Effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Schizophrenia: a unique translational opportunity in behavioral neuroendocrinology

Schizophrenia is a complex and debilitating neuropsychiatric disease in which both environmental and genetic factors contribute to the pathophysiology of the disease. Epidemiological data point to the importance of the prenatal period in the genesis of schizophrenia and suggest that environmental factors, such as stress and hormones of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, may establish a vulnerability to the disease. Unfortunately, the exact cause of this neurodevelopmental disease is unclear. In this review, data on the importance of gestational stress exposure to the etiology of schizophrenia-like behavioral, endocrine and molecular phenotypes will be presented and differences will be highlighted between the preparations that are commonly used in most laboratory investigations.

Pharmakotherapie der Schizophrenie

The management of schizophrenia patients remains one of the great challenges in psychiatry. Despite the undisputed effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs, patients and their physicians still face considerable difficulties mainly related to incomplete or lacking treatment response and the inability to predict the individual efficacy and tolerability. In this manuscript we review the key elements of pharmacological treatment of this disorder, encompassing acute and long-term management as well as specific management problems ranging from acutely violent patients to treatment-resistant subjects. Along with general treatment principles, the document provides specific information regarding efficacy and safety features of antipsychotics. Many of the currently available treatment recommendations/guidelines are based on the evidence reviewed here. This review is meant to serve as a guide for clinicians involved in managing schizophrenia, whether in a psychiatric hospital setting or as family physicians in private practice.

Strategies for maximizing clinical effectiveness in the treatment of schizophrenia

The ultimate clinical objective in the treatment of schizophrenia is to enable affected individuals to lead maximally productive and personally meaningful lives. As with other chronic diseases that lack a definitive cure, the individual's service/recovery plan must include treatment interventions directed towards decreasing manifestations of the illness, rehabilitative services directed towards enhancing adaptive skills, and social support mobilization aimed at optimizing function and quality of life. In this review, we provide a conceptual framework for considering approaches for maximizing the effectiveness of the array of treatments and other services towards promoting recovery of persons with schizophrenia. We discuss pharmacological, psychological, and social strategies that decrease the burden of the disease of schizophrenia on affected individuals and their families while adding the least possible burden of treatment. In view of the multitude of treatments necessary to optimize outcomes for individuals with schizophrenia, effective coordination of these services is essential. In addition to providing best possible clinical assessment and pharmacological treatment, the psychiatrist must function as an effective leader of the treatment team. To do so, however, the psychiatrist must be knowledgeable about the range of available services, must have skills in clinical-administrative leadership, and must accept the responsibility of coordinating the planning and delivery of this multidimensional array of treatments and services. Finally, the effectiveness of providing optimal individualized treatment/rehabilitation is best gauged by measuring progress on multiple effectiveness domains. Approaches for efficient and reliable assessment are discussed.

Clozapine, a neuroleptic agent, inhibits Akt by counteracting Ca2+/calmodulin in PTEN-negative U-87MG human glioblastoma cells

Clozapine (CZP), a dibenzodiazepine derivative with a piperazinyl side chain, is in clinical use as an antipsychotic drug. This study investigated the effect of CZP on the modulation of the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta pathway in PTEN-negative U-87MG glioblastoma cells. Treatment with CZP rapidly inhibited the basal and EGF-induced phosphorylation of Akt. The inhibition of Akt resulted in the dephosphorylation of GSK-3beta and increased GSK-3beta kinase activity. A voltage-sensitive Ca(2+) channel blocker and calmodulin (CaM) antagonists inhibited Akt phosphorylation, whereas elevation of the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration prevented CZP-induced dephosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3beta, suggesting that Ca(2+)/CaM participates in the inhibition of Akt by CZP in U-87MG cells. In addition, similar to LY294002, CZP arrested cell cycle progression at G0/G1 phase, which was accompanied by decreased expression of cyclin D1. The reduction in the cyclin D1 level induced by CZP was abrogated by the inhibition of GSK-3beta, the inhibition of proteasome-dependent proteolysis, or an increase in the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. These results suggest that the antipsychotic drug CZP modulates the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3beta pathway by counteracting Ca(2+)/CaM in PTEN-negative U-87MG glioblastoma cells.

Symptom domains of schizophrenia: the role of atypical antipsychotic agents

Given their more obvious presentation, the reduction of positive symptoms and their associated behavioural problems have been considered the most important treatment outcome parameter in patients with schizophrenia. However, the development of the atypical antipsychotic agents in the early 1990s resulted in the adoption of more wide-reaching measures of therapeutic outcome. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy of currently available atypical agents across multiple symptom domains of schizophrenia with a specific focus on negative symptoms, neurocognition, social functioning, quality of life and insight. As such, studies published between January 1990 and December 2005 that evaluated the clinical efficacy and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics in different symptom domains of schizophrenia were reviewed as identified from literature researches using MEDLINE and Embase. Abstracts and posters presented at key psychiatry and schizophrenia congresses during this period were also reviewed where available in the public domain. Results from the studies identified have consistently demonstrated that atypical antipsychotics have substantial advantages over conventional antipsychotics with a broader spectrum of efficacy across symptomatic domains of schizophrenia as proven by greater improvements in negative symptoms and cognitive function and a beneficial effect on affective symptoms and quality of life. However, their clinical advantages have often been limited by patients' partial compliance with therapy. As such, the development of a long-acting atypical antipsychotic agent may provide a new and valuable treatment option for patients with schizophrenia.

Randomized controlled trial of effect of prescription of clozapine versus other second-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia

There is good evidence that clozapine is more efficacious than first-generation antipsychotic drugs in resistant schizophrenia. It is less clear if clozapine is more effective than the other second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs. A noncommercially funded, pragmatic, open, multisite, randomized controlled trial was conducted in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). Participants were 136 people aged 18-65 with DSM-IV schizophrenia and related disorders whose medication was being changed because of poor clinical response to 2 or more previous antipsychotic drugs. Participants were randomly allocated to clozapine or to one of the class of other SGA drugs (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, amisulpride) as selected by the managing clinician. Outcomes were assessed blind to treatment allocation. One-year assessments were carried out in 87% of the sample. The intent to treat comparison showed no statistically significant advantage for commencing clozapine in Quality of Life score (3.63 points; CI: 0.46-7.71; p = .08) but did show an advantage in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score that was statistically significant (-4.93 points; CI: -8.82 to -1.05; p = .013) during follow-up. Clozapine showed a trend toward having fewer total extrapyramidal side effects. At 12 weeks participants who were receiving clozapine reported that their mental health was significantly better compared with those receiving other SGA drugs. In conclusion, in people with schizophrenia with poor treatment response to 2 or more antipsychotic drugs, there is an advantage to commencing clozapine rather than other SGA drugs in terms of symptom improvement over 1 year.

Clozapine markedly elevates pregnenolone in rat hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and serum: candidate mechanism for superior efficacy?

Clozapine demonstrates superior efficacy in patients with schizophrenia, but the precise mechanisms contributing to this clinical advantage are not clear. Clozapine and olanzapine increase the GABAergic neuroactive steroid (NS) allopregnanolone, and it has been hypothesized that NS induction may contribute to the therapeutic actions of these agents. Pregnenolone administration improves learning and memory in rodent models, and decreases in this NS have been associated with depressive symptoms in humans. These pregnenolone characteristics may be relevant to the actions of antipsychotics. We therefore investigated potential pregnenolone alterations in rat hippocampus and cerebral cortex following clozapine, olanzapine, and other second generation agents as a candidate NS mechanism contributing to antipsychotic efficacy. In the first set of experiments, intact, adrenalectomized, and sham-operated male rats received vehicle or clozapine (20 mg/kg) IP. In the second set, male rats received vehicle, olanzapine (5 mg/kg), quetiapine (20 mg/kg), ziprasidone (10 mg/kg) or aripiprazole (5 mg/kg) IP. Pregnenolone levels were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Clozapine markedly elevates pregnenolone in rat hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and serum; hippocampal levels were strongly correlated with serum levels (r=0.987). Olanzapine also elevates pregnenolone levels, but to a lesser degree than clozapine. Pregnenolone induction may contribute to the clinical actions of clozapine and olanzapine.

Benefits of combining aripiprazole to clozapine: three case reports

OBJECTIVE

A substantial number of patients treated with clozapine shows insufficient response. The author presents the results of adding aripiprazole in patients resistant to clozapine.

METHOD

Three cases of individuals with psychotic symptoms despite clozapine use and with significant side effects that were treated via this combination are presented. Response was evaluated by clinical assessment.

RESULTS

Good clinical results were obtained in all three patients, with improvement of psychotic symptoms and of some of the side effects of clozapine.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this case series suggest that adjunctive therapy with aripiprazole can be of benefit for treating clozapine resistant schizophrenic patients.

Antipsychotic drugs activate SREBP-regulated expression of lipid biosynthetic genes in cultured human glioma cells: a novel mechanism of action?

Several studies have reported on structural abnormalities, decreased myelination and oligodendrocyte dysfunction in post-mortem brains from schizophrenic patients. Glia-derived cholesterol is essential for both myelination and synaptogenesis in the CNS. Lipogenesis and myelin synthesis are thus interesting etiological candidate targets in schizophrenia. Using a microarray approach, we here demonstrate that the antipsychotic drugs clozapine and haloperidol upregulate several genes involved in cholesterol and fatty acid biosynthesis in cultured human glioma cells, including HMGCR (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase), HMGCS1 (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A synthase-1), FASN (fatty acid synthase) and SCD (stearoyl-CoA desaturase). The changes in gene expression were followed by enhanced HMGCR-enzyme activity and elevated cellular levels of cholesterol and triglycerides. The upregulated genes are all known to be controlled by the sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) transcription factors. We show that clozapine and haloperidol both activate the SREBP system. The antipsychotic-induced SREBP-mediated increase in glial cell lipogenesis could represent a novel mechanism of action, and may also be relevant for the metabolic side effects of antipsychotics.

Quetiapine in patients with comorbid schizophrenia-spectrum and substance use disorders: an open-label trial

BACKGROUND

Preliminary evidence suggests that clozapine relieves the craving for psychoactive substances in schizophrenia patients. Quetiapine shares crucial pharmacological properties with clozapine. Promising results have been described with quetiapine therapy in patients with psychosis and substance use disorder.

METHODS

Based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria, patients were diagnosed with comorbid schizophrenia-spectrum and substance use disorders. Patients were switched to quetiapine for a 12-week open-label trial. Craving, quantities used, days of consumption, and severity of substance abuse were assessed every 3 weeks. Alcohol and Drug Use Scales were administered on baseline and end-point. Psychiatric symptoms, depressive symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms, and cognition were also assessed at baseline, week 6 and week 12.

RESULTS

Twenty-four schizophrenia-spectrum patients were included in the last observation carried forward (LOCF) analyses, responding to one or more of the following substance use disorders: cannabis (15 patients), alcohol (10 patients), and other psychoactive substances (nine patients). Overall, severity of substance abuse improved during the study. Less weekly days were spent on drugs of abuse. A decrease in the weekly Canadian dollars spent on psychoactive substances was also observed. Cognition, psychiatric, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms also significantly improved (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this open-label, uncontrolled trial, significant improvements were noted in substance abuse, psychiatric symptoms, extrapyramidal symptoms, and cognition during quetiapine therapy. The study suffered from three main limitations: (1) the open-label design of the study; (2) the patients' poor compliance; and (3) the small sample size involved. Controlled studies on the use of quetiapine in dual diagnosis schizophrenia are warranted to confirm that the effects are drug-related.

Interpreting the efficacy findings in the CATIE study: what clinicians should know

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) schizophrenia trial was an effectiveness/"pragmatic" clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness of four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone) and a conventional antipsychotic (perphenazine) for an 18-month period in patients with schizophrenia. The study randomized 1,460 patients with fewer exclusion criteria than in most trials in hopes that this would allow for a more representative sample of outpatients in "real world" practice. Olanzapine demonstrated significant superiority in time to discontinuation for all cause and for lack of efficacy, as well as likelihood of hospitalization for relapse; however, it was associated with a significantly higher rate of metabolic side effects. Perphenazine exhibited comparable effectiveness with quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, and appeared to be as well tolerated as the atypicals. However, it had the highest rate of drop out due to extrapyramidal symptoms and was restricted to patients who did not have tardive dyskinesia (TD). This article examines the phase 1 CATIE results to guide the clinician in understanding how to interpret the findings, which were intended to be a guide for clinical practice. The nature of the patient population, the doses of drugs relative to one another, inclusion of patients who were treatment resistant, and exclusion of patients with TD from randomization to perphenazine were potential sources of bias in the study. In particular, the use of a higher-than-usual peak dose of olanzapine may have led to the superior results achieved with it. Practical suggestions are given for choice of antipsychotic medication in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Long-acting risperidone: Focus on safety

BACKGROUND

Although atypical antipsychotics are generally regarded as having more favorable tolerability profiles than conventional antipsychotics, differences between specific atypical agents can be important when individualizing treatment. Long-acting risperidone (LAR), the first long-acting injectable atypical anti-psychotic, has been found to be effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

OBJECTIVES

This review summarizes clinical evidence for the tolerability profile of LAR in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and assesses its utility in specific patient groups, including younger patients and the elderly.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1994 and March 2006 that evaluated the tolerability of LAR. The primary search terms were long-acting risperidone, schizophrenia, schizoaffective, long term, tolerability, and safety. Abstracts and posters presented at major psychiatry and schizophrenia conferences during this period also were reviewed. Articles were included if they were reports of clinical studies and included tolerability data for LAR.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 7 open-label trials, 3 double-blind trials, 15 subanalyses, and 1 pooled analysis. When patients were switched directly or indirectly from another antipsychotic agent, LAR was generally well tolerated, with a low incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events (1%-16%). Moreover, LAR was associated with a weight-gain profile of 1 to 2 kg in the short term and did not appear to negatively affect lipids or glucose metabolism. Although LAR was associated with elevations in serum prolactin levels in 2% to 7% of patients, these elevations were not symptomatic, and levels decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

LAR was generally well tolerated in several patient groups, including the elderly and those with schizoaffective disorder. When patients were switched from other antipsychotics, use of LAR was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared with placebo.

Suicidal behavior in schizophrenia

There is a high prevalence of suicidal behavior in individuals suffering from schizophrenia and recent investigations substantially elucidate this problem and provide useful insights about clinical risk factors, neurobiologic underpinnings and the impact of various treatments on reducing such behavior. The risk of suicide is greatest early in the course of schizophrenic illness but continues throughout life; risk factors for suicidal behavior include psychosis, depression and substance abuse. Effectively treating positive symptoms and depression, reducing substance abuse, avoiding akathisia, addressing demoralization and instilling hope are important elements in this treatment approach. The newer generation of atypical antipsychotics (particularly clozapine) and new psychologic approaches (particularly cognitive behavioral therapy) appear to be useful in reducing suicidality in schizophrenia. The significant advances in defining the neurobiologic basis of suicidality may enable the development of more effective treatments. The renewed emphasis on resilience and recovery as desired outcomes in schizophrenia and the accompanying sense of hope encourage optimism about effectively reducing suicidality in schizophrenia. Over the past 10 years, much has been learnt and hopefully this momentum will be translated into increasingly better outcomes.

ECT for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a response from the far East to the UK. NICE report

BACKGROUND

There is controversy about the proper place of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the management of the schizophrenic patient, and the important issues related to theory and practice remain to be resolved, especially in the context of medication-resistant schizophrenia.

METHOD

We briefly summarize existing research in the field. We next use a narrative method to describe in a single article the large body of research from Thailand that, during the past decade, has systematically studied issues related to the use of ECT in medication-resistant schizophrenia. We integrate the findings of the Thai efforts with the results of other research and consider the theoretical and practical importance of the reviewed work.

RESULTS

The ECT treatment data validate a BRPS cutoff of 25 as a definition of recovery in patients with treatment-refractory schizophrenia, and a cutoff of 37 as a definition of subsequent relapse or suitability for entry into a treatment protocol. A 3-week post-ECT stabilization period identifies patients who maintain improvement and who can be legitimately considered to have sustained response to ECT. Clinical characteristics of such responders and symptoms responsive to ECT are described. Higher stimulus dose hastens response to ECT but does not improve responsiveness. Continuation ECT (C-ECT) combined with maintenance-neuroleptic medication is associated with better treatment outcome than either treatment alone. The combined treatment also improves quality of life and functioning in the long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings convey several useful thoughts for research into and the practice of ECT for schizophrenia.

Time to discontinuation of atypical versus typical antipsychotics in the naturalistic treatment of schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate over whether atypical antipsychotics are more effective than typical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. This naturalistic study compares atypical and typical antipsychotics on time to all-cause medication discontinuation, a recognized index of medication effectiveness in the treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

We used data from a large, 3-year, observational, non-randomized, multisite study of schizophrenia, conducted in the U.S. between 7/1997 and 9/2003. Patients who were initiated on oral atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, or ziprasidone) or oral typical antipsychotics (low, medium, or high potency) were compared on time to all-cause medication discontinuation for 1 year following initiation. Treatment group comparisons were based on treatment episodes using 3 statistical approaches (Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox Proportional Hazards regression model, and propensity score-adjusted bootstrap resampling methods). To further assess the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were performed, including the use of (a) only 1 medication episode for each patient, the one with which the patient was treated first, and (b) all medication episodes, including those simultaneously initiated on more than 1 antipsychotic.

RESULTS

Mean time to all-cause medication discontinuation was longer on atypical (N = 1132, 256.3 days) compared to typical antipsychotics (N = 534, 197.2 days; p < .01), and longer on atypicals compared to typicals of high potency (N = 320, 187.5 days; p < .01), medium potency (N = 140, 213.5 days; p < .01), and low potency (N = 74, 208.7 days; p < .01). Among the atypicals, only clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone had significantly longer time to all-cause medication discontinuation compared to typicals, regardless of potency level, and compared to haloperidol with prophylactic anticholinergic treatment. When compared to perphenazine, a medium-potency typical antipsychotic, only clozapine and olanzapine had a consistently and significantly longer time to all-cause medication discontinuation. Results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

In the usual care of schizophrenia patients, time to medication discontinuation for any cause appears significantly longer for atypical than typical antipsychotics regardless of the typical antipsychotic potency level. Findings were primarily driven by clozapine and olanzapine, and to a lesser extent by risperidone. Furthermore, only clozapine and olanzapine therapy showed consistently and significantly longer treatment duration compared to perphenazine, a medium-potency typical antipsychotic.

Clozapine alone versus clozapine and risperidone with refractory schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The treatment of schizophrenia with multiple antipsychotic drugs is common, but the benefits and risks are not known.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, we evaluated patients with schizophrenia and a poor response to treatment with clozapine. The patients continued to take clozapine and were randomly assigned to receive eight weeks of daily augmentation with 3 mg of risperidone or with placebo. This course of treatment was followed by an optional 18 weeks of augmentation with risperidone. The primary outcome was reduction in the total score for severity of symptoms on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The secondary outcomes included cognitive functioning.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. In the double-blind phase, the mean total score for the severity of symptoms decreased from baseline to eight weeks in both the risperidone and the placebo groups. There was no statistically significant difference in symptomatic benefit between augmentation with risperidone and placebo: 9 of 34 patients receiving placebo and 6 of 34 receiving risperidone responded to treatment (P=0.38). The mean difference in the change in PANSS scores from baseline to eight weeks between those receiving risperidone and those receiving placebo was 0.1 (95 percent confidence interval, -7.3 to 7.0). The verbal working-memory index showed a small decline in the risperidone group and a small improvement in the placebo group (P=0.02 for the comparison between the two groups in the change from baseline). The increase in fasting blood glucose levels was mildly greater in the risperidone group than in the placebo group (16.2 vs. 1.8 mg per deciliter [0.90 vs. 0.10 mmol per liter], P=0.04). The incidence and severity of other side effects did not differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this short-term study, the addition of risperidone to clozapine did not improve symptoms in patients with severe schizophrenia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00272584).

Clinical trials for antipsychotic drugs: design conventions, dilemmas and innovations

More than 50 years after the introduction of modern pharmacotherapies for schizophrenia, there remains a tremendous need for therapeutic advances. A second generation of antipsychotic drugs, introduced over the past 15 years, has provided uncertain advantages over the first-generation drugs. This paper reviews the designs of studies that evaluate the effectiveness of putative antipsychotic drugs. Data from the trials needed to achieve regulatory approval do not meet all the needs of clinicians and policy makers. Practical and large, simple trials that evaluate the comparative effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in real-world settings can help to meet these needs once a drug has reached the market.

Treatment persistence: a comparison among patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on atypical antipsychotic agents

BACKGROUND

Although clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic agents in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, the likelihood of sustaining control of schizophrenic symptoms may depend on treatment persistence.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we compared treatment persistence between patients who were initiated on risperidone or olanzapine, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotic agents.

METHOD

We identified patients with schizophrenia by ICD-9-CM codes (> or =1 inpatient or > or =2 outpatient ICD-9-CM codes > or =7 days apart) between 1 July 1998 and 30 June 1999. We further selected those who were prescribed the target drug during 1 April 1999 through 31 March 2000 provided that they were not on any antipsychotic agents during the prior 6 months. Using event history analysis, we compared the treatment persistence in terms of hazard ratio between olanzapine and risperidone initiators, adjusting for patient's sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Following the initiation of the target drug, more patients switched from risperidone to olanzapine than vice versa. However, among patients with schizophrenia who had comorbid diabetes, there were more patients who made a switch from olanzapine to risperidone; whereas among those who used anxiolytics, there were more patients who switched from risperidone to olanzapine. Finally, olanzapine initiators had decreased hazards of discontinuation by 14% (unadjusted; P < 0.001) and 12% (adjusted; P = 0.002), respectively, than risperidone initiators.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with risperidone, olanzapine seems to be better tolerated by patients as indicated by better treatment persistence. As such, initiation of olanzapine may increase the likelihood of sustaining control of symptoms of schizophrenia. Future research needs to provide a more comprehensive assessment of treatment persistence by considering other antipsychotic agents in the study and developing models to assess treatment persistence and switching as two interdependent competing risks.

Adverse drug reactions of antidepressants and antipsychotics: experience, knowledge and attitudes among Norwegian psychiatrists

Efficient prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) requires knowledge about their severity and pharmacological mechanisms and is dependent on reliable data on their frequencies and possible risk factors. The study was conducted to investigate the prescribers' experience and understanding of the ADRs of psychotropic drugs, and their attitude towards reporting these. In a questionnaire, physicians treating adult psychiatric patients were asked which ADRs that they regarded bothersome for some of the most widely used antidepressants and antipsychotics. Questions about the relationship between blockade of drug receptors and ADRs, and about the physicians' personal experience of and attitudes towards reporting of ADRs were also included. In total, 70 of 91 questionnaires (78%) were returned. The mean number of ADRs regarded bothersome ranged from 2.4 to 9.3 for the various drugs/drug classes. Qualified psychiatrists stated a significantly higher number of bothersome ADRs than did the residents. The percentage of physicians associating blockade of a receptor with a specific ADR varied from 76% (histamine receptor blockade and sedation) to 37% (alpha(1)-adrenergic blockade and tachycardia). Thirty-nine per cent of the physicians had never reported an ADR to the Norwegian Medicines Agency. The number of ADRs considered bothersome was relatively high. The pattern of these ADRs generally mirrored the typical ADR profiles of the drugs. The knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of ADRs was more or less incomplete. The reporting rate of ADRs to the national regulatory authorities was low.

Adjunct divalproex or lithium to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia

This retrospective study examined adjunct divalproex (N = 15) or lithium (N = 9) in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients added to clozapine and compared to clozapine monotherapy (N = 25). Six month total BPRS scores were similarly improved in all treatment groups, however significantly greater improvements occurred in the first month for those on divalproex (-9) or lithium (-8) vs. clozapine alone (-4.5) (F = 3.32, df = 10.43, p = 0.0003). Rates of sedation, tachycardia, orthostasis, GI disturbances, confusion and dizziness were similar among groups. Mean weight gain was 8.7 pounds for clozapine monotherapy, 3.0 pounds in the adjunct divalproex group and 13.3 pounds in the adjunct lithium group (P = NS). A trend was noted for greater increases in blood glucose levels for those treated with adjunct lithium (F = 2.62, df = 2.28, p = 0.09). The addition of divalproex was significantly more effective in reducing global symptoms (driven by hostility and anxiety) in the first month of adjunct treatment as compared to clozapine monotherapy and to previous clozapine treatment.

Automated analysis of quetiapine and other antipsychotic drugs in human blood by high performance-liquid chromatography with column-switching and spectrophotometric detection

An automated HPLC method with column switching is described for the determination of quetiapine, clozapine, perazine, olanzapine and metabolites in blood serum. After clean-up on silica C8 material (20 microm particle size) drugs were separated on ODS Hypersil C18 material (5 microm; column size 250 mm x 4.6 mm i.d.) within 25 min and quantified by ultraviolet (UV) detection at 254 nm. The limit of quantification ranged between 10 and 50 ng/ml. At therapeutic concentrations of the drugs, the inter-assay reproducibility was below 10%. Analyses of drug concentrations in serum of 75-295 patients treated with therapeutic doses of the antipsychotic drugs revealed mean+/-S.D. steady state concentrations of 139+/-136 ng/ml for quetiapine, 328+/-195 ng/ml for clozapine, 48+/-27 ng/ml for olanzapine and 71+/-52 ng/ml for perazine. The method was thus suitable for routine therapeutic drug monitoring and may be extended to other drugs.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia

These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The relative effectiveness of second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs as compared with that of older agents has been incompletely addressed, though newer agents are currently used far more commonly. We compared a first-generation antipsychotic, perphenazine, with several newer drugs in a double-blind study.

METHODS

A total of 1493 patients with schizophrenia were recruited at 57 U.S. sites and randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (7.5 to 30 mg per day), perphenazine (8 to 32 mg per day), quetiapine (200 to 800 mg per day), or risperidone (1.5 to 6.0 mg per day) for up to 18 months. Ziprasidone (40 to 160 mg per day) was included after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The primary aim was to delineate differences in the overall effectiveness of these five treatments.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 percent of patients discontinued the study medication before 18 months (1061 of the 1432 patients who received at least one dose): 64 percent of those assigned to olanzapine, 75 percent of those assigned to perphenazine, 82 percent of those assigned to quetiapine, 74 percent of those assigned to risperidone, and 79 percent of those assigned to ziprasidone. The time to the discontinuation of treatment for any cause was significantly longer in the olanzapine group than in the quetiapine (P<0.001) or risperidone (P=0.002) group, but not in the perphenazine (P=0.021) or ziprasidone (P=0.028) group. The times to discontinuation because of intolerable side effects were similar among the groups, but the rates differed (P=0.04); olanzapine was associated with more discontinuation for weight gain or metabolic effects, and perphenazine was associated with more discontinuation for extrapyramidal effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients in each group discontinued their assigned treatment owing to inefficacy or intolerable side effects or for other reasons. Olanzapine was the most effective in terms of the rates of discontinuation, and the efficacy of the conventional antipsychotic agent perphenazine appeared similar to that of quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Olanzapine was associated with greater weight gain and increases in measures of glucose and lipid metabolism.

Patient characteristics and the likelihood of initiation on olanzapine or risperidone among patients with schizophrenia

Although pharmacologic treatments are available for patients with schizophrenia, little is known about how prescription patterns of atypical antipsychotic agents are related to patient characteristics. In this study, we examined the association between patient characteristics and the likelihood of being initiated on olanzapine or risperidone, two of the most frequently prescribed atypical agents for schizophrenia. We selected patients who were diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder based on > or = 1 inpatient or > or = 2 outpatient ICD-9-CM codes (> or = 7 days apart) between 7/1/98 and 6/30/99 from the Veterans Health Administration (VA). We classified patients into one of three types of initiation: (a) not on olanzapine or risperidone, (b) not on any atypical agents, or (c) not on any antipsychotic agents for 6 months, and then subsequently being prescribed the target drugs. Using logistic regression, we examined whether the odds ratio of being initiated on olanzapine versus risperidone are related to patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to risperidone initiators, olanzapine initiators used more drugs for psychiatric conditions (including antiparkinsonian agents, typical antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers) than risperidone initiators. On the other hand, risperidone initiators had more medical comorbidities and more non-psychiatric hospitalizations. Olanzapine and risperidone appear to be prescribed to patients with different characteristics. Initiation of risperidone was more common among patients who presented with more medical comorbid conditions, whereas initiation of olanzapine was more common among patient who presented with more mental comorbid conditions. Future research needs to determine the reasons for those differences.

Modern antipsychotic drugs: a critical overview

Conventional antipsychotic drugs, used for a half century to treat a range of major psychiatric disorders, are being replaced in clinical practice by modern "atypical" antipsychotics, including aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone among others. As a class, the newer drugs have been promoted as being broadly clinically superior, but the evidence for this is problematic. In this brief critical overview, we consider the pharmacology, therapeutic effectiveness, tolerability, adverse effects and costs of individual modern agents versus older antipsychotic drugs. Because of typically minor differences between agents in clinical effectiveness and tolerability, and because of growing concerns about potential adverse long-term health consequences of some modern agents, it is reasonable to consider both older and newer drugs for clinical use, and it is important to inform patients of relative benefits, risks and costs of specific choices.

Atypical antipsychotics in psychiatric practice: practical implications for clinical monitoring

OBJECTIVES

To provide practical recommendations for monitoring patients both before and during treatment with atypical antipsychotics, to assist clinicians in implementing preventative measures against diabetes, and to establish baselines according to which clinicians should initiate diabetes treatment.

METHOD

A working group of Canadian specialists in psychiatry and endocrinology reviewed peer-reviewed clinical studies published in this area and other relevant papers and abstracts.

RESULTS

The reviewed studies further confirm that atypical antipsychotic medications are the most effective components in the medical management of many psychotic conditions; they also further emphasize the need to more stringently monitor and recognize diabetes risk factors inherent in these patients. Recommendations are based on a review of the available data, on expert opinion and consensus, and on current Canadian guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and management of diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psychiatric disorders, most particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders, have an increased risk for type 2 diabetes and should be screened frequently, especially when other risk factors are present. The resulting recommendations offer practical steps for effectively screening patients prior to and during treatment with atypical antipsychotics. They include (1) how to conduct an initial baseline assessment, (2) when and how to monitor blood glucose and lipid levels, and (3) how to educate patients regarding such lifestyle issues as nutrition, exercise, and diet.

Guideline adherence in medication management of psychotic disorders: an observational multisite hospital study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate guideline adherence in in-patient medication care of psychotic disorders.

METHOD

A total of 508 persons with psychotic disorders were included in a naturalistic multisite hospital study. Subjects were assessed weekly on mental state, social functioning, socioeconomic factors and medication prescriptions.

RESULTS

In total, 17% of individuals were prescribed antipsychotic dosages above the recommended value. Among those with persistent psychotic symptoms, 73% received insufficient antipsychotic drug management. About 58% of patients with depressive symptoms were not treated according to guidelines, and 53% of patients did not receive adequate management of side-effects from antipsychotic medications. Subjects with more than six previous psychiatric hospitalizations (OR 1.80, CI: 1.05-3.08) and those with a prominent thought disorder (OR 2.28, CI: 1.23-4.23) had a higher likelihood of not being treated according to guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with chronic and thought-disordered psychosis may be at a higher risk of receiving medication care not supported by guidelines.

Risperidone, Quetiapine, and Fluphenazine in the Treatment of Patients With Therapy-Refractory Schizophrenia

This 12-week, double-blind study evaluated the effectiveness of risperidone (4 mg/day), quetiapine (400 mg/day), or fluphenazine (12.5 mg/day) in a stringently defined treatment-resistant population of people with schizophrenia. No differences were noted in total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) or Clinical Global Impression scores among the drug groups (n = 38). More subjects tended to complete the study on risperidone (69%) or quetiapine (58%) than those treated with fluphenazine (31%; P value not significant). Eighty-nine percent of those who discontinued on fluphenazine (8 of 9) were due to lack of efficacy. Discontinuation due to adverse effects was low, with only 2 subjects (both on quetiapine) stopping due to side effects. Three of 13 risperidone-treated subjects (23%) and 3 of 12 quetiapine-treated subjects (25%) met response criteria (decrease of 20% of total BPRS score), whereas 2 of 13 subjects (15%) responded to fluphenazine. Side effect occurrence was similar among drug groups and EPS ratings on the Simpson Angus Scale improved in all drug groups (quetiapine, 1.64; risperidone, 1.30; fluphenazine, 0.69; P value not significant). Despite the newer class of second-generation antipsychotic medications, this treatment-resistant population remains difficult to treat. Many people have only minimal to modest improvements with antipsychotic treatment and most continue to have residual psychotic symptoms. Treatment with first- and second-generation antipsychotics may demonstrate similar efficacy; however, patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics may be more likely to adhere to treatment.

The impact of European regulatory policies on psychotropic drug prescribing patterns

Thanks to their alleged better tolerability atypical or second-generation antipsychotic drugs (SGA) have gained a considerable fraction of the market at the expense of the classical antipsychotics. The massive advertising of SGA focussed the doubtful reduction of extra-pyramidal side effects (EPS) overlooking the information about the cardiovascular risk induced by SGA. This also led to extensive off-label use as the control of behavioural symptoms associated with dementia in elderly patients. Although the European Medicine Agency (EMEA) eventually warned physicians and patients of the risk associated with SGA use in this area, the regulatory system has some responsibility in this situation. No added therapeutic value is required for new drugs to be approved for the market. They are only evaluated for their own quality, efficacy and safety with no comparison with available alternative treatments. This implies that new drugs may, in fact, be potentially less effective or less safe than other drugs currently in use.

Predictors and markers of clozapine response

RATIONALE

With other atypical antipsychotics now available, having predictors of clozapine response would be of considerable value, offering clinicians guidance in their decision as to when, and if, a trial of clozapine is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review existing evidence regarding identified predictors and markers of clozapine response.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through PUBMED searches (1975-June 2004) and cross-referencing of reviews and included studies. The data were summarized under two main categories: clinical (general, neurological, cognitive/neuropsychological, clozapine levels) and biological (biochemical, endocrine, genetic, metabolic, morphological, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy). 'Reliable' predictors/markers were defined a priori as those with support of at least two independent reports that addressed overall response, with no contradictory findings to date. 'Potential' predictors/markers had the support of a single report that addressed overall response and at least one other evaluating treatment outcome but not directly addressing response status.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline clinical symptoms and functioning in the previous years and low cerebrospinal homovanillic acid/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels were identified as reliable. Three potential measures were identified: reduction of frontal cortex metabolic activity, reduction of caudate volume, and improvement in P50 sensory gating.

[Leponex, 10 years after -- a clinical review]

Clozapine was one of the major advances in the treatment of schizophrenia since the introduction of the classic antipsychotic agent chlorpromazine in the 1950s. Over the past 10 years, clozapine has become the reference compound for the development of new antipsychotics, and new drugs have been developed which have also claimed atypical status. The indications of clozapine were recently extended to Psychosis in Parkinson's disease and harmonized in the European Union. This provides the opportunity to update the data on clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this article we review current clinical evidence in schizophrenia to address the following issues: 1) Efficacy in refractory/positive symptoms: a systematic and critical analysis of 14 double-blind clinical trials in comparison with both standard and novel antipsychotics show consistent findings in favour of clozapine, with all but three of the reports demonstrating superiority. The review of studies allow us to say little about the predictors of treatment response, time to clozapine response and about the impact of clozapine on the quality of patients'life and longer-term outcome. Treatment options for clozapine non-responders are reviewed. 2) Risk of EPS: clozapine is considered to have a minimal risk of EPS and in all studies where a valid methodology was used, a clear superiority over the other neuroleptics is demonstrated. It is pointed out that, if the prevalence and incidence of EPS with clozapine is low, it is not zero. All the studies assessing clozapine treatment for TD have major methodological limitations, so no final conclusion can be drawn. 3) Efficacy for primary and secondary negative symptoms and neurocognitive effects: the data of clinical studies where negative symptoms scales were used favour clozapine in terms of improvement. However most of the studies were carried out in populations with predominantly positive symptoms. With regard to the need to distinguish primary and secondary symptoms, data are conflicting regarding the benefit of clozapine. Due to the lack of studies with a valid methodology, no definitive conclusion can be drawn about the efficacy on clozapine on the deficit syndrome and on neurocognitive disorders. 4) Impact on suicide risk: 4 out of 6 retrospective studies provide evidence for the ability of clozapine therapy to reduce suicidal behaviour. The results of a recent randomized, parallel-group study designed to compare clozapine versus olanzapine in preventing suicide attempts seems to confirm this hypothesis. We also address the tolerability and safety data, especially haematologic, comitial, cardiovascular and metabolic side-effects. The effectiveness of blood monitoring for the management of neutropenia and agranulocytosis demands that the recommendations are strictly followed. The use of clozapine at doses higher than 600 mg daily should follow published recommendations, in order to minimize the risk of seizures; these include anticonvulsant regimens based on blood levels. With regard to the cardiovascular mortality, if clozapine therapy has negligible effects on QT interval, its association with potential fatal myocarditis cannot be excluded in young patients who should be investigated if they develop cardiac symptoms in the first weeks of treatment. Available data support the notion that the frequency of bodyweight gain is high with several new antipsychotics, including clozapine. Potential long term effects of bodyweight gain on mortality and morbidity have to be taken into consideration. The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the "unique clozapine profile" is discussed. Clozapine remains the only antipsychotic with efficacy at relatively low D2 receptor occupancy. The pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic aspects are also reviewed. Finally, the place of clozapine in the current treatment of schizophrenia is highlighted to inform the development of guidelines for clinical management.

Risk:benefit assessment of old medicines

Any meaningful discussion about the present value of old drugs requires appropriate comparisons with new drugs. While there is noisy propaganda claiming the superiority of new drugs, the evidence supporting these claims is often scanty and poor. Therefore, the database utilizable to evaluate old and new drugs is incomplete and fragile. There are several reasons, including the poor dossiers presented for the approval of new drugs, the lack of comparisons aimed at showing superiority of new drugs, the bias frequently involved in clinical trials and the conflict of interests. This brief discussion reviews these questions and gives some examples by comparing diuretics and new antihypertensive agents, ticlopidine and clopidogrel, and atypical and classical antipsychotic agents.

Inhibition of system A-mediated glycine transport in cortical synaptosomes by therapeutic concentrations of clozapine: implications for mechanisms of action

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic with particular efficacy in schizophrenia, possibly related to potentiation of brain N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) -mediated neurotransmission. NMDARs are regulated in vivo by glycine, which is regulated in turn by glycine transporters. The present study investigates transport processes regulating glycine uptake into rat brain synaptosomes, along with effects of clozapine on synaptosomal glycine transport. Amino-acid uptake of amino acids was assessed in rat brain P2 synaptosomal preparations using a radiotransport assay. Synaptosomal glycine transport was inhibited by a series of amino acids and by the selective System A antagonist MeAIB (2-methyl-aminoisobutyric acid). Clozapine inhibited transport of both glycine and MeAIB, but not other amino acids, at concentrations associated with preferential clinical response (0.5-1 microg/ml). By contrast, other antipsychotics studied were ineffective. The novel glycine transport inhibitor N[3-(4'-fluorophenyl)-3-(4'-phenylphenoxy)propyl]sarcosine (NFPS) produced biphasic inhibition of [(3)H]glycine transport, with IC(50) values of approximately 25 nM and 25 microM, respectively. NFPS inhibition of [(3)H]MeAIB was monophasic with a single IC(50) value of 31 microM. Clozapine significantly inhibited [(3)H]glycine binding even in the presence of 100 nM NFPS. In conclusion, this study suggests first that System A transporters, or a subset thereof, may play a critical role in regulation of synaptic glycine levels and by extension of NMDA receptor regulation, and second that System A antagonism may contribute to the differential clinical efficacy of clozapine compared with other typical or atypical antipsychotics.

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

Negative symptoms are core features of schizophrenia that respond poorly to first-generation antipsychotics and present a major obstacle in rehabilitation. Patients may be somewhat more responsive to clozapine and second-generation antipsychotics but even then, considerable impairment remains. This paper reviews the use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) augmentation of antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues particular to the study of negative symptoms are also discussed. Current evidence indicates that at least two SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics. Onset of improvement may be detected within 2 weeks of starting treatment. The combination is well-tolerated, although as antipsychotic drug concentrations may rise, close monitoring of drug doses and possibly drug concentrations is needed. So far, evidence regarding SSRI augmentation of second-generation antipsychotics is limited and in view of the increasing use of these newer agents, controlled studies are urgently needed. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenic patients with persistent negative symptoms. The paradoxical findings that both clozapine, a serotonin antagonist, and an SSRI antidepressant added to antipsychotics, can improve negative symptoms suggests that these pharmacologically distinct treatments may share common final mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms can shed light on the pathogenesis of negative symptoms and provide new targets for drug development.

Cannabis-associated psychosis: current status of research

Cannabis has been used for recreational, medicinal and religious purposes in different cultures since ancient times. There have been various reports of adverse effects due to or associated with cannabis consumption, including psychotic episodes. Historically, our understanding of these clinical observations has been significantly hindered by a lack of knowledge regarding their underlying neurobiological and pharmacological processes. However, the discovery of the endogenous cannabinoid system has allowed a greater understanding of these adverse effects to develop. From a clinical perspective, toxic or transient psychotic reactions to the administration of herbal cannabis preparations or specific cannabinoid compounds have to be differentiated from longer-lasting, persistent schizophrenia-like disorders associated with the use of cannabis/cannabinoids. The latter are most likely to be associated with a predisposition or vulnerability to schizophrenia. Interestingly, the recently suggested role of the endogenous cannabinoid system in schizophrenia not related to previous cannabinoid consumption introduces an additional perspective on the mechanism underlying cannabis-associated schizophrenia-like disorders, as well as on the effects of cannabis consumption in schizophrenia. At present, acute psychopharmacological treatment options for cannabis-associated transient and persistent schizophrenia-like psychotic episodes are similar and are based on the use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. However, new pharmacological strategies using the endogenous cannabinoid system as a primary target are under development. Long-term psychotherapeutic treatment options involve case management strategies and are mainly based on specialised psychotherapeutic programmes to encourage cannabis users to stop their use of the drug.

Adjunctive use of atypical antipsychotics and anticholinergic drugs among patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotics is often associated with extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), a disorder involving involuntary muscle movement. Because EPS are often associated with the use of antipsychotics, anticholinergic agents are often indicated.

OBJECTIVE

In this observational, retrospective study, we examined whether the initiation of olanzapine or risperidone, the two most widely prescribed atypical antipsychotics, is related to the adjunctive use of anticholinergic agents.

METHOD

We identified patients with schizophrenia from outpatient clinics in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and defined initiation of olanzapine or risperidone as patients who were not on any antipsychotics for 6 months and subsequently initiated on the target drug between 1/4/1999 and 31/3/2000. The data were analysed using tests of means or chi-square tests.

RESULTS

The study yielded two major findings. First, compared with risperidone initiators, there were significantly fewer olanzapine initiators who used at least one anticholinergic agent adjunctively. Secondly, among olanzapine or risperidone initiators, patients who used at least one anticholinergic agent adjunctively tended to stay on the target drug significantly longer than those who did not use any anticholinergic agent adjunctively with the target drug.

CONCLUSION

As the use of anticholinergics is a proxy for the presence of EPS, these findings suggest that risperidone may be more associated with EPS than olanzapine. However, to assess the benefits and side effects associated with olanzapine or risperidone, future research needs to examine various patient outcomes resulting from the initiation of each drug.

Comparison of Classical and Clozapine Treatment on Schizophrenia Using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS) and SPECT Imaging

Many neuroimaging studies of schizophrenia have shown abnormalities in the frontal cortex, limbic system, basal ganglia, temporal and parietal lobes. These findings are not specific or consistent enough to build up a coherent theory of the origin of the brain abnormality in schizophrenia. This paper describes a state-of-the-art approach of SPECT to correlate neuropsychological evaluation. PANSS scores and different brain focal abnormalities of two groups of patients receiving Clozapine and classical antipsychotic treatments were observed. A total of 20 drug-free patients, actively psychotic schizophrenic, were selected according to the DSM-IV criteria. Pre-Post-treatment was designed using PANSS and 99mTc- ECD-SPECT to assess regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF). The results showed that after treatment, differences in PANSS scores were significant in both groups, with superior scores resulting from the Clozapine therapy. Results were supported by SPECT, which showed a greater improvement in the Clozapine group. Both positive and negative symptoms were improved with Clozapine as well. Before treatment, hypofrontality was the most common (85%) finding, whereas after treatment hypofrontality was mostly cleared. However, in some areas like temporal and caudate, hyperfrontality was induced. Negative symptoms showed linkage to hypofrontality in both groups before and after treatment, and both positive and negative symptoms were improved more with Clozapine therapy than with classical treatment.

Impact of regulatory changes on first- and second-generation antipsychotic drug consumption and expenditure in Italy

BACKGROUND

In 1994 a change in drug reimbursement status was implemented in Italy according to cost-effectiveness criteria. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of these changes on the use of antipsychotic (AP) drugs.

METHODS

Data concerning actual quantities of antipsychotic agents dispensed in Italy from 1995 to June 2003 were obtained from the Italian Ministry of Health. For each antipsychotic agent, the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 inhabitants per day was calculated, as well as the annual expenditure in Euros.

RESULTS

From 1995 to June 2003 prescriptions for first-generation antipsychotic agents (FGAs) progressively decreased from 2.54 to 2.0 DDD/1,000/day; in contrast, prescriptions for second-generation antipsychotic agents (SGAs) progressively rose up to 1.75 DDD/1,000/day in 2003. Overall, from 1995 to 2003 antipsychotic prescriptions rose from 2.54 to 3.75 DDD/1,000/day. In 2003 the antipsychotic drug most frequently used was haloperidol, followed by olanzapine and risperidone. In 2003 the use of SGAs accounted for nearly 50% of overall DDD/1,000/day of AP agents. The cost of these new drugs, however, accounted for more than 80% of the total AP expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

In Italy, the progressive increase in the utilisation of SGAs has been accompanied by a moderate decrease in the utilisation of phenothiazines and by an almost constant use of butyrophenones. The policy of reimbursing the use of SGAs only in subjects who could not tolerate FGAs eventually failed to significantly affect the pattern of antipsychotic consumption and expenditure; moreover, when this policy was eliminated at the beginning of 2001, the pattern of consumption and expenditure did not change.

Mental health policy and psychotropic drugs

The pace of innovation in psychotropic drugs has been rapid over the past 15 years. There also have been unprecedented increases in spending on prescription drugs generally and psychotropic medications specifically. Psychotropic medications are playing a more central role in treatment. They also are receiving close scrutiny from health insurers, state budget makers, and ordinary citizens. Public policy actions regarding prescription drugs have the potential to significantly affect clinical care for mental disorders, the costs of this care to individuals and society at large, and the prospects for future scientific advances. This article outlines the policy issues related to psychotropic drugs with respect to their role in determining access to mental health treatment and the cost and quality of mental health care.

Genetic heterogeneity, modifier genes, and quantitative phenotypes in psychiatric illness: searching for a framework

Schizophrenia has long been thought to be clinically heterogeneous. A range of studies suggests that this is due to genetic heterogeneity. Some clinical features, such as negative symptoms, are associated with a greater risk of illness in relatives. Affected sibling pairs are correlated for clinical and course features as well as subforms of illness, and twin studies suggest that this is due to genetic factors. This is further supported by findings that subjects from families linked to some chromosomal regions may differ clinically from those from unlinked families. Moreover, some genes may affect clinical features without altering susceptibility (ie are modifier genes). High-risk genotypes may have quantitative, rather than categorical effects, and may influence milder or subclinical phenotypes. Another recent finding is that nonpsychotic relatives may have personality features that resemble those of their affected relatives. These findings taken together suggest that there may be several classes of gene action in schizophrenia: some genes may influence susceptibility only, others may influence clinical features only, and still others may have a mixed effect. Furthermore, subsets of these classes may affect personality and other traits in nonpsychotic relatives. Understanding these classes of gene action may help guide the design of linkage and association studies that have increased power. We describe five classes of genes and their predictions of the outcomes of family, twin, and several types of linkage studies. We go on to explore how these predictions can in turn be used to aid in the design of linkage studies.

Treatments for schizophrenia: a critical review of pharmacology and mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs

The treatment of schizophrenia has evolved over the past half century primarily in the context of antipsychotic drug development. Although there has been significant progress resulting in the availability and use of numerous medications, these reflect three basic classes of medications (conventional (typical), atypical and dopamine partial agonist antipsychotics) all of which, despite working by varying mechanisms of actions, act principally on dopamine systems. Many of the second-generation (atypical and dopamine partial agonist) antipsychotics are believed to offer advantages over first-generation agents in the treatment for schizophrenia. However, the pharmacological properties that confer the different therapeutic effects of the new generation of antipsychotic drugs have remained elusive, and certain side effects can still impact patient health and quality of life. Moreover, the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs is limited prompting the clinical use of adjunctive pharmacy to augment the effects of treatment. In addition, the search for novel and nondopaminergic antipsychotic drugs has not been successful to date, though numerous development strategies continue to be pursued, guided by various pathophysiologic hypotheses. This article provides a brief review and critique of the current therapeutic armamentarium for treating schizophrenia and drug development strategies and theories of mechanisms of action of antipsychotics, and focuses on novel targets for therapeutic agents for future drug development.