201
|
Spies CD, Krampe H, Paul N, Denke C, Kiselev J, Piper SK, Kruppa J, Grunow JJ, Steinecke K, Gülmez T, Scholtz K, Rosseau S, Hartog C, Busse R, Caumanns J, Marschall U, Gersch M, Apfelbacher C, Weber-Carstens S, Weiss B. Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings - Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test. J Intensive Care Soc 2020; 22:159-174. [PMID: 34025756 DOI: 10.1177/1751143720923597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is no consensus on the instruments for diagnosis of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). We present a proposal for a set of outcome measurement instruments of PICS in outpatient care. Methods We conducted a three-round, semi-structured consensus-seeking process with medical experts, followed each by exploratory feasibility investigations with intensive care unit survivors (n1 = 5; n2 = 5; n3 = 7). Fourteen participants from nine stakeholder groups participated in the first and second consensus meeting. In the third consensus meeting, a core group of six clinical researchers refined the final outcome measurement instrument set proposal. Results We suggest an outcome measurement instrument set used in a two-step process. First step: Screening with brief tests covering PICS domains of (1) mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4)), (2) cognition (MiniCog, Animal Naming), (3) physical function (Timed Up-and-Go (TUG), handgrip strength), and (4) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (EQ-5D-5L). Single items measure subjective health before and after the intensive care unit stay. If patients report new or worsened health problems after intensive care unit discharge and show relevant impairment in at least one of the screening tests, a second extended assessment follows: (1) Mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R)); (2) cognition (Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Trail Making Test (TMT) A and B); (3) physical function (2-Minute Walk Test (2-MWT), handgrip strength, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)); and (4) HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L, 12-Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)). Conclusions We propose an outcome measurement instrument set used in a two-step measurement of PICS, combining performance-based and patient-reported outcome measures. First-step screening is brief, free-of-charge, and easily applicable by health care professionals across different sectors. If indicated, specialized healthcare providers can perform the extended, second-step assessment. Usage of the first-step screening of our suggested outcome measurement instrument set in outpatient clinics with subsequent transfer to specialists is recommended for all intensive care unit survivors. This may increase awareness and reduce the burden of PICS. Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04175236; first posted 22 November 2019).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia D Spies
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Henning Krampe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolas Paul
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia Denke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörn Kiselev
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sophie K Piper
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen Kruppa
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius J Grunow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Karin Steinecke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tuba Gülmez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathrin Scholtz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Rosseau
- Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Pneumologisches Beatmungszentrum, Bad Belzig, Germany
| | - Christiane Hartog
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Klinik Bavaria, Kreischa, Germany
| | - Reinhard Busse
- Department for Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Caumanns
- Innovation Center Telehealth Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems (FOKUS), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Gersch
- Department of Information Systems, School of Business & Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Apfelbacher
- Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.,Institute of Social Medicine and Health Economics, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Steffen Weber-Carstens
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Björn Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Our objective was to obtain international consensus on a set of core outcome measures that should be recorded in all clinical trials of interventions intended to modify the duration of ventilation for invasively mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU.
Collapse
|
203
|
Jones JRA, Berney S, Berry MJ, Files DC, Griffith DM, McDonald LA, Morris PE, Moss M, Nordon-Craft A, Walsh T, Gordon I, Karahalios A, Puthucheary Z, Denehy L. Response to physical rehabilitation and recovery trajectories following critical illness: individual participant data meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035613. [PMID: 32371516 PMCID: PMC7223158 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of inconclusive physical rehabilitation randomised controlled trials for patients with critical illness is increasing. Evidence suggests critical illness patient subgroups may exist that benefit from targeted physical rehabilitation interventions that could improve their recovery trajectory. We aim to identify critical illness patient subgroups that respond to physical rehabilitation and map recovery trajectories according to physical function and quality of life outcomes. Additionally, the utilisation of healthcare resources will be examined for subgroups identified. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is an individual participant data meta-analysis protocol. A systematic literature review was conducted for randomised controlled trials that delivered additional physical rehabilitation for patients with critical illness during their acute hospital stay, assessed chronic disease burden, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months measuring performance-based physical function and health-related quality of life outcomes. From 2178 records retrieved in the systematic literature review, four eligible trials were identified by two independent reviewers. Principal investigators of eligible trials were invited to contribute their data to this individual participant data meta-analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed (Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials). Participant and trial characteristics, interventions and outcomes data of included studies will be summarised. Meta-analyses will entail a one-stage model, which will account for the heterogeneity across and the clustering between studies. Multiple imputation using chained equations will be used to account for the missing data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This individual participant data meta-analysis does not require ethical review as anonymised participant data will be used and no new data collected. Additionally, eligible trials were granted approval by institutional review boards or research ethics committees and informed consent was provided for participants. Data sharing agreements are in place permitting contribution of data. The study findings will be disseminated at conferences and through peer-reviewed publications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019152526.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer R A Jones
- Physiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue Berney
- Physiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J Berry
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - D Clark Files
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunologic Disease, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Wake Forest Critical Illness Injury and Recovery Research Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David M Griffith
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Luke A McDonald
- Physiotherapy Department, Division of Allied Health, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter E Morris
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Marc Moss
- Division of Pulmonary Sciences & Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amy Nordon-Craft
- Physical Therapy Program, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Timothy Walsh
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ian Gordon
- Statistical Consulting Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amalia Karahalios
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zudin Puthucheary
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Linda Denehy
- Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
Smith JM, Lee AC, Zeleznik H, Coffey Scott JP, Fatima A, Needham DM, Ohtake PJ. Home and Community-Based Physical Therapist Management of Adults With Post-Intensive Care Syndrome. Phys Ther 2020; 100:1062-1073. [PMID: 32280993 PMCID: PMC7188154 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
More than 4 million adults survive a stay in the intensive care unit each year, with many experiencing new or worsening physical disability, mental health problems, and/or cognitive impairments, known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Given the prevalence and magnitude of physical impairments after critical illness, many survivors, including those recovering from COVID-19, could benefit from physical therapist services after hospital discharge. However, due to the relatively recent recognition and characterization of PICS, there may be limited awareness and understanding of PICS among physical therapists practicing in home health care and community-based settings. This lack of awareness may lead to inappropriate and/or inadequate rehabilitation service provision. While this perspective article provides information relevant to all physical therapists, it is aimed toward those providing rehabilitation services outside of the acute and postacute inpatient settings. This article reports the prevalence and clinical presentation of PICS and provides recommendations for physical examination and outcomes measures, plan of care, and intervention strategies. The importance of providing patient and family education, coordinating community resources including referring to other health care team members, and community-based rehabilitation service options is emphasized. Finally, this perspective article discusses current challenges for optimizing outcomes for people with PICS and suggests future directions for research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James M Smith
- Physical Therapy Department, Utica College, 1600 Burrstone Road, Utica, NY 13502 (USA),Address all correspondence to Dr Smith at:
| | - Alan C Lee
- Department of Physical Therapy, Mount St Mary’s University, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hallie Zeleznik
- Centers for Rehab Services, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Arooj Fatima
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dale M Needham
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University
| | - Patricia J Ohtake
- Department of Rehabilitation Science, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Jackson Chornenki N, Liaw P, Bagshaw S, Burns K, Dodek P, English S, Fan E, Ferrari N, Fowler R, Fox-Robichaud A, Garland A, Green R, Hebert P, Kho M, Martin C, Maslove D, McDonald E, Menon K, Murthy S, Muscedere J, Scales D, Stelfox HT, Wang HT, Weiss M. Data initiatives supporting critical care research and quality improvement in Canada: an environmental scan and narrative review. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67:475-484. [PMID: 31970619 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01571-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Collection and analysis of health data are crucial to achieving high-quality clinical care, research, and quality improvement. This review explores existing hospital, regional, provincial and national data platforms in Canada to identify gaps and barriers, and recommend improvements for data science. SOURCE The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group undertook an environmental survey using list-identified names and keywords in PubMed and the grey literature, from the Canadian context. Findings were grouped into sections, corresponding to geography, purpose, and patient sub-group initiatives, using a narrative qualitative approach. Emerging themes, impressions, and recommendations towards improving data initiatives were generated. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS In Canada, the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database contains high-level clinical data on every adult and child discharged from acute care facilities; however, it does not contain data from Quebec, critical care-specific severity of illness risk-adjustment scores, physiologic data, or data pertaining to medication use. Provincially mandated critical care platforms in four provinces contain more granular data, and can be used to risk adjust and link to within-province data sets; however, no inter-provincial collaborative mechanism exists. There is very limited infrastructure to collect and link biological samples from critically ill patients nationally. Comprehensive international clinical data sets may inform future Canadian initiatives. CONCLUSION Clinical and biological data collection among critically ill patients in Canada is not sufficiently coordinated, and lags behind other jurisdictions. An integrated and inclusive critical care data platform is a key clinical and scientific priority in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Peter Dodek
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Eddy Fan
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicolay Ferrari
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Robert Fowler
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room D478, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Paul Hebert
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Weiss
- Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Rose L, Agar M, Burry L, Campbell N, Clarke M, Lee J, Marshall J, Siddiqi N, Page V. Reporting of Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Studies of Interventions to Prevent and/or Treat Delirium in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e316-e324. [PMID: 32205622 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To inform development of a core outcome set, we evaluated the scope and variability of outcomes, definitions, measures, and measurement time-points in published clinical trials of pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic interventions, including quality improvement projects, to prevent and/or treat delirium in the critically ill. DATA SOURCES We searched electronic databases, systematic review repositories, and trial registries (1980 to March 2019). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION We included randomized, quasi-randomized, and nonrandomized intervention studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. We extracted data on study characteristics, verbatim descriptions of study outcomes, and measurement characteristics. We assessed quality of outcome reporting using the Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate study scoring system; risk of bias and study quality using the Cochrane tool and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. We categorized reported outcomes using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. DATA SYNTHESIS From 195 studies (1/195 pediatric) recruiting 74,632 participants and reporting a mean (SD) of 10 (6.2) outcome domains, we identified 12 delirium-specific outcome domains. Delirium incidence (147, 75% of studies), duration (67, 34%), and antipsychotic use (42, 22%) were most commonly reported. We identified a further 94 non-delirium-specific outcome domains within 19 Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy categories. For both delirium-specific and nonspecific outcome domains, we found multiple outcomes in domains due to differing descriptions and time-points. The Confusion Assessment Method-ICU with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to assess sedation was the most common measure used to ascertain delirium (51, 35%). Measurement generally began at randomization or ICU admission, and lasted from 1 to 30 days, ICU/hospital discharge. Frequency of measurement was highly variable with daily measurement and greater than daily measurement reported for 36% and 37% of studies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We identified substantial heterogeneity and multiplicity of outcome selection and measurement in published studies. These data will inform the consensus building stage of a core outcome set to inform delirium research in the critically ill.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Rose
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Burry
- Department of Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Noll Campbell
- College of Pharmacy, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Mike Clarke
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Jacques Lee
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - John Marshall
- St Michael's Hospital and Li Ka Shing Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- School of Medicine, York University, York, United Kingdom
| | - Valerie Page
- Intensive Care Unit, Watford General Hospital, Watford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Oxland P, Foster N, Fiest KM, Skrobik Y. Engaging Patients and Families to Help Research Inform and Advance Patient and Family-Centered Care in Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2020; 32:211-226. [PMID: 32402317 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnc.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Intensive care unit (ICU) patient, and family member engagement is evolving in both critical care medicine practice and research. The results of two qualitative critical care research projects led by ICU survivors and family members show how patient-partner research training can inform the critical care community of meaningful priorities in the traumatic ICU context. The resulting creation of a prioritized list of critical care research topics builds further on the construct of patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Oxland
- Alberta Health Services, Critical Care, Patient & Community Engagement Researcher (PaCER), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary T2N5A1, Canada
| | - Nadine Foster
- Alberta Health Services, Critical Care, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary T2N5A1, Canada. https://twitter.com/nkwfoster
| | - Kirsten M Fiest
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary T2N5A1, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary T2N5A1, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive Northwest, Calgary T2N5A1, Canada.
| | - Yoanna Skrobik
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Room D6.237, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada. https://twitter.com/YoannaSkrobik
| |
Collapse
|
208
|
Survivor But Not Fully Recovered: The Lived Experience After 1 Year of Surviving Sepsis. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2020; 38:317-327. [PMID: 31593071 DOI: 10.1097/dcc.0000000000000381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital mortality rates related to sepsis have decreased over the last decade, increasing the number of survivors of sepsis who may experience long-term consequences. Yet, little is known about how they perceive their illness experience and its aftermath. OBJECTIVE This study explores the experiences of sepsis survivors after 1 year of their index intensive care unit (ICU) stay. METHODS This phenomenological study was guided by Merleau-Ponty's philosophy. Participants were adult patients admitted directly to the medical ICU with sepsis who had an ICU stay of at least 48 hours and had been discharged from their index ICU stay for at least 1 year. Participants were invited by letter to participate in face-to-face or telephone interviews and a brief survey. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and verified. An interpretive group read transcripts aloud to increase rigor of identifying meaning units, existential grounds, and thematic structure. RESULTS Eight participants were recruited over 20 months. Participants were primarily white (87.5%) females (75%) with an age range of 37 to 74 years who were interviewed between 1 and 2 years following an index sepsis ICU stay. Five major themes emerged from the transcripts: (1) how they survived, (2) blurring of time versus counting time by events, (3) helpful help versus unhelpful help, (4) powerless versus striving for control, and (5) survivor but not fully recovered. DISCUSSION Findings reflected a long trajectory of chronic illness in which the index episode of sepsis was not necessarily what stood out as figural to participants. The meaning of participant experiences must be considered in the context of a health care system that offers little to no systematic follow-up care after sepsis and little prevention. Participants expressed a need for advocacy and follow-up support.
Collapse
|
209
|
Lamontagne F, Richards-Belle A, Thomas K, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, Camsooksai J, Darnell R, Gordon AC, Henry D, Hudson N, Mason AJ, Saull M, Whitman C, Young JD, Rowan KM, Mouncey PR. Effect of Reduced Exposure to Vasopressors on 90-Day Mortality in Older Critically Ill Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 323:938-949. [PMID: 32049269 PMCID: PMC7064880 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Importance Vasopressors are commonly administered to intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise blood pressure. Balancing risks and benefits of vasopressors is a challenge, particularly in older patients. Objective To determine whether reducing exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] target, 60-65 mm Hg) reduces mortality at 90 days in ICU patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension. Design, Setting, and Participants A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 65 ICUs in the United Kingdom and included 2600 randomized patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension (assessed by treating clinician). The study was conducted from July 2017 to March 2019, and follow-up was completed in August 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to vasopressors guided either by MAP target (60-65 mm Hg, permissive hypotension) (n = 1291) or according to usual care (at the discretion of treating clinicians) (n = 1307). Main Outcome and Measures The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days. Results Of 2600 randomized patients, after removal of those who declined or had withdrawn consent, 2463 (95%) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (mean [SD] age 75 years [7 years]; 1387 [57%] men). Patients randomized to the permissive hypotension group had lower exposure to vasopressors compared with those in the usual care group (median duration 33 hours vs 38 hours; difference in medians, -5.0; 95% CI, -7.8 to -2.2 hours; total dose in norepinephrine equivalents median, 17.7 mg vs 26.4 mg; difference in medians, -8.7 mg; 95% CI, -12.8 to -4.6 mg). At 90 days, 500 of 1221 (41.0%) in the permissive hypotension compared with 544 of 1242 (43.8%) in the usual care group had died (absolute risk difference, -2.85%; 95% CI, -6.75 to 1.05; P = .15) (unadjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03). When adjusted for prespecified baseline variables, the odds ratio for 90-day mortality was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98). Serious adverse events were reported for 79 patients (6.2%) in the permissive care group and 75 patients (5.8%) in the usual care group. The most common serious adverse events were acute renal failure (41 [3.2%] vs 33 [2.5%]) and supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (12 [0.9%] vs 13 [1.0%]). Conclusions and Relevance Among patients 65 years or older receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension, permissive hypotension compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality at 90 days. However, the confidence interval around the point estimate for the primary outcome should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of the study. Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN10580502.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Lamontagne
- Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alvin Richards-Belle
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Thomas
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Harrison
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - M. Zia Sadique
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard D. Grieve
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie Camsooksai
- Critical Care, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Darnell
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony C. Gordon
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary’s Hospital, Paddington, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nicholas Hudson
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexina J. Mason
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Saull
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - J. Duncan Young
- Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn M. Rowan
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul R. Mouncey
- Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Fink EL, Jarvis JM, Maddux AB, Pinto N, Galyean P, Olson LM, Zickmund S, Ringwood M, Sorenson S, Dean JM, Carcillo JA, Berg RA, Zuppa A, Pollack MM, Meert KL, Hall MW, Sapru A, McQuillen PS, Mourani PM, Watson RS. Development of a core outcome set for pediatric critical care outcomes research. Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 91:105968. [PMID: 32147572 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) teams provide care for critically ill children with diverse and often complex medical and surgical conditions. Researchers often lack guidance on an approach to select the best outcomes when evaluating this critically ill population. Studies would be enhanced by incorporating multi-stakeholder preferences to better evaluate clinical care. This manuscript outlines the methodology currently being used to develop a PICU Core Outcome Set (COS). This PICU COS utilizes mixed methods, an inclusive stakeholder approach, and a modified Delphi consensus process that will serve as a resource for PICU research programs. METHODS A Scoping Review of the PICU literature evaluating outcomes after pediatric critical illness, a qualitative study interviewing PICU survivors and their parents, and other relevant literature will serve to inform a modified, international Delphi consensus process. The Delphi process will derive a set of minimum domains for evaluation of outcomes of critically ill children and their families. Delphi respondents include researchers, multidisciplinary clinicians, families and former patients, research funding agencies, payors, and advocates. Consensus meetings will refine and finalize the domains of the COS, outline a battery instruments for use in future studies, and prepare for extensive dissemination for broad implementation. DISCUSSION The PICU COS will be a guideline resource for investigators to assure that outcomes most important to all stakeholders are considered in PICU clinical research in addition to those deemed most important to individual scientists. TRIAL REGISTRATION COMET database (http://www.comet-initiative.org/, Record ID 1131, 01/01/18).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ericka L Fink
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Faculty Pavilion, 2nd floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, United States of America.
| | - Jessica M Jarvis
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 910, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
| | - Aline B Maddux
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13121 E 17(th) Ave, MS 8414, Aurora, CO 80045, United States of America.
| | - Neethi Pinto
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, The University of Chicago, 5741 S. Maryland Ave. MC 1145, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America.
| | - Patrick Galyean
- Qualitative Research Core, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States of America.
| | - Lenora M Olson
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
| | - Susan Zickmund
- VA Health Services Research, VA Salt Lake City Medical Center, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States of America.
| | - Melissa Ringwood
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
| | - Samuel Sorenson
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
| | - J Michael Dean
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
| | - Joseph A Carcillo
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Avenue, Faculty Pavilion, 2nd floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, United States of America.
| | - Robert A Berg
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Athena Zuppa
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| | - Murray M Pollack
- Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
| | - Kathleen L Meert
- Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
| | - Mark W Hall
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
| | - Anil Sapru
- Mattel Children's Hospital, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Patrick S McQuillen
- Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
| | - Peter M Mourani
- Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Children's Hospital Colorado, 13121 E 17(th) Ave, MS 8414, Aurora, CO 80045, United States of America.
| | - R Scott Watson
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
211
|
Kjaer MBN, Meyhoff TS, Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Møller MH, Egerod I, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Cronhjort M, Laake JH, Jakob SM, Nalos M, Pettilä V, van der Horst ICC, Ostermann M, Mouncey P, Cecconi M, Ferrer R, Malbrain MLNG, Ahlstedt C, Hoffmann S, Bestle MH, Gyldensted L, Nebrich L, Russell L, Vang M, Sølling C, Brøchner AC, Rasmussen BS, Perner A. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: A protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64:410-416. [PMID: 31828753 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with septic shock, mortality is high, and survivors experience long-term physical, mental and social impairments. The ongoing Conservative vs Liberal Approach to fluid therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial assesses the benefits and harms of a restrictive vs standard-care intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. The hypothesis is that IV fluid restriction improves patient-important long-term outcomes. AIM To assess the predefined patient-important long-term outcomes in patients randomised into the CLASSIC trial. METHODS In this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will assess all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cognitive function 1 year after randomisation in the two intervention groups. The 1-year mortality will be collected from electronic patient records or central national registries in most participating countries. We will contact survivors and assess EuroQol 5-Dimension, -5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol score. We will analyse mortality by logistic regression and use general linear models to assess HRQoL and cognitive function. DISCUSSION With this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will provide patient-important data on long-term survival, HRQoL and cognitive function of restrictive vs standard-care IV fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maj-Brit N Kjaer
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine S Meyhoff
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin B Madsen
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter B Hjortrup
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Hylander Møller
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Egerod
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørn Wetterslev
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Theis Lange
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Cronhjort
- Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon H Laake
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephan M Jakob
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern (Inselspital), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marek Nalos
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, 1. Interni klinika, Fakultni Nemocnice, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Ville Pettilä
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, University Maastricht, Maastrict, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Intensive Care, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paul Mouncey
- Clinical Trial Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ricard Ferrer
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Jette, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Ahlstedt
- Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Søren Hoffmann
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten H Bestle
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Nebrich
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Lene Russell
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Vang
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Sølling
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Anne C Brøchner
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Bodil S Rasmussen
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Jubran A, Grant BJB, Duffner LA, Collins EG, Lanuza DM, Hoffman LA, Tobin MJ. Long-Term Outcome after Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. A Long-Term Acute-Care Hospital Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 199:1508-1516. [PMID: 30624956 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1131oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Patients managed at a long-term acute-care hospital (LTACH) for weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation are at risk for profound muscle weakness and disability. Objectives: To investigate effects of prolonged ventilation on survival, muscle function, and its impact on quality of life at 6 and 12 months after LTACH discharge. Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal study conducted in 315 patients being weaned from prolonged ventilation at an LTACH. Measurements and Main Results: At discharge, 53.7% of patients were detached from the ventilator and 1-year survival was 66.9%. On enrollment, maximum inspiratory pressure (Pimax) was 41.3 (95% confidence interval, 39.4-43.2) cm H2O (53.1% predicted), whereas handgrip strength was 16.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.4-18.7) kPa (21.5% predicted). At discharge, Pimax did not change, whereas handgrip strength increased by 34.8% (P < 0.001). Between discharge and 6 months, handgrip strength increased 6.2 times more than did Pimax. Between discharge and 6 months, Katz activities-of-daily-living summary score improved by 64.4%; improvement in Katz summary score was related to improvement in handgrip strength (r = -0.51; P < 0.001). By 12 months, physical summary score and mental summary score of 36-item Short-Form Survey returned to preillness values. When asked, 84.7% of survivors indicated willingness to undergo mechanical ventilation again. Conclusions: Among patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation at an LTACH, 53.7% were detached from the ventilator at discharge and 1-year survival was 66.9%. Respiratory strength was well maintained, whereas peripheral strength was severely impaired throughout hospitalization. Six months after discharge, improvement in muscle function enabled patients to perform daily activities, and 84.7% indicated willingness to undergo mechanical ventilation again.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Jubran
- 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.,2 Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.,3 RML Specialty Hospital, Hinsdale, Illinois
| | | | - Lisa A Duffner
- 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.,2 Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.,3 RML Specialty Hospital, Hinsdale, Illinois
| | - Eileen G Collins
- 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.,2 Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.,3 RML Specialty Hospital, Hinsdale, Illinois.,5 University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | - Martin J Tobin
- 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hines Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, Illinois.,2 Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.,3 RML Specialty Hospital, Hinsdale, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Contemporary strategies to improve clinical trial design for critical care research: insights from the First Critical Care Clinical Trialists Workshop. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:930-942. [PMID: 32072303 PMCID: PMC7224097 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-05934-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting research in critically-ill patient populations is challenging, and most randomized trials of critically-ill patients have not achieved pre-specified statistical thresholds to conclude that the intervention being investigated was beneficial. METHODS In 2019, a diverse group of patient representatives, regulators from the USA and European Union, federal grant managers, industry representatives, clinical trialists, epidemiologists, and clinicians convened the First Critical Care Clinical Trialists (3CT) Workshop to discuss challenges and opportunities in conducting and assessing critical care trials. Herein, we present the advantages and disadvantages of available methodologies for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis, and a series of recommendations to potentially improve future trials in critical care. CONCLUSION The 3CT Workshop participants identified opportunities to improve critical care trials using strategies to optimize sample size calculations, account for patient and disease heterogeneity, increase the efficiency of trial conduct, maximize the use of trial data, and to refine and standardize the collection of patient-centered and patient-informed outcome measures beyond mortality.
Collapse
|
214
|
Kang J, Jeong YJ, Hong J. Cut-Off Values of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Questionnaire for the Screening of Unplanned Hospital Readmission within One Year. J Korean Acad Nurs 2020; 50:787-798. [PMID: 33441526 DOI: 10.4040/jkan.20233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assign weights for subscales and items of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome questionnaire and suggest optimal cut-off values for screening unplanned hospital readmissions of critical care survivors. METHODS Seventeen experts participated in an analytic hierarchy process for weight assignment. Participants for cut-off analysis were 240 survivors who had been admitted to intensive care units for more than 48 hours in three cities in Korea. We assessed participants using the 18-item Post-Intensive Care Syndrome questionnaire, generated receiver operating characteristic curves, and analysed cut-off values for unplanned readmission based on sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratios. RESULTS Cognitive, physical, and mental subscale weights were 1.13, 0.95, and 0.92, respectively. Incidence of unplanned readmission was 25.4%. Optimal cut-off values were 23.00 for raw scores and 23.73 for weighted scores (total score 54.00), with an area of under the curve (AUC) of .933 and .929, respectively. There was no significant difference in accuracy for original and weighted scores. CONCLUSION The optimal cut-off value accuracy is excellent for screening of unplanned readmissions. We recommend that nurses use the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Questionnaire to screen for readmission risk or evaluating relevant interventions for critical care survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyeon Kang
- College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea
| | | | - Jiwon Hong
- College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
215
|
van Zanten ARH, De Waele E, Wischmeyer PE. Nutrition therapy and critical illness: practical guidance for the ICU, post-ICU, and long-term convalescence phases. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2019; 23:368. [PMID: 31752979 PMCID: PMC6873712 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2657-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although mortality due to critical illness has fallen over decades, the number of patients with long-term functional disabilities has increased, leading to impaired quality of life and significant healthcare costs. As an essential part of the multimodal interventions available to improve outcome of critical illness, optimal nutrition therapy should be provided during critical illness, after ICU discharge, and following hospital discharge. METHODS This narrative review summarizes the latest scientific insights and guidelines on ICU nutrition delivery. Practical guidance is given to provide optimal nutrition therapy during the three phases of the patient journey. RESULTS Based on recent literature and guidelines, gradual progression to caloric and protein targets during the initial phase of ICU stay is recommended. After this phase, full caloric dose can be provided, preferably based on indirect calorimetry. Phosphate should be monitored to detect refeeding hypophosphatemia, and when occurring, caloric restriction should be instituted. For proteins, at least 1.3 g of proteins/kg/day should be targeted after the initial phase. During the chronic ICU phase, and after ICU discharge, higher protein/caloric targets should be provided preferably combined with exercise. After ICU discharge, achieving protein targets is more difficult than reaching caloric goals, in particular after removal of the feeding tube. After hospital discharge, probably very high-dose protein and calorie feeding for prolonged duration is necessary to optimize the outcome. High-protein oral nutrition supplements are likely essential in this period. Several pharmacological options are available to combine with nutrition therapy to enhance the anabolic response and stimulate muscle protein synthesis. CONCLUSIONS During and after ICU care, optimal nutrition therapy is essential to improve the long-term outcome to reduce the likelihood of the patient to becoming a "victim" of critical illness. Frequently, nutrition targets are not achieved in any phase of recovery. Personalized nutrition therapy, while respecting different targets during the phases of the patient journey after critical illness, should be prescribed and monitored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisabeth De Waele
- Intensive Care Unit, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Nutrition, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
216
|
Hosey MM, Bienvenu OJ, Dinglas VD, Turnbull AE, Parker AM, Hopkins RO, Neufeld KJ, Needham DM. The IES-R remains a core outcome measure for PTSD in critical illness survivorship research. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2019; 23:362. [PMID: 31744551 PMCID: PMC6865007 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2630-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Hosey
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 179, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - O Joseph Bienvenu
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison E Turnbull
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ann M Parker
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ramona O Hopkins
- Neuroscience Center and Psychology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.,Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, UT, USA
| | - Karin J Neufeld
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 179, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. .,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
217
|
Parry SM, Nalamalapu SR, Nunna K, Rabiee A, Friedman LA, Colantuoni E, Needham DM, Dinglas VD. Six-Minute Walk Distance After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Intensive Care Med 2019; 36:343-351. [PMID: 31690160 DOI: 10.1177/0885066619885838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Impaired physical functioning is common and long lasting after an intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a validated and widely used test of functional capacity. This systematic review synthesizes existing data in order to: (1) evaluate 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in meters over longitudinal follow-up after critical illness, (2) compare 6MWD between acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus non-ARDS survivors, and (3) evaluate patient- and ICU-related factors associated with 6MWD. DATA SOURCES Five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry) were searched to identify studies reporting 6MWT after hospital discharge in survivors from general (ie, nonspeciality) ICUs. The last search was run on February 14, 2018. Databases were accessed via Johns Hopkins University Library. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Pooled mean 6MWD were reported, with separate linear random effects models used to evaluate associations of 6MWD with ARDS status, and patient- and ICU-related variables. Twenty-six eligible articles on 16 unique participant groups were included. The pooled mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) 6MWD results at 3- and 12-months post discharge were 361 (321-401) and 436 (391-481) meters, respectively. There was a significant increase in 6MWD at 12 months compared to 3 months (P = .017). In ARDS versus non-ARDS survivors, the mean (95% CI) 6MWD difference over 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up was 73 [13-133] meters lower. Female sex and preexisting comorbidity also were significantly associated with lower 6MWD, with ICU-related variables having no consistent associations. CONCLUSIONS Compared to initial assessment at 3 months, significant improvement in 6MWD was reported at 12 months. Female sex, preexisting comorbidity, and ARDS (vs non-ARDS) were associated with lower 6MWT results. Such factors warrant consideration in the design of clinical research studies and in the interpretation of patient status using the 6MWT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina M Parry
- Department of Physiotherapy, 2281The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Anahita Rabiee
- Department of Medicine, 12228Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lisa Aronson Friedman
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Colantuoni
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, 1466John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
218
|
Hope AA, Munro CL. Understanding and Improving Critical Care Survivorship. Am J Crit Care 2019; 28:410-412. [PMID: 31676513 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2019442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aluko A. Hope
- Aluko A. Hope is coeditor in chief of the American Journal of Critical Care. He is an associate professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine and an intensivist and assistant bioethics consultant at Montefiore Medical Center, both in New York City. Cindy L. Munro is coeditor in chief of the American Journal of Critical Care. She is dean and professor, School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
| | - Cindy L. Munro
- Aluko A. Hope is coeditor in chief of the American Journal of Critical Care. He is an associate professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine and an intensivist and assistant bioethics consultant at Montefiore Medical Center, both in New York City. Cindy L. Munro is coeditor in chief of the American Journal of Critical Care. She is dean and professor, School of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
219
|
Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Prevent or Mitigate Adverse Long-Term Outcomes Among ICU Survivors. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:1607-1618. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
220
|
Inspiratory Muscle Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Adults. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019; 15:735-744. [PMID: 29584447 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201712-961oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Respiratory muscle weakness is common in critically ill patients; the role of targeted inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in intensive care unit rehabilitation strategies remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the present study was to describe the range and tolerability of published methods for IMT. The secondary objectives were to determine whether IMT improves respiratory muscle strength and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review to identify randomized and nonrandomized studies of physical rehabilitation interventions intended to strengthen the respiratory muscles in critically ill adults. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases (inception to September Week 3, 2017) and conference proceedings (2012 to 2017). Data were independently extracted by two authors and collected on a standardized report form. RESULTS A total of 28 studies (N = 1,185 patients) were included. IMT was initiated during early mechanical ventilation (8 studies), after patients proved difficult to wean (14 studies), or after extubation (3 studies), and 3 other studies did not report exact timing. Threshold loading was the most common technique; 13 studies employed strength training regimens, 11 studies employed endurance training regimens, and 4 could not be classified. IMT was feasible, and there were few adverse events during IMT sessions (nine studies; median, 0%; interquartile range, 0-0%). In randomized trials (n = 20), IMT improved maximal inspiratory pressure compared with control (15 trials; mean increase, 6 cm H2O; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5-8 cm H2O; pooled relative ratio of means, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.14-1.25) and maximal expiratory pressure (4 trials; mean increase, 9 cm H2O; 95% CI, 5-14 cm H2O). IMT was associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (nine trials; mean difference, 4.1 d; 95% CI, 0.8-7.4 d) and a shorter duration of weaning (eight trials; mean difference, 2.3 d; 95% CI, 0.7-4.0 d), but confidence in these pooled estimates was low owing to methodological limitations, including substantial statistical and methodological heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Most studies of IMT in critically ill patients have employed inspiratory threshold loading. IMT is feasible and well tolerated in critically ill patients and improves both inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength. The impact of IMT on clinical outcomes requires future confirmation.
Collapse
|
221
|
Prescott HC, Iwashyna TJ, Blackwood B, Calandra T, Chlan LL, Choong K, Connolly B, Dark P, Ferrucci L, Finfer S, Girard TD, Hodgson C, Hopkins RO, Hough CL, Jackson JC, Machado FR, Marshall JC, Misak C, Needham DM, Panigrahi P, Reinhart K, Yende S, Zafonte R, Rowan KM. Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200:972-981. [PMID: 31161771 PMCID: PMC6794113 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201812-2383cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
An estimated 14.1 million patients survive sepsis each year. Many survivors experience poor long-term outcomes, including new or worsened neuropsychological impairment; physical disability; and vulnerability to further health deterioration, including recurrent infection, cardiovascular events, and acute renal failure. However, clinical trials and guidelines have focused on shorter-term survival, so there are few data on promoting longer-term recovery. To address this unmet need, the International Sepsis Forum convened a colloquium in February 2018 titled "Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship." The goals were to identify gaps and limitations of current research and shorter- and longer-term priorities for understanding and enhancing sepsis survivorship. Twenty-six experts from eight countries participated. The top short-term priorities identified by nominal group technique culminating in formal voting were to better leverage existing databases for research, develop and disseminate educational resources on postsepsis morbidity, and partner with sepsis survivors to define and achieve research priorities. The top longer-term priorities were to study mechanisms of long-term morbidity through large cohort studies with deep phenotyping, build a harmonized global sepsis registry to facilitate enrollment in cohorts and trials, and complete detailed longitudinal follow-up to characterize the diversity of recovery experiences. This perspective reviews colloquium discussions, the identified priorities, and current initiatives to address them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hallie C. Prescott
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore J. Iwashyna
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Bronagh Blackwood
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Thierry Calandra
- Infectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Linda L. Chlan
- Nursing Research Division, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karen Choong
- Department of Pediatrics
- Department of Critical Care, and
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bronwen Connolly
- Lane Fox Respiratory Unit, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Dark
- National Specialty Lead for Critical Care, National Institute for Health Research, and
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luigi Ferrucci
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Simon Finfer
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Timothy D. Girard
- Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carol Hodgson
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ramona O. Hopkins
- Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
- Center for Humanizing Critical Care at Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
| | - Catherine L. Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - James C. Jackson
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Flavia R. Machado
- Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - John C. Marshall
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, and
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Misak
- Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dale M. Needham
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Pinaki Panigrahi
- Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Konrad Reinhart
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Stiftung Charité Klinik für Anäesthesie Operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sachin Yende
- Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ross Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
| | - Kathryn M. Rowan
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - on behalf of the International Sepsis Forum
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Infectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Nursing Research Division, Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Pediatrics
- Department of Critical Care, and
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Lane Fox Respiratory Unit, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Guy’s and St. Thomas’ National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- National Specialty Lead for Critical Care, National Institute for Health Research, and
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
- Center for Humanizing Critical Care at Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, Utah
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
- Anesthesiology, Pain, and Intensive Care Department, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgery
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, and
- Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
- Stiftung Charité Klinik für Anäesthesie Operative Intensivmedizin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
- Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and
- Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Evaluating longer term mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in survivors of critical illness is a research priority. This review details the challenges of long-term follow-up studies of critically ill patients and highlights recently proposed methodological solutions. RECENT FINDINGS Barriers to long-term follow-up studies of critical care survivors include high rates of study attrition because of death or loss to follow-up, data missingness from experienced morbidity, and lack of standardized outcome as well as reporting of key covariates. A number of recent methods have been proposed to reduce study patients attrition, including minimum data set selection and visits to transitional care or home settings, yet these have significant downsides as well. Conducting long-term follow-up even in the absence of such models carries a high expense, as personnel are very costly, and patients/families require reimbursement for their time and inconvenience. SUMMARY There is a reason why many research groups do not conduct long-term outcomes in critical care: it is very difficult. Challenges of long-term follow-up require careful consideration by study investigators to ensure our collective success in data integration and a better understanding of underlying mechanisms of mortality and morbidity seen in critical care survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Elizabeth Wilcox
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care Medicine), Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Interdepartment Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - E. Wesley Ely
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine and Center for Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, and the Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Comparative validation of three screening instruments for posttraumatic stress disorder after intensive care. J Crit Care 2019; 53:149-154. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
224
|
Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life After ICU: Importance of Patient Demographics, Previous Comorbidity, and Severity of Illness. Crit Care Med 2019; 46:594-601. [PMID: 29293149 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES ICU survivors frequently report reduced health-related quality of life, but the relative importance of preillness versus acute illness factors in survivor populations is not well understood. We aimed to explore health-related quality of life trajectories over 12 months following ICU discharge, patterns of improvement, or deterioration over this period, and the relative importance of demographics (age, gender, social deprivation), preexisting health (Functional Comorbidity Index), and acute illness severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, ventilation days) as determinants of health-related quality of life and relevant patient-reported symptoms during the year following ICU discharge. DESIGN Nested cohort study within a previously published randomized controlled trial. SETTING Two ICUs in Edinburgh, Scotland. PATIENTS Adult ICU survivors (n = 240) who required more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS We prospectively collected data for age, gender, social deprivation (Scottish index of multiple deprivation), preexisting comorbidity (Functional Comorbidity Index), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and days of mechanical ventilation. Health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form version 2 Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score) and patient-reported symptoms (appetite, fatigue, pain, joint stiffness, and breathlessness) were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months. Mean Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score were reduced at all time points with minimal change between 3 and 12 months. In multivariable analysis, increasing pre-ICU comorbidity count was strongly associated with lower health-related quality of life (Physical Component Score β = -1.56 [-2.44 to -0.68]; p = 0.001; Mental Component Score β = -1.45 [-2.37 to -0.53]; p = 0.002) and more severe self-reported symptoms. In contrast, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and mechanical ventilation days were not associated with health-related quality of life. Older age (β = 0.33 [0.19-0.47]; p < 0.001) and lower social deprivation (β = 1.38 [0.03-2.74]; p = 0.045) were associated with better Mental Component Score health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Preexisting comorbidity counts, but not severity of ICU illness, are strongly associated with health-related quality of life and physical symptoms in the year following critical illness.
Collapse
|
225
|
Thille AW, Mauri T, Talmor D. Update in Critical Care Medicine 2017. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 197:1382-1388. [PMID: 29554433 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0055up] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud W Thille
- 1 Réanimation Médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.,2 INSERM Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1402 ALIVE, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Tommaso Mauri
- 3 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; and
| | - Daniel Talmor
- 4 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
226
|
Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies. Curr Opin Crit Care 2019; 24:401-409. [PMID: 30063492 PMCID: PMC6133198 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review Patients surviving critical illness frequently experience long-lasting morbidities. Consequently, researchers and clinicians are increasingly focused on evaluating and improving survivors’ outcomes after hospital discharge. This review synthesizes recent research aimed at understanding the postdischarge outcomes that patients consider important (i.e., patient-important outcomes) for the purpose of advancing future clinical research in the field. Recent findings Across multiple types of studies, patients, family members, researchers, and clinicians have consistently endorsed physical function, cognition, and mental health as important outcomes to evaluate in future research. Aspects of social health, such as return to work and changes in interpersonal relationships, also were noted in some research publications. Informed by these recent studies, an international Delphi consensus process (including patient and caregiver representatives) recommended the following core set of outcomes for use in all studies evaluating acute respiratory failure survivors after hospital discharge: survival, physical function (including muscle/nerve function and pulmonary function), cognition, mental health, health-related quality of life, and pain. The Delphi panel also reached consensus on recommended measurement instruments for some of these core outcomes. Summary Recent studies have made major advances in understanding patient-important outcomes to help guide future clinical research aimed at improving ICU survivors’ recovery.
Collapse
|
227
|
Hosey MM, Leoutsakos JMS, Li X, Dinglas VD, Bienvenu OJ, Parker AM, Hopkins RO, Needham DM, Neufeld KJ. Screening for posttraumatic stress disorder in ARDS survivors: validation of the Impact of Event Scale-6 (IES-6). CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2019; 23:276. [PMID: 31391069 PMCID: PMC6686474 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2553-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are common in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) survivors. Brief screening instruments are needed for clinical and research purposes. We evaluated internal consistency, external construct, and criterion validity of the Impact of Event Scale-6 (IES-6; 6 items) compared to the original Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R; 22 items) and to the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) reference standard evaluation in ARDS survivors. METHODS This study is a secondary analysis from two independent multi-site, prospective studies of ARDS survivors. Measures of internal consistency, and external construct and criterion validity were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 1001 ARDS survivors (51% female, 76% white, mean (SD) age 49 (14) years) were evaluated.
The IES-6 demonstrated internal consistency over multiple time points up to 5 years after ARDS (Cronbach’s
alpha = 0.86 to 0.91) and high correlation with the IES-R (0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.94 to 0.97).
The IES-6 demonstrated stronger correlations with related constructs (e.g., anxiety and depression; |r| = 0.32 to 0.52) and weaker correlations with unrelated constructs (e.g., physical function and healthcare utilization measures (|r| = 0.02 to 0.27). Criterion validity evaluation with the CAPS diagnosis of PTSD in a subsample of 60 participants yielded an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (95% CI) of 0.93 (0.86, 1.00), with an IES-6 cutoff score of 1.75 yielding 0.88 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity. CONCLUSIONS The IES-6 is reliable and valid for screening for PTSD in ARDS survivors and may be useful in clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M Hosey
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Ximin Li
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - O Joseph Bienvenu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ann M Parker
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ramona O Hopkins
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.,Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, UT, USA.,Neuroscience Center and Psychology Department, Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. .,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Karin J Neufeld
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
228
|
Heyland DK, Day A, Clarke GJ, Hough CT, Files DC, Mourtzakis M, Deutz N, Needham DM, Stapleton R. Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness Trial (NEXIS Trial): a protocol of a multicentred, randomised controlled trial of combined cycle ergometry and amino acid supplementation commenced early during critical illness. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e027893. [PMID: 31371287 PMCID: PMC6678006 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survivors of critical illness often experience significant morbidities, including muscle weakness and impairments in physical functioning. This muscle weakness is associated with longer duration mechanical ventilation, greater hospital costs and increased postdischarge impairments in physical function, quality of life and survival. Compared with standard of care, the benefits of greater protein intake combined with structured exercise started early after the onset of critical illness remain uncertain. However, the combination of protein supplementation and exercise in other populations has demonstrated positive effects on strength and function. In the present study, we will evaluate the effects of a combination of early implementation of intravenous amino acid supplementation and in-bed cycle ergometry exercise versus a 'usual care' control group in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS AND ANALYSIS In this multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial, we will randomise 142 patients in a 1:1 ratio to usual care (which commonly consists of minimal exercise and under-achievement of guideline-recommended caloric and protein intake goals) versus a combined intravenous amino acid supplementation and in-bed cycle ergometery exercise intervention. We hypothesise that this novel combined intervention will (1) improve physical functioning at hospital discharge; (2) reduce muscle wasting with improved amino acid metabolism and protein synthesis in-hospital and (3) improve patient-reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation at 6 months after enrolment. Key cointerventions will be standardised. In-hospital outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, ICU discharge and hospital discharge. An intent-to-treat analysis will be used to analyse all data with additional per-protocol analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial received ethics approval at each institution and enrolment has begun. These results will inform both clinical practice and future research in the area. We plan to disseminate trial results in peer-reviewed journals, at national and international conferences, and via nutritional and rehabilitation-focused electronic education and knowledge translation platforms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03021902; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daren K Heyland
- Critical Care, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Day
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology and CERU, Queen's Unversity, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - G John Clarke
- Critical Evalulation Research Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Catherine Terri Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D Clark Files
- Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Immunology Division, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Marina Mourtzakis
- University of Waterloo Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicolaas Deutz
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Renee Stapleton
- Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Sevin CM, Bloom SL, Jackson JC, Wang L, Ely EW, Stollings JL. Comprehensive care of ICU survivors: Development and implementation of an ICU recovery center. J Crit Care 2019; 46:141-148. [PMID: 29929705 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the design and initial implementation of an Intensive Care Unit Recovery Center (ICU-RC) in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective, observational feasibility study was undertaken at an academic hospital between July 2012 and December 2015. Clinical criteria were used to develop the ICU-RC, identify patients at high risk for post intensive care syndrome (PICS), and offer them post-ICU care. RESULTS 218/307 referred patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge; 62 (28% of survivors) were seen in clinic. Median time from discharge to ICU-RC visit was 29days. At initial evaluation, 64% of patients had clinically meaningful cognitive impairment. Anxiety and depression were present in 37% and 27% of patients, respectively. One in three patients was unable to ambulate independently; median 6min walk distance was 56% predicted. Of 47 previously working patients, 7 (15%) had returned to work. Case management and referral services were provided 142 times. The median number of interventions per patient was 4. CONCLUSIONS An ICU-RC identified a high prevalence of cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, physical debility, lifestyle changes, and medication-related problems warranting intervention. Whether an ICU-RC can improve ICU recovery in the US should be investigated in a systematic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla M Sevin
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
| | - Sarah L Bloom
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - James C Jackson
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States; Center for Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - E Wesley Ely
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Joanna L Stollings
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
230
|
Akinremi A, Turnbull AE, Chessare CM, Bingham CO, Needham DM, Dinglas VD. Delphi panelists for a core outcome set project suggested both new and existing dissemination strategies that were feasibly implemented by a research infrastructure project. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 114:104-107. [PMID: 31173895 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ayodele Akinremi
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alison E Turnbull
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Caroline M Chessare
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Clifton O Bingham
- Divisions of Rheumatology and Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dale M Needham
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Victor D Dinglas
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
Nelliot A, Dinglas VD, O’Toole J, Patel Y, Mendez-Tellez PA, Nabeel M, Friedman LA, Hough CL, Hopkins RO, Eakin MN, Needham DM. Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors' Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Outcomes: Quantitative Measures versus Semistructured Interviews. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019; 16:731-737. [PMID: 30844293 PMCID: PMC6543476 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201812-851oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Increasingly, patients are surviving acute respiratory failure (ARF), prompting the need to better understand standardized outcome measures commonly used during ARF follow-up studies. Objectives: Investigate standardized outcome measures (patient-reported physical and mental health measures, and cognitive testing) compared with findings from semistructured, qualitative interviews. Methods: As part of two ARF multicenter follow-up studies, standardized outcome measures were obtained, followed by qualitative evaluation via an in-depth, semistructured interview conducted and coded by two independent researchers. Qualitative interviews revealed the following post-ARF survivorship themes: physical impairment; anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms; and cognitive impairment. Scores from standardized measures related to these themes were compared for ARF survivors reporting versus not reporting these themes in their qualitative interviews. Results: Of 59 invited ARF survivors, 48 (81%) completed both standardized outcome measures and qualitative interviews. Participants' median (interquartile range) age was 53 (43-64) years; 54% were female, and 88% were living independently before hospitalization. The two independent reviewers classifying the presence or absence of themes from the qualitative interviews had excellent agreement (κ = 0.80). There were significantly worse scores on standardized outcome measures for survivors reporting (vs. not reporting) physical and mental health impairments in their qualitative interviews. However, standardized cognitive test scores did not differ between patients reporting versus not reporting cognitive impairments in their qualitative interviews. Conclusions: These findings support the use of recommended, commonly used standardized outcome measures for physical and mental health impairments in ARF survivorship research. However, caution is needed in interpreting self-reported cognitive function compared with standardized cognitive testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archana Nelliot
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Victor D. Dinglas
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | | | - Yashika Patel
- Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, North Carolina
| | - Pedro A. Mendez-Tellez
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and
| | - Mohammed Nabeel
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa Aronson Friedman
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Catherine L. Hough
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ramona O. Hopkins
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah
- Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health Care, Murray, Utah; and
- Psychology Department and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
| | - Michelle N. Eakin
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
| | - Dale M. Needham
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, and
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Costigan FA, Rochwerg B, Molloy AJ, McCaughan M, Millen T, Reid JC, Farley C, Patterson L, Kho ME. I SURVIVE: inter-rater reliability of three physical functional outcome measures in intensive care unit survivors. Can J Anaesth 2019; 66:1173-1183. [PMID: 31147985 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01411-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We prospectively assessed inter-rater reliability of three physical function measures in Canadian intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the inpatient setting. METHODS We enrolled patients who had an ICU length of stay of ≥ three days, were mechanically ventilated for ≥ 24 hr, and were ambulating independently before hospital admission. Weekly from ICU discharge to hospital discharge, two trained frontline clinicians, blinded to each other's findings, independently performed the Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s; score out of 10), 30-sec sit-to-stand (30STS; # of stands), and two-minute walk test (2MWT; distance in m), all within 24 hr. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC90). RESULTS We enrolled 42 patients. PFIT-s: in 36 patients with 66 paired scores, the ICC was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86), the SEM was 1.04, and the MDC90 was 2.42. 30STS: in 35 patients with 67 paired scores, the ICC was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.90), the SEM was 1.91, and the MDC90 was 4.45. 2MWT: in 35 patients with 58 paired scores, the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.87), the SEM was 20.87, and the MDC90 was 48.69. CONCLUSION These three measures show good inter-rater reliability when used by trained frontline clinicians to assess physical function in ICU survivors in the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Aileen Costigan
- Physiotherapy Department, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine (Division of Critical Care), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Magda McCaughan
- Physiotherapy Department, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Millen
- Department of Critical Care, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Julie C Reid
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Chris Farley
- Department of Critical Care, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Laurel Patterson
- Physiotherapy Department, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michelle E Kho
- Physiotherapy Department, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. .,Institute of Applied Health Science, School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Room 403, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Kemp HI, Laycock H, Costello A, Brett SJ. Chronic pain in critical care survivors: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:e372-e384. [PMID: 31126622 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pain is an important problem after critical care admission. Estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain in the year after discharge range from 14% to 77% depending on the type of cohort, the tool used to measure pain, and the time point when pain was assessed. The majority of data available come from studies using health-related quality of life tools, although some have included pain-specific tools. Nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain can occur in critical care survivors, but limited information about the aetiology, body site, and temporal trajectory of pain is currently available. Older age, pre-existing pain, and medical co-morbidity have been associated with pain after critical care admission. No trials were identified of interventions to target chronic pain in survivors specifically. Larger studies, using pain-specific tools, over an extended follow-up period are required to confirm the prevalence, identify risk factors, explore any association between acute and chronic pain in this setting, determine the underlying pathological mechanisms, and inform the development of future analgesic interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet I Kemp
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Helen Laycock
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Stephen J Brett
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
González-Seguel F, Corner EJ, Merino-Osorio C. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Domains of 60 Physical Functioning Measurement Instruments Used During the Adult Intensive Care Unit Stay: A Scoping Review. Phys Ther 2019; 99:627-640. [PMID: 30590839 PMCID: PMC6517362 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzy158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a recent surge in the creation and adaptation of instruments to measure physical functioning (PF) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Selecting the right measurement instrument depends on understanding the core constructs that it measures in terms of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to map systematically the ICF domains and subdomains included in the PF measurement instruments used for adult patients during the ICU stay. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was carried out in Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, CINAHL, and LILACS as well as a hand search up to May 17, 2017. STUDY SELECTION Study selection included all types of research articles that used at least 1 PF measurement instrument in adult patients within the ICU. DATA EXTRACTION Study design, year of publication, study population, and the measurement instruments reported were recorded. A consensus of experts analyzed the ICF domains included in each instrument. DATA SYNTHESIS We found 181 articles containing 60 PF measurement instruments used during the ICU stay. Twenty-six ICF domains were identified, 38 instruments included Mobility, and 13 included Muscle function. LIMITATIONS Studies not written in English or Spanish were excluded. CONCLUSIONS There are numerous PF measurement instruments used in adult patients in the ICU. The most frequent ICF domain measured is Mobility. This study highlights the ICF domains contained in the instruments that can be used clinically, providing a complete database of instruments that could facilitate selection of the most appropriate measure based on the patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe González-Seguel
- Servicio de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Av. Vitacura 5951, Santiago, Chile,Address all correspondence to Mr González-Seguel at:
| | - Evelyn Jane Corner
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London and The Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
235
|
Estrup S, Kjer CKW, Vilhelmsen F, Poulsen LM, Gøgenur I, Mathiesen O. Physical function and actigraphy in intensive care survivors-A prospective 3-month follow-up cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2019; 63:647-652. [PMID: 30623414 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impaired physical function after intensive care unit (ICU) stay is common. We aimed to study the association between activity levels in the ward after discharge from ICU and physical function at 3-month follow-up. METHODS Prospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU for more than 24 hours. Patients wore an accelerometer for up to 7 days at the ward. At discharge from ICU and at 3-month follow-up, patients were tested with the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx). RESULTS We screened 66 consecutive, eligible patients; 41 completed actigraphy and 19 patients were visited at 3 months. The median CPAx increased from 31 (IQR 23-41) at discharge from ICU to 47 (IQR 44-49) at follow-up (P < 0.0001). Mean daily activity for the first week was correlated with CPAx at ICU discharge (R2 = 0.14, P = 0.017; all 41 patients). For the 19 visited patients, we found no significant correlation for activity levels with CPAx at ICU discharge (R2 = 0.12, P = 0.14) nor at visit (R2 = 0.2, P = 0.058). CONCLUSION We found improved physical function for most patients 3 months after ICU treatment. Activity levels for 1 week after ICU discharge at the ward were not associated with better physical function at 3-month follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Estrup
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| | - Cilia K. W. Kjer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| | - Frederik Vilhelmsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| | - Lone M. Poulsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| | - Ismail Gøgenur
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Center for Surgical Science Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| | - Ole Mathiesen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Centre for Anaesthesiological Research Zealand University Hospital Køge Køge Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
236
|
Piva S, Fagoni N, Latronico N. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: unanswered questions and targets for future research. F1000Res 2019; 8. [PMID: 31069055 PMCID: PMC6480958 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17376.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is the most common neuromuscular impairment in critically ill patients. We discuss critical aspects of ICU-AW that have not been completely defined or that are still under discussion. Critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy, and muscle atrophy contribute in various proportions to ICU-AW. Diagnosis of ICU-AW is clinical and is based on Medical Research Council sum score and handgrip dynamometry for limb weakness and recognition of a patient's ventilator dependency or difficult weaning from artificial ventilation for diaphragmatic weakness (DW). ICU-AW can be caused by a critical illness polyneuropathy, a critical illness myopathy, or muscle disuse atrophy, alone or in combination. Its diagnosis requires both clinical assessment of muscle strength and complete electrophysiological evaluation of peripheral nerves and muscles. The peroneal nerve test (PENT) is a quick simplified electrophysiological test with high sensitivity and good specificity that can be used instead of complete electrophysiological evaluation as a screening test in non-cooperative patients. DW, assessed by bilateral phrenic nerve magnetic stimulation or diaphragm ultrasound, can be an isolated event without concurrent limb muscle involvement. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether DW and limb weakness are different manifestations of the same syndrome or are two distinct entities. Delirium is often associated with ICU-AW but a clear correlation between these two entities requires further studies. Artificial nutrition may have an impact on ICU-AW, but no study has assessed the impact of nutrition on ICU-AW as the primary outcome. Early mobilization improves activity limitation at hospital discharge if it is started early in the ICU, but beneficial long-term effects are not established. Determinants of ICU-AW can be many and can interact with each other. Therefore, future studies assessing early mobilization should consider a holistic patient approach with consideration of all components that may lead to muscle weakness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Piva
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy
| | - Nazzareno Fagoni
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy.,Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy
| | - Nicola Latronico
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy, 25123, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
237
|
Kerckhoffs MC, Kosasi FFL, Soliman IW, van Delden JJM, Cremer OL, de Lange DW, Slooter AJC, Kesecioglu J, van Dijk D. Determinants of self-reported unacceptable outcome of intensive care treatment 1 year after discharge. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:806-814. [PMID: 30840124 PMCID: PMC6534510 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05583-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Survivors of critical illness often suffer from reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to long-term physical, cognitive, and mental health problems, also known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Some intensive care unit (ICU) survivors even consider their state of health unacceptable. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of self-reported unacceptable outcome of ICU treatment. METHODS Patients who were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h and survived the first year after discharge completed validated questionnaires on overall HRQoL and the components of PICS and stated whether they considered their current state of health an acceptable outcome of ICU treatment. The effects of overall HRQoL and components of PICS on unacceptable outcome were studied using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 1453 patients, 67 (5%) reported their health state an unacceptable outcome of ICU treatment. These patients had a lower score on overall HRQoL (EQ-5D-index value of 0.57 vs. 0.81; p < 0.001), but we could not determine a cutoff value of the EQ-5D-index value that reliably identified unacceptable outcome. In the multivariate analysis, only the hospital anxiety and depression scale was significantly associated with an unacceptable outcome (OR 2.06, 99% CI 1.18-3.61). CONCLUSIONS Although there is a strong association between low overall HRQoL and self-reported unacceptable outcome of ICU treatment, patients with low overall HRQoL may still consider their outcome acceptable. The mental component of PICS, but not the physical and cognitive component, is strongly associated with self-reported unacceptable outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika C Kerckhoffs
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Felicia F L Kosasi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo W Soliman
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Olaf L Cremer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan W de Lange
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jozef Kesecioglu
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik van Dijk
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Mail Stop F06.149, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
238
|
König C, Matt B, Kortgen A, Turnbull AE, Hartog CS. What matters most to sepsis survivors: a qualitative analysis to identify specific health-related quality of life domains. Qual Life Res 2019; 28:637-647. [PMID: 30350257 PMCID: PMC6414230 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-2028-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unknown how sepsis survivors conceptualize health-related quality of life (HRQL). We aimed to identify important HRQL domains for this population. METHODS A literature search was performed to inform an interview guide. Open-ended interviews were held with 15 purposefully sampled sepsis survivors. Interview transcripts were analyzed by interpretative phenomenological analysis to allow themes to develop organically. Resulting codes were reviewed by an independent expert. The preliminary list of domains was rated in a two-round Delphi consensus procedure with therapists and survivors. RESULTS Eleven domains emerged as critically important: Psychological impairment, Fatigue, Physical impairment, Coping with daily life, Return to normal living, Ability to walk, Cognitive impairment, Self-perception, Control over one's life, Family support, and Delivery of health care. Sepsis survivors want a "normal life," to walk again, and to regain control without cognitive impairment. Family support is essential to overcome sepsis aftermaths. CONCLUSIONS Survivors described many HRQL domains which are not captured by the QoL instruments that have traditionally been used to study ICU survivorship (i.e., SF-36 and EQ-5D). Future studies of QoL in ICU survivors should consider using both a traditional instrument so that results are comparable to previous research, as well as a more holistic QoL measurement instrument like the WHOQOL-BREF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian König
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Bastian Matt
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Andreas Kortgen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany
| | - Alison E Turnbull
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christiane S Hartog
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
- Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
239
|
Kwakman RCH, Major ME, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt DS, Nollet F, Engelbert RHH, van der Schaaf M. Physiotherapy treatment approaches for survivors of critical illness: a proposal from a Delphi study. Physiother Theory Pract 2019; 36:1421-1431. [PMID: 30821565 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1579283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop practical recommendations for physiotherapy for survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus study was performed. A scoping literature review formed the basis for three Delphi rounds. The first round was used to gather input from the panel to finalize the survey for the next two rounds in which the panel was asked to rank each of the statements on an ordinal scale with the objective to reach consensus. Consensus was defined as a SIQR of ≤ 0.5. Ten Dutch panelists participated in this study: three primary care physiotherapists, four intensive care physiotherapists, one occupational therapist, one ICU-nurse and one former ICU-patient. All involved professionals have treated survivors of critical illness. Our study was performed in parallel with an international Delphi study with hospital-based health-care professionals and researchers. Results: After three Delphi rounds, consensus was reached on 95.5% of the statements. This resulted in practical recommendations for physiotherapy for critical illness survivors in the primary care setting. The panel agreed that the handover should include information on 14 items. Physiotherapy treatment goals should be directed toward improvement of aerobic capacity, physical functioning, activities in daily living, muscle strength, respiratory and pulmonary function, fatigue, pain, and health-related quality of life. Physiotherapy measurements and interventions to improve these outcomes are suggested. Conclusion: This study adds to the knowledge on post-ICU physiotherapy with practical recommendations supporting clinical decision-making in the treatment of survivors of critical illness after hospital discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin C H Kwakman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands.,ACHIEVE - Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mel E Major
- ACHIEVE - Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands.,European School of Physiotherapy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daniela S Dettling-Ihnenfeldt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frans Nollet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Raoul H H Engelbert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands.,ACHIEVE - Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marike van der Schaaf
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Rehabilitation, Amsterdam Movement Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands.,ACHIEVE - Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
Møller MH. Patient-important outcomes and core outcome sets: increased attention needed! Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:408-410. [PMID: 30857595 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Morten H Møller
- Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet and Centre for Research in Intensive Care, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
241
|
Bear DE, Puthucheary ZA. Designing nutrition-based interventional trials for the future: addressing the known knowns. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2019; 23:53. [PMID: 30782189 PMCID: PMC6381615 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2345-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The consistent decline in critical illness mortality has a significant effect on trial design, whereby either an improbable effect sizes or large number of patients are required. The signal-to-noise ratio is of particular interest for the critically ill. When considering the potential signal, interventions need to match outcomes in regard to biological plausibility. Provision of nutrition is a complex decision with many underappreciated aspects of noise. However, a fundamental interaction is often not accounted for time. Working as a community to evolve trial design will be our challenge for nutrition interventions in the critically ill for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E Bear
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Lane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zudin A Puthucheary
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. .,Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, E1 1BB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
McIlroy PA, King RS, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Tabah A, Ramanan M. The Effect of ICU Diaries on Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life of Survivors of Critical Illness and Their Relatives. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:273-279. [DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
243
|
Berry MJ, Love NJ, Files DC, Bakhru RN, Morris PE. The relationship between self-report and performance-based measures of physical function following an ICU stay. J Crit Care 2019; 51:19-23. [PMID: 30690430 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine relationships between self-report and performance-based measures of physical function in ICU patients randomized to standardized rehabilitation therapy (SRT) or usual care (UC). METHODS Physical function was assessed in 257 ICU patients using self-report (physical functioning scale of the SF-36 (SF-36 PFS)) and the functional performance inventory-short form (FPI-SF) as well as performance-based measures (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)) and muscular strength (MS). Assessments were at hospital discharge, 2, 4, and 6 months. RESULTS Correlations between self-report and performance-based measures were not significantly different between the two groups. When examining the entire cohort, a significant, but weak, correlation (r = 0.286) was found between the SF-36 PFS and the SPPB. At 2 months, moderate correlations were found between self-report and performance-based measures. The SF-36 PFS and FPI were significantly correlated with the SPPB (r = 0.536 and 0.553, respectively) and muscular strength (r = 0.413 and 0.431, respectively). Similar associations were seen at 4 and 6 months in both groups. CONCLUSION Self-report and performance-based measures of physical function appear to assess different constructs at hospital discharge. Following recovery, these measures converge, but indicate different constructs are being assessed. As such, both self-report and performance-based measures of physical function should be used with ICU patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Berry
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA.
| | - Nathan J Love
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA
| | - D Clark Files
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Rita N Bakhru
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Peter E Morris
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
|
245
|
Exercise Therapy. Pain 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99124-5_225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
246
|
Abstract
Outcomes after critical illness remain poorly understood. Conceptual models developed by other disciplines can serve as a framework by which to increase knowledge about outcomes after critical illness. This article reviews 3 models to understand the distinct but interrelated content of outcome domains, to review the components of functional status, and to describe how injuries and illnesses relate to disabilities and impairments afterward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan E Brummel
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Center for Quality Aging, Suite 350, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
247
|
Paton M, Lane R, Hodgson CL. Early Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit to Improve Long-Term Recovery. Crit Care Clin 2018; 34:557-571. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
248
|
|
249
|
Gensichen J, Schultz S, Adrion C, Schmidt K, Schauer M, Lindemann D, Unruh N, Kosilek RP, Schneider A, Scherer M, Bergmann A, Heintze C, Joos S, Briegel J, Scherag A, König HH, Brettschneider C, Schulze TG, Mansmann U, Linde K, Lühmann D, Voigt K, Gehrke-Beck S, Koch R, Zwissler B, Schneider G, Gerlach H, Kluge S, Koch T, Walther A, Atmann O, Oltrogge J, Sauer M, Schnurr J, Elbert T. Effect of a combined brief narrative exposure therapy with case management versus treatment as usual in primary care for patients with traumatic stress sequelae following intensive care medicine: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PICTURE). Trials 2018; 19:480. [PMID: 30201053 PMCID: PMC6131807 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2853-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic events like critical illness and intensive care are threats to life and bodily integrity and pose a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD affects the quality of life and morbidity and may increase health-care costs. Limited access to specialist care results in PTSD patients being treated in primary care settings. Narrative exposure therapy (NET) is based on the principles of cognitive behavioral therapy and has shown positive effects when delivered by health-care professionals other than psychologists. The primary aims of the PICTURE trial (from "PTSD after ICU survival") are to investigate the effectiveness and applicability of NET adapted for primary care with case management in adults diagnosed with PTSD after intensive care. METHODS/DESIGN This is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, primary care-based, randomized controlled two-arm parallel group, observer-blinded superiority trial conducted throughout Germany. In total, 340 adult patients with a total score of at least 20 points on the posttraumatic diagnostic scale (PDS-5) 3 months after receiving intensive care treatment will be equally randomized to two groups: NET combined with case management and improved treatment as usual (iTAU). All primary care physicians (PCPs) involved will be instructed in the diagnosis and treatment of PTSD according to current German guidelines. PCPs in the iTAU group will deliver usual care during three consultations. In the experimental group, PCPs will additionally be trained to deliver an adapted version of NET (three sessions) supported by phone-based case management by a medical assistant. At 6 and 12 months after randomization, structured blinded telephone interviews will assess patient-reported outcomes. The primary composite endpoint is the absolute change from baseline at month 6 in PTSD symptom severity measured by the PDS-5 total score, which also incorporates the death of any study patients. Secondary outcomes cover the domains depression, anxiety, disability, health-related quality-of-life, and cost-effectiveness. The principal analysis is by intention to treat. DISCUSSION If the superiority of the experimental intervention over usual care can be demonstrated, the combination of brief NET and case management could be a treatment option to relieve PTSD-related symptoms and to improve primary care after intensive care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03315390 . Registered on 10 October 2017. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012589 . Registered on 17 October 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jochen Gensichen
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany.
| | - Susanne Schultz
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Adrion
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Konrad Schmidt
- Institute of General Practice of the Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Maggie Schauer
- Clinical Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Daniela Lindemann
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Natalia Unruh
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert P Kosilek
- Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Pettenkoferstr. 8a, 80336, Munich, Germany
| | - Antonius Schneider
- Institute of General Practice, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Orleansstr. 47, 81667, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Scherer
- Department of General Practice / Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Haus West 37, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antje Bergmann
- Department of General Practice/Clinic of General Medicine - Medical clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christoph Heintze
- Institute of General Practice of the Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefanie Joos
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Health Care, University Clinic Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Josef Briegel
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Andre Scherag
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Bachstr. 18, 07743, Jena, Germany
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Brettschneider
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas G Schulze
- Institute of Psychiatric Phenomics and Genomics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrich Mansmann
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus Linde
- Institute of General Practice, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Orleansstr. 47, 81667, Munich, Germany
| | - Dagmar Lühmann
- Department of General Practice / Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Haus West 37, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karen Voigt
- Department of General Practice/Clinic of General Medicine - Medical clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sabine Gehrke-Beck
- Institute of General Practice of the Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roland Koch
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Health Care, University Clinic Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Zwissler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Gerhard Schneider
- Clinic for Anesthesiology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Orleansstr. 47, 81667, Munich, Germany
| | - Herwig Gerlach
- Clinic for Anesthesiology, Operative Intensive Care and Pain Management, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Rudower Str. 49, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Center for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thea Koch
- Clinic of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Walther
- Clinic for Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care, Klinikum Stuttgart - Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergerstr. 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Oxana Atmann
- Institute of General Practice, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Orleansstr. 47, 81667, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Oltrogge
- Department of General Practice / Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Haus West 37, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maik Sauer
- Department of General Practice/Clinic of General Medicine - Medical clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Schnurr
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Health Care, University Clinic Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Elbert
- Clinical Psychology, University of Konstanz, 78457, Konstanz, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
250
|
Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Rochwerg B, Nunnally ME, Needham DM, Gelinas C, Pandharipande PP, Slooter AJC, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Kho ME, Centofanti J, Price C, Harmon L, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Alhazzani W. Methodologic Innovation in Creating Clinical Practice Guidelines: Insights From the 2018 Society of Critical Care Medicine Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption Guideline Effort. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:1457-1463. [PMID: 29985807 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000003298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe novel guideline development strategies created and implemented as part of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's 2018 clinical practice guidelines for pain, agitation (sedation), delirium, immobility (rehabilitation/mobility), and sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. DESIGN We involved critical illness survivors from start to finish, used and expanded upon Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology for making recommendations, identified evidence gaps, and developed communication strategies to mitigate challenges. SETTING/SUBJECTS Thirty-two experts from five countries, across five topic-specific sections; four methodologists, two medical librarians, four critical illness survivors, and two Society of Critical Care Medicine support staff. INTERVENTIONS Unique approaches included the following: 1) critical illness survivor involvement to help ensure patient-centered questions and recommendations; 2) qualitative and semiquantitative approaches for developing descriptive statements; 3) operationalizing a three-step approach to generating final recommendations; and 4) systematic identification of evidence gaps. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Critical illness survivors contributed to prioritizing topics, questions, and outcomes, evidence interpretation, recommendation formulation, and article review to ensure that their values and preferences were considered in the guidelines. Qualitative and semiquantitative approaches supported formulating descriptive statements using comprehensive literature reviews, summaries, and large-group discussion. Experts (including the methodologists and guideline chairs) developed and refined guideline recommendations through monthly topic-specific section conference calls. Recommendations were precirculated to all members, presented to, and vetted by, most members at a live meeting. Final electronic voting provided links to all forest plots, evidence summaries, and "evidence to decision" frameworks. Written comments during voting captured dissenting views and were integrated into evidence to decision frameworks and the guideline article. Evidence gaps, reflecting clinical uncertainty in the literature, were identified during the evidence to decision process, live meeting, and voting and formally incorporated into all written recommendation rationales. Frequent scheduled "check-ins" mitigated communication gaps. CONCLUSIONS Our multifaceted, interdisciplinary approach and novel methodologic strategies can help inform the development of future critical care clinical practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John W Devlin
- School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Yoanna Skrobik
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Regroupement de Soins Critiques Respiratoires, Réseau de Santé Respiratoire, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Impact and Evidence, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mark E Nunnally
- Division of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
- Division of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
- Division of Neurology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
- Division of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Dale M Needham
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Celine Gelinas
- Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pratik P Pandharipande
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Anesthesiology Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Arjen J C Slooter
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paula L Watson
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Gerald L Weinhouse
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital and School of Medicine, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle E Kho
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Centofanti
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Carrie Price
- Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lori Harmon
- Society of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL
| | - Cheryl J Misak
- Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, Toronto, CA
| | - Pamela D Flood
- Division of Anesthesiology, Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Health Research Methods, Impact and Evidence, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care and Gastroenterology), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|