Efficacy and Safety of Lumateperone for Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: An Update on Research Assessment and the Current and Upcoming Treatment Landscape

The negative symptoms of schizophrenia include diminished emotional expression, avolition, alogia, anhedonia, and asociality, and due to their low responsiveness to available treatments, are a primary driver of functional disability in schizophrenia. This narrative review has the aim of providing a comprehensive overview of the current research developments in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, and begins by introducing the concepts of primary, secondary, prominent, predominant, and broadly defined negative symptoms. We then compare and contrast commonly used research assessment scales for negative symptoms and review the evidence for the specific utility of widely available off-label and investigational treatments that have been studied for negative symptoms. Mechanism of action/putative treatments included are antipsychotics (D2R antagonists), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) and other glutamatergic modulators, serotonin receptor (5-HTR) modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, antidepressants, pro-dopaminergic modulators (non-D2R antagonists), acetylcholine modulators, oxytocin, and phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors. With the caveat that no compounds are definitively proven as gold-standard treatments for broadly defined negative symptoms, the evidence base supports several potentially beneficial off-label and investigational medications for treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia, such as monotherapy with cariprazine, olanzapine, clozapine, and amisulpride, or adjunctive use of memantine, setrons such as ondansetron, minocycline, and antidepressants. These medications are widely available worldwide, generally tolerable and could be considered for an off-label, time-limited trial for a predesignated period of time, after which a decision to switch or stay can be made based on clinical response. Among investigational medications, NMDAR agonists, muscarinic agonists, and LB-102 remain under study. Suggestions for future research include reducing placebo effects by designing studies with a smaller number of high-quality study sites, potentially increasing the use of more precise rating scales for negative symptoms, and focused studies in people with predominant negative symptoms.

Graphene quantum dots as eco-friendly fluorescent probes for sensitive and selective determination of lumateperone in pharmaceutical preparation: Greenness and blueness assessment

This study investigates the potential of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) as fluorescent probes for the determination of the antipsychotic drug lumateperone. The spectral characteristics and sensing mechanism of the fluorescent probes were examined, revealing a static quenching mechanism as indicated by the Stern-Volmer analysis. Different factors affecting the quenching process, such as pH, concentration of QDs, and incubation time, were carefully tuned. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating excellent linearity in the range of 0.5-2.5 μg/mL, limits of detection and quantification of 0.1226 μg/mL and 0.3714 μg/mL, respectively, and high accuracy, precision, robustness and selectivity. Furthermore, the greenness and blueness of the proposed method were assessed using GAPI, AGREE, and BAGI tools, yielding an AGREE score of 0.78 and a BAGI score of 75 confirming its environmentally benign nature as well as analytical practicality. The method was successfully applied to determine lumateperone in a pharmaceutical formulation, highlighting its potential for routine quality control analysis. This study demonstrates the promising analytical capabilities of GQDs for the sensitive and selective detection of antipsychotic drug lumateperone, offering a simple, rapid, and green alternative to existing analytical techniques.

Effect of comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills on medication compliance and cognitive ability of chronic schizophrenia patients

BACKGROUND

The intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia was unknown.

AIM

To explore the intervention value of a drug-psycho-social-skill model on medication compliance and cognitive ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

METHODS

Overall, 98 out-patients and in-patients with chronic schizophrenia treated in our hospital from February 2022 to January 2023 were included and randomly divided into the study (50 patients) and control groups (48 patients). For 3 months, the control group was treated with conventional drugs, and the research group with a comprehensive intervention model of drug-psychology-society-skills. Data were obtained for the mini mental assessment scale (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), positive and negative symptom scale, insight and treatment attitude scale, cognitive ability scale and social skills [personal and social function scale (PSP)]. The adverse reactions were observed.

RESULTS

After the intervention, the MMSE and MoCA scores improved in both groups. MoCA scores in the study group (26.58 ± 3.21) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those in the control group (24.68 ± 3.02), MMSE scores were not significantly higher. Post-intervention, positive and negative symptom scores improved in both groups, and the positive and negative symptom scores in the study group [(12.01 ± 2.58) and (32.51 ± 2.11)] were significantly (P < 0.05) different than those in the control group [(14.54 ± 2.33) and (33.74 ± 2.55)]. Post-intervention, insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire scores of both groups were improved and compared with the control group (7.97 ± 3.02), the study group (13.56 ± 6.35) had significantly (P < 0.05) higher scores. Post-intervention, the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery score of both groups was improved and compared with the control group (38.44 ± 6.23), the score of the study group was significantly (P < 0.05) increased (43.51 ± 6.01). Post-intervention, the PSP score of the study group (78.38 ± 6.63) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of the control group (74.52 ± 7.01). During the intervention period, the incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 6.25%, not significantly different from that in the control group (8.33%). During the intervention, both groups experienced adverse reactions, with no significant difference between groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive intervention model based on drug-psychology-society-skills has obvious intervention effects on patients with chronic schizophrenia, which improves their cognitive ability and reduces their positive and negative symptoms. Simultaneously, it improves the self-knowledge of patients, improves their attitude toward treatment, effectively promotes the recovery of patients' social functions, and is safe. Therefore, it is worthy of being vigorously promoted and widely used in clinics.

Cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis

Objective

Cognitive impairment is notably prevalent among schizophrenic individuals and is acknowledged as one of the core features of the disorder. Despite the proliferation of literature on cognitive rehabilitation treatments for schizophrenia in recent years, there remains a dearth of systematic reviews and selections of research in this area. From a bibliometric perspective, this study aims to analyze and discuss the current state, developmental trends, and potential research hotspots of cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia over the past two decades.

Methods

The Core database of Web of Science was utilized to retrieve articles on cognitive rehabilitation in Schizophrenia that were published from 2004 to 2024. Bibliometrics was applied to perform both quantitative and qualitative analyses of authors, institutions, countries, journals, references, and keywords, leveraging tools such as CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the R software package Bibliometrix.

Results

A total of 2,413 articles were encompassed in this study, comprising 1,774 regular articles and 373 review articles. The United States emerged as the country with the highest productivity and citation counts, engaging in academic collaborations with over 40 nations. This was followed by the United Kingdom and Spain. King's College London stood out as the leading institution in the field. However, the article with the highest average citation rate was authored by Susan R. McGurk from the Dartmouth Centre for Psychiatric Research in the United States. Schizophrenia Research proved to be the most influential journal in this domain, with its articles being cited over 10,000 times.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive review of research achievements in cognitive rehabilitation for schizophrenia spanning from 2004 to 2024, and outlines global research hotspots and trends with future projections. Currently, methods for cognitive rehabilitation in schizophrenia and neural plasticity in the brain represent the cutting-edge of research. The safety, efficacy, and standardization of virtual reality are poised to emerge as potential future hotspots and trends in research. Additionally, the neurobiological foundations of cognitive remediation therapy constitute an unexplored territory ripe for further investigation.

Exploring the Pharmacological and Clinical Features of Lumateperone: A Promising Novel Antipsychotic

Lumateperone is a novel antipsychotic recently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia. Its unique pharmacological profile includes modulation of serotonergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic neurotransmission, differentiating it from other second-generation antipsychotics. This paper explores the pharmacological features and clinical potential of lumateperone across neuropsychiatric conditions. A review of current literature, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, was conducted. It focused on lumateperone's mechanism of action and receptor-binding profile, and clinical trials assessing its efficacy and safety in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. Lumateperone demonstrates high affinity for 5-HT2A receptors, moderate affinity for D2 receptors, and low affinity for H1 and 5-HT2C receptors. It acts as a presynaptic D2 agonist and a postsynaptic antagonist, contributing to a favorable side-effect profile with reduced extrapyramidal symptoms. Clinical trials suggest that lumateperone is effective in reducing both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, with minimal metabolic and cardiovascular risks. It is also being explored as an adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder and bipolar depression. Lumateperone presents a promising therapeutic option for schizophrenia with a novel mechanism of action and a favorable safety profile. Its potential application in other psychiatric conditions warrants further investigation, particularly in treatment-resistant populations.

Recent Advances in representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors: Synthetic Routes and clinical applications

The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) represents a pivotal target for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The successful discovery of numerous effective DRD2 inhibitors has led to their clinical application and ongoing evaluation in various clinical trials. This review explores the synthetic approaches and clinical applications of prototypical small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors that have received approval or are currently undergoing clinical trials, highlighting their therapeutic potential and challenges. The synthesis of these inhibitors employs various chemical strategies, including modifications of phenothiazine and butyrophenone structures, which have yielded significant antipsychotic agents like chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Additionally, newer classes of inhibitors, such as aripiprazole, exhibit partial agonist activity at DRD2, offering a unique therapeutic profile. Clinically, DRD2 inhibitors demonstrate efficacy in managing positive symptoms of schizophrenia, manic episodes in bipolar disorder, and dopaminergic imbalance in Parkinson's disease. However, the emergence of adverse effects, including tardive dyskinesia, extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic syndrome, presents substantial challenges. Advances in the development of second-generation antipsychotics aim to balance efficacy with a better side effect profile by targeting additional neurotransmitter receptors. This review aims to deliver an overview of the synthesis and clinical applications of representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors across various clinical phases, thereby offering strategic insights for the advancement of DRD2 inhibitor development.

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Efficacy and safety of lumateperone for bipolar depression and schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumateperone in treating bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and websites from inception to July 16, 2024, to identify both published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects or fixed-effects models depending on statistical heterogeneity. Relative risks (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to summarize the effects. Out of 931 records screened, 7 RCTs (four focusing on bipolar depression and 3 on schizophrenia) were eligible for inclusion. Lumateperone was efficacious in reducing depressive symptoms in bipolar depression (SMDs = -0.36, 95% CI: -.59 to -.13). In treating schizophrenia, lumateperone exhibited a lower combined SMD of -0.14 (95% CI: -.27 to 0, P = .051, I² = 49.6%), showing no significant difference from the placebo group, although the P-value approached significance. The lumateperone group showed significantly higher response rates compared with placebo in both bipolar depression (RRs = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.51) and schizophrenia (RRs = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.86). Common treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, and headache (RRs = 1.30 to 3.29). Importantly, lumateperone did not significantly increase extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS, RRs = 1.46, 95% CI = .84 to 2.53). Lumateperone is effective in treating bipolar depression but does not significantly reduce symptom severity in schizophrenia. It has a favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, caution is warranted in interpreting these findings due to the limited number of studies included.

Pharmacological Treatments of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia-An Update

Schizophrenia is a chronic psychotic disorder comprising positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and cognitive deficits. Negative symptoms are associated with stigma, worse functional outcomes, and a significant deterioration in quality of life. Clinical diagnosis is challenging despite its significance, and current treatments offer little improvement in the burden of negative symptoms. This article reviews current pharmacological strategies for treating negative symptoms. Dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic, noradrenergic, cholinergic, anti-inflammatory compounds, hormones, and psychostimulants are explored. Finally, we review pharmacological global treatment guidelines for negative symptoms. In general, switching to a second-generation antipsychotic seems to be most often recommended for patients with schizophrenia on first-generation antipsychotics, and an add-on antidepressant is considered when depression is also present. However, the treatment of negative symptoms remains an unmet need. Future, larger clinical studies and meta-analyses are needed to establish effective pharmacological agents for the effective treatment of negative symptoms.

Advances in Mood Disorder Pharmacotherapy: Evaluating New Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers for Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia

This article provides a narrative review of recent developments in mood-stabilizing drugs, considering their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of mood disorders, particularly bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. The review focuses on the mechanism and clinical aspects of second-generation antipsychotic medications; aripiprazole, classified as a third-generation antipsychotic medication; lamotrigine, as a representative of antiepileptic drugs; and lurasidone, a novel second-generation antipsychotic medication. Moreover, the article refers to one of the newest and most highly effective normothymic drugs, cariprazine. The potential of new mood stabilizer candidates lumateperone and brexpiprazole is also presented. Covered topics include the clinical efficacy of new drugs in reducing manic and depressive symptoms during acute episodes, as well as their role in preventing relapse. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of adverse effects of each drug. Many of the new drugs have strong potential to be beneficial and safe in cases of many comorbidities, as they do not cause many adverse effects and do not require high doses of use. The results underscore the importance of ongoing and future research to better understand the action and efficacy of these mood stabilizers and their implications in the treatment of mood disorders, aiming to achieve euthymia and improve the quality of life of affected patients. In this article, we aim to review current drug treatments for the management of mood disorders, including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Analysis of lumateperone data for patients with schizophrenia using related adverse events from the FDA adverse reporting system

BACKGROUND

Our study utilized the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to analyze and study the adverse event (AEs) signals of second-generation antipsychotic drug lumateperone, providing a reference for clinical safety monitoring in the treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

The International Dictionary of Medical Terminology (version 26.0) was used to standardize the preferred system organ category (SOC) and preferred terminology (PT) for adverse drug events (ADE) data related to lumateperone. ADE signals were classified and described using four algorithms: reporting odds ratios (ROR), proportional reporting ratios (PRR), Bayesian confidence-propagation neural network (BCPNN) and Multinomial gamma-poisson shrinkage (MGPS).

RESULT

Among the 2542 case reports collected from the FAERS database, 1762 reports with lumateperone as a 'principal suspect(PS)' AEs were identified. Lumateperone-induced AEs occurred in 26 system organ categories (SOC). A total of 118 significant disproportionate preferred terms (PTs) meeting the requirements of 4 algorithms were retained, and unexpected major events, such as burning sensation, tremor, migraine etc. may also occur. The median time to onset of lumateperone-related adverse events was 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-31.25 days), and most AEs occurred within the first 10 days and 1 month after initiation of lumateperone therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our research may provide a better understanding of the potential adverse events that may be caused by lumateperone and those not recorded in the drug instructions, providing valuable signals for clinical use.

Treatment of a resistant case of schizoaffective disorder with lumateperone: A case report

To this day, there exists skepticism about the reliability and clinical utility of the diagnostic criteria and classification of schizoaffective disorder. In addition, the treatment of schizoaffective disorder, especially of treatment-resistant cases, has been minimally investigated. As a result, formulating official treatment guidelines for schizoaffective disorder has been challenging. We present a case of a 27-year-old female, diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, for whom, for over 5 years, trials of traditional treatments, to include psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and electroconvulsive therapy, were either partially effective or discontinued due to intolerable side effects. The subsequent off-label use of lumateperone led to an adequate response. Lumateperone is an atypical antipsychotic, approved by the Food and Drug Administration for schizophrenia and bipolar depression in adults. Interestingly, it has a similar structure and mechanism of action to paliperidone, the only Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for schizoaffective disorder. Through this case report, as an example of lumateperone's effectiveness and tolerability, as well as a literature review of its pharmacodynamics, we make the case that lumateperone emerges as a promising option for schizoaffective disorder, especially treatment-resistant cases.

Hub genes, a diagnostic model, and immune infiltration based on ferroptosis-linked genes in schizophrenia

Background

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a prevalent and serious mental disorder, and the exact pathophysiology of this condition is not fully understood. In previous studies, it has been proven that ferroprotein levels are high in SCZ. It has also been shown that this inflammatory response may modify fibromodulin. Accumulating evidence indicates a strong link between metabolism and ferroptosis. Therefore, the present study aims to identify ferroptosis-linked hub genes to further investigate the role that ferroptosis plays in the development of SCZ.

Material and methods

From the GEO database, four microarray data sets on SCZ (GSE53987, GSE38481, GSE18312, and GSE38484) and ferroptosis-linked genes were extracted. Using the prefrontal cortex expression matrix of SCZ patients and healthy individuals as the control group from GSE53987, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to discover SCZ-linked module genes. From the feed, genes associated with ferroptosis were retrieved. The intersection of the module and ferroptosis-linked genes was done to obtain the hub genes. Then, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses, and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were conducted. The SCZ diagnostic model was established using logistic regression, and the GSE38481, GSE18312, and GSE38484 data sets were used to validate the model. Finally, hub genes linked to immune infiltration were examined.

Results

A total of 13 SCZ module genes and 7 hub genes linked to ferroptosis were obtained: DECR1, GJA1, EFN2L2, PSAT1, SLC7A11, SOX2, and YAP1. The GO/KEGG/GSEA study indicated that these hub genes were predominantly enriched in mitochondria and lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, immunological inflammation, ferroptosis, Hippo signaling pathway, AMP-activated protein kinase pathway, and other associated biological processes. The diagnostic model created using these hub genes was further confirmed using the data sets of three blood samples from patients with SCZ. The immune infiltration data showed that immune cell dysfunction enhanced ferroptosis and triggered SCZ.

Conclusion

In this study, seven critical genes that are strongly associated with ferroptosis in patients with SCZ were discovered, a valid clinical diagnostic model was built, and a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of SCZ was identified by the investigation of immune infiltration.

Post-marketing safety concerns with lumateperone: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

Objective

Lumateperone, a novel antipsychotic drug that was granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in December 2019, remains insufficiently explored for its adverse event profile. This study used the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to explore its potential safety issues.

Methods

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of FAERS data from the fourth quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2023, extracting reports related to lumateperone. Disproportionality analysis using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) algorithms was employed to detect signals of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Our research processed 4,777 pertinent AE disclosures related to lumateperone, unveiling 125 signals that satisfied both ROR and BCPNN evaluative benchmarks across 26 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Intriguingly, 108 of these signals were categorized as unanticipated, spotlighting notable psychiatric manifestations such as mania (ROR = 73.82, 95% CI = 57.09-95.46; IC = 6.16, IC025 = 4.49), and hypomania (ROR = 34.74, 95% CI = 15.54-77.64; IC = 5.10, IC025 = 3.43), alongside non-psychiatric phenomena like urinary retention (ROR = 3.59, 95% CI = 1.80-7.19; IC = 1.84, IC025 = 0.18) and serotonin syndrome (ROR = 8.69, 95% CI = 4.81-15.72; IC = 3.11, IC025 = 1.45).

Conclusion

This research provides real-world safety data on lumateperone post-marketing and is an important supplement to the information from clinical trial studies. Healthcare professionals should be vigilant for the risk of a manic switch in patients with bipolar depression who are administered lumateperone. More epidemiological studies are needed in the future to explore and further evaluate the risk-benefit issue of lumateperone.

Effect of antipsychotics and mood stabilisers on metabolism in bipolar disorder: a network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Background

Antipsychotics and mood stabilisers are gathering attention for the disturbance of metabolism. This network meta-analysis aims to evaluate and rank the metabolic effects of the commonly used antipsychotics and mood stabilisers in treating bipolar disorder (BD).

Methods

Registries including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, and Google Scholar were searched before February 15th, 2024, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) applying antipsychotics or mood stabilisers for BD treatment. The observed outcomes were twelve metabolic indicators. The data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and confirmed by another four reviewers and a corresponding author. The above six reviewers all participated in data analyses. Data extraction was based on PRISMA guidelines, and quality assessment was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook. Use a random effects model for data pooling. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023466669.

Findings

Together, 5421 records were identified, and 41 publications with 11,678 complete-trial participants were confirmed eligible. After eliminating possible sensitivity, risperidone ranked 1st in elevating fasting serum glucose (SUCRA = 90.7%) and serum insulin (SUCRA = 96.6%). Lurasidone was most likely to elevate HbA1c (SUCRA = 82.1%). Olanzapine ranked 1st in elevating serum TC (SUCRA = 93.3%), TG (SUCRA = 89.6%), and LDL (SUCRA = 94.7%). Lamotrigine ranked 1st in reducing HDL (SUCRA = 82.6%). Amisulpride ranked 1st in elevating body weight (SUCRA = 100.0%). For subgroup analyses, quetiapine is more likely to affect indicators of glucose metabolism among male adult patients with bipolar mania, while long-term lurasidone tended to affect glucose metabolism among female patients with bipolar depression. Among patients under 18, divalproex tended to affect glucose metabolism, with lithium affecting lipid metabolism. In addition, most observed antipsychotics performed higher response and remission rates than placebo, and displayed a similar dropout rate with placebo, while no between-group significance of rate was observed among mood stabilisers.

Interpretation

Our findings suggest that overall, antipsychotics are effective in treating BD, while they are also more likely to disturb metabolism than mood stabilisers. Attention should be paid to individual applicability in clinical practice. The results put forward evidence-based information and clinical inspiration for drug compatibility and further research of the BD mechanism.

Funding

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2506200), and the Research Project of Jinan Microecological Biomedicine Shandong Laboratory (No. JNL-2023001B).

Pharmacodynamic properties of lumateperone and its efficacy in acute bipolar depression: a mechanistic hypothesis based on data

The treatment of bipolar depression is one of the most challenging needs in contemporary psychiatry. Currently, only quetiapine, olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, lurasidone, cariprazine, and recently lumateperone have been FDA-approved to treat this condition. The neurobiology of bipolar depression and the possible mechanistic targets of bipolar antidepressant therapy remain elusive. The current study investigated whether the pharmacodynamic properties of lumateperone fit into a previously developed model which was the first to be derived based on the strict combination of clinical and preclinical data. The authors performed a systematic review of the literature to identify the pharmacodynamic properties of lumateperone. The original model suggests that a constellation of effects on different receptors is necessary, but refinements, including the present study, suggest that the inhibition of the serotonin reuptake at the first level, the 5HT-2A blockade at the second level, and the norepinephrine alpha-1 receptors blockade at a third level in combination with D1 blockade contribute to the antidepressant effect in acute bipolar depression. The D2 blockade acts as a protective mechanism and reduces the risk of switching to mania/hypomania.

New Therapeutic Targets and Drugs for Schizophrenia Beyond Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists

Schizophrenia is a disease with a complex pathological mechanism that is influenced by multiple genes. The study of its pathogenesis is dominated by the dopamine hypothesis, as well as other hypotheses such as the 5-hydroxytryptamine hypothesis, glutamate hypothesis, immune-inflammatory hypothesis, gene expression abnormality hypothesis, and neurodevelopmental abnormality hypothesis. The first generation of antipsychotics was developed based on dopaminergic receptor antagonism, which blocks dopamine D2 receptors in the brain to exert antipsychotic effects. The second generation of antipsychotics acts by dual blockade of 5-hydroxytryptamine and dopamine receptors. From the third generation of antipsychotics onwards, the therapeutic targets for antipsychotic schizophrenia expanded beyond D2 receptor blockade to explore D2 receptor partial agonism and the antipsychotic effects of new targets such as D3, 5-HT1A, 5-HT7, and mGlu2/3 receptors. The main advantages of the second and third generation antipsychotics over first-generation antipsychotics are the reduction of side effects and the improvement of negative symptoms, and even though third-generation antipsychotics do not directly block D2 receptors, the modulation of the dopamine transmitter system is still an important part of their antipsychotic process. According to recent research, several receptors, including 5-hydroxytryptamine, glutamate, γ-aminobutyric acid, acetylcholine receptors and norepinephrine, play a role in the development of schizophrenia. Therefore, the focus of developing new antipsychotic drugs has shifted towards agonism or inhibition of these receptors. Specifically, the development of NMDARs stimulants, GABA receptor agonists, mGlu receptor modulators, cholinergic receptor modulators, 5-HT2C receptor agonists and alpha-2 receptor modulators has become the main direction. Animal experiments have confirmed the antipsychotic effects of these drugs, but their pharmacokinetics and clinical applicability still require further exploration. Research on alternative targets for antipsychotic drugs, beyond the dopamine D2 receptor, has expanded the potential treatment options for schizophrenia and gives an important way to address the challenge of refractory schizophrenia. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the research on therapeutic targets and medications for schizophrenia, offering valuable insights for both treatment and further research in this field.

A Comprehensive Review of Novel FDA-Approved Psychiatric Medications (2018-2022)

Mental health disorders are among the top leading causes of disease burden worldwide and many patients have high levels of treatment resistance. Even though medications offer improvement to some patients, antidepressants are only effective in about half of those treated, and schizophrenia is treatment-refractory in about one-third of patients. One way to combat this disparity is to improve medication development and discovery for psychiatric disorders through evidence-based research. Recently, most psychiatric medications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are for increased tolerability or extended release. Because of the slow, incremental progress, there is a pressing need to explore novel medications with new indications or mechanisms of action to treat the expanding population with mental disorders, especially in those who are fully or partially recalcitrant to first-line medication options. This review aims to present the newest FDA medications with new indications, establish the clinical need for each, and discuss future directions in drug development. We searched and reviewed novel psychiatric medications approved by the FDA from 2018 to 2022. We then analyzed each medication in the United States Clinical Trials Registry and gathered updated results for efficacy and safety information. We also searched PubMed/MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Scopus, Web of Science, Elsevier, and Google Scholar to understand how these new indications met current clinical needs. Finally, we inquired about related technological implications that will lead the field of psychopharmacology now and in the years to come. We found 12 novel psychiatric medications approved by the FDA from 2018 to 2022, representing a very small percentage of the total FDA approvals during that period. These psychiatric medications with novel mechanisms or improved efficacy and safety  are expected to provide further options for treating mental health disorders; promising results will lead to new patterns of research.

Differentiating the third generation of antipsychotics: a focus on lumateperone's similarities and differences

The development of atypical antipsychotics has evolved to include newer pharmacodynamic properties. Lumateperone, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine are all dopamine-2 receptor partial agonists with varying receptor affinities. This review aims to compare the clinical and pharmacodynamic differences among these four atypical antipsychotics, all of which are unique when compared to first- and second-generation antipsychotics. For consideration is further delineating these agents as being third-generation antipsychotics. PubMed searches were conducted to compile preclinical and clinical studies derived from animal models and human subjects. Information gathered included pharmacological mechanisms, clinical efficacy, future-oriented clinical approaches, and adverse effects. Efficacy for the shared indications of these drugs seems comparable. Differences among these drugs lie more in their adverse effect profiles. For example, lumateperone was found to have the lowest rate of weight gain while brexpiprazole was found to have the highest rate of weight gain associated with increased appetite. Aripiprazole had the lowest rates of extrapyramidal symptoms not including akathisia while cariprazine had the highest. All four agents reviewed have a variety of receptor affinities, which likely generates a variety of different adverse effects. This suggests that in any given patient, clinicians may see differential clinical effects.

The Novel Antipsychotic Lumateperone (Iti-007) in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review

Lumateperone (also known as ITI-007 or ITI-722) represents a novel second-generation medication characterized by a favorable safety and tolerability profile. This is attributed to its notable selectivity for D2 receptors within specific regions of the brain. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults in December 2019. Additionally, it gained approval for addressing depressive episodes associated with bipolar I and II disorders in adults, either as a standalone therapy or in conjunction with lithium or valproate, in December 2021. The objective of this investigation is to systematically review the existing literature to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lumateperone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Lumateperone has demonstrated effectiveness in addressing positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms associated with schizophrenia. The evaluation of safety indicators in the reviewed studies indicates that lumateperone is deemed to be a well-tolerated and safe antipsychotic. Additional research is warranted to explore lumateperone's efficacy in managing major depressive disorders, behavioral issues in Alzheimer's disease and dementia, sleep maintenance insomnia, bipolar disorders, and personality disorders.

Path Analysis of Self-Efficacy, Coping Style and Resilience on Depression in Patients with Recurrent Schizophrenia

Purpose

Based on the two mediating variables of self-efficacy and coping style, a multiple mediating model was constructed to explore the mechanism by which psychological resilience affects depression in patients with recurrent schizophrenia.

Methods

A total of 210 patients with recurrent schizophrenia who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, China, were enrolled. The Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), General Self-Efficacy Energy Scale (GSES) and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) were used to evaluate resilience, self-efficacy, coping style and depression. Path analysis was performed by constructing a structural equation model, and the mediating effect between variables was verified by the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile bootstrap method.

Results

Resilience, self-efficacy and positive coping together explained 53.2% of the variance in depression. (1) The total scores of self-efficacy, coping style, resilience and depression in patients with recurrent schizophrenia were 2.54±0.61, 31.73±9.62, 58.06±17.26 and 50.48±12.55, respectively. (2) Pearson analysis showed that the scores of self-efficacy, positive coping, resilience and depression were significantly correlated with depression (r=-0.24-0.51, P<0.01). (3) The path analysis showed that resilience directly affects depression (β=-0.401); additionally, resilience indirectly affects depression through self-efficacy (β=-0.179) and through the chain mediating effect of self-efficacy and positive coping style (β=-0.024).

Conclusion

There is a high incidence of depression in patients with recurrent schizophrenia in China, and intervention is needed. This research revealed that resilience directly affects depression in patients with recurrent schizophrenia and that self-efficacy and positive coping play a part in mediating resilience and depression in patients with recurrent schizophrenia in China. Implementing targeted interventions based on action paths to improve the level of resilience and reduce the incidence of depression has guiding significance in the field of occupational rehabilitation of patients with recurrent schizophrenia.

Adjunctive lumateperone (ITI-007) in the treatment of bipolar depression: Results from a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT02600507) evaluated the efficacy and safety of lumateperone adjunctive therapy to lithium or valproate in patients with bipolar depression.

METHODS

Patients (18-75 years) with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode (MDE), with inadequate therapeutic response to lithium or valproate, were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 weeks adjunctive therapy with lumateperone 28 mg (n = 176), lumateperone 42 mg (n = 177), or placebo (n = 176). The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to Day 43 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total score and the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Bipolar Version-Severity Scale (CGI-BP-S) depression subscore. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory evaluations, vital signs, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicidality.

RESULTS

Patients treated with adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg showed significantly greater improvement compared with adjunctive placebo in MADRS Total score (LS mean difference vs placebo [LSMD], -2.4; p = 0.02) and CGI-BP-S depression subscore (LSMD, -0.3; p = 0.01), while adjunctive lumateperone 28 mg showed numerical improvement in MADRS Total score (LSMD, -1.7; p = 0.10) and improvement in the CGI-BP-S depression subscore (LSMD, -0.3; p = 0.04). Adjunctive lumateperone treatment was well tolerated; treatment-emergent adverse events reported at rates >5% and twice placebo for lumateperone 42 mg were somnolence (11.3%), dizziness (10.7%), and nausea (8.5%), with minimal risk of EPS, metabolic abnormalities, or increased prolactin.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumateperone 42-mg treatment adjunctive to lithium or valproate significantly improved depression symptoms and was generally well tolerated in patients with MDEs associated with either bipolar I or bipolar II disorder.

Illuminating Hope for Mental Health: A Drug Review on Lumateperone

This drug review provides a comprehensive analysis of a novel antipsychotic called lumateperone, marketed as Caplyta. Lumateperone gained FDA approval in 2019 for treating schizophrenia and later, in 2021, for treating bipolar depression. The review begins by delving into lumateperone's mechanism of action, which involves the partial agonism of the dopamine D2 receptor as well as its unique effects on the dopamine transporter, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, and serotonin transporter. Additionally, the study examines lumateperone's distinctive pharmacokinetics. Moreover, this review assesses lumateperone's metabolic profile and highlights its favorable outcomes regarding mean body weight, BMI, and waist circumference, surpassing those of other second-generation antipsychotic medications. The study explicitly emphasizes the efficacy and safety of lumateperone in treating schizophrenia and bipolar depression associated with bipolar I and II disorders. An extensive investigation of multiple clinical trials provides compelling evidence of lumateperone's advantages over existing antipsychotic medications. The review also acknowledges the limitations of lumateperone compared to other antipsychotics. In conclusion, this drug review underscores the importance of further research to uncover the additional limitations of lumateperone while acknowledging its promising benefits and potential for advancing treatment options.

Are informants required to obtain valid ratings on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)?

Ratings on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) are ideally based on both a patient interview and an informant questionnaire. In research and clinical settings, however, the informant questionnaire is often omitted. This study investigated the consequences of omitting informant information by comparing PANSS ratings of patients with schizophrenia (n = 49 patients, 77 ratings) conducted with and without informant information, respectively. Additionally, changes in symptom severity over time based on ratings with and without informant information were also compared for the full PANSS and the six-item version of the PANSS (PANSS-6). PANSS ratings including informant information were higher than those without, both at the total score and individual item level. Additionally, the full PANSS appeared less "responsive" to baseline-to-endpoint changes for ratings without informant information compared to ratings including informant information, while no differences were found for the PANSS-6.

Novel Compounds in the Treatment of Schizophrenia-A Selective Review

Schizophrenia is a chronic neuropsychiatric syndrome that significantly impacts daily function and quality of life. All of the available guidelines suggest a combined treatment approach with pharmacologic agents and psychological interventions. However, one in three patients is a non-responder, the effect on negative and cognitive symptoms is limited, and many drug-related adverse effects complicate clinical management. As a result, discovering novel drugs for schizophrenia presents a significant challenge for psychopharmacology. This selective review of the literature aims to outline the current knowledge on the aetiopathogenesis of schizophrenia and to present the recently approved and newly discovered pharmacological substances in treating schizophrenia. We discuss ten novel drugs, three of which have been approved by the FDA (Olanzapine/Samidorphan, Lumateperone, and Pimavanserin). The rest are under clinical trial investigation (Brilaroxazine, Xanomeline/Trospium, Emraclidine, Ulotaront, Sodium Benzoate, Luvadaxistat, and Iclepertin). However, additional basic and clinical research is required not only to improve our understanding of the neurobiology and the potential novel targets in the treatment of schizophrenia, but also to establish more effective therapeutical interventions for the syndrome, including the attenuation of negative and cognitive symptoms and avoiding dopamine blockade-related adverse effects.

A System for Rapidly Yet Rigorously Evaluating the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

This tutorial describes a system for rapidly yet rigorously assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The system has 7 criteria, represented by the acronym "BIS FOES." The BIS FOES system directs readers to assess RCTs based on the following 7 criteria: the RCT's use (or not) of effective (1) Blinding; the RCT's use (or not) of (2) Intent-to-Treat Analysis; the RCT's (3) Size and other information reflecting the effectiveness of randomization; the amount of sample lost during (4) Follow-up; the (5) Outcomes examined by the RCT (specifically, the outcome measures used by the RCT), the (6) Effects reported (ie, the statistical and clinical significance of the RCT's primary, secondary, and safety findings), and any (7) Special Considerations (ie, additional strengths, limitations, or notable features of the RCT). The first 6 criteria are of basic importance to the assessment of every RCT, whereas the Special Considerations criteria allows the system to be expanded to include virtually any other important aspect of the RCT. This tutorial explains the importance of these criteria and how to assess them. This tutorial also describes how many BIS FOES criteria can be initially assessed from the RCT Abstract while also directing readers to specific locations in the RCT article where additional important information can be found. We hope that the BIS FOES system will help healthcare trainees, but also potentially clinicians, researchers, and the general public, rapidly and thoroughly assess RCTs.

Efficacy of Serotonin and Dopamine Activity Modulators in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Rapid Review

Schizophrenia is among the fifteen most disabling diseases worldwide. Negative symptoms (NS) are highly prevalent in schizophrenia, negatively affect the functional outcome of the disorder, and their treatment is difficult and rarely specifically investigated. Serotonin-dopamine activity modulators (SDAMs), of which aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, and lumateperone were approved for schizophrenia treatment, represent a possible therapy to reduce NS. The aim of this rapid review is to summarize the evidence on this topic to make it readily available for psychiatrists treating NS and for further research. We searched the PubMed database for original studies using SDAM, aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, lumateperone, schizophrenia, and NS as keywords. We included four mega-analyses, eight meta-analyses, two post hoc analyses, and 20 clinical trials. Aripiprazole, cariprazine, and brexpiprazole were more effective than placebo in reducing NS. Only six studies compared SDAMs with other classes of antipsychotics, demonstrating a superiority in the treatment of NS mainly for cariprazine. The lack of specific research and various methodological issues, related to the study population and the assessment of NS, may have led to these partial results. Here, we highlight the need to conduct new methodologically robust investigations with head-to-head treatment comparisons and long-term observational studies on homogeneous groups of patients evaluating persistent NS with first- and second-generation scales, namely the Brief Negative Symptom Scale and the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms. This rapid review can expand research on NS therapeutic strategies in schizophrenia, which is fundamental for the long-term improvement of patients’ quality of life.

MicroRNA schizophrenia: Etiology, biomarkers and therapeutic targets

The three sets of symptoms associated with schizophrenia-positive, negative, and cognitive-are burdensome and have serious effects on public health, which affects up to 1% of the population. It is now commonly believed that in addition to the traditional dopaminergic mesolimbic pathway, the etiology of schizophrenia also includes neuronal networks, such as glutamate, GABA, serotonin, BDNF, oxidative stress, inflammation and the immune system. Small noncoding RNA molecules called microRNAs (miRNAs) have come to light as possible participants in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia in recent years by having an impact on these systems. These small RNAs regulate the stability and translation of hundreds of target transcripts, which has an impact on the entire gene network. There may be improved approaches to treat and diagnose schizophrenia if it is understood how these changes in miRNAs alter the critical related signaling pathways that drive the development and progression of the illness.

Seventy Years of Antipsychotic Development: A Critical Review

Since the mid-1950s discovery of the first effective antipsychotic medications (APM), we have only been able to improve the tolerability but not the overall efficacy of currently available APMs, as reflected by effectiveness trials in Europe and the United States. This inability to develop more effective APMs is attributable to multiple factors, including failure to create and use assessment tools to assess core symptom domains in schizophrenia, move beyond the dopaminergic hypothesis and to develop "me too" drugs, imposing ill-defined research domain criteria, and lacking federal funding for clinical trials. The classification of APMs is also confusing, including second-generation, partial agonists, and multimodal APMs in the same class of APMs, despite significant differences in their mechanisms of action. Other factors stagnating drug development include inadequate sample sizes to address heterogeneity, lack of statistical measures correlating with clinical significance, using the atheoretical basis of psychiatric diagnoses, failure to control placebo response, and high cost of newer and perhaps more tolerable APMs. Furthermore, there has been a failure to develop early predictors of antipsychotic response and various tools to optimize an APM response. Finally, some mental health providers are also responsible for the suboptimal use of APMs, by using excessive maintenance doses, often with irrational polypharmacy, further compromising effectiveness and medication adherence. However, some bright spots in antipsychotic development include improved tolerability of APMs and long-acting injectables to address the high prevalence of medication nonadherence. This review critically reviews 70 years of antipsychotic development, the reasons behind the failure to develop more effective APMs, and suggestions for future direction.

The Difficult Path to the Discovery of Novel Treatments in Psychiatric Disorders

CNS diseases, including psychiatric disorders, represent a significant opportunity for the discovery and development of new drugs and therapeutic treatments with the potential to have a significant impact on human health. CNS diseases, however, present particular challenges to therapeutic discovery efforts, and psychiatric diseases/disorders may be among the most difficult. With specific exceptions such as psychostimulants for ADHD, a large number of psychiatric patients are resistant to existing treatments. In addition, clinicians have no way of knowing which psychiatric patients will respond to which drugs. By definition, psychiatric diagnoses are syndromal in nature; determinations of efficacy are often self-reported, and drug discovery is largely model-based. While such models of psychiatric disease are amenable to screening for new drugs, whether cellular or whole-animal based, they have only modest face validity and, more importantly, predictive validity. Multiple academic, pharmaceutical industry, and government agencies are dedicated to the translation of new findings about the neurobiology of major psychiatric disorders into the discovery and advancement of novel therapies. The collaboration of these agencies provide a pathway for developing new therapeutics. These efforts will be greatly helped by recent advances in understanding the genetic bases of psychiatric disorders, the ongoing search for diagnostic and therapy-responsive biomarkers, and the validation of new animal models.

Functional Nutrition as Integrated Intervention for In- and Outpatient with Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a chronic and progressive disorder characterized by cognitive, emotional, and behavioral abnormalities associated with neuronal development and synaptic plasticity alterations. Genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in cortical parvalbumin-positive GABAergic interneurons and consequent alterations in glutamate-mediated excitatory neurotransmission during early neurodevelopment underlie schizophrenia manifestation and progression. Also, epigenetic alterations during pregnancy or early phases of postnatal life are associated with schizophrenia vulnerability and inflammatory processes, which are at the basis of brain pathology and a higher risk of comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome. In addition, schizophrenia patients adopt an unhealthy lifestyle and poor nutrition, leading to premature death. Here, I explored the role of functional nutrition as an integrated intervention for the long-term management of patients with schizophrenia. Several natural bioactive compounds in plant-based whole foods, including flavonoids, phytonutrients, vitamins, fatty acids, and minerals, modulate brain functioning by targeting neuroinflammation and improving cognitive decline. Although further clinical studies are needed, a functional diet rich in natural bioactive compounds might be effective in synergism with standard treatments to improve schizophrenia symptoms and reduce the risk of comorbidities.

A narrative review of treatment interventions to improve cognitive performance in schizophrenia, with an emphasis on at-risk and early course stages

Cognitive dysfunction is a core feature of schizophrenia (SCZ), which unfavorably affects SCZ patients' daily functioning and overall clinical outcome. An increasing body of evidence has shown that cognitive deficits are present not only at the beginning of the illness but also several years before the onset of psychosis. Nonetheless, the majority of treatment interventions targeting cognitive dysfunction in SCZ, using both pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches, have focused on chronic patients rather than individuals at high risk or in the early stages of the disease. In this article, we provide a narrative review of cognitive interventions in SCZ patients, with a particular focus on pre-emptive interventions in at-risk/early course individuals when available. Furthermore, we discuss current challenges for these pre-emptive treatment interventions and provide some suggestions on how future work may ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in these individuals.

A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials on Lumateperone and Its Effects on Body Weight

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is a clinically relevant and concerning adverse effect of contemporary antipsychotic medications. Lumateperone is a novel antipsychotic, which became commercially available in 2020 and received Food and Drug Administration approval for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in 2019 and 2021, respectively. To date, no comprehensive review exists on its AIWG profile. This systematic review aims to assess the association between lumateperone and AIWG.

METHODS

Data Sources: A comprehensive search of published studies on "lumateperone" OR "ITI-007" OR "Caplyta" was conducted on PubMed, CINAHL Complete, APA PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until January 2022.Study Selection: A total of 149 articles in English were collected. After removing duplicates, all human trials on lumateperone were screened for the inclusion criteria.Data Extraction: Two reviewers conducted an independent screening followed by full-text analysis of extracted studies adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Third reviewer resolved the conflicts as tiebreaker.

RESULTS

Primary search generated 77 articles, excluding 72 duplicates, of which 51 were deemed appropriate for exclusion. Full-text analysis of the remaining 26 articles concluded with 5 studies for finalized review per inclusion criteria. Excluded studies were manually reviewed for relevant citation of studies per inclusion criteria. Three randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials and 2 open-label trials were derived from this systematic review. Lumateperone showed a favorable weight profile compared with placebo and alternate antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumateperone displays minimal to no weight gain among participants in the studies reviewed.

Lumateperone-mediated effects on prefrontal glutamatergic receptor-mediated neurotransmission: A dopamine D1 receptor dependent mechanism

Lumateperone is a novel drug approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults and depressive episodes associated with bipolar depression in adults, as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate treatment in the United States. Lumateperone simultaneously modulates key neurotransmitters, such as serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate, implicated in serious mental illness. In patients with schizophrenia, lumateperone was shown to improve positive symptoms along with negative and depressive symptoms, while also enhancing prosocial behavior. Moreover, in patients with bipolar I or II disorder, lumateperone improved depressive symptoms as well. To further understand the mechanisms related to lumateperone's clinical response, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lumateperone on dopaminergic- and glutamatergic signaling in the rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). We used the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) test to determine the antipsychotic-like effect of lumateperone, electrophysiology in vitro to study lumateperone's effects on NMDA- and AMPA-induced currents in the mPFC, and the neurochemical techniques microdialysis and amperometry to measure dopamine- and glutamate release in the rat mPFC. Our results demonstrate that lumateperone; i) significantly suppressed CAR in rats, indicating an antipsychotic-like effect, ii) facilitated NMDA and AMPA receptor-mediated currents in the mPFC, in a dopamine D₁-dependent manner, and iii) significantly increased dopamine and glutamate release in the rat mPFC. To the extent that these findings can be translated to humans, the ability of lumateperone to activate these pathways may contribute to its demonstrated effectiveness in safely improving symptoms related to neuropsychiatric disorder including mood alterations.

Lumateperone for the Treatment of Adults With Schizophrenia: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lumateperone (LUM) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotic agent for adults with schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar depression (for both bipolar I and bipolar II disorder as as monotherapy or as adjunctive treatment to lithium or valproate). LUM simultaneously modulates serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate neurotransmission. The foregoing pleiotropic mechanism of action is predictive of therapeutic benefits across multiple domains of psychopathology in SCZ (i.e., positive, negative, cognitive, and prosocial symptoms). Herein, the overarching aim is to synthesize the extant literature reporting on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LUM in adults with SCZ.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four clinical studies (i.e., three RCTs and one open-label trial) were included in this synthesis. Overall, LUM significantly reduced the severity of SCZ compared with placebo. The open label study provided the real-world effectiveness of shifting stable patients with SCZ to LUM from other atypical antipsychotics. With respect to safety and tolerability profile, LUM demonstrated placebo-level rates of weight gain, metabolic shift, prolactin elevation, extrapyramidal side effects (EPS), and akathisia across short term trials (i.e., 4-6 weeks). Taken together, our results indicate that LUM significantly improves symptoms severity in adults with SCZ. LUM also exhibits a favorable tolerability and safety profile with placebo level rates of weight gain, metabolic disruption, akathisia, extrapyramidal side effects (excluding akathisia), and prolactin elevation. Lumateperone should be conceptualized as a first-line treatment strategy for adults with SCZ.

Limitations of access to antipsychotics in Canada: loss of the old and unavailability of the new options

Schizophrenia is a severe, debilitating disorder that is associated with a significant burden of illness. Antipsychotic medications remain the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia and related disorders. In recent years, a number of new psychotropic medications have been introduced to the market, with some potential differences in the mechanism of action compared to the previous ones. In this paper, we discuss the issue of lack of access to the newer antipsychotics in Canada, and the discontinuation of some of the older options from the market, leaving clinicians and patients with a limited number of available options. While the aim of this paper is to increase awareness of the current state of availability and accessibility of options, we further discuss some potential solutions.

Risk of Drug-induced Movement Disorders with Newer Antipsychotic Agents

Background:

The last decade has seen development of numerous novel antipsychotic drugs with unique mechanisms including long-acting formulations for clinical use. A comparative assessment of these new drugs with each other and previous antipsychotics have not been performed with regards to risk for drug-induced movement disorders (DIMD).

Methods:

Medline was searched from January 2010 to February 2022 for primary research articles and review articles in English using the search terms “extrapyramidal” and “tardive” with individual drug names of novel antipsychotics.

Results:

We identified articles describing the risk of DIMD with 6 novel antipsychotics, 4 novel formulations, and 3 experimental antipsychotics. Both short- and long-term data generally showed comparable to lower risk of DIMD with novel antipsychotics and recent long-acting formulations compared to previously marketed antipsychotics.

Discussion:

Several novel antipsychotics, particularly lumateperone and pimavanserin, show promise in being able to treat psychosis while reducing the risk of DIMD. Long-acting paliperidone may reduce risk of DIMD while other long-acting injectable formulations of SGA have similar risk of DIMD compared to oral formulations. New drug targets for treating psychosis without dopamine blockade also show promise.

Scalability of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale in first-episode schizophrenia assessed by Rasch models

OBJECTIVE

Historically, assessment of the psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) has had several foci: (1) calculation of reliability indexes, (2) extraction of subdimensions from the scale, and (3) assessment of the validity of the total score. In this study, we aimed to examine the scalability and to assess the clinical performance of the 30-item PANSS total score as well as the scalability of a shorter version (PANSS-6) of the scale.

METHODS

A composite data set of 1073 patients with first-episode schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum disorder was subjected to Rasch analysis of PANSS data from baseline and 4-6 weeks follow-up.

RESULTS

The central tests of fit of the Rasch model failed to satisfy the statistical requirements behind item homogeneity for the PANSS-30 as well as the PANSS-6 total score. For the PANSS-30, Differential Item Functioning was pronounced both for the 7-point Likert scale rating categories and when dichotomizing the rating categories. Subsequently, the Rasch structure analysis in the context of dichotomized items was used to isolate and estimate a systematic error because of item inhomogeneity, as well as a random error. The size of the combined sources of error for the PANSS-30 total score approximated 20% which is often regarded as clinical cut-off between response versus no-response.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate the operational consequences of a lack of statistical fit of the Rasch model and suggest that the calculated measure of uncertainty needs to be considered when using the PANSS-30 total score.

Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Weight gain is among the most important side-effects of antipsychotics. It is, however, unclear whether it is associated with antipsychotic doses. We aimed to fill this gap with a dose-response meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases (last update search June 2021) for all fixed-dose studies that investigated 16 second-generation antipsychotics and haloperidol in adults with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia or with negative symptoms. We estimated the dose-response curves by conducting random-effects dose-response meta-analyses. We used the restricted cubic spline to model the dose-response relationship. The primary outcome was mean weight gain in kg from baseline to endpoint, the secondary outcome was the number of patients with clinically important weight gain.

FINDINGS

Ninety-seven studies with 333 dose arms (36 326 participants) provided data for meta-analyses. Most studies were short-term with median duration of 6 weeks (range 4 to 26 weeks). In patients with acute exacerbation, amisulpride, aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, haloperidol, lumateperone, and lurasidone produced mild weight gain in comparison to placebo (mean difference at any dose≤1 kg), while more significant weight gain was observed by all other drugs. For most drugs, dose-response curves showed an initial dose-related increase in weight which plateaued at higher doses, while for others there was no plateau and some even had bell-shaped curves, meaning less weight gain to be associated with higher doses.

INTERPRETATION

Second-generation antipsychotics do not only differ in their propensity to produce weight gain, but also in the shapes of their dose-response curves. This information is important for dosing decisions in clinical practice.

Neurobiology of Schizophrenia: A Comprehensive Review

Schizophrenia is a debilitating disease that presents with both positive and negative symptoms affecting cognition and emotions. Extensive studies have analyzed the different factors that contribute to the disorder. There is evidence of significant genetic etiology involving multiple genes such as dystrobrevin binding protein 1 (DTNBP1) and neuregulin 1 (NRG1). There is no clear link between neurotransmitter changes and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia; however, studies have shown that subcortical dopamine dysfunction is the key mechanism. Specific regions of gray and white matter changes are observed in patients with schizophrenia; gray matter changes being more significant after the onset of psychosis. These pathological changes may be implicated in the impairment of executive functioning, attention, and working memory. The disease can be managed with pharmacological treatments based on individual patient profile, patient compliance, and disease severity. The challenge of disease management sometimes persists due to the side effects. A better understanding of the pathological processes in schizophrenia may lead to more specific and effective therapies.

Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Resilience in Patients with Recurrent Schizophrenia in China

PURPOSE

To explore the mediating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between perceived social support and resilience in patients with recurrent schizophrenia in China.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 176 patients with recurrent schizophrenia who were hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Hunan Province, China, completed a general data questionnaire, the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the Perceived Social Support Scale (PSSS) and the General Self-Efficacy Energy Scale (GSES).

RESULTS

Among the 176 patients, the mean GSES score was 2.02±0.61, the mean PSSS score was 56.77±14.61, and the mean CD-RISC score was 58.06±17.26. Self-efficacy played a partial mediating role between social support and resilience, and the mediating effect accounted for 42.56% of the total effect.

CONCLUSION

The resilience level of patients with recurrent schizophrenia in China is moderate and needs to be improved. This research revealed that self-efficacy played a part in mediating perceived social support and resilience in patients with recurrent schizophrenia in China. Perceived social support can indirectly affect resilience in patients with recurrent schizophrenia through self-efficacy. Comprehensive interventions in perceived social support and self-efficacy would help to improve the resilience of patients with recurrent schizophrenia.

Third-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and non-responsivity or intolerance to clozapine regimen: What is the evidence?

Clozapine is considered « the golden standard » for the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but many patients do not present adequate responsivity even to this antipsychotic. If we add the need to strictly monitor the hematologic and cardiometabolic adverse events during each clozapine trial and the difficulty of preserving therapeutic adherence in patients with low insight, residual negative/positive symptoms, or economic challenges, then the necessity of exploring alternative interventions for these patients becomes obvious. Also, in case of intolerance to clozapine or where clozapine did not induce remission, clinicians have to find new ways to help their patients. Switching to other antipsychotics or using these agents as add-ons to clozapine are the main interventions explored in this review, for patients with schizophrenia resistant to clozapine (ultra-resistant schizophrenia, URS). When clozapine intolerance is detected, conversion to another antipsychotic with distinct pharmacologic properties or formulation (e.g., long-acting intramuscular injectable agents, LAI) may be a useful option. Third-generation antipsychotics (TGA) have been selected for their distinct pharmacodynamically profile, which allows, at a theoretical level, their use in combination with clozapine. This narrative review is based on searching four electronic databases, that retrieved 19 primary and secondary reports on aripiprazole (seven case reports or case series presenting 24 patients; nine clinical trials, and three systematic reviews/meta-analyses), two primary reports on brexpiprazole (case report and case series, N = 3 patients), and six primary reports on cariprazine (case reports and case series, N = 14 patients). Based on the information collected from these reports, which included oral and LAI formulations, the TGA most supported by evidence for the augmentation of clozapine is aripiprazole (high-and medium-quality data), followed by cariprazine (low-quality data). Brexpiprazole has not yet been systematically explored for this indication, and in the case of lumateperone, no report could be found. The efficacy of aripiprazole and cariprazine was supported in the domains of positive, negative, and general symptoms, and aripiprazole may positively impact the metabolic profile in patients with URS. Also, adding TGA may lead to a decrease in the dose of clozapine concomitantly administered. More data derived from good quality research are needed in order to confirm the circumstances of TGAs recommendation in patients with URS, either as monotherapy, or added to clozapine.

New and emerging treatments for schizophrenia: a narrative review of their pharmacology, efficacy and side effect profile relative to established antipsychotics

Schizophrenia is associated with substantial unmet needs, highlighting the necessity for new treatments. This narrative review compares the pharmacology, clinical trial data and tolerability of novel medications to representative antipsychotics. Cariprazine, brexpiprazole and brilaroxazine are partial dopamine agonists effective in acute relapse. Lumateperone (serotonin and dopamine receptor antagonist) additionally benefits asocial and depressive symptoms. F17464 (D3 antagonist and 5-HT1A partial agonist) has one positive phase II study. Lu AF35700 (dopamine and serotonin receptor antagonist) was tested in treatment-resistance with no positive results. Pimavanserin, roluperidone, ulotaront and xanomeline do not act directly on the D2 receptor at clinical doses. Initial studies indicate pimavanserin and roluperidone improve negative symptoms. Ulotaront and xanomeline showed efficacy for positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia in phase II trials. BI 409306, BI 425809 and MK-8189 target glutamatergic dysfunction in schizophrenia, though of these only BI 425809 showed efficacy. These medications largely have favourable cardiometabolic side-effect profiles. Overall, the novel pharmacology, clinical trial and tolerability data indicate these compounds are promising new additions to the therapeutic arsenal.

Newer antipsychotics: Brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone: A pledge or another unkept promise?

Antipsychotic agents are used for various indications in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Despite their proven roles in multiple conditions, the treatment-emergent side effects of antipsychotic medications, such as metabolic side effects, are often the limiting factor for their long-term and short-term uses. Moreover, antipsychotic medications are often criticized for being less effective in treating different disabling symptoms such as negative symptoms of schizophrenia. As a result, the search for safer and more efficacious antipsychotic agents is ongoing. Newer antipsychotic agents are gaining attention related to emerging efficacy and tolerability data in treating neuropsychiatric conditions. In this review, we attempt to appraise the scientific data on psychopharmacology, safety profile, and efficacy of the newer additions to the list of second-generation antipsychotics, namely brexpiprazole, cariprazine, and lumateperone. We conducted a selective review utilizing PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane databases to gather appropriate publications, keeping broad inclusion criteria. There were no restrictions on the age of the study population or the year of publication. We also cross-referenced articles and references to capture all existing studies. Our review of the current literature indicates that all three antipsychotic agents appear to be promising based on their short-term studies, while long-term studies remain limited. There is also a need for a head to head comparison between the newer antipsychotics with the other antipsychotic agents to ascertain if the newer agents are any better than the others.

Efficacy and Safety of Lumateperone for Major Depressive Episodes Associated With Bipolar I or Bipolar II Disorder: A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

In a phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, the authors investigated the efficacy and safety of 42 mg/day of lumateperone in patients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder experiencing a major depressive episode.

METHODS

Patients 18-75 years old with a clinical diagnosis of bipolar I or bipolar II disorder and experiencing a major depressive episode were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 42 mg/day of lumateperone (N=188) or placebo (N=189), administered orally once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary and key secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to day 43 in score on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and total score on the Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Bipolar Version severity scale (CGI-BP-S), respectively. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, laboratory parameters, vital signs, extrapyramidal symptoms, and suicidality.

RESULTS

At day 43, lumateperone treatment was associated with significantly greater improvement from baseline in MADRS score compared with placebo (least squares mean difference compared with placebo, -4.6 points; effect size=-0.56) and CGI-BP-S total score (least squares mean difference compared with placebo, -0.9; effect size=-0.46). Significant MADRS superiority for lumateperone over placebo was observed both in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders. Somnolence and nausea were the only treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred with lumateperone at a clinically meaningful greater rate than placebo. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptom-related treatment-emergent adverse events was low and similar to that for placebo. Minimal changes were observed in weight, vital signs, or metabolic or endocrine assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumateperone at 42 mg/day significantly improved depression symptoms and was generally well tolerated in patients with major depressive episodes associated with both bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.

New Antipsychotic Medications in the Last Decade

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last ten years, the treatment of psychosis has seen a near explosion of creative development in both novel agents and new delivery modalities. The current review summarizes these developments over the past decade (2011-2020). We performed a systematic review utilizing PubMed and PsychInfo with the aim of identifying all the RCT and related analyses in adults with psychosis (schizophrenia and mania).

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified 11 significant developments: the introduction of new antipsychotics cariprazine, brexpiprazole, lumateperone, and pimavanserin; introduction of new delivery methods: subcutaneous long-acting risperidone, aripiprazole lauroxil, transdermal asenapine, and inhaled loxapine; and the introduction of new approaches such as olanzapine/samidorphan for olanzapine-associated weight gain, examination of the TAAR1 agonist SEP 363,856 as a test of concept, and the combination of Xanomeline/Trospium, an M₁ and M₄ muscarinic receptor agonist in conjunction with a peripheral anticholinergic. Last decade has seen a tremendous development in second-generation antipsychotics which provides unprecedented treatment options for clinicians in treating psychosis.

Clinical pearls for the monitoring and treatment of antipsychotic induced metabolic syndrome

Antipsychotic medications increase the risk of metabolic syndrome, which then increases the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and premature death. Routinely monitoring for signs of metabolic syndrome in patients taking antipsychotics allows for early detection and intervention. Psychiatric pharmacists can improve patient care through metabolic syndrome monitoring and recommendation of appropriate interventions. Monitoring for the metabolic adverse effects of antipsychotics, management of weight gain, and management of lipids and blood pressure are explored through 2 patient cases.

Lumateperone tosylate, A Selective and Concurrent Modulator of Serotonin, Dopamine, and Glutamate, in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Purpose of Review

This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the use of Lumateperone tosylate for schizophrenia. This review presents the background, evidence, and indications for the use of lumateperone tosylate in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Recent Findings

Schizophrenia is a chronic mental health disorder that affects approximately 3.3 million people in the United States. Its symptoms, which must be present more than six months, are comprised of disorganized behavior and speech, a diminished capacity to comprehend reality, hearing voices unheard by others, seeing things unseen by others, delusions, decreased social commitment, and decreased motivation. The majority of these symptoms can be managed with antipsychotic medication. Lumateperone is a selective and concurrent modulator of serotonin, dopamine, and glutamate, which all mediate or modulate serious mental illness.

Summary

Schizophrenia is a complex, severe mental illness that affects how the brain processes information. There are many medications used to treat schizophrenia. One antipsychotic agent, lumateperone tosylate, is a newer agent that the FDA recently approved. The most common adverse effects are shown to be mild such as somnolence, constipation, sedation, and fatigue, with the 42 mg recommended dose. Lumateperone tosylate is an FDA-approved drug that can be given only at the 42mg dose once daily with no titration requirements.