1
|
Qian M, Zhao J, Zhang K, Zhang W, Jin C, Cai B, Lu Z, Hu Y, Huang J, Ma D, Fang X, Jin Y. High intraoperative fluid load associated with prolonged length of hospital stay and complications after non-cardiac surgery in neonates. Eur J Pediatr 2024; 183:3739-3748. [PMID: 38856762 PMCID: PMC11322412 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05628-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Inappropriate perioperative fluid load can lead to postoperative complications and death. This retrospective study was designed to investigate the association between intraoperative fluid load and outcomes in neonates undergoing non-cardiac surgery. From April 2020 to September 2022, 940 neonates who underwent non-cardiac surgery were retrospectively enrolled and their perioperative data were harvested for further analysis. According to recorded intraoperative fluid volumes defined as ml.kg-1 h-1, patients were mandatorily divided into quintile with fluid load as restrictive (quintile 1, Q1), moderately restrictive (Q2), moderate (Q3), moderately liberal (Q4), and liberal (Q5). The primary outcomes were defined as prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) (postoperative LOS ≥ 14 days), complications beyond prolonged LOS, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications within 14 days of hospital stay. The intraoperative fluid load was in Q1 of 6.5 (5.3-7.3) (median and IQR); Q2: 9.2 (8.7-9.9); Q3: 12.2 (11.4-13.2); Q4: 16.5 (15.4-18.0); and Q5: 26.5 (22.3-32.2) ml.kg-1 h-1. The odd of prolonged LOS was positively correlated with an increase fluid volume (Q5 quintile: OR 2.602 [95% CI 1.444-4.690], P = 0.001), as well as complications beyond prolonged LOS (Q5: OR 3.322 [95% CI 1.656-6.275], P = 0.001). The overall 30-day mortality rate was increased with high intraoperative fluid load but did not reach to a statistical significance after adjusted with confounders. Furthermore, the highest quintile of fluid load (26.5 ml.kg-1 h-1, IQR [22.3-32.2]) (Q5 quintile) was significantly associated with longer postoperative mechanical ventilation time compared with Q1 (Q5: OR 2.212 [95% CI 1.101-4.445], P = 0.026). Conclusion: Restrictive intraoperative fluid load had overall better outcomes, whilst high fluid load was significantly associated with prolonged LOS and complications after non-cardiac surgery in neonates. Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2200066823 (December 19, 2022). What is Known: • Inappropriate perioperative fluid load can lead to postoperative complications and even death. What is New: • High perioperative fluid load was significantly associated with an increased length of stay after non-cardiac surgery in neonates, whilst low fluid load was consistently related to better postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minyue Qian
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Jialian Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, China
| | - Wenyuan Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Chunyi Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Binbin Cai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Zhongteng Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Yaoqin Hu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Jinjin Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China
| | - Daqing Ma
- Perioperative and Systems Medicine Laboratory, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
- Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Xiangming Fang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, China.
| | - Yue Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, 310052, China.
- Perioperative and Systems Medicine Laboratory, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Levenson G, Coutrot M, Voron T, Gronnier C, Cattan P, Hobeika C, D'Journo XB, Bergeat D, Glehen O, Mathonnet M, Piessen G, Goéré D. Root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter cohort study from the FREGAT database. Surgery 2024; 176:82-92. [PMID: 38641545 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is associated with significant mortality. A better understanding of the causes leading to death may help to reduce mortality. A root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy was performed. METHODS Root cause analysis was retrospectively applied by an independent expert panel of 4 upper gastrointestinal surgeons and 1 anesthesiologist-intensivist to patients included in the French national multicenter prospective cohort FREGAT between August 2014 and September 2019 who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer and died within 90 days of surgery. A cause-and-effect diagram was used to determine the root causes related to death. Death was classified as potentially preventable or non-preventable. RESULTS Among the 1,040 patients included in the FREGAT cohort, 70 (6.7%) patients (male: 81%, median age 68 [62-72] years) from 17 centers were included. Death was potentially preventable in 37 patients (53%). Root causes independently associated with preventable death were inappropriate indication (odds ratio 35.16 [2.50-494.39]; P = .008), patient characteristics (odds ratio 5.15 [1.19-22.35]; P = .029), unexpected intraoperative findings (odds ratio 18.99 [1.07-335.55]; P = .045), and delay in diagnosis of a complication (odds ratio 98.10 [6.24-1,541.04]; P = .001). Delay in treatment of a complication was found only in preventable deaths (28 [76%] vs 0; P < .001). National guidelines were less frequently followed (16 [43%] vs 22 [67%]; P = .050) in preventable deaths. The only independent risk factor of preventable death was center volume <26 esophagectomies per year (odds ratio 4.71 [1.55-14.33]; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS More than one-half of deaths after esophagectomy were potentially preventable. Better patient selection, early diagnosis, and adequate management of complications through centralization could reduce mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Levenson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Maxime Coutrot
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Département d'anesthésie réanimation et centre de traitement des brûlés, Paris, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. https://www.twitter.com/ThibaultVORON
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Unité de Chirurgie Œsogastrique et Endocrinienne, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Bordeaux-Segalen, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Cattan
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France; UMR Inserm 1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Benoît D'Journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Damien Bergeat
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU Rennes), Université de Rennes 1 Centre, Rennes, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; EMR 3738 Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux Faculty, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Oullins, France
| | - Muriel Mathonnet
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Générale, CHU de Limoges, Avenue Martin Luther King, Limoges Cedex, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Lille, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Lille, France; University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer, Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France. https://www.twitter.com/PiessenG
| | - Diane Goéré
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Bonitta G, Bonavina L. Short-term Outcomes of Different Techniques for Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Before Esophagectomy: A Network Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2024; 279:410-418. [PMID: 37830253 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ischemia at the anastomotic site plays a critical role determinant in the development of anastomosis-related complications after esophagectomy. Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) before esophagectomy has been described to improve the vascular perfusion at the tip of the gastric conduit with a potential effect on anastomotic leak (AL) and stenosis (AS) risk minimization. Laparoscopic (LapGIC) and angioembolization (AngioGIC) techniques have been reported. PURPOSE Compare short-term outcomes among different GIC techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic review and network meta-analysis. One-step esophagectomy (noGIC), LapGIC, and AngioGIC were compared. Primary outcomes were AL, AS, and gastric conduit necrosis (GCN). Risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were used to assess relative inference. RESULTS Overall, 1760 patients (14 studies) were included. Of those, 1028 patients (58.4%) underwent noGIC, 593 (33.6%) LapGIC, and 139 (8%) AngioGIC. AL was reduced for LapGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.68; 95% CrI 0.47-0.98) and AngioGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.52; 95% CrI 0.31-0.93). Similarly, AS was reduced for LapGIC versus noGIC (RR=0.32; 95% CrI 0.12-0.68) and AngioGIC versus noGIC (RR=1.30; 95% CrI 0.65-2.46). The indirect comparison, assessed with the network methodology, did not show any differences for LapGIC versus AngioGIC in terms of postoperative AL and AS risk. No differences were found for GCN, pulmonary complications, overall complications, hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality among different treatments. CONCLUSIONS Compared to noGIC, both LapGIC and AngioGIC before esophagectomy seem equivalent and associated with a reduced risk for postoperative AL and AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Bona
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, University of Milan, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gelzinis TA. Indocyanine Green in Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery: What Anesthesiologists Need to Know. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:7-11. [PMID: 37925227 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa A Gelzinis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang L, Wang B, Huang Y. Impact of anastomotic leakage on survival after surgery for gastric carcinoma: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e35417. [PMID: 37800837 PMCID: PMC10553127 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000035417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term survival of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastric cancer (GC) surgery is still debating. Our aim was to investigate the association between AL and survival of the patients following GC. METHODS We searched articles in databases from inception to July 2023 to retrieve literature related to postoperative AL and survival of GC patients. We evaluated the association of postoperative AL and survival of GC patients using the software STAT10.0. RESULTS Seven articles with 6209 GC patients were included. Our results showed that the postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient overall survival (OS) result in an odds ratio (OR) of 0.504 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.372-0.682; I2 = 84.1%; P = .000), pooled 3-year patient OS (OR = 0.467, 95% CI: 0.356-0.614; I2 = 85.3%; P = .000) and pooled 5-year patient OS (OR = 0.370, 95% CI: 0.171-0.805; I2 = 82.5%; P = .012). The P value of Egger test were 0.759, 0.187, 0.175. The postoperative AL were associated with pooled 1-year patient disease-free survival (DFS) result in an OR of 0.538 (95% CI: 0.171-1.691; I2 = 89.0%; P = .289), the pooled 3-year patient DFS (OR = 0.143, 95% CI: 0.119-1.431; I2 = 91.7%; P = .163), and the pooled 5-year patient DFS (OR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.088-1.338; I2 = 91.0%; P = .124), and the P value of Egger test of pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS were 0.759, 0.247, 0.07. CONCLUSION Postoperative AL was correlated with a worse OS in GC patients, but not correlated with DFS in GC patients, but more studies are required to confirm this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Zhang
- Department of Anorectal branch, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Zhongshan District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Beibei Wang
- Department of Anorectal branch, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Zhongshan District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Yi Huang
- Department of Anorectal branch, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Zhongshan District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Broadbent A, Rahman S, Grace B, Walker R, Noble F, Kelly J, Byrne J, Underwood T. The effect of surgical complications on long-term prognosis following oesophagectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106930. [PMID: 37258358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complications are frequent after oesophagectomy, and there is evidence these adversely impact long-term prognosis. However, the effect of multiple complications, and the absolute magnitude of effect on survival is unclear. This study aimed to examine these effects in a single high-volume UK unit. METHODS Patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer and who survived to 90 days post-oesophagectomy were analysed. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The effect and magnitude of effect of complications on survival were assessed using multivariable cox regression and the risk-adjusted population attributable fraction. RESULTS In total, 380 patients were included. Complications occurred in 251 (66.1%). Suffering ≥3 complications (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.13-3.16, p = 0.015) or an unplanned escalation in care (HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.43-3.45, p < 0.001) significantly reduced survival whereas pulmonary complications and anastomotic leak did not. Patients with a CCI>30 had worse overall survival (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.32-2.76, p < 0.001) and CCI>30 due to multiple minor complications gave a worse prognosis compared to CCI>30 due to major complications (HR 2.44, 95%CI 1.14-5.20, p = 0.022). An estimated 9.1% (95%CI 3.4-14.4%) of deaths at 5 years were attributable to a CCI>30. CONCLUSION Long-term survival following oesophagectomy for cancer is significantly affected by complications and the cumulative effect of multiple complications. Interestingly, multiple minor complications had a worse effect on survival than major complications. The absolute magnitude of effect is substantial: minimising all types of postoperative complications could have significant benefit to overall outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Broadbent
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - S Rahman
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - B Grace
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - R Walker
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | - F Noble
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - J Kelly
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - J Byrne
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK
| | - T Underwood
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, University Hospitals Southampton, UK; Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lemmens J, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Hannink G, Ubels S, Rosman C. Performance of a consensus-based algorithm for diagnosing anastomotic leak after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doad016. [PMID: 36988007 PMCID: PMC10543373 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common and severe complication after esophagectomy. This study aimed to assess the performance of a consensus-based algorithm for diagnosing AL after minimally invasive esophagectomy. This study used data of the ICAN trial, a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing cervical and intrathoracic anastomosis, in which a predefined diagnostic algorithm was used to guide diagnosing AL. The algorithm identified patients suspected of AL based on clinical signs, blood C-reactive protein (cut-off value 200 mg/L), and/or drain amylase (cut-off value 200 IU/L). Suspicion of AL prompted evaluation with contrast swallow computed tomography and/or endoscopy to confirm AL. Primary outcome measure was algorithm performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), respectively. AL was defined according to the definition of the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group. 245 patients were included, and 125 (51%) patients were suspected of AL. The algorithm had a sensitivity of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46-75), a specificity of 97% (95% CI: 89-100), and a PPV and NPV of 94% (95% CI: 79-99) and 77% (95% CI: 66-86), respectively, on initial assessment. Repeated assessment in 19 patients with persisting suspicion of AL despite negative or inconclusive initial assessment had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 77-100). The algorithm showed poor performance because the low sensitivity indicates the inability of the algorithm to confirm AL on initial assessment. Repeated assessment using the algorithm was needed to confirm remaining leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jobbe Lemmens
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Song XY, Liu J, Li HX, Cai XW, Li ZG, Su YC, Li Y, Dong XH, Yu W, Fu XL. Enhancing Prediction for Tumor Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer by Dynamic Parameters from Clinical Assessments. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4377. [PMID: 37686655 PMCID: PMC10486879 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
To develop accurate and accessible prediction methods for assessing pathologic response following NICT prior to surgery, we conducted a retrospective study including 137 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent surgery after two cycles of NICT between January 2019 and March 2022 at our center. We collected clinical parameters to evaluate the dynamic changes in the primary tumor. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the correlations between these parameters and the pathologic response of the primary tumor. Subsequently, we constructed prediction models for pCR and MPR using multivariate logistic regression. The MPR prediction Model 2 was internally validated using bootstrapping and externally validated using an independent cohort from our center. The univariate logistic analysis revealed significant differences in clinical parameters reflecting tumor regression among patients with varying pathologic responses. The clinical models based on these assessments demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with the training cohort achieving a C-index of 0.879 for pCR and 0.912 for MPR, while the testing cohort also achieved a C-index of 0.912 for MPR. Notably, the MPR prediction Model 2, with a threshold cut-off of 0.74, exhibited 92.7% specificity and greater than 70% sensitivity, indicating a low rate of underestimating residual tumors. In conclusion, our study demonstrated the high accuracy of clinical assessment-based models in pathologic response prediction, aiding in decision-making regarding organ preservation and radiotherapy adjustments after induction immunochemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Yun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
- School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Hong-Xuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Xu-Wei Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Zhi-Gang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yu-Chen Su
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Xiao-Huan Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Wen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| | - Xiao-Long Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China; (X.-Y.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aiolfi A, Bona D, Bonitta G, Bonavina L. Effect of gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1633-1643. [PMID: 37498484 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01601-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Ischemia at the anastomotic site is thought to be a protagonist in the development of anastomosis-related complications while different strategies to overcome this problem have been reported. Gastric ischemic conditioning (GIC) prior to esophagectomy has been described with this intent. Evaluate the effect of GIC on anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and PubMed were investigated up to March 31st, 2023. We considered articles that appraised short-term outcomes after GIC vs. no GIC in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Anastomotic leak (AL), anastomotic stricture (AS), and gastric conduit necrosis (GCN) were primary outcomes. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures, whereas 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to calculate related inference. Fourteen studies (1760 patients) were included. Of those, 732 (41.6%) underwent GIC, while 1028 (58.4%) underwent one-step esophagectomy. Compared with no GIC, GIC was related to a reduced RR for AL (R RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.86; p < 0.01) and AS (RR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.91; p = 0.02), whereas no differences were found for GCN (RR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.19-1.61; p = 0.28). Postoperative pneumonia (RR = 1.09; p = 0.99), overall complications (RR = 0.87; p = 0.19), operative time (SMD - 0.58; p = 0.07), hospital stay (SMD 0.66; p = 0.09), and 30-day mortality (RR = 0.69; p = 0.22) were comparable. GIC prior to esophagectomy seems associated with a reduced risk for AL and AS. Further studies are necessary to identify the subset of patients who can benefit from this procedure, the optimal technique, and the timing of GIC prior to esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy.
| | - Davide Bona
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Via C. Belgioioso, 173, 20157, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu MY, McGregor RJ, Scott J, Smithers BM, Thomas J, Frankel A, Barbour A, Thomson I. Textbook outcomes for oesophagectomy: A valid composite measure assessment tool for surgical performance in a specialist unit. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106897. [PMID: 37032271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2017 the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit Group proposed a ten-item composite measure for a 'textbook outcome' (TBO) following oesophago-gastric resection. Studies have shown associations between TBO and improved conditional and overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of TBO to assess the outcomes from a single specialist unit in a country, with low incidence of disease, allowing comparisons with international specialist centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected oesophageal cancer surgery data at a single centre, in Australia, between 2013 and 2018. Multivariable logistical regression assessed association between baseline factors and TBO. Post-operative complications were analysed in two separate groups as Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (CD ≥ 2) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 (CD ≥ 3). Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis determined the association between TBO and survival. RESULTS 246 patients were analysed, with 50.8% (n = 125) achieving a TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2 and 58.9% (n = 145) when using CD ≥ 3. Patients aged ≥75, and those with a pre-operative respiratory co-morbidity were less likely to achieve a TBO. Overall survival was not influenced by TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2, however it was higher when a TBO was achieved, and complications were defined as CD ≥ 3 (HR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION TBO is a multi-parameter metric that allowed benchmarking of the quality of oesophageal cancer surgery in our unit, providing favourable outcomes compared with other published data. There was an association between TBO and improved overall survival when the definition of severe complications was CD ≥ 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Yulong Wu
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
| | - Richard J McGregor
- Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Justin Scott
- QCIF Facility for Advanced Bioinformatics, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Janine Thomas
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia
| | - Adam Frankel
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Andrew Barbour
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| | - Iain Thomson
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia; Academy of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4102, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu YZ, Mehrotra S, Buharin VE, Marois M, Nwaiwu CA, Wilson EB, Kim PCW. Dye-Less Perfusion Quantification of Porcine Gastric Conduit with Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Laser Doppler Imaging. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:1947-1949. [PMID: 37227609 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05708-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Z Liu
- Department of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA
| | - Saloni Mehrotra
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA
- Department of Surgery, University at Buffalo, NY, Buffalo, USA
| | - Vasiliy E Buharin
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA
| | - Mikael Marois
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA
| | - Chibueze A Nwaiwu
- Department of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA
| | - Erik B Wilson
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peter C W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Activ Surgical Inc., 30 Thomson Place, 2nd Floor, MA, 02210, Boston, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ubels S, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Schouten J, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C. Treatment of anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: large, collaborative, observational TENTACLE cohort study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:852-863. [PMID: 37196149 PMCID: PMC10364505 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leak is a severe complication after oesophagectomy. Anastomotic leak has diverse clinical manifestations and the optimal treatment strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of treatment strategies for different manifestations of anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed in 71 centres worldwide and included patients with anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy (2011-2019). Different primary treatment strategies were compared for three different anastomotic leak manifestations: interventional versus supportive-only treatment for local manifestations (that is no intrathoracic collections; well perfused conduit); drainage and defect closure versus drainage only for intrathoracic manifestations; and oesophageal diversion versus continuity-preserving treatment for conduit ischaemia/necrosis. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS Of 1508 patients with anastomotic leak, 28.2 per cent (425 patients) had local manifestations, 36.3 per cent (548 patients) had intrathoracic manifestations, 9.6 per cent (145 patients) had conduit ischaemia/necrosis, 17.5 per cent (264 patients) were allocated after multiple imputation, and 8.4 per cent (126 patients) were excluded. After propensity score matching, no statistically significant differences in 90-day mortality were found regarding interventional versus supportive-only treatment for local manifestations (risk difference 3.2 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. -1.8 to 8.2 per cent), drainage and defect closure versus drainage only for intrathoracic manifestations (risk difference 5.8 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. -1.2 to 12.8 per cent), and oesophageal diversion versus continuity-preserving treatment for conduit ischaemia/necrosis (risk difference 0.1 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. -21.4 to 1.6 per cent). In general, less morbidity was found after less extensive primary treatment strategies. CONCLUSION Less extensive primary treatment of anastomotic leak was associated with less morbidity. A less extensive primary treatment approach may potentially be considered for anastomotic leak. Future studies are needed to confirm current findings and guide optimal treatment of anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Moniek H P Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Schouten
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
- Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ubels S, Matthée E, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, van Esser S, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Siersema PD, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Heisterkamp J, Polat F, Schouten J, Singh P, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, Van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, Willem van den Berg J, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TC, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JW, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CM, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RP, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJ, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MA, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Koshy R, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Constantinoiu S, Birla R, Achim F, Rosianu CG, Hoara P, Castro RG, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Koshy R, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Ahmed HA, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AA, Wills V, Campbell C, Cerdeira MP, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Barbosa JA, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZ, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler M, Schofield W, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Fernández SL, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Ben Taher FA, Ekheel M, Msherghi AA. Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:974-982. [PMID: 36732207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences. METHODS TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment. RESULTS FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4). CONCLUSION Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Eric Matthée
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Esser
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Fatih Polat
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Schouten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ng CSH, Ong BH, Chao YK, Wright GM, Sekine Y, Wong I, Hao Z, Zhang G, Chaturvedi H, Thammineedi SR, Law S, Kim HK. Use of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 115:1068-1076. [PMID: 36030832 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.06.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green in thoracic and esophageal surgery is gaining popularity because of the potential to facilitate surgical planning, to stage disease, and to reduce postoperative complications. To optimize use of fluorescence imaging in thoracic and esophageal surgery, an expert panel sought to establish a set of recommendations at a consensus meeting. METHODS The panel included 12 experts in thoracic and upper gastrointestinal surgery from Asia-Pacific countries. Before meeting, 7 focus areas were defined: intersegmental plane identification for sublobar resections; pulmonary nodule localization; lung tumor detection; bullous lesion detection; lymphatic mapping of lung tumors; evaluation of gastric conduit perfusion; and lymphatic mapping in esophageal surgical procedures. A literature search of the PubMed database was conducted using keywords indocyanine green, fluorescence, thoracic, surgery, and esophagectomy. At the meeting, panelists addressed each focus area by discussing the most relevant evidence and their clinical experiences. Consensus statements were derived from the proceedings, followed by further discussions, revisions, finalization, and unanimous agreement. Each statement was assigned a level of evidence and a grade of recommendation. RESULTS A total of 9 consensus recommendations were established. Identification of the intersegmental plane for sublobar resections, localization of pulmonary nodules, lymphatic mapping in lung tumors, and assessment of gastric conduit perfusion were applications of fluorescence imaging that have the most robust current evidence. CONCLUSIONS Based on best available evidence and expert opinions, these consensus recommendations may facilitate thoracic and esophageal surgery using fluorescence imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calvin Sze-Hang Ng
- Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Boon-Hean Ong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Kai Chao
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linko, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Gavin M Wright
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yasuo Sekine
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yachiyo Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Yachiyo, Japan
| | - Ian Wong
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Zhexue Hao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangjian Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | | | | | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hyun Koo Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shen Y, Chen X, Hou J, Chen Y, Fang Y, Xue Z, D'Journo XB, Cerfolio RJ, Fernando HC, Fiorelli A, Brunelli A, Cang J, Tan L, Wang H. The effect of enhanced recovery after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9113-9122. [PMID: 35773604 PMCID: PMC9652161 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09385-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine if enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) would improve outcomes for three-stage minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). METHODS Patients with esophageal cancer undergoing MIE between March 2016 and August 2018 were consecutively enrolled, and were randomly divided into 2 groups: ERAS+group that received a guideline-based ERAS protocol, and ERAS- group that received standard care. The primary endpoint was morbidity after MIE. The secondary endpoints were the length of stay (LOS) and time to ambulation after the surgery. The perioperative results including the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) and Visualized Analgesia Score (VAS) were also collected and compared. RESULTS A total of 60 patients in the ERAS+ group and 58 patients in the ERAS- group were included. Postoperatively, lower morbidity and pulmonary complication rate were recorded in the ERAS+ group (33.3% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.04, 16.7% vs. 32.8%; p = 0.04), while the incidence of anastomotic leakage remained comparable (11.7% vs. 15.5%; p = 0.54). There was an earlier ambulation (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.001), but comparable LOS (10 [9-11.25] days vs. 10 [9-13] days; p = 0.165) recorded in ERAS+ group. The ERAS protocol led to close scores in both SAS (7.80 ± 1.03 vs. 8.07 ± 0.89, p = 0.21) and VAS (1.74 ± 0.85 vs. 1.78 ± 1.06, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing MIE resulted in earlier ambulation and lower pulmonary complications, without a change in anastomotic leakage or length of hospital stay. Further studies on minimizing leakage should be addressed in ERAS for MIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxing Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 10021, China
| | - Xiaosang Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Junyi Hou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Youwen Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Yong Fang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhanggang Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Xavier Benoit D'Journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Diseases of Esophagus, Aix-Marseille University, North Hospital, Chemin des Bourrely, 13915, Marseille Cedex 20, France
| | - Robert J Cerfolio
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hiran C Fernando
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alfonso Fiorelli
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, Università Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Brunelli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Jing Cang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Muir D, Antonowicz S, Whiting J, Low D, Maynard N. Implementation of the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group definitions: the benefits of speaking the same language. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6603615. [PMID: 35673848 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
In 2015 the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group (ECCG) reported consensus definitions for complications after esophagectomy. This aimed to reduce variation in complication reporting, attributed to heterogeneous definitions. This systematic review aimed to describe the implementation of this definition set, including the effect on complication frequency and variation. A systematic literature review was performed, identifying all observational and randomized studies reporting complication frequencies after esophagectomy since the ECCG publication. Recruitment periods before and subsequent to the index ECCG publication date were included. Coefficients of variance were calculated to assess outcome heterogeneity. Of 144 studies which met inclusion criteria, 70 (48.6%) used ECCG definitions. The median number of separately reported complication types was five per study; only one study reported all ECCG complications. The coefficients of variance of the reported frequencies of eight of the 10 most common complications were reduced in studies which used the ECCG definitions compared with those that did not (P = 0.036). Among ECCG studies, the frequencies of postoperative pneumothorax, reintubation, and pulmonary emboli were significantly reduced in 2020-2021, compared with 2015-2019 (P = 0.006, 0.034, and 0.037 respectively). The ECCG definition set has reduced variation in esophagectomy morbidity reporting. This adds greater confidence to the observed gradual improvement in outcomes with time, and its ongoing use and wider dissemination should be encouraged. However, only a handful of outcomes are widely reported, and only rarely is it used in its entirety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Muir
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stefan Antonowicz
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack Whiting
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Donald Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xing H, Hu M, Wang Z, Jiang Y. Short-term outcomes of Ivor Lewis vs. McKeown esophagectomy: A meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:950108. [PMID: 36386496 PMCID: PMC9649905 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.950108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to assess the rate of anastomotic leak and other perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy with either thoracic or cervical anastomosis. METHODS This meta-analysis was conducted by searching relevant literature studies in Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. Articles that included patients undergoing esophagectomy and compared perioperative outcomes of McKeown with Ivor Lewis procedures were included. The primary outcome parameter was anastomotic leak, and secondary outcome parameters were grade ≥2 anastomotic leak, chylothorax, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, postoperative mortality rate, operative time, blood loss, R0 resection rate, and lymph nodes examined. RESULTS A total of eight studies, with 3,291 patients (1,857 Ivor Lewis procedure and 1,434 McKeown procedure) were eligible for analysis. Meta-analysis showed that Ivor Lewis procedure was associated with lower rate of anastomosis leak of all grades [risk ratio (RR), 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.82; P = 0.0001], lower rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.08-0.25), and shorter length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.22). Grade ≥2 anastomotic leak, chylothorax, ICU length of stay, postoperative mortality rate, operative time, blood loss, R0 resection rate, and lymph nodes examined were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Although all grades of anastomotic leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury are higher in the McKeown procedure, this meta-analysis supports similar short-term outcomes and oncological efficacy between Ivor Lewis and McKeown esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huajie Xing
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Mengyu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhiqiang Wang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuequan Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aiolfi A, Sozzi A, Bonitta G, Lombardo F, Cavalli M, Cirri S, Campanelli G, Danelli P, Bona D. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:3297-3309. [PMID: 36242619 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02706-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different techniques have been described for esophagogastric anastomosis. Over the past decades, surgeons have been improving anastomotic techniques with a gradual shift from hand-sewn to stapled anastomosis. Nowadays, circular-stapled (CS) and linear-stapled (LS) anastomosis are commonly used during esophagectomy. METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to June 2022. The included studies evaluated short-term outcomes for LS vs. CS anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak (AL) and stricture (AS). Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were used as pooled effect size measures whereas 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were used to assess relative inference. RESULTS Eighteen studies (2861 patients) were included. Overall, 1371 (47.9%) underwent CS while 1490 (52.1%) LS. Compared to CS, LS was associated with a significantly reduced RR for AL (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.54-0.91; p < 0.01) and AS (RR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.20-0.51; p < 0.0001). Stratified subgroup analysis according to the level of anastomosis (cervical and thoracic) still shows a tendency toward reduced risk for LS. No differences were found for pneumonia (RR 0.78; p = 0.12), reflux esophagitis (RR 0.74; p = 0.36), operative time (SMD -0.25; p = 0.16), hospital length of stay (SMD 0.13; p = 0.51), and 30-day mortality (RR 1.26; p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS LS anastomosis seems associated with a tendency toward a reduced risk for AL and AS. Although surgeon's own training and experience might direct the choice of esophagogastric anastomosis, our meta-analysis encourages the use of LS anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy. .,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Sozzi
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Lombardo
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Cavalli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Cirri
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giampiero Campanelli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Piergiorgio Danelli
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Bona
- I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio, Division of General Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insubria, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.,Department of General Surgery, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Singh P, Gossage J, Markar S, Pucher PH, Wickham A, Weblin J, Chidambaram S, Bull A, Pickering O, Mythen M, Maynard N, Grocott M, Underwood T. Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on intraoperative and postoperative interventions to reduce pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1096-1106. [PMID: 36001582 PMCID: PMC10364741 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary complications are the most common morbidity after oesophagectomy, contributing to mortality and prolonged postoperative recovery, and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life. A variety of single or bundled interventions in the perioperative setting have been developed to reduce the incidence of pulmonary complications. Significant variation in practice exists across the UK. The aim of this modified Delphi consensus was to deliver clear evidence-based consensus recommendations regarding intraoperative and postoperative care that may reduce pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy. METHODS With input from a multidisciplinary group of 23 experts in the perioperative management of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal cancer, a modified Delphi method was employed. Following an initial systematic review of relevant literature, a range of anaesthetic, surgical, and postoperative care interventions were identified. These were then discussed during a two-part virtual conference. Recommendation statements were drafted, refined, and agreed by all attendees. The level of evidence supporting each statement was considered. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 12 statements on topics including operative approach, pyloric drainage strategies, intraoperative fluid and ventilation strategies, perioperative analgesia, postoperative feeding plans, and physiotherapy interventions. Seven additional questions concerning the perioperative management of patients undergoing oesophagectomy were highlighted to guide future research. CONCLUSION Clear consensus recommendations regarding intraoperative and postoperative interventions that may reduce pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pritam Singh
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - James Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sheraz Markar
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
| | - Philip H Pucher
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Alex Wickham
- Department of Anaesthesia, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Weblin
- Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Alexander Bull
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Oliver Pickering
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| | - Monty Mythen
- Centre for Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mike Grocott
- NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Tim Underwood
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial. Int J Surg 2022; 106:106921. [PMID: 36116675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage (AL) after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Preoperative gastric conditioning (GC) improves blood perfusion of the gastroplasty, one of the most important factors for anastomotic viability. This pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility of GC before oesophageal surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer or Siewert I-II esophagogastric junction cancer, who required an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a randomized (1:1), open-label, single-centre, controlled, parallel-group, pilot clinical trial. Two study groups: 1) GC-group: patients who underwent an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and GC before surgery; 2) Surgery alone (SA)-group: patients who underwent only Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Feasibility was assessed by means of the number of patients in whom a GC was performed, and the cumulative incidence of postoperative AL. Secondary endpoints were conduit necrosis (CN), hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and anastomotic stricture. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 38 patients were randomized and analysed: 20 to GC-group and 18 to SA-group. 17 GCs (85%) were successfully performed, right gastric artery occlusion failed in three patients. Morbidity after GC occurred in 5/22 patients (all Clavien-Dindo ≤ IIIa). The cumulative incidence of AL was 15.0% (3/20, 95%CI: 5.2-36.0%) in GC-group and 33.3% (6/18, 95%CI: 16.3-56.3%) in SA-group, p-value: 0.184. CN: 0/20 vs. 1/18 (p-value: 0.474); surgical morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III-V): 7/20 vs. 12/18 (p-value: 0.070); hospital stay (median [range] days): 12 [9-45] vs. 27.5 [10-166] (p-value: 0.067). When only successful GCs (three arteries) were included for analysis, ischemia-related gastric conduit failure (AL and CN) was lower in the GC group (p-value: 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative arteriographic GC before Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is a feasible and safe procedure and seems it may reduce AL in patients with oesophageal cancer or Siewert I-II esophagogastric junction cancer.
Collapse
|
21
|
West M, Bates A, Grimmett C, Allen C, Green R, Hawkins L, Moyses H, Leggett S, Z H Levett D, Rickard S, Varkonyi-Sepp J, Williams F, Wootton S, Hayes M, P W Grocott M, Jack S. The Wessex Fit-4-Cancer Surgery Trial (WesFit): a protocol for a factorial-design, pragmatic randomised-controlled trial investigating the effects of a multi-modal prehabilitation programme in patients undergoing elective major intra–cavity cancer surgery. F1000Res 2022; 10:952. [PMID: 36247802 PMCID: PMC9490280 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.55324.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment for intra-cavity cancer. Low physical fitness and psychological factors such as depression are predictive of post–operative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. Prolonged post-operative morbidity is associated with persistently elevated risk of premature death. We aim to investigate whether a structured, responsive exercise training programme, a psychological support programme or combined exercise and psychological support, delivered between treatment decision and major intra-cavity surgery for cancer, can reduce length of hospital stay, compared with standard care. Methods: WesFit is a pragmatic
, 2x2 factorial-design, multi-centre, randomised-controlled trial, with planned recruitment of N=1560. Participants will be randomised to one of four groups. Group 1 (control) will receive usual pre-operative care, Group 2 (exercise) patients will undergo 2/3 aerobic, high-intensity interval training sessions per week supervised by personal trainers. Group 3 (psychological support) patients are offered 1 session per week at a local cancer support centre. Group 4 will receive both exercise and psychological support. All patients undergo baseline and pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing, complete self-report questionnaires and will be followed up at 30 days, 12 weeks and 12 months post-operatively. Primary outcome is post-operative length-of-stay. Secondary outcomes include disability-adjusted survival at 1-year postoperatively, post-operative morbidity, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory investigations include objectively measured changes in physical fitness assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test, disease-free and overall mortality at 1-year postoperatively, longer-term physical activity behaviour change, pre-operative radiological tumour regression, pathological tumour regression, pre and post-operative body composition analysis, health economics analysis and nutritional characterisation and its relationship to post-operative outcome. Conclusions: The WesFit trial will be a randomised controlled study investigating whether a high-intensity exercise training programme +/- psychological intervention results in improvements in clinical and patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing major inter-cavity resection of cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03509428 (26/04/2018)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm West
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Andrew Bates
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO22 1BJ, UK
| | - Cait Allen
- Wessex Cancer Trust, Registered charity 1110216, Chandlers Ford, SO53 2GG, UK
| | - Richard Green
- Anaesthetic Department (Royal Bournemouth Site), University Hospitals Dorset, Bournmouth, BH77DW, UK
| | - Lesley Hawkins
- Critical Care/Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Helen Moyses
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Samantha Leggett
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Denny Z H Levett
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sally Rickard
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Judit Varkonyi-Sepp
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Fran Williams
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Stephen Wootton
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Matthew Hayes
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Micheal P W Grocott
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sandy Jack
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Matthée E, Slootmans CAM, Ultee G, Schouten J, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, van den Berg JW, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TCM, van Esser S, Dekker JWT, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JWA, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CMS, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RPR, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJE, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MAH, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Silviu C, Rodica B, Florin A, Cristian Gelu R, Petre H, Guevara Castro R, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Abdelkarem Ahmed H, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AAA, Wills V, Campbell C, Perez Cerdeira M, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Adelino Barbosa J, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZL, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler MI, Schofield WA, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Leturio Fernández S, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Abdullah Ben Taher F, Ekheel M, Msherghi AAA. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.
Methods
This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.
Results
Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.
Conclusion
The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ , Maastricht , the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital group , Almelo , the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital , Tilburg , the Netherlands
| | - Renol Koshy
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Coventry , UK
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham , UK
- Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022; 109:864-871. [PMID: 35759409 PMCID: PMC10364775 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score. METHODS This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally. RESULTS Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification. CONCLUSION The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital group, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Renol Koshy
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.,Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tu DH, Qu R, Ping W, Yang G, Fu X, Cai Y. Anastomosis oversewing technique to prevent leakage after oesophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 61:990-998. [PMID: 35325107 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Oesophagogastric anastomosis is a core part of oesophagectomy, and anastomotic leakage is among its main concerns. We used the oversewing technique to reinforce the anastomosis created with a circular stapler. This study investigated the use of oversewing to reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage without increasing morbidity. METHODS This study enrolled 1734 patients who underwent oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between April 2012 and December 2019. Using propensity score-matched analysis, the clinical results of postoperative complications were compared between anastomotic-oversewn and -unsewn oesophagectomies. RESULTS Of the 1734 patients, 661 were included in the anastomotic-unsewn group and 661 in the anastomotic-oversewn group after propensity score matching. The clinical characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, but the frequency of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher in the anastomotic-unsewn group than in the anastomotic-oversewn group (10.3% vs 4.7%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic analysis showed oversewn anastomosis and smoking history as the independent factors associated with anastomotic leakage (odds ratios, 0.399 and 2.383; P < 0.001 and P = 0.012, respectively). On the sub-group analysis, the relative risk for anastomotic leakage was significantly higher with unsewn than with oversewn anastomosis in patients <65 years old, those with American Association of Anesthesiologists score II, those who had middle segment oesophageal cancer and those who have undergone the McKeown approach and cervical anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS Anastomosis oversewing technique may be a practical method to reduce anastomotic leakage, especially in younger patients and those who have undergone the McKeown approach and cervical anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De-Hao Tu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Rirong Qu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Ping
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiangning Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yixin Cai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chou SY, Lu HI, Chen YH, Lo CM, Lin YH, Huang TT, Fang FM, Chen LC, Chen Y, Chiu YC, Chou YP, Li SH, Wang YM. The Radiation Dose to the Left Supraclavicular Fossa is Critical for Anastomotic Leak Following Esophagectomy – A Dosimetric Outcome Analysis. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:1603-1613. [PMID: 35530530 PMCID: PMC9075167 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s354667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shang-Yu Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-I Lu
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Hao Chen
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Ming Lo
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Hsuan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Ting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Min Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chun Chen
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu Chen
- Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Chiu
- Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yeh-Pin Chou
- Division of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shau-Hsuan Li
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Shau-Hsuan Li, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan, Tel +886-7-7317123 ext. 8303, Fax +886-7-7322813, Email
| | - Yu-Ming Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Correspondence: Yu-Ming Wang, Department of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 129, Ta-Pei Road, Niaosong Dist., Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan, Tel +886-7-7317123 ext. 7000, Fax +886-7-7322813, Email
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chon SH, Berlth F, Dratsch T, Plum PS, Lorenz F, Goeser T, Bruns CJ. Outcome of prophylactic endoscopic vacuum therapy for high-risk anastomosis after esophagectomy. MINIM INVASIV THER 2022; 31:1079-1085. [DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2022.2051719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hun Chon
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix Berlth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Dratsch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Patrick Sven Plum
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Lorenz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Tobias Goeser
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christiane J. Bruns
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lee Y, Lu JY, Malhan R, Shargall Y, Finley C, Hanna W, Agzarian J. Effect of Routine Jejunostomy Tube Insertion in Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 164:422-432.e17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
28
|
Zhong J, Zhang S, Li C, Hu Y, Wei W, Liu L, Wang M, Hong Z, Long H, Rong T, Yang H, Su X. Active cycle of breathing technique may reduce pulmonary complications after esophagectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Thorac Cancer 2021; 13:76-83. [PMID: 34773384 PMCID: PMC8720618 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to determine whether the active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) has an impact on postoperative pulmonary complication (PPC) after esophagectomy. METHODS In this prospective randomized trial, patients who were candidates for esophagectomy were randomized into groups, wherein they received either ACBT (n = 146) or conventional chest physiotherapy (control group, n = 145) on postoperative days (POD) 1-3. The primary outcome was PPC. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL), efficacy of airway clearance, and postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS After esophagectomy, the PPC rate was significantly lower in the ACBT group (15.2%) than in the control group (31.0%) (p = 0.001). The incidences of AL were 5.5% and 12.4% in the ACBT and control groups, respectively (p = 0.042). Mean hospital LOS was 12.3 days for the ACBT group and 16.8 days for the control group (p = 0.008). ACBT significantly increased the mean sputum wet weight (g) on POD 1-3 when compared with conventional therapy (POD 1 9.08 vs. 6.47, POD 2 16.86 vs. 10.92, POD 3 24.65 vs. 13.52, all p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that ACBT decreased the rates of PPC (odds ratio [OR] 0.403, p = 0.003), AL (OR 0.379,p = 0.038),arrhythmia (OR 0.397, p = 0.028), and bronchoscopy aspiration (OR 0.362, p = 0.016). CONCLUSION ACBT is an effective airway clearance technique that significantly reduces the incidence of PPC after esophagectomy. ACBT could also significantly reduce both AL and LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiudi Zhong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Siwen Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chuangzhen Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weijin Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhangxian Hong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hao Long
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tiehua Rong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaodong Su
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China and Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
West M, Bates A, Grimmett C, Allen C, Green R, Hawkins L, Moyses H, Leggett S, Z H Levett D, Rickard S, Varkonyi-Sepp J, Williams F, Wootton S, Hayes M, P W Grocott M, Jack S. The Wessex Fit-4-Cancer Surgery Trial (WesFit): a protocol for a factorial-design, pragmatic randomised-controlled trial investigating the effects of a multi-modal prehabilitation programme in patients undergoing elective major intra-cavity cancer surgery. F1000Res 2021; 10:952. [PMID: 36247802 PMCID: PMC9490280 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.55324.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Surgical resection remains the primary curative treatment for intra-cavity cancer. Low physical fitness and psychological factors such as depression are predictive of post-operative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. Prolonged post-operative morbidity is associated with persistently elevated risk of premature death. We aim to investigate whether a structured, responsive exercise training programme, a psychological support programme or combined exercise and psychological support, delivered between treatment decision and major intra-cavity surgery for cancer, can reduce length of hospital stay, compared with standard care. Methods: WesFit is a pragmatic , 2x2 factorial-design, multi-centre, randomised-controlled trial, with planned recruitment of N=1560. Participants will be randomised to one of four groups. Group 1 (control) will receive usual pre-operative care, Group 2 (exercise) patients will undergo 2/3 aerobic, high-intensity interval training sessions per week supervised by personal trainers. Group 3 (psychological support) patients are offered 1 session per week at a local cancer support centre. Group 4 will receive both exercise and psychological support. All patients undergo baseline and pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing, complete self-report questionnaires and will be followed up at 30 days, 12 weeks and 12 months post-operatively. Primary outcome is post-operative length-of-stay. Secondary outcomes include disability-adjusted survival at 1-year postoperatively, post-operative morbidity, and health-related quality of life. Exploratory investigations include objectively measured changes in physical fitness assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test, disease-free and overall mortality at 1-year postoperatively, longer-term physical activity behaviour change, pre-operative radiological tumour regression, pathological tumour regression, pre and post-operative body composition analysis, health economics analysis and nutritional characterisation and its relationship to post-operative outcome. Conclusions: The WesFit trial will be a randomised controlled study investigating whether a high-intensity exercise training programme +/- psychological intervention results in improvements in clinical and patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing major inter-cavity resection of cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03509428 (26/04/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm West
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Andrew Bates
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO22 1BJ, UK
| | - Cait Allen
- Wessex Cancer Trust, Registered charity 1110216, Chandlers Ford, SO53 2GG, UK
| | - Richard Green
- Anaesthetic Department (Royal Bournemouth Site), University Hospitals Dorset, Bournmouth, BH77DW, UK
| | - Lesley Hawkins
- Critical Care/Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Research Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Helen Moyses
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Samantha Leggett
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Denny Z H Levett
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sally Rickard
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Judit Varkonyi-Sepp
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Fran Williams
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Stephen Wootton
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Matthew Hayes
- Wessex Cancer Alliance, Oakley Road, Southampton, SO16 4GX, UK
| | - Micheal P W Grocott
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Sandy Jack
- School of Clinical and Experimental Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van Kooten RT, Voeten DM, Steyerberg EW, Hartgrink HH, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegersberg R, Tollenaar RAEM, Wouters MWJM. Patient-Related Prognostic Factors for Anastomotic Leakage, Major Complications, and Short-Term Mortality Following Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1358-1373. [PMID: 34482453 PMCID: PMC8724192 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10734-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to identify preoperative patient-related prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage, mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing oncological esophagectomy. BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure with an incidence of major complications around 25% and short-term mortality around 4%. METHODS We systematically searched the Medline and Embase databases for studies investigating the associations between patient-related prognostic factors and anastomotic leakage, major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa), and/or 30-day/in-hospital mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. RESULTS Thirty-nine eligible studies identifying 37 prognostic factors were included. Cardiac comorbidity was associated with anastomotic leakage, major complications, and mortality. Male sex and diabetes were prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage and major complications. Additionally, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > III and renal disease were associated with anastomotic leakage and mortality. Pulmonary comorbidity, vascular comorbidity, hypertension, and adenocarcinoma tumor histology were identified as prognostic factors for anastomotic leakage. Age > 70 years, habitual alcohol usage, and body mass index (BMI) 18.5-25 kg/m2 were associated with increased risk for mortality. CONCLUSIONS Various patient-related prognostic factors are associated with anastomotic leakage, major postoperative complications, and postoperative mortality following oncological esophagectomy. This knowledge may define case-mix adjustment models used in benchmarking or auditing and may assist in selection of patients eligible for surgery or tailored perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert T van Kooten
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan M Voeten
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Dutch Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bolger JC, Parente DN, Yeung JC. Esophagectomy in the setting of left sided portal hypertension. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 113:e413-e415. [PMID: 34474025 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.07.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Left-sided portal hypertension is a rare entity with considerable splenogastric collateralization. We report a case of esophagectomy in the setting of left-sided portal hypertension with resulting treatment of both the esophageal cancer and the portal hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarlath C Bolger
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - David N Parente
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Yeung
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Performance of a deep learning-based identification system for esophageal cancer from CT images. Esophagus 2021; 18:612-620. [PMID: 33635412 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-021-00826-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because cancers of hollow organs such as the esophagus are hard to detect even by the expert physician, it is important to establish diagnostic systems to support physicians and increase the accuracy of diagnosis. In recent years, deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been employed for medical image recognition. However, no optimal CT diagnostic system employing deep learning technology has been attempted and established for esophageal cancer so far. PURPOSE To establish an AI-based diagnostic system for esophageal cancer from CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 457 patients with primary esophageal cancer referred to our division between 2005 and 2018 were enrolled. We fine-tuned VGG16, an image recognition model of deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN), for the detection of esophageal cancer. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the CNN using a test data set including 46 cancerous CT images and 100 non-cancerous images and compared it to that of two radiologists. RESULTS Pre-treatment esophageal cancer stages of the patients included in the test data set were clinical T1 (12 patients), clinical T2 (9 patients), clinical T3 (20 patients), and clinical T4 (5 patients). The CNN-based system showed a diagnostic accuracy of 84.2%, F value of 0.742, sensitivity of 71.7%, and specificity of 90.0%. CONCLUSIONS Our AI-based diagnostic system succeeded in detecting esophageal cancer with high accuracy. More training with vast datasets collected from multiples centers would lead to even higher diagnostic accuracy and aid better decision making.
Collapse
|
33
|
van Workum F, Verstegen MHP, Klarenbeek BR, Bouwense SAW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Gisbertz SS, Hannink G, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Jansen W, Kouwenhoven EA, van Lanschot JJB, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, van der Peet DL, Polat F, Ubels S, Wijnhoven BPL, Rovers MM, Rosman C. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:601-610. [PMID: 33978698 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Transthoracic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly performed as part of curative multimodality treatment. There appears to be no robust evidence on the preferred location of the anastomosis after transthoracic MIE. Objective To compare an intrathoracic with a cervical anastomosis in a randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants This open, multicenter randomized clinical superiority trial was performed at 9 Dutch high-volume hospitals. Patients with midesophageal to distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer planned for curative resection were included. Data collection occurred from April 2016 through February 2020. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to transthoracic MIE with intrathoracic or cervical anastomosis. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was anastomotic leakage requiring endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were overall anastomotic leak rate, other postoperative complications, length of stay, mortality, and quality of life. Results Two hundred sixty-two patients were randomized, and 245 were eligible for analysis. Anastomotic leakage necessitating reintervention occurred in 15 of 122 patients with intrathoracic anastomosis (12.3%) and in 39 of 123 patients with cervical anastomosis (31.7%; risk difference, -19.4% [95% CI, -29.5% to -9.3%]). Overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.3% in the intrathoracic anastomosis group and 34.1% in the cervical anastomosis group (risk difference, -21.9% [95% CI, -32.1% to -11.6%]). Intensive care unit length of stay, mortality rates, and overall quality of life were comparable between groups, but intrathoracic anastomosis was associated with fewer severe complications (risk difference, -11.3% [-20.4% to -2.2%]), lower incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (risk difference, -7.3% [95% CI, -12.1% to -2.5%]), and better quality of life in 3 subdomains (mean differences: dysphagia, -12.2 [95% CI, -19.6 to -4.7]; problems of choking when swallowing, -10.3 [95% CI, -16.4 to 4.2]; trouble with talking, -15.3 [95% CI, -22.9 to -7.7]). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, intrathoracic anastomosis resulted in better outcome for patients treated with transthoracic MIE for midesophageal to distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. Trial Registration Trialregister.nl Identifier: NL4183 (NTR4333).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek H P Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan R Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Walther Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout A Kouwenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep (Hospital Group) Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J B van Lanschot
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maroeska M Rovers
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Merritt RE. Does the Location Matter for the Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy? JAMA Surg 2021; 156:610. [PMID: 33978688 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert E Merritt
- Thoracic Surgery Division, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Knoll W, Fergusson N, Ivankovic V, Wang TF, Caiano L, Auer R, Carrier M. Extended thromboprophylaxis following major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Thromb Res 2021; 204:114-122. [PMID: 34175749 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Many guidelines recommend the use of extended duration postoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) thromboprophylaxis, although the evidence for its overall safety and efficacy is unclear. AIMS We sought to assess the 30-day postoperative rates of VTE and bleeding complications following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery and to explore the potential risks and benefits of extended duration thromboprophylaxis with LMWH in such setting. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Observational studies and RCTs of adult patients that underwent abdominopelvic cancer surgery were included. Pooled proportions for the outcome measures and pooled relative risks for the extended duration thromboprophylaxis analyses were generated. RESULTS A total of 68 studies (1,631,118 patients) were included in the analysis. The 30-day postoperative rate of VTE was 1.7% (95%CI: 1.5 to 1.9, I2 = 98%). The postoperative rate of clinically-relevant bleeding complications was 3.5% (95%CI: 1.6 to 6.1, I2 = 99%). Extended duration thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of clinical VTE (1.0% vs 2.1%; Risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95%CI: 0.31 to 0.74; I2 = 0), without a significant increase in clinically-relevant bleeding (4.0% vs. 4.9%; RR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.66 to 1.5, I2 = 0). CONCLUSIONS The overall risk of symptomatic VTE within 30 days of surgery was relatively low. Extended LMWH thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic cancer surgery was associated with a reduced incidence of clinical VTE without an increase in clinically-relevant bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Knoll
- Faculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada; Department of Medicine University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nathan Fergusson
- Department of Medicine University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Victoria Ivankovic
- Department of Medicine University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Tzu-Fei Wang
- Department of Medicine University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lucia Caiano
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Rebecca Auer
- Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Marc Carrier
- Department of Medicine University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bao T, Zhao XL, Li KK, Wang YJ, Guo W. Effect of surgical start time on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:5917701. [PMID: 33015706 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
There is growing focus on the relationship between surgical start time and postoperative outcomes. However, the extent to which the operation start time affects the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy has not previously been studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the potential effect of surgical start time on the short- and long-term outcomes for patients who underwent thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy. From September 2009 to June 2019, a total of 700 consecutive patients suffering from esophageal cancer underwent thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Daping Hospital. Among these patients, 166 esophagectomies were performed on the same day and were classified as the first- or second-start group. Patients in the first-start group were more likely to be older than those in the second-start group: (64.73 vs. 61.28, P = 0.002). In addition, patients with diabetes mellitus were more likely to be first-start cases (8.4 vs. 1.2%). After propensity score matching (52 matched patients in first-start cases and 52 matched patients in second-start cases), these findings were no longer statistically significant. There was no difference in the incidence rate of peri- or postoperative adverse events between the first- and second-start groups. The disease-specific survival rates and disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups (P = 0.236 and 0.292, respectively). On the basis of the present results, a later start time does not negatively affect the short- or long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Bao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiao-Long Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Kun-Kun Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ying-Jian Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bonavina L. Progress in the esophagogastric anastomosis and the challenges of minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:907. [PMID: 34164541 PMCID: PMC8184442 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The esophagogastric anastomosis is most commonly performed to restore digestive tract continuity after esophagectomy for cancer. Despite a long history of clinical research and development of high-tech staplers, this procedure is still feared by most surgeons and associated with a 10% leakage rate. Among specific factors that may contribute to failure of the esophageal anastomosis are the absence of serosa layer, longitudinal orientation of muscle fibers, and ischemia of the gastric conduit. It has recently been suggested that the gut microbiome may influence the healing process of the anastomosis through the presence of collagenolytic bacterial strains, indicating that suture breakdown is not only a matter of collagen biosynthesis. The esophagogastric anastomosis can be performed either in the chest or neck, and can be completely hand-sewn, completely stapled (circular or linear stapler), or semi-mechanical (linear stapler posterior wall and hand-sewn anterior wall). Because of the lack of randomized clinical trials, no conclusive evidence is available, and the debate between the hand-sewn and the stapling technique is still ongoing even in the present era of robotic surgery. Centralization of care has improved the overall postoperative outcomes of esophagectomy, but the esophagogastric anastomosis remains the Achille’s heel of the procedure. More research and network collaboration of experts is needed to improve safety and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese (Milano), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Anastomotic leak following oesophagectomy: research priorities from an international Delphi consensus study. Br J Surg 2021; 108:66-73. [PMID: 33640931 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) is an international collaborative group set up to study anastomotic leak outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. This Delphi study aimed to prioritize future research areas of unmet clinical need in RCTs to reduce anastomotic leaks. METHODS A modified Delphi process was overseen by the OGAA committee, national leads, and engaged clinicians from high-income countries (HICs) and low/middle-income countries (LMICs). A three-stage iterative process was used to prioritize research topics, including a scoping systematic review (stage 1), and two rounds of anonymous electronic voting (stages 2 and 3) addressing research priority and ability to recruit. Stratified analyses were performed by country income. RESULTS In stage 1, the steering committee proposed research topics across six domains: preoperative optimization, surgical oncology, technical approach, anastomotic technique, enhanced recovery and nutrition, and management of leaks. In stages 2 and stage 3, 192 and 171 respondents respectively participated in online voting. Prioritized research topics include prehabilitation, anastomotic technique, and timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Stratified analyses by country income demonstrated no significant differences in research priorities between HICs and LMICs. However, for ability to recruit, there were significant differences between LMICs and HICs for themes related to the technical approach (minimally invasive, width of gastric tube, ischaemic preconditioning) and location of the anastomosis. CONCLUSION Several areas of research priority are consistent across LMICs and HICs, but discrepancies in ability to recruit by country income will inform future study design.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kamarajah SK, Madhavan A, Chmelo J, Navidi M, Wahed S, Immanuel A, Hayes N, Griffin SM, Phillips AW. Impact of Smoking Status on Perioperative Morbidity, Mortality, and Long-Term Survival Following Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:4905-4915. [PMID: 33660129 PMCID: PMC8349321 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09720-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Esophagectomy is a key component in the curative treatment of esophageal cancer. Little is understood about the impact of smoking status on perioperative morbidity and mortality and the long-term outcome of patients following esophagectomy. Objective This study aimed to evaluate morbidity and mortality according to smoking status in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing two-stage transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for esophageal cancers (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) between January 1997 and December 2016 at the Northern Oesophagogastric Unit were included from a prospectively maintained database. The main explanatory variable was smoking status, defined as current smoker, ex-smoker, and non-smoker. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included perioperative complications (overall, anastomotic leaks, and pulmonary complications) and survival (cancer-specific survival [CSS], recurrence-free survival [RFS]). Results During the study period, 1168 patients underwent esophagectomy for cancer. Of these, 24% (n = 282) were current smokers and only 30% (n = 356) had never smoked. The median OS of current smokers was significantly shorter than ex-smokers and non-smokers (median 36 vs. 42 vs. 48 months; p = 0.015). However, on adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in long-term OS between smoking status in the entire cohort. The overall complication rates were significantly higher with current smokers compared with ex-smokers or non-smokers (73% vs. 66% vs. 62%; p = 0.018), and there were no significant differences in anastomotic leaks and pulmonary complications between the groups. On subgroup analysis by receipt of neoadjuvant therapy and tumor histology, smoking status did not impact long-term survival in adjusted multivariable analyses. Conclusion Although smoking is associated with higher rates of short-term perioperative morbidity, it does not affect long-term OS, CSS, and RFS following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Therefore, implementation of perioperative pathways to optimize patients may help reduce the risk of complications. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09720-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivesh K Kamarajah
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.,Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Anantha Madhavan
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Jakub Chmelo
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Maziar Navidi
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Shajahan Wahed
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Arul Immanuel
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Nick Hayes
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - S Michael Griffin
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle University Trust Hospitals, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK. .,School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li Y, Liu J, Li HX, Cai XW, Li ZG, Ye XD, Teng HH, Fu XL, Yu W. Radiomics Signature Facilitates Organ-Saving Strategy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:615167. [PMID: 33680935 PMCID: PMC7933499 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC), roughly 40% of the patients may achieve pathologic complete response (pCR). Those patients may benefit from organ-saving strategy if the probability of pCR could be correctly identified before esophagectomy. A reliable approach to predict pathological response allows future studies to investigate individualized treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong-Xuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu-Wei Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Gang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Ye
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao-Hua Teng
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Long Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Rossum M, Leenen J, Kingma F, Breteler M, van Hillegersberg R, Ruurda J, Kouwenhoven E, van Det M, Luyer M, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Kalkman C, Hermens H. Expectations of Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring for Recognizing Complications After Esophagectomy: Interview Study Among Nurses and Surgeons. JMIR Perioper Med 2021; 4:e22387. [PMID: 33576743 PMCID: PMC7910120 DOI: 10.2196/22387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing esophagectomy are at serious risk of developing postoperative complications. To support early recognition of clinical deterioration, wireless sensor technologies that enable continuous vital signs monitoring in a ward setting are emerging. Objective This study explored nurses’ and surgeons’ expectations of the potential effectiveness and impact of continuous wireless vital signs monitoring in patients admitted to the ward after esophagectomy. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted at 3 esophageal cancer centers in the Netherlands. In each center, 2 nurses and 2 surgeons were interviewed regarding their expectations of continuous vital signs monitoring for early recognition of complications after esophagectomy. Historical data of patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected in each center and presented to the local participants to support estimations on clinical outcome. Results The majority of nurses and surgeons expected that continuous vital signs monitoring could contribute to the earlier recognition of deterioration and result in earlier treatment for postoperative complications, although the effective time gain would depend on patient and situational factors. Their expectations regarding the impact of potential earlier diagnosis on clinical outcomes varied. Nevertheless, most caregivers would consider implementing continuous monitoring in the surgical ward to support patient monitoring after esophagectomy. Conclusions Caregivers expected that wireless vital signs monitoring would provide opportunities for early detection of postoperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy admitted to the ward and prevent sequelae under certain circumstances. As the technology matures, clinical outcome studies will be necessary to objectify these expectations and further investigate overall effects on patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde van Rossum
- Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jobbe Leenen
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands.,Connected Care Centre, Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
| | - Feike Kingma
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Martine Breteler
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Marc van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Misha Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Cor Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hermie Hermens
- Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reynolds JV, Donlon N, Elliott JA, Donohoe C, Ravi N, Kuppusamy MK, Low DE. Comparison of Esophagectomy outcomes between a National Center, a National Audit Collaborative, and an International database using the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardized definitions. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:5863448. [PMID: 32591791 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The ECCG developed a standardized platform for reporting operative complications, with consensus definitions. The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) published a national comparison against these benchmarks. This study compares ECCG data from the Irish National Center (INC) with both published benchmark studies. All patients undergoing multimodal therapy or surgery with curative intent from 2014 to 2018 inclusive were studied, with data recorded prospectively and entered onto a secure online database (Esodata.org). 219 patients (mean age 67; 77% male) underwent open resection, 66.6% via transthoracic en bloc resection. 30-day and 90-day mortality were 0.0 and 0.9%,nrespectively. Anastomotic leak rate was 5.4%, pneumonia 18.2%, respiratory failure 10%, ARDS 2.7%, atrial dysrhythmia 22.8%, recurrent nerve injury 3%, and delirium in 5% of patients. Compared with both ECCG and DUCA, where MIE constituted 47 and 86% of surgical approaches, respectively, overall complications were similar, as were severity of complications; however, anastomotic leak rate was several-fold less, and mortality was significantly lower (P < 0.001). In this consecutive series and comparative audit with benchmark averages from the ECCG and DUCA publications, a low mortality and anastomotic leak rate were the key differential findings. Although not risk stratified, the severity of complications from this 'open' series is consistent with series containing large numbers of total or hybrid MIE, highlighting a need to adhere to these strictly defined definitions in further prospective research and randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John V Reynolds
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Noel Donlon
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jessie A Elliott
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Claire Donohoe
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Narayanasamy Ravi
- National Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Center, St James's Hospital and Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Deana C, Vetrugno L, Stefani F, Basso A, Matellon C, Barbariol F, Vecchiato M, Ziccarelli A, Valent F, Bove T, Bassi F, Petri R, De Monte A. Postoperative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position: any anesthesia-related factor? TUMORI JOURNAL 2020; 107:525-535. [PMID: 33323061 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620979358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications arising within 30 days of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position with total lung ventilation and their relationship with 30-day and 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included possible anesthesia-related factors linked to the development of complications. METHODS The study is a retrospective single-center observational study at the Anesthesia and Surgical Department of a tertiary care center in the northeast of Italy. Patients underwent cancer resection through esophagectomy in the prone position without one-lung ventilation. RESULTS We included 110 patients from January 2010 to December 2017. A total of 54% of patients developed postoperative complications that increased mortality risk at 1 year of follow-up. Complications postponed first oral intake and delayed patient discharge to home. Positive intraoperative fluid balance was related to increased mortality and the risk to develop postoperative complications. C-reactive protein at third postoperative day may help detect complication onset. CONCLUSIONS Complication onset has a great impact on mortality after esophagectomy. Some anesthesia-related factors, mainly fluid balance, may be associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity. These factors should be carefully taken into account to obtain better outcomes after esophagectomy in the prone position without one-lung ventilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Deana
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Luigi Vetrugno
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesca Stefani
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Andrea Basso
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Carola Matellon
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Federico Barbariol
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Massimo Vecchiato
- General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Ziccarelli
- General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Francesca Valent
- Institute of Epidemiology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Tiziana Bove
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Flavio Bassi
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Roberto Petri
- General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Amato De Monte
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Breteler MJM, Numan L, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van der Horst S, Dohmen DAJ, van Rossum MC, Kalkman CJ. Wireless Remote Home Monitoring of Vital Signs in Patients Discharged Early After Esophagectomy: Observational Feasibility Study. JMIR Perioper Med 2020; 3:e21705. [PMID: 33393923 PMCID: PMC7728408 DOI: 10.2196/21705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospital stays after major surgery are shorter than ever before. Although enhanced recovery and early discharge have many benefits, some complications will now first manifest themselves in home settings. Remote patient monitoring with wearable sensors in the first days after hospital discharge may capture clinical deterioration earlier but is largely uncharted territory. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the technical feasibility of patients, discharged after esophagectomy, being remotely monitored at home with a wireless patch sensor and the experiences of these patients. In addition, we determined whether observing vital signs with a wireless patch sensor influences clinical decision making. METHODS In an observational feasibility study, vital signs of patients were monitored with a wearable patch sensor (VitalPatch, VitalConnect Inc) during the first 7 days at home after esophagectomy and discharge from hospital. Vital signs trends were shared with the surgical team once a day, and they were asked to check the patient's condition by phone each morning. Patient experiences were evaluated with a questionnaire, and technical feasibility was analyzed on a daily basis as the percentage of data loss and gap durations. In addition, the number of patients for whom a change in clinical decision was made based on the results of remote vital signs monitoring at home was assessed. RESULTS Patients (N=20) completed 7 days each of home monitoring with the wearable patch sensor. Each of the patients had good recovery at home, and remotely observed vital signs trends did not alter clinical decision making. Patients appreciated that surgeons checked their vital signs daily (mean 4.4/5) and were happy to be called by the surgical team each day (mean 4.5/5). Wearability of the patch was high (mean 4.4/5), and no reports of skin irritation were mentioned. Overall data loss of vital signs measurements at home was 25%; both data loss and gap duration varied considerably among patients. CONCLUSIONS Remote monitoring of vital signs combined with telephone support from the surgical team was feasible and well perceived by all patients. Future studies need to evaluate the impact of home monitoring on patient outcome as well as the cost-effectiveness of this new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine J M Breteler
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Luscii Healthtech BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lieke Numan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Mathilde C van Rossum
- Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Biomedical Signals and Systems Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Cor J Kalkman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Plat VD, Bootsma BT, Straatman J, van den Bergh J, van Waesberghe JHTM, Luttikhold J, Luyer MDP, van der Peet DL, Daams F. The clinical suspicion of a leaking intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis: the role of CT imaging. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:7182-7192. [PMID: 33447407 PMCID: PMC7797855 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background CT imaging is the primary diagnostic approach to assess the integrity of the intrathoracic anastomosis following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. In the postoperative setting interpretation of CT findings, such as air and fluid collections, may be challenging. Establishment of a scoring system that incorporates CT findings to diagnose anastomotic leakage could assist radiologists and surgeons in the postoperative phase. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent a CT scan for a clinical suspicion of postoperative anastomotic leakage following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy between 2010 and 2016 in two medical centers were retrospectively included. Scans were excluded when oral contrast was not (correctly) administered. Acquired images were randomized and independently assessed by two experienced gastrointestinal radiologists, blinded for clinical information. For this study anastomotic leakage was defined as a visible defect during endoscopy or thoracotomy. Results A total of 80 patients had 101 CT scans, resulting in 32 scans with a confirmed anastomotic leak (25 patients). After multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression, a practical 5-point scoring system was developed, which included the following CT findings: presence of extraluminal oral contrast, air collection at the anastomotic site, fluid collection at the anastomotic site, pneumothorax and loculated pleural effusion. Patients with a score of ≥3 were considered at high risk for anastomotic leakage (positive predictive value: 83.3%), patients with scores <3 were considered at low risk for anastomotic leakage (negative predictive value: 84.4%). The scoring system showed a superior diagnostic performance compared to the original CT report and blinded interpretation of two radiologists. Conclusions Our CT-based practical scoring system enables a standardized approach in CT assessment and could facilitate early recognition of anastomotic leakage in patients after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor D Plat
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boukje T Bootsma
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer Straatman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke van den Bergh
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joanna Luttikhold
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Micha D P Luyer
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Linden PA, Towe CW, Watson TJ, Low DE, Cassivi SD, Grau-Sepulveda M, Worrell SG, Perry Y. Mortality After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Individual Complications and Their Association with Mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1948-1954. [PMID: 31410819 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04346-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between individual complications and esophagectomy mortality is unclear. The influence of comorbidities on the impact of complications on operative mortality is also unknown. We sought to assess the impact of individual complications and the effect of coexisting comorbidities on operative mortality following esophagectomy. METHODS All gastric conduit esophagectomies performed for cancer from 2008 to 2017 in the Society of Thoracic Surgery database were identified. Chi square was utilized to identify postoperative events associated with operative mortality. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed, utilizing postoperative events, to determine the risk-adjusted effect on operative mortality for each postoperative event. To assess the effect of preoperative comorbidities, a second logistic regression analysis was performed, incorporating preoperative characteristics. RESULTS Of 11,943 esophagectomy patients, 63.9% had a postoperative event and 3.3% died, which did not change over the study period. The postoperative events with the highest impact on operative mortality were respiratory distress syndrome (OR 7.48 (95% CI 5.23-10.7)), reintubation (OR 6.55 (4.61-9.30)), and renal failure (OR 5.97 (4.08-8.75)). Anastomotic leak requiring reoperation was associated with increased operative mortality (OR 1.48 (1.03-2.14)), but medically managed leak was not. Incorporating preoperative characteristics into the operative mortality model had little effect on odds ratio for death for individual postoperative events. CONCLUSIONS In the Society of Thoracic Surgery database, 64% of patients suffer postoperative events and 3.3% die following esophagectomy. The independent association of certain postoperative events with mortality is an objective method of terming a complication "major" and may aid efforts to reduce mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Linden
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-501, USA
| | - Christopher W Towe
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-501, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Stephanie G Worrell
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-501, USA
| | - Yaron Perry
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-501, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hirahara N, Tajima Y. Favorable clinical outcomes of total robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:3455-3456. [PMID: 32802420 PMCID: PMC7399442 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Noriyuki Hirahara
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Yoshitsugu Tajima
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Luo J, Zhuo ZG, Zhu YK, Deng HY, Song TN, Alai GH, Shen X, Lin YD. Fixed in the neck or pushed back into the thorax?-Impact of cervical anastomosis position on anastomosis healing. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:2153-2160. [PMID: 32642120 PMCID: PMC7330304 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.04.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Cervical anastomotic leakage remains a great challenge for thoracic surgeons in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Among the factors affecting cervical anastomosis healing, the surgical technique is the key controllable element. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of cervical anastomotic leakage after McKeown esophagectomy, especially those controllable surgical factors. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy in the past eight years in West China Hospital was performed. Patients with cervical anastomotic leakage were assigned to leakage group (LG) while the left was enrolled in the none-leakage group (NLG). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors of anastomotic leakage. Results A total of 518 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. In the baseline comparison, the difference in fixation of anastomosis in the neck, anastomosis mode, diabetes, and hypertension between the LG and NLG reached statistically significant. Moreover, the statistical difference of cervical fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension remained significant in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions The cervical anastomosis fixation, anastomosis mode, and hypertension are independent risk factors of gastroesophageal cervical anastomotic leakage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Luo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ze-Guo Zhuo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yun-Ke Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Han-Yu Deng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.,Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Tie-Niu Song
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Gu-Ha Alai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xu Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi-Dan Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Is Local Endoscopic Resection a Viable Therapeutic Option for Early Clinical Stage T1a and T1b Esophageal Adenocarcinoma? Ann Surg 2020; 275:700-705. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
Impact of Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy on Mortality, Organ Failure, Hospital Stay, and Readmission: Analysis of a Nationwide Audit. Ann Surg 2020; 275:e222-e228. [PMID: 32502075 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the impact of individual complications on mortality, organ failure, hospital stay, and readmission after pancreatoduodenectomy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA An initial complication may provoke a sequence of adverse events potentially leading to mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. This study was conducted to aid prioritization of quality improvement initiatives. METHODS Data from consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (2014-2017) were extracted from the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit. Population attributable fractions (PAF) were calculated for the association of each complication (ie, postoperative pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, and pneumonia) with each unfavorable outcome [ie, in-hospital mortality, organ failure, prolonged hospital stay (>75th percentile), and unplanned readmission), whereas adjusting for confounders and other complications. The PAF represents the proportion of an outcome that could be prevented if a complication would be eliminated completely. RESULTS Overall, 2620 patients were analyzed. In-hospital mortality occurred in 95 patients (3.6%), organ failure in 198 patients (7.6%), and readmission in 427 patients (16.2%). Postoperative pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage had the greatest independent impact on mortality [PAF 25.7% (95% CI 13.4-37.9) and 32.8% (21.9-43.8), respectively] and organ failure [PAF 21.8% (95% CI 12.9-30.6) and 22.1% (15.0-29.1), respectively]. Delayed gastric emptying had the greatest independent impact on prolonged hospital stay [PAF 27.6% (95% CI 23.5-31.8)]. The impact of individual complications on unplanned readmission was smaller than 11%. CONCLUSION Interventions focusing on postoperative pancreatic fistula and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage may have the greatest impact on in-hospital mortality and organ failure. To prevent prolonged hospital stay, initiatives should in addition focus on delayed gastric emptying.
Collapse
|