The G-protein coupling properties of the human sweet and amino acid taste receptors

Steviol rebaudiosides bind to four different sites of the human sweet taste receptor (T1R2/T1R3) complex explaining confusing experiments

Sucrose provides both sweetness and energy by binding to both Venus flytrap domains (VFD) of the heterodimeric sweet taste receptor (T1R2/T1R3). In contrast, non-caloric sweeteners such as sucralose and aspartame only bind to one specific domain (VFD2) of T1R2, resulting in high-intensity sweetness. In this study, we investigate the binding mechanism of various steviol glycosides, artificial sweeteners, and a negative allosteric modulator (lactisole) at four distinct binding sites: VFD2, VFD3, transmembrane domain 2 (TMD2), and TMD3 through binding experiments and computational docking studies. Our docking results reveal multiple binding sites for the tested ligands, including the radiolabeled ligands. Our experimental evidence demonstrates that the C20 carboxy terminus of the Gα protein can bind to the intracellular region of either TMD2 or TMD3, altering GPCR affinity to the high-affinity state for steviol glycosides. These findings provide a mechanistic understanding of the structure and function of this heterodimeric sweet taste receptor.

Ligand-Dependent and G Protein-Dependent Properties for the Sweet Taste Heterodimer, TAS1R2/1R3

The heterodimeric sweet taste receptor, TAS1R2/1R3, is a class C G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that couples to gustducin (Gt), a G protein (GP) specifically involved in taste processing. This makes TAS1R2/1R3 a possible target for newly developing low caloric ligands that taste sweet to address obesity and diabetes. The activation of TAS1R2/1R3 involves the insertion of the GαP C-terminus of the GP into the GPCR in response to ligand binding. However, it is not known for sure whether the GP inserts into the TAS1R2 or TAS1R3 intracellular region of this GPCR dimer. Moreover, TAS1R2/1R3 can also connect to other GPs, such as Gs, Gi1, Gt3, Go, Gq, and G12. These GPs have different C-termini that may modify GPCR signaling. To understand the possible GP dependence of sweet perception, we use molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to examine the coupling of various GαP C20 termini to TAS1R2/1R3 for various steviol glycoside ligands and an artificial sweetener. Since the C20 could interact with the transmembrane domain (TMD) of either TAS1R2 (TMD2) or TAS1R3 (TMD3), we consider both cases. Without any sweetener, we find that the apo GPCR shows similar Go and Gt selectivities, while all steviol glycoside ligands increase the selectivity of Gt but decrease Go selectivity at TMD2. Interestingly, we find that high sweet rebaudioside M (RebM) and RebD ligands show better interactions of C20 at TMD3 for the Gt protein, but low sweet RebC and hydRebM ligands show better interaction of C20 at TMD2 for the Gt protein. Thus, our MD simulation suggests that TAS1R2/1R3 may couple the GP to either 1R2 or to 1R3 and that it can couple other GPs compared to Gt. This will likely lead to multimodal functions producing multiple patterns of intracellular signaling for sweet taste receptors, depending on the particular sweetener. Directing the GP to one of the other may have beneficial therapeutic outcomes.

Tastant-receptor interactions: insights from the fruit fly

Across species, taste provides important chemical information about potential food sources and the surrounding environment. As details about the chemicals and receptors responsible for gustation are discovered, a complex view of the taste system is emerging with significant contributions from research using the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a model organism. In this brief review, we summarize recent advances in Drosophila gustation and their relevance to taste research more broadly. Our goal is to highlight the molecular mechanisms underlying the first step of gustatory circuits: ligand-receptor interactions in primary taste cells. After an introduction to the Drosophila taste system and how it encodes the canonical taste modalities sweet, bitter, and salty, we describe recent insights into the complex nature of carboxylic acid and amino acid detection in the context of sour and umami taste, respectively. Our analysis extends to non-canonical taste modalities including metals, fatty acids, and bacterial components, and highlights unexpected receptors and signaling pathways that have recently been identified in Drosophila taste cells. Comparing the intricate molecular and cellular underpinnings of how ligands are detected in vivo in fruit flies reveals both specific and promiscuous receptor selectivity for taste encoding. Throughout this review, we compare and contextualize these Drosophila findings with mammalian research to not only emphasize the conservation of these chemosensory systems, but to demonstrate the power of this model organism in elucidating the neurobiology of taste and feeding.

Novel gurmarin-like peptides from Gymnema sylvestre and their interactions with the sweet taste receptor T1R2/T1R3

Gymnema sylvestre (GS) is a traditional medicinal plant known for its hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects. Gurmarin (hereafter Gur-1) is the only known active peptide in GS. Gur-1 has a suppressive sweet taste effect in rodents but no or only a very weak effect in humans. Here, 8 gurmarin-like peptides (Gur-2 to Gur-9) and their isoforms are reported in the GS transcriptome. The molecular mechanism of sweet taste suppression by Gur-1 is still largely unknown. Therefore, the complete architecture of human and mouse sweet taste receptors T1R2/T1R3 and their interaction with Gur-1 to Gur-9 were predicted by AlphaFold-Multimer (AF-M) and validated. Only Gur-1 and Gur-2 interact with the T1R2/T1R3 receptor. Indeed, Gur-1 and Gur-2 bind to the region of the cysteine-rich domain (CRD) and the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the mouse T1R2 subunit. In contrast, only Gur-2 binds to the TMD of the human T1R2 subunit. This result suggests that Gur-2 may have a suppressive sweet taste effect in humans. Furthermore, AF-M predicted that Gα-gustducin, a protein involved in sweet taste transduction, interacts with the intracellular domain of the T1R2 subunit. These results highlight an unexpected diversity of gurmarin-like peptides in GS and provide the complete predicted architecture of the human and mouse sweet taste receptor with the putative binding sites of Gur-1, Gur-2, and Gα-gustducin. In addition, gurmarin-like peptides may serve as promising drug scaffolds for the development of antidiabetic molecules.

Prediction of dynamic allostery for the transmembrane domain of the sweet taste receptor subunit, TAS1R3

The sweet taste receptor plays an essential role as an energy sensor by detecting carbohydrates. However, the dynamic mechanisms of receptor activation remain unclear. Here, we describe the interactions between the transmembrane domain of the G protein-coupled sweet receptor subunit, TAS1R3, and allosteric modulators. Molecular dynamics simulations reproduced species-specific sensitivity to ligands. We found that a human-specific sweetener, cyclamate, interacted with the mouse receptor as a negative allosteric modulator. Agonist-induced allostery during receptor activation was found to destabilize the intracellular part of the receptor, which potentially interfaces with the Gα subunit, through ionic lock opening. A common human variant (R757C) of the TAS1R3 exhibited a reduced response to sweet taste, in support of our predictions. Furthermore, histidine residues in the binding site acted as pH-sensitive microswitches to modulate the sensitivity to saccharin. This study provides important insights that may facilitate the prediction of dynamic activation mechanisms for other G protein-coupled receptors.

Sweet taste receptor subunit T1R3 regulates casein secretion and phosphorylation of STAT5 in mammary epithelial cells

During lactation, mammary epithelial cells (MECs) on the apical membrane are in contact with lactose in milk, while MECs on the basolateral membrane are in contact with glucose in blood. Both glucose and lactose are sweeteners that are sensed by a sweet taste receptor. Previously, we have shown that lactose exposure on the basolateral membrane, but not the apical membrane, inhibits casein production and phosphorylation of STAT5 in MECs. However, it remains unclear whether MECs have a sweet taste receptor. In this study, we confirmed that the sweet taste receptor subunit T1R3 existed in both the apical and basolateral membranes of MECs. Subsequently, we investigated the influence of apical and basolateral sucralose as a ligand for the sweet taste receptor using a cell culture model. In this model, upper and lower media were separated by the MEC layer with less-permeable tight junctions. The results showed in the absence of glucose, both apical and basolateral sucralose induced phosphorylation of STAT5, which is a positive transcriptional factor for milk production. In contrast, the T1R3 inhibitor basolateral lactisole reducing phosphorylated STAT5 and secreted caseins in the presence of glucose. Furthermore, exposure of the apical membrane to sucralose in the presence of glucose inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT5. Simultaneously, GLUT1 was partially translocated from the basolateral membrane to the cytoplasm in MECs. These results suggest that T1R3 functions as a sweet receptor and is closely involved in casein production in MECs.

PRECOGx: exploring GPCR signaling mechanisms with deep protein representations

In this study we show that protein language models can encode structural and functional information of GPCR sequences that can be used to predict their signaling and functional repertoire. We used the ESM1b protein embeddings as features and the binding information known from publicly available studies to develop PRECOGx, a machine learning predictor to explore GPCR interactions with G protein and β-arrestin, which we made available through a new webserver (https://precogx.bioinfolab.sns.it/). PRECOGx outperformed its predecessor (e.g. PRECOG) in predicting GPCR-transducer couplings, being also able to consider all GPCR classes. The webserver also provides new functionalities, such as the projection of input sequences on a low-dimensional space describing essential features of the human GPCRome, which is used as a reference to track GPCR variants. Additionally, it allows inspection of the sequence and structural determinants responsible for coupling via the analysis of the most important attention maps used by the models as well as through predicted intramolecular contacts. We demonstrate applications of PRECOGx by predicting the impact of disease variants (ClinVar) and alternative splice forms from healthy tissues (GTEX) of human GPCRs, revealing the power to dissect system biasing mechanisms in both health and disease.

A Dynamic Mass Redistribution Assay for the Human Sweet Taste Receptor Uncovers G-Protein Dependent Biased Ligands

The sweet taste receptor is rather unique, recognizing a diverse repertoire of natural or synthetic ligands, with a surprisingly large structural diversity, and with potencies stretching over more than six orders of magnitude. Yet, it is not clear if different cell-based assays can faithfully report the relative potencies and efficacies of these molecules. Indeed, up to now, sweet taste receptor agonists have been almost exclusively characterized using cell-based assays developed with overexpressed and promiscuous G proteins. This non-physiological coupling has allowed the quantification of receptor activity via phospholipase C activation and calcium mobilization measurements in heterologous cells on a FLIPR system, for example. Here, we developed a novel assay for the human sweet taste receptor where endogenous G proteins and signaling pathways are recruited by the activated receptor. The effects of several sweet taste receptor agonists and other types of modulators were recorded by measuring changes in dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) using an Epic^® reader. Potency and efficacy values obtained in the DMR assay were compared to those results obtained with the classical FLIPR assay. Results demonstrate that for some ligands, the two assay systems provide similar information. However, a clear bias for the FLIPR assay was observed for one third of the agonists evaluated, suggesting that the use of non-physiological coupling may influence the potency and efficacy of sweet taste receptor ligands. Replacing the promiscuous G protein with a chimeric G protein containing the C-terminal tail 25 residues of the physiologically relevant G protein subunit Gα_gustducin reduced or abrogated bias.

Whole-Brain Mapping of the Expression Pattern of T1R2, a Subunit Specific to the Sweet Taste Receptor

Chemosensory receptors are expressed primarily in sensory organs, but their expression elsewhere can permit ligand detection in other contexts that contribute to survival. The ability of sweet taste receptors to detect natural sugars, sugar alcohols, and artificial sweeteners suggests sweet taste receptors are involved in metabolic regulation in both peripheral organs and in the central nervous system. Our limited knowledge of sweet taste receptor expression in the brain, however, has made it difficult to assess their contribution to metabolic regulation. We, therefore, decided to profile the expression pattern of T1R2, a subunit specific to the sweet taste receptor complex, at the whole-brain level. Using T1r2-Cre knock-in mice, we visualized the overall distribution of Cre-labeled cells in the brain. T1r2-Cre is expressed not only in various populations of neurons, but also in glial populations in the circumventricular organs and in vascular structures in the cortex, thalamus, and striatum. Using immunohistochemistry, we found that T1r2 is expressed in hypothalamic neurons expressing neuropeptide Y and proopiomelanocortin in arcuate nucleus. It is also co-expressed with a canonical taste signaling molecule in perivascular cells of the median eminence. Our findings indicate that sweet taste receptors have unidentified functions in the brain and suggest that they may be a novel therapeutic target in the central nervous system.

Sweet Taste Is Complex: Signaling Cascades and Circuits Involved in Sweet Sensation

Sweetness is the preferred taste of humans and many animals, likely because sugars are a primary source of energy. In many mammals, sweet compounds are sensed in the tongue by the gustatory organ, the taste buds. Here, a group of taste bud cells expresses a canonical sweet taste receptor, whose activation induces Ca²⁺ rise, cell depolarization and ATP release to communicate with afferent gustatory nerves. The discovery of the sweet taste receptor, 20 years ago, was a milestone in the understanding of sweet signal transduction and is described here from a historical perspective. Our review briefly summarizes the major findings of the canonical sweet taste pathway, and then focuses on molecular details, about the related downstream signaling, that are still elusive or have been neglected. In this context, we discuss evidence supporting the existence of an alternative pathway, independent of the sweet taste receptor, to sense sugars and its proposed role in glucose homeostasis. Further, given that sweet taste receptor expression has been reported in many other organs, the physiological role of these extraoral receptors is addressed. Finally, and along these lines, we expand on the multiple direct and indirect effects of sugars on the brain. In summary, the review tries to stimulate a comprehensive understanding of how sweet compounds signal to the brain upon taste bud cells activation, and how this gustatory process is integrated with gastro-intestinal sugar sensing to create a hedonic and metabolic representation of sugars, which finally drives our behavior. Understanding of this is indeed a crucial step in developing new strategies to prevent obesity and associated diseases.

Pharmacology of the Umami Taste Receptor

Umami, the fifth taste, has been recognized as a legitimate taste modality only recently relative to the other tastes. Dozens of compounds from vastly different chemical classes elicit a savory (also called umami) taste. The prototypical umami substance glutamic acid or its salt monosodium glutamate (MSG) is present in numerous savory food sources or ingredients such as kombu (edible kelp), beans, soy sauce, tomatoes, cheeses, mushrooms, and certain meats and fish. Derivatives of glutamate (Glu), other amino acids, nucleotides, and small peptides can also elicit or modulate umami taste. In addition, many potent umami tasting compounds structurally unrelated to amino acids, nucleotides, and MSG have been either synthesized or discovered as naturally occurring in plants and other substances. Over the last 20 years several receptors have been suggested to mediate umami taste, including members of the metabotropic and ionotropic Glu receptor families, and more recently, the heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor, T1R1/T1R3. Careful assessment of representative umami tasting molecules from several different chemical classes shows activation of T1R1/T1R3 with the expected rank order of potency in cell-based assays. Moreover, 5'-ribonucleotides, molecules known to enhance the savory note of Glu, considerably enhance the effect of MSG on T1R1/T1R3 in vitro. Binding sites are found on at least 4 distinct locations on T1R1/T1R3, explaining the propensity of the receptor to being activated or modulated by many structurally distinct compounds and these binding sites allosterically interact to modulate receptor activity. Activation of T1R1/T1R3 by all known umami substances evaluated and the receptor's pharmacological properties are sufficient to explain the basic human sensory experience of savory taste and it is therefore unlikely that other receptors are involved.

An alternative pathway for sweet sensation: possible mechanisms and physiological relevance

Sweet substances are detected by taste-bud cells upon binding to the sweet-taste receptor, a T1R2/T1R3 heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor. In addition, experiments with mouse models lacking the sweet-taste receptor or its downstream signaling components led to the proposal of a parallel "alternative pathway" that may serve as metabolic sensor and energy regulator. Indeed, these mice showed residual nerve responses and behavioral attraction to sugars and oligosaccharides but not to artificial sweeteners. In analogy to pancreatic β cells, such alternative mechanism, to sense glucose in sweet-sensitive taste cells, might involve glucose transporters and K_ATP channels. Their activation may induce depolarization-dependent Ca²⁺ signals and release of GLP-1, which binds to its receptors on intragemmal nerve fibers. Via unknown neuronal and/or endocrine mechanisms, this pathway may contribute to both, behavioral attraction and/or induction of cephalic-phase insulin release upon oral sweet stimulation. Here, we critically review the evidence for a parallel sweet-sensitive pathway, involved signaling mechanisms, neural processing, interactions with endocrine hormonal mechanisms, and its sensitivity to different stimuli. Finally, we propose its physiological role in detecting the energy content of food and preparing for digestion.

Atomistic mechanisms underlying the activation of the G protein-coupled sweet receptor heterodimer by sugar alcohol recognition

The human T1R2-T1R3 sweet taste receptor (STR) plays an important role in recognizing various low-molecular-weight sweet-tasting sugars and proteins, resulting in the release of intracellular heterotrimeric G protein that in turn leads to the sweet taste perception. Xylitol and sorbitol, which are naturally occurring sugar alcohols (polyols) found in many fruits and vegetables, exhibit the potential caries-reducing effect and are widely used for diabetic patients as low-calorie sweeteners. In the present study, computational tools were applied to investigate the structural details of binary complexes formed between these two polyols and the T1R2-T1R3 heterodimeric STR. Principal component analysis revealed that the Venus flytrap domain (VFD) of T1R2 monomer was adapted by the induced-fit mechanism to accommodate the focused polyols, in which α-helical residues 233-268 moved significantly closer to stabilize ligands. This finding likely suggested that these structural transformations might be the important mechanisms underlying polyols-STR recognitions. The calculated free energies also supported the VFD of T1R2 monomer as the preferential binding site for such polyols, rather than T1R3 region, in accord with the lower number of accessible water molecules in the T1R2 pocket. The E302 amino acid residue in T1R2 was found to be the important recognition residue for polyols binding through a strongly formed hydrogen bond. Additionally, the binding affinity of xylitol toward the T1R2 monomer was significantly higher than that of sorbitol, making it a sweeter tasting molecule.

Sugar sensor genes in the murine gastrointestinal tract display a cephalocaudal axis of expression and a diurnal rhythm

Distributed along the length of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are nutrient sensing cells that release numerous signaling peptides influencing GI function, nutrient homeostasis and energy balance. Recent studies have shown a diurnal rhythm in GI nutrient sensing, but the mechanisms responsible for rhythmicity are poorly understood. In this report we studied murine GI sugar sensor gene and protein expression levels in the morning (7 AM) and evening (7 PM). Sweet taste receptor ( tas1r2/tas1r3/gnat3/gnat1) sugar transporter ( slc5a1, slc2a2, slc2a5) and putative sugar sensor ( slc5a4a and slc5a4b) gene expression levels were highest in tongue and proximal and distal small intestine, respectively. Clock gene ( cry2/arntl) activity was detected in all regions studied. Slc5a4a and slc5a4b gene expression showed clear diurnal rhythmicity in the small intestine and stomach, respectively, although no rhythmicity was detected in SGLT3 protein expression. Tas1r2, tas1r3, gnat1, and gcg displayed a limited rhythm in gene expression in proximal small intestine. Microarray analysis revealed a diurnal rhythm in gut peptide gene expression in tongue (7 AM vs. 7 PM) and in silico promoter analysis indicated intestinal sugar sensors and transporters possessed the canonical E box elements necessary for clock gene control over gene transcription. In this report we present evidence of a diurnal rhythm in genes that are responsible for intestinal nutrient sensing that is most likely controlled by clock gene activity. Disturbances in clock gene/nutrient sensing interactions may be important in the development of diet-related diseases, such as obesity and diabetes.

Sucralose activates an ERK1/2-ribosomal protein S6 signaling axis

The sweetener sucralose can signal through its GPCR receptor to induce insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells, but the downstream signaling pathways involved are not well‐understood. Here we measure responses to sucralose, glucagon‐like peptide 1, and amino acids in MIN6 β cells. Our data suggest a signaling axis, whereby sucralose induces calcium and cAMP, activation of ERK1/2, and site‐specific phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6. Interestingly, sucralose acted independently of mTORC1 or ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK). These results suggest that sweeteners like sucralose can influence β‐cell responses to secretagogues like glucose through metabolic as well as GPCR‐mediated pathways. Future investigation of novel sweet taste receptor signaling pathways in β cells will have implications for diabetes and other emergent fields involving these receptors.

Regulation of α-Transducin and α-Gustducin Expression by a High Protein Diet in the Pig Gastrointestinal Tract

Background

The expression of taste receptors (TASRs) and their signalling molecules in the gastrointestinal (GI) epithelial cells, including enteroendocrine cells (EECs), suggests they participate in chemosensing mechanisms influencing GI physiology via the release of endocrine messengers. TASRs mediate gustatory signalling by interacting with different transducers, including α-gustducin (G_αgust) and α-transducin (G_αtran) G protein subunits. This study tested whether G_αtran and G_αgust immunoreactive (-IR) cells are affected by a short-term (3 days) and long-term (30 days) high protein (Hp) diet in the pig GI tract.

Result

In the stomach, G_αgust and G_αtran-IR cells contained serotonin (5-HT) and ghrelin (GHR), while in the small and large intestine, G_αgust and G_αtran-IR colocalized with 5-HT-, cholecystokinin (CCK)- and peptide YY (PYY)-IR. There was a significant increase in the density of G_αtran-IR cells in the pyloric mucosa in both short- and long-term Hp diet groups (Hp3 and Hp30) vs. the control group (Ctr) (P<0.05), while the increase of G_αgust-IR cells in the pyloric mucosa was significant in Hp30 group vs. Ctr and vs. Hp3 (P<0.05); these cells included G_αtran / 5HT-IR and G_αtran / GHR-IR cells (P<0.05 and P<0.001 vs. Ctr, respectively) as well as G_αgust /5-HT-IR or G_αgust / GHR-IR cells (P<0.05 and P<0.01 vs. Ctr, respectively). In the small intestine, we recorded a significant increase in G_αtran-IR cells in the duodenal crypts and a significant increase of G_αgust-IR cells in the jejunal crypts in Hp3 group compared to HP30 (P<0.05). With regard to the number of G_αtran-G_αgust IR cells colocalized with CCK or 5-HT, there was only a significant increase of G_αtran / CCK-IR cells in Hp3 group compared to Ctr (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

This study showed an upregulation of selected subpopulations of G_αgust / G_αtran-IR cells in distinct regions of the pig GI tract by short- and long-term Hp diet lending support to TASR-mediated effects in metabolic homeostasis and satiety mechanisms.

Sweet taste receptor signaling network: possible implication for cognitive functioning

Sweet taste receptors are transmembrane protein network specialized in the transmission of information from special "sweet" molecules into the intracellular domain. These receptors can sense the taste of a range of molecules and transmit the information downstream to several acceptors, modulate cell specific functions and metabolism, and mediate cell-to-cell coupling through paracrine mechanism. Recent reports indicate that sweet taste receptors are widely distributed in the body and serves specific function relative to their localization. Due to their pleiotropic signaling properties and multisubstrate ligand affinity, sweet taste receptors are able to cooperatively bind multiple substances and mediate signaling by other receptors. Based on increasing evidence about the role of these receptors in the initiation and control of absorption and metabolism, and the pivotal role of metabolic (glucose) regulation in the central nervous system functioning, we propose a possible implication of sweet taste receptor signaling in modulating cognitive functioning.

Minireview: Nutrient sensing by G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that recognize molecules in the extracellular milieu and transmit signals inside cells to regulate their behaviors. Ligands for many GPCRs are hormones or neurotransmitters that direct coordinated, stereotyped adaptive responses. Ligands for other GPCRs provide information to cells about the extracellular environment. Such information facilitates context-specific decision making that may be cell autonomous. Among ligands that are important for cellular decisions are amino acids, required for continued protein synthesis, as metabolic starting materials and energy sources. Amino acids are detected by a number of class C GPCRs. One cluster of amino acid-sensing class C GPCRs includes umami and sweet taste receptors, GPRC6A, and the calcium-sensing receptor. We have recently found that the umami taste receptor heterodimer T1R1/T1R3 is a sensor of amino acid availability that regulates the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin. This review focuses on an array of findings on sensing amino acids and sweet molecules outside of neurons by this cluster of class C GPCRs and some of the physiologic processes regulated by them.

Sweet-taste-suppressing compounds: current knowledge and perspectives of application

Sweet-tasting compounds are recognized by a heterodimeric receptor composed of the taste receptor, type 1, members 2 (T1R2) and 3 (T1R3) located in the mouth. This receptor is also expressed in the gut where it is involved in intestinal absorption, metabolic regulation, and glucose homeostasis. These metabolic functions make the sweet taste receptor a potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of obesity and related metabolic dysfunctions such as diabetes. Existing sweet taste inhibitors or blockers that are still in development would constitute promising therapeutic agents. In this review, we will summarize the current knowledge of sweet taste inhibitors, including a sweet-taste-suppressing protein named gurmarin, which is only active on rodent sweet taste receptors but not on that of humans. In addition, their potential applications as therapeutic tools are discussed.

The black agonist-receptor model of high potency sweeteners, and its implication to sweetness taste and sweetener design

The dose responses of the most commonly used high potency sweeteners (HPSs) have been measured by a more precise sensory procedure. The data were analyzed by Black's pharmacological model that takes into account not only agonist binding affinity but transduction efficiency as well. HPSs are clearly segregated into 2 groups depending on whether they bind to T1R2 or T1R3 of the receptor heterodimer. Surprisingly, the more potent sweeteners have lower transduction efficiencies. The implications of these on consumer product development and HPS design are discussed.

Ric-8A, a Galpha protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor potentiates taste receptor signaling

Taste receptors for sweet, bitter and umami tastants are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). While much effort has been devoted to understanding G-protein-receptor interactions and identifying the components of the signalling cascade downstream of these receptors, at the level of the G-protein the modulation of receptor signal transduction remains relatively unexplored. In this regard a taste-specific regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS), RGS21, has recently been identified. To study whether guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) are involved in the transduction of the signal downstream of the taste GPCRs we investigated the expression of Ric-8A and Ric-8B in mouse taste cells and their interaction with G-protein subunits found in taste buds. Mammalian Ric-8 proteins were initially identified as potent GEFs for a range of Gα subunits and Ric-8B has recently been shown to amplify olfactory signal transduction. We find that both Ric-8A and Ric-8B are expressed in a large portion of taste bud cells and that most of these cells contain IP3R-3 a marker for sweet, umami and bitter taste receptor cells. Ric-8A interacts with Gα-gustducin and Gαi2 through which it amplifies the signal transduction of hTas2R16, a receptor for bitter compounds. Overall, these findings are consistent with a role for Ric-8 in mammalian taste signal transduction.

Umami taste transduction mechanisms

l-Glutamate elicits the umami taste sensation, now recognized as a fifth distinct taste quality. A characteristic feature of umami taste is its potentiation by 5'-ribonucleotides such as guanosine-5'-monophosphate and inosine 5'-monophosphate, which also elicit the umami taste on their own. Recent data suggest that multiple G protein-coupled receptors contribute to umami taste. This review will focus on events downstream of the umami taste receptors. Ligand binding leads to Gbetagamma activation of phospholipase C beta2, which produces the second messengers inositol trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. Inositol trisphosphate binds to the type III inositol trisphosphate receptor, which causes the release of Ca(2+) from intracellular stores and Ca(2+)-dependent activation of a monovalent-selective cation channel, TRPM5. TRPM5 is believed to depolarize taste cells, which leads to the release of ATP, which activates ionotropic purinergic receptors on gustatory afferent nerve fibers. This model is supported by knockout of the relevant signaling effectors as well as physiologic studies of isolated taste cells. Concomitant with the molecular studies, physiologic studies show that l-glutamate elicits increases in intracellular Ca(2+) in isolated taste cells and that the source of the Ca(2+) is release from intracellular stores. Both Galpha gustducin and Galpha transducin are involved in umami signaling, because the knockout of either subunit compromises responses to umami stimuli. Both alpha-gustducin and alpha-transducin activate phosphodiesterases to decrease intracellular cAMP. The target of cAMP in umami transduction is not known, but membrane-permeant analogs of cAMP antagonize electrophysiologic responses to umami stimuli in isolated taste cells, which suggests that cAMP may have a modulatory role in umami signaling.

Perceptual variation in umami taste and polymorphisms in TAS1R taste receptor genes

BACKGROUND

The TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 G protein-coupled receptors are believed to function in combination as a heteromeric glutamate taste receptor in humans.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that variations in the umami perception of glutamate would correlate with variations in the sequence of these 2 genes, if they contribute directly to umami taste.

DESIGN

In this study, we first characterized the general sensitivity to glutamate in a sample population of 242 subjects. We performed these experiments by sequencing the coding regions of the genomic TAS1R1 and TAS1R3 genes in a separate set of 87 individuals who were tested repeatedly with monopotassium glutamate (MPG) solutions. Last, we tested the role of the candidate umami taste receptor hTAS1R1-hTAS1R3 in a functional expression assay.

RESULTS

A subset of subjects displays extremes of sensitivity, and a battery of different psychophysical tests validated this observation. Statistical analysis showed that the rare T allele of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) R757C in TAS1R3 led to a doubling of umami ratings of 25 mmol MPG/L. Other suggestive SNPs of TAS1R3 include the A allele of A5T and the A allele of R247H, which both resulted in an approximate doubling of umami ratings of 200 mmol MPG/L. We confirmed the potential role of the human TAS1R1-TAS1R3 heteromer receptor in umami taste by recording responses, specifically to l-glutamate and inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP) mixtures in a heterologous expression assay in HEK (human embryonic kidney) T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a reliable and valid variation in human umami taste of l-glutamate. Variations in perception of umami taste correlated with variations in the human TAS1R3 gene. The putative human taste receptor TAS1R1-TAS1R3 responds specifically to l-glutamate mixed with the ribonucleotide IMP. Thus, this receptor likely contributes to human umami taste perception.

Interactions of the sweet-tasting proteins thaumatin and lysozyme with the human sweet-taste receptor

This study investigated the sweetness of the sweet-tasting protein thaumatin and lysozyme by both an in vitro cell-based assay and an in vivo sensory analysis to elucidate the differences between in vitro and in vivo response profiles. Hek293 cells were constructed that stably expressed the human T1R2+T1R3 sweet-taste receptor, and their responses to thaumatin and lysozyme were analyzed by monitoring the levels of intracellular cAMP. The results indicated that thaumatin and lysozyme as well as aspartame induced a decrease in the intracellular cAMP accumulation of the T1R2+T1R3-transfected cells and that EC(50) values of thaumatin and lysozyme determined by cell-based assay are well-consistent with the results of the sweetness threshold value determined by sensory analysis in the presence of 140 mM NaCl. The results of both in vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that the sweetness inhibitor lactisole significantly suppressed the sweetness of thaumatin and lysozyme.

Allelic polymorphism within the TAS1R3 promoter is associated with human taste sensitivity to sucrose

Human sweet taste perception is mediated by the heterodimeric G protein-coupled receptor encoded by the TAS1R2 and TAS1R3 genes. Variation in these genes has been characterized, but the functional consequences of such variation for sweet perception are unknown. We found that two C/T single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located at positions -1572 (rs307355) and -1266 (rs35744813) upstream of the TAS1R3 coding sequence strongly correlate with human taste sensitivity to sucrose and explain 16% of population variability in perception. By using a luciferase reporter assay, we demonstrated that the T allele of each SNP results in reduced promoter activity in comparison to the C alleles, consistent with the phenotype observed in humans carrying T alleles. We also found that the distal region of the TAS1R3 promoter harbors a composite cis-acting element that has a strong silencing effect on promoter activity. We conclude that the rs307355 and rs35744813 SNPs affect gene transcription by altering the function of this regulatory element. A worldwide population survey reveals that the T alleles of rs307355 and rs35744813 occur at lowest frequencies in European populations. We propose that inherited differences in TAS1R3 transcription account for a substantial fraction of worldwide differences in human sweet taste perception.

Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection

Abstract Taste perception plays a key role in determining individual food preferences and dietary habits. Individual differences in bitter, sweet, umami, sour, or salty taste perception may influence dietary habits, affecting nutritional status and nutrition-related chronic disease risk. In addition to these traditional taste modalities there is growing evidence that "fat taste" may represent a sixth modality. Several taste receptors have been identified within taste cell membranes on the surface of the tongue, and they include the T2R family of bitter taste receptors, the T1R receptors associated with sweet and umami taste perception, the ion channels PKD1L3 and PKD2L1 linked to sour taste, and the integral membrane protein CD36, which is a putative "fat taste" receptor. Additionally, epithelial sodium channels and a vanilloid receptor, TRPV1, may account for salty taste perception. Common polymorphisms in genes involved in taste perception may account for some of the interindividual differences in food preferences and dietary habits within and between populations. This variability could affect food choices and dietary habits, which may influence nutritional and health status and the risk of chronic disease. This review will summarize the present state of knowledge of the genetic variation in taste, and how such variation might influence food intake behaviors.

Expression of Galpha14 in sweet-transducing taste cells of the posterior tongue

Background

"Type II"/Receptor cells express G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for sweet, umami (T1Rs and mGluRs) or bitter (T2Rs), as well as the proteins for downstream signalling cascades. Transduction downstream of T1Rs and T2Rs relies on G-protein and PLCβ2-mediated release of stored Ca²⁺. Whereas Gαgus (gustducin) couples to the T2R (bitter) receptors, which Gα-subunit couples to the sweet (T1R2 + T1R3) receptor is presently not known. We utilized RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry and single-cell gene expression profiling to examine the expression of the Gαq family (q, 11, 14) in mouse taste buds.

Results

By RT-PCR, Gα14 is expressed strongly and in a taste selective manner in posterior (vallate and foliate), but not anterior (fungiform and palate) taste fields. Gαq and Gα11, although detectable, are not expressed in a taste-selective fashion. Further, expression of Gα14 mRNA is limited to Type II/Receptor cells in taste buds. Immunocytochemistry on vallate papillae using a broad Gαq family antiserum reveals specific staining only in Type II taste cells (i.e. those expressing TrpM5 and PLCβ2). This staining persists in Gαq knockout mice and immunostaining with a Gα11-specific antiserum shows no immunoreactivity in taste buds. Taken together, these data show that Gα14 is the dominant Gαq family member detected. Immunoreactivity for Gα14 strongly correlates with expression of T1R3, the taste receptor subunit present in taste cells responsive to either umami or sweet. Single cell gene expression profiling confirms a tight correlation between the expression of Gα14 and both T1R2 and T1R3, the receptor combination that forms sweet taste receptors.

Conclusion

Gα14 is co-expressed with the sweet taste receptor in posterior tongue, although not in anterior tongue. Thus, sweet taste transduction may rely on different downstream transduction elements in posterior and anterior taste fields.