1
|
Boal MWE, Afzal A, Gorard J, Shah A, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Tutton M, Ahmad J, Selvasekar C, Khan J, Francis NK. Development and evaluation of a societal core robotic surgery accreditation curriculum for the UK. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:305. [PMID: 39106003 PMCID: PMC11303427 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02062-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Standardised proficiency-based progression is the cornerstone of safe robotic skills acquisition, however, is currently lacking within surgical training curricula. Expert consensuses have defined a modular pathway to accredit surgeons. This study aimed to address the lack of a formal, pre-clinical core robotic skills, proficiency-based accreditation curriculum in the UK. Novice robotic participants underwent a four-day pre-clinical core robotic skills curriculum incorporating multimodal assessment. Modifiable-Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (M-GEARS), VR-automated performance metrics (APMs) and Objective Clinical Human Reliability Analysis (OCHRA) error methodology assessed performance at the beginning and end of training. Messick's validity concept and a curriculum evaluation model were utilised. Feedback was collated. Proficiency-based progression, benchmarking, tool validity and reliability was assessed through comparative and correlational statistical methods. Forty-seven participants were recruited. Objective assessment of VR and dry models across M-GEARS, APMs and OCHRA demonstrated significant improvements in technical skill (p < 0.001). Concurrent validity between assessment tools demonstrated strong correlation in dry and VR tasks (r = 0.64-0.92, p < 0.001). OCHRA Inter-rater reliability was excellent (r = 0.93, p < 0.001 and 81% matched error events). A benchmark was established with M-GEARS and for the curriculum at 80%. Thirty (63.82%) participants passed. Feedback was 5/5 stars on average, with 100% recommendation. Curriculum evaluation fulfilled all five domains of Messick's validity. Core robotic surgical skills training can be objectively evaluated and benchmarked to provide accreditation in basic robotic skills. A strategy is necessary to enrol standardised curricula into national surgical training at an early stage to ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W E Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
| | - Asma Afzal
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
- The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Freweini Tesfai
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
| | - Walaa Ghamrawi
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Matthew Tutton
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
- East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK
| | - Jawad Ahmad
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Chelliah Selvasekar
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Jim Khan
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
- Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Nader K Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks' Hospital, London, UK.
- The Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK.
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK.
- Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset Foundation NHS Trust, Yeovil, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tesfai FM, Nagi J, Morrison I, Boal M, Olaitan A, Chandrasekaran D, Stoyanov D, Lanceley A, Francis N. Objective assessment tools in laparoscopic or robotic-assisted gynecological surgery: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:1480-1497. [PMID: 38610108 PMCID: PMC11266631 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a growing emphasis on proficiency-based progression within surgical training. To enable this, clearly defined metrics for those newly acquired surgical skills are needed. These can be formulated in objective assessment tools. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the literature reporting on available tools for objective assessment of minimally invasive gynecological surgery (simulated) performance and evaluate their reliability and validity. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search (1989-2022) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science in accordance with PRISMA. The trial was registered with the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) ID: CRD42022376552. Randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative studies, prospective single-group (with pre- and post-training assessment) or consensus studies that reported on the development, validation or usage of assessment tools of surgical performance in minimally invasive gynecological surgery, were included. Three independent assessors assessed study setting and validity evidence according to a contemporary framework of validity, which was adapted from Messick's validity framework. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the modified medical education research study quality instrument (MERSQI) checklist. Heterogeneity in data reporting on types of tools, data collection, study design, definition of expertise (novice vs. experts) and statistical values prevented a meaningful meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 19 746 titles and abstracts were screened of which 72 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 37 different assessment tools were identified of which 13 represented manual global assessment tools, 13 manual procedure-specific assessment tools and 11 automated performance metrices. Only two tools showed substantive evidence of validity. Reliability and validity per tool were provided. No assessment tools showed direct correlation between tool scores and patient related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Existing objective assessment tools lack evidence on predicting patient outcomes and suffer from limitations in transferability outside of the research environment, particularly for automated performance metrics. Future research should prioritize filling these gaps while integrating advanced technologies like kinematic data and AI for robust, objective surgical skill assessment within gynecological advanced surgical training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freweini Martha Tesfai
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Iona Morrison
- Yeovil District HospitalSomerset Foundation NHS TrustYeovilUK
| | - Matt Boal
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Gynecological OncologyUniversity College of London HospitalsLondonUK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Center for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS)University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Anne Lanceley
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Nader Francis
- The Griffin InstituteNorthwick Park & St Marks' HospitalLondonUK
- EGA Institute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Yeovil District HospitalSomerset Foundation NHS TrustYeovilUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogar PZ, Virag M, Bene M, Hardi P, Matuz A, Schlegl AT, Toth L, Molnar F, Nagy B, Rendeki S, Berner-Juhos K, Ferencz A, Fischer K, Maroti P. Validation of a novel, low-fidelity virtual reality simulator and an artificial intelligence assessment approach for peg transfer laparoscopic training. Sci Rep 2024; 14:16702. [PMID: 39030307 PMCID: PMC11271545 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67435-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Simulators are widely used in medical education, but objective and automatic assessment is not feasible with low-fidelity simulators, which can be solved with artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) solutions. The effectiveness of a custom-made VR simulator and an AI-based evaluator of a laparoscopic peg transfer exercise was investigated. Sixty medical students were involved in a single-blinded randomised controlled study to compare the VR simulator with the traditional box trainer. A total of 240 peg transfer exercises from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery programme were analysed. The experts and AI-based software used the same criteria for evaluation. The algorithm detected pitfalls and measured exercise duration. Skill improvement showed no significant difference between the VR and control groups. The AI-based evaluator exhibited 95% agreement with the manual assessment. The average difference between the exercise durations measured by the two evaluation methods was 2.61 s. The duration of the algorithmic assessment was 59.47 s faster than the manual assessment. The VR simulator was an effective alternative practice compared with the training box simulator. The AI-based evaluation produced similar results compared with the manual assessment, and it could significantly reduce the evaluation time. AI and VR could improve the effectiveness of basic laparoscopic training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Zoltan Bogar
- 3D Printing and Visualisation Centre, University of Pecs, Medical School, Boszorkany Str. 2, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Mark Virag
- 3D Printing and Visualisation Centre, University of Pecs, Medical School, Boszorkany Str. 2, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
- Department of Public Health Medicine, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Matyas Bene
- 3D Printing and Visualisation Centre, University of Pecs, Medical School, Boszorkany Str. 2, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Peter Hardi
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
- Department of Surgery and Vascular Surgery, Tolna County Janos Balassa Hospital, Beri Balogh Adam str. 5-7, Szekszard, 7100, Hungary
| | - Andras Matuz
- Department of Behavioural Sciences, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
- Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Ifjusag str. 20., 7624, Hungary
| | - Adam Tibor Schlegl
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
- Department of Orthopaedics, Medical School, University of Pecs, Akac Str. 1, Pecs, 7632, Hungary
| | - Luca Toth
- 3D Printing and Visualisation Centre, University of Pecs, Medical School, Boszorkany Str. 2, Pecs, 7624, Hungary.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School, University of Pecs, 2 Ret Street, Pecs, 7624, Hungary.
| | - Ferenc Molnar
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Balint Nagy
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Szilard Rendeki
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Berner-Juhos
- Department of Surgical Research and Techniques, Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Nagyvarad Square 4, Budapest, 1089, Hungary
| | - Andrea Ferencz
- Department of Surgical Research and Techniques, Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, Nagyvarad Square 4, Budapest, 1089, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Fischer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Peter Maroti
- 3D Printing and Visualisation Centre, University of Pecs, Medical School, Boszorkany Str. 2, Pecs, 7624, Hungary.
- Medical Skills Education and Innovation Centre, Medical School, University of Pecs, Szigeti Str. 12, Pecs, 7624, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bian W, Wu X, Feng Y, Cao Q. Letter to the editor about "Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis". World J Urol 2024; 42:399. [PMID: 38985172 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05088-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Bian
- Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xi'an, 710068, China
| | - Xinyan Wu
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 610000, China
| | - Yangdongping Feng
- School of Medical Humanities, China Medical University, Shenyang, 110122, China
| | - Qiang Cao
- Department of Earth Sciences, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grüter AAJ, Daams F, Bonjer HJ, van Duijvendijk P, Tuynman JB. Surgical quality assessment of critical view of safety in 283 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos by surgical residents and surgeons. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3609-3614. [PMID: 38769182 PMCID: PMC11219398 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10873-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical quality assessment has improved the efficacy and efficiency of surgical training and has the potential to optimize the surgical learning curve. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the critical view of safety (CVS) can be assessed with a 6-point competency assessment tool (CAT), a task commonly performed by experienced surgeons. The aim of this study is to determine the capability of surgical residents to perform this assessment. METHODS Both surgeons and surgical residents assessed unedited LC videos using a 6-point CVS, a CAT, using an online video assessment platform. The CAT consists of the following three criteria: 1. clearance of hepatocystic triangle, 2. cystic plate, and 3. two structures connect to the gallbladder, with a maximum of 2 points available for each criterion. A higher score indicates superior surgical performance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-rater reliability between surgeons and surgical residents. RESULTS In total, 283 LC videos were assessed by 19 surgeons and 31 surgical residents. The overall ICC for all criteria was 0.628. Specifically, the ICC scores were 0.504 for criterion 1, 0.639 for criterion 2, and 0.719 for the criterion involving the two structures connected to the gallbladder. Consequently, only the criterion regarding clearance of the hepatocystic triangle exhibited fair agreement, whereas the other two criteria, as well as the overall scores, demonstrated good agreement. In 71% of cases, both surgeons and surgical residents scored a total score either ranging from 0 to 4 or from 5 to 6. CONCLUSION Compared to the gold standard, i.e., the surgeons' assessments, surgical residents are equally skilled at assessing critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos. By incorporating video-based assessments of surgical procedures into their training, residents could potentially enhance their learning pace, which may result in better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paciotti M, Diana P, Gallioli A, De Groote R, Farinha R, Ficarra V, Gaston R, Gontero P, Hurle R, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Minervini A, Pansadoro V, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Wiklund P, Casale P, Lughezzani G, Uleri A, Mottrie A, Palou J, Gallagher AG, Breda A, Buffi N. International consensus panel for transurethral resection of bladder tumours metrics: assessment of face and content validity. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38830818 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop performance metrics that objectively define a reference approach to a transurethral resection of bladder tumours (TURBT) procedure, seek consensus on the performance metrics from a group of international experts. METHODS The characterisation of a reference approach to a TURBT procedure was performed by identifying phases and explicitly defined procedure events (i.e., steps, errors, and critical errors). An international panel of experienced urologists (i.e., Delphi panel) was then assembled to scrutinise the metrics using a modified Delphi process. Based on the panel's feedback, the proposed metrics could be edited, supplemented, or deleted. A voting process was conducted to establish the consensus level on the metrics. Consensus was defined as the panel majority (i.e., >80%) agreeing that the metric definitions were accurate and acceptable. The number of metric units before and after the Delphi meeting were presented. RESULTS A core metrics group (i.e., characterisation group) deconstructed the TURBT procedure. The reference case was identified as an elective TURBT on a male patient, diagnosed after full diagnostic evaluation with three or fewer bladder tumours of ≤3 cm. The characterisation group identified six procedure phases, 60 procedure steps, 43 errors, and 40 critical errors. The metrics were presented to the Delphi panel which included 15 experts from six countries. After the Delphi, six procedure phases, 63 procedure steps, 47 errors, and 41 critical errors were identified. The Delphi panel achieved a 100% consensus. CONCLUSION Performance metrics to characterise a reference approach to TURBT were developed and an international panel of experts reached 100% consensus on them. This consensus supports their face and content validity. The metrics can now be used for a proficiency-based progression training curriculum for TURBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Paciotti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Pietro Diana
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Rui Farinha
- Urology Department, Lusíadas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Gaetano Barresi Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology, Section of Urology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Richard Gaston
- Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Hurle
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luis Martínez-Piñeiro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital and La Paz Hospital Research Institute, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vito Pansadoro
- Fondazione Vincenzo Pansadoro, Centro di Urologia Laparoscopica e Oncologia Medica, Rome, Italy
| | - Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anthony G Gallagher
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicolò Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Awshah S, Bowers K, Eckel DT, Diab AF, Ganam S, Sujka J, Docimo S, DuCoin C. Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2542-2552. [PMID: 38485783 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10754-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of intraoperative recording are well published in the literature; however, few studies have identified current practices, barriers, and subsequent solutions. The objective of this study was to better understand surgeon's current practices and perceptions of video management and gather blinded feedback on a new surgical video recording product with the potential to address these barriers effectively. METHODS A structured questionnaire was used to survey 230 surgeons (general, gynecologic, and urologic) and hospital administrators across the US and Europe regarding their current video recording practices. The same questionnaire was used to evaluate a blinded concept describing a new intraoperative recording solution. RESULTS 54% of respondents reported recording eligible cases, with the majority recording less than 35% of their total eligible caseload. Reasons for not recording included finding no value in recording simple procedures, forgetting to record, lack of access to equipment, legal concerns, labor intensity, and difficulty accessing videos. Among non-recording surgeons, 65% reported considering recording cases to assess surgical techniques, document practice, submit to conferences, share with colleagues, and aid in training. 35% of surgeons rejected recording due to medico-legal concerns, lack of perceived benefit, concerns about secure storage, and price. Regarding the concept of a recording solution, 74% of all respondents were very likely or quite likely to recommend the product for adoption at their facility. Appealing features to current recorders included the product's ease of use, use of AI to maintain patient and staff privacy, lack of manual downloads, availability of full-length procedural videos, and ease of access and storage. Non-recorders found the immediate access to videos and maintenance of patient/staff privacy appealing. CONCLUSION Tools that address barriers to recording, accessing, and managing surgical case videos are critical for improving surgical skills. Touch Surgery Enterprise is a valuable tool that can help overcome these barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Samer Ganam
- Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Sujka
- USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Salvatore Docimo
- USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Christopher DuCoin
- USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nikolic A, Tranter-Entwistle I, McCombie A, Connor S, Eglinton T. The utility of synoptic operation reports in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:63. [PMID: 38689196 PMCID: PMC11061035 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04613-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate documentation is crucial in surgical patient care. Synoptic reports (SR) are structured checklist-based reports that offer a standardised alternative to traditional narrative reports (NR). This systematic review aims to assess the completeness of SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Secondary outcomes include the time to completion, surgeon satisfaction, educational value, research value, and barriers to implementation. METHODS Prospective or retrospective studies that assessed SR compared to NR in colorectal cancer surgery procedures were identified through a systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), CIHNAL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), and Cochrane. One thousand two articles were screened, and eight studies met the inclusion criteria after full-text review of 17 papers. RESULTS Analysis included 1797 operative reports (NR, 729; SR, 1068). Across studies reporting this outcome, the completeness of documentation was significantly higher in SR (P < 0.001). Reporting of secondary outcomes was limited, with a predominant focus on research value. Several studies demonstrated significantly reduced data extraction times when utilising SR. Surgeon satisfaction with SR was high, and these reports were seen as valuable tools for research and education. Barriers to implementation included integrating SR into existing electronic medical records (EMR) and surgeon concerns regarding increased administrative burden. CONCLUSIONS SR offer advantages in completeness, data extraction, and communication compared to NR. Surgeons perceive them as beneficial for research, quality improvement, and teaching. This review supports the necessity for development of user-friendly SR that seamlessly integrate into pre-existing EMRs, optimising patient care and enhancing the quality of CRC surgical documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Nikolic
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand.
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand.
| | - Isaac Tranter-Entwistle
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Andrew McCombie
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Saxon Connor
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand
| | - Tim Eglinton
- Te Whatu Ora, Waitaha, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery and Critical Care, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Christchurch Hospital, C/O Department of Surgery, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch Central City, Christchurch, 4710, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hertz P, Rattenborg S, Haug TR, Houlind K, Konge L, Bjerrum F. Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendicectomy- a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:597-608. [PMID: 38396135 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
AIM There is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendicectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach. METHOD A systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported. RESULTS Fifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendicectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendicectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery. CONCLUSION This review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hertz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Rattenborg
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Cancer Center South, University of Southern Denmark DK, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Tora R Haug
- Department of Surgery, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kim Houlind
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital Lillebaelt, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Lars Konge
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Bjerrum
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Center for HR and Education, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Gastrounit, Surgical Section, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yiu A, Lam K, Simister C, Clarke J, Kinross J. Adoption of routine surgical video recording: a nationwide freedom of information act request across England and Wales. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 70:102545. [PMID: 38685926 PMCID: PMC11056472 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical video contains data with significant potential to improve surgical outcome assessment, quality assurance, education, and research. Current utilisation of surgical video recording is unknown and related policies/governance structures are unclear. Methods A nationwide Freedom of Information (FOI) request concerning surgical video recording, technology, consent, access, and governance was sent to all acute National Health Service (NHS) trusts/boards in England/Wales between 20th February and 20th March 2023. Findings 140/144 (97.2%) trusts/boards in England/Wales responded to the FOI request. Surgical procedures were routinely recorded in 22 trusts/boards. The median estimate of consultant surgeons routinely recording their procedures was 20%. Surgical video was stored on internal systems (n = 27), third-party products (n = 29), and both (n = 9). 32/140 (22.9%) trusts/boards ask for consent to record procedures as part of routine care. Consent for recording included non-clinical purposes in 55/140 (39.3%) trusts/boards. Policies for surgeon/patient access to surgical video were available in 48/140 (34.3%) and 32/140 (22.9%) trusts/boards, respectively. Surgical video was used for non-clinical purposes in 64/140 (45.7%) trusts/boards. Governance policies covering surgical video recording, use, and/or storage were available from 59/140 (42.1%) trusts/boards. Interpretation There is significant heterogeneity in surgical video recording practices in England and Wales. A minority of trusts/boards routinely record surgical procedures, with large variation in recording/storage practices indicating scope for NHS-wide coordination. Revision of surgical video consent, accessibility, and governance policies should be prioritised by trusts/boards to protect key stakeholders. Increased availability of surgical video is essential for patients and surgeons to maximally benefit from the ongoing digital transformation of surgery. Funding KL is supported by an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship and acknowledges infrastructure support for this research from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Yiu
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Kyle Lam
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Clarke
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - James Kinross
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tou S, Au S, Clancy C, Clarke S, Collins D, Dixon F, Dreher E, Fleming C, Gallagher AG, Gomez-Ruiz M, Kleijnen J, Maeda Y, Rollins K, Matzel KE. European Society of Coloproctology guideline on training in robotic colorectal surgery (2024). Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:776-801. [PMID: 38429251 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Samson Tou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, UK
| | | | - Cillian Clancy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Steven Clarke
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Danielle Collins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Frances Dixon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Elizabeth Dreher
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Christina Fleming
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Marcos Gomez-Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, UK
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Katie Rollins
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Klaus E Matzel
- Section of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, FAU, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Abma I, Belgers EHJ, Coene PPLO, Dekker JWT, van Duijvendijk P, Emous M, Gisbertz SS, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Ruurda JP, van Sandick JW, van der Sluis PC, van Det MJ, van Esser S, Law S, de Steur WO, Sosef MN, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, Rosman C, van Workum F. Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e246556. [PMID: 38639938 PMCID: PMC11031683 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Suboptimal surgical performance is hypothesized to be associated with less favorable patient outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Establishing this association may lead to programs that promote better surgical performance of MIE and improve patient outcomes. Objective To investigate associations between surgical performance and postoperative outcomes after MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants In this nationwide cohort study of 15 Dutch hospitals that perform more than 20 MIEs per year, 7 masked expert MIE surgeons assessed surgical performance using videos and a previously developed and validated competency assessment tool (CAT). Each hospital submitted 2 representative videos of MIEs performed between November 4, 2021, and September 13, 2022. Patients registered in the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, were included to examine patient outcomes. Exposure Hospitals were divided into quartiles based on their MIE-CAT performance score. Outcomes were compared between highest (top 25%) and lowest (bottom 25%) performing quartiles. Transthoracic MIE with gastric tube reconstruction. Main Outcome and Measure The primary outcome was severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) within 30 days after surgery. Multilevel logistic regression, with clustering of patients within hospitals, was used to analyze associations between performance and outcomes. Results In total, 30 videos and 970 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.6 [9.1] years; 719 men [74.1%]) were included. The mean (SD) MIE-CAT score was 113.6 (5.5) in the highest performance quartile vs 94.1 (5.9) in the lowest. Severe postoperative complications occurred in 18.7% (41 of 219) of patients in the highest performance quartile vs 39.2% (40 of 102) in the lowest (risk ratio [RR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-0.99). The highest vs the lowest performance quartile showed lower rates of conversions (1.8% vs 8.9%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.21-0.21), intraoperative complications (2.7% vs 7.8%; RR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-0.94), and overall postoperative complications (46.1% vs 65.7%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24-0.96). The R0 resection rate (96.8% vs 94.2%; RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97-1.05) and lymph node yield (mean [SD], 38.9 [14.7] vs 26.2 [9.0]; RR, 3.20; 95% CI, 0.27-3.21) increased with oncologic-specific performance (eg, hiatus dissection, lymph node dissection). In addition, a high anastomotic phase score was associated with a lower anastomotic leakage rate (4.6% vs 17.7%; RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that better surgical performance is associated with fewer perioperative complications for patients with esophageal cancer on a national level. If surgical performance of MIE can be improved with MIE-CAT implementation, substantially better patient outcomes may be achievable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H. M. Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Inger Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Marloes Emous
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Twee-Steden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C. van der Sluis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc J. van Det
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Esser
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, China
| | - Wobbe O. de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
E Y, Lu C, Wang Z, Huang Y, Ji P, Luo X, Chu C, Yu C. Evaluation of the prognostic performance of different cutoff values of lymph node ratio staging system for stage III colorectal cancer. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01770-1. [PMID: 38530611 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01770-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
This study attempted to compare the prognostic performance of lymph node ratio (LNR) staging system with different cutoff values relative to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN staging system in stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Overall, 45,069 patients from the SEER dataset and 69 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (the External set) who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor and were diagnosed with stage III CRC by postoperative pathology were included. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on the LNR cutoff used in previous studies, Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences among groups in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression model was applied for survival analysis. To evaluate the discriminatory power of different lymph node staging systems, Harrell's C statistic(C-index) and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) were applied. A set of optimal cutoff values (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system with the most considerable discriminatory power to the prognosis in patients with stage III CRC (SEER set: C-index = 0.714; AIC = 58,942.46, External set: C-index = 0.809; AIC = 164.36) were obtained, and both were superior to the AJCC pN staging system (SEER set: C-index = 0.708; AIC = 59,071.20, External set: C-index = 0.788; AIC = 167.06). For evaluating the prognostic efficacy of patients with stage III colorectal cancer, the cutoff value (0.11; 0.36; 0.66) of LNR staging system had the best discrimination and prognostic ability, which was superior to LNR staging system under other cutoff values and AJCC pN staging system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yimin E
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China
| | - Chen Lu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zijun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China
| | - Yicheng Huang
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Suzhou Xiangcheng People's Hospital, Suzhou, China
| | - Pengcheng Ji
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiagang Luo
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China
| | - Chaoshun Chu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
| | - Chunzhao Yu
- Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210011, China.
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Hospital Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cheong E, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Ferri LE, Gisbertz SS, Gutschow CA, Hubka M, Hölscher AH, Law S, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Morse CR, Mueller CL, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Nilsson M, Pattyn P, Shen Y, van den Wildenberg FJH, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. A Video-Based Procedure-Specific Competency Assessment Tool for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:297-305. [PMID: 38150247 PMCID: PMC10753443 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Importance Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a complex procedure with substantial learning curves. In other complex minimally invasive procedures, suboptimal surgical performance has convincingly been associated with less favorable patient outcomes as assessed by peer review of the surgical procedure. Objective To develop and validate a procedure-specific competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIE. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international quality improvement study, a procedure-specific MIE-CAT was developed and validated. The MIE-CAT contains 8 procedural phases, and 4 quality components per phase are scored with a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. For evaluation of the MIE-CAT, intraoperative MIE videos performed by a single surgical team in the Esophageal Center East Netherlands were peer reviewed by 18 independent international MIE experts (with more than 120 MIEs performed). Each video was assessed by 2 or 3 blinded experts to evaluate feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity. MIE-CAT version 2 was composed with refined content aimed at improving interrater reliability. A total of 32 full-length MIE videos from patients who underwent MIE between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2023. Exposure Performance assessment of transthoracic MIE with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures Feasibility, content validity, interrater and intrarater reliability, and construct validity, including correlations with both experience of the surgical team and clinical parameters, of the developed MIE-CAT. Results Experts found the MIE-CAT easy to understand and easy to use to grade surgical performance. The MIE-CAT demonstrated good intrarater reliability (range of intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs], 0.807 [95% CI, 0.656 to 0.892] for quality component score to 0.898 [95% CI, 0.846 to 0.932] for phase score). Interrater reliability was moderate (range of ICCs, 0.536 [95% CI, -0.220 to 0.994] for total MIE-CAT score to 0.705 [95% CI, 0.473 to 0.846] for quality component score), and most discrepancies originated in the lymphadenectomy phases. Hypothesis testing for construct validity showed more than 75% of hypotheses correct: MIE-CAT performance scores correlated with experience of the surgical team (r = 0.288 to 0.622), blood loss (r = -0.034 to -0.545), operative time (r = -0.309 to -0.611), intraoperative complications (r = -0.052 to -0.319), and severe postoperative complications (r = -0.207 to -0.395). MIE-CAT version 2 increased usability. Interrater reliability improved but remained moderate (range of ICCs, 0.666 to 0.743), and most discrepancies between raters remained in the lymphadenectomy phases. Conclusions and Relevance The MIE-CAT was developed and its feasibility, content validity, reliability, and construct validity were demonstrated. By providing insight into surgical performance of MIE, the MIE-CAT might be used for clinical, training, and research purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H. M. Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Edward Cheong
- The PanAsia Surgery Group, Mount Elizabeth Hospital, Singapore
| | - Miguel A. Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo E. Ferri
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian A. Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Arnulf H. Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Misha D. P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Robert E. Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| | | | - Carmen L. Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Piet Pattyn
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Inger L. Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kitaguchi D, Kumano K, Takatsuki R, Xie C, Hashimoto S, Akashi Y, Kitahara I, Oda T. Free-Viewpoint Video in Open Surgery: Development of Surgical Arena 360. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2024; 81:326-329. [PMID: 38278723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to apply the free-viewpoint video technology developed and introduced mainly for sports spectators to an open surgical video recording system. DESIGN Prospective feasibility study. SETTING University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer between December 2022 and March 2023 were included. The gastrojejunal anastomosis was the subject of the recording. RESULTS Four surgeries were recorded with Surgical Arena 360, which is the free-viewpoint video system that we developed. The feasibility of performing a series of surgical procedures without interrupting the surgeon's line of sight or manipulation was demonstrated in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed that Surgical Arena 360, an open surgical video recording system developed by applying free-viewpoint video technology, can provide new insights into surgical support and clinical knowledge to surgeons by enabling secure capture of the open surgical field from multiple angles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Kitaguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Koichiro Kumano
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Takatsuki
- Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Chun Xie
- Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shinji Hashimoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Akashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Itaru Kitahara
- Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Oda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bitner DP, Choksi S, Carsky K, Addison P, Andrews R, Kowalski R, Reisner A, Farrell A, Jain K, Dronsky V, Jarc A, Yee A, Filicori F. Kinematic metrics and surgeon experience in robotic cholecystectomies: a pilot study on breaking down technical performance. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:913-921. [PMID: 37857922 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10481-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have correlated surgical skill measured by video-based assessment with improved clinical outcomes. Certain automated measures of operative performance in robotic surgery can be gathered beyond video review called objective performance indicators (OPIs). We explore the relationship between OPIs, surgeon experience, and postoperative recovery, hypothesizing that more efficient dissection will be associated with experience. METHODS Fifty-six robotic cholecystectomies between February 2022 and March 2023 were recorded at a large tertiary referral center. Surgeon experience and clinical outcomes data from the EMR were obtained for all 56 cases with 10 completing the QOL survey. Two steps of robotic cholecystectomies were reviewed: dissection of Calot's triangle (DCT) and dissection of the gallbladder from the liver (DGL). Postoperative recovery was measured using the SF-36 well-being survey. Univariate analysis was conducted using Pearson's coefficient. RESULTS Increased operative experience was associated with more efficient camera and instrument movements. DCT had 7 and DGL had 31 of 41 OPIs that correlated with experience. With respect to DGL, more experienced surgeons had reduced step duration and instrument path length and increased camera and instrument speeds. CONCLUSIONS Several OPIs correlate with surgical experience and may form the basis of more instructive feedback for trainees and less experienced surgeons in improving intraoperative technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Bitner
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E 76th Street, First Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Sarah Choksi
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine Carsky
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Poppy Addison
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Andrews
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Kowalski
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adin Reisner
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Farrell
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kavita Jain
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Valery Dronsky
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Andrew Yee
- Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Filippo Filicori
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Davies J, Cheetham M, Branagan G, Eardley N, Tiernan J, Harikrishnan A, Spinelli A, Wheeler J, Moran B, Jenkins JT, Maxwell-Armstrong C. Response to: Boyle J M, et al. 'What is the impact of hospital and surgeon volumes on outcomes in rectal cancer surgery?' Colorectal Disease 2023; 25: 1981-1993. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:381-382. [PMID: 38131634 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Cheetham
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | | | | | - Jim Tiernan
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Humanitas research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - James Wheeler
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brendan Moran
- Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
El-Sayed C, Yiu A, Burke J, Vaughan-Shaw P, Todd J, Lin P, Kasmani Z, Munsch C, Rooshenas L, Campbell M, Bach SP. Measures of performance and proficiency in robotic assisted surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:16. [PMID: 38217749 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01756-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Robotic assisted surgery (RAS) has seen a global rise in adoption. Despite this, there is not a standardised training curricula nor a standardised measure of performance. We performed a systematic review across the surgical specialties in RAS and evaluated tools used to assess surgeons' technical performance. Using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for full texts published on or after January 2020-January 2022. Observational studies and RCTs were included; review articles and systematic reviews were excluded. The papers' quality and bias score were assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score for the observational studies and Cochrane Risk Tool for the RCTs. The initial search yielded 1189 papers of which 72 fit the eligibility criteria. 27 unique performance metrics were identified. Global assessments were the most common tool of assessment (n = 13); the most used was GEARS (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills). 11 metrics (42%) were objective tools of performance. Automated performance metrics (APMs) were the most widely used objective metrics whilst the remaining (n = 15, 58%) were subjective. The results demonstrate variation in tools used to assess technical performance in RAS. A large proportion of the metrics are subjective measures which increases the risk of bias amongst users. A standardised objective metric which measures all domains of technical performance from global to cognitive is required. The metric should be applicable to all RAS procedures and easily implementable. Automated performance metrics (APMs) have demonstrated promise in their wide use of accurate measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte El-Sayed
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - A Yiu
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Burke
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - P Vaughan-Shaw
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Todd
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - P Lin
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Z Kasmani
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - C Munsch
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - L Rooshenas
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M Campbell
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - S P Bach
- RCS England/HEE Robotics Research Fellow, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Mazomenos E, Curtis N, Collins JW, Sridhar A, Kelly J, Stoyanov D, Francis NK. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad331. [PMID: 37951600 PMCID: PMC10771126 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need to standardize training in robotic surgery, including objective assessment for accreditation. This systematic review aimed to identify objective tools for technical skills assessment, providing evaluation statuses to guide research and inform implementation into training curricula. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Ovid Embase/Medline, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criterion: robotic surgery technical skills tools. Exclusion criteria: non-technical, laparoscopy or open skills only. Manual tools and automated performance metrics (APMs) were analysed using Messick's concept of validity and the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence and Recommendation (LoR). A bespoke tool analysed artificial intelligence (AI) studies. The Modified Downs-Black checklist was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-seven studies were analysed, identifying: 8 global rating scales, 26 procedure-/task-specific tools, 3 main error-based methods, 10 simulators, 28 studies analysing APMs and 53 AI studies. Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and the da Vinci Skills Simulator were the most evaluated tools at LoR 1 (OCEBM). Three procedure-specific tools, 3 error-based methods and 1 non-simulator APMs reached LoR 2. AI models estimated outcomes (skill or clinical), demonstrating superior accuracy rates in the laboratory with 60 per cent of methods reporting accuracies over 90 per cent, compared to real surgery ranging from 67 to 100 per cent. CONCLUSIONS Manual and automated assessment tools for robotic surgery are not well validated and require further evaluation before use in accreditation processes.PROSPERO: registration ID CRD42022304901.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W E Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Anastasiou
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Freweini Tesfai
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Walaa Ghamrawi
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Evangelos Mazomenos
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nathan Curtis
- Department of General Surgey, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK
| | - Justin W Collins
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Computer Science, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nader K Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset Foundation NHS Trust, Yeovil, Somerset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grüter AAJ, Toorenvliet BR, Belgers EHJ, Belt EJT, van Duijvendijk P, Hoff C, Hompes R, Smits AB, van de Ven AWH, van Westreenen HL, Bonjer HJ, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study). Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad404. [PMID: 38103184 PMCID: PMC10763527 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substantial variation exists when performing a minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) due to disparities in training, expertise and differences in implementation of innovations. This study aimed to achieve national consensus on an optimal and standardized MIRH technique for colon cancer and to develop and validate a video-based competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIRH. METHOD Statements covering all elements of MIRH were formulated. Subsequently, the Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on a standardized MIRH among 76 colorectal surgeons from 43 different centres. A CAT was developed based on the Delphi results. Nine surgeons assessed the same 12 unedited full-length videos using the CAT, allowing evaluation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS After three Delphi rounds, consensus (≥80% agreement) was achieved on 23 of the 24 statements. Consensus statements included the use of low intra-abdominal pressure, detailed anatomical outline how to perform complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation, the creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis, and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision using a wound protector. The CAT included seven consecutive steps to measure competency of the MIRH and showed high consistency among surgeons with an overall ICC of 0.923. CONCLUSION Nationwide consensus on a standardized and optimized technique of MIRH was reached. The CAT developed showed excellent interrater reliability. These achievements are crucial steps to an ongoing nationwide quality improvement project (the Right study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eric H J Belgers
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christiaan Hoff
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Roel Hompes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, St.Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gorard J, Boal M, Swamynathan V, Ghamrawi W, Francis N. The application of objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) in the assessment of basic robotic surgical skills. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:116-128. [PMID: 37932602 PMCID: PMC10776495 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10510-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Using a validated, objective, and standardised assessment tool to assess progression and competency is essential for basic robotic surgical training programmes. Objective clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) is an error-based assessment tool that provides in-depth analysis of individual technical errors. We conducted a feasibility study to assess the concurrent validity and reliability of OCHRA when applied to basic, generic robotic technical skills assessment. METHODS Selected basic robotic surgical skill tasks, in virtual reality (VR) and dry lab equivalent, were performed by novice robotic surgeons during an intensive 5-day robotic surgical skills course on da Vinci® X and Xi surgical systems. For each task, we described a hierarchical task analysis. Our developed robotic surgical-specific OCHRA methodology was applied to error events in recorded videos with a standardised definition. Statistical analysis to assess concurrent validity with existing tools and inter-rater reliability were performed. RESULTS OCHRA methodology was applied to 272 basic robotic surgical skills tasks performed by 20 novice robotic surgeons. Performance scores improved from the start of the course to the end using all three assessment tools; Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) [VR: t(19) = - 9.33, p < 0.001] [dry lab: t(19) = - 10.17, p < 0.001], OCHRA [VR: t(19) = 6.33, p < 0.001] [dry lab: t(19) = 10.69, p < 0.001] and automated VR [VR: t(19) = - 8.26, p < 0.001]. Correlation analysis, for OCHRA compared to GEARS and automated VR scores, shows a significant and strong inverse correlation in every VR and dry lab task; OCHRA vs GEARS [VR: mean r = - 0.78, p < 0.001] [dry lab: mean r = - 0.82, p < 0.001] and OCHRA vs automated VR [VR: mean r = - 0.77, p < 0.001]. There is very strong and significant inter-rater reliability between two independent reviewers (r = 0.926, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION OCHRA methodology provides a detailed error analysis tool in basic robotic surgical skills with high reliability and concurrent validity with existing tools. OCHRA requires further evaluation in more advanced robotic surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Gorard
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Boal
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, Charles Bell House, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vishaal Swamynathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK
| | - Walaa Ghamrawi
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nader Francis
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital Campus, University College London, London, UK.
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Mark's Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schmidt MW, Fan C, Köppinger KF, Schmidt LP, Brechter A, Limen EF, Vey JA, Metz M, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F, Kowalewski KF. Laparoscopic but not open surgical skills can be transferred to robot-assisted surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2024; 48:14-28. [PMID: 38686793 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With an increase in robot-assisted surgery across all specialties, adequate training and credentialing strategies need to be identified to ensure patients safety. The meta-analysis assesses the transferability of technical surgical skills between laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, and robot-assisted surgery. DESIGN A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Outcomes were categorized into time, process, product, and composite outcome measures and pooled separately using Hedges'g (standardized mean difference [SMD]). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of study design, virtual reality platforms and task difficulty. RESULTS Out of 14,120 screened studies, 30 were included in the qualitative synthesis and 26 in the quantitative synthesis. Technical surgical skill transfer was demonstrated from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery (composite: SMD 0.40, 95%-confidence interval [CI] [0.19; 0.62], time: SMD 0.62, CI [0.33; 0.91]) and vice versa (composite: SMD 0.66, CI [0.33; 0.99], time [basic skills]: SMD 0.36, CI [0.01; 0.72]). No skill transfer was seen from open to robot-assisted surgery with limited available data. CONCLUSION Technical surgical skills can be transferred from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery and vice versa. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgical skills training and credentialing should not be regarded separately, but a reasonable combination could shorten overall training times and increase efficiency. Previous experience in open surgery should not be considered as an imperative prerequisite for training in robot-assisted surgery. Recommendations for studies assessing skill transfer are proposed to increase comparability and significance of future studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO CRD42018104507.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona W Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carolyn Fan
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karl F Köppinger
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leon P Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anna Brechter
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Eldrige F Limen
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes A Vey
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthes Metz
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Biostatistics, GCP-Service International Ltd. & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Abdominal Surgery, Clarunis-Academic Centre of Gastrointestinal Diseases, St Clara and University Hospital of Basle, Basle, Switzerland
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
McGaghie WC, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB, Issenberg SB. Powerful medical education improves health care quality and return on investment. MEDICAL TEACHER 2024; 46:46-58. [PMID: 37930940 DOI: 10.1080/0142159x.2023.2276038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Powerful medical education (PME) involves the use of new technologies informed by the science of expertise that are embedded in laboratories and organizations that value evidence-based education and support innovation. This contrasts with traditional medical education that relies on a dated apprenticeship model that yields uneven results. PME involves an amalgam of features, conditions and assumptions, and contextual variables that comprise an approach to developing clinical competence grounded in education impact metrics including efficiency and cost-effectiveness. METHODS This article is a narrative review based on SANRA criteria and informed by realist review principles. The review addresses the PME model with an emphasis on mastery learning and deliberate practice principles drawn from the new science of expertise. Pub Med, Scopus, and Web of Science search terms include medical education, the science of expertise, mastery learning, translational outcomes, cost effectiveness, and return on investment. Literature coverage is comprehensive with selective citations. RESULTS PME is described as an integrated set of twelve features embedded in a group of seven conditions and assumptions and four context variables. PME is illustrated via case examples that demonstrate improved ventilator patient management learning outcomes compared to traditional clinical education and mastery learning of breaking bad news communication skills. Evidence also shows that PME of physicians and other health care providers can have translational, downstream effects on patient care practices, patient outcomes, and return on investment. Several translational health care quality improvements that derive from PME include reduced infections; better communication among physicians, patients, and families; exceptional birth outcomes; more effective patient education; and return on investment. CONCLUSIONS The article concludes with challenges to hospitals, health systems, and medical education organizations that are responsible for producing physicians who are expected to deliver safe, effective, and cost-conscious health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C McGaghie
- Departments of Medical Education and Preventive Medicine and Northwestern Simulation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Barsuk
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Education and Northwestern Simulation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Diane B Wayne
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Education and Northwestern Simulation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S Barry Issenberg
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Education and the Gordon Center for Research in Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Komatsu M, Kitaguchi D, Yura M, Takeshita N, Yoshida M, Yamaguchi M, Kondo H, Kinoshita T, Ito M. Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:187-196. [PMID: 38038811 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01450-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric surgery involves numerous surgical phases; however, its steps can be clearly defined. Deep learning-based surgical phase recognition can promote stylization of gastric surgery with applications in automatic surgical skill assessment. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based surgical phase-recognition model using multicenter videos of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, and examine the feasibility of automatic surgical skill assessment using the developed model. METHODS Surgical videos from 20 hospitals were used. Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was defined and annotated into nine phases and a deep learning-based image classification model was developed for phase recognition. We examined whether the developed model's output, including the number of frames in each phase and the adequacy of the surgical field development during the phase of supra-pancreatic lymphadenectomy, correlated with the manually assigned skill assessment score. RESULTS The overall accuracy of phase recognition was 88.8%. Regarding surgical skill assessment based on the number of frames during the phases of lymphadenectomy of the left greater curvature and reconstruction, the number of frames in the high-score group were significantly less than those in the low-score group (829 vs. 1,152, P < 0.01; 1,208 vs. 1,586, P = 0.01, respectively). The output score of the adequacy of the surgical field development, which is the developed model's output, was significantly higher in the high-score group than that in the low-score group (0.975 vs. 0.970, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION The developed model had high accuracy in phase-recognition tasks and has the potential for application in automatic surgical skill assessment systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaru Komatsu
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Department for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ward, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Daichi Kitaguchi
- Department for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yura
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeshita
- Department for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Mitsumasa Yoshida
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masayuki Yamaguchi
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-Ward, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan
| | - Hibiki Kondo
- Department for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kinoshita
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mosca V, Fuschillo G, Sciaudone G, Sahnan K, Selvaggi F, Pellino G. Use of artificial intelligence in total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer surgery: State of the art and perspectives. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2023; 4:64-71. [DOI: 10.35712/aig.v4.i3.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a major public health problem, with 1.9 million new cases and 953000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard of care for the treatment of rectal cancer and is crucial to prevent local recurrence, but it is a technically challenging surgery. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) could help improve the performance and safety of TME surgery.
AIM To review the literature on the use of AI and machine learning in rectal surgery and potential future developments.
METHODS Online scientific databases were searched for articles on the use of AI in rectal cancer surgery between 2020 and 2023.
RESULTS The literature search yielded 876 results, and only 13 studies were selected for review. The use of AI in rectal cancer surgery and specifically in TME is a rapidly evolving field. There are a number of different AI algorithms that have been developed for use in TME, including algorithms for instrument detection, anatomical structure identification, and image-guided navigation systems.
CONCLUSION AI has the potential to revolutionize TME surgery by providing real-time surgical guidance, preventing complications, and improving training. However, further research is needed to fully understand the benefits and risks of AI in TME surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicio Mosca
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli 80138, Italy
| | - Giacomo Fuschillo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli 80138, Italy
| | - Guido Sciaudone
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “Vincenzo Tiberio”, University of Molise, Campobasso 86100, Italy
| | - Kapil Sahnan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Mark’s Hospital, London HA1 3UJ, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 5NH, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli 80138, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Napoli 80138, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Are C, Murthy SS, Sullivan R, Schissel M, Chowdhury S, Alatise O, Anaya D, Are M, Balch C, Bartlett D, Brennan M, Cairncross L, Clark M, Deo SVS, Dudeja V, D'Ugo D, Fadhil I, Giuliano A, Gopal S, Gutnik L, Ilbawi A, Jani P, Kingham TP, Lorenzon L, Leiphrakpam P, Leon A, Martinez-Said H, McMasters K, Meltzer DO, Mutebi M, Zafar SN, Naik V, Newman L, Oliveira AF, Park DJ, Pramesh CS, Rao S, Subramanyeshwar Rao T, Bargallo-Rocha E, Romanoff A, Rositch AF, Rubio IT, Salvador de Castro Ribeiro H, Sbaity E, Senthil M, Smith L, Toi M, Turaga K, Yanala U, Yip CH, Zaghloul A, Anderson BO. Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e472-e518. [PMID: 37924819 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00412-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
The first Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery was published in 2015 and serves as a landmark paper in the field of cancer surgery. The Commission highlighted the burden of cancer and the importance of cancer surgery, while documenting the many inadequacies in the ability to deliver safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgical care. This Commission builds on the first Commission by focusing on solutions and actions to improve access to cancer surgery globally, developed by drawing upon the expertise from cancer surgery leaders across the world. We present solution frameworks in nine domains that can improve access to cancer surgery. These nine domains were refined to identify solutions specific to the six WHO regions. On the basis of these solutions, we developed eight actions to propel essential improvements in the global capacity for cancer surgery. Our initiatives are broad in scope, pragmatic, affordable, and contextually applicable, and aimed at cancer surgeons as well as leaders, administrators, elected officials, and health policy advocates. We envision that the solutions and actions contained within the Commission will address inequities and promote safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgery for every patient, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrakanth Are
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Shilpa S Murthy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Makayla Schissel
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Sanjib Chowdhury
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Olesegun Alatise
- Department of Surgery, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
| | - Daniel Anaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Madhuri Are
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Charles Balch
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Murray Brennan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lydia Cairncross
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Matthew Clark
- University of Auckland School of Medicine, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S V S Deo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Vikas Dudeja
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Domenico D'Ugo
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Armando Giuliano
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Satish Gopal
- Center for Global Health, National Cancer Institute, Washington DC, USA
| | - Lily Gutnik
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Andre Ilbawi
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pankaj Jani
- Department of Surgery, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Laura Lorenzon
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Premila Leiphrakpam
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Augusto Leon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Kelly McMasters
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Hiram C Polk, Jr MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - David O Meltzer
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Miriam Mutebi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Syed Nabeel Zafar
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vibhavari Naik
- Department of Anesthesiology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | - Lisa Newman
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Do Joong Park
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - C S Pramesh
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Saieesh Rao
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - T Subramanyeshwar Rao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Anya Romanoff
- Department of Global Health and Health System Design, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anne F Rositch
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Eman Sbaity
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maheswari Senthil
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Lynette Smith
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Masakazi Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiran Turaga
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ujwal Yanala
- Surgical Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Department of Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grüter AA, Sijmons JM, Coblijn UK, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. Best Evidence for Each Surgical Step in Minimally Invasive Right Hemicolectomy: A Systematic Review. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e343. [PMID: 38144490 PMCID: PMC10735091 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature for each surgical step of the minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) for non-locally advanced colon cancer, to define the most optimal procedure with the highest level of evidence. Background High variability exists in the way MIRH is performed between surgeons and hospitals, which could affect patients' postoperative and oncological outcomes. Methods A systematic search using PubMed was performed to first identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and if there were none then landmark papers and consensus statements were systematically searched for each key step of MIRH. Systematic reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool, and selection was based on highest quality followed by year of publication. Results Low (less than 12 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) gives higher mean quality of recovery compared to standard IAP. Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is associated with lowest recurrence and highest 5-year overall survival rates, without worsening short-term outcomes. Routine D3 versus D2 lymphadenectomy showed higher LN yield, but more vascular injuries, and no difference in overall and disease-free survival. Intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with better intra- and postoperative outcomes. The Pfannenstiel incision gives the lowest chance of incisional hernias compared to all other extraction sites. Conclusion According to the best available evidence, the most optimal MIRH for colon cancer without clinically involved D3 nodes entails at least low IAP, CME with D2 lymphadenectomy, an intracorporeal anastomosis and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A.J. Grüter
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Julie M.L. Sijmons
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Usha K. Coblijn
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J. Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B. Tuynman
- From the Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Grüter AAJ, Coblijn UK, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Tuynman JB. National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study). Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:1083-1090. [PMID: 37097330 PMCID: PMC10562307 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02801-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with right-sided colon cancer. This operation has evolved during recent decades, with many innovations and improvements but this has also resulted in high variability of uptake with subsequent substantial variableness. The aim of this ongoing study is to identify current surgical variations, determine the most optimal and standardised MIRH and nationally train and implement that technique to improve short-term clinical and long-term oncological outcomes. METHODS The Right study is a national multicentre prospective interventional sequential cohort study. Firstly, current local practice was evaluated. Subsequently, a standardised surgical technique for right-sided colon cancer was determined using the Delphi consensus method, and this procedure was trained during hands-on courses. The standardised MIRH will be implemented with proctoring (implementation cohort), after which the performance will be monitored (consolidation cohort). Patients who will receive a minimally invasive (extended) right hemicolectomy for cT1-3N0-2M0 colon cancer will be included. The primary outcome is patient safety reflected in the 90-day overall complication rate according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes will include intraoperative complications, 90-day mortality rate, number of resected tumour-positive lymph nodes, completeness of mesocolic excision, surgical quality score, locoregional and distant recurrence and 5-year overall survival. A total number of 1095 patients (365 per cohort) will be included. DISCUSSION The Right study is designed to safely implement the best surgical practice concerning patients with right-sided colon cancer aiming to standardise and improve the surgical quality of MIRH at a national level. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04889456, May 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Usha K Coblijn
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ketel MHM, Klarenbeek BR, Eddahchouri Y, Cuesta MA, van Daele E, Gutschow CA, Hölscher AH, Hubka M, Luyer MDP, Merritt RE, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Shen Y, Abma IL, Rosman C, van Workum F. Crowd-sourced and expert video assessment in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7819-7828. [PMID: 37605010 PMCID: PMC10520122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10297-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Video-based assessment by experts may structurally measure surgical performance using procedure-specific competency assessment tools (CATs). A CAT for minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE-CAT) was developed and validated previously. However, surgeon's time is scarce and video assessment is time-consuming and labor intensive. This study investigated non-procedure-specific assessment of MIE video clips by MIE experts and crowdsourcing, collective surgical performance evaluation by anonymous and untrained laypeople, to assist procedure-specific expert review. METHODS Two surgical performance scoring frameworks were used to assess eight MIE videos. First, global performance was assessed with the non-procedure-specific Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) of 64 procedural phase-based video clips < 10 min. Each clip was assessed by two MIE experts and > 30 crowd workers. Second, the same experts assessed procedure-specific performance with the MIE-CAT of the corresponding full-length video. Reliability and convergent validity of GOALS for MIE were investigated using hypothesis testing with correlations (experience, blood loss, operative time, and MIE-CAT). RESULTS Less than 75% of hypothesized correlations between GOALS scores and experience of the surgical team (r < 0.3), blood loss (r = - 0.82 to 0.02), operative time (r = - 0.42 to 0.07), and the MIE-CAT scores (r = - 0.04 to 0.76) were met for both crowd workers and experts. Interestingly, experts' GOALS and MIE-CAT scores correlated strongly (r = 0.40 to 0.79), while crowd workers' GOALS and experts' MIE-CAT scores correlations were weak (r = - 0.04 to 0.49). Expert and crowd worker GOALS scores correlated poorly (ICC ≤ 0.42). CONCLUSION GOALS assessments by crowd workers lacked convergent validity and showed poor reliability. It is likely that MIE is technically too difficult to assess for laypeople. Convergent validity of GOALS assessments by experts could also not be established. GOALS might not be comprehensive enough to assess detailed MIE performance. However, expert's GOALS and MIE-CAT scores strongly correlated indicating video clip (instead of full-length video) assessments could be useful to shorten assessment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirte H M Ketel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Yassin Eddahchouri
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elke van Daele
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Christian A Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Arnulf H Hölscher
- Department for General, Visceral and Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Michal Hubka
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, SE, USA
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Robert E Merritt
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Inger L Abma
- IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pedrett R, Mascagni P, Beldi G, Padoy N, Lavanchy JL. Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7412-7424. [PMID: 37584774 PMCID: PMC10520175 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10335-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technical skill assessment in surgery relies on expert opinion. Therefore, it is time-consuming, costly, and often lacks objectivity. Analysis of intraoperative data by artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential for automated technical skill assessment. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the performance, external validity, and generalizability of AI models for technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. METHODS A systematic search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore was performed to identify original articles reporting the use of AI in the assessment of technical skill in minimally invasive surgery. Risk of bias (RoB) and quality of the included studies were analyzed according to Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies criteria and the modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, respectively. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RESULTS In total, 1958 articles were identified, 50 articles met eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Motion data extracted from surgical videos (n = 25) or kinematic data from robotic systems or sensors (n = 22) were the most frequent input data for AI. Most studies used deep learning (n = 34) and predicted technical skills using an ordinal assessment scale (n = 36) with good accuracies in simulated settings. However, all proposed models were in development stage, only 4 studies were externally validated and 8 showed a low RoB. CONCLUSION AI showed good performance in technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery. However, models often lacked external validity and generalizability. Therefore, models should be benchmarked using predefined performance metrics and tested in clinical implementation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romina Pedrett
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Pietro Mascagni
- IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Beldi
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Padoy
- IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- ICube, CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Joël L Lavanchy
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
- IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, PO Box, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liang T, Feng Z, Zhang X, Li T, Yang T, Yu L. Research progress of calcium carbonate nanomaterials in cancer therapy: challenge and opportunity. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023; 11:1266888. [PMID: 37811375 PMCID: PMC10551635 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1266888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer has keeping the main threat to the health of human being. Its overall survival rate has shown rare substantial progress in spite of the improving diagnostic and treatment techniques for cancer in recent years. Indeed, such classic strategies for malignant tumor as surgery, radiation and chemotherapy have been developed and bring more hope to the patients, but still been accompanied by certain limitations, which include the challenge of managing large wound sizes, systemic toxic side effects, and harmful to the healthy tissues caused by imprecise alignment with tumors in radiotherapy. Furthermore, immunotherapy exhibits a limited therapeutic effect in advanced tumors which is reported only up to 25%-30%. The combination of nanomaterials and cancer treatment offers new hope for cancer patients, demonstrating strong potential in the field of medical research. Among the extensively utilized nanomaterials, calcium carbonate nanomaterials (CCNM) exhibit a broad spectrum of biomedical applications due to their abundant availability, cost-effectiveness, and exceptional safety profile. CCNM have the potential to elevate intracellular Ca2+ levels in tumor cells, trigger the mitochondrial damage and ultimately lead to tumor cell death. Moreover, compared with other types of nanomaterials, CCNM exhibit remarkable advantages as delivery systems owing to their high loading capacity, biocompatibility and biodegradability. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of CCNM synthesis, focusing on summarizing its diverse roles in cancer treatment and the benefits and challenges associated with CCNM in cancer therapy. Hoping to present the significance of CCNM as for the clinical application, and summarize information for the design of CCNM and other types of nanomaterials in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Liang
- Graduate School, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Zongqi Feng
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation of the Metabolic Disease, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Xiao Zhang
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation of the Metabolic Disease, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Tianfang Li
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation of the Metabolic Disease, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Tingyu Yang
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation of the Metabolic Disease, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Lan Yu
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation of the Metabolic Disease, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
- Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences, Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Igaki T, Kitaguchi D, Matsuzaki H, Nakajima K, Kojima S, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Kinugasa Y, Ito M. Automatic Surgical Skill Assessment System Based on Concordance of Standardized Surgical Field Development Using Artificial Intelligence. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:e231131. [PMID: 37285142 PMCID: PMC10248810 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Importance Automatic surgical skill assessment with artificial intelligence (AI) is more objective than manual video review-based skill assessment and can reduce human burden. Standardization of surgical field development is an important aspect of this skill assessment. Objective To develop a deep learning model that can recognize the standardized surgical fields in laparoscopic sigmoid colon resection and to evaluate the feasibility of automatic surgical skill assessment based on the concordance of the standardized surgical field development using the proposed deep learning model. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective diagnostic study used intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery submitted to the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery between August 2016 and November 2017. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to September 2022. Interventions Videos of surgery performed by expert surgeons with Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) scores higher than 75 were used to construct a deep learning model able to recognize a standardized surgical field and output its similarity to standardized surgical field development as an AI confidence score (AICS). Other videos were extracted as the validation set. Main Outcomes and Measures Videos with scores less than or greater than 2 SDs from the mean were defined as the low- and high-score groups, respectively. The correlation between AICS and ESSQS score and the screening performance using AICS for low- and high-score groups were analyzed. Results The sample included 650 intraoperative videos, 60 of which were used for model construction and 60 for validation. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the AICS and ESSQS score was 0.81. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the screening of the low- and high-score groups were plotted, and the areas under the ROC curve for the low- and high-score group screening were 0.93 and 0.94, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance The AICS from the developed model strongly correlated with the ESSQS score, demonstrating the model's feasibility for use as a method of automatic surgical skill assessment. The findings also suggest the feasibility of the proposed model for creating an automated screening system for surgical skills and its potential application to other types of endoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Igaki
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daichi Kitaguchi
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsuzaki
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kei Nakajima
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kojima
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiro Hasegawa
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeshita
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mascheroni J, Stockburger M, Patwala A, Mont L, Rao A, Retzlaff H, Garweg C, Verbelen T, Gallagher AG. Effect of Metrics-Based Simulation Training to Proficiency on Procedure Quality and Errors Among Novice Cardiac Device Implanters: The IMPROF Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2322750. [PMID: 37651144 PMCID: PMC10472192 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In cardiac device implant training, there is no common system to objectively assess trainees' ability to perform tasks at predetermined performance levels before in vivo practice; therefore, patients are potentially exposed to risks related to operators' early learning curve. Objective To assess the effect on implant performance quality of novel metrics-based simulation training to proficiency (proficiency-based progression [PBP]) vs traditional simulation-based training (SBT). Design, Setting, and Participants In this prospective randomized trial, conducted between March 8, 2022 and November 24, 2022, novice implanters were randomized (blinded) 1:1 to participate in an SBT curriculum (procedural knowledge e-learning and in-person simulation training) at an international skills training center, with proficiency demonstration requirements at each training stage for advancing (PBP approach) or without the requirements. Ultimately, trainees performed a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant using virtual reality simulation. The procedure was video-recorded and subsequently scored using previously validated metrics by 2 independent assessors blinded to group. Physicians who had already implanted more than 20 pacemakers or defibrillators and fewer than 200 CRT systems as the first operator were eligible. Thirty-two implanters from 10 countries voluntarily enrolled in the training program and were randomized; 30 (15 per group) started and completed training. Data analysis was performed from November 27 to December 22, 2022. Intervention Training with PBP vs SBT. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome comprised 4 objectively assessed performance metrics derived from the video-recordings: number of procedural steps completed, errors, critical errors, and all errors combined. Results Baseline experience of the 30 participants (19 [63%] male; mean [SD] number of years in implant practice, 2.0 [1.8]; median [IQR] number of implanted pacemakers or defibrillators, 47.5 [30.0-115.0]; median [IQR] number of implanted CRT systems, 3.0 [1.25-10.0]) was similar between study groups. Compared with the SBT group, the PBP group completed 27% more procedural steps (median [IQR], 31 [30-32] vs 24 [22-27]; P < .001) and made 73% fewer errors (median [IQR], 2 [1-3] vs 7 [5-8]; P < .001), 84% fewer critical errors (median [IQR], 1 [0-1] vs 3 [3-5]; P < .001), and 77% fewer all errors combined (errors plus critical errors) (median [IQR], 3 [1-3] vs 11 [8-12]; P < .001); 14 of the 15 PBP trainees (93%) demonstrated the predefined target performance level vs 0 of the 15 SBT trainees. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized trial, the PBP approach to novice implanter training generated superior objectively assessed performance vs SBT. If implemented broadly and systematically, PBP training may ensure safe and effective performance standards before trainees proceed to (supervised) in vivo practice. Future studies are needed to verify implications on procedure-related patient complications. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05952908.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorio Mascheroni
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiac Rhythm Management Training and Education, Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Martin Stockburger
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Havelland Kliniken, Nauen, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ashish Patwala
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Lluís Mont
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain
| | - Archana Rao
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christophe Garweg
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Verbelen
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony G. Gallagher
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wu S, Chen Z, Liu R, Li A, Cao Y, Wei A, Liu Q, Liu J, Wang Y, Jiang J, Ying Z, An J, Peng B, Wang X. SurgSmart: an artificial intelligent system for quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an observational study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1105-1114. [PMID: 37039533 PMCID: PMC10389595 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) continues to be high due to low critical view of safety (CVS) achievement and the absence of an effective quality control system. The development of an intelligent system enables the automatic quality control of LC surgery and, eventually, the mitigation of bile duct injury. This study aims to develop an intelligent surgical quality control system for LC and using the system to evaluate LC videos and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. MATERIALS AND METHODS SurgSmart, an intelligent system capable of recognizing surgical phases, disease severity, critical division action, and CVS automatically, was developed using training datasets. SurgSmart was also applied in another multicenter dataset to validate its application and investigate factors associated with CVS achievement. RESULTS SurgSmart performed well in all models, with the critical division action model achieving the highest overall accuracy (98.49%), followed by the disease severity model (95.45%) and surgical phases model (88.61%). CVSI, CVSII, and CVSIII had an accuracy of 80.64, 97.62, and 78.87%, respectively. CVS was achieved in 4.33% in the system application dataset. In addition, the analysis indicated that surgeons at a higher hospital level had a higher CVS achievement rate. However, there was still considerable variation in CVS achievement among surgeons in the same hospital. CONCLUSIONS SurgSmart, the surgical quality control system, performed admirably in our study. In addition, the system's initial application demonstrated its broad potential for use in surgical quality control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangdi Wu
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Zixin Chen
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Runwen Liu
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Ang Li
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- Guang’an People’s Hospital, Guang’an, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu Cao
- Operating Room
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University
| | - Ailin Wei
- Guang’an People’s Hospital, Guang’an, Sichuan Province, China
| | | | - Jie Liu
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Yuxian Wang
- ChengDu Withai Innovations Technology Company
| | - Jingwen Jiang
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Zhiye Ying
- West China Biomedical Big Data Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
- Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu
| | - Jingjing An
- Operating Room
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University
| | - Bing Peng
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| | - Xin Wang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery
- West China School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Grüter AAJ, Van Lieshout AS, van Oostendorp SE, Henckens SPG, Ket JCF, Gisbertz SS, Toorenvliet BR, Tanis PJ, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB. Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. [PMID: 37099157 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality of surgery has substantial impact on both short- and long-term clinical outcomes. This stresses the need for objective surgical quality assessment (SQA) for education, clinical practice and research purposes. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of all video-based objective SQA tools in laparoscopic procedures and their validity to objectively assess surgical performance. METHODS PubMed, Embase.com and Web of Science were systematically searched by two reviewers to identify all studies focusing on video-based SQA tools of technical skills in laparoscopic surgery performed in a clinical setting. Evidence on validity was evaluated using a modified validation scoring system. RESULTS Fifty-five studies with a total of 41 video-based SQA tools were identified. These tools were used in 9 different fields of laparoscopic surgery and were divided into 4 categories: the global assessment scale (GAS), the error-based assessment scale (EBAS), the procedure-specific assessment tool (PSAT) and artificial intelligence (AI). The number of studies focusing on these four categories were 21, 6, 31 and 3, respectively. Twelve studies validated the SQA tool with clinical outcomes. In 11 of those studies, a positive association between surgical quality and clinical outcomes was found. CONCLUSION This systematic review included a total of 41 unique video-based SQA tools to assess surgical technical skills in various domains of laparoscopic surgery. This study suggests that validated SQA tools enable objective assessment of surgical performance with relevance for clinical outcomes, which can be used for training, research and quality improvement programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A J Grüter
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Annabel S Van Lieshout
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan E van Oostendorp
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Vondellaan 13, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | - Sofie P G Henckens
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes C F Ket
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Zwieten T, Okkema S, van Det M, Pereboom I, Veeger N, Pierie JP. Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:105. [PMID: 37074421 PMCID: PMC10115727 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04395-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery has become the golden standard for many procedures, requiring new skills and training methods. The aim of this review is to appraise literature on assessment methods for laparoscopic colorectal procedures and quantify these methods for implementation in surgical training. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched in October 2022 for studies reporting learning and assessment methods for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Quality was scored using the Downs and Black checklist. Included articles were categorized in procedure-based assessment methods and non-procedure-based assessment methods. A second distinction was made between capability for formative and/or summative assessment. RESULTS In this systematic review, nineteen studies were included. These studies showed large heterogeneity despite categorization. Median quality score was 15 (range 0-26). Fourteen studies were categorized as procedure-based assessment methods (PBA), and five as non-procedure-based assessment methods. Three studies were applicable for summative assessment. CONCLUSIONS The results show a considerable diversity in assessment methods with varying quality and suitability. To prevent a sprawl of assessment methods, we argue for selection and development of available high-quality assessment methods. A procedure-based structure combined with an objective assessment scale and possibility for summative assessment should be cornerstones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom van Zwieten
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
- Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Sietske Okkema
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc van Det
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Ilona Pereboom
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Nic Veeger
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Pierre Pierie
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
- Postgraduate School of Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kitaguchi D, Teramura K, Matsuzaki H, Hasegawa H, Takeshita N, Ito M. Automatic purse-string suture skill assessment in transanal total mesorectal excision using deep learning-based video analysis. BJS Open 2023; 7:7071650. [PMID: 36882082 PMCID: PMC9991500 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Purse-string suture in transanal total mesorectal excision is a key procedural step. The aims of this study were to develop an automatic skill assessment system for purse-string suture in transanal total mesorectal excision using deep learning and to evaluate the reliability of the score output from the proposed system. METHODS Purse-string suturing extracted from consecutive transanal total mesorectal excision videos was manually scored using a performance rubric scale and computed into a deep learning model as training data. Deep learning-based image regression analysis was performed, and the purse-string suture skill scores predicted by the trained deep learning model (artificial intelligence score) were output as continuous variables. The outcomes of interest were the correlation, assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, between the artificial intelligence score and the manual score, purse-string suture time, and surgeon's experience. RESULTS Forty-five videos obtained from five surgeons were evaluated. The mean(s.d.) total manual score was 9.2(2.7) points, the mean(s.d.) total artificial intelligence score was 10.2(3.9) points, and the mean(s.d.) absolute error between the artificial intelligence and manual scores was 0.42(0.39). Further, the artificial intelligence score significantly correlated with the purse-string suture time (correlation coefficient = -0.728) and surgeon's experience (P< 0.001). CONCLUSION An automatic purse-string suture skill assessment system using deep learning-based video analysis was shown to be feasible, and the results indicated that the artificial intelligence score was reliable. This application could be expanded to other endoscopic surgeries and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Kitaguchi
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Teramura
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsuzaki
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hiro Hasegawa
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeshita
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Leitao MM, Kreaden US, Laudone V, Park BJ, Pappou EP, Davis JW, Rice DC, Chang GJ, Rossi EC, Hebert AE, Slee A, Gonen M. The RECOURSE Study: Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Associated With Robotically Assisted Minimally Invasive Procedures for Endometrial, Cervical, Colorectal, Lung, or Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:387-396. [PMID: 36073772 PMCID: PMC9905254 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term outcomes with robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery for colorectal, urologic, endometrial, cervical, and thoracic cancers. BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery provides perioperative benefits and similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Recent robotic surgery data have questioned long-term benefits. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer outcomes based on surgical approach was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines using Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase. Hazard ratios for recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted/estimated using a hierarchical decision tree and pooled in RevMan 5.4 using inverse-variance fixed-effect (heterogeneity nonsignificant) or random effect models. RESULTS Of 31,204 references, 199 were included (7 randomized, 23 database, 15 prospective, 154 retrospective studies)-157,876 robotic, 68,007 laparoscopic/thoracoscopic, and 234,649 open cases. Cervical cancer: OS and DFS were similar between robotic and laparoscopic [1.01 (0.56, 1.80), P =0.98] or open [1.18 (0.99, 1.41), P =0.06] surgery; 2 papers reported less recurrence with open surgery [2.30 (1.32, 4.01), P =0.003]. Endometrial cancer: the only significant result favored robotic over open surgery [OS; 0.77 (0.71, 0.83), P <0.001]. Lobectomy: DFS favored robotic over thoracoscopic surgery [0.74 (0.59, 0.93), P =0.009]; OS favored robotic over open surgery [0.93 (0.87, 1.00), P =0.04]. Prostatectomy: recurrence was less with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery [0.77 (0.68, 0.87), P <0.0001]; OS favored robotic over open surgery [0.78 (0.72, 0.85), P <0.0001]. Low-anterior resection: OS significantly favored robotic over laparoscopic [0.76 (0.63, 0.91), P =0.004] and open surgery [0.83 (0.74, 0.93), P =0.001]. CONCLUSIONS Long-term outcomes were similar for robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery, with no safety signal or indication requiring further research (PROSPERO Reg#CRD42021240519).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario M Leitao
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY, USA
| | - Usha S Kreaden
- Biostatistics and Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Bernard J Park
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| | - John W Davis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David C Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma C Rossi
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - April E Hebert
- Biostatistics and Global Evidence Management, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | | | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Karadza E, Haney CM, Limen EF, Müller PC, Kowalewski KF, Sandini M, Wennberg E, Schmidt MW, Felinska EA, Lang F, Salg G, Kenngott HG, Rangelova E, Mieog S, Vissers F, Korrel M, Zwart M, Sauvanet A, Loos M, Mehrabi A, de Santibanes M, Shrikhande SV, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Nickel F. Development of biotissue training models for anastomotic suturing in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 2023:S1365-182X(23)00041-2. [PMID: 36828741 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic suturing is the Achilles heel of pancreatic surgery. Especially in laparoscopic and robotically assisted surgery, the pancreatic anastomosis should first be trained outside the operating room. Realistic training models are therefore needed. METHODS Models of the pancreas, small bowel, stomach, bile duct, and a realistic training torso were developed for training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery. Pancreas models with soft and hard textures, small and large ducts were incrementally developed and evaluated. Experienced pancreatic surgeons (n = 44) evaluated haptic realism, rigidity, fragility of tissues, and realism of suturing and knot tying. RESULTS In the iterative development process the pancreas models showed high haptic realism and highest realism in suturing (4.6 ± 0.7 and 4.9 ± 0.5 on 1-5 Likert scale, soft pancreas). The small bowel model showed highest haptic realism (4.8 ± 0.4) and optimal wall thickness (0.1 ± 0.4 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and suturing behavior (0.1 ± 0.4). The bile duct models showed optimal wall thickness (0.3 ± 0.8 and 0.4 ± 0.8 on -2 to +2 Likert scale) and optimal tissue fragility (0 ± 0.9 and 0.3 ± 0.7). CONCLUSION The biotissue training models showed high haptic realism and realistic suturing behavior. They are suitable for realistic training of anastomoses in pancreatic surgery which may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emir Karadza
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caelan M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eldridge F Limen
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philip C Müller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urooncological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marta Sandini
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Erica Wennberg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mona W Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Eleni A Felinska
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Franziska Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Salg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannes G Kenngott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elena Rangelova
- Section for Upper Abdominal Surgery at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Frederique Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy-Paris, France
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin de Santibanes
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Buffi N, Paciotti M, Gallagher AG, Diana P, De Groote R, Lughezzani G, Gallioli A, Casale P, Palou J, Mottrie A, Breda A. European training in urology (ENTRY): quality-assured training for European urology residents. BJU Int 2023; 131:177-178. [PMID: 36337002 PMCID: PMC10099734 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Buffi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Paciotti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Anthony G Gallagher
- ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.,Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,School of Medicine, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
| | - Pietro Diana
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben De Groote
- ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Casale
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Igaki T, Takenaka S, Watanabe Y, Kojima S, Nakajima K, Takabe Y, Kitaguchi D, Takeshita N, Inomata M, Kuroyanagi H, Kinugasa Y, Ito M. Universal meta-competencies of operative performances: a literature review and qualitative synthesis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:835-845. [PMID: 36097096 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prioritizing patient health is essential, and given the risk of mortality, surgical techniques should be objectively evaluated. However, there is no comprehensive cross-disciplinary system that evaluates skills across all aspects among surgeons of varying levels. Therefore, this study aimed to uncover universal surgical competencies by decomposing and reconstructing specific descriptions in operative performance assessment tools, as the basis of building automated evaluation system using computer vision and machine learning-based analysis. METHODS The study participants were primarily expert surgeons in the gastrointestinal surgery field and the methodology comprised data collection, thematic analysis, and validation. For the data collection, participants identified global operative performance assessment tools according to detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thereafter, thematic analysis was used to conduct detailed analyses of the descriptions in the tools where specific rules were coded, integrated, and discussed to obtain high-level concepts, namely, "Skill meta-competencies." "Skill meta-competencies" was recategorized for data validation and reliability assurance. Nine assessment tools were selected based on participant criteria. RESULTS In total, 189 types of skill performances were extracted from the nine tool descriptions and organized into the following five competencies: (1) Tissue handling, (2) Psychomotor skill, (3) Efficiency, (4) Dissection quality, and (5) Exposure quality. The evolutionary importance of these competences' different evaluation targets and purpose over time were assessed; the results showed relatively high reliability, indicating that the categorization was reproducible. The inclusion of basic (tissue handling, psychomotor skill, and efficiency) and advanced (dissection quality and exposure quality) skills in these competencies enhanced the tools' comprehensiveness. CONCLUSIONS The competencies identified to help surgeons formalize and implement tacit knowledge of operative performance are highly reproducible. These results can be used to form the basis of an automated skill evaluation system and help surgeons improve the provision of care and training, consequently, improving patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Igaki
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin Takenaka
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yusuke Watanabe
- Clinical Research and Medical Innovation Center, Institute of Health Science Innovation for Medical Care, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shigehiro Kojima
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Kei Nakajima
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yuya Takabe
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Daichi Kitaguchi
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeshita
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Oita, Japan
| | - Hiroya Kuroyanagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Minato, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Farinha R, Breda A, Porter J, Mottrie A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Vander Sloten J, Mottaran A, Gallagher AG. Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01521-1. [PMID: 36689078 PMCID: PMC10374474 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01521-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
RAPN training usually takes place in-vivo and methods vary across countries/institutions. No common system exists to objectively assess trainee capacity to perform RAPN at predetermined performance levels prior to in-vivo practice. The identification of objective performance metrics for RAPN training is a crucial starting point to improve training and surgical outcomes. The authors sought to examine the reliability, construct and discriminative validity of objective intraoperative performance metrics which best characterize the optimal and suboptimal performance of a reference approach for training novice RAPN surgeons. Seven Novice and 9 Experienced RAPN surgeons video recorded one or two independently performed RAPN procedures in the human. The videos were anonymized and two experienced urology surgeons were trained to reliably score RAPN performance, using previously developed metrics. The assessors were blinded to the performing surgeon, hospital and surgeon group. They independently scored surgeon RAPN performance. Novice and Experienced group performance scores were compared for procedure steps completed and errors made. Each group was divided at the median for Total Errors score, and subgroup scores (i.e., Novice HiErrs and LoErrs, Experienced HiErrs and LoErrs) were compared. The mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) for scoring was 0.95 (range 0.84-1). Compared with Novices, Experienced RAPN surgeons made 69% fewer procedural Total Errors. This difference was accentuated when the LoErr Expert RAPN surgeon's performance was compared with the HiErrs Novice RAPN surgeon's performance with an observed 170% fewer Total Errors. GEARS showed poor reliability (Mean IRR = 0.44; range 0.0-0.8), for scoring RAPN surgical performance. The RAPN procedure metrics reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced surgeon performances. They further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experiences. Reliable and valid metrics will underpin quality-assured novice RAPN surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Farinha
- Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, São José Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - James Porter
- Swedish Urology Group, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Cleynenbreugel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Jozef Vander Sloten
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Section of Biomechanics, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Angelo Mottaran
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaris di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anthony G Gallagher
- Orsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
- Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Derry, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bitner DP, Kutana S, Carsky K, Addison P, DeChario SP, Antonacci A, Mikhail D, Yatco E, Chung PJ, Filicori F. The Surgical Learning Curve: Does Robotic Technical Skill Explain Differences in Operative Performance? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:471-479. [PMID: 36668994 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prior studies on technical skills use small collections of videos for assessment. However, there is likely heterogeneity of performance among surgeons and likely improvement after training. If technical skill explains these differences, then it should vary among practicing surgeons and improve over time. Materials and Methods: Sleeve gastrectomy cases (n = 162) between July 2018 and January 2021 at one health system were included. Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (GEARS) scores were assigned by crowdsourced evaluators. Videos were manually annotated. Analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables between surgeons. Tamhane's post hoc test was used to define differences between surgeons with the eta-squared value for effect size. Linear regression was used for temporal changes. A P value <.05 was considered significant. Results: Variations in operative time discriminated between individuals (e.g., between 2 surgeons, means were 91 and 112 minutes, Tamhane's = 0.001). Overall, GEARS scores did not vary significantly (e.g., between those 2 surgeons, means were 20.32 and 20.6, Tamhane's = 0.151). Operative time and total GEARS score did not change over time (R2 = 0.0001-0.096). Subcomponent scores showed idiosyncratic temporal changes, although force sensitivity increased among all (R2 = 0.172-0.243). For a novice surgeon, phase-adjusted operative time (R2 = 0.24), but not overall GEARS scores (R2 = 0.04), improved over time. Conclusions: GEARS scores showed less variability and did not improve with time for a novice surgeon. Improved technical skill does not explain the learning curve of a novice surgeon or variation among surgeons. More work could define valid surrogate metrics for performance analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel P Bitner
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Saratu Kutana
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine Carsky
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Poppy Addison
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Anthony Antonacci
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - David Mikhail
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward Yatco
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Paul J Chung
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Filippo Filicori
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Woods MS, Liberman JN, Rui P, Wiggins E, White J, Ramshaw B, Stulberg JJ. Association between Surgical Technical Skills and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. JSLS 2023; 27:JSLS.2022.00076. [PMID: 36818767 PMCID: PMC9913064 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2022.00076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between intraoperative surgical skill and clinical outcomes. Methods Peer-reviewed, original research articles published through August 31, 2021 were identified from PubMed and Embase. From the 1,513 potential articles, seven met eligibility requirements, reporting on 151 surgeons and 17,932 procedures. All included retrospective assessment of operative videos. Associations between surgical skill and outcomes were assessed by pooling odds ratios (OR) using random-effects models with the inverse variance method. Eligible studies included pancreaticoduodenectomy, gastric bypass, laparoscopic gastrectomy, prostatectomy, colorectal, and hemicolectomy procedures. Results Meta-analytic pooling identified significant associations between the highest vs. lowest quartile of surgical skill and reoperation (OR: 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23, 0.83), hemorrhage (OR: 0.66; 95% CI, 0.65, 0.68), obstruction (OR: 0.33; 95% CI, 0.30, 0.35), and any medical complication (OR: 0.23, 95% CI, 0.19, 0.27). Nonsignificant inverse associations were noted between skill and readmission, emergency department visit, mortality, leak, infection, venous thromboembolism, and cardiac and pulmonary complications. Conclusions Overall, surgeon technical skill appears to predict clinical outcomes. However, there are surprisingly few articles that evaluate this association. The authors recommend a thoughtful approach for the development of a comprehensive surgical quality infrastructure that could significantly reduce the challenges identified by this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jonah J. Stulberg
- Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center of Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Haug TR, Miskovic D, Ørntoft MBW, Iversen LH, Johnsen SP, Valentin JB, Gomez Ruiz M, Benz S, Storli KE, Stearns AT, Brigic A, Madsen AH. Development of a procedure-specific tool for skill assessment in left- and right-sided laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:31-43. [PMID: 36031925 PMCID: PMC10087795 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM To (1) develop an assessment tool for laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (LCME) and (2) report evidence of its content validity. METHOD Assessment statements were revealed through (1) semi-structured expert interviews and (2) consensus by the Delphi method, both involving an expert panel of five LCME surgeons. All experts were interviewed and then asked to rate LCME describing statements from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were returned anonymously to the panel until consensus was reached. Statements were directly included as content in the assessment tool if ≥60% of the experts responded "agree" or "strongly agree" (ratings 4 and 5), with the remaining responses being "neither agree nor disagree" (rating 3). Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for expert agreement evaluation. All included statements were subsequently reformulated as tool items and approved by the experts. RESULTS Four Delphi rounds were performed to reach consensus. Disagreement was reported for statements describing instrument handling around pancreas; visualisation of landmarks before inferior mesenteric artery ligation; lymphadenectomy around the inferior mesenteric artery, and division of the terminal ileum and transverse colon. ICC in the last Delphi-round was 0.84. The final tool content included 73 statements, converted to 48 right- and 40 left-sided items for LCME assessment. CONCLUSION A procedure-specific, video-based tool, named complete mesocolic excision competency assessment tool (CMECAT), has been developed for LCME skill assessment. In the future, we hope it can facilitate assessment of LCME surgeons, resulting in improved patient outcome after colon cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tora Rydtun Haug
- Department of Surgery, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jan Brink Valentin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Marcos Gomez Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla and Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Stefan Benz
- Klinik fur Allgemein-und Viszeralchirurgie, Kliniken Boblingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Adela Brigic
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kurashima Y, Kitagami H, Teramura K, Poudel S, Ebihara Y, Inaki N, Nakamura F, Misawa K, Shibao K, Nagai E, Akashi Y, Takiguchi S, Kobayashi S, Hirano S. Validation study of a skill assessment tool for education and outcome prediction of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8807-8816. [PMID: 35578050 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09305-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Japanese operative-rating scale for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (JORS-LDG) was developed through cognitive task analysis together with the Delphi method to measure intraoperative performance during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. This study aimed to investigate the value of this rating scale as an educational tool and a surgical outcome predictor in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. METHODS The surgical performance of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy was assessed by the first assistant, through self-evaluation in the operating room and by video raters blind to the case. We evaluated inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, and correlations between the JORS-LDG scores and the evaluation methods, patient characteristics, and surgical outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-four laparoscopic distal gastrectomy procedures performed by 40 surgeons at 16 institutions were evaluated in the operating room and with video recordings using the proposed rating scale. The video inter-rater reliability was > 0.8. Participating surgeons were divided into the low, intermediate, and high groups based on their total scores. The number of laparoscopic surgeries and laparoscopic gastrectomy procedures performed differed significantly among the groups according to laparoscopic distal gastrectomy skill levels. The low, intermediate, and high groups also differed in terms of median operating times (311, 266, and 229 min, respectively, P < 0.001), intraoperative complication rates (27.8, 11.8, and 0%, respectively, P = 0.01), and postoperative complication rates (22.2, 0, and 0%, respectively, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The JORS-LDG is a reliable and valid measure for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy training and could be useful in predicting surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yo Kurashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
- Clinical Simulation Center, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Hidehiko Kitagami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Teramura
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Saseem Poudel
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yuma Ebihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Inaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kazunari Misawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazunori Shibao
- Department of Surgey1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Eishi Nagai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshimasa Akashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Billiary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shuji Takiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Kita-15, Nishi-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wagner M, Brandenburg JM, Bodenstedt S, Schulze A, Jenke AC, Stern A, Daum MTJ, Mündermann L, Kolbinger FR, Bhasker N, Schneider G, Krause-Jüttler G, Alwanni H, Fritz-Kebede F, Burgert O, Wilhelm D, Fallert J, Nickel F, Maier-Hein L, Dugas M, Distler M, Weitz J, Müller-Stich BP, Speidel S. Surgomics: personalized prediction of morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome in surgery using machine learning on multimodal data. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8568-8591. [PMID: 36171451 PMCID: PMC9613751 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09611-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personalized medicine requires the integration and analysis of vast amounts of patient data to realize individualized care. With Surgomics, we aim to facilitate personalized therapy recommendations in surgery by integration of intraoperative surgical data and their analysis with machine learning methods to leverage the potential of this data in analogy to Radiomics and Genomics. METHODS We defined Surgomics as the entirety of surgomic features that are process characteristics of a surgical procedure automatically derived from multimodal intraoperative data to quantify processes in the operating room. In a multidisciplinary team we discussed potential data sources like endoscopic videos, vital sign monitoring, medical devices and instruments and respective surgomic features. Subsequently, an online questionnaire was sent to experts from surgery and (computer) science at multiple centers for rating the features' clinical relevance and technical feasibility. RESULTS In total, 52 surgomic features were identified and assigned to eight feature categories. Based on the expert survey (n = 66 participants) the feature category with the highest clinical relevance as rated by surgeons was "surgical skill and quality of performance" for morbidity and mortality (9.0 ± 1.3 on a numerical rating scale from 1 to 10) as well as for long-term (oncological) outcome (8.2 ± 1.8). The feature category with the highest feasibility to be automatically extracted as rated by (computer) scientists was "Instrument" (8.5 ± 1.7). Among the surgomic features ranked as most relevant in their respective category were "intraoperative adverse events", "action performed with instruments", "vital sign monitoring", and "difficulty of surgery". CONCLUSION Surgomics is a promising concept for the analysis of intraoperative data. Surgomics may be used together with preoperative features from clinical data and Radiomics to predict postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome, as well as to provide tailored feedback for surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Wagner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Johanna M Brandenburg
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Bodenstedt
- Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop" (CeTI), Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany
| | - André Schulze
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander C Jenke
- Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Antonia Stern
- Corporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany
| | - Marie T J Daum
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Mündermann
- Corporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany
| | - Fiona R Kolbinger
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nithya Bhasker
- Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
| | - Gerd Schneider
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Grit Krause-Jüttler
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hisham Alwanni
- Corporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany
| | - Fleur Fritz-Kebede
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Burgert
- Research Group Computer Assisted Medicine (CaMed), Reutlingen University, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Dirk Wilhelm
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Fallert
- Corporate Research and Technology, Karl Storz SE & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Maier-Hein
- Department of Intelligent Medical Systems (IMSY), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Dugas
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Speidel
- Department of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence "Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop" (CeTI), Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Balvardi S, Kammili A, Hanson M, Mueller C, Vassiliou M, Lee L, Schwartzman K, Fiore JF, Feldman LS. The association between video-based assessment of intraoperative technical performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7938-7948. [PMID: 35556166 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09296-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efforts to improve surgical safety and outcomes have traditionally placed little emphasis on intraoperative performance, partly due to difficulties in measurement. Video-based assessment (VBA) provides an opportunity for blinded and unbiased appraisal of surgeon performance. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the existing literature on the association between intraoperative technical performance, measured using VBA, and patient outcomes. METHODS Major databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Database, and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies assessing the association of intraoperative technical performance measured by tools supported by validity evidence with short-term (≤ 30 days) and/or long-term postoperative outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results were appraised descriptively as study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 11 observational studies were identified involving 8 different procedures in foregut/bariatric (n = 4), colorectal (n = 4), urologic (n = 2), and hepatobiliary surgery (n = 1). The number of surgeons assessed ranged from 1 to 34; patient sample size ranged from 47 to 10,242. High risk of bias was present in 5 of 8 studies assessing short-term outcomes and 2 of 6 studies assessing long-term outcomes. Short-term outcomes were reported in 8 studies (i.e., morbidity, mortality, and readmission), while 6 reported long-term outcomes (i.e., cancer outcomes, weight loss, and urinary continence). Better intraoperative performance was associated with fewer postoperative complications (6 of 7 studies), reoperations (3 of 4 studies), and readmissions (1 of 4 studies). Long-term outcomes were less commonly investigated, with mixed results. CONCLUSION Current evidence supports an association between superior intraoperative technical performance measured using surgical videos and improved short-term postoperative outcomes. Intraoperative performance analysis using video-based assessment represents a promising approach to surgical quality-improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Balvardi
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anitha Kammili
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Melissa Hanson
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carmen Mueller
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Melina Vassiliou
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Kevin Schwartzman
- Respiratory Division, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- McGill International Tuberculosis Centre, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julio F Fiore
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Liane S Feldman
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Ave, D6-136, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.
- Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mascagni P, Alapatt D, Laracca GG, Guerriero L, Spota A, Fiorillo C, Vardazaryan A, Quero G, Alfieri S, Baldari L, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Cuccurullo D, Costamagna G, Dallemagne B, Padoy N. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8379-8386. [PMID: 35171336 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09112-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A computer vision (CV) platform named EndoDigest was recently developed to facilitate the use of surgical videos. Specifically, EndoDigest automatically provides short video clips to effectively document the critical view of safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). The aim of the present study is to validate EndoDigest on a multicentric dataset of LC videos. METHODS LC videos from 4 centers were manually annotated with the time of the cystic duct division and an assessment of CVS criteria. Incomplete recordings, bailout procedures and procedures with an intraoperative cholangiogram were excluded. EndoDigest leveraged predictions of deep learning models for workflow analysis in a rule-based inference system designed to estimate the time of the cystic duct division. Performance was assessed by computing the error in estimating the manually annotated time of the cystic duct division. To provide concise video documentation of CVS, EndoDigest extracted video clips showing the 2 min preceding and the 30 s following the predicted cystic duct division. The relevance of the documentation was evaluated by assessing CVS in automatically extracted 2.5-min-long video clips. RESULTS 144 of the 174 LC videos from 4 centers were analyzed. EndoDigest located the time of the cystic duct division with a mean error of 124.0 ± 270.6 s despite the use of fluorescent cholangiography in 27 procedures and great variations in surgical workflows across centers. The surgical evaluation found that 108 (75.0%) of the automatically extracted short video clips documented CVS effectively. CONCLUSIONS EndoDigest was robust enough to reliably locate the time of the cystic duct division and efficiently video document CVS despite the highly variable workflows. Training specifically on data from each center could improve results; however, this multicentric validation shows the potential for clinical translation of this surgical data science tool to efficiently document surgical safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Mascagni
- ICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, c/o IHU-Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France.
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Deepak Alapatt
- ICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, c/o IHU-Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Guerriero
- Department of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, AORN dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Spota
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Chirurgia Generale, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorillo
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Armine Vardazaryan
- ICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, c/o IHU-Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Baldari
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Cuccurullo
- Department of Laparoscopic and Robotic General Surgery, Monaldi Hospital, AORN dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bernard Dallemagne
- Institute for Research Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
- IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nicolas Padoy
- ICube, University of Strasbourg, CNRS, c/o IHU-Strasbourg, 1, place de l'hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
- IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Younes MM, Larkins K, To G, Burke G, Heriot A, Warrier S, Mohan H. What are clinically relevant performance metrics in robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:335-350. [PMID: 36190655 PMCID: PMC10076398 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01457-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Abstract
A crucial element of any surgical training program is the ability to provide procedure-specific, objective, and reliable measures of performance. During robotic surgery, objective clinically relevant performance metrics (CRPMs) can provide tailored contextual feedback and correlate with clinical outcomes. This review aims to define CRPMs, assess their validity in robotic surgical training and compare CRPMs to existing measures of robotic performance. A systematic search of Medline and Embase databases was conducted in May 2022 following the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms included Clinically Relevant Performance Metrics (CRPMs) OR Clinically Relevant Outcome Measures (CROMs) AND robotic surgery. The study settings, speciality, operative context, study design, metric details, and validation status were extracted and analysed. The initial search yielded 116 citations, of which 6 were included. Citation searching identified 3 additional studies, resulting in 9 studies included in this review. Metrics were defined as CRPMs, CROMs, proficiency-based performance metrics and reference-procedure metrics which were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. All metrics underwent both contents and construct validation. Two studies found a strong correlation with GEARS but none correlated their metrics with patient outcome data. CRPMs are a validated and objective approach for assessing trainee proficiency. Evaluating CRPMs with other robotic-assessment tools will facilitate a multimodal metric evaluation approach to robotic surgery training. Further studies should assess the correlation with clinical outcomes. This review highlights there is significant scope for the development and validation of CRPMs to establish proficiency-based progression curricula that can be translated from a simulation setting into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa M Younes
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten Larkins
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Gloria To
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Burke
- International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|