Anakinra as first-line disease-modifying therapy in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: report of forty-six patients from an international multicenter series

The emerging paradigm in pediatric rheumatology: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence algorithms, with roots extending into the past but experiencing a resurgence and evolution in recent years due to their superiority over traditional methods and contributions to human capabilities, have begun to make their presence felt in the field of pediatric rheumatology. In the ever-evolving realm of pediatric rheumatology, there have been incremental advancements supported by artificial intelligence in understanding and stratifying diseases, developing biomarkers, refining visual analyses, and facilitating individualized treatment approaches. However, like in many other domains, these strides have yet to gain clinical applicability and validation, and ethical issues remain unresolved. Furthermore, mastering different and novel terminologies appears challenging for clinicians. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature, categorizing algorithms and their applications, thus offering a fresh perspective on the nascent relationship between pediatric rheumatology and artificial intelligence, highlighting both its advancements and constraints.

Intravenous high-dose anakinra drops venous thrombosis and acute coronary syndrome in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a propensity score matched study

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of high-dose intravenous anakinra treatment on the development of thrombotic events in severe and critical COVID-19 patients. This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary referral center in Aksaray, Turkey. The study population consisted of two groups as follows; the patients receiving high-dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) added to background therapy and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC) as a historical control group. Age, gender, mcHIS scores, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease of the patients were determined as the variables to be matched. We included 114 patients in SoC and 139 patients in the Anakinra group in the study. Development of any thromboembolic event (5% vs 12.3%, p = 0.038; OR 4.3) and PTE (2.9% vs 9.6%, p = 0.023; OR 5.1) were lower in the Anakinra group than SoC. No patient experienced cerebrovascular accident and/or clinically evident deep venous thrombosis both in two arms. After 1:1 PS matching, 88 patients in SoC and 88 patients in the Anakinra group were matched and included in the analysis. In survival analysis, the development of any thromboembolic event, pulmonary thromboembolism, and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were higher in SoC compared to Anakinra. Survival rate was also lower in patients with SoC arm than Anakinra in patients who had any thromboembolic event as well as ACS. In our study, the development of thrombosis was associated with hyperinflammation in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. Intravenous high-dose anakinra treatment decreases both venous and arterial events in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.

Management of adult-onset Still's disease: evidence- and consensus-based recommendations by experts

OBJECTIVES

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare condition characterized by fevers, rash, and arthralgia/arthritis; most doctors treating AOSD in the Netherlands treat <5 patients per year. Currently, there is no internationally accepted treatment guideline for AOSD. The objectives of this study were to conduct a Delphi panel aimed at reaching consensus about diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with AOSD and to use the outcomes as a basis for a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

The Delphi panel brought together 18 AOSD experts: rheumatologists, internists and paediatricians. The Delphi process consisted of three rounds. In the first two rounds, online lists of questions and statements were completed. In the third round, final statements were discussed during a virtual meeting and a final vote took place. Consensus threshold was set at 80%. Two targeted literature searches were performed identifying the level of evidence of the consensus-based statements.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 29 statements, including statements related to diagnosis and diagnostic tests, definition of response and remission, the therapy, the use of methotrexate and tapering of treatment. The panel consented on reduction of the use of glucocorticoids to avoid side effects, and preferred the use of biologics over conventional treatment. The role of IL-1 and IL-6 blocking agents was considered important in the treatment of AOSD.

CONCLUSION

In this Delphi panel, a high level of consensus was achieved on recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of AOSD that can serve as a basis for a treatment guideline.

Joint-specific memory, resident memory T cells and the rolling window of opportunity in arthritis

In rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis and other forms of inflammatory arthritis, the immune system targets certain joints but not others. The pattern of joints affected varies by disease and by individual, with flares most commonly involving joints that were previously inflamed. This phenomenon, termed joint-specific memory, is difficult to explain by systemic immunity alone. Mechanisms of joint-specific memory include the involvement of synovial resident memory T cells that remain in the joint during remission and initiate localized disease recurrence. In addition, arthritis-induced durable changes in synovial fibroblasts and macrophages can amplify inflammation in a site-specific manner. Together with ongoing systemic processes that promote extension of arthritis to new joints, these local factors set the stage for a stepwise progression in disease severity, a paradigm for arthritis chronicity that we term the joint accumulation model. Although durable drug-free remission through early treatment remains elusive for most forms of arthritis, the joint accumulation paradigm defines new therapeutic targets, emphasizes the importance of sustained treatment to prevent disease extension to new joints, and identifies a rolling window of opportunity for altering the natural history of arthritis that extends well beyond the initiation phase of disease.

Heterogeneity of macrophage activation syndrome and treatment progression

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a rare complication of autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) characterized by a progressive and life-threatening condition with features including cytokine storm and hemophagocytosis. Predisposing factors are typically associated with microbial infections, genetic factors (distinct from typical genetically related hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)), and inappropriate immune system overactivation. Clinical features include unremitting fever, generalized rash, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, anemia, worsening liver function, and neurological involvement. MAS can occur in various AIIRDs, including but not limited to systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Kawasaki disease (KD), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and Sjögren's syndrome (SS), etc. Although progress has been made in understanding the pathogenesis and treatment of MAS, it is important to recognize the differences between different diseases and the various treatment options available. This article summarizes the cell types and cytokines involved in MAS-related diseases, the heterogeneity, and treatment options, while also comparing it to genetically related HLH.

Combination therapy of high-dose intravenous anakinra and baricitinib in patients with critical COVID-19: Promising results from retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination treatment of high-dose intravenous anakinra and baricitinib in patients with critically ill COVID-19.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary center with diagnosis of COVID-19 patients.Study population consisted of patients with positive polymerase chain reaction and computer tomography findings compatible with COVID-19 as well as critical illness.

RESULTS

Data of 15 patients in combination group and 43 patients in control group were evaluated and included into the study. Overall mortality was 46.7 % (n = 7) in combination arm and 69.8 % (n = 30) in control group although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). Similarly, need of intubation was also lower in combination arm (46.7 %) compared to control group (69.8 %), it was not significantly different (p = 0.1). ICU admission was significantly lower in combination (46.7 %, n = 7) arm than control group (76.7 %, n = 33) (p = 0.03, Odds ratio [OR]:4.7). Development of severe infection (20 %, n = 3 vs 25 %, n = 9/36), pulmonary embolism (6.7 %, n = 1 vs 0), myocardial infarction (6.7 %, n = 1 vs 2.6 %, n = 1/38) and pneumothorax (13.3 %, n = 2 vs 2.6 %, n = 1/38) were not different between two groups (p = 0.7, p = 0.3, p = 0.5 and p = 0.2). In multivariable analysis only cHIS score was associated with high mortality (p = 0.018, OR:2.8, [95 % confidence interval: 1.2-6.6]). In survival analysis, mortality rate was significantly lower in combination arm than control group (Log-Rank:p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy of high-dose anakinra and baricitinib may be an adequate treatment option in patients with COVID-19 who had critical disease and has acceptable safety profile.

Individualized High Dose Intravenous Anakinra Treatment in Cancer Patients with COVID-19 Associated Cytokine Storm: A Retrospective Controlled Study

Objective

Patients with COVID-19 accompanying cancer have been reported to have higher morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the high-dose high intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with COVID-19-associated cytokine storm accompanying cancer.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center between September 01, 2021, and February 01, 2022, in Turkey. The study population consisted of two groups: patients receiving high-dose intravenous anakinra and patients treated with standard care.

Results

Data from 146 patients in the anakinra group and 114 patients in the control group were analyzed. Malignancy frequency was 11% (n=16) in the anakinra group and 7% (n=8) in the control group. In survival analysis, a significantly lower survival rate was observed in patients with malignancy than those without in the control group (log-rank: p=0.002) and patients with malignancy in the control group compared to the anakinra group (log-rank: p=0.013). However, it did not differ between patients with and without malignancy in the anakinra group (log-rank: p=0.9).

Conclusion

In the control group, mortality was higher in patients with malignancy compared to those without malignancy, but not in the anakinra group. Also, mortality was higher in patients receiving SoC compared to anakinra. Intravenous high-dose anakinra treatment is safe and effective in patients with COVID-19 accompanying cancer.

Disease Course, Treatments, and Outcomes of Children With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Lung Disease

OBJECTIVE

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated lung disease (SJIA-LD) is a life-threatening disease complication. Key questions remain regarding clinical course and optimal treatment approaches. The objectives of the study were to detail management strategies after SJIA-LD detection, characterize overall disease courses, and measure long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record, including current clinical status and changes since diagnosis. Serum biomarkers were determined and correlated with presence of LD.

RESULTS

We enrolled 41 patients with SJIA-LD, 85% with at least one episode of macrophage activation syndrome and 41% with adverse reactions to a biologic. Although 93% of patients were alive at last follow-up (median 2.9 years), 37% progressed to requiring chronic oxygen or other ventilator support, and 65% of patients had abnormal overnight oximetry studies, which changed over time. Eighty-four percent of patients carried the HLA-DRB1*15 haplotype, significantly more than patients without LD. Patients with SJIA-LD also showed markedly elevated serum interleukin-18 (IL-18), variable C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), and significantly elevated matrix metalloproteinase 7. Treatment strategies showed variable use of anti-IL-1/6 biologics and addition of other immunomodulatory treatments and lung-directed therapies. We found a broad range of current clinical status independent of time from diagnosis or continued biologic treatment. Multidomain measures of change showed imaging features were the least likely to improve with time.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SJIA-LD had highly varied courses, with lower mortality than previously reported but frequent hypoxia and requirement for respiratory support. Treatment strategies were highly varied, highlighting an urgent need for focused clinical trials.

Recent advances and evolving concepts in Still's disease

Still's disease is a rare inflammatory syndrome that encompasses systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still's disease, both of which can exhibit life-threatening complications, including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a secondary form of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Genetic insights into Still's disease involve both HLA and non-HLA susceptibility genes, suggesting the involvement of adaptive immune cell-mediated immunity. At the same time, phenotypic evidence indicates the involvement of autoinflammatory processes. Evidence also implicates the type I interferon signature, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 signalling and ferritin in the pathogenesis of Still's disease and MAS. Pathological entities associated with Still's disease include lung disease that could be associated with biologic DMARDs and with the occurrence of MAS. Historically, monophasic, recurrent and persistent Still's disease courses were recognized. Newer proposals of alternative Still's disease clusters could enable better dissection of clinical heterogeneity on the basis of immune cell profiles that could represent diverse endotypes or phases of disease activity. Therapeutically, data on IL-1 and IL-6 antagonism and Janus kinase inhibition suggest the importance of early administration in Still's disease. Furthermore, there is evidence that patients who develop MAS can be treated with IFNγ antagonism. Despite these developments, unmet needs remain that can form the basis for the design of future studies leading to improvement of disease management.

IL-1 Family Blockade in Cytokine Storm Syndromes

Interleukin-1 is a prototypic proinflammatory cytokine that is elevated in cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs), such as secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). IL-1 has many pleotropic and redundant roles in both innate and adaptive immune responses. Blockade of IL-1 with recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor antagonist has shown efficacy in treating CSS. Recently, an IL-1 family member, IL-18, has been demonstrated to be contributory to CSS in autoinflammatory conditions, such as in inflammasomopathies (e.g., NLRC4 mutations). Anecdotally, recombinant IL-18 binding protein can be of benefit in treating IL-18-driven CSS. Lastly, another IL-1 family member, IL-33, has been postulated to contribute to CSS in an animal model of disease. Targeting of IL-1 and related cytokines holds promise in treating a variety of CSS.

Cytokine Storm Syndrome Associated with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) has widely been referred to as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). In this chapter, we use the term sJIA-associated CSS (sJIA-CSS) when referring to this syndrome and use the term MAS when referencing publications that specifically report on sJIA-associated MAS.

Cytokines in Cytokine Storm Syndrome

As the eponymous mediators of the cytokine storm syndrome, cytokines are a pleomorphic and diverse set of soluble molecules that activate or suppress immune functions in a wide variety of ways. The relevant cytokines for each CSS are likely a result of differing combinations of environmental triggers and host susceptibilities. Because cytokines or their receptors may be specifically targeted by biologic therapeutics, understanding which cytokines are relevant for disease initiation and propagation for each unique CSS is of major clinical importance. This chapter will review what is known about the role of cytokines across the spectrum of CSS.

The latest advances in the use of biological DMARDs to treat Still's disease

INTRODUCTION

Currently, the therapeutic management of Still's disease, a multisystemic inflammatory rare disorder, is directed to target the inflammatory symptoms and signs of patients. The treatment varies from glucocorticoids to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), both conventional synthetic and biological (bDMARDs). Usually, in refractory patients, bDMARDs are administered.

AREAS COVERED

Among bDMARDs, IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors are frequently used, as data reported from both clinical trials and 'real-life' experiences. Recently, innovative therapeutic strategies have suggested an early administration of bDMARDs to increase the rate of clinical response and drug-free remission. Some new targets have been also proposed targeting IL-18, IFN-γ, and JAK/STAT pathway, which could be applied to Still's disease and its life-threatening evolution.

EXPERT OPINION

Many lines of evidence improved the knowledge about the therapeutic management of Still's disease with bDMARDs. However, many unmet needs may be still highlighted which could provide the basis to arrange further specific research in increasing the rate of clinical response. In fact, Still's disease remains a highly heterogeneous disease suggesting possible diverse underlying pathogenic mechanisms, at least partially, and consequent different therapeutic strategies. A better patient stratification may help in arranging specific studies to improve the long-term outcome of Still's disease.

Efficacy of canakinumab in patients with Still's disease across different lines of biologic therapy: real-life data from the International AIDA Network Registry for Still's Disease

Introduction

The effectiveness of canakinumab may change according to the different times it is used after Still's disease onset. This study aimed to investigate whether canakinumab (CAN) shows differences in short- and long-term therapeutic outcomes, according to its use as different lines of biologic treatment.

Methods

Patients included in this study were retrospectively enrolled from the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) International Registry dedicated to Still's disease. Seventy-seven (51 females and 26 males) patients with Still's disease were included in the present study. In total, 39 (50.6%) patients underwent CAN as a first-line biologic agent, and the remaining 38 (49.4%) patients were treated with CAN as a second-line biologic agent or subsequent biologic agent.

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between patients treated with CAN as a first-line biologic agent and those previously treated with other biologic agents in terms of the frequency of complete response (p =0.62), partial response (p =0.61), treatment failure (p >0.99), and frequency of patients discontinuing CAN due to lack or loss of efficacy (p =0.2). Of all the patients, 18 (23.4%) patients experienced disease relapse during canakinumab treatment, 9 patients were treated with canakinumab as a first-line biologic agent, and nine patients were treated with a second-line or subsequent biologic agent. No differences were found in the frequency of glucocorticoid use (p =0.34), daily glucocorticoid dosage (p =0.47), or concomitant methotrexate dosage (p =0.43) at the last assessment during CAN treatment.

Conclusion

Canakinumab has proved to be effective in patients with Still's disease, regardless of its line of biologic treatment.

Rheumatoid factor value for determining the first biologic agent to use for non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Currently, no indicators on which biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be used first for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) have been established. Thus, this study aimed to determine the useful biomarkers in JIA to enable the best selection of the first bDMARDs without primary failure.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data of patients examined for JIA between 2015 and 2021 at Kagoshima University Hospital in Japan.

RESULTS

Altogether, 67 cases of non-systemic JIA were analyzed, excluding cases that had been treated for <6 months. Of the 67 cases, 52 were treated with bDMARDs and all rheumatoid factor (RF)+ types (32 cases) were treated with bDMARDs. Eleven cases (31.4&) (all were RF+ types and used anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α agents) switched to other bDMARDs because of primary failure, and nine cases had secondary failure (6;anti-TNF, 3;anti-Interleukin-6). A significant difference in pre-treatment RF values (177.9 vs 25.7 IU/ml, p = 0.002) and presence (Odds Ratio 1.952,p = 0.004) were observed between the primary failure group and effective group.

CONCLUSIONS

RF+ JIA required bDMARDs with high probability. JIA with high titre of RF tends to be refractory to anti-TNFα agents. Tocilizumab or abatacept could be a first-choice bDMARD in such cases.

Molecular Pathways in the Pathogenesis of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare childhood chronic inflammatory disorder with risk for life-threatening complications including macrophage activation syndrome and lung disease. At onset, sJIA pathogenesis resembles that of the autoinflammatory periodic fever syndromes with marked innate immune activation, expansion of neutrophils and monocytes, and high levels of interleukin-18. Here, we review the current conceptual understanding of sJIA pathogenesis with a focus on both innate and adaptive immune pathways. Finally, we consider how recent progress toward understanding the immunologic basis of sJIA may support new therapies for refractory disease courses.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Eosinophilia and Lung Disease in Biologic-Exposed Children With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Although interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-6 inhibitors are effective therapies for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), some patients develop eosinophilia and lung disease during treatment. This study was undertaken to retrospectively evaluate incidence and risk factors for eosinophilia and describe lung disease outcomes in IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor-exposed patients with systemic JIA.

METHODS

Among JIA patients at our institution exposed to interleukin-1 (IL-1)/IL-6 inhibitors (1995-2022), we compared incidence rate of eosinophilia in systemic JIA compared to other JIA, stratified by medication class (IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors, other cytokine inhibitors, methotrexate). We used Cox models to identify predictors of eosinophilia during IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor use and summarized treatment changes and outcomes after eosinophilia, including lung disease. HLA typing was performed on a clinical or research basis.

RESULTS

There were 264 new medication exposures in 75 patients with systemic JIA and 41 patients with other JIA. A total of 49% of patients with systemic JIA with HLA typing (n = 45) were positive for HLA-DRB1*15 alleles. Eosinophilia was common during IL-1/IL-6 inhibitor use and did not differ by systemic JIA compared to other JIA (0.08 and 0.07 per person-year, respectively; P = 0.30). Among systemic JIA patients, pretreatment macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) was associated with a higher rate of subsequent eosinophilia on biologic therapy (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.2 [95% confidence interval 1.2-8.3]). A total of 4 of 5 patients who switched therapy within 10 weeks of eosinophilia experienced disease flare compared to none of the patients who continued the original therapy. A total of 8 of 25 patients with pulmonary evaluations had lung disease, and all had severe manifestations of systemic JIA (MAS, intensive care unit stay). One death was attributed to systemic JIA-lung disease.

CONCLUSION

Eosinophilia is common in JIA patients using IL-1/IL-6 inhibitors. Severe disease may be associated with eosinophilia and lung disease in systemic JIA.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: The Great Ormond Street Hospital experience (2005-2021)

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex, systemic inflammatory disorder driven by both innate and adaptive immunity. Improved understanding of sJIA pathophysiology has led to recent therapeutic advances including a growing evidence base for the earlier use of IL-1 or IL-6 blockade as first-line treatment. We conducted a retrospective case notes review of patients diagnosed with sJIA over a 16-year period (October 2005-October 2021) at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. We describe the clinical presentation, therapeutic interventions, complications, and remission rates at different timepoints over the disease course. We examined our data, which spanned a period of changing therapeutic landscape, to try and identify potential therapeutic signals in patients who received biologic treatment early in the disease course compared to those who did not. A total of 76-children (female n = 40, 53%) were diagnosed with sJIA, median age 4.5 years (range 0.6-14.1); 36% (27/76) presented with suspected or confirmed macrophage activation syndrome. A biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) alone was commenced as first-line treatment in 28% (n = 21/76) of the cohort; however, at last review, 84% (n = 64/76) had received treatment with a bDMARD. Clinically inactive disease (CID) was achieved by 88% (n = 67/76) of the cohort at last review; however, only 32% (24/76) achieved treatment-free CID. At 1-year follow-up, CID was achieved in a significantly greater proportion of children who received treatment with a bDMARD within 3 months of diagnosis compared to those who did not (90% vs. 53%, p = 0.002). Based on an ever-increasing evidence base for the earlier use of bDMARD in sJIA and our experience of the largest UK single-centre case series described to date, we now propose a new therapeutic pathway for children diagnosed with sJIA in the UK based on early use of bDMARDs. Reappraisal of the current National Health Service commissioning pathway for sJIA is now urgently required.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its associated uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatologic disease in children. Uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation of JIA, and it can be a sight-threatening condition.

AREAS COVERED

In this review article, we discussed epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, supportive laboratory tests, treatment options, and complications of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis. We covered conventional immunomodulatory therapy and biologic response modifiers agents for different types of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their associated uveitis. Finally, we discussed the course of disease, functional outcome, and the quality of life of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Although clinical outcomes of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its associated uveitis have been improved over the past three decades by biologic response modifier agents, a significant proportion of patients require active treatment into adult life therefore screening and monitoring of these patients is required during the patient's entire life. The limited number of food and drug administration approved biologic response modifier agents for the treatment of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis justify more randomized clinical trials with new medications in this field.

Biological therapies for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: current knowledge and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperinflammatory syndrome with a dismal prognosis. The underlying causes of HLH are diverse. However, the overabundance of cytokines was shared by all forms of HLH. Cytokine-targeted biotherapies have been increasingly used in HLH treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we aim to provide an overview of biological treatment options for HLH.

EXPERT OPINION

Biological therapies offer alternative treatment options for patients with refractory/relapsed HLH or who are intolerant to conventional chemotherapies. As a complement to traditional treatment, biological agents improve response rates, maintain more protracted periods of remission, and reduce treatment related toxicity. A combination of biological agents may be a promising direction for HLH treatment. However, they may induce HLH to deteriorate and even trigger HLH.

Withdrawal of biologic therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis due to remission: predictors of flare and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To investigate patients who flared after discontinuation of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic agents (bDMARDs) and identify risk factors associated with flare.

METHODS

A multicenter study evaluating systemic and non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA and non-sJIA) patients whose bDMARDs were ceased after remission.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients whose bDMARDs were ceased after remission was evaluated. Children with sJIA had the lowest risk of flare and 11.1% of 36 sJIA patients experienced flare after a median of 9 (4-24) months of bDMARDs cessation with three of them flaring in the first year. High leukocyte counts in sJIA patients were associated with inactive disease at 1-year after the start of treatment (p = 0.004). In the non-sJIA group, 46.1% patients experienced flare after a median of 7 (1-32) months of biologic cessation, and of these, 25 flared in the first year. Antinuclear antibody positivity (p = 0.02), earlier disease onset (p = 0.03), long disease duration (p = 0.01), and follow-up (p = 0.02) and extended time from diagnosis to first biological onset (p = 0.03) were more common among patients with flare.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering discontinuation of bDMARDs, it should be kept in mind that the risk of exacerbation requiring re-initiation therapy is quite significant within the first year after discontinuation of therapy.

Use of Intravenous Anakinra for Management of Pediatric Cytokine Storm Syndromes at an Academic Medical Center

Background: Off-label intravenous (IV) route of anakinra is increasingly recognized to enable higher and faster maximal plasma concentrations than subcutaneous route for treatment of cytokine storm syndromes. Objective: To describe off-label indications of IV anakinra, corresponding dosing and safety profiles, particularly during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A retrospective, single-cohort study was conducted at an academic medical center to evaluate use of IV anakinra in hospitalized pediatric patients (age ≤21 years). Institutional Review Board review was considered exempt. The primary endpoint was the primary indication(s) for IV anakinra. The key secondary endpoints were dosing of IV anakinra, previous immunomodulatory therapies, and adverse events. Results: Of 14 pediatric patients, 8 (57.1%) received IV anakinra for treatment of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19, whereas 3 and 2 were treated for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and flares of systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA), respectively. The initial dosing regimen of IV anakinra for MIS-C associated with COVID-19 was a median dose of 2.25 mg/kg/dose with a median dosing interval of 12 hours for a median initial treatment duration of 3.5 days. Eleven (78.6%) patients received previous immunomodulatory therapies (IV immune globulin [n = 10; 71.4%] and steroids [n = 9; 64.3%]). No adverse drug events were documented. Conclusion: IV anakinra was used off-label for treatment of MIS-C associated with COVID-19, HLH and SoJIA flares in critically ill patients with no adverse drug events documented. This study helped ascertain the off-label indications of IV anakinra and corresponding patient characteristics.

High-dose intravenous anakinra treatment is safe and effective in severe and critical COVID-19 patients: a propensity score-matched study in a single center

BACKGROUND

In COVID-19, severe disease course such as need of intensive care unit (ICU) as well as development of mortality is mainly due to cytokine storm. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the high-dose intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with severe and critically ill COVID-19 compared to standard of care.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of two groups as follows: the patients receiving high-dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) between 01.09.2021 and 01.02.2022 and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC, control group) as historical control group who were hospitalized between 01.07.2021 and 01.09.2021.

RESULTS

After the propensity score 1:1 matching, 79 patients in anakinra and 79 patients in SoC matched and were included into the analysis. Mean ± SD patient age was 67.4 ± 16.7 and 67.1 ± 16.3 years in anakinra and SoC groups, respectively (p = 0.9). Male gender was 38 (48.7%) in anakinra and 36 (46.2%) in SoC (p = 0.8). Overall, ICU admission was in 14.1% (n = 11) and 30.8% (n = 24) (p = 0.013; OR 6.2), intubation in 12.8% (n = 10) and 16.7% (n = 13) patients (p = 0.5), and 14.1% (n = 11) and 32.1% (n = 25) patients died in anakinra and control groups, respectively (p = 0.008; OR 7.1).

CONCLUSION

In our study, mortality was lower in patients receiving anakinra compared to SoC. Intravenous high-dose anakinra is safe and effective treatment in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.

Plausible Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome and Associated Cytokines in Pathogenesis of Rheumatic Heart Disease

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is a post-streptococcal sequela caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. The global burden of disease is high among people with low socio-economic status, with significant cases emerging every year despite global eradication efforts. The current treatment includes antibiotic therapies to target strep throat and rheumatic fever and valve replacement strategies as a corrective measure for chronic RHD patients. Valvular damage and valve calcification are considered to be the end-stage processes of the disease resulting from impairment of the endothelial arrangement due to immune infiltration. This immune infiltration is mediated by a cascade of events involving NLRP3 inflammasome activation. NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by wide range of stimuli including bacterial cell wall components like M proteins and leukocidal toxins like nicotinamide dehydrogenase (NADase) and streptolysin O (SLO) and these play a major role in sustaining the virulence of Streptococcus pyogenes and progression of RHD. In this review, we are discussing NLRP3 inflammasome and its plausible role in the pathogenesis of RHD by exploiting the host-pathogen interaction mainly focusing on the NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. Different therapeutic approaches involving NLRP3 inflammasome inactivation, caspase-1 inhibition, and blockade of IL-1β and IL-18 are discussed in this review and may be promising for treating RHD patients.

Fatal Pulmonary Veno-Occlusive Disease and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Case Report and Literature Review

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a chronic childhood inflammatory disease. SJIA accounts for approximately 5-15 per cent of all cases of JIA and has a high morbidity and mortality rate. In this disease, pulmonary complications (PC) other than pleuritis are much less frequent and not easily recognised by clinicians. Pulmonary hypertension, the most severe PC, is associated with uncontrolled disease and use of biologic therapies. We present a case of a school-age female with sJIA who died of acute cardiopulmonary instability secondary to pulmonary venous-occlusive disease demonstrated by necropsy. We describe her clinical evolution. We also undertook a narrative review of the literature about PC in sJIA to discuss the current state of the art regarding this complication. High disease activity and the use of multiple therapies include disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs should be a red flag for clinicians when discounting PC and pulmonary hypertension. The combination of chest X-ray, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram appear to be the best tests to achieve an early diagnosis.

Canakinumab as first-line biological therapy in Still's disease and differences between the systemic and the chronic-articular courses: Real-life experience from the international AIDA registry

Objective

Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors are largely employed in patients with Still's disease; in cases with refractory arthritis, IL-6 inhibitors have shown to be effective on articular inflammatory involvement. The aim of the present study is to assess any difference in the effectiveness of the IL-1β antagonist canakinumab prescribed as first-line biologic agent between the systemic and the chronic-articular Still's disease.

Methods

Data were drawn from the retrospective phase of the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) international registry dedicated to Still's disease. Patients with Still's disease classified according to internationally accepted criteria (Yamaguchi criteria and/or Fautrel criteria) and treated with canakinumab as first-line biologic agent were enrolled.

Results

A total of 26 patients (17 females, 9 males; 18 patients developing Still's disease after the age of 16 years) were enrolled; 16 (61.5%) patients suffered from the systemic pattern of the disease; 10 (38.5%) patients suffered from the chronic-articular type. No differences were observed between the systemic and the chronic-articular Still's disease in the frequency of complete response, of flares after the start of canakinumab (p = 0.701) and in the persistence in therapy (p = 0.62). No statistical differences were observed between the two groups after 3 months, 12 months and at the last assessment in the decrease of: the systemic activity score (p = 0.06, p = 0.17, p = 0.17, respectively); the disease activity score on 28 joints (p = 0.54, p = 0.77, p = 0.98, respectively); the glucocorticoid dosage (p = 0.15, p = 0.50, and p = 0.50, respectively); the use of concomitant disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (p = 0.10, p = 1.00, and p = 1.00, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in the decrease of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.34), C reactive protein (p = 0.48), and serum ferritin levels (p = 0.34) after the start of canakinumab.

Conclusion

Canakinumab used for Still's disease has been effective in controlling both clinical and laboratory manifestations disregarding the type of disease course when used as first-line biotechnological agent. These excellent results might have been further enhanced by the early start of IL-1 inhibition.

First-line options for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatment: an observational study of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Treatment Plans

BACKGROUND

The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) developed consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to compare treatment initiation strategies for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). First-line options for sJIA treatment (FROST) was a prospective observational study to assess CTP outcomes using the CARRA Registry.

METHODS

Patients with new-onset sJIA were enrolled if they received initial treatment according to the biologic CTPs (IL-1 or IL-6 inhibitor) or non-biologic CTPs (glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy or methotrexate). CTPs could be used with or without systemic GC. Primary outcome was achievement of clinical inactive disease (CID) at 9 months without current use of GC. Due to the small numbers of patients in the non-biologic CTPs, no statistical comparisons were made between the CTPs.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were enrolled: 63 (86%) in the biologic CTPs and 10 (14%) in the non-biologic CTPs. CTP choice appeared to be strongly influenced by physician preference. During the first month of follow-up, oral GC use was observed in 54% of biologic CTP patients and 90% of non-biologic CTPs patients. Five (50%) non-biologic CTP patients subsequently received biologics within 4 months of follow-up. Overall, 30/53 (57%) of patients achieved CID at 9 months without current GC use.

CONCLUSION

Nearly all patients received treatment with biologics during the study period, and 46% of biologic CTP patients did not receive oral GC within the first month of treatment. The majority of patients had favorable short-term clinical outcomes. Increased use of biologics and decreased use of GC may lead to improved outcomes in sJIA.

Lung Involvement in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Narrative Review

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with lung disorders (sJIA-LD) is a subtype of sJIA characterized by the presence of chronic life-threatening pulmonary disorders, such as pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and/or endogenous lipoid pneumonia, which were exceptionally rare before 2013. Clinically, these children show a striking dissociation between the relatively mild clinical manifestations (tachypnoea, clubbing and chronic cough) and the severity of the pulmonary inflammatory process. Our review describes sJIA-LD as having a reported prevalence of approximately 6.8%, with a mortality rate of between 37% and 68%. It is often associated with an early onset (<2 years of age), macrophage activation syndrome and high interleukin (IL)-18 circulating levels. Other risk factors may be trisomy 21 and a predisposition to adverse reactions to biological drugs. The most popular hypothesis is that the increase in the number of sJIA-LD cases can be attributed to the increased use of IL-1 and IL-6 blockers. Two possible explanations have been proposed, named the “DRESS hypothesis” and the “cytokine plasticity hypothesis”. Lung ultrasounds and the intercellular-adhesion-molecule-5 assay seem to be promising tools for the early diagnosis of sJIA-LD, although high resolution computed tomography remains the gold standard. In this review, we also summarize the treatment options for sJIA-LD, focusing on JAK inhibitors.

Refractory systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: current challenges and future perspectives

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) is a rare disease with distinct features not seen in other categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. In recent years, advances in the understanding of disease immunopathogenesis have led to improved targeted therapies with significant improvement in patient outcomes. Despite these advances, there remain subsets of SJIA with refractory disease and severe disease-associated complications. This review highlights existing options for treatment of refractory SJIA and explores potential future therapeutics for refractory disease.Key Points:Despite targeted Interleukin IL-1 and IL-6 inhibitors a subset of SJIA remains refractory to therapy. About 1 in 7 SJIA patients will be refractory to targeted IL-1 or IL-6 therapy.There is no current agreed upon definition for refractory SJIA and we propose in this review that refractory SJIA is presence of active systemic or arthritic features despite treatment with anti-IL-1 or anti-IL-6 therapy or disease requiring glucocorticoids for control beyond 6 months.SJIA disease associated complications include presence of associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), interstitial lung disease (ILD) or amyloidosis and management of each differs.Refractory SJIA treatment options currently include additional conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDS), biologic (bDMARDS), combination biologic therapy, targeted synthetic (tsDMARDS) or other immunomodulatory therapies.

mTORC1 links pathology in experimental models of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome

Still's disease is a severe inflammatory syndrome characterized by fever, skin rash and arthritis affecting children and adults. Patients with Still's disease may also develop macrophage activation syndrome, a potentially fatal complication of immune dysregulation resulting in cytokine storm. Here we show that mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) underpins the pathology of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome. Single-cell RNA sequencing in a murine model of Still's disease shows preferential activation of mTORC1 in monocytes; both mTOR inhibition and monocyte depletion attenuate disease severity. Transcriptomic data from patients with Still's disease suggest decreased expression of the mTORC1 inhibitors TSC1/TSC2 and an mTORC1 gene signature that strongly correlates with disease activity and treatment response. Unrestricted activation of mTORC1 by Tsc2 deletion in mice is sufficient to trigger a Still's disease-like syndrome, including both inflammatory arthritis and macrophage activation syndrome with hemophagocytosis, a cellular manifestation that is reproduced in human monocytes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated deletion of TSC2. Consistent with this observation, hemophagocytic histiocytes from patients with macrophage activation syndrome display prominent mTORC1 activity. Our study suggests a mechanistic link of mTORC1 to inflammation that connects the pathogenesis of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome.

Effectiveness and Safety of High-Dose Biologics in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance

OBJECTIVE

To describe high-dose biologic use when treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

Patients with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry and treated with a biologic after enrollment were eligible. We described the frequency of high-dose biologic use and characteristics of patients receiving high-dose biologics. We used regression modeling to compare 6-month outcomes (using disease activity measures) between those who increased their biologic from standard to high dose (high-dose group) to those who initiated and remained on standard dosing (no-change group), and to those who switched biologic agents (biologic-switch group). We also compared serious adverse events (SAEs) between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 5,352 patients with JIA were treated with biologics following enrollment; 1,080 (20%) had ever received a high-dose biologic. There were no significant differences in outcomes between the high-dose group and the biologic-switch group; both improved disease activity measures, including the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (-3.53 and -3.95, respectively; P = 0.68). Although the SAE rates in the high-dose group and the biologic-switch group were numerically higher than the no-change group, the event rates were similar, and neither rate was significantly higher than in the no-change group (unadjusted incident rate ratio 2.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.7-8.5] and 1.8 [95% CI 0.7-4.6], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Dosing escalation appears to be a reasonable choice to improve disease control, but large, prospective, randomized studies evaluating specific biologic agents are needed.

Renal involvement as a unique manifestation of hemophagocytic syndrome

Renal-limited hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) is a rare clinical setting characterized by abnormal activation of the immune system. Fever associated with pancytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly with liver dysfunction, and hypofibrinogenemia are usually observed in HPS. From a histological level, the presence of non-malignant macrophages infiltrating bone marrow and organs represents the hallmark of this condition. Non-malignant macrophages are associated with phagocytizing activities involving other blood cells. While primary HPS is usually associated with inherited dysregulation of the immune system, secondary HPS usually occurs in the context of infection or is linked to a neoplastic process. Clinical presentation varies and can potentially lead to life-threatening settings. While renal involvement has frequently been reported, however, detailed descriptions of the kidney manifestations of HPS are lacking. More critically, the diagnosis of HPS is rarely supported by renal biopsy specimens. We report four rare cases of biopsy-proven renal-limited HPS in patients presenting with acute kidney injury (AKI). The available evidence on this topic is critically discussed in light of the possible emergence of an autonomous entity characterized by an isolated kidney involvement.

Macrophage activation syndrome in adults: Characteristics, outcomes, and therapeutic effectiveness of etoposide-based regimen

Objectives

To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) patients and to provide experience for the treatment.

Methods

Adult patients with MAS admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital from December 2014 to September 2021 were enrolled in this study. Clinical data of patients were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 118 adult MAS patients entered this study. MAS was the first manifestation in 43 (36.4%) patients, while 75 (63.6%) developed MAS after the diagnosis of autoimmune disease (AID) with a median diagnostic interval of 2 (0.5–359) months. Eighty-two patients were initially treated with glucocorticoid-based regimen; the overall response (OR) rate at the 2-week posttreatment was 37.8%. Forty-five patients switched to etoposide-based regimen, and the OR rate was 84.4%. Thirty-six patients were initially treated with etoposide-based regimen, and the OR rate at the 2-week posttreatment was 80.6%. Serum IL-18 (P = 0.021), IFN-γ (P = 0.013), IP-10 (P = 0.001), IL-10 (P = 0.041), IL-1RA (P < 0.001), and TNF-α (P = 0.020) levels of patients were significantly decreased in the remission phase than in the active phase. Levels of SDF-1α (P = 0.018) and IL-7 (P = 0.022) were higher in refractory patients, while the GRO-α level had a strong tendency toward statistical significance (P = 0.050). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 3, 6, and 36 months after HLH diagnosis were 89.8%, 89.0%, and 87.9%, retrospectively. The active MAS status at the 2-week post initial treatment [P = 0.009, HR = 15.281, 95% CI, (0.1.972, 118.430)] and baseline neutrophil count (Neu) <1.5 × 10⁹/l [P = 0.017, HR = 3.678, 95% CI, (1.267, 10.672)] were negative prognostic factors.

Conclusion

MAS typically occurs within 2 months after the onset of autoimmune disease in adults. SDF-1α, IL-7, and GRO-α could be used to predict refractory MAS. The etoposide-based regimen is effective and tolerable for adult MAS.

The Conundrum of Lung Disease and Drug Hypersensitivity-like Reactions in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

An unusual form of lung disease has begun to affect some children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), coincident with increasing utilization of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6 antagonists. Many children with systemic JIA-associated lung disease (SJIA-LD) have a history of clinical and laboratory features resembling drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), a presentation now convincingly associated with HLA-DRB1*15. Treatment of DRESS typically requires drug discontinuation, a daunting prospect for clinicians and families who rely upon these agents. Here we review SJIA-LD and its associated DRESS-like phenotype. We suggest an alternative explanation, the cytokine plasticity hypothesis, proposing that IL-1 and IL-6 blockers modulate the milieu in which T cells develop, leading to a pathologic immune response triggered through exposure to common microbes, or to other exogenous or endogenous antigens, rather than to the drugs themselves. This hypothesis differs from DRESS in mechanism but also in clinical implications, predicting that control of pathogenic T cells could permit continued use of IL-1 and IL-6 antagonists in some individuals. The spectrum posed by these two hypotheses provides a conceptual framework that will guide investigation into the pathogenesis of SJIA-LD and may open up new therapeutic avenues for patients with systemic JIA.

Burden of comorbid conditions in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a collaborative analysis of 3 JIA registries

OBJECTIVES

Burden of comorbidities are largely unknown in JIA. From 2000, national and international patient registries were established to monitor biologic treatment, disease activity and adverse events in patients with JIA. The aim of this analysis was to investigate in parallel, for the first time, three of the largest JIA registries in Europe/internationally-UK JIA Biologic Registers (BCRD/BSPAR-ETN), German biologic registers (BiKeR/JuMBO), multinational Pharmachild-to quantify the occurrence of selected comorbidities in patients with JIA.

METHODS

Information on which data the registers collect were compared. Patient characteristics and levels of comorbidity were presented, focussing on four key conditions: uveitis, MAS, varicella, and history of tuberculosis. Incidence rates of these on MTX/biologic therapy were determined.

RESULTS

8066 patients were registered into the three JIA registers with similar history of the four comorbidities across the studies; however, varicella vaccination coverage was higher in Germany (56%) vs UK/Pharmachild (16%/13%). At final follow-up, prevalence of varicella infection was lower in Germany (15%) vs UK/Pharmachild (37%/50%). Prevalence of TB (0.1-1.8%) and uveitis (15-19%) was similar across all registers. The proportion of systemic-JIA patients who ever had MAS was lower in Germany (6%) vs UK (15%) and Pharmachild (17%).

CONCLUSION

This analysis is the first and largest to investigate the occurrence of four important comorbidities in three JIA registries in Europe and the role of anti-rheumatic drugs. Combined, these three registries represent one of the biggest collection of cases of JIA worldwide and offer a unique setting for future JIA outcome studies.

Rheumatoid arthritis: current therapeutics compendium

Rheumatoid arthritis is a common chronic inflammatory disease with substantial economic, social, and personal costs. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial and complex. The ultimate goal of rheumatoid arthritis treatment is stopping or slowing down the disease progression. In the past two decades, invention of new medicines, especially biologic agents, revolutionized the management of this disease. These agents have been associated with an improved prognosis and clinical remission, especially in patients who did not respond to traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Improvement in the understanding of the rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis leads to the development of novel biologic therapeutic approaches. In the present paper, we summarized the current therapeutics, especially biologic agents, available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

B Cells on the Stage of Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Leading or Supporting Actors in Disease Pathogenesis?

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a term that collectively refers to a group of chronic childhood arthritides, which together constitute the most common rheumatic condition in children. The International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) criteria define seven categories of JIA: oligoarticular, polyarticular rheumatoid factor (RF) negative (RF-), polyarticular RF positive (RF+), systemic, enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated arthritis. The ILAR classification includes persistent and extended oligoarthritis as subcategories of oligoarticular JIA, but not as distinct categories. JIA is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process affecting the synovia that begins before the age of 16 and persists at least 6 weeks. If not treated, JIA can cause significant disability and loss of quality of life. Treatment of JIA is adjusted according to the severity of the disease as combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), synthetic and/ or biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although the disease etiology is unknown, disturbances in innate and adaptive immune responses have been implicated in JIA development. B cells may have important roles in JIA pathogenesis through autoantibody production, antigen presentation, cytokine release and/ or T cell activation. The study of B cells has not been extensively explored in JIA, but evidence from the literature suggests that B cells might have indeed a relevant role in JIA pathophysiology. The detection of autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) in JIA patients supports a breakdown in B cell tolerance. Furthermore, alterations in B cell subpopulations have been documented in peripheral blood and synovial fluid from JIA patients. In fact, altered B cell homeostasis, B cell differentiation and B cell hyperactivity have been described in JIA. Of note, B cell depletion therapy with rituximab has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment in children with JIA, which further supports B cell intervention in disease development.

Anakinra in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Long-term Safety From the Pharmachild Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

Data from patients with sJIA enrolled in the Pharmachild registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03932344) prior to September 30, 2018, and treated with anakinra were analyzed. The study endpoints were the occurrence of non-serious adverse events (SAEs) of at least moderate severity and SAEs, including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and the duration of anakinra treatment with reasons for discontinuation. All endpoints were analyzed overall by 6-month time windows, and in different treatment sets represented by those patients treated continuously with anakinra for at least 12, 18, and 24 months (set-12, -18, and -24, respectively).

RESULTS

Three hundred six patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 46%, 34%, and 28% had been treated for at least 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Two hundred and one AEs, mostly represented by infections, were reported for 509.3 patient-years (PY) with an overall incidence rate (IR) of 39.5 per 100 PY. Among 56 SAEs (IR 11.0/100 PY), 23.2% were infections and 19.6% MAS episodes. The IR of AEs was higher during the first 6 months of anakinra treatment, followed by decreasing IRs in the long-term treatment sets. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 76% of patients, most frequently in the first 6 months, because of inefficacy (43%), remission (31%), or AEs/intolerance (15%). No deaths or malignancies occurred during anakinra treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study confirm the long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with sJIA and demonstrate an overall decreasing incidence of AEs over time. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01399281 and NCT03932344].

Role of Distinct Macrophage Populations in the Development of Heart Failure in Macrophage Activation Syndrome

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is one of the few entities in rheumatology with the potential to quickly cause multiple organ failure and loss of life, and as such, requires urgent clinical intervention. It has a broad symptomatology, depending on the organs it affects. One especially dangerous aspect of MAS’s course of illness is myocarditis leading to acute heart failure and possibly death. Research in recent years has proved that macrophages settled in different organs are not a homogenous group, with particular populations differing in both structure and function. Within the heart, we can determine two major groups, based on the presence of the C-C 2 chemokine receptor (CCR2): CCR2+ and CCR2−. There are a number of studies describing their function and the changes in the population makeup between normal conditions and different illnesses; however, to our knowledge, there has not been one touching on the matter of changes occurring in the populations of heart macrophages during MAS and their possible consequences. This review summarizes the most recent knowledge on heart macrophages, the influence of select cytokines (those particularly significant in the development of MAS) on their activity, and both the immediate and long-term consequences of changes in the makeup of specific macrophage populations—especially the loss of CCR2− cells that are responsible for regenerative processes, as well as the substitution of tissue macrophages by the highly proinflammatory CCR2+ macrophages originating from circulating monocytes. Understanding the significance of these processes may lead to new discoveries that could improve the therapeutic methods in the treatment of MAS.

[Still's syndrome-similarities and differences between the juvenile and adult forms]

Still's syndrome includes systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and the adult form of Still's disease (adult-onset Still's disease, AOSD). Except for age, there are many similarities between sJIA and AOSD. A biphasic disease model is currently put forth. At disease onset, autoinflammation predominates, which is caused by dysregulation of the innate immune system. Later on, the disease can progress to a chronic-articular form, which is predominantly mediated by the adaptive immune system and is consequently due to autoimmunity. The "window-of-opportunity" hypothesis is based on this biphasic model and supports the assumption that an early, targeted therapy with cytokine blockade can prevent disease progression to chronic destructive arthritis. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a serious complication of the so-called cytokine storm during the systemic phase of the disease. Clinically, there are many similarities between sJIA and AOSD. Recurrent fever, a fleeting, salmon-colored rash, and arthralgia/arthritis are common signs and symptoms of both sJIA and AOSD. The few differences are mainly related to the therapies and their side effects in children versus adults. In addition, the contribution of genetics to pathogenesis is more pronounced in sJIA compared to AOSD, but there are also smooth transitions in this respect and both diseases are heavily influenced by exogenous factors such as microbial triggers. Future research aspects could include additional investigation of these triggers such as viruses, bacteria, or dysbiosis of the human microbiome.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term for arthritis of unknown origin, lasting for >6 weeks with onset before 16 years of age. JIA is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition of childhood. According to the International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) classification, seven mutually exclusive categories of JIA exist based on disease manifestations during the first 6 months of disease. Although the ILAR classification has been useful to foster research, it has been criticized mainly as it does not distinguish those forms of chronic arthritis observed in adults and in children from those that may be unique to childhood. Hence, efforts to provide a new evidence-based classification are ongoing. Similar to arthritis observed in adults, pathogenesis involves autoimmune and autoinflammatory mechanisms. The field has witnessed a remarkable improvement in therapeutic possibilities of JIA owing to the availability of new potent drugs and the possibility to perform controlled trials with support from legislative interventions and large networks availability. The goal of drug therapy in JIA is to rapidly reduce disease activity to inactive disease or clinical remission, minimize drug side effects and achieve a quality of life comparable to that of healthy peers. As JIA can influence all aspects of a child's and their family's life, researchers increasingly recognize improvement of health-related quality of life as a key treatment goal.

Anakinra in Paediatric Rheumatology and Periodic Fever Clinics: Is the Higher Dose Safe?

OBJECTIVE

Anakinra has been increasingly used in off-label indications as well as dosing and mode of administration in a variety of inflammatory conditions. We aimed to review our clinical practice and compare treatment outcomes with published data.

METHODS

Clinical data from electronic records were retrospectively reviewed for patients treated with anakinra over the past 6 years for autoinflammatory diseases (AID).

RESULTS

From 47 eligible patients (27 female patients), 32 were children. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) was the indication for anakinra therapy in 42.6% of patients. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) was the most common underlying diagnosis (19/47) followed by the spectrum of AID. Off-label use was noted in 38.3% patients. Recommended dose was exceeded in 21 children (mean induction dose 5.1, highest dose 29.4 mg/kg/day) and two adults; five patients were treated intravenously. The mean treatment duration for SJIA was 1.4 years, that for AID was 2.2 years, and that for patients with higher anakinra dose was 9.7 (19.3) months. The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 (1.7) years. Treatment was effective in the majority of SJIA and cryopyrinopathy patients as well as those with MAS. Anakinra was well-tolerated without any major adverse effects even in patients with long-term administration of higher than recommended doses including two infants treated with a dose of over 20 mg/kg/day.

CONCLUSION

Our results support early use of anakinra in the individually tailored dosing. In patients with hyperinflammation, anakinra may be lifesaving and may even allow for corticosteroid avoidance. Further studies are needed in order to set up generally accepted response parameters and define condition-specific optimal dosing regimen.

Reasons for Initiating Canakinumab among Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still's Disease in the U.S. Real-World Settings

Introduction

The aim of this study was to understand the reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with Still’s disease, including systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), in US clinical practice.

Methods

Physicians retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients with Still’s disease (regardless of age at symptom onset) who were prescribed canakinumab from 2016 to 2018. Patients aged < 16 years at symptom onset were classified as having SJIA and those aged ≥ 16 years at symptom onset (calculated from case-record forms) were classified as having AOSD. Patient treatment history and physician reasons for canakinumab initiation were analyzed. Overall results were presented as SJIA/AOSD. Sensitivity analyses were performed for the robustness of the results.

Results

Forty-three physicians in the USA (rheumatologists/dermatologists/immunologists/allergists: 51.2/27.9/11.6/9.3%; subspecialty in adults/pediatrics: 67.4/32.6%) abstracted information for 72 patients with SJIA/AOSD (SJIA/AOSD/age unknown at symptom onset: 75.0/18.1/6.9%; mean age 19.4 years; children 61.1%; females 56.9%). Most patients (90.3%) received treatment directly preceding canakinumab initiation (etanercept 27.7%; anakinra 18.5%; adalimumab 16.9%); the respective treatment was discontinued due to lack of efficacy/effectiveness (43.1%) and availability of a new treatment (27.8%). Most common reasons for canakinumab initiation were physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness of canakinumab (77.8%; children/adults: 81.8/71.4%), lack-of-response to previous treatment (45.8%; children/adults: 36.4/60.7%), convenient administration/dosing (26.4%; children/adults: 29.5/21.4%) and ability to discontinue/spare steroids (25.0%; children/adults: 20.5/32.1%). The sensitivity analysis provided similar results.

Conclusions

In US clinical practice, physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness of canakinumab and lack-of-response to previous treatment were the primary reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with SJIA/AOSD. Physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness and convenient administration/dosing of canakinumab were the most common reasons for canakinumab initiation among children, whereas lack-of-response to previous treatment and ability to discontinue/spare steroids being the most frequent reasons among adults.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00402-z.

A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Systemic Immune Activation Post Immunotherapy

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly a standard of care for many cancers; these agents can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including fever, which is common but can rarely be associated with systemic immune activation (SIA or acquired HLH).

Methods

All consecutive patients receiving ICIs in the Drug Development Unit of the Royal Marsden Hospital between May 2014 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with fever ≥ 38°C or chills/rigors (without fever) ≤ 6 weeks of commencing ICIs were identified for clinical data collection.

Results

Three patients met diagnostic criteria for SIA/HLH with median time to onset of symptoms of 10 days. We describe the clinical evolution, treatment used, and outcomes for these patients. High-dose steroids are used first-line with other treatments, such as tocilizumab, immunoglobulin and therapeutic plasmapheresis can be considered for steroid-refractory SIA/HLH.

Conclusion

SIA/HLH post ICI is a rare but a potentially fatal irAE that presents with fever and a constellation of nonspecific symptoms. Early recognition and timely treatment are key to improving outcomes.

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Refractory Disease Courses in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Refractory Arthritis, Recurrent Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Chronic Lung Disease

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a distinct and heterogeneous disease presently classified under the umbrella of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, with some patients following a monophasic remitting course, whereas others have persistent disease with chronic organ- and life-threatening complications. Although biologic therapies have revolutionized treatment, recent follow-up studies report significant numbers of children with persistently active disease on long term follow-up. This review focuses on refractory disease courses, specifically refractory arthritis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with recurrent, or longstanding signs of macrophage activation syndrome, and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with suspected, probable, or definite lung disease.

An Economic Comparison of Treatment Strategies with Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA)

Introduction

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA.

Methods

Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared.

Results

Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896).

Conclusion

The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.