The burden of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: Impact of disease activity and psychological factors

How to Distinguish Non-Inflammatory from Inflammatory Pain in RA?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Managing non-inflammatory pain in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be a huge burden for the rheumatologist. Pain that persists despite optimal RA treatment is extremely challenging for patient and physician alike. Here, we outline the latest research relevant to distinguishing non-inflammatory from inflammatory RA pain and review the current understanding of its neurobiology and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nociplastic pain is a recently introduced term by the international pain community. Its definition encompasses the non-inflammatory pain of RA and describes pain that is not driven by inflamed joints or compromised nerves, but that is instead driven by a functional reorganisation of the central nervous system (CNS). Insights from all areas of nociplastic pain research, including fibromyalgia, support a personalised pain management approach for non-inflammatory pain of RA, with evidence-based guidelines favouring use of non-pharmacological interventions. Future developments include novel CNS targeting pharmacotherapeutic approaches to treat nociplastic pain.

Gabapentin alleviates peripheral nerve sensitization induced by inflammatory arthritis via ionotropic glutamate receptor NR2B subunit

Inflammatory arthritis leads to peripheral nerve sensitization, but the therapeutic effect is often unsatisfactory. Our preliminary studies have found that in mice with inflammatory arthritis, the use of ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists can produce a good analgesic effect without altering foot swelling, suggesting that pain relief may be related to the improvement of neuropathic pain. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To further investigate the effects of neuropathic pain medications on inflammatory arthritis and the impact of the ionotropic glutamate receptor NR2B subunit (NR2B) on inflammatory arthritis, this study employed gabapentin (GBP) treatment on the inflammatory arthritis mouse model (the adjuvant induced arthritis, AIA), and we found a significant reduction in pain. Further studies revealed that in AIA, the expression levels of NR2B, TRPV1, pain-related molecules (substance P, PGE2), inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and GM-CSF) and Ca2+ were elevated in the foot and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). GBP treatment was able to influence the downregulation of the expression levels of NR2B, TRPV1, pain-related molecules, inflammatory cytokines and Ca2+. Mechanistic studies have shown that GBP treatment affects the downregulation of NR2B, and the downregulation of NR2B expression leads to the downregulation of TRPV1, pain-related molecules and inflammatory cytokines, thereby alleviating pain. These results suggest that in peripheral sensitization caused by AIA, GBP can play a role in improving pain, and NR2B may be a key target of peripheral nerve sensitization induced by inflammatory arthritis. GBP provides a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of inflammatory arthritis.

Unveiling Novel Drug Targets and Emerging Therapies for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic debilitating autoimmune disease, that causes joint damage, deformities, and decreased functionality. In addition, RA can also impact organs like the skin, lungs, eyes, and blood vessels. This autoimmune condition arises when the immune system erroneously targets the joint synovial membrane, resulting in synovitis, pannus formation, and cartilage damage. RA treatment is often holistic, integrating medication, physical therapy, and lifestyle modifications. Its main objective is to achieve remission or low disease activity by utilizing a "treat-to-target" approach that optimizes drug usage and dose adjustments based on clinical response and disease activity markers. The primary RA treatment uses disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that help to interrupt the inflammatory process. When there is an inadequate response, a combination of biologicals and DMARDs is recommended. Biological therapies target inflammatory pathways and have shown promising results in managing RA symptoms. Close monitoring for adverse effects and disease progression is critical to ensure optimal treatment outcomes. A deeper understanding of the pathways and mechanisms will allow new treatment strategies that minimize adverse effects and maintain quality of life. This review discusses the potential targets that can be used for designing and implementing precision medicine in RA treatment, spotlighting the latest breakthroughs in biologics, JAK inhibitors, IL-6 receptor antagonists, TNF blockers, and disease-modifying noncoding RNAs.

Comparative analysis of centrally mediated and inflammatory pain experiences amongst patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis: A multimethods study

BACKGROUND

The identification of pain originating from distinct biological processes may lead to individualised pain treatment. In this study, we aimed to explore the pain experiences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), differentiating between those predominantly exhibiting features of peripheral inflammatory versus centrally mediated pain.

METHODS

Through a multimethods approach we (i) quantitatively analysed the differences in pain descriptors between patients diagnosed with RA experiencing peripheral inflammatory and centrally mediated pain, utilising the Short Form-McGill Pain Questionnaire which includes the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and (ii) qualitatively explored their subjective pain experiences grounded in the biopsychosocial model, commonly applied in chronic pain.

RESULTS

Participants with centrally mediated pain reported higher pain scores on the VAS, used a wider range of pain descriptors, and a higher proportion selected each descriptor compared to those with inflammatory pain (p < .001). The qualitative analysis revealed the centrally mediated pain group's experiences were overwhelming and relentless, struggling to precisely articulate the nature of their pain. In contrast, individuals with inflammatory pain expressed their pain in more tangible terms and shared their adaptive and coping strategies. Importantly, both groups revealed the substantial psychological, functional and social impacts of their pain, highlighting the often 'invisible' and misunderstood nature of their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This study has gained a deeper insight into the pain experiences of patients living with RA, particularly in differentiating between centrally mediated and inflammatory types of pain, potentially facilitating a more individualised approach to pain treatment.

PATIENT CONTRIBUTION

Patients actively participated in the study conception and design. This engagement includes collaboration with key stakeholders, such as members of the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society and Patient Research Partners (PRPs), who provided continuous feedback and guidance throughout the research process. Specifically, the qualitative element was coproduced with two PRPs, who were involved in co-leading the focus groups and data analysis.

Impact of frailty severity and severe pain on cognitive function for community-dwelling older adults with arthritis: a cross-sectional study in Korea

Pain is a major symptom of arthritis in older adults, often leading to frailty and cognitive decline. However, few studies have investigated the relationship among pain, frailty, and cognitive function in older adults with arthritis. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing cognitive function and the impact of frailty severity and pain on cognitive function in older adults with arthritis using a Korean population-based dataset. This cross-sectional descriptive study involved the secondary data of 1089 participants from the seventh and eighth waves of the Korean Longitudinal Study on Aging. We examined general characteristics, health behaviors, health conditions (including severe pain and frailty), and cognitive function. Participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of pain severity and frailty status as follows: robust, only severe pain, only prefrail, prefrail with severe pain, only frail, and frail with severe pain. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to establish correlations between groups and cognitive function. The only-prefrail group was the largest (19.7%) among participants experiencing either pain or frailty. Advanced age, sex, level of education, and visual and hearing impairments were significantly associated with cognitive function. Compared to the robust group, only prefrail (β = -1.54, confidence interval [CI] = - 2.33; - 0.76), prefrail with severe pain (β = - 2.69, CI = - 3.52; - 1.87), only frail (β = - 4.02, CI = - 5.08; - 2.97), and frail with severe pain (β = - 5.03, CI = - 5.99; - 4.08) groups were associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores. The study confirmed that severe pain alone does not significantly impact cognitive function in older adults with arthritis. To prevent cognitive decline in this group, assessment of both pain and frailty severity is essential to predict high-risk groups and provide appropriate interventions, such as transfer to hospitals or primary clinics according to the severity of pain and frailty.

Reliability, validity, and simplification of the Chinese version of the Global Pain Scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Persistent pain is the most reported symptom in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, effective and brief assessment tools are lacking. We validated the Chinese version of the Global Pain Scale (C-GPS) in Chinese patients with RA and proposed a short version of the C-GPS (s-C-GPS).

METHOD

The study was conducted using a face-to-face questionnaire survey with a multicenter cross-sectional design from March to December 2019. Patients aged > 18 years who met the RA diagnostic criteria were included. Based on the classical test theory (CTT) and the item response theory (IRT), we assessed the validity and reliability of the C-GPS and the adaptability of each item. An s-C-GPS was developed using IRT-based computerized adaptive testing (CAT) analytics.

RESULTS

In total, 580 patients with RA (mean age, 51.04 ± 24.65 years; mean BMI, 22.36 ± 4.07 kg/m2), including 513 (88.4%) women, were included. Most participants lived in a suburb (49.3%), were employed (72.2%) and married (91.2%), reported 9-12 years of education (66.9%), and had partial medical insurance (57.8%). Approximately 88.1% smoked and 84.5% drank alcohol. Analysis of the CTT demonstrated that all items in the C-GPS were positively correlated with the total scale score, and the factor loadings of all these items were > 0.870. A significant positive relationship was found between the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the C-GPS. IRT analysis showed that discrimination of the C-GPS was between 2.271 and 3.312, and items 6, 8, 13, 14, and 16 provided a large amount of information. Based on the CAT and clinical practice, six items covering four dimensions were included to form the s-C-GPS, all of which had very high discrimination. The s-C-GPS positively correlated with the VAS.

CONCLUSION

The C-GPS has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate pain in RA patients from a Chinese cultural background. The s-C-GPS, which contains six items, has good criterion validity and may be suitable for pain assessment in busy clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This cross-sectional study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800020343), granted on December 25, 2018.

How to treat chronic pain in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) - A pharmacological review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain is a common symptom of rheumatic diseases that impacts patients' quality of life. While non-pharmacological approaches are often recommended as first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are important for pain management. However, the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rheumatic diseases are unclear.

METHODS

This review critically synthesizes the current evidence base to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments for their patients, considering the expected benefits and potential risks and side effects.

RESULTS

For osteoarthritis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and antidepressants are commonly used, with NSAIDs being the most recommended. In addition, topical agents, such as topical NSAIDs, are recommended for localized pain relief. For fibromyalgia, amitriptyline, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and gabapentinoids are commonly used, with SNRIs being the most recommended. For back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids are used only for acute of flare-up pain, whereas neuropathic pain drugs are only used for chronic radicular pain. For inflammatory rheumatic diseases, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological agents are recommended to slow disease progression and manage symptoms.

CONCLUSION

While DMARDs and biological agents are recommended for inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacological treatments for other rheumatic diseases only alleviate symptoms and do not provide a cure for the underlying condition. The use of pharmacological treatments should be based on the expected benefits and evaluation of side effects, with non-pharmacological modalities also being considered, especially for fibromyalgia.

The mediting role of psychological resilience on the negative effect of pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross-sectional study

The objective of this study was to investigate the direct effects of pain-induced depression and anxiety, as well as the mediating role of psychological resilience, on the psychological distress associated with rheumatoid arthritis. The method involved a sample of 196 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and applied the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and visual analog scale for pain. Bivariate and path analyses were performed, and a multiple mediational model was utilized. Results showed that all correlations among study variables were significant (p < 0.01). A partial mediation effect of psychological resilience was observed, and direct effects among the variables (pain, psychological resilience, anxiety, and depression) were statistically significant, including the direct effect of psychological resilience on depression and anxiety. The indirect effects of pain through psychological resilience on depression and anxiety were also significant. Thus, the results suggest that psychological resilience partially mediates the effects of pain-induced anxiety and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Anti-GM-CSF otilimab versus sarilumab or placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to targeted therapies: a phase III randomised trial (contRAst 3)

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy and safety of otilimab, an anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic (cs) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or Janus kinase inhibitors.

METHODS

ContRAst 3 was a 24-week, phase III, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Patients received subcutaneous otilimab (90/150 mg once weekly), subcutaneous sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo for 12 weeks, in addition to csDMARDs. Patients receiving placebo were switched to active interventions at week 12 and treatment continued to week 24. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology ≥20% response (ACR20) at week 12.

RESULTS

Overall, 549 patients received treatment. At week 12, there was no significant difference in the proportion of ACR20 responders with otilimab 90 mg and 150 mg versus placebo (45% (p=0.2868) and 51% (p=0.0596) vs 38%, respectively). There were no significant differences in Clinical Disease Activity Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, pain Visual Analogue Scale or Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores with otilimab versus placebo at week 12. Sarilumab demonstrated superiority to otilimab in ACR20 response and secondary end points. The incidence of adverse or serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Otilimab demonstrated an acceptable safety profile but failed to achieve the primary end point of ACR20 and improve secondary end points versus placebo or demonstrate non-inferiority to sarilumab in this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04134728.

Examining the Psychological and Spiritual Well-Being of Older Adult Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Turkey

This study examined the psychological well-being (PWB) and spiritual well-being (SWB) of older adult individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experienced the difficulties of both aging and RA. This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted in two centers located in the capital city of Turkey. A total of 136 individuals with a diagnosis of RA who met the inclusion criteria constituted the sample group of the study. Participant Information Form, SWB, and PWB Scales were used for data collection. The results showed that participants' PWB score was positively and significantly difference with marital status, presence of children, and regular participation in social activities. It was concluded that pain severity was not significantly difference with PWB and SWB. However, there was a significant negative correlation between PWB score and total SWB score and its two sub-dimensions, transcendence and anomie. Results emphasize the necessity of supportive interventions to increase psychological and spiritual well-being of older adult individuals with RA.

The effectiveness of exercise and physical activity programs on fatigue and sleep in people with arthritis - A systematic review with meta-analysis

This systematic review aimed to systematically investigate the literature on the effectiveness of exercise and physical activity programs on fatigue and sleep in people with arthritis. For that, seven databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. After the searches, 36 studies investigating 2281 participants were included. Risk of bias assessments were done by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to judge the certainty of evidence. The evidence on benefits of exercise and physical activity programs on fatigue and sleep parameters in people with osteoarthritis and psoriatic arthritis was either lacking or inconclusive. There was very low to low certainty evidence for a slight benefit of exercise and physical activity programs on fatigue at short-term in people with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. However, the evidence was very uncertain for the medium- and long-term as well as for any sleep parameters. The results indicate that exercise and physical activity programs may offer some benefits on fatigue for people with arthritis in the short-term, although the best type of exercise remains uncertain. The available evidence on improvements in sleep was insufficient to draw strong conclusions.

Estimation of the global prevalence, incidence, years lived with disability of rheumatoid arthritis in 2019 and forecasted incidence in 2040: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to provide a better understanding of the secular trends in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) burden at the regional and national levels, contributing to identifying the areas with high burden needs and finding the potential areas requiring additional attention, which will facilitate the development of strategies tailored to RA burden.

METHOD

Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019 study. We presented the secular trends in the prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) of RA needs by sex, age, sociodemographic index (SDI), region, country, and category between 1990 and 2019 using data from the GBD 2019 study. The age-standardized rates (ASR) and its estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) are employed to describe the secular trends in RA.

RESULTS

Globally, there were an estimated 18.5 million [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.53 to 41.74)] prevalent cases of RA, with 1.07 million (95% CI 0.95 to 1.18) incident cases per year and almost 2.43 million YLDs (95% CI 1.68 to 3.28) in 2019. The age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates estimated for RA were 224.25 per 100,000 and 12.21 per 100,000 in 2019, with EAPCs of 0.37 (95% CI - 0.32, 0.42) and 0.30 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.34), respectively. The corresponding age-standardized YLDs estimated was 29.35 per 100,000 in 2019, with an EAPC of 0.38 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.43). During the study period, the ASR of RA was consistently higher in females than in males. Moreover, the age-standardized YLD rate of RA was associated with the sociodemographic index (SDI) in 2019 across all 204 countries and territories (R = 0.28). The projections indicate that the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) trend will continue to increase from 2019 to 2040, with a projected ASIR of 10.48 and 4.63/100,000 for females and males, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RA is prevalent and remains a significant global public health challenge. Globally, the burden of RA has increased over the past 30 years and will continue to increase. Prevention and early treatment of RA are pivotal to avoiding disease onset and alleviating the enormous burden. Key Points • The burden of rheumatoid arthritis is increasing globally. • Global estimates indicate that the number of RA incident cases will increase 1.4-fold globally, from approximately 1.07 million at the end of 2019 to approximately 1.5 million by 2040.

Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Use and Its Effect on Long-term Opioid Use in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The prevalence of chronic pain is high in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), increasing the risk for opioid use. The objective of this study was to assess disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use and its effect on long-term opioid use in patients with RA.

METHODS

This cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries with diagnosis of RA who received at least 30-day consecutive prescription of opioids in 2017 (n = 23,608). The patients were grouped into non-DMARD and DMARD users, who were further subdivided into regimens set forth by the American College of Rheumatology. The outcome measured was long-term opioid use in 2018 defined as at least 90-day consecutive prescription of opioids. Dose and duration of opioid use were also assessed. A multivariable model identifying factors associated with non-DMARD use was also performed.

RESULTS

Compared with non-DMARD users, the odds of long-term opioid use were significantly lower among DMARD users (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.95). All regimens except non-tumor necrosis factor biologic + methotrexate were associated with lower odds of long-term opioid use relative to non-DMARD users. The mean total morphine milligram equivalent, morphine milligram equivalent per day, and total days of opioid use were lower among DMARD users compared with non-DMARD users. Older age, male sex, Black race, psychiatric and medical comorbidities, and not being seen by a rheumatologist were significantly associated with non-DMARD use.

CONCLUSION

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use was associated with lower odds of long-term opioid use among RA patients with baseline opioid prescription. Factors associated with non-DMARD use represent a window of opportunity for intervention to improve pain-related quality of life in patients living with RA.

Trajectories of self-reported pain-related health outcomes and longitudinal effects on medication use in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective cohort analysis using the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD)

OBJECTIVE

To determine distinct trajectories of self-reported pain-related health status in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), their relationship with sociodemographic factors and medication use.

METHODS

988 Australian Rheumatology Association Database participants with RA (71% female, mean age 54 years, mean disease duration 2.3 years) were included. Distinct multi-trajectories over 15-year follow-up for five different self-reported pain-related health outcome measures (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, visual analogue scores for pain, arthritis, global health and the Assessment of Quality of Life utility index) were identified using latent variable discrete mixture modelling. Random effects models were used to determine associations with medication use and biologic therapy modification during follow-up.

RESULTS

Four, approximately equally sized, pain/health status groups were identified, ranging from 'better' to 'poorer', within which changes over time were relatively small. Important determinants of those with poorer pain/health status included female gender, obesity, smoking, socioeconomic indicators and comorbidities. While biologic therapy use was similar between groups during follow-up, biologic therapy modifications (p_linear<0.001) and greater tendency of non-tumour necrosis factor inhibitor use (p_linear<0.001) were observed in those with poorer pain/health status. Similarly, greater use of opioids, prednisolone and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was seen in those with poorer pain/health status.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of disease activity information, distinct trajectories of varying pain/health status were seen from the outset and throughout the disease course in this RA cohort. More biologic therapy modifications and greater use in anti-inflammatories, opioids and prednisolone were seen in those with poorer pain/health status, reflecting undesirable lived experience of persistent pain in RA.

The Problem of Pain in the United States: A Population-Based Characterization of Biopsychosocial Correlates of High Impact Chronic Pain Using the National Health Interview Survey

Over 20 million adults in the United States live with high impact chronic pain (HICP), or chronic pain that limits life or work activities for ≥3 months. It is critically important to differentiate people with HICP from those who sustain normal activities although experiencing chronic pain. Therefore, we aim to help clinicians and researchers identify those with HICP by: 1) developing models that identify factors associated with HICP using the 2016 national health interview survey (NHIS) and 2) evaluating the performances of those models overall and by sociodemographic subgroups (sex, age, and race/ethnicity). Our analysis included 32,980 respondents. We fitted logistic regression models with LASSO (a parametric model) and random forest (a nonparametric model) for predicting HICP using the whole sample. Both models performed well. The most important factors associated with HICP were those related to underlying ill-health (arthritis and rheumatism, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits) and poor psychological well-being. These factors can be used for identifying higher-risk sub-groups for screening for HICP. We will externally validate these findings in future work. We need future studies that longitudinally predict the initiation and maintenance of HICP, then use this information to prevent HICP and direct patients to optimal treatments. PERSPECTIVE: Our study developed models to identify factors associated with high-impact chronic pain (HICP) using the 2016 National Health Interview Survey. There was homogeneity in the factors associated with HICP by gender, age, and race/ethnicity. Understanding these risk factors is crucial to support the identification of populations and individuals at highest risk for developing HICP and improve access to interventions that target these high-risk subgroups.

Exploring pain catastrophizing and its associations with low disease activity in rheumatic inflammatory disorders

Pain catastrophizing is a maladaptive mechanism associated with the exaggerated experience of pain, increased rumination and feelings of helplessness. The main objective of this study was to explore whether increased pain catastrophizing is independently associated with a lower proportion of low disease activity (LDA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA). Demographics, comorbidities, treatment, disease activity measures and patient-reported outcome data were recorded in RA, PsA and axSpA patients. Pain catastrophizing score (PCS) was assessed using a standardised questionnaire. For each diagnosis, composite disease activity scores with distinct cut-off values for LDA, i.e. DAS28-CRP (RA), DAPSA (PsA) and ASDAS-CRP (axSpA) were calculated and used as the dependent variable in logistic regression reflecting LDA achieved. A total of one thousand two hundred and twenty nine patients were included: 580 with RA, 394 with PsA and 255 with axSpA. In the multivariable analysis, pain catastrophizing was independently associated with LDA rates in axSpA (OR 0.33, 95% CI [0.12, 0.88]) amongst tested groups. In RA (OR 0.90, 95% CI [0.64, 1.28]) and PsA (OR 0.77, 95% CI [0.55, 1.07]), a statistically significant association was not observed. Higher PCS was independently associated with not achieving LDA in axSpA. Our data, however, indicate that pain catastrophizing, which also reflects a patient's personality traits and coping abilities, plays a less important role for the patient than general pain perception.

The Effects of Self-Aromatherapy Massage on Pain and Sleep Quality in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis and can lead to pain, joint deformity, and disability, resulting in poor sleep quality and lower quality of life. The efficacy of aromatherapy massage on pain levels and sleep quality among rheumatoid arthritis patients remains unclear.

AIMS

To investigate the effects of aromatherapy on pain and sleep quality among rheumatoid arthritis patients.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients with rheumatoid arthritis from one regional hospital in Taoyuan, Taiwan. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 32), placebo (n = 36), or control groups (n = 34). The intervention and placebo groups underwent self-aromatherapy hand massage guided by a self-aromatherapy hand massage manual and video for 10 minutes 3 times a week for 3 weeks. The intervention group used 5% compound essential oils, the placebo group used sweet almond oil, and the control group had no intervention. Pain, sleep quality and sleepiness were measured by using the numerical rating scale for pain, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

The intervention and placebo groups had significantly decreased sleep quality and sleepiness scores from baseline to 3 weeks after aromatherapy massage. Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed statistically significant improvement in the sleep quality scores in the first weeks after aromatherapy massage (B = -1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.35, -0.02, P =.046), but no statistically significant differences were found in the changes in pain levels from baseline to the three time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Aromatherapy massage is effective in improving sleep quality in rheumatoid arthritis patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the effects of aromatherapy hand massage on the pain levels of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Assessment of Bidirectional Relationships between Mental Illness and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

A correlation between mental illness and systemic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been observed in several prior investigations. However, little is known about the causative relationship between them. The present study aimed to systematically investigate the potential association between genetically determined mental illness and RA. Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed using publicly released genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We selected independent genetic variants associated with four mental illnesses (bipolar disorder, broad depression, major depression, and anxiety) as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis to assess the causal relationship between mental illness and RA. Results of the IVW analysis suggested that genetic predisposition to bipolar disorder was associated with a decreased risk of RA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.825, 95% CI = 0.716 to 0.95, p = 0.007). Furthermore, we did not find a significant causal effect of RA on bipolar disorder in the reverse MR analysis (p > 0.05). In addition, our study found no evidence of a bidirectional causal relationship between genetically predicted broad depression, major depression, anxiety, and RA (p > 0.05). The genetically proxied bipolar disorder population has a lower RA risk, which may indicate that there is a hidden mechanism for inhibiting the pathogenesis of RA in bipolar disorder. However, results do not support a causal connection between depression, anxiety, and RA.

[A cross-sectional study on the clinical phenotypes of rheumatoid arthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics and clinical phenotypes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provide the basis for further understanding, interventions and outcomes of this disease.

METHODS

RA patients attended at Peking University People's Hospital from 2018 to 2021 were enrolled in the study. Data collection included demographic data, the sites and numbers of joints involved, extra-articular manifestations (EAM), comorbidities and laboratory variables. Statistical and bioinformatical analysis was performed to establish clinical subtypes by clustering analysis based on the type of joint involved, EAM involvement and other autoimmune diseases overlapped. The characteristics of each subtype were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 411 patients with RA were enrolled. The mean age was (48.84±15.17) years, and 346 (84.2%) were females. The patients were classified into 4 subtypes: small joint subtype (74, 18.0%), total joint subtype (154, 37.5%), systemic subtype (100, 24.3%), and overlapping subtype (83, 20.2%). The small joint subtype had no medium or large joint involvement, and 35.1% had systemic involvement. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and platelet count (PLT) were lower than those in other subtypes, and the rates of positive rheumatoid factors (RF-IgA and RF-IgG) were significantly higher in the small joint subtype. The total joint subtype had both large and small joint involvement but no systemic involvement. The rate of morning stiffness and positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in this subtype were lower than those in other subtypes. In the systemic subtype, interstitial lung disease and secondary Sjögren syndrome were the most common systemic involvements, with prominent levels of disease activity score 28-joint count (DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP). The overlapping subtype was commonly combined with Hashimoto's thyroiditis or primary Sjögren syndrome. Female in the overlapping subtype was more common than in other subtypes. This subtype was characterized by hyperglobulinemia, hypocomplementemia and high rate of positive ANA, especially spotting type.

CONCLUSION

Based on the clinical features, RA patients could be classified into 4 subtypes: small joint subtype, total joint subtype, systemic subtype, and overlapping subtype. Each subtype had its own clinical characteristics. They help for further understanding and a more individualized treatment strategy of RA.

Effect of solution-focused approach on anxiety and depression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A quasi-experimental study

Introduction

Anxiety and depression are common psychological problems in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, few effective nursing intervention models have been designed specifically to improve anxiety and depression in RA patients. Solution-focused approach (SFA) is an effective intervention method for psychosocial issues. There have been no studies involving SFA yet in RA patients. This study investigated the effects of SFA-based nursing intervention on anxiety and depression in RA patients.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study using a convenience sampling of RA patients was conducted. The 48 RA patients were divided into the control group (n = 24) and the experimental group (n = 24). The control group received routine nursing intervention, while the experimental group received SFA-based nursing intervention. The scores on the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), arthritis self-efficacy scale-8 (ASES-8), and questionnaire on patient satisfaction with nursing care were collected before and after nursing interventions.

Results

Between-Group Comparison: Before the nursing intervention, there was no statistically significant difference in the SDS, SAS, and ASES-8 scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, after the nursing intervention, the SDS and SAS scores of the experimental group were statistically significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). In contrast, the ASES-8 score of the experimental group was statistically significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, patient satisfaction with nursing care of the experimental group was better than that of the control group (p > 0.05). Within-Group Comparison: There was no statistically significant difference in the SDS, SAS, and ASES-8 scores in the control group before and after routine nursing intervention (p > 0.05). However, in the experimental group, the SDS and SAS scores before SFA-based nursing intervention were statistically significantly higher than those after SFA nursing intervention (p < 0.05), and the ASES-8 score before SFA-based nursing intervention was considerably lower than that after SFA nursing intervention (p < 0.05).

Discussion

SFA-based nursing intervention can effectively improve anxiety, depression, and arthritis self-efficacy of RA patients. This study broadens clinical psychological nursing intervention models for RA patients. SFA may be an effective nursing model for various psychosocial problems in the current medical context.

Implications of Persistent Pain in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Remission Status: Data From the KOBIO Registry

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of pain in patients with RA in clinical remission and analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of those who experienced persistent pain despite remission status.

Methods

Data from 1,891 patients with RA registered on the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted Therapy registry were obtained. Remission was defined as a Disease Activity Score of 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6. Pain intensity was classified as severe (pain visual analog scale [VAS] ≥7), moderate (4≤VAS<7), or mild (VAS <4).

Results

Our analysis showed that 52.6% of patients complained of severe pain at the start of or during switching biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs). Despite having a 36.0% (n=680) remission rate after the use of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs at their 1-year follow-up, 21.5% (n=146) of these patients had moderate-to-severe pain, higher frequency of foot erosions, and comorbidities, such as mental illness, endocrine, renal, and neurological disorders, than patients with a milder degree of pain. The multivariable regression analysis showed that presence of foot erosions, neurological disorders, and use of corticosteroids were independently associated with moderate-to-severe pain in patients with RA despite being in remission. The level of ESR and use of Janus kinase inhibitors were inversely associated with moderate-to-severe pain.

Conclusion

Persistent pain and discomfort continue to be a problem for patients with RA in clinical remission. Continued research on insistent pain in patients with RA is warranted to better alleviate distress and improve the quality of life in patients.

miR-544-3p mediates arthritis pain through regulation of FcγRI

ABSTRACT

Chronic joint pain is a major symptom in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its adequate treatment represents an unmet medical need. Noncoding microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of RA as negative regulators of specific target mRNAs. Yet, their significance in RA pain is still not well defined. We and other groups recently identified neuronally expressed FcγRI as a key driver of arthritis pain in mouse RA models. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that miRNAs that target and regulate neuronal FcγRI attenuate RA pain. Here, we show that miR-544-3p was robustly downregulated, whereas FcγRI was significantly upregulated in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in mouse RA models. Intrathecal injection of miR-544-3p mimic attenuated established mechanical and heat hyperalgesia partly through the downregulation of FcγRI in the DRG in a mouse model of collagen II-induced arthritis. Moreover, this effect was likely mediated, at least in part, by FcγRI because miR-544-3p mimic downregulated Fcgr1 mRNA expression in the DRG during arthritis and genetic deletion of Fcgr1 produced similar antihyperalgesic effects in the collagen II-induced arthritis model. This notion was further supported by a dual luciferase assay showing that miR-544-3p directly targeted Fcgr1 3'UTR. In naïve mice, miR-544-3p mediated acute joint pain hypersensitivity induced by IgG immune complex through the regulation of FcγRI. These findings suggest that miR-544-3p causally participates in the maintenance of arthritis pain by targeting neuronal FcγRI, and thus define miR-544-3p as a new potential therapeutic target for treating RA pain.

Subjective Symptoms Contributing to the Quality of Life of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Clinical Remission from the IORRA Database

OBJECTIVES

To explore patient-reported outcomes (PROs) related to quality of life (QOL) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved clinical remission.

METHODS

In the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) dataset, RA patients over 18 years old who met the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission criteria in April 2017 were enrolled in this analysis. Pain-visual analogue scale (pain-VAS) (0-100 mm), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (0-100 mm), Japanese version of Health Assessment Questionnaire, duration of morning joint stiffness, and fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength 8R [CIS]) were the tools used to evaluate PROs. To assess the contribution of each PRO to the European QOL-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) score, analysis of variance was conducted.

RESULTS

Among the 2,443 patients with remission, the mean EQ-5D-5L was 0.9. The mean pain VAS and patients' global assessment of disease activity (Pt-GA) were 7.2 and 7.4, respectively. Factors that significantly contributed to the EQ-5D-5L were pain-VAS (48.8%), CIS score (18.1%), and Pt-GA (15.6%). Around 82.5% of the variance in EQ-5D-5L were explained by the three PROs.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that pain-VAS, CIS, and Pt-GA were significant contributors to the EQ-5D-5L score in patients with RA who achieved SDAI remission.

Pain and Fatigue Improvements in Patients Treated with Repository Corticotropin Injection Across Five Indications: A Narrative Review

Repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar^® Gel) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in 19 indications, including for the treatment of selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), symptomatic sarcoidosis, uveitis, and keratitis. Despite treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, many patients with RA, SLE, and other chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases continue to be affected by severe pain and fatigue, indicating a need for other therapies. To examine the clinical data regarding the impact of RCI treatment on pain and fatigue in selected populations, this review included English-language peer-reviewed publications of clinical trials of any size and cohort studies with more than 10 patients that included pain and/or fatigue based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and/or physician-assessed measures in adults following treatment with RCI for RA, SLE, symptomatic sarcoidosis, uveitis, or keratitis. Literature searches identified eight studies that met these criteria. Four studies (reported in five publications) were in patients with RA or SLE, two in patients with sarcoidosis, one in patients with uveitis, and one in patients with noninfectious keratitis. Across the different types of studies assessed (clinical trials, chart reviews, real-world evidence), the results were consistent with respect to the impact of RCI treatment on improving pain and fatigue. As summarized in this review, data from patient- and physician-reported outcome measures in eight studies demonstrate that, in addition to improving more traditional efficacy measures, RCI may also improve pain and fatigue in patients with RA, SLE, symptomatic sarcoidosis, uveitis, and noninfectious keratitis.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are chronic autoimmune diseases. Clinical studies of drugs for these diseases do not often ask patients how they feel after treatment. Despite treatment, many people with these diseases have pain and feel tired. Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) is a prescription drug for patients with RA, SLE, and other chronic immune diseases. We reviewed the results of published studies with data on pain and fatigue from patients treated with RCI. Four studies were in patients with RA or SLE. Two studies were in patients with symptomatic sarcoidosis. One study was in patients with uveitis. One study was in patients with noninfectious keratitis. These eight studies show that adding RCI to standard treatment lowers pain and fatigue in some patients. It would be helpful to measure pain and fatigue in future clinical studies of drugs for patients with chronic immune diseases.

Ability to Participate in Social Activities of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Compared with Other Rheumatic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the ability to participate in social activities among rheumatoid arthritis patients with other rheumatic disease patients and identify potentially implicated factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June and November 2019, we consecutively selected patients aged ≥18 years with RA (defined according to ACR/EULAR 2010), SpA (ASAS/EULAR 2010), and SLE (ACR 1997).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ability to participate in social roles and activities evaluated using the PROMIS score v2.0 short-form 8a (PROMIS-APS).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Participation in social activities according to a series of variables (mobility, depression, satisfaction with social relationships, social isolation, company, emotional support, instrumental support, and support via information). We evaluated the association between the ability to participate in social activities and associated variables using multivariable linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 50 patients with RA (33.1%), 51 patients (33.8%) with SpA, and 50 patients (33.1%) with SLE. The mean PROMIS-APS scores were similar in the three groups. The multivariable analysis for the whole sample showed that the ability to participate in social activities was inversely associated with depression and directly with social satisfaction, mobility, company, and age. The stratified analysis revealed an inverse association between inflammatory activity and ability to participate in social activities in patients with RA and SpA, but not in those with SLE.

CONCLUSION

All patients with RA, SpA, and SLE had a similar ability to participate in social activities. This was associated with other psychosocial factors (social satisfaction, mobility, company, depression) and clinical factors (age and inflammatory activity).

Systemic effects of IL-6 blockade in rheumatoid arthritis beyond the joints

Interleukin (IL)-6 is produced locally in response to an inflammatory stimulus, and is able to induce systemic manifestations at distance from the site of inflammation. Its unique signaling mechanism, including classical and trans-signaling pathways, leads to a major expansion in the number of cell types responding to IL-6. This pleiotropic cytokine is a key factor in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is involved in many extra-articular manifestations that accompany the disease. Thus, IL-6 blockade is associated with various biological effects beyond the joints. In this review, the systemic effects of IL-6 in RA comorbidities and the consequences of its blockade will be discussed, including anemia of chronic disease, cardiovascular risks, bone and muscle functions, and neuro-psychological manifestations.

Experiences of living with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to investigate the available qualitative evidence to enhance understanding of the experiences of children, young adults, and their carers living with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in any setting.

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in childhood. Despite the availability of effective treatments, persistent pain, growth retardation, physical disability, and psychological problems can occur. This may reduce the quality of life for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis patients by negatively affecting their family, educational, and social well-being. Patient-centered management and care for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis patients requires increasing attention to their self-reported quality of life and experiences, in addition to clinically measured disease activity. Furthermore, taking care of children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis may have negative impacts on the lives of their carers and families. The experiences of carers have been poorly understood and studied. This review describes experiences and perspectives from patients and carers in order to inform the needs of families throughout their Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis journey.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies describing the experiences of patients aged <21 years who have been diagnosed with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis according to the International League of Associations for Rheumatology criteria, as well as the experiences of their carers, have been considered.

METHODS

A comprehensive search using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as relevant conference proceedings of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR; 2018-2019), the European Pediatric Rheumatology Congress (PReS) 2018, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR; 2018-2019), and the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology (APLAR; 2018-2019), was undertaken in December 2020 to identify pertinent published and unpublished studies. Studies published in English from 2001 to 2020 were included. The JBI approach to study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis was used.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in this review. A total of 61 findings were extracted and aggregated to form 12 categories. From the 12 categories, five synthesized findings were developed: i) Self-management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis requires pain management, medication management, and the acquisition of knowledge and professional support; ii) A promising relationship with health care professionals but unbalanced access to services; iii) Parental financial burden and their adjustment to maintain family happiness; iv) Patients and parents support the web-based approach to communicate and develop self-management skills and acknowledge the importance of clinical trials; v) Desire to live a normal life without prejudice from school, social settings, and the workplace.

CONCLUSIONS

This review has provided a comprehensive overview of experiences and perceptions of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis patients and their parents. It is important to understand what they need to know and understand about the disease. This review also highlights the importance of appropriate web-based programs, career counseling, infrastructures, and school facilities. Findings in this review can guide future policy and practice in order to improve care for families and children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Further research is required to develop management strategies for medication intolerance and evaluate the longitudinal benefits of relevant Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis programs.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (CRD42019133165).

Influence of Depression and Anxiety on Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment Outcomes: A 6-Month Prospective Study

Periodontal treatment could be worsened by risk factors. Depression and anxiety have been suggested as potentially influencing periodontal treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine their association with non-surgical periodontal treatment outcomes in patients with generalized severe periodontitis (stage III/IV generalized periodontitis) at 6 months. A total of 68 patients diagnosed with generalized severe periodontitis were treated with scaling and root planing (SRP) and were followed at 3 and 6 months. The data of the 54 patients that followed the entire protocol were considered for analysis. Depression and anxiety levels were determined at baseline by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and State-Trait Inventory (STAI) questionnaires. The association between psychological scores and periodontal parameters was evaluated by multivariate analysis. At 3 and 6 months, SRP induced an improvement for all periodontal parameters (plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), periodontal probing depth (PPD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL)). BDI and STAI scores were associated with the evolution of PI, BOP, mean PPD and number of sites with PPD > 3 mm and with CAL > 3 mm. Depression and anxiety should be considered as risk factors for SRP and the identification of at-risk patients should be performed using well-established tools.

Sociodemographic determinants in the evolution of pain in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from ESPOIR and DESIR cohorts

Objective

To determine whether socio-demographic factors are associated with heterogeneity in pain evolution in inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) after accounting for disease-specific characteristics in a system with universal health care.

Methods

This analysis included the data from two prospective observational cohorts of early IRDs (ESPOIR for early RA and DESIR for early SpA). Data on pain was measured, respectively, on 13 and 9 occasions spanning 10 and 6 years of follow-up using the Short-Form 36 bodily pain score for 810 participants of ESPOIR, and 679 participants of DESIR. Linear mixed models were used to characterize differences in pain evolution as a function of age (tertiles), sex, ethnicity, education, marital, and professional status, after accounting for disease-related, treatment, lifestyle, and health factors.

Results

While transitioning from early (disease duration ≤6 months for RA and ≤3 years for SpA) to long-standing disease, differences in pain evolution emerged as a function of age (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.050), and ethnicity (P = 0.001) in RA, and as a function of age (P = 0.048) in SpA; younger age, males, and Caucasians exhibited lower pain in the latter phases of both diseases. Highly educated participants (RA, β = −3.8, P = 0.007; SpA, β = −6.0, P < 0.001) for both diseases, and Caucasians (β = −5.6, P = 0.021) for SpA presented with low pain early in the disease, with no changes throughout disease course.

Conclusion

Being older, female, non-Caucasian and having lower education was found to be associated with worse pain in early and/or long-standing IRDs, despite universally accessible health-care. Early identification of at-risk populations and implementation of multidisciplinary strategies may reduce patient-reported health outcome disparities.

Trial registration registrations

ESPOIR: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03666091. DESIR: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01648907.

The Joint-Brain Axis: Insights From Rheumatoid Arthritis on the Crosstalk Between Chronic Peripheral Inflammation and the Brain

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by erosive polyarthritis. Beyond joint pathology, RA is associated with neuropsychiatric comorbidity including depression, anxiety, and an increased risk to develop neurodegenerative diseases in later life. Studies investigating the central nervous system (CNS) in preclinical models of RA have leveraged the understanding of the intimate crosstalk between peripheral and central immune responses. This mini review summarizes the current knowledge of CNS comorbidity in RA patients and known underlying cellular mechanisms. We focus on the differential regulation of CNS myeloid and glial cells in different mouse models of RA reflecting different patterns of peripheral immune activation. Moreover, we address CNS responses to anti-inflammatory treatment in human RA patients and mice. Finally, to illustrate the bidirectional communication between the CNS and chronic peripheral inflammation, we present the current knowledge about the impact of the CNS on arthritis. A comprehensive understanding of the crosstalk between the CNS and chronic peripheral inflammation will help to identify RA patients at risk of developing CNS comorbidity, setting the path for future therapeutic approaches in both RA and neuropsychiatric diseases.

The burden of pain in rheumatoid arthritis: Impact of disease activity and psychological factors

BACKGROUND

Pain remains a prevalent symptom for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients despite a wide therapeutic choice. The objective of this study was to provide a multidimensional evaluation of pain.

METHODS

A total of 295 RA patients from 7 French rheumatology centres were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Patients completed a chronic pain assessment questionnaire approved by the French National Authority for Health, the health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) as well as depression and anxiety scales (HAD, Beck Depression Inventory, STAI). Disease activity (DAS28) and ESR were recorded. A multivariate descriptive analysis was undertaken using principal component analysis (PCA).

RESULTS

38.4% of patients had a pain score > 40 mm/100, although 83% were on biological treatment and 38.7% were in remission based on the RA activity score. The PCA analysis found four axes representing 70% of total variance. The axes, per cent of variance and variables represented were as follows: (a) axis 1, 41% variance, anxiety and depression scores, sensory and affective qualifier score, HAQ and pain impact on daily life; (b) axis 2, 13% variance, disease activity score (DAS28) and pain relief with current treatment; (c) axis 3, 9% of variance, RA duration and radiographic score and (d) axis 4, 6% of variance, DAS28 and ESR. Moderate to severe pain was significantly associated with axes 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high proportion of patients on biological treatments, 38.4% of patients continue to experience moderate to severe pain. Pain is associated with the RA activity score, but also with the depression and anxiety scores.

SIGNIFICANCE

Substantial proportion of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients still experiences relevant pain, although more than 80% on biological treatment. Pain is primarily associated with anxiety and depression scores and with disease activity score. These findings highlight the need to assess patients' mental well-being alongside. Clinical measures of disease activity to better manage pain and guide treatment decisions.