 2.7% in the TOPAZ-1 trial. Advanced CCA treated with immunotherapy combinations has shown complete responses influenced by high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or Epstein-Barr virus expression. These responses were enhanced by combining radiotherapy with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. A 62-year-old man was diagnosed with unresectable GBC, distant lymphatic metastases, and local invasion of liver segments 4i and 5, the colonic hepatic flexure, the duodenal bulb, and the pancreatic head. Immunohistochemical examination revealed poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, without expression of PD-L1. Next generation sequencing revealed the mutation of ERBB2 R678Q and a microsatellite stable tumour. The patient started chemo-immunotherapy with cisplatin-gemcitabine plus durvalumab in June 2022. After eight cycles, a significant reduction in tumour volume and markers was reported, and therapy with durvalumab was maintained through November 2023. The subsequent computed tomography scans showed further reduction in the tumour volume, and surgical resection was performed. Histological examinations confirmed the absence of residual tumour or lymph node metastases. As of June 2024, the patient has shown no signs of disease recurrence. Several reports of conversion surgery in GBC exist, but data on pre-surgical chemo-immunotherapy are limited. Furthermore, a complete response without pathological confirmation in CCA and GBC raises several questions regarding the need for surgery after immunotherapy. Although effective disease control and tumour regression have been reported in advanced GBC with combined anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 and anti-PD-1 agents and chemotherapy, further studies are needed to identify reliable predictive biomarkers due to unclear associations with PD-L1 expression or tumour mutational burden. Overall, chemo-immunotherapy has been effective in treating metastatic CCA, especially when tailored to specific molecular profiles. These treatments may lead to complete responses and novel strategies.

Comparison of Machine Learning Models Using Diffusion-Weighted Images for Pathological Grade of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma

Is the radiomic approach, utilizing diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), capable of predicting the various pathological grades of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC)? Furthermore, which model demonstrates superior performance among the diverse algorithms currently available? The objective of our study is to develop DWI radiomic models based on different machine learning algorithms and identify the optimal prediction model. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the DWI data of 77 patients with IMCC confirmed by pathological testing. Fifty-seven patients initially included in the study were randomly assigned to either the training set or the validation set in a ratio of 7:3. We established four different classifier models, namely random forest (RF), support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), by manually contouring the region of interest and extracting prominent radiomic features. An external validation of the model was performed with the DWI data of 20 patients with IMCC who were subsequently included in the study. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), precision (PRE), sensitivity (REC), and F1 score were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. Following the process of feature selection, a total of nine features were retained, with skewness being the most crucial radiomic feature demonstrating the highest diagnostic performance, followed by Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix lmc1 (glcm-lmc1) and kurtosis, whose diagnostic performances were slightly inferior to skewness. Skewness and kurtosis showed a negative correlation with the pathological grading of IMCC, while glcm-lmc1 exhibited a positive correlation with the IMCC pathological grade. Compared with the other three models, the SVM radiomic model had the best diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.957, an accuracy of 88.2%, a sensitivity of 85.7%, a precision of 85.7%, and an F1 score of 85.7% in the training set, as well as an AUC of 0.829, an accuracy of 76.5%, a sensitivity of 71.4%, a precision of 71.4%, and an F1 score of 71.4% in the external validation set. The DWI-based radiomic model proved to be efficacious in predicting the pathological grade of IMCC. The model with the SVM classifier algorithm had the best prediction efficiency and robustness. Consequently, this SVM-based model can be further explored as an option for a non-invasive preoperative prediction method in clinical practice.

Phase I/II study of nivolumab plus lenvatinib for advanced biliary tract cancer (JCOG1808/NCCH1817, SNIPE)

BACKGROUND

Although cisplatin plus gemcitabine and other combinations have improved the survival of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), high unmet medical needs remain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus lenvatinib in the second-line treatment for advanced BTC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nivolumab (240 mg) was administered biweekly. Phase I determined the recommended phase II dose of lenvatinib (20 mg or 14 mg). In phase II, the primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The planned sample size was 32 patients with a power of 80%, a one-sided alpha error of 5%, threshold ORR of 10%, and expected ORR of 30%.

RESULTS

In phase I, the recommended dose of lenvatinib was determined to be 20 mg in six patients, with one dose-limiting toxicity (myocarditis). In phase II, we enrolled 26 patients. ORR, DCR, and median OS and PFS were 9.4% [90% confidence interval (CI) 2.6% to 22.5%], 53.1% (95% CI 34.7% to 70.9%), and 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-9.7 months) and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.5-4.1 months), respectively. No response was observed in patients with the usage of antibiotics. The grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypertension (59.4%) and biliary tract infection (37.5%). Rash (28.1%) and hypothyroidism (21.9%) were observed as immune-mediated adverse events of any grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab plus lenvatinib had a manageable safety in advanced BTC, but its efficacy in the second-line treatment was limited.

Clinical characteristics and influencing factors of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cardiac adverse event: based on FAERS and TCGA databases

Combining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases, we aim to explore the factors that influence anti-programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors/programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) related severe cardiac adverse events (cAEs). We obtained anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports from January 2014 to December 2022 from the FAERS database. Disproportionality analysis was performed to find anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related cAEs using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). We were exploring influencing factors based on multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, we utilized a strategy that combines FAERS and TCGA databases to explore the potential immune and genetic influencing factors associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. Reports of severe cAEs accounted for 7.10% of the overall anti-PD-1/PD-L1 adverse event reports in the FAERS database. Immune-mediated myocarditis (PRR = 77.01[59.77-99.23]) shows the strongest toxic signal. The elderly group (65-74: OR = 1.34[1.23-1.47], ≥ 75: OR = 1.64[1.49-1.81]), male (OR = 1.14[1.05-1.24]), anti-PD-L1 agents (OR = 1.17[1.03-1.33]), patients with other adverse events (OR = 2.38[2.17-2.60]), and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitor (OR = 1.29[1.17-1.43]), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 1.17[1.04-1.31]), or antibiotics (OR = 1.24[1.08-1.43]) may increase the risk of severe cAEs. In addition, PD-L1 mRNA (Rs = 0.71, FDR = 2.30 × 10- 3) and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 3 (LRP3) (Rs = 0.82, FDR = 2.17 × 10- 2) may be immune and genetic influencing factors for severe cAEs. Severe cAEs may be related to antigen receptor-mediated signalling pathways. In this study, we found that age, gender, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, concomitant other adverse events, concomitant medication, PD-L1 mRNA, and LRP3 may be influencing factors for anti-PD-1/PD-L1-related severe cAEs. However, our findings still require a large-scale prospective cohort validation.

A case report: deep and durable response to low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab in an elderly patient with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma lack systemic therapy standards. These people have a high risk of chemotherapy, accompanied by adverse reactions and even discontinuation of treatment.

Case presentation

We report a 78-year-old female subject with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting with unresectable lesions involving the hepatic veins, along with extensive metastatic lymph nodes. After the geriatric assessment, capecitabine was utilized for only one cycle owing to adverse events (AEs). Next, a combination of low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab was administrated as a second-line treatment, which resulted in remarkable early tumor shrinkage. The following individual lenvatinib taper enabled a manageable safety profile and durable deep response. A near-complete response was achieved, with the primary tumor significantly reducing from 5.6 cm × 4.7 cm to nearly complete disappearance, accompanied by complete regression of lymph nodes, and both progression-free survival and overall survival exceeding 24 months.

Conclusion

The case provides valuable insights that could influence future treatment strategies for older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who are unsuitable for chemotherapy. The dose-individualized chemotherapy-free regime of lenvatinib and tislelizumab might be used in similar cases to improve their outcomes.

Rethinking Immune Check Point Inhibitors Use in Liver Transplantation: Implications and Resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, including the two most common liver tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, but their use in the peri-transplantation period is controversial. ICI therapy aims to heighten cytotoxic T lymphocytes response against tumors. However, tumor recurrence is common owing to tumor immune response escape involving ablation of CTL response by interfering with antigen presentation, triggering CLT apoptosis and inducing epigenetic changes that promote ICI therapy resistance. ICI can also affect tissue resident memory T cell population, impact tolerance in the post-transplant period, and induce acute inflammation risking graft survival post-transplant. Their interaction with immunosuppression may be key in reducing tumor burden and may thus, require multimodal therapy to treat these tumors. This review summarizes ICI use in the liver transplantation period, their impact on tolerance and resistance, and new potential therapies for combination or sequential treatments for liver tumors.

Bevacizumab Erlotinib Switch Maintenance in Chemo-Responsive Advanced Gallbladder and Cholangiocarcinoma (BEER BTC): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Patients with chemotherapy-responsive advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are usually observed after 6 months of gemcitabine-based therapy. There is limited prospective evidence for maintenance strategies after chemotherapy.

METHODS

This investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized, integrated phase II-III study enrolled adult patients with advanced BTC from two cancer centers in India. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma who had at least disease stabilization after 6 months of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to either active surveillance or switch maintenance, which was a combination of bevacizumab 5 mg/kg intravenous once every 21 days plus erlotinib 100 mg once daily. Both arms were continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient decision to withdraw. The primary end point of the phase II component of the trial was investigator-evaluated progression-free survival. This trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/05/019323I).

RESULTS

From May 2021 to November 2022, 98 patients were randomly assigned to active surveillance (n = 49) or bevacizumab-erlotinib (n = 49). A majority of patients had gallbladder cancer (80%). The median follow-up was 13.4 months. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.47 to 3.64) in the active surveillance group versus 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.53 to 7.04) in the bevacizumab-erlotinib group (hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0·74]; P = .0013). The most common grade 3 class-specific adverse events associated with bevacizumab-erlotinib were acneiform rash 1 (2%) and oral stomatitis 1 (2%) with erlotinib and bleeding 1 (2%) with bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib as switch maintenance improves progression-free survival with an acceptable safety profile compared with active surveillance in patients with advanced BTCs in this phase II study. The trial moves on to the phase III component to evaluate improvement in overall survival.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Expressing Biliary Tract Cancer (HERB; NCCH1805): A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Treatment options for patients with unresectable or recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) who progress on a gemcitabine-containing regimen are limited. In addition, the significance of anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy in HER2-expressing BTC has not been sufficiently investigated.

METHODS

In this phase II trial, participants from five institutions in Japan were enrolled. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent BTC with centrally confirmed HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry [IHC]3+ or IHC2+ and in situ hybridization [ISH]+) or HER2-low (IHC2+ and ISH-, IHC1+, and IHC0 and ISH+) and were refractory or intolerant to a gemcitabine-containing regimen. The patients received 5.4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) once every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in HER2-positive BTC by an independent central review (threshold ORR, 15%; expected ORR, 40%).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were enrolled and treated. Among these patients, 22 with HER2-positive disease comprised the primary efficacy population and had a confirmed ORR of 36.4% (90% CI, 19.6 to 56.1; P = .01), meeting the primary end point. Eight with HER2-low disease comprised the exploratory population and had a confirmed ORR of 12.5%. The most common ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (53.1%) and neutropenia (31.3%). Eight patients (25.0%) had interstitial lung disease (ILD), including two grade 5 events.

CONCLUSION

T-DXd showed promising activity in patients with HER2-positive BTC and a signal of efficacy in patients with HER2-low BTC. Although the safety profile was generally manageable, ILD requires careful monitoring and early intervention.

Chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a single arm phase II trial

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, long-term prognosis and safety of combining chemotherapy with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC).

Methods

In this single arm phase II trial, twenty-nine patients with advanced BTC were included, all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line treatment. And the study analyzed anti-tumor efficacy, long-term prognosis, and adverse reactions.

Results

Among the patients, 0 patient achieved complete response, 18 patients (62.1%) achieved partial response, 8 patients (27.6%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10.3%) experienced progressive disease. The corresponding objective response rate (ORR) was 18/29 (62.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26/29 (89.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0 -21.8) and the median progress free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.8- 12.6). The 1-year OS and PFS were 65% (95% CI: 0.479-0.864) and 41% (95% CI: 0.234-0.656), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 27/29 (93.1%), and the incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions was 5/29 (17.2%).

Conclusion

The combination of chemotherapy, regorafenib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC may has good anti-tumor efficacy without causing serious adverse reactions, and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis.

Safety of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in biliary cancer patients with peritoneal metastases

Biliary tract cancers are a rare diagnosis with a rising incidence. Up to 20% of patients have peritoneal metastases, resulting in symptoms of ascites, abdominal pain and potential bowel obstruction. A standard of care systemic treatment comprises gemcitabine, cisplatin and durvalumab (gem/cis/durva). However, the clinical benefit among patients with peritoneal metastases remains unknown. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) delivers chemotherapy directly to the peritoneal space, which could potentially improve efficacy with minimal systemic toxicity. We describe the design of a Phase I study investigating PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel plus systemic gem/cis/durva among biliary tract cancer patients with peritoneal metastases who have not received prior systemic treatment. The primary end point is safety of PIPAC with nab-paclitaxel in combination with systemic gem/cis/durva.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05285358 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Updates on Endoscopic Stenting for Unresectable Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) can cause obstructive jaundice and/or cholangitis necessitating appropriate biliary drainage. Endoscopic biliary stenting is the first-choice treatment, especially in unresectable cases, owing to its minimally invasive nature and utility. However, the hilar region is complex because of the branching and curving of bile ducts, making strictures in this area more complicated. Therefore, MHBO stenting is challenging, and treatment strategies have yet to be established. Furthermore, recent advances in antitumor therapies have altered the background surrounding the development of stenting strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and grasp the current evidence well and to accumulate additional evidence reflecting the current situation. This study reviews the current status, issues, and prospects of endoscopic stenting for MHBO, especially in unresectable cases.

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin or Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase II Study of the AIO Hepatobiliary-YMO Cancer Groups (NIFE-AIO-YMO HEP-0315)

PURPOSE

First-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA.

METHODS

NIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon's optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

HSF1 is a prognostic determinant and therapeutic target in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a lethal primary liver tumor characterized by clinical aggressiveness, poor prognosis, and scarce therapeutic possibilities. Therefore, new treatments are urgently needed to render this disease curable. Since cumulating evidence supports the oncogenic properties of the Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1) transcription factor in various cancer types, we investigated its pathogenetic and therapeutic relevance in iCCA.

METHODS

Levels of HSF1 were evaluated in a vast collection of iCCA specimens. The effects of HSF1 inactivation on iCCA development in vivo were investigated using three established oncogene-driven iCCA mouse models. In addition, the impact of HSF1 suppression on tumor cells and tumor stroma was assessed in iCCA cell lines, human iCCA cancer-associated fibroblasts (hCAFs), and patient-derived organoids.

RESULTS

Human preinvasive, invasive, and metastatic iCCAs displayed widespread HSF1 upregulation, which was associated with a dismal prognosis of the patients. In addition, hydrodynamic injection of a dominant-negative form of HSF1 (HSF1dn), which suppresses HSF1 activity, significantly delayed cholangiocarcinogenesis in AKT/NICD, AKT/YAP, and AKT/TAZ mice. In iCCA cell lines, iCCA hCAFs, and patient-derived organoids, administration of the HSF1 inhibitor KRIBB-11 significantly reduced proliferation and induced apoptosis. Cell death was profoundly augmented by concomitant administration of the Bcl-xL/Bcl2/Bcl-w inhibitor ABT-263. Furthermore, KRIBB-11 reduced mitochondrial bioenergetics and glycolysis of iCCA cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data underscore the critical pathogenetic, prognostic, and therapeutic role of HSF1 in cholangiocarcinogenesis.

Efficacy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary duct cancer and biomarkers exploration

BACKGROUND

The anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab has been approved for use in first-line advanced biliary duct cancer (ABC). So far, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are lacking.

METHODS

ABC patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without durvalumab were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline clinical pathological indices were retrieved from medical records. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed. The levels of peripheral biomarkers from 48 patients were detected with assay kits including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genomic alterations in 27 patients whose tumor tissues were available were depicted via targeted next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 186 ABC patients met the inclusion criteria between January 2020 and December 2022 were finally enrolled in this study. Of these, 93 patients received chemotherapy with durvalumab and the rest received chemotherapy alone. Durvalumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (6.77 vs. 4.99 months; hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88]; P = 0.005), but not OS (14.29 vs. 13.24 months; hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.62-1.32]; P = 0.608) vs. chemotherapy alone in previously untreated ABC patients. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving chemotherapy with and without durvalumab was 19.1% and 7.8%, respectively. Pretreatment sPD-L1, CSF1R and OPG were identified as significant prognosis predictors in patients receiving durvalumab. ADGRB3 and RNF43 mutations were enriched in patients who responded to chemotherapy plus durvalumab and correlated with superior survival.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective real-world study confirmed the clinical benefit of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve ABC patients. Peripheral sPD-L1 and CSF1R are promising prognostic biomarkers for this therapeutic strategy. Presence of ADGRB3 or RNF43 mutations could improve the stratification of immunotherapy outcomes, but further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 may be a potential better alternative option for advanced unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective real-world study

Background

Currently, the prognosis of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is poor, and the current treatment methods are not effective.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anticancer efficacy of chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with ICC.

Methods

We retrospectively screened patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) who received chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib and PD-1. We evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), the tumor shrinkage rate, and safety.

Results

We enrolled 95 patients with ICC and divided them into three groups with a median follow-up duration of 15.1 months. The chemotherapy group (chemo-regimen group), chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (dual-regimen group), and chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib (triple-regimen group) had median OS times of 13.1 months, 20.8 months, and 39.6 months, respectively. Notably, the triple-regimen group had a significantly longer OS than did the chemo-regimen and dual-regimen groups. The chemo-regimen group, dual-regimen group, and triple-regimen group reported median PFS durations of 4.8 months, 11.9 months, and 23.4 months, respectively. Both combination groups exhibited significantly longer PFS than the chemotherapy-only group (P<0.05). The ORRs of the chemo-regimen, dual-regimen, and triple-regimen groups were 18.2%, 55.5%, and 54.7%, respectively. The DCRs were 72.7%, 90%, and 96.2%, respectively, indicating significantly better outcomes in the combination therapy groups.

Conclusion

The combination of chemotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib demonstrates considerable efficacy and tolerability as a treatment strategy for patients with advanced ICC.

Facts and Hopes in the Systemic Therapy of Biliary Tract Carcinomas

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a heterogeneous group of cancers that continue to present a particularly poor prognosis. BTC treatment is rapidly evolving yet facing many challenges to improve patient outcomes and maximize benefit from treatment. Only a minority of patients are diagnosed with early-stage disease and are suitable for curative resection. Current surgical strategies are limited by a high relapse rate, and despite extensive efforts focused on adjuvant strategies, the development of more effective adjuvant strategies remains a challenge. In addition, the role of locoregional strategies, liver transplant, and neoadjuvant treatment remains unclear. Systemic treatment in the advanced setting is based on three main pillars: first, cytotoxic chemotherapy options; second, the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy; and third, targeted therapies. The role of targeted therapies is oriented by many promising targets, including IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 fusions, BRAF-V600E mutations, and HER2 amplifications. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current facts and future hopes in the management of BTC, including an overview of the unmet need, and particularly focus on systemic therapies.

Case Report of Concomitant Diagnosis of Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Solitary Plasmacytoma of T11 Vertebra: Impact on Diagnostic and Clinical Management

A solitary bone plasmacytoma is a rare tumor. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. We present the case of a 48-year-old female patient who consulted for recent back pain, with a final diagnosis of T10 solitary plasmacytoma and synchronous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Imaging suggested cholangiocarcinoma with bone metastasis. The patient underwent neurosurgical management with laminectomy, arthrodesis, and arthrectomy, with biopsies revealing monotypic kappa plasmacytic proliferation. Liver biopsies revealed an adenocarcinoma with expression of cytokeratin 19, cytokeratin 7, N-cadherin, and high expression of carbonic anydrase IX. The plasmacytoma was treated with external radiotherapy. The cholangiocarcinoma was treated with selective internal radiation therapy and concomitant systemic treatment with combinations of cisplatin and durvalumab, with capecitabine during radiotherapy, switched for gemcitabine after completion of irradiation. One year after initial management, imaging revealed a partial metabolic response of the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and a complete metabolic response of the plasmacytoma. This case illustrates the importance of not ignoring two primary tumors and the management of two concomitant treatments exploiting potential therapeutic synergies and limiting expected toxicities.

Targeted therapies in advanced biliary malignancies: a clinical review

INTRODUCTION

Despite several therapeutic advancements, the proportion of patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) surviving 5 years from diagnosis remains dismal. The increasing recognition of targetable genetic alterations in BTCs has ushered in a new era in the treatment of these patients. Newer therapeutic agents targeting mutations such as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), fibroblastic growth factor receptor (FGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER), and so on have established a new standard of care for treatment upon progression on frontline therapy in patients with disease harboring these mutations.

AREAS COVERED

The current review aims to concisely summarize progress with various targeted therapy options for BTC. We also briefly discuss future directions in clinical and translational research for the adoption of a personalized approach for the treatment of unresectable or advanced BTC.

EXPERT OPINION

Several new agents continue to emerge as feasible treatment options for patients with advanced BTC harboring targetable mutations. There is a growing need to identify mechanisms to conquer primary and acquired resistance to these agents. The identification of potential biomarkers that predict response to targeted therapy may be helpful in adopting a more tailored approach. All patients receiving treatment for advanced BTC should undergo tissue genomic profiling at diagnosis.

Which therapy in biliary tract cancer? Review of main concerns in diagnosis and choice of therapy in advanced setting, current standard, and new options

The incidence of biliary tract cancer is increasing in developed countries and is generating renewed interest in the scientific community due to the evidence of a high percentage (approximately 40%) of potentially targetable molecular alterations. However, to date, patient selection and the development of therapeutic approaches remain challenging due to the need for accurate diagnosis, adequate sampling, a specialized team for molecular analysis, centralization of patients in high-volume centers capable of supporting the high cost of these methods, and the feasibility of clinical studies on diseases with aggressive onset and poor prognosis. In this article, we would like to provide a detailed overview of the necessary tools for diagnostic framing and the various therapeutic scenarios being investigated concerning the most frequently detected molecular alterations.

Cardiogenic shock secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor associated myocarditis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment for multiple cancers and are increasingly used in recent years, but they can cause potentially life-threatening cardiac toxicity. We report a case of a 64-year-old gentleman who presented to the Emergency Department with symptoms of fatigue and breathlessness whilst receiving treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, for cholangiocarcinoma. He was found to be in cardiogenic shock with an abnormal electrocardiogram and elevated cardiac troponin at presentation. Echocardiogram demonstrated severely impaired right and left ventricular function. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography and invasive coronary angiography excluded pulmonary embolism and acute myocardial infarction, respectively, and he was diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor associated myocarditis. He was treated with high-dose methylprednisolone and a dobutamine infusion. Within days, his troponin and C-reactive protein levels decreased, and his left ventricular function improved. He was established on heart failure therapies and discharged from hospital 12 days later.

Head and neck cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a highly aggressive type of tumor characterized by delayed diagnosis, recurrence, metastasis, relapse, and drug resistance. The occurrence of HNC were associated with smoking, alcohol abuse (or both), human papillomavirus infection, and complex genetic and epigenetic predisposition. Currently, surgery and radiotherapy are the standard treatments for most patients with early-stage HNC. For recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNC, the first-line treatment is platinum-based chemotherapy combined with the antiepidermal growth factor receptor drug cetuximab, when resurgery and radiation therapy are not an option. However, curing HNC remains challenging, especially in cases with metastasis. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis of HNC, including genetic and epigenetic changes, abnormal signaling pathways, and immune regulation mechanisms, along with all potential therapeutic strategies such as molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, epigenetic modifications, and combination therapies. Recent preclinical and clinical studies that may offer therapeutic strategies for future research on HNC are also discussed. Additionally, new targets and treatment methods, including antibody-drug conjugates, photodynamic therapy, radionuclide therapy, and mRNA vaccines, have shown promising results in clinical trials, offering new prospects for the treatment of HNC.

Intra-arterial locoregional therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the 2nd most common primary liver malignancy. For nonsurgical candidates, the primary treatment option is systemic chemotherapy, which can be combined with locoregional therapies to enhance local control. Common intra-arterial locoregional therapies include transarterial hepatic embolization, conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 microspheres, and hepatic artery infusion. This article aims to review the latest literature on intra-arterial locoregional therapies for treating ICC.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed using keywords: intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, intra-arterial locoregional therapy, embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, hepatic artery infusion, and immunotherapy. Articles from 2008 to 2024 were reviewed. Survival data from retrospective and prospective studies, meta-analyses, and clinical trials were evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Although no level I evidence supports the superiority of any specific intra-arterial therapy, there has been a shift toward favoring radioembolization. In our expert opinion, radioembolization may offer superior outcomes when performed by skilled operators with meticulous planning and personalized dosimetry, particularly for radiation segmentectomy or treating lobar/bilobar disease in appropriate candidates.

Anatomical classification of advanced biliary tract cancer predicts programmed cell death protein 1 blockade efficacy

Background

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based immunotherapy has inspired new hope for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) treatment; however, there are no prior studies that primarily focus on different anatomical types of unresectable BTCs reacting differently to ICB.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data on advanced BTC patients who received anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD1) therapy from two affiliated hospitals of Sun Yat-Sen university. The effects of anti-PD1 were compared for different anatomical sites. The GSE32225 and GSE132305 datasets were used to further analyze differences in the immune microenvironments between intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC).

Results

A total of 198 advanced BTC patients were enrolled in this study, comprising 142 patients with ICC and 56 with other cancer types ("Others" group), including ECC and gallbladder cancer. In the anti-PD1 treated patients, the ICC group (n = 90) achieved longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.5 vs. 6.2 months, p = 0.02) and median overall survival (mOS) (15.1 vs. 10.7 months, p = 0.02) than the Others group (n = 26). However, chemotherapy did not show different effects between the two groups (mOS: 10.6 vs. 12.1 months, p = 0.20; mPFS: 4.9 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.83). For the first-line anti-PD1 therapy, the ICC group (n = 70) achieved higher mOS (16.0 vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.04) than the Others group (n = 19). Moreover, most chemokines, chemokine receptors, major histocompatibility complex molecules, immunostimulators, and immunoinhibitors were stronger in ICC than ECC; furthermore, CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages were higher in ICC than ECC for most algorithms. The immune differential genes were mainly enriched in antigen processing and presentation as well as the cytokine receptors.

Conclusions

This study shows that the efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy was higher in ICC than in other types of BTCs. Differences in the immune-related molecules and cells between ICC and ECC indicate that ICC could benefit more from immunotherapy.

Management of distal cholangiocarcinoma with arterial involvement: Systematic review and case series on the role of neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) with regional arterial or extensive venous involvement, is not widely accepted and evidence is sparse.

AIM

To synthesise evidence on NAT for dCCA and present the experience of a high-volume tertiary-centre managing dCCA with arterial involvement.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidance to identify all studies reporting outcomes of patients with dCCA who received NAT. All patients from 2017 to 2022 who were referred for NAT for dCCA at our centre were retrospectively collected from a prospectively maintained database. Baseline characteristics, NAT type, progression to surgery and oncological outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. The definition of "unresectable" locally advanced dCCA was heterogenous. Four studies reported outcomes for 9 patients who received NAT for dCCA with extensive vascular involvement. R0 resection rate ranged between 0 and 100% but without survival benefit in most cases. Remaining studies considered either NAT in resectable dCCA or inclusive with extrahepatic CCA. The presented case series includes 9 patients (median age 67, IQR 56-74 years, male:female 5:4) referred for NAT for borderline resectable or locally advanced disease. Three patients progressed to surgery and 2 were resected. One patient died at 14 months with evidence of recurrence at 6 months and the other died at 51 months following recurrence 6 months post-operatively.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for benefit of NAT is limited. Consensus on criteria for uniform definition of resectability for dCCA is required. We propose using the established National-Comprehensive-Cancer-Network® criteria for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Real-world treatment patterns, resource utilization and costs in biliary tract cancers in the USA

Aim: To evaluate real-world treatment patterns, survival and healthcare-resource utilization in US patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) receiving systemic therapy.Patients & methods: This study used claims data from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) linked to clinical data from the Cancer Care Quality Program (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2020).Results: Of 413 patients, 84.5% received gemcitabine-based first-line (1L) treatment, 46% received second-line treatment, and 16.5% received third-line (3L) treatment. All-cause mortality was 53% and approximately 70% of patients had ≥1 inpatient visit. The total mean per-patient-per-month all-cause costs were $19,589 for 1L and $33,534 for 3L treatment.Conclusion: Results showed poor survival, significant resource use and high costs as treatment line progresses for patients with advanced BTC.

FDA Approval Summary: Durvalumab and Pembrolizumab, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer

On September 2, 2022, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved durvalumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC). On October 31, 2023, the FDA approved pembrolizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine for the same indication. Approvals were based on two randomized, multiregional, placebo-controlled trials that randomly allocated patients to receive durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966) in combination with chemotherapy or placebo in combination with chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in both studies. In both studies, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS was demonstrated. In the TOPAZ-1 trial, the median OS of patients receiving durvalumab was 12.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.1-14.0] and 11.5 months (95% CI, 10.1-12.5) in patients receiving placebo [hazard ratio (HR), 0.80 (95% CI, 0.66-0.97)]. In the KEYNOTE-966 trial, the median OS of patients receiving pembrolizumab was 12.7 months (95% CI, 11.5-13.6) and 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.9-11.6) in patients receiving placebo [HR, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95)]. The addition of checkpoint inhibitors to standard of care chemotherapy for this indication did not reveal any new adverse event signals, and the safety profile was generally consistent with the known clinical experience with durvalumab, pembrolizumab, and the backbone chemotherapy regimen. The approvals of durvalumab and pembrolizumab in combination with standard of care cisplatin and gemcitabine for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic BTC add two new therapeutic options for these patients.

Nivolumab with or without Ipilimumab Combined with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of nivolumab with/without ipilimumab combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with pretreated metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a phase 2 randomized trial with Simon's optimal two-stage design requiring 36 evaluable patients per group after second stage. Sixty-one patients were included from September 2018 to January 2022 and randomized (1:1) to receive SBRT (15 Gy × 1 on day 1 to a primary or metastatic lesion) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 2 weeks) with/without ipilimumab (1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 and every 6 weeks). Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease. Decision to continue accrual into the second stage depended on the CBR from the first stage.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab with a CBR of 31.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.6-47.1]. Five patients (11.9%) achieved partial response with median duration of 4.4 months (range, 1.1-21.5). Nineteen patients received SBRT/nivolumab. This group was closed after the initial stage based on a CBR of 10.5% (95% CI, 1.3-33.1). Adverse events were graded with National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 13 (31%) and 3 (16%) patients in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab and SBRT/nivolumab groups, respectively. One patient died from immune-related hepatitis in the SBRT/nivolumab/ipilimumab group.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining SBRT, nivolumab, and ipilimumab is well tolerated, feasible, and shows response in a subgroup of patients with mBTC.

Emerging biomarkers for immunotherapy response in biliary tract cancers: a comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitor strategies

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have rising incidence and mortality rates. Chemotherapy's limited efficacy has led to exploring new treatments like immunotherapy. which offers modest benefits. Moreover, the identification of reliable predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint therapy in BTCs remains elusive, hindering personalized treatment strategies. This review provides an overview of the current landscape of emerging biomarkers for immunotherapy response in BTCs. We discuss the incremental benefits of combination therapy and the evolving role of immunotherapy in managing advanced BTC. Additionally, we highlight the need for robust predictive biomarkers to optimize treatment outcomes and foster a more individualized approach to patient care. We aim to identify promising research avenues and strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy and patient survival in BTCs.

Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer in China and the US

Background: Pembrolizumab is a potentially valuable treatment. However, patients, doctors, and healthcare decision-makers are uncertain about its cost-effectiveness and an appropriate pricing for this new therapy. This study aims to appraise the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients in China and the United States (US). Methods: A Markov model was constructed from the perspectives of healthcare systems in both China and the US for pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Patient baseline characteristics and key clinical data were sourced from the KEYNOTE-966 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636). Costs and utilities were collected from drug cost websites and published literature. Cumulative costs (in USD), life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured and compared. Price simulations were conducted under given willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds to provide pricing scheme references. The model's robustness was analyzed through one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results: Basic data analysis illustrates that pembrolizumab ($2662.41/100 mg) in combination with chemotherapy regimen was not cost-effective relative to chemotherapy regimens at the WTP threshold of $38,201.19 in China, and the additional cost relative to chemotherapy regimens was $77,114.94 (ICER $556,689.47/QALY) while increasing 0.14 QALYs. Pembrolizumab ($54.71/1 mg) also increased efficacy by 0.14 QALYs in the US, but remained also not cost-effective at the US WTP threshold of $229,044, and the total cost increased by $160,425.24 (ICER $1,109,462.92/QALY). Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy reduces the disease of burden. However, at its current price, it may not be a cost-effective treatment for advanced BTC in both China and the US. This study can aid decision-makers in making optimal choices.

Strategies for treating the cold tumors of cholangiocarcinoma: core concepts and future directions

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare type of digestive tract cancer originating from the epithelial cells of the liver and biliary tract. Current treatment modalities for CCA, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, have demonstrated limited efficacy in enhancing survival rates. Despite the revolutionary potential of immunotherapy in cancer management, its application in CCA remains restricted due to the minimal infiltration of immune cells in these tumors, rendering them cold and unresponsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Cancer cells within cold tumors deploy various mechanisms for evading immune attack, thus impeding clinical management. Recently, combination immunotherapy has become increasingly essential to comprehend the mechanisms underlying cold tumors to enhance a deficient antitumor immune response. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the knowledge on the combination immunotherapy of cold CCA is imperative to leverage the benefits of immunotherapy in treating patients. Moreover, gut microbiota plays an essential role in the immunotherapeutic responses in CCA. In this review, we summarize the current concepts of immunotherapy in CCA and clarify the intricate dynamics within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of CCA. We also delve into the evasion mechanisms employed by CCA tumors against the anti-tumor immune responses. The context of combination immunotherapies in igniting cold tumors of CCA and the critical function of gut microbiota in prompting immune responses have also been annotated. Furthermore, we have proposed future directions in the realm of CCA immunotherapy, aiming to improve the clinical prognosis of CCA patients.

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers: An open-label, non-randomized, phase II clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options.

AIM

To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs.

METHODS

This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented.

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.

Deleterious alterations in homologous recombination repair genes and efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard first-line treatment for biliary tract cancers (BTC). Deficits in genes involved in the homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) may confer higher sensitivity to platinum agents.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients affected by BTC from 2 Italian institutions. Inclusion criteria consist of the receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and the availability of comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients were included in the HRD-like group if demonstrated oncogenic or likely oncogenic alterations in HR-/DDR-genes. Clinical endpoints were compared between the HRD-like group and the non-HRD-like group.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included, of whom 25 (33%) in the HRD-like group and 49 (66%) in the non-HRD group. With a median follow-up of 26.04 months (interquartile-range [IQR] 9.41-29.27) in the HRD-like group and of 22.48 months (IQR 16.86-40.53) in the non-HRD group, no PFS difference emerged, with a mPFS of 5.18 months in the HRD-like group compared to 6.04 months in the non-HRD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017, 95% CI 0.58-1.78; P = .95). No differences were observed in DCR (64% [95 CI 45%-83%] vs 73% [95 CI 61%-86%]; P = .4), and CBR (45% [95% CI 28%-73%] vs 50% [95% CI, 37%-68%]; P = .9) between the HRD-like group and non-HRD groups, respectively. Median OS did not statistically differ between the HRD-like group and non-HRD group (26.7 vs 18.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.670, 0.33 to 1.37, P = .27).

CONCLUSION

HR-/DDR-genes, when assessed with regular tumor-only NGS panels, provide limited clinical validity to identify patients with BTC more likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy.

Targeting Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) in Solid Tumors: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

The isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) enzymes are involved in key metabolic processes in human cells, regulating differentiation, proliferation, and oxidative damage response. IDH mutations have been associated with tumor development and progression in various solid tumors such as glioma, cholangiocarcinoma, chondrosarcoma, and other tumor types and have become crucial markers in molecular classification and prognostic assessment. The intratumoral and serum levels of D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG) could serve as diagnostic biomarkers for identifying IDH mutant (IDHmut) tumors. As a result, an increasing number of clinical trials are evaluating targeted treatments for IDH1/IDH2 mutations. Recent studies have shown that the focus of these new therapeutic strategies is not only the neomorphic activity of the IDHmut enzymes but also the epigenetic shift induced by IDH mutations and the potential role of combination treatments. Here, we provide an overview of the current knowledge about IDH mutations in solid tumors, with a particular focus on available IDH-targeted treatments and emerging results from clinical trials aiming to explore IDHmut tumor-specific features and to identify the clinical benefit of IDH-targeted therapies and their combination strategies. An insight into future perspectives and the emerging roles of circulating biomarkers and radiomic features is also included.

Nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies (AIO NALIRICC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet need for effective therapies in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of nanoliposomal irinotecan and fluorouracil plus leucovorin compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin as second-line treatment for biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

NALIRICC was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done in 17 German centres for patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, metastatic biliary tract cancer, and progression on gemcitabine-based therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous infusions of nanoliposomal irinotecan (70 mg/m2), fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2), and leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (nanoliposomal irinotecan group) or fluorouracil (2400 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (400 mg/m2) every 2 weeks (control group). Randomisation was by permutated block randomisation in block sizes of four, stratified by primary tumour site. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival was the primary endpoint, which was evaluated in all randomly assigned patients. Secondary efficacy outcomes were overall survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Enrolment for this trial has been completed, and it is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03043547.

FINDING

Between Dec 4, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 49 patients were randomly assigned to the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 51 patients to the control group. Median age was 65 years (IQR 59-71); 45 (45%) of 100 patients were female. Median progression-free survival was 2·6 months (95% CI 1·7-3·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 2·3 months (1·6-3·4) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·87 [0·56-1·35]). Median overall survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 5·3-10·6) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 8·2 months (5·4-11·9) in the control group (HR 1·08 [0·68-1·72]). The objective response rate was 14% (95% CI 6-27; seven patients) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 4% (1-14; two patients) in the control group. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group were neutropenia (eight [17%] of 48 vs none in the control group), diarrhoea (seven [15%] vs one [2%]), and nausea (four [8%] vs none). In the control group, the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were cholangitis (four [8%] patients vs none in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group) and bile duct stenosis (four [8%] vs three [6%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 16 (33%) patients in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group (grade 2-3 diarrhoea in five patients; one case each of abdominal infection, acute kidney injury, pancytopenia, increased blood bilirubin, colitis, dehydration, dyspnoea, infectious enterocolitis, ileus, oral mucositis, and nausea). One (2%) treatment-related serious adverse event occurred in the control group (worsening of general condition). Median duration until deterioration of global health status, characterised by the time from randomisation to the initial observation of a score decline exceeding 10 points, was 4·0 months (95% CI 2·2-not reached) in the nanoliposomal irinotecan group and 3·7 months (2·7-not reached) in the control group.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of nanoliposomal irinotecan to fluorouracil plus leucovorin did not improve progression-free survival or overall survival and was associated with higher toxicity compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. Further research is necessary to define the role of irinotecan-based combinations in second-line treatment of biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

Servier and AIO-Studien.

Durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1): updated overall survival from a randomised phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

In the preplanned interim analysis of the TOPAZ-1 study, durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin significantly improved overall survival versus placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer. We aimed to report updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1 with additional follow-up and data maturity beyond the interim analysis.

METHODS

TOPAZ-1 was a phase 3, randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, global study done at 105 sites in 17 countries. Participants aged 18 years or older with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin using a computer-generated randomisation scheme, stratified by disease status and primary tumour location. Participants received durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo on day 1 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles, followed by durvalumab (1500 mg) or placebo monotherapy every 4 weeks until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Investigators and participants were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. TOPAZ-1 met its primary endpoint at the preplanned interim analysis, and the study is active but no longer recruiting participants. Updated overall survival and safety data from TOPAZ-1, with additional follow-up (data cutoff Feb 25, 2022) and data maturity beyond the interim analysis, are reported here. Efficacy was assessed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set (all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment). The TOPAZ-1 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03875235.

FINDINGS

From April 16, 2019, to Dec 11, 2020, 914 participants were enrolled, 685 of whom were randomly assigned (341 to the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 344 to the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group). 345 (50%) participants were male and 340 (50%) were female. Median follow-up at the updated data cutoff was 23·4 months (95% CI 20·6-25·2) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 22·4 months (21·4-23·8) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. At the updated data cutoff, 248 (73%) participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 279 (81%) participants in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group had died (median overall survival 12·9 months [95% CI 11·6-14·1] vs 11·3 months [10·1-12·5]; hazard ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·91]). Kaplan-Meier-estimated 24-month overall survival rates were 23·6% (95% CI 18·7-28·9) in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 11·5% (7·6-16·2) in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. Maximum grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 250 (74%) of 338 participants in the durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group and 257 (75%) of 342 in the placebo plus gemcitabine-cisplatin group. The most common maximum grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (70 [21%] vs 86 [25%]), anaemia (64 [19%] vs 64 [19%]), and neutropenia (63 [19%] vs 68 [20%]).

INTERPRETATION

Durvalumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed robust and sustained overall survival benefit with no new safety signals. Findings continue to support the regimen as a standard of care for people with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy-Related Lymphopenia Is Associated With Worse Survival in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of radiotherapy (RT)-related lymphopenia, its predictors, and association with survival in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with hypofractionated-RT (HF-RT).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 96 patients with unresectable ICC who underwent HF-RT (median 58.05 Gy in 15 fractions) between 2009 and 2022 was performed. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadir within 12 weeks of RT was analyzed. Primary variable of interest was severe lymphopenia, defined as Grade 3+ (ALC <0.5 k/μL) per CTCAE v5.0. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival (OS) from RT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 16 months. Fifty-two percent of patients had chemotherapy pre-RT, 23% during RT, and 40% post-RT. Pre-RT, median ALC was 1.1 k/μL and 5% had severe lymphopenia. Post-RT, 68% developed RT-related severe lymphopenia. Patients who developed severe lymphopenia had a significantly lower pre-RT ALC (median 1.1 vs. 1.5 k/μL, P =0.01) and larger target tumor volume (median 125 vs. 62 cm 3 , P =0.02). In our multivariable Cox model, severe lymphopenia was associated with a 1.7-fold increased risk of death ( P =0.04); 1-year OS rates were 63% vs 77% ( P =0.03). Receipt of photon versus proton-based RT (OR=3.50, P =0.02), higher mean liver dose (OR=1.19, P <0.01), and longer RT duration (OR=1.49, P =0.02) predicted severe lymphopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

HF-RT-related lymphopenia is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with unresectable ICC. Patients with lower baseline ALC and larger tumor volume may be at increased risk, and use of proton therapy, minimizing mean liver dose, and avoiding treatment breaks may reduce RT-related lymphopenia.

Conversion surgery intervention versus continued systemic therapy in patients with a response after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapy for initially unresectable biliary tract cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of conversion surgery in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer who responded positively to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapy remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the outcomes in patients with or without conversion surgery.

METHODS

In this cohort study, patients with advanced biliary tract cancer who received combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from July 2019 to January 2023 were retrospectively. Patients who exhibited positive responses and met the criteria for conversion surgery were enrolled, and their surgical and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 475 patients, 34 who met the conversion resection criteria were enrolled. The median follow-up was 40.5 months postinitiation of systemic therapy. Ultimately, 13 patients underwent conversion surgery, while 21 received continuation of systemic treatment alone (nonsurgical group). The median interval from the initial antitumor therapy to surgery was 6.7 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.9-9.2] months. Survival with conversion surgery was significantly longer than the nonsurgical cohort, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) [unreached vs. 12.4 months; hazard ratio 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.48); P =0.001] and overall survival (OS) [unreached vs. 22.4 months; hazard ratio 0.28 (95% CI: 0.09-0.84); P =0.02], respectively. After a median postoperative follow-up of 32.2 months in the surgical cohort, eight patients survived without recurrence. The estimated 3-year OS, PFS, and recurrence-free survival rate in the surgical cohort were 59.9, 59.2, and 60.6%, respectively. The R0 resection rate reached 92.3%, with two achieving a pathological complete response. One patient experienced a Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complication without surgery-related mortality. No serious adverse events or surgical delays were observed. Multivariate analysis indicated that conversion surgery was independently associated with OS ( P =0.03) and PFS survival ( P =0.003).

CONCLUSION

Conversion surgery appears safe and offers survival benefits to patients responding to immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations. However, further studies are required to validate this strategy in the era of immunotherapy.