1
|
Annaswamy TM, Grover P, Douglas NF, Poploski KM, Anderson CA, Clark MA, Flores AM, Hafner BJ, Hoffman JM, Kinney AR, Ressel K, Sánchez J, Whitten MJ, Resnik L, McDonough CM. Relevance of learning health systems to physiatrists and its synergy with implementation science: A commentary. PM R 2024. [PMID: 38967539 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
As health care attempts to bridge the gap between evidence and practice, the concept of the learning health system (LHS) is becoming increasingly relevant. LHS integrates evidence with health systems data, driving health care quality and outcomes through updates in policy, practice, and care delivery. In addition, LHS research is becoming critically important as there are several initiatives underway to increase research capacity, expertise, and implementation, including attempts to stimulate increasing numbers of LHS researchers. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) physicians (physiatrists), nurses, therapists (physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, clinical psychologists), and scientists are affiliated with LHSs. As LHS research expands in health care systems, better awareness and understanding of LHSs and LHS research competencies are key for rehabilitation professionals including physiatrists. To address this need, the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) identified 33 core competencies, grouped into eight domains, for training LHS researchers. The domains are: (1) Systems Science; (2) Research Questions and Standards of Scientific Evidence; (3) Research Methods; (4) Informatics; (5) Ethics of Research and Implementation in Health Systems; (6) Improvement and Implementation Science; (7) Engagement, Leadership, and Research Management; and the recently added (8) Health and Healthcare Equity and Justice. The purpose of this commentary is to define LHS and its relevance to physiatrists, present the role of implementation science (IS) in LHSs and application of IS principles to design LHSs, illustrate current LHS research in rehabilitation, and discuss potential solutions to improve awareness and to stimulate interest in LHS research and IS among physiatrists in LHSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiru M Annaswamy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Prateek Grover
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Natalie F Douglas
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA
| | - Kathleen M Poploski
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Catherine A Anderson
- Department of Counseling, Rehabilitation and Human Services, College of Education, Hospitality, Health and Human Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Stout, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Melissa A Clark
- Departments of Health Services Policy and Practice and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ann Marie Flores
- Departments of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences and Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeanne M Hoffman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Adam R Kinney
- VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Kristin Ressel
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Sánchez
- Department of Counselor Education, College of Education, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Margarite J Whitten
- Departments of Health Services Policy and Practice and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Linda Resnik
- Departments of Health Services Policy and Practice and Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christine M McDonough
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu W, Chen D, Ding X, Qiao L, Zhang L, Gao X, Yan Y, Mo W, Ma J, Yin M. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on surgical treatments for spinal metastasis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:1868-1898. [PMID: 38407614 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08127-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE As an important treatment for spinal metastasis, surgery has strict applicable conditions. Although various organizations have formulated different guidelines on surgical treatment for spinal metastasis (SM), there are certain differences in the content, standardization and quality of the guidelines and it is necessary to make a critical appraisal of them. We aim to systematically review and appraise the current guidelines on surgical treatments of SM and summarize the related recommendations with the quality evaluation of supporting evidence, as to provide a reference for the standardization of surgical treatment plans, and help clinical front-line medical workers can make safe and effective clinical decisions faster. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase for three major databases and online guideline databases. According to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria, the latest guidelines on the surgical treatment of SM were sorted out. AGREE II was used to evaluated the guideline's quality, and we extracted and compared the recommended treatment content of each guideline with evaluating by the evidence-grading scale. RESULTS Eight guidelines from 2013 to 2019 were included. Seven guidelines are comprehensive guidelines and one related to the reconstructive surgery of SM. Five guidelines were evaluated as "recommended," and three guidelines were evaluated as "recommended with modifications." Regarding the indications of surgery with SM, four guidelines, seven guidelines, seven guidelines, three guidelines and three guidelines recommended surgical treatment for patients with SM with intractable pain, mechanical instability, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), recurrent spinal metastasis (RSM), and survival predication, respectively. Regarding the surgical strategies, three guidelines recommended minimally invasive therapy but had strict indications. Six guidelines and five guidelines recommend palliative surgery and with receiving radiation therapy, respectively. For the aggressive surgery, only one guideline recommended to apply to patients in good general conditions who has isolated symptomatic SM. Regarding the surgical reconstructions, one guideline didn't recommend iliac bone graft and three guidelines recommended PMMA bone cement. CONCLUSION Most of the guidelines do not provide clear criteria for surgical application and provide more of a basic framework. The level of evidence for these surgical recommendations ranges from LOE B to D, and almost all guidelines recommend vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, but for palliative and more aggressive surgery, which recommended to personalize specific surgical strategies with multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Yu
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Dingbang Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xing Ding
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Liang Qiao
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Luosheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Yinjie Yan
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wen Mo
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Junming Ma
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Mengchen Yin
- Department of Orthopedic, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meng M, Hu J, Liu X, Tian M, Lei W, Liu E, Han Z, Li Q, Chen Y. Barriers and facilitators to guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:435. [PMID: 38580958 PMCID: PMC10998389 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10860-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being a global public health concern, there is a research gap in analyzing implementation strategies for managing off-label drug use in children. This study aims to understand professional health managers' perspectives on implementing the Guideline in hospitals and determine the Guideline's implementation facilitators and barriers. METHODS Pediatric directors, pharmacy directors, and medical department directors from secondary and tertiary hospitals across the country were recruited for online interviews. The interviews were performed between June 27 and August 25, 2022. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was adopted for data collection, data analysis, and findings interpretation to implement interventions across healthcare settings. RESULTS Individual interviews were conducted with 28 healthcare professionals from all over the Chinese mainland. Key stakeholders in implementing the Guideline for the Management of Pediatric Off-Label Use of Drugs in China (2021) were interviewed to identify 57 influencing factors, including 27 facilitators, 29 barriers, and one neutral factor, based on the CFIR framework. The study revealed the complexity of the factors influencing managing children's off-label medication use. A lack of policy incentives was the key obstacle in external settings. The communication barrier between pharmacists and physicians was the most critical internal barrier. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this study significantly reduces the implementation gap in managing children's off-label drug use. We provided a reference for the standardized management of children's off-label use of drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Meng
- Chevidence Lab of Child & Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Jiale Hu
- Department of Nurse Anesthesia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | - Xiao Liu
- School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Min Tian
- Department of Pharmacy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wenjuan Lei
- Department of Pharmacy, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Enmei Liu
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhu Han
- College of Pharmacy, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiu Li
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China.
- Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Chevidence Lab of Child & Adolescent Health, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, China.
- Research Unit of Evidence-Based Evaluation and Guidelines, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences(2021RU017), School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China.
- Lanzhou University GRADE Center, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klasnja P, Meza RD, Pullmann MD, Mettert KD, Hawkes R, Palazzo L, Weiner BJ, Lewis CC. Getting cozy with causality: Advances to the causal pathway diagramming method to enhance implementation precision. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2024; 5:26334895241248851. [PMID: 38694167 PMCID: PMC11062231 DOI: 10.1177/26334895241248851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Implementation strategies are theorized to work well when carefully matched to implementation determinants and when factors-preconditions, moderators, etc.-that influence strategy effectiveness are prospectively identified and addressed. Existing methods for strategy selection are either imprecise or require significant technical expertise and resources, undermining their utility. This article outlines refinements to causal pathway diagrams (CPDs), a method for articulating the causal process through which implementation strategies work and offers illustrations of their use. Method CPDs are a visualization tool to represent an implementation strategy, its mechanism(s) (i.e., the processes through which a strategy is thought to operate), determinants it is intended to address, factors that may impede or facilitate its effectiveness, and the series of outcomes that should be expected if the strategy is operating as intended. We offer principles for constructing CPDs and describe their key functions. Results Applications of the CPD method by study teams from two National Institute of Health-funded Implementation Science Centers and a research grant are presented. These include the use of CPDs to (a) match implementation strategies to determinants, (b) understand the conditions under which an implementation strategy works, and (c) develop causal theories of implementation strategies. Conclusions CPDs offer a novel method for implementers to select, understand, and improve the effectiveness of implementation strategies. They make explicit theoretical assumptions about strategy operation while supporting practical planning. Early applications have led to method refinements and guidance for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Predrag Klasnja
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rosemary D. Meza
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D. Pullmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kayne D. Mettert
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rene Hawkes
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lorella Palazzo
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Hans Rosling Center Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle WA, USA
| | - Cara C. Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fajardo E, Lastrucci C, Bah N, Mingiedi CM, Ba NS, Mosha F, Lule FJ, Paul MAS, Hughes L, Barr-DiChiara M, Jamil MS, Sands A, Baggaley R, Johnson C. Country adoption of WHO 2019 guidance on HIV testing strategies and algorithms: a policy review across the WHO African region. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071198. [PMID: 38154882 PMCID: PMC10759095 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2019, the WHO released guidelines on HIV testing service (HTS). We aim to assess the adoption of six of these recommendations on HIV testing strategies among African countries. DESIGN Policy review. SETTING 47 countries within the WHO African region. PARTICIPANTS National HTS policies from the WHO African region as of December 2021. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Uptake of WHO recommendations across national HTS policies including the standard three-test strategy; discontinuation of a tiebreaker test to rule in HIV infection; discontinuation of western blotting (WB) for HIV diagnosis; retesting prior to antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation and the use of dual HIV/syphilis rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) in antenatal care. Country policy adoption was assessed on a continuum, based on varying levels of complete adoption. RESULTS National policies were reviewed for 96% (n=45/47) of countries in the WHO African region, 38% (n=18) were published before 2019 and 60% (n=28) adopted WHO guidance. Among countries that had not fully adopted WHO guidance, not yet adopting a three-test strategy was the most common reason for misalignment (45%, 21/47); of which 31% and 22% were in low-prevalence (<5%) and high-prevalence (≥5%) countries, respectively. Ten policies (21%) recommended the use of WB and 49% (n=23) recommended retesting before ART initiation. Dual HIV/syphilis RDTs were recommended in 45% (n=21/47) of policies. CONCLUSIONS Many countries in the African region have adopted WHO-recommended HIV testing strategies; however, efforts are still needed to fully adopt WHO guidance. Countries should accelerate their efforts to adopt and implement a three-test strategy, retesting prior to ART initiation and the use of dual HIV/syphilis RDTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Fajardo
- Global HIV, Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Céline Lastrucci
- Global HIV, Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nayé Bah
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Bamako, Mali
| | - Casimir Manzengo Mingiedi
- Inter-country support team for Central Africa, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Libreville, Gabon
| | - Ndoungou Salla Ba
- Inter-country support team for Western and Central Africa, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
| | - Fausta Mosha
- Inter-country support team for Eastern and Southern Africa, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Frank John Lule
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | | | - Lago Hughes
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | | | - Muhammad S Jamil
- Global HIV, Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anita Sands
- Regulation and Prequalification, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rachel Baggaley
- Global HIV, Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cheryl Johnson
- Global HIV, Hepatitis, and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wabnitz K, Rueb M, Rehfuess EA, Strahwald B, Pfadenhauer LM. Assessing the impact of an evidence- and consensus-based guideline for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in German schools on decision-making processes: a multi-component qualitative analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:138. [PMID: 38115061 PMCID: PMC10729453 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01072-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION During the COVID-19 pandemic, decision-making on measures to reduce or prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools was rendered difficult by a rapidly evolving and uncertain evidence base regarding their effectiveness and unintended consequences. To support decision-makers, an interdisciplinary panel of scientific experts, public health and school authorities as well as those directly affected by school measures, was convened in an unprecedented effort to develop an evidence- and consensus-based public health guideline for German schools. This study sought to assess whether and how this guideline impacted decision-making processes. METHODS This study comprised three components: (1) we sent inquiries according to the Freedom of Information Acts of each Federal State to ministries of education, family, and health. (2) We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in decision-making regarding school measures in two Federal States, and (3) we undertook semi-structured interviews with members of the guideline panel. The content of response letters in component 1 was analysed descriptively; data for components 2 and 3 were analysed using deductive-inductive thematic qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. RESULTS Responses to the Freedom of Information Act inquiries showed that the guideline was recognised as a relevant source of information by ministries of education in nine out of 16 Federal States and used as a reference to check existing directives for school measures in five Federal States. All participants (20 interviews) emphasised the value of the guideline given its evidence- and consensus-based development process but also noted limitations in its usability and usefulness, e.g., lack of context-specificity. It was consulted by participants who advised policy-makers (5 interviews) alongside other sources of evidence. Overall, perceptions regarding the guideline's impact were mixed. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the guideline was relatively well-known in Federal States' decision-making bodies and that it was considered alongside other forms of evidence in some of these. We suggest that further research to evaluate the impact of public health guidelines on (political) decision-making is warranted. Guideline development processes may need to be adapted to account for the realities of decision-making during public health emergencies and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Wabnitz
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany.
| | - Mike Rueb
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva A Rehfuess
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Brigitte Strahwald
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Lisa M Pfadenhauer
- Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abuwa C, Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Battistella M, Lofters A, Ahluwalia V, Gagliardi AR. Identifying strategies that support equitable person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: content analysis of guidelines. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:734. [PMID: 37710195 PMCID: PMC10500823 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06877-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women are disproportionately impacted by osteoarthritis (OA) but less likely than men to access early diagnosis and management, or experience OA care tailored through person-centred approaches to their needs and preferences, particularly racialized women. One way to support clinicians in optimizing OA care is through clinical guidelines. We aimed to examine the content of OA guidelines for guidance on providing equitable, person-centred care to disadvantaged groups including women. METHODS We searched indexed databases and websites for English-language OA-relevant guidelines published in 2000 or later by non-profit organizations. We used manifest content analysis to extract data, and summary statistics and text to describe guideline characteristics, person-centred care (PCC) using a six-domain PCC framework, OA prevalence or barriers by intersectional factors, and strategies to improve equitable access to OA care. RESULTS We included 36 OA guidelines published from 2003 to 2021 in 8 regions or countries. Few (39%) development panels included patients. While most (81%) guidelines included at least one PCC domain, guidance was often brief or vague, few addressed exchange information, respond to emotions and manage uncertainty, and none referred to fostering a healing relationship. Few (39%) guidelines acknowledged or described greater prevalence of OA among particular groups; only 3 (8%) noted that socioeconomic status was a barrier to OA care, and only 2 (6%) offered guidance to clinicians on how to improve equitable access to OA care: assess acceptability, availability, accessibility, and affordability of self-management interventions; and employ risk assessment tools to identify patients without means to cope well at home after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that OA guidelines do not support clinicians in caring for diverse persons with OA who face disadvantages due to intersectional factors that influence access to and quality of care. Developers could strengthen OA guidelines by incorporating guidance for PCC and for equity that could be drawn from existing frameworks and tools, and by including diverse persons with OA on guideline development panels. Future research is needed to identify multi-level (patient, clinician, system) strategies that could be implemented via guidelines or in other ways to improve equitable, person-centred OA care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study was informed by a team of researchers, collaborators, and thirteen diverse women with lived experience, who contributed to planning, and data collection, analysis and interpretation by reviewing study materials and providing verbal (during meetings) and written (via email) feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma Abuwa
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Angelina Abbaticchio
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | | | | | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Marisa Battistella
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fahim C, Prashad AJ, Silveira K, Chandraraj A, Thombs BD, Tonelli M, Thériault G, Grad R, Riva J, Colquhoun H, Rodin R, Subnath M, Rolland-Harris E, Barnhardt K, Straus SE. Dissemination and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a longitudinal, mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's knowledge translation efforts. CMAJ Open 2023; 11:E684-E695. [PMID: 37553226 PMCID: PMC10414974 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20220121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (task force) develops evidence-based preventive health care guidelines and knowledge translation (KT) tools to facilitate guideline dissemination and implementation. We aimed to determine practitioners' awareness of task force guidelines and KT tools and explore barriers and facilitators to their use. METHODS The task force's KT team completed annual evaluations using surveys and interviews with primary care providers in Canada from 2014 to 2020, to assess practitioners' awareness and determinants of use of task force guidelines and tools. We transcribed interviews verbatim and double-coded them using a framework analysis approach. RESULTS A total of 1284 primary care practitioners completed surveys and 183 participated in interviews. On average, 79.9% of participants were aware of the task force's 7 cancer screening guidelines, 36.2% were aware of the other 6 screening guidelines and 18.6% were aware of the 3 lifestyle or prevention guidelines. Participants identified 13 barriers and 7 facilitators to guideline and KT tool implementation; these were consistent over time. Participants identified strategies at the public and patient, provider and health systems levels to improve uptake of guidelines. INTERPRETATION Canadian primary care practitioners were more aware of task force cancer screening guidelines than its other preventive health guidelines. Over the 6-year period, participants consistently reported barriers to guideline uptake, including misalignment with patient preferences and other provincial or specialty guideline organizations. Further evaluations will assess tailored strategies to address the barriers identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Fahim
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - Anupa Jyoti Prashad
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kyle Silveira
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Arthana Chandraraj
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Marcello Tonelli
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Guylène Thériault
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Roland Grad
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - John Riva
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Heather Colquhoun
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Rachel Rodin
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Melissa Subnath
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Elizabeth Rolland-Harris
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Kim Barnhardt
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Sharon E Straus
- Knowledge Translation Program (Fahim, Prashad, Silveira, Chandraraj, Straus), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Medicine (Thombs, Theriault), McGill University; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research (Thombs), Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Que.; Cumming School of Medicine (Tonelli), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Medicine (Grad), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Department of Family Medicine (Riva), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Colquhoun), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Public Health Agency of Canada (Rodin, Subnath, Rolland-Harris); Canadian Medical Association Journal (Barnhardt), Ottawa, Ont.; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Straus), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Olver I, Braithwaite J. Clinical practice guideline adherence in oncology: A qualitative study of insights from clinicians in Australia. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279116. [PMID: 36525435 PMCID: PMC9757567 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of cancer is large in Australia, and rates of cancer Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) adherence is suboptimal across various cancers. METHODS The objective of this study is to characterise clinician-perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer CPG adherence in Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect data from 33 oncology-focused clinicians (surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and haematologists). Clinicians were recruited in 2019 and 2020 through purposive and snowball sampling from 7 hospitals across Sydney, Australia, and interviewed either face-to-face in hospitals or by phone. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative thematic analysis of the interview data was undertaken. Human research ethics committee approval and governance approval was granted (2019/ETH11722, #52019568810127). RESULTS Five broad themes and subthemes of key barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment CPG adherence were identified: Theme 1: CPG content; Theme 2: Individual clinician and patient factors; Theme 3: Access to, awareness of and availability of CPGs; Theme 4: Organisational and cultural factors; and Theme 5: Development and implementation factors. The most frequently reported barriers to adherence were CPGs not catering for patient complexities, being slow to be updated, patient treatment preferences, geographical challenges for patients who travel large distances to access cancer services and limited funding of CPG recommended drugs. The most frequently reported facilitators to adherence were easy accessibility, peer review, multidisciplinary engagement or MDT attendance, and transparent CPG development by trusted, multidisciplinary experts. CPGs provide a reassuring framework for clinicians to check their treatment plans against. Clinicians want cancer CPGs to be frequently updated utilising a wiki-like process, and easily accessible online via a comprehensive database, coordinated by a well-trusted development body. CONCLUSION Future implementation strategies of cancer CPGs in Australia should be tailored to consider these context-specific barriers and facilitators, taking into account both the content of CPGs and the communication of that content. The establishment of a centralised, comprehensive, online database, with living wiki-style cancer CPGs, coordinated by a well-funded development body, along with incorporation of recommendations into point-of-care decision support would potentially address many of the issues identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Geoff P. Delaney
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
- SWSLHD Cancer Services, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
- SESLHD Cancer Service, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sedelius H, Tistad M, Bergsten U, Dehlin M, Iggman D, Wallin L, Svärd A. Professionals’ perspectives on existing practice and conditions for nurse-led gout care based on treatment recommendations: a qualitative study in primary healthcare. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:71. [PMID: 35392809 PMCID: PMC8988383 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01677-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Gout affects nearly 2 % of the population and is associated with repeated painful flares of arthritis. Preventive urate-lowering therapy is widely available, but only one third of patients receive adequate treatment. Lack of knowledge among healthcare professionals and patients within primary healthcare are implicated as partial explanations for this undertreatment. Nurse-led care has proved to be an effective model when treating patients with gout, but there is a need for more knowledge about factors that can be expected to influence the future implementation of such care. The aim of this study was to describe factors influencing existing gout care in primary healthcare and the conditions for a future implementation of nurse-led gout care based on national treatment recommendations. Methods In this qualitative study, focus group discussions with 56 nurses and physicians and individual interviews with eight managers were conducted at nine primary healthcare units in central Sweden. A deductive qualitative content analysis based on the main constructs of the framework Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services was followed by an inductive analysis within the frames of the main constructs: innovation, recipients and context. Results Gout-related contacts with primary healthcare was described as being patient initiated, diagnostics was in some respects complex and nurse-led care was experienced as a favourable primary healthcare model in general (innovation). Gout was seen as a low-priority condition with acute flares and there was inadequate knowledge of gout, including preventive treatment (recipients). Primary healthcare was perceived as having a holistic but fragmented responsibility for gout care, recommendations against keeping waiting lists complicated follow-up appointments and a need for motivation and support when introducing new practices was emphasised (context). Conclusion In this study, investigating the perspective of professionals, several factors were found to influence existing gout care. It will be crucial to target these factors in the development of a future implementation strategy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01677-z.
Collapse
|
11
|
Taylor E, Webster CS. Quality improvement in New Zealand pediatric anesthesia: National quality direction, patient experience, equity, and collaboration. Paediatr Anaesth 2022; 32:1191-1200. [PMID: 35357723 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The current priorities of the quality and safety of patient care in New Zealand at a central government level are described, with a focus on equity and patient experience. Priorities between stakeholders differ. We report the current quality activities of New Zealand pediatric anesthetists in relation to these governance aims, seeking gaps and suggesting future directions to align governance priorities and local activities. International relevance is also outlined. New Zealand Māori experience health inequity. Complex systemic factors including those of systemic racism and prejudice contribute to the inequity. The specific contributions to health inequity from pediatric anesthetists are unknown but could include aspects of cultural safety, delays in treatment and treatment deficits. Patient experience is correlated positively with other quality domains. Peri-operative patient experience tools require outcomes of interest that matter to patients, including relevant cultural safety domains. Risk identification and critical event review contribute to local learnings in departments and institutions, and more widely to national and binational (with Australia) learnings. Several collaborative projects in Australia and New Zealand, whilst not primarily quality improvement projects, may improve pediatric anesthesia. These collaborations include a pediatric anesthesia professional network, a curriculum for a pediatric anesthetic fellowship, contributions to a document on standards for pediatric anesthesia, and a national quality group researching key performance indicators across New Zealand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsa Taylor
- Starship Children's Hospital, District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Craig S Webster
- Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schladitz K, Weitzel EC, Löbner M, Soltmann B, Jessen F, Schmitt J, Pfennig A, Riedel-Heller SG, Gühne U. Demands on Health Information and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients from the Perspective of Adults with Mental Illness and Family Members: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192114262. [PMID: 36361142 PMCID: PMC9659184 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: "Patient health information" promote health literacy. "Patient guidelines" as a sub group reflect the current evidence about illnesses and treatment options adapted to the needs of laypersons. Little is known about factors promoting and hindering their use by people affected by mental illness and their relatives. (2) Methods: Telephone interviews (N = 15; n = 4 adults affected by mental illness, n = 5 relatives, n = 6 both applicable) were conducted according to the Sørensen model of health literacy. Data were recorded, transcribed and content-analyzed following Mayring. (3) Results: Health information is used regularly by individuals affected by mental illness and their relatives, but "patient guidelines" are largely unknown. Yet, there is a great willingness to use them. Main barriers are a lack of statistical knowledge, the complexity of health-related topics and cognitive impairment sometimes accompanying mental illnesses. Target group-oriented adaptation as well as transparent and even-handed presentation of (dis-)advantages of treatment options can increase trust. (4) Conclusions: Health information and guidelines can help affected persons and relatives to make treatment decisions by conveying unbiased, up-to-date knowledge. Target group-specific adaptations should be made for psychiatric illnesses and features specific to mental illnesses compared to physical illnesses should be included. Clinical practice guidelines must be distributed more widely to increase their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Schladitz
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-341-97-15481
| | - Elena C. Weitzel
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Margrit Löbner
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bettina Soltmann
- Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Köln, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (ZEGV), Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
| | - Andrea Pfennig
- Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Uta Gühne
- Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Methodological Rigor and Transparency in Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Care in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review Using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX Tools. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14132603. [PMID: 35807784 PMCID: PMC9268338 DOI: 10.3390/nu14132603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the methodological quality of (1) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that inform nutrition care in critically ill adults using the AGREE II tool and (2) CPG recommendations for determining energy expenditure using the AGREE-REX tool. Methods: CPGs by a professional society or academic group, intended to guide nutrition care in critically ill adults, that used a systematic literature search and rated the evidence were included. Four databases and grey literature were searched from January 2011 to 19 January 2022. Five investigators assessed the methodological quality of CPGs and recommendations specific to energy expenditure determination. Scaled domain scores were calculated for AGREE II and a scaled total score for AGREE-REX. Data are presented as medians (interquartile range). Results: Eleven CPGs were included. Highest scoring domains for AGREE II were clarity of presentation (82% [76–87%]) and scope and purpose (78% [66–83%]). Lowest scoring domains were applicability (37% [32–42%]) and stakeholder involvement (46% [33–51%]). Eight (73%) CPGs provided recommendations relating to energy expenditure determination; scores were low overall (37% [36–40%]) and across individual domains. Conclusions: Nutrition CPGs for critically ill patients are developed using systematic methods but lack engagement with key stakeholders and guidance to support application. The quality of energy expenditure determination recommendations is low.
Collapse
|
14
|
Uwizeye CB, Zomahoun HTV, Bussières A, Thomas A, Kairy D, Massougbodji J, Rheault N, Tchoubi S, Philibert L, Abib Gaye S, Khadraoui L, Ben Charif A, Diendéré E, Langlois L, Dugas M, Légaré F. Implementation strategies for knowledge products in primary healthcare: a systematic review of systematic reviews (Preprint). Interact J Med Res 2022; 11:e38419. [PMID: 35635786 PMCID: PMC9315889 DOI: 10.2196/38419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The underuse or overuse of knowledge products leads to waste in health care, and primary care is no exception. Objective This study aimed to characterize which knowledge products are frequently implemented, the implementation strategies used in primary care, and the implementation outcomes that are measured. Methods We performed a systematic review (SR) of SRs using the Cochrane systematic approach to include eligible SRs. The inclusion criteria were any primary care contexts, health care professionals and patients, any Effective Practice and Organization of Care implementation strategies of specified knowledge products, any comparators, and any implementation outcomes based on the Proctor framework. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Ovid PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to October 2019 without any restrictions. We searched the references of the included SRs. Pairs of reviewers independently performed selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment by using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2. Data extraction was informed by the Effective Practice and Organization of Care taxonomy for implementation strategies and the Proctor framework for implementation outcomes. We performed a descriptive analysis and summarized the results by using a narrative synthesis. Results Of the 11,101 records identified, 81 (0.73%) SRs were included. Of these 81, a total of 47 (58%) SRs involved health care professionals alone. Moreover, 15 SRs had a high or moderate methodological quality. Most of them addressed 1 type of knowledge product (56/81, 69%), common clinical practice guidelines (26/56, 46%) or management, and behavioral or pharmacological health interventions (24/56, 43%). Mixed strategies were used for implementation (67/81, 83%), predominantly education-based (meetings in 60/81, 74%; materials distribution in 59/81, 73%; and academic detailing in 45/81, 56%), reminder (53/81, 36%), and audit and feedback (40/81, 49%) strategies. Education meetings (P=.13) and academic detailing (P=.11) seemed to be used more when the population was composed of health care professionals alone. Improvements in the adoption of knowledge products were the most commonly measured outcome (72/81, 89%). The evidence level was reported in 12% (10/81) of SRs on 62 outcomes (including 48 improvements in adoption), of which 16 (26%) outcomes were of moderate or high level. Conclusions Clinical practice guidelines and management and behavioral or pharmacological health interventions are the most commonly implemented knowledge products and are implemented through the mixed use of educational, reminder, and audit and feedback strategies. There is a need for a strong methodology for the SR of randomized controlled trials to explore their effectiveness and the entire cascade of implementation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claude Bernard Uwizeye
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Réseau Provincial de recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation (REPAR), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Réseau Provincial de recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation (REPAR), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Dahlia Kairy
- Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Réseau Provincial de recherche en Adaptation-Réadaptation (REPAR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Institut Universitaire sur la Réadaptation en Déficience Physique de Montréal (IURDPM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - José Massougbodji
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Nathalie Rheault
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Sébastien Tchoubi
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Leonel Philibert
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Serigne Abib Gaye
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Lobna Khadraoui
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Ali Ben Charif
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- CubecXpert, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Ella Diendéré
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Léa Langlois
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Learning Health System Component of the Québec Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) - Support for People and Patient-Oriented and Trials (SUPPORT) Unit, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS-CN), Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carlisle N, Dalkin SM, Shennan AH, Sandall J. Protocol for the IMPART study: IMplementation of the preterm birth surveillance PAthway - a RealisT evaluation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061302. [PMID: 35351735 PMCID: PMC8966568 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New guidance, from NHS England (Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 Element 5 (SBLCBv2)) has recommended a best practice pathway for women at risk of preterm birth (the Preterm Birth Pathway). This is to help meet the Department of Health's aim to reduce preterm birth from 8% to 6% by 2025. Considering most hospitals do not currently have a preterm prevention clinic, implementing this pathway will require significant coordination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study will aim to investigate key features of contexts, mechanisms and outcomes, and their interactions in the implementation of the asymptomatic prediction and prevention components of the SBLCBv2 Preterm Birth Surveillance Pathway. This will be through a theory driven realist evaluation, utilising mixed methods (interviews with staff and women, observational analysis and analysing routinely collected hospital and admin data) in three case sites in England. The study has a Project Advisory Group composed of five women who have recently given birth. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has ethical approval (King's College London REC approval number: MRSP-20/21-20955, and, IRAS:289144). A dissemination plan will be fully created with the Project Advisory Group, and we anticipate this will include presenting at conferences, publications, webinars, alongside dissemination to the wider population through parent and baby groups, the media and charities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN57127874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Carlisle
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Michelle Dalkin
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew H Shennan
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dray J, Licata M, Doherty E, Tully B, Williams B, Curtin S, White D, Lecathelinais C, Ward S, Hasson S, Elliott EJ, Wiggers J, Kingsland M. Enhancing clinician participation in quality improvement training: implementation and impact of an evidence-based initiative to maximise antenatal clinician participation in training regarding women’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:402. [PMID: 35351113 PMCID: PMC8962084 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07717-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are significant challenges in ensuring sufficient clinician participation in quality improvement training. Clinician capability has been identified as a barrier to the delivery of evidence-based care. Clinician training is an effective strategy to address this barrier, however, there are significant challenges in ensuring adequate clinician participation in training. This study aimed to assess the extent of participation by antenatal clinicians in evidence-based training to address alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and to assess differences in participation by profession. Methods A 7-month training initiative based on six evidence-based principles was implemented in a maternity service in New South Wales, Australia. Descriptive statistics described participation in training (% attending: any training; six evidence-based principles of training; all principles). Regression analyses examined differences by profession. Results Almost all antenatal clinicians participated in some training (182/186; 98%); 69% participated in ≥1 h of training (μ = 88.2mins, SD:56.56). The proportion of clinicians participating in training that satisfied each of the six principles ranged from 35% (training from peers and experts) to 82% (training was educational and instructional). Only 7% participated in training that satisfied all principles. A significantly higher proportion of midwifery compared to medical clinicians participated in training satisfying five of the six training principles. Conclusions A training initiative based on evidence-based principles resulted in almost all clinicians receiving some training and 69% participating in at least 1 h of training. Variability between professions suggests training needs to be tailored to such groups. Further research is required to determine possible associations with care delivery outcomes. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, No. ACTRN12617000882325 (date registered: 16/06/2017).
Collapse
|
17
|
Overbury RS, Stoddard GJ, Pupaibool J, Hansen CB, Lebiedz-Odrobina D. The effect of an electronic medical record intervention on hydroxychloroquine prescribing habits and surveyed providers' opinions of the 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines in the rheumatology and dermatology practices of an academic institutionle. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:913. [PMID: 34479563 PMCID: PMC8418105 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06954-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retinal toxicity is a rare adverse event related to the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). To address this, in 2016, the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) issued guidelines recommending that HCQ not exceed 5 mg/kg/day. We analyzed HCQ prescribing habits at our institution, compared to these guidelines, and used surveys to determine the opinions on these guidelines. We then introduced, in a prospective and non-controlled study, a clinical decision support (CDS) tool into the electronic medical record (EMR) to study how this intervention might affect adherence with or opinions on these guidelines. METHODS Data were collected pre-intervention (June 2017-January 2019) and post-intervention (March 2019-April 2020). In January 2019 we released our CDS tool. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics for demographic data and Fisher's exact tests for comparisons of proportions between groups. RESULTS Pre-intervention, we reviewed 1128 rheumatology charts and 282 dermatology charts. 31.0 and 39.7% respectively (32.8% combined) were prescribed HCQ > 5 .0 mg/kg/day. Post-intervention, we reviewed 1161 rheumatology charts and 110 dermatology charts. 23.0 and 25.5% respectively (23.2% combined) were prescribed HCQ > 5.0 mg/kg/day. Post-intervention, 9.6% fewer patients were prescribed HCQ > 5 mg/kg/day (P < .001). Pre-intervention, we compiled 18 rheumatology surveys and 12 dermatology surveys. Post-intervention, we compiled 16 rheumatology surveys and 12 dermatology surveys. Post-intervention, fewer rheumatologists incorrectly described the AAO weight-based guidelines. Combined, there was an overall reduction but not of statistical significance (P = .47). The majority of providers surveyed believed that the CDS tool was useful (72.2%). CONCLUSIONS At our academic institution, there remains unfamiliarity with and hesitation to comply with the 2016 AAO guidelines. Prescribed doses often exceed what is recommended in these guidelines. A CDS tool can improve adherence with these guidelines and might improve providers' familiarity with these guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca S Overbury
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, 4B200, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Gregory J Stoddard
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Jakrapun Pupaibool
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | | | - Dorota Lebiedz-Odrobina
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, 4B200, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bussières A, Cancelliere C, Ammendolia C, Comer CM, Zoubi FA, Châtillon CE, Chernish G, Cox JM, Gliedt JA, Haskett D, Jensen RK, Marchand AA, Tomkins-Lane C, O'Shaughnessy J, Passmore S, Schneider MJ, Shipka P, Stewart G, Stuber K, Yee A, Ornelas J. Non-Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Leading To Neurogenic Claudication: A Clinical Practice Guideline. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2021; 22:1015-1039. [PMID: 33857615 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.03.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) causing neurogenic claudication (NC) is increasingly common with an aging population and can be associated with significant symptoms and functional limitations. We developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on nonsurgical management of patients with LSS causing NC. Using the GRADE approach, a multidisciplinary guidelines panel based recommendations on evidence from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews published through June 2019, or expert consensus. The literature monitored up to October 2020. Clinical outcomes evaluated included pain, disability, quality of life, and walking capacity. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population includes adults with LSS (congenital and/or acquired, lateral recess or central canal, with or without low back pain, with or without spondylolisthesis) causing NC. The guidelines panel developed 6 recommendations based on randomized controlled trials and 5 others based on professional consensus, summarized in 3 overarching recommendations: (Grade: statements are all conditional/weak recommendations) Recommendation 1. For patients with LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may initially select multimodal care nonpharmacological therapies with education, advice and lifestyle changes, behavioral change techniques in conjunction with home exercise, manual therapy, and/or rehabilitation (moderate-quality evidence), traditional acupuncture on a trial basis (very low-quality evidence), and postoperative rehabilitation (supervised program of exercises and/or educational materials encouraging activity) with cognitive-behavioral therapy 12 weeks postsurgery (low-quality evidence). Recommendation 2. In patients LSS causing NC, clinicians and patients may consider a trial of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants. (very low-quality evidence). Recommendation 3. For patients LSS causing NC, we recommend against the use of the following pharmacological therapies: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, methylcobalamin, calcitonin, paracetamol, opioids, muscle relaxants, pregabalin (consensus-based), gabapentin (very low-quality), and epidural steroidal injections (high-quality evidence). PERSPECTIVE: This guideline, on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence on the nonsurgical management of lumbar spine stenosis, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe and effective non-surgical management of lumbar spine stenosis should be on the basis of a plan of care tailored to the individual and the type of treatment involved, and multimodal care is recommended in most situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Bussières
- School of Physical Medicine & Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Carolina Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Canada
| | - Carlo Ammendolia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto and Mount Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine M Comer
- Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom/ Faculty of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Fadi Al Zoubi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
| | | | - Greg Chernish
- Family Medicine at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | - Rikke Krüger Jensen
- NIKKB and Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Andrée-Anne Marchand
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christy Tomkins-Lane
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada
| | - Julie O'Shaughnessy
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven Passmore
- Faculty of Kinesiology & Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Michael J Schneider
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Kent Stuber
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Albert Yee
- Health Systems Management, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joseph Ornelas
- American Hip Institute, Des Plaines, Illinois; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yang M, Yue W, Han X, Hu C, Sun X, Luo J. Postpartum care indications and methodological quality:a systematic review of guidelines. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG 2021; 30:2261-2275. [PMID: 34306970 PMCID: PMC8288832 DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The coverage of postpartum care is not ideal, and has not been used very well due to not enough attention being paid to the puerperal women and newborns, especially in developing countries. Practice guidelines on postpartum care provide beneficial practice guidance and help to reduce maternal mortality. However, little is known about the credibility and consistency of those guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to summarize main postpartum care indications and appraise methodological quality of guidelines. Methods Seven literature databases and guideline development institutions and organizations of obstetrics and maternity care were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument, and synthesized consistent and non-consistent recommendations using the content analysis approach. Results Twenty-nine guidelines were included and a total of eight postpartum care indications were identified. Most guidelines focused on care indications and interventions including exclusive breastfeeding, maternal nutrition, home visit, infant or newborn care and sexuality, contraception, and birth spacing. However, indications such as pain or weight management, pelvic floor muscle training, abdominal rehabilitation, and mental health got less attention. Additionally, the overall quality of all involving postpartum care guidelines is relatively good and acceptable. Conclusions Guidelines developed by NICE, RANO, and WHO indicated higher methodological quality. For postpartum care indications, most guidelines are incomplete. Variation in practice guidelines for postpartum care recommendations exists. In the future, implementation research into shared decision-making, as well as further high-quality research to broaden the evidence base for postpartum care indications is recommended. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01629-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Yang
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Wei Yue
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Xinrui Han
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Chunhong Hu
- Department of Spleen and Stomach, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Xiaoning Sun
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| | - Jianghe Luo
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, No. 232, Waihuan East Road, Guangzhou University City, Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Adedayo T, O'Mahony D, Adeleke O, Mabunda S. Doctors' practice and attitudes towards red blood cell transfusion at Mthatha Regional Hospital, Eastern Cape, South Africa: A mixed methods study. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 2021; 13:e1-e8. [PMID: 34212740 PMCID: PMC8252156 DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Unnecessary blood transfusion exposes recipients to potential harms. Aim The aim of this study was to describe blood transfusion practice and explore doctors’ attitudes towards transfusion. Setting A hospital providing level 1 and 2 services. Methods A mixed-methods study design was used. In the cross-sectional descriptive component, a sample was taken from patients transfused over a 2-month period. Blood use was categorised as for medical anaemia or haemorrhage, and appropriate or not. The qualitative component comprised a purposeful sample for focus group and individual semi-structured interviews. Results Of 239 patients sampled, 62% were transfused for medical anaemia and 38% for haemorrhage. In the medical anaemia group, compliance with age-appropriate transfusion thresholds was 69%. In medical anaemia and haemorrhage, 114 (77%) and 85 (93.4%) of recipients had orders for ≥ 2 red blood cell (RBC) units, respectively. In adults ≥ 18 years old with medical anaemia, 47.1% of orders would have resulted in a haemoglobin (Hb) > 8 g/dL. Six doctors participated in focus group and eleven in individual interviews. There was a lack of awareness of institutional transfusion guidelines, disagreement on appropriate RBC transfusion thresholds and comments that more than one RBC unit should always be transfused. Factors informing decisions to transfuse included advice from senior colleagues, relieving symptoms of anaemia and high product costs. Conclusion Most orders were for two or more units. In medical anaemia, doctors’ compliance with RBC transfusion thresholds was reasonable; however, almost half of the orders would have resulted in overtransfusion. The attitudes of doctors sampled suggest that their transfusion practice is influenced more by institutional values than formal guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Temitope Adedayo
- Department of Family Medicine and Rural Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Yates MW, Pond D. Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia: a protocol for undertaking a Delphi technique to identify the recommendations relevant to primary care nurses in the delivery of person-centred dementia care. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044843. [PMID: 33986053 PMCID: PMC8126272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nationally and internationally it is well recognised that dementia is poorly recognised and suboptimally managed in the primary care setting. There are multiple and complex reasons for this gap in care, including a lack of knowledge, high care demands and inadequate time for the general practitioner alone to manage dementia with its multiple physical, psychological and social dimensions. The primary care nurse potentially has a role in assisting the general practitioner in the provision of evidence-based dementia care. Although dementia-care guidelines for general practitioners exist, evidence on resources to support the primary care nurse in dementia care provision is scarce. The 'Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia' provides 109 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dementia. This protocol describes a Delphi study to identify which of the 109 recommendations contained in these multidisciplinary guidelines are relevant to the primary care nurse in the delivery of person-centred dementia care in the general practice setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using a Delphi consensus online survey, an expert panel will grade each of the recommendations written in the 'Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia' as high-to-low relevance with respect to the role of the primary care nurse in general practice. To optimise reliability of results, quality indicators will be used in the data collection and reporting of the study. Invited panel members will include Australian primary care nurses working in general practice, primary care nursing researchers and representatives of the Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association, the peak professional body for nurses working in primary healthcare. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by The University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (H-2019-0029).Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Department of Public Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark William Yates
- Geriatric Medicine, Ballarat Health Service, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Ballarat Clinical School, Deakin University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- General Practice, University of Newcastle Australia, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tomsic I, Ebadi E, Gossé F, Hartlep I, Schipper P, Krauth C, Schock B, Chaberny IF, von Lengerke T. Determinants of orthopedic physicians' self-reported compliance with surgical site infection prevention: results of the WACH-trial's pilot survey on COM-B factors in a German university hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2021; 10:67. [PMID: 33827692 PMCID: PMC8025554 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00932-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs), which due to their long-term consequences are especially critical in orthopedic surgery, entails compliance with over 20 individual measures. However, little is known about the psychosocial determinants of such compliance among orthopedic physicians, which impedes efforts to tailor implementation interventions to improve compliance. Thus, for this professional group, this pilot survey examined psychosocial determinants of self-reported compliance, which have been theoretically derived from the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior) model. METHODS In 2019, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in a tertiary care university orthopedic clinic in Hannover, Germany, as a pilot for the WACH-trial ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotics Consumption in Surgery]). Fifty-two physicians participated (38 surgeons, 14 anesthesiologists; response rate: 73.2%). The questionnaire assessed self-reported compliance with 26 SSI preventive measures, and its psychosocial determinants (COM-B). Statistical analyses included descriptive, correlational, and linear multiple regression modeling. RESULTS Self-reported compliance rates for individual measures varied from 53.8 to 100%, with overall compliance (defined for every participant as the mean of his or her self-reported rates for each individual measure) averaging at 88.9% (surgeons: 90%, anesthesiologists: 85.9%; p = 0.097). Of the components identified in factor analyses of the COM-B items, planning, i.e., self-formulated conditional plans to comply, was the least pronounced (mean = 4.3 on the 7-point Likert scale), while motivation was reported to be the strongest (mean = 6.3). Bi-variately, the overall compliance index co-varied with all four COM-B-components, i.e., capabilities (r = 0.512, p < 0.001), opportunities (r = 0.421, p = 0.002), planning (r = 0.378, p = 0.007), and motivation (r = 0.272, p = 0.051). After mutual adjustment and adjustment for type of physician and the number of measures respondents felt responsible for, the final backward regression model included capabilities (β = 0.35, p = 0.015) and planning (β = 0.29, p = 0.041) as COM-B-correlates. CONCLUSION Though based on a small sample of orthopedic physicians in a single hospital (albeit in conjunction with a high survey response rate), this study found initial evidence for positive correlations between capabilities and planning skills with self-reported SSI preventive compliance in German orthopedic physicians. Analyses of the WACH-trial will further address the role of these factors in promoting SSI preventive compliance in orthopedic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION This survey was conducted as part of the research project WACH ("Wundinfektionen und Antibiotikaverbrauch in der Chirurgie" [Wound Infections and Antibiotic Consumption in Surgery]), which has been registered in the German Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.drks.de/ ; ID: DRKS00015502).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivonne Tomsic
- Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology (OE 5430), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ella Ebadi
- Centre for Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Epidemiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Gossé
- Spinal Surgery and Conservative Orthopaedics, Clinic of Orthopaedics of Hannover Medical School at DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ina Hartlep
- Center for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Pamela Schipper
- Center for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bettina Schock
- Center for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Iris F Chaberny
- Center for Infection Medicine (ZINF), Institute of Hygiene, Hospital Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Thomas von Lengerke
- Centre for Public Health and Healthcare, Department of Medical Psychology (OE 5430), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quantity and Quality of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Osteoarthritis Clinical Practice Guidelines: Systematic Review and Assessment Using AGREE II. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40674-021-00172-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
24
|
de Vasconcelos LP, Melo DOD, Stein AT, de Carvalho HB. Even High-Quality CPGs Seldom Include Implementation Strategies. Front Pharmacol 2021; 11:593894. [PMID: 33519455 PMCID: PMC7845482 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.593894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Implementation is a key step in ensuring that high-quality clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations are followed and have a positive impact. This step must be planned during CPG development. This study aims to inform professionals tasked with developing and implementing CPGs regarding implementation strategies and tools reported in high-quality CPGs for chronic non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Methods: NCD guidelines were selected based on Appraisal of Guideline Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II assessment. CPGs with a score of ≥60% in AGREE II domains 3 (rigor of development), 5 (applicability), and 6 (editorial independence), were considered high quality. The content related to implementation was extracted from CPG full texts and complementary materials. Implementation strategies and tools were assessed and classified using Mazza taxonomy. Results: Twenty high-quality CPGs were selected, most of which were developed by government institutions (16; 80%) with public funding (16; 80%); almost half (9; 45%) addressed the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The countries with the most high-quality CPGs were the UK (6; 30%) and Colombia (5; 25%). These countries also had the highest average number of strategies, Colombia with 28 (SD = 1) distributed in all levels, and the UK with 15 (SD = 7), concentrating on professional and organizational levels. Although the content of the Colombian CPGs was similar regardless the disease, the CPGs from the UK were specific and contained data-based feedback reports and information on CPG compliance. Implementation strategies most frequently identified were at the professional level, such as distributing reference material (18; 80%) and educating groups of healthcare professionals (18; 80%). At the organizational level, the most frequent strategies involve changes in structure (15; 75%) and service delivery method (13; 65%). Conclusion: Countries with established CPG programs, such as the UK and Colombia, where identified as having the highest number of high-quality CPGs, although CPG implementation content had significant differences. Among high-quality CPGs, the most common implementation strategies were at the professional and organizational levels. There is still room for improvement regarding the implementation strategies report, even among high-quality CPGs, especially concerning monitoring of implementation outcomes and selection of strategies based on relevant implementation barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela Oliveira De Melo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Institute of Environmental, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Airton Tetelbom Stein
- Department of Collective Health, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Carter M, Chapman S, Watson MC. Multiplicity and complexity: a qualitative exploration of influences on prescribing in UK general practice. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041460. [PMID: 33431490 PMCID: PMC7802664 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite widespread availability of evidence-based guidelines to inform rational use of medicines, considerable unwarranted variation exists in prescribing. A greater understanding of key determinants of contemporary prescribing in UK general practice could inform strategies to promote evidence-based prescribing. This study explored (1) current influences on prescribing in general practice and (2) the possibility that general practice-based pharmacists (PBPs) may contribute to greater engagement with evidence-based prescribing. DESIGN Semistructured, telephone interviews and a focus group were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was undertaken. PARTICIPANTS General practice prescribers: general practitioners (GPs), PBPs, nurses.Key informants: individuals within the National Health Service (NHS) with responsibility for influencing, monitoring and measuring general practice prescribing. SETTING General practices and NHS organisations in England. RESULTS Interviews with 17 prescribers (GPs (n=6), PBPs (n=6), nurses (n=5)) and 6 key informants, and one focus group with five key informants were undertaken between November 2018 and April 2019. Determinants operating at individual, practice and societal levels impacted prescribing and guideline use. Prescribers' professional backgrounds, for example, nursing, pharmacy, patient populations and patient pressure were perceived as substantial influences, as well as media portrayal and public perceptions of medicines.Prescribers identified practice-level determinants of prescribing, including practice culture and shared beliefs. Key informants tended to emphasise higher-level influences, including NHS policies, availability of support and advice from secondary care and generic challenges associated with medicines use, for example, multimorbidity.Participants expressed mixed views about the potential of PBPs to promote evidence-based prescribing in general practice. CONCLUSION Prescribing in UK general practice is influenced by multiple intersecting factors. Strategies to promote evidence-based prescribing should target modifiable influences at practice and individual levels. Customising strategies for medical and non-medical prescribers may maximise their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Carter
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Sarah Chapman
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Margaret C Watson
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barreto JOM, Bortoli MC, Luquine CD, Oliveira CF, Toma TS, Ribeiro AAV, Tesser TR, Rattner D, Vidal A, Mendes Y, Carvalho V, Neri MA, Chapman E. Implementation of national childbirth guidelines in Brazil: barriers and strategies. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2020; 44:e170. [PMID: 33417646 PMCID: PMC7778467 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2020.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The present report describes the process and results obtained with a knowledge translation project developed in three stages to identify barriers to the Implementation of the National Guidelines for Normal Childbirth in Brazil, as well strategies for effective implementation. The Improving Programme Implementation through Embedded Research (iPIER) model and the Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools provided the methodological framework for the project. In the first stage, the quality of the Guidelines was evaluated and the barriers preventing implementation of the recommendations were identified through review of the global evidence and analysis of contributions obtained in a public consultation process. In the second stage, an evidence synthesis was used as the basis for a deliberative dialogue aimed at prioritizing the barriers identified. Finally, a second evidence synthesis was presented in a new deliberative dialogue to discuss six options to address the prioritized barriers: 1) promote the use of multifaceted interventions; 2) promote educational interventions for the adoption of guidelines; 3) perform audits and provide feedback to adjust professional practice; 4) use reminders to mediate the interaction between workers and service users; 5) enable patient-mediated interventions; and 6) engage opinion leaders to promote use of the Guidelines. The processes and results associated with each stage were documented and formulated to inform a review and update of the Guidelines and the development of an implementation plan for the recommendations. Effective implementation of the Guidelines is important for improving the care provided during labor and childbirth in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)Brasília, DFBrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
| | - Maritsa C. Bortoli
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Cézar D. Luquine
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Cintia F. Oliveira
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Tereza S. Toma
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Aline A. V. Ribeiro
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Taís R. Tesser
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrazilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
| | - Daphne Rattner
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Avila Vidal
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Yluska Mendes
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Viviane Carvalho
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrazilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brazil.
| | - Mônica Almeida Neri
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde ColetivaSalvador (BA)BrazilUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador (BA), Brazil.
| | - Evelina Chapman
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz)Brasília, DFBrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barreto JOM, Bortoli MC, Luquine Jr CD, Oliveira CF, Toma TS, Ribeiro AAV, Tesser TR, Rattner D, Vidal A, Mendes Y, Carvalho V, Neri MA, Chapman E. [Implementation of the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil: barriers and trategiesObstáculos y estrategias para la aplicación de las Directrices Nacionales para el Parto Normal en el Brasil]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2020; 44:e120. [PMID: 33346245 PMCID: PMC7745726 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2020.120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The present report describes the process and results obtained with a knowledge translation project developed in three stages to identify barriers to the National Childbirth Guidelines in Brazil as well strategies for effective implementation. The Improving Programme Implementation through Embedded Research (iPIER) model and the Supporting Policy Relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools provided the methodological framework for the project. In the first stage, the quality of the Guidelines was evaluated and the barriers preventing implementation of the recommendations were identified through review of the global evidence and analysis of contributions obtained in a public consultation process. In the second stage, an evidence synthesis was used as basis for a deliberative dialogue aimed at prioritizing the barriers identified. Finally, a second evidence synthesis was presented in a new deliberative dialogue to discuss six options to address the prioritized barriers: 1) promote the use of multifaceted interventions; 2) promote educational interventions for the adoption of guidelines; 3) perform audits and provide feedback to adjust professional practice; 4) use reminders to mediate the interaction between workers and service users; 5) enable patient-mediated interventions; and 6) engage opinion leaders to promote the use of guidelines. The processes and results associated with each stage were documented and formulated to inform a review and update of the Guidelines and the development of an implementation plan for the recommendations. An effective implementation of the Guidelines is relevant to improve the care provided during labor and childbirth in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), BrasíliaDFBrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| | - Maritsa C. Bortoli
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Cézar D. Luquine Jr
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Cintia F. Oliveira
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Tereza S. Toma
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Aline A. V. Ribeiro
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Taís R. Tesser
- Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de SaúdeSão Paulo (SP)BrasilSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo, Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo (SP), Brasil.
| | - Daphne Rattner
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Avila Vidal
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Yluska Mendes
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Viviane Carvalho
- Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde ColetivaBrasília (DF)BrasilUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde Coletiva, Brasília (DF), Brasil.
| | - Mônica Almeida Neri
- Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde ColetivaSalvador (BA)BrasilUniversidade Federal da Bahia (UFBa), Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
| | - Evelina Chapman
- Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), BrasíliaDFBrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
McNett M, O'Mathúna D, Tucker S, Roberts H, Mion LC, Balas MC. A Scoping Review of Implementation Science in Adult Critical Care Settings. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2:e0301. [PMID: 33354675 PMCID: PMC7746210 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this scoping review is to provide a synthesis of the available literature on implementation science in critical care settings. Specifically, we aimed to identify the evidence-based practices selected for implementation, the frequency and type of implementation strategies used to foster change, and the process and clinical outcomes associated with implementation. DATA SOURCES A librarian-assisted search was performed using three electronic databases. STUDY SELECTION Articles that reported outcomes aimed at disseminating, implementing, or sustaining an evidence-based intervention or practice, used established implementation strategies, and were conducted in a critical care unit were included. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. DATA SYNTHESIS Of 1,707 citations, 82 met eligibility criteria. Studies included prospective research investigations, quality improvement projects, and implementation science trials. The most common practices investigated were use of a ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle, nutritional support protocols, and the Awakening and Breathing Coordination, Delirium Monitoring/Management, and Early Exercise/Mobility bundle. A variety of implementation strategies were used to facilitate evidence adoption, most commonly educational meetings, auditing and feedback, developing tools, and use of local opinion leaders. The majority of studies (76/82, 93%) reported using more than one implementation strategy. Few studies specifically used implementation science designs and frameworks to systematically evaluate both implementation and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The field of critical care has experienced slow but steady gains in the number of investigations specifically guided by implementation science. However, given the exponential growth of evidence-based practices and guidelines in this same period, much work remains to critically evaluate the most effective mechanisms to integrate and sustain these practices across diverse critical care settings and teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly McNett
- Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Dónal O'Mathúna
- Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Sharon Tucker
- Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Haley Roberts
- Helene Fuld Health Trust National Institute for Evidence-based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Lorraine C Mion
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Center for Healthy Aging, Self Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Michele C Balas
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
- Center for Healthy Aging, Self Management, and Complex Care, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Silverberg ND, Panenka WJ, Lizotte PP, Bayley MT, Dance D, Li LC. Promoting early treatment for mild traumatic brain injury in primary care with a guideline implementation tool: a pilot cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035527. [PMID: 33082178 PMCID: PMC7577038 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES New clinical practice guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) emphasise that family physicians should proactively screen and initiate treatment for depression/anxiety, insomnia and headaches. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of delivering an implementation intervention to family physicians. DESIGN Pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Specialty outpatient clinic (recruitment) and primary care (implementation). PARTICIPANTS 114 primary care clinics were randomised. These clinics were associated with 137 unique family physicians caring for 148 adult patients who sustained an mTBI within the previous 3 months and were seeking care for persistent symptoms. INTERVENTIONS Patients completed self-report screening measures for depression/anxiety, insomnia and headaches. A tailored letter that incorporates the patient's screening test results and associated treatment algorithms was sent to their family physician (or walk-in clinic). Physicians at clinics assigned to the control condition received a generic letter, without the screening test results. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Feasibility outcomes included the frequency of primary care follow-up, retention rates and reliability of patient recall of their physicians' actions (primary mechanistic outcome). The primary efficacy outcome was the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptom Questionnaire (RPQ). RESULTS Most patients (97.8%; 128 of 131) followed up at the primary care clinic they planned to. Retention rates were 88% (131 of 148) and 78% (116 of 148) at the 1-month and 3-month assessments, respectively. Agreement between patient recall of their physicians' actions and medical chart audits was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.48-0.65). Patients in the experimental group reported fewer symptoms on the RPQ compared with those in the control group, whose physician received a general letter (B=-4.0, 95% CI: -7.3 to -0.7). CONCLUSIONS A larger trial will need to address minor feasibility challenges to evaluate the effectiveness of this guideline implementation tool for improving mTBI clinical outcomes and confirm the mechanism(s) of intervention benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03221218.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah D Silverberg
- Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - William J Panenka
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Neuropsychiatry Program, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Pierre-Paul Lizotte
- Department of Family Medicine, Providence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mark T Bayley
- Hull-Ellis Concussion Research Center, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derry Dance
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Acquired Brain Injury Program, GF Strong Rehabilitation Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linda C Li
- Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Performance Measure Development, Use, and Measurement of Effectiveness Using the Guideline on Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2020; 16:1463-1472. [PMID: 31774323 PMCID: PMC6956829 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.201909-665st] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Guideline implementation tools are designed to improve uptake of guideline recommendations in clinical settings but do not uniformly accompany the clinical practice guideline documents. Performance measures are a type of guideline implementation tool with the potential to catalyze behavior change and greater adherence to clinical practice guidelines. However, many performance measures suffer from serious flaws in their design and application, prompting the American Thoracic Society (ATS) to define its own performance measure development standards in a previous workshop in 2012. This report summarizes the proceedings of a follow-up workshop convened to advance the ATS’s work in performance measure development and guideline implementation. To illustrate the application of the ATS’s performance measure development framework, we used the example of a low–tidal volume ventilation performance measure created de novo from the 2017 ATS/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome clinical practice guideline. We include a detailed explanation of the rationale for the specifications chosen, identification of areas in need of further validity testing, and a preliminary strategy for pilot testing of the performance measure. Pending additional resources and broader performance measure expertise, issuing “preliminary performance measures” and their specifications alongside an ATS clinical practice guideline offers a first step to further the ATS’s guideline implementation agenda. We recommend selectively proceeding with full performance measure development for those measures with positive early user feedback and the greatest potential impact in accordance with ATS leadership guidance.
Collapse
|
31
|
Adherence to breast cancer guidelines is associated with better survival outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in EU countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:920. [PMID: 33028324 PMCID: PMC7542898 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) clinical guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to improve quality of healthcare for patients with or at risk of BC. Suboptimal adherence to recommendations has the potential to negatively affect population health. However, no study has systematically reviewed the impact of BC guideline adherence -as prognosis factor- on BC healthcare processes and health outcomes. The objectives are to analyse the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes and on healthcare costs. METHODS We searched systematic reviews and primary studies in MEDLINE and Embase, conducted in European Union (EU) countries (inception to May 2019). Eligibility assessment, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted by one author and crosschecked by a second. We used random-effects meta-analyses to examine the impact of guideline adherence on overall survival and disease-free survival, and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE. RESULTS We included 21 primary studies. Most were published during the last decade (90%), followed a retrospective cohort design (86%), focused on treatment guideline adherence (95%), and were at low (80%) or moderate (20%) risk of bias. Nineteen studies (95%) examined the impact of guideline adherence on health outcomes, while two (10%) on healthcare cost. Adherence to guidelines was associated with increased overall survival (HR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.59-0.76) and disease-free survival (HR = 0.35, 95%CI 0.15-0.82), representing 138 more survivors (96 more to 178 more) and 336 patients free of recurrence (73 more to 491 more) for every 1000 women receiving adherent CG treatment compared to those receiving non-adherent treatment at 5 years follow-up (moderate certainty). Adherence to treatment guidelines was associated with higher costs, but adherence to follow-up guidelines was associated with lower costs (low certainty). CONCLUSIONS Our review of EU studies suggests that there is moderate certainty that adherence to BC guidelines is associated with an improved survival. BC guidelines should be rigorously implemented in the clinical setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO ( CRD42018092884 ).
Collapse
|
32
|
Neri L, Ponce P, Matias N, Stuard S, Cromm K. Clinical target achievement is associated with better quality of life among dialysis patients: results from a continuous quality improvement program in a Portuguese healthcare network. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:2705-2714. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02543-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
33
|
Rapid Scoping Review of Laparoscopic Surgery Guidelines During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Appraisal Using a Simple Quality Appraisal Tool "EMERGE". Indian J Surg 2020; 82:930-940. [PMID: 32958987 PMCID: PMC7494978 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-020-02596-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The theoretical danger of virus transmission during laparoscopic surgery (LS) via surgical smoke and laparoscopy gas has led to the formulation of many guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. This rapid scoping review of these guidelines was done to assess the quality of their evidence and appraise them for their impact on surgical services from the global south. A simple quality appraisal tool was constructed which can be used to evaluate rapidly emerging guidelines for evidence as well as for the needs of the global south. This rapid scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews protocol. Electronic databases were searched with predefined strategy and retrieved papers were screened according to relevant criteria. A simple objective tool to assess the quality of rapidly emerging guidelines including evidence, methodology, ease, resource optimization, geography, and the economy was constructed. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. None of the guidelines qualified to be evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as the level of evidence was uniformly rated “low”. A newly constructed tool showed good validation, reliability, and internal consistency. This rapid scoping review found two major research gaps: lack of systematic review of evidence during their development and insufficient weightage of their impact on surgical services from the global south. These significant issues were addressed by constructing a simple and more representative tool for evaluating rapidly emerging guidelines which also gives the rightful importance of their impact on surgical services from the global south.
Collapse
|
34
|
Glonti K, Boutron I, Moher D, Hren D. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035600. [PMID: 32792429 PMCID: PMC7430556 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To generate an understanding of the communication practices that might influence the peer-review process in biomedical journals. METHOD Recruitment was based on purposive maximum variation sampling. We conducted semistructured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis method. PARTICIPANTS 56 journal editors from general medicine (n=13) and specialty (n=43) biomedical journals. Most were editor-in-chiefs (n=39), men (n=40) and worked part time (n=50). RESULTS Our analysis generated four themes (1) providing minimal guidance to peer reviewers-two subthemes described the way journal editors rationalised their behaviour: (a) peer reviewers should know without guidelines how to review and (b) detailed guidance and structure might have a negative effect; (2) communication strategies of engagement with peer reviewers-two opposing strategies that journal editors employed to handle peer reviewers: (a) use of direct and personal communication to motivate peer reviewers and (b) use of indirect communication to avoid conflict; (3) concerns about impact of review model on communication-maintenance of anonymity as a means of facilitating critical and unburdened communication and minimising biases and (4) different practices in the moderation of communication between authors and peer reviewers-some journal editors actively interjected themselves into the communication chain to guide authors through peer reviewers' comments, others remained at a distance, leaving it to the authors to work through peer reviewers' comments. CONCLUSIONS These journal editors' descriptions reveal several communication practices that might have a significant impact on the peer-review process. Editorial strategies to manage miscommunication are discussed. Further research on these proposed strategies and on communication practices from the point of view of authors and peer reviewers is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ketevan Glonti
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Splitsko-dalmatinska, Croatia
- CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Isabelle Boutron
- CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Université de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - David Moher
- Ottawa Methods Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darko Hren
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Splitsko-dalmatinska, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim C, Armstrong MJ, Berta WB, Gagliardi AR. How to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinical guidelines: A scoping review. Health Expect 2020; 23:1028-1036. [PMID: 32656807 PMCID: PMC7696279 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines optimize care delivery and outcomes. Guidelines support patient engagement and adherence if they reflect patient preferences for treatment options, risks and benefits. Many guidelines do not address patient preferences. Developers require insight on how to develop such guidelines. OBJECTIVE To conduct a scoping review on how to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in guidelines. SEARCH We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, OpenGrey and GreyLit from 2010 to November 2019. ELIGIBILITY We included English language studies describing patient preferences and guidelines. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS We reported approaches for and determinants and impacts of identifying patient preferences using summary statistics and text, and interpreted findings using a conceptual framework of patient engagement in guideline development. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included: 2 consulted patients and providers about patient engagement approaches, and 14 identified patient preferences (42.9%) or methods for doing so (71.4%). Studies employed single (57.1%) or multiple (42.9%) methods for identifying preferences. Eight (57.1%) incorporated preferences in one aspect of guideline development, while 6 (42.9%) incorporated preferences in multiple ways, most commonly to identify questions, benefits or harms, and generate recommendations. Studies did not address patient engagement in many guideline development steps. Included studies were too few to establish the best approaches for identifying or incorporating preferences. Fewer than half of the studies (7, 43.8%) explored barriers. None examined reporting preferences in guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Research is needed to establish the single or multiple approaches that result in incorporating and reporting preferences in all guideline development steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kim
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yoong SL, Hall A, Stacey F, Grady A, Sutherland R, Wyse R, Anderson A, Nathan N, Wolfenden L. Nudge strategies to improve healthcare providers' implementation of evidence-based guidelines, policies and practices: a systematic review of trials included within Cochrane systematic reviews. Implement Sci 2020; 15:50. [PMID: 32611354 PMCID: PMC7329401 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01011-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nudge interventions are those that seek to modify the social and physical environment to enhance capacity for subconscious behaviours that align with the intrinsic values of an individual, without actively restricting options. This study sought to describe the application and effects of nudge strategies on clinician implementation of health-related guidelines, policies and practices within studies included in relevant Cochrane systematic reviews. METHODS As there is varied terminology used to describe nudge, this study examined studies within relevant systematic reviews. A two-stage screening process was undertaken where, firstly, all systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library between 2016 and 2018 were screened to identify reviews that included quantitative studies to improve implementation of guidelines among healthcare providers. Secondly, individual studies within relevant systematic reviews were included if they were (i) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (ii) included a nudge strategy in at least one intervention arm, and (iii) explicitly aimed to improve clinician implementation behaviour. We categorised nudge strategies into priming, salience and affect, default, incentives, commitment and ego, and norms and messenger based on the Mindspace framework. SYNTHESIS The number and percentage of trials using each nudge strategy was calculated. Due to substantial heterogeneity, we did not undertake a meta-analysis. Instead, we calculated within-study point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, and used a vote-counting approach to explore effects. RESULTS Seven reviews including 42 trials reporting on 57 outcomes were included. The most common nudge strategy was priming (69%), then norms and messenger (40%). Of the 57 outcomes, 86% had an effect on clinician behaviour in the hypothesised direction, and 53% of those were statistically significant. For continuous outcomes, the median effect size was 0.39 (0.22, 0.45), while for dichotomous outcomes the median Odds Ratio was 1.62 (1.13, 2.76). CONCLUSIONS This review of 42 RCTs included in Cochrane systematic reviews found that the impact of nudge strategies on clinician behaviour was at least comparable to other interventions targeting implementation of evidence-based guidelines. While uncertainty remains, the review provides justification for ongoing investigation of the evaluation and application of nudge interventions to support provider behaviour change. TRIAL REGISTRATION This review was not prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Lin Yoong
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia.
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.
| | - Alix Hall
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
| | - Fiona Stacey
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
| | - Alice Grady
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| | - Rachel Sutherland
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| | - Rebecca Wyse
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| | - Amy Anderson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
| | - Nicole Nathan
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Hunter New England Population Health, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2300, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Briscoe S, Nunns M, Shaw L. How do Cochrane authors conduct web searching to identify studies? Findings from a cross‐sectional sample of Cochrane Reviews. Health Info Libr J 2020; 37:293-318. [DOI: 10.1111/hir.12313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Briscoe
- Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility Institute of Health Research University of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Michael Nunns
- Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility Institute of Health Research University of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Liz Shaw
- Exeter PRP Evidence Review Facility Institute of Health Research University of Exeter Medical School University of Exeter Exeter UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gardner C, Moseley GL, Karran EL, Wiles LK, Hibbert P. Implementing high value back pain care in private physiotherapy in Australia: A qualitative evaluation of physiotherapists who participated in an "implementation to innovation" system. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR 2020; 4:86-102. [PMID: 33987488 PMCID: PMC7951159 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2020.1732808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Many barriers exist to delivering high-value care for people with low back pain (LBP). We have developed a multistrategy implementation system to overcome these barriers. Here we describe a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of private-sector physiotherapists implementing the system. Design: PRISM (Practice-based innovation and implementation system) is an iterative clinician-as-scientist implementation program, tailored here for acute and subacute LBP. PRISM integrates strategies from behavioral change, implementation, and educational science fields. Semistructured interviews, group discussion forums, and electronic questionnaires were used to collect data at multiple time points that were then analyzed using an interpretative descriptive approach. Participants: Six physiotherapists (purposive sample) practicing in private practice physiotherapy clinics in the Adelaide region, South Australia, were enrolled in the study. Interventions: Interventions included an educational pain science and care workshop incorporating self-regulated learning principles, a co-planned clinical pathway, an electronic decision support tool, development and support of a community of practice, case study simulations, audit and feedback, and collaborative problem solving and innovation for physiotherapists. Results: Participants’ experiences and perceptions centered around five themes: (1) knowledge and skills training; (2) networking and mentoring; (3) a clear clinical pathway; (4) practical tools; and (5) data feedback. Participants appraised the implementation process positively but identified patient receptiveness as a challenge at times. Suggestions for improvement included streamlining/automating data collection forms and processes and providing more simulation opportunities. Conclusions: PRISM appears to be a promising approach to overcoming several barriers that prevent people with back pain from receiving high-value care. It consolidates and increases pain science knowledge and increases physiotherapist confidence in delivering high-value care. It appears to legitimize some current practices, enhance clinical reasoning and communication skills, extend knowledge in line with contemporary pain science, and facilitate the application of a biopsychosocial management approach. The high-level acceptance by participants provides a foundation for further research to test outcomes and delivery in different settings. Contribution of the articleA quality improvement intervention designed to improve delivery of high-value care was well received by private practice physiotherapists. Physiotherapists particularly valued using experiential learning to improve fluency in communicating with, and educating patients about, contemporary pain science. A structured clinical pathway and tools guided physiotherapists on the basic elements of necessary care and allowed them to concentrate on higher levels of decision making and communication with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gardner
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - G Lorimer Moseley
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emma L Karran
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Louise K Wiles
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Hibbert
- IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines provide few complementary and alternative medicine therapy recommendations: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2861-2873. [PMID: 32385761 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05054-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Sixty percent of patients with arthritis have used complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies at least once. The two most common types of arthritis include rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). The quality and quantity of CAM recommendations for RA and OA is currently unknown. The purpose of this research was to identify the quantity and assess the quality of CAM recommendations in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of RA and OA. A systematic review was conducted to identify CPGs; MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from 2008 to 2018. The Guidelines International Network and the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health websites were also searched. Three independent reviewers evaluated the quality of reporting for each guideline that provided CAM recommendations, and the specific section providing CAM recommendations, using the AGREE II instrument. From 525 unique search results, seven guidelines (3 OA, 4 RA) mentioned CAM and 5 guidelines made CAM recommendations. Scaled domain percentages from highest to lowest were (overall, CAM) as follows: clarity of presentation (92.2% vs. 94.1%), scope and purpose (90.1% vs. 87.4%), rigour of development (72.6% vs. 64.2%), stakeholder involvement (64.8% vs. 49.6%), editorial independence (61.1% vs. 60.6%), and applicability (51.4% vs. 33.3%). None of the 5 guidelines was recommended by both appraisers for either the overall guideline or CAM section. For the overall guideline, appraisers agreed in their overall recommendation for 3 of 5 guidelines, including 3 Yes with modifications; of the remaining 2 guidelines, 1 was rated by the three appraisers as 1 No and 2 Yes with modifications, while 1 guideline was rated at 2 Yes and 1 Yes with modifications. For the CAM section, appraisers agreed in their overall recommendation for all 5 guidelines including 1 No, and 4 Yes with modifications. Roughly half of arthritis CPGs found included in this review provided CAM recommendations. The quality of CAM recommendations are of lower quality than overall recommendations across the scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigour of development, applicability, and editorial independence domains. Quality varied within and across guidelines.
Collapse
|
40
|
Bierbaum M, Braithwaite J, Arnolda G, Delaney GP, Liauw W, Kefford R, Tran Y, Nic Giolla Easpaig B, Rapport F. Clinicians' attitudes to oncology clinical practice guidelines and the barriers and facilitators to adherence: a mixed methods study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035448. [PMID: 32205377 PMCID: PMC7103843 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to reduce inappropriate clinical variation and improve the quality of care. Barriers to CPGs include a lack of awareness of CPGs, access to them, time pressures and concerns regarding the evidence underpinning CPG development, implementation and dissemination. The objectives of this study are to assess clinicians' attitudes to CPGs for cancer treatment and the perceived barriers to and facilitators of CPG adherence in order to inform the implementation of cancer treatment CPGs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed methods study will be conducted using a three-phase, sequential design, with each phase informing the next. In phase 1, a qualitative study using recorded interviews will investigate clinicians' attitudes to CPGs for cancer treatment and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to CPG adherence (n=30); interview transcripts will be analysed thematically. In phase 2, a survey will quantify the frequency of attitudes, barriers and facilitators identified in phase 1, in a broader clinical sample (n=200). In phase 3, a workshop forum will be held to facilitate discussions examining the implications of phase 1 and 2 findings for cancer CPG implementation strategies (n=40) leading to recommendations for improvements to practice. The workshop discussion will be recorded, and the transcript will be analysed thematically. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has received ethics approval in New South Wales, Australia (2019/ETH11722, #52019568810127). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will form part of a doctoral thesis and be presented at national and international conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Bierbaum
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey P Delaney
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales South Western Sydney Clinical School, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Winston Liauw
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Translational Cancer Research Network, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Cancer Services, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Kefford
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Research Excellence in Implementation Science in Oncology, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Barriers and Facilitators for Screening Older Adults on Fall Risk in a Hospital Setting: Perspectives from Patients and Healthcare Professionals. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17051461. [PMID: 32106465 PMCID: PMC7084218 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17051461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/1970] [Revised: 02/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators to fall risk screening of older adults visiting the hospital as experienced by patients and healthcare professionals, and to examine the differences between chronic- and acute-care patients. We invited patients (≥ 70 years) attending the nephrology and emergency department to participate in the screening. Patients and their healthcare professionals were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire based on the "Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument". Differences in barriers and facilitators between acute- and chronic-care patients were examined with chi-square tests. A total of 216 patients were screened, and 103 completed the questionnaire. They considered many factors as facilitators, and none as barriers. Acute-care patients were more positive than chronic-care patients about healthcare worker characteristics, such as knowledge and skills. After screening, patients were more open to receiving advice regarding fall prevention. The 36 healthcare professionals considered program characteristics to be facilitators and mainly factors regarding healthcare worker characteristics as barriers to implementation. For patients, the outpatient setting seemed to be a good place to be screened for fall risk. Healthcare professionals also suggested that program characteristics could enhance implementation. However, healthcare professionals' mindsets and the changing of routines are barriers that have to be addressed first.
Collapse
|
42
|
Froggatt K, Best A, Bunn F, Burnside G, Coast J, Dunleavy L, Goodman C, Hardwick B, Jackson C, Kinley J, Davidson Lund A, Lynch J, Mitchell P, Myring G, Patel S, Algorta GP, Preston N, Scott D, Silvera K, Walshe C. A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-140. [PMID: 31971506 PMCID: PMC7008353 DOI: 10.3310/hta24060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with advanced dementia who live and die in nursing homes experience variable quality of life, care and dying. There is a need to identify appropriate, cost-effective interventions that facilitate high-quality end-of-life care provision. OBJECTIVES To establish the feasibility and acceptability to staff and family of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Namaste Care intervention for people with advanced dementia in nursing homes. DESIGN The study had three phases: (1) realist review and (2) intervention refinement to inform the design of (3) a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial with a process evaluation and economic analysis. Clusters (nursing homes) were randomised in a 3 : 1 ratio to intervention or control (usual care). The nature of the intervention meant that blinding was not possible. SETTING Nursing homes in England providing care for people with dementia. PARTICIPANTS Residents with advanced dementia (assessed as having a Functional Assessment Staging Test score of 6 or 7), their informal carers and nursing home staff. INTERVENTION Namaste Care is a complex group intervention that provides structured personalised care in a dedicated space, focusing on enhancements to the physical environment, comfort management and sensory engagement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The two contender primary outcome measures were Comfort Assessment in Dying - End of Life Care in Dementia for quality of dying (dementia) and Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia for quality of life. The secondary outcomes were as follows: person with dementia, sleep/activity (actigraphy), neuropsychiatric symptoms, agitation and pain; informal carers, satisfaction with care at the end of life; staff members, person-centred care assessment, satisfaction with care at the end of life and readiness for change; and other data - health economic outcomes, medication/service use and intervention activity. RESULTS Phase 1 (realist review; 86 papers) identified that a key intervention component was the activities enabling the development of moments of connection. In phase 2, refinement of the intervention enabled the production of a user-friendly 16-page A4 booklet. In phase 3, eight nursing homes were recruited. Two homes withdrew before the intervention commenced; four intervention and two control homes completed the study. Residents with advanced dementia (n = 32) were recruited in intervention (n = 18) and control (n = 14) homes. Informal carers (total, n = 12: intervention, n = 5; control, n = 7) and 97 staff from eight sites (intervention, n = 75; control, n = 22) were recruited over a 6-month period. Recruitment is feasible. Completion rates of the primary outcome questionnaires were high at baseline (100%) and at 4 weeks (96.8%). The Quality of Life in Late Stage Dementia was more responsive to change over 24 weeks. Even where economic data were missing, these could be collected in a full trial. The intervention was acceptable; the dose varied depending on the staffing and physical environment of each care home. Staff and informal carers reported changes for the person with dementia in two ways: increased social engagement and greater calm. No adverse events related to the intervention were reported. CONCLUSIONS A subsequent definitive trial is feasible if there are amendments to the recruitment process, outcome measure choice and intervention specification. FUTURE WORK In a full trial, consideration is needed of the appropriate outcome measure that is sensitive to different participant responses, and of clear implementation principles for this person-centred intervention in a nursing home context. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14948133. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Froggatt
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Ashley Best
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Frances Bunn
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Girvan Burnside
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanna Coast
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lesley Dunleavy
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Ben Hardwick
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Clare Jackson
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | | - Jennifer Lynch
- Department of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Paul Mitchell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Gareth Myring
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Shakil Patel
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Guillermo Perez Algorta
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | | - Kate Silvera
- Clinical Trials Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Catherine Walshe
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gold R, Bunce A, Cowburn S, Davis JV, Nelson JC, Nelson CA, Hicks E, Cohen DJ, Horberg MA, Melgar G, Dearing JW, Seabrook J, Mossman N, Bulkley J. Does increased implementation support improve community clinics' guideline-concordant care? Results of a mixed methods, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial. Implement Sci 2019; 14:100. [PMID: 31805968 PMCID: PMC6894475 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0948-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Disseminating care guidelines into clinical practice remains challenging, partly due to inadequate evidence on how best to help clinics incorporate new guidelines into routine care. This is particularly true in safety net community health centers (CHCs). Methods This pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial used a parallel mixed methods design. Twenty-nine CHC clinics were randomized to receive increasingly intensive implementation support (implementation toolkit (arm 1); toolkit + in-person training + training webinars (arm 2); toolkit + training + webinars + offered practice facilitation (arm 3)) targeting uptake of electronic health record (EHR) tools focused on guideline-concordant cardioprotective prescribing for patients with diabetes. Outcomes were compared across study arms, to test whether increased support yielded additive improvements, and with 137 non-study CHCs that share the same EHR as the study clinics. Quantitative data from the CHCs’ EHR were used to compare the magnitude of change in guideline-concordant ACE/ARB and statin prescribing, using adjusted Poisson regressions. Qualitative data collected using diverse methods (e.g., interviews, observations) identified factors influencing the quantitative outcomes. Results Outcomes at CHCs receiving higher-intensity support did not improve in an additive pattern. ACE/ARB prescribing did not improve in any CHC group. Statin prescribing improved overall and was significantly greater only in the arm 1 and arm 2 CHCs compared with the non-study CHCs. Factors influencing the finding of no additive impact included: aspects of the EHR tools that reduced their utility, barriers to providing the intended implementation support, and study design elements, e.g., inability to adapt the provided support. Factors influencing overall improvements in statin outcomes likely included a secular trend in awareness of statin prescribing guidelines, selection bias where motivated clinics volunteered for the study, and study participation focusing clinic staff on the targeted outcomes. Conclusions Efforts to implement care guidelines should: ensure adaptability when providing implementation support and conduct formative evaluations to determine the optimal form of such support for a given clinic; consider how study data collection influences adoption; and consider barriers to clinics’ ability to use/accept implementation support as planned. More research is needed on supporting change implementation in under-resourced settings like CHCs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325531. Registered 15 December 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gold
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA. .,OCHIN, Inc., 1881 NW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
| | - Arwen Bunce
- OCHIN, Inc., 1881 NW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
| | - Stuart Cowburn
- OCHIN, Inc., 1881 NW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
| | - James V Davis
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| | - Joan C Nelson
- OCHIN, Inc., 1881 NW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
| | | | - Elisabeth Hicks
- Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Deborah J Cohen
- Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Michael A Horberg
- Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, 2101 East Jefferson St, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Gerardo Melgar
- Cowlitz Family Health Center, 1057 12th Avenue, Longview, WA, 98632, USA
| | - James W Dearing
- Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Rd, Room 473, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA
| | - Janet Seabrook
- Community HealthNet Health Centers, 1021 West 5th Avenue, Gary, IN, 46402, USA
| | - Ned Mossman
- OCHIN, Inc., 1881 NW Naito Pkwy, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
| | - Joanna Bulkley
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Enoch AJ, English M, McGivern G, Shepperd S. Variability in the use of pulse oximeters with children in Kenyan hospitals: A mixed-methods analysis. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002987. [PMID: 31891572 PMCID: PMC6938307 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulse oximetry, a relatively inexpensive technology, has the potential to improve health outcomes by reducing incorrect diagnoses and supporting appropriate treatment decisions. There is evidence that in low- and middle-income countries, even when available, widespread uptake of pulse oximeters has not occurred, and little research has examined why. We sought to determine when and with which children pulse oximeters are used in Kenyan hospitals, how pulse oximeter use impacts treatment provision, and the barriers to pulse oximeter use. METHODS AND FINDINGS We analyzed admissions data recorded through Kenya's Clinical Information Network (CIN) between September 2013 and February 2016. We carried out multiple imputation and generated multivariable regression models in R. We also conducted interviews with 30 healthcare workers and staff from 14 Kenyan hospitals to examine pulse oximetry adoption. We adapted the Integrative Model of Behavioural Prediction to link the results from the multivariable regression analyses to the qualitative findings. We included 27,906 child admissions from 7 hospitals in the quantitative analyses. The median age of the children was 1 year, and 55% were male. Three-quarters had a fever, over half had a cough; other symptoms/signs were difficulty breathing (34%), difficulty feeding (34%), and indrawing (32%). The most common diagnoses were pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria: 45%, 35%, and 28% of children, respectively, had these diagnoses. Half of the children obtained a pulse oximeter reading, and of these, 10% had an oxygen saturation level below 90%. Children were more likely to receive a pulse oximeter reading if they were not alert (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09, 1.55, p = 0.003), had chest indrawing (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.40, p < 0.001), or a very high respiratory rate (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.43, p < 0.001), as were children admitted to certain hospitals, at later time periods, and when a Paediatric Admission Record (PAR) was used (OR PAR used compared with PAR not present: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.98, 2.94, p < 0.001). Children were more likely to be prescribed oxygen if a pulse oximeter reading was obtained (OR: 1.42, 95% CI:1.25, 1.62, p < 0.001) and if this reading was below 90% (OR: 3.29, 95% CI: 2.82, 3.84, p < 0.001). The interviews indicated that the main barriers to pulse oximeter use are inadequate supply, broken pulse oximeters, and insufficient training on how, when, and why to use pulse oximeters and interpret their results. According to the interviews, variation in pulse oximeter use between hospitals is because of differences in pulse oximeter availability and the leadership of senior doctors in advocating for pulse oximeter use, whereas variation within hospitals over time is due to repair delays. Pulse oximeter use increased over time, likely because of the CIN's feedback to hospitals. When pulse oximeters are used, they are sometimes used incorrectly and some healthcare workers lack confidence in readings that contradict clinical signs. The main limitations of the study are that children with high levels of missing data were not excluded, interview participants might not have been representative, and the interviews did not enable a detailed exploration of differences between counties or across senior management groups. CONCLUSIONS There remain major challenges to implementing pulse oximetry-a cheap, decades old technology-into routine care in Kenya. Implementation requires efficient and transparent procurement and repair systems to ensure adequate availability. Periodic training, structured clinical records that include prompts, the promotion of pulse oximetry by senior doctors, and monitoring and feedback might also support pulse oximeter use. Our findings can inform strategies to support the use of pulse oximeters to guide prompt and effective treatment, in line with the Sustainable Development Goals. Without effective implementation, the potential benefits of pulse oximeters and possible hospital cost-savings by targeting oxygen therapy might not be realized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail J Enoch
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (former DPhil student)
| | - Mike English
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gerald McGivern
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Trujillo-Martín MM, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Del Pino-Sedeño T, Rúa-Figueroa Í, Trujillo-Martín E, Vallejo-Torres L, Imaz-Iglesia I, Sánchez-de-Madariaga R, de Pascual-Medina AM, Serrano-Aguilar P. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:783. [PMID: 31675957 PMCID: PMC6824022 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4589-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with significant potential morbidity and mortality. Substantial gaps have been documented between the development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and their implementation in practice. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component knowledge transfer intervention to implement a CPG for the management of SLE (CPG-SLE). Methods The study is an open, multicentre, controlled trial with random allocation by clusters to intervention or control. Clusters are four public university hospitals of the Canary Islands Health Service where rheumatologists are invited to participate. Patients diagnosed with SLE at least one year prior to recruitment are selected. Rheumatologists in intervention group receive a short educational group programme to both update their knowledge about SLE management according to CPG-SLE recommendations and to acquire knowledge and training on use of the patient-centred approach, a decision support tool embedded in the electronic clinical record and a quarterly feedback report containing information on management of SLE patients. Primary endpoint is change in self-perceived disease activity. Secondary endpoints are adherence of professionals to CPG-SLE recommendations, health-related quality of life, patient perception of their participation in decision making, attitudes of professionals towards shared decision making, knowledge of professionals about SLE and use of healthcare resources. Calculated sample size is 412 patients. Data will be collected from questionnaires and clinical records. Length of follow-up will be 18 months. Multilevel mixed models with repeated time measurements will be used to analyze changes in outcomes over time. Cost-effectiveness, from both social and healthcare services perspectives, will be analyzed by measuring effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses are planned. Discussion Impact of CPGs in clinical practice could be improved by applying proven value interventions to implement them. The results of this ongoing trial are expected to generate important scientifically valid and reproducible information not only on clinical effectiveness but also on cost-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention for implementation of a CPG based on communication technologies for chronic patients in the hospital setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03537638. Registered on 25 May 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María M Trujillo-Martín
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain. .,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain. .,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain. .,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Laura Vallejo-Torres
- Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Sánchez-de-Madariaga
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación en Telemedicina y e-Salud, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana M de Pascual-Medina
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Servicio Canario de la Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Servicio Canario de la Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Walshe C, Kinley J, Patel S, Goodman C, Bunn F, Lynch J, Scott D, Lund AD, Stacpoole M, Preston N, Froggatt K. A four-stage process for intervention description and guide development of a practice-based intervention: refining the Namaste Care intervention implementation specification for people with advanced dementia prior to a feasibility cluster randomised trial. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:275. [PMID: 31638902 PMCID: PMC6802319 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1275-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Some interventions are developed from practice, and implemented before evidence of effect is determined, or the intervention is fully specified. An example is Namaste Care, a multi-component intervention for people with advanced dementia, delivered in care home, community, hospital and hospice settings. This paper describes the development of an intervention description, guide and training package to support implementation of Namaste Care within the context of a feasibility trial. This allows fidelity to be determined within the trial, and for intervention users to understand how similar their implementation is to that which was studied. Methods A four-stage approach: a) Collating existing intervention materials and drawing from programme theory developed from a realist review to draft an intervention description. b) Exploring readability, comprehensibility and utility with staff who had not experienced Namaste Care. c) Using modified nominal group techniques with those with Namaste Care experience to refine and prioritise the intervention implementation materials. d) Final refinement with a patient and public involvement panel. Results Eighteen nursing care home staff, one carer, one volunteer and five members of our public involvement panel were involved across the study steps. A 16-page A4 booklet was designed, with flow charts, graphics and colour coded information to ease navigation through the document. This was supplemented by infographics, and a training package. The guide describes the boundaries of the intervention and how to implement it, whilst retaining the flexible spirit of the Namaste Care intervention. Conclusions There is little attention paid to how best to specify complex interventions that have already been organically implemented in practice. This four-stage process may have utility for context specific adaptation or description of existing, but untested, interventions. A robust, agreed, intervention and implementation description should enable a high-quality future trial. If an effect is determined, flexible practice implementation should be enabled through having a clear, evidence-based guide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Walshe
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.
| | - Julie Kinley
- St Christopher's Hospice, 51-59 Lawrie Park Road, Sydenham, London, SE26 6DZ, UK
| | - Shakil Patel
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK.,Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - Jennifer Lynch
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK
| | - David Scott
- Patient Representative c/o The Alzheimer's Society, London, UK
| | | | - Min Stacpoole
- St Christopher's Hospice, 51-59 Lawrie Park Road, Sydenham, London, SE26 6DZ, UK
| | - Nancy Preston
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
| | - Katherine Froggatt
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Impact of the Alphabet Strategy on Improving Diabetes Care at a Free Health Clinic. J Community Health Nurs 2019; 36:157-164. [PMID: 31621432 DOI: 10.1080/07370016.2019.1665323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The complexity and cost of diabetes care are barriers to a free health clinic attempting to provide quality care to uninsured patients. The alphabet strategy intervention was selected to increase the number of patients with diabetes receiving care according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines because it is simple and cost-effective. The project results revealed statistically significant increases in clinic uptake of diabetes education, blood pressure interventions, proteinuria, glucose control measurement and intervention, eye exams, and foot exams. The findings may be useful to other free health clinics attempting to provide quality care to their patients with diabetes.
Collapse
|
48
|
Jin Y, Li Z, Han F, Huang D, Huang Q, Cao Y, Weng H, Zeng XT, Wang X, Shang HC. Barriers and enablers for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in China: a mixed-method study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026328. [PMID: 31519667 PMCID: PMC6747634 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to explore perspectives and reasoning of medical staff from Class A tertiary hospitals about the factors hindering and facilitating the uptake and use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) during medical procedures. DESIGN Mixed-method research study to collect and analyse both quantitative and qualitative data. SETTING Class A tertiary hospitals in China. PARTICIPANTS The inclusion criteria for the questionnaire survey and qualitative research were (1) medical practitioners and (2) years of practice: above 5 years in a tertiary hospital. METHODS Questionnaires were distributed to medical staff in 11 cities to collect quantitative data. Frequency and ranking of barriers and enablers were analysed. Spearman correlations were computed to explore the correlation between years of practice, professional title ranking and educational background with self-reported guideline adherence. Using a constructivist grounded theory method, qualitative data were generated via in-depth face-to-face interviews with Chinese medical practitioners. RESULTS A total of 359 medical practitioners were surveyed and 32 medical practitioners interviewed in 11 cities. Higher frequency and higher ranking of barriers all converged on 'lack of access', 'less convenient', 'lack of applicability' and 'lack of evidence from Chinese sample'. Higher frequency and higher ranking of enablers converged on 'Short formats presentation', 'Utilisation of various media', 'Information visualisation' and 'Linking to patient electronic medical records'. There were no relationships between characteristics of respondents with self-reported adherence. This research produced a theoretical understanding of the experience of medical practitioners when using guidelines. Themes identified were as follows: existing intrinsic flaws in guidelines, deficient or incomplete system mechanism and being ambiguous. CONCLUSION Our findings provide a comprehensive and culturally sensitive perspective in understanding guideline implementation in China. Strategies addressing those barriers should be further discussed and researched in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinghui Jin
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Zimeng Li
- Graduate School, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Fei Han
- Xuan Wu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Di Huang
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiao Huang
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yue Cao
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong Weng
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xian-Tao Zeng
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinghuan Wang
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong-Cai Shang
- Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education and Beijing, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
- College of Integrated Chinese and Western medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cancelliere C, Sutton D, Côté P, French SD, Taylor-Vaisey A, Mior SA. Implementation interventions for musculoskeletal programs of care in the active military and barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of implementation: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2019; 14:82. [PMID: 31419992 PMCID: PMC6698020 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0931-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Musculoskeletal disorders are common in the active military and are associated with significant lost duty days and disability. Implementing programs of care to manage musculoskeletal disorders can be challenging in complex healthcare systems such as in the military. Understanding how programs of care for musculoskeletal disorders have been implemented in the military and how they impact outcomes may help to inform future implementation interventions in this population. Methods We conducted a scoping review using the modified Arksey and O’Malley framework to identify literature on (1) implementation interventions of musculoskeletal programs of care in the active military, (2) barriers and facilitators of implementation, and (3) implementation outcomes. We identified studies published in English by searching MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane) from inception to 1 June 2018 and hand searched reference lists of relevant studies. We included empirical studies. We synthesized study results according to three taxonomies: the Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) taxonomy to classify the implementation interventions; the capability, opportunity, motivation-behavior (COM-B) system to classify barriers and facilitators of implementation; and Proctor et al.’s taxonomy (Adm Policy Ment Health 38:65–76, 2011) to classify outcomes in implementation research. Results We identified 1785 studies and 16 were relevant. All but two of the relevant studies were conducted in the USA. Implementation interventions were primarily associated with delivery arrangements (e.g., multidisciplinary care). Most barriers or facilitators of implementation were environmental (physical or social). Service and client outcomes indicated improved efficiency of clinical care and improved function and symptomology. Studies reporting implementation outcomes indicated the programs were acceptable, appropriate, feasible, or sustainable. Conclusion Identification of evidence-based approaches for the management of musculoskeletal disorders is a priority for active-duty military. Our findings can be used by military health services to inform implementation strategies for musculoskeletal programs of care. Further research is needed to better understand (1) the components of implementation interventions, (2) how to overcome barriers to implementation, and (3) how to measure implementation outcomes to improve quality of care and recovery from musculoskeletal disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada. .,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada. .,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.
| | - Deborah Sutton
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Canada Research Chair in Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada
| | - Simon D French
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Louise D. Acton Building, 31 George Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.,Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada
| | - Silvano A Mior
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe Street North, Science building, Room 3000, Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4, Canada.,UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada.,Division of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McCaul M, Hendricks L, Naidoo R. Prehospital providers' perspectives for clinical practice guideline implementation and dissemination: Strengthening guideline uptake in South Africa. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0219761. [PMID: 31329643 PMCID: PMC6645495 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016 the first African emergency care clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed for national uptake in the prehospital sector in South Africa, with implementation starting in 2018. Comprehensive uptake of CPGs post development is not a given, as this requires effective and efficient dissemination and implementation strategies that take into account the perceptions, barriers and facilitators of the local end-users. This study aimed to identify prehospital end-users' perceptions of the emergency care guidelines, including barriers and facilitators for national decision makers, to strengthen CPG uptake in South Africa. METHODS Our study employed a descriptive qualitative research design, including nine focus groups with 56 operational emergency care providers across four major provinces in South Africa. Data was analysed using thematic analysis in ATLAS.ti. Ethics approval was provided by Stellenbosch University. RESULTS Themes related to provider perceptions, expectations and guideline uptake emerging from the data was unofficial and unclear communication, broadening versus limiting guideline expectations, conflicted personal reactions and spreading the word. Challenges to dissemination and implementation included poor communication, changes to scope of practice, and limited capacity to upskill existing providers. Facilitators included using technology for end-user documents, local champions to support change, establishing online and modular training, and implementation by independent decision makers. CONCLUSION This study provides an overview of the perceptions of operational emergency care providers and how their experiences of hearing about and engaging with the guidelines, in their industry, can contribute to the dissemination, implementation and uptake of emergency care guidelines. In order to disseminate and implement an emergency care CPG, decision makers must take into account the perceptions, barriers, and facilitators of local end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael McCaul
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lynn Hendricks
- Centre for Evidence-based Health Care, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Raveen Naidoo
- Director Emergency Medical Services & Disaster Medicine, National Department of Health, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|