Initiation of tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and the risk of hospitalization for infection in patients with autoimmune diseases

Comparison of infection risk between enzalutamide and abiraterone in patients with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide and abiraterone may differ in their immunomodulatory effects, and the prednisone coadministered with abiraterone can be immunosuppressive. This study aimed to compare the risk of different types of infection in patients with prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone in combination with androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer receiving enzalutamide or abiraterone in addition to androgen deprivation therapy in Hong Kong between December 1999 to March 2021 were identified in this retrospective cohort study and followed up until September 2021, death, or crossover. Outcomes, including any sepsis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cellulitis or skin abscess, central nervous system infections, and tuberculosis, were analyzed as both time-to-event outcomes (multivariable Fine-Gray regression, with mortality considered a competing event) and recurrent-event outcomes (multivariable negative binomial regression).

RESULTS

Altogether, 1582 patients were analyzed (923 abiraterone users; 659 enzalutamide users) with a median follow-up of 10.6 months (interquartile range: 5.3-19.9 months). Compared to abiraterone users, enzalutamide users had lower cumulative incidences of sepsis (adjusted subhazard ratio [SHR] 0.70 [0.53-0.93], p = .014), pneumonia (adjusted SHR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .040), and cellulitis or skin abscess (adjusted SHR 0.55 [0.39-0.79], p = .001), but not urinary tract infection (adjusted SHR 0.91 [0.62-1.35], p = .643). Associations between exposure and central nervous system infections and tuberculosis were not assessed because of low event rates. Analyzing the outcomes as recurrent events gave similar results. Enzalutamide use may be associated with a lower risk of urinary tract infection in patients with diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to abiraterone users, enzalutamide users have significantly lower risks of sepsis, pneumonia, cellulitis, or skin abscess.

Incidence of serious infections in the working-age Japanese adult population with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors and interleukin-6 inhibitors: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

AIM

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the risk of serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFαi) and interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), with no prior use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

We employed the nationwide insurance claims database encompassing the years 2005 to 2018 in Japan. The inclusion criteria specified patients who were prescribed any type of bDMARDs, including TNFαi and IL-6i. The following exclusion criteria were applied: missing prescription dates, RA not diagnosed, below 16 years of age, bDMARDs prescribed within 6 months of registration, RA diagnosed post-bDMARDs prescription, and incidence of serious infections within 2 weeks before bDMARDs therapy. We applied stabilized inverse probability weights and utilized a Cox regression model to estimate the risk of serious infections associated with TNFαi and IL-6i.

RESULTS

The cohort of 2493 patients with RA was categorized into a TNFαi group and an IL-6i group of 2018 and 475 participants, respectively. The median follow-up duration (interquartile range) was 347 (147-820) days in the TNFαi group and 369 (149-838) days in the IL-6i group. In the inverse probability-weighted cohort, the incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of serious infections were 2.13 (1.65-2.71) and 3.25 (2.15-4.69) per 100 person-years for the TNFαi and IL-6i groups, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) comparing the TNFαi group to the IL-6i group was 0.66 (0.36-1.20, p = 0.168).

DISCUSSION

The results underscore the lack of evidence to preferentially favor either TNFαi or IL-6i as later-line therapy in the management of bDMARDs-naive RA to mitigate the risk of serious infections.

Association of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Low-Dose Glucocorticoid Prescription in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Many guidelines recommend limiting glucocorticoids in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but 40% of patients remain on glucocorticoids long term. We evaluated the cardiovascular risk of long-term glucocorticoid prescription by studying patients on stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

METHODS

Using two claims databases, we identified patients with RA on stable DMARD therapy for >180 days. Proportional hazards models with inverse-probability weights and clustering to account for multiple observations were used to estimate the effect of glucocorticoid dose on composite cardiovascular outcomes (stroke or myocardial infarction [MI]).

RESULTS

There were 135,583 patients in Medicare and 39,272 in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart (CDM) database. Medicare and CDM patients had an incidence of 1.3 and 0.8 composite cardiovascular outcomes per 100 person-years, respectively. In the older, comorbid Medicare cohort, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes in adjusted models with predicted one-year incidence of 1.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2%-1.6%) for ≤5 mg, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4%-1.9%) for >5 to 10 mg, and 1.8% (95% CI 1.2%-2.5%) for >10 mg versus 1.1% (95% CI 1.1%-1.2%) among patients not receiving glucocorticoids. There was no significant association among the CDM cohort. However, in the subgroup of younger patients with RA and higher cardiovascular risk, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in composite cardiovascular outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among older patients with more comorbidities and younger patients with higher cardiovascular risk with RA on stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of MI and stroke, even at doses ≤5 mg/day. By contrast, no association was noted among younger, healthier patients with RA.

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Short- and Long-Term Mortality of Hospitalized Patients With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases and Serious Infections: A National Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Infectious conditions are a significant cause of mortality in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD). Among patients hospitalized with an infection, we compared in-hospital and long-term (3-year) mortality between those with and without ARD.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included members of the largest health maintenance organization in Israel, aged > 18 years at the first episode of infection, who required hospitalization during 2003-2019. We compared in-hospital mortality and the results of a 3-year landmark analysis of those who survived the index hospitalization between patients with ARD, according to disease subgroups, and patients without ARD. Additionally, we compared mortality outcomes among patients with ARD, according to subgroup diagnosis, matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, and ethnicity to patients without ARD.

RESULTS

Included were 365,247 patients who were admitted for the first time with the diagnosis of a serious infection. Of these, we identified 9755 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 1351 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 2120 with spondyloarthritis (SpA), 584 with systemic sclerosis, and 3214 with vasculitis. In a matched multivariate analysis, the risk for in-hospital mortality was lower among patients with RA (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97) and SpA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94). In a similar analysis, the risk of 3-year mortality was lower among patients with RA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86) and vasculitis (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Among patients hospitalized for an infection, the risk of in-hospital and 3-year mortality was not increased among those with ARD compared to those without ARD.

Effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone administration on early postoperative pain following retrograde intrarenal surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone use on postoperative early pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

METHODS

Patients who had 10-20 mm solitary kidney stones and underwent RIRS procedures were included in this prospective cohort study between February 2022 and May 2023. Patients who were administered methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively were included in group 1 (n: 31), and the other first 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive methylprednisolone before surgery were included in group 2 (n: 90). Demographic data, features of stone, postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hour, the need for analgesics, changes in serum glucose levels, and the prevalence of postoperative fever were compared.

RESULTS

Age, sex, stone laterality, localization, size, Hounsfield Unit, modified Satava scores, stone-free status, duration of the RIRS procedure, and duration of the ureteral access sheath were found to be similar between groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h were found to be statistically significantly lower in group 1 (p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, and p = .001, respectively). Similarly, postoperative analgesic requirements were found to be significantly lower in group 1 (p = .048) with a similar postoperative fever rate and changes in serum glucose levels between groups.

CONCLUSION

Giving a single dose of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively for the RIRS procedure is safe and effective at preventing early pain and the need for analgesics after the RIRS procedure.

Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Do Not Increase Risk for Prosthetic Joint Infection in Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Over 25% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are expected to undergo a joint replacement during their lifetime. Current practice guidelines recommend withholding biologic therapy 1 week prior to total hip arthroplasty, given its immunosuppressive effects. Most patients are on a regimen including biologic and nonbiologic therapy; however, the individual influences of these therapies are not well understood in the setting of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, we sought to compare biologic, nonbiologic, and recipients of both types of therapy in patients with RA undergoing TKA. We specifically assessed (1) medical complications at 90 days; (2) surgical complications up to 1 year; and (3) independent risk factors for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs).A retrospective review was conducted using a national, all-payer database for patients undergoing primary TKA from January 2010 to April 2020 (n = 1.97 million). Patients diagnosed with RA were then separated into at least 1-year users of biologic (n = 3,092), nonbiologic (28,299), or dual (n = 10,949) therapy. Bivariate analyses were utilized to assess for 90-day medical and up to 1-year surgical outcomes. Additionally, multivariate regression models were utilized to assess for independent risk factors.The incidence and odds ratio for medical/surgical outcomes were equivocal among the biologic, nonbiologic, and recipients receiving both types of therapy (p > 0.061). No differences were observed between the type of therapy as additional risk factors for infection (p > 0.505). However, glucocorticoids at 90 days and alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, obesity, as well as tobacco use were identified as additional risk factors for PJI(p < 0.036).No appreciable differences in medical or surgical outcomes were associated with the independent use of biologic, nonbiologic, or recipients of both types of therapy in patients with RA. Additionally, alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, glucocorticoids, obesity, and tobacco use conferred an increased risk of PJI. These results can serve as an adjunct to current practice guidelines.

Personalized Treatment for Crohn's Disease: Current Approaches and Future Directions

Crohn's disease is a complex, relapsing and remitting inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract with a variable disease course. While the treatment options for Crohn's disease have dramatically increased over the past two decades, predicting individual patient response to treatment remains a challenge. As a result, patients often cycle through multiple different therapies before finding an effective treatment which can lead to disease complications, increased costs, and decreased quality of life. Recently, there has been increased emphasis on personalized medicine in Crohn's disease to identify individual patients who require early advanced therapy to prevent complications of their disease. In this review, we summarize our current approach to management of Crohn's disease by identifying risk factors for severe or disabling disease and tailoring individual treatments to patient-specific goals. Lastly, we outline our knowledge gaps in implementing personalized Crohn's disease treatment and describe the future directions in precision medicine.

Biologics in peripheral ulcerative keratitis

Over the past two decades biologic therapies have seen a rapid uptake in the management of ocular inflammation. Peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK), once a harbinger of blindness and mortality in refractory rheumatological disease, is now increasingly being treated with these agents. We conducted a review to evaluate the evidence base for this application and to provide a road map for their clinical usage in PUK, including dosage and adverse effects. A literature search across Medline, Embase and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was undertaken to identify all patients with PUK that were treated with a biologic in a peer viewed article. Overall, whilst the evidence base for biologic use in PUK was poor, reported cases demonstrate an increasingly powerful and effective role for biologics in refractory PUK. This was particularly the case for rituximab in PUK secondary to granulomatous with polyangiitis.

Risk of severe infections after the introduction of biologic DMARDs in people with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of the introduction of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on severe infections among people newly diagnosed with RA compared with non-RA individuals.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative data (from 1990-2015) for British Columbia, Canada, all incident RA patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2007 were identified. General population controls with no inflammatory arthritis were matched to RA patients based on age and gender, and were assigned the diagnosis date (i.e. index date) of the RA patients they were matched with. RA/controls were then divided into quarterly cohorts according to their index dates. The outcome of interest was all severe infections necessitating hospitalization or occurring during hospitalization after the index date. We calculated 8-year severe infection rates for each cohort and conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare severe infection trends in RA/controls with index date during pre-bDMARDs (1995-2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003-2007) periods.

RESULTS

A total of 60 226 and 588 499 incident RA/controls were identified. We identified 14 245 severe infections in RA, and 79 819 severe infections in controls. The 8-year severe infection rates decreased among RA/controls with increasing calendar year of index date in the pre-bDMARDs period, but increased over time only among RA, not controls, with index date in the post-bDMARDs period. The adjusted difference between the pre- and post-bDMARDs secular trends in 8-year severe infection rates was 1.85 (P = 0.001) in RA and 0.12 (P = 0.29) in non-RA.

CONCLUSION

RA onset after bDMARDs introduction was associated with an elevated severe infection risk in RA patients compared with matched non-RA individuals.

Case report: A pregnant woman with Crohn disease who used ustekinumab to the 3rd trimester developed severe infection

RATIONALE

Crohn disease (CD) and pregnancy often impact each other, which poses challenges for women with CD to successfully give birth to a healthy baby. The latest guideline recommends that patients with active inflammatory bowel disease delay pregnancy to induce remission and optimize disease control. Research data has showed that the incidence of infection and severe infection in patients treated with ustekinumab (UST) did not increase compared to those treated with a placebo.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This report describes the entire process of a pregnant woman with CD who has undergone ileostomy and long-term enteral nutrition and requires biological agents to control the disease, from conception to delivery. This case was pregnant during CD period and regularly treated with UST to the third trimester, with the onset of sepsis and septic shock at 38 weeks gestation.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was pathologically diagnosed with CD 16 years ago and admitted to our department at 38 weeks gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

After admission to our department, fetal heart monitoring indicated fetal distress, so we immediately terminated the pregnancy by cesarean section. After the diagnosis of septic shock, the patient was transferred to intensive care unit for active anti-infection and symptomatic supportive treatment.

OUTCOMES

The mother only experienced an infection in the third trimester, and cured by active treatment. The newborn was delivered at full term and confirmed to be low birth weight.

LESSONS

Her experience suggests that although pregnant during Crohn active period, a good outcome can be achieved through positively controlling with medication and closely monitoring it. The use of UST during pregnancy appears to be safe for both the mother and fetus but may be associated with severe infections.

Treating the Side Effects of Exogenous Glucocorticoids; Can We Separate the Good From the Bad?

It is estimated that 2% to 3% of the population are currently prescribed systemic or topical glucocorticoid treatment. The potent anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids to deliver therapeutic benefit is not in doubt. However, the side effects associated with their use, including central weight gain, hypertension, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and osteoporosis, often collectively termed iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome, are associated with a significant health and economic burden. The precise cellular mechanisms underpinning the differential action of glucocorticoids to drive the desirable and undesirable effects are still not completely understood. Faced with the unmet clinical need to limit glucocorticoid-induced adverse effects alongside ensuring the preservation of anti-inflammatory actions, several strategies have been pursued. The coprescription of existing licensed drugs to treat incident adverse effects can be effective, but data examining the prevention of adverse effects are limited. Novel selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists and selective glucocorticoid receptor modulators have been designed that aim to specifically and selectively activate anti-inflammatory responses based upon their interaction with the glucocorticoid receptor. Several of these compounds are currently in clinical trials to evaluate their efficacy. More recently, strategies exploiting tissue-specific glucocorticoid metabolism through the isoforms of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase has shown early potential, although data from clinical trials are limited. The aim of any treatment is to maximize benefit while minimizing risk, and within this review we define the adverse effect profile associated with glucocorticoid use and evaluate current and developing strategies that aim to limit side effects but preserve desirable therapeutic efficacy.

Comparative short-term risks of infection and serious infection in patients receiving biologic and small-molecule therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Infection events are a major concern for patients and physicians when making psoriasis treatment decisions.

Objective

To estimate the relative short-term risks of infection and serious infection for biologic and small molecule therapies in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Data Sources and Methods

A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted on 17 June 2022. We included phase II, III, or IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologic and small-molecule therapies that are licensed or likely to gain approval soon for PsO and PsA, as well as infection data reports. Two investigators independently extracted the data based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to estimate the pooled relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals of total infections and serious infections for treatments during placebo-controlled phases of RCTs. The surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) was calculated to rank the infection risk for each treatment.

Results

A total of 94 RCTs with a total of 19 treatment arms involving 54,369 participants were analyzed. For patients with PsO, bimekizumab, secukizumab, risankizumab, ustekinumab, apremilast, guselkumab, and adalimumab were associated with significantly higher risks of infection than placebo; SUCRA ranked infliximab, deucravacitinib, and bimekizumab with the highest risks of infection. For patients with PsA, bimekizumab, apremilast, and upadacitinib (30 mg daily) were associated with higher risks of infection; SUCRA ranked bimekizumab with the highest risk of infection. No treatments, except for upadacitinib (30 mg daily), were associated with a higher risk of serious infection than placebo in PsA.

Conclusion

This NMA provides a comprehensive assessment of the comparative short-term risks of infection, which could help physicians and patients to select individualized treatments for psoriasis.

Registration

CRD42022359873.

Long-Term Use of Immunosuppressive Agents Increased the Risk of Fractures in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: An 18-Year Population-Based Cohort Study

The risk of fractures is higher in patients with autoimmune diseases, but it is not clear whether the use of immunosuppressive agents can further increase this risk. To investigate this issue, a retrospective study was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients diagnosed with autoimmune diseases between 2000 and 2014, including psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, were included in the study. A control group of patients without autoimmune diseases was selected from the same database during the same period. Patients with autoimmune diseases were divided into two sub-cohorts based on their use of immunosuppressive agents. This study found the risk of fractures was 1.14 times higher in patients with autoimmune diseases than in those without. Moreover, we found that patients in the immunosuppressant sub-cohort had a higher risk of fractures compared to those in the non-immunosuppressant sub-cohort. The adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio for shoulder fractures was 1.27 (95% CI = 1.01-1.58), for spine fractures was 1.43 (95% CI = 1.26-1.62), for wrist fractures was 0.95 (95% CI = 0.75-1.22), and for hip fractures was 1.67 (95% CI = 1.38-2.03). In conclusion, the long-term use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with autoimmune diseases may increase the risk of fractures.

Using pooled electronic health records data to conduct pharmacoepidemiology safety studies: Challenges and lessons learned

PURPOSE

We assessed the suitability of pooled electronic health record (EHR) data from clinical research networks (CRNs) of the patient-centered outcomes research network to conduct studies of the association between tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and infections.

METHODS

EHR data from patients with one of seven autoimmune diseases were obtained from three CRNs and pooled. Person-level linkage of CRN data and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fee-for-service claims data was performed where possible. Using filled prescriptions from CMS claims data as the gold standard, we assessed the misclassification of EHR-based new (incident) user definitions. Among new users of TNFi, we assessed subsequent rates of hospitalized infection in EHR and CMS data.

RESULTS

The study included 45 483 new users of TNFi, of whom 1416 were successfully linked to their CMS claims. Overall, 44% of new EHR TNFi prescriptions were not associated with medication claims. Our most specific new user definition had a misclassification rate of 3.5%-16.4% for prevalent use, depending on the medication. Greater than 80% of CRN prescriptions had either zero refills or missing refill data. Compared to using EHR data alone, there was a 2- to 8-fold increase in hospitalized infection rates when CMS claims data were added to the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

EHR data substantially misclassified TNFi exposure and underestimated the incidence of hospitalized infections compared to claims data. EHR-based new user definitions were reasonably accurate. Overall, using CRN data for pharmacoepidemiology studies is challenging, especially for biologics, and would benefit from supplementation by other sources.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Crohn's Disease: A CA-IBD Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We compared the safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a multicenter cohort (CA-IBD).

METHODS

We created an electronic health record-based cohort of adult patients with CD who were initiating a new biologic agent (TNF-α antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 health systems in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of serious infections (safety) and all-cause hospitalization and inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (effectiveness) between different biologic classes using propensity score (PS) matching.

RESULTS

As compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 1030), 2:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21) or surgery (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.70). Compared with vedolizumab (n = 221), 1:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.60), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) or surgery (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.54-3.72). Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), 2:1 PS-matched, vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.78), hospitalization (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77), and surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.47). High comorbidity burden, concomitant opiate use, and prior hospitalization were associated with serious infections and hospitalization in biologic-treated patients with CD.

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter cohort of biologic-treated patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with TNF-α antagonists and vedolizumab, without any differences in risk of hospitalization or surgery. The risk of serious infections was similar for TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab.

Risk of infection from glucocorticoid and methotrexate interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using biologics: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effect of the interaction between methotrexate and glucocorticoids on the risk of developing bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

We used the 2005-2018 JMDC claims database, a nationwide claims database in Japan. From the database of 7 175 048 patients, study patients were obtained by applying the following exclusion criteria: no use of bDMARDs; without information on the date of prescription; without RA as a disease; other than the new users of bDMARDs; and age <18 years. The exposures were glucocorticoids and methotrexate, and the outcome was bacterial infection. The interaction effects were examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Bacterial infections were identified according to antibiotic prescription and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes.

RESULTS

A total of 2837 RA patients were identified, with a median age of 50 years. The incidence of infection was 16.8% (95% confidence interval: 15.5-18.3). The interaction term for the doses of glucocorticoids and methotrexate was significant. Additionally, a higher dose of glucocorticoid was a significant risk factor for developing bacterial infections on the side of high doses of methotrexate. The incidence of bacterial infections tended to increase significantly with increasing methotrexate doses coprescribed with glucocorticoids ≥5 mg or glucocorticoid doses coprescribed with methotrexate ≥8 mg.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate a potential association between methotrexate dose and bacterial infections during bDMARDs administration with glucocorticoids in patients with RA.

Perioperative treatment with TNF inhibitors does not affect survival of total hip arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis: a registry-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Aim of this study was to investigate the effect of perioperative exposure to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) on the long-term survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in inflammatory arthritis patients from a large regional register of arthroplasty procedures (RIPO).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of data from RIPO for THAs performed between 2008 and 2019. After extraction of the procedures of interest from the RIPO dataset, cross-matching with administrative databases were used to identify patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), primary osteoarthritis (OA), and treatments of interest. Three different cohorts of patients were identified: perioperative TNFi-treated patients (6 months before or after the surgery), perioperative non-bDMARD/tsDMARD (biologic or targeted-synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs), and OA.

RESULTS

At an average follow-up of 5 years, survival rates (using any revision surgery as an endpoint) were not significantly different when perioperative TNFi users and non-bDMARD/tsDMARD patients were compared (p = 0.713), and between TNFi-treated and OA controls (p = 0.123). At the latest available follow-up, 2.5% patients in the TNFi cohort, 3% in the non-bDMARD/tsDMARD cohort, and 0.8% in the OA cohort underwent revision surgery. No significant differences were found comparing the risk of postoperative infection or aseptic loosening among groups.

CONCLUSION

Risk of revision surgery is not increased in patients with inflammatory arthritis perioperatively exposed to TNFi. Our results support the long-term safety of this class of molecules on survival of prosthetic implants.

The Risk of Serious Infections Before and After Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Serious infections have been observed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on anti-TNF use-but to what extent these infections are due to anti-TNF or the disease activity per se is hard to disentangle. We aimed to describe how the rates of serious infections change over time both before and after starting anti-TNF in IBD.

METHODS

Inflammatory bowel disease patients naïve to anti-TNF treatment were identified at 5 centers participating in the Swedish IBD Quality Register, and their medical records examined in detail. Serious infections, defined as infections requiring in-patient care, the year before and after the start of anti-TNF treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Among 980 patients who started their first anti-TNF therapy between 1999 and 2016, the incidence rate of serious infections was 2.19 (95% CI,1.43-3.36) per 100 person years the year before and 2.11 (95% CI, 1.33-3.34) per 100 person years 1 year after treatment start. This corresponded to an incidence rate ratio 1 year after anti-TNF treatment of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.51-1.84). Compared with before anti-TNF therapy, the incidence of serious infection was significantly decreased more than 1 year after treatment (incidence rate ratio 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33-0.95; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

In routine clinical practice in Sweden, the incidence rate of serious infection among IBD patients did not increase with anti-TNF therapy. Instead, serious infections seemed to decrease more than 1 year after initiation of anti-TNF treatment.

Comparison of glucocorticoids and painkiller prescribed days between rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving early and late treatment with a biological agent via a population-based cohort study

Comparison between early biologics treatment and late biologics treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in decreasing prescription days of glucocorticoids and painkillers by using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research database from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2013. We defined early use of biologics as biologics prescribed within 2.24 years after the RA diagnosis, and the late use of biologics was defined as those prescribed after 2.24 years of the RA diagnosis. These definitions are based on previous studies defining early arthritis as arthritis within 2 years of diagnosis, while we needed another 3 months for application biologics here in Taiwan, which equals a total of 2.24 years. Among the 821 patients, 410 patients (50%) were classified in the Early group, and the other 411 patients (50%) were classified in the Late group. The use of any of these 3 types of medication, including steroids, disease modifying antirhuematic drugs, and nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was changed significantly after biologics treatment. Comparing between before and after biologics treatment, oral medication was significantly tapered (all P < .0001). The results show that men are 1.81 times more likely than women to taper oral glucocorticoids and NSAIDs. Younger age (<45) patients are 1.91 times more likely to taper steroids and NSAIDs than those aged over 65 years old. Both gender and age were found to be independent factors that could decrease days of prescription of both steroids and NSAIDs in early use of biologics agents. This study indicates that younger patients only need short-term (2.53 ± 1.92 years, P = .03) and early treatment with biologics (within 2.24 years of diagnosis of RA), just in order to taper steroids and NSAIDs to less than 50% compared to the steroids and NSAIDs doses before biologics treatment.

Comorbidity Influences the Comparative Safety of Biologic Therapy in Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on comparative risk of infections with various biologic agents in older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We aimed to assess the comparative safety of biologic agents in older IBD patients with varying comorbidity burden.

METHODS

We used data from a large, national commercial insurance plan in the United States to identify patients 60 years and older with IBD who newly initiated tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNF), vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. Comorbidity was defined using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Our primary outcome was infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare the risk of infections between the different therapeutic classes.

RESULTS

The anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab cohorts included 2,369, 972, and 352 patients, respectively, with a mean age of 67 years. The overall rate of infection-related hospitalizations was similar to that of anti-TNF agents for patients initiating vedolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04) and ustekinumab (0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.16). Among patients with a CCI of >1, both ustekinumab (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91, p-interaction <0.01) and vedolizumab (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p-interaction: 0.02) were associated with a significantly lower rate of infection-related hospitalizations compared with anti-TNFs. No difference was found among patients with a CCI of ≤1.

DISCUSSION

Among adults 60 years and older with IBD initiating biologic therapy, both vedolizumab and ustekinumab were associated with lower rates of infection-related hospitalizations than anti-TNF therapy for those with high comorbidity burden.

Adherence patterns in naïve and prevalent use of infliximab and its biosimilar

Introduction

Although short-term clinical trials have demonstrated that switching from infliximab (INF) bio-originator to its biosimilar is safe with no significant loss of efficacy, there are limited real-world data comparing their patterns of use and adherence.

Methods

Using 2015–2018 IBM Marketscan data, we established 4 cohorts of patients with at least one administration or pharmacy claim for INF bio-originator or biosimilar in 2017, including INF naïve biosimilar users, INF prevalent biosimilar users, INF naïve bio-originator users, and INF prevalent bio-originator users, defined according to their prior use of INF from 2015 to their first INF administration in 2017. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated for patients with at least 6, 12, or 18 months of follow-up time. Factors associated with optimal adherence (PDC > 80%) were evaluated using log-binomial models.

Results

We identified 96 INF naïve biosimilar users, 223 INF prevalent biosimilar users, 2,149 INF naïve bio-originator users, and 10,970 INF prevalent bio-originator users. At the end of 18 months of follow-up, 64% of INF prevalent bio-originators, 48% of INF naïve biosimilars, 41% of INF naïve bio-originators, and 36% of INF prevalent biosimilars had optimal adherence. Depression, previous hospitalization, and greater use of prior biologics were negatively associated with adherence, whereas IBD diagnoses (referent to RA) and age 55–64 (referent to < 35) were positively associated with high adherence.

Conclusion

INF prevalent users had higher adherence in our analyses than INF naïve users. However, further studies with larger sample size are needed to evaluate INF biosimilar users’ adherence.

Opportunistic infections as a cause of death in patients with autoimmune diseases: An autopsy-based study

BACKGROUND

Infections are an important cause of mortality in patients with autoimmune diseases and opportunistic infections account for a large percentage of these cases. It is often a clinical challenge to find a balance between immunosuppressive therapy and the risk of developing an infectious process.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive study of autopsy reports.

RESULTS

15 patients with a premortem diagnosis of autoimmune disease were included. All patients died due to an opportunistic infection. The most commonly reported infection was tuberculosis, followed by invasive fungal infections.

CONCLUSIONS

The most prevalent pathogens were found in our autopsy-based study of patients with autoimmune diseases and opportunistic infections. Prevention and early detection strategies are vital in order to reach a correct diagnosis and begin the appropriate treatment as soon as possible.

Comparison of developing tuberculosis following tumor necrosis factor inhibition and interleukin-6 inhibition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide observational study in South Korea, 2013–2018

Background

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study compared the incidence of TB after treatment with TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab in patients with RA, separately in those who were treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and those without evidence of LTBI.

Methods

This study included patients with RA who initiated TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab between December 2013 and August 2018. Patient data were collected from the nationwide database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment service in South Korea. The incidence of TB was compared among different biologic drugs in patients with or without LTBI treatment.

Results

Of 4736 patients, 1168 were treated for LTBI and 48 developed TB (554.9 per 100,000 person-years). When compared based on etanercept, infliximab showed a higher risk of TB (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.05–7.01), especially in patients without evidence of LTBI. Other TNF inhibitors and tocilizumab showed a comparable incidence of TB, regardless of treatment for LTBI. There was no significant difference in TB incidence after biologic therapy between patients with and without LTBI treatment (627.9/100,000 vs. 529.5/100,000 person-years). In patients treated for LTBI, no differential risk of TB was observed among biologic drugs.

Conclusions

The incidence of TB was not significantly different among biologic drugs in the current era, except for infliximab in patients who were not treated for LTBI. Treatment of LTBI might alleviate the drug-specific risk of TB in patients with RA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02842-6.

Vedolizumab Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Serious Infections Than Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents in Older Adults

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite the increased numbers of older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), there are few studies regarding the safety and effectiveness of IBD treatments in older adults. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents and vedolizumab in older adults with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an active comparator, new-user design for adults age 65 years and older with IBD initiating anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab in the Medicare claims database from 2014 to 2017. The primary safety outcome was infection-related hospitalization (excluding intra-abdominal and perianal abscesses). Co-primary outcomes to estimate effectiveness were IBD-related hospitalization, IBD-related surgery, and new corticosteroid use 60 days or more after biologic initiation. We performed propensity score weighting to control for confounding and estimated adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using standardized morbidity ratio-weighted variables.

RESULTS

We identified 1152 anti-TNF-α new users and 480 vedolizumab new users. The median age was 71 years in both cohorts and 11% were age 80 years or older. Crohn's disease patients comprised 54% of the anti-TNF-α cohort and 57% of the vedolizumab cohort. There was no significant difference in demographics, health care utilization, or frailty in both cohorts. More than half of both cohorts had a Charlson comorbidity index of 2 or higher. Vedolizumab users had a decreased risk of infection-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.86). There was no significant difference in the outcomes approximating effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Older IBD patients treated with vedolizumab had a lower risk of infection-related hospitalization compared with those initiating anti-TNFs. We observed no difference in effectiveness defined by hospitalizations, surgery, or new corticosteroid use.

Efficacy of a nurse-led patient education intervention in promoting safety skills of patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with biologics: a multicentre randomised clinical trial

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a nurse-led patient education on safety skills of patients with inflammatory arthritis treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

Methods

This is a multicentre, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial comparing an intervention group (face-to-face education by a nurse at baseline and 3 months later) with a control group (usual care) at the introduction of a first subcutaneous bDMARD. The primary outcome was score on the BioSecure questionnaire at 6 months (0–100 scale), a validated questionnaire assessing competencies in dealing with fever, infections, vaccination and daily situations. The secondary outcomes were disease activity, coping, psychological well-being, beliefs about medication, self-efficacy and severe infection rate.

Results

129 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis were enrolled in nine rheumatology departments; 122 completed the study; 127 were analysed; and 64 received the intervention (mean duration: 65 min at baseline and 44 min at 3 months). The primary outcome was met: the BioSecure score was 81.2±13.1 and 75.6±13.0 in the education and usual care groups (difference: +6.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.1, p=0.015), demonstrating higher safety skills in the education group. Exploratory analyses showed better skills regarding infections, greater willingness for vaccinations and greater adherence-related behaviours in the education group. Coping was significantly more improved by education; other secondary outcomes were improved in both groups, with no difference.

Conclusions

Educating patients was effective in promoting patient behaviours for preventing adverse events with bDMARDs. An education session delivered to patients starting a first bDMARD can be useful to help them self-manage safety issues.

Trial registration number

NCT02855320.

Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis

The field of inflammatory disease of the heart or "cardio-immunology" is rapidly evolving due to the wider use of non-invasive diagnostic tools able to detect and monitor myocardial inflammation. In acute myocarditis, recent data on the use of immunomodulating therapies have been reported both in the setting of systemic autoimmune disorders and in the setting of isolated forms, especially in patients with specific histology (e.g., eosinophilic myocarditis) or with an arrhythmicburden. A role for immunosuppressive therapies has been also shown in severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a condition that can be associated with cardiac injury and acute myocarditis. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are assessing the role of high dosage methylprednisolone in the context of acute myocarditis complicated by heart failure or fulminant presentation or the role of anakinra to treat patients with acute myocarditis excluding patients with hemodynamically unstable conditions. In addition, the explosion of immune-mediated therapies in oncology has introduced new pathophysiological entities, such as immune-checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis and new basic research models to understand the interaction between the cardiac and immune systems. Here we provide a broad overview of evolving areas in cardio-immunology. We summarize the use of new imaging tools in combination with endomyocardial biopsy and laboratory parameters such as high sensitivity troponin to monitor the response to immunomodulating therapies based on recent evidence and clinical experience. Concerning pericarditis, the normal composition of pericardial fluid has been recently elucidated, allowing to assess the actual presence of inflammation; indeed, normal pericardial fluid is rich in nucleated cells, protein, albumin, LDH, at levels consistent with inflammatory exudates in other biological fluids. Importantly, recent findings showed how innate immunity plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of recurrent pericarditis with raised C-reactive protein, with inflammasome and IL-1 overproduction as drivers for systemic inflammatory response. In the era of tailored medicine, anti-IL-1 agents such as anakinra and rilonacept have been demonstrated highly effective in patients with recurrent pericarditis associated with an inflammatory phenotype.

A Case of Stevens–Johnson Syndrome Complicated with Multimatrix System Mesalamine in Ulcerative Colitis

A 41-year-old man was treated with prednisolone (PSL) and multimatrix (MMX) mesalamine for remission induction therapy of ulcerative colitis. PSL was tapered due to successful remission induction treatment. During the treatment course, ocular foreign body sensation, eyelid swelling, ocular conjunctiva hyperemia, facial redness and swelling, watery nasal discharge, stomatitis, anal pain, and reddish puffiness on the bilateral dorsum of the hands appeared, and he was diagnosed with Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS). SJS was improved by PSL treatment and intravenous immunoglobulin. MMX mesalamine was the causative agent by drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test. This is the first reported case of SJS with MMX mesalamine.

Risk of Serious Infection With Low-dose Glucocorticoids in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Instrumental Variable Analysis

BACKGROUND

Low-dose glucocorticoids are commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Observational studies have found an increased risk of serious infection associated with low-dose glucocorticoids, but concerns about residual confounding remain.

METHODS

We identified adults with RA on stable immunomodulatory therapy for >6 months receiving no glucocorticoids or ≤5 mg/day using Medicare data from 2006 to 2015. We used provider preference for glucocorticoids as an instrumental variable (IV) to assess associations between low-dose glucocorticoid use and the risk of infection requiring hospitalization using a cause-specific proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

We identified 163,603 qualifying treatment episodes among 120,656 patients. Glucocorticoids ≤5 mg/day were used by 25,373/81,802 (31.0%) of patients seen by a rheumatologist with low provider preference for glucocorticoids and by 36,087/81,801 (44.1%) of patients seen by a rheumatologist with high provider preference for glucocorticoids (adjusted odds ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.77, 1.84 for association between provider preference and glucocorticoids). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, opioids, antibiotics, previous emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and infections requiring hospitalization infections were unbalanced with regard to exposure but not to the IV. The incidence of infection requiring hospitalization was 8.0/100 person-years among patients unexposed to glucocorticoids versus 11.7/100 person-years among those exposed. The association between glucocorticoids and infection requiring hospitalization from IV analysis (hazard ratio 1.26 [1.02-1.56]) was similar to results from a standard multivariable model (hazard ratio 1.24 [1.21-1.28]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with RA on stable immunomodulatory therapy, IV analysis based on provider preference demonstrated an increased risk of infection requiring hospitalization associated with low-dose glucocorticoids, similar to a traditional analysis.

Aspergillus Osteomyelitis Secondary to Chronic Necrotizing Pulmonary Aspergillosis in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Aspergillus spp. are ubiquitous molds that cause a wide range of clinical syndromes depending on the immune status of the host. Herein, we present a case of a patient with rheumatoid arthritis on long-term immunosuppressive medications, with a persistent dry cough and left-sided chest pain for over a year, who presented with acute sternal drainage. Computed tomography of the chest showed chronic pulmonary abnormalities, parasternal fluid, and bone destruction of the distal sternum and left sixth rib. The patient underwent debridement; sternal biopsy tissue showed septate hyphae with acute-angled branching, and Aspergillus fumigatus grew in culture. We suspected that the patient developed chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis (CNPA) that traversed tissue planes and caused chest wall osteomyelitis. The patient received voriconazole and surgical debridement, with clinical and radiological improvement. This case demonstrates the importance of considering CNPA as a diagnosis in patients with moderate degrees of immunosuppression and chronic respiratory symptoms, and Aspergillus spp. as an etiology of osteomyelitis in such patients.

Adult-onset inflammatory bowel disease and rate of serious infections compared to the general population: a nationwide register-based cohort study 2002-2017

OBJECTIVES

To investigate absolute and relative risk of serious infections in adult/elderly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosed 2002-2017.

METHODS

Nationwide, register-based cohort study of Swedish patients with IBD compared with general population matched reference individuals with regard to time to first serious infection, equal to hospital admission. Multivariable Cox regression estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for any serious infection. Secondary outcomes included site-specific infections, opportunistic infections and sepsis.

RESULTS

We identified 47 798 individuals with IBD. During a follow-up of 329 000 person-years, they had 8752 first serious infections (26.6 per 1000 person-years). This compared with an incidence rate of 10.7 per 1000 person-years in matched reference individuals, corresponding to a 2.53-fold increased hazard of serious infections (95%CI = 2.47-2.59). The HR for serious infection in elderly-onset IBD was 2.01 (95%CI = 1.95-2.08). The relative hazard of serious infection was somewhat higher in Crohn's disease (2.94; 95%CI = 2.81-3.06) than in ulcerative colitis (2.24; 95%CI = 2.17-2.31). The HR for serious infections was high in the first year of follow-up (5.17; 95%CI = 4.93-5.42). Individuals with IBD were at a particularly high relative hazard of gastrointestinal and opportunistic infections. The HR for sepsis was 2.47 (95%CI = 2.32-2.63). The relative rates for serious infections in IBD increased in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with adult-onset IBD are at increased risk of serious infections, particularly gastrointestinal and opportunistic infections. Relative rates were highest just after IBD diagnosis, and seem to have increased in recent years.

Factors associated with IgG levels in adults with IgG subclass deficiency

Background

Factors associated with IgG levels in adults with IgG subclass deficiency (IgGSD) are incompletely understood. We studied adults with IgGSD with subnormal IgG1 only, subnormal IgG1/IgG3, or subnormal IgG3 only without other subnormal IgG subclasses, IgA, or IgM. We compiled: age; sex; autoimmune condition(s) (AC); atopy; IgG, IgG subclasses, IgA, IgM; IgGsum (IgG1 + IgG2 + IgG3 + IgG4); and D (percentage difference between IgGsum and IgG). We compared attributes of patients with/without subnormal IgG (< 7.00 g/L; subnormal IgG1 subclass groups only) and analyzed IgGsum and IgG relationships. We performed backward stepwise regressions on IgG using independent variables IgG subclasses, age, and sex and on D using independent variables age and sex.

Results

There were 39 patients with subnormal IgG1 only (89.7% women), 53 with subnormal IgG1/IgG3 (88.7% women), and 115 with subnormal IgG3 only (91.3% women). Fifteen patients (38.5%) and 32 patients (60.4%) in the respective subnormal IgG1 subclass groups had subnormal IgG. Attributes of patients with/without IgG < 7.00 g/L were similar, except that AC prevalence was lower in patients with subnormal IgG1 only and IgG < 7.00 g/L than ≥ 7.00 g/L (p = 0.0484). Mean/median IgG1 and IgG2 were significantly lower in patients with IgG < 7.00 g/L in both subnormal IgG1 subclass groups (p < 0.0001, all comparisons). Regressions on IgG in three subclass groups revealed positive associations with IgG1 and IgG2 (p < 0.0001 each association). Regressions on D revealed no significant association. IgG1 percentages of IgGsum were lower and IgG2 percentages were higher in patients with subnormal IgG1 subclass levels than subnormal IgG3 only (p < 0.0001 all comparisons).

Conclusions

We conclude that both IgG1 and IgG2 are major determinants of IgG in patients with subnormal IgG1, combined subnormal IgG1/IgG3, or subnormal IgG3 and that in patients with subnormal IgG1 or combined subnormal IgG1/IgG3, median IgG2 levels are significantly lower in those with IgG < 7.00 g/L than those with IgG ≥ 7.00 g/L.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12865-021-00447-3.

Treatment-based risk stratification of infections in inflammatory bowel disease: A comparison between anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and nonbiological exposure in real-world setting

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Infective issues about anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain controversial, especially when compared with nonbiological treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of several infections in anti-TNF-α-exposed patients compared with nonbiological treatments.

METHODS

All naïve IBD subjects treated with anti-TNF-α and matched nonbiologic-exposed patients were included.

RESULTS

Among 3453 patients in the database, 288 anti-TNF-α-exposed subjects and 288 nonbiologic-exposed IBD controls met inclusion criteria. Fifty-eight infections (20.1%) occurred during anti-TNF-α treatment versus 23 (8%) in the matched group (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, P < 0.001) (incidence 5.72 vs 0.96/100 patient-years, incidence ratio [IR] 6, P < 0.001). IR was higher for anti-TNF-α versus mesalamine/sulfasalazine (IR 40.8, P < 0.001), similar to azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate (IR 0.78, P = 0.32) and lower than corticosteroids (IR 0.05, P < 0.001). The incidence rate of serious infections was 1.3 in the anti-TNF-α-exposed versus 0.38/100 patient-years in nonexposed subjects (IR 3.44, P = 0.002), without significant difference between anti-TNF-α and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate (1.3 vs 3.03/100 patient-years, IR 0.43, P = 0.1). Predictors of infections in anti-TNF-α-exposed patients were concomitant use of systemic steroids (OR 1.9, P = 0.02) or azathioprine (OR 2.6, P = 0.01) and a body mass index < 18.5 at time of infection (OR 2.2, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing infections during anti-TNF-α therapy remains high, although not dissimilar to that found for other immunosuppressants, while concomitant immunosuppression and malnutrition appear the most important causes of infection.

AGA Technical Review on the Medical Management of Moderate to Severe Luminal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

The incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD) is rising globally. Patients with moderate to severe CD are at high risk for needing surgery and hospitalization and for developing disease-related complications, corticosteroid dependence, and serious infections. Optimal management of outpatients with moderate to severe luminal and/or fistulizing (including perianal) CD often requires the use of immunomodulator (thiopurines, methotrexate) and/or biologic therapies, including tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, either as monotherapy or in combination (with immunomodulators) to mitigate these risks. Decisions about optimal drug therapy in moderate to severe CD are complex, with limited guidance on comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments, leading to considerable practice variability. Since the last iteration of these guidelines published in 2013, significant advances have been made in the field, including the regulatory approval of 2 new biologic agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized updating clinical guidelines on this topic. To inform the clinical guidelines, this technical review was completed in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework. The review addressed the following focused questions (in adult outpatients with moderate to severe luminal CD): overall and comparative efficacy of different medications for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with or without prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists, comparative efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy vs combination therapy with immunomodulators, comparative efficacy of a top-down (upfront use of biologics and/or immunomodulator therapy) vs step-up treatment strategy (acceleration to biologic and/or immunomodulator therapy only after failure of mesalamine), and the role of corticosteroids and mesalamine for induction and/or maintenance of remission. Finally, in adult outpatients with moderate to severe fistulizing CD, this review addressed the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for achieving fistula and the role of adjunctive antibiotics without clear evidence of active infection.

Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Are at Higher Risk for Meningitis

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of meningitis is unknown in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients.

GOALS

We aimed to determine the incidence of and risk factors for meningitis in IBD patients.

STUDY

We conducted a retrospective cohort and nested case-control study in the Quintiles IMS Legacy PharMetrics Adjudicated Claims Database from January 2001 to June 2016. We matched IBD patients to those without IBD on age, sex, enrollment, and region. Meningitis was defined as one code for meningitis associated with an emergency department visit or hospitalization. Meningitis risk was calculated with incidence rate ratios. In a nested case-control study of IBD patients, predictors for meningitis were determined with multivariable conditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 50,029 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 59,830 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) matched to 296,801 non-IBD comparators. There were 85 CD patients, 77 UC patients, and 235 comparators with meningitis. CD patients had 2.17 times the rate of meningitis and UC patients had 1.63 times the rate of meningitis as non-IBD comparators. After adjusting for relevant covariates among those with IBD, treatment with mesalamine was associated with a significantly lower odds of a meningitis claim (odds ratio: 0.40, 95% confidence interval: 0.26-0.62). Having at least one comorbidity was associated with a significantly higher odds of a meningitis claim (odds ratio: 2.21, 95% confidence interval: 1.76-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the overall rate of meningitis is low, IBD patients are at an increased risk compared with non-IBD comparators. Comorbidities are a risk factor for meningitis in IBD patients. Pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinations should be discussed.

Coronavirus disease 2019, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and immunosuppressive therapies - A Danish population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist regarding the disease course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its relationship with immunosuppressants among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between COVID-19, frequent rheumatological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, and neurological IMIDs and immunosuppressants.

METHODS

We conducted a Danish population-based cohort study including all residents living within Capital Region of Denmark and Region Zealand from January 28th, 2020 until September 15th, 2020 with the only eligibility criterion being a test for SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcription-polymerase chain-reaction. Main outcomes included development of COVID-19, COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality.

RESULTS

COVID-19 was less common among patients with IMIDs than the background population (n = 328/20,513 (1.60%) and n = 10,792/583,788(1.85%), p < 0.01, respectively). However, those with IMIDs had a significantly higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization (31.1% and 18.6%, p < 0.01, respectively) and mortality (9.8% and 4.3%, p < 0.01, respectively), which were associated with patients older than 65 years, and presence of comorbidities. Furthermore, systemic steroids were independently associated with a severe course of COVID-19 (Odds ratio (OR) = 3.56 (95%CI 1.83-7.10), p < 0.01), while biologic therapies were associated with a reduced risk hereof (OR = 0.47 (95%CI 0.22-0.95), p = 0.04). Patients suspending immunosuppressants due to COVID-19 had an increased risk of subsequent hospitalization (OR = 3.59 (95%CI 1.31-10.78), p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study found a lower occurrence, but a more severe disease course, of COVID-19 among patients with IMIDs, which was associated with the use of systemic steroids for IMIDs and suspension of other immunosuppressants. This study emphasizes the importance of weighing risks before suspending immunosuppressants during COVID-19.

Harnessing Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha to Achieve Effective Cancer Immunotherapy

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) is a pleiotropic cytokine known to have contradictory roles in oncoimmunology. Indeed, TNFα has a central role in the onset of the immune response, inducing both activation and the effector function of macrophages, dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and B and T lymphocytes. Within the tumor microenvironment, however, TNFα is one of the main mediators of cancer-related inflammation. It is involved in the recruitment and differentiation of immune suppressor cells, leading to evasion of tumor immune surveillance. These characteristics turn TNFα into an attractive target to overcome therapy resistance and tackle cancer. This review focuses on the diverse molecular mechanisms that place TNFα as a source of resistance to immunotherapy such as monoclonal antibodies against cancer cells or immune checkpoints and adoptive cell therapy. We also expose the benefits of TNFα blocking strategies in combination with immunotherapy to improve the antitumor effect and prevent or treat adverse immune-related effects.

Risk for infections with glucocorticoids and DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Immunomodulatory therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) carries risk for infectious complications. Understanding the risks of different therapeutic options is essential for making treatment decisions and appropriately monitoring patients. This review examines data on the risks for serious infections and other key infections of interest for the major classes of agents in use for RA: glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Conventional synthetic DMARDs have an excellent safety profile with recent data available supporting the relative safety of methotrexate. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are associated with an increase in the risk of serious infections. Risk with other biological agents and with JAK inhibitors varies somewhat but overall appears similar to that of TNF inhibitors, with JAK inhibitors also associated with a greater risk of herpes zoster. Glucocorticoids have a dose-dependent effect on serious infection risk-at higher doses risk of infection with glucocorticoids is substantially greater than with other immunomodulatory therapies, and even low-dose therapy carries a risk of infection that appears to be similar to that of biological therapies.

Effect of Concomitant Therapy With Steroids and Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists for Induction of Remission in Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is not clear whether concomitant therapy with corticosteroids and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents is more effective at inducing remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) than anti-TNF monotherapy. We aimed to determine whether patients with active CD receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents had higher rates of clinical improvement than patients not receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy.

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases, through January 20, 2016, for randomized trials of anti-TNF agents approved for treatment of CD and identified 14 trials (5 of adalimumab, 5 of certolizumab, and 4 of infliximab). We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of individual patient and aggregated data from these trials. We compared data from participants who continued oral corticosteroids during induction with anti-TNF therapy to those treated with anti-TNF agents alone. The endpoints were clinical remission (CD activity index [CDAI] scores <150) and clinical response (a decrease in CDAI of 100 points) at the end of induction (weeks 4-14 of treatment).

RESULTS

We included 4354 patients who received induction therapy with anti-TNF agents, including 1653 [38.0%] who were receiving corticosteroids. The combination of corticosteroids and an anti-TNF agent induced clinical remission in 32.0% of patients, whereas anti-TNF monotherapy induced clinical remission in 35.5% of patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.74-1.17). The combination of corticosteroids and an anti-TNF agent induced a clinical response in 42.7% of patients, whereas anti-TNF monotherapy induced a clinical response in 46.8% (OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96). These findings did not change with adjustment for baseline CDAI scores and concurrent use of immunomodulators.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis of data from randomized trials of anti-TNF therapies in patients with active CD, patients receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents did not have higher rates of clinical improvement compared with patients not receiving corticosteroids during induction therapy. Given these findings and the risks of corticosteroid use, clinicians should consider early weaning of corticosteroids during induction therapy with anti-TNF agents for patients with corticosteroid-refractory CD.

The Potential for Repurposing Anti-TNF as a Therapy for the Treatment of COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) currently has few effective treatments. Given the uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness and uptake of a vaccine, it is important that the search for treatments continue. An exaggerated inflammatory state is likely responsible for much of the morbidity and mortality in COVID-19. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), a key pro-inflammatory cytokine, have been shown to be associated with increased COVID-19 mortality. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, TNF blockade reduces not only biologically active TNF but other pro-inflammatory cytokines important in COVID-19 hyperinflammation. Observational data from patients already on anti-TNF therapy show a reduced rate of COVID-19 poor outcomes and death compared with other immune-suppressing therapies. Anti-TNF has a long history of safe use, including in special at-risk populations, and is widely available. The case to adequately assess anti-TNF as a treatment for COVID-19 is compelling.

American College of Rheumatology Guidance for the Management of Rheumatic Disease in Adult Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Version 3

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidance to rheumatology providers on the management of adult rheumatic disease in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

METHODS

A task force, including 10 rheumatologists and 4 infectious disease specialists from North America, was convened. Clinical questions were collated, and an evidence report was rapidly generated and disseminated. Questions and drafted statements were reviewed and assessed using a modified Delphi process. This included asynchronous anonymous voting by email and webinars with the entire panel. Task force members voted on agreement with draft statements using a 1-9-point numerical scoring system, and consensus was determined to be low, moderate, or high based on the dispersion of votes. For approval, median votes were required to meet predefined levels of agreement (median values of 7-9, 4-6, and 1-3 defined as agreement, uncertainty, or disagreement, respectively) with either moderate or high levels of consensus.

RESULTS

Draft guidance statements approved by the task force have been combined to form final guidance.

CONCLUSION

These guidance statements are provided to promote optimal care during the current pandemic. However, given the low level of available evidence and the rapidly evolving literature, this guidance is presented as a "living document," and future updates are anticipated.

Pre-operative withholding of infliximab and the risk of infections after major surgery in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Withholding TNF inhibitors (TNFI) before surgery has been recommended due to concern for post-operative infection. We examined the risks of post-operative infections and mortality in patients with RA in relation to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used US Medicare claims data from 2007 to 2015 to identify patients with RA who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic or vascular surgery, or bowel resection, and who were treated with infliximab in the 90 days prior to surgery. We examined associations between the timing of infusion and infections and mortality in the 30 days after surgery. We adjusted for the predicted probability of post-operative infection or death, demographic characteristics, use of MTX, post-operative blood transfusion and hospital volume.

RESULTS

We studied 712 patients with CABG, 244 patients with vascular surgery and 862 patients with bowel resections. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in 7.4-11.9%, urinary tract infection in 9.0-15.2%, surgical site infection in 3.2-18.9%, sepsis in 4.2-9.6% and death in 3.5-7.0% among surgery cohorts. There was no association between the time from last infliximab dose to surgery and the risk of post-operative infection or mortality in any surgical cohort. No subgroups were identified that had an increased risk of infection with more proximate use of infliximab.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly patients with RA, risks of infection and mortality after major surgery were not related to the pre-operative timing of infliximab infusion.

Risk for Serious Infection With Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis : A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose glucocorticoids are frequently used for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other chronic conditions, but the safety of long-term use remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk for hospitalized infection with long-term use of low-dose glucocorticoids in patients with RA receiving stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Medicare claims data and Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database from 2006 to 2015.

PATIENTS

Adults with RA receiving a stable DMARD regimen for more than 6 months.

MEASUREMENTS

Associations between glucocorticoid dose (none, ≤5 mg/d, >5 to 10 mg/d, and >10 mg/d) and hospitalized infection were evaluated using inverse probability-weighted analyses, with 1-year cumulative incidence predicted from weighted models.

RESULTS

247 297 observations were identified among 172 041 patients in Medicare and 58 279 observations among 44 118 patients in Optum. After 6 months of stable DMARD use, 47.1% of Medicare patients and 39.5% of Optum patients were receiving glucocorticoids. The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Medicare patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 8.6% versus 11.0% (95% CI, 10.6% to 11.5%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 14.4% (CI, 13.8% to 15.1%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 17.7% (CI, 16.5% to 19.1%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids). The 1-year cumulative incidence of hospitalized infection in Optum patients not receiving glucocorticoids was 4.0% versus 5.2% (CI, 4.7% to 5.8%) for glucocorticoid dose of 5 mg or less per day, 8.1% (CI, 7.0% to 9.3%) for greater than 5 to 10 mg/d, and 10.6% (CI, 8.5% to 13.2%) for greater than 10 mg/d (all P < 0.001 vs. no glucocorticoids).

LIMITATION

Potential for residual confounding and misclassification of glucocorticoid dose.

CONCLUSION

In patients with RA receiving stable DMARD therapy, glucocorticoids were associated with a dose-dependent increase in the risk for serious infection, with small but significant risks even at doses of 5 mg or less per day. Clinicians should balance the benefits of low-dose glucocorticoids with this potential risk.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.