1
|
Massmann A, Christensen KD, Van Heukelom J, Schultz A, Shaukat MHS, Hajek C, Weaver M, Green RC, Wu AC, Hickingbotham MR, Zoltick ES, Stys A, Stys TP. Clinical impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing on antiplatelet therapy in a real-world setting. Eur J Hum Genet 2024; 32:895-902. [PMID: 38424298 PMCID: PMC11291480 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01567-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy after patients develop acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or require percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) reduces the likelihood of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Evidence about the impact of preemptive testing, where genotyping occurs while patients are healthy, is lacking. In patients initiating antiplatelet therapy for ACS or PCI, we compared medical records data from 67 patients who received CYP2C19 genotyping preemptively (results >7 days before need), against medical records data from 67 propensity score-matched patients who received early genotyping (results within 7 days of need). We also examined data from 140 patients who received late genotyping (results >7 days after need). We compared the impact of genotyping approaches on medication selections, specialty visits, MACE and bleeding events over 1 year. Patients with CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles were less likely to be initiated on clopidogrel if they received preemptive rather than early or late genotyping (18.2%, 66.7%, and 73.2% respectively, p = 0.001). No differences were observed by genotyping approach in the number of specialty visits or likelihood of MACE or bleeding events (all p > 0.21). Preemptive genotyping had a strong impact on initial antiplatelet selection and a comparable impact on patient outcomes and healthcare utilization, compared to genotyping ordered after a need for antiplatelet therapy had been identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Massmann
- Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA.
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA.
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Joel Van Heukelom
- Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA
| | - April Schultz
- Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA
| | - Muhammad Hamza Saad Shaukat
- Minneapolis Heart Institute/Abbott Northwestern Hospital Institute, Minneapolis, MN, 55407, USA
- Sanford Cardiovascular Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
| | - Catherine Hajek
- Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
- Helix OpCo, LLC, San Mateo, CA, 94401, USA
| | - Max Weaver
- Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Ann Chen Wu
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Madison R Hickingbotham
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Emilie S Zoltick
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Adam Stys
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA
- Sanford Cardiovascular Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
| | - Tomasz P Stys
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD, 57069, USA
- Sanford Cardiovascular Institute, Sioux Falls, SD, 57105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wiss FM, Jakober D, Lampert ML, Allemann SS. Overcoming Barriers: Strategies for Implementing Pharmacist-Led Pharmacogenetic Services in Swiss Clinical Practice. Genes (Basel) 2024; 15:862. [PMID: 39062642 PMCID: PMC11276441 DOI: 10.3390/genes15070862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that pharmacogenetic analysis can improve drug therapy for individual patients. In Switzerland, pharmacists are legally authorized to initiate pharmacogenetic tests. However, pharmacogenetic tests are rarely conducted in Swiss pharmacies. Therefore, we aimed to identify implementation strategies that facilitate the integration of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service into clinical practice. To achieve this, we conducted semi-structured interviews with pharmacists and physicians regarding the implementation process of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service. We utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify potential facilitators and barriers in the implementation process. Additionally, we employed Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to identify strategies mentioned in the interviews and used the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to identify additional strategies. We obtained interview responses from nine pharmacists and nine physicians. From these responses, we identified 7 CFIR constructs as facilitators and 12 as barriers. Some of the most commonly mentioned barriers included unclear procedures, lack of cost coverage by health care insurance, insufficient pharmacogenetics knowledge, lack of interprofessional collaboration, communication with the patient, and inadequate e-health technologies. Additionally, we identified 23 implementation strategies mentioned by interviewees using ERIC and 45 potential strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool. In summary, we found that significant barriers hinder the implementation process of this new service. We hope that by highlighting potential implementation strategies, we can advance the integration of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetic service in Switzerland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florine M. Wiss
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (D.J.); (M.L.L.)
- Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Solothurner Spitäler, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Jakober
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (D.J.); (M.L.L.)
| | - Markus L. Lampert
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (D.J.); (M.L.L.)
- Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Solothurner Spitäler, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
| | - Samuel S. Allemann
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (D.J.); (M.L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hetland LH, Maguire J, Debono D, Wright H. Scholarly literature on nurses and pharmacogenomics: A scoping review. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2024; 137:106153. [PMID: 38484442 DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomics is the bioscience investigating how genes affect medication responses. Nurses are instrumental in medication safety. Pharmacogenomics is slowly being integrated into healthcare, and knowledge and understanding of it is now pertinent to nursing practice. PURPOSE This paper aims to map the scholarly literature on pharmacogenomics in relation to nurses. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in four databases: CINAHL, Embase (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medicine and PubMed using the search terms pharmacogenomic*, pharmacogenetic*, PGx*, and nurs*, resulting in 263 articles of which 77 articles met the inclusion criteria. FINDINGS Most articles (85 %, n = 65) were non-empirical and 12 presented empirical data (15 %, n = 12). The articles were USA-centric (81 %, n = 62) and represented a broad range of nursing specialties. CONCLUSION The majority of scholarly literature on nurses and pharmacogenomics is narrative reviews. Further empirical research is warranted to investigate nurses' current knowledge levels and potential involvement with pharmacogenomics in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linn Helen Hetland
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, QLD, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Jane Maguire
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, QLD, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah Debono
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, QLD, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Helen Wright
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, QLD, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh H, Nim DK, Randhawa AS, Ahluwalia S. Integrating clinical pharmacology and artificial intelligence: potential benefits, challenges, and role of clinical pharmacologists. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024; 17:381-391. [PMID: 38340012 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2317963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical pharmacology could be a potential approach for accelerating drug discovery and development, improving patient care, and streamlining medical research processes. AREAS COVERED We reviewed the current state of AI applications in clinical pharmacology, focusing on drug discovery and development, precision medicine, pharmacovigilance, and other ventures. Key AI applications in clinical pharmacology are examined, including machine learning, natural language processing, deep learning, and reinforcement learning etc. Additionally, the evolving role of clinical pharmacologists, ethical considerations, and challenges in implementing AI in clinical pharmacology are discussed. EXPERT OPINION The AI could be instrumental in accelerating drug discovery, predicting drug safety and efficacy, and optimizing clinical trial designs. It can play a vital role in precision medicine by helping in personalized drug dosing, treatment selection, and predicting drug response based on genetic, clinical, and environmental factors. The role of AI in pharmacovigilance, such as signal detection and adverse event prediction, is also promising. The collaboration between clinical pharmacologists and AI experts also poses certain ethical and practical challenges. Clinical pharmacologists can be instrumental in shaping the future of AI-driven clinical pharmacology and contribute to the improvement of healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmanjit Singh
- Department of Pharmacology, Government Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fragoulakis V, Koufaki MI, Joefield-Roka C, Sunder-Plassmann G, Mitropoulou C. Cost-utility analysis of pharmacogenomics-guided tacrolimus treatment in Austrian kidney transplant recipients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2024; 24:10. [PMID: 38499549 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-024-00330-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health issue. Kidney failure patients may undergo a kidney transplantation (KTX) and prescribed an immunosuppressant medication i.e., tacrolimus. Tacrolimus' efficacy and toxicity varies among patients. This study investigates the cost-utility of pharmacogenomics (PGx) guided tacrolimus treatment compared to the conventional approach in Austrian patients undergone KTX, participating in the PREPARE UPGx study. Treatment's effectiveness was determined by mean survival, and utility values were based on a Visual Analog Scale score. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio was also calculated. PGx-guided treatment arm was found to be cost-effective, resulting in reduced cost (3902 euros less), 6% less hospitalization days and lower risk of adverse drug events compared to the control arm. The PGx-guided arm showed a mean 0.900 QALYs (95% CI: 0.862-0.936) versus 0.851 QALYs (95% CI: 0.814-0.885) in the other arm. In conclusion, PGx-guided tacrolimus treatment represents a cost-saving option in the Austrian healthcare setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki
- Department of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Candace Joefield-Roka
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gere Sunder-Plassmann
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Mitropoulou
- The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK.
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Riess O, Sturm M, Menden B, Liebmann A, Demidov G, Witt D, Casadei N, Admard J, Schütz L, Ossowski S, Taylor S, Schaffer S, Schroeder C, Dufke A, Haack T. Genomes in clinical care. NPJ Genom Med 2024; 9:20. [PMID: 38485733 PMCID: PMC10940576 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-024-00402-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, genome sequencing (GS) has become more affordable and the importance of genomics and multi-omics in clinical care is increasingly being recognized. However, how to scale and effectively implement GS on an institutional level remains a challenge for many. Here, we present Genome First and Ge-Med, two clinical implementation studies focused on identifying the key pillars and processes that are required to make routine GS and predictive genomics a reality in the clinical setting. We describe our experience and lessons learned for a variety of topics including test logistics, patient care processes, data reporting, and infrastructure. Our model of providing clinical care and comprehensive genomic analysis from a single source may be used by other centers with a similar structure to facilitate the implementation of omics-based personalized health concepts in medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Riess
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Marc Sturm
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benita Menden
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Liebmann
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - German Demidov
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dennis Witt
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicolas Casadei
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jakob Admard
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Leon Schütz
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- NGS Competence Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Dufke
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Haack
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Diseases Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Skokou M, Karamperis K, Koufaki MI, Tsermpini EE, Pandi MT, Siamoglou S, Ferentinos P, Bartsakoulia M, Katsila T, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP. Clinical implementation of preemptive pharmacogenomics in psychiatry. EBioMedicine 2024; 101:105009. [PMID: 38364700 PMCID: PMC10879811 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomics (PGx) holds promise to revolutionize modern healthcare. Although there are several prospective clinical studies in oncology and cardiology, demonstrating a beneficial effect of PGx-guided treatment in reducing adverse drug reactions, there are very few such studies in psychiatry, none of which spans across all main psychiatric indications, namely schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. In this study we aim to investigate the clinical effectiveness of PGx-guided treatment (occurrence of adverse drug reactions, hospitalisations and re-admissions, polypharmacy) and perform a cost analysis of the intervention. METHODS We report our findings from a multicenter, large-scale, prospective study of pre-emptive genome-guided treatment named as PREemptive Pharmacogenomic testing for preventing Adverse drug REactions (PREPARE) in a large cohort of psychiatric patients (n = 1076) suffering from schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. FINDINGS We show that patients with an actionable phenotype belonging to the PGx-guided arm (n = 25) present with 34.1% less adverse drug reactions compared to patients belonging to the control arm (n = 36), 41.2% less hospitalisations (n = 110 in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 187 in the control arm) and 40.5% less re-admissions (n = 19 in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 32 in the control arm), less duration of initial hospitalisations (n = 3305 total days of hospitalisation in the PGx-guided arm from 110 patients, versus n = 6517 in the control arm from 187 patients) and duration of hospitalisation upon readmission (n = 579 total days of hospitalisation upon readmission in the PGx-guided arm, derived from 19 patients, versus n = 928 in the control arm, from 32 patients respectively). It was also shown that in the vast majority of the cases, there was less drug dose administrated per drug in the PGx-guided arm compared to the control arm and less polypharmacy (n = 124 patients prescribed with at least 4 psychiatric drugs in the PGx-guided arm versus n = 143 in the control arm) and smaller average number of co-administered psychiatric drugs (2.19 in the PGx-guided arm versus 2.48 in the control arm. Furthermore, less deaths were reported in the PGx-guided arm (n = 1) compared with the control arm (n = 9). Most importantly, we observed a 48.5% reduction of treatment costs in the PGx-guided arm with a reciprocal slight increase of the quality of life of patients suffering from major depressive disorder (0.935 versus 0.925 QALYs in the PGx-guided and control arm, respectively). INTERPRETATION While only a small proportion (∼25%) of the entire study sample had an actionable genotype, PGx-guided treatment can have a beneficial effect in psychiatric patients with a reciprocal reduction of treatment costs. Although some of these findings did not remain significant when all patients were considered, our data indicate that genome-guided psychiatric treatment may be successfully integrated in mainstream healthcare. FUNDING European Union Horizon 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Skokou
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Patras General Hospital, Patras, Greece
| | - Kariofyllis Karamperis
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece; The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK
| | - Margarita-Ioanna Koufaki
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece; The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK
| | - Evangelia-Eirini Tsermpini
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Maria-Theodora Pandi
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stavroula Siamoglou
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Ferentinos
- 2nd Department of Psychiatry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ATIKON University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Marina Bartsakoulia
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Theodora Katsila
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | | | - George P Patrinos
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece; Erasmus University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology, Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics and Genomics, United Arab Emirates University, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; United Arab Emirates University, Zayed Center for Health Sciences, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abad-Santos F, Aliño SF, Borobia AM, García-Martín E, Gassó P, Maroñas O, Agúndez JAG. Developments in pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, and personalized medicine. Pharmacol Res 2024; 200:107061. [PMID: 38199278 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
The development of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics in Western Europe is highly relevant in the worldwide scenario. Despite the usually low institutional support, many research groups, composed of basic and clinical researchers, have been actively working for decades in this field. Their contributions made an international impact and paved the way for further studies and pharmacogenomics implementation in clinical practice. In this manuscript, that makes part of the Special Issue entitled Spanish Pharmacology, we present an analysis of the state of the art of Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics research in Europe, we compare it with the developments in Spain, and we summarize the most salient contributions since 1988 to the present, as well as recent developments in the clinical application of pharmacogenomics knowledge. Finally, we present some considerations on how we could improve translation to clinical practice in this specific scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Abad-Santos
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), CIBEREHD, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Princesa (IP), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Salvador F Aliño
- Gene Therapy and Pharmacogenomics Group, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez 15, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto M Borobia
- Clinical Pharmacology Department, La Paz University Hospital, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elena García-Martín
- Department of Pharmacology, Universidad de Extremadura, Avda de la Universidad s/n, 10071 Cáceres, Spain
| | - Patricia Gassó
- Basic Clinical Practice Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit (BCSU), IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olalla Maroñas
- Public Foundation of Genomic Medicine, Santiago University Hospital, Genomic Medicine group, Pharmacogenetics and Drug Discovery (GenDeM), CIBERER, Santiago Health Research Institute (IDIS), Galicia, Spain
| | - José A G Agúndez
- Universidad de Extremadura. University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, Avda de las Ciencias s/n, 10071 Cáceres, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li LJ, Legeay S, Gagnon AL, Frigon MP, Tessier L, Tremblay K. Moving towards the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in Quebec. Front Genet 2024; 14:1295963. [PMID: 38234998 PMCID: PMC10791884 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1295963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) into routine care will elevate the current paradigm of treatment decisions. However, while PGx tests are increasingly becoming reliable and affordable, several barriers have limited their widespread usage in Canada. Globally, over ninety successful PGx implementors can serve as models. The purpose of this paper is to outline the PGx implementation barriers documented in Quebec (Canada) to suggest efficient solutions based on existing PGx clinics and propose an adapted clinical implementation model. We conclude that the province of Quebec is ready to implement PGx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Jing Li
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Samuel Legeay
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- University Angers, [CHU Angers], Inserm, CNRS, MINT, Angers, France
| | - Ann-Lorie Gagnon
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Pier Frigon
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence Tessier
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Pharmacology-Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada
| | - Karine Tremblay
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux Du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Chicoutimi University Hospital), Research Center, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Pharmacology-Physiology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Saguenay, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche Du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CR-CHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Principi N, Petropulacos K, Esposito S. Impact of Pharmacogenomics in Clinical Practice. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1596. [PMID: 38004461 PMCID: PMC10675377 DOI: 10.3390/ph16111596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Polymorphisms of genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters can significantly modify pharmacokinetics, and this can be associated with significant differences in drug efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Moreover, genetic variants of some components of the immune system can explain clinically relevant drug-related adverse events. However, the implementation of drug dose individualization based on pharmacogenomics remains scarce. In this narrative review, the impact of genetic variations on the disposition, safety, and tolerability of the most commonly prescribed drugs is reported. Moreover, reasons for poor implementation of pharmacogenomics in everyday clinical settings are discussed. The literature analysis showed that knowledge of how genetic variations can modify the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of a drug can lead to the adjustment of usually recommended drug dosages, improve effectiveness, and reduce drug-related adverse events. Despite some efforts to introduce pharmacogenomics in clinical practice, presently very few centers routinely use genetic tests as a guide for drug prescription. The education of health care professionals seems critical to keep pace with the rapidly evolving field of pharmacogenomics. Moreover, multimodal algorithms that incorporate both clinical and genetic factors in drug prescribing could significantly help in this regard. Obviously, further studies which definitively establish which genetic variations play a role in conditioning drug effectiveness and safety are needed. Many problems must be solved, but the advantages for human health fully justify all the efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peruzzi E, Roncato R, De Mattia E, Bignucolo A, Swen JJ, Guchelaar HJ, Toffoli G, Cecchin E. Implementation of pre-emptive testing of a pharmacogenomic panel in clinical practice: Where do we stand? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023. [PMID: 37926674 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) account for a large proportion of hospitalizations among adults and are more common in multimorbid patients, worsening clinical outcomes and burdening healthcare resources. Over the past decade, pharmacogenomics has been developed as a practical tool for optimizing treatment outcomes by mitigating the risk of ADRs. Some single-gene reactive tests are already used in clinical practice, including the DPYD test for fluoropyrimidines, which demonstrates how integrating pharmacogenomic data into routine care can improve patient safety in a cost-effective manner. The evolution from reactive single-gene testing to comprehensive pre-emptive genotyping panels holds great potential for refining drug prescribing practices. Several implementation projects have been conducted to test the feasibility of applying different genetic panels in clinical practice. Recently, the results of a large prospective randomized trial in Europe (the PREPARE study by Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics consortium) have provided the first evidence that prospective application of a pre-emptive pharmacogenomic test panel in clinical practice, in seven European healthcare systems, is feasible and yielded a 30% reduction in the risk of developing clinically relevant toxicities. Nevertheless, some important questions remain unanswered and will hopefully be addressed by future dedicated studies. These issues include the cost-effectiveness of applying a pre-emptive genotyping panel, the role of multiple co-medications, the transferability of currently tested pharmacogenetic guidelines among patients of non-European origin and the impact of rare pharmacogenetic variants that are not detected by currently used genotyping approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Peruzzi
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Rossana Roncato
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Elena De Mattia
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Alessia Bignucolo
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Toffoli
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
| | - Erika Cecchin
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huebner T, Steffens M, Scholl C. Current status of the analytical validation of next generation sequencing applications for pharmacogenetic profiling. Mol Biol Rep 2023; 50:9587-9599. [PMID: 37787843 PMCID: PMC10635985 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analytical validity is a prerequisite to use a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based application as an in vitro diagnostic test or a companion diagnostic in clinical practice. Currently, in the United States and the European Union, the intended use of such NGS-based tests does not refer to guided drug therapy on the basis of pharmacogenetic profiling of drug metabolizing enzymes, although the value of pharmacogenetic testing has been reported. However, in research, a large variety of NGS-based tests are used and have been confirmed to be at least comparable to array-based testing. METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic evaluation was performed screening and assessing published literature on analytical validation of NGS applications for pharmacogenetic profiling of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, VKORC1 and/or UGT1A1. Although NGS applications are also increasingly used for implementation assessments in clinical practice, we show in the present systematic literature evaluation that published information on the current status of analytical validation of NGS applications targeting drug metabolizing enzymes is scarce. Furthermore, a comprehensive performance evaluation of whole exome and whole genome sequencing with the intended use for pharmacogenetic profiling has not been published so far. CONCLUSIONS A standard in reporting on analytical validation of NGS-based tests is not in place yet. Therefore, many relevant performance criteria are not addressed in published literature. For an appropriate analytical validation of an NGS-based qualitative test for pharmacogenetic profiling at least accuracy, precision, limit of detection and specificity should be addressed to facilitate the implementation of such tests in clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Huebner
- Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, Bonn, 53175, Germany.
| | - Michael Steffens
- Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, Bonn, 53175, Germany
| | - Catharina Scholl
- Research Division, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, Bonn, 53175, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fragoulakis V, Roncato R, Bignucolo A, Patrinos GP, Toffoli G, Cecchin E, Mitropoulou C. Cost-utility analysis and cross-country comparison of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment in colorectal cancer patients participating in the U-PGx PREPARE study. Pharmacol Res 2023; 197:106949. [PMID: 37802427 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A cost-utility analysis was conducted to evaluate pharmacogenomic (PGx)-guided treatment compared to the standard-of-care intervention among patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) in Italy. METHODS Data derived from a prospective, open-label, block randomized clinical trial, as a part of the largest PGx study worldwide (355 patients in both arms) were used. Mortality was used as the primary health outcome to estimate life years (LYs) gained in treatment arms within a survival analysis context. PGx-guided treatment was based on established drug-gene interactions between capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan with DPYD and/or UGT1A1 genomic variants. Utility values for the calculation of Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) was based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Missing data were imputed via the Multiple Imputation method and linear interpolation, when possible, while censored cost data were corrected via the Replace-From-The-Right algorithm. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated for QALYs. Raw data were bootstrapped 5000 times in order to produce 95% Confidence Intervals based on non-parametric percentile method and to construct a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Cost differences for study groups were investigated via a generalized linear regression model analysis. Total therapy cost per patient reflected all resources expended in the management of any adverse events, including medications, diagnostics tests, devices, surgeries, the utilization of intensive care units, and wards. RESULTS The total cost of the study arm was estimated at €380 (∼ US$416; 95%CI: 195-596) compared to €565 (∼ US$655; 95%CI: 340-724) of control arm while the mean survival in study arm was estimated at 1.58 (+0.25) LYs vs 1.50 (+0.26) (Log Rank test, X2 = 4.219, df=1, p-value=0.04). No statistically significant difference was found in QALYs. ICER was estimated at €13418 (∼ US$14695) per QALY, while the acceptability curve indicated that when the willingness-to-pay was under €5000 (∼ US$5476), the probability of PGx being cost-effective overcame 70%. The most frequent adverse drug event in both groups was neutropenia of severity grade 3 and 4, accounting for 82.6% of total events in the study arm and 65.0% in the control arm. Apart from study arm, smoking status, Body-Mass-Index and Cumulative Actionability were also significant predictors of total cost. Subgroup analysis conducted in actionable patients (7.9% of total patients) indicated that PGx-guided treatment was a dominant option over its comparator with a probability greater than 92%. In addition, a critical literature review was conducted, and these findings are in line with those reported in other European countries. CONCLUSION PGx-guided treatment strategy may represent a cost-saving option compared to the existing conventional therapeutic approach for colorectal cancer patient management in the National Health Service of Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - George P Patrinos
- Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece; Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Zayed Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Erika Cecchin
- Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO), Aviano, Italy
| | - Christina Mitropoulou
- The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK; Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hjemås BJ, Bøvre K, Bjerknes K, Mathiesen L, Mellingsaeter MCR, Molden E. Implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in medication reviews in a hospital setting. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:3116-3125. [PMID: 37277227 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate whether it is feasible to perform pharmacogenetic testing and implement the test results as part of medication reviews during hospitalization of multimorbid patients. METHODS Patients with ≥2 chronic conditions and ≥5 regular drugs with at least one potential gene-drug interaction (GDI) were included from one geriatric and one cardiology ward for pharmacogenetic testing. After inclusion by the study pharmacist, blood samples were collected and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. For patients still hospitalized at the time when the pharmacogenetic test results were available, the information was used in medication reviews. Recommendations from the pharmacist on actionable GDIs were communicated to the hospital physicians, who subsequently decided on potential immediate changes or forwarded suggestions in referrals to general practitioners. RESULTS The pharmacogenetic test results were available for medication review in 18 of the 46 patients (39.1%), where median length of hospital stay was 4.7 days (1.6-18.3). The pharmacist recommended medication changes for 21 of 49 detected GDIs (42.9%). The hospital physicians accepted 19 (90.5%) of the recommendations. The most commonly detected GDIs involved metoprolol (CYP2D6 genotype), clopidogrel (CYP2C19 genotype) and atorvastatin (CYP3A4/5 and SLCOB1B1 genotype). CONCLUSIONS The study shows that implementation of pharmacogenetic testing for medication review of hospitalized patients has the potential to improve drug treatment before being transferred to primary care. However, the logistics workflow needs to be further optimized, as test results were available during hospitalization for less than half of the patients included in the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katrine Bøvre
- Hospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Liv Mathiesen
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Espen Molden
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Psychopharmacology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jamrat S, Sukasem C, Sratthaphut L, Hongkaew Y, Samanchuen T. A precision medicine approach to personalized prescribing using genetic and nongenetic factors for clinical decision-making. Comput Biol Med 2023; 165:107329. [PMID: 37611418 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Screening potential drug-drug interactions, drug-gene interactions, contraindications, and other factors is crucial in clinical practice. However, implementing these screening concepts in real-world settings poses challenges. This work proposes an approach towards precision medicine that combines genetic and nongenetic factors to facilitate clinical decision-making. The approach focuses on raising the performance of four potential interaction screenings in the prescribing process, including drug-drug interactions, drug-gene interactions, drug-herb interactions, drug-social lifestyle interactions, and two potential considerations for patients with liver or renal impairment. The work describes the design of a curated knowledge-based model called the knowledge model for potential interaction and consideration screening, the screening logic for both the detection module and inference module, and the personalized prescribing report. Three case studies have demonstrated the proof-of-concept and effectiveness of this approach. The proposed approach aims to reduce decision-making processes for healthcare professionals, reduce medication-related harm, and enhance treatment effectiveness. Additionally, the recommendation with a semantic network is suggested to assist in risk-benefit analysis when health professionals plan therapeutic interventions with new medicines that have insufficient evidence to establish explicit recommendations. This approach offers a promising solution to implementing precision medicine in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samart Jamrat
- Technology of Information System Management Division, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand; Artificial Intelligence and Metabolomics Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand
| | - Chonlaphat Sukasem
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand; Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand; Bumrungrad Genomic Medicine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
| | - Lawan Sratthaphut
- Artificial Intelligence and Metabolomics Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand; Department of Biomedicine and Health Informatics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, 73000, Thailand
| | - Yaowaluck Hongkaew
- Bumrungrad Genomic Medicine Institute, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand; Research and Development Laboratory, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
| | - Taweesak Samanchuen
- Technology of Information System Management Division, Faculty of Engineering, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Haga SB. The Critical Role of Pharmacists in the Clinical Delivery of Pharmacogenetics in the U.S. PHARMACY 2023; 11:144. [PMID: 37736916 PMCID: PMC10514841 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy11050144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the rebirth of pharmacogenomics (PGx) in the 1990s and 2000s, with new discoveries of genetic variation underlying adverse drug response and new analytical technologies such as sequencing and microarrays, there has been much interest in the clinical application of PGx testing. The early involvement of pharmacists in clinical studies and the establishment of organizations to support the dissemination of information about PGx variants have naturally resulted in leaders in clinical implementation. This paper presents an overview of the evolving role of pharmacists, and discusses potential challenges and future paths, primarily focused in the U.S. Pharmacists have positioned themselves as leaders in clinical PGx testing, and will prepare the next generation to utilize PGx testing in their scope of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B Haga
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke University, 101 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fahim SM, Alexander CSW, Qian J, Ngorsuraches S, Hohmann NS, Lloyd KB, Reagan A, Hart L, McCormick N, Westrick SC. Current published evidence on barriers and proposed strategies for genetic testing implementation in health care settings: A scoping review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:998-1016. [PMID: 37119989 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The slow uptake of genetic testing in routine clinical practice warrants the attention of researchers and practitioners to find effective strategies to facilitate implementation. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the barriers to and strategies for pharmacogenetic testing implementation in a health care setting from published literature. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in August 2021 with an expanded literature search using Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstract, and Google Scholar to identify studies reporting implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in a health care setting, from a health care system's perspective. Articles were screened using DistillerSR and findings were organized using the 5 major domains of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). RESULTS A total of 3536 unique articles were retrieved from the above sources, with only 253 articles retained after title and abstract screening. Upon screening the full texts, 57 articles (representing 46 unique practice sites) were found matching the inclusion criteria. We found that most reported barriers and their associated strategies to the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing surrounded 2 CFIR domains: intervention characteristics and inner settings. Factors relating to cost and reimbursement were described as major barriers in the intervention characteristics. In the same domain, another major barrier was the lack of utility studies to provide evidence for genetic testing uptake. Technical hurdles, such as integrating genetic information to medical records, were identified as an inner settings barrier. Collaborations and lessons from early implementers could be useful strategies to overcome majority of the barriers across different health care settings. Strategies proposed by the included implementation studies to overcome these barriers are summarized and can be used as guidance in future. CONCLUSION Barriers and strategies identified in this scoping review can provide implementation guidance for practice sites that are interested in implementing genetic testing.
Collapse
|
18
|
Padmanabhan S, du Toit C, Dominiczak AF. Cardiovascular precision medicine - A pharmacogenomic perspective. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 1:e28. [PMID: 38550953 PMCID: PMC10953758 DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2023.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Precision medicine envisages the integration of an individual's clinical and biological features obtained from laboratory tests, imaging, high-throughput omics and health records, to drive a personalised approach to diagnosis and treatment with a higher chance of success. As only up to half of patients respond to medication prescribed following the current one-size-fits-all treatment strategy, the need for a more personalised approach is evident. One of the routes to transforming healthcare through precision medicine is pharmacogenomics (PGx). Around 95% of the population is estimated to carry one or more actionable pharmacogenetic variants and over 75% of adults over 50 years old are on a prescription with a known PGx association. Whilst there are compelling examples of pharmacogenomic implementation in clinical practice, the case for cardiovascular PGx is still evolving. In this review, we shall summarise the current status of PGx in cardiovascular diseases and look at the key enablers and barriers to PGx implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandosh Padmanabhan
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Clea du Toit
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Anna F. Dominiczak
- BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kabbani D, Akika R, Wahid A, Daly AK, Cascorbi I, Zgheib NK. Pharmacogenomics in practice: a review and implementation guide. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1189976. [PMID: 37274118 PMCID: PMC10233068 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1189976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Considerable efforts have been exerted to implement Pharmacogenomics (PGx), the study of interindividual variations in DNA sequence related to drug response, into routine clinical practice. In this article, we first briefly describe PGx and its role in improving treatment outcomes. We then propose an approach to initiate clinical PGx in the hospital setting. One should first evaluate the available PGx evidence, review the most relevant drugs, and narrow down to the most actionable drug-gene pairs and related variant alleles. This is done based on data curated and evaluated by experts such as the pharmacogenomics knowledge implementation (PharmGKB) and the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), as well as drug regulatory authorities such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicinal Agency (EMA). The next step is to differentiate reactive point of care from preemptive testing and decide on the genotyping strategy being a candidate or panel testing, each of which has its pros and cons, then work out the best way to interpret and report PGx test results with the option of integration into electronic health records and clinical decision support systems. After test authorization or testing requirements by the government or drug regulators, putting the plan into action involves several stakeholders, with the hospital leadership supporting the process and communicating with payers, the pharmacy and therapeutics committee leading the process in collaboration with the hospital laboratory and information technology department, and healthcare providers (HCPs) ordering the test, understanding the results, making the appropriate therapeutic decisions, and explaining them to the patient. We conclude by recommending some strategies to further advance the implementation of PGx in practice, such as the need to educate HCPs and patients, and to push for more tests' reimbursement. We also guide the reader to available PGx resources and examples of PGx implementation programs and initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danya Kabbani
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Reem Akika
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ahmed Wahid
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ann K. Daly
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ingolf Cascorbi
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nathalie Khoueiry Zgheib
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nunez-Torres R, Pita G, Peña-Chilet M, López-López D, Zamora J, Roldán G, Herráez B, Álvarez N, Alonso MR, Dopazo J, Gonzalez-Neira A. A Comprehensive Analysis of 21 Actionable Pharmacogenes in the Spanish Population: From Genetic Characterisation to Clinical Impact. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041286. [PMID: 37111771 PMCID: PMC10140932 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) is a main milestones of precision medicine nowadays in order to achieve safer and more effective therapies. Nevertheless, the implementation of PGx diagnostics is extremely slow and unequal worldwide, in part due to a lack of ethnic PGx information. We analysed genetic data from 3006 Spanish individuals obtained by different high-throughput (HT) techniques. Allele frequencies were determined in our population for the main 21 actionable PGx genes associated with therapeutical changes. We found that 98% of the Spanish population harbours at least one allele associated with a therapeutical change and, thus, there would be a need for a therapeutical change in a mean of 3.31 of the 64 associated drugs. We also identified 326 putative deleterious variants that were not previously related with PGx in 18 out of the 21 main PGx genes evaluated and a total of 7122 putative deleterious variants for the 1045 PGx genes described. Additionally, we performed a comparison of the main HT diagnostic techniques, revealing that after whole genome sequencing, genotyping with the PGx HT array is the most suitable solution for PGx diagnostics. Finally, all this information was integrated in the Collaborative Spanish Variant Server to be available to and updated by the scientific community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocio Nunez-Torres
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Guillermo Pita
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - María Peña-Chilet
- Computational Medicine Platform, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS), Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Computational Systems Medicine Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBiS, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | - Daniel López-López
- Computational Medicine Platform, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS), Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Computational Systems Medicine Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBiS, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
| | - Jorge Zamora
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Gema Roldán
- Computational Medicine Platform, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS), Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Belén Herráez
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Álvarez
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - María Rosario Alonso
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Joaquín Dopazo
- Computational Medicine Platform, Fundación Progreso y Salud (FPS), Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Bioinformatics in Rare Diseases (BiER), Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), ISCIII, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
- Computational Systems Medicine Group, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, IBiS, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/University of Sevilla, 41013 Seville, Spain
- Functional Genomics Node, FPS/ELIXIR-ES, Hospital Virgen del Rocío, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
| | - Anna Gonzalez-Neira
- Human Genotyping Unit (CEGEN), Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER-U706), ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fujita K, Masnoon N, Mach J, O’Donnell LK, Hilmer SN. Polypharmacy and precision medicine. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 1:e22. [PMID: 38550925 PMCID: PMC10953761 DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2023.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Precision medicine is an approach to maximise the effectiveness of disease treatment and prevention and minimise harm from medications by considering relevant demographic, clinical, genomic and environmental factors in making treatment decisions. Precision medicine is complex, even for decisions about single drugs for single diseases, as it requires expert consideration of multiple measurable factors that affect pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and many patient-specific variables. Given the increasing number of patients with multiple conditions and medications, there is a need to apply lessons learned from precision medicine in monotherapy and single disease management to optimise polypharmacy. However, precision medicine for optimisation of polypharmacy is particularly challenging because of the vast number of interacting factors that influence drug use and response. In this narrative review, we aim to provide and apply the latest research findings to achieve precision medicine in the context of polypharmacy. Specifically, this review aims to (1) summarise challenges in achieving precision medicine specific to polypharmacy; (2) synthesise the current approaches to precision medicine in polypharmacy; (3) provide a summary of the literature in the field of prediction of unknown drug-drug interactions (DDI) and (4) propose a novel approach to provide precision medicine for patients with polypharmacy. For our proposed model to be implemented in routine clinical practice, a comprehensive intervention bundle needs to be integrated into the electronic medical record using bioinformatic approaches on a wide range of data to predict the effects of polypharmacy regimens on an individual. In addition, clinicians need to be trained to interpret the results of data from sources including pharmacogenomic testing, DDI prediction and physiological-pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to inform their medication reviews. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this model and to test generalisability so that it can be implemented at scale, aiming to improve outcomes in people with polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Fujita
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nashwa Masnoon
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John Mach
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Kouladjian O’Donnell
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah N. Hilmer
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney and the Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Levens AD, den Haan MC, Jukema JW, Heringa M, van den Hout WB, Moes DJAR, Swen JJ. Feasibility of Community Pharmacist-Initiated and Point-of-Care CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided De-Escalation of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:genes14030578. [PMID: 36980851 PMCID: PMC10048116 DOI: 10.3390/genes14030578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Tailoring antiplatelet therapy based on CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing can improve cardiovascular outcomes and potentially reduce healthcare costs in patients on a P2Y12-inhibitor regime with prasugrel or ticagrelor. However, ubiquitous adoption—particularly in an outpatient setting—remains limited. We conducted a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the feasibility of CYP2C19-guided de-escalation of prasugrel/ticagrelor to clopidogrel through point-of-care (POC) PGx testing in the community pharmacy. Multiple feasibility outcomes were assessed. Overall, 144 patients underwent CYP2C19 PGx testing in 27 community pharmacies. Successful test results were obtained in 142 patients (98.6%). De-escalation to clopidogrel occurred in 19 patients (20%) out of 95 (67%) eligible for therapy de-escalation, which was mainly due to PGx testing not being included in cardiology guidelines. Out of the 119 patients (84%) and 14 pharmacists (100%) surveyed, 109 patients (92%) found the community pharmacy a suitable location for PGx testing, and the majority of pharmacists (86%) thought it has added value. Net costs due to PGx testing were estimated at €43 per patient, which could be reduced by earlier testing and could turn into savings if de-escalation would double to 40%. Although the observed de-escalation rate was low, POC CYP2C19-guided de-escalation to clopidogrel appears feasible in a community pharmacy setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar D. Levens
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Melina C. den Haan
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J. Wouter Jukema
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Heart Institute, 3511 EP Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mette Heringa
- SIR Institute for Pharmacy Practice and Policy, 2331 JE Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B. van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan A. R. Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse J. Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Swen JJ, van der Wouden CH, Manson LE, Abdullah-Koolmees H, Blagec K, Blagus T, Böhringer S, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cecchin E, Cheung KC, Deneer VH, Dupui M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Jonsson S, Joefield-Roka C, Just KS, Karlsson MO, Konta L, Koopmann R, Kriek M, Lehr T, Mitropoulou C, Rial-Sebbag E, Rollinson V, Roncato R, Samwald M, Schaeffeler E, Skokou M, Schwab M, Steinberger D, Stingl JC, Tremmel R, Turner RM, van Rhenen MH, Dávila Fajardo CL, Dolžan V, Patrinos GP, Pirmohamed M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Toffoli G, Guchelaar HJ. A 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel to prevent adverse drug reactions: an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised crossover implementation study. Lancet 2023; 401:347-356. [PMID: 36739136 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01841-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 154.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of pharmacogenetic testing before starting drug therapy has been well documented for several single gene-drug combinations. However, the clinical utility of a pre-emptive genotyping strategy using a pharmacogenetic panel has not been rigorously assessed. METHODS We conducted an open-label, multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, crossover implementation study of a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel in 18 hospitals, nine community health centres, and 28 community pharmacies in seven European countries (Austria, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK). Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a first prescription for a drug clinically recommended in the guidelines of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (ie, the index drug) as part of routine care were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included previous genetic testing for a gene relevant to the index drug, a planned duration of treatment of less than 7 consecutive days, and severe renal or liver insufficiency. All patients gave written informed consent before taking part in the study. Participants were genotyped for 50 germline variants in 12 genes, and those with an actionable variant (ie, a drug-gene interaction test result for which the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group [DPWG] recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) were treated according to DPWG recommendations. Patients in the control group received standard treatment. To prepare clinicians for pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing, local teams were educated during a site-initiation visit and online educational material was made available. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions within the 12-week follow-up period. Analyses were irrespective of patient adherence to the DPWG guidelines. The primary analysis was done using a gatekeeping analysis, in which outcomes in people with an actionable drug-gene interaction in the study group versus the control group were compared, and only if the difference was statistically significant was an analysis done that included all of the patients in the study. Outcomes were compared between the study and control groups, both for patients with an actionable drug-gene interaction test result (ie, a result for which the DPWG recommended a change to standard-of-care drug treatment) and for all patients who received at least one dose of index drug. The safety analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of a study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03093818 and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS Between March 7, 2017, and June 30, 2020, 41 696 patients were assessed for eligibility and 6944 (51·4 % female, 48·6% male; 97·7% self-reported European, Mediterranean, or Middle Eastern ethnicity) were enrolled and assigned to receive genotype-guided drug treatment (n=3342) or standard care (n=3602). 99 patients (52 [1·6%] of the study group and 47 [1·3%] of the control group) withdrew consent after group assignment. 652 participants (367 [11·0%] in the study group and 285 [7·9%] in the control group) were lost to follow-up. In patients with an actionable test result for the index drug (n=1558), a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction occurred in 152 (21·0%) of 725 patients in the study group and 231 (27·7%) of 833 patients in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·54-0·91]; p=0·0075), whereas for all patients, the incidence was 628 (21·5%) of 2923 patients in the study group and 934 (28·6%) of 3270 patients in the control group (OR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·79]; p <0·0001). INTERPRETATION Genotype-guided treatment using a 12-gene pharmacogenetic panel significantly reduced the incidence of clinically relevant adverse drug reactions and was feasible across diverse European health-care system organisations and settings. Large-scale implementation could help to make drug therapy increasingly safe. FUNDING European Union Horizon 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Lisanne En Manson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Heshu Abdullah-Koolmees
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Kathrin Blagec
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja Blagus
- Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stefan Böhringer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anne Cambon-Thomsen
- CNRS, Centre for Epidemiology and Research in Population health (CERPOP), Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Erika Cecchin
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Ka-Chun Cheung
- Medicines Information Centre, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Vera Hm Deneer
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Netherlands
| | - Mathilde Dupui
- Service de pharmacologie médicale et clinique, CEIP-addictovigilance de Toulouse, faculté de médecine, CHU, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Siv Jonsson
- Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Candace Joefield-Roka
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katja S Just
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Lidija Konta
- Bio.logis Digital Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Rudolf Koopmann
- Bio.logis Digital Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Diagnosticum Centre for Humangenetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marjolein Kriek
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Lehr
- Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Christina Mitropoulou
- The Golden Helix Foundation, London, UK; Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Victoria Rollinson
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rossana Roncato
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Matthias Samwald
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elke Schaeffeler
- Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC2180)-Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumour Therapies, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Maria Skokou
- University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacology and Biosciences, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualised Therapy, Patras, Greece
| | - Matthias Schwab
- Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany; iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC2180)-Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumour Therapies, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany; Department of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Daniela Steinberger
- Bio.logis Digital Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Diagnosticum Centre for Humangenetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julia C Stingl
- Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roman Tremmel
- Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Richard M Turner
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mandy H van Rhenen
- Medicines Information Centre, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Cristina L Dávila Fajardo
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Vita Dolžan
- Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - George P Patrinos
- Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Zayed Centre for Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacology and Biosciences, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualised Therapy, Patras, Greece; Erasmus University Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Pathology-Clinical Bioinformatics Unit, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gere Sunder-Plassmann
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giuseppe Toffoli
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen T, O'Donnell PH, Middlestadt M, Ruhnke GW, Danahey K, van Wijk XMR, Choksi A, Knoebel R, Hartman S, Yeo KTJ, Friedman PN, Ratain MJ, Nutescu EA, O'Leary KJ, Perera MA, Meltzer DO. Implementation of pharmacogenomics into inpatient general medicine. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2023; 33:19-23. [PMID: 36729768 DOI: 10.1097/fpc.0000000000000487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics is a crucial piece of personalized medicine. Preemptive pharmacogenomic testing is only used sparsely in the inpatient setting and there are few models to date for fostering the adoption of pharmacogenomic treatment in the inpatient setting. We created a multi-institutional project in Chicago to enable the translation of pharmacogenomics into inpatient practice. We are reporting our implementation process and barriers we encountered with solutions. This study, 'Implementation of Point-of-Care Pharmacogenomic Decision Support Accounting for Minority Disparities', sought to implement pharmacogenomics into inpatient practice at three sites: The University of Chicago, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, and the University of Illinois at Chicago. This study involved enrolling African American adult patients for preemptive genotyping across a panel of actionable germline variants predicting drug response or toxicity risk. We report our approach to implementation and the barriers we encountered engaging hospitalists and general medical providers in the inpatient pharmacogenomic intervention. Our strategies included: a streamlined delivery system for pharmacogenomic information, attendance at hospital medicine section meetings, use of physician and pharmacist champions, focus on hospitalists' care and optimizing system function to fit their workflow, hand-offs, and dealing with hospitalists turnover. Our work provides insights into strategies for the initial engagement of inpatient general medicine providers that we hope will benefit other institutions seeking to implement pharmacogenomics in the inpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Chen
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Peter H O'Donnell
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Merisa Middlestadt
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gregory W Ruhnke
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Anish Choksi
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Randall Knoebel
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Seth Hartman
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Paula N Friedman
- Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Edith A Nutescu
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kevin J O'Leary
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Minoli A Perera
- Department of Pharmacology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David O Meltzer
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Inter-individual variability in drug response, be it efficacy or safety, is common and likely to become an increasing problem globally given the growing elderly population requiring treatment. Reasons for this inter-individual variability include genomic factors, an area of study called pharmacogenomics. With genotyping technologies now widely available and decreasing in cost, implementing pharmacogenomics into clinical practice - widely regarded as one of the initial steps in mainstreaming genomic medicine - is currently a focus in many countries worldwide. However, major challenges of implementation lie at the point of delivery into health-care systems, including the modification of current clinical pathways coupled with a massive knowledge gap in pharmacogenomics in the health-care workforce. Pharmacogenomics can also be used in a broader sense for drug discovery and development, with increasing evidence suggesting that genomically defined targets have an increased success rate during clinical development.
Collapse
|
26
|
Using chemical and biological data to predict drug toxicity. SLAS DISCOVERY : ADVANCING LIFE SCIENCES R & D 2023; 28:53-64. [PMID: 36639032 DOI: 10.1016/j.slasd.2022.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Various sources of information can be used to better understand and predict compound activity and safety-related endpoints, including biological data such as gene expression and cell morphology. In this review, we first introduce types of chemical, in vitro and in vivo information that can be used to describe compounds and adverse effects. We then explore how compound descriptors based on chemical structure or biological perturbation response can be used to predict safety-related endpoints, and how especially biological data can help us to better understand adverse effects mechanistically. Overall, the described applications demonstrate how large-scale biological information presents new opportunities to anticipate and understand the biological effects of compounds, and how this can support predictive toxicology and drug discovery projects.
Collapse
|
27
|
Baldo BA. Allergic and other adverse reactions to drugs used in anesthesia and surgery. ANESTHESIOLOGY AND PERIOPERATIVE SCIENCE 2023; 1:16. [PMCID: PMC10264870 DOI: 10.1007/s44254-023-00018-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
The list of drugs patients may be exposed to during the perioperative and postoperative periods is potentially extensive. It includes induction agents, neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs), opioids, antibiotics, sugammadex, colloids, local anesthetics, polypeptides, antifibrinolytic agents, heparin and related anticoagulants, blue dyes, chlorhexidine, and a range of other agents depending on several factors related to individual patients’ clinical condition and progress in the postoperative recovery period. To avoid poor or ultrarapid metabolizers to a particular drug (for example tramadol and codeine) or possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs), some drugs may need to be avoided during or after surgery. This will be the case for patients with a history of anaphylaxis or other adverse events/intolerances to a known drug. Other drugs may be ceased for a period before surgery, e.g., anticoagulants that increase the chance of bleeding; diuretics for patients with acute renal failure; antihypertensives relative to kidney injury after major vascular surgery; and serotonergic drugs that together with some opioids may rarely induce serotonin toxicity. Studies of germline variations shown by genotyping and phenotyping to identify a predisposition of genetic factors to ADRs offer an increasingly important approach to individualize drug therapy. Studies of associations of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes with some serious delayed immune-mediated reactions are ongoing and variations of drug-metabolizing cytochrome CYP450 enzymes, P-glycoprotein, and catechol-O -methyltransferase show promise for the assessment of ADRs and non-responses to drugs, particularly opioids and other analgesics. Surveys of ADRs from an increasing number of institutions often cover small numbers of patients, are retrospective in nature, fail to clearly identify culprit drugs, and do not adequately distinguish immune-mediated from non-immune-mediated anaphylactoid reactions. From the many surveys undertaken, the large list of agents identified during and after anesthesia and surgery are examined for their ADR involvement. Drugs are classified into those most often involved, (NMBD and antibiotics); drugs that are becoming more frequently implicated, namely antibiotics (particularly teicoplanin), and blue dyes; those becoming less frequently involved; and drugs more rarely involved in perioperative, and postoperative adverse reactions but still important and necessary to keep in mind for the occasional potential sensitive patient. Clinicians should be aware of the similarities between drug-induced true allergic type I IgE/FcεRI- and pseudoallergic MRGPRX2-mediated ADRs, the clinical features of each, and their distinguishing characteristics. Procedures for identifying MRGPRX2 agonists and diagnosing and distinguishing pseudoallergic from allergic reaction mechanisms are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A. Baldo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital of Sydney, St Leonards, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Lindfield, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Biswas M, Jinda P, Sukasem C. Pharmacogenomics in Asians: Differences and similarities with other human populations. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2023; 19:27-41. [PMID: 36755439 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2178895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various pharmacogenomic (PGx) variants differ widely in different ethnicities. and clinical outcomes associated with these variants may also be substantially varied. Literature was searched in different databases, i.e. PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and PharmGKB, from inception to 30 June 2022 for this review. AREAS COVERED Certain PGx variants were distinctly varied in Asian populations compared to the other human populations, e.g. CYP2C19*2,*3,*17; CYP2C9*2,*3; CYP2D6*4,*5,*10,*41; UGT1A1*6,*28; HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*15:21, HLA-B*58:01, and HLA-A*31:01. However, certain other variants do not vary greatly between Asian and other ethnicities, e.g. CYP3A5*3; ABCB1, and SLCO1B1*5. As evident in this review, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was much stronger in Asian patients taking clopidogrel and who inherited the CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, e.g. CYP2C19*2 and*3, when compared to the western/Caucasian patients. Additionally, the risk of carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs) for the patients inheriting HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-B*15:21 alleles varied significantly between Asian and other ethnicities. In contrast, both Caucasian and Asian patients inheriting the SLCO1B1*5 variant possessed a similar magnitude of muscle toxicity, i.e. myopathy. EXPERT OPINION Asian countries should take measures toward expanding PGx research, as well as initiatives for the purposes of obtaining clinical benefits from this newly evolving and economically viable treatment model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohitosh Biswas
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Rajshahi, 6205, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center SDMC, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pimonpan Jinda
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center SDMC, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chonlaphat Sukasem
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Ramathibodi Hospital, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center SDMC, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
- Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine Clinic, Bumrungrad Genomic Medicine Institute (BGMI), Bumrungrad International Hospital, 10110, Bangkok, Thailand
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, L69 3GL, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McDermott JH, Sharma V, Keen J, Newman WG, Pirmohamed M. The Implementation of Pharmacogenetics in the United Kingdom. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2023; 280:3-32. [PMID: 37306816 DOI: 10.1007/164_2023_658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There is considerable inter-individual variability in the effectiveness and safety of pharmaceutical interventions. This phenomenon can be attributed to a multitude of factors; however, it is widely acknowledged that common genetic variation affecting drug absorption or metabolism play a substantial contributory role. This is a concept known as pharmacogenetics. Understanding how common genetic variants influence responses to medications, and using this knowledge to inform prescribing practice, could yield significant advantages for both patients and healthcare systems. Some health services around the world have introduced pharmacogenetics into routine practice, whereas others are less advanced along the implementation pathway. This chapter introduces the field of pharmacogenetics, the existing body of evidence, and discusses barriers to implementation. The chapter will specifically focus on efforts to introduce pharmacogenetics in the NHS, highlighting key challenges related to scale, informatics, and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John H McDermott
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Videha Sharma
- Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Centre for Health Informatics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jessica Keen
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - William G Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
- Liverpool University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van der Wouden CH, Guchelaar HJ, Swen JJ. Precision Medicine Using Pharmacogenomic Panel-Testing: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Clin Lab Med 2022; 42:587-602. [PMID: 36368784 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cathelijne H van der Wouden
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333ZA, The Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333ZA, The Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333ZA, The Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Cavallari LH, Pratt VM. Building Evidence for Clinical Use of Pharmacogenomics and Reimbursement for Testing. Clin Lab Med 2022; 42:533-546. [PMID: 36368780 PMCID: PMC9896522 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Larisa H Cavallari
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100486, Gainesville, FL 32610-0486, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
O'Shea J, Ryan C, Gallagher J, O'Brien C, Morris C, Dwyer E, Laughlin JM, Fitzpatrick L, O'Meara M, Kelly S, Knox S, Ledwidge M. Public perceptions of pharmacogenomic services in Ireland - Are people with chronic disease more likely to want service availability than those without? A questionnaire study. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2022; 8:100182. [PMID: 36200068 PMCID: PMC9529536 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As pharmacogenomic services begin to emerge in primary care, the insight of the public is crucial for its integration into clinical practice. Objectives To establish perceptions of pharmacogenomics (awareness, understanding, openness to availability, perceived benefits and concerns, willingness to pay, and service setting) and investigate if they differ between those with and without chronic disease(s). Methods An anonymous, online questionnaire generated using Qualtrics® and circulated via social media and posters placed in eight participating community pharmacies was conducted with Irish adults. The questions were designed to consider existing literature on patient perceptions of pharmacogenomics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize questionnaire responses. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables, while independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to compare the mean values of two (with and without chronic disease) and three groups (multimorbidity (two or more chronic conditions) and polypharmacy (prescribed four or more regular medicines) (MMPP), a single chronic disease, and those without existing medical conditions) respectively Logistic regression was used to evaluate age and gender adjusted associations of chronic disease(s) with responses. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 421 responses were received, 30% (n = 120) of whom reported having a chronic disease. Overall, respondents reported low awareness (44%, n = 166) and poor knowledge (55%, n = 212) of pharmacogenomics. After explaining pharmacogenomics to respondents, patients with chronic disease(s) were 2.17 times more likely (p < 0.001) to want pharmacogenomic services availability than those without existing conditions, adjusted for age and gender (driven by preferences of those with MMPP than those with single chronic disease). Respondents demonstrated a high level of interest and noted both the potential benefits and downsides of pharmacogenomic testing. Willingness-to-pay was not associated with having a chronic disease and respondents were more positive about primary care (community pharmacy or general practice) rather than hospital-based pharmacogenomics implementation. Conclusion The Irish public in general and those with chronic disease in particular are strongly supportive of pharmacogenomic testing, highlighting an unmet need for its incorporation in medicines optimization. These data underline the need for more research on the implementation of community-based pharmacogenomics services for MMPP patients and ubiquitous pharmacogenomics education programs.
Collapse
|
33
|
Asiimwe IG, Pirmohamed M. Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions in Cardiovascular Medicine. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2022; 15:879-911. [PMID: 36353710 PMCID: PMC9639705 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s338601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of both morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is widely accepted that both concomitant medications (drug-drug interactions, DDIs) and genomic factors (drug-gene interactions, DGIs) can influence cardiovascular drug-related efficacy and safety outcomes. Although thousands of DDI and DGI (aka pharmacogenomic) studies have been published to date, the literature on drug-drug-gene interactions (DDGIs, cumulative effects of DDIs and DGIs) remains scarce. Moreover, multimorbidity is common in cardiovascular disease patients and is often associated with polypharmacy, which increases the likelihood of clinically relevant drug-related interactions. These, in turn, can lead to reduced drug efficacy, medication-related harm (adverse drug reactions, longer hospitalizations, mortality) and increased healthcare costs. To examine the extent to which DDGIs and other interactions influence efficacy and safety outcomes in the field of cardiovascular medicine, we review current evidence in the field. We describe the different categories of DDIs and DGIs before illustrating how these two interact to produce DDGIs and other complex interactions. We provide examples of studies that have reported the prevalence of clinically relevant interactions and the most implicated cardiovascular medicines before outlining the challenges associated with dealing with these interactions in clinical practice. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to manage the challenges including but not limited to expanding the scope of drug information compendia, interaction databases and clinical implementation guidelines (to include clinically relevant DDGIs and other complex interactions) and work towards their harmonization; better use of electronic decision support tools; using big data and novel computational techniques; using clinically relevant endpoints, preemptive genotyping; ensuring ethnic diversity; and upskilling of clinicians in pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Innocent G Asiimwe
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalized Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalized Medicine, MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Skryabin V, Rozochkin I, Zastrozhin M, Lauschke V, Franck J, Bryun E, Sychev D. Meta-analysis of pharmacogenetic clinical decision support systems for the treatment of major depressive disorder. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2022; 23:45-49. [PMID: 36273107 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-022-00295-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing pharmacogenetically guided dosing of antidepressants with empiric standard of care. Publications referring to genotype-guided antidepressant therapy were identified via PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases from the inception of the databases to 2021. In addition, bibliographies of all articles were manually searched for additional references not identified in primary searches. Studies comparing clinical outcomes between two groups of patients who received antidepressant treatment were included in meta-analysis. Analysis of the data revealed statistically significant differences between the experimental group receiving pharmacogenetically guided dosing and the empirically treated controls. Specifically, genotype-guided treatment significantly improved response and remission of patients after both eight and twelve weeks of therapy, whereas no effect on the development of adverse drug reactions was observed. This meta-analysis indicates that the use of preemptive genotyping to guide dosing of antidepressants might increase treatment efficacy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim J, Choi JP, Kim MS, Bhak J. PharmaKoVariome database for supporting genetic testing. Database (Oxford) 2022; 2022:6762639. [PMID: 36255213 PMCID: PMC9578302 DOI: 10.1093/database/baac092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) provides information about routine precision medicine, based on the patient's genotype. However, many of the available information about human allele frequencies, and about clinical drug-gene interactions, is based on American and European populations. PharmaKoVariome database was constructed to support genetic testing for safe prescription and drug development. It consolidated and stored 2507 diseases, 11 459 drugs and 61 627 drug-target or druggable genes from public databases. PharmaKoVariome precomputed ethnic-specific abundant variants for approximately 120 M single-nucleotide variants of drug-target or druggable genes. A user can search by gene symbol, drug name, disease and reference SNP ID number (rsID) to statistically analyse the frequency of ethnical variations, such as odds ratio and P-values for related genes. In an example study, we observed five Korean-enriched variants in the CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 genes, one of which (rs1065852) is known to be incapable of metabolizing drug. It is also shown that 4-6% of North and East Asians have risk factors for drugs metabolized by the CYP2D6 gene. Therefore, PharmaKoVariome is a useful database for pharmaceutical or diagnostic companies for developing diagnostic technologies that can be applied in the Asian PGx industry. Database URL: http://www.pharmakovariome.com/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungeun Kim
- Personal Genomics Institute (PGI), Genome Research Foundation (GRF), Cheongju 28190, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Pil Choi
- Personal Genomics Institute (PGI), Genome Research Foundation (GRF), Cheongju 28190, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Sun Kim
- Personal Genomics Institute (PGI), Genome Research Foundation (GRF), Cheongju 28190, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Bhak
- *Corresponding author: Tel: +82 (0)10 4644 6754; Fax: +82 (0)43 235 8688;
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians' attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe. Transl Psychiatry 2022; 12:442. [PMID: 36220808 PMCID: PMC9553897 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing has evolved rapidly over recent years and new developments have the potential to provide insights that could improve the ability to diagnose, treat, and prevent diseases. Information obtained through genetic testing has proven useful in other specialties, such as cardiology and oncology. Nonetheless, a range of barriers impedes techniques, such as whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing, pharmacogenomics, and polygenic risk scoring, from being implemented in psychiatric practice. These barriers may be procedural (e.g., limitations in extrapolating results to the individual level), economic (e.g., perceived relatively elevated costs precluding insurance coverage), or related to clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (e.g., perceived unfavorable cost-effectiveness, insufficient understanding of probability statistics, and concerns regarding genetic counseling). Additionally, several ethical concerns may arise (e.g., increased stigma and discrimination through exclusion from health insurance). Here, we provide an overview of potential barriers for the implementation of genetic testing in psychiatry, as well as an in-depth discussion of strategies to address these challenges.
Collapse
|
37
|
Genetic Variation among Pharmacogenes in the Sardinian Population. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231710058. [PMID: 36077453 PMCID: PMC9456055 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231710058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenetics (PGx) aims to identify the genetic factors that determine inter-individual differences in response to drug treatment maximizing efficacy while decreasing the risk of adverse events. Estimating the prevalence of PGx variants involved in drug response, is a critical preparatory step for large-scale implementation of a personalized medicine program in a target population. Here, we profiled pharmacogenetic variation in fourteen clinically relevant genes in a representative sample set of 1577 unrelated sequenced Sardinians, an ancient island population that accounts for genetic variation in Europe as a whole, and, at the same time is enriched in genetic variants that are very rare elsewhere. To this end, we used PGxPOP, a PGx allele caller based on the guidelines created by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC), to identify the main phenotypes associated with the PGx alleles most represented in Sardinians. We estimated that 99.43% of Sardinian individuals might potentially respond atypically to at least one drug, that on average each individual is expected to have an abnormal response to about 17 drugs, and that for 27 drugs the fraction of the population at risk of atypical responses to therapy is more than 40%. Finally, we identified 174 pharmacogenetic variants for which the minor allele frequency was at least 10% higher among Sardinians as compared to other European populations, a fact that may contribute to substantial interpopulation variability in drug response phenotypes. This study provides baseline information for further large-scale pharmacogenomic investigations in the Sardinian population and underlines the importance of PGx characterization of diverse European populations, such as Sardinians.
Collapse
|
38
|
Haidar CE, Crews KR, Hoffman JM, Relling MV, Caudle KE. Advancing Pharmacogenomics from Single-Gene to Preemptive Testing. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2022; 23:449-473. [PMID: 35537468 PMCID: PMC9483991 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-111621-102737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic testing can be an effective tool to enhance medication safety and efficacy. Pharmacogenomically actionable medications are widely used, and approximately 90-95% of individuals have an actionable genotype for at least one pharmacogene. For pharmacogenomic testing to have the greatest impact on medication safety and clinical care, genetic information should be made available at the time of prescribing (preemptive testing). However, the use of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing is associated with some logistical concerns, such as consistent reimbursement, processes for reporting preemptive results over an individual's lifetime, and result portability. Lessons can be learned from institutions that have implemented preemptive pharmacogenomic testing. In this review, we discuss the rationale and best practices for implementing pharmacogenomics preemptively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrine E Haidar
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; , , , ,
| | - Kristine R Crews
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; , , , ,
| | - James M Hoffman
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; , , , ,
- Office of Quality and Safety, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mary V Relling
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; , , , ,
| | - Kelly E Caudle
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; , , , ,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McDermott JH, Wright S, Sharma V, Newman WG, Payne K, Wilson P. Characterizing pharmacogenetic programs using the consolidated framework for implementation research: A structured scoping review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:945352. [PMID: 36059837 PMCID: PMC9433561 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.945352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Several healthcare organizations have developed pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing programs, where testing is undertaken prior to the prescription of a medicine. This review characterizes the barriers and facilitators which influenced the development of these programs. A bidirectional citation searching strategy identified relevant publications before a standardized data extraction approach was applied. Publications were grouped by program and data synthesis was undertaken using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). 104 publications were identified from 40 programs and 4 multi-center initiatives. 26 (66%) of the programs were based in the United States and 95% in high-income countries. The programs were heterogeneous in their design and scale. The Characteristics of the Intervention, Inner Setting, and Process domains were referenced by 92.5, 80, and 77.5% of programs, respectively. A positive institutional culture, leadership engagement, engaging stakeholders, and the use of clinical champions were frequently described as facilitators to implementation. Clinician self-efficacy, lack of stakeholder knowledge, and the cost of the intervention were commonly cited barriers. Despite variation between the programs, there were several similarities in approach which could be categorized via the CFIR. These form a resource for organizations planning the development of pharmacogenetic programs, highlighting key facilitators which can be leveraged to promote successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John H. McDermott
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: John H. McDermott,
| | - Stuart Wright
- Division of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Videha Sharma
- Division of Informatics, Centre for Health Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - William G. Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Payne
- Division of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Wilson
- Division of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Stäuble CK, Jeiziner C, Bollinger A, Wiss FM, Hatzinger M, Hersberger KE, Ihde T, Lampert ML, Mikoteit T, Meyer zu Schwabedissen HE, Allemann SS. A Guide to a Pharmacist-Led Pharmacogenetic Testing and Counselling Service in an Interprofessional Healthcare Setting. PHARMACY 2022; 10:pharmacy10040086. [PMID: 35893724 PMCID: PMC9326676 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10040086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic predisposition is one factor influencing interindividual drug response. Pharmacogenetic information can be used to guide the selection and dosing of certain drugs. However, the implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx) in clinical practice remains challenging. Defining a formal structure, as well as concrete procedures and clearly defined responsibilities, may facilitate and increase the use of PGx in clinical practice. Over 140 patient cases from an observational study in Switzerland formed the basis for the design and refinement of a pharmacist-led pharmacogenetics testing and counselling service (PGx service) in an interprofessional setting. Herein, we defined a six-step approach, including: (1) patient referral; (2) pre-test-counselling; (3) PGx testing; (4) medication review; (5) counselling; (6) follow-up. The six-step approach supports the importance of an interprofessional collaboration and the role of pharmacists in PGx testing and counselling across healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline K. Stäuble
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
- Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Solothurner Spitäler AG, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
- Biopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Chiara Jeiziner
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
| | - Anna Bollinger
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
| | - Florine M. Wiss
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
- Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Solothurner Spitäler AG, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hatzinger
- Psychiatric Services Solothurn, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4503 Solothurn, Switzerland; (M.H.); (T.M.)
| | - Kurt E. Hersberger
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
| | - Thomas Ihde
- Institute of Psychiatry, Spitäler Frutigen Meiringen Interlaken AG (fmiAG), 3800 Unterseen, Switzerland;
| | - Markus L. Lampert
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
- Institute of Hospital Pharmacy, Solothurner Spitäler AG, 4600 Olten, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Mikoteit
- Psychiatric Services Solothurn, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4503 Solothurn, Switzerland; (M.H.); (T.M.)
| | | | - Samuel S. Allemann
- Pharmaceutical Care, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; (C.J.); (A.B.); (F.M.W.); (K.E.H.); (M.L.L.); (S.S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thiele LS, Ishtiak-Ahmed K, Thirstrup JP, Agerbo E, Lunenburg CATC, Müller DJ, Gasse C. Clinical Impact of Functional CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 Gene Variants on Treatment with Antidepressants in Young People with Depression: A Danish Cohort Study. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15070870. [PMID: 35890168 PMCID: PMC9318115 DOI: 10.3390/ph15070870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The clinical impact of the functional CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 gene variants on antidepressant treatment in people with depression is not well studied. Here, we evaluate the utility of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in psychiatry by investigating the association between the phenotype status of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19/2D6 enzymes and the one-year risks of clinical outcomes in patients with depression with incident new-use of (es)citalopram, sertraline, or fluoxetine. Methods: This study is a population-based cohort study of 17,297 individuals who were born between 1981 and 2005 with a depression diagnosis between 1996 and 2012. Using array-based single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data, the individuals were categorized according to their metabolizing status of CYP2C19/CYP2D6 as normal (NM, reference group), ultra-rapid- (UM), rapid- (RM), intermediate- (IM), or poor-metabolizer (PM). The outcomes were treatment switching or discontinuation, psychiatric emergency department contacts, and suicide attempt/self-harm. By using Poisson regression analyses, we have estimated the incidence rate ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) that were adjusted for covariates and potential confounders, by age groups (<18 (children and adolescents), 19−25 (young adults), and 26+ years (adults)), comparing the outcomes in individuals with NM status (reference) versus the mutant metabolizer status. For statistically significant outcomes, we have calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to genotype (NNG) in order to prevent one outcome. Results: The children and adolescents who were using (es)citalopram with CYP2C19 PM status had increased risks of switching (IRR = 1.64 [95% CI: 1.10−2.43]) and suicide attempt/self-harm (IRR = 2.67 [95% CI; 1.57−4.52]). The young adults with CYP2C19 PM status who were using sertraline had an increased risk of switching (IRR = 2.06 [95% CI; 1.03−4.11]). The young adults with CYP2D6 PM status who were using fluoxetine had an increased risk of emergency department contacts (IRR = 3.28 [95% CI; 1.11−9.63]). No significant associations were detected in the adults. The NNG for preventing one suicide attempt/suicide in the children who were using (es)citalopram was 463, and the NNT was 11. Conclusion: The CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 PM phenotype statuses were associated with outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults with depression with incident new-use of (es)citalopram, sertraline, or fluoxetine, therefore indicating the utility of PGx testing, particularly in younger people, for PGx-guided antidepressant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liv S. Thiele
- Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (L.S.T.); (K.I.-A.); (J.P.T.); (C.A.T.C.L.)
| | - Kazi Ishtiak-Ahmed
- Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (L.S.T.); (K.I.-A.); (J.P.T.); (C.A.T.C.L.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Janne P. Thirstrup
- Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (L.S.T.); (K.I.-A.); (J.P.T.); (C.A.T.C.L.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Esben Agerbo
- National Centre for Register-Based Research (NCRR), Aarhus BSS, Aarhus University, 8210 Aarhus, Denmark;
- Centre for Integrated Register-Based Research Aarhus University (CIRRAU), 8210 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Carin A. T. C. Lunenburg
- Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (L.S.T.); (K.I.-A.); (J.P.T.); (C.A.T.C.L.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Daniel J. Müller
- Pharmacogenetics Research Clinic, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON M6J 1H4, Canada;
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
| | - Christiane Gasse
- Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (L.S.T.); (K.I.-A.); (J.P.T.); (C.A.T.C.L.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +45-51191476
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tiwattanon K, John S, Koomdee N, Jinda P, Rachanakul J, Jantararoungtong T, Nuntharadthanaphong N, Kloypan C, Biswas M, Boongird A, Sukasem C. Implementation of HLA-B*15:02 Genotyping as Standard-of-Care for Reducing Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine Induced Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions in Thailand. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:867490. [PMID: 35865943 PMCID: PMC9294359 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.867490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of HLA-B*15:02 pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing before carbamazepine (CBZ)/oxcarbazepine (OXC) prescriptions and to determine whether this PGx testing was associated with the reduction of CBZ/OXC-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) in Thailand.Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted by obtaining relevant HLA-B*15:02 PGx-testing and clinical data from electronic medical records during 2011–2020. 384 patient data were included in this study to investigate the clinical decision on CBZ/OXC usage before and after the HLA-B*15:02 PGx testing, and 1,539 patient data were included in this study to demonstrate the incidence of CBZ/OXC-induced SCARs and SJS between HLA-B*15:02 tested and non-tested patients. To analyze and summarize the results, descriptive statistics were employed, and Fisher exact test was used to compare the clinical difference between the HLA-B*15:02 positive and negative groups and to compare the differences of SCARs incidence.Results: 384 patients were included in this study as per the inclusion criteria. Of these, 70 patients carried HLA-B*15:02, of which 63 and 65 patients were not prescribed with CBZ/OXC before and after the availability of genotyping results, respectively. In the remaining HLA-B*15:02 non-carriers, 48, and 189 patients were prescribed CBZ/OXC before and after genotyping results were available, respectively. The findings of this study showed that the incidence of SCARs of CBZ/OXC was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the HLA-B*15:02 screening arm than in the non-screening arm.Conclusion:HLA-B pharmacogenetics testing influenced the selection of appropriate AEDs. The presence of mild rash in the HLA-B*15:02 negative group indicates that other genetic biomarker (HLA-A*31:01) and/or non-genetic variables are involved in CBZ/OXC-induced CADRs, emphasizing that CBZ/OXC prescriptions necessitate CADR monitoring. The hospital policy and clinical decision support (CDS) alert system is essential to overcome the barriers associated with the utilization of PGx guidelines into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanyawan Tiwattanon
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Shobana John
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Napatrupron Koomdee
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Napatrupron Koomdee, ; Apisit Boongird,
| | - Pimonpan Jinda
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jiratha Rachanakul
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thawinee Jantararoungtong
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nutthan Nuntharadthanaphong
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chiraphat Kloypan
- Unit of Excellence in Integrative Molecular Biomedicine, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Science, Department of Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, University of Phayao, Phayao, Thailand
| | - Mohitosh Biswas
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
| | - Apisit Boongird
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Ramathibodi Multidisciplinary Center (RMEC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Napatrupron Koomdee, ; Apisit Boongird,
| | - Chonlaphat Sukasem
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Laboratory for Pharmacogenomics, Somdech Phra Debaratana Medical Center (SDMC), Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Ramathibodi Multidisciplinary Center (RMEC), Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine Clinic, The Preventive Genomics and Family Check-up Services Center, Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Blagec K, Swen JJ, Koopmann R, Cheung KC, Crommentuijn-van Rhenen M, Holsappel I, Konta L, Ott S, Steinberger D, Xu H, Cecchin E, Dolžan V, Dávila-Fajardo CL, Patrinos GP, Sunder-Plassmann G, Turner RM, Pirmohamed M, Guchelaar HJ, Samwald M. Pharmacogenomics decision support in the U-PGx project: Results and advice from clinical implementation across seven European countries. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268534. [PMID: 35675343 PMCID: PMC9176797 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical implementation of pharmacogenomics (PGx) could be one of the first milestones towards realizing personalized medicine in routine care. However, its widespread adoption requires the availability of suitable clinical decision support (CDS) systems, which is often impeded by the fragmentation or absence of adequate health IT infrastructures. We report results of CDS implementation in the large-scale European research project Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics (U-PGx), in which PGx CDS was rolled out and evaluated across more than 15 clinical sites in the Netherlands, Spain, Slovenia, Italy, Greece, United Kingdom and Austria, covering a wide variety of healthcare settings. Methods We evaluated the CDS implementation process through qualitative and quantitative process indicators. Quantitative indicators included statistics on generated PGx reports, median time from sampled upload until report delivery and statistics on report retrievals via the mobile-based CDS tool. Adoption of different CDS tools, uptake and usability were further investigated through a user survey among healthcare providers. Results of a risk assessment conducted prior to the implementation process were retrospectively analyzed and compared to actual encountered difficulties and their impact. Results As of March 2021, personalized PGx reports were produced from 6884 genotyped samples with a median delivery time of twenty minutes. Out of 131 invited healthcare providers, 65 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 49.6%). Overall satisfaction rates with the different CDS tools varied between 63.6% and 85.2% per tool. Delays in implementation were caused by challenges including institutional factors and complexities in the development of required tools and reference data resources, such as genotype-phenotype mappings. Conclusions We demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a standardized PGx decision support solution in a multinational, multi-language and multi-center setting. Remaining challenges for future wide-scale roll-out include the harmonization of existing PGx information in guidelines and drug labels, the need for strategies to lower the barrier of PGx CDS adoption for healthcare institutions and providers, and easier compliance with regulatory and legal frameworks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Blagec
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Koopmann
- Diagnosticum Center for Human Genetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Institute for Human Genetics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ka-Chun Cheung
- Medicines Information Centre, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | | | - Inge Holsappel
- Medicines Information Centre, Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Lidija Konta
- Diagnosticum Center for Human Genetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Simon Ott
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniela Steinberger
- Diagnosticum Center for Human Genetics, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Institute for Human Genetics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Hong Xu
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erika Cecchin
- Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Vita Dolžan
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Pharmacogenetics Laboratory, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Cristina Lucía Dávila-Fajardo
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria Granada (Ibs.Granada), Granada, Spain
| | - George P Patrinos
- Department of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, University of Patras School of Health Sciences, Patras, Greece
| | - Gere Sunder-Plassmann
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Richard M Turner
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital and University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Matthias Samwald
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Therianou M, Gerou A, Mitropoulos K, Patrinos GP. Conference report: the Festival of Genetics and Personalized Medicine. Pharmacogenomics 2022; 23:509-511. [PMID: 35670264 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of personalized medicine in the clinic is a lengthy and multifaceted approach that is also dependent on the raising of the general public's awareness of genomics. The Festival of Genetics and Personalized Medicine aims to familiarize the general public with the principles and applications of genetics and personalized medicine using numerous approaches - namely, a theatrical performance; a roundtable discussion of emerging topics in the field, such as pharmacogenomics, clinical genetics, bioinformatics, bioethics and health economics; the 'Genome: Unlocking Life's Code' exhibition, with its do-it-yourself format; and a live demonstration of 2MoBiL, a portable molecular biology laboratory. This festival attracted more than 900 participants and helped disseminate to a broader audience the principles of genetics and personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Therianou
- Department of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | | | | | - George P Patrinos
- Department of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Therapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.,Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.,Zayed Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang L, Scherer SE, Bielinski SJ, Muzny DM, Jones LA, Black JL, Moyer AM, Giri J, Sharp RR, Matey ET, Wright JA, Oyen LJ, Nicholson WT, Wiepert M, Sullard T, Curry TB, Vitek CRR, McAllister TM, Sauver JL, Caraballo PJ, Lazaridis KN, Venner E, Qin X, Hu J, Kovar CL, Korchina V, Walker K, Doddapaneni H, Wu TJ, Raj R, Denson S, Liu W, Chandanavelli G, Zhang L, Wang Q, Kalra D, Karow MB, Harris KJ, Sicotte H, Peterson SE, Barthel AE, Moore BE, Skierka JM, Kluge ML, Kotzer KE, Kloke K, Vander Pol JM, Marker H, Sutton JA, Kekic A, Ebenhoh A, Bierle DM, Schuh MJ, Grilli C, Erickson S, Umbreit A, Ward L, Crosby S, Nelson EA, Levey S, Elliott M, Peters SG, Pereira N, Frye M, Shamoun F, Goetz MP, Kullo IJ, Wermers R, Anderson JA, Formea CM, El Melik RM, Zeuli JD, Herges JR, Krieger CA, Hoel RW, Taraba JL, Thomas SR, Absah I, Bernard ME, Fink SR, Gossard A, Grubbs PL, Jacobson TM, Takahashi P, Zehe SC, Buckles S, Bumgardner M, Gallagher C, Fee-Schroeder K, Nicholas NR, Powers ML, Ragab AK, Richardson DM, Stai A, Wilson J, Pacyna JE, Olson JE, Sutton EJ, Beck AT, Horrow C, Kalari KR, Larson NB, Liu H, Wang L, Lopes GS, Borah BJ, Freimuth RR, Zhu Y, Jacobson DJ, Hathcock MA, Armasu SM, McGree ME, Jiang R, Koep TH, Ross JL, Hilden M, Bosse K, Ramey B, Searcy I, Boerwinkle E, Gibbs RA, Weinshilboum RM. Implementation of preemptive DNA sequence-based pharmacogenomics testing across a large academic medical center: The Mayo-Baylor RIGHT 10K Study. Genet Med 2022; 24:1062-1072. [PMID: 35331649 PMCID: PMC9272414 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Mayo-Baylor RIGHT 10K Study enabled preemptive, sequence-based pharmacogenomics (PGx)-driven drug prescribing practices in routine clinical care within a large cohort. We also generated the tools and resources necessary for clinical PGx implementation and identified challenges that need to be overcome. Furthermore, we measured the frequency of both common genetic variation for which clinical guidelines already exist and rare variation that could be detected by DNA sequencing, rather than genotyping. METHODS Targeted oligonucleotide-capture sequencing of 77 pharmacogenes was performed using DNA from 10,077 consented Mayo Clinic Biobank volunteers. The resulting predicted drug response-related phenotypes for 13 genes, including CYP2D6 and HLA, affecting 21 drug-gene pairs, were deposited preemptively in the Mayo electronic health record. RESULTS For the 13 pharmacogenes of interest, the genomes of 79% of participants carried clinically actionable variants in 3 or more genes, and DNA sequencing identified an average of 3.3 additional conservatively predicted deleterious variants that would not have been evident using genotyping. CONCLUSION Implementation of preemptive rather than reactive and sequence-based rather than genotype-based PGx prescribing revealed nearly universal patient applicability and required integrated institution-wide resources to fully realize individualized drug therapy and to show more efficient use of health care resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liewei Wang
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steven E. Scherer
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Suzette J. Bielinski
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Donna M. Muzny
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Leila A. Jones
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - John Logan Black
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ann M. Moyer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jyothsna Giri
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Wayne T. Nicholson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mathieu Wiepert
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Terri Sullard
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Timothy B. Curry
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Jennifer L. Sauver
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Pedro J. Caraballo
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Konstantinos N. Lazaridis
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric Venner
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Xiang Qin
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jianhong Hu
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Christie L. Kovar
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Viktoriya Korchina
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Kimberly Walker
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | | - Tsung-Jung Wu
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Ritika Raj
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Shawn Denson
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Wen Liu
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Gauthami Chandanavelli
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Lan Zhang
- Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Qiaoyan Wang
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Divya Kalra
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Mary Beth Karow
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Hugues Sicotte
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sandra E. Peterson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy E. Barthel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Brenda E. Moore
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Michelle L. Kluge
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Katrina E. Kotzer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Karen Kloke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Heather Marker
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph A. Sutton
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Dennis M. Bierle
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Audrey Umbreit
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN
| | - Leah Ward
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Sheena Crosby
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Sharon Levey
- Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Michelle Elliott
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steve G. Peters
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Naveen Pereira
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark Frye
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Fadi Shamoun
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Matthew P. Goetz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Robert Wermers
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott R. Thomas
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Imad Absah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Stephanie R. Fink
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Andrea Gossard
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Paul Takahashi
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Susan Buckles
- Department of Public Affairs, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Melody L. Powers
- Biospecimens Accessioning and Processing Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ahmed K. Ragab
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Anthony Stai
- Department of Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jaymi Wilson
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joel E. Pacyna
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Janet E. Olson
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erica J. Sutton
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Annika T. Beck
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Caroline Horrow
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Krishna R. Kalari
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Nicholas B. Larson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Hongfang Liu
- Division of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Liwei Wang
- Division of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Guilherme S. Lopes
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Bijan J. Borah
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert R. Freimuth
- Division of Digital Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ye Zhu
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Debra J. Jacobson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Matthew A. Hathcock
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sebastian M. Armasu
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michaela E. McGree
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ruoxiang Jiang
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric Boerwinkle
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Human Genome Sequencing Center Clinical Laboratory, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Richard A. Gibbs
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,Corresponding Authors (), ()
| | - Richard M. Weinshilboum
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,Corresponding Authors (), ()
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jiang S, Mathias PC, Hendrix N, Shirts BH, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Veenstra D, Malone D, Devine B. Implementation of pharmacogenomic clinical decision support for health systems: a cost-utility analysis. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2022; 22:188-197. [PMID: 35365779 PMCID: PMC9156556 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-022-00275-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We constructed a cost-effectiveness model to assess the clinical and economic value of a CDS alert program that provides pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing results, compared to no alert program in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and atrial fibrillation (AF), from a health system perspective. We defaulted that 20% of 500,000 health-system members between the ages of 55 and 65 received PGx testing for CYP2C19 (ACS-clopidogrel) and CYP2C9, CYP4F2 and VKORC1 (AF-warfarin) annually. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated over 20 years with an annual discount rate of 3%. In total, 3169 alerts would be fired. The CDS alert program would help avoid 16 major clinical events and 6 deaths for ACS; and 2 clinical events and 0.9 deaths for AF. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $39,477/QALY. A PGx-CDS alert program was cost-effective, under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY gained, compared to no alert program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangqing Jiang
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Patrick C Mathias
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nathaniel Hendrix
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian H Shirts
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel Malone
- College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gill PS, Elchynski AL, Porter-Gill PA, Goodson BG, Scott MA, Lipinski D, Seay A, Kehn C, Balmakund T, Schaefer GB. Multidisciplinary Consulting Team for Complicated Cases of Neurodevelopmental and Neurobehavioral Disorders: Assessing the Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Pharmacogenomics into a Team Setting. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040599. [PMID: 35455715 PMCID: PMC9024886 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders have steadily increased in incidence in the United States. Over the past decade, there have been significant changes in clinical diagnoses and treatments some of which are due to the increasing adoption of pharmacogenomics (PGx) by clinicians. In this pilot study, a multidisciplinary team at the Arkansas Children’s Hospital North West consulted on 27 patients referred for difficult-to-manage neurodevelopmental and/or neurobehavioral disorders. The 27 patients were evaluated by the team using records review, team discussion, and pharmacogenetic testing. OneOme RightMed® (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the Arkansas Children’s Hospital comprehensive PGx test were used for drug prescribing guidance. Of the 27 patients’ predicted phenotypes, the normal metabolizer was 11 (40.8%) for CYP2C19 and 16 (59.3%) for CYP2D6. For the neurodevelopmental disorders, the most common comorbid conditions included attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (66.7%), anxiety disorder (59.3%), and autism (40.7%). Following the team assessment and PGx testing, 66.7% of the patients had actionable medication recommendations. This included continuing current therapy, suggesting an appropriate alternative medication, starting a new therapy, or adding adjunct therapy (based on their current medication use). Moreover, 25.9% of patients phenoconverted to a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer. This retrospective chart review pilot study highlights the value of a multidisciplinary treatment approach to deliver precision healthcare by improving physician clinical decisions and potentially impacting patient outcomes. It also shows the feasibility to implement PGx testing in neurodevelopmental/neurobehavioral disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pritmohinder S. Gill
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA; (T.B.); (G.B.S.)
- Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(501)-364-1418; Fax: +1-(501)-364-3654
| | | | | | - Bradley G. Goodson
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Mary Ann Scott
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Damon Lipinski
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Amy Seay
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
- Arkansas Children’s Hospital Northwest, Springdale, AR 72762, USA
| | - Christina Kehn
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
| | - Tonya Balmakund
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA; (T.B.); (G.B.S.)
- Arkansas Children’s Hospital Northwest, Springdale, AR 72762, USA
| | - G. Bradley Schaefer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA; (T.B.); (G.B.S.)
- Arkansas Children’s Research Institute, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA;
- Schmieding Developmental Center, Springdale, AR 72762, USA; (B.G.G.); (M.A.S.); (D.L.); (A.S.); (C.K.)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fontana V, Turner RM, Francis B, Yin P, Pütz B, Hiltunen TP, Ruotsalainen S, Kontula KK, Müller-Myhsok B, Pirmohamed M. Chromosomal Region 11p14.1 is Associated with Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bisoprolol. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2022; 15:249-260. [PMID: 35356681 PMCID: PMC8958266 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s352719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bisoprolol is a widely used beta-blocker in patients with cardiovascular diseases. As with other beta-blockers, there is variability in response to bisoprolol, but the underlying reasons for this have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim was to investigate genetic factors that affect bisoprolol pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and potentially the clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were recruited prospectively on admission to hospital and followed up for up to 2 years. Patients from this cohort who were on treatment with bisoprolol, at any dose, had bisoprolol adherence data and a plasma sample, one month after discharge from index hospitalisation were included in the study. Individual bisoprolol clearance values were estimated using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Genome-wide association analysis after genotyping was undertaken using an Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome-8 v1.0 BeadChip array, while CYP2D6 copy number variations were determined by PCR techniques and phenotypes for CYP2D6 and CYP3A were inferred from the genotype. GWAS significant SNPs were analysed for heart rate response to bisoprolol in an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects. Results Six hundred twenty-two patients on bisoprolol underwent both PK and genome wide analysis. The mean (IQR) of the estimated clearance in this population was 13.6 (10.0-18.0) L/h. Bisoprolol clearance was associated with rs11029955 (p=7.17×10-9) mapped to the region of coiled-coil domain containing 34 region (CCDC34) on chromosome 11, and with rs116702638 (p=2.54×10-8). Each copy of the minor allele of rs11029955 was associated with 2.2 L/h increase in clearance. In an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects, rs11029955 was associated with 24-hour heart rate response to 4-week treatment with bisoprolol (p= 9.3×10-5), but not with rs116702638. Conclusion A novel locus on the chromosomal region 11p14.1 was associated with bisoprolol clearance in a real-world cohort of patients and was validated in independent cohort with a pharmacodynamic association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Fontana
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard Myles Turner
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ben Francis
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Peng Yin
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Benno Pütz
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo P Hiltunen
- Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Program for Clinical and Molecular Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sanni Ruotsalainen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kimmo K Kontula
- Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Program for Clinical and Molecular Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bertam Müller-Myhsok
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- The Wolfson Centre for Personalised Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, and Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pharmacogenetic interventions to improve outcomes in patients with multimorbidity or prescribed polypharmacy: a systematic review. THE PHARMACOGENOMICS JOURNAL 2022; 22:89-99. [PMID: 35194175 PMCID: PMC8975737 DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00260-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Conventional medicines optimisation interventions in people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy are complex and yet limited; a more holistic and integrated approach to healthcare delivery is required. Pharmacogenetics has potential as a component of medicines optimisation. Studies involving multi-medicine pharmacogenetics in adults with multimorbidity or polypharmacy, reporting on outcomes derived from relevant core outcome sets, were included in this systematic review. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to summarise the data; meta-analysis was inappropriate due to study heterogeneity. Fifteen studies of diverse design and variable quality were included. A small, randomised study involving pharmacist-led medicines optimisation, including pharmacogenetics, suggests this approach could have significant benefits for patients and health systems. However, due to study design heterogeneity and the quality of the included studies, it is difficult to draw generalisable conclusions. Further pragmatic, robust pharmacogenetics studies in diverse, real-world patient populations, are required to establish the benefit of multi-medicine pharmacogenetic screening on patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
50
|
The Value of Pharmacogenetics to Reduce Drug-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients. Mol Diagn Ther 2022; 26:137-151. [PMID: 35113367 PMCID: PMC8975257 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-021-00575-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Many anticancer drugs cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that negatively impact safety and reduce quality of life. The typical narrow therapeutic range and exposure-response relationships described for anticancer drugs make precision dosing critical to ensure safe and effective drug exposure. Germline mutations in pharmacogenes contribute to inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs. Patients carrying reduced-activity or loss-of-function alleles are at increased risk for ADRs. Pretreatment genotyping offers a proactive approach to identify these high-risk patients, administer an individualized dose, and minimize the risk of ADRs. In the field of oncology, the most well-studied gene-drug pairs for which pharmacogenetic dosing recommendations have been published to improve safety are DPYD-fluoropyrimidines, TPMT/NUDT15-thiopurines, and UGT1A1-irinotecan. Despite the presence of these guidelines, the scientific evidence showing the benefits of pharmacogenetic testing (e.g., improved safety and cost-effectiveness) and the development of efficient multi-gene genotyping panels, routine pretreatment testing for these gene-drug pairs has not been implemented widely in the clinic. Important considerations required for widespread clinical implementation include pharmacogenetic education of physicians, availability or allocation of institutional resources to build an efficient clinical infrastructure, international standardization of guidelines, uniform adoption of guidelines by regulatory agencies leading to genotyping requirements in drug labels, and development of cohesive reimbursement policies for pretreatment genotyping. Without clinical implementation, the potential of pharmacogenetics to improve patient safety remains unfulfilled.
Collapse
|