201
|
Christy SM, Mosher CE, Rawl SM, Haggstrom DA. Masculinity Beliefs and Colorectal Cancer Screening in Male Veterans. PSYCHOLOGY OF MEN & MASCULINITY 2016; 18:390-399. [PMID: 29308055 DOI: 10.1037/men0000056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
As the third most common cause of cancer death among United States men, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant threat to men's health. Although adherence to CRC screening has the potential to reduce CRC mortality by approximately half, men's current rates of adherence fall below national screening objectives. In qualitative studies, men have reported forgoing screenings involving the rectum (e.g., colonoscopy) due to concern about breaching masculinity norms. However, the extent to which masculinity beliefs predict men's CRC screening adherence has yet to be examined. The current study tested the hypothesis that greater endorsement of masculinity beliefs (i.e., self-reliance, risk-taking, heterosexual self-presentation, and primacy of work) would be associated with a lower likelihood of adherence to CRC screening with any test and with colonoscopy specifically. Participants were 327 men aged 51-75 at average risk for CRC who were accessing primary care services at a Midwestern Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Contrary to hypotheses, masculinity beliefs did not predict CRC screening outcomes in hierarchical regression analyses that controlled for demographic predictors of screening. Although results are largely inconsistent with masculinity theory and prior qualitative findings, further research is needed to determine the degree to which findings generalize to other populations and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M Christy
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Catherine E Mosher
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Susan M Rawl
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - David A Haggstrom
- HSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
202
|
Ersek JL, Eberth JM, McDonnell KK, Strayer SM, Sercy E, Cartmell KB, Friedman DB. Knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening among family physicians. Cancer 2016; 122:2324-31. [PMID: 27294476 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The results of the National Lung Screening Trial showed a 20% reduction in lung cancer mortality and a 6.7% reduction in all-cause mortality when high-risk patients were screened with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) versus chest x-ray (CXR). The US Preventive Services Task Force has issued a grade B recommendation for LDCT screening, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and private insurers now cover the screening cost under certain conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge of, attitudes toward, and use of LDCT screening for lung cancer among family physicians. METHODS A 32-item questionnaire was distributed to members of the South Carolina Academy of Family Physicians in 2015. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS There were 101 respondents, and most had incorrect knowledge about which organizations recommended screening. Many physicians continued to recommend CXR for lung cancer screening. Most felt that LDCT screening increased the odds of detecting disease at earlier stages (98%) and that the benefits outweighed the harms (75%). Concerns included unnecessary procedures (88%), stress/anxiety (52%), and radiation exposure (50%). Most physicians discussed the risks/benefits of screening with their patients in some capacity (76%); however, more than 50% reported making 1 or no screening recommendations in the past year. CONCLUSIONS Most family physicians report discussing LDCT with patients at high risk for lung cancer; however, referrals remain low. There are gaps in physician knowledge about screening guidelines and reimbursement, and this indicates a need for further educational outreach. The development of decision aids may facilitate shared decision-making discussions about screening, and targeted interventions may improve knowledge gaps. Cancer 2016;122:2324-2331. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Ersek
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | | | - Scott M Strayer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Erica Sercy
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Kathleen B Cartmell
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.,Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
203
|
Abstract
The primary goal of cancer screening is to reduce cancer-related mortality without incurring significant harm. Screening efforts for solid tumors, therefore, have targeted the precursors of the most common and the most deadly cancers-breast, cervical, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer. Balancing risk and benefit has led to controversy regarding the timing of cancer screening-when to begin, how often to screen and when to stop-and the nature of the modality of cancer screening-invasive or noninvasive, laboratory-centered or imaging-centered. Evidence-based guidelines published by general medical societies, subspecialty societies and publicly funded task forces on population-based screening aid healthcare providers in making individualized decisions with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Calvin Thigpen
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi.
| | - Stephen A Geraci
- Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
204
|
Zhou M, Melancon M, Stafford RJ, Li J, Nick AM, Tian M, Sood AK, Li C. Precision Nanomedicine Using Dual PET and MR Temperature Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1778-1783. [PMID: 27283932 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.172775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Imaging-based techniques have enabled the direct integration of noninvasive imaging with minimally invasive interventions such as photothermal therapy (PTT) to improve the precision of treatment. METHODS We investigated the feasibility of PTT for ovarian cancer under the guidance of PET and MR temperature imaging using copper sulfide nanoparticles (CuS NPs). The tumor distribution of the CuS NPs after systemic administration was assessed using highly sensitive, quantifiable PET imaging. Two wavelengths of near-infrared (NIR) lasers-808 and 980 nm-were tested for PTT using noninvasive MR temperature imaging real-time monitoring. RESULTS The in vivo studies revealed that the 980-nm NIR laser had better photothermal effects than the 808-nm NIR laser. These results were in accord with the histologic findings. In vivo PTT using CuS NPs combined with 980-nm laser irradiation achieved significant tumor ablation compared with no treatment control in both subcutaneous (P = 0.007) and orthotopic (P < 0.001) models of ovarian cancer with regard to the percentage of necrotic damage. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that real-time monitoring of the accuracy of PTT is a promising approach for future clinical translation of this emerging thermal ablation technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Zhou
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.,Institute of Translational Medicine, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Marites Melancon
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - R Jason Stafford
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Junjie Li
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alpa M Nick
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Mei Tian
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Anil K Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and.,Center for RNAi and Non-Coding RNA, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chun Li
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
205
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality and is widely recommended. However, despite these demonstrated benefits, a large percentage of the population remains unscreened. The multi-target stool DNA (MT-sDNA) test is a new, non-invasive option for CRC screening that has a high accuracy rate in detection of colorectal neoplasia and offers great opportunity to enhance screening uptake. This review provides the current state of the art knowledge about the use of MT-sDNA in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth Sweetser
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - David A Ahlquist
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
206
|
Iannone A, Losurdo G, Pricci M, Girardi B, Massaro A, Principi M, Barone M, Ierardi E, Di Leo A. Stool Investigations for Colorectal Cancer Screening: From Occult Blood Test to DNA Analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 47:143-151. [PMID: 26922358 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-016-9810-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report an update of current methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal sample analysis. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Direct electronic databases. RESULTS Blood in the stools is the first and most used strategy. Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are the main methods. Both are economic, easy to perform with high specificity, and low sensitivity. Based on CRC multi-step process with genetic and epigenetic alterations in large bowel cell DNA, single mutations or panels of alterations have been detected. These tests have the advantage of a marked improvement of the sensitivity when compared to fecal blood. However, high costs, poor availability, and correct choice of marker panel represent the major limits. A specific sDNA panel including aberrantly methylated BMP3 and NDRG4 promoter regions, mutant k-ras and β-actin (a reference gene for human DNA quantity), and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin has been recently approved by Food and Drug Administration. Novel promising biomarkers for CRC screening are represented by microRNAs (miRNAs), a group of 18-25 nucleotide non-coding RNA molecules that regulate gene expression. Reports on these fecal biomarkers are case-control studies, and each of them evaluates single miRNAs or multi-target panels. On the other hand, some fecal proteins have been studied as possible CRC screening markers, even though they demonstrated poor results. Finally, alterations of estrogen receptor-beta (i.e., dramatic reduction in the early stage of CRC) have been demonstrated in tissue samples. CONCLUSIONS Specific investigations are warranted in order to add further noninvasive markers to the panel of CRC screening tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Losurdo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Maria Pricci
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Bruna Girardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonio Massaro
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Mariabeatrice Principi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Barone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Enzo Ierardi
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alfredo Di Leo
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
207
|
Associations between prior HPV4 vaccine doses and cervical cancer screening participation. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 42:108-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2015] [Revised: 04/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
208
|
Coughlin SS, Thind H, Liu B, Wilson LCC. Towards research-tested smartphone applications for preventing breast cancer. Mhealth 2016; 2:26. [PMID: 27390745 PMCID: PMC4933519 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2016.06.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Efforts to prevent breast cancer and other chronic illnesses have focused on promoting physical activity, healthy diet and nutrition, and avoidance of excessive alcohol consumption. Smartphone applications (apps) offer a low-cost, effective strategy for breast cancer prevention in women through behavioral change. However, there are currently no research-tested smartphone apps for breast cancer prevention that are suitable for women with varying levels of health literacy and eHealth literacy. In this perspective, we consider modifiable risk factors for breast cancer in women in relation to the development of smartphone apps to promote healthy behaviors associated with breast cancer-risk reduction. First, we provide a summary of breast cancer risk factors that are modifiable through behavioral change including their corresponding relative risk. Second, we discuss scientific issues related to the development of smartphone apps for the primary prevention of breast cancer and offer suggestions for further research. Smartphone apps for preventing breast cancer should be tailored for women at different life stages (e.g., young women, women who are post-menopausal, and older women). Topics such as breastfeeding and oral contraceptives are appropriate for younger women. Weight management, physical activity, avoiding cigarette smoking, and dispelling breast cancer myths are appropriate for women of all ages. As women age, topics such as hormone replacement therapy or comorbid health conditions become more important to address. Apps for breast cancer prevention should be grounded in a behavioral theory or framework and should be suitable for people with varying levels of health literacy. Future developments in smartphone apps for breast cancer prevention should include apps that are tailored for specific cultural, racial, and ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven S. Coughlin
- Department of Clinical and Digital Health Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Herpreet Thind
- Department of Community Health and Sustainability, Division of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
| | - Benyuan Liu
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, USA
| | - Lt Col Candy Wilson
- Malcolm Grow Medical Clinics and Surgery Center at JB-Andrews, Joint Base Andrews, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
209
|
Saltybaeva N, Martini K, Frauenfelder T, Alkadhi H. Organ Dose and Attributable Cancer Risk in Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0155722. [PMID: 27203720 PMCID: PMC4874690 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Lung cancer screening with CT has been recently recommended for decreasing lung cancer mortality. The radiation dose of CT, however, must be kept as low as reasonably achievable for reducing potential stochastic risks from ionizing radiation. The purpose of this study was to calculate individual patients’ lung doses and to estimate cancer risks in low-dose CT (LDCT) in comparison with a standard dose CT (SDCT) protocol. Materials and Methods This study included 47 adult patients (mean age 63.0 ± 5.7 years) undergoing chest CT on a third-generation dual-source scanner. 23/47 patients (49%) had a non-enhanced chest SDCT, 24 patients (51%) underwent LDCT at 100 kVp with spectral shaping at a dose equivalent to a chest x-ray. 3D-dose distributions were obtained from Monte Carlo simulations for each patient, taking into account their body size and individual CT protocol. Based on the dose distributions, patient-specific lung doses were calculated and relative cancer risk was estimated according to BEIR VII recommendations. Results As compared to SDCT, the LDCT protocol allowed for significant organ dose and cancer risk reductions (p<0.001). On average, lung dose was reduced from 7.7 mGy to 0.3 mGy when using LDCT, which was associated with lowering of the cancer risk from 8.6 to 0.35 per 100’000 cases. A strong linear correlation between lung dose and patient effective diameter was found for both protocols (R2 = 0.72 and R2 = 0.75 for SDCT and LDCT, respectively). Conclusion Use of a LDCT protocol for chest CT with a dose equivalent to a chest x-ray allows for significant lung dose and cancer risk reduction from ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Saltybaeva
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Katharina Martini
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hatem Alkadhi
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
210
|
Torre LA, Goding Sauer AM, Chen MS, Kagawa-Singer M, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, 2016: Converging incidence in males and females. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:182-202. [PMID: 26766789 PMCID: PMC5325676 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 298] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the leading cause of death among Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (AANHPIs). In this report, the American Cancer Society presents AANHPI cancer incidence data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. Among AANHPIs in 2016, there will be an estimated 57,740 new cancer cases and 16,910 cancer deaths. While AANHPIs have 30% to 40% lower incidence and mortality rates than non-Hispanic whites for all cancers combined, risk of stomach and liver cancers is double. The male-to-female incidence rate ratio among AANHPIs declined from 1.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.49) in 1992 to 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07) in 2012 because of declining prostate and lung cancer rates in males and increasing breast cancer rates in females. The diversity within the AANHPI population is reflected in the disparate cancer risk by subgroup. For example, the overall incidence rate in Samoan men (526.5 per 100,000) is more than twice that in Asian Indian/Pakistani men (216.8). Variations in cancer rates in AANHPIs are related to differences in behavioral risk factors, use of screening and preventive services, and exposure to cancer-causing infections. Cancer-control strategies include improved use of vaccination and screening; interventions to increase physical activity and reduce excess body weight, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption; and subgroup-level research on burden and risk factors. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:182-202. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey A. Torre
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann M. Goding Sauer
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Moon S. Chen
- Professor and Associate Director for Cancer Control, University of California-Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | - Marjorie Kagawa-Singer
- Professor Emerita, Department of Community Health Sciences and Department of Asian American Studies, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L. Siegel
- Director of Surveillance Information, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
211
|
Chen C, Shen H, Zhang LG, Liu J, Cao XG, Yao AL, Kang SS, Gao WX, Han H, Cao FH, Li ZG. Construction and analysis of protein-protein interaction networks based on proteomics data of prostate cancer. Int J Mol Med 2016; 37:1576-86. [PMID: 27121963 PMCID: PMC4866967 DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, using human prostate cancer (PCa) tissue samples to conduct proteomics research has generated a large amount of data; however, only a very small amount has been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we manually carried out the mining of the full text of proteomics literature that involved comparisons between PCa and normal or benign tissue and identified 41 differentially expressed proteins verified or reported more than 2 times from different research studies. We regarded these proteins as seed proteins to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. The extended network included one giant network, which consisted of 1,264 nodes connected via 1,744 edges, and 3 small separate components. The backbone network was then constructed, which was derived from key nodes and the subnetwork consisting of the shortest path between seed proteins. Topological analyses of these networks were conducted to identify proteins essential for the genesis of PCa. Solute carrier family 2 (facilitated glucose transporter), member 4 (SLC2A4) had the highest closeness centrality located in the center of each network, and the highest betweenness centrality and largest degree in the backbone network. Tubulin, beta 2C (TUBB2C) had the largest degree in the giant network and subnetwork. In addition, using module analysis of the whole PPI network, we obtained a densely connected region. Functional annotation indicated that the Ras protein signal transduction biological process, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), neurotrophin and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) signaling pathway may play an important role in the genesis and development of PCa. Further investigation of the SLC2A4, TUBB2C proteins, and these biological processes and pathways may therefore provide a potential target for the diagnosis and treatment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Modern Technology and Education Center, North China University of Science and Technology and International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Geriatric Medicine, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Li-Guo Zhang
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Ge Cao
- Tianjin Binhai New Area Hangu No. 1 High School, Tianjin 300480, P.R. China
| | - An-Liang Yao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Shao-San Kang
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Wei-Xing Gao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Feng-Hong Cao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Guo Li
- Medical Research Center, North China University of Science and Technology and International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Geriatric Medicine, Tangshan, Hebei 063000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
212
|
Schiffman JD, Breen M. Comparative oncology: what dogs and other species can teach us about humans with cancer. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2016; 370:rstb.2014.0231. [PMID: 26056372 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 262] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 1.66 million humans (approx. 500/100,000 population rate) and over 4.2 million dogs (approx. 5300/100,000 population rate) are diagnosed with cancer annually in the USA. The interdisciplinary field of comparative oncology offers a unique and strong opportunity to learn more about universal cancer risk and development through epidemiology, genetic and genomic investigations. Working across species, researchers from human and veterinary medicine can combine scientific findings to understand more quickly the origins of cancer and translate these findings to novel therapies to benefit both human and animals. This review begins with the genetic origins of canines and their advantage in cancer research. We next focus on recent findings in comparative oncology related to inherited, or genetic, risk for tumour development. We then detail the somatic, or genomic, changes within tumours and the similarities between species. The shared cancers between humans and dogs that we discuss include sarcoma (osteosarcoma, soft tissue sarcoma, histiocytic sarcoma, hemangiosarcoma), haematological malignancies (lymphoma, leukaemia), bladder cancer, intracranial neoplasms (meningioma, glioma) and melanoma. Tumour risk in other animal species is also briefly discussed. As the field of genomics advances, we predict that comparative oncology will continue to benefit both humans and the animals that live among us.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Schiffman
- Department of Pediatrics and Oncological Sciences, Primary Children's Hospital, Intermountain Healthcare, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew Breen
- Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, Center for Human Health and the Environment, Cancer Genetics, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
213
|
Capsule Commentary on Tosteson et al., Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31:411. [PMID: 26857730 PMCID: PMC4803689 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
214
|
Bartel MJ, Brahmbhatt BS, Wallace MB. Management of colorectal T1 carcinoma treated by endoscopic resection from the Western perspective. Dig Endosc 2016; 28:330-41. [PMID: 26718885 DOI: 10.1111/den.12598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Detection of early colorectal cancer is expected to rise in light of national colorectal cancer screening programs. This The present review article delineates current endoscopic risk assessments, differentiating invasive from non-invasive neoplasia, for high likelihood of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer, also termed high-risk early colorectal cancer, and endoscopic and surgical resection methods from a Western hemisphere perspective.
Collapse
|
215
|
Chen C, Zhang LG, Liu J, Han H, Chen N, Yao AL, Kang SS, Gao WX, Shen H, Zhang LJ, Li YP, Cao FH, Li ZG. Bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in prostate cancer based on proteomics data. Onco Targets Ther 2016; 9:1545-57. [PMID: 27051295 PMCID: PMC4803245 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s98807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We mined the literature for proteomics data to examine the occurrence and metastasis of prostate cancer (PCa) through a bioinformatics analysis. We divided the differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) into two groups: the group consisting of PCa and benign tissues (P&b) and the group presenting both high and low PCa metastatic tendencies (H&L). In the P&b group, we found 320 DEPs, 20 of which were reported more than three times, and DES was the most commonly reported. Among these DEPs, the expression levels of FGG, GSN, SERPINC1, TPM1, and TUBB4B have not yet been correlated with PCa. In the H&L group, we identified 353 DEPs, 13 of which were reported more than three times. Among these DEPs, MDH2 and MYH9 have not yet been correlated with PCa metastasis. We further confirmed that DES was differentially expressed between 30 cancer and 30 benign tissues. In addition, DEPs associated with protein transport, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, and the extracellular matrix (ECM)–receptor interaction pathway were prevalent in the H&L group and have not yet been studied in detail in this context. Proteins related to homeostasis, the wound-healing response, focal adhesions, and the complement and coagulation pathways were overrepresented in both groups. Our findings suggest that the repeatedly reported DEPs in the two groups may function as potential biomarkers for detecting PCa and predicting its aggressiveness. Furthermore, the implicated biological processes and signaling pathways may help elucidate the molecular mechanisms of PCa carcinogenesis and metastasis and provide new targets for clinical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Chen
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Li-Guo Zhang
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Chen
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - An-Liang Yao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shao-San Kang
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei-Xing Gao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Modern Technology and Education Center, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Long-Jun Zhang
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Ya-Peng Li
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng-Hong Cao
- Department of Urology, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Guo Li
- Department of Medical Research Center, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Geriatric Medicine, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
216
|
Mendes R, Carreira B, Baptista PV, Fernandes AR. Non-small cell lung cancer biomarkers and targeted therapy - two faces of the same coin fostered by nanotechnology. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2016. [DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2016.1159914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
217
|
Yasa C, Dural O, Bastu E, Ugurlucan FG, Nehir A, İyibozkurt AC. Evaluation of the diagnostic role of transvaginal ultrasound measurements of endometrial thickness to detect endometrial malignancy in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294:311-6. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4054-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
218
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The combined administration of F-NaF and F-FDG in a single PET/CT scan has the potential to improve patient convenience and cancer detection. Here we report the use of this approach for patients with sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective review of 21 patients (12 men, 9 women; age, 19-66 years) with biopsy-proven sarcomas who had separate F-NaF PET/CT, F-FDG PET/CT, and combined F-NaF/F-FDG PET/CT scans for evaluation of malignancy. Two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians and 1 board-certified musculoskeletal radiologist were randomly assigned to review the scans. Results were analyzed for sensitivity and specificity, using linear regression and receiver operating characteristics. RESULTS A total of 13 patients had metastatic disease on F-NaF PET/CT, F-FDG PET/CT, and combined F-NaF/F-FDG PET/CT. Skeletal disease was more extensive on the F-NaF PET/CT scan than on the F-FDG PET/CT in 3 patients, whereas in 1 patient, F-FDG PET/CT showed skeletal disease and the F-NaF PET/CT was negative. Extraskeletal lesions were detected on both F-FDG and combined F-NaF/F-FDG PET/CT in 20 patients, with 1 discordant finding in the lung. CONCLUSIONS The combined F-NaF/F-FDG PET/CT scan allows for accurate evaluation of sarcoma patients. Further evaluation of this proposed imaging modality is warranted to identify the most suitable clinical scenarios, including initial treatment strategy and evaluation of response to therapy.
Collapse
|
219
|
Pascale A, Beal MW, Fitzgerald T. Rethinking the Well Woman Visit: A Scoping Review to Identify Eight Priority Areas for Well Woman Care in the Era of the Affordable Care Act. Womens Health Issues 2016; 26:135-46. [PMID: 26817659 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2015] [Revised: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The annual pap smear for cervical cancer screening, once a mainstay of the well woman visit (WWV), is no longer recommended for most low-risk women. This change has led many women and their health care providers to wonder if they should abandon this annual preventive health visit altogether. Changing guidelines coinciding with expanded WWV coverage for millions of American women under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act have created confusion for health care consumers and care givers alike. Is there evidence to support continued routine preventive health visits for women and, if so, what would ideally constitute the WWV of today? METHODS A scoping review of the literature was undertaken to appraise the current state of evidence regarding a wide range of possible elements to identify priority areas for the WWV. FINDINGS A population health perspective taking into consideration the reproductive health needs of women as well as the preventable and modifiable leading causes of death and disability was used to identify eight domains for the WWV of today: 1) reproductive life planning and sexual health, 2) cardiovascular disease and stroke, 3) prevention, screening, and early detection of cancers, 4) unintended injury, 5) anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and suicidal intent, 6) intimate partner violence, assault, and homicide, 7) lower respiratory disease, and 8) arthritis and other musculoskeletal problems. CONCLUSIONS The WWV remains a very important opportunity for prevention, health education, screening, and early detection and should not be abandoned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Pascale
- Department of Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Margaret W Beal
- School of Nursing, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thérèse Fitzgerald
- Women's Health Policy and Advocacy Program, Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
220
|
Smith RA, Andrews K, Brooks D, DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Lortet-Tieulent J, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brawley OW, Wender RC. Cancer screening in the United States, 2016: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:96-114. [PMID: 26797525 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 175] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Each year the American Cancer Society (ACS) publishes a summary of its guidelines for early cancer detection, data and trends in cancer screening rates, and select issues related to cancer screening. In this issue of the journal, we summarize current ACS cancer screening guidelines, including the update of the breast cancer screening guideline, discuss quality issues in colorectal cancer screening and new developments in lung cancer screening, and provide the latest data on utilization of cancer screening from the National Health Interview Survey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Smith
- Vice President, Cancer Screening, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly Andrews
- Director, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Durado Brooks
- Managing Director, Cancer Control Intervention, Cancer Control Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Carol E DeSantis
- Senior Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Director for Risk Factor Screening and Surveillance, Department of Epidemiology and Research Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Joannie Lortet-Tieulent
- Senior Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Otis W Brawley
- Chief Medical Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard C Wender
- Chief Cancer Control Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
221
|
Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, Cannady RS, Pratt-Chapman ML, Edge SB, Jacobs LA, Hurria A, Marks LB, LaMonte SJ, Warner E, Lyman GH, Ganz PA. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:611-35. [PMID: 26644543 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.3809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 586] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of the American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendations to assist primary care and other clinicians in the care of female adult survivors of breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, gynecology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nursing was formed and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. A total of 1,073 articles met inclusion criteria; and, after full text review, 237 were included as the evidence base. Patients should undergo regular surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, including evaluation with a cancer-related history and physical examination, and should be screened for new primary breast cancer. Data do not support performing routine laboratory tests or imaging tests in asymptomatic patients to evaluate for breast cancer recurrence. Primary care clinicians should counsel patients about the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle, monitor for post-treatment symptoms that can adversely affect quality of life, and monitor for adherence to endocrine therapy. Recommendations provided in this guideline are based on current evidence in the literature and expert consensus opinion. Most of the evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong evidence-based recommendation. Recommendations on surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer and its treatment, health promotion, and care coordination/practice implications are made. This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Cancer Society and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians and Journal of Clinical Oncology. Copyright © 2015 American Cancer Society and American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by the American Cancer Society or the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn D. Runowicz
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Corinne R. Leach
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - N. Lynn Henry
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Karen S. Henry
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Heather T. Mackey
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Rachel S. Cannady
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Stephen B. Edge
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Linda A. Jacobs
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Arti Hurria
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Lawrence B. Marks
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Samuel J. LaMonte
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Ellen Warner
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Gary H. Lyman
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- Carolyn D. Runowicz, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University; Karen S. Henry, Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL; Corinne R. Leach, Rebecca L. Cowens-Alvarado, Rachel S. Cannady, and Samuel J. LaMonte, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; N. Lynn Henry, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Heather T. Mackey, Oncology Nursing Society, Pittsburgh; Linda A. Jacobs, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania,
| |
Collapse
|
222
|
Mishra S, Saadat D, Kwon O, Lee Y, Choi WS, Kim JH, Yeo WH. Recent advances in salivary cancer diagnostics enabled by biosensors and bioelectronics. Biosens Bioelectron 2016; 81:181-197. [PMID: 26946257 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Revised: 02/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
There is a high demand for a non-invasive, rapid, and highly accurate tool for disease diagnostics. Recently, saliva based diagnostics for the detection of specific biomarkers has drawn significant attention since the sample extraction is simple, cost-effective, and precise. Compared to blood, saliva contains a similar variety of DNA, RNA, proteins, metabolites, and microbiota that can be compiled into a multiplex of cancer detection markers. The salivary diagnostic method holds great potential for early-stage cancer diagnostics without any complicated and expensive procedures. Here, we review various cancer biomarkers in saliva and compare the biomarkers efficacy with traditional diagnostics and state-of-the-art bioelectronics. We summarize biomarkers in four major groups: genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics/microbiota. Representative bioelectronic systems for each group are summarized based on various stages of a cancer. Systematic study of oxidative stress establishes the relationship between macromolecules and cancer biomarkers in saliva. We also introduce the most recent examples of salivary diagnostic electronics based on nanotechnologies that can offer rapid, yet highly accurate detection of biomarkers. A concluding section highlights areas of opportunity in the further development and applications of these technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswat Mishra
- Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Darius Saadat
- School of Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA
| | - Ohjin Kwon
- Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Yongkuk Lee
- Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Woon-Seop Choi
- School of Display Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Hoon Kim
- School of Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Vancouver, WA 98686, USA.
| | - Woon-Hong Yeo
- Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA; Center for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
223
|
Schiffman JD, Fisher PG, Gibbs P. Early detection of cancer: past, present, and future. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016:57-65. [PMID: 25993143 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2015.35.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Screening in both healthy and high-risk populations offers the opportunity to detect cancer early and with an increased opportunity for treatment and curative intent. Currently, a defined role for screening exists in some cancer types, but each screening test has limitations, and improved screening methods are urgently needed. Unfortunately, many cancers still lack effective screening recommendations, or in some cases, the benefits from screening are marginal when weighed against the potential for harm. Here we review the current status of cancer screening: we examine the role of traditional tumor biomarkers, describe recommended imaging for early tumor surveillance, and explore the potential of promising novel cancer markers such as circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA. Consistent challenges for all of these screening tests include limited sensitivity and specificity. The risk for overdiagnosis remains a particular concern in screening, whereby lesions of no clinical consequence may be detected and thus create difficult management decisions for the clinician and patient. If treatment is pursued following overdiagnosis, patients may be exposed to morbidity from a treatment that may not provide any true benefit. The cost-effectiveness of screening tests also needs to be an ongoing focus. The improvement of genomic and surveillance technologies, which leads to more precise imaging and the ability to characterize blood-based tumor markers of greater specificity, offers opportunities for major progress in cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Schiffman
- From the Department of Pediatrics and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Ludwig Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne and Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul G Fisher
- From the Department of Pediatrics and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Ludwig Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne and Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- From the Department of Pediatrics and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Ludwig Cancer Research, Royal Melbourne and Western Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
224
|
Fedewa SA, Sauer AG, Siegel RL, Jemal A. Prevalence of major risk factors and use of screening tests for cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 24:637-52. [PMID: 25834147 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Much of the suffering and death from cancer could be prevented by more systematic efforts to reduce tobacco use, improve diet, increase physical activity, reduce obesity, and expand the use of established screening tests. Monitoring the prevalence of cancer risk factors and screening is important to measure progress and strengthen cancer prevention and early detection efforts. In this review article, we provide recent prevalence estimates for several cancer risk factors, including tobacco, obesity, physical activity, nutrition, ultraviolet radiation exposure as well as human papillomavirus and hepatitis B vaccination coverage and cancer screening prevalence in the United States. In 2013, cigarette smoking prevalence was 17.8% among adults nationally, but ranged from 10.3% in Utah to 27.3% in West Virginia. In addition, 15.7% of U.S. high school students were current smokers. In 2011-2012, obesity prevalence was high among both adults (34.9%) and adolescents (20.5%), but has leveled off since 2002. About 20.2% of high school girls were users of indoor tanning devices, compared with 5.3% of boys. In 2013, cancer screening prevalence ranged from 58.6% for colorectal cancer to 80.8% for cervical cancer and remains low among the uninsured, particularly for colorectal cancer screening where only 21.9% of eligible adults received recommended colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Fedewa
- Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia. Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Ann Goding Sauer
- Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Department of Intramural Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
225
|
Wu H, Liu H, Liang C, Zhang S, Liu Z, Liu C, Liu Y, Hu M, Li C, Mei Y. Diffusion-weighted multiparametric MRI for monitoring longitudinal changes of parameters in rabbit VX2 liver tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44:707-14. [PMID: 26878263 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Haijun Wu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
- Graduate College; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou Guangdong Province PR China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Shuixing Zhang
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Zaiyi Liu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Chunling Liu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Yubao Liu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
| | - Maoqing Hu
- Department of Radiology; Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences; Guangzhou Guangdong PR China
- Graduate College; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou Guangdong Province PR China
| | - Chuanzi Li
- Graduate College; Southern Medical University; Guangzhou Guangdong Province PR China
| | | |
Collapse
|
226
|
Meyskens FL, Mukhtar H, Rock CL, Cuzick J, Kensler TW, Yang CS, Ramsey SD, Lippman SM, Alberts DS. Cancer Prevention: Obstacles, Challenges and the Road Ahead. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108:djv309. [PMID: 26547931 PMCID: PMC4907357 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2015] [Revised: 07/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Approaches to reduce the global burden of cancer include two major strategies: screening and early detection and active preventive intervention. The latter is the topic of this Commentary and spans a broad range of activities. The genetic heterogeneity and complexity of advanced cancers strongly support the rationale for early interruption of the carcinogenic process and an enhanced focus on prevention as a priority strategy to reduce the burden of cancer; however, the focus of cancer prevention management should be on individuals at high risk and on primary localized disease in which screening and detection should also play a vital role. The timing and dose of (chemo-)preventive intervention also affects response. The intervention may be ineffective if the target population is very high risk or already presenting with preneoplastic lesions with cellular changes that cannot be reversed. The field needs to move beyond general concepts of carcinogenesis to targeted organ site prevention approaches in patients at high risk, as is currently being done for breast and colorectal cancers. Establishing the benefit of new cancer preventive interventions will take years and possibly decades, depending on the outcome being evaluated. We also propose that comparative effectiveness research designs and the value of information obtained from large-scale prevention studies are necessary in order for preventive interventions to become a routine part of cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank L Meyskens
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY).
| | - Hasan Mukhtar
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Cheryl L Rock
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Thomas W Kensler
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Chung S Yang
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - Scott M Lippman
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| | - David S Alberts
- Biological Chemistry, Public Health, and Epidemiology, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine - University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA (FLMJr); Arizona Board of Regents Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Nutritional Sciences & BIO5, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Skin Cancer Institute, Tucson, AZ (DSA); Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine and Head, Centre for Cancer Prevention; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK (JC); Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (TWK); Moores Cancer Center (SML) and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Cancer Prevention and Control Program (CLR), UC San Diego, San Diego, CA (SML); Dermatology Research Laboratories, University of Wisconsin; Madison, WI (HM); Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA (SDR); Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ (CSY)
| |
Collapse
|
227
|
Zhao WH, Hao M, Cheng XT, Yang X, Wang ZL, Cheng KY, Liu FL, Bai YX. c-myc Gene Copy Number Variation in Cervical Exfoliated Cells Detected on Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Cervical Cancer Screening. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016; 81:416-23. [PMID: 26808725 DOI: 10.1159/000442286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the clinical significance of c-myc gene copy number gain detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) progression. METHODS We retrospectively investigated 140 Thinprep cytologic test (TCT) specimens that were histopathologically diagnosed with various stages of cervical neoplasia or malignancy. The specimens were subjected to TCT, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, and FISH analysis with a c-myc-specific probe. The diagnostic reliability of these methods in determining progression was assessed according to sensitivity, specificity, and κ coefficients. RESULTS The gene copy number gain of c-myc was significantly higher in the cervical lesion of advanced histologic grade (p < 0.001). For CIN2+ lesions, the sensitivities of TCT, HPV DNA testing, and FISH analysis were 72.3, 92.1, and 64.5%, respectively; the specificities were 81.3, 57.8, and 93.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). The κ coefficients between the c-myc gene test and either the TCT or the HPV DNA test were 0.538 and 0.399, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS FISH analysis of the c-myc oncogene could be a useful adjunct screening method for the early diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions. Moreover, c-myc may be a new molecular biomarker for the early diagnosis of cervical lesion progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Hong Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
228
|
Homan SG, Kayani N, Yun S. Risk Factors, Preventive Practices, and Health Care Among Breast Cancer Survivors, United States, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2016; 13:E09. [PMID: 26796517 PMCID: PMC4722934 DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.150377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We compared behavioral risk factors and preventive measures among female breast cancer survivors, female survivors of other types of cancers, and women without a history of cancer. Survivorship health care indicators for the 2 groups of cancer survivors were compared. METHODS Using data from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we calculated the proportion of women with risk factors and their engagement in preventive practices, stratified by cancer status (cancer survivors or women with no history of cancer), and compared the proportions after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS A significantly higher proportion of breast cancer survivors had mammography in the previous year (79.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 76.0%-83.0%) than did other cancer survivors (68.1%; 95% CI, 65.6%-70.7%) or women with no history of cancer (66.4%; 95% CI, 65.5%-67.3%). Breast cancer survivors were also more likely to have had a Papanicolaou (Pap) test within the previous 3 years than women with no history of cancer (89.4%; 95% CI, 85.9%-93.0 vs 85.1%; 95% CI, 84.4%-85.8%) and a colonoscopy within the previous 10 years (75.4%; 95% CI, 71.7%-79.0%) than women with no history of cancer (60.0%; 95% CI, 59.0%-61.0%). Current smoking was significantly lower among survivors of breast cancer (10.3%; 95% CI, 7.4%-13.2%) than other cancer survivors (20.8%; 95% CI, 18.4%-23.3%) and women with no history of cancer (18.3%; 95% CI, 17.5%-19.1%). After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, we found that breast cancer survivors were significantly more likely to have had mammography, a Pap test, and colonoscopy, and less likely to be current smokers. CONCLUSION Breast cancer survivors are more likely to engage in cancer screening and less likely to be current smokers than female survivors of other types of cancer or women with no history of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherri G Homan
- Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Division of Community and Public Health, Office of Epidemiology, 920 Wildwood, Jefferson City, MO 65109-5796. . Sherri Homan is also affiliated with the University of Missouri, Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Noaman Kayani
- Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, Missouri
| | - Shumei Yun
- Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, Missouri, and University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
229
|
Yörüker EE, Holdenrieder S, Gezer U. Blood-based biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. Clin Chim Acta 2016; 455:26-32. [PMID: 26797671 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated morbidity and mortality is increasing, in part due to a lack of early detection. Direct structural examination techniques, such as colonoscopy, are invasive and can therefore affect the willingness of patients to participate in screening. Recently, the use of "liquid biopsy" has gained considerable attention as a novel source of biomarkers. Blood-based biomarkers could prove to be practical tools for CRC detection, as the monitoring of biomarkers in biological fluids offers many advantages, including minimal invasiveness and easy accessibility. Biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity can enable the detection of CRC at an early stage, thereby improving prognosis, prediction of treatment response, and recurrence risk. In this review, we summarize that the biomarkers currently thought to have potential for the early detection and monitoring of CRC, including circulating tumor cells, DNA, RNA and proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebru E Yörüker
- Department of Basic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Stefan Holdenrieder
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ugur Gezer
- Department of Basic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
230
|
Roland KB, Benard VB, Greek A, Hawkins NA, Lin L. Changes in Knowledge and Beliefs About Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals in Low-Income Women After an Educational Intervention. J Prim Care Community Health 2016; 7:88-95. [PMID: 26763304 DOI: 10.1177/2150131915624869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women have been reluctant to adopt longer than annual intervals for cervical cancer screening, despite guidelines recommending screening every 3 to 5 years. Our study assessed patient knowledge and beliefs about human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer screening after exposure to an educational intervention, and whether there was a change in time regarding knowledge and beliefs among all study participants in an underserved population. METHOD The study was conducted in 15 clinics associated with 6 Federally Qualified Health Centers in Illinois, USA. Cervical cancer screening patients (n = 644) completed a baseline and postintervention follow-up survey. The intervention included an HPV test and an educational pamphlet. Significance testing of changes in knowledge and beliefs was conducted with multilevel, mixed-effects models adjusting for repeated measures of patients and clustering within clinics. RESULTS No significant differences in study outcomes were found between the intervention and control groups. Among all women, knowledge of HPV significantly improved over time. At follow-up, fewer women reported that having a co-test is good, wise, will give you peace of mind, will tell you whether you need to worry if Pap is abnormal, is something your doctor thinks you should have, and will give you the best care available. More women said it would be bad, useless, or worrying to wait 3 years for a Pap test at follow-up. CONCLUSION HPV knowledge improved over time, but the educational intervention utilized in this study was not successful in improving attitudes and beliefs about co-testing and longer screening intervals, and beliefs about HPV co-testing and 3-year screening intervals were less favorable. Having health care providers discuss the consequences of overscreening and the natural history of HPV and cervical cancer with their patients may help increase adherence to longer screening intervals. Further examination of the essential components for educational intervention in this population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vicki B Benard
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - April Greek
- Battelle, Health & Analytics, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lavinia Lin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
231
|
NIE JIAO, ZHAO CHANGLIN, DENG LI, CHEN JIA, YU BIN, WU XIANLIN, PANG PENG, CHEN XIAOYIN. Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine in treating cancer. Biomed Rep 2016; 4:3-14. [PMID: 26870326 PMCID: PMC4726876 DOI: 10.3892/br.2015.537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The morbidity associated with cancer has rapidly increased in recent years, and in the previous 5 years has had a tendency to be the leading cause of fatality compared with cardiovascular disease. Therefore, effective measures are required with an aim to reduce the incidence. Based on the results of clinical investigation, a multidisciplinary treatment strategy for cancer, which includes radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, are prominently used in clinical practice. However, the therapies are insufficient due to multidrug resistance, adverse effects and the presence of the root of the cancer. Therefore, there is a necessity to develop more effective or adjunctive therapies for cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer is now widely recognized as a systemic humoral disease. Similarly, the function of herbal drugs is to modulate the whole body system in a more holistic way. Recently, herbal drugs have been applied to one of the efficient approaches for cancer therapy. Furthermore, there is evidence that various herbal medicines have been proven to be useful and effective in sensitizing the conventional agents against the various factors at the cellular and molecular levels that are associated with the occurrence of cancer and in prolonging survival time, alleviating side effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy and improving the quality of life in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JIAO NIE
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - CHANGLIN ZHAO
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
- Department of Oncology, Clifford Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - LI DENG
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - JIA CHEN
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - BIN YU
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
- Clinical Institute, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272013, P.R. China
| | - XIANLIN WU
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
- Department of Pancreatic Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - PENG PANG
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| | - XIAOYIN CHEN
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical College of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
232
|
Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, Cannady RS, Pratt-Chapman ML, Edge SB, Jacobs LA, Hurria A, Marks LB, LaMonte SJ, Warner E, Lyman GH, Ganz PA. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66:43-73. [PMID: 26641959 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 477] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The purpose of the American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline is to provide recommendations to assist primary care and other clinicians in the care of female adult survivors of breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, gynecology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and nursing was formed and tasked with drafting the Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. A total of 1073 articles met inclusion criteria; and, after full text review, 237 were included as the evidence base. Patients should undergo regular surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, including evaluation with a cancer-related history and physical examination, and should be screened for new primary breast cancer. Data do not support performing routine laboratory tests or imaging tests in asymptomatic patients to evaluate for breast cancer recurrence. Primary care clinicians should counsel patients about the importance of maintaining a healthy lifestyle, monitor for post-treatment symptoms that can adversely affect quality of life, and monitor for adherence to endocrine therapy. Recommendations provided in this guideline are based on current evidence in the literature and expert consensus opinion. Most of the evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong evidence-based recommendation. Recommendations on surveillance for breast cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer and its treatment, health promotion, and care coordination/practice implications are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn D Runowicz
- Executive Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine Florida International University, Miami, FL
| | - Corinne R Leach
- Director, Cancer and Aging Research, Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Associate Professor, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Karen S Henry
- Nurse Practitioner, Oncology/Hematology Sylvester Cancer Center at the University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | | | | | - Rachel S Cannady
- Behavioral Scientist, Behavioral Research Center/National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Linda A Jacobs
- Clinical Professor of Nursing, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Associate Professor and Director, Cancer and Aging Research Program, City of Hope, Duarte, CA
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Sidney K. Simon Distinguished Professor of Oncology Research and Chairman, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Samuel J LaMonte
- Retired Head and Neck Surgeon, Survivorship Workgroup Member and Volunteer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ellen Warner
- Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto, Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Gary H Lyman
- Co-Director Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Distinguished Professor of Medicine and Health Policy & Management, Schools of Medicine and Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
233
|
Ren X, Liu L, Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Li H. Nanoparticle siRNA against BMI-1 with a Polyethylenimine-Laminarin Conjugate for Gene Therapy in Human Breast Cancer. Bioconjug Chem 2015; 27:66-73. [PMID: 26629893 DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The B-cell-specific Moloney leukemia virus inset site 1 gene (BMI-1) has attracted considerable attention in recent years because of its key role in breast cancer development and metastasis. The downregulation of BMI-1 expression via small interfering RNA (siRNA) effectively inhibits tumor growth. However, the successful application of this therapy is limited by the unavailability of an appropriate vector for siRNA transfer. Therefore, this study aimed to construct a novel laminarin-based nonviral gene transfer vector to carry a constructed BMI-1-targeting siRNA and to investigate the in vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of this siRNA on breast cancer cells. To enhance the siRNA-carrying capacity, we introduced polyethylenimine (PEI) to laminarin's surface via N,N'-carbonyldiimidazole, which produced the cationic PEI-modified laminarin conjugate nLP. Subsequent in vitro experiments indicated that nLP not only formed a nanoparticle with a diameter of 200 nm through electrostatic interactions with siRNA but also showed high efficiency (95.0%) in the delivery siRNA to MCF-7 cells. The nanoparticle targeting BMI-1 (nLP/siBMI-2) reduced BMI-1 expression in breast MCF-7 cells by 90.9% reduction. An in vivo tumor suppression experiment demonstrated that the nLP/siBMI-2 nanoparticle had relatively low toxicity and good gene-therapeutic efficacy, with a tumor inhibition rate of 46.6%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueling Ren
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University , Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | - Yuxue Zhou
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Zhenzhong Zhang
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| | - Huixiang Li
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University , Zhengzhou 450052, China.,Department of Pathology, Basic Medical College of Zhengzhou University , 100 Kexue Avenue, Zhengzhou 450001, China
| |
Collapse
|
234
|
Cooper GS, Kou TD, Schluchter MD, Dor A, Koroukian SM. Changes in Receipt of Cancer Screening in Medicare Beneficiaries Following the Affordable Care Act. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108:djv374. [PMID: 26640244 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Affordable Care Act (ACA) removed copayments for screening mammography and colonoscopy in Medicare beneficiaries, but its clinical impact is unknown. METHODS Using a 5% random sample of Medicare claims from 2009 through 2012 in individuals age 70 years or older who were due for screening, we examined claims for screening mammography and screening or surveillance colonoscopy for two years prior to ACA (2009-2010) and two years post-ACA (2011-2012). Receipt of the procedures at the patient level was compared across years using generalized estimating equations. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Compared with 2009, we found an increase in mammography uptake during the ACA coverage period, with multivariable odds ratios (MOR) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20 to 1.25, P < .001) for 2011 and 1.17 (95% CI = 1.15 to 1.20, P < .001) for 2012 and less change in 2010 (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.05, P = .01). In contrast to mammography, uptake of screening or surveillance colonoscopy decreased in 2012 (MOR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.92 to 0.98, P = .002) compared with 2009, with no change in 2010 (MOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.04, P = .47) or 2011 (MOR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.04, P = .34). Other factors associated with procedure receipt included younger age and prior preventive health visits. In an analysis restricted to patients age 70 to 74 years, colonoscopy use increased slightly in 2011 but was unchanged in 2012, and the findings by year for mammography were consistent with the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS Following ACA implementation with concomitant reduction in out-of-pocket expenditures, there was a statistically significant increment in mammography uptake but not colonoscopy. This suggests that affordability is a necessary but not sufficient facilitator of preventive services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory S Cooper
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (GSC, TDK); Comprehensive Cancer Center (GSC, MDS, SMK) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SMK), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC (AD).
| | - Tzuyung D Kou
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (GSC, TDK); Comprehensive Cancer Center (GSC, MDS, SMK) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SMK), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC (AD)
| | - Mark D Schluchter
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (GSC, TDK); Comprehensive Cancer Center (GSC, MDS, SMK) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SMK), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC (AD)
| | - Avi Dor
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (GSC, TDK); Comprehensive Cancer Center (GSC, MDS, SMK) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SMK), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC (AD)
| | - Siran M Koroukian
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (GSC, TDK); Comprehensive Cancer Center (GSC, MDS, SMK) and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (SMK), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, DC (AD)
| |
Collapse
|
235
|
Kaniklidis C. Mammography, Martin Yaffe, and me: response and appreciation. Curr Oncol 2015; 22:e404-8. [PMID: 26628887 DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
I thank Dr. Martin Yaffe for his many constructive comments in his thoughtful review of my previous invited editorial, providing valuable insights into the complex and controversial issues of the current mammography debate. [...]
Collapse
|
236
|
Erdogan S, Yilmaz FM, Yazici O, Yozgat A, Sezer S, Ozdemir N, Uysal S, Purnak T, Sendur MA, Ozaslan E. Inflammation and chemerin in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol 2015; 37:6337-42. [DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4483-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
237
|
Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015; 205:1365-71. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.15.15293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
238
|
Cervical cancer screening among women ≥70 years of age in the United States-A referral problem or patient choice. Prev Med 2015; 81:427-32. [PMID: 26500084 PMCID: PMC4679483 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical guidelines recommend that women with a history of adequate screening and not otherwise at high risk may discontinue cervical cancer screening after 65 years of age. However, screening remains common among US women over 65 years old. This study was conducted to examine whether overutilization was attributable to provider's recommendation or patient choice. METHOD This cross-sectional study used data from 1752 female participants (70+ years) from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We quantitatively assessed the proportions of provider-recommended and patient self-initiated Pap smears. RESULTS Among female respondents, 40.8% had a Pap smear within the past 3 years, 19.4% had a Pap smear in the last year, and 39.7% reported receiving a recommendation for a Pap smear from their provider in the past year. Among women who received a recommendation to obtain a Pap smear, 39.8% did so within the past 12 months compared to 5.9% of women who did not receive a recommendation (adjusted odds ratio 10.5, 95% confidence interval 7.39-15.0). About 70% of women who visited an obstetrician/gynecologist and reported receiving a recommendation to have a Pap smear did so in the past year, while 32.3% of women who visited an obstetrician/gynecologist but did not receive a recommendation obtained one. CONCLUSION Pap smears were common among women ≥70 years of age. Health care providers may need additional education on current guidelines regarding indications for Pap smears in this age group to help reduce screening of patients who may not benefit.
Collapse
|
239
|
Kim J, Yun SJ, Kim WJ. Virus encoded circulatory miRNAs for early detection of prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2015; 15:116. [PMID: 26612689 PMCID: PMC4662007 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0111-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and kills about 28,000 American men annually. Although progress has been made in understanding the molecular features of different forms of the disease, PCa is considered incurable when it becomes resistant to standard therapies. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) test has been a gold standard of diagnosis for PCa, however, it can result in lead to the unnecessary biopsies and treatment of indolent cancers due to the low specificity. Thus, the limitations of PSA screening for PCa have prompted much focus on strategies how to enhance the accuracy of PSA for distinction between aggressive and indolent cancers. DISCUSSION Studies of miRNAs in PCa patients have suggested differentially expressed miRNAs between healthy controls and those with PCa, providing potential biomarker candidates using body fluids including urine and blood. Virus infection has been considered to associate with PCa incidence. Virus infected PCa cells may shed extracellular vesicles and communicate with neighboring cells, which were not infected yet, however, no mechanistic approaches were performed to understand the biology. The miRNAs composition in the shedding extracellular vesicles, and its role in PCa are completely undefined. In the near future, new insights to connect between the viral derived miRNAs and PCa progression might provide an opportunity to diagnose, risk prediction and therapeutic strategies. The goal of this debate article is to provide a short review on miRNAs, virus infection and viral encoded miRNAs in PCa, with a primary focus on circulating miRNAs as potential non-invasive biomarkers for PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayoung Kim
- Departments of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Davis Room 5071, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
- Departments of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Seok Joong Yun
- Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 62 Kaeshin-dong, Heungduk-gu, Cheongju, 361-763, Republic of Korea.
| | - Wun-Jae Kim
- Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 62 Kaeshin-dong, Heungduk-gu, Cheongju, 361-763, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
240
|
BRYUKHOVETSKIY IGOR, BRYUKHOVETSKIY ANDREY, KHOTIMCHENKO YURI, MISCHENKO POLINA. Novel cellular and post-genomic technologies in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (Review). Oncol Rep 2015; 35:639-48. [DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
241
|
Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Miller KD, Goding-Sauer A, Pinheiro PS, Martinez-Tyson D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:457-80. [PMID: 26375877 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 350] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is the leading cause of death among Hispanics/Latinos, who represent the largest racial/ethnic minority group in the United States, accounting for 17.4% (55.4 million/318 million) of the total US population in 2014. Every 3 years, the American Cancer Society reports on cancer statistics for Hispanics based on incidence data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. Among Hispanics in 2015, there will be an estimated 125,900 new cancer cases diagnosed and 37,800 cancer deaths. For all cancers combined, Hispanics have 20% lower incidence rates and 30% lower death rates compared with non-Hispanic whites (NHWs); however, death rates are slightly higher among Hispanics during adolescence (aged 15-19 years). Hispanic cancer rates vary by country of origin and are generally lowest in Mexicans, with the exception of infection-associated cancers. Liver cancer incidence rates in Hispanic men, which are twice those in NHW men, doubled from 1992 to 2012; however, rates in men aged younger than 50 years declined by 43% since 2003, perhaps a bellwether of future trends for this highly fatal cancer. Variations in cancer risk between Hispanics and NHWs, as well as between subpopulations, are driven by differences in exposure to cancer-causing infectious agents, rates of screening, and lifestyle patterns. Strategies for reducing cancer risk in Hispanic populations include increasing the uptake of preventive services (e.g., screening and vaccination) and targeted interventions to reduce obesity, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Siegel
- Director, Surveillance Information, Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Stacey A Fedewa
- Director, Risk Factor and Screening Surveillance, Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kimberly D Miller
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ann Goding-Sauer
- Epidemiologist, Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Vice President, Surveillance and Health Services Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
242
|
Verma M, Sarfaty M, Brooks D, Wender RC. Population-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:497-510. [PMID: 26331705 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Screening to detect polyps or cancer at an early stage has been shown to produce better outcomes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Programs with a population-based approach can reach a large majority of the eligible population and can offer cost-effective interventions with the potential benefit of maximizing early cancer detection and prevention using a complete follow-up plan. The purpose of this review was to summarize the key features of population-based programs to increase CRC screening in the United States. A search was conducted in the SCOPUS, OvidSP, and PubMed databases. The authors selected published reports of population-based programs that met at least 5 of the 6 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) criteria for cancer prevention and were known to the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Interventions at the level of individual practices were not included in this review. IARC cancer prevention criteria served as a framework to assess the effective processes and elements of a population-based program. Eight programs were included in this review. Half of the programs met all IARC criteria, and all programs led to improvements in screening rates. The rate of colonoscopy after a positive stool test was heterogeneous among programs. Different population-based strategies were used to promote these screening programs, including system-based, provider-based, patient-based, and media-based strategies. Treatment of identified cancer cases was not included explicitly in 4 programs but was offered through routine medical care. Evidence-based methods for promoting CRC screening at a population level can guide the development of future approaches in health care prevention. The key elements of a successful population-based approach include adherence to the 6 IARC criteria and 4 additional elements (an identified external funding source, a structured policy for positive fecal occult blood test results and confirmed cancer cases, outreach activities for recruitment and patient education, and an established rescreening process).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Verma
- Research Scientist, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mona Sarfaty
- Director, Program for Climate and Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
| | - Durado Brooks
- Director, Cancer Control Intervention, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Richard C Wender
- Chief Cancer Control Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
243
|
Aghaei F, Tan M, Hollingsworth AB, Qian W, Liu H, Zheng B. Computer-aided breast MR image feature analysis for prediction of tumor response to chemotherapy. Med Phys 2015; 42:6520-8. [PMID: 26520742 PMCID: PMC4617733 DOI: 10.1118/1.4933198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 08/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify a new clinical marker based on quantitative kinetic image features analysis and assess its feasibility to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS The authors assembled a dataset involving breast MR images acquired from 68 cancer patients before undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among them, 25 patients had complete response (CR) and 43 had partial and nonresponse (NR) to chemotherapy based on the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The authors developed a computer-aided detection scheme to segment breast areas and tumors depicted on the breast MR images and computed a total of 39 kinetic image features from both tumor and background parenchymal enhancement regions. The authors then applied and tested two approaches to classify between CR and NR cases. The first one analyzed each individual feature and applied a simple feature fusion method that combines classification results from multiple features. The second approach tested an attribute selected classifier that integrates an artificial neural network (ANN) with a wrapper subset evaluator, which was optimized using a leave-one-case-out validation method. RESULTS In the pool of 39 features, 10 yielded relatively higher classification performance with the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) ranging from 0.61 to 0.78 to classify between CR and NR cases. Using a feature fusion method, the maximum AUC=0.85±0.05. Using the ANN-based classifier, AUC value significantly increased to 0.96±0.03 (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of kinetic image features computed from breast MR images acquired prechemotherapy has potential to generate a useful clinical marker in predicting tumor response to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faranak Aghaei
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
| | - Maxine Tan
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
| | | | - Wei Qian
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas, El Paso, Texas 79968
| | - Hong Liu
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
| | - Bin Zheng
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
| |
Collapse
|
244
|
El-Shami K, Oeffinger KC, Erb NL, Willis A, Bretsch JK, Pratt-Chapman ML, Cannady RS, Wong SL, Rose J, Barbour AL, Stein KD, Sharpe KB, Brooks DD, Cowens-Alvarado RL. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:428-55. [PMID: 26348643 PMCID: PMC5385892 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 321] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death in both men and women and second leading cause of cancer death when men and women are combined in the United States (US). Almost two-thirds of CRC survivors are living 5 years after diagnosis. Considering the recent decline in both incidence and mortality, the prevalence of CRC survivors is likely to increase dramatically over the coming decades with the increase in rates of CRC screening, further advances in early detection and treatment and the aging and growth of the US population. Survivors are at risk for a CRC recurrence, a new primary CRC, other cancers, as well as both short-term and long-term adverse effects of the CRC and the modalities used to treat it. CRC survivors may also have psychological, reproductive, genetic, social, and employment concerns after treatment. Communication and coordination of care between the treating oncologist and the primary care clinician is critical to effectively and efficiently manage the long-term care of CRC survivors. The guidelines in this article are intended to assist primary care clinicians in delivering risk-based health care for CRC survivors who have completed active therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled El-Shami
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Director, Cancer Survivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicole L Erb
- Program Manager, National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Anne Willis
- Director, Patient-Centered Programs, The George Washington University Cancer Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Jennifer K Bretsch
- Director, Performance Improvement, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | | | - Rachel S Cannady
- Behavioral Scientist, Behavioral Research Center/National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Johnie Rose
- Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine/Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
| | - April L Barbour
- Associate Professor of Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Kevin D Stein
- Vice President, Behavioral Research, Director, Behavioral Research Center, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Katherine B Sharpe
- Senior Vice President, Patient and Caregiver Support, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Durado D Brooks
- Director, Cancer Control Intervention, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado
- Vice President, Behavioral Research, South Atlantic Health Systems, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
245
|
Pellegrini KL, Sanda MG, Moreno CS. RNA biomarkers to facilitate the identification of aggressive prostate cancer. Mol Aspects Med 2015; 45:37-46. [PMID: 26022941 PMCID: PMC4637232 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2015.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A large number of men are diagnosed with prostate cancer each year, but many will not experience morbidity or mortality as a result of their cancers. Therefore, biomarkers for prostate cancer are necessary to carefully select patients for initial diagnostic biopsy or to facilitate care decisions for men who have already been diagnosed with prostate cancer. RNA-based approaches to biomarker discovery allow the investigation of non-coding RNAs, gene fusion transcripts, splice variants, and multi-gene expression panels in tissue, urine, or blood as opportunities to improve care decisions. This review focuses on RNA biomarkers that are available as commercial assays, and therefore already available for potential clinical use, as well as providing an overview of newer RNA biomarkers that are in earlier stages of clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn L Pellegrini
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Martin G Sanda
- Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Carlos S Moreno
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
246
|
Alqahtani S, Khoja A. Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a Needed Intervention in Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16:7391. [PMID: 26514542 DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.16.7391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shareef Alqahtani
- Surgery Department, King Fahad Specialist Hospital-Dammam, Saudi Arabia E-mail :
| | | |
Collapse
|
247
|
Peng L, Song L, Liu C, Lv X, Li X, Jie J, Zhao D, Li D. piR-55490 inhibits the growth of lung carcinoma by suppressing mTOR signaling. Tumour Biol 2015; 37:2749-56. [PMID: 26408181 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4056-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung carcinoma is the most common human cancer with poor prognosis and has an increasing incidence in recent years. However, the related mechanism of lung cancer onset has not been completely explored. Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) is a type of noncoding small RNA with established function in germ cells, and interestingly, piRNA has also been shown to be implicated in cancer biology. In this study, piR-55490 was found to be silenced in lung carcinoma specimens and cell lines, compared with normal lung tissues and cells. Intriguingly, the expression level of piR-55490 is negatively associated with patients' survival. Restoration of piR-55490 can reduce the proliferation rates of lung cancer cells, while piR-55490 suppression led to the gain in the proliferation rates. Animal model study showed that piR-55490 can suppress the growth of lung carcinoma xenograft. Further study revealed that piR-55490 suppressed the activation of Akt/mTOR pathway in lung cancer cells. Surprisingly, piR-55490 was found to bind 3'UTR of mTOR messenger RNA (mRNA) and induce its degradation in a mechanism similar to microRNA (miRNA). The introduction of an mTOR construct resistant to action of piR-55490 was able to abolish the effect of piR-55490 on lung cancer cells. In conclusions, we found that piRNA can contribute to the suppression of cancer cell phenotypes by directly targeting a oncogene mRNA. This finding facilitates our understanding of piRNA's function and its association with human cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Peng
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Lei Song
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Chaoying Liu
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xiaohong Lv
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Xiaoping Li
- Department of Pediatrics, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Jing Jie
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Dan Zhao
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Dan Li
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
248
|
Quinn GP, Sanchez JA, Sutton SK, Vadaparampil ST, Nguyen GT, Green BL, Kanetsky PA, Schabath MB. Cancer and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65:384-400. [PMID: 26186412 PMCID: PMC4609168 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 301] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2015] [Revised: 05/29/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the current literature on seven cancer sites that may disproportionately affect lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) populations. For each cancer site, the authors present and discuss the descriptive statistics, primary prevention, secondary prevention and preclinical disease, tertiary prevention and late-stage disease, and clinical implications. Finally, an overview of psychosocial factors related to cancer survivorship is offered as well as strategies for improving access to care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
- Corresponding Author: Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Ph.D, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive MRC-CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612, | Fax: 1-813-449-8019
| | - Julian A. Sanchez
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Steven K. Sutton
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Susan T. Vadaparampil
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
| | - Giang T. Nguyen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B. Lee Green
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
- Diversity and Communication Relations, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Peter A. Kanetsky
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Matthew B. Schabath
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology; H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
249
|
Fedewa SA, Ma J, Sauer AG, Siegel RL, Smith RA, Wender RC, Doroshenk MK, Brawley OW, Ward EM, Jemal A. How many individuals will need to be screened to increase colorectal cancer screening prevalence to 80% by 2018? Cancer 2015; 121:4258-65. [PMID: 26308967 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2015] [Revised: 07/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent study estimates that 277,000 colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and 203,000 CRC deaths will be averted between 2013 and 2030 if the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable goal of increasing CRC screening prevalence to 80% by 2018 is reached. However, the number of individuals who need to be screened (NNS) to achieve this goal is unknown. In this communication, the authors estimate the NNS to achieve 80% by 2018 nationwide and by state. METHODS The authors estimated the NNS by subtracting adults aged 50 to 75 years who would need to be screened to achieve an 80% CRC screening prevalence from the number who are currently guideline-compliant from population estimates for this age group. The 2013 National Health Interview Survey and the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were used to estimate CRC screening prevalence and data from the US Census Bureau were used to estimate population projections. The NNS were age-standardized and sex-standardized. RESULTS Nationwide, 24.39 million individuals (95% confidence interval, 24.37-24.41 million) aged 50 to 75 years will need to be screened to achieve 80% by 2018. By state, the NNS ranged from 45,400 in Vermont to 2.72 million in California. The majority of individuals who need to be screened are aged 50 to 64 years and the largest subgroup is privately insured. CONCLUSIONS The authors estimated that at least 24.4 million additional individuals in the United States will need to be screened to achieve the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable goal of increasing CRC screening prevalence to 80% by 2018. To reach this goal, improving facilitators of CRC screening, including physician recommendation and patient awareness, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacey A Fedewa
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.,Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jiemin Ma
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ann Goding Sauer
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert A Smith
- Cancer Control Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Richard C Wender
- Cancer Control Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary K Doroshenk
- Cancer Control Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Otis W Brawley
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elizabeth M Ward
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Services Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
250
|
YAN SHI, YUAN CUNZHONG, YANG QIFENG, LI XIAOYAN, YANG NING, LIU XIAOYAN, DONG RUIHUA, ZHANG XI, YUAN ZENG, ZHANG NING, KONG BEIHUA. A genetic polymorphism (rs17251221) in the calcium-sensing receptor is associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility. Oncol Rep 2015; 34:2151-5. [DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|