1
|
Oettinger V, Hilgendorf I, Wolf D, Stachon P, Heidenreich A, Zehender M, Westermann D, Kaier K, von Zur Mühlen C. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Germany with need for a surgical bailout. J Cardiol 2024; 84:99-104. [PMID: 38307247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), complications may force the need for a surgical bailout, but knowledge is rare about outcomes in Germany. METHODS Using national health records, we investigated all TAVR in German hospitals between 2007 and 2020, focusing on 2018-2020. We extracted data on those interventions with need for a surgical bailout. RESULTS A total of 159,643 TAVR were analyzed, with an overall rate of surgical bailout of 2.30 %, an overall in-hospital mortality of 3.85 %, and in-hospital mortality in case of bailout of 16.51 %. The number of all annual TAVR procedures increased substantially (202 to 22,972), with the rate of surgical bailout declining from 27.23 to 0.61 % and overall mortality from 11.39 to 2.29 %. However, in-hospital mortality after bailout was still high (28.37 % in 2020). The standardized rates of overall mortality and surgical bailout between 2018 and 2020 were significantly lower for balloon-expandable and self-expanding transfemoral TAVR than for transapical TAVR after risk adjustment [transapical/transfemoral balloon-expandable/transfemoral self-expanding TAVR: in-hospital mortality: 5.66 % (95 % CI 4.81 %; 6.52 %)/2.30 % (2.03 %; 2.57 %)/2.32 % (2.07 %; 2.57 %); surgical bailout: 2.33 % (1.68 %; 2.97 %)/0.79 % (0.60 %; 0.98 %)/0.42 % (0.31 %; 0.53 %)]. Coronary artery disease [risk-adjusted OR = 1.50 (1.21; 1.85), p < 0.001] and atrial fibrillation [OR = 1.29 (1.07; 1.57), p = 0.009] were found to be the main risk factors for bailout. CONCLUSIONS Rates of TAVR with need for a surgical bailout and overall in-hospital mortality have declined noticeably over the years in Germany. However, the outcomes are still unfavorable after surgical bailout, as in-hospital mortality is continuously high. We present risk factors for surgical bailout to improve preparation of subsequent measures. It must be a major goal to further reduce the rate of surgical bailouts in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Oettinger
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ingo Hilgendorf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dennis Wolf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Stachon
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adrian Heidenreich
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Zehender
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantin von Zur Mühlen
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dorian D, Thomson RJ, Lim HS, Proudfoot AG. Cardiogenic shock trajectories: is the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions definition the right one? Curr Opin Crit Care 2024; 30:324-332. [PMID: 38841918 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review the current Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) cardiogenic shock classification system and consider alternatives or iterations that may enhance our current descriptions of cardiogenic shock trajectory. RECENT FINDINGS Several studies have identified the potential prognostic value of serial SCAI stage re-assessment, usually within the first 24 h of shock onset, to predict deterioration and clinical outcomes across shock causes. In parallel, numerous registry-based analyses support the utility of a more precise assessment of the macrocirculation and microcirculation, leveraging invasive haemodynamics, imaging and additional laboratory and clinical markers. The emergence of machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities offers the opportunity to integrate multimodal data into high fidelity, real-time metrics to more precisely define trajectory and inform our therapeutic decision making. SUMMARY Whilst the SCAI staging system remains a pivotal tool in cardiogenic shock assessment, communication and reassessment, it is vital that the sophistication with which we measure and assess shock trajectory evolves in parallel our understanding of the complexity and variability of clinical course and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Dorian
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Cardiology, Trillium Health Partners, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ross J Thomson
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | - Hoong Sern Lim
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Basir MB, Gorgis S, Aurora L. Editorial: Defining the problem, the first step to making progress in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock care. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2024; 64:52-53. [PMID: 38555189 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mir Babar Basir
- Henry Ford Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
| | - Sarah Gorgis
- Henry Ford Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Lindsey Aurora
- Henry Ford Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
El Hussein MT, Mushaluk C. Cardiogenic Shock: An Overview. Crit Care Nurs Q 2024; 47:243-256. [PMID: 38860953 DOI: 10.1097/cnq.0000000000000513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex and dreadful condition for which effective treatments remain unclear. The concerningly high mortality rate of CS emphasizes a need for developing effective therapies to reduce its mortality and reverse its detrimental course. This article aims to provide an updated and evidence-based review of the pathophysiology of CS and the related pharmacotherapeutics with a special focus on vasoactive and inotropic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Toufic El Hussein
- Author Affiliations: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Community & Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada (Dr El Hussein and Ms Mushaluk);Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta (Dr El Hussein); and Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Medical Cardiology, Coronary Care Unit - Rockyview General Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (Dr El Hussein)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van Edom CJ, Swol J, Castelein T, Gramegna M, Huber K, Leonardi S, Mueller T, Pappalardo F, Price S, Schaubroeck H, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Vercaemst L, Vranckx P, Vandenbriele C. European practices on antithrombotic management during percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in adults: a survey of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the ESC and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:458-469. [PMID: 38529950 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Bleeding and thrombotic complications compromise outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) and/or microaxial flow pumps like Impella™. Antithrombotic practices are an important determinant of the coagulopathic risk, but standardization in the antithrombotic management during pMCS is lacking. This survey outlines European practices in antithrombotic management in adults on pMCS, making an initial effort to standardize practices, inform future trials, and enhance outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS This online cross-sectional survey was distributed through digital newsletters and social media platforms by the Association of Acute Cardiovascular Care and the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. The survey was available from 17 April 2023 to 23 May 2023. The target population were European clinicians involved in care for adults on pMCS. We included 105 responses from 26 European countries. Notably, 72.4% of the respondents adhered to locally established anticoagulation protocols, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) being the predominant anticoagulant (Impella™: 97.0% and V-A ECMO: 96.1%). A minority of the respondents, 10.8 and 14.5%, respectively, utilized the anti-factor-Xa assay in parallel with activated partial thromboplastin time for UFH monitoring during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support. Anticoagulant targets varied across institutions. Following acute coronary syndrome without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 54.0 and 42.7% were administered dual antiplatelet therapy during Impella™ and V-A ECMO support, increasing to 93.7 and 84.0% after PCI. CONCLUSION Substantial heterogeneity in antithrombotic practices emerged from participants' responses, potentially contributing to variable device-associated bleeding and thrombotic complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J Van Edom
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Justyna Swol
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Prof. Ernst-Nathan Str. 1, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Castelein
- Cardiovascular Center, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
| | - Mario Gramegna
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminen Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud University, Freudpl. 1+3, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Sergio Leonardi
- Department of Medical Sciences and Infective Disease, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Fondazione, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Piazzale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Thomas Mueller
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Spalto Marengo 43, 15121 Alessandria, Italy
| | - Susanna Price
- Department of Critical Care, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Rd, Harefield, Uxbridge UB9 6JH, United Kingdom
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Guy Scadding Building, Dovehouse St., SW3 6LY London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Schaubroeck
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS, Piazzale Golgi 19, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Leen Vercaemst
- Department of Perfusion, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Vranckx
- Department of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hartcentrum Hasselt, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Martelarenplein 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Christophe Vandenbriele
- Cardiovascular Center, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
- Department of Critical Care, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Hill End Rd, Harefield, Uxbridge UB9 6JH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alkhunaizi FA, Smith N, Brusca SB, Furfaro D. The Management of Cardiogenic Shock From Diagnosis to Devices: A Narrative Review. CHEST CRITICAL CARE 2024; 2:100071. [PMID: 38993934 PMCID: PMC11238736 DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogenous syndrome broadly characterized by inadequate cardiac output leading to tissue hypoperfusion and multisystem organ dysfunction that carries an ongoing high mortality burden. The management of CS has advanced rapidly, especially with the incorporation of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. A thorough understanding of how to approach a patient with CS and to select appropriate monitoring and treatment paradigms is essential in modern ICUs. Timely characterization of CS severity and hemodynamics is necessary to optimize outcomes, and this may be performed best by multidisciplinary shock-focused teams. In this article, we provide a review of CS aimed to inform both the cardiology-trained and non-cardiology-trained intensivist provider. We briefly describe the causes, pathophysiologic features, diagnosis, and severity staging of CS, focusing on gathering key information that is necessary for making management decisions. We go on to provide a more detailed review of CS management principles and practical applications, with a focus on tMCS. Medical management focuses on appropriate medication therapy to optimize perfusion-by enhancing contractility and minimizing afterload-and to facilitate decongestion. For more severe CS, or for patients with decompensating hemodynamic status despite medical therapy, initiation of the appropriate tMCS increasingly is common. We discuss the most common devices currently used for patients with CS-phenotyping patients as having left ventricular failure, right ventricular failure, or biventricular failure-and highlight key available data and particular points of consideration that inform tMCS device selection. Finally, we highlight core components of sedation and respiratory failure management for patients with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatimah A Alkhunaizi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nikolhaus Smith
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Samuel B Brusca
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David Furfaro
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zeymer U, Heer T, Ouarrak T, Akin I, Noc M, Stepinska J, Oldroyd K, Serpytis P, Montalescot G, Huber K, Windecker S, Savonitto S, Vrints C, Schneider S, Desch S, Thiele H. Current spectrum and outcomes of infarct-related cardiogenic shock: insights from the CULPRIT-SHOCK registry and randomized controlled trial. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:335-346. [PMID: 38349233 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
AIMS We analysed consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) who were enrolled into the CULPRIT-SHOCK randomized controlled trial (RCT) and those with exclusion criteria who were included into the accompanying registry. METHODS AND RESULTS In total, 1075 patients with infarct-related CS were screened for CULPRIT-SHOCK in 83 specialized centres in Europe; 369 of them had exclusion criteria for the RCT and were enrolled into the registry. Patients were followed over 1 year. The mean age was 68 years and 260 (25%) were women. 13.5%, 30.9%, and 55.6% had one-vessel, two-vessel, and three-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD), respectively. Significant left main (LM) coronary artery stenosis was present in 8.0%. 54.2% of the patients had cardiac arrest before admission. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 patency of the infarct vessel after percutaneous coronary intervention was achieved in 83.6% of all patients. Mechanical circulatory support was applied in one-third of patients. Total mortality after 30 days and 1 year was 47.6% and 52.9%. Mortality after 1 year was highest in patients with LM coronary artery stenosis (63.5%), followed by three-vessel (56.6%), two-vessel (49.8%), and one-vessel CAD (38.6%), respectively. Mechanical complications were rare (21/1008; 2.1%) but associated with a high mortality of 66.7% after 1 year. CONCLUSION In specialized centres in Europe, short- and long-term mortality of patients with infarct-related CS treated with an invasive strategy is still high and mainly depends on the extent of CAD. Therefore, there is still a need for improvement of care to improve the prognosis of infarct-related CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Zeymer
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Tobias Heer
- Department of Cardiology, München Klinik Neuperlach, Academic Teaching Hospital, LMU University of Munich, Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51, 81737 Munich, Germany
| | - Taoufik Ouarrak
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Ibrahim Akin
- Department of Cardiology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marko Noc
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Janina Stepinska
- Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Keith Oldroyd
- Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pranas Serpytis
- Department of Cardiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Giles Montalescot
- Department of Cardiology, ACTION Study Group, Sorbonne Université Paris 6, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kurt Huber
- Department of Cardiology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Cardiology, Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Windecker
- Department of Cardiology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Christiaan Vrints
- Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Steffen Schneider
- Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Bremserstraße 79, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Steffen Desch
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cervera JP, López CAA, Romero RN, Macías JC, Asensio JMN, Mínguez JRL. Implementation of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions classification in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction in a spanish university hospital. Acute Crit Care 2024; 39:257-265. [PMID: 38863356 PMCID: PMC11167420 DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.01620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Killip-Kimball classification has been used for estimating death risk in patients suffering acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Killip-Kimball stage IV corresponds to cardiogenic shock. However, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) classification provides a more precise tool to classify patients according to shock severity. The aim of this study was to apply this classification to a cohort of Killip IV patients and to analyze the differences in death risk estimation between the two classifications. METHODS A single-center retrospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patients hospitalized for "Killip IV AMI" between 2016 and 2023 was performed to reclassify patients according to SCAI stage. RESULTS Distribution of patients according to SCAI stages was B=4%, C=53%, D=27%, E=16%. Thirty-day mortality increased progressively according to these stages (B=0%, C=11.88%, D=55.56%, E=87.50%; P<0.001). The exclusive use of Killip IV stage overestimated death risk compared to SCAI C (35% vs. 11.88%, P=0.002) and underestimated it compared to SCAI D and E stages (35% vs. 55.56% and 87.50%, P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively). Age >69 years, creatinine >1.15 mg/dl and advanced SCAI stages (SCAI D and E) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Mechanical circulatory support use showed an almost significant benefit in advanced SCAI stages (D and E hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-1.06; P=0.058). CONCLUSIONS SCAI classification showed superior death risk estimation compared to Killip IV. Age, creatinine levels and advanced SCAI stages were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Mechanical circulatory support could play a beneficial role in advanced SCAI stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Pérez Cervera
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Division of Cardiology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Badajoz, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - José Ramón López Mínguez
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Badajoz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Carrillo-Aleman L, Agamez-Luengas AA, Guia M, Renedo-Villarroya A, Alonso-Fernández N, Lopez-Gomez L, Bayoumy-Delis P, Sanchez-Nieto JM, Pascual-Figal D, Carrillo-Alcaraz A. Effectiveness and safety of non-invasive ventilation in the management of cardiogenic shock. Rev Port Cardiol 2024; 43:259-273. [PMID: 37949366 DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Cardiogenic shock (CS) has long been considered a contraindication for the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV). The main objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness, measured as NIV success, in patients with respiratory failure due to CS. As secondary objective, we studied risk factors for NIV failure and compared the outcome of patients treated with NIV versus invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS Retrospective study on a prospective database, over a period of 25 years, of all consecutively patients admitted to an intensive care unit, with a diagnosis of CS and treated with NIV. A comparison was made between patients on NIV and patients on IMV using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS Three hundred patients were included, mean age 73.8 years, mean SAPS II 49. The main cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI): 164 (54.7%). NIV failure occurred in 153 (51%) cases. Independent factors for NIV failure included D/E stages of CS, AMI, NIV related complications, and being transferred from the ward. In the propensity analysis, hospital mortality (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.09-2.63) and 1 year mortality (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04-2.51) was higher in IMV. Mortality was lower with NIV (vs. EIT-IMV) in C stage (10.1% vs. 32.9%; p<0.001) but did not differ in D stage or E stage. CONCLUSIONS NIV seems to be relatively effective and safe in the treatment of early-stage CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Miguel Guia
- Sleep and Non-invasive Ventilation Unit, Thorax Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal; ISAMB, Instituto de Saúde Ambiental da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Domingo Pascual-Figal
- Cardiology Department, Virgen de la Arrixaca Hospital, Ctra. Madrid-Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beer BN, Kellner C, Sundermeyer J, Besch L, Dettling A, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Magnussen C, Schrage B. Prediction of cardiac worsening through to cardiogenic shock in patients with acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2024. [PMID: 38632837 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
AIMS Acute heart failure (AHF) can result in worsening of heart failure (WHF), cardiogenic shock (CS), or death. Risk factors for these adverse outcomes are not well characterized. This study aimed to identify predictors for WHF or new-onset CS in patients hospitalized for AHF. METHODS AND RESULTS Prospective cohort study enrolling consecutive patients with AHF admitted to a large tertiary care centre with follow-up until death or discharge. WHF was defined by the RELAX-AHF-2 criteria. CS was defined as SCAI stages B-E. Potential predictors were assessed by fitting logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. N = 233 patients were enrolled, median age was 78 years, and 80 were women (35.9%). Ischaemic cardiomyopathy was present in 82 patients (40.8%). Overall, 96 (44.2%) developed WHF and 18 (9.7%) CS. In-hospital death (8/223, 3.6%) was related to both events (WHF: OR 6.64, 95% CI 1.21-36.55, P = 0.03; CS: OR 38.27, 95% CI 6.32-231.81, P < 0.001). Chronic kidney disease (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.25-3.93, P = 0.007), logarithmized serum creatinine (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.51-5.82, P = 0.002), cystatin c (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.27-2.77, P = 0.002), tricuspid valve regurgitation (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.11-3.94, P = 0.023) and logarithmized pro-adrenomedullin (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.75-5.38, P < 0.001) were significant predictors of WHF. Chronic kidney disease (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.16-9.58, P = 0.03), cystatin c (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.00-3.53, P = 0.045), logarithmized pro-adrenomedullin (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.19-7.19, P = 0.019), and tricuspid valve regurgitation (OR 10.44, 95% CI 2.61-70.00, P = 0.003) were significantly with new-onset CS. CONCLUSIONS Half of patients admitted with AHF experience WHF or new-onset CS. Chronic kidney disease, tricuspid valve regurgitation, and elevated pro-adrenomedullin concentrations predict these events. They could potentially serve as early warning signs for further deterioration in AHF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Magnussen
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Möbius-Winkler S, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Schrage B. Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:612-625. [PMID: 38353681 PMCID: PMC10954943 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of all CS cases. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on sex-related differences in HF-CS, especially regarding use of treatment and mortality risk in women vs. men. This study aimed to investigate potential differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and mortality between women and men with HF-CS. METHODS In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS (without acute myocardial infarction) from 16 tertiary-care centers in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess differences in clinical presentation, use of treatments, and 30-day mortality in women vs. men with HF-CS. RESULTS N = 1030 patients with HF-CS were analyzed, of whom 290 (28.2%) were women. Compared to men, women were more likely to be older, less likely to have a known history of heart failure or cardiovascular risk factors, and lower rates of highly depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and renal dysfunction. Nevertheless, CS severity as well as use of treatments were comparable, and female sex was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (53.0% vs. 50.8%; adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75-1.19). CONCLUSIONS In this large HF-CS registry, sex disparities in risk factors and clinical presentation were observed. Despite these differences, the use of treatments was comparable, and both sexes exhibited similarly high mortality rates. Further research is necessary to evaluate if sex-tailored treatment, accounting for the differences in cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation, might improve outcomes in HF-CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Dept Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio E Biagio E Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, DHZC Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pavia Italy, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Unità Di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi, ONLUS, Santa Maria Nascente, Milan, Italy
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Winkler SM, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Westenfeld R, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Schrage B. Association between left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality and use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:570-580. [PMID: 37982863 PMCID: PMC10954940 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02332-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock (CS) is predominantly guided by shock-specific markers, and not by markers of cardiac function. We hypothesise that left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) can identify patients with a higher likelihood to benefit from MCS and thus help to optimise their expected benefit. METHODS Patients with non-ischaemic CS and available data on LVEF from 16 tertiary-care centres in five countries were analysed. Cox regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between LVEF and mortality, as well as the interaction between LVEF, MCS use and mortality. RESULTS N = 807 patients were analysed: mean age 63 [interquartile range (IQR) 51.5-72.0] years, 601 (74.5%) male, lactate 4.9 (IQR 2.6-8.5) mmol/l, LVEF 20 (IQR 15-30) %. Lower LVEF was more frequent amongst patients with more severe CS, and MCS was more likely used in patients with lower LVEF. There was no association between LVEF and 30-day mortality risk in the overall study cohort. However, there was a significant interaction between MCS use and LVEF, indicating a lower 30-day mortality risk with MCS use in patients with LVEF ≤ 20% (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.02 for LVEF ≤ 20% vs. hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.85-2.01 for LVEF > 20%, interaction-p = 0.017). CONCLUSION This retrospective study may indicate a lower mortality risk with MCS use only in patients with severely reduced LVEF. This may propose the inclusion of LVEF as an adjunctive parameter for MCS decision-making in non-ischaemic CS, aiming to optimise the benefit-risk ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Dept Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio E Biagio E Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- IRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Unità Di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ralf Westenfeld
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Camblor-Blasco A, Nuñez-Gil IJ, Duran Cambra A, Almendro-Delia M, Ródenas-Alesina E, Fernández-Cordon C, Vedia O, Corbí-Pascual M, Blanco-Ponce E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Guillén Marzo M, Sanchez Grande Flecha A, Garcia Acuña JM, Salamanca J, Escudier-Villa JM, Martin-Garcia AC, Tomasino M, Vazirani R, Perez-Castellanos A, Uribarri A. Prognostic Utility of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Stage Approach for Classifying Cardiogenic Shock Severity in Takotsubo Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032951. [PMID: 38471832 PMCID: PMC11010033 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a significant complication of Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), contributing to heightened mortality and morbidity. Despite this, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) staging system for CS severity lacks validation in patients with TTS and CS. This study aimed to characterize a patient cohort with TTS using the SCAI staging system and assess its utility in cases of TTS complicated by CS. METHODS AND RESULTS From a TTS national registry, 1591 consecutive patients were initially enrolled and stratified into 5 SCAI stages (A through E). Primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality; secondary end points were TTS-related in-hospital complications and 1-year all-cause mortality. After exclusions, the final cohort comprised 1163 patients, mean age 71.0±11.8 years, and 87% were female. Patients were categorized across SCAI shock stages as follows: A 72.1%, B 12.2%, C 11.2%, D 2.7%, and E 1.8%. Significant variations in baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentations, and in-hospital courses were observed across SCAI shock stages. After multivariable adjustment, each higher SCAI shock stage showed a significant association with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.77-29.31) compared with SCAI shock stage A. Higher SCAI shock stages were also associated with increased 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS In a large multicenter patient cohort with TTS, the functional SCAI shock stage classification effectively stratified mortality risk, revealing a continuum of escalating shock severity with higher stages correlating with increased in-hospital mortality. This study highlights the applicability and prognostic value of the SCAI staging system in TTS-related CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ivan J Nuñez-Gil
- Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense Madrid Spain
- Universidad Europea Madrid Spain
| | | | | | - Eduard Ródenas-Alesina
- Cardiology Department Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
- CIBERCV Madrid Spain
| | | | - Oscar Vedia
- Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense Madrid Spain
- Universidad Europea Madrid Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jose Maria Garcia Acuña
- Cardiology Department Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain
| | - Jorge Salamanca
- Cardiology Department Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP) Madrid Spain
| | | | | | - Marco Tomasino
- Cardiology Department Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
| | - Ravi Vazirani
- Instituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense Madrid Spain
- Universidad Europea Madrid Spain
| | - Alberto Perez-Castellanos
- Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Islas Baleares (IdISBa) Hospital Universitario Son Espases Palma Spain
| | - Aitor Uribarri
- Cardiology Department Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
- CIBERCV Madrid Spain
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR) Barcelona Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mehta A, Vavilin I, Nguyen AH, Batchelor WB, Blumer V, Cilia L, Dewanjee A, Desai M, Desai SS, Flanagan MC, Isseh IN, Kennedy JLW, Klein KM, Moukhachen H, Psotka MA, Raja A, Rosner CM, Shah P, Tang DG, Truesdell AG, Tehrani BN, Sinha SS. Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1354158. [PMID: 38545346 PMCID: PMC10965643 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1354158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a time-sensitive and hemodynamically complex syndrome with a broad spectrum of etiologies and clinical presentations. Despite contemporary therapies, CS continues to maintain high morbidity and mortality ranging from 35 to 50%. More recently, burgeoning observational research in this field aimed at enhancing the early recognition and characterization of the shock state through standardized team-based protocols, comprehensive hemodynamic profiling, and tailored and selective utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices has been associated with improved outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiology of CS, novel phenotypes, evolving definitions and staging systems, currently available pharmacologic and device-based therapies, standardized, team-based management protocols, and regionalized systems-of-care aimed at improving shock outcomes. We also explore opportunities for fertile investigation through randomized and non-randomized studies to address the prevailing knowledge gaps that will be critical to improving long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Mehta
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Ilan Vavilin
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Andrew H. Nguyen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Wayne B. Batchelor
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Vanessa Blumer
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Lindsey Cilia
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Aditya Dewanjee
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Mehul Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Michael C. Flanagan
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Iyad N. Isseh
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Jamie L. W. Kennedy
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Katherine M. Klein
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Hala Moukhachen
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Mitchell A. Psotka
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Anika Raja
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Carolyn M. Rosner
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Palak Shah
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Daniel G. Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Alexander G. Truesdell
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Virginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Behnam N. Tehrani
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barrionuevo-Sánchez MI, Ariza-Solé A, Viana-Tejedor A, Del Prado N, Rosillo N, Jorge-Pérez P, Sánchez-Salado JC, Lorente V, Alegre O, Llaó I, Martín-Asenjo R, Bernal JL, Fernández-Pérez C, Corbí-Pascual M, Pascual J, Marcos M, de la Cuerda F, Carmona J, Comin-Colet J, Elola FJ. Clinical profile, management and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing transfer between centers in Spain. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA (ENGLISH ED.) 2024; 77:226-233. [PMID: 37925017 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical profile, management, and prognosis of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) requiring interhospital transfer, as well as the prognostic impact of structural variables of the treating centers in this setting. METHODS This study included patients with STEMI-CS treated at revascularization-capable centers from 2016 to 2020. The patients were divided into the following groups: group A: patients attended throughout their admission at hospitals with interventional cardiology without cardiac surgery; group B: patients treated at hospitals with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery; and group C: patients transferred to centers with interventional cardiology and cardiac surgery. We analyzed the association between the volume of STEMI-CS cases treated, the availability of cardiac intensive care units (CICU), and heart transplant with hospital mortality. RESULTS A total of 4189 episodes were included: 1389 (33.2%) from group A, 2627 from group B (62.7%), and 173 from group C (4.1%). Transferred patients were younger, had a higher cardiovascular risk, and more commonly underwent revascularization, mechanical circulatory support, and heart transplant during hospitalization (P<.001). The crude mortality rate was lower in transferred patients (46.2% vs 60.3% in group A and 54.4% in group B, (P<.001)). Lower mortality was associated with a higher volume of care and CICU availability (OR, 0.75, P=.009; and 0.80, P=.047). CONCLUSIONS The proportion of transfers in patients with STEMI-CS in our setting is low. Transferred patients were younger and underwent more invasive procedures. Mortality was lower among patients transferred to centers with a higher volume of STEMI-CS cases and CICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Isabel Barrionuevo-Sánchez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Ariza-Solé
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Náyade Del Prado
- Fundación Instituto para la Mejora de la Asistencia Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicolás Rosillo
- Fundación Instituto para la Mejora de la Asistencia Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Jorge-Pérez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - José Carlos Sánchez-Salado
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victòria Lorente
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oriol Alegre
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isaac Llaó
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - José Luis Bernal
- Fundación Instituto para la Mejora de la Asistencia Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Control de Gestión, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Fernández-Pérez
- Fundación Instituto para la Mejora de la Asistencia Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Medicina Preventiva, Área Sanitaria de Santiago y Barbanza, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Júlia Pascual
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Marta Marcos
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco de la Cuerda
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Carmona
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Comin-Colet
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Bioheart, Grup de Malalties Cardiovasculars, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Beer BN, Kellner C, Goßling A, Sundermeyer J, Besch L, Dettling A, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Bernhardt AM, Brunner S, Colson P, Eckner D, Frank D, Eitel I, Frey N, Eden M, Graf T, Kupka D, Landmesser U, Majunke N, Maniuc O, Möbius-Winkler S, Morrow DA, Mourad M, Noel C, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Patel SM, Pauschinger M, Reichenspurner H, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Wechsler A, Skurk C, Thiele H, Varshney AS, Sag CM, Krais J, Westermann D, Schrage B. Complications in patients with cardiogenic shock on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: distribution and relevance. Results from an international, multicentre cohort study. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:203-212. [PMID: 37875127 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (VA-ECMO) restores circulation and tissue oxygenation in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients, but can also lead to complications. This study aimed to quantify VA-ECMO complications and analyse their association with overall survival as well as favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance categories 1 + 2). METHODS AND RESULTS All-comer patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO were retrospectively enrolled from 16 centres in four countries (2005-2019). Neurological, bleeding, and ischaemic adverse events (AEs) were considered. From these, typical VA-ECMO complications were identified and analysed separately as device-related complications. n = 501. Overall, 118 were women (24%), median age was 56.0 years, median lactate was 8.1 mmol/L. Acute myocardial infarction caused CS in 289 patients (58%). Thirty-days mortality was 40% (198/501 patients). At least one device-related complication occurred in 252/486 (52%) patients, neurological AEs in 108/469 (23%), bleeding in 192/480 (40%), ischaemic AEs in 123/478 (26%). The 22% of patients with the most AEs accounted for 50% of all AEs. All types of AEs were associated with a worse prognosis. Aside from neurological ones, all AEs and device-related complications were more likely to occur in women; although prediction of AEs outside of neurological AEs was generally poor. CONCLUSION Therapy and device-related complications occur in half of all patients treated with VA-ECMO and are associated with a worse prognosis. They accumulate in some patients, especially in women. Aside from neurological events, identification of patients at risk is difficult, highlighting the need to establish additional quantitative markers of complication risk to guide VA-ECMO treatment in CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alina Goßling
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander M Bernhardt
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Brunner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Pascal Colson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Derk Frank
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eden
- Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Danny Kupka
- Department of Internal Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin/Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würburg, Germany
| | | | - David A Morrow
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Marc Mourad
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, CHU Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Curt Noel
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Internal Medicine I, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Sandeep M Patel
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, St.Rita's Medical Center, Lima, USA
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Antonia Wechsler
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin/Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anubodh S Varshney
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, USA
| | - Can Martin Sag
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jannis Krais
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Geller BJ, van Diepen S. Do the risks of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock outweigh the potential benefits? EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:213-214. [PMID: 38157414 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bram J Geller
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Critical Care, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, Gilard M, Hinterbuchner L, Jankowska EA, Jüni P, Kimura T, Kunadian V, Leosdottir M, Lorusso R, Pedretti RFE, Rigopoulos AG, Rubini Gimenez M, Thiele H, Vranckx P, Wassmann S, Wenger NK, Ibanez B. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:55-161. [PMID: 37740496 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuad107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
|
19
|
Dettling A, Weimann J, Sundermeyer J, Beer BN, Besch L, Becher PM, Brunner FJ, Kluge S, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Westermann D, Schrage B. Association of systemic inflammation with shock severity, 30-day mortality, and therapy response in patients with cardiogenic shock. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:324-335. [PMID: 37982862 PMCID: PMC10850174 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02336-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) remains high even when mechanical circulatory support (MCS) restores adequate circulation. To detect a potential contribution of systemic inflammation to shock severity, this study determined associations between C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and outcomes in patients with CS. METHODS Unselected, consecutive patients with CS and CRP measurements treated at a single large cardiovascular center between 2009 and 2019 were analyzed. Adjusted regression models were fitted to evaluate the association of CRP with shock severity, 30-day in-hospital mortality and treatment response to MCS. RESULTS The analysis included 1116 patients [median age: 70 (IQR 58-79) years, 795 (71.3%) male, lactate 4.6 (IQR 2.2-9.5) mmol/l, CRP 17 (IQR 5-71) mg/l]. The cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction in 530 (48%) patients, 648 (58%) patients presented with cardiac arrest. Plasma CRP concentrations were equally distributed across shock severities (SCAI stage B-E). Higher CRP concentrations were associated with 30-day in-hospital mortality (8% relative risk increase per 50 mg/l increase in CRP, range 3-13%; p < 0.001), even after adjustment for CS severity and other potential confounders. Higher CRP concentrations were only associated with higher mortality in patients not treated with MCS [hazard ratio (HR) for CRP > median 1.50; 95%-CI 1.21-1.86; p < 0.001], but not in those treated with MCS (HR for CRP > median 0.92; 95%-CI 0.67-1.26; p = 0.59; p-interaction = 0.01). CONCLUSION Elevated CRP concentrations are associated with increased 30-day in-hospital mortality in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock. The use of mechanical circulatory support attenuates this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Weimann
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter M Becher
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian J Brunner
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, University Heart Center Freiburg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Randhawa VK, Baran DA. Unraveling heart failure cardiogenic shock profiles and pathways. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:445-447. [PMID: 38124463 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Varinder Kaur Randhawa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David A Baran
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sundermeyer J, Kellner C, Beer BN, Besch L, Dettling A, Bertoldi LF, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska J, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Möbius Winkler S, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Reichenspurner H, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Winzer EB, Westermann D, Gustafsson F, Schrage B. Clinical presentation, shock severity and mortality in patients with de novo versus acute-on-chronic heart failure-related cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:432-444. [PMID: 37940139 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Heart failure-related cardiogenic shock (HF-CS) accounts for a significant proportion of CS cases. Whether patients with de novo HF and those with acute-on-chronic HF in CS differ in clinical characteristics and outcome remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in clinical presentation and mortality between patients with de novo and acute-on-chronic HF-CS. METHODS AND RESULTS In this international observational study, patients with HF-CS from 16 tertiary care centres in five countries were enrolled between 2010 and 2021. To investigate differences in clinical presentation and 30-day mortality, adjusted logistic/Cox regression models were fitted. Patients (n = 1030) with HF-CS were analysed, of whom 486 (47.2%) presented with de novo HF-CS and 544 (52.8%) with acute-on-chronic HF-CS. Traditional markers of CS severity (e.g. blood pressure, heart rate and lactate) as well as use of treatments were comparable between groups. However, patients with acute-on-chronic HF-CS were more likely to have a higher CS severity and also a higher mortality risk, after adjusting for relevant confounders (de novo HF 45.5%, acute-on-chronic HF 55.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.72, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION In this large HF-CS cohort, acute-on-chronic HF-CS was associated with more severe CS and higher mortality risk compared to de novo HF-CS, although traditional markers of CS severity and use of treatments were comparable. These findings highlight the vast heterogeneity of patients with HF-CS, emphasize that HF chronicity is a relevant disease modifier in CS, and indicate that future clinical trials should account for this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Kellner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Dettling
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Joanna Jozwiak-Nozdrzykowska
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Center for Population Health Innovation (POINT), University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo Hospital, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ephraim B Winzer
- Technische Universität Dresden, Heart Centre Dresden, University Hospital, Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Rigshospitalet and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O'Kelly AC, Sarma A, Naoum E, Easter SR, Economy K, Ludmir J. Cardiogenic Shock and Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Pregnancy. J Intensive Care Med 2024:8850666231225606. [PMID: 38204193 DOI: 10.1177/08850666231225606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Maternal mortality rates are rising in the United States, a trend which is in contrast to that seen in other high-income nations. Cardiovascular disease and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are consistently the leading causes of maternal mortality both in the United States and globally, accounting for about one-quarter to one-third of maternal and peripartum deaths. A large proportion of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality stems from acquired disease in the context of cardiovascular risk factors, which include obesity, pre-existing diabetes and hypertension, and inequities in care from maternal care deserts and structural racism. Patients may also become pregnant with preexisting structural heart disease, or acquire disease throughout pregnancy (ex: spontaneous coronary artery dissection, peripartum cardiomyopathy), and be at higher risk of pregnancy-related cardiovascular complications. While risk-stratification tools including the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification, Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (CARPREG II) and Zwangerschap bij Aangeboren HARtAfwijking/Pregnancy in Women with Congenital Heart Disease (ZAHARA) have been designed to help physicians identify patients at increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes and who may therefore benefit from referral to a tertiary care center, the limitation of these scores is their predominant focus on patients with known preexisting heart disease. As such, identifying patients at risk for pregnancy complications presents a significant challenge, and it is often patients with high-risk cardiovascular substrates prior to or during pregnancy who are at a highest risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes including cardiogenic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C O'Kelly
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Sarma
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Naoum
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Rae Easter
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katherine Economy
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Ludmir
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oettinger V, Hilgendorf I, Wolf D, Rilinger J, Maier A, Zehender M, Westermann D, Kaier K, von Zur Mühlen C. Comparing balloon-expandable and self-expanding transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on subgroups in Germany 2019/2020. Clin Res Cardiol 2024; 113:168-176. [PMID: 37982864 PMCID: PMC10808194 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02326-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously, overall comparable outcomes were seen for balloon-expandable (BE) or self-expanding (SE) transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, subgroup analyses based on large case numbers are still needed. METHODS German national data of all BE and SE transfemoral TAVR treating aortic valve stenosis in 2019 and 2020 were analysed. We then compared different outcomes and performed a subgroup analysis for the endpoint in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Overall, 46,243 TAVR were analysed, 19,910 BE, and 26,333 SE. Patients in the SE group had a significantly higher logistic EuroSCORE (13.61 vs 12.66%, p < 0.001), age (81.55 vs 79.99a, p < 0.001), and proportion of women (54.82 vs 40.06%, p < 0.001). Both groups showed a similar in-hospital mortality with 2.37% in BE and 2.35% in SE (p = 0.916). In-hospital mortality also did not differ significantly after risk adjustment (OR = 0.98 [0.86, 1.13], p = 0.799). Patients in the SE group had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (OR = 0.83 [0.73, 0.95], p = 0.006), but a significantly higher risk of stroke (OR = 1.38 [1.19, 1.59], p < 0.001), delirium (OR = 1.15 [1.06, 1.24], p = 0.001), and permanent pacemaker implantation (OR = 1.29 [1.21, 1.37], p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of in-hospital mortality, there were no significant differences in any of the observed subgroups (age < 75/75-79/80-84/ ≥ 85a, logistic EuroSCORE < 4/4- < 9/ ≥ 9, gender, NYHA III/IV, previous CABG, peripheral vascular disease, COPD, pulmonary hypertension, renal disease GFR < 30 ml/min, and diabetes mellitus). CONCLUSION In the direct comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expanding TAVR, there are no differences for in-hospital mortality in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Oettinger
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ingo Hilgendorf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dennis Wolf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Rilinger
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Maier
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Zehender
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantin von Zur Mühlen
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Basir MB, Lemor A, Gorgis S, Patel KC, Kolski BC, Bharadwaj AS, Todd JW, Tehrani BN, Truesdell AG, Lasorda DM, Lalonde TA, Kaki A, Schrieber TL, Patel NC, Senter SR, Gelormini JL, Marso SP, Rahman AM, Federici RE, Wilkins CE, Thomas McRae A, Nsair A, Caputo CP, Khuddus MA, Chahin JJ, Dupont AG, Goldsweig AM, Lim MJ, Kapur NK, Wohns DHW, Zhou Y, Hacala MJ, O'Neill WW. Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e031401. [PMID: 38014676 PMCID: PMC10727311 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices increase systemic blood pressure and end organ perfusion while reducing cardiac filling pressures. METHODS AND RESULTS The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCT03677180) is a single-arm, multicenter study. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing early MCS with Impella in patients presenting with AMI-CS. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. A total of 406 patients were enrolled at 80 sites between 2016 and 2020. Average age was 64±12 years, 24% were female, 17% had a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 27% had in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 9% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation during MCS implantation. Patients presented with a mean systolic blood pressure of 77.2±19.2 mm Hg, 85% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, mean lactate was 4.8±3.9 mmol/L and cardiac power output was 0.67±0.29 watts. At 24 hours, mean systolic blood pressure improved to 103.9±17.8 mm Hg, lactate to 2.7±2.8 mmol/L, and cardiac power output to 1.0±1.3 watts. Procedural survival, survival to discharge, survival to 30 days, and survival to 1 year were 99%, 71%, 68%, and 53%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Early use of MCS in AMI-CS is feasible across varying health care settings and resulted in improvements to early hemodynamics and perfusion. Survival rates to hospital discharge were high. Given the encouraging results from our analysis, randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess the role of utilizing early MCS, using a standardized, multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amir Kaki
- Ascension St. John HospitalDetroitMI
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ali Nsair
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical CenterLos AngelesCA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bogerd M, Ten Berg S, Peters EJ, Vlaar APJ, Engström AE, Otterspoor LC, Jung C, Westermann D, Pöss J, Thiele H, Schrage B, Henriques JPS. Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:2021-2031. [PMID: 37671582 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to give contemporary insight into the use of Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMICS) and into associated outcomes, adverse events, and resource demands. METHODS AND RESULTS This nationwide observational cohort study describes all AMICS patients treated with Impella (ABIOMED, Danvers, MA, USA) and/or VA-ECMO in 2020-2021. Impella and/or VA-ECMO were used in 20% of all AMICS cases (n = 4088). Impella patients were older (34% vs. 13% >75 years, p < 0.001) and less frequently presented after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (18% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower in the Impella versus VA-ECMO cohort (61% vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Adverse events occurred less frequently in Impella-supported patients: acute haemorrhagic anaemia (36% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accidents (4% vs. 11%, p < 0.001), thromboembolisms of the extremities (5% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (21% vs. 25%, p = 0.004), acute kidney injury (44% vs. 53%, p < 0.001), and acute liver failure (7% vs. 12%, p < 0.001). Impella patients were discharged home directly more often (20% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) whereas VA-ECMO patients were more often discharged to another care facility (22% vs. 19%, p = 0.031). Impella patients had shorter hospital stays and lower hospital costs. CONCLUSION This is the largest, most recent European cohort study describing outcomes, adverse events, and resource demands based on claims data in patients with Impella and/or VA-ECMO. Overall, adverse event rates and resource consumption were high. Given the current lack of beneficial evidence, our study reinforces the need for prospectively established, high-quality evidence to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margriet Bogerd
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Ten Berg
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elma J Peters
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P J Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie E Engström
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk C Otterspoor
- Department of Cardiology and Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Centre, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Janine Pöss
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Centre Leipzig at the University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Centre Leipzig at the University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Science, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José P S Henriques
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, Claeys MJ, Dan GA, Dweck MR, Galbraith M, Gilard M, Hinterbuchner L, Jankowska EA, Jüni P, Kimura T, Kunadian V, Leosdottir M, Lorusso R, Pedretti RFE, Rigopoulos AG, Rubini Gimenez M, Thiele H, Vranckx P, Wassmann S, Wenger NK, Ibanez B. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:3720-3826. [PMID: 37622654 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 498] [Impact Index Per Article: 498.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
|
27
|
Brener MI, Kanwar MK. ADMIT(tance) ONE: Real-Time Hemodynamics in Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices. J Card Fail 2023; 29:1380-1382. [PMID: 37236500 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael I Brener
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Manreet K Kanwar
- Cardiovascular Institute at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Everett KD, Swain L, Reyelt L, Majumdar M, Qiao X, Bhave S, Warner M, Mahmoudi E, Chin MT, Awata J, Kapur NK. Transvalvular Unloading Mitigates Ventricular Injury Due to Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2023; 8:769-780. [PMID: 37547066 PMCID: PMC10401286 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Whether extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with Impella, known as EC-Pella, limits cardiac damage in acute myocardial infarction remains unknown. The authors now report that the combination of transvalvular unloading and ECMO (EC-Pella) initiated before reperfusion reduced infarct size compared with ECMO alone before reperfusion in a preclinical model of acute myocardial infarction. EC-Pella also reduced left ventricular pressure-volume area when transvalvular unloading was applied before, not after, activation of ECMO. The authors further observed that EC-Pella increased cardioprotective signaling but failed to rescue mitochondrial dysfunction compared with ECMO alone. These findings suggest that ECMO can increase infarct size in acute myocardial infarction and that EC-Pella can mitigate this effect but also suggest that left ventricular unloading and myocardial salvage may be uncoupled in the presence of ECMO in acute myocardial infarction. These observations implicate mechanisms beyond hemodynamic load as part of the injury cascade associated with ECMO in acute myocardial infarction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Navin K. Kapur
- Address for correspondence: Dr Navin K. Kapur, CardioVascular Center and Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington Street, Box #80, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA. @NavinKapur4
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Araki T, Kondo T, Imaizumi T, Sumita Y, Nakai M, Tanaka A, Okumura T, Yang M, Butt JH, Petrie MC, Murohara T. Relationship between the volume of cases and in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving short-term mechanical circulatory support. Am Heart J 2023; 261:109-123. [PMID: 37031832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined the relationship between annual case volume at each hospital and outcome in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices. METHODS This cross-sectional study used the Japanese nationwide database to identify patients receiving short-term MCS for CS between April 2012 and March 2020. Of 65,837 patients, 3 subcohorts were created; the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) alone (n = 48,643), the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (n = 16,871), and the Impella cohorts (n = 696). RESULTS The median annual case volume was 13.5 (7.4-22.1) in the IABP alone cohort, 6.4 (3.4-11.0) in the ECMO cohort, and 7.5 (4.0-10.7) in the Impella cohort. The highest quintile for the volume of cases in the IABP alone and ECMO had the lowest in-hospital mortality (IABP alone, 25.1% in quintile 1 vs 15.2% in quintile 5; ECMO, 73.7% in quintile 1 in 67.4% in quintile 5). Adjusted ORs for in-hospital mortality decreased as case volume increased (IABP alone, 0.63 [0.58-0.68] in quintile 5; ECMO, 0.73 [0.65-0.82] in quintile 5, with the lowest quintile as reference) but did not decrease significantly in the Impella (0.90 [0.58-1.39] in tertile 3, with the lowest tertile as reference). In the continuous models with the case volume as a continuous variable, adjusted ORs for in-hospital mortality decreased to 28 IABP cases/year and 12 ECMO cases/year. They did not decrease or became almost flat above that. CONCLUSIONS Higher volumes of IABP and ECMO are associated with a lower mortality. There is an upper limit to the decline. Centralizing patients with refractory CS in a particular hospital might improve patient outcomes in each region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Araki
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toru Kondo
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Takahiro Imaizumi
- Department of Nephrology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoko Sumita
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Michikazu Nakai
- Department of Medical and Health Information Management, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan
| | - Akihito Tanaka
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takahiro Okumura
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mingming Yang
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jawad H Butt
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark C Petrie
- British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Toyoaki Murohara
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ott S, Notz Q, Menger J, Stoppe C. [The Role of the Percutaneous Impella Pump in Anesthesia and Intensive Care]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2023; 58:304-320. [PMID: 37192639 DOI: 10.1055/a-1859-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices and in particular the increasing use of the Impella device family has gained significant interest over the last two decades. Nowadays, its use plays a well-established key role in both the treatment of cardiogenic shock, and as a preventive and protective therapeutic option during high-risk procedures in both cardiac surgery and cardiology, such as complex percutaneous interventions (protected PCI). Thus, it is not surprising that the Impella device is more and more present in the perioperative setting and especially in patients on intensive care units. Despite the numerous advantages such as cardiac resting and hemodynamic stabilization, potential adverse events exist, which may lead to severe, but preventable complications, so that adequate education, early recognition of such events and a subsequent adequate management are crucial in patients with tMCS. This article provides an overview especially for anesthesiologists and intensivists focusing on technical basics, indications and contraindications for its use with special focus on the intra- and postoperative management. Furthermore, troubleshooting for most common complications for patients on Impella support is provided.
Collapse
|
31
|
Eftychiou S, Kalakoutas A, Proudfoot A. The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support in de novo heart failure syndromes with cardiogenic shock: A contemporary review. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE MEDICINE 2023; 3:89-103. [PMID: 37188124 PMCID: PMC10175707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex clinical syndrome with a high mortality rate. It can occur to due to multiple etiologies of cardiovascular disease and is phenotypically heterogeneous. Acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS) has historically been the most prevalent cause, and thus, research and guidance have focused primarily on this. Recent data suggest that the burden of non-ischemic CS is increasing in the population of patents requiring intensive care admission. There is, however, a paucity of data and guidelines to inform the management of these patients who fall into two broad groups: those with existing heart failure and CS and those with no known history of heart failure who present with "de novo" CS. The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has expanded across all etiologies, despite its high cost, resource intensity, complication rates, and lack of high-quality outcome data. Herein, we discuss the currently available evidence on the role of MCS in the management of patients with de novo CS to include fulminant myocarditis, right ventricular (RV) failure, Takotsubo syndrome, post-partum cardiomyopathy, and CS due to valve lesions and other cardiomyopathies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonis Kalakoutas
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford RM7 0AG, UK
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
- Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, German Heart Centre Berlin, Berlin 13353, Germany
- Corresponding author: Alastair Proudfoot, Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schrage B, Sundermeyer J, Blankenberg S, Colson P, Eckner D, Eden M, Eitel I, Frank D, Frey N, Graf T, Kirchhof P, Kupka D, Landmesser U, Linke A, Majunke N, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Mierke J, Möbius-Winkler S, Morrow DA, Mourad M, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Patel SM, Pauschinger M, Pazzanese V, Radakovic D, Schulze PC, Scherer C, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Thiele H, Varshney A, Wechsler L, Westermann D. Timing of Active Left Ventricular Unloading in Patients on Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2023; 11:321-330. [PMID: 36724180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear if active left ventricular (LV) unloading should be used as a primary treatment strategy or as a bailout in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the association between timing of active LV unloading and implantation of VA-ECMO with outcomes of patients with CS. METHODS Data from 421 patients with CS treated with VA-ECMO and active LV unloading at 18 tertiary care centers in 4 countries were analyzed. Patients were stratified by timing of device implantation in early vs delayed active LV unloading (defined by implantation before up to 2 hours after VA-ECMO). Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models were fitted to evaluate the association between early active LV unloading and 30-day mortality as well as successful weaning from ventilation. RESULTS Overall, 310 (73.6%) patients with CS were treated with early active LV unloading. Early active LV unloading was associated with a lower 30-day mortality risk (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) and a higher likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 1.19-3.93) but not with more complications. Importantly, the relative mortality risk increased and the likelihood of successful weaning from ventilation decreased almost proportionally with the time interval between VA-ECMO implantation and (delayed) initiation of active LV unloading. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study lends support to the use of early active LV unloading in CS patients on VA-ECMO, although the findings need to be validated in a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pascal Colson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eden
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany; University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Derk Frank
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Internal Medicine III-Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Norbert Frey
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany; University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany; Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham and Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trusts, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Danny Kupka
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany & German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, German
| | - Axel Linke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicolas Majunke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Mierke
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - David A Morrow
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc Mourad
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Advanced Heart Failure and Mechanical Circulatory Support Program, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy; Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Sandeep M Patel
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, St. Rita's Medical Center, Lima, Ohio, USA
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Vittorio Pazzanese
- Advanced Heart Failure and Mechanical Circulatory Support Program, Vita Salute University, Milan, Italy; Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Darko Radakovic
- Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, Ruhr University of Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Scherer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany & German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, German
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anubodh Varshney
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lukas Wechsler
- Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Megaly M, Gandolfo C, Zakhour S, Jiang M, Burgess K, Chetcuti S, Ragosta M, Adler E, Coletti A, O'Neill B, Alaswad K, Basir MB. Utilization of TandemHeart in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the THEME registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 101:756-763. [PMID: 36748804 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND TandemHeart has been demonstrated to improve hemodynamic and metabolic complications in cardiogenic shock (CS). Contemporary outcomes have not been reported. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the outcomes of the TandemHeart (LivaNova) in contemporary real-world use. METHODS We analyzed baseline characteristics, hemodynamic changes, and outcomes of all patients treated with TandemHeart who were enrolled in the THEME registry, a multicenter, prospective, observational study. RESULTS Between May 2015 and June 2019, 50 patients underwent implantation of the TandemHeart device. 22% of patients had TandemHeart implanted within 12 h, 32% within 24 h, and 52% within 48 h of CS diagnosis. Cardiac index (CI) was significantly improved 24 h after implantation (median change 1.0, interquartile range (IQR) (0.5-1.4 L/min/m2 ). In survivors, there was a significant improvement in CI (1.0, IQR (0.5-2.25 L/min/m2 ) and lactate clearance -2.3 (-5.0 to -0.7 mmol/L). The 30-day and 180-day survival were 74% (95% confidence interval: 60%-85%) and 66% (95% confidence interval: 51%-79%), respectively. Survival was similarly high in those in whom TandemHeart has been used as a bridge to surgery (85% 180-day survival). CONCLUSION In a contemporary cohort of patients presenting in CS, the use of TandemHeart is associated with a 74% 30-day survival and a 66% 180-day survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Megaly
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Chaun Gandolfo
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Samer Zakhour
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Stanley Chetcuti
- Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael Ragosta
- Division of Cardiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Eric Adler
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Andrew Coletti
- Division of Cardiology, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, Washington, USA
| | - Brian O'Neill
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Khaldoon Alaswad
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Mir B Basir
- Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Watson RA, Rosenberg RD. Cardiac Surgery for Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit: Worth the Risk. JACC. ADVANCES 2023; 2:100280. [PMID: 38938311 PMCID: PMC11198617 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A. Watson
- Division of Cardiolovascular Medicine at Allegheny Health Network and Drexel College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell D. Rosenberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schrage B, Sundermeyer J, Beer BN, Bertoldi L, Bernhardt A, Blankenberg S, Dauw J, Dindane Z, Eckner D, Eitel I, Graf T, Horn P, Kirchhof P, Kluge S, Linke A, Landmesser U, Luedike P, Lüsebrink E, Mangner N, Maniuc O, Winkler SM, Nordbeck P, Orban M, Pappalardo F, Pauschinger M, Pazdernik M, Proudfoot A, Kelham M, Rassaf T, Reichenspurner H, Scherer C, Schulze PC, Schwinger RHG, Skurk C, Sramko M, Tavazzi G, Thiele H, Villanova L, Morici N, Wechsler A, Westenfeld R, Winzer E, Westermann D. Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:562-572. [PMID: 36781178 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Despite its high incidence and mortality risk, there is no evidence-based treatment for non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for non-ischaemic CS treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS In this multicentre, international, retrospective study, data from 890 patients with non-ischaemic CS, defined as CS due to severe de-novo or acute-on-chronic heart failure with no need for urgent revascularization, treated with or without active MCS, were collected. The association between active MCS use and the primary endpoint of 30-day mortality was assessed in a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort. MCS was used in 386 (43%) patients. Patients treated with MCS presented with more severe CS (37% vs. 23% deteriorating CS, 30% vs. 25% in extremis CS) and had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction at baseline (21% vs. 25%). After matching, 267 patients treated with MCS were compared with 267 patients treated without MCS. In the matched cohort, MCS use was associated with a lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.97). This finding was consistent through all tested subgroups except when CS severity was considered, indicating risk reduction especially in patients with deteriorating CS. However, complications occurred more frequently in patients with MCS; e.g. severe bleeding (16.5% vs. 6.4%) and access-site related ischaemia (6.7% vs. 0%). CONCLUSION In patients with non-ischaemic CS, MCS use was associated with lower 30-day mortality as compared to medical therapy only, but also with more complications. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Sundermeyer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Norbert Beer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Letizia Bertoldi
- Cardio Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexander Bernhardt
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jeroen Dauw
- Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL), Genk, Belgium.,Doctoral School for Medicine and Life Sciences, LCRC, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Zouhir Dindane
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dennis Eckner
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Ingo Eitel
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tobias Graf
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.,University Heart Center Lübeck, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Patrick Horn
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Kluge
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Axel Linke
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Luedike
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Enzo Lüsebrink
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Norman Mangner
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Octavian Maniuc
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter Nordbeck
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Orban
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Dept Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Matthias Pauschinger
- Department of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Matthew Kelham
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens Scherer
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Skurk
- Department of Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Sramko
- Department of Cardiology, IKEM, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Holger Thiele
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Luca Villanova
- Unità di Cure Intensive Cardiologiche and De Gasperis Cardio-Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Nuccia Morici
- IRCCS Santa Maria Nascente Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonia Wechsler
- Medizinische Klinik II, Kliniken Nordoberpfalz AG, Weiden, Germany
| | - Ralf Westenfeld
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ephraim Winzer
- Herzzentrum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Prognosis in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Who Received Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support. JACC. ASIA 2023; 3:122-134. [PMID: 36873766 PMCID: PMC9982290 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is often used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), and the type of MCS may vary by cause of CS. Objectives This study sought to describe the causes of CS in patients receiving temporary MCS, the types of MCS used, and associated mortality. Methods This study used a nationwide Japanese database to identify patients receiving temporary MCS for CS between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2020. Results Of 65,837 patients, the cause of CS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 77.4%, heart failure (HF) in 10.9%, valvular disease in 2.7%, fulminant myocarditis (FM) in 2.5%, arrhythmia in 4.5%, and pulmonary embolism (PE) in 2.0% of cases. The most commonly used MCS was an intra-aortic balloon pump alone in AMI (79.2%) and in HF (79.0%) and in valvular disease (66.0%), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with intra-aortic balloon pump in FM (56.2%) and arrhythmia (43.3%), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation alone in PE (71.5%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 32.4%; 30.0% in AMI, 32.6% in HF, 33.1% in valvular disease, 34.2% in FM, 60.9% in arrhythmia, and 59.2% in PE. Overall in-hospital mortality increased from 30.4% in 2012 to 34.1% in 2019. After adjustment, valvular disease, FM, and PE had lower in-hospital mortality than AMI: valvular disease, OR: 0.56 (95% CI: 0.50-0.64); FM: OR: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.66); PE: OR: 0.49 (95% CI: 0.43-0.56); whereas HF had similar in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.05) and arrhythmia had higher in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.04-1.26). Conclusions In a Japanese national registry of patients with CS, different causes of CS were associated with different types of MCS and differences in survival.
Collapse
Key Words
- AMI, acute myocardial infarction
- CS, cardiogenic shock
- ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- FM, fulminant myocarditis
- HF, heart failure
- IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump
- ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision
- MCS, mechanical circulatory support
- OR, odds ratio
- PE, pulmonary embolism
- cardiogenic shock
- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
- intra-aortic balloon pump
- mechanical circulatory support
- pVAD, percutaneous ventricular assist device
- percutaneous ventricular assist device
Collapse
|
37
|
Barssoum K, Patel HP, Abdelmaseih R, Hassib M, Victor V, Mohamed A, Jazar DA, Mai S, Ibrahim F, Patel B, Baeni AE, Khalife W, Bandyopadhay D, Rai D, Chatila K. Characteristics and Outcomes of Early vs Late Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Non-Acute Myocardial Infarction related Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample Database. Curr Probl Cardiol 2023; 48:101584. [PMID: 36642353 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is significant cause of mortality. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with non-acute myocardial infarction (Non-AMI) CS is lacking. We inquired data regarding the trends and outcomes early vs late initiation of MCS in non-AMI CS. We investigated National Inpatient Sample database between October 2015-December 2018, identifying hospitalizations with CS, either complicated by AMI or Non-AMI. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, early initiation of MCS (<48 hours) and late initiation of MCS (>48 hours). The primary analysis included death within first 24 hours. A secondary analysis was adjusted after excluding patients who died in first 24 hours. A total of 85,318 patients with non-AMI-related CS with MCS placement were identified. Among this cohort, 54.6% (n=46,579) underwent early initiation of MCS within 48 hours, and 45.4% (n=38,739) underwent late initiation of MCS after 48 hours. In primary analysis, early MCS initiation was associated with more in-hospital mortality in primary outcome of all-cause hospital mortality (35.72% vs 27.63%, P<0.0001, OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.40-1.49, P<0.0001), however, adjusted secondary analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in all-cause hospital mortality (23.63% vs 27.63%, P<0.0001, OR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.78-0.83, P<0.0001). In non-AMI-related CS and based on survival to 24 hours after admission, early initiation of MCS had statistically significant decrease in all-cause hospital mortality, with less incidence of vascular and renal complications, and shorter hospital stay. Late initiation of MCS was associated with a higher incidence of advanced therapies, including LVAD and transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirolos Barssoum
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Harsh P Patel
- Department cardiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL
| | - Ramy Abdelmaseih
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Mohab Hassib
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - Ahmed Mohamed
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Deaa Abu Jazar
- Department of internal medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Steven Mai
- Department of internal medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Fadi Ibrahim
- American University of Antigua, Antigua & Barbuda
| | - Bhavin Patel
- Department of internal medicine, Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital, Pontiac, MI
| | - Aiham El Baeni
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Wissam Khalife
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | | | - Devesh Rai
- Department of Cardiology, Sands-Constellation Heart Institute, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY.
| | - Khaled Chatila
- Department of cardiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hockstein MA, Singam NS, Papolos AI, Kenigsberg BB. The Role of Echocardiography in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:9-16. [PMID: 36571660 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-022-01827-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used to temporarily support patients in severe circulatory and/or respiratory failure. Echocardiography is a core component of successful ECMO deployment. Herein, we review the role of echocardiography at different phases on extracorporeal support including candidate identification, cannulation, maintenance, complication vigilance, and decannulation. RECENT FINDINGS During cannulation, ultrasound is used to confirm intended vascular access and appropriate inflow cannula positioning. While on ECMO, echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular loading conditions and hemodynamics, cannula positioning, and surveillance for intracardiac or aortic thrombi is needed for complication mitigation. Echocardiography is crucial during all phases of ECMO use. Specific echocardiographic queries depend on the ECMO type, V-V, or V-A, and the specific cannula configuration strategy employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell A Hockstein
- Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Narayana Sarma Singam
- Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Division of Cardiology, MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St., NW, Room A121, Washington, DC, 20010, USA
| | - Alexander I Papolos
- Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.,Division of Cardiology, MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St., NW, Room A121, Washington, DC, 20010, USA
| | - Benjamin B Kenigsberg
- Department of Critical Care, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. .,Division of Cardiology, MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St., NW, Room A121, Washington, DC, 20010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Oettinger V, Hilgendorf I, Wolf D, Stachon P, Heidenreich A, Zehender M, Westermann D, Kaier K, von zur Mühlen C. Treatment of pure aortic regurgitation using surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement between 2018 and 2020 in Germany. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1091983. [PMID: 37200971 PMCID: PMC10187752 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1091983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In pure aortic regurgitation, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not yet used on a regular base. Due to constant development of TAVR, it is necessary to analyze current data. Methods By use of health records, we analyzed all isolated TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVR) for pure aortic regurgitation between 2018 and 2020 in Germany. Results 4,861 procedures-4,025 SAVR and 836 TAVR-for aortic regurgitation were identified. Patients treated with TAVR were older, showed a higher logistic EuroSCORE, and had more pre-existing diseases. While results indicate a slightly higher unadjusted in-hospital mortality for transapical TAVR (6.00%) vs. SAVR (5.71%), transfemoral TAVR showed better outcomes, with self-expanding compared to balloon-expandable transfemoral TAVR having significantly lower in-hospital mortality (2.41% vs. 5.17%; p = 0.039). After risk adjustment, balloon-expandable as well as self-expanding transfemoral TAVR were associated with a significantly lower mortality vs. SAVR (balloon-expandable: risk adjusted OR = 0.50 [95% CI 0.27; 0.94], p = 0.031; self-expanding: OR = 0.20 [0.10; 0.41], p < 0.001). Furthermore, the observed in-hospital outcomes of stroke, major bleeding, delirium, and mechanical ventilation >48 h were significantly in favor of TAVR. In addition, TAVR showed a significantly shorter length of hospital stay compared to SAVR (transapical: risk adjusted Coefficient = -4.75d [-7.05d; -2.46d], p < 0.001; balloon-expandable: Coefficient = -6.88d [-9.06d; -4.69d], p < 0.001; self-expanding: Coefficient = -7.22 [-8.95; -5.49], p < 0.001). Conclusions TAVR is a viable alternative to SAVR in the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation for selected patients, showing overall low in-hospital mortality and complication rates, especially with regard to self-expanding transfemoral TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Oettinger
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Correspondence: Vera Oettinger
| | - Ingo Hilgendorf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dennis Wolf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Stachon
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adrian Heidenreich
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Zehender
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantin von zur Mühlen
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bunch CM, Chang E, Moore EE, Moore HB, Kwaan HC, Miller JB, Al-Fadhl MD, Thomas AV, Zackariya N, Patel SS, Zackariya S, Haidar S, Patel B, McCurdy MT, Thomas SG, Zimmer D, Fulkerson D, Kim PY, Walsh MR, Hake D, Kedar A, Aboukhaled M, Walsh MM. SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE): A mechanistic justification for viscoelastography-guided resuscitation of traumatic and non-traumatic shock. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1094845. [PMID: 36923287 PMCID: PMC10009294 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1094845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Irrespective of the reason for hypoperfusion, hypocoagulable and/or hyperfibrinolytic hemostatic aberrancies afflict up to one-quarter of critically ill patients in shock. Intensivists and traumatologists have embraced the concept of SHock-INduced Endotheliopathy (SHINE) as a foundational derangement in progressive shock wherein sympatho-adrenal activation may cause systemic endothelial injury. The pro-thrombotic endothelium lends to micro-thrombosis, enacting a cycle of worsening perfusion and increasing catecholamines, endothelial injury, de-endothelialization, and multiple organ failure. The hypocoagulable/hyperfibrinolytic hemostatic phenotype is thought to be driven by endothelial release of anti-thrombogenic mediators to the bloodstream and perivascular sympathetic nerve release of tissue plasminogen activator directly into the microvasculature. In the shock state, this hemostatic phenotype may be a counterbalancing, yet maladaptive, attempt to restore blood flow against a systemically pro-thrombotic endothelium and increased blood viscosity. We therefore review endothelial physiology with emphasis on glycocalyx function, unique biomarkers, and coagulofibrinolytic mediators, setting the stage for understanding the pathophysiology and hemostatic phenotypes of SHINE in various etiologies of shock. We propose that the hyperfibrinolytic phenotype is exemplified in progressive shock whether related to trauma-induced coagulopathy, sepsis-induced coagulopathy, or post-cardiac arrest syndrome-associated coagulopathy. Regardless of the initial insult, SHINE appears to be a catecholamine-driven entity which early in the disease course may manifest as hyper- or hypocoagulopathic and hyper- or hypofibrinolytic hemostatic imbalance. Moreover, these hemostatic derangements may rapidly evolve along the thrombohemorrhagic spectrum depending on the etiology, timing, and methods of resuscitation. Given the intricate hemochemical makeup and changes during these shock states, macroscopic whole blood tests of coagulative kinetics and clot strength serve as clinically useful and simple means for hemostasis phenotyping. We suggest that viscoelastic hemostatic assays such as thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are currently the most applicable clinical tools for assaying global hemostatic function-including fibrinolysis-to enable dynamic resuscitation with blood products and hemostatic adjuncts for those patients with thrombotic and/or hemorrhagic complications in shock states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor M Bunch
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Eric Chang
- Department of Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Notre Dame Campus, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Department of Surgery, Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Hunter B Moore
- Department of Surgery, Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States.,Department of Transplant Surgery, Denver Health and University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Hau C Kwaan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Joseph B Miller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Mahmoud D Al-Fadhl
- Department of Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Notre Dame Campus, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Anthony V Thomas
- Department of Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Notre Dame Campus, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Nuha Zackariya
- Department of Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Notre Dame Campus, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Shivani S Patel
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Sufyan Zackariya
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Saadeddine Haidar
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Bhavesh Patel
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Michael T McCurdy
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Scott G Thomas
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Memorial Leighton Trauma Center, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Donald Zimmer
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Memorial Leighton Trauma Center, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Daniel Fulkerson
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Memorial Leighton Trauma Center, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Paul Y Kim
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Daniel Hake
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States
| | - Archana Kedar
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States
| | - Michael Aboukhaled
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States
| | - Mark M Walsh
- Department of Medical Education, Indiana University School of Medicine, Notre Dame Campus, South Bend, IN, United States.,Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beer BN, Schrage B. First steps taken, but many more ahead. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2022; 11:904-905. [PMID: 36306402 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt N Beer
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.,German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Amado-Rodríguez L, Rodríguez-Garcia R, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Madotto F, Laffey JG, Albaiceta GM. Mechanical ventilation in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a sub-analysis of the LUNG SAFE study. J Intensive Care 2022; 10:55. [PMID: 36567347 PMCID: PMC9791731 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-022-00648-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with acute respiratory failure caused by cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) may require mechanical ventilation that can cause further lung damage. Our aim was to determine the impact of ventilatory settings on CPE mortality. METHODS Patients from the LUNG SAFE cohort, a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation, were studied. Relationships between ventilatory parameters and outcomes (ICU discharge/hospital mortality) were assessed using latent mixture analysis and a marginal structural model. RESULTS From 4499 patients, 391 meeting CPE criteria (median age 70 [interquartile range 59-78], 40% female) were included. ICU and hospital mortality were 34% and 40%, respectively. ICU survivors were younger (67 [57-77] vs 74 [64-80] years, p < 0.001) and had lower driving (12 [8-16] vs 15 [11-17] cmH2O, p < 0.001), plateau (20 [15-23] vs 22 [19-26] cmH2O, p < 0.001) and peak (21 [17-27] vs 26 [20-32] cmH2O, p < 0.001) pressures. Latent mixture analysis of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation on ICU day 1 revealed a subgroup ventilated with high pressures with lower probability of being discharged alive from the ICU (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval 0.60-1.05], p = 0.103) and increased hospital mortality (HR 1.65 [1.16-2.36], p = 0.005). In a marginal structural model, driving pressures in the first week (HR 1.12 [1.06-1.18], p < 0.001) and tidal volume after day 7 (HR 0.69 [0.52-0.93], p = 0.015) were related to survival. CONCLUSIONS Higher airway pressures in invasively ventilated patients with CPE are related to mortality. These patients may be exposed to an increased risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02010073.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Amado-Rodríguez
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cardiológicos, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida del Hospital Universitario s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Spain
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER)-Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Rodríguez-Garcia
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cardiológicos, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida del Hospital Universitario s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER)-Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giacomo Bellani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Tài Pham
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, DMU 4 CORREVE Maladies du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, FHU Sepsis, Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm U1018, Equipe d'Epidémiologie Respiratoire Intégrative, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
| | - Eddy Fan
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fabiana Madotto
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency' Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - John G Laffey
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Regenerative Medicine Institute at CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Guillermo M Albaiceta
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Cardiológicos, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Avenida del Hospital Universitario s/n, 33011, Oviedo, Spain.
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER)-Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sinha SS, Bohula EA, Diepen SVAN, Leonardi S, Mebazaa A, Proudfoot AG, Sionis A, Chia YW, Zampieri FG, Lopes RD, Katz JN. The Intersection Between Heart Failure and Critical Care Cardiology: An International Perspective on Structure, Staffing, and Design Considerations. J Card Fail 2022; 28:1703-1716. [PMID: 35843489 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The overall patient population in contemporary cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) has only increased with respect to patient acuity, complexity, and illness severity. The current population has more cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities, a higher prevalence of multiorgan injury, and consumes more critical care resources than previously. Patients with heart failure (HF) now occupy a large portion of contemporary tertiary or quaternary care CICU beds around the world. In this review, we discuss the core issues that relate to the care of critically ill patients with HF, including global perspectives on the organization, designation, and collaboration of CICUs regionally and across institutions, as well as unique models for provisioning care for patients with HF within a health care setting. The latter includes a discussion of traditional and emerging models, specialized HF units, the makeup and implementation of multidisciplinary team-based decision-making, and cardiac critical care admission and triage practices. This article illustrates the ways in which critically ill patients with HF have helped to shape contemporary CICUs throughout the world and explores how these very patients will similarly help to inform the future maturation of these specialized critical care units. Finally, we will critically examine broad, contemporary, international models of HF and cardiac critical care delivery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia, and conclude with opportunities for the further investigation and generation of evidence for care delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank S Sinha
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sean VAN Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sergio Leonardi
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Université de Paris, Inserm 942 MASCOT, APHP Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Clinic For Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Univesität zu, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alessandro Sionis
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBER-CV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Yew Woon Chia
- Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Fernando G Zampieri
- HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil Intensive Care Unit, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renato D Lopes
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Brazilian Clinical Research Institute (BCRI), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Akil A, Napp LC, Rao C, Klaus T, Scheier J, Pappalardo F. Use of CytoSorb© Hemoadsorption in Patients on Veno-Venous ECMO Support for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11205990. [PMID: 36294309 PMCID: PMC9604472 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11205990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Adjunct hemoadsorption is increasingly utilized to target underlying hyperinflammation derived from ARDS. This article aims to review available data on the use of CytoSorb© therapy in combination with V-V ECMO in severe ARDS, and to assess the effects on inflammatory, laboratory and clinical parameters, as well as on patient outcomes. A systematic literature review was conducted and reported in compliance with principles derived from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. When applicable, a before-and-after analysis for relevant biomarkers and clinical parameters was carried out. CytoSorb© use was associated with significant reductions in circulating levels of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 (p = 0.039 and p = 0.049, respectively). Increases in PaO2/FiO2 reached significance as well (p = 0.028), while norepinephrine dosage reductions showed a non-significant trend (p = 0.067). Mortality rates in CytoSorb© patients tended to be lower than those of control groups of most included studies, which, however, were characterized by high heterogeneity and low power. In an exploratory analysis on 90-day mortality in COVID-19 patients supported with V-V ECMO, the therapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death. Based on the reviewed data, CytoSorb© therapy is able to reduce inflammation and potentially improves survival in ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO. Early initiation of CytoSorb© in conjunction with ECMO might offer a new approach to enhance lung rest and promote recovery in patients with severe ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Akil
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Support, Ibbenbueren General Hospital, 49477 Ibbenbueren, Germany
| | - L. Christian Napp
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Federico Pappalardo
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, 15100 Alessandria, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Oettinger V, Stachon P, Hilgendorf I, Heidenreich A, Zehender M, Westermann D, Kaier K, von Zur Mühlen C. COVID-19 pandemic affects STEMI numbers and in-hospital mortality: results of a nationwide analysis in Germany. Clin Res Cardiol 2022; 112:550-557. [PMID: 36198827 PMCID: PMC9534737 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02102-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic led to extensive restrictions in Germany in 2020, including the postponement of elective interventions. We examined the impact on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as an acute and non-postponable disease. Methods Using German national records, all STEMI between 2017 and 2020 were identified. Using the number of STEMI cases between 2017 and 2019, we created a forecast for 2020 and compared it with the observed number of STEMI in 2020. Results From 2017 to 2020, 248,062 patients were treated for STEMI in Germany. Mean age was 65.21 years and 28.36% were female. When comparing forecasted and observed STEMI in 2020, a correlation can be seen: noticeable fewer STEMI were treated in those weeks respectively months with an increasing COVID-19 hospitalization rate (monthly percentage decrease in STEMI: March − 14.85%, April − 13.39%, November − 11.92%, December − 22.95%). At the same time, the crude in-hospital mortality after STEMI increased significantly at the peaks of the first and second waves (relative risk/RR of monthly in-hospital mortality: April RR = 1.11 [95% CI 1.02; 1.21], November RR = 1.13 [1.04; 1.24], December RR = 1.16 [1.06; 1.27]). Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic led to a noticeable decrease in the number of STEMI interventions in Germany at the peaks of the first and second waves in 2020, corresponding to an increase in COVID-19 hospitalizations. At the same time, in-hospital mortality after STEMI increased significantly in these phases. Graphical abstract Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on STEMI numbers and in-hospital mortality in Germany. Relative difference between forecasted and observed STEMI numbers (above figure), the relative risk of in-hospital mortality (middle figure) as well as number of new hospital admissions for COVID-19 per million inhabitants according to Roser et al.27 (bottom figure). ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02102-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Oettinger
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Peter Stachon
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Hilgendorf
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Adrian Heidenreich
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Zehender
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kaier
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantin von Zur Mühlen
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jentzer JC, Rayfield C, Soussi S, Berg DD, Kennedy JN, Sinha SS, Baran DA, Brant E, Mebazaa A, Billia F, Kapur NK, Henry TD, Lawler PR. Advances in the Staging and Phenotyping of Cardiogenic Shock: Part 1 of 2. JACC. ADVANCES 2022; 1:100120. [PMID: 38939719 PMCID: PMC11198663 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous syndrome reflecting a broad spectrum of shock severity, diverse etiologies, variable cardiac function, different hemodynamic trajectories, and concomitant organ dysfunction. These factors influence the clinical presentation, management, response to therapy, and outcomes of CS patients, necessitating a tailored approach to care. To better understand the variability inherent to CS populations, recent algorithms for staging the severity of CS have been described and validated. This paper is part 1 of a 2-part state-of-the-art review. In this first article, we consider the context for clinical staging and stratification in CS with a focus on established severity staging systems for CS and their use for risk stratification and clinical care. We describe the use of staging for predicting outcomes in populations with or at risk for CS, including risk modifiers that provide more nuanced risk stratification, and highlight how these approaches may allow individualized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C. Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Corbin Rayfield
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Sabri Soussi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière-Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP–HP Nord, Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris, Paris, France
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science and Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David D. Berg
- TIMI Study Group, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason N. Kennedy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - David A. Baran
- Cleveland Clinic Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, Florida, USA
| | - Emily Brant
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexandre Mebazaa
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lariboisière-Saint-Louis Hospitals, DMU Parabol, AP–HP Nord, Inserm UMR-S 942, Cardiovascular Markers in Stress Conditions (MASCOT), University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Filio Billia
- Peter Munk Cardiac Center and Ted Roger’s Center for Heart Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Navin K. Kapur
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy D. Henry
- The Carl and Edyth Lindner Center for Research and Education at the Christ Hospital Health Network, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Patrick R. Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Center and Ted Roger’s Center for Heart Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Cardiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tehrani BN, Sherwood MW, Rosner C, Truesdell AG, Ben Lee S, Damluji AA, Desai M, Desai S, Epps KC, Flanagan MC, Howard E, Ibrahim N, Kennedy J, Moukhachen H, Psotka M, Raja A, Saeed I, Shah P, Singh R, Sinha SS, Tang D, Welch T, Young K, deFilippi CR, Speir A, O'Connor CM, Batchelor WB. A Standardized and Regionalized Network of Care for Cardiogenic Shock. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2022; 10:768-781. [PMID: 36175063 PMCID: PMC10404382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of standardized care for cardiogenic shock (CS) across regional care networks are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES The authors compared the management and outcomes of CS patients initially presenting to hub versus spoke hospitals within a regional care network. METHODS The authors stratified consecutive patients enrolled in their CS registry (January 2017 to December 2019) by presentation to a spoke versus the hub hospital. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included bleeding, stroke, or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. RESULTS Of 520 CS patients, 286 (55%) initially presented to 34 spoke hospitals. No difference in mean age (62 years vs 61 years; P = 0.38), sex (25% vs 32% women; P = 0.10), and race (54% vs 52% white; P = 0.82) between spoke and hub patients was noted. Spoke patients more often presented with acute myocardial infarction (50% vs 32%; P < 0.01), received vasopressors (74% vs 66%; P = 0.04), and intra-aortic balloon pumps (88% vs 37%; P < 0.01). Hub patients were more often supported with percutaneous ventricular assist devices (44% vs 11%; P < 0.01) and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (13% vs 0%; P < 0.01). Initial presentation to a spoke was not associated with increased risk-adjusted 30-day mortality (adjusted OR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.49-1.55]; P = 0.64), bleeding (adjusted OR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.49-1.62]; P = 0.70), stroke (adjusted OR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.31-1.75]; P = 0.49), or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (adjusted OR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.50-1.35]; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS Spoke and hub patients experienced similar short-term outcomes within a regionalized CS network. The optimal strategy to promote standardized care and improved outcomes across regional CS networks merits further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Behnam N Tehrani
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
| | | | - Carolyn Rosner
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Alexander G Truesdell
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA; Virginia Heart, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | | | - Mehul Desai
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Shashank Desai
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly C Epps
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Edward Howard
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA; Virginia Heart, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Nasrien Ibrahim
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Jamie Kennedy
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Hala Moukhachen
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Mitchell Psotka
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Anika Raja
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Ibrahim Saeed
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA; Virginia Heart, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Palak Shah
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Ramesh Singh
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Daniel Tang
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Timothy Welch
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | - Karl Young
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Alan Speir
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Oren D, Zilinyi R, Lotan D, Uriel M, Uriel N, Sayer G. The role of temporary mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to advanced heart failure therapies or recovery. Curr Opin Cardiol 2022; 37:394-402. [PMID: 35766587 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has become central in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and can be used to bridge patients to durable MCS, heart transplant or recovery. This review will discuss contemporary data regarding bridging strategies utilizing tMCS. RECENT FINDINGS There has been significant growth in tMCS use recently, driven by increased familiarity with tMCS devices, and increased experience with both implantation and management. Identifying goals of therapy at the time of therapy initiation can facilitate better outcomes. The three primary goals are bridge to recovery, bridge to heart transplantation or bridge to durable left ventricular assist device. Bridging to recovery requires adequate treatment of underlying conditions and optimization of haemodynamics. Bridging to heart transplantation has become more frequent following changes to the heart allocation policy. Despite early concerns, patients bridge with tMCS, including ventricular-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, do not appear to have worse posttransplant outcomes. When bridging to durable mechanical circulatory support, tMCS can be used to enhance end-organ dysfunction and improve perioperative outcomes. In situations in which none of these goals are attainable, palliative care plays a critical role to identify patient wishes and assist with withdrawal of care when necessary. SUMMARY The use of tMCS, as a bridge to recovery or heart replacement therapy in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock has grown significantly over the past decade. Multiple device choices are available and must be chosen appropriately to address the specific situation and the goals of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Oren
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kim M, Seong SW, Song PS, Jeong JO, Yang JH, Gwon HC, Ko YG, Yu CW, Chun WJ, Jang WJ, Kim HJ, Bae JW, Kwon SU, Lee HJ, Lee WS, Park SD, Cho SS, Park JH. Inodilators May Improve the In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11174958. [PMID: 36078888 PMCID: PMC9456701 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11174958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Although inodilators (dobutamine and milrinone) are widely used empirically for cardiogenic shock (CS), the efficacy of inodilators for patients with CS undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is controversial. We evaluated the effects of inodilators on clinical outcomes using the RESCUE (REtrospective and prospective observational Study to investigate Clinical oUtcomes and Efficacy of left ventricular assist device for Korean patients with cardiogenic shock; NCT02985008) registry. We selected and analyzed the clinical outcomes of 496 patients who underwent VA-ECMO and did or did not receive inodilators. Of the 496 patients, 257 (51.8%) died during hospitalization. We selected 191 matched pairs to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the inodilator group had significantly lower in-hospital mortality than the no-inodilator group (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.768; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.579–1.018; p = 0.066, adjusted HR, 0.702; 95% CI, 0.552–0.944; p = 0.019). For patients with CS undergoing VA-ECMO, inodilators may improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mijoo Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
| | - Seok-Woo Seong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
| | - Pil Sang Song
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
| | - Jin-Ok Jeong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Young-Guk Ko
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea
| | - Cheol Woong Yu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Korea
| | - Woo Jung Chun
- Department of Cardiology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Jang
- Department of Cardiology, Ewha Woman’s University Seoul Hospital, Ehwa Woman’s University School of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Korea
| | - Hyun-Joong Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Korea
| | - Jang-Whan Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju 28644, Korea
| | - Sung Uk Kwon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Seoul 48108, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jong Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon 14754, Korea
| | - Wang Soo Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul 06973, Korea
| | - Sang-Don Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon 22332, Korea
| | - Sung Soo Cho
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan 31116, Korea
| | - Jae-Hyeong Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-42-280-8237
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ghajar A, Ordonez CP, Philips B, Pinzon PQ, Fleming LM, Motiwala SR, Sriwattanakomen R, Ho JE, Grandin EW, Sabe M, Garan AR. Cardiogenic shock related cardiovascular disease mortality trends in US population: Heart failure vs. acute myocardial infarction as contributing causes. Int J Cardiol 2022; 367:45-48. [PMID: 36002041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational and trial data have revealed significant improvement in cardiogenic shock (CS) mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after introducing early coronary revascularization. Less is known about CS mortality due to heart failure (HF), which is increasingly recognized as a distinct entity from AMI-CS. METHODS AND RESULTS In this nationwide observational study, the CDC WONDER database was used to identify national trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) due to CS (HF vs. AMI related) per 100,000 people aged 35-84. AAMR from AMI-CS decreased significantly from 1999 to 2009 (AAPC: -6.9% [95%CI -7.7, -6.1]) then stabilized from 2009 to 2020. By contrast, HF-CS associated AAMR rose steadily from 2009 to 2020 (AAPC: 13.3% [95%CI 11.4,15.2]). The mortality rate was almost twice as high in males compared to females in both AMI-CS and HF-CS throughout the study period. HF-CS mortality in the non-Hispanic Black population is increasing more quickly than that of the non-Hispanic White population (AAMR in 2020: 4.40 vs. 1.97 in 100,000). The AMI-CS mortality rate has been consistently higher in rural than urban areas (30% higher in 1999 and 28% higher in 2020). CONCLUSIONS These trends highlight the fact that HF-CS and AMI-CS represent distinct clinical entities. While mortality associated with AMI-CS has primarily declined over the last two decades, the mortality related to HF-CS has increased significantly, particularly over the last decade, and is increasing rapidly among individuals younger than 65. Accordingly, a dramatic change in the demographics of CS patients in modern intensive care units is expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Ghajar
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cesar Palacios Ordonez
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Binu Philips
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pablo Quintero Pinzon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa M Fleming
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shweta R Motiwala
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roy Sriwattanakomen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer E Ho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - E Wilson Grandin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marwa Sabe
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arthur Reshad Garan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|