A systematic scoping review of diagnostic validity in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

Empirical Approaches to the Classification of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a relatively new formal diagnosis for which empirical classification research (defined here as studies using latent class/latent profile analysis-type methods) is still emerging. Such research focused on ARFID is an important gap to fill given questions about (1) the boundaries between ARFID and phenotypically similar presentations (e.g., eating disorders [EDs] such as anorexia nervosa [AN], and pediatric feeding disorder [PFD]), and (2) within-ARFID heterogeneity. These questions have practical implications, including diagnostic reliability and treatment selection.

METHOD

This forum synthesizes the limited empirical classification literature seeking to quantitatively distinguish ARFID from non-ARFID EDs or from PFD, and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity.

RESULTS

To our knowledge, only five studies in clinical samples have used empirical classification methods to delineate ARFID from non-ARFID EDs and/or characterize within-ARFID heterogeneity; no studies have used such methods to delineate ARFID from PFD. Existing studies are mixed in determining how well ARFID can be distinguished from other EDs (particularly AN), but converge in identifying several potential ARFID subclasses (i.e., sensory sensitivity, low appetite, feared eating-related consequences, and subclass representing a combination of these) with some overlapping features.

DISCUSSION

The existing ARFID empirical classification literature should guide future ARFID classification research priorities (e.g., incorporating mechanistic variables as classification indicators, incorporating longitudinal variables as classification validators) to inform differences between ARFID and other disorders and between ARFID presentations. Dimensional approaches to conceptualizing, studying, and modeling psychopathology (namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology [HiTOP] and the Research Domain Criteria [RDoC]) may offer useful insights.

Incidence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents across the UK and Ireland: a BPSU and CAPSS surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to estimate the incidence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in children and adolescents (CA) presenting to secondary care in the UK and Republic of Ireland (ROI).

DESIGN

This observational surveillance study used the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit and the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Surveillance System. Monthly electronic reports were submitted by consultant paediatricians and child and adolescent psychiatrists from 1 March 2021 to 31 March 2022, with outcomes assessed at a 1-year follow-up.

SETTING

The UK and ROI.

PARTICIPANTS

Clinician-reported data on children and young people aged 5-17 (inclusive) in contact with paediatric services or CA mental health services for a new diagnosis of ARFID.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Annual incidence rates (IRs) estimated as confirmed new cases per 100 000 population at risk.

RESULTS

319 newly diagnosed cases of ARFID were reported over the 13-month surveillance period and assessed as eligible for inclusion. The mean age of the sample was 11.2 years (SD=3.8). The sample consisted of 145 females (45.5%). Most cases were of white British ethnicity (71.2%). The observed IR (IR0) in the UK was 2.79 per 100 000 CA (95% CI 2.48 to 3.13), with a higher IRo in males (2.98 per 100 000 CA (95% CI 2.55 to 3.49)) than in females (2.58 per 100 000 CA (95% CI 2.18 to 3.07)). Comorbidity was common in this sample with anxiety and autism spectrum disorder. At follow-up, 54.8% of cases had improved according to clinicians' clinical impression.

CONCLUSIONS

We conducted the first study reporting estimates of incidence of ARFID in CA in the UK and ROI presenting to secondary care. Our finding that ARFID is a disorder of relatively low incidence in CA should help inform service planning and resource allocation, as well as the development of evidence-based interventions.

A living experience proposal for the co-occurring diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and other eating disorders

The eating and feeding disorder section of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) is organized by a diagnostic algorithm that limits the contemporaneous assignment of multiple eating disorder diagnoses. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a disturbance in food intake typically associated with lack of interest in food, food avoidance based on sensory characteristics, and/or fear of aversive consequences from eating. According to the DSM-5-TR, an ARFID diagnosis cannot be made when weight or shape disturbances are present, and ARFID cannot be co-diagnosed with other eating disorders characterized by these disturbances. However, emerging evidence from both clinical and lived experience contexts suggests that the co-occurrence of ARFID with multiple other types of eating disorders may be problematically invisibilized by this trumping scheme. The diagnostic criteria for ARFID can contribute to inappropriate diagnosis or exclusion from diagnosis due to excessive ambiguity and disqualification based on body image disturbance and other eating disorder pathology, even if unrelated to the food restriction or avoidance. This harmfully limits the ability of diagnostic codes to accurately describe an individual's eating disorder symptomatology, impacting access to specialized and appropriate eating disorder care. Therefore, revision of the DSM-5-TR criteria for ARFID and removal of limitations on the diagnosis of ARFID concurrent to other full-syndrome eating disorders stands to improve identification, diagnosis, and support of the full spectrum of ARFID presentations.

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: recent advances in neurobiology and treatment

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is an eating disorder characterized by persistent insufficient nutritional and/or energy intake. ARFID, before referred to as "selective eating disorder", was introduced recently in the DSM-5 as a replacement for and expansion of the previous diagnosis. Individuals with ARFID may limit food variety and intake due to avoidance based on the sensory characteristics of the food or related to any adverse consequences of eating without the intention of losing weight and concerns of body image. The limited understanding of avoidant and restrictive eating poses challenges to effective treatment and management, impacting directly on the growth and development of children and adolescents. The ARFID neurobiological concept has not yet been clearly defined to clinical practice for nutritionists, thereby hindering screening and impeding the development of treatment recommendations. This narrative review provide useful practical information to consult the pathophysiology, the neurobiology, the clinical features, the assessment and the treatment for healthcare professionals seeking to enhance their clinical knowledge and management of this disorder.

Autistic traits and ARFID-associated eating behaviors in preschoolers: Mediating effects of sensory processing patterns

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association between autistic traits and Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID)-associated eating behaviors in preschool-age children and investigated whether this association was mediated by sensory processing patterns.

METHOD

A cross-sectional, parent-reported study was conducted between July 2022 and March 2023 among 503 preschoolers aged 4-6 years in China. Parents provided assessments of their children's autistic traits using the Social Responsiveness Scale, sensory processing patterns using the Short Sensory Profile 2, and ARFID-associated eating behaviors using the Nine Items ARFID Screen. The mediation model based on ordinary least squares regression was employed to test the mediating effects of sensory processing patterns between autistic traits and ARFID-associated eating behaviors.

RESULTS

The results indicated significant associations among autistic traits, ARFID-associated eating behaviors, and sensory processing patterns. Moreover, mediation analyses revealed that sensory processing patterns played a partial mediating role in the relationship between autistic traits and ARFID-associated eating behaviors. Specifically, autistic traits were observed to weaken ARFID-associated eating behaviors, particularly picky eating and poor appetite, through Registration, while simultaneously fostering them through Sensitivity and Avoiding.

DISCUSSION

Our study is limited to some extent by the inability to draw longitudinal conclusions from cross-sectional data. Nevertheless, it underscores the significance of early identification and intervention for food avoidance/restriction behaviors due to sensory processing abnormalities in children with heightened autistic traits. This proactive approach may contribute to mitigating ARFID-associated eating behaviors that might drive clinical symptoms of ARFID.

Psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) in a community sample of adults

BACKGROUND

No epidemiological data is yet available on Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) in Arab countries, which may in part be due to the lack of measures available in Arabic language. This constitutes a major obstacle to further progress of our understanding of the nature, aetiology, course, treatment, and prevention of ARFID, especially as some evidence suggested that ARFID may vary across cultures and food environments. We aimed to contribute to the literature in the eating disorders field by examining the psychometric properties of an Arabic translation of the Nine Item ARFID Screen (NIAS).

METHOD

This was a cross-sectional, web-based study. A total of 515 Lebanese community adults (mean age of 27.55 ± 10.92 years, 69.9% females) participated. The forward-backward method was adopted to translate the NIAS from English to Arabic.

RESULTS

Confirmatory Factor Analyses provided evidence for the adequate fit indices for the three-factor model (i.e., Picky eating, Fear, and Appetite) and the 9-item version of the NIAS. An adequate reliability of the Arabic NIAS was achieved, with McDonald's ω ranging from .75 to .90 for the total score and all three subscores. Multi-group analyses demonstrated measurement invariance by sex (males vs. females) and weight groups (underweight/healthy weight [BMI ≤ 25] vs. overweight/obese [BMI > 25]) at the configural, metric, and scalar levels. Adequate patterns of correlations between the NIAS and measures of disordered eating symptoms, psychological distress and well-being were seen. In particular, fear was significantly associated with non-ARFID disordered eating symptoms. Appetite and Picky eating, but not Fear, were inversely correlated with well-being. All three NIAS subscores and the total score were positively correlated with psychological distress.

CONCLUSION

Findings provided evidence that the Arabic NIAS is a short, valid and reliable self-report measure to screen for ARFID symptoms. In light of these findings, we recommend its use for clinical and research purposes among Arabic-speaking adults.

Current evidence for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: Implications for clinical practice and future directions

Background

ARFID (avoidant restrictive food intake disorder) is a relatively new diagnostic term covering a number of well-recognised, clinically significant disturbances in eating behaviour unrelated to body weight/shape concerns. Its phenotypic heterogeneity combined with much about the condition remaining unknown, can contribute to uncertainties about best practice. While other reviews of the evidence base for ARFID exist, few specifically target health care professionals and implications for clinical practice.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted to synthesise the findings of ARFID papers in scientific journals focussing on four key areas relevant to clinical practice: prevalence, assessment and characterisation of clinical presentations, treatment, and service delivery. Freely available online databases were searched for case studies and series, research reports, review articles, and meta-analyses. Findings were reviewed and practice implications considered, resulting in proposed clinical recommendations and future research directions.

Results

We discuss what is currently known about the four key areas included in this review. Based on available evidence as well as gaps identified in the literature, recommendations for clinical practice are derived and practice-related research priorities are proposed for each of the four of the areas explored.

Conclusion

Prevalence studies highlight the need for referral and care pathways to be embedded across a range of health care services. While research into ARFID is increasing, further studies across all areas of ARFID are required and there remains a pressing need for guidance on systematic assessment, evidence-based management, and optimal service delivery models. Informed clinical practice is currently predominantly reliant on expert consensus and small-scale studies, with ongoing routine clinical data capture, robust treatment trials and evaluation of clinical pathways all required. Despite this, a number a positive practice points emerge.

What do we know about the epidemiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was a new diagnosis in DSM-5. This systematic review explores what is known to date about the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents.

METHOD

Embase, Medline and PsycInfo were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, with most coming from specialised eating disorder services where prevalence rates were 5%-22.5%. Three studies from specialist feeding clinics showed the highest prevalence rates, ranging from 32% to 64%. Studies from non-clinical samples reported ARFID prevalence estimates ranging from 0.3% to 15.5%. One study, using national surveillance methodology, reported the incidence of ARFID in children and adolescents reaching clinical care to be 2.02 per 100,000 patients. Psychiatric comorbidity was common, especially anxiety disorders (9.1%-72%) and autism spectrum disorder (8.2%-54.75%).

CONCLUSION

The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs.

Prevalence of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) in children and adolescents with eating disorders

BACKGROUND

Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and eating disorder symptoms frequently overlap, clouding diagnostic certainty and hypothesized etiologic factors. Pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) is defined by abrupt emergence of core obsessive-compulsive behaviours and/or food restriction with concurrent, ancillary cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Inflammatory and immune processes have putative roles in both PANS and a related described condition with cardinal obsessive-compulsive or tic symptoms, known as pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infection (PANDAS). While prevalence of PANS and PANDAS has been examined in tic, movement disorder and OCD populations, this has not yet been systematically examined in a pediatric eating disorder sample.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the lifetime prevalence of those meeting PANS and/or PANDAS criteria within a pediatric eating disorder cohort.

METHODS

Convenience sampling method was utilized to select consecutive youth (ages 8-18-years) presenting to an interdisciplinary pediatric eating disorder subspecialty program with a confirmed eating disorder and completed parent-report PANS/PANDAS questionnaire (n = 100). A parent-reported measure was used to establish lifetime prevalence rates for PANS and PANDAS. Descriptive and exploratory comparative analyses were conducted between PANS and non-PANS groups. Continuous measures were analyzed using two-tailed independent sample t-tests and categorical measures were analyzed using two-tailed Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Among participants, 52% (n = 52) met PANS criteria and 0% (n = 0) met PANDAS diagnostic criteria. Core, abrupt-onset PANS symptoms included both food restriction and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 63.5% (n = 33), food restriction only in 25% (n = 13), and obsessive-compulsive symptoms only in 11.5% (n = 6) of participants. In comparison to those who did not meet PANS criteria, those in the PANS subgroup were less likely to be male and more commonly prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medication. Significant group differences did not emerge for onset age, body mass index, eating disorder type or comorbid psychiatric/medical/autoimmune illness.

CONCLUSION

Lifetime prevalence of symptoms in keeping with PANS diagnostic criteria within a pediatric eating disorder cohort was notably higher than that previously reported in OCD or tic disorder cohorts. The overlap between starvation effects and ancillary PANS symptoms may challenge the practical utility of this putative syndrome within the eating disorder population.

The factor structure and validity of a diagnostic interview for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a sample of children, adolescents, and young adults

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of validated diagnostic interviews for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) to aid identification and classification of cases for both clinical and research purposes. To evaluate the factor structure, construct validity, and criterion validity of the Pica ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI; ARFID module), we administered the PARDI to 129 children and adolescents ages 9-23 years (M = 16.1) with ARFID (n = 84), subclinical ARFID (n = 11), and healthy controls (n = 34).

METHOD

We used exploratory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the PARDI in children, adolescents, and young adults with an ARFID diagnosis, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Spearman correlations to test the construct validity of the measure, and non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curves to evaluate the criterion validity of the PARDI.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis yielded a 3-factor structure: (1) concern about aversive consequences of eating, (2) low appetite/low interest in food, and (3) sensory sensitivity. Participants with ARFID demonstrated significantly higher levels of sensory sensitivity, low appetite/low-food interest, and concern about aversive consequences of eating symptoms relative to control participants. The construct validity for each PARDI subscale was supported and clinical cutoffs for the low appetite/low interest in food (1.1) and sensory sensitivity subscales (0.6) were established.

DISCUSSION

These data present evidence for the factor structure and validity of the PARDI diagnostic interview for diagnosing ARFID in children, adolescents, and young adults, supporting the use of this tool to facilitate ARFID clinical assessment and research.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Due to the paucity of validated diagnostic interviews for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), we evaluated the factor structure and validity of the Pica ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview (ARFID module). Findings suggest that the interview assesses 3 components of ARFID: concern about aversive consequences of eating, low-appetite, and sensory sensitivity, and that clinical threshold scores on the latter two subscales can be used to advance ARFID assessment.

The Polish Version of the Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Questionnaire—Parents Report (ARFID-Q-PR) and the Nine Items Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen—Parents Report (NIAS-PR): Maternal Perspective

The aim of the present study was to develop and validate the Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Questionnaire—Parents Report (ARFID-Q-PR), a new tool to diagnose ARFID, based on a report submitted by Polish mothers of children aged 2 to 10 years. In total, 167 mothers of boys and girls aged 2 to 10 participated in the study. We used the ARFID-Q-PR and the Nine Items Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen—Parents Report (NIAS-PR). In addition, all mothers were asked to provide information on age, sex, height and weight, chronic somatic diseases, neurodevelopmental and mental disorders as well as intellectual disability of their children. Results of the reliability analysis demonstrated that the ARFID-Q-PR had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84). The stability of the ARFID-Q-PR factorial structure was confirmed. It is composed of three subscales: (1) attitudes to food; (2) justification for restrictions; (3) somatic symptoms. Our findings demonstrated that the ARFID-Q-PR total score was positively associated with the NIAS-PR total score. In addition, children with developmental and mental disorders substantially demonstrated more ARFID symptoms than did the children in the general population. The Polish version ARFID-Q-PR can be used to recognize the ARFID symptoms in young children by the main feeder in the family—mother or father.

Screening, assessment and diagnosis in the eating disorders: findings from a rapid review

BACKGROUND

Limited screening practices, minimal eating disorder training in the healthcare professions, and barriers related to help-seeking contribute to persistent low rates of eating disorder detection, significant unmet treatment need, and appreciable associated disease burden. The current review sought to broadly summarise the literature and identify gaps relating to the screening, assessment, and diagnosis of eating disorders within Western healthcare systems.

METHODS

This paper forms part of a Rapid Review series scoping the evidence base for the field of eating disorders, conducted to inform the Australian National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy 2021-2031, funded and released by the Australian Government. ScienceDirect, PubMed and Ovid/Medline were searched for studies published between 2009 and mid 2021 in English. High-level evidence such as meta-analyses, large population studies and Randomised Control Trials were prioritised through purposive sampling. Data from selected studies relating to Screening, Assessment and Diagnosis of eating disorders were synthesised and are disseminated in the current review.

RESULTS

Eighty seven studies were identified, 38% relating to screening and 62% to assessment and diagnosis. The majority of screening studies were conducted in university student samples, showing high prevalence but only modest improvements in help-seeking in those studies that followed up post-screen. In healthcare settings, clinicians continue to have difficulty identifying eating disorder presentations, particularly Binge Eating Disorder, Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorders, and sub-threshold eating disorders. This is preceded by inadequate and frequently homogenous screening mechanisms and exacerbated by considerable personal and health-system barriers, including self-stigma and lack of resourcing. While all groups are at risk of delayed or no diagnosis, those at particular risk include LGBTQ+ and gender diverse individuals, individuals living in larger bodies, and males.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of individuals with eating disorders remain undiagnosed and untreated despite a high prevalence of these conditions and increased advocacy in recent years. Research into improving detection and clinician diagnostic skill is extremely limited. Innovative empirical research is strongly recommended to address significant individual and health-system barriers currently preventing appropriate and timely intervention for many. Limited screening in healthcare settings and low rates of eating disorder training in the healthcare professions are just some of the barriers to help-seeking which may contribute to delayed intervention and diagnosis in the eating disorders. This has significant impacts, prolonging treatment when it is finally received, and increasing healthcare costs for both the individual and the healthcare system. The current review is part of a larger Rapid Review series conducted to inform the development of Australia's National Eating Disorders Research and Translation Strategy 2021-2031. A Rapid Review is designed to comprehensively summarise a body of literature in a short timeframe, often to guide policy-making and address urgent health concerns. The Rapid Review synthesises the current evidence-base and identifies gaps in eating disorder research and care, in order to guide decision making and address urgent health concerns. This paper gives a critical overview of the scientific literature relating to the current state of screening, assessment, and diagnosis of eating disorders within Western healthcare systems that may inform health policy and research in an Australian context. It covers screening initiatives in both general and high-risk populations; personal, clinician and healthcare system challenges relating to help-seeking; and obstacles to accurate and timely clinical diagnosis across the eating disorders.

Avoidant and Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Outcomes for 16 Inpatient Cases to Target Oral Consumption Using a Medical and Behavioral Treatment Model

INTRODUCTION

Avoidant and restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is characterized by restrictions in oral intake and does not include concerns related to body image. Despite the evidence-based medical and behavioral treatments, there is limited research as they apply to ARFID, but the extant research supports hospital-based behavioral therapy. Individuals with ARFID may have comorbidities that can affect treatment, which requires multidisciplinary treatment to provide effective care. Supplementary sources of nutrition may be required for individuals with this diagnosis to ensure they maintain proper nutritional status (eg, enteral feeding).

METHODS

A record review from 2015 to 2019 identified 16 participants admitted to an inpatient hospital. Of the sample, 75% of participants had a psychiatric diagnosis and 88% of participants experienced an acute event that preceded their feeding difficulties. Each participant received medical oversight, and instead of a standard treatment approach, behavioral treatment components were individualized based on each participants' presentation.

RESULTS

All participants met at least 80% of their admission treatment goals, and 92% of participants who completed their admission consumed 100% of their nutritional needs orally. Follow-up data indicate sustained progress for several months following discharge.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that a multidisciplinary, medical, and behavioral treatment model is effective for a variety of clinical presentations of ARFID. More research is needed on triggering events that precede restricted food and liquid intake. In addition, the extent to which these treatment components are preferred should be assessed in an effort to maintain treatment gains after discharge.

Pediatric Avoidant-Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and gastrointestinal-related Somatic Symptom Disorders: Overlap in clinical presentation

Certain presentations of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders (SSRDs) have conceptual overlap, namely, distress and impairment related to a physical symptom. This study compared characteristics of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID to those with gastrointestinal (GI)-related SSRD. A 5-year retrospective chart review at a tertiary care pediatric hospital comparing assessment data of patients with a diagnosis of ARFID (n = 62; 69% girls, M_age = 14.08 years) or a GI-related SSRD (n = 37; 68% girls, M_age = 14.25 years). Patients diagnosed with ARFID had a significantly lower percentage of median BMI than those with GI-related SSRD. Patients diagnosed with ARFID were most often assessed in the Eating Disorders Program, whereas patients diagnosed with an SSRD were most often assessed by Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Groups did not differ on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, illness duration, or pre-assessment services/medications. GI symptoms were common across groups. Patients diagnosed with an SSRD had more co-occurring medical diagnoses. A subset (16%) of patients reported symptoms consistent with both diagnoses. Overlap is observed in the clinical presentation of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID or GI-related SSRD. Some group differences emerged, including anthropometric measurements and co-occurring medical conditions. Findings may inform diagnostic classification and treatment approach.

Are feeding disorders and feeding tube dependency the same?: A discrimination study between feeding disorders, feeding tube dependency and healthy eaters

AIM

Feeding disorders (FD) and feeding tube dependency (FTD) are defined by a persistent pattern of food aversion, but data regarding the frequency of food aversion symptoms are scarce. In this study, the frequency of aversion symptoms for FD, FTD and healthy eaters (HE) were compared.

METHODS

We compared the frequency of food aversion symptoms in a group with FD (n = 32) and FTD (n = 39) to HE (n = 38) using the AFT questionnaire. This includes growth data as well as the feeding aversion scale and the frequency of food aversion symptoms.

RESULTS

HE were reported to have minor frequency of symptoms, while FD children were reported to have daily aversive symptoms. FTD patients had the highest frequency in total. There were significant differences between FD and FTD regarding the frequency of food refusal, vomiting and bizarre eating patterns, and there were different correlative patterns of food aversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with FD and FTD show significantly different patterns of feeding behaviour compared to healthy norms as well as to each other. This suggests individualised assessment and treatment programs may be most beneficial for the needs of children with FD and FTD.

Eater profile and associated factors in pediatric patients of the PEDIANUT cohort

Appetite traits have multifactorial origins. In association with environmental and genetic factors, they could become problematic and lead to Feeding or Eating Disorders (FED). As the DSM-5 classification is not suitable for pediatric FED, another way to describe eating behavior is to distinguish the clinical profiles of "small eater" and "big eater". The aim of this study was to identify socio-demographic and medical factors associated with these profiles, and to compare problematic and non-problematic profiles. From the Pedianut study, we analyzed socio-demographic, medical and family history data among 401 children according to 4 age groups (<1 year n = 101, 1-6 years n = 99, 6-12 years n = 100, 12-18 years n = 101). The information collected on eating behavior made it possible to define small eater profile (SEP) and big eater profile (BEP) using predefined grids. BEP was more frequent in adolescents (35.6%), and SEP was more frequent in children aged 1-6 years (34.3%). BEP was associated with having separated parents, being male and the oldest sibling (p < 0.05). Problematic BEP was associated with eating while watching television, being a girl, and having sensory disorders (p < 0.05). SEP was associated, whatever age, with non-breastfeeding, chronic illness, psychological history, sensory disorders, language delays (in the 1-6 year age group), and family history of FED (in the adolescent group) (p < 0.05). This analysis of factors associated with eater profile opens new perspectives for research on risk factors associated with eating traits, which warrants further study in larger populations to delineate transition from healthy to problematic eating.

A Moving Target: How We Define Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Can Double Its Prevalence

Objective: The DSM-5 criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) include ambiguities. Diagnostic criteria that allow for clinical judgment are essential for clinical practice. However, ambiguities can have major implications for treatment access and comparability and generalizability of research studies. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree to which distinct operationalizations of the diagnostic criteria for ARFID contribute to differences in the frequency of individuals who are eligible for the ARFID diagnosis. Methods: Because criteria B, C, and D are rule-outs, we focused on criterion A, identified 19 potential operational definitions, and determined the extent to which these different methods impacted the proportion of individuals who met criteria for ARFID in a sample of children, adolescents, and young adults (n = 80; September 2016-February 2020) enrolled in an avoidant/restrictive eating study. Results: Within each criterion, the proportion of individuals meeting diagnostic criteria differed significantly across the methodologies (all P values < .008). Using the strictest definition of each criterion, 50.0% (n = 40) of participants met criteria for ARFID. In contrast, under the most lenient definition of each criterion, the number nearly doubled, resulting in 97.5% (n = 78) meeting ARFID criteria. Conclusions: Comparison of diagnostic definitions for ARFID among children, adolescents, and young adults confirmed a broad range of statistically distinct proportions within a single sample. Our findings support the need for additional contextual support and consensus among disciplines on operationalization in both research and clinical settings.

Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and autistic traits in children with anorexia nervosa and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

BACKGROUND

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and feeding and eating disorders (FEDs) such as anorexia nervosa (AN) are strongly linked as evidenced by frequent comorbidity and overlapping traits. However, eating and social behaviors are shaped by culture, so it is critical to examine these associations in different populations. Moreover, FEDs are heterogeneous, and there has been no examination of autistic traits in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID).

METHODS

Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of ASD and autistic traits among Japanese children with AN (n = 92) or ARFID (n = 32) from a prospective multicenter cohort study using the Autism Spectrum Quotient Children's version (AQC) and Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT26).

RESULTS

ASD prevalence was high in both AN and ARFID (16.3 and 12.5%, respectively). The AN group exhibited significantly higher scores on all AQC subscales than an age-matched healthy control (HC) group, but there were no significant correlations between AQC scores and ChEAT26 scores. In the AFRID group, AQC scores did not differ from HCs, but significant correlations were found between total AQC and ChEAT26 scores and between several AQC and ChEAT26 subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the AN and ARFID groups had high prevalence rates of ASD. The AN group showed a significantly higher degree of autistic traits than the HC group; however, no difference was found between the ARFID and HC groups. Clinicians need to be aware of these rates when working with children with ED.

Feeding Problems in Typically Developing Young Children, a Population-Based Study

Feeding problems have been estimated to occur in approximately 25-45% of normally developing children. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of feeding problems in typically developing young children in Greece. Child feeding behavior, parents' feelings about their child's feeding patterns, and parental feeding practices were also explored. Parents completed the Greek version of the Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS). Data on 742 healthy, typically developing children aged two to seven years are presented. Overall, the majority of children in the sample showed high frequency of desirable mealtime behaviors and low frequency of undesirable mealtime behaviors. However, a significant proportion of the cohort presented with food neophobia and low consumption of vegetables. When applying test cut-off scores, it was found that 8.2% of the sample had abnormal Total Frequency Score (TFS) and 26.6% had abnormal Total Problem Score (TPS). The study showed that parent-reported feeding problems are quite common in children of typical development in Greece. Moreover, while the majority of the sample displayed a high frequency of favorable behaviors, specific child feeding behaviors are amenable to improvement.

Health professionals' familiarity and experience with providing clinical care for pediatric avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

OBJECTIVE

The current study explored the experience and familiarity of pediatric health professionals with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and assessed the application of diagnostic criteria in a series of clinical vignettes.

METHOD

Pediatric health professionals were invited to complete an online survey. Data from 93 health professionals from medical and allied health roles who completed the survey were analyzed.

RESULTS

Respondents providing care for pediatric feeding/eating disorders were more likely to report familiarity with ARFID than those not typically providing care for feeding/eating disorders. Clinicians who had provided care for pediatric ARFID reported more confidence in clinical management of ARFID than did those who had not yet provided care for ARFID, though there were overall relatively low levels of confidence in providing care for ARFID. Respondents to the clinical vignettes were more likely to confer a diagnosis of ARFID when there were symptoms of both psychosocial impairment and weight loss than when there was psychosocial impairment alone.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest variability in current application of diagnostic criteria for ARFID, low confidence in clinical management of ARFID, and ambiguity in clinicians' judgments regarding whether psychosocial impairment is sufficient to meet a diagnosis of ARFID.

Eggs, sugar, grated bones: colour-based food preferences in autism, eating disorders, and beyond

In 1913, eccentric French composer Erik Satie wrote a fragmentary, diary-like essay where he depicted a strikingly rigid diet consisting solely of white foods: eggs, sugar, coconuts, rice, cream cheese, fuchsia juice and so on. Satie's brief essay has later been used as one of many puzzle pieces in attempts to retrospectively diagnose him with autism spectrum disorder. With Satie's white meal as a starting point, this paper explores colour-based food preferences and selective eating in clinical and non-clinical populations, with a special focus on autism spectrum disorder and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). General colour preferences and their causes as well as the impact of colour on taste and food identification are also explored. Selective eating during childhood is immensely common and does not generally lead to disordered eating in the long run, although subgroups may experience rigidity around food of a more enduring nature. Problems related to eating were repeatedly described in Kanner's original 1943 autism case series and continue to be common in autism. Most studies on eating and sensory sensitivity in autism show that the texture and consistency of the food are the most common factors behind selective eating. In contrast, colour-based food preferences appear to be relatively rare, although numerous anecdotal reports exist. Foods that are white or colourless may be particularly appealing or tolerable for individuals with sensory hypersensitivity, which can occur in autism or ARFID. Ultimately, in the case of Erik Satie, this paper concludes that his description of a strictly white diet should not be read as an autobiographical account but rather as an ironic take on contemporary symbolist literature, with the famously decadent all-black dinner party in French novelist Joris-Karl Huysmans' À Rebours (1884; also known as Against Nature) as an obvious source of inspiration.

Psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire when used in adults: Prevalence estimates for symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and population norms

OBJECTIVE

Restrictive eating behaviors occur across ages, but little is known about symptoms of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), especially in adults. This study sought to examine the prevalence of symptoms of ARFID in the adult population, providing a psychometric evaluation of the Eating Disorders in Youth-Questionnaire (EDY-Q) and population norms.

METHOD

In a representative survey of the German population, N = 2,424 adults (1,297 women, 1,127 men; age 49.5 ± 17.5 years) were assessed with the EDY-Q and measures of eating disorder and general psychopathology for divergent validation.

RESULTS

The point prevalence of self-reported symptoms of ARFID amounted to 0.8% (20/2,424), with 0.8% of women (10/1,297) and 0.9% of men (10/1,127) being affected. Adults with symptoms of ARFID were significantly more likely to have underweight or normal weight, were more likely to report restrictive behaviors and lower levels of eating disorder psychopathology and binge eating than noneating-disordered controls and adults with symptoms of an eating disorder, but did not significantly differ in levels of compensatory behaviors, or depression and anxiety. The EDY-Q revealed favorable item statistics, heterogeneity, and satisfactory construct validity, including factorial, discriminant, and divergent validity. Weight-status specific norms were provided.

DISCUSSION

Both women and men from the population reported symptoms of ARFID with an anthropometric and psychopathological profile similar to that seen in youth with symptoms of ARFID, however, with lower prevalence estimates, and distinctive from that in other eating disorders. Interview-based assessment of this symptomatology is required to confirm the prevalence of ARFID diagnosis.

The changing profile of eating disorders and related sociocultural factors in Japan between 1700 and 2020: A systematic scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the changing profile of the phenotypic expression of eating disorders (EDs) and related sociocultural factors in Japan between 1700 and 2020.

METHOD

The authors conducted a systematic scoping review in accordance with the PRISMA statement guidelines for scoping reviews.

RESULTS

Findings indicate that Kampo doctors reported more than 50 patients with restrictive EDs in the 1700s, when Japan adopted a national isolation policy. On the other hand, only a few reports of EDs were found between 1868 and 1944, when rapid Westernization occurred. After World War II, providers began diagnosing patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) around 1960. Patients reported experiencing fat phobia, but did not engage in restriction for achieving slimness. However, after the 1970s, Japan experienced a rise in patients with AN who engaged in restriction to achieve thinness. Cases of patients who engaged in binge/purge symptomatology increased after the 1980s, followed by a steady increase in total ED cases after the 1990s. At various time points, providers attributed family conflicts, internalization of a thin ideal of beauty, changing food environments, and pressures associated with traditional gender roles to the onset and maintenance of EDs in Japan.

DISCUSSION

Findings reveal that restrictive EDs were present as early as the 18th century; Japanese patients may present with both "typical" and "atypical" forms of AN; ED symptoms can persist in the absence of Western influence; and sociocultural factors, such as gender-specific stressors and family dynamics, may contribute to EDs for Japanese populations.

Characteristics of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a general paediatric inpatient sample

OBJECTIVE

Although patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) often consult general paediatric services initially, existing literature mostly concentrated on intensive eating disorder treatment settings. This cross-sectional study sought to describe symptoms of ARFID and their associations with eating disorder psychopathology, quality of life, anthropometry, and physical comorbidities in a general paediatric sample.

METHODS

In N = 111 patients (8-18 years) seeking treatment for physical diseases, prevalence of ARFID-related restrictive eating behaviours was estimated by self-report and compared to population-based data (N = 799). Using self-report and medical record data, further ARFID diagnostic criteria were evaluated. Patients with versus without symptoms of ARFID based on self-report and medical records were compared in diverse clinical variables.

RESULTS

The prevalence of self-reported symptoms of ARFID was not higher in the inpatient than population-based sample. Only picky eating and shape concern were more common in the inpatient than population-based sample. Although 68% of the inpatient sample reported any restrictive eating behaviours, only 7% of patients showed symptoms of ARFID based on medical records in addition to self-report, particularly those with underweight, without significant effects for age, sex, and medical diagnoses.

DISCUSSION

The study revealed the importance of considering ARFID within the treatment of children and adolescents with physical diseases, especially for those with underweight. Further research is needed to replicate the findings with interview-based measures and to investigate the direction of effects in ARFID and its physical correlates.

A Middle-Range Theory for Nurses to Diagnose Ineffective Infant Feeding Patterns

PURPOSE

To construct a middle-range theory, based on the Roy adaptation model, for nurses can diagnose an ineffective infant feeding pattern.

DATA SOURCE

Scientific findings were used through a literature review and the concepts of the Roy model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The theory indicated new elements for the diagnosis: 12 etiological factors and 13 clinical indicators. Most of those are not contained in the NANDA taxonomy.

CONCLUSION

The middle-range theory for these diagnoses highlights the need for a review of the components present in the taxonomy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This approach guides research on nursing diagnoses to revise the content of the theory and to expand its concepts and elements for the diagnosis of an ineffective infant feeding pattern.

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: A systematic scoping review of the current literature

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was recently introduced to psychiatric nosology to describe a group of patients who have avoidant or restrictive eating behaviours that are not motivated by a body image disturbance or a desire to be thinner. This scoping review aimed to systematically assess the extent and nature of the ARFID literature, to identify gaps in current understanding, and to make recommendations for further study. Following an extensive database search, 291 unique references were identified. When matched against pre-determined eligibility criteria, 78 full-text publications from 14 countries were found to report primary, empirical data relating to ARFID. This literature was synthesised and categorised into five subject areas according to the central area of focus: diagnosis and assessment, clinical characteristics, treatment interventions, clinical outcomes, and prevalence. The current evidence base supports ARFID as a distinct clinical entity, but there is a limited understanding in all areas. Several possible avenues for further study are indicated, with an emphasis placed on first parsing this disorder's heterogeneous presentation. A better understanding of the varied mechanisms which drive food avoidance and/or restriction will inform the development of targeted treatment interventions, refine screening tools and impact clinical outcomes.

Eating disorders

Eating disorders are disabling, deadly, and costly mental disorders that considerably impair physical health and disrupt psychosocial functioning. Disturbed attitudes towards weight, body shape, and eating play a key role in the origin and maintenance of eating disorders. Eating disorders have been increasing over the past 50 years and changes in the food environment have been implicated. All health-care providers should routinely enquire about eating habits as a component of overall health assessment. Six main feeding and eating disorders are now recognised in diagnostic systems: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder, pica, and rumination disorder. The presentation form of eating disorders might vary for men versus women, for example. As eating disorders are under-researched, there is a great deal of uncertainty as to their pathophysiology, treatment, and management. Future challenges, emerging treatments, and outstanding research questions are addressed.

Introduction to a special issue on child and adolescent feeding and eating disorders and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

OBJECTIVE

We are very pleased to introduce a special issue of the International Journal of Eating Disorders on child and adolescent feeding and eating disorders and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID).

METHOD

Contributions focused on five main themes: (1) the definition and assessment of ARFID; (2) the clinical phenomenology of ARFID; (3) similarities and differences between ARFID and anorexia nervosa (AN); (4) novel treatments for ARFID; and (5) new ideas for improving treatment outcomes in AN.

RESULTS

These papers highlight the importance of clear operationalization and measurement of the ARFID diagnostic criteria. ARFID phenotypes bear both similarities and important differences in clinical profile, course, and outcome from AN. Findings suggest the utility of adapting existing treatments for restrictive eating disorders to apply to ARFID and engender clinical creativity to move beyond existing treatments and develop novel interventions that address the heterogeneity of ARFID. Furthermore, burgeoning understanding of ARFID offers the potential that novel treatments for ARFID may also be applied to improve outcomes for AN.

DISCUSSION

This collection of papers features child and adolescent feeding and eating disorder patient groups that have been understudied and we hope that this catalyzes clinical research in these important presentations.