Health professionals' familiarity and experience with providing clinical care for pediatric avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder

A living experience proposal for the co-occurring diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and other eating disorders

The eating and feeding disorder section of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 Text Revision (DSM-5-TR) is organized by a diagnostic algorithm that limits the contemporaneous assignment of multiple eating disorder diagnoses. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a disturbance in food intake typically associated with lack of interest in food, food avoidance based on sensory characteristics, and/or fear of aversive consequences from eating. According to the DSM-5-TR, an ARFID diagnosis cannot be made when weight or shape disturbances are present, and ARFID cannot be co-diagnosed with other eating disorders characterized by these disturbances. However, emerging evidence from both clinical and lived experience contexts suggests that the co-occurrence of ARFID with multiple other types of eating disorders may be problematically invisibilized by this trumping scheme. The diagnostic criteria for ARFID can contribute to inappropriate diagnosis or exclusion from diagnosis due to excessive ambiguity and disqualification based on body image disturbance and other eating disorder pathology, even if unrelated to the food restriction or avoidance. This harmfully limits the ability of diagnostic codes to accurately describe an individual's eating disorder symptomatology, impacting access to specialized and appropriate eating disorder care. Therefore, revision of the DSM-5-TR criteria for ARFID and removal of limitations on the diagnosis of ARFID concurrent to other full-syndrome eating disorders stands to improve identification, diagnosis, and support of the full spectrum of ARFID presentations.

Clinical care for severe and persistent eating disorders in pediatric populations: Perspectives of health professionals

OBJECTIVE

Models of treatment for adults with severe and enduring eating disorders focus on harm reduction and improving quality of life. However, there is a notable gap in the pediatric literature in this area. The current study set out to assess the perspectives of health professionals regarding clinical care for young people (e.g., ages 10-25 years) with severe and enduring eating disorders, and to explore perceptions about appropriate treatment options for these presentations.

METHODS

Health professionals were invited to complete a two-stage online survey about their experiences with clinical care for pediatric eating disorders through Canadian and Australian professional eating disorder networks. Survey 1 included questions about their experiences in supporting individuals with severe and enduring presentations. Participants who completed Survey 2 reviewed clinical vignettes and shared their perspectives about treatment recommendations and models of care, including for a severe and enduring presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 85 clinicians responded to questions on Survey 1 about severe and enduring eating disorder presentations. A portion of these respondents (n = 25) also participated in Survey 2. The majority of respondents to Survey 1 reported providing clinical care for pediatric severe and enduring eating disorder presentations. Amongst respondents to Survey 2, there was low consensus amongst respondents for the clinical care that would be most appropriate for young people with a severe and enduring eating disorder presentation. Numerous challenges in models of care for severe and enduring presentations in pediatric settings were raised in responses on Survey 2, with clinicians sharing their awareness of models focusing on quality of life, while also raising concerns about the appropriateness of these models for young people.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results of this study demonstrate that the majority of clinicians report that they have provided care to young people with severe and enduring presentations. There is a clear need for establishing guidance for clinicians working in pediatric eating disorder settings around models of care focused on quality of life. Engagement with interested parties, including those with lived experience, can clarify the development of terminology and clinical pathways for severe and enduring presentations of pediatric eating disorders.

Preparedness of Speech Language Pathologists and Occupational Therapists to Treat Pediatric Feeding Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is increasingly common and is often treated by speech language pathologists (SLPs) and occupational therapists (OTs) in the community setting. However, the preparedness of these disciplines to effectively address PFD is relatively unknown.

METHODS

A national (US), online survey was disseminated to providers who assess and treat PFD. For the present analysis, the responses of SLPs (N = 418) and OTs (N = 195) related to their clinical background, educational background, post-graduate training, and self-rated clinical effectiveness were statistically analyzed and compared across the two disciplines.

RESULTS

Both SLPs and OTs report feeling underprepared to work with PFD clients immediately following their academic training, but time spent in post-graduate training and years of clinical practice both significantly (p < 0.0001) increased feelings of effectiveness in assessing and treating PFD. Most SLPs and OTs pursued self-directed learning activities to increase competence, with the most common activities being article review, podcasts, and peer case review, although SLPs were significantly more likely to use podcasts (p < 0.0001) and peer review (p = 0.0004) than OTs. The most common barriers for providers were financial, time, travel, and institutional support barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

While PFD is a key practice area of both SLPs and OTs, both provider groups feel unprepared and under-supported in providing competent care to these patients upon graduation. Future research and policy should support advancements in training for current SLPs and OTs related to PFD and address current barriers to a specialized educational pathway.

Analysis of feeding and eating disorders in 191 children according to psychiatric or gastroenterological recruitment: The PEDIAFED cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The DSM-5 classification introduced new Feeding and Eating Disorders (FED) diagnostic categories, notably Avoidant and Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID), which, like other FED, can present psychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, paediatric clinical research that focuses on children below the age of 12 years remains scarce. The aim of this study was first to investigate the clinical features of FED in a cohort of children, second to compare them according to their recruitment (gastroenterology or psychiatry unit).

METHOD

This non-interventional retrospective cohort study analysed 191 patients in a French paediatric tertiary care centre (gastroenterology n = 100, psychiatry n = 91). The main outcome variables were clinical data (type of FED, BMI, nutritional support, chronic diseases, psychiatric comorbidities, sensory, sleep, language disorders, gastrointestinal complaints, adverse life events, family history). The outcome was defined by a Clinical Global Impression of Change-score.

RESULTS

FED diagnoses were ARFID (n = 100), Unspecified FED (UFED, n = 57), anorexia nervosa (AN, n = 33) and one pica/rumination. Mean follow-up was 3.28 years (SD 1.91). ARFID was associated with selective and sensory disorders (p < 0.001); they had more anxiety disorders than patients with UFED (p < 0.001). Patients with UFED had more chewing difficulties, language disorder (p < 0.001), and more FED related to chronic disease (p < 0.05) than patients with ARFID and AN. Patients with AN were female, underweight, referred exclusively to the psychiatrist, and had more depression than patients with ARFID and UFED (p < 0.001). The gastroenterology cohort included more UFED, while the psychiatry cohort included more psychiatric comorbidities (p < 0.001). A worse clinical outcome was associated with ARFID, a younger age at onset (p < 0.001), selective/sensory disorders and nutritional support (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ARFID and UFED children were diagnosed either by gastroenterologists or psychiatrists. Due to frequently associated somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, children with FED should benefit from a multidisciplinary assessment and care.

A systematic review of COVID-19 and the presentation of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder-like symptoms

BACKGROUND

The adverse effects of COVID-19 and the associated restrictions on eating disorder populations have been discussed in recent literature. However, little is known about the presentation of cases with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) during this period.

AIMS

To explore the extent of the literature on the presentation of ARFID, and ARFID-like cases, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

Cochrane Library, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid) and Medline (Ovid) were searched for publications between March 2020 and May 2023. Google Scholar and reference lists were hand searched. At least two reviewers independently screened each paper. Narrative synthesis was used.

RESULTS

Seven papers were included: four case reports and three cohort studies (total ARFID sample of 46). Included papers were assessed as having high (n = 3) or moderate (n = 4) quality. Findings did not suggest an increase in ARFID cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, although it is unclear if this is because of a lack of impact or underrecognition of ARFID. A need for a multidisciplinary approach to differentiate between ARFID and organic causes of ARFID-like presentations (e.g. gastrointestinal effects of COVID-19) was highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

Publications specifically pertaining to ARFID presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic have been few. Papers found have been of small sample sizes and lack subanalyses for ARFID within broader eating disorder samples. Continued surveillance is needed to evaluate any COVID-19-specific effects on the development, identification, treatment and outcomes of ARFID.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Child and Adolescent Healthcare Utilization for Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis documenting healthcare service utilization rates for pediatric (age <19 years) eating disorders during compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for studies published up to May 19, 2023. Studies with pediatric visits to primary care, inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department for eating disorders before and during the pandemic were included. This preregistered review (PROSPERO CRD42023413392) was reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data were analyzed with random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 52 studies reporting >148,000 child and adolescent eating disorder-related visits to >300 health settings across 15 countries were included (mean age, 12.7 years; SD = 4.1 years; 87% girls). There was strong evidence of an increase in healthcare use for eating disorders during the pandemic (rate ratio [RR] = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.38-1.71). Moderator analysis revealed larger rate increases among girls (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.28-1.71) compared to boys (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.06-1.45) and for adolescents (age ≥12 to 19 years) (RR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.29-1.81) compared to children (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.43). Moderator analysis demonstrated strong evidence of increased use of emergency department (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.48-1.97), inpatient (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.33-1.84), and outpatient (RR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.35-1.95) services, as well as strong evidence of increased rates of anorexia nervosa (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.24-1.75).

CONCLUSION

Healthcare use for pediatric eating disorders increased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among girls and adolescents. It is important to continue to monitor whether changes in healthcare use associated with acute pediatric mental distress are sustained beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY PREREGISTRATION INFORMATION

Risk factors for eating disorders for youth during the COVID-19 pandemic; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/; CRD42023413392.

DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT

One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as living with a disability. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our reference list. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science.

Avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder and autism: epidemiology, etiology, complications, treatment, and outcome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is considerable overlap between the features of avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and autism. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of studies published on ARFID and autism in 2022 and the first half of 2023.

RECENT FINDINGS

ARFID and autism are highly heritable conditions that often co-occur. In a large autism cohort, 21% of participants and 17% of their parents presented with avoidant-restrictive features. Of children diagnosed with ARFID, 8.2-54.8% are autistic. More than half of individuals with ARFID also have other neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, or somatic diagnoses. Anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and learning difficulties are particularly common co-occurring issues. Various strategies have been developed to support autistic children with feeding difficulties. It appears that their feeding difficulties, particularly sensory sensitivities, food preferences, and mealtime rituals and routines frequently persist into adolescence and adulthood, but research on optimal support for adults and adolescents is still scarce. Untreated ARFID in autistic individuals may lead to serious complications.

SUMMARY

Individuals seeking specialist care for autism, eating disorders, or gender dysphoria should be screened for ARFID. More research is needed on how to support autistic adolescents and adults with features of ARFID.

A diagnostic subgroup comparison of health care utilization patterns in individuals with eating disorders diagnosed in childhood and/or adolescence

OBJECTIVE

This study examined a 2-year period after diagnosis of an eating disorder to compare health care utilization in diagnostic subgroups including: anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and other specified eating disorders (Other).

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study of children diagnosed with AN (n = 674), BN (n = 230), BED (n = 59), ARFID (n = 171), and Other (n = 315). We used a general population cohort for comparison, matched 5:1 to the diagnostic subgroups on sex and birth date. We then conducted a separate analysis using the ARFID subgroup as a reference group compared to the other subgroups. Outcomes were determined using data linkage with health administrative databases and included hospitalizations, emergency department, general practitioner, psychiatry, and pediatrician visits. Odds ratios (dichotomous outcomes) and rate ratios (continuous outcome) were calculated.

RESULTS

Mental health care utilization was higher for all subgroups compared to the general population. When the subgroups were compared to the ARFID subgroup, those with ARFID appeared to have similar health care utilization to the other subgroups, except when compared to those with AN. The AN subgroup had higher odds of a mental health related hospitalization (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.5) higher rates of mental health related pediatrician visits (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.46) and psychiatry visits (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Those with ARFID have similar utilization as other subtypes of eating disorders, except when compared to those with AN who have higher health care utilization.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Our study found that the health service needs of young people with all types of eating disorders are substantially higher than the general population, and it appears that Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) has similar health care utilization to other eating disorders.

The clinical presentation of avoidant restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents is largely independent of sex, autism spectrum disorder and anxiety traits

Background

Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a new eating disorder with a heterogeneous clinical presentation. It is unclear which patient characteristics contribute to its heterogeneity.

Methods

To identify these patient characteristics, we performed symptom-level correlation and driver-level regression analyses in our cross-sectional study in up to 261 ARFID patients (51% female; median age = 12.7 years) who were assessed at the Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders, London between November 2019 and July 2022.

Findings

Symptoms across the three drivers 1) avoidance based on sensory characteristics of food; 2) apparent lack of interest in eating; and 3) concern about aversive consequences positively correlated with each other. Patients' anxiety traits showed the greatest positive correlations with symptoms of concern about aversive consequences of eating. Patient sex was not significantly associated with any of the three ARFID drivers. Patients with comorbid autism spectrum disorder (ASD; 28%) showed more food-related sensory sensitivities (RR = 1.26) and greater lack of interest in eating (RR = 1.18) than those of patients without ASD (49%).

Interpretation

In our clinical sample, the ARFID drivers occurred together and did not show clinically meaningful differences between the sexes. ASD may accentuate food-related sensory sensitivities and lack of interest, but may not drive a completely different symptom presentation. ARFID is multi-faceted and heterogenous, requiring a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment to sufficiently understand the drivers of the restrictive eating behaviour. Results need replication in larger samples with more statistical power.

Funding

None.

Current evidence for avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: Implications for clinical practice and future directions

Background

ARFID (avoidant restrictive food intake disorder) is a relatively new diagnostic term covering a number of well-recognised, clinically significant disturbances in eating behaviour unrelated to body weight/shape concerns. Its phenotypic heterogeneity combined with much about the condition remaining unknown, can contribute to uncertainties about best practice. While other reviews of the evidence base for ARFID exist, few specifically target health care professionals and implications for clinical practice.

Methods

A narrative review was conducted to synthesise the findings of ARFID papers in scientific journals focussing on four key areas relevant to clinical practice: prevalence, assessment and characterisation of clinical presentations, treatment, and service delivery. Freely available online databases were searched for case studies and series, research reports, review articles, and meta-analyses. Findings were reviewed and practice implications considered, resulting in proposed clinical recommendations and future research directions.

Results

We discuss what is currently known about the four key areas included in this review. Based on available evidence as well as gaps identified in the literature, recommendations for clinical practice are derived and practice-related research priorities are proposed for each of the four of the areas explored.

Conclusion

Prevalence studies highlight the need for referral and care pathways to be embedded across a range of health care services. While research into ARFID is increasing, further studies across all areas of ARFID are required and there remains a pressing need for guidance on systematic assessment, evidence-based management, and optimal service delivery models. Informed clinical practice is currently predominantly reliant on expert consensus and small-scale studies, with ongoing routine clinical data capture, robust treatment trials and evaluation of clinical pathways all required. Despite this, a number a positive practice points emerge.

What do we know about the epidemiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in children and adolescents? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) was a new diagnosis in DSM-5. This systematic review explores what is known to date about the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents.

METHOD

Embase, Medline and PsycInfo were used to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, with most coming from specialised eating disorder services where prevalence rates were 5%-22.5%. Three studies from specialist feeding clinics showed the highest prevalence rates, ranging from 32% to 64%. Studies from non-clinical samples reported ARFID prevalence estimates ranging from 0.3% to 15.5%. One study, using national surveillance methodology, reported the incidence of ARFID in children and adolescents reaching clinical care to be 2.02 per 100,000 patients. Psychiatric comorbidity was common, especially anxiety disorders (9.1%-72%) and autism spectrum disorder (8.2%-54.75%).

CONCLUSION

The current literature on the epidemiology of ARFID in children and adolescents is limited. Studies are heterogeneous with regard to setting and sample characteristics, with a wide range of prevalence estimates. Further studies, especially using surveillance methodology, will help to better understand the nature of this disorder and estimate clinical service needs.

Pediatric Avoidant-Restrictive Food Intake Disorder and gastrointestinal-related Somatic Symptom Disorders: Overlap in clinical presentation

Certain presentations of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders (SSRDs) have conceptual overlap, namely, distress and impairment related to a physical symptom. This study compared characteristics of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID to those with gastrointestinal (GI)-related SSRD. A 5-year retrospective chart review at a tertiary care pediatric hospital comparing assessment data of patients with a diagnosis of ARFID (n = 62; 69% girls, M_age = 14.08 years) or a GI-related SSRD (n = 37; 68% girls, M_age = 14.25 years). Patients diagnosed with ARFID had a significantly lower percentage of median BMI than those with GI-related SSRD. Patients diagnosed with ARFID were most often assessed in the Eating Disorders Program, whereas patients diagnosed with an SSRD were most often assessed by Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Groups did not differ on demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, illness duration, or pre-assessment services/medications. GI symptoms were common across groups. Patients diagnosed with an SSRD had more co-occurring medical diagnoses. A subset (16%) of patients reported symptoms consistent with both diagnoses. Overlap is observed in the clinical presentation of pediatric patients diagnosed with ARFID or GI-related SSRD. Some group differences emerged, including anthropometric measurements and co-occurring medical conditions. Findings may inform diagnostic classification and treatment approach.

Incidence and Age- and Sex-Specific Differences in the Clinical Presentation of Children and Adolescents With Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder

IMPORTANCE

To our knowledge, this is the first pediatric surveillance study of children and adolescents with avoidant restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the incidence and age- and sex-specific differences in the clinical presentation of ARFID in children and adolescents in Canada.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cross-sectional study, patients with ARFID were identified through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program by surveying 2700 Canadian pediatricians monthly from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2017.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The incidence of ARFID in Canadian children (5-18 years of age) and age- and sex-specific clinical characteristics at presentation.

RESULTS

In total, 207 children and adolescents (mean [SD] age, 13.1 [3.2] years; 127 [61.4%] female) were included in this study. The incidence of ARFID in children 5 to 18 years of age was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.76-2.31) per 100 000 patients. Older children and adolescents were more likely to endorse eating too little (5-9 years of age: 76.7%; 95% CI, 58%-88.6; 10-14 years of age: 90.9%; 95% CI, 84.6%-94.8%; 15-18 years of age: 95.6%; 95% CI, 83.6%-98.9%; P = .02), have a loss of appetite (5-9 years of age: 53.3%; 95% CI, 35.4%-70.4%; 10-14 years of age: 74.2%; 95% CI, 66.0%-81.0%; 15-18 years of age: 80.0%; 95% CI, 65.5%-89.4%; P = .03), be medically compromised (mean body mass index z score: 10-14 vs 5-9 years of age: -1.31; 95% CI, -2.0 to -0.6; 15-18 vs 5-9 years of age: -1.35; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.5; 15-18 vs 10-14 years of age: -0.04; 95% CI, -0.6 to 0.5; P < .001; mean percentage of treatment goal weight: 10-14 vs 5-9 years of age: -8.6; 95% CI, -14.3 to -2.9; 15-18 vs 5-9 years of age: -9.8; 95% CI, -16.3 to -3.3; 15-18 vs 10-14 years of age: -1.2; 95% CI, -5.8 to 3.4; P < .001; mean heart rate (beats per min): 10-14 vs 5-9 years of age: -10; 95% CI, -21.9 to 1.9; 15-18 vs 5-9 years of age: -19.7; 95% CI, -33.1 to -6.2; 15-18 vs 10-14 years of age: -9.7; 95% CI, -18.7 to -0.7; P = .002), have higher rates of anxiety (5-9 years of age: 26.7%; 95% CI, 13.7-45.4; 10-14 years of age: 52.3%; 95% CI, 43.7%-60.7%; 15-18 years of age: 53.3%; 95% CI, 38.6%-67.5%; P = .03) and depression (5-9 years of age: 0%; 10-14 years of age: 6.8%; 95% CI, 3.6%-12.7%; 15-18 years of age: 26.7%; 95% CI, 15.7%-41.6%; P < .001), and be more likely to be hospitalized (5-9 years of age: 13.3%; 95% CI, 5.0%-31.1%; 10-14 years of age: 41.7%; 95% CI, 33.5%-50.3%; 15-18 years of age: 55.6%; 95% CI, 40.7%-69.5%; P = .001). Younger children were more likely to endorse lack of interest in food (5-9 years of age: 56.7%; 95% CI, 38.4%-73.2%; 10-14 years of age: 75.0%; 95% CI, 66.8%-81.7%; 15-18 years of age: 57.8%; 95% CI, 42.8%-71.4%; P = .03), avoidance of certain foods (5-9 years of age: 90.0%; 95% CI, 72.6%-96.8%; 10-14 years of age: 69.7%; 95% CI, 61.3%-77.0%; 15-18 years of age: 62.2%; 95% CI, 47.2%-75.3%; P = .03), and refusal based on sensory characteristics (5-9 years of age: 66.7%; 95% CI, 47.9%-81.3%; 10-14 years of age: 38.6%; 95% CI, 30.7%-47.3%; 15-18 years of age: 22.2%; 95% CI, 12.3%-36.9%; P < .001). Eating but not enough was more common in girls (75.0%; 95% CI, 64.1%-83.4%) vs boys (68.5%; 95% CI, 59.8%-76.1; P = .04), and boys had a higher rate of refusal based on sensory characteristics (51.2%; 95% CI, 40.2%-62.2%) compared with girls (31.5%; 95% CI, 23.9%-40.2%; P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that ARFID is a relatively common eating disorder and is associated with important age- and sex- specific clinical characteristics that may help in early recognition and timely treatment of the presenting symptoms.