Interaction between a single nucleotide polymorphism in the alcohol dehydrogenase 3 gene, alcohol consumption and oral cancer risk

Impact of alcohol dehydrogenase 3 (ADH3 or ADH1C) genetic variation on head and neck cancer susceptibility: A systematic review, meta-analysis, functional analysis, and trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVES

Alcohol drinking is a major risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC), and this risk may be modified by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes. The first systematic review and meta-analysis was designed with more studies and added trial sequential analysis and functional analysis for a better understanding of the role of ADH3 polymorphism in HNC patients.

METHODS

A search was performed across several databases, including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to May 5, 2024, without any restrictions to find pertinent studies. The RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate the effect sizes. These were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven articles were included in the meta-analysis. The frequency of *1/*1, *1/*2, and *2/*2 genotypes in cases with HNC was 47.14 %, 41.06 %, and 11.80 %, respectively, and in controls was 50.56 %, 38.29 %, and 11.15 %, respectively. The pooled OR for the allelic model is 1.11 (p = 0.18), for the homozygous model is 0.95 (p = 0.64), for the heterozygous model is 0.99 (p = 0.90), for the dominant model is 1.11 (p = 0.14), and for the recessive model is 0.98 (p = 0.78). In the Asians, the three models showed an increased significant association. In the cancer subtype subgroup, a protective significant association was found in the pharyngeal cancer subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

The current analysis suggests that ADH3 polymorphism may not have a significant impact on the risk of HNC, but the polymorphism had an increased risk in Asians and a protective role in pharyngeal cancers.

The Interaction between CLSPN Gene Polymorphisms and Alcohol Consumption Contributes to Oral Cancer Progression

Most disease single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are regulatory and approximately half of heritability is occupied by the top 1% of genes, with the gene-level structure varying with the number of variants associated with the most common alleles. Cancer occurrence and progression are significantly affected by Claspin (CLSPN) gene polymorphism present in the population, which alters the expression, function, and regulation of the gene. CLSPN genotypes are associated with oral cancer, but the literature on this association is limited. As a result, the goal of this study is to investigate the correlation between CLSPN genotypes and oral cancers' development. This study will explore the presence of four CLSPN SNPs including rs12058760, rs16822339, rs535638 and rs7520495 gene polymorphisms, and analyze the expression of these genes in 304 cancer-free controls and 402 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cases. Attempts have been made to obtain insight into the role of CLSPN gene polymorphisms in oral cancer through the analysis of this study. We demonstrated that the OSCC risk of individuals with four CLSPN SNPs relative to the wild type did not differ significantly from that of the wild type when the polymorphisms are analyzed according to individual habits. We further studied the mechanism by which CLSPN polymorphisms affect the progression of clinicopathological features in OSCC patients. The results of the degree of cell differentiation showed that compared with patients of rs7520495 SNP carrying the CC genotype, the incidence of poor cell differentiation in patients carrying the CC + GG genotype was higher (AOR: 1.998-fold; 95% CI, 1.127-3.545; p = 0.018). In particular, patients with the G genotype of rs7520495 had increased poor cell differentiation compared with patients with the C genotype (AOR: 4.736-fold; 95% CI, 1.306-17.178; p = 0.018), especially in the drinking group. On the basis of our analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas dataset, we found that higher CLSPN levels were associated with poorer cell differentiation in oral cancers. In this study, we provide the first evidence showing that CLSPN SNPs contribute to oral cancer. Whether or not rs7520495 can be used as a confirmatory factor in the future is uncertain, but it seems likely that it can be used as an important factor in predicting recurrence, response to treatment and medication toxicity to patients with oral cancer.

Association Between Matrix Metalloproteinase-1, 2, 3 Polymorphisms and Oral Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Numerous studies have estimated the association between matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) polymorphisms and the risk of oral cancer; the results, however, are inconsistent and conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association of MMP-1, 2, and 3 polymorphisms with oral cancer risk.

METHODS

A computerized literature search was conducted of electronic databases and search engines. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each gene, and the heterogeneity among studies was estimated using the Q-test and I² values. Overall and subgroup analyses were undertaken. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager v5.3 and Stata v12.0 software.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. For MMP-1(-1607) 1G/2G, a significant association was observed using the recessive genetic model (OR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.14-1.91; I² = 64%, p_{heterogeneity} = 0.003). In the subgroup studies, a significant association was observed in the Asian subgroup (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.42-1.99; I² = 17%, p_{heterogeneity} = 0.30 for the recessive model; and OR = 1.59; 95% CI = 1.19-2.13; I² = 80%, p_{heterogeneity} < 0.00001 for the allelic contrast model) and in the European subgroup (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.44-0.98; I² = 21%, p_{heterogeneity} = 0.26 for the allelic contrast model). No significant associations were observed with either MMP-2(-1306) C/T or MMP-3(-1171) 5A/6A.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMP-1(-1607) 1G/2G polymorphism is associated with oral cancer risk, and the 2G allele played different roles in Asian and European populations.

Does CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism confer head and neck carcinoma susceptibility?: A meta-analysis based on 43 studies

BACKGROUND

Previous reports showed that CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism may be a risk factor for cancers. Published meta-analyses in 2010 and 2011, respectively, on the relationship of CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphisms with the susceptibility to head and neck carcinoma (HNC) have generated inconsistent results. Thus, this study aimed to conduct an updated meta-analysis involving published studies up to Nov 2015 to get a more confidential result.

METHODS

Eligible studies up to Nov 2015 were retrieved and screened. Data were extracted and a quantitative meta-analysis was conducted. Subgroup analyses on ethnicity, source of controls, sample size, genotyping method, smoking status, and drinking status were also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one publications including a total of 43 case-control studies were selected for analysis. The overall data under a homozygote comparison model indicated a significant association of CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphisms with HNC risk (c2c2 vs c1c1: odds ratio [OR] = 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53-2.53). Similar results were observed in the Asian subgroup (c2c2 vs c1c1: OR = 1.98; 95%CI = 1.51-2.60; c2 vs c1: OR = 1.20; 95%CI = 1.03-1.39) and mixed population (c2 vs c1: OR = 1.41; 95%CI = 1.06-1.86) when the data were stratified by ethnicities. Interestingly, increased cancer risk only was shown among never-smokers (c2c2+c1c2 vs c1c1: OR = 1.44; 95%CI = 1.05-1.98) but not ever-smokers.

CONCLUSION

CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphisms may modify the susceptibility to HNC, particularly among Asians, mixed population, and never-smokers. Future large and well-designed studies are needed to verify this conclusion.

Alcohol-medical drug interactions

Concomitant use of alcohol and medications may lead to potentially serious medical conditions. Increasing prescription medication abuse in today's society necessitates a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in alcohol-medication interactions in order to help prevent adverse events. Interactions of medications with alcohol result in altered bioavailability of the medication or alcohol (pharmacokinetic interactions) or modification of the effects at receptor or ion channel sites to alter behavioral or physical outcome (pharmacodynamic interactions). The nature of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions involved in alcohol-medication interactions may differ between acute and chronic alcohol use and be influenced by race, gender, or environmental or genetic factors. This review focuses on the mechanisms underlying pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between alcohol and medications and provides examples for such interactions from replicated research studies. In conclusion, further translational research is needed to address several gaps in our current knowledge of alcohol-medication interactions, including those under various pathologic conditions.

ADH1C Ile350Val polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 35 case-control studies

BACKGROUND

Alcohol dehydrogenase 1C (ADH1C) is the key enzyme catalyze oxidation of alcohol to acetaldehyde, which plays vital roles in the etiology of various cancer. To date, studies investigated the association between a functional polymorphism in ADH1C, Ile350Val (rs698), and risk of cancer have shown inclusive results.

METHODS

A meta-analysis based on 35 case-control studies was performed to address this issue. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association. The statistical heterogeneity across studies was examined with χ2-based Q-test.

RESULTS

Overall, no significant associations between ADH1C Ile350Val polymorphism and cancer risk were observed in any genetic models (P>0.05). In the stratified analyses, there was a significantly increased cancer risk among African (Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile OR  =  2.19, 95% CI  =  1.29-3.73, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.989; Ile/Val + Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR  =  1.79, 95%CI  =  1.18-2.71, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.761; Val/Val vs. Ile/Val + Ile/Ile: OR  =  1.92, 95% CI  =  1.16-3.17, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.981) and Asian (Ile/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR  =  1.58, 95% CI  =  1.32-1.90, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.375; Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR  =  3.84, 95% CI  =  1.74-8.49, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.160; Ile/Val + Val/Val vs. Ile/Ile: OR  =  1.65, 95% CI  =  1.38-1.96, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.330; Val/Val vs. Ile/Val + Ile/Ile: OR  =  3.54, 95% CI  =  1.62-7.75, P(heterogeneity)  =  0.154) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that ADH1C Ile350Val polymorphism may contribute to cancer risk among Africans and Asians. Additional comprehensive system analyses are required to validate this association combined with other related polymorphisms.

The role of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ADH1B and ADH1C

Alcohol drinking is a major risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC). This risk may be modified by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) genes, particularly ADH1B and ADH1C, that oxidise ethanol to its carcinogenic metabolite, acetaldehyde. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between ADH1B and ADH1C and HNC risk. Twenty-nine studies from 28 articles identified from a literature search were included. Summary odds ratios (meta-ORs) were generated using random effect models. A reduced risk for HNC was associated with carrying the ADH1B*2 and ADH1C*1 alleles that confer faster metabolism of ethanol to acetaldehyde [meta-OR ADH1B, 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.68, 13 studies; meta-OR ADH1C, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76-0.99, 22 studies]. ADH1B*2 and ADH1C*1 alleles appear to be protective for HNC, possibly due to: (i) decreasing the opportunity for oral microflora to produce acetaldehyde locally from a prolonged systemic circulation of ethanol, (ii) preventing ethanol from acting as a solvent for other carcinogens, and (iii) decreasing the amount of ethanol a person consumes since a consequent peak in systemic acetaldehyde could cause discomfort. These results underscore the importance of ADH1B and ADH1C in the association between alcohol consumption and the risk for HNC.

CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism contributes to oral cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Previous data on association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk were controversial. To investigate the association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between oral cancer and genotype with English language until June 2010. Twelve published case-control studies of 1259 patients with oral cancer and 2262 controls were acquired. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association in codominant and dominant models. Overall, the pooled ORs indicated a significant association between CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I polymorphism and oral cancer risk (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.04-1.62, Pheterogeneity=0.57; for (c1/c2+c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.07-1.64, Pheterogeneity=0.57, respectively). In subgroup analysis by race, the same significant risks were found among Asian (for c1/c2 vs. c1/c1: OR=1.41, 95% CI=1.05-1.91, Pheterogeneity=0.92; for (c1/c2+c2/c2) vs. c1/c1: OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.08-1.88, Pheterogeneity=0.97, respectively). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that CYP2E1 Rsa I/Pst I c2 allele may be a biomarker for oral cancer, especially among Asian populations.

Oral squamous cell cancer: early detection and the role of alcohol and smoking

Objective

Oral squamous cell carcinoma has a remarkable incidence worldwide and a fairly onerous prognosis, encouraging further research on factors that might modify disease outcome.

Data sources

A web-based search for all types of articles published was initiated using Medline/Pub Med, with the key words such as oral cancer, alcohol consumption, genetic polymorphisms, tobacco smoking and prevention. The search was restricted to articles published in English, with no publication date restriction (last update 2010).

Review Methods

In this review article, we approach the factors for a cytologic diagnosis during OSCC development and the markers used in modern diagnostic technologies as well. We also reviewed available studies of the combined effects of alcohol drinking and genetic polymorphisms on alcohol-related cancer risk.

Results

The interaction of smoking and alcohol significantly increases the risk for aero-digestive cancers. The interaction between smoking and alcohol consumption seems to be responsible for a significant amount of disease.

Conclusion

Published scientific data show promising pathways for the future development of more effective prognosis. There is a clear need for new prognostic indicators, which could be used in diagnostics and, therefore a better selection of the most effective treatment can be achieved.

Chip-based analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in colorectal cancer-related genes

AIM: To detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in colorectal cancer (CRC)-related genes using gene chip technology and to investigate the relationship between these SNPs and the risk of developing CRC.

METHODS: Blood samples collected from 20 CRC patients and 30 healthy adults were used for DNA extraction, PCR amplification and SNP genotyping using the GenomeLab^TM SNPstream Genotyping System. We tested 12 SNPs in 8 genes which were known to be related to the carcinogenesis of CRC. The relationship between the SNPs and the risk of developing CRC was then analyzed.

RESULTS: A significant association was observed between 2 SNPs (MTRR-01 and CYP19A1-06) and the risk of developing CRC (both P < 0.05). A significant association was also noted among CYP19A1-09, CYP19A1-06, CYP19A1-14 and CYP19A1-01, which had strong LD (D′ > 0.75) in pairwise LD.

CONCLUSION: Two SNPs (MTRR-01 and CYP19A1-06) are related to the susceptibility to CRC. SNP array is a simple and fast method to detect SNPs in colorectal cancer-related genes.

Acetaldehyde as an underestimated risk factor for cancer development: role of genetics in ethanol metabolism

Chronic ethanol consumption is a strong risk factor for the development of certain types of cancer including those of the upper aerodigestive tract, the liver, the large intestine and the female breast. Multiple mechanisms are involved in alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis. Among those the action of acetaldehyde (AA), the first metabolite of ethanol oxidation is of particular interest. AA is toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic in animal experiments. AA binds to DNA and forms carcinogenic adducts. Direct evidence of the role of AA in alcohol-associated carcinogenesis derived from genetic linkage studies in alcoholics. Polymorphisms or mutations of genes coding for AA generation or detoxifying enzymes resulting in elevated AA concentrations are associated with increased cancer risk. Approximately 40% of Japanese, Koreans or Chinese carry the AA dehydrogenase 2*2 (ALDH2*2) allele in its heterozygous form. This allele codes for an ALDH2 enzyme with little activity leading to high AA concentrations after the consumption of even small amounts of alcohol. When individuals with this allele consume ethanol chronically, a significant increased risk for upper alimentary tract and colorectal cancer is noted. In Caucasians, alcohol dehydrogenase 1C*1 (ADH1C*1) allele encodes for an ADH isoenzyme which produces 2.5 times more AA than the corresponding allele ADH1C*2. In studies with moderate to high alcohol intake, ADH1C*1 allele frequency and rate of homozygosity was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract, the liver, the colon and the female breast. These studies underline the important role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-mediated carcinogenesis.

Alcohol and genetic polymorphisms: effect on risk of alcohol-related cancer

Public health guidelines aim to limit the consumption of alcoholic beverages worldwide and the subsequent health burden. In particular, alcohol consumption is an avoidable risk factor for cancer. In human beings, ethanol in alcoholic drinks is mainly oxidised in the liver by alcohol dehydrogenases to acetaldehyde, and is further detoxified to acetate by aldehyde dehydrogenases. Functional variants in genes involved in alcohol metabolism result in differences between individuals in exposure to carcinogenic acetaldehyde, suggesting a possible interaction of genetic susceptibility and alcohol exposure in cancer. We reviewed available studies of the combined effects of alcohol drinking and genetic polymorphisms on alcohol-related cancer risk. Most available data were for polymorphisms in alcohol and folate metabolism. We give an overview of published studies on the combined effects of alcohol drinking and polymorphisms in genes for alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), cytochrome P450 2E1, and methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase on the risk of alcohol-related cancer. Current data lend support to a role of polymorphisms ADH1B and ALDH2 combined with alcohol consumption in cancer. Other available data are insufficient or inconclusive, highlighting the need for additional studies.

Current topics in the epidemiology of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers

Oral cancer incidence rates rose dramatically during the twentieth century in the United States and Europe, especially among individuals under the age of 60 years. Although influenced by age, sex, and country of origin, incidence trends were most strongly affected by elevated risk among individuals born after approximately 1915. This cohort effect was indicative of strong behavioral influences on oral cancer risk. In this article, associations between oral cancer risk and established behavioral risk factors including alcohol and tobacco use are reviewed. Additionally, possible associations between oral cancer risk and oral hygiene, diet, nutritional status, and sexual behavior as well as the influence of genetic factors on oral cancer risk are considered. Special emphasis is placed on evaluating possible risk differences in individuals above and below the age of 45 and in users and nonusers of alcohol and tobacco.

Epidemiology of carcinogen metabolism genes and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The risk association between tobacco and alcohol use with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is well recognized. However, clearly not all individuals who smoke or drink develop SCCHN. Individual genetic susceptibility differences in carcinogen-metabolizing enzyme function, mutagen sensitivity, apoptosis, and chromosomal aberrations either alone or in combination have been theorized to modify the risk of SCCHN. Nearly all carcinogens and procarcinogens require activation by metabolizing enzymes. Similarly, detoxifying enzymes exist and deactivate carcinogens as well as their intermediate by-products. Together these enzymes are termed xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes; genetic polymorphisms of these enzymes can modify an individual's response to carcinogens and hence the carcinogenic potential of such exposures. In this review, we explore the available evidence in recent literature regarding the risk association between SCCHN and various xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, including cytochrome P450s, glutathione S-transferases, N-acetyltransferases, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1, alcohol dehydrogenase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase.

Molecular mechanisms of alcohol-mediated carcinogenesis

Approximately 3.6% of cancers worldwide derive from chronic alcohol drinking, including those of the upper aerodigestive tract, the liver, the colorectum and the breast. Although the mechanisms for alcohol-associated carcinogenesis are not completely understood, most recent research has focused on acetaldehyde, the first and most toxic ethanol metabolite, as a cancer-causing agent. Ethanol may also stimulate carcinogenesis by inhibiting DNA methylation and by interacting with retinoid metabolism. Alcohol-related carcinogenesis may interact with other factors such as smoking, diet and comorbidities, and depends on genetic susceptibility.

The role of acetaldehyde in upper digestive tract cancer in alcoholics

Chronic excessive alcohol consumption is the strongest risk factor for upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer. Multiple mechanisms are involved in alcohol-associated cancer development of the UADT, including acetaldehyde (AA) effects. AA is toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic. Evidence of the role of AA in alcohol-associated carcinogenesis derived from genetic linkage studies in alcoholics. Polymorphism or mutation in genes coding for AA generation or detoxification enzymes are associated with increased cancer risk. It has been clearly shown in Asians that individuals carrying the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase 2*2 (ALDH2*2) allele have a significantly increased cancer risk when they consume alcohol. In Caucasians, alcohol dehydrogenase 1*1 (ADH1C*1) allele encodes for an alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) isoenzyme, which produces 2.5 times more AA than the corresponding allele ADH1C*2. The authors found that the ADH1C*1 allele frequency and rate of homozygosity was significantly associated with an increased risk for alcohol-related cancer. AA seems to be an important factor in alcohol-associated carcinogenesis of the UADT.

Global pharmacogenetics: giving the genome to the masses

With pharmacogenetics comes the promise of individualized therapy selection for many common diseases where multiple treatment options are available. Recent advances including the Human Genome Project, the International HapMap project, advances in throughput and reduction in cost of genetic testing, and the inclusion of genotype-related dosing recommendations into package inserts all point to the integration of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice. However, many countries will not have access to pharmacogenetics resources in the near future. Generation of global genotype profiles will provide a useful, but not perfect resource for incorporating pharmacogenetics into national drug formularies in the form of prioritization or surveillance where individual genotype data would not be attainable. The PharmacoGenetics for Every Nation Initiative is a first step to making pharmacogenetics applicable on a global level.

Increased Plasma Fatty Acid Ethyl Ester Levels Following Inhibition of Oxidative Metabolism of Ethanol by 4-Methylpyrazole Treatment in Human Subjects

BACKGROUND

Recent experimental evidence suggests that fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE), nonoxidative metabolites of ethanol, mediate ethanol-induced organ damage. A direct association between pancreas-specific toxicity and increased levels of FAEE following inhibition of the oxidative metabolism of ethanol by 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP) has previously been shown in studies with rats.

METHODS

We obtained plasma samples from 32 healthy human volunteers who drank ethanol following 4-MP or placebo ingestion to determine whether in vivo inhibition of oxidative metabolism of ethanol causes a shift to nonoxidative metabolism of ethanol and the subsequent production of increased levels of FAEE. Plasma FAEE were isolated by solid-phase extraction and quantified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

RESULTS

Plasma FAEE levels in subjects receiving 4-MP treatment before ethanol consumption were elevated compared with plasma FAEE concentrations taken from control subjects who received a placebo before ethanol ingestion. Increased FAEE levels in the 4-MP treatment group occurred after peak blood ethanol, and peak FAEE levels were achieved. There was a correlation between the blood ethanol and the plasma FAEE levels, and the correlation persisted in the presence or absence of 4-MP. The peak FAEE values were greater in men than in women, with or without 4-MP treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the in vivo inhibition of the oxidative metabolism of ethanol using 4-MP results in an increased circulating concentration of FAEE, products of the nonoxidative metabolism of ethanol.

Alcohol dehydrogenase 1C*1 allele is a genetic marker for alcohol-associated cancer in heavy drinkers

Chronic alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk for upper aerodigestive tract cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Increased acetaldehyde production via alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) has been implicated in the pathogenesis. The allele ADH1C*1 of ADH1C encodes for an enzyme with a high capacity to generate acetaldehyde. So far, the association between the ADH1C*1 allele and alcohol-related cancers among heavy drinkers is controversial. ADH1C genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism in a total of 818 patients with alcohol-associated esophageal (n=123), head and neck (n=84) and hepatocellular cancer (n=86) as well as in patients with alcoholic pancreatitis (n=117), alcoholic liver cirrhosis (n=217), combined liver cirrhosis and pancreatitis (n=17) and in alcoholics without gastrointestinal organ damage (n=174). The ADH1C*1 allele and genotype ADH1C*1/1 were significantly more frequent in patients with alcohol-related cancers than that in individuals with nonmalignant alcohol-related organ damage. Using multivariate analysis, ADH1C*1 allele frequency and rate of homozygosity were significantly associated with an increased risk for alcohol-related cancers (p<0.001 in all instances). The odds ratio for genotype ADH1C*1/1 regarding the development of esophageal, hepatocellular and head and neck cancer were 2.93 (CI, 1.84-4.67), 3.56 (CI, 1.33-9.53) and 2.2 (CI, 1.11-4.36), respectively. The data identify genotype ADH1C*1/1 as an independent risk factor for the development of alcohol-associated tumors among heavy drinkers, indicating a genetic predisposition of individuals carrying this genotype.

Prospective Study of Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Oral Premalignant Lesions in Men

Recent case-control studies indicate that alcohol increases the risk of oral premalignant lesions (OPL) among tobacco users, but the independent association between alcohol and OPL remains unclear. We prospectively evaluated the association between alcohol consumption and the incidence of OPL. Participants were 41,458 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Alcohol consumption was assessed every 4 years using validated food frequency questionnaires. We confirmed clinically or histopathologically diagnosed OPL events occurring between 1986 and 2002 by medical record review (193 cases). Multivariate-adjusted relative risks of OPL were calculated from Cox proportional hazards models. With detailed control for tobacco and other variables, multivariate relative risks (95% confidence intervals) were 1.7 (0.9-3.2) for drinkers of 0.1 to 14.9 g/d, 2.9 (1.5-5.6) for 15 to 29.9 g/d, and 2.5 (1.3-5.1) for > or =30 g/d, compared with nondrinkers. Approximately one additional drink per day (12.5 g) was associated with a 22% increase in risk (P < 0.001). The associations did not vary by beverage type, frequency, or consumption with meals. Results were similar when restricted to cases of oral epithelial dysplasia. Alcohol increased OPL risk in never-users of tobacco as well as in past or current users. An interaction between alcohol and tobacco was apparent by their more-than-additive joint effects. Alcohol is an independent risk factor for OPL, regardless of beverage type or drinking pattern. Recommendations to reduce alcohol intake have the potential to reduce incidence of OPL in nonsmokers and smokers alike.

Interaction between the ADH1C polymorphism and maternal alcohol intake in the risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts: an evaluation of the contribution of child and maternal genotypes

BACKGROUND

Maternal alcohol consumption has been associated with an increased risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts in some studies. Study of gene-environment interaction may provide insight into the reasons for their discrepancies observed. We focused on a polymorphism of the ADH1C gene (third gene of the class I alcohol dehydrogenase family), involved in the metabolism of ethanol and other alcohols.

METHODS

Data come from a French case-control study (1998-2001), which tested the association between maternal alcohol consumption during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts (240 cases, 236 controls). A case-parent study design looked at the association with an ADH1C polymorphism (Ile349Val site) and potential gene-environment interaction effects. A log-linear model was used to distinguish the direct effect of the child's genotype from the maternally mediated effects.

RESULTS

An increased risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts was observed for women who reported drinking alcohol during the first trimester, compared with women who did not. The mutated ADH1C allele carried by the child seemed to have a protective effect against the risk of oral clefts (RRone copy, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.02; RRtwo copies, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.3-1.3). The maternal genotype played a less important role than the child's, and its action remains unclear. No significant evidence of interaction effects between the ADH1C genotype and maternal alcohol consumption was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the ADH1C gene is involved in the metabolic pathways of many alcohols, we propose several hypotheses about the causal pathway, including ethanol oxidation activity and, more probably, retinol oxidation.

Alcohol Dehydrogenase 3 and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck

In order to examine the association between alcohol dehydrogenase 3 (ADH3) genotypes and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), we conducted a hospital based case-control study including 348 cases and 330 controls. DNA isolated from exfoliated cells from the oral cavity were genotyped for ADH3 polymorphisms using PCR followed by SspI digestion. Odds ratios (OR) and hazards ratios (HR) were done by unconditional logistic regression and Cox regression. Relative to ADH3(2-2) carriers, ADH3(1-1) [OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-1.1] and ADH3(1-2) (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.5-1.2) had a nonsignificant reduced risk of HNSCC. ADH(1-2) smokers of >30 pack-years were at decreased risk of oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas compared with ADH3(2-2) (OR, 0.3, 0.1-0.9), whereas ADH3(1-1) smokers were not. After adjustment, those with ADH3(1-2) had significantly worse overall survival compared with ADH3(1-1) (HR, 0.3, 0.2-0.6) or ADH3(2-2) (HR, 0.4, 0.2-0.9) and increased recurrence (ADH3(1-1), 0.2, 0.1-0.6; ADH3(2-2), 0.6, 0.2-1.3). Our data did not show that ADH3 genotypes had a significantly independent effect on the risk of HNSCC, nor did they modify the risks increased by alcohol or tobacco consumption and high-risk human papillomavirus infection. However, participants with ADH3(1-2) genotype were associated with poorer survival compared with those who had the other two ADH3 genotypes and a higher rate of recurrence than participants with ADH3(1-1) genotype.

Alcohol consumption and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract

Epidemiological data have identified chronic alcohol consumption as a significant risk factor for upper gastrointestinal cancer (oropharynx, hypopharynx, esophagus) and colorectal cancer. Pathophysiological mechanisms include generation of acetaldehyde (AA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), induction of cytochrome P 4502E1 (CYP2E1), and local and nutritional factors. Genetic polymorphisms of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes may individually influence the risk of carcinogenesis. AA, the first and major metabolite of ethanol, has proven to be the most carcinogenic and mutagenic agent in alcohol-associated cancer. Gastrointestinal bacteria as well as various isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) are capable of metabolizing ethanol to AA thus leading to an increased cell turnover of the gastrointestinal mucosa after chronic alcohol consumption. In Caucasians, ADH1C polymorphism is most important, for the ADH1C*1 transcription results in an ADH isoenzyme 2.5 times more active than that from ADH1C*2, which is associated with an increase in AA production. Additionally, oxidative stress due to an induction of CYP2E1 in the gastrointestinal mucosa of alcoholics should be considered as another key factor in alcohol-induced carcinogenesis. Nutritional deficiencies, i.e. lack of folic and retinoic acid, as well as malnutrition itself may also contribute to the development of gastrointestinal cancer.