Is the prognosis for Japanese and German patients with gastric cancer really different?

Macroscopic type is implicated in the prognostic impact of initial chemotherapy on peritoneal lavage cytology-positive gastric cancer with no other noncurative factors

BACKGROUND

Initial chemotherapy (Initial-C) followed by surgery is a promising treatment strategy for peritoneal lavage cytology-positive gastric cancer (CY1 GC) with no other noncurative factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival advantage of Initial-C compared to initial surgery (Initial-S) for this disease according to the macroscopic type, which was associated with prognosis and the efficacy of chemotherapy in GC.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-nine patients who were diagnosed with CY1 GC with no other noncurative factors at four institutions from January 2007 to December 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into a macroscopic type 4 group (N = 48) and a non-type 4 group (N = 141). The influence of initial treatment on overall survival (OS) in each group was evaluated.

RESULTS

In the type 4 group, the 5-year OS rates of Initial-C (N = 35) and Initial-S (N = 13) were 11.6% and 0%, respectively (P = 0.801). The multivariate analysis could not show the survival advantage of Initial-C. In the non-type 4 group, the 5-year OS rates of Initial-C (N = 41) and Initial-S (N = 100) were 48.4% and 29.0%, respectively (P = 0.020). The multivariate analysis revealed that Initial-C was independently associated with prolonged OS (hazard ratio, 0.591; 95% confidence interval, 0.375-0.933: P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial-C improves the prognosis of non-type 4 CY1 GC with no other noncurative factors. On the other hand, further development of effective chemotherapeutic regimens and innovative treatment strategies are required for type 4 CY1 GC.

Breath Volatile Organic Compounds in Surveillance of Gastric Cancer Patients following Radical Surgical Management

As of today, there is a lack of a perfect non-invasive test for the surveillance of patients for potential relapse following curative treatment. Breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been demonstrated to be an accurate diagnostic tool for gastric cancer (GC) detection; here, we aimed to prove the yield of the markers in surveillance, i.e., following curative surgical management. Patients were sampled in regular intervals before and within 3 years following curative surgery for GC; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and nanosensor technologies were used for the VOC assessment. GC-MS measurements revealed a single VOC (14b-Pregnane) that significantly decreased at 12 months, and three VOCs (Isochiapin B, Dotriacontane, Threitol, 2-O-octyl-) that decreased at 18 months following surgery. The nanomaterial-based sensors S9 and S14 revealed changes in the breath VOC content 9 months after surgery. Our study results confirm the cancer origin of the particular VOCs, as well as suggest the value of breath VOC testing for cancer patient surveillance, either during the treatment phase or thereafter, for potential relapse.

Preoperative Low Prealbumin Is Associated With Recurrence in Patients With Stage II/III Gastric Cancer After Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy

Background

Postoperative recurrence is associated with poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. This study aimed to explore predictive factors contributing to recurrence in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer after laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were collected. The patients were divided into recurrence and non-recurrence groups. The predictive factors were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

In total, 462 patients were included. The incidence of recurrence was 26.4% (122/462) in all patients. The most common recurrence pattern was haematogenous recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictive factors for recurrence were serum prealbumin level (p < 0.001), prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.001), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (p < 0.001), number of lymph node metastases (p < 0.001), signet-ring cell carcinoma (p = 0.001), tumor deposit (p = 0.001), and no/incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings revealed that nutritional status was an independent predictive factor for recurrence in patients with gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. We suggest that patients with risk factors for recurrence receive both nutritional support and intense surveillance.

The Use of miRNAs in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Oesophageal Cancer

Oesophageal cancer (OC) is the ninth most common cancer worldwide. Patients receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) as standard of care, but less than 20% of patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) or a third of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients, obtain a clinically meaningful response. Developing a method of determining a patient's response to NAT before treatment will allow rational treatment decisions to be made, thus improving patient outcome and quality of life. (1) Background: To determine the use and accuracy of microRNAs as biomarkers of response to NAT in patients with OAC or OSCC. (2) Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane library were searched to identify studies investigating microRNAs in treatment naïve biopsies to predict response to NAT in OC patients. (3) Results: A panel of 20 microRNAs were identified as predictors of good or poor response to NAT, from 15 studies. Specifically, miR-99b, miR-451 and miR-505 showed the strongest ability to predict response in OAC patients along with miR-193b in OSCC patients. (4) Conclusions: MicroRNAs are valuable biomarkers of response to NAT in OC. Research is needed to understand the effects different types of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy have on the predictive value of microRNAs; studies also require greater standardization in how response is defined.

Signet ring cell percentage in poorly cohesive gastric cancer patients: A potential novel predictor of survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Signet ring cells (SRC) are widely acknowledged as a prognostically unfavorable histotype amongst poorly cohesive gastric cancer. In this study we evaluated the impact of SRC percentage on the clinical, pathological and prognostic features of these tumors according to the classification by the European Chapter of the IGCA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients with poorly cohesive gastric cancer that underwent surgery between 1995 and 2016, whose tissue specimens were available in a biological bank. All slides were put under revision, patients were reclassified into three groups according to the proportion of signet ring cells: "pure" SRC (containing ≥90% of SRCs), Poorly Cohesive-Not Otherwise Specified (PC-NOS) (containing ≤10% of SRCs), and PC-NOS/SRC (containing <90% but >10% of SRCs). The clinicopathological factors between different types were analyzed and prognostic differences were compared.

RESULTS

Among 143 enrolled patients, 51% were male and 49% were female. The mean (±SD) age at diagnosis was 61 ± 13.9 years. Eighty-seven patients (60.8%) were reclassified as PC-NOS, 56 (39.2%) as PC-NOS/SRC and none as "pure" SRC. Five-years overall survival was significantly higher in PC-NOS/SRC group (63.3%) compared with PC-NOS group (12.7%). The increase in mortality risk was more than four-fold in patients with PC-NOS pattern compared to those with PC-NOS/SRC (HR 4.32 [95% CI 2.5-7.4]. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, SRC pattern was still an independent predictor of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of SRCs is inversely related to tumor aggressiveness, confirming the role of SRC pattern as an independent predictor of survival.

Shifting sands: the role of radiotherapy for patients with gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

Gastric adenocarcinoma, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, is treated primarily with surgical resection in the non-metastatic setting. However, the optimal role and sequencing of adjunctive therapies, including radiotherapy (RT) as well as systemic therapy, remains unclear. A complex milieu of trials spanning several decades has evaluated different treatment strategies for gastric cancer, including the role of RT. In this review, we summarize the trial-level evidence for the diverse gastric cancer treatment paradigms. Despite initial success, postoperative RT has not shown a clear benefit in modern prospective studies in the setting of more aggressive surgical nodal dissection. On the other hand, the role of preoperative RT in optimizing oncologic outcomes for gastric cancer patients remains relatively under-explored; ongoing trials assessing preoperative RT aim to illuminate the optimal treatment strategy for non-metastatic gastric cancer patients.

Specific Borrmann classification in advanced gastric cancer by an ensemble multilayer perceptron network: a multicenter research

PURPOSE

Borrmann classification in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is necessarily associated with personalized surgical strategy and prognosis. But few radiomics research studies have focused on specific Borrmann classification, and there is yet no consensus regarding what machine learning methods should be the most effective.

METHODS

A combined size of 889 AGC patients was retrospectively enrolled from two centers. Radiomic features were extracted from tumors manually delineated on preoperative computed tomography images. Two classification experiments (Borrmann I/II/III vs. IV and Borrmann II vs. III) were conducted. In each task, we combined three common feature selection methods and five typical machine learning classifiers to construct 15 basic classification models, and then fed the 15 predictions to a designed multilayer perceptron (MLP) network.

RESULTS

In internal and external validation cohorts, the proposed ensemble MLP yielded good performance with area under curves of 0.767 and 0.702 for Borrmann I/II/III vs. IV, as well as 0.768 and 0.731 for Borrmann II vs. III. Considering the imbalanced distribution of four Borrmann types (I, 2.9%; II, 12.8%; III, 69.5%; IV, 14.7%), the ensemble MLP surpassed the overfitting barrier and attained fine specificity (0.667 and 0.750 for Borrmann I/II/III vs. IV; 0.714 and 0.620 for Borrmann II vs. III) and sensitivity (0.795 and 0.610 for Borrmann I/II/III vs. IV; 0.652 and 0.703 for Borrmann II vs. III). Also, survival analysis showed that patients could be significantly risk stratified by MLP predicted types in both experiments (p < 0.0001, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed an MLP-based ensemble learning architecture, which could identify Borrmann type IV automatically and improve the differentiation of Borrmann type II from III. The study provided a new view for specific Borrmann classification in clinical practice.

Paralytic ileus in the United States: A cross-sectional study from the national inpatient sample

Introduction:

Paralytic ileus is a common clinical condition leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Most studies to date have focused on postoperative ileus, a common but not exclusive cause of the condition. There are limited epidemiological data regarding the incidence and impact of paralytic ileus and its relationship to other clinical conditions. In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed national inpatient hospitalization trends, demographic variation, cost of care, length of stay, and mortality for paralytic ileus hospitalizations as a whole.

Methods:

The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all hospitalizations with the diagnosis of paralytic ileus (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 560.1) as primary or secondary diagnosis during the period from 2001 to 2011. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochran–Armitage trend test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and Poisson regression.

Results:

In 2001, there were 362,561 hospitalizations with the diagnosis of paralytic ileus as compared to 470,110 in 2011 (p < 0.0001). The age group 65–79 years was most commonly affected by paralytic ileus throughout the study period. In-hospital all-cause mortality decreased from 6.03% in 2001 to 5.10% in 2011 (p < 0.0001). However, the average cost of care per hospitalization increased from US$19,739 in 2001 to US$26,198 in 2011 (adjusted for inflation, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

There was a significant rise in the number of hospitalizations of paralytic ileus with increased cost of care and reduced all-cause mortality.

Preoperative computed tomography-guided disease-free survival prediction in gastric cancer: a multicenter radiomics study

PURPOSE

Preoperative and noninvasive prognosis evaluation remains challenging for gastric cancer. Novel preoperative prognostic biomarkers should be investigated. This study aimed to develop multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT)-guided prognostic models to direct follow-up strategy and improve prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective dataset of 353 gastric cancer patients were enrolled from two centers and allocated to three cohorts: training cohort (n = 166), internal validation cohort (n = 83), and external validation cohort (n = 104). Quantitative radiomic features were extracted from MDCT images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalized Cox regression was adopted to construct a radiomic signature. A radiomic nomogram was established by integrating the radiomic signature and significant clinical risk factors. We also built a preoperative tumor-node-metastasis staging model for comparison. All models were evaluated considering the abilities of risk stratification, discrimination, calibration, and clinical use.

RESULTS

In the two validation cohorts, the established four-feature radiomic signature showed robust risk stratification power (P = 0.0260 and 0.0003, log-rank test). The radiomic nomogram incorporated radiomic signature, extramural vessel invasion, clinical T stage, and clinical N stage, outperforming all the other models (concordance index = 0.720 and 0.727) with good calibration and decision benefits. Also, the 2-yr disease-free survival (DFS) prediction was most effective (time-dependent area under curve = 0.771 and 0.765). Moreover, subgroup analysis indicated that the radiomic signature was more sensitive in risk stratifying patients with advanced clinical T/N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed MDCT-guided radiomic signature was verified as a prognostic factor for gastric cancer. The radiomic nomogram was a noninvasive auxiliary model for preoperative individualized DFS prediction, holding potential in promoting treatment strategy and clinical prognosis.

Development and validation of a pretreatment nomogram to predict overall survival in gastric cancer

Background

Pretreatment clinical staging is essential to select therapy. However, there have been no published pretreatment gastric cancer nomograms constructed using pretreatment clinical prognostic factors, including in nonresection patients. We aimed to develop a new pretreatment gastric cancer nomogram for individualized prediction of overall survival (OS).

Methods

The nomogram was developed using data of 5231 Japanese gastric cancer patients, and it was created with a Cox regression model. Fifteen clinical variables, which were obtained at pretreatment, were collected and registered. Data of two independent cohorts of patients from Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (1001 patients), and the University of Verona (389 patients) formed the external validation cohorts. The model was validated internally and externally using measures of discrimination (Harrell's C‐index), calibration, and decision curve analysis.

Results

The developed nomogram showed good discrimination, with a C‐index of 0.855; that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage was 0.819. In the external validation procedure, the C‐indexes were 0.856 (AJCC, 0.795) in the Seoul St. Mary's cohort and 0.714 (AJCC, 0.648) in the University of Verona cohort. The nomogram performed well in the calibration and decision curve analyses when applied to both the internal and external validation cohorts. A stage‐specific subset survival analysis of the three risk groups calculated using the nomogram also showed the superiority of nomogram‐prediction when compared to AJCC.

Conclusion

This new pretreatment model accurately predicts OS in gastric cancer and can be used for patient counseling in clinical practice and stratification in clinical trials.

Inpatient burden of gastric cancer in the United States

Background

Gastric cancer is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Over one-half of patients have advanced disease at the time of presentation, leading to a significant burden on the healthcare system. Limited epidemiological data exists on national inpatient hospitalization trends. The aim of this study is to determine the inpatient burden of gastric cancer in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for all subjects with the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the stomach (ICD-9 code 151.x) as primary diagnosis during the period from 2001-2011. NIS is the largest all-payer inpatient care database in the U.S. Statistical significance of variation in the number of hospitalizations, patient demographics, and comorbidity measures was determined using Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Results

From 2001 to 2011, the number of hospitalizations with the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the stomach ranged between 22,430 and 25,371, however, the trend was not significant. Men were always more affected than women with no significant change in overall proportion (P<0.0001). Overall, in-hospital mortality decreased from 11.19% in 2001 to 6.47% in 2011 (P<0.0001). However, average cost of care per hospitalization increased from $21,710 in 2001 to $24,706 in 2011 (adjusted for inflation, P<0.0001).

Conclusions

The total number of hospitalizations remained relatively stable throughout the study period with higher proportion of men affected every year. Although in-hospital mortality in patients with the diagnosis of gastric cancer decreased over the study period, there was a significant rise in the cost of care.

Treatment for unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer: current evidence and trends

Approximately half of the patients diagnosed with oesophageal cancer present with unresectable or metastatic disease. Treatment for these patients aims to control dysphagia and other cancer-related symptoms, improve quality of life and prolong survival. In the past 25 years, modestly improved outcomes have been achieved in the treatment of patients with inoperable non-metastatic cancer who are medically not fit for surgery or have unresectable, locally advanced disease. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy offers the best outcomes in these patients. In distant metastatic oesophageal cancer, several double-agent or triple-agent chemotherapy regimens have been established as first-line treatment options. In addition, long-term results of multiple large randomized phase III trials using additional targeted therapies have been published in the past few years, affecting contemporary clinical practice and future research directions. For the local treatment of malignant dysphagia, various treatment options have emerged, and self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement is currently the most widely applied method. Besides the continuous search for improved SEMS designs to minimize the risk of associated complications, efforts have been made to develop and evaluate the efficacy of antireflux stents and irradiation stents. This Review outlines the current evidence and ongoing trends in the different modern-day, multidisciplinary interventions for patients with unresectable or metastatic oesophageal cancer with an emphasis on key randomized trials.

Screening and Preventive Strategies in Esophagogastric Cancer

Gastric adenocarcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma are among the most prevalent and deadly of malignancies worldwide. Screening and prevention programs will be critical to finally improving outcomes in these diseases. For gastric adenocarcinoma, screening in high-risk populations has significantly reduced mortality. More research is needed on screening high-risk individuals in low-risk populations. For esophageal adenocarcinoma, work is needed to develop efficient and effective techniques in mass screening programs. For most Western populations, current screening is not cost effective. Avoiding environmental risk factors is critical to reducing the incidence of this deadly illness.

Differences in the multimodal treatment of gastric cancer: East versus west

There has been a great deal of interest about varying treatment paradigms of gastric cancer in Eastern and Western countries. Differences in tumor biology, screening initiatives, surgical approach, extent of lymphadenectomy, and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy regimens have been studied and documented in the literature. The purpose of this review is to give an updated report on the current status and management differences in the treatment of gastric cancer between Eastern and Western countries.

Clinical Outcomes after Surgery for Linitis Plastica of the Stomach: Analysis of a Population Cancer Registry

Linitis plastica (LP), a subset of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA), has been considered as a fatal disease with few management options. Little evidence has been reported regarding the role for surgical therapy in treating LP. A retrospective review of GA patients with LP from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database (2004–2009) was performed. 29,440 patients with GA were identified, of whom 948 (3.2%) had LP. After matching for American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) stage, LP patients had significantly worse 5-year disease specific survival (DSS) compared with GA (6 vs 34%, P < 0.001). For potentially resectable LP patients (i.e., stage I–III), 5-year DSS was 0 per cent for no treatment and for radiation therapy alone, 18 per cent for both and surgery and radiation, and 20 per cent for surgery alone(P < 0.001). LP is a marker of poor survival in patients with GA. However, surgical resection provides the best oncologic outcomes in these patients with a 20 per cent 5-year DSS in patients with loco-regional disease.

Screening and surveillance for gastric cancer in the United States: Is it needed?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although the incidence of gastric cancer in the United States is relatively low, the incidence of gastric cancer is higher than for esophageal cancer, for which clear guidelines for screening and surveillance exist. With the increasing availability of endoscopic therapy, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, for treating advanced dysplasia and early gastric cancer, establishing guidelines for screening and surveillance of patients who are at high risk of developing gastric cancer has the potential to diagnose and treat gastric cancer at an earlier stage and improve mortality from gastric cancer. The aims of this article were to review the data regarding the risk factors for developing gastric cancer, methods for gastric cancer screening, and results of national screening programs.

METHODS

A review of the existing literature related to the aims was performed.

RESULTS

Risk factors for gastric cancer that were identified include race/ethnicity (East Asian, Russian, or South American), first-degree relative diagnosed with gastric cancer, positive Helicobacter pylori status, and presence of atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia. Endoscopy has the highest rate of detecting gastric cancer compared with other gastric cancer screening methods. The national screening program in Japan has demonstrated a mortality reduction from gastric cancer based on cohort data.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer screening with endoscopy should be considered in individuals who are immigrants from regions associated with a high risk of gastric cancer (East Asia, Russia, or South America) or who have a family history of gastric cancer. Those with findings of atrophic gastritis or intestinal metaplasia on screening endoscopy should undergo surveillance endoscopy every 1 to 2 years. Large prospective multicenter studies are needed to further identify additional risk factors for developing gastric cancer and to assess whether gastric cancer screening programs for high-risk populations in the United States would result in improved mortality.

Different survival outcomes after curative R0-resection for Eastern Asian and European gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matched analysis comparing a Korean and a German specialized center

Several retrospective analyses on patients who underwent gastric cancer (GC) surgery revealed different survival outcomes between Eastern (Korean, Japanese) and Western (USA, Europe) countries due to potential ethnical and biological differences. This study investigates treatment outcomes between specialized institution for GC in Korea and Germany.The prospectively documented databases of the Gastric Cancer Center of the National Cancer Center, Korea (NCCK) and the Department of Surgery of the Technische Universitaet Muenchen (TUM), Germany were screened for patients who underwent primary surgical resection for GC between 2002 and 2008. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ testing, and 2 cohorts were matched using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. Patients' survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used for comparison.Three thousand seven hundred ninety-five patients were included in the final analysis, 3542 from Korea and 253 from Germany. Baseline characteristics revealed statistically significant differences for age, tumor location, pT stage, grading, lymphatic vessel infiltration (LVI), comorbidities, number of dissected lymph nodes (LN), postoperative complications, lymph-node ratio stage, and application of adjuvant chemotherapy. After PSM, 171 patients in TUM were matched to NCCK patients, and baseline characteristics for both cohorts were well balanced. Patients in Korea had significantly longer survival than those in Germany both before and after PSM. When the analysis was performed for each UICC stage separately, same trend was found over all UICC stages before PSM. However, significant difference in survival was observed only for UICC I after PSM.This analysis demonstrates different survival outcomes after surgical treatment of GC on different continents in specialized centers after balancing of baseline characteristics by PSM.

Early Gastric Cancer: Trends in Incidence, Management, and Survival in a Well-Defined French Population

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of early gastric cancer (EGC) in Western countries. The aim of this study was to analyze trends in the incidence, management, and survival of EGC in a well-defined population over a 30 year period.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the population-based cancer Registry of Burgundy (France). Incidence rates were calculated by sex, age, and 10 year period of diagnosis. Net survival rates were calculated and a multivariate relative survival analysis performed.

RESULTS

EGC represented 6.7 % of gastric cancer diagnosed between 1982 and 2011. Age-standardized incidence rates were higher in men (0.79/100,000) than in women (0.40/100,000). Between the periods 1982-1991 and 2002-2011, it decreased from 0.97 to 0.53 per 100,000 in men and from 0.44 to 0.30 per 100,000 in women. Overall, 19 % of the tumors were limited to the mucosa, 69 % to the submucosa, and 15 % invaded lymph nodes. Node invasion and male sex were the only significant prognostic factors. Five-year net survival was 50 % in node-positive patients and 85 % in node-negative patients (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the relative risk of death in men compared to women was 2.3 and was 10.4 in patients with positive nodes compared to patients with negative nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

EGCs are rare in France. The prognosis is favorable, except for node-positive cancers, which may benefit from the recently developed adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors

BACKGROUND

Previous studies comparing survival between gastric cancer (GC) patients from the West and the East were based on the assumption that background factors and prognostic factors were identical. The aim of the current study was to compare the survival of GC patients from the UK and Japan using weighted propensity score analysis after identifying all different background factors.

METHODS

Data from 464 patients from the Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK (LTHT), and 465 patients from the Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital, Yokohama, Japan (KCCH), who had surgery for GC were analyzed. Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival was compared by propensity score weighting after adjusting for all significantly different background factors.

RESULTS

Most background factors were different between LTHT and KCCH patients. Unadjusted stage-specific OS and CSS were significantly better in KCCH. Independent prognostic factors for unadjusted OS and CSS were pT and pN in KCCH and in addition tumor location, pancreatectomy, resection margin status and number of examined lymph nodes in LTHT. Even after adjusting for all background characteristics, survival remained better in KCCH.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that differences in background factors are unable to fully explain the survival difference of GC patients between UK and Japan. Comprehensive studies into the biology of GC and/or host factors are needed to fully understand the survival difference.

Evaluation of Angiopoietin-2 as a biomarker in gastric cancer: results from the randomised phase III AVAGAST trial

Background:

In the phase III AVAGAST trial, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. We studied the role of Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a key driver of tumour angiogenesis, metastasis and resistance to antiangiogenic treatment, as a biomarker.

Methods:

Previously untreated, advanced gastric cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab (n=387) or placebo (n=387) in combination with chemotherapy. Plasma collected at baseline and at progression was analysed by ELISA. The role of Ang-2 as a prognostic and a predictive biomarker of bevacizumab efficacy was studied using a Cox proportional hazards model. Logistic regression analysis was applied for correlations with metastasis.

Results:

Median baseline plasma Ang-2 levels were lower in Asian (2143 pg ml⁻¹) vs non-Asian patients (3193 pg ml⁻¹), P<0.0001. Baseline plasma Ang-2 was identified as an independent prognostic marker for OS but did not predict bevacizumab efficacy alone or in combination with baseline VEGF. Baseline plasma Ang-2 correlated with the frequency of liver metastasis (LM) at any time: Odds ratio per 1000 pg ml⁻¹ increase: 1.19; 95% CI 1.10–1.29; P<0.0001 (non-Asians) and 1.37; 95% CI 1.13–1.64; P=0.0010 (Asians).

Conclusions:

Baseline plasma Ang-2 is a novel prognostic biomarker for OS in advanced gastric cancer strongly associated with LM. Differences in Ang-2 mediated vascular response may, in part, account for outcome differences between Asian and non-Asian patients; however, data have to be further validated. Ang-2 is a promising drug target in gastric cancer.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The clinicopathologic features and surgical treatment strategy of Borrmann type IV (B-4) gastric cancer remains controversial. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of patients with B-4 gastric cancer and to assess whether or not non-curative resection improved prognosis.

Methods

PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant articles. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.2). The odds ratio (OR), risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI), and weighted average of median survival times were calculated as effect values.

Results

Fifteen studies were included. Compared with Borrmann type “others” (B-O), B-4 had a higher incidence of poorly differentiated carcinoma (OR = 4.92; 95 % CI = 3.10–7.83; P < 0.01), lymph node metastases (OR = 2.13; 95 % CI = 1.88–2.41; P < 0.01), peritoneal metastases (OR = 3.91; 95 % CI = 3.37–4.54; P < 0.01), serosal invasion (OR = 3.66; 95 % CI = 2.91–4.60; P < 0.01), and lymphatic invasion (OR = 1.39; 95 % CI = 1.02–1.91; P = 0.04). B-4 patients with non-curative resection were associated with a worse survival rate (HR = 2.83; 95 % CI = 2.35–3.40; P < 0.01) than patients with curative resection; however, B-4 patients with non-curative resection had a better survival rate (1-year: RR = 0.70, 95 % CI = 0.63–0.77; P < 0.01; 2-year: RR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.85–0.94; P < 0.01) than patients with non-resection.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated that B-4 patients were associated with poor tumor differentiation, lymph node metastases, peritoneal metastases, serosal invasion, lymphatic invasion, and prognosis. Curative resection may increase the survival rate for B-4 patients. If it is not possible to perform a curative resection, a non-curative resection may improve the prognosis.

External Validation of an Eastern Asian Nomogram for Survival Prediction After Gastric Cancer Surgery in a European Patient Cohort

Several nomograms for survival prediction after curative gastric cancer surgery have been published over the recent years. Previous validation studies failed to prove applicability of Eastern Asian nomograms in Western patients. Here we present data on a validation analysis of a newly developed Korean nomogram in a German patient cohort.Among a total of 2771 patients having been treated in the Department of Surgery of the Technische Universitaet Muenchen from 1982 to 2008, 908 patients were eligible to undergo this analysis. Patients were treated according to Japanese Gastric Cancer guidelines and followed up on a regular basis for at least 60 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics were compared using χ-testing. Survival analyses were computed with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate regression analysis models. The C-statistics and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square statistics were computed for comparisons of the nomogram's predictive ability.All baseline characteristics were significantly different (P < 0.0001) between Korean and German patients except Union Internationale Contre le Cancer-stages (P = 0.427). Multivariate regression analysis revealed the same predictive factors for overall survival in the German and Korean cohorts, respectively, with the exception of tumor size >10 cm and an exclusive correlation of whole stomach spread and pN1-stage for German patients only. The C-index was 0.76, representing an adequate value for predictability of the Korea nomogram in German patients. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic implied applicability of the nomogram in the TUM-cohort.A newly developed multicenter Korean nomogram for survival prediction after curative gastric cancer surgery may be applicable for estimating survival prognosis in Western (European) patients.

Is Linitis Plastica a Contraindication for Surgical Resection: A Multi-Institution Study of the U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative

BACKGROUND

Current staging and treatment guidelines for gastric adenocarcinoma do not differentiate between linitis plastic (LP) and non-LP cancers. Significant controversy exists regarding the surgical management of LP patients.

METHODS

Using the multi-institutional U.S. Gastric Cancer Collaborative database, 869 gastric cancer patients who underwent resection between 2000 and 2012 were identified. Clinicopathologic and outcomes data of 58 LP patients were compared to 811 non-LP patients.

RESULTS

Stage III/IV disease was more common at presentation in LP patients compared with non-LP patients (90 vs. 44 %, p < 0.01). Despite the fact that most LP patients underwent total gastrectomy (88 vs. 39 %, p < 0.01), final positive margins were more common in LP patients (33 vs. 7 %, p < 0.01). The use of frozen section allowed 15 intraoperative positive margins in 38 patients to be converted to negative final margins. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in patients with LP (11.6 vs. 37.8 months, p < 0.01). There was no difference in median OS of LP patients based on stage (I/II, 17.3 mo; III, 10.6 mo; IV, 12.0 mo; p = 0.46). LP and non-LP patients who underwent optimal resection (negative margin and D2/3 lymphadenectomy) had better survival compared with those with nonoptimal resections. The median OS for optimally resected stage III LP (n = 22) and stage III non-LP (n = 185) patients was nearly identical (26.7 vs. 25.3 mo; p = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Future staging systems and treatment guidelines should differentiate between LP and non-LP gastric cancers. Long-term survival in select LP patients who undergo optimal resections is comparable to optimally resected non-LP patients.

Differences in gastric cancer survival between the U.S. and China

BACKGROUND

Previous comparisons of gastric cancer between the West and the East have focused predominantly on Japan and Korea, where early gastric cancer is prevalent, and have not included the Chinese experience, which accounts for approximately half the world's gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, surgical procedures, pathologic information, and survival were compared among gastric cancer patients who underwent curative intent gastrectomy at two large volume cancer centers in China and the US between 1995 and 2005.

RESULTS

Median age and body mass index were significantly higher in US patients. The proportion of proximal gastric cancer was comparable. Gastric cancer patients in China had larger tumors and a later stage at presentation. The median number of positive lymph nodes was higher (5 vs 4, P < 0.02) despite a lower lymph node retrieval (16 vs 22, P < 0.001) in Chinese patients. The probability of death due to gastric cancer in Chinese patients was 1.7 fold of that in the US (P < 0.0001) after adjusting for important prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Even after adjusting for important prognostic factors Chinese gastric cancer patients have a worse outcome than US gastric cancer patients. The differences between Chinese and US gastric cancer are a potential resource for understanding the disease.

Comparison of gastric cancer survival between Caucasian and Asian patients treated in the United States: results from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for gastric cancer is better for Asian than for Caucasian patients. The primary driver of this difference is unknown. This study determined whether the survival advantage of Asian ethnicity continued to hold after control was used for other well-known prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this study, 12,773 patients who underwent gastrectomy for treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry. Patients with cardia tumor were excluded from the study. The independent prognostic effect of ethnicity was evaluated by adjusting for other known factors.

RESULTS

The Asian patients tended to have a diagnosis at an earlier age (66.8 vs. 68.5 years), more lymph nodes examined (16 vs. 13), and more positive lymph nodes (5.1 vs. 4.8). Survival was better for the Asian patients than for the Caucasian patients, with a 12 % 5-year survival difference. Among the patients with IB, IIA, and IIB disease, the Asian patients had 37, 72, and 13 months longer median survival time than the corresponding Caucasian patients. The multivariate Cox model showed persistence of this result after adjustment for imbalances of age, gender, tumor grade, and number of examined and positive lymph nodes. The largest risk reduction was observed for the stage IA patients (31 %) and the smallest for the stage IIIC patients (9 %).

CONCLUSION

After excluding proximal gastric cancers, controlling for the imbalance of known prognostic factors, and decreasing in the influence of D2 lymphadenectomy, stage migration, and chemo/radiation therapy by including only patients treated in the United States, this study found that the survival advantage of Asian ethnicity continued to be present.

Race/Ethnicity is predictive of lymph node status in patients with early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Race/ethnicity has long been suspected to affect survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. However, the clinicohistopathological impact of race or ethnicity on early gastric cancer (EGC) is not known.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2013, 286 patients underwent gastrectomy and 104 patients had pathological confirmation of EGC. A retrospective analysis of pathological and clinical prognostic indicators was performed.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 38 (37%) Asian Americans and 66 (63%) non-Asian Americans. Of these, 2 (5.3%) Asian Americans and 19 (28.8%) non-Asian Americans had pathological confirmation of lymph node metastasis (LNM) (p = 0.004). Univariate analysis comparing the clinicohistopathological characteristics in each group did not reveal significant difference regarding histotype, tumor size, grade, location, morphology, or lymphovascular invasion, except for the LNM rate and mean body mass index (23.2 versus 26.6, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that non-Asian race/ethnicity (odds ratio (OR), 9.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-71.43; p = 0.038), younger age (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; p = 0.046), and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 13.9; 95% CI, 2.40-79.99; p = 0.003) were significant predictors for LNM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that Asian American race in EGC is associated with a significantly decreased rate of LNM in comparison to non-Asian Americans, despite similar histopathological characteristics of each group.

How prognostic and predictive biomarkers are transforming our understanding and management of advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. GC is a heterogeneous disease in terms of histology, anatomy, and epidemiology. There is also wide variability in how GC is treated in both the resectable and unresectable settings. Identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to help direct and tailor therapy for this deadly disease.

METHODS

A literature search was done using Medline and MeSH terms for GC and predictive biomarkers and prognostic biomarkers. The search was limited to human subjects and the English language. There was no limit on dates. Published data and unpublished abstracts with clinical relevance were included.

RESULTS

Many potential prognostic and predictive biomarkers have been assessed for GC, some of which are becoming practice changing. This review is focused on clinically relevant biomarkers, including EGFR, HER2, various markers of angiogenesis, proto-oncogene MET, and the mammalian target of rapamycin.

CONCLUSION

GC is a deadly and heterogeneous disease for which biomarkers are beginning to change our understanding of prognosis and management. The recognition of predictive biomarkers, such as HER2 and vascular endothelial growth factor, has been an exciting development in the management of GC, validating the use of targeted drugs trastuzumab and ramucirumab. MET is another potential predictive marker that may be targeted in GC with drugs such as rilotumumab, foretinib, and crizotinib. Further identification and validation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers has the potential transform how this deadly disease is managed.

Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention

Less than a century ago, gastric cancer was the most common cancer in the United States and perhaps throughout the world. Despite its worldwide decline in incidence over the past century, gastric cancer remains a major killer across the globe. This article reviews the epidemiology, screening, and prevention of gastric cancer. We first discuss the descriptive epidemiology of gastric cancer, including its incidence, survival, mortality, and trends over time. Next, we characterize the risk factors for gastric cancer, both environmental and genetic. Serologic markers and histological precursor lesions of gastric cancer and early detection of gastric cancer using these markers are reviewed. Finally, we discuss prevention strategies and provide suggestions for further research.

Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention

Less than a century ago, gastric cancer was the most common cancer in the United States and perhaps throughout the world. Despite its worldwide decline in incidence over the past century, gastric cancer remains a major killer across the globe. This article reviews the epidemiology, screening, and prevention of gastric cancer. We first discuss the descriptive epidemiology of gastric cancer, including its incidence, survival, mortality, and trends over time. Next, we characterize the risk factors for gastric cancer, both environmental and genetic. Serologic markers and histological precursor lesions of gastric cancer and early detection of gastric cancer using these markers are reviewed. Finally, we discuss prevention strategies and provide suggestions for further research.

Evidence-based review of the management of early gastric cancer

Although standard gastrectomy remains the most definitive locoregional treatment for early gastric cancer, it carries significant perioperative morbidities. Surgical gastrectomy for resection of lymph nodes is not always required and endoscopic resection may be a treatment option for patients at negligible risk of lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, the criteria for endoscopic resection are expanding, along with the development of new technology, in both Eastern and western countries with high prevalence of early gastric cancer, where studies for endoscopic treatment modalities have been conducted. Within such a trend, however, it should be emphasized that early gastric cancer needs to be treated cautiously, especially in western countries, as several studies suggest that there may be differences in tumor biology and aggressiveness between Asian and non-Asian populations.

Long-term survival after gastrectomy for cancer in randomized, controlled oncological trials: comparison between West and East

BACKGROUND

The presence of mixed evidence about the value of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer surgery coupled with the difference in patients' demographics and tumor stage between the West and East have doubted the needs to standardize surgical techniques in Western clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to compare survival rates between the West and East following gastrectomy in randomized, controlled, oncological trials with appropriate adjustment for confounding variables.

METHODS

Systematic search revealed 25 trials that have randomization into surgery and chemotherapy versus surgery alone between 1995 and 2012 (n = 7 (East) and n = 18 (West)). End points were 5-year survival and cancer recurrence.

RESULTS

There was association between gastrectomy performed in the East and improved 5-year survival (pooled odds ratio (OR) 4.83; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.27-7.12) and reduced cancer recurrence (pooled OR 0.33; 95 % CI 0.2-0.54). Association of improved 5-year survival with surgery in the East remained when meta-regression adjusted for the effect of age, sex, chemotherapy, tumor depth and nodal status, and gastrectomy type. Association of reduced cancer recurrence also persisted with meta-regression adjusting for age, chemotherapy, nodal status, and gastrectomy type. However, when adjustment for the percentage of patients with tumor depth T1 or 2 was made statistical significance was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis shows association between gastrectomy performed in Eastern countries and improved survival. The known difference in surgical techniques between the East and the West is one potential unexamined variable that may be responsible in part for such discrepancy in outcomes.

Comparison of disease-specific survival in the United States and Korea after resection for early-stage node-negative gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Disease-specific survival (DSS) for GC patients differs in Eastern and Western countries. The aim is to compare outcomes of US and Korean patients following resection of early-stage, node-negative gastric carcinoma (GC).

METHODS

All patients (1995-2005) with T1N0 gastric carcinoma, excluding gastroesophageal tumors, were evaluated. DSS was compared by adjusting for prognostic variables from an internationally validated GC nomogram.

RESULTS

The cohort included 598 Korean patients and 159 US patients. Age and BMI were significantly higher in US patients. Distal tumor location was more frequent in Korea (60% vs. 52%) and proximal location in the US (19% vs. 5%, P < 0.0001). Five-year DSS did not differ significantly between Korea and the US. After multivariate analysis, DSS of Korean patients persisted, with no significant differences when compared to US patients (HR = 1.2, 95% CI: 0.3-5.2, P = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite widespread speculations that GC differs in the East and West, when we compare similarly staged, node-negative GC patients, survival did not differ significantly between Korea and the US. This suggests that GC is a heterogeneous disease and when similar subtypes of gastric cancer are compared, these differences disappear. This study suggests more similarities than previously hypothesized between US and Korean GC patients.

Comparisons of Gastric Cancer Treatments: East vs. West

There has been a large amount of speculation concerning the differences in the outcomes in patients who have gastric cancer in the Eastern and Western worlds. The differences in biology, surgical and adjuvant treatment have been used to explain such differences. There are clear differences observed in the histology (diffuse vs. intestinal), tumor location (proximal vs. distal), environmental exposures, dietary factors and Helicobacter pylori status. A higher incidence of gastric cancer in the East has led to screening programs, and leading to an earlier stage at presentation. Surgical treatment differs in that the extended lymph node dissection is routinely practiced in the Asian countries. Additionally, different adjuvant therapeutic regimens are used in both regions. The purpose of this review is to describe the differences in both presentation and treatment between the East and the West.

Gastric adenocarcinoma surgery and adjuvant therapy

Gastric adenocarcinoma is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy, offering the only chance for complete cure. Resection is based on the principles of obtaining adequate margins, with the extent of lymphadenectomy remaining controversial. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are used to reduce local recurrence and improve long-term survival. This article reviews the literature and provides a summary of surgical management options and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Validation of seventh edition AJCC gastric cancer staging modifications

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The seventh edition of the AJCC has more detailed staging categories for gastric cancer than does the sixth edition. The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic accuracies of the sixth and seventh AJCC editions for gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

We analyzed survival rates by category using the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC in 10,060 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone gastrectomy between 1994 and 2007 at Samsung Medical Center.

RESULTS

Significant differences in prognosis were seen when comparing the new stages of the seventh edition of the AJCC that are subgroups of stages IB, II, IIIA, and IV in the sixth edition. In particular, stage IV of the AJCC sixth edition is divided into stages IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IIIC and IV in the seventh edition, and the 5-year survival rates of these respective stages were 80.2%, 45.3%, 23.5%, 17.2%, and 10.1% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Each category of the AJCC sixth edition has been divided into multiple stages in the AJCC seventh edition, each with a different prognosis. The newly divided subgroups from AJCC sixth edition stage IV showed more accurate outcome classification based on AJCC seventh edition staging stratification.

Survival of metastatic gastric cancer: Significance of age, sex and race/ethnicity

BACKGROUND

Despite the success of modern chemotherapy in the treatment of large bowel cancers, patients with metastatic gastric cancer continue to have a dismal outcome. Identifying predictive and prognostic markers is an important step to improving current treatment approaches and extending survival.

METHODS

Extracting data from the US NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries, we compared overall survival for patients with metastatic gastric cancer by gender, age, and ethnicity using Cox proportional hazards models. 13,840 patients (≥ 18 years) were identified from 1988-2004. Males and females were categorized by age grouping and ethnicity.

RESULTS

19% of Hispanic patients were diagnosed < 45 years of age as compared to 5.5% of Caucasians. Caucasian patients and men were more likely to be diagnosed with tumors in the gastric cardia (P<0.001). In our survival analysis, we found that women had a lower risk of dying as compared to men (P<0.001). Overall survival diminished with age (P<0.001). The median overall survival was 6 months in patients of ≤ 44 years old as compared to 3 months in patients 75 years and older. Gender differences in overall survival significantly varied by race and tumor grade/differentiation (P for interaction = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study of metastatic gastric cancer patients from the SEER registry to show that age, gender, and tumor location are significant independent prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Prognostic relevance of demographics and surgical practice for patients with gastric cancer in two centers: in Poland versus Germany

BACKGROUND

Although studies comparing the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma in Japan and Western industrialized countries have revealed differing survival rates, no studies to date have been performed comparing Western and Eastern Europe. This study aimed to compare demographics and surgical practice as well as the related prognostic impact on gastric cancer patients treated in Poland and Germany.

METHODS

This retrospective study included gastric cancer patients treated between 1999 and 2004 by surgical departments in Gdansk (Poland) and Cologne (Germany). Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic, histopathological, surgical, and prognostic data were performed.

RESULTS

Included were 117 patients from Gdansk and 130 patients from Cologne. The Cologne patients showed higher incidence rates of serious comorbidity, pT1 cancer, and distant metastasis than those from Gdansk. Indications for and frequency of selected surgical procedures differed significantly. D2-lymphadenectomy was performed in 89% of the Cologne patients, while D1-lymphadenectomy was done for 85% of the Gdansk patients. Univariate analysis yielded a 5-year survival rate of 28.3% for the Gdansk patients, and 40.3% for the Cologne patients (p = 0.056). Independent prognostic factors were pT category (p = 0.002), pN category (p < 0.001), pM category (p = 0.027), residual tumor (R) category (p = 0.004), age (p = 0.012), and number of resected lymph nodes (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences of clinical and surgical parameters exist between gastric cancer patients treated in Poland and Germany. In addition to established independent prognostic factors, we found that survival improved with each additionally resected lymph node.

Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease-specific survival (DSS) between the US and Korea following R0 resection for gastric carcinoma (GC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Many studies have described decreased 5-year survival after curative gastrectomy for GC in the West compared with the East. Although clinicopathological presentations of GC are known to vary widely between Eastern and Western countries, including histology, tumor location, and stage at presentation, it remains unclear whether these factors account for differences in survival.

METHODS

All patients undergoing curative intent resections (R0) for GC (1995-2005) were evaluated in 2 independent, single-institution prospectively maintained databases from the US (711 patients) and Korea (1646 patients). Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from this analysis. Patient, surgical and pathologic variables were compared. DSS was determined via multivariate analysis using prognostic variables from an internationally validated GC nomogram that estimates the probability of 5- and 9-year survival.

RESULTS

Age and body mass index were significantly higher in US patients. Location of tumors was more often proximal in the United States (39% vs. 9%, P < 0.0001) and distal in Korea (54% vs. 33%, P < 0.0001). Korean patients had more early stage tumors (42% vs. 28% stage Ia, P < 0.0001) with a higher number of lymph nodes identified (97% vs. 79%, >or=15 lymph nodes, P < 0.0001). The 5-year DSS was higher in Korea than in the United States. After multivariate analysis, applying factors used in the nomogram, DSS of Korean GC patients remained significantly better than that of US patients (HR = 1.3, 95% CI; 1.0-1.6, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates better survival for GC patients in Korea compared with the US as determined by multivariate analysis with a validated gastric cancer nomogram. Multiple possibilities can explain this difference.

Treatment and outcomes of gastric cancer among United States-born and foreign-born Asians and Pacific Islanders

BACKGROUND

The authors investigated whether stage at diagnosis, cancer treatments, and survival of Asian and Pacific Islander (API) gastric cancer patients in the United States vary by birthplace.

METHODS

The authors studied 6454 API and 10,099 non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1992 and 2005. In descriptive analyses, stage, receipt of adequate lymph node examination (ALNE), and surgery were compared among US-born APIs, foreign-born (FB) APIs, and NHWs. Multivariate polytomous logistic and proportional hazards regression models were used to assess differences in cancer stage and survival, respectively, adjusted for clinical and demographic factors.

RESULTS

As a group, APIs were more likely than NHWs to present with earlier-stage diagnoses and receive surgery and ALNE (P < .001). However, FB (adjusted odds ratios [aOR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.86) but not US-born APIs (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.92-1.20) were significantly more likely to present at earlier stages than NHWs. Compared with NHW patients, FB and US-born APIs were more likely to receive surgery (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09 and aRR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14, respectively) and ALNE (aRR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.41 and aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32, respectively). In fully adjusted models, FB (adjusted relative hazard ratios [aHR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90) but not US-born APIs (aHR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.04) had more favorable survival than NHWs.

CONCLUSIONS

The earlier-stage diagnosis, more complete surgical treatment, and improved survival of Asians and Pacific Islanders with gastric cancer may result from less aggressive tumors or more prompt recognition and thorough evaluation of early symptoms. Further study of these factors could improve outcomes for all patients with gastric cancer.

Different pathological features and prognosis in gastric cancer patients coming from high-risk and low-risk areas of Italy

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinicopathological features and long-term outcome in gastric cancer patients coming from high-risk and low-risk areas of Italy.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Better survival rates have been reported from countries with higher incidence of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Data regarding 829 patients coming from Tuscany (group A) and 143 patients coming from Southern Italy (group B) were analyzed. Mean follow-up time was 56 +/- 57 months; it was 85 +/- 63 months in surviving patients or not tumor-related deaths. Prognostic factors were investigated by multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model after verifying the assumption of proportionality of the risk associated with covariates.

RESULTS

Lauren diffuse-mixed histotype, younger age, extended lymphadenectomy, and advanced stages were more common in group B. Gastric cancer-related 10-year survival probability was 48% in group A versus 29% in group B (log-rank test: P < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, geographic area was confirmed as a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio for group B vs. group A: 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.12-2.06, P = 0.006). The influence of this factor on long-term survival was independent from other clinical, surgical, and pathologic factors, and was notable in neoplasms involving the serosa (10-year survival probability: 15% in group A vs. 3% in group B, log-rank test: P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients coming from low-risk area of Italy showed distinct pathologic features, more advanced stage, and worse prognosis when compared with patients coming from high-risk area. These findings may be indicative of different tumor biology, and may contribute to partly explain worldwide geographic variability in prognosis reported in different series.

The number of metastatic lymph nodes is a significant risk factor for bone metastasis and poor outcome after surgery for linitis plastica-type gastric carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Linitis plastica-type gastric carcinoma remains a disease with poor prognosis despite an aggressive surgical approach. Although a prominent pattern of disease failure is peritoneal carcinomatosis, some patients experience rapid disease progression without signs of the peritoneal disease.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic data from 178 patients with linitis plastica-type gastric cancer operated on between 1991 and 2000 were analyzed. Survival stratified by curability of surgery, pN stage, and patterns of failure were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and chi(2) test was used to evaluate correlation between the number of metastatic lymph nodes in terms of pN categories and the incidence of various patterns of metastasis and recurrence. Cox regression hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

R0 resection was performed only among 82 patients (46% of those who underwent laparotomy). Node metastasis was frequent with only 22 patients classified as pN0. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was observed in 131 patients and was the commonest pattern of recurrence. Bone metastasis, found in 13 patients, was associated with poor outcome, and its incidence was significantly correlated with the number of metastatic nodes. pT4 status and pN3 status were identified as significant independent prognostic determinants.

CONCLUSION

Treatment strategy for the linitis plastica should in general combine surgery with aggressive treatment directed toward peritoneal disease. However, patients with >16 metastatic nodes more often are associated with bone metastasis than those with modest nodal involvement and suffer from poor prognosis.

Comparison of colorectal and gastric cancer: survival and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastric and colorectal cancers are the most common gastrointestinal malignancies in Iran. We aim to compare the survival rates and prognostic factors between these two cancers.

METHODS

We studied 1873 patients with either gastric or colorectal cancer who were registered in one referral cancer registry center in Tehran, Iran. All patients were followed from their time of diagnosis until December 2006 (as failure time). Survival curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier Method and compared by the Log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was carried out using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Of 1873 patients, there were 746 with gastric cancer and 1138 with colorectal cancer. According to the Kaplan-Meier method 1, 3, 5, and 7-year survival rates were 71.2, 37.8, 25.3, and 19.5%, respectively, in gastric cancer patients and 91.1, 73.1, 61, and 54.9%, respectively, in patients with colorectal cancer. Also, univariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis, sex, grade of tumor, and distant metastasis were of prognostic significance in both cancers (P < 0.0001). However, in multivariate analysis, only distant metastasis in colorectal cancer and age at diagnosis, grade of tumor, and distant metastasis in colorectal cancer were identified as independent prognostic factors influencing survival.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our findings, survival is significantly related to histological differentiation of tumor and distant metastasis in colorectal cancer patients and only to distant metastasis in gastric cancer patients.

Role of symptoms in diagnosis and outcome of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and the second most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Apart from Japan, where screening programmes have resulted in early diagnosis in asymptomatic patients, in most countries the diagnosis of gastric cancers is invariably made on account on dyspeptic and alarm symptoms, which may also be of prognostic significance when reported by the patient at diagnosis. However, their use as selection criteria for endoscopy seems to be inconsistent since alarm symptoms are not sufficiently sensitive to detect malignancies. In fact, the overall prevalence of these symptoms in dyspeptic patients is high, while the prevalence of gastro-intestinal cancer is very low. Moreover, symptoms of early stage cancer may be indistinguishable from those of benign dyspepsia, while the presence of alarm symptoms may imply an advanced and often inoperable disease. The features of dyspeptic and alarm symptoms may reflect the pathology of the tumour and be of prognostic value in suggesting site, stage and aggressiveness of cancer. Alarm symptoms in gastric cancer are independently related to survival and an increased number, as well as specific alarm symptoms, are closely correlated to the risk of death.Dysphagia, weight loss and a palpable abdominal mass appear to be major independent prognostic factors in gastric cancer, while gastro-intestinal bleeding, vomiting and also duration of symptoms, do not seem to have a relevant prognostic impact on survival in gastric cancer.

TS-1 as first-line therapy for gastric linitis plastica: historical control study

Gastric linitis plastica (LP) is usually found as an advanced gastric cancer and has a poor prognosis. No sufficiently effective chemotherapy has been reported. In recent years, TS-1 has yielded a high response rate for advanced gastric cancers and favorable treatment results have also been suggested for gastric LP. We retrospectively compared and discussed anti-tumor effects and survival time for 62 consecutive patients with unresectable gastric LP who underwent chemotherapy at Kitasato University East Hospital between November 1995 and December 2002. They were divided into two groups: 19 patients given chemotherapy including TS-1 as first-line therapy (TS-1 group), and 43 patients given chemotherapy mainly with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, methotrexate and mitomycin C (non-TS-1 group). The overall response was 57.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.7-80.1%] in the TS-1 group, which was significantly greater than the 27.9% (95% CI 14.5-41.3%) of the non-TS-1 group (P < 0.01). The median survival time was 402 days (95% CI 251-553 days) in the TS-1 group, which was also significantly longer than the non-TS-1 group (213 days, 95% CI 165-261 days, P < 0.01). Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher were observed in 21.1 and 5.2%, respectively, in the TS-1 group, which were lower than the values of 37.2 and 20.9% in the non-TS-1 group. We conclude that greater anti-tumor effects and longer survival time can be expected from chemotherapy including TS-1 for gastric LP compared with conventional chemotherapy.