Hair Regrowth Outcomes of Contact Immunotherapy for Patients With Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Alopecia areata: What's new in the diagnosis and treatment with JAK inhibitors?

Alopecia areata (AA) affects individuals of all ages and is intractable in severe relapsing cases. Dermatologists and other healthcare providers should consider AA in the medical context and prioritize treatment. Several randomized controlled clinical studies on Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors with different specificities for the treatment of AA are ongoing. These studies have encouraged us to appreciate the importance of a definitive diagnosis and accurate evaluation of AA before and during treatment. Following our previous review article in 2017, here we provide the second part of this two-review series on the recent progress in the multidisciplinary approaches to AA from more than 1800 articles published between July 2016 and December 2022. This review focuses on the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of AA. We also provide the latest information on the safety and efficacy of JAK inhibitors for the treatment of AA and describe their mechanisms of action.

Baricitinib Therapy for Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata: A Retrospective Review of 95 Japanese Patients

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Alopecia Areata: Current Treatments and New Directions

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune hair loss disease that is non-scarring and is characterized by chronic inflammation at the hair follicle level. Clinically, patients' presentation varies from patchy, circumscribed scalp involvement to total body and scalp hair loss. Current management is guided by the degree of scalp and body involvement, with topical and intralesional steroid injections as primarily first-line for mild cases and broad immunosuppressants as the mainstay for more severe cases. Until recently, the limited number of blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials for this disease had made establishing an evidence-based treatment paradigm challenging. However, growing insights into the pathogenesis of alopecia areata through blood and tissue analysis of human lesions have identified several promising targets for therapy. T-helper (Th) 1/interferon skewing has traditionally been described as the driver of disease; however, recent investigations suggest activation of additional immune mediators, including the Th2 pathway, interleukin (IL)-9, IL-23, and IL-32, as contributors to alopecia areata pathogenesis. The landscape of alopecia areata treatment has the potential to be transformed, as several novel targeted drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials. Given the recent US FDA approval of baricitinib and ritlecitinib, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a promising drug class for treating severe alopecia areata cases. This article will review the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of current treatments for alopecia areata, and will provide an overview of the emerging therapies that are leading the revolution in the management of this challenging disease.

Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Alopecia Areata in Korea: Part I Topical and Device-based Treatment

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic disease with an unpredictable disease course and severe psychological impact.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence- and consensus-based insights regarding the treatment of patients with AA in Korea.

METHODS

We searched for relevant studies on the topical and device-based treatment of AA in the literature from inception until May 2021. Evidence-based recommendations were also prepared. The evidence for each statement was graded and classified according to the strength of the recommendations. Hair experts from the Korean Hair Research Society (KHRS) voted on the statements, and an agreement of 75% or greater was considered as consensus.

RESULTS

Currently, there remains a scarcity of topical treatments, which is supported by robust evidence from a number of high-quality randomized controlled trials. Current evidence supports the efficacy of topical corticosteroids, corticosteroid intralesional injection, and contact immunotherapy in AA patients. Topical corticosteroids and contact immunotherapy are recommended for pediatric AA. A consensus was achieved in 6 out of 14 (42.8%), and 1 out of 5 (20.0%) statements pertaining to topical and device-based treatments in AA, respectively. The expert consensus was from a single country, and the study may not cover all the treatments used.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides up-to-date, evidence-based treatment guidelines for AA based on the consensus reached among experts after considering regional healthcare circumstances, adding diversity to the previous guidelines.

Efficacy of Methotrexate Alone vs Methotrexate Plus Low-Dose Prednisone in Patients With Alopecia Areata Totalis or Universalis: A 2-Step Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Poor therapeutic results have been reported in patients with alopecia areata totalis (AT) or universalis (AU), the most severe and disabling types of alopecia areata (AA). Methotrexate, an inexpensive treatment, might be effective in AU and AT.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate alone or combined with low-dose prednisone in patients with chronic and recalcitrant AT and AU.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This academic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 dermatology departments at university hospitals between March 2014 and December 2016 and included adult patients with AT or AU evolving for more than 6 months despite previous topical and systemic treatments. Data analysis was performed from October 2018 to June 2019.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive methotrexate (25 mg/wk) or placebo for 6 months. Patients with greater than 25% hair regrowth (HR) at month 6 continued their treatment until month 12. Patients with less than 25% HR were rerandomized: methotrexate plus prednisone (20 mg/d for 3 months and 15 mg/d for 3 months) or methotrexate plus placebo of prednisone.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point assessed on photos by 4 international experts was complete or almost complete HR (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score <10) at month 12, while receiving methotrexate alone from the start of the study. Main secondary end points were the rate of major (greater than 50%) HR, quality of life, and treatment tolerance.

Results

A total of 89 patients (50 female, 39 male; mean [SD] age, 38.6 [14.3] years) with AT (n = 1) or AU (n = 88) were randomized: methotrexate (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44). At month 12, complete or almost complete HR (SALT score <10) was observed in 1 patient and no patient who received methotrexate alone or placebo, respectively, in 7 of 35 (20.0%; 95% CI, 8.4%-37.0%) patients who received methotrexate (for 6 or 12 months) plus prednisone, including 5 of 16 (31.2%; 95% CI, 11.0%-58.7%) who received methotrexate for 12 months and prednisone for 6 months. A greater improvement in quality of life was observed in patients who achieved a complete response compared with nonresponder patients. Two patients in the methotrexate group discontinued the study because of fatigue and nausea, which were observed in 7 (6.9%) and 14 (13.7%) patients receiving methotrexate, respectively. No severe treatment adverse effect was observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, while methotrexate alone mainly allowed partial HR in patients with chronic AT or AU, its combination with low-dose prednisone allowed complete HR in up to 31% of patients. These results seem to be of the same order of magnitude as those recently reported with JAK inhibitors, with a much lower cost.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02037191.

The Adaptation Model of Immunity: Signal IV Matters Most in Determining the Functional Outcomes of Immune Responses

Current research in immunology and immunotherapy is fully influenced by the self-nonself model of immunity. This theoretical model suggests that alloreactivity results in graft rejection, whereas tolerance toward self-antigens expressed by malignant cells facilitates cancer development. Similarly, breakage of immunological tolerance toward self-antigens results in autoimmune diseases. Accordingly, immune suppression is recommended for the management of autoimmune diseases, allergy, and organ transplantation, whereas immune inducers are used for the treatment of cancers. Although the danger model, the discontinuity model, and the adaptation model are proposed for a better understanding of the immune system, the self-nonself model continues to dominate the field. Nevertheless, a cure for these human diseases remains elusive. This essay discusses current theoretical models of immunity, as well as their impacts and limitations, and expands on the adaptation model of immunity to galvanize a new direction for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, organ transplantation, and cancer.

A phase 2a randomized vehicle-controlled multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of delgocitinib in subjects with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata

Alopecia areata/AA is an autoimmune cause of nonscarring hair loss. The pathogenesis of AA involves many immune axes, including Th1/Th2 pathways. Delgocitinib is a pan-Janus kinase/JAK inhibitor that broadly blocks pro-inflammatory cytokines and has been effective in other inflammatory skin conditions. Recent human studies/reports have shown that use of some systemic JAK inhibitors led to hair regrowth, suggesting this medication class as a potential therapy for AA. However, topical treatment is desirable due to potential systemic side effects. To assess the efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in AA, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial in 31 moderate-to-severe AA patients that were randomized 2:1 to receive delgocitinib ointment 30 mg/g (n = 20) or ointment vehicle (n = 11) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in severity of Alopecia Tool/SALT score from baseline to week 12. The secondary endpoint included safety profile by reported adverse events. Twenty-three subjects completed the trial, with eight discontinuing mostly due to voluntary withdrawal. Ten patients receiving delgocitinib ointment and three patients receiving vehicle showed SALT score improvements after 12 weeks, but the mean percent SALT improvement at week 12 compared to baseline between the two arms was not significant (p = 0.92). Our study suggests that delgocitinib ointment is not effective in moderate-to-severe AA, likely due to its inability to penetrate sufficiently deeply into the dermis of the scalp, but larger studies are necessary to assess whether a different formulation of topical JAK inhibitors may be suitable to treat mild or more localized forms of AA.

A Case Series and Literature Review of Telogen Effluvium and Alopecia Universalis after the Administration of a Heterologous COVID-19 Vaccine Scheme

COVID-19 vaccines have positively changed the course of the pandemic. They entered the market after only one year of the initial trials, which that yielded positive results in terms of safety and efficacy. However, after inoculating billions of people in the most extensive vaccination campaign worldwide, mild but common and some rare but potentially fatal adverse events have been reported. Among several self-reported adverse events, hair loss and alopecia have been linked to COVID-19 mRNA or viral vector vaccines. We tracked and followed a series of five cases with post-vaccine telogen effluvium and alopecia development in Ecuador. Here, we reported the clinical presentation of two women and three men with the diagnosis of post-vaccine hair loss. All patients received a heterologous vaccination scheme (mRNA and attenuated virus vaccine) with an additional viral vector booster associated with the apparition of telogen effluvium and alopecia universalis between 3 and 17 days after the vaccine was administered.

Acquired causes of eyebrow and eyelash loss: A review and approach to diagnosis and treatment

Eyebrows and eyelashes serve important anatomical and social functions, and hair loss at these sites can impact patients significantly. Acquired eyebrow and eyelash loss (madarosis) may be due to a variety of underlying local or systemic disease processes; in other cases it may be idiopathic. There is a dearth of literature relating to eyebrow and eyelash loss, and there is limited guidance to help clinicians treat these clinical presentations in comparison with scalp alopecia. Here, we discuss the acquired causes of eyebrow and eyelash alopecia, our clinical approach to diagnosis and review treatment options for clinicians.

Novel potential therapeutic targets of alopecia areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring hair loss disorder caused by autoimmunity. The immune collapse of the hair follicle, where interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and CD8+ T cells accumulate, is a key factor in AA. However, the exact functional mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, AA treatment has poor efficacy maintenance and high relapse rate after drug withdrawal. Recent studies show that immune-related cells and molecules affect AA. These cells communicate through autocrine and paracrine signals. Various cytokines, chemokines and growth factors mediate this crosstalk. In addition, adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), gut microbiota, hair follicle melanocytes, non-coding RNAs and specific regulatory factors have crucial roles in intercellular communication without a clear cause, suggesting potential new targets for AA therapy. This review discusses the latest research on the possible pathogenesis and therapeutic targets of AA.

Complementary and alternative medicine for alopecia areata: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite high use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for alopecia areata (AA), efficacy and safety remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To identify all CAM therapies studied for treatment of AA. Outcomes of interest included disease course and psychologic well-being.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched to identify English articles containing original data investigating CAM in individuals with AA from 1950-2018. Quality was assessed with Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria.

RESULTS

Of 1015 initial citations, 16 articles met inclusion criteria: 5 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective controlled cohorts, 4 prospective noncontrolled cohorts, 1 retrospective cohort, and 1 case series. CAM therapies with best evidence and efficacy for hair growth in AA include essential oil aromatherapy, topical garlic, and oral glucosides of peony with compound glycyrrhizin. Hypnosis and mindfulness psychotherapy represent low-quality evidence for improvement of psychologic and quality of life outcomes. Adverse events were rare and mild for all therapies evaluated.

LIMITATIONS

Inconsistent or poorly reported study methodology and nonstandardized outcomes limit the conclusions that can be made from these studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This work serves to inform physician treatment of patients with AA seeking CAM while encouraging further investigation into these therapies to address some of the therapeutic challenges of AA.

IADVL SIG Pediatric Dermatology (Academy) Recommendations on Childhood Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by nonscarring alopecia. In contrast to adult onset AA, the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and therapy of childhood AA are less explored. This study aims at providing recommendations for the management of childhood AA. The special interest group (SIG) in pediatric dermatology under the Indian Association of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (IADVL) conducted online meetings from February 2021 to September 2021, intending to identify the critical aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of AA. The classification, diagnosis, and tools for assessment of disease activity of childhood AA have been described in this study, along with recommendations for topical and systemic therapy, including newer therapeutic options.

Hair Follicle Melanocytes Initiate Autoimmunity in Alopecia Areata: a Trigger Point

Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by common non-scarring alopecia due to autoimmune disorders. To date, the specific pathogenesis underlying AA remains unknown. Thus, AA treatment in the dermatological clinic is still a challenge. Numerous clinical observations and experimental studies have established that melanocytes may be the trigger point that causes hair follicles to be attacked by the immune system. A possible mechanism is that the impaired melanocytes, under oxidative stress, cannot be repaired in time and causes apoptosis. Melanocyte-associated autoantigens are released and presented, inducing CD8⁺ T cell attacks. Thereafter, amplification of the immune responses further spreads to the entire hair follicle (HF). The immune privilege of HF subsequently collapses, leading to AA. Herein, we present a narrative review on the roles of melanocytes in AA pathogenesis, aiming to provide a better understanding of this disease from the melanocyte's perspective.

The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for alopecia areata: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Background: Due to the lack of comprehensive evidence based on prospective studies, the efficacy and safety of Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors (including tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, baricitinib, ritlecitinib and brepocitinib) for alopecia areata (AA) are yet to be proved.

Methods: The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed pursuant to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022303007).

Results: Fourteen prospective studies (5 RCTs and 9 non-RCTs), enrolling a total of 1845 patients with AA, were included for quantitative analysis. In RCTs, oral JAK inhibitors resulted in higher good response rate compared with control (RR: 6.86, 95% CI: 2.91–16.16); topical JAK inhibitors did not show any difference compared with control (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.31–3.18). In non-RCTs, the pooled rate of good response to oral, topical and sublingual JAK inhibitors were 63% (95% CI: 44%–80%), 28% (95% CI: 1%–72%) and 11% (95% CI: 1%–29%), respectively. The pooled recurrence rate in patients treated with JAK inhibitors was 54% (95% CI: 39%–69%), mainly due to the withdrawal of JAK inhibitors. In RCTs, no difference was found in the risk of experiencing most kind of adverse events; in non-RCTs, the reported adverse events with high incidence rate were mostly mild and manageable.

Conclusion: JAK inhibitors are efficacious and generally well-tolerated in treating AA with oral administration, whereas topical or sublingual administration lacks efficacy. Subgroup analyses indicate that baricitinib, ritlecitinib and brepocitinib seem to have equal efficacy for AA in RCTs; ruxolitinib (vs. tofacitinib) and AA (vs. AT/AU) are associated with better efficacy outcomes in non-RCT. Due to the high recurrence rate after withdrawal of JAK inhibitors, continuous treatment should be considered to maintain efficacy.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO: CRD 42022303007

Hair safe study: Effects of scalp cooling on hair preservation and hair regrowth in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy - A prospective interventional study

•

Scalp cooling significantly reduced chemotherapy-induced-alopecia in breast cancer patients.

•

No significant effect regarding regrowth after chemotherapy in scalp cooling group.

•

Scalp cooling is more effective in preventing alopecia in patients receiving taxane monotherapy.

A Comprehensive Review of Natural Alternatives for Treatment of Alopecia with an Overview of Market Products

Alopecia or hair loss is a widespread issue that has significant effects on personal well-being for both genders nationally and internationally. In addition, alopecia causes extreme emotional stress and negatively impacts the psychological health and self-esteem of cancer patients suffering from chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Unfortunately, available synthetic medications are costly, invasive, or have extreme adverse effects. On the contrary, natural and herbal hair loss products are widely available in the local and international markets in variable pharmaceutical forms with different mechanisms of action, namely, androgen antagonists, nutritional supplements, vasodilators, and 5α-reductase inhibitors or dihydrotestosterone blockers. Thus, it is of great importance to encourage researchers to investigate these natural alternatives that can act as potent therapeutic agents having diverse mechanisms of action as well as limited side effects. Currently, natural remedies are considered a fast-rising pharmaceutical segment with demand from a wide range of consumers. In this study, we present a review of reported herbal remedies and herb combinations recommended for hair loss and their mode of action, along with an overview of available market products and formulations, their composition, and declared effects. In addition, a general outline of the different forms of alopecia, its causes, and recommended treatments are mentioned as well. This was all done with the aim of assisting further studies with developing standardized natural formulations for alopecia as many were found to lack standardization of their bioactive ingredients and efficiency confirmation.

Translational impact of omics studies in alopecia areata: recent advances and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) is a non-scarring, hair loss disorder and a common autoimmune-mediated disease with an estimated lifetime risk of about 2%. To date, the treatment of AA is mainly based on suppression or stimulation of the immune response. Genomics and transcriptomics studies generated important insights into the underlying pathophysiology, enabled discovery of molecular disease signatures, which were used in some of the recent clinical trials to monitor drug response and substantiated the consideration of new therapeutic modalities for the treatment of AA such as abatacept, dupilumab, ustekinumab and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, genomics and transcriptomics studies in AA are discussed in detail with particular emphasis on their past and prospective translational impacts. Microbiome studies are also briefly introduced.

EXPERT OPINION

The generation of large datasets using the new high-throughput technologies has revolutionized medical research and AA has also benefited from the wave of omics studies. However, the limitations associated with JAK inhibitors and clinical heterogeneity in AA patients underscore the necessity for continuing omics research in AA for discovery of novel therapeutic modalities and development of clinical tools for precision medicine.

Topical immunotherapy treatment of alopecia areata with diphenylcyclopropenone: regulatory T cells as biomarkers for treatment response

Treatment of alopecia areata is often challenging, especially for patients with extended disease. Contact immunotherapy with diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) has been reported as an effective topical treatment but the exact immunologic mechanism of diverting the immune response is still unknown. We investigated the efficacy of topical immunotherapy with DPCD in acute, intermediate, and chronic lesions of AA and the response rate was associated with perifollicular infiltrate of T regulatory cells. Approximately two-thirds of our patients (67.5%) had a response rate > 50% after 6 months of DPCP therapy. Patients with acute and intermediate onset of the disease were more likely to respond to the therapy. Although responders demonstrated FOXP3+ positive lymphocytes in immunohistochemistry, this association could not be confirmed by statistical significance (p = 0.052). In patients with multiple lesions, that had different chronological onset, the lesions with more recent onset responded faster than lesions of longer duration. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Imiquimod-enhanced immunotherapy with diphencyprone for patients with alopecia areata

Topical immunotherapy with dyphencyprone (DPCP) is widely used in patients with alopecia areata (AA). It can produce a contact dermatitis that is believed to decrease Th1 response, predominant in AA. It has been shown that imiquimod (IMQ), a topical immunomodulator drug, can produce sensitization to DPCP in patients that do not show signs of contact dermatitis when exposed to DPCP. Nevertheless, there is no evidence as to whether it can improve DPCP efficacy in already sensitized patients. We present a series of 9 patients, (7 females [77%] and 2 males [22%]) with a mean age of 38.4 years (range, 19-60 years), successfully sensitized to DPCP, that were treated with a combination of DPCP and IMQ. The mean SALT (Severity of Alopecia Tool) score before adding IMQ was 43.3 (range, 10-60), and the mean number of months of DPCP use prior to the addition of IMQ was 6,8 (range 0-10). After adding IMQ to their DPCP treatment, 77% of the patients had further improvement, with a mean SALT reduction of 13.3 (range, [-50] - 40), and a mean duration of response of 5.2 months. No adverse effects were reported. According to this data, we believe that the combination of DPCP and IMQ can be a promising way of improving the efficacy of contact immunotherapy in AA, and requires further study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Economic Impact of Home-Use versus Office-Use Diphenylcyclopropenone in Extensive Alopecia Areata

Introduction

Diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is the medication of choice for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) according to AA treatment guidelines. Precise initiation and application are important factors for successful treatment. However, it is difficult for patients who live far away to visit their doctor weekly.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the cost, effectiveness, and side effects of DPCP treatment between office-use DPCP (O-DPCP) and home-use DPCP (H-DPCP) in severe AA patients. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the perspective of healthcare providers and patients using real-world data and the national cost statistics for hospital services comparing O-DPCP and H-DPCP in patients with severe AA at 24, 36, and 48 weeks.

Results

Two groups of 41 patients treated with O-DPCP and H-DPCP were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who showed a favorable outcome (≥50% improvement) with minimal side effects between both groups at 24 (O-DPCP 43.9% vs. H-DPCP 26.8%, p = 0.11), 36 (O-DPCP 58.5% vs. H-DPCP 43.9%, p = 0.19), or 48 weeks (O-DPCP 63.4% vs. H-DPCP 56.1%, p = 0.49). The cost of H-DPCP was half of the cost of O-DPCP.

Discussion/Conclusion

H-DPCP is a cost-effective and time-efficient alternative treatment option for severe AA patients.

Alopecia areata - Current understanding and management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by acute or chronic non-scarring hair loss, with a heterogeneity in clinical manifestations ranging from patchy hair loss to complete scalp and body hair loss. An overview of the up-to-date pathophysiology and the underlying signaling pathways involved in AA together with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations will be provided. Current treatments, including topical, systemic and injectable interventions show varying response and frequent relapses reflecting the unmet clinical need. Thus, the new emerging concepts and therapeutic approaches, including Janus kinase inhibitors are eagerly awaited. Traditional and emerging therapies of AA will be discussed, in order to provide physicians with guidance for AA management. Since the latter is so challenging and often tends to take a chronic course, it can have an enormous psychosocial burden on patients, compromising their quality of life and often causing depression and anxiety. Therefore, the psychosocial aspects of the disease need to be evaluated and addressed, in order to implement appropriate psychological support when needed.

Topical diphenylcyclopropenone plus topical 0.5% anthralin versus topical diphenylcyclopropenone alone for the treatment of chronic extensive alopecia areata: A split-scalp, double-blind, controlled study

Background:

The combination of diphenylcyclopropenone (DCP) and anthralin may demonstrate synergistic effects in the treatment of chronic extensive alopecia areata (AA).

Objective:

The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of the combination therapy of topical DCP and topical 0.5% anthralin versus topical DCP alone for the treatment of chronic extensive AA.

Materials and Methods:

Ten patients were included in the study. Of these, 1, 2, and 7 patients were diagnosed with alopecia totalis, severe AA (>50% hair loss), and alopecia universalis, respectively. For each patient, one side of the scalp was treated with a DCP solution and 0.5% anthralin for 6 months, while the other side was treated with DCP and a cream base for the same duration. The clinical responses were assessed at baseline and then monthly until the end of the 6-month study period using the Severity of Alopecia Tool score. The side effects were evaluated at each follow-up visit.

Results:

The difference in the efficacies of the combination treatment and DCP alone was not statistically significant (P = 0.59). Regarding the side effects, DCP plus 0.5% anthralin caused significantly more excessive dermatitis than DCP alone (7 patients vs. 2 patients; P = 0.02). Eight patients reported temporary hyperpigmentation at the combination-treatment site, whereas no hyperpigmentation was reported at the DCP-alone site of any patient (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The combination of DCP and 0.5% anthralin was not superior to DCP alone for the treatment of chronic extensive AA. An increase in side effects – excessive dermatitis and hyperpigmentation – was observed in the combination-treatment group.

Intramuscular Corticosteroid Therapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Time-to-Event Analysis

Introduction

Intramuscular corticosteroids (IMC) have gained popularity for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) in recent years; however, evidence on their efficacy and safety is still limited.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, relapse rate, and tolerability of IMC in the treatment of AA, as well as factors associated with treatment outcomes.

Methods

Time-to-event analysis was performed on patients with severe, extensive, or rapidly progressive AA receiving IMC. The IMC regimen comprised triamcinolone acetonide 20–40 mg/mL injected every 4–6 weeks. The evaluated outcomes included initial (25% regrowth), significant (75% regrowth), and complete hair regrowth (100% regrowth). Relapse and adverse events were also noted. Factors associated with treatment outcomes and relapse were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 101 patients were eligible for analysis. Significant hair regrowth was obtained in 80.2% of the patients (n = 81), in a median time of 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9–4.4). Complete hair regrowth was achieved in 48.5% of the subjects (n = 49), and relapse was observed in 47.5% (n = 48). Acneiform eruption was the most common adverse effect. Multivariable analysis revealed that nail involvement was a negative predictor of significant hair regrowth (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01–0.55; P = 0.015), whereas duration of AA longer than 6 months was associated with disease recurrence (adjusted HR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.52–4.66; P = 0.005).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of IMC in the treatment of severe or active AA; however, the relapse rate remained relatively high after discontinuation of the therapy. Nail involvement was a negative predictor of significant hair regrowth, while disease duration longer than 6 months predicted AA relapse.

Alopecia areata: Current understanding of the pathophysiology and update on therapeutic approaches, featuring the Japanese Dermatological Association guidelines

Alopecia areata (AA) is a relatively common nonscarring hairloss disease characterized by an autoimmune response to anagen hair follicles (HFs). Accumulated evidence suggests that collapse of the HF immune privilege subsequent to triggering events, represented by viral infection, leads to autoimmune response in which autoreactive cytotoxic CD8+NKG2D+ T cells mainly target exposed HF autoantigens. AA had been recognized as type 1 inflammatory disease, but recent investigations have suggested some roles of type 2- and Th17-associated mediators in AA pathogenesis. The significance of psychological stress in AA pathogenesis is less emphasized nowadays, but psychological comorbidities, such as depression and anxiety, attract greater interest in AA management. In this regard, the disease severity may not solely be evaluated by the extent of hair loss. Use of trichoscopy markedly improved the resolution of the diagnosis and evaluation of the phase of AA, which is indispensable for the optimization of treatment. For the standardization of AA management, the establishment of guidelines/expert consensus is pivotal. Indeed, the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) and other societies and expert groups have published guidelines/expert consensus reports, which mostly recommend intralesional/topical corticosteroid administration and contact immunotherapy as first-line treatments, depending on the age, disease severity, and activity of AA. The uniqueness of the JDA guidelines can be found in their descriptions of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy, antihistamines, and other miscellaneous domestically conducted treatments. Considering the relatively high incidence of spontaneous regression in mild AA and its intractability in severe subsets, the importance of course observation is also noted. Evidenced-based medicine for AA is currently limited, however, novel therapeutic approaches, represented by JAK inhibitors, are on their way for clinical application. In this review, the latest understanding of the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology, and update on therapeutic approaches with future perspectives are summarized for AA, following the current version of the JDA AA management guidelines.

A systematic review on the treatment of pediatric severe alopecia areata by topical immunotherapy or Anthralin (contact sensitization) or low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT): focus on efficacy, safety, treatment duration, recurrence, and follow-up based on clinical studies

INTRODUCTION

Alopecia areata (AA) in its extensive and severe forms is treatment-challenging, especially in pediatrics.

METHOD

A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of seven electronic databases was searched by the terms "alopecia areata," "pediatric," "topical immunotherapy," "Anthralin," and "light therapy" from inception until March 2021. All the alternative names of the disease and therapies have been included in the search terms. 790 articles went to title abstract review by two independent reviewers. In the subsequent level, a review of the full text of studies was conducted.

RESULTS

Finally, 10 relevant articles in terms of content structure, subject coverage, and purpose, were selected for further review. The highest percentages of complete hair regrowth were 79.6% and 63.61% by SADBE (topical immunotherapy) and laser therapy. By Anthralin (contact sensitization), the complete response rate was below 50% (between 30 and 35%). Regarding average response, the most effective methods were local immunotherapy (with an average effectiveness of 53.8%), laser therapy (52.55%), and the use of Anthralin-induced contact dermatitis (30.86%), respectively. However, recurrence rate-after treatment with induced contact dermatitis by topical medications like Anthralin (contact sensitization)-was lower (mean 43.53%) in comparison with local immunotherapy (57%). In topical immunotherapy, light base therapy, and contact sensitization, the highest percentage of complete hair regrowth and the average response rate were (63.61% and 52.55%), (79.6% and 53.8%) and (32% and 30.8%), respectively. These methods are considered safe in children.

CONCLUSION

A high and more than 50% efficacy in hair regrowth could be expected by topical immunotherapy and light/laser therapy method. No serious side effects have been observed by these methods that are well tolerated in children. Therefore, a combination of local immunotherapy and light/laser therapy could be suggested for the treatment of extensive AA in children. The use of Anthralin could be associated with a lower but more durable response. These points are important for patient selection in individualized situations.

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Autoimmune Diseases in Patients with Alopecia Areata

BACKGROUND

Increased rates of autoimmune diseases (ADs) have been reported in association with alopecia areata (AA); however, the risk factors for coexisting ADs in AA patients have been poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with AD comorbidities in patients with AA.

METHODS

This case-control study included patients diagnosed with AA between January 2000 and March 2020. Individuals with AA, both with and without concomitant ADs, were statistically compared. Variables significantly associated with coexisting ADs were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the specific risk factors for each concomitant AD.

RESULTS

Among the 615 patients with AA, comorbid ADs were found in 76 (12.4%). Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) exhibited the highest frequency (n = 42, 6.8%), followed by vitiligo (n = 15, 2.4%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 12, 2.0%). Logistic regression analyses revealed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-4.82; P = 0.011), nail abnormalities (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.14-5.46; P = 0.023), and atopic diseases (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.09-2.43; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with coexisting ADs. Regarding each concomitant AD, nail abnormalities were an associated factor for AITD (OR = 4.65, 95% CI = 1.96-7.24; P = 0.01), whereas coexisting atopic diseases were demonstrated as a predictor of vitiligo (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.43-4.58; P = 0.02). Female sex (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.18-4.27; P = 0.04) and family history of AD (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.26-4.19; P = 0.03) were predictors of SLE.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that female AA patients with nail abnormalities and atopic diseases have increased rates of AD comorbidities. A thorough review of systems for associated factors can help physicians screen for concomitant ADs.

Is the severity of initial sensitization to diphenylcyclopropenone in alopecia areata patients predictive of the final clinical response?

Immunotherapy by diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is generally started with 2% DPCP sensitization, however in recent years studies have questioned the necessity of sensitization that may cause patients severe reactions and troubles at the onset of therapy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the association between the severity of initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization in AA patients and clinical response. In this retrospective study, 110 AA patients who continued therapy for at least 6 months were enrolled. Hair loss and hair regrowth rates were calculated based on the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scoring system. Initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization after 2 weeks was graded as negative reaction (absence of any reaction), doubtful reaction (mild erythema, pruritus, and irritation for minutes after test), weak (erythema, mild edema, and scaling), and strong to extreme reaction (vesicles, bullae, ulcer, and discharge). The degrees of the initial reaction to 2% DPCP after 2 weeks were negative reaction 13 (11.81%), doubtful reaction 40 (36.36%), weak reaction 33 (30%), and strong to extreme reaction 24 (21.81%). Patients were divided into two groups: (A) patients with less than 12-month therapy (75 of 110), (B) patients with more than 12-month therapy (35 of 110). Initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization was not correlated with hair regrowth rate in either group (group A: Spearman's rho = 0.194, p = 0.095; group B: Spearman's rho = 0.063 p = 0.720). After 12-month treatment with DPCP, hair regrowth rate was significantly greater than 6-months therapy (group A: 17.03 ± 37.78, group B: 49.26 ± 36.34; p = 0.003). The severity of hair loss at the onset of treatment was significantly associated with the response rate in both groups (p-value <0.002). Based on our results, it is the initial severity of the disease and not the initial reaction to 2% DPCP sensitization that predicts the clinical response to DPCP immunotherapy.

Alopecia Areata: an Update on Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common chronic tissue-specific autoimmune disease, resulting in hair loss, that affects up to 2% of the general population. The exact pathobiology of AA has still remained elusive, while the common theory is the collapse of the immune privilege of the hair follicle caused by immunological mechanism. Multiple genetic and environment factors contribute to the pathogenesis of AA. There are several clinical treatments for AA, varying from one or multiple well-defined patches to more diffuse or total hair loss of the scalp (alopecia totalis) or hair loss of the entire body (alopecia universalis). The available treatments for AA, such as corticosteroids and other immunomodulators, minoxidil, and contact immunotherapy, are of limited efficacy with a high risk of adverse effects and high recurrence rates, especially for patients with severe AA. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of AA have led to the development of new treatment strategies, such as Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, biologics, and several small molecular agents. In addition, modern therapies for AA, including antihistamines, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection, and other novel therapies have been well explored. In this review, we discussed the recent advances in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of AA.

Therapeutic approach with squaric acid dibutylester for steroid resistant-alopecia areata incognita: A pilot study of a single center

Topical immunotherapy is widely used in the treatment of alopecia areata (AA). Alopecia areata incognita (AAI) is a relatively common disorder, predominantly affecting females, characterized by widespread hair thinning in the absence of typical alopecic patches. AAI can have a chronic relapsing course and in some cases can be resistant to current standard treatments. Topical immunotherapy has been used in the management of AA with encouraging results, but to date there are no literature studies reporting the efficacy of topical immunotherapy with squaric acid dibutylester (SADBE) in AAI. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of topical immunotherapy with SADBE in AAI not responding to conventional steroid therapy. A total of 12 patients were enrolled in our Hair Disease Outpatient Service, with a proved histological diagnosis of AAI, and resistant to classical steroid therapy. Each patient underwent global photography, pull test, and trichoscopy at beginning and during the follow-ups. The efficacy of topical immunotherapy with SADBE was assessed by evaluating the changes of clinical and trichoscopic signs. Complete regrowth was achieved in 66.7% of cases (8/12), three patients remained unchanged on clinical evaluation but showed subclinical improvement on trichoscopy, whereas one patient progressed and worsened both on clinical and trichoscopic examination. All patients reported scalp diffuse mild erythema and itching the day after the application of SADBE, which were well tolerated. Three patients developed reactive cervical lymphoadenomegaly. No other side effects were observed. Topical immunotherapy with SADBE is widely used in the management of patchy AA and can be considered an effective alternative in resistant AAI, providing visible clinical and trichoscopic improvement in the majority of cases. Further studies are warranted to confirm and validate our findings.

Treatment of pediatric alopecia areata: A systematic review

Background:

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune, nonscarring hair loss disorder with slightly greater prevalence in children than adults. Various treatment modalities exist; however, their evidence in pediatric AA patients is lacking.

Objective:

To evaluate the evidence of current treatment modalities for pediatric AA.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review on the PubMed database in October 2019 for all published articles involving patients <18 years old. Articles discussing AA treatment in pediatric patients were included, as were articles discussing both pediatric and adult patients, if data on individual pediatric patients were available.

Results:

Inclusion criteria were met by 122 total reports discussing 1032 patients. Reports consisted of 2 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective comparative cohorts, 83 case series, 2 case-control studies, and 31 case reports. Included articles assessed the use of aloe, apremilast, anthralin, anti-interferon gamma antibodies, botulinum toxin, corticosteroids, contact immunotherapies, cryotherapy, hydroxychloroquine, hypnotherapy, imiquimod, Janus kinase inhibitors, laser and light therapy, methotrexate, minoxidil, phototherapy, psychotherapy, prostaglandin analogs, sulfasalazine, topical calcineurin inhibitors, topical nitrogen mustard, and ustekinumab.

Limitations:

English-only articles with full texts were used. Manuscripts with adult and pediatric data were only incorporated if individual-level data for pediatric patients were provided. No meta-analysis was performed.

Conclusion:

Topical corticosteroids are the preferred first-line treatment for pediatric AA, as they hold the highest level of evidence, followed by contact immunotherapy. More clinical trials and comparative studies are needed to further guide management of pediatric AA and to promote the potential use of pre-existing, low-cost, and novel therapies, including Janus kinase inhibitors.

Application of Topical Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Review and Update

Treatment of extensive or recalcitrant alopecia areata (AA) is a major clinical challenge. Even after thorough investigation of several medications, its treatment outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. While there is no US Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for AA yet, topical immunotherapy has been a well-documented treatment option. Dinitrochlorobenzene, squaric acid dibutylester, and diphenylcyclopropenone are three substances that have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of extensive or recalcitrant AA. Despite being commonly used, the mechanism underlying topical immunotherapy is not well-elucidated and a wide range of clinical efficacies have been reported in the literature. The aim of this review was to summarize and update the pharmacology, mechanism of action, therapeutic efficacy, and tolerability of topical immunotherapy in the treatment of AA.

Immunological Properties of Atopic Dermatitis-Associated Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata (AA) is regarded as a tissue-specific and cell-mediated autoimmune disorder. Regarding the cytokine balance, AA has been considered a type 1 inflammatory disease. On the other hand, AA often complicates atopic dermatitis (AD) and AD is regarded as type 2 inflammatory disease. However, the immunological aspects of AA in relation to AD are still poorly understood. Therefore, we aim to clarify the immunological properties of AD-associated AA. In this study, we performed comparative analysis of the expression of intracytoplasmic cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-13), chemokine receptors (CXCR3 and CCR4) in peripheral blood which were taken from healthy controls, non-atopic AA patients, AA patients with extrinsic AD, and AA patients with intrinsic AD by flowcytometric analysis. We also compared the scalp skin samples taken from AA patients with extrinsic AD before and after treatment with dupilumab. In non-atopic AA patients, the ratios of CD4+IFN-γ+ cells to CD4⁺IL-4⁺ cells and CD4⁺IFN-γ⁺ cells to CD4⁺IL-13⁺ cells were higher than those in AA patients with extrinsic AD. Meanwhile, the ratio of CD8⁺IFN-γ⁺ cells to CD8+IL-13+ cells was significantly higher in the non-atopic AA than in the healthy controls. In AA patients with extrinsic AD, the skin AA lesion showed dense infiltration of not only CXCR3+ cells but also CCR4⁺ cells around hair bulb before dupilumab treatment. However, after the treatment, the number of CXCR3⁺ cells had no remarkable change while the number of CCR4⁺ cells significantly decreased. These results indicate that the immunological condition of AA may be different between atopic and non-atopic patients and between extrinsic and intrinsic AD patients. Our study provides an important notion that type 2 immunity may participate in the development of AA in extrinsic AD patients. It may be considered that the immunological state of non-atopic AA is different from that of atopic AA.

The clonal structure and dynamics of the human T cell response to an organic chemical hapten

Diphenylcyclopropenone (DPC) is an organic chemical hapten which induces allergic contact dermatitis and is used in the treatment of warts, melanoma, and alopecia areata. This therapeutic setting therefore provided an opportunity to study T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire changes in response to hapten sensitization in humans. Repeated exposure to DPC induced highly dynamic transient expansions of a polyclonal diverse T cell population. The number of TCRs expanded early after sensitization varies between individuals and predicts the magnitude of the allergic reaction. The expanded TCRs show preferential TCR V and J gene usage and consist of clusters of TCRs with similar sequences, two characteristic features of antigen-driven responses. The expanded TCRs share subtle sequence motifs that can be captured using a dynamic Bayesian network. These observations suggest the response to DPC is mediated by a polyclonal population of T cells recognizing a small number of dominant antigens.

Limited efficacy of diphenylcyclopropenone in the treatment of alopecia areata: Experience from a Tertiary Healthcare Institution in Singapore

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common cause of nonscarring hair loss. Diphenylcyclopropenone (DPCP) is a form of contact immunotherapy used in the treatment of AA. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were diagnosed with AA over a 4-year period (1st January 2012 to 31st December 2015) and who have received DPCP. Forty patients were studied in total. The mean duration of disease prior to the study was 195 days. Patients received a mean number of 14.91 sessions (range: 1-65). The mean number of sessions required before clinical response was seen was 2.33 sessions, corresponding to 0.001% DPCP. Based on the modified Global Assessment Grading System, 33.5% (n = 11) of the patients experienced less than 25% improvement, 48.5% (n = 16) experienced 25%-74% improvement and 18.3% (n = 6) experienced more than 75% improvement. One patient had severe sensitisation reaction amounting to near erythroderma which resolved completely upon cessation of DPCP therapy. No other adverse reactions were noted in the cohort. DPCP remains a valuable tool in a dermatologist's armamentarium in treating alopecia areata as it is safe, well-tolerated, and shows limited efficacy.

Topical immunotherapy in combination with anthralin in the treatment of refractory alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Treatment is often challenging in patients with alopecia areata. We often try topical immunotherapy to treat alopecia areata in Japan. Anthralin is sometimes used in other countries.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine effectiveness of combination therapy with both topical immunotherapy with squaric acid dibutylester or diphenylcyclopropenone and anthralin in the treatment of refractory alopecia areata.

METHODS

We treat four patients with refractory alopecia areata by topical immunotherapy and anthralin. Two patients had alopecia areata multilocularis and the other two patients had alopecia totalis. The entire scalp was treated with weekly application of squaric acid dibutylester or diphenylcyclopropenone and daily 0.5% anthralin ointment. Patients were followed up weekly, and adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

One patient with multifocal patches of alopecia areata got complete hair regrowth at week 30, the other patient with multifocal patches of alopecia areata turned for the worse at week 30 and recovered at week 52. Hair regrowth was not seen in the other two patients with alopecia totalis. Localized pruritis and hyperpigmentation of the scalp were seen in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To treat alopecia areata unresponsive to topical immunotherapy alone, topical immunotherapy in combination with anthralin is worth a try.

Therapeutic outcome of diphencyprone and its correlation with serum cytokine profile in alopecia areata

Introduction: Diphencyprone (DPCP) is considered as the first line of management in severe and extensive alopecia areata. The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of DPCP in alopecia areata and identify various prognostic factors and biomarkers associated with clinical response.Materials and methods: The study included participants with patchy and extensive alopecia areata (>30% scalp hair loss) treated with DPCP. Participants with Macdonald Hull and Norris grade 3 and 4 at the end of 6 months were considered as responders. We performed cytokine analysis prior and post-therapy. The protocol was registered with CTRI (REF/2017/09/015424).Results: The response rate was 54.5%. Longer disease duration, nail involvement, and high severity of alopecia tool (SALT) scores were associated with non-response. There was no significant difference in the cytokine levels among responders and non-responders before therapy. Among the responders, we found a significant decrease in IFN-γ, IL-17A, IL-9, TGF-β, and IL-13 except for IL-4, which significantly increased whereas, among the non-responders, only IL-17A and IL-13 levels have reduced considerably.Discussion: Diphencyprone reduced the level of Th1, Th17, and Th9 cytokines and increased the level of Th2 cytokines (IL-4) in the present study, which induced remission and promoted hair regrowth.