Use of nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The impact of biosimilar use on healthcare utilization among new users of etanercept for inflammatory arthritis: a population-based regression discontinuity analysis

Background

Epidemiological evidence on biosimilars' real-world performance is limited. On July 18th, 2017, a biosimilar health policy was implemented in British Columbia (BC), Canada, mandating all patients initiating a new biologic medication to be prescribed a biosimilar (if/when available). Exploiting a policy change as a natural experiment, we assessed the real-world impact of biosimilar use for inflammatory arthritis (IA) on health resource utilization as a surrogate marker of real-world effectiveness and safety.

Methods

Using administrative health data, we identified all incident etanercept users for IA in BC with initiation dates between 2014 and 2020 (n = 3004) [63·6% female; mean (S.D.) age at IA disease diagnosis 52·5 (16·6) years]. Healthcare utilization over three years after initiation was assessed using outcomes including - physician visits (PV), all-cause hospitalizations (ACH), infection-related hospitalizations (IRH), length of hospital stays (LOS), and emergency room visits (ERV). Using regression discontinuity design, we compared healthcare utilization risk in patients initiating etanercept immediately before/after policy-change date, representing the intention-to-treat effect. Additionally, we estimated the complier average causal effect of biosimilar use with instrumental variable (IV) control function method.

Findings

Intention-to-treat analyses showed no significant impact of biosimilar policy implementation on PV, HOSP, IRH, LOS, or ERV, with respective adjusted RRs of 0·96 (95% CI: 0·82-1·12), 0·84 (95% CI: 0·49-1·44), 0·91 (95% CI: 0·21-3·86), 0·94 (95% CI: 0·41-2·15), and 0·91 (95% CI: 0·44-1·88). IV analyses indicated biosimilar use in routine settings did not significantly change healthcare utilization, compared to originator etanercept.

Interpretation

No significant impact of biosimilar policy or actual biosimilar use on healthcare utilization was observed, suggesting equivalent real-world effectiveness and safety of biosimilars to originators and no unintended consequences of the policy change.

Funding

CHIR and NSERC.

Incidence and Risk of Infections in Patients With Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Receiving Biologic Therapies: A Prospective Observational Study Using the KOBIO Registry

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the occurrence of infection and risk factors among patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) treated with biologics in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study included patients with r-axSpA from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics (KOBIO) registry who initiated or switched to a biologic agent between December 2012 and December 2023. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of any infection, ranging from mild to severe, classified by organ system. The infection rates per 1000 person-years (PY), with 95% CI, were calculated using the Poisson distribution method. Cox proportional hazard regression models-adjusted for confounders-estimated hazard ratios for infection risk, considering only the first infection event.

RESULTS

This analysis included 2129 patients with a total of 7107.67 PY of follow-up. The predominant infections observed were of the upper and lower respiratory tract (25.89/1000 PY), followed by herpes zoster (HZ; 6.13/1000 PY). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed significant risk factors for infection, including advanced age, ischemic heart disease (IHD), diabetes mellitus (DM) with complications, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and peripheral arthritis. In contrast, male sex was identified as a protective factor against the development of infections.

CONCLUSION

The infection rate was 39.39 events/1000 PY, with respiratory tract infections being most common, followed by HZ. Significant risk factors for the occurrence of infection in patients with r-axSpA treated with biologics included advanced age, female sex, IHD, DM with complications, CKD, and peripheral arthritis. These findings emphasize infection risk assessment, particularly in high-risk patients, to optimize the safety of biologic therapy in r-axSpA.

Incidence of serious respiratory tract infections and associated characteristics in a population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies: a register-based population study

BACKGROUND

Immunosuppressive therapies are associated with a risk of infections. Nevertheless, their incidence in this population remains unclear. This study aims to determine the incidence of serious respiratory tract infections (SRI) in a population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies.

METHODS

Data from a representative sample of the French healthcare claims from 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2019 were analyzed. Exposure to immunosuppressive therapy was defined by the dispensation of drugs through community pharmacies or in hospitals. SRI diagnosis was based on ICD-10 codes from hospitalization records. A cohort analysis was performed to estimate standardized SRI incidence rates. A nested case-control analysis within this cohort was used to study the characteristics associated with SRI.

RESULTS

We identified 24,122 individuals exposed to immunosuppressive therapies, among which 1,559 developed SRI, resulting in a standardized incidence rate of 1,398 per 100,000 person-years. In this population, the risk of SRI was associated with a history of cancer (OR 2.68, 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) 2.24-3.21; p < 0.001), chronic respiratory disease (2.62, 95%CI 2.17-3.16; p < 0.001), end-stage renal failure (2.38, 95%CI 1.37-4.13; p = 0.003), neurodegenerative diseases (1.52, 95%CI 1.07-2.17; p = 0.026), diabetes (1.44, 95%CI 1.14-1.82; p < 0.001), psychiatric diseases (1.27, 95%CI 1.06-1.52; p < 0.001), and cardiovascular diseases (1.26, 95%CI 1.04-1.52; p = 0.002). Compared to corticosteroids alone, the risk of SRI was lower in individuals treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) only (0.44, 95%CI 0.25-0.78; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the population exposed to immunosuppressive therapies, a history of chronic disease is associated with an increased risk of SRI. This risk is lower in those receiving csDMARD alone than corticosteroids alone.

Can efficacy and safety data from clinical trials of rituximab in RA be extrapolated? Insights from 1984 patients from the AIR-PR Registry

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the efficacy and safety data from drug-registration trials can be extrapolated to real-life RA patients receiving RTX.

METHODS

The 'AutoImmunity and Rituximab' (AIR-PR) registry is a French multicentre, prospective cohort of RA patients treated with RTX in a real-life setting. We compared treatment responses at 12 months and serious adverse events (AEs) between eligible and non-eligible patients, by retrieving the eligibility criteria of the three rituximab-registration trials. We determined critical eligibility criteria and modelled the benefit-risk ratio according to the number of fulfilled critical eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Among 1984 RA patients, only 9-12% fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Non-eligible patients had fewer EULAR responses at 12 months (40.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.044). Critical inclusion criteria included swollen joints count ≥4, tender joints count ≥4, CRP ≥15 mg/l and RF positivity. Critical exclusion criteria were age >80 years, RA-associated systemic diseases, ACR functional class IV, DMARD other than MTX and prednisone >10 mg/day. Only 20.8% fulfilled those critical eligibility criteria. During the first year, serious AEs occurred for 182 (9.2%) patients (70.3% serious infections) and patients with ≥1 critical exclusion criterion were at higher risk (hazard ratio 3.03; 95% CI 2.25-4.06; for ≥3 criteria vs 0). The incremental risk-benefit ratio decreased with the number of unmet critical inclusion criteria and of fulfilled exclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

Few real-life RA patients were eligible for the drug-registration trials. Non-eligible patients had lower chance of response, and higher risk of serious AEs. Efficacy and safety data obtained from those trials may not be generalizable to RA patients receiving RTX in real-world clinical practice.

Risk of infections in psoriatic arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis patients treated with targeted therapies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of global infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis encompassing ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) treated with targeted therapies.

METHODS

Medline and Cochrane databases were systematically searched up to March 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in patients with PsA or axial spondyloarthritis treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). Global infections (any infections reported, including bacterial, viral and fungal infections, except serious infections) were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included serious infections defined as life-threatening infections or any infection requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization. The relative risk of infections was determined by meta-analysis of RCTs.

RESULTS

A total of 60 RCTs were included (20,418 patients), encompassing 17 b/tsDMARDs, compared with placebo, conventional synthetic drugs (csDMARDs) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). An increased risk of any infection for patients exposed to these drugs was found (RR 1.15, 95% CI [1.06-1.25]), mainly with high doses and longer duration of treatment. Most infections were respiratory tract or ear, nose, and throat (ENT) infections. Subgroup analyses showed a statistically significant increased risk of infections for axial spondyloarthritis patients (RR 1.32, 95% CI [1.14-1.52]), but not for PsA patients (RR 1.05, 95% CI [0.97-1.14]). Infection risk was highest with TNF inhibitors (RR 1.23, 95% CI [1.11-1.37]) and IL-17 inhibitors (RR 1.30, 95% CI [1.07-1.59]). No increased risk of serious infections was shown.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to serious infections, the risk of global infections is moderately increased with b/tsDMARDs in spondyloarthritis, and is associated in particular with use of TNF and IL-17 inhibitors.

Clinical and immunological effects of hydroxychloroquine in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite antirheumatic treatment

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Patients with active RA, despite conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), were recruited. HCQ was administered for 24 weeks, in addition to prior treatment. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 at Week 24, compared to that of a propensity score-matched historical control group.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and administered HCQ. We also identified 276 patients as candidates for the historical control group. Propensity score matching yielded 46 patients in each group. The proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at Week 24 was significantly higher in the HCQ group than in the control group (54.4% vs. 28.3%, P = .007). The proportion of patients achieving ACR50 and ACR70 at Week 24 were also higher in the HCQ group than in the control group (ACR50, 30.4% vs. 4.3%, P = .006; ACR70, 17.4% vs. 0%, P = .005). Neither HCQ retinopathy nor any new safety signal was observed during the study.

CONCLUSION

The addition of HCQ to csDMARDs was effective, with no new safety signal in patients with RA.

Risk of severe infections after the introduction of biologic DMARDs in people with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based interrupted time-series analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of the introduction of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) on severe infections among people newly diagnosed with RA compared with non-RA individuals.

METHODS

In this population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative data (from 1990-2015) for British Columbia, Canada, all incident RA patients diagnosed between 1995 and 2007 were identified. General population controls with no inflammatory arthritis were matched to RA patients based on age and gender, and were assigned the diagnosis date (i.e. index date) of the RA patients they were matched with. RA/controls were then divided into quarterly cohorts according to their index dates. The outcome of interest was all severe infections necessitating hospitalization or occurring during hospitalization after the index date. We calculated 8-year severe infection rates for each cohort and conducted interrupted time-series analyses to compare severe infection trends in RA/controls with index date during pre-bDMARDs (1995-2001) and post-bDMARDs (2003-2007) periods.

RESULTS

A total of 60 226 and 588 499 incident RA/controls were identified. We identified 14 245 severe infections in RA, and 79 819 severe infections in controls. The 8-year severe infection rates decreased among RA/controls with increasing calendar year of index date in the pre-bDMARDs period, but increased over time only among RA, not controls, with index date in the post-bDMARDs period. The adjusted difference between the pre- and post-bDMARDs secular trends in 8-year severe infection rates was 1.85 (P = 0.001) in RA and 0.12 (P = 0.29) in non-RA.

CONCLUSION

RA onset after bDMARDs introduction was associated with an elevated severe infection risk in RA patients compared with matched non-RA individuals.

Risk of infection from glucocorticoid and methotrexate interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using biologics: A retrospective cohort study

AIMS

This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effect of the interaction between methotrexate and glucocorticoids on the risk of developing bacterial infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).

METHODS

We used the 2005-2018 JMDC claims database, a nationwide claims database in Japan. From the database of 7 175 048 patients, study patients were obtained by applying the following exclusion criteria: no use of bDMARDs; without information on the date of prescription; without RA as a disease; other than the new users of bDMARDs; and age <18 years. The exposures were glucocorticoids and methotrexate, and the outcome was bacterial infection. The interaction effects were examined using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Bacterial infections were identified according to antibiotic prescription and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision codes.

RESULTS

A total of 2837 RA patients were identified, with a median age of 50 years. The incidence of infection was 16.8% (95% confidence interval: 15.5-18.3). The interaction term for the doses of glucocorticoids and methotrexate was significant. Additionally, a higher dose of glucocorticoid was a significant risk factor for developing bacterial infections on the side of high doses of methotrexate. The incidence of bacterial infections tended to increase significantly with increasing methotrexate doses coprescribed with glucocorticoids ≥5 mg or glucocorticoid doses coprescribed with methotrexate ≥8 mg.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate a potential association between methotrexate dose and bacterial infections during bDMARDs administration with glucocorticoids in patients with RA.

Association between risk, duration and cause of hospitalisations in people with rheumatoid arthritis and multimorbidity in the UK Biobank and Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) cohorts: Longitudinal observational study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate association between presence of multimorbidity in people with established and early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and risk, duration and cause of hospitalisations.

DESIGN

Longitudinal observational study.

SETTING

UK Biobank, population-based cohort recruited between 2006 and 2010, and the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA), inception cohort recruited between 2011 and 2015. Both linked to mortality and hospitalisation data.

PARTICIPANTS

4757 UK Biobank participants self-reporting established RA; 825 SERA participants with early RA meeting the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Participants stratified by number of long-term conditions (LTCs) in addition to RA (RA only, RA + 1 LTC and RA + ≥ 2 LTCs) and matched to five non-RA controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number and duration of hospitalisations and their causes. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using negative binomial regression models.

RESULTS

Participants with RA + ≥ 2 LTCs experienced higher hospitalisation rates compared to those with RA alone (UK Biobank: IRR 2.10, 95% CI 1.91 to 2.30; SERA: IRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.48). Total duration of hospitalisation in RA + ≥ 2 LTCs was also higher (UK Biobank: IRR 2.48, 95% CI 2.17 to 2.84; SERA: IRR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.38) than with RA alone. Rate and total duration of hospitalisations was higher in UK Biobank RA participants than non-RA controls with equivalent number of LTCs. Hospitalisations for respiratory infection were higher in early RA than established RA and were the commonest cause of hospital admission in early RA.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with established or early RA with multimorbidity experienced a higher rate and duration of hospitalisations than those with RA alone and with non-RA matched controls.

Cachexia measured by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis and risk of infection in women with rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have a higher frequency of infections than the healthy population. The reason has yet to be explained but involves several factors, of which body composition and rheumatoid cachexia are often overlooked. This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with cachexia, measured by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis, are at an increased risk of developing infections compared with patients without cachexia. A secondary analysis of 186 women with RA enrolled in a randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02900898, September 14, 2016) was completed. Medical records and phone calls were used to record infectious events diagnosed and treated during follow-up. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and a predictive model of infection was created. After 36 months of follow-up, 62 patients (26.7% non-cachectic and 44.3% cachectic, p < 0.01) developed at least one infectious event. The most common site of was the urinary tract, followed by the lungs and respiratory tract. The presence of cachexia (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15-3.13) and the use of glucocorticoids (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.09) were associated with infection in univariate and multivariate models. Body mass index (BMI), smoking, and methotrexate use were not associated with a higher frequency of infections. The presence of cachexia and the use of glucocorticoids were identified as predictors of infections in a cohort of female RA patients. More extensive measurements of body composition should be performed beyond BMI in RA patients to better understand its impact and to prevent additional comorbidities and complications. Key Points • The presence of cachexia measured by bioelectrical impedance vector analysis was associated with infectious events in women with rheumatoid arthritis, whereas body mass index did not show an association. • Glucocorticoids were the only drug associated with a higher frequency of infection. None of the disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including methotrexate, showed an association.

Reasons for discontinuation of methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and challenges of methotrexate resumption: a single-center, retrospective study

Background

Methotrexate (MTX) is an anchor drug used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); hence, understanding the reasons for MTX discontinuation in RA can help improve its treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the reasons for MTX discontinuation and to identify future challenges in RA treatment regarding the discontinuation and resumption of MTX treatment.

Results

MTX administration was discontinued in 771 patients with RA. The reasons for MTX discontinuation were as follows: (1) infectious diseases (20.0%), (2) malignancy (14.1%), and (3) respiratory problems (10.2%). Some patients did not resume MTX therapy even after the infections were cured. Liver dysfunction (8.0%) did not improve with MTX discontinuation and was often associated with fatty liver disease. In addition to adverse events, MTX discontinuation was due to patient preference (4.3%), planning for pregnancy (5.1%), invalidity (5.7%), remission (5.6%), remission with biologics (4.7%), old age (2.6%), and poor compliance (1.6%).

Conclusions

This study revealed diverse reasons for the discontinuation of MTX; there are cases in which MTX is discontinued but should be considered for resumption. Furthermore, issues such as the indications for MTX discontinuation should still be debated, and multicenter evidence must be collected and examined in future studies.

Respiratory tract infections and risk factors for infection in a cohort of 330 patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common infections in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunosuppressive treatment and may contribute to morbidity and mortality as well as increased healthcare costs. However, to date only limited data on infection risk in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients are available. In this study we assessed the occurrence of respiratory tract infections in a monocentric real-world cohort consisting of 330 patients (168 psoriatic arthritis and 162 axial spondyloarthritis patients) and determined factors associated with increased infection risk. Out of 330 SpA patients, 89.3% had suffered from ≥ 1 upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and 31.1% from ≥ 1 lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) within the last two years. The most common URTIs were rhinitis and laryngitis/pharyngitis with 87.3% and 36.1%, respectively. Bronchitis constituted the most common LRTI, reported in 29.7% of patients. In a multivariate binomial logistic regression model occurrence of LRTI was associated with chronic lung disease (OR 17.44, p=0.006), glucocorticoid therapy (OR 9.24, p=0.012), previous history of severe airway infections (OR 6.82, p=0.013), and number of previous biological therapies (OR 1.72, p=0.017), whereas HLA B27 positivity was negatively associated (OR 0.29, p=0.025). Female patients reported significantly more LRTIs than male patients (p=0.006) and had a higher rate of antibiotic therapy (p=0.009). There were no significant differences between axSpA and PsA patients regarding infection frequency or antibiotic use. 45.4% of patients had required antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. Antibiotic therapy was associated with smoking (OR 3.40, p=0.008), biological therapy (OR 3.38, p=0.004), sleep quality (OR 1.13, p<0.001) and age (OR 0.96, p=0.030). Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG<7g/l) was rare (3.4%) in this SpA cohort despite continuous immunomodulatory treatment. Awareness of these risk factors will assist physicians to identify patients with an increased infection risk, who will benefit from additional preventive measures, such as vaccination and smoking cessation or adjustment of DMARD therapy.

The infection risks of JAK inhibition

INTRODUCTION

Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have shown to be highly effective in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. As with all immunomodulatory therapies, careful assessment of any treatment-associated infection risk is essential to inform clinical decision-making.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize current literature on infection rates among the licensed JAKi using published phase II/III trial results, post-licensing and registry data.

EXPERT OPINION

licensed JAKi show increased risk of infection across the class compared to placebo, most commonly affecting respiratory and urinary tracts, nasopharynx and skin. This risk is dose-dependent. Risks are similar at licensed JAKi doses to that seen with biologic therapies. The risk is compounded by other risk factors for infection, such as age and steroid co-prescription. Herpes zoster reactivation is more common with JAKi compared to other targeted immune modulation, making screening for varicella exposure and vaccination in appropriate cohorts an advisable strategy. Crucially, these small risk increases must be balanced against the known harms (including infection) of uncontrolled autoimmune disease. JAKi are a safe and potentially transformative treatment when used for appropriately selected patients.

Investigation Into the Effect of COVID-19 Infection on Length of Hospital Stay and Mortality in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a positive-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus of the coronavirus family, which has resulted in one of the most serious pandemics, with more than 14 million cases confirmed globally. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is estimated to be prevalent in 0.5-1% of the U.S. population. So far, there has been little evidence of COVID-19 infection and its propensity to result in increased mortality or length of hospital stay in patients with RA. To contribute to this body of literature, this study will assess the degree to which COVID-19 is associated with increased mortality and length of hospital stay in patients with RA while also taking into account these patients' comorbidities.

Methods

Our retrospective study included 14,180 patients (age >18, median 58, range 18-90) who tested positive for COVID-19 or were assumed to have COVID-19 infection from January 1^st, 2020, through July 31^st, 2020. Patients were grouped based on the diagnosis of RA and COVID-19 infection versus those without RA. Patients who were diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension were excluded. Covariates included age, body mass index (BMI), race, sex, maximum C-reactive protein value, maximum D-dimer value, and comorbid diabetes mellitus. Outcome measures were length of hospital stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU LOS, mechanical ventilation, time on mechanical ventilation, and discharge to hospice. The logistic regression model was used to estimate the probability of in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, placement on mechanical ventilation, discharge to hospice, and in-hospital mortality related to home anti-inflammatory use when comparing patients with RA and COVID-19 infection to COVID-19 infected patients without RA.

Results

Of the total 14,180 patients (males 57.1%, females 42.9%), 159 patients (1.1%), had a diagnosis of RA. There was no significant association between RA and hospital LOS, ICU admission, ICU LOS, LOS on mechanical ventilation, or discharge to hospice among those infected with COVID-19. Yet, RA was associated with higher mortality (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.07-2.53; p=0.02) and placement on mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.22-2.71; p<0.01) amidst patients infected with COVID-19.

Conclusion

This study suggests that patients with RA and COVID-19 have a significantly increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality and placement on mechanical ventilation. While challenging to realize in a pandemic situation, large studies nationwide are necessary to improve our understanding of COVID-19 infection in patients diagnosed with RA.

Increased risk of severe infections and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of severe infection and infection-related mortality among patients with newly diagnosed SLE.

METHODS

We conducted an age- and gender-matched cohort study of all patients with incident SLE between 1 January 1997 and 31 March 2015 using administrative health data from British Columbia, Canada. Primary outcome was the first severe infection after SLE onset necessitating hospitalization or occurring during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were total number of severe infections and infection-related mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 5169 SLE patients and matched them with 25 845 non-SLE individuals from the general population, yielding 955 and 1986 first severe infections during 48 367 and 260 712 person-years follow-up, respectively. The crude incidence rate ratios for first severe infection and infection-related mortality were 2.59 (95% CI: 2.39, 2.80) and 2.20 (95% CI: 1.76, 2.73), respectively. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.66, 1.99) and 1.61 (95% CI: 1.24, 2.08). SLE patients had an increased risk of a greater total number of severe infections with crude rate ratio of 3.24 (95% CI: 3.06, 3.43) and adjusted rate ratio of 2.07 (95% CI: 1.82, 2.36).

CONCLUSION

SLE is associated with increased risks of first severe infection (1.8-fold), a greater total number of severe infections (2.1-fold) and infection-related mortality (1.6-fold).

Rheumatologic aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic: a practical resource for physicians in Kuwait and the Gulf region based on recommendations by the Kuwait Association of Rheumatology (KAR)

The Kuwait Association of Rheumatology members met three times in April 2020 to quickly address and support the local practitioners treating rheumatic disease in Kuwait and the Gulf region during the COVID-19 pandemic. As patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD) may need modifications to their therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic, we voted online for general guidance that local practitioners needed. In this review, we have addressed the vulnerability of rheumatic patients and issues surrounding their optimum management. We base our recommendations on a synthesis of national/international guidelines and expert consensus among KAR members in the context of the Kuwaiti healthcare system caring for the patient population with RMD. The most recent reports from the World Health Organization, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institutes of Health - National Medical Library, and the COVID-19 educational website of the United Kingdom National Health Service have been incorporated. We discuss the management of RMD in various clinical scenarios: screening protocols in an infusion clinic, medication protocols for stable patients and care for suspected or confirmed COVID infection and whether they are stable, in a disease flare or newly diagnosed. Besides, we also outline the conditions for the hospital admission. This guidance is for the specialist and non-specialist readership and should be regarded as interim as the virus is relatively new and we rely on experience and necessity more than evidence collection. The guidance presented should be supplemented with recent scientific evidence wherever applicable.

Safety of long-term use of four common conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis for a long time. Whereas methotrexate (MTX) is the anchor drug, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine are used along with MTX either in combination or sequentially. Together these four drugs are the most commonly used DMARDs. They are also used in combination with biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) to enhance their efficacy and MTX in particular to reduce antibodies against anti-tumour necrosis factor. Despite their widespread use, concerns regarding their safety especially when used long-term hinder their optimum use in clinical medicine. In this narrative review we have critically appraised the available literature regarding the safety of these four DMARDs when used long-term.

Fears about COVID-19 and perceived risk among people with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis following the initial lockdown in Aotearoa New Zealand

Background

The COVID‐19 pandemic has disrupted all aspects of life and may raise particular fears for people with rheumatic disease. There is a need for research on fears and perceived risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 so as to understand the impact on wellbeing and inform service provision.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the correlates of COVID‐19 fears and perceived risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 among people with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.

Design

A cross‐sectional survey design was applied in Aotearoa New Zealand in the period after initial nationwide lockdowns.

Method

An online survey was completed from July to September 2020 by 126 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 96) or ankylosing spondylitis (n = 30) who had previously been recruited to the Patient Opinion Real‐Time Anonymous Liaison (PORTAL) study in 2015 or 2018. The survey included demographics and health information as well as measures of COVID‐19 fears and experiences, functional disability and fatigue‐related disability.

Results

Fears about COVID‐19 were higher among younger participants, those who had been tested for SARS‐CoV‐2, and those who experienced more flares over the initial lockdown. Perceived risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was also higher among individual who had been tested for SARS‐CoV‐2 and those taking biologic medications.

Conclusion

Fears about COVID‐19 and perceived risk of infection are related to age, health and medications among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis. These findings inform how health professionals can help address the concerns of particular groups of people with rheumatic disease by providing relevant information about the ongoing effects of the pandemic.

COVID-19: Considerations about immune suppression and biologicals at the time of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

The extent of the profound immunological and nonimmunological responses linked to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is currently being investigated worldwide due to the large burden associated with death due to SARS-CoV-2 and the short-term consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It has been hypothesized that patients on immunosuppressive treatments, including biologics, may have an augmented risk of being infected by SARS-CoV-2; however, there are currently no definitive data about biological drugs and COVID-19 in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Current epidemiological models developed to understand how long the COVID-19 epidemic may last are not conclusive and range from sustained epidemics to complete elimination. Nevertheless, even in the best-case scenario of apparent elimination, there is concordance about a possible contagion resurgence as late as 2024. Therefore, knowledge of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on immune-mediated diseases and among patients treated with biologicals, together with the results of novel and promising COVID-19 treatment strategies targeting the virus and the host immune response (or both), will help us to best manage our patients during this pandemic over the next few years.

2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.

RESULTS

The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional).

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.

2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations.

RESULTS

The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional).

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients' values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.

Nonserious Infections in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and predictors of nonserious infections (NSI) and compare incidence across biologic agents within the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA).

METHODS

The BSRBR-RA is a prospective observational cohort study. An NSI was defined as an infection that did not require hospitalization or intravenous therapy. Infections were captured from clinician questionnaires and patient diaries. Individuals were considered "at risk" from the date of initiation of biologic treatment for up to 3 years. Drug exposure was defined by agent: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor, B cell depletion (rituximab), or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) alone. A multiple-failure Cox model was used with multivariable adjustment. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

There were 17,304 NSI in 8,145 patients, with an event rate of 27.0 per person per year (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 26.6-27.4). Increasing age, female sex, comorbidity burden, glucocorticoid therapy, higher Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and higher Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index were associated with an increased risk of NSI. There was a significant reduction in NSI risk with csDMARDs compared to biologic treatments. Compared to TNFi, IL-6 inhibition and rituximab were associated with a higher NSI risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.45 [95% CI 1.29-1.63] and adjusted hazard ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.14-1.45], respectively), while the csDMARD cohort had a lower risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.59-0.70]). Within the TNFi class, adalimumab was associated with a higher NSI risk than etanercept (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11 [95% CI 1.05-1.17]).

CONCLUSION

NSI occur frequently in RA, and predictors mirror those reported with serious infections. All biologics are associated with a greater risk of NSI, with differences observed between agents. While unmeasured confounding must be considered, the magnitude of effect is large, and a relationship between NSI and targeted immunomodulatory therapy likely exists.

Risk of Serious Infection Associated with Agents that Target T-Cell Activation and Interleukin-17 and Interleukin-23 Cytokines

Co-stimulatory T-cell inhibitors are used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to prevent rejection of renal transplants. Inhibitors of the intereukin (IL-17) cytokine are indicated for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis and anti- IL-23 drugs for psoriasis. Serious infections occur in 4.2% to 25.0% of co-stimulatory inhibitors and 1.0% to 2.0% with IL-17 or IL-23 inhibitors. Underlying disease, steroid dose greater than 7.5 to 10.0 mg, and comorbidities influence risk in individual patients. Opportunistic infections or reactivation of tuberculosis are rare.

Comparative risk of infections among real-world users of biologics for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the German BIKER registry

To examine whether treatment with interleukin (IL)-1-, IL-6-, tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα)-inhibitors or Abatacept is associated with an increased risk of common infections, infections requiring hospitalization (SAE) or opportunistic infections among real-world juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. Furthermore, the influence of other patient-related covariates on the occurrence of infections was investigated. Patients diagnosed with JIA and treated with biologics were selected from the German BIKER registry. Incidence rates (IR) of infections per 100 person years were calculated and compared between the different cohorts. Using multivariate logistic regression, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for the influence of patient-related covariates (age, diagnosis, laboratory data, concomitant medication, JIA activity, comorbidities, and premedication) on the occurrence of infections. 3258 patients entered the analysis. A total of 3654 treatment episodes were distributed among TNFα- (Etanercept, Adalimumab, Golimumab, Infliximab, n = 3044), IL-1- (Anakinra, Canakinumab, n = 105), IL-6- (Tocilizumab, n = 400) and T-cell activation inhibitors (Abatacept, n = 105). 813 (22.2%) patients had at least one infection, 103 (2.8%) patients suffered from an SAE infection. Both common and SAE infections were significantly more frequent in IL-1 (IR 17.3, 95% CI 12.5/24 and IR 4.3, 95% CI 2.3/8.3) and IL-6 cohort (IR 16.7, 95% CI 13.9/20 and IR 2.8, 95% CI 1.8/4.4) compared to TNFα-inhibitor cohort (IR 8.7, 95% CI 8.1/9.4 and IR 1, 95% CI 0.8/1.3). When comparing the influencing factors for various infectious diseases, the use of corticosteroids, younger age, cardiac comorbidities and higher JIA-activity are the most striking risk factors. Relative to TNFα inhibitors and Abatacept, IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors were associated with an increased risk of common and SAE infections. The influencing covariates identified may be helpful for the choice of a suitable biologic to treat JIA.

Absence of Association Between Abatacept Exposure and Initial Infection in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship between infection risk and abatacept (ABA) exposure levels in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) following treatment with subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) ABA.

METHODS

Data from 2 published studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01844518, NCT00095173) of ABA treatment in pediatric patients were analyzed. One study treated patients aged 2-17 years with SC ABA and the other treated patients aged 6-17 years with IV ABA. Association between serum ABA exposure measures and infection was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots of probability of first infection vs time on treatment by ABA exposure quartiles and log-rank tests. Number of infections by ABA exposure quartiles was investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 343 patients were included in this analysis: 219 patients received SC ABA and 124 patients received IV ABA. Overall, 237/343 (69.1%) patients had ≥ 1 infection over 24 months. No significant difference in time to first infection across 4 quartiles of ABA exposure levels was observed in the pooled (P = 0.45), SC (2-5 yrs: P = 0.93; 6-17 yrs: P = 0.48), or IV (P = 0.50) analyses. Concomitant use of methotrexate and glucocorticoids (at baseline and throughout) with ABA did not increase infection risk across the ABA exposure quartiles. There was no evidence of association between number of infections and ABA exposure quartiles. No opportunistic infections related to ABA were reported.

CONCLUSION

In patients aged 2-17 years with pJIA, no evidence of association between higher levels of exposure to IV ABA or SC ABA and incidence of infection was observed.

The association between age and adverse events due to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective cohort study

We examined whether the age of patients with rheumatoid arthritis was associated with adverse events (AEs) caused by biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs).Patients with rheumatoid arthritis using bDMARDs from Showa University Hospital, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, and Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital from January 2005 to December 2017 were eligible for this retrospective cohort study. The maximum observation period was determined to be 1 year. Outcomes in patients older and younger than 75 years were compared. The primary outcome was the rate of drug discontinuation because of AEs caused by bDMARDs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Pearson's chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis, respectively.A total of 416 patients were enrolled; median (interquartile range [IQR]): 60.0 (44.3 - 71.0) years and 84.6% women; patients ≥ 75 years were 67/416 (16.1%). The rates of drug discontinuation because of AEs caused by bDMARDs were 10.5% (7/67) in patients 75 years and older and 10.9% (38/349) in those younger than 75 years (relative risk 0.95, 95% confidential interval 0.45-2.24). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for covariates, the rate of drug discontinuation showed no significant difference between the patients ≥ 75 years and the those < 75 years (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidential interval 0.29-1.75, P = .45).The rate of drug discontinuation because of AEs caused by bDMARDs was not significantly different between patients 75 years and older and patients younger than 75 years.

Severe type 2 leprosy reaction with COVID-19 with a favourable outcome despite continued use of corticosteroids and methotrexate and a hypothesis on the possible immunological consequences

Type 2 leprosy reaction (T2LR), or Erythema Nodosum Leprosum (ENL), often poses a therapeutic challenge to clinicians and commonly requires long courses of steroids for control. While immunosuppressants are known to achieve control and lower steroid dependence in T2LR, the prospect of managing a severe T2LR in conjunction with COVID-19, with the concern of worsening COVID-19 with long-term immunosuppression has not previously been encountered. We report a case of severe T2LR treated with oral steroids and methotrexate, with COVID-19 infection acquired during hospital stay, and a favourable outcome achieved despite the continued use of immunosuppressants. We discuss the possible reasons for this both in terms of the drug pharmacodynamics and the immunological profile of T2LR.

Risk of Serious Infection Among Initiators of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Plus Methotrexate Versus Triple Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of serious infections between the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) plus methotrexate (MTX) versus triple therapy among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Using claims data from Truven MarketScan (2003-2014), we conducted a cohort study to compare RA patients receiving MTX who added a TNFi (TNFi plus MTX group) versus MTX plus hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine (triple therapy group). The primary outcome was any serious infection (i.e., a composite end point of hospitalized bacterial and opportunistic infections or herpes zoster). Secondary outcomes were individual components of the composite end point. To adjust for baseline confounding, we used propensity score (PS)-based fine stratification and weighting. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model estimated the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the outcomes.

RESULTS

After PS stratification (PSS) and weighting, we included a total of 45,208 TNFi plus MTX initiators and 1,387 triple therapy initiators. Mean age was 53 years and 70% were female. The incidence rate of any serious infection per 100 person-years was 2.46 in the TNFi plus MTX group and 2.03 in the triple therapy group. The PSS-weighted HR for any serious infection comparing TNFi plus MTX versus triple therapy was 1.23 (95% CI 0.87-1.74). For the secondary outcomes, the PSS-weighted HR was 1.41 (95% CI 0.85-2.34) for bacterial infection and 0.80 (95% CI 0.55-1.18) for herpes zoster.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world cohort of RA patients, we noted no substantially different risk of any serious infection, bacterial infection, or herpes zoster after initiating TNFi plus MTX versus triple therapy, although CIs were wide.

The potential similarities of COVID-19 and autoimmune disease pathogenesis and therapeutic options: new insights approach

Cytokine pathways and their signaling disorders can be the cause of onset and pathogenesis of many diseases such as autoimmune diseases and COVID-19 infection. Autoimmune patients may be at higher risk of developing infection due to the impaired immune responses, the use of immunosuppressive drugs, and damage to various organs. Increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines and intolerance of the patient's immune system to COVID-19 infection are the leading causes of hospitalization of these patients. The content used in this paper has been taken from English language articles (2005-2020) retrieved from the PubMed database and Google Scholar search engine using "COVID-19," "Autoimmune disease," "Therapeutic," "Pathogenesis," and "Pathway" keywords. The emergence of COVID-19 and its association with autoimmune disorders is a major challenge in the management of these diseases. The results showed that the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of autoimmune diseases can make diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 more challenging by preventing the fever. Due to the common pathogenesis of COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases, the use of autoimmune drugs as a possible treatment option could help control the virus. KEY POINTS: • Inflammatory cytokines play an essential role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 • ACE2 dysfunctions are related to the with COVID-19 and autoimmune diseases • The use autoimmune diseases drugs can be useful in treating COVID-19.

Recommendations for the management of patients with systemic rheumatic diseases during the coronavirus disease pandemic

Patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD) are vulnerable for coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The Korean College of Rheumatology recognized the urgent need to develop recommendations for rheumatologists and other physicians to manage patients with SRD during the COVID-19 pandemic. The working group was organized and was responsible for selecting key health questions, searching and reviewing the available literature, and formulating statements. The appropriateness of the statements was evaluated by voting panels using the modified Delphi method. Four general principles and thirteen individual recommendations were finalized through expert consensus based on the available evidence. The recommendations included preventive measures against COVID-19, medicinal treatment for stable or active SRD patients without COVID-19, medicinal treatment for SRD patients with COVID-19, and patient evaluation and monitoring. Medicinal treatments were categorized according to the status with respect to both COVID-19 and SRD. These recommendations should serve as a reference for individualized treatment for patients with SRD. As new evidence is emerging, an immediate update will be required.

Rheumatic Musculoskeletal Diseases and COVID-19 A Review of the First 6 Months of the Pandemic

In December 2019, a cluster of severe pneumonia was observed in China, with the subsequent discovery of a new beta-coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) as the causative agent. The elicited disease COVID-19 is characterized by fever, dry cough, myalgia, or fatigue and has a favorable outcome in the majority of cases. However, in some patients COVID-19 leads to severe pneumonia and sepsis with subsequent respiratory failure and gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological, and cardiovascular complications. A higher risk of infection is intrinsic to active rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) and the use of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). With an increasing number of reports on COVID-19 in RMD patients, we are beginning to appraise their risks. In this review, we summarize the published cases of COVID-19 infections in RMD patients, including patients with inflammatory arthritis and connective tissue diseases as well as anti-phospholipid syndrome and Kawasaki syndrome. Overall, patients with inflammatory arthritis do not seem to be at a higher risk for infection or a severe course of COVID-19. Risk for critical COVID-19 in patients with systemic inflammatory diseases such as SLE or vasculitis might be increased, but this needs further confirmation. Furthermore, we summarize the data on DMARDs used to fight SARS-CoV-2 infection and hyperinflammation.

Incidence and Complication Rates for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Across Four Decades

INTRODUCTION

Over the past several decades, management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved significantly, but few studies have examined the real-world impact of these changes on orthopaedic surgery in patients with RA. This systematic review assessed total hip arthroplasty (THA) incidence and postoperative complication rates across the past four decades.

METHODS

This is a systematic literature review sourcing data on THA in patients with RA from the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 2019.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 1715 articles of which 44 were included for quantitative synthesis. The rate for THA decreased by almost 40% from 11/1000 patient years (PY) in the 2000s to 7/1000 PY in the 2010s, while the overall complication rate decreased from 9.9% in the 1990s to 5.3% in the 2010s. Throughout the duration of the study, THA incidence and overall complication rate decreased. However, not all individual complication rates decreased. For example, revision and periprosthetic fracture decreased, infection and aseptic loosening remained constant, and dislocation increased.

CONCLUSION

Medical management of patients with RA has reduced the need for THA, while postoperative medical and surgical management has improved some postoperative outcomes. Nevertheless, there remains room for further improvement to postoperative outcomes through RA-specific management.

Use of Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs, Biologics, and Corticosteroids in Older Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Over 20 Years

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in prescribing patterns, especially the use of corticosteroids (CS), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over 2 decades.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of health administrative data using a previously validated dataset and case definition for RA. Cases were matched 1:4 by age and sex to controls within a population of approximately 1 million inhabitants with access to universal health care. Longitudinal data for incident and prevalent RA cases were studied between 1997 and 2017.

RESULTS

There were 8240 RA cases (all ≥ 65 yrs) with a mean (SD) age 72.2 (7.5) years and 70.6% were female. Over 20 years, annual utilization of coxibs in prevalent RA cases fell with a concomitant increase in disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics. Over the same period, CS use was largely unchanged. Approximately one-third of patients had at least 1 annual prescription for CS, most frequently prednisone. The mean annual dose showed a modest reduction and the duration of utilization in each year shortened. Rheumatologists prescribed CS less frequently and in lower doses than other physician groups. For incident RA cases, there was a significant fall in annual prescribed dose of prednisone by rheumatologists over time.

CONCLUSION

In older adults with RA, the utilization of DMARDs and biologics has increased over the past 20 years. However, the use of CS has persisted. Renewed efforts are required to minimize their use in the long-term pharmacological management of RA.

Immunosuppressive agents for dermatological indications in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: Rationalizing use and clinical applicability

The ongoing COVID-19 epidemic has brought to the fore many concerns related to use of immunosuppressive agents (ISAs) in dermatology. While it is unclear whether the patients on ISAs for skin conditions are more prone to develop COVID-19, and what impact the ISA may have on the clinical outcome if a patient does get infected, rationalizations based on the specific immune effects of each drug, and existing literature on incidence of various infections with each, are possible. In this review, we provide the readers with practically useful insights into these aspects, related to the conventional ISAs, and briefly mention the clinical outcome data available on related scenarios from other patient groups so far. In the end, we have attempted to provide some clinically useful points regarding practical use of each dermatologically relevant conventional ISA in the current scenario.

Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 case with rheumatoid arthritis taking iguratimod treated with ciclesonide

We report a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case with rheumatoid arthritis taking iguratimod. The patient who continued iguratimod therapy without dose reduction was treated with ciclesonide had an uneventful clinical course, but prolonged detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was observed after resolution of symptoms. The effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and ciclesonide on clinical course and viral shedding remain unknown and warrant further investigation.

COVID-19 infection and rheumatoid arthritis: Faraway, so close!

The outbreak of the new coronavirus infections COVID-19 in December 2019 in China has quickly become a global health emergency. Given the lack of specific anti-viral therapies, the current management of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2) is mainly supportive, even though several compounds are now under investigation for the treatment of this life-threatening disease. COVID-19 pandemic is certainly conditioning the treatment strategy of a complex disorder as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whose infectious risk is increased compared to the general population because of an overall impairment of immune system typical of autoimmune diseases combined with the iatrogenic effect generated by corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs. However, the increasing knowledge about the pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection is leading to consider some anti-rheumatic drugs as potential treatment options for the management of COVID-19. In this review we will critically analyse the evidences on either positive or negative effect of drugs commonly used to treat RA in this particular scenario, in order to optimize the current approach to RA patients.

Targeting Granulocyte-Monocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Signaling in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Future Prospects

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic, autoimmune disease that affects joints and extra-articular structures. In the last decade, the management of this chronic disease has dramatically changed with the introduction of several targeted mechanisms of action, such as tumor necrosis factor-α inhibition, T-cell costimulation inhibition, B-cell depletion, interleukin-6 blockade, and Janus kinase inhibition. Beyond its well-known hematopoietic role on the proliferation and differentiation of myeloid cells, granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a proinflammatory mediator acting as a cytokine, with a proven pathogenetic role in autoimmune disorders such as RA. In vitro studies clearly demonstrated the effect of GM-CSF in the communication between resident tissue cells and activated macrophages at chronic inflammation sites, and confirmed the elevation of GM-CSF levels in inflamed synovial tissue of RA subjects compared with healthy controls. Moreover, a pivotal role of GM-CSF in the perception of pain has been clearly confirmed. Therefore, blockade of the GM-CSF pathway by monoclonal antibodies directed against the cytokine itself or its receptor has been investigated in refractory RA patients. Overall, the safety profile of GM-CSF inhibitors seems to be very favorable, with a particularly low incidence of infectious complications. The efficacy of this new mechanism of action is comparable with main competitors, even though the response rates reported in phase II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) appear to be numerically lower than the response rates observed with other biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs already licensed for RA. Mainly because of this reason, nowadays the development program of most GM-CSF blockers for RA has been discontinued, with the exception of otilimab, which is under evaluation in two phase III RCTs with a head-to head non-inferiority design against tofacitinib. These studies will likely be useful for better defining the potential role of GM-CSF inhibition in the therapeutic algorithm of RA. On the other hand, the potential role of GM-CSF blockade in the treatment of other rheumatic diseases is now under investigation. Phase II trials are ongoing with the aim of evaluating mavrilimumab for the treatment of giant cell arteritis, and namilumab for the treatment of spondyloarthritis. Moreover, GM-CSF inhibitors have been tested in osteoarthritis and diffuse subtype of systemic sclerosis. This review aims to describe in detail the available evidence on the GM-CSF blocking pathway in RA management, paving the way to a possible alternative treatment for RA patients. Novel insights regarding the potential use of GM-CSF blockers for alternative indications will be also addressed.

Long-term safety of certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease: a pooled analysis of 11 317 patients across clinical trials

Objective

To review long-term certolizumab pegol (CZP) safety across all approved indications: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PSO) and Crohn’s disease (CD).

Methods

Data were pooled across 49 UCB-sponsored CZP clinical trials (27 RA, one axSpA, one PsA, five PSO, 15 CD) to August 2017. Serious adverse events (SAEs) of interest (infections, malignancies, autoimmunity/hypersensitivity events, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), gastrointestinal (GI) perforations, psoriasis events, laboratory abnormalities) and deaths were medically reviewed by an external expert committee, using predefined case rules. Incidence rates (IRs)/100 patient-years (PY) are presented by indication; standardised mortality and malignancy rates were calculated using WHO/GLOBOCAN/SEER databases. Pregnancies with maternal CZP exposure are also reported.

Results

Of 11 317 CZP-treated patients across indications (21 695 PY CZP exposure; maximum: 7.8 years), infections were the most common SAEs (overall IR: 3.62/100 PY; IRs ranged from 1.50/100 PY(PSO) to 5.97/100 PY(CD)). The IR for malignancies was 0.82/100 PY, including lymphoma (0.06/100 PY). MACE and GI perforation IRs in CZP-treated patients were 0.47/100 PY and 0.08/100 PY and were highest in RA and CD, respectively. Patients with PSO had the lowest SAE rates. The incidence of deaths and malignancies aligned with expected general population data.

Conclusion

This extensive overview of the CZP safety profile in clinical trials, across all indications, provides large-scale confirmation of previous reports. No new safety signals or relevant non-disease-related laboratory abnormalities were identified. The study demonstrated some indication-specific differences in certain SAE rates that may be attributable to the underlying inflammatory disease.

Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are currently several available biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with similar efficacy in most trials. A major consideration therefore in choosing a biologic, continues to be safety concerns such as infection. Considerable advances have been made in the understanding of biologic safety on a population level; however, how close are we to stratifying risk for individual patients? This review discusses evidence published in the last year, with reference to key previous literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Comparative safety of biologics has been studied in observational cohorts, with a possible increased risk of serious infection in tocilizumab-treated patients compared with etanercept. Rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologics are often on concomitant medications such as steroids and opioids, and the advances in relation to infection are summarized. Pharmacological biomarkers and optimizing existing risk prediction scores may allow better future risk stratification.

SUMMARY

Improved quantification of personalized benefit:harms would allow better-informed decisions, reduction of infection-associated morbidity as well as direct/indirect costs associated with biologics. Although advances have been made to better understand and predict risk, future studies are likely to require a range of novel data sources and methodologies for the goal of precision medicine to be truly realized.

Influence of disease duration and socioeconomic factors on the prevalence of infection and hospitalization in rheumatoid arthritis: KRAC study

AIM

The use of healthcare resources by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients can be related to the presence of disease, comorbid conditions, use of steroids, and the combined use of immunosuppressants. This study evaluated the risk factors associated with infection and hospitalization in RA.

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolled 3247 RA subjects fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria to examine the prevalence of hospitalization and episodes of documentable non-tubercular infections as a part of the "Karnataka rheumatoid arthritis comorbidity" study (KRAC). The study included 2081 subjects and 1166 were excluded due to incomplete data. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were collected, and the events related to infections and hospitalization were extracted from the medical records. Comparative analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed.

RESULTS

Around 22% of the subjects had hospitalizations and 2.9% had infections. Infections were pertaining to dental (1.3%), urinary tract (1.6%) and candidiasis (0.2%). Skin- and soft tissue-related infections were found in 1.8% and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Increased need of hospitalization in RA patients was associated with advanced age (≥60 years), lower education, family income, and longer duration of RA. Presence of comorbidity, usage of three or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and family income influenced the likelihood of infection. Dental infections were less likely in working subjects and more likely in patients with increased disease duration, higher family income, comorbidities and those between the age group 40-59 years. Urinary tract infection was associated with DMARD usage.

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific risk factors should be considered to improve treatment strategies and to reduce the risk of infection and hospitalization in RA patients.

Identification of high-risk groups for complication after arthroplasty: predictive value of patient's related risk factors

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) benefit patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a specific approach to detect patients at higher risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and mechanical complications is absent. The aim of this study is to identify groups at higher risk for infections and mechanical complications after TJA in patients with RA and OA based on their most significant predictors.

METHODS

This is a hospital-based cohort study with 1150 recipients of TJA. Risk factors and comorbidities were assessed prior to the index surgery. Multivariate logistic and hazard regression were used to determine the relationship between risk factors and occurrence of complications after TJA. Odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and comparison between areas under the curve (AUC) using DeLong's method are presented.

RESULTS

Complications were more frequent in subjects with RA, use of corticosteroids, and previous comorbidities: respiratory disease, infections, diabetes, anemia, mental and musculoskeletal comorbidities than in subjects without these risk factors, and these factors were predictors of infections and mechanical complications (P < 0.05). A model including these factors was superior to a model with only type of joint disease (OA/RA) or age and gender to detect infections or mechanical complications after TJA (P < 0.05 for difference between models). Complication risk proportionally increased with the presence of two or more comorbidities (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There are two groups at higher risk for infections after TJA: patients with OA with at least two risk factors and patients with RA, who usually present at least one of the risk factors for infection.

Risk of Infection with Methotrexate Therapy in Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The aim of this study was to determine the risk of infection in adults with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) treated with methotrexate. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing methotrexate versus placebo in adults using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases from 1980 to August 2017. The primary outcome was the risk of infection associated with methotrexate therapy. We chose a random effect model to summarize adverse event outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) and related 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Twelve RCTs (total patients 1146) met the inclusion criteria for our main analysis, and ten for risk of serious infection (total patients 906). Overall, methotrexate was associated with increased risk of infection in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (RR: 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01⁻1.56; p = 0.04; I² = 0%), but not in other non-RA IRD populations. There was no increased risk of total infections (RR: 1.14; 95% CI, 0.98⁻1.34; p = 0.10; I² = 0%) or serious infections (RR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.11⁻5.15; p = 0.78; I² = 0%) in all included IRDs. Conclusively, methotrexate use in IRDs is associated with a higher risk of all infections in RA, but not in other non-RA (IRD) populations. There is no increased risk of serious infections.

Rheumatoid Arthritis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease in Greece: A Multicentre Epidemiological and Clinical Study

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) represents one of the most severe complications of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Preliminary data from the RA Greek cohort show a prevalence of 5.3%. Due to scarcity of data, little is known regarding the epidemiological and clinical features of Greek patients with RA-ILD. Moreover, use of pulmonary function tests for prognostic purposes in patients with RA-ILD is still not sufficiently studied. Interestingly, the treatment approach of patients with RA-ILD remains controversial due to high risk of infection, possible drug-related pulmonary toxicity, and scarce evidence regarding the efficacy of medications used in these patients. The aim of this research protocol is to collect data from patients with RA-ILD followed in multiple centres across Greece in order to identify the clinical and epidemiological features of these patients. The second part of the study focuses on the prospective data collection regarding the progression of ILD, the response to different treatment modalities and the incidence of adverse events attributed either to the disease itself or to its treatment in patients with RA-ILD. This study may provide useful evidence in exploring both the natural history and the risk factors contributing to the development of ILD, as well as the efficacy and the adverse events attributed to the medications used in Greek patients with RA-ILD; thus ameliorating the therapeutic approach of RA-ILD patients in daily clinical practice.

Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis and infection risk: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) and infection risk in clinical practice. We examined the association between DMTs and infection-related medical encounters.

METHODS

Using population-based administrative data from British Columbia, Canada, we identified MS cases and followed them from their first demyelinating event (1996-2013) until emigration, death or study end (December 2013). Associations between DMT exposure (by DMT generation or class) and infection-related physician or hospital claims were assessed using recurrent time-to-events models, adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, index year and comorbidity count. Results were reported as adjusted HRs (aHRs).

RESULTS

Of 6793 MS cases, followed for 8.5 years (mean), 1716 (25.3%) were DMT exposed. Relative to no DMT, exposure to any first-generation DMT (beta-interferon or glatiramer acetate) was not associated with infection-related physician claims (aHR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.02), nor was exposure to these drug classes when assessed separately. Exposure to any second-generation DMT (oral DMT or natalizumab) was associated with an increased hazard of an infection-related physician claim (aHR: 1.47; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.85); when assessed individually, the association was significant for natalizumab (aHR: 1.59; 95% CI 1.19 to 2.11) but not the oral DMTs (aHR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.56). While no DMTs were associated with infection-related hospital claims, these hospitalisations were also uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Exposure to first-generation DMTs was not associated with an altered infection risk. However, exposure to the second-generation DMTs was, with natalizumab associated with a 59% increased risk of an infection-related physician claim. Continued pharmacovigilance is warranted, including an investigation of the DMT-associated infection burden on patient outcomes.