Germline mutations in the ribonuclease L gene in families showing linkage with HPC1

An Apoptotic Signaling Pathway in the Interferon Antiviral Response Mediated by RNase L and c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase

Cellular stress responses induced during viral infections are critical to the health and survival of organisms. In higher vertebrates, interferons (IFNs) mediate the innate antiviral response in part through the action of RNase L, a uniquely regulated enzyme. RNase L is activated by 5'-phosphorylated, 2'-5' oligoadenylates (2-5A) produced from IFN-inducible and double stranded RNA-dependent synthetases. We show that viral activation of the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNK) family of MAP kinases and viral induction of apoptosis are both deficient in mouse cells lacking RNase L. Also, JNK phosphorylation in response to 2-5A was greatly reduced in RNase L-/- mouse cells. In addition, 2-5A treatment of the human ovarian carcinoma cell line, Hey1b, resulted in specific ribosomal RNA cleavage products coinciding with JNK activation. Furthermore, suppression of JNK activity with the chemical inhibitor, SP600125, prevented apoptosis induced by 2-5A. In contrast, inhibition of alternative MAP kinases, p38 and ERK, failed to prevent 2-5A-mediated apoptosis. Short interfering RNA to JNK1/JNK2 mRNAs resulted in JNK ablation while also suppressing 2-5A-mediated apoptosis. Moreover, Jnk1-/- Jnk2-/- cells were highly resistant to the apoptotic effects of IFN and 2-5A. These findings suggest that JNK and RNase L function in an integrated signaling pathway during the IFN response that leads to elimination of virus-infected cells through apoptosis.

Genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer: a review

A genetic component in prostate cancer has been recognized since decades. Through numerous epidemiological and molecular biological studies, much evidence has accumulated in favor of a significant but heterogeneous hereditary component in prostate cancer (PCa) susceptibility. Since the mapping of a high-penetrant PCa susceptibility locus at 1q24-25, much attention has been paid to the identification of PCa susceptibility genes. So far, seven loci have been mapped, and at three of these loci, genes have been cloned and mutations identified. Yet their role in hereditary and sporadic disease is still under debate and probably very modest. Although research on hereditary prostate cancer has improved our knowledge of the genetic etiology of the disease, still a lot of questions remain unanswered. Here, we aim to review the genetic epidemiological and molecular biological research in the field of hereditary prostate cancer and the problems that are encountered with this research.

Genomewide linkage analysis of familial prostate cancer in the Japanese population

Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality in Western countries, and familial aggregation of PC is well known. Multiple PC susceptibility loci have been reported in Western countries, but attempts to confirm the loci in independent data sets have proven to be inconsistent. We performed a genomewide linkage analysis with 53 affected sib pairs to identify genetic loci related to PC in a Japanese population. Two linkage analyses, GENEHUNTER-PLUS and SIBPAL, were applied and detected nominal statistical significance of linkage to PC at chromosome 1p and 8p, which were reported as being loci for PC in Caucasians. The best evidence of linkage was detected near D8S550 on 8p23 (maximum Zlr=2.25, P=0.037), and the second-best evidence of linkage was observed near D1S2667 on 1p36 (maximum Zlr=2.24, P=0.034). This is the first genetic mapping of PC in Japanese, and the results suggest that susceptibilities to PC lie close to D8S550 on 8p23 and D1S2667 on 1p36.

Human prostate cancer precursors and pathobiology

Prostate cancer is among the most common malignancies. It is estimated that 1 in 6 men in the United States will be diagnosed with this disease. Despite the high prevalence and importance of prostate cancer, the molecular mechanisms underlying its development and progression remain poorly understood. This article reviews new information about the roles of oxidants and electrophiles in prostate cancer; the potential importance of chronic inflammation and atrophy in prostate carcinogenesis, and implications for chemoprevention; evidence supporting telomere shortening and genetic instability in the etiology of prostate cancer; and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) as a potential marker for prostate carcinogenesis. These new results show that at least some high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PIN) and early adenocarcinomas appear to arise from proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA). Inflammation and other environmental factors may lead to the destruction of prostate epithelial cells, and increased proliferation may occur as a response to this cell death. Such proliferation may be mechanistically related to decreased p27(Kip1) observed in PIA. The decreased apoptosis associated with these events may also be related to increased expression of Bcl-2. Increased oxidant and electrophile stress in the setting of increased proliferation associated with these events may lead to elevated glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) expression as a genomic-protective measure. However, aberrant methylation of the CpG island of the GSTP1 gene promoter silences GSTP1 gene expression and protein levels, setting the stage for additional genetic damage and accelerated progression toward PIN and carcinoma. Additional results show that AMACR may be an important new marker of prostate cancer, and its use in combination with p63 staining may provide the basis for an improved method for identification of prostate cancer.

Genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes using families from the University of Michigan prostate cancer genetics project finds evidence for linkage on chromosome 17 near BRCA1

BACKGROUND

Previous linkage studies have suggested prostate cancer susceptibility genes located on chromosomes 1, 20, and X. Several putative prostate cancer candidate genes have also been identified including RNASEL, MSR1, and ELAC2. Presently, these linkage regions and candidate genes appear to explain only a small proportion of hereditary prostate cancer cases suggesting the need for additional whole genome analyses.

METHODS

A genome-wide mode-of-inheritance-free linkage scan, using 405 genetic markers, was conducted on 175 pedigrees, the majority containing three or more affected individuals diagnosed with prostate cancer. Stratified linkage analyses were performed based on previously established criteria.

RESULTS

Results based on the entire set of 175 pedigrees showed strong suggestive evidence for linkage on chromosome 17q (LOD = 2.36), with strongest evidence coming from the subset of pedigrees with four or more affected individuals (LOD = 3.27). Race specific analyses revealed strong suggestive evidence for linkage in our African-American pedigrees on chromosome 22q (LOD = 2.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Genome-wide analysis of a large set of prostate cancer families indicates new areas of the genome that may harbor prostate cancer susceptibility genes. Specifically, our linkage results suggest that there is a prostate cancer susceptibility gene on chromosome 17 that is independent of ELAC2. Further research including combined analyses of independent genome-wide scan data may clarify the most important regions for future investigation.

Where are the prostate cancer genes?--A summary of eight genome wide searches

BACKGROUND

There is strong evidence for genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer, but most of the genes underlying this susceptibility remain to be identified.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of eight genome-wide linkage searches based on 1,293 families with multiple cases of prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Across these studies, 11 linkage peaks with LOD scores in excess of 2 were identified. However, no chromosomal region was reported as significant at this level by more than one study and only one corresponded to a peak previously suggested by another group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that prostate cancer is genetically complex, and that combined analyses of large family sets will be required to evaluate reliably the linkage evidence.

Mutations in Ribonuclease L Gene Do NotOccur at a Greater Frequency in Patients with Familial Prostate Cancer Compared with Patients with Sporadic Prostate Cancer

Several genetic loci are suspected to be involved in hereditary prostate cancer, including the hereditary prostate cancer 1 (HPC1) locus at chromosome 1q24-25. The ribonuclease L (RNase L) gene has been reported as the putative hereditary prostate cancer gene located at HPC1. If this is the case, mutations of RNase L should be found at a greater frequency in familial cancers than in sporadic prostate cancers. Examination of familial and sporadic cases of prostate cancer by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing resulted in a mutational frequency rate that was not statistically different between the 2 forms of the disease. These results suggest that the mutations examined within this study are rare and may contribute to very few familial prostate cancers.

Genomic scan of 254 hereditary prostate cancer families

Hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease, complicating efforts to map and clone susceptibility loci. We have used stratification of a large dataset of 254 HPC families in an effort to improve power to detect HPC loci and to understand what types of family features may improve locus identification. The strongest result is that of a dominant locus at 6p22.3 (heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) = 2.51), the evidence for which is increased by consideration of the age of PC onset (HLOD = 3.43 in 214 families with median age-of-onset 56-72 years) and co-occurrence of primary brain cancer (HLOD = 2.34 in 21 families) in the families. Additional regions for which we observe modest evidence for linkage include chromosome 7q and 17p. Only weak evidence of several previously implicated HPC regions is detected. These analyses support the existence of multiple HPC loci, whose presence may be best identified by analyses of large, including pooled, datasets which consider locus heterogeneity.

Results of a genome-wide linkage analysis in prostate cancer families ascertained through the ACTANE consortium

BACKGROUND

The aggregation of prostate cancer within families suggests a major inherited component to the disease. Genetic linkage studies have identified several chromosomal regions that may contain prostate cancer susceptibility loci, but none has been definitively implicated.

METHODS

We performed a genome-wide linkage search based on 64 families, 63 with at least 3 cases of prostate cancer, ascertained in five countries. The majority of cases from these centers presented with clinically detected disease. Four hundred and one polymorphic markers were typed in 268 individuals. Multipoint heterogeneity analysis was conducted under three models of susceptibility; non-parametric analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Some weak evidence of linkage, under at least one of the genetic models, was observed to markers on chromosomes 2 (heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) = 1.15, P = 0.021), 3 (HLOD = 1.25, P = 0.016), 4 (HLOD = 1.28, P = 0.015), 5 (HLOD = 1.20, P = 0.019), 6 (HLOD = 1.41, P = 0.011), and 11 (HLOD = 1.24, P = 0.018), and in two regions on chromosome 18 (HLOD = 1.40, P = 0.011 and HLOD = 1.34, P = 0.013). There were no HLOD scores greater than 1.5 under any model, and no locus would be predicted to explain more than half of the genetic effect. No evidence in favor of linkage to previously suggested regions on chromosomes 1, 8, 17, 20, or X was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic susceptibility to prostate cancer is likely to be controlled by many loci, with no single gene explaining a large fraction of the familial risk. Pooling of results from all available genome scans is likely to be required to obtain definitive linkage results.

Genome-wide scan of brothers: replication and fine mapping of prostate cancer susceptibility and aggressiveness loci

BACKGROUND

Substantial evidence suggests that genetic factors play an important role in both the risk of prostate cancer and its biologic aggressiveness. Here we investigate prostate cancer susceptibility and aggressiveness with genome-wide linkage analyses of affected brothers.

METHODS

We first undertook a new genome-wide linkage study of 259 brothers with prostate cancer. Our analyses tested whether the proportion of marker alleles shared by brothers was correlated with disease status or Gleason score. To further clarify 11 linkage regions observed here or previously, we genotyped and analyzed an additional 101 finely spaced markers in the 259 men, and in 594 previously studied brothers, allowing for a pooled genome-wide analysis of 853 affected brothers.

RESULTS

In the new study, we detected linkage to prostate cancer on chromosome 16q23 (P = 0.009), replicating previous results, and to chromosome 11q24 (P = 0.001). In the pooled analysis, the 16q23 linkage was strengthened (P = 0.0005), as was our previous linkage to chromosome 16p (P = 0.0001), and we detected linkage to chromosome 2q32 (P = 0.009). When evaluating Gleason score, our new study detected linkage to chromosome 7q32 (P = 0.0009), again replicating previous results, and to chromosomes 5p15 (P = 0.003), 9q34 (P = 0.009), 10q26 (P = 0.03), and 18p11 (P = 0.02). In the pooled analysis of Gleason score, we observed stronger linkage to chromosome 7q32 (P = 0.0002), but slightly weaker linkage to chromosomes 5q33 (P = 0.005) and 19q13 (P = 0.009) than previously reported. In addition, the new linkages to chromosomes 10q26 and 18p11 were strengthened (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide compelling evidence for loci harboring prostate cancer susceptibility and tumor aggressiveness genes, especially on chromosomes 16q23 and 7q32.

Genome linkage screen for prostate cancer susceptibility loci: results from the Mayo Clinic Familial Prostate Cancer Study

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men and has long been recognized to occur in familial clusters. Brothers and sons of affected men have a twofold to threefold increased risk of developing prostate cancer. However, identification of genetic susceptibility loci for prostate cancer has been extremely difficult. Several putative loci identified by genetic linkage have been reported to exist on chromosomes 1 (HPC1, PCAP, and CAPB), X (HPCX), 17 (HPC2), and 20 (HPC20), with genes RNASEL (HPC1) and ELAC2 (HPC2) tentatively defined. In this study, we report our genome linkage scan in 160 prostate cancer families, using the ABI Prism Linkage Mapping Set Version 2 with 402 microsatellite markers. The most significant linkage was found for chromosome 20, with a recessive model heterogeneity LOD score (HLOD) of 4.77, and a model-free LOD score (LOD - ZLR) of 3.46 for the entire group of pedigrees. Linkage for chromosome 20 was most prominent among families with a late age of diagnosis (average age at diagnosis >/= 66 years; maximum LOD - ZLR = 2.82), with <5 affected family members (LOD - ZLR = 3.02), with presence of hereditary prostate cancer (LOD - ZLR = 2.81), or with no male-to-male transmission of disease (LOD - ZLR = 3.84). No other chromosome showed significant evidence for linkage. However, chromosomes 6 and X showed suggestive results, with maximum LOD - ZLR values of 1.38 and 1.36, respectively. Subset analyses suggest additional chromosomal regions worth further follow-up.

Genome-wide scan for linkage in finnish hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) families identifies novel susceptibility loci at 11q14 and 3p25-26

BACKGROUND

In order to identify predisposition loci to hereditary prostate cancer (HPC), we performed a genome-wide linkage analysis using samples from a genetically homogeneous population, with 13 Finnish multiplex prostate cancer families.

METHODS

Altogether 87 DNA samples were genotyped from 13 families. Logarithm-of-odds (LOD) scores were calculated for all autosomes using FASTLINK and GENEHUNTER designating all unaffected men and all women as unknown.

RESULTS

The highest LOD scores in the affected-only analyses were found at 11q14, where the two-point LOD score was 2.97 (theta = 0.0 at D11S901), GENEHUNTER heterogeneity LOD (HLOD) of 3.36, and a non-parametric-linkage (NPL) score of 2.67 (P = 0.008). A second positive site was at 3p25-26, with a two-point LOD score of 2.57 (theta = 0.01 at D3S1297), HLOD of 2.15, and NPL score of 2.27 (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest two HPC regions in the Finnish population, which have not been reported previously and warrant further study.

Genome-wide scan for prostate cancer susceptibility genes in the Johns Hopkins hereditary prostate cancer families

BACKGROUND

Although the subject of intensive study, the genetic influences responsible for familial clustering of prostate cancer remain largely unidentified. Genome-wide scans for linkage in prostate cancer families can be used to systematically search for genes capable of affecting risk for the disease.

METHODS

All available family members from 188 families, each having at least three first-degree relatives affected with prostate cancer, were genotyped at 406 markers distributed across the genome at average intervals of less than 10 cM. Genotype data was analyzed using primarily a non-parametric, multipoint approach, although parametric analyses were performed as well.

RESULTS

The strongest evidence for linkage was observed at D4S1615, at 4q21 (LOD of 2.8, P = 0.0002). Two other regions had LOD scores over 2.0: at 9q34 (marker D9S1826, LOD = 2.17, P = 0.0008) and at 2q23 (marker D2S151, LOD = 2.03, P = 0.001). An additional 12 regions had LOD scores over 1.0, including markers at 1q24-25 and 7q22 having scores >1.6. Stratifying the linkage results by age of diagnosis indicated that the linkages to chromosomes 2 and 4 were strongest in families with early and late ages of diagnosis, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data implicate several new loci as harboring prostate cancer susceptibility genes, and provide confirmatory evidence of linkage at several loci identified previously in other genome-wide scans, including the three regions (4q21, 9q34, and 2q23) with strongest evidence for prostate cancer linkage. These data also emphasize the need to combine linkage data from large numbers of prostate cancer families in efforts to effectively address the extensive heterogeneity that characterizes genetic aspects of this disease.

Crystal Structure of the 2′-Specific and Double-Stranded RNA-Activated Interferon-Induced Antiviral Protein 2′-5′-Oligoadenylate Synthetase

2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetases are interferon-induced, double-stranded RNA-activated antiviral enzymes which are the only proteins known to catalyze 2'-specific nucleotidyl transfer. This crystal structure of a 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase reveals a structural conservation with the 3'-specific poly(A) polymerase that, coupled with structure-guided mutagenesis, supports a conserved catalytic mechanism for the 2'- and 3'-specific nucleotidyl transferases. Comparison with structures of other superfamily members indicates that the donor substrates are bound by conserved active site features while the acceptor substrates are oriented by nonconserved regions. The 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetases are activated by viral double-stranded RNA in infected cells and initiate a cellular response by synthesizing 2'-5'-oligoadenylates, which in turn activate RNase L. This crystal structure suggests that activation involves a domain-domain shift and identifies a putative dsRNA activation site that is probed by mutagenesis, thus providing structural insight into cellular recognition of viral double-stranded RNA.

The molecular genetics of prostate cancer

The molecular genetics of prostate cancer, the second most common cause of cancer-related death in men, is poorly understood. Inherited factors are believed to account for 42% of the risk of prostate cancer, and although multiple chromosomal loci of susceptibility have been identified, the target genes for these loci have not been well defined. Its heterogeneous nature suggests that the predisposition to prostate cancer may involve multiple genes and variable phenotypic expression. Genes that have been found to play a role in progression of prostate cancer include GSTP1 and PTEN, as well as the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Evidence suggests that the AR signaling pathway can be activated by other ligands when androgen levels are low. Recent findings have also implicated Kruppel-like factor 6 (KFL6), E-cadherin, the p40 subunit of eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF3-p40), and Elongin C, but confirmatory evidence is required to clarify the roles of these factors. Technologic advances, such as complementary DNA and tissue microarrays, have facilitated identification of genetic alterations and investigations of their function, but improved tools for searching and analyzing genes are still needed.

Family history of prostate cancer and relapse after definitive external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE

The influence of family history on outcome after definitive therapy for prostate cancer has been disputed. One series reported increased relapse rates in men with a positive family history of prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, whereas others have reported no difference in outcome. We examined our series of patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy to determine if a positive family history for prostate cancer is associated with better or worse outcome.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Family history information was available for 538 patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer between 1983 and 2001. Prostate cancer in one or more first-degree relatives (father, brother, or son) was considered a positive family history. The endpoint of interest was time to prostate-specific antigen failure or initiation of hormonal therapy after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven of 538 patients (18%) had a positive family history. There were no significant differences between the positive and negative family history groups. Family history had no effect on relapse-free survival rates in the entire cohort (p = 0.94) or in any subgroup. African American patients with a positive family history had significantly worse 5-year relapse-free survival rates, although there were few patients in this subgroup. Neither family history nor race was a statistically significant predictor of relapse in multivariate analysis; however, combined African American race and positive family history was associated with worse relapse-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large study of patients receiving definitive radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer, no relationship was found between positive first-degree family history of prostate cancer and relapse. The influence of family history on clinical outcome may be more understandable once the gene or genes responsible for hereditary prostate cancer are identified.

Molecular Techniques and Prostate Cancer Diagnostic

Recent advances in molecular techniques have given the opportunity to assess genomic and proteomic alterations comprehensively and rapidly in routinely acquired tissue samples. In particular, new markers derived from qualitative and quantitative DNA, RNA, and protein analysis have provided additional objective information to supplant and extend the morphologic interpretations and have been increasingly integrated into the final surgical pathology diagnosis. In this review several recently developed molecular techniques are described and illustrated. The focus is on prostate cancer diagnostics, as an example of their application.

Genetic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor alpha,CYP19, catechol-O-methyltransferase are associated with familial prostate carcinoma risk in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Estrogen is one of the crucial hormones participating in the proliferation and carcinogenesis of the prostate glands. Genetic polymorphisms in the estrogen metabolism pathway might be involved in the risk of prostate carcinoma development. The authors evaluated the association between genetic polymorphisms in estrogen-related enzymes and receptors and the risk of developing familial prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

In the current study, 101 cases with prostate carcinoma whose first-degree relatives had prostate carcinoma and 114 healthy age and residence-matched male controls were enrolled. The genotypes of estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, aromatase (CYP19), and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genes were analyzed.

RESULTS

For single polymorphisms, a significant association of the T/T genotype of the PvuII site in the ER alpha gene (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-5.99; P = 0.0028), and the C/T and T/T genotypes of the CYP19 gene (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.02-3.09; P = 0.037) with prostate carcinoma risk, was observed. The G/A genotype of the COMT gene showed a weak tendency toward increased risk (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.85-2.57; P = 0.18). Stratification of cases according to clinical stage and pathologic grade showed that the C/T and T/T genotypes of the CYP19 gene were associated significantly with high-grade carcinoma (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.47-4.46; P = 0.048). The number of high-risk genotypes (the T/T in ER alpha, the C/T and T/T in CYP19, and the G/A in COMT) significantly increased the risk of developing prostate carcinoma (2 genotypes: OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.72-5.23; P = 0.008; 3 genotypes: OR, 6.30; 95% CI, 3.61-10.99; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic polymorphisms of genes in the estrogen metabolism pathway were associated significantly with familial prostate carcinoma risk. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of low-penetrance genes are targets for understanding the genetic susceptibility of familial prostate carcinoma.

Expression of the zinc transporter ZnT4 is decreased in the progression from early prostate disease to invasive prostate cancer

We have utilized oligonucleotide microarrays to identify novel genes of potential clinical and biological importance in prostate cancer. RNA from 74 prostate cancers and 164 normal body samples representing 40 different tissues were analysed using a customized Affymetrix GeneChip oligonucleotide microarray representative of over 90% of the expressed human genome. The gene for the zinc transporter ZnT4 was one of several genes that displayed significantly higher expression in prostate cancer compared to normal tissues from other organs. A polyclonal antipeptide antibody was used to demonstrate ZnT4 expression in the epithelium of all 165 elements of benign and 326 elements of localized prostate cancers examined and in nine of 10 advanced prostate cancer specimens by immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, decreased intensity of ZnT4 immunoreactivity occurred in the progression from benign to invasive localized prostate cancer and to metastatic disease. Immunofluorescence analysis and surface biotinylation studies of cells expressing ZnT4 localised the protein to intracellular vesicles and to the plasma membrane. These findings are consistent with a role for ZnT4 in vesicular transport of zinc to the cell membrane and potentially in efflux of zinc in the prostate.

Role of genetic polymorphisms of the RNASEL gene on familial prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population

The RNASEL gene on chromosome 1q25 has been identified as a prostate cancer susceptibility gene. We screened for RNASEL germline mutations in familial prostate cancer patients, and performed a case-control study to examine the association of specific variants with prostate cancer risk in the Japanese. Three variants within the RNASEL gene, G282A, G1385A and T1623G were identified. G1385 and T1623G variants result in previously reported Arg462Gln and Asp541Glu variants, respectively. The novel G282A variant does not cause amino-acid substitution. A case-control study consisting of 101 familial prostate cancer cases and 105 noncancer controls showed that the Gln/Gln genotype of codon462 was observed in 7.6% of controls. However, the Gln/Gln genotype was not observed in cases, and reduced prostate cancer risk (odds ratio (OR)=0.061, P=0.014). The Asp/Asp genotype of codon541 increased the familial prostate cancer risk (OR=7.37, P=0.0004). In subset analysis, a significant association was observed in patients with more than two affected members (OR=3.15, P=0.028), and weak associations were found in patients with metastatic disease (OR=2.40, P=0.11) and high-grade disease (Gleason score >or=7) (OR=3.07, P=0.14). These findings suggested that the polymorphic changes within the RNASEL gene may be associated with familial prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population.

Xq27-28 deletions in prostate carcinoma

Linkage studies have implicated a prostate cancer susceptibility locus at Xq27-28 (termed HPCX), estimated to be responsible for approximately 16% of hereditary prostate cancer cases. To date, this region has not been investigated in sporadic disease. In this study, we examined tumor DNA samples prepared from patients with sporadic prostate cancer, prostate cancer cell lines, and prostate cancer xenografts for evidence of genomic alterations within the Xq27-28 region. To facilitate the detection of nullizygosity, we examined a unique series of highly tumor-enriched DNA samples prepared from men with multi-sampled metastatic prostate cancer, as well as a series of prostate cancer xenografts and cell lines. PCR amplification of carcinoma and normal DNA templates was performed for 11 loci spanning an Xq27-28 interval of approximately 16 cM. Among 19 patients studied, somatic deletions in this region were found in two cases. Within these two cases, each independent metastatic tumor sample available from an individual (n = 4 sites and 8 sites, respectively) showed the same reduction to nullizygosity, suggesting a pre-metastatic origin for the deletion events in both. Mapping of the deletion boundaries with eight additional sets of markers indicated that both deletions had breakpoints within an approximately 500- to 800-kb interval containing FMR1; however, the deletions were non-overlapping. The lack of a common region of deletion suggests one of three possibilities: (1) that these two deletions are unrelated, (2) that the deletions affect the opposite ends of an as yet unknown gene, or (3) that each deletion has inactivated a single copy of an unknown gene arranged in cis in the region of interest. These data clearly indicate that deletions do occur within the HPCX locus in a subset of sporadic prostate cancers and therefore raises the possibility that the gene at this locus may prove to play a role in sporadic disease.

Searching for the gatekeeper oncogene of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is a common malignancy that has a heterogeneous etiology and a variable outcome. Nearly all prostatic adenocarcinoma results from androgen-dependent tumor promotion. However, the cause of prostate cancer initiation is not well understood and only a few of the target oncogenes activated during prostate cancer initiation have been identified. Prostate cancer risk is strongly influenced by family history. Several genetic loci have been found to cosegregate with prostate cancer occurrence in high-risk families. Some candidate oncogenes that map to these loci have been implicated by the identification of mutations in high-risk kindreds. However, the roles of the putative oncogene products in the biochemical pathways that mediate carcinogenesis remain obscure and their influence on cancer etiology has yet to be supported by gene targeting experiments in mice. Moreover, the genes that have been implicated in hereditary prostate cancers do not appear to be mutated in sporadic cancers. Karyotypic and loss of heterozygosity analysis of sporadic prostate cancers have identified 8p, 10q, and 17p as the loci most often disrupted. Candidate oncogenes have been identified at each of these regions. Additional genes with pathogenic significance in prostate cancer have been identified by analysis of cDNA microarrays comparing benign and malignant prostate tissue, by differential genetic analysis of benign and malignant prostatic epithelium, and by induction of experimental prostate cancer in genetically engineered mice.

Epigenetic silencing of multiple interferon pathway genes after cellular immortalization

Abrogating cellular senescence is a necessary step in the formation of a cancer cell. Promoter hypermethylation is an epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation known to silence gene expression in carcinogenesis. Treatment of spontaneously immortal Li-Fraumeni fibroblasts with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5AZA-dC), an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT), induces a senescence-like state. We used microarrays containing 12 558 genes to determine the gene expression profile associated with cellular immortalization and also regulated by 5AZA-dC. Remarkably, among 85 genes with methylation-dependent downregulation (silencing) after immortalization, 39 (46%) are known to be regulated during interferon signaling, a known growth-suppressive pathway. This work indicates that gene silencing may be associated with an early event in carcinogenesis, cellular immortalization.

Single nucleotide polymorphism of the human kallikrein-2 gene highly correlates with serum human kallikrein-2 levels and in combination enhances prostate cancer detection

PURPOSE

We examined the relationship between a mutant (T) for wild-type (C) allele substitution of the human kallikrein-2 gene (KLK2), circulating human kallikrein-2 (hK2) levels and prostate cancer risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 1,287 consecutive men who underwent prostate biopsies because of an abnormal prostate-specific antigen level. Serum and DNA were obtained before biopsy. Cases were patients with cancer, and controls were patients with no cancer. The mutant and wild-type alleles of the KLK2 gene were designated as the T and C alleles, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 1,287 men, 616 had cancer, and 671 had no cancer. The overall distribution of the CC, CT, and TT KLK2 genotypes was 55.1%, 38.2%, and 6.8%, respectively. The median hK2 levels for men with the CC, CT, and TT genotypes were 0.24, 0.18, and 0.062 ng/mL and correlated with the genotypes, respectively (P =.0001). The adjusted odds ratios for prostate cancer for patients with the TT and CT genotypes compared with patients with the CC genotype, were 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.5; P =.004) and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.2 to 2.0; P =.002), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for prostate cancer for patients in the fourth quartile of hK2 compared with the first quartile was 4.33 (95% CI, 2.9 to 6.4; P =.0001). When combined, the adjusted odds ratio for having prostate cancer was 13.92 (95% CI, 6.6 to 29.2; P =.0001) for patients with high hK2 levels and at least one T allele.

CONCLUSION

The C/T polymorphism of the KLK2 gene and circulating levels of hK2 are correlated and, in combination, are highly predictive for prostate cancer.

Characterization of the 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase ubiquitin-like family

The interferon-induced 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetases (OAS) are important for the antiviral activity of interferons. The human and murine OAS gene families each contain four genes: OAS1, OAS2, OAS3 and OASL, all having one or more conserved OAS units composed of five translated exons. The OASL gene has both an OAS unit and a C-terminus of two ubiquitin-like repeats. In this study, we demonstrate that murine Oasl1 protein is inactive while murine Oasl2 is active as an OAS. Further more, murine Oasl2 requires double-stranded RNA as co-factor. The affinity of murine Oasl2 for the double-stranded RNA activator is higher than that of human OAS1 (p42 isoform). We propose a model for the evolutionary origin of the murine Oasl1 and Oasl2 genes. The identification of a human orthologue (hOASL2) to the murine Oasl2 gene establishes that the OASL gene was duplicated prior to the radiation of the rodent and primate groups. We suggest that murine Oasl2, which has both enzymatic activity and a ubiquitin-like domain, is a functional intermediate between the active OAS species and the inactive human OASL1/murine Oasl1 proteins. In addition, we propose that murine Oasl1 appears to have gained a hitherto uncharacterized function independent of 2'-5'-linked oligoadenylate synthesis.

Association of the genetic polymorphism in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1 with risk of familial prostate cancer in a Japanese population: a case-control study

Association between genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and familial prostate cancer risk was examined by a case-control study of 185 individuals. Although the individual analysis of m1 or m2 genotype of CYP1A1 showed no significant association with prostate cancer risk, the presence of any mutated alleles significantly increased prostate cancer risk in comparison with wild-type genotypes by combination analysis (odds ratio [OR]=2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.72-3.29; P=0.0069). Furthermore, metastatic cancer had a significant association with mutated alleles of m1 and m2. These finding suggested that CYP1A1 polymorphisms has an association with prostate cancer risk, especially with progression of prostate cancer.

New paraoxonase 1 polymorphism I102V and the risk of prostate cancer in Finnish men

BACKGROUND

Human serum paraoxonase eliminates carcinogenic lipid-soluble radicals. Because expression of the main human paraoxonase gene PON1 varies widely in humans, certain PON1 polymorphisms might be associated with increased risks of cancer. We sought new functional mutations in PON1 and determined whether known or new PON1 mutations were associated with the risk for prostate cancer in a prospective, random, population-based sample of Finnish men and in a case-control study.

METHODS

Serum paraoxonase activity was measured in 835 healthy men in the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. PON1 mutations were identified by hierarchical phenotype-targeted sequencing in DNAs from the 100 men with the lowest paraoxonase activity in this cohort, and 1595 men in the cohort were genotyped for PON1 mutations by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Multivariable analysis was used to investigate the association of known and new PON1 mutations with incident prostate cancer in 1569 cancer-free men in the cohort followed for 9-14 years. In a case-control study of Finnish men, the association of prostate cancer with the PON1 mutation identified in the cohort study was investigated in 69 case patients with familial prostate cancer and 69 unmatched healthy control subjects.

RESULTS

We identified a new single-nucleotide PON1 polymorphism associated with decreased serum paraoxonase activity that caused an isoleucine-->valine change at codon 102 in exon 4 (I102V). Of the 1569 men cancer-free at baseline, 56 (3.6%) were carriers of the I102V mutation. After adjusting for age and cholesterol-lowering medications, the relative risk for developing prostate cancer during follow-up was 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 19.2) among 102V allele carriers compared with noncarriers. Other PON1 alleles were not statistically significantly associated with prostate cancer. In the case-control study, patients with familial prostate cancer were more likely to be carriers of the PON1 I102V mutation than control subjects (odds ratio = 4.3, 95% CI = 0.9 to 21.5).

CONCLUSION

The PON1 102V allele appears to be associated with an increased risk for prostate cancer.

Association between the clinical presentation and epidemiological features of familial prostate cancer in patients selected for radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated if epidemiological features of familial prostate cancer are associated with certain clinical or histopathological characteristics of the disease.

METHODS

463 German patients with familial prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy were stratified according to several epidemiological criteria: (1). the apparent mode of disease transmission, (2). the average age of onset and (3). number of affected relatives/family, (4). whether or not they met the Johns Hopkins criteria of hereditary prostate cancer. The variables analysed included the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and the digital rectal examination at diagnosis, histopathological characteristics of the prostatectomy specimen and relapse free 5-year survival rates. These characteristics were compared within the subsets of familial patients and compared to 492 control patients with sporadic prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Age of onset was the only clinical parameter differentiating familial and sporadic prostate cancer. Otherwise there was no association between epidemiological features of familial predisposition and the clinical presentation or outcome of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Familial and sporadic prostate cancer seem to be the same disease. Alternatively it may be concluded that the common epidemiological features of familial prostate cancer are not useful to tell tumours that are based on inherited susceptibility apart from those that are not. Whether hereditary prostate cancer is clinically distinct from sporadic forms cannot be determined before the underlying genetic alterations are identified.

Identification of 9 novel transcripts and two RGSL genes within the hereditary prostate cancer region (HPC1) at 1q25

We applied a systematic bioinformatics approach, followed by careful manual inspection and experimental validation to identify additional expressed sequences located at the Hereditary Prostate Cancer Region (HPC1) between D1S2818 and D1S1642 on chromosome 1q25. All transcripts already described for the 1q25 region were identified and we were able to define 11 additional expressed sequences within this region (three full-length cDNA clone sequences and eight ESTs), increasing the total number of gene count in this region by 38%. Five out of the 11 expressed sequences identified were shown to be expressed in prostate tissue and thus represent novel disease gene candidates for the HPC1 region. Here, we report a detailed characterization of these five novel disease gene candidates, their expression pattern in various tissues, their genomic organization and functional annotation. Two candidates (RGSL1 and RGSL2) correspond to novel members of the RGS family, which is involved in the regulation of G-protein signaling. RGSL1 and RGLS2 expression was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction in normal prostate tissue, but could not be detected in prostate tumor cell lines, suggesting they might have a role in prostate cancer.

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism in familial prostate cancer in a Japanese population

AIM

Vitamin D acts as an antiproliferative agent against prostate cells. Epidemiological study has shown that a low level of serum vitamin D concentration is a risk factor for prostate cancer. Vitamin D acts via vitamin D receptor (VDR), and an association of genetic polymorphisms of the VDR gene has been reported. In the current study, we examined the association of VDR gene polymorphisms with familial prostate cancer in a Japanese population.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study consisting of 81 familial prostate cancer cases and 105 normal control subjects. Three genetic polymorphisms (BsmI, ApaI and TaqI) in the VDR gene were examined by the restriction fragment restriction length polymorphism method.

RESULTS

Overall, there was no significant association of the VDR gene polymorphisms with familial prostate cancer risk in the cases and control subjects. However, a weak association between BsmI or TaqI genotypes and cancer risk was observed in subjects under 70 years of age. Stratification of cases by clinical stage or pathological grade did not show significant association between the VDR gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we could not confirm any significant association between VDR gene polymorphisms with familial prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population. Further large-scale case-control studies are warranted to confirm the importance of VDR gene polymorphisms in familial prostate cancer.

Evolving strategies for prostate cancer chemoprevention trials

Prostate cancer chemoprevention (CP) can be defined as the use of natural and synthetic agents that inhibit, reverse or regress precancer and delay progression to invasive cancer. During the past two decades several CP strategies have evolved. The first generation of CP trials tested the efficacy of antioxidants and vitamins including B-carotene, vitamin A, retinol, 13 cis retinoic acid, vitamins E, C and selenium. Although these trials were disappointing, provocative hypotheses were generated for selenium and vitamin E that set the stage for future prostate trials. In the 1990s, the NCI launched a second generation of large CP trials aimed at breast and prostate cancer. One of these trials is the PCPT, testing the efficacy of a 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor-finasteride to prevent prostate cancer in 18,000 men. Although PCPT is still in progress, the NCI recently launched a second large primary prostate CP trial called SELECT, testing the efficacy of selenium and vitamin E in 32,400 men. The Prostate Cancer Progress Report to the Director of NCI in 1998 challenged the research community to design more efficient CP trials for prostate cancer. In response, the NCI has evolved a third generation of CP trials. This involves pharmacologically driven translational science research including agents and their targets, biomarker endpoints, suitable clinical models for testing agents and efficient trial designs employing high risk cohorts and surrogate endpoints. In summary, a dual strategy for CP is being developed which includes public health measures and a medical intervention approach.

The role of nutrition in preventing prostate cancer: a review of the proposed mechanism of action of various dietary substances

BACKGROUND

Dietary modifications to prevent prostate cancer (PCa) continue to gain attention as research demonstrates that various dietary nutrients/supplements are related to decreased risk of developing prostate cancer (PCa). Several studies have focused on the antioxidant and nonantioxidant effects of various dietary substances in the prevention of PCa. Research into the mechanisms by which PCa is prevented, or its disease severity is reduced by dietary micronutrients and vitamins continues to enrich our understanding of the mechanisms by which PCa is initiated and progresses.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on dietary nutrients with antioxidant properties that have been shown to have a positive effect in reducing the incidence or preventing the occurrence of PCa including carotenoids (e.g., lycopene), retinoids (e.g., vitamin A), vitamin E, vitamin C, selenium, and polyphenols. Other nutrients examined included vitamin D and calcium.

RESULTS

Many dietary micronutrients have demonstrated significant and complex effects on PCa cell proliferation, differentiation, and signaling related to the initiation, progression, and regression of PCa.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the mechanisms by which various dietary nutrients exert their effects on PCa may make it possible to design effective drugs for treating PCa and to promote better nutrition and lifestyle changes in those at risk for PCa.

Linkage analysis of prostate cancer susceptibility: confirmation of linkage at 8p22-23

Frequent loss of heterogeneity in prostate cancer cells and linkage studies of families affected by hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) have implied that the short arm of chromosome 8, specifically 8p22-23, may harbor a prostate-cancer-susceptibility gene. In a recent study, seven potentially important mutations in the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene (MSR1), located at 8p22, were observed in families affected with HPC, and an indication of co-segregation between these mutations and prostate cancer was reported. In an attempt to confirm linkage at 8p22-23, we performed linkage analyses in 57 families affected with HPC (ascertained throughout Sweden) by using 13 markers on the short arm of chromosome 8. In the complete set of families, evidence for prostate cancer linkage was observed at 8p22-23, with a peak hold of 1.08 (P=0.03), observed at D8S1731, approximately 1 cM centromeric to the MSR1 gene. At marker D8S1135, the closest marker to MSR1, a hlod of 1.07 (P=0.03) was observed. Evidence of linkage was seen in families with early-onset HPC and in families with a small number of affected individuals. The peak multipoint non-parametric linkage score was 2.01 (P=0.03) at D8S552 in the 14 pedigrees with mean age at onset <65 years, and 2.25 (P=0.01) at D8S1731 in the 36 pedigrees with fewer than five affected family members. Thus, we have confirmed evidence for prostate cancer linkage at 8p22-23. Follow-up studies to evaluate the possible association between prostate cancer and genes in this region, especially the MSR1 gene, are warranted.

Pathological and molecular aspects of prostate cancer

This review focuses on new findings and controversial issues in the the pathology and molecular biology of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Since management of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy--the most common precursor lesion to prostate cancer--is the crucial issue with this lesion, we discuss the risk of cancer subsequent to this histological diagnosis and the issue of whether such neoplasia should be regarded as carcinoma-in-situ. We also look at prostate cancer itself, starting with its diagnosis, reporting on needle biopsy, and reviewing how the most frequently used grading system, the Gleason grading system, affects treatment. The molecular basis of prostate cancer includes inheritable and somatic genetic changes (tumour suppressor genes, loss of heterozygosity, gene targets and regions of chromosomal gain, CpG island promoter methylation, invasion and metastasis suppressor genes, telomere shortening, and genetic instability). Changed gene expression (eg, proliferation-related genes, changes in the androgen receptor, apoptosis and stress-response genes) have potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer epidemiology

Because more and more men are being diagnosed with prostate cancer worldwide, knowledge about and prevention of this disease is important. Epidemiological studies have provided some insight about the cause of prostate cancer in terms of diet and genetic factors. However, compared with other common cancers such as breast and lung cancer, the causes remain poorly understood. Several important issues could help in our understanding of this disease-the variation in incidence of prostate cancer between ethnic populations and the factors leading to familial clustering of the diseases.

Genetic counseling for prostate cancer risk

Major risk factors for developing prostate cancer, including positive family history and African-American ethnicity, can be quantified for genetic counseling. Factors increasing familial risk for prostate cancer are closer degree of kinship, number of affected relatives, and early age of onset (< 50 years) among the affected relatives. Genetic testing may be useful for modification of risk, but currently should be performed only within the context of a well-designed research study that will determine penetrance and genotype-phenotype correlation of specific mutations. Even in the absence of genetic testing, African-American men and men with a strong family history of prostate cancer may opt to initiate screening by prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal exam (DRE) screening at age 40.

Implications for RNase L in prostate cancer biology

Recently, the interferon (IFN) antiviral pathways and prostate cancer genetics and have surprisingly converged on a single-strand specific, regulated endoribonuclease. Genetics studies from several laboratories in the U.S., Finland, and Israel, support the recent identification of the RNase L gene, RNASEL, as a strong candidate for the long sought after hereditary prostate cancer 1 (HPC1) allele. Results from these studies suggest that mutations in RNASEL predispose men to an increased incidence of prostate cancer, which in some cases reflect more aggressive disease and/or decreased age of onset compared with non-RNASEL linked cases. RNase L is a uniquely regulated endoribonuclease that requires 5'-triphosphorylated, 2',5'-linked oligoadenylates (2-5A) for its activity. The presence of both germline mutations in RNASEL segregating with disease within HPC-affected families and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in tumor tissues suggest a novel role for the regulated endoribonuclease in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. The association of mutations in RNASEL with prostate cancer cases further suggests a relationship between innate immunity and tumor suppression. It is proposed here that RNase L functions in counteracting prostate cancer by virtue of its ability to degrade RNA, thus initiating a cellular stress response that leads to apoptosis. This monograph reviews the biochemistry and genetics of RNase L as it relates to the pathobiology of prostate cancer and considers implications for future screening and therapy of this disease.

Alphavirus minus-strand synthesis and persistence in mouse embryo fibroblasts derived from mice lacking RNase L and protein kinase R

We report our studies to probe the possible role of the host response to double-stranded RNA in cessation of alphavirus minus-strand synthesis. Mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF) from Mx1-deficient mice that also lack either the protein kinase R (PKR) or the latent RNase L or both PKR and RNase L were screened. In RNase L-deficient but not wild-type or PKR-deficient MEF, there was continuous synthesis of minus-strand templates and the formation of new replication complexes producing viral plus strands. Inhibiting translation caused minus-strand synthesis to stop and a loss of transcription activity of the mature replication complexes. This turnover of replication complexes that were stable in cells containing RNase L suggested that RNase L plays some role, albeit possibly indirect, in the formation of stable replication complexes during alphavirus infection. In addition, confluent monolayers of RNase L-deficient murine cells readily established persistent infections and were not killed. This phenotype is contrary to what has been observed for infection in vertebrate cells with a presumably functional RNase L gene and more resembled alphavirus replication in Aedes mosquito cells, in which the activity of replication complexes making plus stands was also found to decay with inhibition of translation.

Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk

The DNA-damage-signaling pathway has been implicated in all human cancers. However, the genetic defects and the mechanisms of this pathway in prostate carcinogenesis remain poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed CHEK2, the upstream regulator of p53 in the DNA-damage-signaling pathway, in several groups of patients with prostate cancer. A total of 28 (4.8%) germline CHEK2 mutations (16 of which were unique) were found among 578 patients. Additional screening for CHEK2 mutations in 149 families with familial prostate cancer revealed 11 mutations (5 unique) in nine families. These mutations included two frameshift and three missense mutations. Importantly, 16 of 18 unique CHEK2 mutations identified in both sporadic and familial cases were not detected among 423 unaffected men, suggesting a pathological effect of CHEK2 mutations in prostate cancer development. Analyses of the two frameshift mutations in Epstein Barr virus-transformed cell lines, using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis, revealed abnormal splicing for one mutation and dramatic reduction of CHEK2 protein levels in both cases. Overall, our data suggest that mutations in CHEK2 may contribute to prostate cancer risk and that the DNA-damage-signaling pathway may play an important role in the development of prostate cancer.

Common sequence variants of the macrophage scavenger receptor 1 gene are associated with prostate cancer risk

Rare germline mutations of macrophage scavenger receptor 1 (MSR1) gene were reported to be associated with prostate cancer risk in families with hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) and in patients with non-HPC (Xu et al. 2002). To further evaluate the role of MSR1 in prostate cancer susceptibility, at Johns Hopkins Hospital, we studied five common variants of MSR1 in 301 patients with non-HPC who underwent prostate cancer treatment and in 250 control subjects who participated in prostate cancer-screening programs and had normal digital rectal examination and PSA levels (<4 ng/ml). Significantly different allele frequencies between case subjects and control subjects were observed for each of the five variants (P value range.01-.04). Haplotype analyses provided consistent findings, with a significant difference in the haplotype frequencies from a global score test (P=.01). Because the haplotype that is associated with the increased risk for prostate cancer did not harbor any of the known rare mutations, it appears that the observed association of common variants and prostate cancer risk are independent of the effect of the known rare mutations. These results consistently suggest that MSR1 may play an important role in prostate carcinogenesis.

Allelic imbalance in hereditary and sporadic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

In this study, we evaluate the pattern of allelic imbalance (AI) in both sporadic prostate cancer (SPC) and hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) at loci that frequently show allelic imbalance in sporadic prostate cancer, or are believed to have a putative role in the disease.

METHODS

DNA obtained from 35 sporadic tumors and 46 hereditary tumors were tested for AI, by using a panel of 35 microsatellite markers.

RESULTS

Chromosomal regions that display high frequencies of AI (>or=30%) in HPC include 1q, 5q, 7q, 8p, 13q, 16q, 17q, 18q, and 20q. In SPC, high frequencies of AI were found at 5q, 7q, 8p, 10q, 13q. Main differences (delta >or= 20%) in AI between HPC and SPC were at 1q, 10q, 17q, 18q, and 20q.

CONCLUSION

AI at the prostate cancer susceptibility loci HPC1, PCaP, and HPC20 was seen more often in HPC compared with SPC. It appears that there are marked differences in the pattern of AI between sporadic and hereditary PCa.

Linkage of aggressive prostate cancer to chromosome 7q31-33 in German prostate cancer families

It has been suggested that chromosome 7q32 contains genes that influence the progression of prostate cancer from latent to invasive disease. In an attempt to confirm this linkage to prostate cancer aggressiveness, 100 German prostate cancer families were genotyped using a panel of eight polymorphic markers on chromosome 7q. We used a multipoint allele sharing method based upon a likelihood ratio test implemented in GENEHUNTERPLUS v1.2 in order to calculate the nonparametric Z(lr) and the associated LOD scores. We applied the aggressiveness of prostate cancer given by the pathological tumour grade of each individual, and the mean age of onset of a family as covariates, and constructed two weighted models. The first (weight(0-1) model) puts weights on families with at least two cases of GIII prostate cancer. The second (weight(0-2) model) also adds weights to families with early and late onset cancer respectively. The unweighted analysis gave no evidence of linkage to chromosome 7q. The Z(lr) scores increased when including the covariates, to 2.60 (P=0.005) using the weight(0-1) and to 3.02 (P=0.001) using the weight(0-2) model for late onset prostate cancer. The associated LOD scores were respectively 1.47 (P=0.009) and 1.98 (P=0.002). The markers that gave most evidence for linkage were exactly in the range of the published prostate cancer aggressiveness region. Our results support a widespread relevance of this locus and suggest that aggressive and late onset prostate cancer is linked to chromosme 7q31-33 in the German population.

Two percent of men with early-onset prostate cancer harbor germline mutations in the BRCA2 gene

Studies of families with breast cancer have indicated that male carriers of BRCA2 mutations are at increased risk of prostate cancer, particularly at an early age. To evaluate the contribution of BRCA2 mutations to early-onset prostate cancer, we screened the complete coding sequence of BRCA2 for germline mutations, in 263 men with diagnoses of prostate cancer who were Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Age of Onset
• Aged
• Base Sequence
• Breast Neoplasms/genetics
• DNA Mutational Analysis
• Female
• Genes, BRCA2
• Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics
• Genetic Testing
• Germ-Line Mutation/genetics
• Heterozygote
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics
• Pedigree
• Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics
• Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Stephen M Edwards Translational Cancer Genetics Team, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
Julia Meitz
Rifat Hamoudi
Questa Hope
Peter Osin
Rachel Jackson
Christine Southgate
Rashmi Singh
Alison Falconer
David P Dearnaley
Audrey Ardern-Jones
Annette Murkin
Anna Dowe
Jo Kelly
Sue Williams
Richard Oram
Margaret Stevens
Dawn M Teare
Bruce A J Ponder
Simon A Gayther
Doug F Easton
Rosalind A Eeles

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Genetics of prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed visceral cancer of men, responsible for approximately 40,000 deaths in adult males per year. To identify the genetic causes of prostate cancer, we performed a whole genome scan of affected sib pairs, using DNA markers spaced evenly across the human genome. We demonstrated that regions on chromosomes 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 16 and 19 might harbor genes that predispose individuals to prostate cancer and may affect tumor growth rate and tumor aggressiveness. Here we present DNA sequence analysis of KIAA 0872 and 17-beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase that are located on chromosome 16 within the mapped region, and we demonstrate that neither of these genes carries mutations in the protein coding region or their splice junction sites. These results suggest that these genes are less likely to be associated with the cause of familial prostate cancer.

RNASEL Arg462Gln variant is implicated in up to 13% of prostate cancer cases

RNASEL (encoding ribonuclease L) has recently been proposed as a candidate for the hereditary prostate cancer (HPC1) gene. We determined that the RNASEL variant Arg462Gln has three times less enzymatic activity than the wildtype and is significantly associated with prostate cancer risk (P = 0.007). At least one copy of the mutated allele that causes this substitution is carried by nearly 60% of the men in our study. Men that are heterozygous with respect to the mutated allele have 50% greater risk of prostate cancer than non-carriers, and homozygotes have more than double the risk.

Segregation analysis of 389 Icelandic pedigrees with Breast and prostate cancer

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are the most commonly occurring cancers in females and males, respectively. The objective of this project was to test the hypothesis that breast cancer in females and prostate cancer in males represent homologous cancers that may be controlled by one or more common unidentified genes that may explain some of the observed familial aggregation. We modeled the transmission of a breast-prostate cancer phenotype in 389 pedigrees ascertained through a breast cancer proband drawn from the Icelandic Cancer Registry. Assuming that age at diagnosis of this combined phenotype followed a logistic distribution, segregation analyses were performed to evaluate residual parental effects, a sibship covariate, and a dichotomous cohort effect. The most parsimonious model was a Mendelian codominant model, which could partly explain the familial aggregation of both cancers. Inheritance of a putative high-risk allele (A) predicted gender-specific mean ages of onset for females as 53.8 years, 59.7 years, and 65.6 years for the putative AA, AB, and BB genotypes, respectively. Similarly, the predicted means were 73.7 years, 75.6 years, and 78.3 years, respectively, among males. Under this codominant model, the lifetime risk of a woman being affected was 19% by age 80 years. This implies that when prostate cancer among male relatives of breast cancer probands (unselected for family history or early-onset disease) is considered a pleiotrophic effect of the same gene that increases the risk for breast cancer, women are predicted to have a less than 1 in 5 risk of developing breast cancer when they carry the putative high-risk allele. However, this is a higher risk than in the general Icelandic population. Our results suggest that BRCA2 mutations alone are inadequate to explain all of the excess clustering of prostate cancer cases in families of breast cancer probands, and that additional genes conferring excess risk to both breast and prostate cancer may exist in this population.