1
|
Farinha I, Heaney LG. Barriers to clinical remission in severe asthma. Respir Res 2024; 25:178. [PMID: 38658975 PMCID: PMC11044532 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-024-02812-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Severe asthma is associated with an increased risk for exacerbations, reduced lung function, fixed airflow obstruction, and substantial morbidity and mortality. The concept of remission in severe asthma as a new treatment goal has recently gained attention due to the growing use of monoclonal antibody therapies, which target specific pathologic pathways of inflammation. This review evaluates the current definitions of asthma remission and unveils some of the barriers for achieving this state in the severe asthma population. Although there is no unified definition, the concept of clinical remission in asthma should be based on a sustained period of symptom control, elimination of oral corticosteroid exposure and exacerbations, and stabilization of pulmonary function. The conjugation of these criteria seems a realistic treatment target in a minority of asthmatic patients. Some unmet needs in severe asthma may affect the achievement of clinical remission. Late intervention with targeted therapies in the severe asthma population may increase the risk of corticosteroid exposure and the development of irreversible structural airway changes. Moreover, airway infection is an important component in persistent exacerbations in patients on biologic therapies. Phenotyping exacerbations may be useful to guide therapy decisions and to avoid the liberal use of oral corticosteroids. Another challenge associated with the aim of clinical remission in severe asthma is the multifaceted interaction between the disease and its associated comorbidities. Behavioural factors should be evaluated in case of persistent symptoms despite optimised treatment, and assessing biomarkers and targeting treatable traits may allow for a more objective way of reaching remission. The concept of clinical remission will benefit from an international consensus to establish unifying criteria for its assessment, and it should be addressed in the future management guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Farinha
- Pulmonology Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, Coimbra, 3004-561, Portugal
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Snoeck Henkemans SVJ, Vis M, Looijen AEM, van der Helm-van Mil AHM, de Jong PHP. Patient-reported outcomes and radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained remission versus low disease activity. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003860. [PMID: 38382943 PMCID: PMC10882354 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) over 5 years between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sustained remission (sREM), sustained low disease activity (sLDA) or active disease (AD) in the first year after diagnosis. METHODS All patients with RA from the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis CoHort trial, a multicentre, stratified, single-blinded trial with a treat-to-target approach, aiming for LDA (Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4), were studied. Patients were categorised into: (1) sREM (mean DAS from 6 to 12 months <1.6) (n=173); (2) sLDA (mean DAS from 6 to 12 months 1.6-2.4) (n=142); and (3) AD (mean DAS from 6 to 12 months >2.4) (n=59). Pain, fatigue, functional impairment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), health status and productivity loss during 5 years were compared between groups. Radiographic progression (modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS)) was compared over 2 years. RESULTS Patients in sLDA in the first year had worse PROs during follow-up, compared with patients in sREM: pain (0-10 Likert) was 0.90 units higher (95% CI 0.52 to 1.27), fatigue (Visual Analogue Scale) was 12.10 units higher (95% CI 7.27 to 16.92), functional impairment (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) was 0.28 units higher (95% CI 0.17 to 0.39), physical HRQoL (36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary score) was 4.42 units lower (95% CI -6.39 to -2.45), mental HRQoL (SF-36 Mental Component Summary score (MCS)) was 2.95 units lower (95% CI -4.83 to -1.07), health status (European Quality of life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L)) was 0.06 units lower (95% CI -0.09 to -0.03) and productivity loss (0%-100%) was 7.76% higher (95% CI 2.76 to 12.75). Differences between the AD and sREM group were even larger, except for the SF-36 MCS and EQ-5D-3L. No differences in mTSS were found between groups. CONCLUSION Patients with RA who reach sREM in the first year have better HRQoL and function, and less pain, fatigue and productivity loss in the years thereafter, compared with patients with RA who are in sLDA or AD in the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marijn Vis
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alten R, Burmester GR, Matucci-Cerinic M, Salmon JH, Östör A, Ng KJ, Gerwien J, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Brnabic AJM, Fautrel B. Comparative Effectiveness, Time to Discontinuation, and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Baricitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2-Year Data from the Multinational, Prospective Observational RA-BE-REAL Study in European Patients. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1575-1595. [PMID: 37755648 PMCID: PMC10654280 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00597-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION RA-BE-REAL is a 3-year, multinational, prospective, observational study of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) evaluating time to discontinuation of initial RA treatment along with patient baseline characteristics. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population. METHODS Patients initiated treatment with baricitinib (cohort A) or any bDMARD or tsDMARD (cohort B) for the first time. This study's primary objective was to assess the time to discontinuation of initial baricitinib, any other targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (tsDMARD), or any biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response) over 24 months in a European population. Comparative effectiveness analyses, over 24 months, included time to treatment discontinuation for all causes (excluding sustained clinical response), percentage of patients achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission or low disease activity (LDA), as well as mean changes from baseline for CDAI, pain visual analogue scale, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). For this European subpopulation, comparative analyses were performed using a frequentist model averaging (FMA) framework based on a data-driven machine learning causal inference approach to compare time to discontinuation, effectiveness, rates of remission or LDA, and patient-reported outcomes over 24 months comparing baricitinib with TNFi, as well as non-TNFi and tsDMARD grouped as other mechanism of action (OMA) drugs. RESULTS In the European sample of RA-BE-REAL, patients with RA treated with baricitinib experienced fewer discontinuations in comparison to those treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors or OMA. Overall, patients naïve to b/tsDMARDs achieved a higher rate of LDA and remission compared with experienced patients. A significantly greater proportion of patients treated with baricitinib achieved LDA compared with b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSION This real-world data can better inform clinicians about baricitinib effectiveness and drug survival when prescribing treatment for patients with RA across different subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Schlosspark-Klinik, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Jean-Hugues Salmon
- Rheumatology Department, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims University Hospitals, Reims, France
| | - Andrew Östör
- Cabrini Hospital, Monash University and Emeritus Research, Melbourne, Australia
- ANU, Canberra, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- PEPITES Team, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ruyssen-Witrand A, Guernec G, Dupont J, Lapuyade D, Lioté F, Vittecoq O, Degboé Y, Constantin A. Ten-year radiographic and functional outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission compared to patients in low disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther 2023; 25:207. [PMID: 37864239 PMCID: PMC10588022 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-023-03176-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the 10-year structural and functional prognosis between patients in sustained remission versus patients in sustained low disease activity (LDA) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS We included 256 patients from the ESPOIR cohort who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA and who were in sustained remission using the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score (n = 48), in sustained LDA (n = 139) or in sustained moderate to high disease activity (MDA or HDA, n = 69) over 10 years. The mTSSs progression over 10 years and the 10-year HAQ-DI scores were compared between the 3 groups. A longitudinal latent process mixed model was used to assess the independent effect of SDAI status over time on 10-year mTSS progression and HAQ-DI at 10 years. RESULTS Patients in sustained remission group were younger, had lower baseline HAQ-DI and mTSS scores and were less exposed to glucocorticoids, methotrexate or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs over 10 years. Patients in sustained remission had lower 10-year structural progression (variation of mTSS in the remission group: 4.06 (± 4.75) versus 14.59 (± 19.76) in the LDA group and 21.04 (± 24.08), p < 0.001 in the MDA or HDA groups) and lower 10-year HAQ-DI scores (10-year HAQ-DI in the remission group: 0.14 (± 0.33) versus 0.53 (± 0.49) in the LDA group and 1.20 (± 0.62) in the MDA or HDA groups, p < 0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events over 10 years was low, about 3.34/100 patient years, without any difference between the three groups. CONCLUSION RA patients in sustained SDAI remission have better long-term structural and functional outcomes in comparison to patients in sustained LDA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand
- Rheumatology Centre, Toulouse University Hospital, Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Toulouse CIC1436, Inserm, Team PEPSS "Pharmacologie En Population cohorteS Et biobanqueS, Purpan Teaching Hospital, University of Toulouse 3, 1 Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, Cedex 9, France.
| | - Gregory Guernec
- Inserm, Centre d'Epidémiologie Et de Recherche en Santé Des Populations, UMR1295, Inserm, Toulouse, France
| | - Julia Dupont
- Rheumatology Centre, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Diane Lapuyade
- Rheumatology Centre, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Frédéric Lioté
- Université Paris Cité and Inserm UMR1132 Bioscar Hôpital Lariboisière and Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Vittecoq
- Department of Rheumatology and CIC-CRB1404, Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Rouen University Hospital, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Yannick Degboé
- Rheumatology Center, Toulouse University Hospital, INFINITY, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, INSERM U1291, CNRS U5051, University Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| | - Arnaud Constantin
- Rheumatology Center, Toulouse University Hospital, INFINITY, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases, INSERM U1291, CNRS U5051, University Toulouse 3, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khabbazi A, Gadakchi L, Moslemi M, Khalaji A, Esalatmanesh K, Ziarati Yazdeli A, Hajialilo M, Malek Mahdavi A. Prevalence and predictors of long-term remission in rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a longitudinal study. Clin Rheumatol 2023; 42:1537-1544. [PMID: 36800137 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06548-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to provide real-world evidence for factors predicting long-term remission in a longitudinal study of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS Long-term remission was defined by meeting American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria for remission and prednisolone dose ≤ 5 mg/d for at least 5 years. Patients in this cohort were treated by tight control strategy using step-up combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs), biologic DMARDs. The parameters associated with long-term remission were subjected to univariate analysis, and parameters with P-values of < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS One thousand two hundred and eighty-six RA subjects were considered for eligibility, and finally, 499 patients were included in the study. Median duration of follow-up was 108 months. Long-term remission occurred in 157 (31.5%) patients. Median time to long-term remission was 8 (5, 41) months. Predictors of long-term remission were absence of flare during the course of disease, occurrence of sustained remission during 6 months after starting therapy, age at the disease onset > 60, being anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) negative, and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) at cohort entry ≤ 5.1. CONCLUSION In real-world practice, long-term remission occurs in 31.5% of patients treated with a tight control strategy. Absence of flare during the course of disease, occurrence of sustained remission during 6 months after starting therapy, age at the disease onset > 60, being ACPA negative, and DAS28 at baseline ≤ 5.1 are independent predictors of long-term remission. Key Points • In real-world practice, long-term remission occurs in 31.5% of patients treated with a tight control strategy. • Median time to long-term remission was 8 months. • Absence of flare during the course of disease, occurrence of sustained remission during 6 months after starting therapy, age at the disease onset >60, being ACPA negative, and DAS28 at baseline ≤ 5.1 are independent predictors of long-term remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Khabbazi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Leyla Gadakchi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Moslemi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Amirreza Khalaji
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Kamal Esalatmanesh
- Internal Medicine Department, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Asma Ziarati Yazdeli
- Internal Medicine Department, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mehrzad Hajialilo
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Aida Malek Mahdavi
- Connective Tissue Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Golgasht St., P.O Box 5166614756, Tabriz, Iran. .,Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. .,Rahat Breathe and Sleep Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gamboa-Cárdenas RV, Ugarte-Gil MF, Pimentel-Quiroz V, Reátegui-Sokolova C, Rodríguez-Bellido Z, Zevallos-Miranda F, Medina-Chinchón M, Alfaro-Lozano J, Noriega-Zapata E, Cucho-Venegas JM, Perich-Campos R, Pastor-Asurza C, Alarcón GS. Predictors of Remission and Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Results From the Follow-up of a Real-World Peruvian Cohort. J Clin Rheumatol 2022; 28:390-396. [PMID: 35697014 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical remission is the goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management; however, this can be difficult to achieve in several parts of the world. Our objective was to determine predictors of remission and remission/low disease activity (LDA) in RA. METHODS A longitudinal real-setting RA cohort was followed up (January 2016-2020). Predictors examined were sex, age at diagnosis, disease duration, socioeconomic status, tobacco use, rheumatoid factor titer, comorbidities (Charlson index), Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score, disability (Multidimensional Disease Health Assessment Questionnaire), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 questionnaire), glucocorticoid dose, biological/target synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and conventional DMARD (c-DMARD) use. Univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equation models were done to determine predictors of remission (at a given visit) and sustained remission (2 consecutives visits), using the SDAI definition (0 or <3.3). Similarly, remission/LDA (SDAI <11) predictors were examined. RESULTS Five hundred thirty RA patients included the following: 160 patients (30.2%) achieved remission in at least 1 visit, and 126 patients (23.77%) achieved sustained remission. On the multivariable analysis glucocorticoid dose (odds ratio [OR], 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.027-1.094; p = 0.004) and current (OR, 2.293; 95% CI, 1.811-2.903; p < 0.001) or past (OR, 1.383; 95% CI, 1.127-1.698; p = 0.002) use of c-DMARDs predicted remission/LDA in at least 1 visit, whereas the SDAI (OR, 0.951; 95% CI, 0.942-0.959; p < 0.001), Multidimensional Disease Health Assessment Questionnaire (OR, 0.648; 95% CI, 0.549-0.764; p < 0.001), and age at diagnosis (OR, 0.994; 95% CI, 0.990-0.998; p = 0.004) were negative predictors. As to sustained remission/LDA, current (OR, 2.012; 95% CI, 1.458-2.776: p < 0.001) or past (OR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.155-1.993; p = 0.003) use of c-DMARDs, having a better Short Form-36 questionnaire physical component summary (OR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.014-1.029; p < 0.001), and older age at diagnosis (OR, 1.013; 95% CI, 1.003-1.022; p = 0.008) predicted it, whereas SDAI (OR, 0.949; 95% CI, 0.933-0.965; p < 0.001) and medium low/low socioeconomic status (OR, 0.674; 95% CI, 0.500-0.909; p = 0.010) were negative predictors. CONCLUSION During follow-up of this real-world RA cohort, c-DMARD use predicted remission and remission/LDA. In contrast, disease activity was a negative predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - José Alfaro-Lozano
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen EsSalud
| | | | | | - Risto Perich-Campos
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen EsSalud
| | - César Pastor-Asurza
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Nacional Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen EsSalud
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Value of Remission in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Targeted Review. Adv Ther 2022; 39:75-93. [PMID: 34787822 PMCID: PMC8799574 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01946-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The treat-to-target strategy, which defines clinical remission as the primary therapeutic goal for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is a widely recommended treatment approach in clinical guidelines. Achieving remission has been associated with improved clinical outcomes, quality of life, and productivity. These benefits are likely to translate to reduced economic burden in terms of lower healthcare costs and resource utilization. As such, a literature review was conducted to better understand the economic value of remission. Despite the large heterogeneity found in RA-related economic outcomes across studies, patients in remission consistently had lower direct medical and indirect costs, less healthcare resource utilization, and greater productivity compared to those without remission. Remission was associated with 19–52% savings in direct medical costs and 37–75% savings in indirect costs. The economic value of remission should thus be considered in economic analyses of RA therapies to inform treatment and reimbursement decisions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Danila MI, Chen L, Ruderman EM, Owensby JK, O'Beirne R, Melnick JA, Harrold LR, Curtis D, Nowell WB, Curtis JR. Evaluation of an Intervention to Support Patient-Rheumatologist Conversations About Escalating Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Principle Study. ACR Open Rheumatol 2021; 4:279-287. [PMID: 34962093 PMCID: PMC8992469 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study’s objective was to test whether an online video intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation improves willingness to change treatment in people living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods We conducted a controlled, randomized trial among patients with RA enrolled in ArthritisPower, a United States patient registry. We recruited participants by email and surveyed their assessment of disease activity (patient global), satisfaction with disease control (patient acceptable symptom state), attitudes about RA medications, decisional conflict (decisional conflict scale), and willingness to modify RA treatment (choice predisposition scale, higher scores are better) if or when recommended by their rheumatologist. Intervention groups watched educational videos relevant to a treat‐to‐target (T2T) strategy, whereas control groups viewed vaccination‐related videos as an “attention control.” We compared the between‐group difference in patients’ willingness to modify RA treatment (primary outcome) and difference in decisional conflict about changing RA treatment (secondary outcome) after watching the videos using t tests. Results Participants with self‐reported RA (n = 208) were 90% White and 90% women, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50 (11) years, and 52% reported familiarity with the RA T2T strategy. We found a significant improvement in between‐group difference in willingness to change RA treatment among intervention versus control participants (0.49 [95% confidence interval 0.09‐0.88], P = 0.02). The effect size (Glass’s delta) for the intervention was 0.48. Decisional conflict about treatment change decreased, but the between‐group difference was not significant. Conclusion This novel educational patient‐directed intervention discussing appropriate treatment escalation was associated with improved willingness to change RA treatment if or when recommended by a rheumatologist. Further studies should evaluate whether this change in patients’ predisposition translates into actual treatment escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria I Danila
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Lang Chen
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | - Ronan O'Beirne
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - Leslie R Harrold
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - David Curtis
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Effect of sustained intensive therapy with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a 5-year real-world consecutive study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 133:1397-1403. [PMID: 32496302 PMCID: PMC7339243 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000000811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Intensive therapy with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been reported to improve the outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, real-world study on the effect of intensive therapy on RA sustained remission is still lacking. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of sustained intensive DMARD therapy (SUIT) for RA in a real-world 5-year consecutive cohort. Methods Based on a consecutive cohort of 610 out-patients with RA, remission of RA was assessed in 541 patients from 2012 to 2017, by dividing into SUIT, non-SUIT, and intermittent SUIT (Int-SUIT) groups. Changes in the disease activity scores were evaluated by 28-joint disease activity score based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), and clinical deep remission criteria (CliDR). Cumulative remission rates between different groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and predictive factors of sustained remission were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results The remission rates of the SUIT group decreased from 12.0% (65/541) to 5.6% (20/359) based on DAS28-ESR, from 14.0% (76/541) to 7.2% (26/359) based on DAS28-CRP, and from 8.5% (46/541) to 3.1% (11/359) based on CliDR, respectively, with a gradually decreasing trend during the 5 years. The SUIT regimen led to a significantly higher cumulative remission rate than non-SUIT regimen based on DAS28-ESR (39.7% vs. 19.5%, P = 0.001), DAS28-CRP (42.0% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.001), and CliDR (24.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.001). The cumulative remission rates of patients treated with SUIT regimen were significantly higher than those treated with Int-SUIT regimen based on DAS28-ESR (39.7% vs. 25.7%, P = 0.043) and CliDR (24.5% vs. 14.2%, P = 0.047), but there was no significant difference between the two groups based on DAS28-CRP (42.0% vs. 27.4%, P = 0.066). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of SUIT regimen was an independent favorable predictor according to different remission definitions (for DAS28-ESR: odds ratio [OR], 2.215, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.271–3.861, P = 0.005; for DAS28-CRP: OR, 1.520, 95% CI: 1.345–1.783, P = 0.002; for CliDR: OR, 1.525, 95% CI: 1.314–1.875, P = 0.013). Conclusion Sustained intensive treatment of RA is an optimal strategy in daily practice and will lead to an increased remission rate.
Collapse
|
10
|
ARSLAN D. Romatoid artrit - tedavi prensipleri: Ne zaman geçiş yapalım? EGE TIP DERGISI 2021. [DOI: 10.19161/etd.864145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
11
|
Byun SH, Min C, Choi HG, Hong SJ. Increased Risk of Temporomandibular Joint Disorder in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9093005. [PMID: 32957710 PMCID: PMC7565073 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9093005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated the incidence of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and examined the association between TMD and RA, through longitudinal follow-up. Population data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort from 2002 to 2015 was used. From 514,866 subjects, 3122 with RA were matched with 12,488 controls in a 1:4 ratio. The crude and adjusted models (for obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption, blood pressure, blood glucose, total cholesterol, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores) were calculated. Chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis, and two-tailed analyses were used for statistical analysis. Stratified Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for TMD in the RA group, compared to those in the control group. The adjusted HR for TMD in RA was 2.52 (95% CI = 1.70–3.74), compared to the control group. The results were consistent with the subgroup analyses, according to age and sex, except in men older than 60 years of age. KM analysis showed similar results. Hence, we found that patients with RA have a higher risk of TMD, and should be observed for symptoms of the initial stage of TMD to prevent the risk of aggravation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Hwan Byun
- Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea;
- Research Center of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University Clinical Dentistry Graduate School, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
| | - Chanyang Min
- Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea;
| | - Hyo-Geun Choi
- Research Center of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University Clinical Dentistry Graduate School, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
- Hallym Data Science Laboratory, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea;
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Korea
- Correspondence: (H.-G.C.); (S.-J.H.); Tel.: +82-10-9033-9224 (H.-G.C.); +82-31-8086-2670 (S.-J.H.)
| | - Seok-Jin Hong
- Research Center of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University Clinical Dentistry Graduate School, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan 18450, Korea
- Correspondence: (H.-G.C.); (S.-J.H.); Tel.: +82-10-9033-9224 (H.-G.C.); +82-31-8086-2670 (S.-J.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ramiro S, Landewé RB, van der Heijde D, Sepriano A, FitzGerald O, Ostergaard M, Homik J, Elkayam O, Thorne JC, Larche M, Ferraccioli G, Backhaus M, Boire G, Combe B, Schaeverbeke T, Saraux A, Dougados M, Rossini M, Govoni M, Sinigaglia L, Cantagrel AG, Allaart CF, Barnabe C, Bingham CO, Tak PP, van Schaardenburg D, Hammer HB, Dadashova R, Hutchings E, Paschke J, Maksymowych WP. Is treat-to-target really working in rheumatoid arthritis? a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients treated in daily practice (RA BIODAM). Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:453-459. [PMID: 32094157 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether following a treat-to-target (T2T)-strategy in daily clinical practice leads to more patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) meeting the remission target. METHODS RA patients from 10 countries starting/changing conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were assessed for disease activity every 3 months for 2 years (RA BIODAM (BIOmarkers of joint DAMage) cohort). Per visit was decided whether a patient was treated according to a T2T-strategy with 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) remission (DAS44 <1.6) as the target. Sustained T2T was defined as T2T followed in ≥2 consecutive visits. The main outcome was the achievement of DAS44 remission at the subsequent 3-month visit. Other outcomes were remission according to 28-joint disease activity score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean definitions. The association between T2T and remission was tested in generalised estimating equations models. RESULTS In total 4356 visits of 571 patients (mean (SD) age: 56 (13) years, 78% female) were included. Appropriate application of T2T was found in 59% of the visits. T2T (vs no T2T) did not yield a higher likelihood of DAS44 remission 3 months later (OR (95% CI): 1.03 (0.92 to 1.16)), but sustained T2T resulted in an increased likelihood of achieving DAS44 remission (OR: 1.19 (1.03 to 1.39)). Similar results were seen with DAS28-ESR remission. For more stringent definitions (CDAI, SDAI and ACR/EULAR Boolean remission), T2T was consistently positively associated with remission (OR range: 1.16 to 1.29), and sustained T2T had a more pronounced effect on remission (OR range: 1.49 to 1.52). CONCLUSION In daily clinical practice, the correct application of a T2T-strategy (especially sustained T2T) in patients with RA leads to higher rates of remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Bm Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexandre Sepriano
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Oliver FitzGerald
- St Vincent's University Hospital and Conway Institute for Biomolecular Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joanne Homik
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ori Elkayam
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the "Sackler" Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - J Carter Thorne
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margaret Larche
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Divisions of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunolgoy and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Marina Backhaus
- Park-Klinik Weissensee, Academic Hospital of the Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gilles Boire
- Department of Medicine/Division of Rheumatology, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS), Universite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bernard Combe
- CHU Montpellier and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
| | - Thierry Schaeverbeke
- Department of Rheumatology, FHU ACRONIM, University Hospital of Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Rheumatology Department, Paris Descartes University, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Rossini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marcello Govoni
- Rheumatology Unit, S. Anna Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Luigi Sinigaglia
- Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alain G Cantagrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cheryl Barnabe
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Paul P Tak
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Medicine, Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel Paschke
- CaRE Arthritis LTD, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Menzies-Gow A, Bafadhel M, Busse WW, Casale TB, Kocks JWH, Pavord ID, Szefler SJ, Woodruff PG, de Giorgio-Miller A, Trudo F, Fageras M, Ambrose CS. An expert consensus framework for asthma remission as a treatment goal. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 145:757-765. [PMID: 31866436 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With novel therapies in development, there is an opportunity to consider asthma remission as a treatment goal. In this Rostrum, we present a generalized framework for clinical and complete remission in asthma, on and off treatment, developed on the basis of medical literature and expert consensus. A modified Delphi survey approach was used to ascertain expert consensus on core components of asthma remission as a treatment target. Phase 1 identified other chronic inflammatory diseases with remission definitions. Phase 2 evaluated components of those definitions as well as published definitions of spontaneous asthma remission. Phase 3 evaluated a remission framework created using consensus findings. Clinical remission comprised 12 or more months with (1) absence of significant symptoms by validated instrument, (2) lung function optimization/stabilization, (3) patient/provider agreement regarding remission, and (4) no use of systemic corticosteroids. Complete remission was defined as clinical remission plus objective resolution of asthma-related inflammation and, if appropriate, negative bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Remission off treatment required no asthma treatment for 12 or more months. The proposed framework is a first step toward developing asthma remission as a treatment target and should be refined through future research, patient input, and clinical study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mona Bafadhel
- Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - William W Busse
- Department of Medicine, Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wis
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| | - Janwillem W H Kocks
- General Practitioners Research Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands; Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ian D Pavord
- Respiratory Medicine Unit and Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stanley J Szefler
- Breathing Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado and Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Prescott G Woodruff
- UCSF, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and CVRI, San Francisco, Calif
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has evolved significantly over the past decades. Therapeutic advances have made clinical remission a feasible goal. Systematic treatment approaches taking into account objective measures of disease activity ("treat-to-target"/"T2T") have been shown to result in better outcomes. This article reviews the latest information regarding T2T in rheumatoid arthritis, including a synopsis of the different disease activity scores available, new definitions of remission used in clinical trials and in routine clinical care, studies supporting a T2T approach, the role of imaging to guide treatment, and areas in which uncertainty remains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Salomon-Escoto
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
| | - Jonathan Kay
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Carvalho PD, Ferreira RJ, Landewé R, Vega-Morales D, Salomon-Escoto K, Veale DJ, Chopra A, da Silva JA, Machado PM. Association of 17 Definitions of Remission with Functional Status in a Large Clinical Practice Cohort of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Rheumatol 2019; 47:20-27. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To compare the association between different remission criteria and physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed in clinical practice.Methods.Longitudinal data from the METEOR database were used. Seventeen definitions of remission were tested: American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Boolean-based; Simplified/Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI/CDAI); and 14 Disease Activity Score (DAS)-based definitions. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤ 0.5 was defined as good functional status. Associations were investigated using generalized estimating equations. Potential confounders were tested and sensitivity analyses performed.Results.Data from 32,915 patients (157,899 visits) were available. The most stringent definition of remission was the ACR/EULAR Boolean-based definition (1.9%). The proportion of patients with HAQ ≤ 0.5 was higher for the most stringent definitions, although it never reached 100%. However, this also meant that, for the most stringent criteria, many patients in nonremission had HAQ ≤ 0.5. All remission definitions were associated with better function, with the strongest degree of association observed for the SDAI (adjusted OR 3.36, 95% CI 3.01–3.74).Conclusion.The 17 definitions of remission confirmed their validity against physical function in a large international clinical practice setting. Achievement of remission according to any of the indices may be more important than the use of a specific index. A multidimensional approach, targeted at wider goals than disease control, is necessary to help all patients achieve the best possible functional status.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sung YK, Yoshida K, Prince FHM, Frits ML, Cho SK, Choe JY, Lee HS, Lee J, Lee SS, Yoo DH, Helfgott SM, Shadick NA, Weinblatt ME, Solomon DH, Bae SC. Prevalence and predictors for sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214981. [PMID: 31002669 PMCID: PMC6474583 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Remission is a key goal in managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with sustained remission as the preferred sequelae of short-term remission. However little is known about the predictors of sustained remission for patients reaching remission. Using two independent cohorts, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and predictors for sustained remission. METHODS The study cohort consisted of subjects with RA from the Brigham and Women's Hospital Rheumatoid Arthritis Sequential Study (BRASS) and the Korean Observational Study Network for Arthritis (KORONA). We analyzed subjects who reached remission in 2009 with follow up data for two consecutive years. Remission was defined by the Disease Activity Score 28- (DAS28-CRP) of less than 2.6. Sustained remission was defined as three consecutive annual visits in remission. Predictors for sustained remission were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 465 subjects were in remission in 2009. Sustained remission was achieved by 53 of 92 (57.5%) in BRASS and by 198 of 373 (53.1%) in KORONA. In multivariate analyses, baseline predictors of sustained remission were: disease duration less than 5 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.08-3.58], Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) score of 0 (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.18-2.74), and non-use of oral glucocorticoid (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01-2.47). CONCLUSION More than half of RA subjects in remission in 2009 remained in remission through 2011. Short disease duration, no disability, and non-use of oral glucocorticoid at baseline were associated with sustained remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon-Kyoung Sung
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Kazuki Yoshida
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Femke H. M. Prince
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
- Department of Paediatrics/ Paediatric Rheumatology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle L. Frits
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Soo-Kyung Cho
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung-Yoon Choe
- Department of Rheumatology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Hye-Soon Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, South Korea
| | - Jisoo Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Shin-Seok Lee
- Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Dae-Hyun Yoo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Simon M. Helfgott
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Nancy A. Shadick
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Michael E. Weinblatt
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Daniel H. Solomon
- Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States America
| | - Sang-Cheol Bae
- Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sewerin P, Schleich C, Brinks R, Müller-Lutz A, Fichter F, Eichner M, Schneider M, Ostendorf B, Vordenbäumen S. Assessing Associations of Synovial Perfusion, Cartilage Quality, and Outcome in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Rheumatol 2019; 47:15-19. [PMID: 30877219 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess associations of synovial perfusion, cartilage quality, and outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Synovial perfusion and cartilage quality were assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in metacarpophalangeal joints of 28 treatment-naive patients with RA at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after methotrexate. Analysis was by linear mixed modeling. RESULTS Synovial perfusion variables were associated with remission (p < 0.05) and cartilage quality (p < 0.004). Maximum synovial enhancement was associated to European League Against Rheumatism response (p < 0.05). Synovial perfusion improved in nonresponders over time (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Synovial perfusion relates to remission, response, and cartilage quality in a cohort of therapy-naive patients with early RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Sewerin
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany. .,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work.
| | - Christoph Schleich
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Ralph Brinks
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Anja Müller-Lutz
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Florian Fichter
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Markus Eichner
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Matthias Schneider
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Benedikt Ostendorf
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| | - Stefan Vordenbäumen
- From Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Düsseldorf, Germany.,P. Sewerin, MD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; C. Schleich, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; R. Brinks, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; A. Müller-Lutz, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; F. Fichter, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Eichner, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology; M. Schneider, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; B. Ostendorf, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology; S. Vordenbäumen, MD, PhD, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department and Hiller-Research-Unit for Rheumatology. P. Sewerin and C. Schleich contributed equally to this work
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Radiol Med 2019; 124:1071-1086. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01001-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
19
|
Bugatti S, Sakellariou G, Luvaro T, Greco MI, Manzo A. Clinical, Imaging, and Pathological Suppression of Synovitis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Is the Disease Curable? Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:140. [PMID: 29868592 PMCID: PMC5962817 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has witnessed a dramatic revolution in recent years, and disease remission has become an increasingly achievable outcome. Rheumatologists are now facing the urgent question of whether, once remission has been achieved and stably maintained, drugs can be tapered, and even discontinued. The concept of disease remission however encompasses progressive layers of complexity, all of which need to be disentangled before considering RA as a “curable” condition. As the synovial membrane represents the ultimate target of the pathological process of RA, a critical issue remains whether disease remission coincides with true suppression of inflammation and definitive tissue “healing.” In this short review, we will provide a critical summary of recent studies investigating the possibility of controlling RA synovitis at the clinical, imaging or pathological level. Potential advantages and limitations of these perspectives in the definition of remission are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Bugatti
- Division of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Garifallia Sakellariou
- Division of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Terenzj Luvaro
- Division of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Immacolata Greco
- Division of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonio Manzo
- Division of Rheumatology, Rheumatology and Translational Immunology Research Laboratories (LaRIT), IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
What is the optimal target for treat-to-target strategies in rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018; 30:282-287. [DOI: 10.1097/bor.0000000000000484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
21
|
Ferreira RJO, Eugénio G, Ndosi M, Silva C, Medeiros C, Duarte C, da Silva JAP. Influence of the different “patient global assessment” formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
22
|
Konijn NPC, van Tuyl LHD, Boers M, den Uyl D, ter Wee MM, Kerstens P, Voskuyl AE, van Schaardenburg D, Nurmohamed MT, Lems WF. Do Short and Sustained Periods of American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Remission Predict Functional and Radiographic Outcome in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Low Overall Damage Progression? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69:989-996. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 09/15/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole P. C. Konijn
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Lilian H. D. van Tuyl
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Boers
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Debby den Uyl
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Marieke M. ter Wee
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Pit Kerstens
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, and Westfriesgasthuis; Hoorn The Netherlands
| | - Alexandre E. Voskuyl
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, and Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Michael T. Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center and Reade; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Willem F. Lems
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center and Reade; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sewerin P, Vordenbaeumen S, Hoyer A, Brinks R, Buchbender C, Miese F, Schleich C, Klein S, Schneider M, Ostendorf B. Silent progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: is DAS28 remission an insufficient goal in RA? Results from the German Remission-plus cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:163. [PMID: 28420375 PMCID: PMC5395882 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1528-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remission is arguably the ultimate therapeutic goal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Applying modern strategies, clinical remission can be achieved in a substantial number of patients with early RA (ERA). Even in those patients, the number and scope of erosions can increase. We, therefore, investigated the value of MRI for the detection of radiological progression in patients with DAS28 improvement and/or clinical remission of the German Remission-plus cohort. METHODS Data-sets of 80 RA patients (according to 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria) from the Remission-plus study cohort, who fulfilled the following criteria, were retrospectively analysed: availability of two consecutive MRI scans (low-field MRI, follow-up interval 1 year) of the clinically dominant hand and wrist, and the presence of DAS28 (CRP) scores at both time points, which was used to assess disease activity. RESULTS Seventy-one of the 80 investigated patients presented a numerical improvement of the DAS28 (CRP) after 12 months (DAS28(CRP) T0 average (Ø) 4.96, SD 1.2; DAS28 T4 (12 month) Ø 2.6, SD 1.0), 73% of them also improved in the RAMRIS-Score, while 24% demonstrated an increase despite DAS28 improvement and 3% showed equal values. 48% of patients who improved in the DAS28 reached EULAR remission. 41% of these patients had an increase in the RAMRIS Erosion-subscore after 12 months. When considering EULAR response criteria (non-response (n = 7), moderate response (n = 19), good response (n = 45)), an increase of erosions was found in 71.4% of non-responders, 52.6% of moderate responders, and 31.1% of good responders after 12 months, all compared to baseline. CONCLUSION Up to 40% of patients in this study demonstrated a progressive erosive disease detected by MRI despite DAS28 improvement or EULAR remission. Future studies are needed to determine the prognostic clinical impact of disease progression in MRI despite clinical remission, and to investigate if DAS28 remission may be an insufficient therapeutic goal and should be accompanied by MRI remission criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Sewerin
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany.
| | - Stefan Vordenbaeumen
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Annika Hoyer
- German Diabetes Centre, Institute for Biometry and Epidemiology, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Ralph Brinks
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Christian Buchbender
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Falk Miese
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Christoph Schleich
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Sabine Klein
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| | - Benedikt Ostendorf
- Department of Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstreet 5, Duesseldorf, 40225, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Miguel E, Pecondón-Español A, Castaño-Sánchez M, Corrales A, Gutierrez-Polo R, Rodriguez-Gomez M, Pinto-Tasende JA, Rivas JL, Ivorra-Cortés J. A reduced 12-joint ultrasound examination predicts lack of X-ray progression better than clinical remission criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2017; 37:1347-1356. [PMID: 28389854 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-017-3714-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
To study the predictive value of clinical remission definitions and ultrasound (US) examination on X-ray progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This was an observational prospective multicenter 1-year follow-up cohort of RA patients with moderate disease activity (3.2 < DAS28 ≤ 5.1) who started anti-TNF therapy. DAS28ESR, DAS28CRP, SDAI, CDAI, and ACR/EULAR remission criteria were applied and reduced 12-joint US examination was performed at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. At baseline and month 12, radiographs of hands and feet were obtained in a subset of patients. A blind independent reader scored radiographs. X-ray progression was defined as Sharp van der Heijde change score >1 and no progression was defined as ≤0. 319 of 357 patients completed the study; patients had a mean (SD) age of 53.5 (13.1) years, with a disease duration of 7.5 (7.1) years. Laboratory, clinical, and US values significantly improved at month 6, except CRP, with additional improvement at month 12. Remission and low disease activity rates increased at follow-up. In the subset of 115 patients with radiological studies, clinical remission by any definition was not significantly associated with X-ray progression. Patients without PD signal at baseline and month 6 were a lower risk of X-ray progression than patients with PD signal, OR 0.197 (95% CI 0.046-0.861) and 0.134 (95% CI 0.047-0.378), respectively. Absence of PD signal, but not clinical remission predicts lack of X-ray progression. A feasible 12-joint US examination may add relevant information to RA remission criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio de Miguel
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Pº de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Manuel Castaño-Sánchez
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Alfonso Corrales
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Jose A Pinto-Tasende
- Rheumatology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schneider M. [New options for the practice : Update S1/S2 guidelines on rheumatoid arthritis?]. Z Rheumatol 2017; 76:125-132. [PMID: 28102443 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-016-0261-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines are important tools for evidence-based pharmacological treatment of patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Recommendations assist physicians in identifying the best form of treatment but ultimately, the final decision is based on joint participation by the patient and physician. Nowadays, general concepts, such as treat to target seem to be more important in rheumatoid arthritis than differencies between various drugs or drug classes. The universal recommendation to use methotrexate as the initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) is driven more by economic reasons than by scientific data, which is not completely wrong but should be disclosed. For the future, more differentiated recommendations need better individual risk stratification and more distinct profiling of the different substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Schneider
- Poliklinik und Funktionsbereich für Rheumatologie, Hiller Forschungszentrum, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, HHUD Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Tuyl LHD, Sadlonova M, Hewlett S, Davis B, Flurey C, Goel N, Gossec L, Heegaard Brahe C, Hill CL, Hoogland W, Kirwan J, Hetland ML, van Schaardenburg D, Smolen JS, Stamm T, Voshaar M, Wells GA, Boers M. The patient perspective on absence of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a survey to identify key domains of patient-perceived remission. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:855-861. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Revised: 10/25/2016] [Accepted: 11/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundGuidelines suggest treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to target remission, in close consultation with the patient. Our recent qualitative study of the patients' perspective on remission in RA identified 26 domains. The current study aimed to identify a short list of the most important aspects to inform future research.MethodsPatients with RA from the Netherlands, the UK, Austria, Denmark, France and the USA completed a survey that contained all domains identified in our qualitative study. They rated domains for importance (‘not important’, ‘important’ or ‘essential’ to characterise a period of remission) and if important or essential, whether this domain needs to be ‘less’, ‘almost gone’ or ‘gone’ to reflect remission. Respondents were also asked to determine their personal top 3 most important/essential domains. Frequency of specific domains in the top 3 was calculated, and domains were sorted on the percentage of patients that evaluated a particular domain as ‘essential’.ResultsOf 274 respondents, 75% were female, mean (SD) age 57(13) years, disease duration 12(9) years. The top 3 were as follows: pain (67%), fatigue (33%) and independence (19%); domains most frequently rated as ‘essential’ were as follows: pain (60%), being mobile (52%), physical function (51%), being independent (47%) and fatigue (41%). Pain needed to be less (13%), almost gone (42%) or gone (45%) to reflect remission. Similar patterns were seen for fatigue, independence, mobility and physical functioning.ConclusionPatients identified pain, fatigue and independence as the most important domains of RA disease activity that need to be improved to reflect remission.
Collapse
|
27
|
Leung AMH, Farewell D, Lau CS, Choy EHS. Defining criteria for rheumatoid arthritis patient-derived disease activity score that correspond to Disease Activity Score 28 and Clinical Disease Activity Index based disease states and response criteria. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55:1954-1958. [PMID: 27477805 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Two versions of a patient-based DAS (PDAS) 1 and 2 (with and without ESR) have been developed and validated in RA. The objective of this study was to define PDAS1- and PDAS2-based criteria for remission, low, moderate and high disease activity and responses to treatment. METHOD Using receiver operating characteristic curves, the optimal thresholds for PDAS1 and PDAS2 that correspond to validated assessor-based DAS (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) disease statuses were determined. Data from RA patients initiated on disease-modifying drugs were used to determine optimal thresholds for PDAS1 and PDAS2 that corresponded to EULAR good and moderate responses. Agreement with DAS28, CDAI and EULAR response criteria was assessed by Cohen's κ statistic. RESULTS Threshold for PDAS1 and PDAS2 demonstrated fair to moderate agreement with DAS28 [κ = 0.44 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.50) and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.38)] and CDAI [κ = 0.27 (95% CI: 0.22, 0.33) and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.35, 0.49)] disease statuses, respectively, which was similar to agreement between DAS28 and CDAI [κ = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.61)] within this group. Agreement of EULAR good and moderate response with PDAS1 and PDAS2 was κ = 0.46 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.64) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20, 0.56), respectively. CONCLUSION Thresholds for disease activity statuses and response to treatment for PDAS1 and PDAS2 have been established. They have comparable agreement to assessor-based criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Farewell
- Institute of Primary Care & Public Health, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chak Sing Lau
- LKS Faculty of Medicine and Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ernest H S Choy
- Section of Rheumatology, Institute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Alemao E, Joo S, Kawabata H, Al MJ, Allison PD, Rutten-van Mölken MPMH, Frits ML, Iannaccone CK, Shadick NA, Weinblatt ME. Effects of Achieving Target Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis on Functional Status, Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization: Analysis of Clinical Practice Data. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 68:308-17. [PMID: 26238974 PMCID: PMC5067571 DOI: 10.1002/acr.22678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2015] [Revised: 06/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate associations between achieving guideline‐recommended targets of disease activity, defined by the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP) <2.6, the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤3.3, or the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤2.8, and other health outcomes in a longitudinal observational study. Methods Other defined thresholds included low disease activity (LDA), moderate (MDA), or severe disease activity (SDA). To control for intraclass correlation and estimate effects of independent variables on outcomes of the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M‐HAQ), the EuroQol 5‐domain (EQ‐5D; a quality‐of‐life measure), hospitalization, and durable medical equipment (DME) use, we employed mixed models for continuous outcomes and generalized estimating equations for binary outcomes. Results Among 1,297 subjects, achievement (versus nonachievement) of recommended disease targets was associated with enhanced physical functioning and lower health resource utilization. After controlling for baseline covariates, achievement of disease targets (versus LDA) was associated with significantly enhanced physical functioning based on SDAI ≤3.3 (ΔM‐HAQ −0.047; P = 0.0100) and CDAI ≤2.8 (−0.073; P = 0.0003) but not DAS28‐CRP <2.6 (−0.022; P = 0.1735). Target attainment was associated with significantly improved EQ‐5D (0.022–0.096; P < 0.0030 versus LDA, MDA, or SDA). Patients achieving guideline‐recommended disease targets were 36–45% less likely to be hospitalized (P < 0.0500) and 23–45% less likely to utilize DME (P < 0.0100). Conclusion Attaining recommended target disease‐activity measures was associated with enhanced physical functioning and health‐related quality of life. Some health outcomes were similar in subjects attaining guideline targets versus LDA. Achieving LDA is a worthy clinical objective in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evo Alemao
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Maiwenn J Al
- Institute of Health Policy and Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute of Health Policy and Management and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle L Frits
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Nancy A Shadick
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael E Weinblatt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Machado-Alba JE, Ruiz AF, Machado-Duque ME. Effectiveness of treatment with biologic- and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients in Colombia. Int J Clin Pract 2016; 70:506-11. [PMID: 27238964 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease cause of disability and high costs. To determine the effectiveness of therapy with biologic- and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA and factors associated with the control of the disease. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of RA patients receiving treatment with DMARDs in a rheumatologic healthcare institution in five Colombian cities from December 2009 to August 2013. The effectiveness was assessed by Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28) and a lower value of 2.6 was considered remission. RESULTS A total of 827 patients were studied for an average observation period of 17.3 ± 11.0 months, with mean age 54.3 ± 13.1 years. The most frequently used DMARDs were methotrexate, leflunomide and chloroquine. The most frequently used biological DMARDs were etanercept and abatacept. Initially, 17.8% of the patients received some biological DMARDs in comparison with 28.7% at the end of the observation period. A median DAS28 of 3.5 was found, which was reduced by the end of the observation period to 2.8 (p < 0.001), and cases of patients who were in remission increased from 30.1% to 42.9%. Treatment with leflunomide (OR: 0.47; CI 95%: 0.35-0.64, p < 0.001) or rituximab (OR: 0.37; CI 95%: 0.17-0.83, p = 0.016) was associated with a lesser probability of reaching remission. To be treated in the city of Manizales (OR: 2.56; CI 95%: 1.36-4.82, p = 0.004) was associated with a high probability of remission. CONCLUSIONS Biological and DMARDs therapy for RA was effective in a relevant proportion of Colombian patients as a consequence of management with strategies set on remission aims quantified using DAS28. Cost-effectiveness of the therapy must be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Machado-Alba
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Pereira, Colombia
| | - A F Ruiz
- Farmacoeconomía-Audifarma S.A. Bogotá, Pereira, Colombia
| | - M E Machado-Duque
- Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Uhlig T, Lie E, Norvang V, Lexberg ÅS, Rødevand E, Krøll F, Kalstad S, Olsen IC, Kvien TK. Achievement of Remission and Low Disease Activity Definitions in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice: Results from the NOR-DMARD Study. J Rheumatol 2016; 43:716-23. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.151132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To examine the frequency of 6 definitions for remission and 4 definitions for low disease activity (LDA) after starting a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice, and to study whether predictors for achieving remission after 6 months are similar for these definitions.Methods.Remission and LDA were calculated according to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3), and both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Boolean remission definitions 3 and 6 months after 4992 DMARD prescriptions for patients enrolled in the NOR-DMARD, a 5-center Norwegian register. Prediction of remission after 6 months was also studied.Results.After 3 months, remission rates varied between definitions from 8.7% to 22.5% and for LDA from 35.5% to 42.7%, and increased slightly until 6 months of followup. DAS28 and RAPID3 gave the highest and ACR/EULAR, SDAI, and CDAI the lowest proportions for remission. Positive predictors for remission after 6 months were similar across the definitions and included lower age, male sex, short disease duration, high level of education, current nonsmoking, nonerosive disease, treatment with a biological DMARD, being DMARD-naive, good physical function, little fatigue, and LDA.Conclusion.In daily clinical practice, the DAS28 and RAPID3 definitions identified remission about twice as often as the ACR/EULAR Boolean, SDAI, and CDAI. Predictors of remission were similar across remission definitions. These findings provide additional evidence to follow treatment recommendations and treat RA early with a DMARD.
Collapse
|
31
|
Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, Bykerk V, Dougados M, Emery P, Kvien TK, Navarro-Compán MV, Oliver S, Schoels M, Scholte-Voshaar M, Stamm T, Stoffer M, Takeuchi T, Aletaha D, Andreu JL, Aringer M, Bergman M, Betteridge N, Bijlsma H, Burkhardt H, Cardiel M, Combe B, Durez P, Fonseca JE, Gibofsky A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Graninger W, Hannonen P, Haraoui B, Kouloumas M, Landewe R, Martin-Mola E, Nash P, Ostergaard M, Östör A, Richards P, Sokka-Isler T, Thorne C, Tzioufas AG, van Vollenhoven R, de Wit M, van der Heijde D. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:3-15. [PMID: 25969430 PMCID: PMC4717393 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 954] [Impact Index Per Article: 119.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reaching the therapeutic target of remission or low-disease activity has improved outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) significantly. The treat-to-target recommendations, formulated in 2010, have provided a basis for implementation of a strategic approach towards this therapeutic goal in routine clinical practice, but these recommendations need to be re-evaluated for appropriateness and practicability in the light of new insights. OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 treat-to-target recommendations based on systematic literature reviews (SLR) and expert opinion. METHODS A task force of rheumatologists, patients and a nurse specialist assessed the SLR results and evaluated the individual items of the 2010 recommendations accordingly, reformulating many of the items. These were subsequently discussed, amended and voted upon by >40 experts, including 5 patients, from various regions of the world. Levels of evidence, strengths of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. RESULTS The update resulted in 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. The previous recommendations were partly adapted and their order changed as deemed appropriate in terms of importance in the view of the experts. The SLR had now provided also data for the effectiveness of targeting low-disease activity or remission in established rather than only early disease. The role of comorbidities, including their potential to preclude treatment intensification, was highlighted more strongly than before. The treatment aim was again defined as remission with low-disease activity being an alternative goal especially in patients with long-standing disease. Regular follow-up (every 1-3 months during active disease) with according therapeutic adaptations to reach the desired state was recommended. Follow-up examinations ought to employ composite measures of disease activity that include joint counts. Additional items provide further details for particular aspects of the disease, especially comorbidity and shared decision-making with the patient. Levels of evidence had increased for many items compared with the 2010 recommendations, and levels of agreement were very high for most of the individual recommendations (≥9/10). CONCLUSIONS The 4 overarching principles and 10 recommendations are based on stronger evidence than before and are supposed to inform patients, rheumatologists and other stakeholders about strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ferdinand C Breedveld
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology Free University and Humboldt University, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vivian Bykerk
- Division of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, USA
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology B, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital,Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Monika Schoels
- 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaela Stoffer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jose Louis Andreu
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Martin Aringer
- Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bergman
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Neil Betteridge
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, and VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harald Burkhardt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt, German
| | - Mario Cardiel
- Centro de Investigación Clínica de Morelia, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
| | - Bernard Combe
- Service d'Immuno-Rhumatologie, Montpellier University, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Durez
- Pôle de Recherche en Rhumatologie, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain and Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joao Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Rheumatology Department, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alan Gibofsky
- Weill Medical College, Cornell University Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - Juan J Gomez-Reino
- Rheumatology Unit, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | - Pekka Hannonen
- Department of Medicine, Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Marios Kouloumas
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Landewe
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Nash
- University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mikkel Ostergaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet and Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andrew Östör
- Rheumatology Clinical Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pam Richards
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Carter Thorne
- Division of Rheumatology, Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newarket, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Martinus de Wit
- EULAR Standing Committee of People with Arthritis/Rheumatism in Europe (PARE), Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Desirée van der Heijde
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gent YYJ, Ter Wee MM, Voskuyl AE, den Uyl D, Ahmadi N, Dowling C, van Kuijk C, Hoekstra OS, Boers M, Lems WF, van der Laken CJ. Subclinical synovitis detected by macrophage PET, but not MRI, is related to short-term flare of clinical disease activity in early RA patients: an exploratory study. Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17:266. [PMID: 26403667 PMCID: PMC4582930 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0770-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Residual subclinical synovitis can still be present in joints of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients despite clinical remission and has been linked to ongoing radiological damage. The aim of the present study was to assess subclinical synovitis by positron emission tomography (PET; macrophage tracer (11)C-(R)-PK11195) in early RA patients with minimal disease activity without clinically apparent synovitis (MDA); and its relationship with clinical outcome and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. METHODS Baseline PET and MRI of hands/wrists were performed in 25 early MDA RA patients (DAS 44 < 1.6; no tender/swollen joints) on combined DMARD therapy. PET tracer uptake (semi-quantitative score: 0-3) and MRI synovitis and bone marrow edema (OMERACT RAMRIS) were assessed in MCP, PIP and wrist joints (22 joints/patient; cumulative score). RESULTS Eleven of 25 patients (44 %) showed enhanced tracer uptake in ≥ 1 joint. Fourteen of these 25 (56 %) patients developed a flare within 1 year: 8/11 (73 %) with a positive, and 6/14 (43 %) with a negative PET. In the latter, in 5/6 patients flare was located outside the scan region. Median cumulative PET scores of patients with a subsequent flare in the hands or wrists were significantly higher than those of patients without a flare (1.5 [IQR 0.8-5.3] vs 0.0 [IQR 0.0-1.0], p = 0.04); significance was lost when all flares were considered (1.0 [IQR 0.0-4.0] vs 0.0 [IQR 0.0-1.0], p = 0.10). No difference in cumulative MRI scores was observed between both groups. CONCLUSIONS Positive PET scans were found in almost half of early RA patients with MDA. Patients with a subsequent flare in hand or wrist had higher cumulative PET scores but not MRI scores, suggesting that subclinical arthritis on PET may predict clinical flare in follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoony Y J Gent
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Marieke M Ter Wee
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Alexandre E Voskuyl
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Debby den Uyl
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Nazanin Ahmadi
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Cristina Dowling
- Department of Rheumatology, Jan van Breemen Research Institute
- Reade, Amsterdam, dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, Amsterdam, 1056, AB, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis van Kuijk
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Otto S Hoekstra
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Maarten Boers
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Willem F Lems
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| | - Conny J van der Laken
- Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, PO Box 7057, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Remission is the key treatment goal in rheumatoid arthritis and should provide the optimal state for patients. Clinical remission criteria are based on composite scores of disease activity and are widely used in clinical practice and trials. With the use of biologic therapies and treat to target strategies, rates of clinical remission have significantly improved. Despite achieving this target, many patients demonstrate structural and functional deterioration. This raises the question regarding the validity of clinical criteria, although they have evolved significantly over the years. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound have been described as more accurate methods of assessing the remission state compared with clinical assessment alone. Furthermore, immuno-pathological assessments are gaining significant interest as this would enable assessment of disease activity at the primary site of pathology. Further research is required to develop accurate biomarkers of remission. We aimed to review the evolution of remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis to date and to evaluate novel concepts in and the future of defining remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna L Gul
- a 1 Leeds Institute of Rheumatology & Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2nd Floor, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Smolen JS, Wollenhaupt J, Gomez-Reino JJ, Grassi W, Gaillez C, Poncet C, Le Bars M, Westhovens R. Attainment and characteristics of clinical remission according to the new ACR-EULAR criteria in abatacept-treated patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: new analyses from the Abatacept study to Gauge Remission and joint damage progression in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with Early Erosive rheumatoid arthritis (AGREE). Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17:157. [PMID: 26063454 PMCID: PMC4494702 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0671-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated various remission criteria in abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX)-treated patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to investigate the time to, and sustainability of, remission, and to evaluate the relationship between remission, function and structure. METHODS Post hoc analyses were performed from the 12-month, double-blind period of the Abatacept study to Gauge Remission and joint damage progression in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with Early Erosive rheumatoid arthritis (AGREE) in patients with early RA (≤2 years) and poor prognostic factors, comparing abatacept plus MTX (n = 210) versus MTX alone (n = 209). RESULTS At month 12, Disease Activity Score 28, Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Clinical Disease Activity Index and Boolean remission rates were, for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX alone: 47.6 % versus 27.3 %, 33.3 % versus 12.4 %, 34.3 % versus 16.3 %, and 23.8 % versus 5.7 %, respectively. Cumulative probability demonstrated higher proportions achieving first remission and first sustained remission for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX alone (e.g., 23.3 % [95 % confidence interval (CI): 17.6, 29.1] vs 12.9 % [8.4, 17.5] for first SDAI remission over 0-6 months). For patients in SDAI remission at month 3, mean Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index at month 12 was 0.20 versus 0.50 for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX alone. Mean changes in radiographic score from baseline to month 12 were minimal for patients in SDAI remission at month 3 in both groups, while less structural damage progression was seen, 0.75 versus 1.35, respectively, for abatacept plus MTX versus MTX alone for patients with moderate/high disease activity at month 3 (adjusted mean treatment difference: -0.60 [95 % CI: -1.11, -0.09; P < 0.05]). CONCLUSIONS High proportions of abatacept plus MTX-treated patients achieved stringent remission criteria. Remission was associated with long-term functional benefit; dissociation was seen between clinical and structural outcomes for abatacept. These findings highlight the impact of reaching stringent remission targets early, on physical function and structural damage, in MTX-naïve biologic-treated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00122382. Registered 19 July 2005.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, and 2nd Department of Medicine, Hietzing Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, A-1090, Austria.
| | | | | | - Walter Grassi
- Clinica Reumatologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Rene Westhovens
- Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Department of Development and Regeneration KU Leuven; Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sanmartí R, García-Rodríguez S, Álvaro-Gracia JM, Andreu JL, Balsa A, Cáliz R, Fernández-Nebro A, Ferraz-Amaro I, Gómez-Reino JJ, González-Álvaro I, Martín-Mola E, Martínez-Taboada VM, Ortiz AM, Tornero J, Marsal S, Moreno-Muelas JV. 2014 update of the Consensus Statement of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 11:279-94. [PMID: 26051464 DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish recommendations for the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to serve as a reference for all health professionals involved in the care of these patients, and focusing on the role of available synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS Consensual recommendations were agreed on by a panel of 14 experts selected by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER). The available scientific evidence was collected by updating three systematic reviews (SR) used for the EULAR 2013 recommendations. A new SR was added to answer an additional question. The literature review of the scientific evidence was made by the SER reviewer's group. The level of evidence and the degree of recommendation was classified according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine system. A Delphi panel was used to evaluate the level of agreement between panellists (strength of recommendation). RESULTS Thirteen recommendations for the management of adult RA were emitted. The therapeutic objective should be to treat patients in the early phases of the disease with the aim of achieving clinical remission, with methotrexate playing a central role in the therapeutic strategy of RA as the reference synthetic DMARD. Indications for biologic DMARDs were updated and the concept of the optimization of biologicals was introduced. CONCLUSIONS We present the fifth update of the SER recommendations for the management of RA with synthetic and biologic DMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimon Sanmartí
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | - José Luis Andreu
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Alejandro Balsa
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España
| | - Rafael Cáliz
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España
| | - Antonio Fernández-Nebro
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Reumatología, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, España
| | - Iván Ferraz-Amaro
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, España
| | - Juan Jesús Gómez-Reino
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España
| | | | | | | | - Ana M Ortiz
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, España
| | - Jesús Tornero
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, España
| | - Sara Marsal
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron, Barcelona, España
| | - José Vicente Moreno-Muelas
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron, Barcelona, España; Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Takeuchi T, Miyasaka N, Inui T, Yano T, Yoshinari T, Abe T, Koike T. Prediction of clinical response after 1 year of infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis based on disease activity at 3 months: posthoc analysis of the RISING study. J Rheumatol 2015; 42:599-607. [PMID: 25684765 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.140572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the probability of clinical remission (REM) or low disease activity (LDA) after 1 year of infliximab (IFX) therapy based on disease activity at 3 months in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Methotrexate-refractory patients with RA received 3 mg/kg of IFX at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by 3 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, or 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks from Week 14 (W14) to Week 46. Correlation of disease activity at W14 with disease activity at W54 and probability of REM/LDA at W54 were analyzed in each dosing group. RESULTS Disease activities at W14 were significantly correlated with both disease activity at W54 and probability of REM/LDA at W54 in patients continuing 3 mg/kg as well as in those receiving 6 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg therapy from W14. Results showed that, if approximate REM or LDA had not been achieved by W14, > 50% of patients continuing 3 mg/kg therapy would not be able to achieve REM or LDA at W54. However, even in patients with high or moderate disease activity at W14, dose escalation to 6 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg enabled many to achieve REM/LDA. CONCLUSION Disease activity at W14 in standard-dose IFX therapy enabled the prediction of longterm clinical response at continued standard dose, as well as subsequent escalated-dose regimens. Disease activity at W14 was hypothesized to be an important index for IFX treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Takeuchi
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC.
| | - Nobuyuki Miyasaka
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| | - Takashi Inui
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| | - Toshiro Yano
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| | - Toru Yoshinari
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| | - Tohru Abe
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| | - Takao Koike
- From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Osaka; Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama; and the Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC, Hokkaido, Japan.T. Inui, T. Yano, and T. Yoshinari are employees of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. T. Takeuchi, MD, PhD, Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University; N. Miyasaka, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University; T. Inui, DVM; T. Yano, PhD; T. Yoshinari, MS, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; T. Abe, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University; T. Koike, MD, PhD, Chief Executive, Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Therapeutic options after treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritides. Adv Ther 2014; 31:780-802. [PMID: 25112460 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-014-0142-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritides has improved dramatically due to earlier diagnosis, recognition of the need to treat early with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), alone or in combinations, the establishment of treatment targets, and the development of biological DMARDs (bDMARDs). Many patients are now able to achieve clinical remission or low disease activity with therapy, and reduce or eliminate systemic corticosteroid use. Guidelines recommend methotrexate as a first-line agent for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; however, a majority of patients will require a change of csDMARD or step up to combination therapy with the addition of another csDMARD or a bDMARD. However, treatment failure is common and switching to a different therapy may be required. The large number of available treatment options, combined with a lack of comparative data, makes the choice of a new therapy complex and often not evidence based. We summarize and discuss evidence to inform treatment decisions in patients who require a change in therapy, including baseline factors that may predict response to therapy.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lisbona MP, Pàmies A, Ares J, Almirall M, Navallas M, Solano A, Maymó J. Association of Bone Edema with the Progression of Bone Erosions Quantified by Hand Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Remission. J Rheumatol 2014; 41:1623-9. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.130902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To evaluate the association of synovitis, bone marrow edema (BME), and tenosynovitis in the progression of erosions quantified by hand magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 year in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in remission.Methods.A total of 56 of 196 patients with early RA in remission at 1 year and with available MRI data at baseline and at 12 months were included. MRI images were assessed according to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring (RAMRIS) system. Persistent remission was defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≤ 2.6 and/or Simplified Disease Activity Index ≤ 3.3 and/or the new boolean American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism remission criteria for a continuous period of at least 6 months. Progression of bone erosions was defined as an increase of 1 or more units in annual RAMRIS score for erosions compared to baseline.Results.At 1 year, the majority of patients with RA in sustained remission showed some inflammatory activity on MRI (94.6% synovitis, 46.4% BME, and 58.9% tenosynovitis) and 19 of the 56 patients (33.9%) showed MRI progression of bone erosions. A significant difference was observed in MRI BME at 1 year, with higher mean score in patients with progression compared to nonprogression of erosions (4.8 ± 5.6 and 1.4 ± 2.6, p = 0.03).Conclusion.Subclinical inflammation was identified by MRI in 96.4% of patients with RA in sustained clinical remission. Significantly higher scores of BME after sustained remission were observed in patients with progression of erosions compared to patients with no progression. The persistence of higher scores of BME may explain the progression of bone erosions in patients with persistent clinical remission.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kaneko Y, Koike T, Oda H, Yamamoto K, Miyasaka N, Harigai M, Yamanaka H, Ishiguro N, Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T. Obstacles to the implementation of the treat-to-target strategy for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice in Japan. Mod Rheumatol 2014; 25:43-9. [PMID: 24950169 DOI: 10.3109/14397595.2014.926607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To clarify the obstacles preventing the implementation of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. METHODS A total of 301 rheumatologists in Japan completed a questionnaire. In the first section, participants were indirectly questioned on the implementation of basic components of T2T, and in the second section, participants were directly questioned on their level of agreement and application. RESULTS Although nearly all participants set treatment targets for the majority of RA patients with moderate to high disease activity, the proportion who set clinical remission as their target was 59%, with only 45% of these using composite measures. The proportion of participants who monitored X-rays and Health Assessment Questionnaires for all their patients was 44% and 14%, respectively. The proportion of participants who did not discuss treatment strategies was 44%, with approximately half of these reasoning that this was due to a proportion of patients having a lack of understanding of the treatment strategy or inability to make decisions. When participants were directly questioned, there was a high level of agreement with the T2T recommendations. CONCLUSION Although there was a high level of agreement with the T2T recommendations, major obstacles preventing its full implementation still remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kaneko
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine , Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo , Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ruyssen-Witrand A, Guernec G, Nigon D, Tobon G, Jamard B, Rat AC, Vittecoq O, Cantagrel A, Constantin A. Aiming for SDAI remission versus low disease activity at 1 year after inclusion in ESPOIR cohort is associated with better 3-year structural outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 74:1676-83. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Accepted: 04/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
41
|
Combe B, Logeart I, Belkacemi MC, Dadoun S, Schaeverbeke T, Daurès JP, Dougados M. Comparison of the long-term outcome for patients with rheumatoid arthritis with persistent moderate disease activity or disease remission during the first year after diagnosis: data from the ESPOIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 74:724-9. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
42
|
Seeliger B, Foerster M, Neumann T, Moeser A, Happe J, Kehler N, Kroegel C. Interferon-α induced remission in three patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis and polyangiitis. A case study. Respir Med Case Rep 2013; 10:60-3. [PMID: 26029516 PMCID: PMC3920446 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2013] [Revised: 08/21/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a systemic small vessel vasculitis associated with asthma and eosinophilia. Optimal therapy for maintenance of remission is yet to be defined. We present a case-series of three patients with EGPA in whom IFN-α, an immunomodulatory cytokine induced remission, which was maintained even after discontinuation of the drug. In all patients (ages 60, 51, and 50 years), remission was associated with normalisation of eosinophil counts and IgE-levels. Moreover, the patients remained in remission for one to four years. Two patients did not need further immunosuppression, one patient required low dose maintenance therapy. Although reversible side effects occur, IFN-α-therapy induces long-term remission of EGPA even after discontinuation of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Seeliger
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
- Corresponding author. Pneumology & Allergology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07749 Jena, Thuringia, Germany.
| | - M. Foerster
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - T. Neumann
- Rheumatology/Osteology, Internal Medicine III, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - A. Moeser
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - J. Happe
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - N. Kehler
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| | - C. Kroegel
- Pneumology & Allergology/Immunology, Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rantalaiho V, Kautiainen H, Korpela M, Hannonen P, Kaipiainen-Seppänen O, Möttönen T, Kauppi M, Karjalainen A, Laiho K, Laasonen L, Hakola M, Peltomaa R, Leirisalo-Repo M. Targeted treatment with a combination of traditional DMARDs produces excellent clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes in early rheumatoid arthritis regardless of initial infliximab. The 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial, the NEO-RACo trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 73:1954-61. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
44
|
Vermeer M, Kuper HH, Moens HJB, Drossaers-Bakker KW, van der Bijl AE, van Riel PLCM, van de Laar MAFJ. Sustained Beneficial Effects of a Protocolized Treat-to-Target Strategy in Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: Three-Year Results of the Dutch Rheumatoid Arthritis Monitoring Remission Induction Cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013; 65:1219-26. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.21984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Accepted: 02/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Vermeer
- University of Twente and Medisch Spectrum Twente; Enschede The Netherlands
| | - H. H. Kuper
- Medisch Spectrum Twente; Enschede The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schneider M, Krüger K. Rheumatoid arthritis--early diagnosis and disease management. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2013; 110:477-84. [PMID: 23964304 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2012] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 0.5% to 0.8% of all adults suffer from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The main considerations for persons with new-onset RA are early diagnosis, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), remission, and interdisciplinary treatment. METHOD As part of the process of creating a new S3 guideline on the management of early RA and a new S1 guideline on stage-adapted pharmacotherapy for RA, the authors conducted a selective search and review of the literature and specifically updated it to 20 March 2013. RESULTS In patients presenting with joint inflammation, the diagnosis of RA can be directly confirmed (positive predictive value, 85% to 97%), and its prognosis assessed, on the basis of the following findings: joint examination, acute phase reaction, serology (rheumatoid factor [RF], antibody against citrullinated peptides/proteins [ACPA], and duration of symptoms (ACR/Eular classification criteria, 2010). Early, remission-oriented and adapted treatment with DMARDs ("treating to target") leads to several years of normal bodily function without disability in 40% to 60% of patients. Treatment by an interdisciplinary team promotes the achievement of this goal. The risks associated with this form of treatment are low, with a dropout rate of less than 1 per 100 patient-years. Life-threatening complications are rare. CONCLUSION Early diagnosis, intervention with DMARDs in the first three months of disease, and the achievement of a remission minimize the adverse sequelae of RA. The sequential introduction of DMARDs, including biological agents in non-responders, as part of a treat-to-target concept optimizes the long-term outcome, as has been demonstrated in clinical trials for periods of up to eight years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Schneider
- Department of Rheumatology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, Kavanaugh A, Kupper H, Liu S, Guérette B, Mozaffarian N. Clinical, functional, and radiographic benefits of longterm adalimumab plus methotrexate: final 10-year data in longstanding rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2013; 40:1487-97. [PMID: 23818718 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.120964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the longterm effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in patients with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX), and to assess the effect of a 1-year delay in initiation of combination therapy. METHODS DE019 was a 1-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which patients received adalimumab 20 mg weekly, adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), or placebo; all received concomitant MTX. Patients completing the RCT could receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg eow + MTX for an additional 9 years. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes were assessed using composite measures of disease activity (e.g., American College of Rheumatology responses, 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein, Simplified Disease Activity Index), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and the modified total Sharp score (mTSS), respectively. RESULTS Of the 619 patients randomized, 457 entered the open-label extension; 202 completed 10 years. At Year 10, patients demonstrated effective disease control and inhibition of radiographic progression. Differences in clinical and functional responses between adalimumab + MTX and placebo + MTX observed during the RCT became less apparent at Year 10. Still, patients who initially received adalimumab + MTX had significantly lower mean ΔmTSS at Year 10 compared with patients who initially received placebo + MTX. No new safety signals arose following up to 10 years of adalimumab + MTX exposure. CONCLUSION During up to 10 years of treatment with adalimumab + MTX, patients with longstanding RA experienced effective disease control with no change to the expected safety profile. A 1-year delay in receipt of adalimumab + MTX was associated with reduced effectiveness, suggesting that a window of opportunity to prevent irreversible damage exists even in a population with established RA.
Collapse
|
47
|
Scirè CA, Lunt M, Marshall T, Symmons DPM, Verstappen SMM. Early remission is associated with improved survival in patients with inflammatory polyarthritis: results from the Norfolk Arthritis Register. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 73:1677-82. [PMID: 23749581 PMCID: PMC4145442 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate whether the early achievement of clinical remission influences overall survival in an inception cohort of patients with inflammatory polyarthritis (IP). Methods Consecutive early IP patients, recruited to a primary care based inception cohort from 1990 to 1994 and from 2000 to 2004 were eligible for this study. Remission was defined as absence of clinically detectable joint inflammation on a 51-joint count. In sensitivity analyses, less stringent definitions of remission were used, based on 28-joint counts. Remission was assessed at 1, 2 and 3 years after baseline. All patients were flagged with the national death register. Censoring was set at 1 May 2011. The effect of remission on mortality was analysed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, and presented as HRs and 95% CIs. Results A total of 1251 patients were included in the analyses. Having been in remission at least once within the first 3 years of follow-up was associated with a significantly lower risk of death: HR 0.72 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.94). Patients who were in remission 1 year after the baseline assessments and had persistent remission over time had the greatest reduction in mortality risk compared with patients who never achieved remission within the first 3 years of follow-up: HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.91). Remission according to less stringent definitions was associated with progressively lower protective effect. Conclusions Early and sustained remission is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with IP. This result supports clinical remission as the target in the management of IP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Scirè
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy Epidemiology Unit, Italian Society for Rheumatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Mark Lunt
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tarnya Marshall
- Department of Rheumatology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Deborah P M Symmons
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - Suzanne M M Verstappen
- Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Chakr RMDS, Mendonça JA, Brenol CV, Xavier RM, Brenol JCT. Assessing rheumatoid arthritis disease activity with ultrasound. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 32:1249-54. [PMID: 23700041 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-013-2291-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Accepted: 05/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
In practice, composite indices are used for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity evaluation. Despite valid and widely used, not rarely composite indices miss accuracy. Ultrasound (US) is more precise than clinical examination in synovitis appraisal. US-based disease activity estimation depends on the detection of synovitis. The most common synovitis abnormalities are proliferation, effusion, and neoangiogenesis. Gray scale ultrasound identifies synovial hypertrophy and effusion with its good soft tissue contrast. Additionally, power Doppler ultrasound depicts neoangiogenesis within synovia, remarking local inflammation. Several studies have combined local US findings to develop a patient level disease activity index. Most of them summed selected joint scores in an overall score of disease activity and evaluated its correlation with clinical composite indexes. To be incorporated into clinical practice, an overall US score must have some fundamental characteristics such as reproducibility, viability, and sensitivity to change over time. In global US score development, finding the joints that truly estimate individual disease activity is highly challenging. This article presents an up-to-date literature review on assessing RA disease activity with US and depicts the challenges in finding the perfect global US score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Mendonça da Silva Chakr
- Rheumatology Division Faculty, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, suite 645, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 90035-903, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Liou LB, Tsai WP, Chang CJ, Chao WJ, Chen MH. Blood monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and adapted disease activity Score28-MCP-1: favorable indicators for rheumatoid arthritis activity. PLoS One 2013; 8:e55346. [PMID: 23383162 PMCID: PMC3559534 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2012] [Accepted: 12/21/2012] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We assessed blood pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and macrophage chemotactic factor-1 (MCP-1) levels as indicators of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, because data on disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and DAS28-C-reactive protein (CRP) are still imperfect. METHODS In 111 patients with RA, we examined longitudinal and cross-sectional correlations of blood PTX3, MCP-1, CRP, and ESR levels with measures of clinical arthritic activity, namely, swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), visual analog scale for general health (GH), DAS28, and adapted DAS28-MCP-1. RESULTS Blood MCP-1, but not PTX3, was significantly correlated with SJC, TJC, DAS28, and DAS28-CRP. DAS28-MCP-1 was strongly correlated with DAS28 (r = 0.984, P<0.001) and DAS28-CRP (r = 0.971, P<0.001), and modestly correlated with CRP (r = 0.350, P<0.001), and ESR (r = 0.386, P<0.001). Similarly, the duration of arthritic symptoms, but not sex, was significantly correlated with variables of arthritic activity. In particular, DAS28-MCP-1 significantly correlated with DAS28 during a 6-month period (r = 0.944, P<0.001; r = 0.951, P<0.001; r = 0.862, P<0.001; and r = 0.865, P<0.001 for month 0, 1, 3, and 6, respectively). CONCLUSION Blood MCP-1 and adapted DAS28-MCP-1, but not blood PTX3, may be useful in monitoring RA activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieh-bang Liou
- Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Lin-kou, Kwei-san Hsiang, Tao-yuan County, Taiwan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Felson DT, Smolen JS, Wells G, Zhang B, van Tuyl LHD, Funovits J, Aletaha D, Allaart CF, Bathon J, Bombardieri S, Brooks P, Brown A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Choi H, Combe B, de Wit M, Dougados M, Emery P, Furst D, Gomez-Reino J, Hawker G, Keystone E, Khanna D, Kirwan J, Kvien TK, Landewé R, Listing J, Michaud K, Martin-Mola E, Montie P, Pincus T, Richards P, Siegel JN, Simon LS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, Tyndall A, van der Heijde D, Verstappen S, White B, Wolfe F, Zink A, Boers M. American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis for clinical trials. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 63:573-86. [PMID: 21294106 DOI: 10.1002/art.30129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 554] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used definition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a definition. METHODS A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecified analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent definition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to define remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate definitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as definitions using disease activity indexes. To select a definition of remission, trial data were analyzed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS Survey results for the definition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (e.g., tender and swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein [CRP] level, and global assessments on a 0-10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patient-reported measure. Examination of 2-year followup data suggested that many candidate definitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score-based measures of remission did not predict good radiographic outcomes as well as the other candidate definitions did. Given these and other considerations, we propose that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (a) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP (in mg/dl), and patient global assessment (0-10 scale) are all ≤ 1, or (b) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is ≤ 3.3. CONCLUSION We propose two new definitions of remission, both of which can be uniformly applied and widely used in RA clinical trials. We recommend that one of these be selected as an outcome measure in each trial and that the results on both be reported for each trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Felson
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|