Recurrent Stroke With Rivaroxaban Compared With Aspirin According to Predictors of Atrial Fibrillation: Secondary Analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Clinical Trial

Anticoagulation vs Antiplatelets Across Subgroups of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The term "embolic stroke of undetermined source" (ESUS) encompasses a substantial but heterogeneous population of patients with ischemic stroke, underscoring the importance of identifying personalized treatment strategies. In subgroups of patients randomized in ESUS trials, we evaluated the effectiveness of anticoagulation compared with antiplatelet therapy in secondary ischemic stroke prevention.

METHODS

A study-level meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials of patients with ESUS, comparing anticoagulation with antiplatelet therapy. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent ischemic stroke, and safety outcomes were major bleeding and death. Subgroups assessed were age, sex, presence of patent foramen ovale (PFO), left atrial enlargement (LAE), and atrial cardiopathy. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were meta-analyzed. Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used for risk-of-bias assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 7 randomized controlled trials involving 14,804 patients were analyzed, with 7,406 patients treated with anticoagulation and 7,398 treated with antiplatelet therapy. Compared with antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a similar rate of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80-1.05; I2 = 0%). In ESUS with PFO, anticoagulation was associated with significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.98; I2 = 0%). Heterogeneity was present in those with LAE: antiplatelet therapy was superior in trials allowing cardiac monitoring after randomization (RR 6.65, 95% CI 1.26-35.08; I2 = 0%), but anticoagulation was superior in trials prohibiting cardiac monitoring after randomization (RR 0.25 95% CI 0.07-0.89). Subgroups based on age, sex, or presence of atrial cardiopathy did not benefit from anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy.

DISCUSSION

In this meta-analysis, an empiric anticoagulation approach is not beneficial for patients with ESUS. This finding highlights the importance of an individualized treatment strategy. Such a strategy should include prolonged cardiac monitoring for atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with moderate-to-severe LAE. Anticoagulation treatment showed promise in patients with medically treated PFO. Other subgroups did not benefit from anticoagulation therapy. Large prospective studies within ESUS subgroups are needed to validate our findings.

Detection of atrial fibrillation after stroke due to large or small vessel disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence indicates a frequent occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection among patients with established causes of ischemic stroke unrelated to AF. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate AF detection rates in stroke patients with large or small vessel disease, considering the AF detection modality and duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring.

AIMS

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Scopus databases up to 2 March 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials, non-randomized prospective studies, and retrospective studies assessing the frequency of AF detection in stroke patients with large or small vessel disease. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of AF detection. We utilized inverse-variance weights to produce the pooled prevalence (effect size (ES)) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of patients diagnosed with post-stroke AF.

SUMMARY OF REVIEW

In the analysis of 14 eligible studies encompassing 4334 patients, AF was identified in 154 out of 2082 patients with strokes attributed to small or large vessel disease, yielding a pooled prevalence of 6.27% (ES; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.18-10.17, I2 = 87.83%). Among patients with large vessel disease strokes, AF was diagnosed in 79 out of 1042 patients, accounting for a pooled prevalence of 5.07% (ES; 95% CI: 1.30-10.33, I2 = 77.05%). Similarly, among those with small vessel disease strokes, AF was detected in 75 out of 1040 patients, with a pooled prevalence of 5.03% (ES; 95% CI: 1.96-9.06, I2 = 78.05%).

CONCLUSIONS

AF is often found in ischemic stroke patients with large or small vessel disease. Detection rates increase with longer cardiac rhythm monitoring. The safety and benefits of oral anticoagulation for these AF episodes are uncertain.

Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction with Elevated Filling Pressures Is Associated with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Atrial Fibrillation

Background/Objectives: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) are strong predictors of clinical outcomes across various populations. However, their diagnostic utility in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) remains unclear. We hypothesized that LVDD with elevated LVFP (based on echocardiography) was more likely to be prevalent in ESUS compared to non-cardioembolic stroke (NCE) and to be associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) on follow-up monitoring. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study that included adult patients with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke between January 2016 and June 2017. LV function was assessed by inpatient transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), and stroke etiology was adjudicated by the neurologist per the consensus criteria. Patients with cardioembolic stroke and those with indeterminate diastolic function on TTE were excluded. Baseline patient characteristics and clinical variables were compared among patients with and without LVDD and elevated LVFP. Multivariable regression models were used to assess the associations between diastolic dysfunction, ESUS, and AF detection in ESUS patients. Results: We identified 509 patients with ESUS and NCE stroke who had reported diastolic function. The mean age was 64.19 years, 45.19% were female, and 146 had LVDD with available LVFP data. LVDD was not associated with ESUS (adjusted OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.90-2.27, p = 0.130) or atrial fibrillation (AF) detection on cardiac monitoring (adjusted OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 0.75-4.72, p = 0.179). However, LVDD with elevated LVFP was borderline associated with ESUS (adjusted OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 0.99-4.77, p = 0.054) and significantly associated with AF detection (adjusted OR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.07-12.06, p = 0.038). Conclusions: Our data suggest that LVDD with elevated LVFP is borderline associated with ESUS and significantly associated with AF detection on follow-up cardiac monitoring. Therefore, the presence of LVDD with an increased probability of elevated LVFP may help identify a subset of stroke patients more likely to have ESUS, potentially due to atrial cardiopathy with underlying occult AF. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in patients with ESUS and LVDD with elevated LVFP.

Risk of Stroke and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Patients in Sinus Rhythm With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke, especially in patients with high CHA2DS2-VASc. We aimed to identify variables associated with incident AF or stroke using left atrial deformation analysis and its prognostic value added to CHA2DS2-VASc score. Patients with NIDCM and left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in sinus rhythm were included between January 2015 and December 2019. Left atrial volume index (LAVI) and atrial strain were used in combination with the CHA2DS2-VAS score to predict ischemic stroke or incident AF. Proportional hazards Cox regression was used to provide hazard ratios (HRs). There were 338 patients included. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the end point occurred in 41 patients (12.1%). LAVI outperformed other echocardiographic parameters, with a significant improvement in risk reclassification compared with CHA2DS2-VASc alone (net reclassification index 0.6, increase in Harrell's C from 0.63 to 0.73, p = 0.003), and remained significant after multivariate adjustment. LAVI was associated with both components of the end point separately. The best cutoff for LAVI was 44 ml/m2. LAVI ≥44 ml/m2 increased the risk of the end point among those with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 (HR 6.0, 95% confidence interval 2.6 to 13.5) but not in those with CHA2DS2-VASc <3 (HR 1.2, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 4.5). Competing risk analysis did not alter the results. In conclusion, LAVI might be used to assess the risk of incident AF or stroke in NIDCM. Patients with LAVI ≥44 ml/m2 and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 could be at high risk of AF and stroke and may benefit from more intensive surveillance.

Assessment of Left Atrial Fibrosis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ischemic Stroke Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Left atrial (LA) fibrosis is a marker of atrial cardiomyopathy and has been reported to be associated with both atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke. Elucidating this relationship is clinically important as LA fibrosis could serve as a surrogate biomarker of LA cardiomyopathy. The objective of this study is to investigate the association of LA fibrosis and embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Following an International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews-registered protocol, 3 blinded reviewers performed a systematic review for studies that quantified the degree of LA fibrosis in patients with ESUS as compared with healthy patients from inception to February 2024. A meta-analysis was conducted in the mean difference. From 7 studies (705 patients), there was a significantly higher degree of LA fibrosis in patients with ESUS compared with healthy controls (MD, 5.71% [95% CI, 3.55%-7.87%], P<0.01). The degree of LA fibrosis was significantly higher in patients with atrial fibrillation than healthy controls (MD, 8.22% [95% CI, 5.62%-10.83%], P<0.01). A similar degree of LA fibrosis was observed in patients with ESUS compared with patients with atrial fibrillation (MD, -0.92% [95% CI, -2.29% to 0.44%], P=0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher degree of LA fibrosis was found in patients with ESUS as compared with healthy controls. This suggests that LA fibrosis may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of ESUS. Further research is warranted to investigate LA fibrosis as a surrogate biomarker of atrial cardiomyopathy and recurrent stroke risk in patients with ESUS.

Patent Foramen Ovale and Other Cardiopathies as Causes of Embolic Stroke With Unknown Source

In patients with stroke caused by cardiac embolism, the responsible heart diseases include atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, sick sinus syndrome, valvular disease, and significant heart failure. When there is no clear source of the embolism, the condition is referred to as "embolic stroke with unknown source (ESUS)." Recent studies have shown that the most common cause of ESUS is a right-to-left cardiac shunt through a patent foramen ovale (PFO). However, considering that PFOs are found in up to 25% of the general population, their presence does not necessarily indicate causality. In patients with ESUS associated with a PFO, either anticoagulants or antiplatelets are used for the prevention of future strokes or transient ischemic attacks. However, it currently remains unclear which treatment is superior. Nevertheless, recent randomized clinical trials have shown that percutaneous closure of the PFO more effectively reduces the incidence of recurrent strokes compared to medical therapy alone in patients with PFO-related strokes. This benefit is especially significant when the PFO carries high-risk features, such as a large shunt or the presence of an atrial septal aneurysm. Furthermore, the effectiveness of PFO closure has been well documented in young patients (<60 years) with a high-risk PFO development. In other cases, the therapeutic decision should be made through discussion among neurologists, cardiologists, and patients. Notably, in ESUS patients without a PFO, the underlying heart condition itself may be the source of embolism, with left atrial enlargement being the most important factor. Theoretically, anticoagulants such as non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) would be an effective therapy in these cases. However, recent trials have failed to show that NOACs are superior to antiplatelets in preventing further strokes in these patients. This may be due to the still uncertain definition of emboligenic cardiopathy and the presence of other potential embolic sources, such as mild but emboligenic arterial diseases. Overall, further research is needed to elucidate the source of embolism and to determine an effective management strategy for patients with ESUS.

The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source

Aims

Stroke is the most debilitating outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of implantable loop recorders increases the detection of AF episodes among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. The significance of device-detected AF, or subclinical AF, is unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence of AF detected by implantable loop recorder in patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Methods and results

We retrospectively studied all patients without known AF who were referred to our institution for implantable loop recorder implantation following embolic stroke of undetermined source, syncope, or palpitations from March 2009 to November 2019. The primary endpoint was any detection of AF or atrial flutter by implantable loop recorder. Seven hundred and fifty patients were included and followed up for a mean duration of 731 days (SD 443). An implantable loop recorder was implanted following embolic stroke of undetermined source in 323 and for assessment of syncope, palpitations, or another reason in 427 patients. The incidence of AF was significantly (P < 0.001) higher among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with the non-embolic stroke of undetermined source group; 48.6% vs. 13.8% (for any duration of AF) and 32.2% vs. 12.4% (for AF lasting ≥30 s) both P < 0.001. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly higher incidence of AF for incremental durations of AF up to >5.5 h, but not >24 h. This was driven by longest AF durations of <6 min and between 5.5 h and 24 h, suggesting a bimodal distribution. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, embolic stroke of undetermined source independently conferred an almost 5-fold increase in the hazard for any duration of AF.

Conclusion

The incidence of AF is significantly higher amongst embolic stroke of undetermined source vs. non-embolic stroke of undetermined source patients monitored constantly by an implantable loop recorder. A high number of embolic stroke of undetermined source survivors have short-duration AF episodes. Further work is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy of these AF episodes in embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Atrial fibrillation burden: a new outcome predictor and therapeutic target

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is not a dichotomous disease trait. Technological innovations enable long-term rhythm monitoring in many patients and can estimate AF burden. These technologies are already used to detect and monitor AF. This review describes the relation between AF burden and outcomes and potential effects of AF burden reduction. A lower AF burden is associated with a lower risk of stroke and heart failure in patients with AF: stroke risk without anticoagulation is lower in patients with device-detected AF and a low AF burden (stroke rate 1%/year) than in patients with persistent and permanent AF (stroke rate 3%/year). Paroxysmal AF shows intermediate stroke rates (2%/year). Atrial fibrillation burden-reducing interventions can reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF: early rhythm control reduces cardiovascular events including stroke and heart failure in patients with recently diagnosed AF and cardiovascular conditions. In patients with heart failure and AF, early rhythm control and AF ablation, interventions that reduce AF burden, reduce mortality and heart failure events. Recent technological innovations allow to estimate AF burden in clinical care, creating opportunities and challenges. While evidence remains limited, the existing data already suggest that AF burden reduction could be a therapeutic goal. In addition to anticoagulation and treatment of cardiovascular conditions, AF burden reduction emerges as a therapeutic goal. Future research will define the AF burden that constitutes a relevant risk of stroke and heart failure. Technologies quantifying AF burden need careful validation to advance the field.

Scientific statement from the French neurovascular and cardiac societies for improved detection of atrial fibrillation after ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the primary cause of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA). AF is associated with a high risk of recurrence, which can be reduced using optimal prevention strategies, mainly anticoagulant therapy. The availability of effective prophylaxis justifies the need for a significant, coordinated and thorough transdisciplinary effort to screen for AF associated with stroke. A recent French national survey, initiated and supported by the Société française neurovasculaire (SFNV) and the Société française de cardiologie (SFC), revealed many shortcomings, such as the absence or inadequacy of telemetry equipment in more than half of stroke units, insufficient and highly variable access to monitoring tools, delays in performing screening tests, heterogeneous access to advanced or connected ambulatory monitoring techniques, and a lack of dedicated human resources. The present scientific document has been prepared on the initiative of the SFNV and the SFC with the aim of helping to address the current shortcomings and gaps, to promote efficient and cost-effective AF detection, and to improve and, where possible, homogenize the quality of practice in AF screening among stroke units and outpatient post-stroke care networks. The working group, composed of cardiologists and vascular neurologists who are experts in the field and are nominated by their peers, reviewed the literature to propose statements, which were discussed in successive cycles, and maintained, either by consensus or by vote, as appropriate. The text was then submitted to the SFNV and SFC board members for review. This scientific statement document argues for the widespread development of patient pathways to enable the most efficient AF screening after stroke. This assessment should be carried out by a multidisciplinary team, including expert cardiologists and vascular neurologists.

Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: New Data and New Controversies on Cardiac Monitoring and Anticoagulation

Embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) represent 9%-25% of all ischemic strokes. Based on the suspicion that a large proportion of cardioembolic sources remain undetected among embolic stroke of undetermined source patients, it has been hypothesized that a universal approach of anticoagulation would be better than aspirin for preventing recurrent strokes. However, 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with different degrees of patient selection, failed to confirm this hypothesis. In parallel, several RCTs consistently demonstrated that prolonged cardiac monitoring increased atrial fibrillation detection and anticoagulation initiation compared with usual care in patients with ESUS, and later in individuals with ischemic stroke of known cause (e.g., large or small vessel disease). However, none of these trials or subsequent meta-analyses of all available RCTs have shown a reduction in stroke recurrence associated with the use of prolonged cardiac monitoring. In this article, we review the clinical and research implications of recent RCTs of antithrombotic therapy in patients with ESUS and in high-risk populations with and without stroke, with device-detected asymptomatic atrial fibrillation.

Ischemic stroke and the emerging role of left atrial function

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that left atrial (LA) dysfunction could play a role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke, as a possible contributor and as a predictive biomarker.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review details the intricate relationship between LA function, atrial fibrillation (AF), and ischemic stroke. We discuss imaging techniques used to assess LA function, the mechanisms by which impaired LA function may contribute to stroke, and its potential as a prognostic marker of stroke.

EXPERT OPINION

There is a lack of evidence-based treatments of LA dysfunction in both primary and secondary stroke prevention. This is partly due to the lack of a practical clinical definition and unanswered questions concerning the clinical implications of LA dysfunction in patients without AF. Until such questions are resolved, addressing well-known cardiovascular risk factors, like hypertension and obesity, should be prioritized for preventing AF and ischemic stroke. These risk factors are closely tied to atrial remodeling, emphasizing the importance of targeting primary modifiable factors for preventing future morbidity and mortality.

The Usefulness of Outpatient Cardiac Telemetry in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF), apart from non-stenotic supracardiac atherosclerosis and neoplastic disease, is the leading cause of cryptogenic stroke, including embolic stroke of un-determined source (ESUS). The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of AF in ESUS patients based on 30-day telemetric heart rate monitoring initiated within three months after stroke onset. Another aim was to identify factors that increase the likelihood of detecting subsequent AF among ESUS patients. Material and Methods: patients with first-ever stroke classified as per the ESUS definition were eligible for this study. All patients underwent outpatient 30-day telemetric heart rate monitoring. Results: In the period between 2020 and 2022, 145 patients were included. The mean age of all qualified patients was 54; 40% of eligible patients were female. Six patients (4.14%), mostly male patients (4 vs. 2), were diagnosed with AF within the study period. In each case, the diagnosis related to a patient whose stroke occurred in the course of large vessel occlusion. Episodes of AF were detected between day 1 and 25 after starting ECG monitoring. Out of the analyzed parameters that increase the probability of, A.F.; only supraventricular extrasystoles proved to be an independent factor regarding an increased risk of AF [OR 1.046, CI 95% 1.016-1.071, p-value < 0.01]. Conclusions: The use of telemetry heart rhythm monitoring in an outpatient setting can detect AF in 4% of ESUS patients who have undergone prior diagnostic procedures for cardiogenic embolism. Supraventricular extrasystoles significantly increases the likelihood of AF detection in patients with ESUS within three months following stroke. Comorbid coronary artery disease, diabetes and hypertension, rather than a single-factor clinical burden, increase the likelihood of AF detection in older ESUS patients. ESUS in the course of large vessel occlusion is probably associated with an increased likelihood of cardiogenic embolism.

Assessing left atrial size and pump function in ischemic stroke patients: Is cardiac MRI superior to transthoracic echocardiography?

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines recommend transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) following an ischemic stroke as the primary technique to identify cardiac abnormalities associated with an increased risk of cerebral embolism. It is unclear whether cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), a technique shown to provide increased imaging resolution, may also enhance the cardiac assessment of ischemic stroke patients. We compared cMRI with TTE in the evaluation of Left Atrial (LA) size and pump function in a cohort of 44 patients with ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The biplane method was utilized to acquire LA diameters as well as area measurements in both TTE and cMRI. We calculated LA volume (LAV), LAV index (LAVI), LA Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) and LA pump function. Results were compared using paired two sample for means t-test. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman methods quantified the agreement of measurements obtained by TTE and cMRI.

RESULTS

LAVI measurements by cMRI were significantly larger (34.97 v. 28.81; p = 0.001) than by TTE. The concordance correlation demonstrated only a weak agreement between LA size measured by cMRI and TTE (ρc = 0.397; p= 0.001, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.59), and the Bland-Altman plot demonstrated that LAVI measured by cMRI averaged 6.3 ml/m2 larger magnitude than those obtained by TTE.

CONCLUSIONS

Using TTE alone leads to an underestimation of LA abnormalities important in the evaluation of ischemic stroke patients. Nearly one in every five ischemic stroke patients evaluated based on the current guidelines may have a missed potential source of cardiac embolism.

In cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy, apixaban did not reduce recurrent stroke vs. aspirin

SOURCE CITATION

Kamel H, Longstreth WT Jr, Tirschwell DL, et al; ARCADIA Investigators. Apixaban to prevent recurrence after cryptogenic stroke in patients with atrial cardiopathy: the ARCADIA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:573-581. 38324415.

Embolic strokes of undetermined source: a clinical consensus statement of the ESC Council on Stroke, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC

One in six ischaemic stroke patients has an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), defined as a stroke with unclear aetiology despite recommended diagnostic evaluation. The overall cardiovascular risk of ESUS is high and it is important to optimize strategies to prevent recurrent stroke and other cardiovascular events. The aim of clinicians when confronted with a patient not only with ESUS but also with any other medical condition of unclear aetiology is to identify the actual cause amongst a list of potential differential diagnoses, in order to optimize secondary prevention. However, specifically in ESUS, this may be challenging as multiple potential thromboembolic sources frequently coexist. Also, it can be delusively reassuring because despite the implementation of specific treatments for the individual pathology presumed to be the actual thromboembolic source, patients can still be vulnerable to stroke and other cardiovascular events caused by other pathologies already identified during the index diagnostic evaluation but whose thromboembolic potential was underestimated. Therefore, rather than trying to presume which particular mechanism is the actual embolic source in an ESUS patient, it is important to assess the overall thromboembolic risk of the patient through synthesis of the individual risks linked to all pathologies present, regardless if presumed causally associated or not. In this paper, a multi-disciplinary panel of clinicians/researchers from various backgrounds of expertise and specialties (cardiology, internal medicine, neurology, radiology and vascular surgery) proposes a comprehensive multi-dimensional assessment of the overall thromboembolic risk in ESUS patients through the composition of individual risks associated with all prevalent pathologies.

Pathophysiology and clinical relevance of atrial myopathy

Atrial myopathy is a condition that consists of electrical, structural, contractile, and autonomic remodeling of the atria and is the substrate for development of atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia. Pathophysiologic mechanisms driving atrial myopathy are inflammation, oxidative stress, atrial stretch, and neurohormonal signals, e.g., angiotensin-II and aldosterone. These mechanisms initiate the structural and functional remodeling of the atrial myocardium. Novel therapeutic strategies are being developed that target the pathophysiologic mechanisms of atrial myopathy. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of atrial myopathy, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Malignancy-associated ischemic stroke: Implications for diagnostic and therapeutic workup

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignancies have an increased risk of suffering ischemic stroke via several mechanisms such as coagulation dysfunction and other malignancy-related effects as well as iatrogenic causes. Moreover, stroke can be the first sign of an occult malignancy, termed as malignancy-associated ischemic stroke (MAS). Therefore, timely diagnostic assessment and targeted management of this complex clinical situation are critical.

FINDINGS

Patients with both stroke and malignancy have atypical ages, risk factors, and often exhibit malignancy-related symptoms and multiple lesions on neuroimaging. New biomarkers such as eicosapentaenoic acid and blood mRNA profiles may help in distinguishing MAS from other strokes. In terms of treatment, malignancy should not be considered a contraindication, given comparable rates of recanalization and complications between stroke patients with or without malignancies.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we summarize the latest developments in diagnosing and managing MAS, especially stroke with occult malignancies, and provide new recommendations from recently emerged clinical evidence for diagnostic and therapeutic workup strategies.

Atrial Fibrillation Detection and Ischemic Stroke Recurrence in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to be a strong risk factor for stroke. However, the risk of stroke recurrence in patients with cryptogenic stroke with AF detected after stroke by an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is not well known. We sought to evaluate the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with cryptogenic stroke with and without ICM-detected AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with cryptogenic stroke who underwent ICM implantation at 8 stroke centers in Japan. Cox regression models were developed using landmark analysis and time-dependent analysis. We set the target sample size at 300 patients based on our estimate of the annualized incidence of ischemic stroke recurrence to be 3% in patients without AF detection and 9% in patients with AF detection. Of the 370 patients, 121 were found to have AF, and 110 received anticoagulation therapy after AF detection. The incidence of ischemic stroke recurrence was 4.0% in 249 patients without AF detection and 5.8% in 121 patients with AF detection (P=0.45). In a landmark analysis, the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence was not higher in patients with AF detected ≤90 days than in those without (hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 0.41-5.28]). In a time-dependent analysis, the risk of ischemic stroke recurrence did not increase after AF detection (hazard ratio, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.70-4.47]).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of ischemic stroke recurrence in patients with cryptogenic stroke with ICM-detected AF, 90% of whom were subsequently anticoagulated, was not higher than in those without ICM-detected AF.

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

An effective anticoagulation therapy is required for patients with atrial fibrillation because it presents a significant risk of stroke. The current study evaluates the relative safety as well as efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients who are diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. A thorough literature review of relevant databases was conducted, focusing on academic and clinical studies that were published from 2017 onward. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials and other observational studies comparing the incidence of stroke and the safety index of rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for data overview reporting and overview. A total of 21 studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria. A total of 19/21 studies advocated the adoption of rivaroxaban for minimizing stroke incidence. Rivaroxaban also showed superiority in achieving the therapeutic objectives, i.e., reduction in the incidence of stroke. The results for rivaroxaban against warfarin showed an improved safety index and effectiveness of rivaroxaban. The total effect size for the analysis was calculated to be Z=2.62 (p-value=0.009). The individual effect of all studies favored the "rivaroxaban" group. The heterogeneity in the study was as follows: tau2=0.10; chi2=110.10, df=6; I2=95%. The second analysis for risk reduction and incidence of stroke after rivaroxaban therapy also showed a bias towards rivaroxaban therapy. The combined effect for the analysis was found to be as follows: HR=0.73 ((95% CI: 0.50, 1.07). The total effect was calculated to be Z=1.61 (p-value= 0.10). The heterogeneity was found to be as follows: tau2= 0.20, chi2=89.97, df=6, I2=93%. Standard dosing of rivaroxaban emerges as a preferred strategy for stroke prevention, balancing efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making should consider individual patient characteristics and future research should delve into specific subpopulations and long-term outcomes to further refine treatment guidelines.

A Simple Score for Predicting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in a Tunisian Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The annualized recurrent stroke rate in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) under antiplatelet therapy is around 4.5%. Only a fraction of these patients will develop atrial fibrillation (FA), to which a stroke can be attributed retrospectively. The challenge is to identify patients at risk of occult AF during follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to determine clinical factors and electrocardiographic and ultrasound parameters that can predict occult AF in patients with ESUS and build a simple predictive score applicable worldwide.

METHODS

This is a single-center, registry-based retrospective study conducted at the stroke unit of Sahloul University Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia, between January 2016 and December 2020. Consecutive patients meeting ESUS criteria were monitored for a minimum of one year, with a standardized follow-up consisting of outpatient visits, including ECG every three months and a new 24-hour Holter monitoring in case of palpitations. We performed multivariate stepwise regression to identify predictors of new paroxysmal AF among initial clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring) and echocardiographic parameters. The coefficient of each independent covariate of the fitted multivariable model was used to generate an integerbased point-scoring system.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients met the criteria for ESUS. Among them, 42 (14%) patients showed at least one episode of paroxysmal AF during a median follow-up of two years. In univariate analysis, age, gender, coronary artery disease, history of ischemic stroke, higher NIHSS at admission and lower NIHSS at discharge, abnormal P-wave axis, prolonged P-wave duration, premature atrial contractions (PAC) frequency of more than 500/24 hours, and left atrial (LA) mean area of more than 20 cm2 were associated with the risk of occurrence of paroxysmal AF. We proposed an AF predictive score based on (1.771 x NIHSS score at admission) + (10.015 x P-wave dispersion; coded 1 if yes and 0 if no) + (9.841x PAC class; coded 1 if ≥500 and 0 if no) + (9.828x LA class surface; coded 1 if ≥20 and 0 if no) + (0.548xNIHSS score at discharge) + 0.004. A score of ≥33 had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 93%.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with ESUS, NIHSS at both admission and discharge, Pwave dispersion, PAC≥500/24h on a 24-hour Holter monitoring, and LA surface area≥20 cm2 provide a simple AF predictive score with very reasonable sensitivity and specificity and is applicable almost worldwide. An external validation of this score is ongoing.

Efficacy and Safety of Different Dosing Regimens of Rivaroxaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation for Stroke Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a substantial risk of stroke, necessitating effective anticoagulation therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) evaluates the efficacy and safety of different dosing regimens of rivaroxaban in patients with AF. A comprehensive search of relevant databases, focusing on studies published from 2017 onward, was conducted. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing standard and reduced dosing of rivaroxaban in AF. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessment were performed, and a meta-analysis was conducted for relevant outcomes. A total of 21 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Standard dosing demonstrates a slightly lower risk of composite effectiveness outcomes and safety outcomes (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94, P=0.01) compared to reduced dosing (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.97, P=0.02). Notable differences in major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), and intracranial bleeding favored standard dosing. Hemorrhagic stroke and all-cause stroke rates differed significantly, with standard dosing showing a more favorable profile for ischemic stroke prevention. This study highlights the pivotal role of personalized anticoagulation therapy in AF. Standard dosing of rivaroxaban emerges as a preferred strategy for stroke prevention, balancing efficacy and safety. Clinical decision-making should consider individual patient characteristics and future research should delve into specific subpopulations and long-term outcomes to further refine treatment guidelines. The study bridges evidence from clinical trials to real-world practice, offering insights into the evolving landscape of AF management.

Atrial fibrillation in embolic stroke of undetermined source: role of advanced imaging of left atrial function

AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is detected in over 30% of patients following an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) when monitored with an implantable loop recorder (ILR). Identifying AF in ESUS survivors has significant therapeutic implications, and AF risk is essential to guide screening with long-term monitoring. The present study aimed to establish the role of left atrial (LA) function in subsequent AF identification and develop a risk model for AF in ESUS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective case-control study including all patients with ESUS referred to our institution for ILR implantation from December 2009 to September 2019. We recorded clinical variables at baseline and analysed transthoracic echocardiograms in sinus rhythm. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to inform variables associated with AF. Lasso regression analysis was used to develop a risk prediction model for AF. The risk model was internally validated using bootstrapping. Three hundred and twenty-three patients with ESUS underwent ILR implantation. In the ESUS population, 293 had a stroke, whereas 30 had suffered a transient ischaemic attack as adjudicated by a senior stroke physician. Atrial fibrillation of any duration was detected in 47.1%. The mean follow-up was 710 days. Following lasso regression with backwards elimination, we combined increasing lateral PA (the time interval from the beginning of the P wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the beginning of the A' wave on pulsed wave tissue Doppler of the lateral mitral annulus) [odds ratio (OR) 1.011], increasing Age (OR 1.035), higher Diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.027), and abnormal LA reservoir Strain (OR 0.973) into a new PADS score. The probability of identifying AF can be estimated using the formula. Model discrimination was good [area under the curve (AUC) 0.72]. The PADS score was internally validated using bootstrapping with 1000 samples of 150 patients showing consistent results with an AUC of 0.73.

CONCLUSION

The novel PADS score can identify the risk of AF on prolonged monitoring with ILR following ESUS and should be considered a dedicated risk stratification tool for decision-making regarding the screening strategy for AF in stroke.

Left atrial appendage flow velocity predicts occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke: a CRYPTON-ICM registry

BACKGROUND

An insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are useful for investigating potential embolic sources in cryptogenic stroke, of which atrial fibrillation (AF) is a critical risk factor for stroke recurrence. The association of left atrial appendage flow velocity (LAA-FV) on TEE with ICM-detected AF is yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

CRYPTON-ICM (CRYPTOgenic stroke evaluation in Nippon using ICM) is a multicenter registry of cryptogenic stroke with ICM implantation, and patients whose LAA-FV was evaluated on TEE were enrolled. The primary outcome was the detection of AF (> 2 min) on ICM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off of LAA-FV, and factors associated with ICM-detected AF were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients (age 66.6 ± 12.3 years; 199 males) with median follow-up of 440 (interquartile range 169-726) days were enrolled; AF was detected in 101 patients. The lower-tertile LAA-FV group had older age, more history of congestive heart failure, and higher levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal proBNP (all P < 0.05). On ROC analysis, LAA-FV < 37.5 cm/s predicted ICM-detected AF with sensitivity of 26.7% and specificity of 92.2%. After adjustment for covariates, the lower tertile of LAA-FV (hazard ratio [HR], 1.753 [1.017-3.021], P = 0.043) and LAA-FV < 37.5 cm/s (HR 1.987 [1.240-3.184], P = 0.004) predicted ICM-detected AF.

CONCLUSIONS

LAA-FV < 37.5 cm/s predicts AF. TEE is useful not only to evaluate potential embolic sources, but also for long-term detection of AF on ICM by measuring LAA-FV in cryptogenic stroke. http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ (UMIN000044366).

Assessing atrial myopathy with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in embolic stroke of undetermined source

BACKGROUND

Left atrial myopathy has been implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS).

OBJECTIVE

To use advanced cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging techniques, including left atrial (LA) strain and 4D flow CMR, to identify atrial myopathy in patients with ESUS.

METHODS

20 patients with ESUS and no AF or other cause for stroke, and 20 age and sex-matched controls underwent CMR with 4D flow analysis. Markers of LA myopathy were assessed including LA size, volume, ejection fraction, and strain. 4D flow CMR was performed to measure novel markers of LA stasis such as LA velocities and the LA residence time distribution time constant (RTDtc). These markers of LA myopathy were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in: CMR-calculated LA velocities or LA total, passive or active ejection fractions between the groups. There was no significant difference in CMR-derived reservoir, conduit or contractile average longitudinal strain between the ESUS and control groups (22.9 vs 22.6%, p=0.379, 11.2 ± 3.5 vs 12.4 ± 2.6% p=0.224, 10.8 ± 3.2 vs 10.4 ± 2.3%, p=0.625 respectively). Similarly, RTDtc was not significantly longer in ESUS patients compared to controls (1.3 ± 0.2 vs 1.2 ± 0.2, p=0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in any CMR marker of atrial myopathy in ESUS patients compared to healthy controls, likely reflecting the multiple possible aetiologies of ESUS suggesting that the role LA myopathy plays in ESUS is smaller than previously thought.

Independent external validation of a stroke recurrence score in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source

BACKGROUND

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for a substantial proportion of ischaemic strokes. A stroke recurrence score has been shown to predict the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS based on a combination of clinical and imaging features. This study aimed to externally validate the performance of the ESUS recurrence score using data from a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

The validation dataset consisted of eligible stroke patients with available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data enrolled in the PreDAFIS sub-study of the MonDAFIS study. The score was calculated using three variables: age (1 point per decade after 35 years), presence of white matter hyperintensities (2 points), and multiterritorial ischaemic stroke (3 points). Patients were assigned to risk groups as described in the original publication. The model was evaluated using standard discrimination and calibration methods.

RESULTS

Of the 1054 patients, 241 (22.9%) were classified as ESUS. Owing to insufficient MRI quality, three patients were excluded, leaving 238 patients (median age 65.5 years [IQR 20.75], 39% female) for analysis. Of these, 30 (13%) patients experienced recurrent ischaemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) during a follow-up period of 383 patient-years, corresponding to an incidence rate of 7.8 per 100 patient-years (95% CI 5.3-11.2). Patients with an ESUS recurrence score value of ≥ 7 had a 2.46 (hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI 1.02-5.93) times higher risk of stroke recurrence than patients with a score of 0-4. The cumulative probability of stroke recurrence in the low-(0-4), intermediate-(5-6), and high-risk group (≥ 7) was 9%, 13%, and 23%, respectively (log-rank test, χ2 = 4.2, p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

This external validation of a published scoring system supports a threshold of ≥ 7 for identifying ESUS patients at high-risk of stroke recurrence. However, further adjustments may be required to improve the model's performance in independent cohorts. The use of risk scores may be helpful in guiding extended diagnostics and further trials on secondary prevention in patients with ESUS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials, NCT02204267. Registered 30 July 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02204267 .

Atrial Myopathy and Ischemic Stroke in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Recent studies suggested an association between atrial myopathy and stroke independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined the hypothesis that atrial myopathy may be associated with ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This is an exploratory, post hoc analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial. Patients with sinus rhythm documented at baseline electrocardiogram and without known AF were included in this analysis. Atrial myopathy was defined by echocardiographic evidence of left atrial (LA) enlargement (LA diameter >46 mm or LA volume index >36 ml/m2) or elevated natriuretic peptides (brain natriuretic peptide >100 pg/ml or N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide >400 pg/ml). We used Cox regression to investigate the effect of atrial myopathy on incident ischemic stroke over the study period. In 3,445 patients in the TOPCAT trial, 2,225 (mean age 67.5 ± 4.9 years; female 54.8%) had normal sinus rhythm at baseline and no history of AF. Atrial myopathy was present in 756 patients (34.0%). During a median follow-up of 2 years, 56 patients (2.5%) developed ischemic stroke, including 25 with atrial myopathy. Atrial myopathy was associated with increased risk of stroke (hazard ratio = 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.98, p = 0.04) in multivariate analysis. Diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 3.43 p = 0.01) was the only other independent predictor of stroke. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, atrial myopathy increases the risk of ischemic stroke, in the absence of AF. Further investigations are needed to better characterize this association and implement stroke prevention strategies.

ECG Smart Monitoring versus Implantable Loop Recorders for Atrial Fibrillation Detection after Cryptogenic Stroke-An Overview for Decision Making

Up to 20% of patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack have a prior history of known atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, unknown AF can be detected by different monitoring strategies in up to 23% of patients with cryptogenic or non-cardioembolic stroke. However, most studies had substantial gaps in monitoring time, especially early after the index event. Following this, AF rates would be higher if patients underwent continuous monitoring early after stroke, avoiding any gaps in monitoring. The few existing randomized studies focused on patients with cryptogenic stroke but did not focus otherwise specifically on prevention strategies in patients at high risk for AF (patients at higher age or with high CHA2DS2-VASC scores). Besides invasive implantable loop recorders (ILRs), external loop recorders (ELRs) and mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) are non-invasive tools that are commonly used for long-term ECG monitoring in cryptogenic-stroke patients in the ambulatory setting. The role of MCOT and hand-held devices within ECG smart monitoring in the detection of AF for the prevention of and after cryptogenic stroke is currently unclear. This intense review provides an overview of current evidence, techniques, and gaps in knowledge and aims to advise which patients benefit most from the current available devices.

Atrial Cardiopathy: Redefining Stroke Risk Beyond Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and ischemic stroke are dual epidemics in society, both associated with poor clinical outcomes, patient disability, and significant healthcare expenditure. The conditions are interrelated and share complex causal pathways. Risk stratification algorithms such as the CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score offer predictive value in stroke and systemic embolism risk in the AF population, however, have limitations. Recent evidence suggests that an intrinsically prothrombotic atrial substrate may precede and promote AF and lead to thromboembolic events independent of the arrhythmia, allowing for a window of intervention before arrhythmia detection and development of ischemic stroke. Initial work has found incremental value in addition of parameters of atrial cardiopathy to traditional stroke risk stratification algorithms, however, requires evaluation with dedicated prospective randomized studies before use in real-world clinical practice. In this narrative review, we explore current evidence and literature on the use of measures of atrial cardiopathy in stroke risk stratification and management.

Left atrial reservoir strain predicts ischaemic stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting independent of postoperative atrial fibrillation

Aims

Measures of left atrial (LA) function are known to predict both ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation in specific patient groups. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of LA reservoir strain for predicting ischaemic stroke in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and investigate whether the presence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) modified this relationship.

Methods and results

Patients undergoing isolated CABG were included. The primary endpoint was ischaemic stroke. The association between LA reservoir strain and ischaemic stroke was investigated in uni- and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models including adjustment for POAF.We included 542 patients (mean age 67.3±8.9 years, 16.4% female). During a median follow-up period of 3.9 years, 21 patients (3.9%) experienced an ischaemic stroke. In total, 96 patients (17.7%) developed POAF during the index hospitalization. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression model, LA reservoir strain was significantly associated with the development of ischaemic stroke [HR (hazard ratio) 1.09 (95% CI 1.02-1.17) per 1% decrease, P = 0.011]. The presence of POAF did not modify this association (p for interaction = 0.07). The predictive value of the LA reservoir strain persisted in multiple sensitivity analyses including restricting the analysis to patients with normal left atrial volumes (LAV<34 ml/m²), patients without POAF, patients without prior stroke, and when excluding patients who developed atrial fibrillation at any time during follow-up.

Conclusion

LA reservoir strain was independently associated with ischaemic stroke in CABG patients. The predictive value of LA reservoir strain was unaffected by the presence of POAF. Prospective studies are warranted to validate the potential usefulness of LA reservoir strain to predict postoperative ischaemic stroke in the setting of CABG.

Atrial cardiomyopathy and incident ischemic stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Growing evidence suggests that atrial cardiomyopathy may play an essential role in thrombosis and ischemic stroke. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the values of cardiomyopathy markers for predicting ischemic stroke risk.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for longitudinal cohort studies evaluating the association between cardiomyopathy markers and incident ischemic stroke risk.

RESULTS

We included 25 cohort studies examining electrocardiographic, structural, functional, and serum biomarkers of atrial cardiomyopathy involving 262,504 individuals. P-terminal force in the precordial lead V1 (PTFV1) was found to be an independent predictor of ischemic stroke as both a categorical variable (HR 1.29, CI 1.06-1.57) and a continuous variable (HR 1.14, CI 1.00-1.30). Increased maximum P-wave area (HR 1.14, CI 1.06-1.21) and mean P-wave area (HR 1.12, CI 1.04-1.21) were also associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Left atrial (LA) diameter was independently associated with ischemic stroke as both a categorical variable (HR 1.39, CI 1.06-1.82) and a continuous variable (HR 1.20, CI 1.06-1.35). LA reservoir strain independently predicted the risk of incident ischemic stroke (HR 0.88, CI 0.84-0.93). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was also associated with incident ischemic stroke risk, both as a categorical variable (HR 2.37, CI 1.61-3.50) and continuous variable (HR 1.42, CI 1.19-1.70).

CONCLUSION

Atrial cardiomyopathy markers, including electrocardiographic markers, serum markers, LA structural and functional markers, can be used to stratify the risk of incident ischemic stroke.

Atrial cardiopathy in young adults with embolic stroke of undetermined source: a myocardial deformation imaging analysis

BACKGROUND

Atrial cardiopathy (AC) has emerged as a potential pathological thrombogenic atrial substract of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), even in the absence of atrial fibrillation. Left atrium (LA) myocardial deformation analysis may be of value as a subclinical marker of AC and a predictor of ESUS.

AIMS

To compare LA mechanical function between ESUS cases and age and sex-matched controls.

METHODS

A single-center analytical study with case-control design was performed. Case group was composed by young patients admitted in the Neurology department from January 2017 to June 2021. Control group was composed by age and sex matched controls recruited from the community. All participants performed echocardiogram and a smaller sample underwent cardiac magnetic resonance.

RESULTS

We recruited 31 ESUS patients aged between 18 and 65 years and 31 age and sex matched controls. ESUS patients had a significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and patent foramen ovale (PFO). The prevalence of AC was not different between groups. Echocardiogram parameters, including strain analysis, were similar between groups, except for LA appendage (LAA) ostium variation which was significantly lower in ESUS patients (absolute: 6.5vs8.7mm, p<0.001; relative: 44.5%vs53.4%, p=0.002). After exclusion of patients with PFO, all the results were statistically similar. Regarding cardiac magnetic resonance analysis, there were no statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in our population atria cardiopathy and atrial function was not associated with ESUS.LAA structural and functional abnormalities may play a major role. The role of LAA in ESUS warrants further studies.

Diagnosis and Management of Cardioembolic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Cardioembolic stroke accounts for nearly 30% of ischemic strokes. Prompt diagnosis of the underlying mechanism may improve secondary prevention strategies. This article reviews recent randomized trials, observational studies, case reports, and guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of cardioembolic stroke.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Several pathologies can lead to cardioembolic stroke, including atrial fibrillation, aortic arch atheroma, patent foramen ovale, left ventricular dysfunction, and many others. Secondary stroke prevention strategies differ across these heterogeneous mechanisms. In addition to medical treatment advances such as the use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation, surgical treatments such as closure of patent foramen ovale have been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in select patients. Furthermore, left atrial appendage occlusion is a promising strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who are candidates for short-term oral anticoagulation therapy but not long-term oral anticoagulation therapy.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

A thorough diagnostic evaluation is essential to determine cardioembolic causes of stroke. In addition to risk factor management and lifestyle modifications, identification and targeting of the underlying cardioembolic stroke mechanisms will lead to improved stroke prevention strategies in patients with cardioembolic stroke.

Atrial Fibrillation: a Marker or Risk Factor for Stroke

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is strongly associated with stroke risk, but an association by itself does not necessarily imply causation. The question remains whether AF is a risk factor for stroke and whether treatment that reduces the severity of AF will also reduce the burden of stroke. On the other hand, it is possible that AF is a risk marker associated with atrial insufficiency, in which structural and electrical atrial remodeling coexist, leading  to the clinical manifestations of AF and the risk of stroke simultaneously. Atrial fibrillation and stroke are inextricably linked to the classic Virchow pathophysiology, which explains thromboembolism as blood stasis in a fibrillating left atrium. This concept has been reinforced by the proven efficacy of oral anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in AF. However, a number of observations showing that the presence of AF is neither necessary nor sufficient for stroke cast doubt on the causal role of AF in vascular brain injury. The growing recognition of the role of atrial cardiomyopathy and the atrial substrate in the development of stroke associated with AF, as well as stroke without AF, has led to a rethinking of the pathogenetic model of cardioembolic stroke. A number of recent studies have shown that AF is a direct cause of stroke. Studies in which cardiac implantable devices have been used to collect data on pre-stroke AF do not appear to show a direct time relationship. The presence of AF is neither necessary nor sufficient for stroke, which casts doubt on the causal role of AF in cerebrovascular injury. Known risk factors for stroke in the presence of AF are also recognized risk factors for ischemic stroke, regardless of the presence of AF. The risk of stroke in patients with AF in the absence of risk factors differs little from that in patients without AF. This work is devoted to an attempt to answer the question whether AF is a marker or a risk factor for ischemic stroke.

Predictors of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation with CHA2 DS2 -VASc score of 0

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant therapy has been important for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it was not recommended due to its relatively higher risk of bleeding than its lower risk of stroke in patients with a CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of 0.

HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to evaluate the predictors of stroke in AF patients with very low risk of stroke.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 2020, 542 patients with non-valvular AF (NVAF) with a CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of 0 followed up for at least 6 months were enrolled. Patients with only being woman as a risk factor were included as a CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of 0 in this study. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism.

RESULTS

The primary outcome rate was 0.78%/year. In Cox hazard model, age of ≥50 years at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 6.710, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.811-24.860, p = .004), LVEDD of ≥46 mm (HR 4.513, 95% CI 1.038-19.626, p = .045), and non-paroxysmal AF (HR 5.575, 95% CI 1.621-19.175, p = .006) were identified as independent predictors of stroke or systemic embolism. Patients with all three independent predictors had a higher risk of stroke or systemic embolism (4.21%/year), whereas those without did not have a stroke or systemic embolism.

CONCLUSION

The annual stroke or systemic embolism rate in NVAF patients with CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of 0 was 0.78%/year, and age at AF diagnosis, LVEDD, and non-paroxysmal AF were independent predictors of stroke or systemic embolism in patients considered to have a very low risk of stroke.

Current perspectives on the clinical management of cryptogenic stroke

INTRODUCTION

Cryptogenic stroke is a heterogeneous entity defined as an ischemic stroke for which no probable cause is identified despite thorough diagnostic evaluation. Since about a quarter of all ischemic strokes are classified as cryptogenic, it is a commonly encountered problem for providers as secondary stroke prevention is guided by stroke etiology.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors provide an overview of stroke subtype classification schemes and diagnostic evaluation in cryptogenic stroke. They then detail putative cryptogenic stroke mechanisms, their therapeutic implications, and ongoing research. This review synthesizes the available evidence on PubMed up to December 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

Cryptogenic stroke is an evolving concept that changes with ongoing research. Investigations are focused on improving our diagnostic capabilities and solidifying useful constructs within cryptogenic stroke that could become therapeutically targetable subgroups within an otherwise nonspecific entity. Advances in technology may help move specific proposed cryptogenic stroke mechanisms from undetermined to known source of ischemic stroke.

Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis, Investigations, and Management

In 2014, Hart et al. introduced the concept of "embolic stroke of undetermined source" (ESUS) to the clinical-research stroke community. The hypothesis underlying the development of the ESUS construct was that this potentially heterogenous group of stroke mechanisms were largely thromboembolic, and would thus benefit from anticoagulation over antiplatelet for secondary prevention. Since then, 2 large clinical trials have shown that, to date, there is not a clear uniform antithrombotic strategy for secondary prevention after ESUS as it was originally broadly defined. However, this work has yielded valuable information about the patient phenotypes that experience ESUS strokes, as well as hypothesis-generating substudies that have given rise to the next generation of secondary prevention trials aimed at more personalized approaches for different suspected mechanisms of embolic stroke. In parallel with the evolution of ESUS, several studies aimed at screening for atrial fibrillation in the secondary stroke prevention population have generated additional questions about the mechanistic relevance of atrial fibrillation detected after stroke, and how this should inform poststroke workup, and secondary prevention strategies. Herein, we provide a synthesis of the current understanding surrounding the patient phenotypes that experience ESUS strokes, and previous, ongoing, and anticipated clinical trials that will guide earlier and later secondary prevention strategies and poststroke cardiac investigations.

Are Factor Xa Inhibitors Efficacious for Ischemic Stroke Prevention in Patients Without Atrial Fibrillation? Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials provide conflicting evidence regarding oral factor Xa inhibitors for prevention of ischemic stroke in patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

We performed a critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials that tested oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients without AF that reported ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

Considering the 11 trials that reported > 10 ischemic strokes during follow-up (97,578 participants, 1195 ischemic strokes), 1 tested apixaban (57 strokes), 1 betrixaban (52 strokes), and 9 rivaroxaban (1086 strokes). In 7 trials with placebo comparisons, numerically fewer ischemic strokes occurred among those assigned factor Xa inhibitors in 7 of 8 randomized comparisons (range of hazard ratios [HRs], 0.89-0.51), including statistically significant reductions in 2 trials that compared rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily vs placebo on a background of aspirin in patients with cardiovascular disease, COMPASS (HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-0.68) and COMMANDER-HF (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.95). Compared with aspirin in 4 trials, oral factor Xa inhibitors were associated with fewer ischemic strokes in 2, with statistically significant reduction in 1 (rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily in COMPASS; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90). Major bleeding was increased by oral factor Xa inhibitors in all 7 placebo-controlled trials (HR range, 1.42-4.08), with statistically significant increases reported in 5 trials, and in all 4 aspirin-controlled trials (all statistically significant increases; HR range, 1.52-2.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggregate evidence on the basis of placebo comparisons from randomized trials supports the potential for oral factor Xa inhibitors to reduce ischemic stroke in patients without AF, but major bleeding is increased.

Atrial fibrillation and stroke: A review and new insights

The link between heart and brain continues to be a matter of great interest for the scientific community. One of the most established associations between the two is that the heart is a significant source of emboli and is responsible for 20-25% of all ischemic strokes. The most frequent underlying cause of cardioembolic stroke is atrial fibrillation (AF), a disease that affects almost 3 million people in the USA and 4.5 million in Europe. AF increases the risk of ischemic stroke by a factor of 3 to 5 times. It is estimated that AF is responsible for 15% of all strokes worldwide. A more comprehensive understanding of this association and development of intensive stroke prevention measures are needed, as we know that AF incidence and prevalence will increase over the coming years, becoming one of the largest epidemics and public health challenges we face.

Determining the etiology of cerebral stroke: from the most prevalent to rare causes

Cerebral stroke remains the leading cause of death and disability worldwide as well as in Ukraine. After a cerebral stroke, there is an increased risk of a new cerebral stroke (9‒15 % within 1 year), and about a quarter of all cerebral stroke are recurrent. Up to 80 % of recurrent cerebral stroke can be avoided through lifestyle modifications (healthy diet, sufficient amount of physical activity, normalization of body weight, cessation of smoking and alcohol abuse) and control of chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation. The key to effective secondary prevention is determining the etiology of cerebral stroke, which requires a primary examination in all cases and a number of additional tests as needed. The most common causes of ischemic cerebral stroke are cardiogenic embolism, atherosclerosis of the large cerebral arteries (macroangiopathy), and brain small vessels disease (microangiopathy), but approximately 1/3 of cerebral stroke have other, rear, determined cause or the cause remains unknown despite the appropriate workup (cryptogenic cerebral stroke). In the review, we discuss modern approaches to ischemic cerebral stroke classification and determination of their etiology, from the most prevalent to the rarest causes. A careful search for the cause of cerebral stroke is particularly important in young patients (aged 18 to 50 years) with a high life expectancy. We have reviewed in detail the possibilities of screening for subclinical atrial fibrillation by long-term cardiac monitoring with implantable devices and the diagnosis of monogenetic causes of cerebral stroke, with a particular focus on Fabry disease, for which there is an effective treatment.

Potential Embolic Sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale

INTRODUCTION

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) may coexist with other potential embolic sources (PESs) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), leading to difficulty in attributing the stroke to either the PFO or other PESs. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of concomitant PESs in ESUS patients with PFOs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary stroke centre. Consecutive patients with ESUS and a concomitant PFO admitted between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. Baseline characteristics and investigations as a part of stroke workup including echocardiographic and neuroimaging data were collected. PESs were adjudicated by 2 independent neurologists after reviewing the relevant workup.

RESULTS

Out of 1,487 ESUS patients, a total of 309 patients who had a concomitant PFO with mean age of 48.8 ± 13.2 years were identified during the study period. The median Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score for the study cohort was 6 (IQR 5-7.5). Of the 309 patients, 154 (49.8%) only had PFO, 105 (34.0%) patients had 1 other PES, 34 (11.0%) had 2 PES, and 16 (5.2%) had 3 or more PES. The most common PESs were atrial cardiopathy (23.9%), left ventricular dysfunction (22.0%), and cardiac valve disease (12.9%). The presence of additional PESs was associated with age ≥60 years (p < 0.001), RoPE score ≤6 (p ≤0.001), and the presence of comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (p = 0.004), hypertension (p≤ 0.001), and ischaemic heart disease (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of ESUS patients with PFOs had concomitant PESs. The presence of concomitant PESs was associated with older age and a lower RoPE score. Further, large cohort studies are warranted to investigate the significance of the PES and their overlap with PFOs in ESUS.

Atrial cardiomyopathy markers predict ischemic cerebrovascular events independent of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Background

Contemporary data on atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) markers and ischemic cerebrovascular events (ICVE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is lacking. We aimed to examine whether ACM markers predict ICVE among AMI patients.

Materials and methods

A total of 4,206 AMI cases diagnosed in clinical examinations between January 2016 and June 2021 were assessed for markers of ACM including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), P-wave terminal force in ECG lead V1 (PTFV1), and left atrium diameter (LAD). Left atrial enlargement (LAE) and abnormal PTFV1 were defined by previously published cut-off points. The primary outcome was incident ICVE composed of ischemic stroke (IS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Receiver operating curve analyses were used to compare the predictive performance of the CHA2DS2-VASc score combined with ACM markers to the CHA2DS2-VASc score alone.

Results

During a median follow-up of 44.0 months, 229 (5.44%) ICVE occurred. Of these, 156 individuals developed IS and the remaining 73 cases were diagnosed with TIAs. The ICVE group showed larger PTFV1 and increased LAD as well as elevated BNP levels at baseline. In the multivariate analysis, we found significant associations with ICVE for PTFV1 (HR per 1,000 μV*ms, 1.143; 95% CI, 1.093–1.196), LAD (HR per millimeter, 1.148; 95% CI, 1.107–1.190), but not BNP after adjusting for known ICVE risk factors and interim atrial fibrillation (AF). The addition of abnormal PTFV1 and LAE improved the predictive accuracy of the CHA2DS2-VASc score with C-statistic increasing from 0.708 to 0.761 (p &lt; 0.001).

Conclusion

Atrial cardiomyopathy markers including PTFV1 and LAD were associated with incident ICVE independent of well-established risk factors and AF occurrence. The addition of ACM markers with CHA2DS2-VASc score may well discriminate individuals at high risk of ICVE in AMI patients.