Rate and Clinical Presentation of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Canakinumab

A MASsive attack: a pediatric case of macrophage activation syndrome complicated by DIC as an onset of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis successfully treated with anakinra and review of the literature

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is one of the most severe complications of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Around 10% of patients with sJIA exhibit systemic symptoms accompanied by macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), but it may occur subclinically in another 30-40%. In this article, we present a case of a 3-year-old girl diagnosed with sever MAS as an onset of sJIA complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). First symptoms of sJIA were observed about 5 months before setting the diagnose, and it was resembling urticaria. A comprehensive allergological diagnostics were conducted, but no cause for the skin changes was identified. A few weeks before admission to the hospital, the girl was presented with a high fever. During the hospital stay, viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were ruled out. However, the findings indicated significantly elevated markers of inflammation (ferritin, CRP, ESR) in the conducted tests. Meanwhile, swelling of the feet and ankle joints was also observed. Based on Ravelli criteria, we set the diagnosis of MAS in a course of sJIA. We implemented treatment with steroid pulses, followed by cyclosporine; however, her clinical condition did not improve. Despite intensive treatment, skin petechiae were observed twice, and laboratory tests revealed a very high INR along with an extremely low level of fibrinogen. The patient required multiple plasma transfusions and clotting factor administrations. Due to the severe condition of the girl, we initiated biological treatment with anakinra, after which the child's condition gradually improved. In this case, we want to present how dynamic and life-threatening the course of MAS can be. In the discussion, we are also comparing our approach and the applied treatment with the currently available knowledge.

Efficacy and safety of therapies for Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS): a systematic review informing the EULAR/PReS guidelines for the management of Still's disease

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the efficacy and safety of treatments for Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials (randomised, randomised controlled trial (RCT), controlled and clinical controlled trial (CCT)), observational studies (retrospective, longitudinal observational retrospective (LOR), prospective and longitudinal observational prospective (LOP)) and systematic reviews (SRs), in which the populations studied were patients with Still's disease and MAS. The intervention was any pharmacological treatment (approved or under evaluation) versus any comparator drug or placebo, and as outcomes, any relevant efficacy and safety event. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with the Cochrane RoB and AMSTAR-2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2, version 2) for SRs.

RESULTS

128 full texts were included: 25 RCTs, 1 CCT, 11 SRs published after 2013 and 91 LOP/LOR studies. In Still's disease, interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors (IL-1i) and IL-6R inhibitors (IL-6i) were the most studied drugs. Two meta-analyses on RCTs showed an OR, to achieve an ARC50 response rate, of 6.02 (95% CI 2.24 to 21.36) and 8.08 (95% CI 1.89 to 34.57) for IL-1i and IL-6Ri, respectively. Retrospective studies showed that early initiation of IL-1i or IL-6i was associated with high rates of clinically inactive disease. In MAS, GCs were employed in all patients, often associated with ciclosporin and/or anakinra. Rates of complete response were reported, with a range from 53% to 100%. Emapalumab was the only drug tested in a CCT, with a complete response of 93%.

CONCLUSION

IL-1i and IL-6Ri show the highest level of efficacy in the treatment of Still's disease. For MAS, IL-1 and interferon-γ inhibition appear to be effective on a background of high-dose glucocorticoids.

Macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis on anti-interleukin-1 or -6 therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anti-interleukin (IL)-1/-6 biologics on systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA)-associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).

METHODS

Demographic, clinical and laboratory data of patients followed up with a diagnosis of sJIA-associated MAS assessed from sixteen paediatric rheumatology centres across the country. The clinical and laboratory features of MAS developing while on biological drugs were compared with those without this treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two patients were included in the study. Forty-five of the MAS events were detected under the effect of anti-IL-1/-6 biologics, while the patients experiencing the remaining 155 events have not received biological treatment in the last three months. Platelet count [128 (72-232) vs 199 (130-371) 109/l], ferritin level on admission [1107 (676-2050) vs 2863 (1193-9562) ng/ml], C-reactive protein level [15.4 (2.9-56) vs 90 (32-160) mg/l], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [13 (3-36) vs 43.5 (13-77) mm/h] and fever duration [5 (4-7.5) vs 10 (7-14.3) days] were found lower in the group under the impact of anti-IL-1/-6 biologics. Among patients treated with biologics, 26.6% did not meet the published 2016 MAS classification criteria at presentation. The rates of hepatomegaly and splenomegaly were relatively lower in the canakinumab-treated group when compared with those receiving other biologicals or to patients, not on biologicals.

CONCLUSION

Anti-IL-1/-6 therapies can mask the clinical and laboratory features of MAS, and proposed guidelines for MAS classification criteria may not be met.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and macrophage activation syndrome: two rare sides of the same devastating coin

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare genetic hyperinflammatory syndrome that occurs early in life. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) usually refers to a secondary form of HLH associated with autoimmunity, although there are other causes of secondary HLH, such as infections and malignancy. In this article, we reviewed the concepts, epidemiology, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of HLH and MAS. We also reviewed the presence of MAS in the most common autoimmune diseases that affect children. Both are severe diseases that require prompt diagnosis and treatment to avoid morbidity and mortality.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the first Chinese experience

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a severe form of juvenile arthritis that is characterized by chronic joint inflammation and systemic symptoms such as fever, rash, and organ involvement. Anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody tocilizumab is an effective treatment. However, some patients still experience persisting or recurrent symptoms and the real-world effectiveness of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA has never been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in Chinese patients with sJIA using real-world data.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on children with active sJIA. Clinical features, laboratory data, corticosteroid dosage, and adverse events (AEs) were collected at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after initiating canakinumab treatment.

RESULTS

Seven female and four male patients were included in the study. All patients had previously been treated with tocilizumab and were administered canakinumab for 12.4 ± 3.4 months. Notably, significant improvements were observed in both clinical signs and symptoms as well as laboratory indicators. Four children under corticosteroid treatment were able to successfully discontinue their corticosteroid therapy: one at week 4, two at week 12, and one at week 24. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the number of tender and swollen joints (P = 0.0059) as well as the systemic juvenile arthritis disease activity score (P < 0.0001). The most common AE was infection, but no patients experienced serious AEs. No cases of macrophage activation syndrome or death were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Canakinumab was found to be potentially efficacious and safe in Chinese patients with sJIA. No new AEs were observed with canakinumab treatment.

Cytokine Storm Syndrome Associated with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

The cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) has widely been referred to as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). In this chapter, we use the term sJIA-associated CSS (sJIA-CSS) when referring to this syndrome and use the term MAS when referencing publications that specifically report on sJIA-associated MAS.

Cytokines in Cytokine Storm Syndrome

As the eponymous mediators of the cytokine storm syndrome, cytokines are a pleomorphic and diverse set of soluble molecules that activate or suppress immune functions in a wide variety of ways. The relevant cytokines for each CSS are likely a result of differing combinations of environmental triggers and host susceptibilities. Because cytokines or their receptors may be specifically targeted by biologic therapeutics, understanding which cytokines are relevant for disease initiation and propagation for each unique CSS is of major clinical importance. This chapter will review what is known about the role of cytokines across the spectrum of CSS.

Biological and clinical roles of IL-18 in inflammatory diseases

Several new discoveries have revived interest in the pathogenic potential and possible clinical roles of IL-18. IL-18 is an IL-1 family cytokine with potent ability to induce IFNγ production. However, basic investigations and now clinical observations suggest a more complex picture. Unique aspects of IL-18 biology at the levels of transcription, activation, secretion, neutralization, receptor distribution and signalling help to explain its pleiotropic roles in mucosal and systemic inflammation. Blood biomarker studies reveal a cytokine for which profound elevation, associated with detectable 'free IL-18', defines a group of autoinflammatory diseases in which IL-18 dysregulation can be a primary driving feature, the so-called 'IL-18opathies'. This impressive specificity might accelerate diagnoses and identify patients amenable to therapeutic IL-18 blockade. Pathogenically, human and animal studies identify a preferential activation of CD8+ T cells over other IL-18-responsive lymphocytes. IL-18 agonist treatments that leverage the site of production or subversion of endogenous IL-18 inhibition show promise in augmenting immune responses to cancer. Thus, the unique aspects of IL-18 biology are finally beginning to have clinical impact in precision diagnostics, disease monitoring and targeted treatment of inflammatory and malignant diseases.

Safety and efficacy of canakinumab treatment for undifferentiated autoinflammatory diseases: the data of a retrospective cohort two-centered study

Introduction

The blockade of interleukine-1 (anakinra and canakinumab) is a well-known highly effective tool for monogenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), such as familial Mediterranean fever, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome, hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D syndrome, and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, but this treatment has not been assessed for patients with undifferentiated AIDs (uAIDs). Our study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of canakinumab for patients with uAIDs.

Methods

Information on 32 patients with uAIDs was retrospectively collected and analyzed. Next-generation sequencing and Federici criteria were used for the exclusion of the known monogenic AID.

Results

The median age of the first episode was 2.5 years (IQR: 1.3; 5.5), that of the disease diagnosis was 5.7 years (IQR: 2.5;12.7), and that of diagnostic delay was 1.1 years (IQR: 0.4; 6.1). Patients had variations in the following genes: IL10, NLRP12, STAT2, C8B, LPIN2, NLRC4, PSMB8, PRF1, CARD14, IFIH1, LYST, NFAT5, PLCG2, COPA, IL23R, STXBP2, IL36RN, JAK1, DDX58, LACC1, LRBA, TNFRSF11A, PTHR1, STAT4, TNFRSF1B, TNFAIP3, TREX1, and SLC7A7. The main clinical features were fever (100%), rash (91%; maculopapular predominantly), joint involvement (72%), splenomegaly (66%), hepatomegaly (59%), lymphadenopathy (50%), myalgia (28%), heart involvement (31%), intestinal involvement (19%); eye involvement (9%), pleuritis (16%), ascites (6%), deafness, hydrocephalia (3%), and failure to thrive (25%). Initial treatment before canakinumab consisted of non-biologic therapies: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (91%), corticosteroids (88%), methotrexate (38%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (34%), cyclosporine A (25%), colchicine (6%) cyclophosphamide (6%), sulfasalazine (3%), mycophenolate mofetil (3%), hydroxychloroquine (3%), and biologic drugs: tocilizumab (62%), sarilumab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, and infliximab (all 3%). Canakinumab induced complete remission in 27 patients (84%) and partial remission in one patient (3%). Two patients (6%) were primary non-responders, and two patients (6%) further developed secondary inefficacy. All patients with partial efficacy or inefficacy were switched to tocilizumab (n = 4) and sarilumab (n = 1). The total duration of canakinumab treatment was 3.6 (0.1; 8.7) years. During the study, there were no reported Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). The patients experienced non-frequent mild respiratory infections at a rate that is similar as before canakinumab is administered. Additionally, one patient developed leucopenia, but it was not necessary to stop canakinumab for this patient.

Conclusion

The treatment of patients with uAIDs using canakinumab was safe and effective. Further randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Japanese patients: Results from an open-label Phase III study

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to report the efficacy and safety of canakinumab treatment in Japanese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) over a 48-week study period.

METHODS

Patients were administered canakinumab 4 mg/kg (maximum dose 300 mg) every 4 weeks, with no dose adjustments. The key outcome measures included adapted American College of Rheumatology paediatric (aACR pedi) 30/50/70/90/100 response, proportion of patients with inactive disease, and corticosteroid (CS) tapering.

RESULTS

In total, 16/19 (84.2%) patients received canakinumab for ≥96 weeks reaching end-of-study (EOS) visit without premature discontinuation. Regardless of the level of joint involvement at baseline, high aACR pedi responses were observed throughout the study; at the EOS, aACR pedi 90/100 response rates were 84.2%/63.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who successfully tapered CSs at EOS was 66.7% (12/18), of which 10 patients were steroid-free. The most common adverse events were infections (238.3 events/100 patient-years). Serious adverse events were observed in 52.6%. The event (n=1) adjudicated as possible macrophage activation syndrome was preceded by sJIA flare. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Canakinumab treatment resulted in a sustained treatment response in sJIA patients over 48 weeks and was associated with CS tapering in majority of patients. No new safety findings were reported.

Distinct roles of IL-18 and IL-1β in murine model of macrophage activation syndrome

BACKGROUND

IL-18 and IL-1β play a central role in the pathogenesis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its life-threatening complication, macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the role of IL-18 and IL-1β in the pathogenesis of MAS.

METHODS

We developed a mouse model to evaluate the role of each cytokine with Toll-like receptor 9 stimulation after continuous infusion with IL-18, IL-1β, and a combination of both for 7 days. The symptoms and laboratory findings were compared among the IL-18, IL-1β, and combination (IL-18+IL-1β) groups.

RESULTS

Body weight was significantly decreased in the IL-1β and combination groups. Splenomegaly was observed in all groups, whereas hepatomegaly was noted in the IL-18 group only. Decreased T-cell numbers, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combination group. IFN-γ, CXCL9, and IL-12A mRNA levels were upregulated and IL-10 mRNA levels in the spleen were downregulated in the IL-18 group. Hepatomegaly and splenomegaly in the IL-18 group were observed in a dose-dependent manner. TNF-α, CXCL9, and IL-12A mRNA levels were upregulated only in those mice with extremely elevated plasma IL-18 levels.

CONCLUSION

IL-18 and IL-1β have distinct roles in the pathogenesis of MAS. Dual blockade of IL-18 and IL-1β might be necessary to treat MAS.

IL-18 in Autoinflammatory Diseases: Focus on Adult Onset Still Disease and Macrophages Activation Syndrome

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine that is involved in various innate and adaptive immune processes related to infection, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Therefore, it is described as a key mediator of autoinflammatory diseases associated with the development of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), including systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still's disease. This review focuses on the role of IL-18 in inflammatory responses, placing emphasis on autoinflammatory diseases associated with chronic excess of serum IL-18, which correlate with clinical and biological signs of the disease. Therefore, it is useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity. Researchers are currently investigating IL-18's role as a therapeutic target for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. The inhibition of IL-18 signaling through recombinant human IL-18BP (IL-18 binding protein) seems to be an effective therapeutic strategy, though further studies are necessary to clarify its importance as a therapeutic target.

The safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and autoinflammatory diseases in pediatric patients: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of canakinumab using real-world data in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and autoinflammatory diseases (AID).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational, multicenter study. Patients diagnosed with AID and sJIA treated with canakinumab were included in the study. The participating 13 centers retrospectively collected their patients' data.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients were involved in the study. Among these patients, 280 were in the AID group and 55 were in the sJIA group. Canakinumab was administered at a median dose of 3 (2.5-4) mg/kg. The median total exposure time to canakinumab was 1.9 (0.8-3.2) years, corresponding to 759.5 patient-years. Seven hundred and seventy-nine total adverse events (AE) were identified. The total incidence of AE, and serious adverse events (SAE) throughout the study period was 1.02 per patient-years. The upper respiratory tract infection rate was 0.7 per patient-years, while the other infection rate was 0.13 per patient-years. While no death was observed in any patient, SAE were observed in 8 patients. Interstitial lung disease, anaphylaxis, or anaphylactoid reactions were not observed in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life data from a large cohort of patients suggests that canakinumab is as safe as claimed in clinical trials.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab as a second line biologic after tocilizumab treatment failure in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A single-centre cohort study using routinely collected health data

Background

A significant number of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) patients discontinue biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Studies of biologic therapy switch regimens in sJIA are required.

Methods

Patients with sJIA who switched from tocilizumab (due to lack of efficacy or safety) to canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and were hospitalized at the rheumatology department from August 2012 to July 2020 were included. Primary efficacy outcomes were 30% or greater improvement based on the paediatric criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR30), achievement of inactive disease (JADAS-71 = 0) and clinical remission (ACR sJIA clinical inactive disease criteria). Follow-up from time first canakinumab dose administered was 12 months or the closest time point (not less than 6 and not more than 18 months). Data were extracted from electronic outpatient medical records.

Results

During the study period, 46 patients with sJIA switched from tocilizumab to canakinumab. Median age at baseline was 8.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 4.0-12.9] years, with the median sJIA duration being 1.8 (IQR 0.8-5.8) years; 37 (80%) patients received at least one conventional DMARD (cDMARD; oral corticosteroids, methotrexate and/or cyclosporine A). Study outcomes were followed up in 45 patients (one patient did not attend the follow-up for an unknown reason); median follow-up was 359 (IQR 282-404) days. During the follow-up, 1 patient discontinued canakinumab due to tuberculosis detection and the dose was reduced or the injection interval increased in 4 (9%) patients. In total, 27 (60%) patients continued to receive at least one cDMARD. Improvement according to the ACR30 criteria was achieved in 43 patients [96%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85-99], inactive disease in 42 (93%; 95%CI 82-98), and remission in 37 (82%; 95% CI 69-91); after adjustment for actual time-at-risk, the rates were 83, 85 and 73 events per 100 person-years, respectively. During follow-up, 23 AEs (most frequently infections) were reported in 19/45 (42%) patients; 5/45 (11%) patients developed macrophage activation syndrome, with a favorable outcome in all cases.

Conclusions

One-year canakinumab therapy was found to be potentially effective as second-line biologic therapy after discontinuation of tocilizumab in patients with sJIA.

mTORC1 links pathology in experimental models of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome

Still's disease is a severe inflammatory syndrome characterized by fever, skin rash and arthritis affecting children and adults. Patients with Still's disease may also develop macrophage activation syndrome, a potentially fatal complication of immune dysregulation resulting in cytokine storm. Here we show that mTORC1 (mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1) underpins the pathology of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome. Single-cell RNA sequencing in a murine model of Still's disease shows preferential activation of mTORC1 in monocytes; both mTOR inhibition and monocyte depletion attenuate disease severity. Transcriptomic data from patients with Still's disease suggest decreased expression of the mTORC1 inhibitors TSC1/TSC2 and an mTORC1 gene signature that strongly correlates with disease activity and treatment response. Unrestricted activation of mTORC1 by Tsc2 deletion in mice is sufficient to trigger a Still's disease-like syndrome, including both inflammatory arthritis and macrophage activation syndrome with hemophagocytosis, a cellular manifestation that is reproduced in human monocytes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated deletion of TSC2. Consistent with this observation, hemophagocytic histiocytes from patients with macrophage activation syndrome display prominent mTORC1 activity. Our study suggests a mechanistic link of mTORC1 to inflammation that connects the pathogenesis of Still's disease and macrophage activation syndrome.

Off-label use of canakinumab in pediatric rheumatology and rare diseases

Since the first success of interleukin-1 blockade in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, the use of interleukin-1 inhibitors has expanded to other disorders, including off-label indications. In particular, canakinumab has been employed in an off-label fashion in several diseases such as rare monogenic autoinflammatory diseases and multifactorial autoinflammatory diseases, disclosing an excellent efficacy and good safety profile in pediatric patients unresponsive to standards of care. In addition, hyperferritinemic syndromes and complex disorders, as well as Kawasaki disease, uveitis, and other pediatric rare disorders, represent additional areas where canakinumab efficacy is worth exploring. Altogether, the results summarized below are of paramount importance in pediatric patients where a considerable proportion of treatments are prescribed off-label. This review focuses on the off-label use of canakinumab in pediatric patients affected by systemic immune-mediated diseases.

Pathogenic roles and diagnostic utility of interleukin-18 in autoinflammatory diseases

Interleukin (IL)-18 is a pleiotropic, pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. IL-18 has attracted increasing attention as a key mediator in autoinflammatory diseases associated with the development of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) including systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and adult-onset Still’s disease. In these diseases, dysregulation of inflammasome activity and overproduction of IL-18 might be associated with the development of MAS by inducing natural killer cell dysfunction. Serum IL-18 levels are high in patients with these diseases and therefore are useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of disease activity. In contrast, a recent study revealed the overproduction of IL-18 was present in cases of autoinflammation without susceptibility to MAS such as pyogenic sterile arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne (PAPA) syndrome. The pathogenic and causative roles of IL-18 remain unclear in these autoinflammatory diseases. Further investigations are necessary to clarify the role of IL-18 and its importance as a therapeutic target in the pathogenesis of autoinflammatory diseases.

Looking into the IL-1 of the storm: are inflammasomes the link between immunothrombosis and hyperinflammation in cytokine storm syndromes?

Inflammasomes and the interleukin (IL)-1 family of cytokines are key mediators of both inflammation and immunothrombosis. Inflammasomes are responsible for the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, as well as releasing tissue factor (TF), a pivotal initiator of the extrinsic coagulation cascade. Uncontrolled production of inflammatory cytokines results in what is known as a "cytokine storm" leading to hyperinflammatory disease. Cytokine storms can complicate a variety of diseases and results in hypercytokinemia, coagulopathies, tissue damage, multiorgan failure, and death. Patients presenting with cytokine storm syndromes have a high mortality rate, driven in part by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). While our knowledge on the factors propagating cytokine storms is increasing, how cytokine storm influences DIC remains unknown, and therefore treatments for diseases, where these aspects are a key feature are limited, with most targeting specific cytokines. Currently, no therapies target the immunothrombosis aspect of hyperinflammatory syndromes. Here we discuss how targeting the inflammasome and pyroptosis may be a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of hyperinflammation and its associated pathologies.

Cytokine storm and targeted therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome. The central pathogenesis is an explosive cytokine storm characterized by a significant increase in proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, IFN-γ, and TNF-α. Meanwhile, negative regulatory factors, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, are also related to the production of HLH. Exploring the specific mechanism of cytokine storms could provide ideas regarding targeted therapy, which could be helpful for early treatment to reduce the mortality of HLH. Although some research has focused on the advantages of targeted therapies, there is still a lack of a comprehensive discourse. This article attempts to summarize the mechanisms of action of various cytokines and provide a therapeutic overview of the current targeted therapies for HLH.

Anakinra in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Long-term Safety From the Pharmachild Registry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

Data from patients with sJIA enrolled in the Pharmachild registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03932344) prior to September 30, 2018, and treated with anakinra were analyzed. The study endpoints were the occurrence of non-serious adverse events (SAEs) of at least moderate severity and SAEs, including macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), and the duration of anakinra treatment with reasons for discontinuation. All endpoints were analyzed overall by 6-month time windows, and in different treatment sets represented by those patients treated continuously with anakinra for at least 12, 18, and 24 months (set-12, -18, and -24, respectively).

RESULTS

Three hundred six patients were enrolled. Of these patients, 46%, 34%, and 28% had been treated for at least 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Two hundred and one AEs, mostly represented by infections, were reported for 509.3 patient-years (PY) with an overall incidence rate (IR) of 39.5 per 100 PY. Among 56 SAEs (IR 11.0/100 PY), 23.2% were infections and 19.6% MAS episodes. The IR of AEs was higher during the first 6 months of anakinra treatment, followed by decreasing IRs in the long-term treatment sets. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 76% of patients, most frequently in the first 6 months, because of inefficacy (43%), remission (31%), or AEs/intolerance (15%). No deaths or malignancies occurred during anakinra treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study confirm the long-term safety profile of anakinra in patients with sJIA and demonstrate an overall decreasing incidence of AEs over time. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01399281 and NCT03932344].

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Refractory Disease Courses in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Refractory Arthritis, Recurrent Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Chronic Lung Disease

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a distinct and heterogeneous disease presently classified under the umbrella of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, with some patients following a monophasic remitting course, whereas others have persistent disease with chronic organ- and life-threatening complications. Although biologic therapies have revolutionized treatment, recent follow-up studies report significant numbers of children with persistently active disease on long term follow-up. This review focuses on refractory disease courses, specifically refractory arthritis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with recurrent, or longstanding signs of macrophage activation syndrome, and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with suspected, probable, or definite lung disease.

An Economic Comparison of Treatment Strategies with Anakinra in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA)

Introduction

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a rare, complex autoinflammatory disease with substantial morbidity, often characterized by fever, rash, and muscle pain, amongst other symptoms. Biologic agents, such as anakinra, have been successfully used to treat patients internationally, but their usage in some regions is limited to patients that have failed to achieve clinically inactive disease with corticosteroids and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Use of anakinra early in the disease course leads to better clinical outcomes; however, longer-term costs for this treatment strategy have not been established. This study compares the economic implications of first-line versus later-line availability of anakinra for patients with sJIA.

Methods

Data for patients treated with first-line anakinra were identified from a single-center, prospective study and compared to a combination of published trial and economic evaluation information to facilitate a comparison to later-line anakinra (ie, following corticosteroids + csDMARDs). Costs were estimated for product acquisition and medical resource utilization (MRU), including planned outpatient visits and unplanned hospital admissions. Total costs over a 5-year horizon were compared.

Results

Total 5-year product acquisition cost for the first-line anakinra strategy was €24,021, and for later-line anakinra was €20,471. The corresponding MRU costs were €19,197 (first-line) versus €25,425 (later-line). Overall 5-year costs (product acquisition and MRU) were lower for the first-line strategy (€43,218 versus €45,896).

Conclusion

The use of anakinra for patients with sJIA in the first-line setting is efficacious to induce and sustain inactive disease, and the findings of this study show that this treatment strategy leads to cost savings through reduced medical expenditure.

CANAKINUMAB IN SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: REAL-LIFE DATA FROM A RETROSPECTIVE ITALIAN COHORT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in real-life the effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in Italian patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study of children with sJIA was performed. Clinical features, laboratory parameters and adverse events were collected at baseline, after 6 and 12 months from starting canakinumab. The effectiveness primary outcome was clinical inactive disease (CID) off glucocorticoids (GCs) treatment at 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children were analyzed from 15 Italian centers. Of the 12 patients who started canakinumab in CID while receiving anakinra, all maintained CID. Of the 68 with active disease at baseline, 57.4% achieved CID off GCs at 6 months and 63.8% at 12 months. In univariate analysis, the variables significantly related with non-response were number of active joints (NAJ) ≥5, history of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and disease duration. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association with non-response of NAJ ≥5 (OR 6.37 (95%CI 1.69-24.02), p= 0.006) and history of MAS (OR 3.53 (95%CI 1.06-11.70), p= 0.039). No serious adverse events were recorded in this series. There were two cases of MAS during canakinumab, leading to a rate of 2.9 episodes per 100 patient year.

CONCLUSION

We confirm, in real-life, the efficacy of canakinumab in sJIA in a multicentric cohort. History of MAS and higher NAJ were associated with lower probability of achieving clinical inactive disease.

The 'cytokine storm': molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects

Cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) has generally been described as a collection of clinical manifestations resulting from an overactivated immune system. Cytokine storms (CSs) are associated with various pathologies, as observed in infectious diseases, certain acquired or inherited immunodeficiencies and autoinflammatory diseases, or following therapeutic interventions. Despite the role of CS in tissue damage and multiorgan failure, a systematic understanding of its underlying molecular mechanisms is lacking. Recent studies demonstrate a positive feedback loop between cytokine release and cell death pathways; certain cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), can activate inflammatory cell death, leading to further cytokine secretion. Here, we discuss recent progress in innate immunity and inflammatory cell death, providing insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of CSs and therapeutics that might quell ensuing life-threatening effects.

COVID-19 and cytokine storm syndrome: are there lessons from macrophage activation syndrome?

Although interest in "cytokine storms" has surged over the past decade, it was massively amplified in 2020 when it was suggested that a subset of patients with COVID-19 developed a form of cytokine storm. The concept of cytokine storm syndromes (CSS) encompasses diverse conditions or circumstances that coalesce around potentially lethal hyperinflammation with hemodynamic compromise and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a prototypic form of CSS that develops in the context of rheumatic diseases, particularly systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The treatment of MAS relies heavily upon corticosteroids and cytokine inhibitors, which have proven to be lifesaving therapies in MAS, as well as in other forms of CSS. Within months of the recognition of SARS-CoV2 as a human pathogen, descriptions of COVID-19 patients with hyperinflammation emerged. Physicians immediately grappled with identifying optimal therapeutic strategies for these patients, and despite clinical distinctions such as marked coagulopathy with endothelial injury associated with COVID-19, borrowed from the experiences with MAS and other CSS. Initial reports of patients treated with anti-cytokine agents in COVID-19 were promising, but recent large, better-controlled studies of these agents have had mixed results suggesting a more complex pathophysiology. Here, we discuss how the comparison of clinical features, immunologic parameters and therapeutic response data between MAS and hyperinflammation in COVID-19 can provide new insight into the pathophysiology of CSS.

Application of systems biology-based in silico tools to optimize treatment strategy identification in Still's disease

Background

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) are manifestations of an autoinflammatory disorder with complex pathophysiology and significant morbidity, together also termed Still’s disease. The objective of the current study is to set in silico models based on systems biology and investigate the optimal treat-to-target strategy for Still’s disease as a proof-of-concept of the modeling approach.

Methods

Molecular characteristics of Still’s disease and data on biological inhibitors of interleukin (IL)-1 (anakinra, canakinumab), IL-6 (tocilizumab, sarilumab), and glucocorticoids as well as conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs, methotrexate) were used to construct in silico mechanisms of action (MoA) models by means of Therapeutic Performance Mapping System (TPMS) technology. TPMS combines artificial neuronal networks, sampling-based methods, and artificial intelligence. Model outcomes were validated with published expression data from sJIA patients.

Results

Biologicals demonstrated more pathophysiology-directed efficiency than non-biological drugs. IL-1 blockade mainly acts on proteins implicated in the innate immune system, while IL-6 signaling blockade has a weaker effect on innate immunity and rather affects adaptive immune mechanisms. The MoA models showed that in the autoinflammatory/systemic phases of Still’s disease, in which the innate immunity plays a pivotal role, the IL-1β-neutralizing antibody canakinumab is more efficient than the IL-6 receptor-inhibiting antibody tocilizumab. MoA models reproduced 67% of the information obtained from expression data.

Conclusions

Systems biology-based modeling supported the preferred use of biologics as an immunomodulatory treatment strategy for Still’s disease. Our results reinforce the role for IL-1 blockade on innate immunity regulation, which is critical in systemic autoinflammatory diseases. This further encourages early use on Still’s disease IL-1 blockade to prevent the development of disease or drug-related complications. Further analysis at the clinical level will validate the findings and help determining the timeframe of the window of opportunity for canakinumab treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02507-w.

Off-label use of anti-IL-1 drugs in rheumatic diseases

Interleukin-1 (IL-1) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of different rheumatic diseases. There are now several agents available on the market capable of blocking IL-1. The proven effectiveness and excellent safety of these drugs makes them a possible therapeutic option in the treatment of IL-1 driven diseases, when previous therapies are contraindicated or ineffective. This article discusses the European wide off-label use of these drugs for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.

Experiences with IL-1 blockade in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis - data from the German AID-registry

BACKGROUND

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex disease with dysregulation of the innate immune system driven by cytokines. A major role is ascribed to interleukin-1β (IL-1β), supporting the autoinflammatory character of the disease and offering an effective blocking mechanism for treatment. Here we present clinical practice data from the German AID-registry for patients treated with IL-1 inhibition (IL-1i).

METHODS

In 2009 a clinical and research consortium (AID-Net) was established, including an online AID-registry. Patients with documented sJIA diagnosis were identified. Data for this retrospective IL-1i study were recorded by 17 centers. Response to treatment was evaluated according to Wallace criteria and additionally by an own classifying clinical response system.

RESULTS

In 6 years, 202 patients with confirmed sJIA were recorded in the AID-registry. Out of these, 111 children received therapy with Anakinra (ANA) (n = 84, 39 f) and/or Canakinumab (CANA) (n = 27, 15 f) at a median age of 8.7 y (range 0.6-19.1). During the first 12 months 75/111 (ANA 55, CANA 20) patients were evaluated according to Wallace criteria (achievement of inactive disease 28/55 and 17/20, remission over 6 months under medication 13/55 and 7/20 cases). Over the whole period of time, clinical response was preserved in the majority of patients (ANA 54/80, CANA 20/27). Arthritis mostly persisted in polyarticular (PA) courses. During treatment with IL-1i concomitant medication could be tapered in about 15%. IL-1i was discontinued in 59/111 patients. 45 (15) adverse events (AE)s in ANA (CANA) treated patients (19.7 (26.6) AE/100 ANA (CANA) exposure years, 95%CI: 14.4-26.4 (14.9-43.9)) were reported.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of sJIA patients from Germany, we can confirm an overall favorable clinical response to both available IL-1 blocking agents. IL-1i was well tolerated with acceptable safety and effectiveness in a real-life clinical setting.

The Pathogenic Role of Interferons in the Hyperinflammatory Response on Adult-Onset Still's Disease and Macrophage Activation Syndrome: Paving the Way towards New Therapeutic Targets

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder of unknown aetiology affecting young adults, which is burdened by life-threatening complications, mostly macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Interferons (IFNs) are signalling molecules that mediate a variety of biological functions from defence against viral infections, to antitumor and immunomodulatory effects. These molecules have been classified into three major types: IFN I, IFN II, IFN III, presenting specific characteristics and functions. In this work, we reviewed the role of IFNs on AOSD and MAS, focusing on their pathogenic role in promoting the hyperinflammatory response and as new possible therapeutic targets. In fact, both preclinical and clinical observations suggested that these molecules could promote the hyperinflammatory response in MAS during AOSD. Furthermore, the positive results of inhibiting IFN-γ in primary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis may provide a solid rationale to arrange further clinical studies, paving the way for reducing the high mortality rate in MAS during AOSD.

Immune cartography of macrophage activation syndrome in the COVID-19 era

A hyperinflammatory 'cytokine storm' state termed macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), culminating from a complex interplay of genetics, immunodeficiency, infectious triggers and dominant innate immune effector responses, can develop across disparate entities including systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) and its counterpart adult-onset Still disease (AOSD), connective tissue diseases, sepsis, infection, cancers and cancer immunotherapy. Classifying MAS using the immunological disease continuum model, with strict boundaries that define the limits of innate and adaptive immunity, at one boundary is MAS with loss of immune function, as occurs in the 'perforinopathies' and some cases of sJIA-AOSD. Conversely, at the other boundary, immune hypersensitivity with gain of immune function in MHC class II-associated sJIA-AOSD and with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy also triggers MAS. This provides a benchmark for evaluating severe inflammation in some patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, which cripples primary type I interferon immunity and usually culminates in a lung-centric 'second wave' cytokine-driven alveolitis with associated immunothrombosis; this phenomenon is generally distinct from MAS but can share features with the proposed 'loss of immune function' MAS variant. This loss and gain of function MAS model offers immune cartography for a novel mechanistic classification of MAS with therapeutic implications.

Interleukin-1 Blockade in Polygenic Autoinflammatory Disorders: Where Are We now?

Polygenic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), such as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), adult-onset Still's disease, Kawasaki disease, idiopathic recurrent pericarditis (IRP), Behçet’s Syndrome, Crystal-induced arthropatihes such as gout or Calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease are characterized by the overexpression of inflammasome-associated genes, leading to a dysregulation of the innate immune response. The IL-1 cytokine family (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-18, IL-36Ra, IL-36α, IL-37, IL-36β, IL-36g, IL-38, IL-33) was defined to be principally responsible for the inflammatory nature of polygenic AIDs. Several clinical trials were initiated, and IL-1 blockade has been proven to cause a rapid reduction of clinical symptoms and normalization of laboratory parameters in the majority of cases. Randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials, together with registry-based clinical trials and open-label, retrospective and prospective observational studies, supported the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in the treatment of polygenic AIDs. Most of the current data are focused on the therapeutic use of anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, canakinumab, an anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody, and rilonacept, a soluble decoy receptor. However, other promising agents, such as gevokizumab, IL-1β blocking monoclonal antibody, tadekinig alfa, a human recombinant IL-18-binding protein, and tranilast, an analog of a tryptophan metabolite, are currently being tested. Anakinra, canakinumab and rilonacept caused impressive improvements in both systemic and musculoskeletal symptoms. Furthermore, the anti-IL-1 therapy allowed corticosteroid tapering and, in some cases, even withdrawal. This article reviews the current IL-1 inhibitors and the results of all clinical trials in which they have been tested for the management of broad spectrum of polygenic AIDs.

Long-term surveillance of biologic therapies in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from the German BIKER registry

OBJECTIVE

Using data from the German Biologics JIA Registry (BIKER), long-term safety of biologics for systemic-onset JIA with regard to adverse events of special interest was assessed.

METHODS

Safety assessments were based on adverse event reports after first dose through 90 days after last dose. Rates of adverse event, serious adverse event and 25 predefined adverse events of special interest were analysed. Incidence rates were compared for each biologic against all other biologics combined applying a mixed-effect Poisson model.

RESULTS

Of 260 systemic-onset JIA patients in this analysis, 151 patients received etanercept, 109 tocilizumab, 71 anakinra and 51 canakinumab. Patients with etanercept had higher clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 scores, active joint counts and steroid use at therapy start. Serious adverse events were reported with higher frequency in patients receiving canakinumab [20/100 patient years (PY)] and tocilizumab (21/100 PY). Cytopenia and hepatic events occurred with a higher frequency with tocilizumab and canakinumab. Medically important infections were seen more often in patients with IL-6 or IL-1 inhibition. Macrophage activation syndrome occurred in all cohorts with a higher frequency in patients with canakinumab (3.2/100 PY) and tocilizumab (2.5/100 PY) vs anakinra (0.83/100 PY) and etanercept (0.5/100 PY). After adjustment only an elevated risk for infections in anakinra-treated patients remained significant. Three definite malignancies were reported in patients ever exposed to biologics. Two deaths occurred in patients treated with etanercept.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance of pharmacotherapy as provided by BIKER is an import approach especially for patients on long-term treatment. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Differences between several biologics were noted and should be considered in daily patient care.

Clinical variability of the systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis course: literature review based on case series

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a heterogeneous category of arthritis that frequently leads to disability and severe complications. The clinical cause of sJIA is very variable, which results in difficulties of disease recognition.

In this literature review based on case series we outline the main challenges in diagnostic of sJIA and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Using the 2016 criteria for MAS diagnostic allowed to consider MAS in the diagnostically challenging cases, that confirms their sensitivity in pediatric patients. The reviewed literature showed last updates for the improvement of classification, diagnostic of sJIA and its complication. The modification of JIA criteria, initiated by Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation, will allow to improve detection and treatment of JIA.

The presentation of this clinical cases and the discussion may be useful for understanding the disease cause and will help to differentiate sJIA and MAS from other disorders, and to improve treatment outcomes.

Outcome of refractory to conventional and/or biologic treatment adult Still's disease following canakinumab treatment: Countrywide data in 50 patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of the IL-1b inhibitor canakinumab in all adults with refractory Still's disease identified from the National Organization For Medicines for off-label drug use.

METHODS

In a retrospective longitudinal multicenter cohort of 50 patients (median age 39 years) with active Still's disease despite treatment with corticosteroids (n = 11), conventional and synthetic (n = 34) and/or biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (n = 30), we assessed the efficacy of canakinumab 150-300 mg administered every 4 (n = 47) or 8 weeks (n = 3) as combination therapy or monotherapy (n = 7) during a median follow-up of 27 (3-84) months.

RESULTS

Α complete response was initially observed in 78% of patients within 3 months (median), irrespective of age at disease onset. A partial response was evident in 20%. One patient had resistant disease. Treatment de-escalation was attempted in 15 of 39 complete responders and a complete drug discontinuation in 21 patients for 8 months (median). Eleven patients (22%) relapsed during treatment, one during de-escalation process, and 11 after treatment discontinuation. Overall, 9 of 11 relapses were successfully treated with canakinumab treatment intensification or re-introduction. At last visit, 18% of patients were off treatment due to remission and 26% due to disease activity. Canakinumab had a significant corticosteroid sparing effect allowing weaning in 21 of 41 cases. Infections (20%, severe 4%) and leucopenia (6%) led to treatment cessation in one patient.

CONCLUSION

High rates of sustained remission were observed in this, largest so far, real-life cohort of adult patients with refractory Still's disease treated with canakinumab.

Tapering Canakinumab Monotherapy in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Clinical Remission: Results From a Phase IIIb/IV Open-Label, Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 canakinumab monotherapy tapering regimens in order to maintain complete clinical remission in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).

METHODS

The study was designed as a 2-part phase IIIb/IV open-label, randomized trial. In the first part, patients received 4 mg/kg of canakinumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks and discontinued glucocorticoids and/or methotrexate as appropriate. Patients in whom clinical remission was achieved (inactive disease for at least 24 weeks) with canakinumab monotherapy were entered into the second part of the trial, in which they were randomized 1:1 into 1 of 2 treatment arms. In arm 1, the dose of canakinumab was reduced from 4 mg/kg to 2 mg/kg and then to 1 mg/kg, followed by discontinuation. In arm 2, the 4 mg/kg dose interval was prolonged from every 4 weeks, to every 8 weeks, and then to every 12 weeks, followed by discontinuation. In both arms, canakinumab exposure could be reduced provided systemic JIA remained in clinical remission for 24 weeks with each step. The primary objective was to assess whether >40% of randomized patients in either arm maintained clinical remission of systemic JIA for 24 weeks in the first part of the study.

RESULTS

In part 1 of the study, 182 patients were enrolled, with 75 of those patients randomized before entering part 2 of the trial. Among the 75 randomized patients, clinical remission was maintained for 24 weeks in 27 (71%) of 38 patients in arm 1 (2 mg/kg every 4 weeks) and 31 (84%) of 37 patients in arm 2 (4 mg/kg every 8 weeks) (P ≤ 0.0001 for arm 1 versus arm 2 among those meeting the 40% threshold). Overall, 25 (33%) of 75 patients discontinued canakinumab, and clinical remission was maintained for at least 24 weeks in all 25 of these patients. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

Reduction of canakinumab exposure may be feasible in patients who have achieved clinical remission of systemic JIA, but consistent interleukin-1 inhibition appears necessary to maintain this response.

Monocyte and bone marrow macrophage transcriptional phenotypes in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis reveal TRIM8 as a mediator of IFN-γ hyper-responsiveness and risk for macrophage activation syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) confers high risk for macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a life-threatening cytokine storm driven by interferon (IFN)-γ. SJIA monocytes display IFN-γ hyper-responsiveness, but the molecular basis of this remains unclear. The objective of this study is to identify circulating monocyte and bone marrow macrophage (BMM) polarisation phenotypes in SJIA including molecular features contributing to IFN response.

METHODS

Bulk RNA-seq was performed on peripheral blood monocytes (n=26 SJIA patients) and single cell (sc) RNA-seq was performed on BMM (n=1). Cultured macrophages were used to define consequences of tripartite motif containing 8 (TRIM8) knockdown on IFN-γ signalling.

RESULTS

Bulk RNA-seq of SJIA monocytes revealed marked transcriptional changes in patients with elevated ferritin levels. We identified substantial overlap with multiple polarisation states but little evidence of IFN-induced signature. Interestingly, among the most highly upregulated genes was TRIM8, a positive regulator of IFN-γ signalling. In contrast to PBMC from SJIA patients without MAS, scRNA-seq of BMM from a patient with SJIA and MAS identified distinct subpopulations of BMM with altered transcriptomes, including upregulated IFN-γ response pathways. These BMM also showed significantly increased expression of TRIM8. In vitro knockdown of TRIM8 in macrophages significantly reduced IFN-γ responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Macrophages with an 'IFN-γ response' phenotype and TRIM8 overexpression were expanded in the bone marrow from an MAS patient. TRIM8 is also upregulated in SJIA monocytes, and augments macrophage IFN-γ response in vitro, providing both a candidate molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic target for monocyte hyper-responsiveness to IFNγ in cytokine storms including MAS.

Efficacy of high-dose anakinra in refractory macrophage activation syndrome in adult-onset Still's disease: when dosage matters in overcoming secondary therapy resistance

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe, potentially fatal complication of rheumatic diseases. This case demonstrates the significant challenges and therapeutic considerations in adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) complicated with MAS at initial presentation, which will be discussed. MAS in our patient was refractory to the first-line therapy with high-dose corticosteroids, early administration of anakinra at a standard dosage and subsequent add-on treatments with cyclosporine A, IVIG, etoposides and tocilizumab. At 2 months after presentation, the patient was still critically ill with clinical, laboratory and histological signs of an active uncontrolled MAS. Notably, adoption of anakinra at a high dosage finally induced remission. This case confirms that adjusted dosage of anakinra is an effective therapeutic strategy in a severe AOSD-related MAS. It is tempting to speculate that anakinra at a high dosage, if used earlier, would have significantly changed the course of the disease in our patient and could have led to earlier remission.

Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis With and Without Fever at Baseline: Results From an Open-Label, Active-Treatment Extension Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab and explore prediction of response in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with or without fever at treatment initiation.

METHODS

At enrollment, patients with active systemic JIA (ages 2 to <20 years) started open-label canakinumab (4 mg/kg every 4 weeks subcutaneously). Efficacy measures included the adapted American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 50/70/90 criteria, the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS), and clinically inactive disease and clinical remission on medication, evaluated by either the JADAS or ACR criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 123 patients (70 with fever and 52 without fever [fever status was not reported for 1 patient]), 84 (68.3%) completed the study (median duration 1.8 years). Comparable efficacy (adapted ACR Pediatric 50/70/90/100) was observed by day 15 in both subgroups (60.0%/48.6%/37.1%/24.3% in those with fever and 67.3%/48.1%/34.6%/19.2% in those without fever), and further increased thereafter. By month 6, clinical remission according to the JADAS or the ACR criteria was achieved in 17 (24.3%) and 26 (37.1%), respectively, of patients with fever and 9 (17.3%) and 12 (23.1%), respectively, of patients without fever. Median time to onset of clinical remission according to the JADAS or ACR criteria was 57 and 30 days, respectively, in those with fever, and 58 and 142 days, respectively, in those without fever. An adapted ACR Pediatric 50 response by day 15 was the strongest predictor of achieving clinical remission according to the JADAS (odds ratio [OR] 13 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4, 42]; P < 0.0001) or glucocorticoid discontinuation (OR 19 [95% CI 3, 114]; P = 0.002). Of the 71 of 123 patients (57.7%) who received glucocorticoids at study entry, 27 (38.0%) discontinued glucocorticoids and 21 (29.6%) reached a dose of <0.2 mg/kg/day, with no difference between those with and those without fever; 13 patients (10.6%) tolerated a sustained canakinumab dose reduction to 2 mg/kg every 4 weeks. No new safety findings were observed.

CONCLUSION

Canakinumab provided rapid and sustained improvement of active systemic JIA irrespective of the presence of fever at treatment initiation.

Repurposing Immunomodulatory Therapies against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Era of Cardiac Vigilance: A Systematic Review

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in efforts to identify therapies to ameliorate adverse clinical outcomes. The recognition of the key role for increased inflammation in COVID-19 has led to a proliferation of clinical trials targeting inflammation. The purpose of this review is to characterize the current state of immunotherapy trials in COVID-19, and focuses on associated cardiotoxicities, given the importance of pharmacovigilance. The search terms related to COVID-19 were queried in ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 1621 trials were identified and screened for interventional trials directed at inflammation. Trials (n = 226) were fully assessed for the use of a repurposed drug, identifying a total of 141 therapeutic trials using a repurposed drug to target inflammation in COVID-19 infection. Building on the results of the Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial demonstrating the benefit of low dose dexamethasone in COVID-19, repurposed drugs targeting inflammation are promising. Repurposed drugs directed at inflammation in COVID-19 primarily have been drawn from cancer therapies and immunomodulatory therapies, specifically targeted anti-inflammatory, anti-complement, and anti-rejection agents. The proposed mechanisms for many cytokine-directed and anti-rejection drugs are focused on evidence of efficacy in cytokine release syndromes in humans or animal models. Anti-complement-based therapies have the potential to decrease both inflammation and microvascular thrombosis. Cancer therapies are hypothesized to decrease vascular permeability and inflammation. Few publications to date describe using these drugs in COVID-19. Early COVID-19 intervention trials have re-emphasized the subtle, but important cardiotoxic sequelae of potential therapies on outcomes. The volume of trials targeting the COVID-19 hyper-inflammatory phase continues to grow rapidly with the evaluation of repurposed drugs and late-stage investigational agents. Leveraging known clinical safety profiles and pharmacodynamics allows swift investigation in clinical trials for a novel indication. Physicians should remain vigilant for cardiotoxicity, often not fully appreciated in small trials or in short time frames.

Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 48-week results from an open-label phase III study in Japanese patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in Japanese patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).

METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm active treatment study. sJIA patients, aged ≥2 to <20 years, were administered canakinumab 4 mg/kg every 4 weeks for ≤48 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who achieved an adapted American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR pedi) 30 criteria at week 8, and the proportion of patients who successfully tapered corticosteroids at week 28. Herein, the efficacy and safety results up to 48 weeks are reported.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients enrolled, 15 (78.9%) had previously used tocilizumab. All patients achieved ACR pedi 30 at week 8 and 73.7% (14/19) successfully tapered corticosteroids at week 28. At week 48, ACR pedi 50/70/90/100 responses were achieved by 100.0%/100.0%/87.5%/68.8% of patients. The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections (271.6 patient-years), 42.1% (8/19) patients had serious AEs. Two potential cases of macrophage activation syndrome were identified. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Canakinumab was efficacious in Japanese patients with sJIA and was associated with substantial corticosteroid dose reduction in the majority of patients. The safety profile of canakinumab was consistent with that observed from previous studies.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV (IDENTIFIER

NCT02396212).

Proceedings from the 2nd Next Gen Therapies for Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Macrophage Activation Syndrome symposium held on October 3-4, 2019

For reasons poorly understood, and despite the availability of biological medications blocking IL-1 and IL-6 that have markedly improved overall disease control, children with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) are now increasingly diagnosed with life-threatening chronic complications, including hepatitis and lung disease (SJIA-LD). On October 3-4, 2019, a two-day meeting, NextGen Therapies for Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) & macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) organized by the Systemic JIA Foundation ( www.systemicjia.org/ ) in Washington, DC brought together scientists, clinicians, parents and FDA representatives with the objectives (1) to integrate clinical and research findings in MAS and SJIA-LD, and (2) to develop a shared understanding of this seemingly new pulmonary complication of SJIA. The current manuscript summarizes discussions and conclusions of the meeting.

Successful treatment of refractory hyperferritinemic syndromes with canakinumab: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Hyperferritinemic syndromes are systemic inflammatory disorders characterized by a dysfunctional immune response, which leads to excessive activation of the monocyte-macrophage system with hypercytokinemia and may pursue a rapidly fatal course.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe two patients of 11 and 9 years of age with hyperferritinemic syndromes, one with impending macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) and one with overt MAS, who were refractory or intolerant to conventional therapies, but improved dramatically with canakinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report indicates that canakinumab may be efficacious in the management of hyperferritinemic syndromes, including MAS.

Can we use interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced cytokine release syndrome (CRS)?

The emergent outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused a global pandemic. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiorgan dysfunction are among the leading causes of death in critically ill patients with COVID-19. The elevated inflammatory cytokines suggest that a cytokine storm, also known as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), may play a major role in the pathology of COVID-19. However, the efficacy of corticosteroids, commonly utilized antiinflammatory agents, to treat COVID-19-induced CRS is controversial. There is an urgent need for novel therapies to treat COVID-19-induced CRS. Here, we discuss the pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-induced CRS, compare the CRS in COVID-19 with that in SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), and summarize the existing therapies for CRS. We propose to utilize interleukin-6 (IL-6) blockade to manage COVID-19-induced CRS and discuss several factors that should be taken into consideration for its clinical application.

Interleukin-1 Blockade in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a severe disorder now linked more to autoinflammation than to autoimmunity. Clinical and laboratory evidence support the pathogenetic role of interleukin-1 (IL-1), and blockade of this cytokine has proved to be very effective in the treatment of sJIA. There are now several agents that block IL-1 available on the market. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of these drugs for the treatment of sJIA on the basis of published data, and offers the current view on treating sJIA according to its different phenotypes. There are no head to head trials among the different IL-1 inhibitors, and although efficacy has been demonstrated for all of them, it is still unknown which one would be more appropriate for which particular situation. The presence of synovitis in addition to active systemic features might be relevant for these choices. In addition, complications such as macrophage activation syndrome can be important since, on one hand, it has been associated with biologic therapy administration and, on another, there have been some reports of this complication being treated with anti-IL-1. Current recommendations by the American College of Rheumatology are now outdated, and new ones are being prepared. In the meantime, basic and clinical research is advancing in order to identify new treatment targets and to evaluate the different protocols currently in use.

Cytokine Release Syndrome in COVID-19 Patients, A New Scenario for an Old Concern: The Fragile Balance between Infections and Autoimmunity

On 7 January 2020, researchers isolated and sequenced in China from patients with severe pneumonitis a novel coronavirus, then called SARS-CoV-2, which rapidly spread worldwide, becoming a global health emergency. Typical manifestations consist of flu-like symptoms such as fever, cough, fatigue, and dyspnea. However, in about 20% of patients, the infection progresses to severe interstitial pneumonia and can induce an uncontrolled host-immune response, leading to a life-threatening condition called cytokine release syndrome (CRS). CRS represents an emergency scenario of a frequent challenge, which is the complex and interwoven link between infections and autoimmunity. Indeed, treatment of CRS involves the use of both antivirals to control the underlying infection and immunosuppressive agents to dampen the aberrant pro-inflammatory response of the host. Several trials, evaluating the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressants commonly used in rheumatic diseases, are ongoing in patients with COVID-19 and CRS, some of which are achieving promising results. However, such a use should follow a multidisciplinary approach, be accompanied by close monitoring, be tailored to patient's clinical and serological features, and be initiated at the right time to reach the best results. Autoimmune patients receiving immunosuppressants could be prone to SARS-CoV-2 infections; however, suspension of the ongoing therapy is contraindicated to avoid disease flares and a consequent increase in the infection risk.

Macrophage activation syndrome in adults: recent advances in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperinflammatory syndrome, which if not promptly treated, can lead rapidly to critical illness and death. HLH is termed macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) when associated with rheumatic disease (where it is best characterized in systemic JIA) and secondary HLH (sHLH) when associated with other triggers including malignancy and infection. MAS/sHLH is rare and coupled with its mimicry of other conditions, is underrecognized. These inherent challenges can lead to diagnostic and management challenges in multiple medical specialties including haematology, infectious diseases, critical care and rheumatology. In this review we highlight the pathogenesis of MAS/sHLH including its underlying triggers, key clinical features and diagnostic challenges, prognostic factors and current treatments in adults.