Differences in human papillomavirus type distribution in high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer in Europe

Impact of human papillomavirus types on uterine cervical neoplasia

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of cervical cancer. As the natural history of HPV-associated cervical lesions is HPV genotype-dependent, it is important to understand the characteristics of these genotypes and to manage them accordingly. Among high-risk HPVs, HPV16 and 18 are particularly aggressive, together accounting for 70% of HPV genotypes detected in cervical cancer. Other than HPV16 and 18, HPV31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 are also at a high risk of progression to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)3 or higher. Recent studies have shown that the natural history of HPV16, 18, 52, and 58, which are frequently detected in Japan, depends on the HPV genotype. For example, HPV16 tends to progress in a stepwise fashion from CIN1 to CIN3, while HPV52 and 58 are more likely to persist in the CIN1 to CIN2 state. Among the high-risk HPVs, HPV18 has some peculiar characteristics different from those of other high-risk HPV types; the detection rate in precancerous lesions is much lower than those of other high-risk HPVs, and it is frequently detected in highly malignant adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma. Recent findings demonstrate that HPV18 may be characterized by latent infection and carcinogenesis in stem cell-like cells. In this context, this review outlines the natural history of HPV-infected cervical lesions and the characteristics of each HPV genotype.

Decoding dysregulated genes, molecular pathways and microRNAs involved in cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to identify dysregulated genes, molecular pathways, and regulatory mechanisms in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cervical cancers. We have investigated the disease-associated genes along with the Gene Ontology, survival prognosis, transcription factors and the microRNA (miRNA) that are involved in cervical carcinogenesis, enabling a deeper comprehension of cervical cancer linked to HPV.

METHODS

We used 10 publicly accessible Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets to examine the patterns of gene expression in cervical cancer. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), which showed a clear distinction between cervical cancer and healthy tissue samples, were analyzed using the GEO2R tool. Additional bioinformatic techniques were used to carry out pathway analysis and functional enrichment, as well as to analyze the connection between altered gene expression and HPV infection.

RESULTS

In total, 48 DEGs were identified to be differentially expressed in cervical cancer tissues in comparison to healthy tissues. Among DEGs, CCND1, CCNA2 and SPP1 were the key dysregulated genes involved in HPV-associated cervical cancer. The five common miRNAs that were identified against these genes are miR-7-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-10b-5p and miR-27a-3p. The hub-DEGs targeted by miRNA hsa-miR-27a-3p are controlled by the common transcription factor SP1.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study has identified DEGs involved in HPV-associated cervical cancer progression and the various molecular pathways and transcription factors regulating them. These findings have led to a better understanding of cervical cancer resulting in the development and identification of possible therapeutic and intervention targets, respectively.

Distribution of human papillomavirus among Vietnamese women with cervical cancer and unusual genetic variability of HPV16

HPV16, with typical mutations that differ in geographical distribution and carcinogenic potency, has implications for cervical cancer screening, clinical diagnosis, and treatment. DNASTAR and MEGA were used to identify HPV16 variants and construct a phylogenetic tree. The most prevalent HPV genotypes were HPV16 (63.9%), HPV18 (26.7%), and other HPV (6.9%). HPV16 alterations were found in all E6, E7, and L1 genes, including 15 missense and 18 synonymous mutations. Missense mutations include R10G, Q14H, D25E, H78Y, L83V (E6); M29V, R35K, L78R, L95P (E7); H73Y, T176 N, N178T, T317P, T386S, L472F/I (L1). HPV16 sublineages include A1 (17.2%), A2 (0.9%), A3 (56.0%), A4 (19.0%), D1 (4.3%), and D3 (2.6%). Although several mutations in the oncoproteins E6, E7, and L1 have been detected, mutations known to be associated with cervical cancer risk, such as D25E and L83V, occur at a relatively low frequency. This suggests that HPV16 mutations are associated with cervical cancer through a complicated mechanism.

Characteristics of Cervical Cancer Caused by the Human Papillomavirus 18 and Its Genetic Variations in Vietnamese Women

BACKGROUND

The involvement of HPV18 in cervical cancer pathogenesis, as well as its high oncogenic potential and influence on the variation of cervical cancer distribution in different geographical regions, makes assessing the characteristics of cervical cancer and its variants the basis for considering potential carcinogenic HPV18 sequence variations and vaccine strategies.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at Vietnam Central Obstetrics Hospital from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. HPV18 infection was confirmed in cervical cancer patients using molecular diagnostics. Nucleotide sequences of the HPV18 E6, E7, and L1 genes were used to analyze genetic variations. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the patients were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients with HPV18-infected cervical cancer, 79.2% were between the ages of 35-54; while only 20.8% were < 35 and > 54 years old. 100% of patients have been pregnant at some point in their lives, with ≥3 pregnancies accounting for 83.3%. Patients with cervical cancer caused by HPV18 infection were predominantly in stages 0 and I, with no patients in stages II, III, or IV. A single HPV18 infection generates much more cervical cancer cases than multiple HPV18 infections. Symptoms such as lower abdomen pain, unusual anginal discharge, and vaginal bleeding were observed in both stages 0 and I; however, vaginal bleeding after sex was only detected in women with stage I cervical cancer. Cervicitis, cervical ectropion, and ulcers are reported in cervical status stages 0 and I; however, warts and ulcers were only present in stage I. Magnetic resonance imaging produces far superior outcomes than ultrasound. All cytology and pathology tests confirmed L/HSIL, SCC, AC, and CIS. On the other hand, a single HPV18 infection was associated with a significantly higher risk of L/HSIL, SCC, AC, and CIS than multiple HPV18 infections. Nulceotide sequences of the E6, E7, and L1 genes revealed 20 mutations, including three (E6), five (E7), and twelve (L1) mutations. High-frequency mutations (95.8%-100% of HPV18 samples had mutations) occur at the following positions: C287G - P61P (E6 gene), G5503A - R25Q, C5701G - P91R, C6460G - P344R, C6625G - P399R, and C6842G - P471R (L1 gene). A phylogenetic tree based on the E6/E7/L1 gene sequence revealed that 100% belonged to A lineage, with 97.9% belonging AA (Asian Amerindian - A1) and 2.1% belonging to the E (European - A5).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a single HPV18 infection have a higher risk of cervical cancer than those infected with HPV18 and other high-risk strains simultaneously. HPV18 single-infection, on the other hand, had considerably higher incidences of L/HSIL, SCC, AC, and CIS than HPV18 co-infection. The HPV18 strain that was found in Vietnam belonged to lineage A (A1 and A5), which contains several oncogene mutations.

Human papilloma virus vaccines: A comprehensive narrative review

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women aged 15-44 years in the world, with more than three-quarters of cases diagnosed at a locally advanced clinical stage with minor prospects of survival. Although only a small percentage of women with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) develop cervical cancer and most of the HPV infections are cleared subsequently at primary stage itself, but seroconversion not always guarantees that the individual is immune to HPV. The advent of the cervical carcinoma vaccine has raised the expectations that eradication of cervical carcinoma might be possible in the near future as it exhibited remarkably high efficacy against the vaccine-specific types in naive women with no serious vaccine-related adverse events. Few prophylactic HPV vaccines are currently licensed in over 100 countries. It has also been suggested that vaccinating both men and women is more beneficial than vaccinating only females. Vaccination is a cost-effective strategy to reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and mortality compared to no vaccination based on the cost of cancer treatment. Well-coordinated vaccination strategy with focus on adolescent girls and if possible, boys can lead to dramatic impact on disease reduction around the world.

Do Concurrent Multiple Infections with High-Risk HPVs Carry a More Malignant Potential than a Single Infection in the Uterine Cervix?

The high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) has been known as the most important carcinogen in uterine cervical carcinoma. However, there is limited evidence of the malignant potential of these concurrent multiple infections. This study included women who had undergone cervical conization. They underwent an HPV test by cervical swab within 12 months before the surgery. They were divided into two groups: one with a single infection with HR-HPV16 and the other with concurrent multiple infections with HR-HPVs, including genotype 16. Pathologic examination classified cases as CIS+ to assess and compare the malignant potential in both groups, including carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive carcinoma. Of the 220 patients infected with HR-HPV16, the single infection group consisted of 120 patients (54.5%), whereas the concurrent multiple infections consisted of 100 (45.5%) patients. The rates of HSIL were significantly higher in the concurrent multiple infection group. However, the odds ratio for CIS+ did not show a significant difference between both groups (1.417, 95% CI = 0.831-2.414, p = 0.200). The malignant potential was not significantly different between concurrent multiple infections with HR-HPVs, including 16, and a single infection with 16 in Korean women.

HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in 2,306 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma in central and eastern China

Background

To explore the positivity rate and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) tissues in central and eastern China and to provide theoretical basis for cervical cancer screening and prophylactic HPV vaccine development in China.

Methods

DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissues of CSCC samples and exfoliated cervical cells of cervical cancer screening populations. 23 HPV genotypes were detected by combining polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse dot hybridized gene chip detection technology in 2,306 CSCC tissues and 10,245 cervical cancer screening populations. The genotype distribution of HPV infection was analyzed.

Results

The overall infection rate of HPVs in 2,306 CSCC patients was 92.71%. The frequency of single-type HPV infection and multiple-type HPV infection were 86.48% and 13.51%, respectively. The most common HPV genotypes detected in Chinese CSCC tissues were HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-31, HPV-33, HPV-45, HPV-52, HPV-58, and HPV-59. The overall positivity rate of these eight high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) genotypes in HPV-positive CSCC was as high as 96.91%. Of which the positivity rate of seven HR-HPV genotypes related to nine-valent HPV vaccines in HPV-positive CSCC was 95.09%. Meanwhile, the overall infection rates of HR-HPV and low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) in female aged 35-64 years who underwent cervical cancer screening were 13.16% and 1.32%, respectively. The high-frequency HR-HPV genotypes in cervical cancer screening women were HPV-52, HPV-58, HPV-16, HPV-53, HPV-68, HPV-39, HPV-51, and HPV-56, with positivity rates of 2.25%, 1.60%, 1.31%, 1.22%, 0.93%, 0.92%, 0.78%, and 0.74%, respectively.

Conclusion

Among women screened for cervical cancer in China, detecting the 8 high-frequency HR-HPV genotypes can reduce technical difficulty and reagent costs, while also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. HPV genotyping assists gynecologists in assessing the risk of HR-HPV-positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and guiding them in implementing appropriate interventions. Furthermore, HPV genotyping is helpful for doctors to follow up HR-HPV-positive women and to evaluate the protective effect of HPV vaccine.

Prevalence of High-Risk HPV Subtypes and Efficacy of the HPV Vaccine in Preventing Cervical Epithelial Lesions: Survey and Insights from a German Study

BACKGROUND

Historically, cervical cytology has been the standard method for detecting dysplastic cervical changes. However, extensive research has established that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a primary cause of these changes, necessitating a shift in screening and preventive strategies towards the molecular detection of high-risk HPV subtypes. To combat HPV infection, prophylactic vaccines have been developed, including the nonavalent, quadrivalent, and bivalent vaccines. An essential criterion for an effective HPV vaccine is to provide comprehensive coverage against the most prevalent high-risk HPV types associated with cervical cancer, ensuring optimal efficacy in preventing cervical lesions. Long-term protection against these types is crucial for effective prevention strategies; Material and Methods: A cohort of 210,510 women's samples was included in the analysis conducted within one year of implementing a screening program in Germany. The screening program involved the molecular detection of high-risk HPV subtypes, targeting specific age groups. The cohort comprised 63,710 women below 35 years of age and 146,800 women aged 35 years and above. The selection of high-risk HPV subtypes followed the guidelines provided by Becton-Dickinson. This study focused exclusively on cases with a documented history of vaccination, which were categorized into two main groups: Group I consisted of vaccinated individuals under 35 years old (12,765 cases), while Group II comprised vaccinated individuals aged 35 years and above (296 cases); Results: The HPV types HPV56/59/66 were found to be widely distributed across all age groups, with certain age groups exhibiting a higher incidence compared to HPV16 and HPV18. Similarly, HPV35/39/69, along with HPV31 and HPV45, were also observed to have a broad distribution among women. The incidence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), including both CIN2 and CIN3, varied between 0.076% and 0.5% across all age groups, regardless of the individuals' vaccination status; Aim of the study: Our study provides valuable insights into the distribution, incidence, and prevalence of various high-risk HPV subtypes, including HPV56/59/66, HPV33/58, HPV35/39/68, and HPV45, in relation to precancerous cervical lesions. These subtypes are not adequately covered by the currently available HPV vaccines. Addressing the discrepancies between the prevalent HPV subtypes and existing vaccines is crucial in developing an ideal HPV vaccine that offers comprehensive protection. Tailoring screening programs and vaccination strategies to the local distribution of HPV subtypes is essential for effective prevention. By raising awareness and implementing targeted preventive measures, including vaccination, we can significantly reduce the incidence of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions.

Elevated risk of cervical cancer in elderly women with incident ulcerative colitis in South Korea

The association between ulcerative colitis (UC) and uterine cervical cancer is still unclear. To investigate cervical cancer risk in South Korean women with UC, we analyzed the Korean National Health Insurance claims data. UC was defined using both ICD-10 codes and UC-specific prescriptions. We analyzed incident cases of UC diagnosed between 2006 and 2015. Age-matched women without UC (control group) were randomly selected from the general population (1:3 ratio). Hazard ratios were calculated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, and the event was defined as occurrence of cervical cancer. A total of 12,632 women with UC and 36,797 women without UC were enrolled. The incidence of cervical cancer was 38.8 per 100,000 women per year in UC patients and 25.7 per 100,000 women per year in controls, respectively. The adjusted HR for cervical cancer was 1.56 (95% CI 0.97-2.50) in the UC group with reference to the control group. When stratified by age, the adjusted HR for cervical cancer was 3.65 (95% CI 1.54-8.66) in elderly UC patients (≥ 60 years) compared to elderly control group (≥ 60 years). Within UC patients, increased age (≥ 40 years) and low socioeconomic status were associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer. The incidence of cervical cancer was found to be higher among elderly patients (≥ 60 years) with newly diagnosed UC in South Korea, compared to age-matched controls. Therefore, regular cervical cancer screening is recommended for elderly patients who have recently been diagnosed with UC.

Proposal for a descriptive and differentiated presentation of the longitudinal impact of the new organized cancer screening guideline and HPV vaccination in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Since 01/01/2020, the cervical cancer screening in Germany has been carried out due to the organized early cancer diagnosis guideline (oKFE-RL). In 2007, HPV vaccination was initiated in Germany. The main goal of both initiatives is to further reduce the incidence of invasive cervical cancer. To assess the effect of the new screening strategy in a timely manner, monitoring of short-term changes need to be considered. Ideally, the effects of both prevention methods would be presented together in one model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Because no change in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer is initially expected, the incidence of CIN 3 is used as a surrogate parameter to assess the effects of the prevention efforts. Based on expected additional effects of vaccination and co-testing, a model-based estimation of the expected CIN 3 incidence during the evaluation of the screening program is performed using the CIN 3 incidence in the Saarland population.

MODELING RESULTS

The oKFE-RL provides for two groups: Primary cytodiagnosis continues until 35 years of age. Here, in the next few years, CIN 3 incidence will be reduced not by the oKFE-RL but by the increasing proportion of vaccinated women. In the group over 35 years, co-testing was introduced with a stringent algorithm. Due to the higher sensitivity of the HPV test, significantly more CIN 3 are detected in the first round of 3 years and thus, the CIN 3 incidence initially increases. As these CIN 3 are absent in the second round, significantly fewer CIN 3 cases will be detected then. These effects suggest a global decrease in CIN 3 incidence of 25.8% after 6 years.

CONCLUSION

Observation of the age distribution curve of CIN 3 allows both effects of prevention to be assessed in a timely manner and separately. In the future, data from epidemiologic cancer registries should be incorporated into the model to replace modeling with real data.

The Mechanisms of GPR55 Receptor Functional Selectivity during Apoptosis and Proliferation Regulation in Cancer Cells

GPR55 is a non-canonical cannabinoid receptor, important for cancer proliferation. Depending on the ligand, it induces either cell proliferation or death. The objective of the study was to establish the mechanisms of this multidirectional signaling. Using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, the GPR55, CB1, CB2, and GPR18 receptor knockouts of the MDA-MB-231 line were obtained. After the CB2 receptor knockout, the pro-apoptotic activity of the pro-apoptotic ligand docosahexaenoyl dopamine (DHA-DA) slightly increased, while the pro-proliferative activity of the most active synthetic ligand of the GPR55 receptor (ML-184) completely disappeared. On the original cell line, the stimulatory effect of ML-184 was removed by the CB2 receptor blocker and by GPR55 receptor knockout. Thus, it can be confidently assumed that when proliferation is stimulated with the participation of the GPR55 receptor, a signal is transmitted from the CB2 receptor to the GPR55 receptor due to the formation of a heterodimer. GPR18 was additionally involved in the implementation of the pro-apoptotic effect of DHA-DA, while the CB1 receptor is not involved. In the implementation of the pro-apoptotic action of DHA-DA, the elimination of Gα13 led to a decrease in cytotoxicity. The obtained data provide novel details to the mechanism of the pro-proliferative action of GPR55.

13-Type HPV DNA Test versus 5-Type HPV mRNA Test in Triage of Women Aged 25-33 Years with Minor Cytological Abnormalities-6 Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

A specific, cost-effective triage test for minor cytological abnormalities is essential for cervical cancer screening among younger women to reduce overmanagement and unnecessary healthcare utilization. We compared the triage performance of one 13-type human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test and one 5-type HPV mRNA test.

METHODS

We included 4115 women aged 25-33 years with a screening result of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) recorded in the Norwegian Cancer Registry during 2005-2010. According to Norwegian guidelines, these women went to triage (HPV testing and repeat cytology: 2556 were tested with the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test, which detects the HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68; and 1559 were tested with the PreTect HPV-Proofer HPV mRNA test, which detects HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45). Women were followed through December 2013.

RESULTS

HPV positivity rates at triage were 52.8% and 23.3% among DNA- and mRNA-tested women (p < 0.001), respectively. Referral rates for colposcopy and biopsy and repeat testing (HPV + cytology) after triage were significantly higher among DNA-tested (24.9% and 27.9%) compared to mRNA-tested women (18.3% and 5.1%), as were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) detection rates (13.1% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001). Ten cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up; eight were in DNA-tested women.

CONCLUSION

We observed significantly higher referral rates and CIN3+ detection rates in young women with ASC-US/LSIL when the HPV DNA test was used at triage. The mRNA test was as functional in cancer prevention, with considerably less healthcare utilization.

Does full HPV genotyping perform similarly well in clinician-collected cervical samples and self-collected vaginal samples when using the CLART HPV4S assay?

BACKGROUND

Studies comparing self-collected vaginal samples with clinician-collected cervical samples with respect to high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) detection and genotype agreement based on clinically validated full HPV genotype assays (e.g. the CLART HPV4S) are limited. This study compared the two types of samples using the CLART assay with respect to HPV detection and genotype agreement in a referral population.

METHODS

A total of 212 women aged 30-59 years and diagnosed with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) within the Danish cervical cancer screening programme had a cervical sample taken at their general practitioner. Afterwards, the women took a vaginal sample with the Evalyn Brush device at home. The paired samples were HPV-tested with the full genotyping CLART HPV4S assay. Histological results, i.e. cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) were available for 14 women with HPV-positive clinician-collected samples.

RESULTS

The study found the same HPV prevalence in self-collected vaginal samples compared to clinician-collected cervical samples (19.3%, 95% CI 14.3-25.3% vs 18.4%, 95% CI 13.4-24.3%). The CLART HPV4S assay detected approximately the same number of CIN2+ cases in the self-collected vaginal samples compared to the clinician-collected cervical samples (13 vs 11 cases). Exactly the same genotypes were detected in 75% (21/28) of the HPV-positive paired samples, while at least one identical genotype was found in the remaining 25% (7/28) of the paired samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The CLART HPV4S assay performed similarly well in self-collected vaginal samples as in clinician-collected cervical samples with respect to both HPV detection and genotype agreement when using the Evalyn Brush and the CLART HPV4S assay in a referral population. Although further evaluation is needed, the findings suggest that full HPV genotyping based on the CLART assay can be useful when establishing HPV genotype-specific referral strategies for women tested HPV-positive by self-sampling.

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by real-time multiplex PCR assay using type-specific primers and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay

The SPF10-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based line probe assay (LiPA-25) with high analytical sensitivity and specificity for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping in clinical samples has been widely used in vaccine and epidemiologic studies. A real-time multiplex PCR assay using type-specific primers (Hybribio-23) with low workload and cost has been developed recently. The study aimed to compare the performance of LiPA-25 and Hybribio-23 in selected 1731 cervical swab and 117 tissue samples, with a focus on 20 common HPV types (14 high-risk: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68/73; 6 low-risk: 6, 11, 42, 43, 44, and 53). The level of agreement of two assays was determined using Cohen's Kappa (κ) statistics. A total of 1296 (74.9%) swab samples were identified as HPV-positive by Hybribio-23 or LiPA-25, of which 814 (62.8%) samples exhibited concordant, 358 (27.6%) showed additional or fewer types (compatible), and 124 (9.6%) were discordant. In addition, the two assays showed a perfect agreement for 20 HPV-combined detection (κ = 0.838) and 17 individual HPV types (all κ > 0.800), a good agreement for HPV31 (κ = 0.792) and 43 (κ = 0.696), and a moderate agreement for HPV42 (κ = 0.504). Hybribio-23 was significantly more sensitive for HPV58, 59, 68/73, 42, 43, and 44, and less sensitive for HPV35 and 66 than LiPA-25 (McNemar's test: all p < 0.05). For 117 HPV-positive tissue specimens, the identification of genotypes was 85.2% identical, 12.2% compatible, and only 2.6% discordant. The agreement for HPV31 (κ = 0.786), 68/73 (κ = 0.742), and HPV53 (κ = 0.742) was good, while for other types (all κ > 0.853) and 20 HPV-combined detection (κ = 0.936) was perfect (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, Hybribio-23 and LiPA-25 are comparable. Hybribio-23 could be used for the detection and genotyping of HPV in cervical samples for epidemiological and vaccine studies worldwide.

Head-to-head comparison of genotyping of human papillomavirus by GP5+/6+-PCR-based reverse dot blot hybridization assay and SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay

The SPF10-PCR-based line probe assay (LiPA-25) for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping with high analytical sensitivity and specificity was widely used in HPV vaccine clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. In the study, we aimed to compare a novel GP5+/6+-PCR-based reverse dot blot hybridization assay (Yaneng-23) with LiPA-25. The performance of two assays was evaluated in 1735 cervical swab and 117 tissue samples, with a focus on 19 common HPV types (14 high-risk: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68/73; 5 low-risk: 6, 11, 42, 43, and 53). A total of 1197 (69.0%) swab samples were identified as HPV-positive by two assays. Of these, 878 (73.4%) samples displayed absolute agreement (concordant), 255 (21.3%) showed additional or fewer types (compatible), and the remaining 64 (5.3%) samples were discordant. Additionally, the two assays showed an excellent strength of agreement for 19 HPV-combined detection (κ = 0.886) and 17 individual HPV types (all κ > 0.800), and displayed a good agreement for HPV39 (κ = 0.780) and 42 (κ = 0.699). Yaneng-23 was more sensitive than LiPA-25 for HPV58, 59, 68/73, 42, 43 and 53 (McNemar's test: all p < 0.05), while LiPA-25 was more sensitive for HPV31, 39, 52, and 66 than Yaneng-23 (all p < 0.05). In 113 HPV-positive tissue specimens, the identification of genotypes was 82.3% identical and 17.7% compatible. The agreement between the tests for HPV45 (κ = 0.796) and 51 (κ = 0.742) was good, and for other types (all κ > 0.843) and 19 HPV-combined detection (κ = 0.929) was perfect (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, Yaneng-23 and LiPA-25 are comparable. Yaneng-23 could be used for the detection and genotyping of HPV in cervical samples for epidemiological and vaccine studies worldwide.

Histologıcal results of HPV genotyping from a colposcopy center

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of partial human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping tests in predicting the diagnosis of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion and cancer (HSIL +) as a result of colposcopic histopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 2872 patients who presented at our colposcopy unit between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 and underwent colposcopy for the first time. The patients were compared in terms of HSIL + results as HPV 16/18 and HPV other type positive groups.

RESULTS

HSIL + was determined at the rate of 22.3% in the HPV 16/18 group and at 7.0% in the HPV Other group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.000). HPV 16/18 types were found to be responsible for 84.8% of cervical cancers and 83.5% of HSIL and worse cases.

CONCLUSION

Partial HPV 16/18 genotyping is an effective strategy in the triage of HPV-positive women. HPV type identification consistent with the epidemiology of HPV types in HSIL + cases in the screened population, and the age-appropriate use of primary HPV tests will determine the sensitivity and cost effectiveness of screening.

Does Vaccination Protect against Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers? Preliminary Findings from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2018)

Most oropharyngeal and anogenital cancers are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). Although HPV vaccines showed high efficacy against oropharyngeal and anogenital HPV infections, and cancer precursors in randomized clinical trials, there are limited data on the effectiveness of HPV vaccination against HPV-related cancers. We aimed to evaluate the association of HPV vaccination with HPV-related cancers among a nationally representative sample of United States adults, aged 20-59 years. In a cross-sectional study combining four cycles from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from 2011 through 2018, we used a survey-weighted logistic regression model, propensity score matching and multiple imputations by chained equations to explore the association of HPV vaccination with HPV-related cancers. Among 9891 participants, we did not find an association of HPV vaccination with HPV-related cancers (adjusted OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.19; 1.75). Despite no statistically significant association between HPV vaccination and HPV-related cancers, our study findings suggest that HPV-vaccinated adults might have lower odds of developing HPV-related cancers than those who were not vaccinated. Given the importance of determining the impact of vaccination on HPV-related cancers, there is a need to conduct future research by linking cancer registry data with vaccination records, to obtain more robust results.

Impact of HPV mRNA types 16, 18, 45 detection on the risk of CIN3+ in young women with normal cervical cytology

BACKGROUND

Despite a well-established cervical cancer (CC) screening program in Norway, the incidence of CC in young women is increasing, peaking at 35 years of age. 25 percent of all women diagnosed with CC had normal cytology within 3 years prior to cancer diagnosis, addressing the need to improve the screening programme to further reduce cancer incidences missed by cytology.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to investigate the detection rate of CIN3+ in women 25-39 years with normal cytology by using a 3-type HPV mRNA test as a targeted quality assurance measure. The control group is women with normal cytology.

METHODS

During 2014-2017, samples from 13,021 women 25-39 years of age attending cervical cancer screening were analysed at Nordlandssykehuset, Bodø, Norway, including 1,896 women with normal cytology and HPV mRNA test (intervention group), and 11,125 women with cytology only (control group). The HPV mRNA testing was performed using a 3-type HPV E6/E7 mRNA test (PreTect SEE; direct genotyping 16, 18 and 45). The women were followed-up according to national guidelines throughout December 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 13,021 women, 429 women (3.3%) had CIN3+ confirmed by biopsy in the follow-up, including 13 cases of invasive cervical cancer. Of the 1,896 women with normal cytology and HPV mRNA test (intervention group), 49 women (2.6%) had a positive test. The risks of CIN3+ among women with either a positive or negative HPV mRNA test were 28.6% (14/49) and 0.8% (14/1847). None of the women in the intervention group developed cervical cancer during follow-up. Of the 11,125 women with cytology only (control group), 712 women (6.4%) had abnormal cytology (ASC-US+). The risks of CIN3+ among women with abnormal and normal cytology were 17.7% (126/712) and 2.6% (275/10,413).

CONCLUSION

By testing women 25-39 years of age with a normal cytology result using a specific 3-type HPV mRNA test, an increase in screening programme sensitivity can be achieved without an excessive additional workload. Women with normal cytology and a negative HPV mRNA test have a very low risk of cervical cancer.

Head-to-head comparison of 7 high-sensitive human papillomavirus nucleic acid detection technologies with the SPF10 LiPA-25 system

Background

The SPF10 LiPA-25 system for human papillomavirus (HPV) detection with high analytical performance is widely used in HPV vaccine clinical trials. To develop and evaluate more valent HPV vaccines, other comparable methods with simpler operations are needed.

Methods

The performance of the LiPA-25 against that of other 7 assays, including 4 systems based on reverse hybridization (Bohui-24, Yaneng-23, Tellgen-27, and Hybribio-16) and 3 real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (Hybribio-23, Bioperfectus-21, and Sansure-26), was evaluated in selected 1726 cervical swab and 56 biopsy samples. A total of 15 HPV genotypes (HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 66) were considered for comparison for each HPV type.

Results

Among the swab samples, compared to LiPA-25, compatible genotypes were observed in 94.1% of samples for Hybribio-23, 92.8% for Yaneng-23, 92.6% for Bioperfectus-21, 92.4% for Hybribio-16, 91.3% for Sansure-26, 89.7% for Bohui-24, and 88.0% for Tellgen-27. The highest overall agreement of the 15 HPV genotypes combined was noted for Hybribio-23 (κ = 0.879, McNemar's test: P = 0.136), followed closely by Hybribio-16 (κ = 0.877, P< 0.001), Yaneng-23 (κ = 0.871, P < 0.001), Bioperfectus-21 (κ = 0.848, P < 0.001), Bohui-24 (κ = 0.847, P < 0.001), Tellgen-27 (κ = 0.831, P < 0.001), and Sansure-26 (κ = 0.826, P < 0.001). Additionally, these systems were also highly consistent with LiPA-25 for biopsy specimens (all, κ > 0.897).

Conclusions

The levels of agreement for the detection of 15 HPV types between other 7 assays and LiPA-25 were all good, and Hybribio-23 was most comparable to LiPA-25. The testing operation of HPV genotyping should also be considered for vaccine and epidemiological studies.

The Clinical Utility of Extended High-Risk HPV Genotyping in Women With ASC-US Cytology

OBJECTIVES

Extended testing for high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes (hrHPVGTs) is increasingly investigated for risk stratification in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Age and hrHPVGT results from 16,993 women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology between November 2015 and August 2021 were studied and correlated with available histopathologic findings within 6 months.

RESULTS

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive rate was 66.9% in women with ASC-US cytology, and the most prevalent genotypes were HPV 52 (20.9%), 16 (15.7%), and 58 (12.8%). Single hrHPV genotypes and multiple HPV genotypes were detected in 77.2% and 22.8% of women with hrHPV-positive results. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) severe lesions were identified in 19.5% of women with hrHPV-positive ASC-US. The greatest risk for CIN2+ was found in single genotype infections with HPV 16 (33.1%), followed by women with multiple genotype infections, including HPV 16 (32.7%), 82 (30.8%), and 31 (30.0%). hrHPVGT testing for genotypes 16, 31, 35, 45, 82, 58, 33, 52, and 18 was identified in 91.9% (965/1,050) of CIN2+ cases, with 88.9% sensitivity, 43.2% specificity, positive predictive value of 23.9%, and negative predictive value of 95.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended hrHPV genotyping for women with ASC-US cytology could identify those hrHPV genotypes (HPV 16, 31, 35, 45, 82, 58, 33, 52, 18) associated with higher risk of CIN2+ and allows for refined risk stratification of women being screened.

Distribution of HPV Subtypes in Diverse Anogenital and Oral Samples from Women and Correlation of Infections with Neoplasia of the Cervix

Simple Summary

Human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated cancers and their precursors are increasing worldwide. The purpose of our study was to investigate HPV subtypes in anogenital and oral samples to analyze the distribution and frequency of high- and low-risk HPV in the cervix, vagina, vulva, anus, and oral cavity. Identification of special HPV subtypes for these areas may help to increase the prognostic value of HPV screening for early detection of precursors or cancers being highly HPV-attributable. HPV genotyping with the EUROArray HPV test was performed in 509 patient samples from our dysplasia consultation. In addition to the well described HPV, e.g., HPV 16 and HPV 31, we detected further HPV subtypes with higher incidences in the investigated areas (e.g., HPV 53 and HPV 73) which may be evident for precursors and cancers of all areas.

Abstract

Background: Cancers and intraepithelial lesions of different anogenital areas as well as oral cancer are associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) infections. Methods: In this study cervical, vaginal, vulvar, anal, and oral samples were taken from 509 patients visiting our dysplasia consultation clinic. HPV genotyping was performed using the EUROArray HPV test. Results: Positivity of HR HPV was found in 60.4–64.3% of anogenital and 14.6% of oral samples. HPV 16 showed the highest incidence in all investigated areas. In cervical and vaginal samples HPV 31 was detected second most, while in vulvar, anal, and oral samples HPV 53 was the second most common subtype. HPV 18 was found lower in all areas, while HPV 51, HPV 52, and HPV 73 were detected higher than expected from published data. A good concordance between cervical, vaginal and vulvar samples was examined for most of the HPV. HR HPV infection was higher in cervical cancer (CC; 91.7%) and high-grade intraepithelial squamous lesions (HSIL; 93.9%) compared to low-grade SIL (LSIL; 69.6%) and normal samples (44.8%). Conclusion: In addition to the well described HPV subtypes, we found others with high incidences in the investigated areas which may be evident for HSIL and CC of those areas.

False Negative Results in Cervical Cancer Screening-Risks, Reasons and Implications for Clinical Practice and Public Health

False negative (FN) results in cervical cancer (CC) screening pose serious risks to women. We present a comprehensive literature review on the risks and reasons of obtaining the FN results of primary CC screening tests and triage methods and discuss their clinical and public health impact and implications. Misinterpretation or true lack of abnormalities on a slide are the reasons of FN results in cytology and p16/Ki-67 dual-staining. For high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) molecular tests, those include: truly non-HPV-associated tumors, lesions driven by low-risk HPV types, and clearance of HPV genetic material before sampling. Imprecise disease threshold definition lead to FN results in visual inspection with acetic acid. Lesions with a discrete colposcopic appearance are a source of FN in colposcopic procedures. For FAM19A4 and hsa-miR124-2 genes methylation, those may originate from borderline methylation levels. Histological misinterpretation, sampling, and laboratory errors also play a role in all types of CC screening, as well as reproducibility issue, especially in methods based on human-eye evaluation. Primary HPV-based screening combined with high quality-assured immunocytochemical and molecular triage methods seem to be an optimal approach. Colposcopy with histological evaluation remains the gold standard for diagnosis but requires quality protocols and assurance measures.

Determination of human papillomavirus type in archival tissue specimens of invasive cervical cancer using molecular mapping and E6/E7-based polymerase chain reaction

In our previous study, an L1-based human papillomavirus (HPV) test using liquid-based cytology revealed that some invasive cervical cancers (ICC) exhibited multiple HPV types or harbored no HPV DNA. Here, molecular mapping of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cancer tissue specimens from the same patients were conducted to confirm these observations. Among 377 ICC cases, 73 eligible specimens (9 positive for multiple HPV types, 16 negative for HPV, and 48 positive for a single HPV type from the previous study) were reexamined by manual microdissection of cancer lesions, then subjected to HPV genotyping using the uniplex E6/E7 polymerase-chain-reaction method to detect all high-risk and potentially high-risk HPV types. The HPV typing results were confirmed in 52 of 73 cancer cases; among the 21 remaining cases, 15 were discordant and 6 were partially concordant. In total, 8 of 16 (50%) HPV-negative samples became positive; 6 were positive for HPV16 and 2 were positive for HPV67. Moreover, two samples previously positive for HPV6 and HPV53 were negative for HPV. All nine cancers with multiple HPV types were found to harbor only a single HPV type. In total, 63 cancer tissues exhibited a single HPV type. HPV16 and HPV18 were detected in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC). Alpha-5 (HPV82), -6 (HPV56), and -9 (HPV31/52/67) HPV types were detected in SCC, whereas Alpha-7 (HPV59/68) types were detected in ADC and adenosquamous carcinoma (ADSCC). These findings suggested that the different HPV types induced different histological cancers. Furthermore, all SCCs and 10 of 11 usual-type ADCs were positive for high-risk HPV types, supporting the use of HPV screening for the detection of these cancers and associated premalignant lesions. HPV16 is likely to remain undetected in some cervical cancer tissues because of low viral-copy-numbers. Putative high-risk HPV types (e.g., HPV67 and HPV82) might be high risk in Japan.

The clinical utility of extended high-risk HPV genotyping in risk-stratifying women with L-SIL cytology: A retrospective study of 8726 cases

BACKGROUND

The value of extended high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) genotyping for cervical cancer screening in women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (L-SIL) cytology has been recognized, but few studies have investigated this.

METHODS

Women with L-SIL Papanicolaou results who underwent human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping between October 2017 and October 2021 at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University were identified. Their HPV results were correlated with immediate histopathologic follow-up findings.

RESULTS

In total, 8726 women who had L-SIL cytology and extended HPV genotyping results were analyzed. The overall hrHPV-positive rate was 84% in women with L-SIL, and the most prevalent hrHPV genotypes were type 52 (HPV52) (20.7%), HPV53 (15.7%), and HPV16 (14.3%). Single and multiple coinfections of hrHPV genotypes were detected in 57.2% and 42.8% of women with positive hrHPV results, respectively. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade ≥2 (CIN2+) was identified in 8.5% of hrHPV-positive women. The CIN2+ detection rate in women who had multiple hrHPV infections (9.9%) was significantly higher than the rate in those who had infection with a single HPV type (7.2%). The top 5 CIN2+-associated HPV infections were HPV16 (25.2%), HPV82 (17.8%), HPV33 (16.3%), HPV31 (14.6%), and HPV26 (13.8%). For the composite group with HPV types HPV16, HPV26, HPV82, HPV31, HPV18, HPV33, HPV58, HPV35, HPV52, and HPV51, the risk of CIN2+ was 11.5% and represented 97.1% of all CIN2+ in biopsied, hrHPV-positive patients. The composite group of 8 remaining HPV genotypes (HPV39, HPV45, HPV53, HPV56, HPV59, HPV66, HPV68, and HPV73) was identified in 29.7% of hrHPV-positive patients, and the risk of CIN2+ for this composite group was similar to the risk of CIN2+ in hrHPV-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This large retrospective study in a predominantly unvaccinated cohort demonstrated that extended hrHPV genotyping improves genotype-specific risk stratification in women with L-SIL.

HPV16 and HPV18 type-specific APOBEC3 and integration profiles in different diagnostic categories of cervical samples

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 are the most predominant types in cervical cancer. Only a small fraction of HPV infections progress to cancer, indicating that additional factors and genomic events contribute to the carcinogenesis, such as minor nucleotide variation caused by APOBEC3 and chromosomal integration. We analysed intra-host minor nucleotide variants (MNVs) and integration in HPV16 and HPV18 positive cervical samples with different morphology. Samples were sequenced using an HPV whole genome sequencing protocol TaME-seq. A total of 80 HPV16 and 51 HPV18 positive samples passed the sequencing depth criteria of 300× reads, showing the following distribution: non-progressive disease (HPV16 n = 21, HPV18 n = 12); cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 (HPV16 n = 27, HPV18 n = 9); CIN3/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (HPV16 n = 27, HPV18 n = 30); cervical cancer (HPV16 n = 5). Similar numbers of MNVs in HPV16 and HPV18 samples were observed for most viral genes, with the exception of HPV18 E4 with higher numbers across clinical categories. APOBEC3 signatures were observed in HPV16 lesions, while similar mutation patterns were not detected for HPV18. The proportion of samples with integration was 13% for HPV16 and 59% for HPV18 positive samples, with a noticeable portion located within or close to cancer-related genes.

A Gene Signature Identifying CIN3 Regression and Cervical Cancer Survival

The purpose of this study was to establish a gene signature that may predict CIN3 regression and that may aid in selecting patients who may safely refrain from conization. Oncomine mRNA data including 398 immune-related genes from 21 lesions with confirmed regression and 28 with persistent CIN3 were compared. L1000 mRNA data from a cervical cancer cohort was available for validation (n = 239). Transcriptomic analyses identified TDO2 (p = 0.004), CCL5 (p < 0.001), CCL3 (p = 0.04), CD38 (p = 0.02), and PRF1 (p = 0.005) as upregulated, and LCK downregulated (p = 0.01) in CIN3 regression as compared to persistent CIN3 lesions. From these, a gene signature predicting CIN3 regression with a sensitivity of 91% (AUC = 0.85) was established. Transcriptomic analyses revealed proliferation as significantly linked to persistent CIN3. Within the cancer cohort, high regression signature score associated with immune activation by Gene Set enrichment Analyses (GSEA) and immune cell infiltration by histopathological evaluation (p < 0.001). Low signature score was associated with poor survival (p = 0.007) and large tumors (p = 0.01). In conclusion, the proposed six-gene signature predicts CIN regression and favorable cervical cancer prognosis and points to common drivers in precursors and cervical cancer lesions.

Reduced MAGI3 level by HPV18E6 contributes to Wnt/β-catenin signaling activation and cervical cancer progression

Human papillomavirus type 18 (HPV18) has high carcinogenic power in invasive cervical cancer (ICC) development. However, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. The carcinogenic properties of HPV18 require the PDZ‐binding motif of its E6 oncoprotein (HPV18 E6) to degrade its target PSD95/Dlg/ZO‐1 (PDZ) proteins. In this study, we demonstrated that the PDZ protein membrane‐associated guanylate kinase, WW and PDZ domain containing 3 (MAGI3) inhibited the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, and subsequently cervical cancer (CC) cell migration and invasion, via decreasing β‐catenin levels. By reducing MAGI3 protein levels, HPV18 E6 promoted CC cell migration and invasion through activation of Wnt/β‐catenin signaling. Furthermore, HPV18 rather than HPV16 was preferentially associated with the downregulation of MAGI3 and activation of the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in CC. These findings shed light on the mechanism that gives HPV18 its high carcinogenic potential in CC progression.

Precision Prevention: The 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors

The approach to cervical cancer prevention has evolved significantly over the past two decades. HPV immunization has decreased the specificity of screening modalities and HPV-based testing has been replacing our previously successful morphology-only approach. Additionally, there is much more emphasis on providing precision prevention, rather than the previously used “one-fits-all” management strategies. A number of new biomarkers are entering clinical practice and being integrated into cervical cancer screening and management in order to enable a more personalized assessment of the risk for precancer/cancer for an individual patient. The 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines expand on the concept of “equal management for equal risk”. They consider a patient’s history in addition to current test results to provide recommendations for increased surveillance/treatment in patients at higher risk for CIN3+ while minimizing interventions for lower-risk patients who have new versus persistent HPV infection. Clinical management decisions are based on immediate risk and 5-year risk estimates for CIN3+, which are determined by referencing an extensive risk table compiled by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The course of action for a given patient is recommended by comparison of the risk in the risk database, to the predetermined clinical action thresholds. These guidelines address the need for simplification and offer some stability for the provider while being conducive to the incorporation of anticipated continued technologic advances in methods for cervical cancer prevention. Their enduring nature will allow for changes needed based on risk reduction as HPV vaccination uptake increases and vaccinated women reach screening age. Similarly, the design allows for the addition of new tests into the risk assessment calculations after their approval by applicable regulatory agencies and review/consensus approval by the ASCCP new technology and enduring guidelines workgroups. As cytopathologists, we must be familiar with the scientific advancements in primary and secondary prevention, evolving screening and management guidelines, and participate actively in the multidisciplinary approach for the prevention of cervical cancer.

Human Papilloma Virus Frequency and Genotypes; Evaluation of the 4879 Screenings Made with Polymerase Chain Reaction and Chip Array Between 2001 and 2019 in Istanbul

Objectives:

The aim of this study is the documentation of human papilloma virus (HPV) frequency and types seen in the city of Istanbul, Turkey, as well as evaluation of the relationship between these subtypes and cytological and pathological diagnoses.

Methods:

4879 cases were studied in our molecular pathology department between 2001 and 2019 in Istanbul. Between 2001 and 2010, 1692 cases were screened for HPV 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, and 33 by conventional hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Since 2011, up to 49 HPV typing has been performed for 3187 cases with chip array. The cases were referred to the pathology center and the hospital pathology department by clinicians for screening before HPV vaccination and on the observation of precancerous changes and koilocyts in cytological-histopathological evaluations.

Results:

In this study, the frequency of HPV was found to be 10.8% (527 HPV-positive cases). Among these, 348 cases were high-risk groups, whether or not they were previously associated with a low-risk group. When we look at the distribution of the cases according to the high-risk HPV types, HPV 16 is the most common type. The frequencies of occurrence of other HPV types are as following: HPV–16: 41.7%, HPV–31: 11.7%, HPV–52: 7.9%, HPV–51: 7.1%, HPV–33: 6.9%, HPV–45: 6.5%, HPV–18: 6.3%, HPV–39: 6.1%, and HPV–58: 5.8%. It was further found that multiple infections were 28% of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases. HPV frequency was 38% and 72%, respectively, in cases with cytologically or histopathological precancerous, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and HSIL changes. As a final note, HPV was detected in 9 of 10 cases with cervical cancer (90%). Only 1 adenocarcinoma case detected in the series was a double infection with HPV types 18 and 45.

Conclusion:

HPV 16 was the most common type found in this study. It is followed by types 31, 52, 51, 33, 45, 18, 39, and 58, respectively. The most common association observed in double infections was between HPV 16 and 58. It was also observed that the incidence of HPV in the city of Istanbul, Turkey, was similar to other developed countries. As a final note, in addition to screening tests, PCR and chip array studies should be conducted and the community should be informed about preventive medicine and the importance of condom use.

Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or higher (CIN3+) among women with HPV-test in 1990-1992, a 30-year follow-up study

Background/objective

Having a 30-year follow-up of a cohort of women tested for HPV is a unique opportunity to further study long-term risk of CIN3+. The study objective was to compare HPV status at baseline with the risk of CIN3+ in the follow-up period of 30 years.

Methods

All women (n = 642) referred to the HPV outpatient clinic at the University Hospital of North Norway (UNN) in 1990–1992, with an HPV test at baseline, were included in a prospective cohort. HPV-testing was performed by two different HPV-DNA tests, and genotypes 6, 11, 16, 18, 31 and 33 were identified. High-risk (HR) HPV genotypes (16, 18, 31 and 33) were classified as HPV positive, whereas low-risk (LR) genotypes (6 and 11) in addition to absent HPV were classified as HPV negative. A single cohort in which women were classified for their HPV status underwent follow-up prospectively to the last time-point of observation of 30 years.

Results

During follow-up, 148 (148/642) cases of CIN3+ were detected, of whom 70.3% (104/148) were HPV positive and 29.7% (44/148) were HPV negative at baseline. The proportions of women who developed CIN3+ following a positive and a negative test were 46.6% (104/223) and 10.5% (44/419), respectively. Most cases of CIN3+ were seen shortly after the baseline HPV test, with 112 cases of CIN3+ diagnosed within the first year. In total, 48.6% (72/148) with HPV 16 and 57.6% (19/33) with HPV 33 developed CIN3+. Within the first year, CIN3+ was detected in 37.8% (56/148) with HPV 16, and 51.5% (17/33) with HPV 33. The long-term risk of CIN3+ was significantly lower than the short-term risk, and mainly associated with HPV 16. Overall, eight cases of cervical cancer were detected. Five were HPV positive, harboured HPV 16 at baseline and developed cervical cancer after 3, 4, 5, 11 and 24 years of follow-up.

Conclusion and consequences

HPV status at baseline is predictive for the subsequent risk of developing CIN3+. Women with a positive HPV test in 1990–1992 had a significantly higher risk of CIN3+ during 30 years of follow-up than those with a negative test. HPV 16 was associated with the greatest long-term risk of cervical cancer. All patients with a positive HPV test at baseline should be followed up until negative.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, ISRCTN10836802. Registered 14 December 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13027-021-00386-z.

Cric searchable image database as a public platform for conventional pap smear cytology data

Amidst the current health crisis and social distancing, telemedicine has become an important part of mainstream of healthcare, and building and deploying computational tools to support screening more efficiently is an increasing medical priority. The early identification of cervical cancer precursor lesions by Pap smear test can identify candidates for subsequent treatment. However, one of the main challenges is the accuracy of the conventional method, often subject to high rates of false negative. While machine learning has been highlighted to reduce the limitations of the test, the absence of high-quality curated datasets has prevented strategies development to improve cervical cancer screening. The Center for Recognition and Inspection of Cells (CRIC) platform enables the creation of CRIC Cervix collection, currently with 400 images (1,376 × 1,020 pixels) curated from conventional Pap smears, with manual classification of 11,534 cells. This collection has the potential to advance current efforts in training and testing machine learning algorithms for the automation of tasks as part of the cytopathological analysis in the routine work of laboratories.

Characterization of HPV subtypes not covered by the nine-valent vaccine in patients with CIN 2-3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As the second most common female malignant tumor, cervical cancer is also one of the most preventable and avoidable cancers. The World Health Organization has launched a global plan to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer. Therefore, in the era of postvaccine, the role of HPV subtypes in cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer that are not covered by vaccine should be further discussed. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of HPV subtypes not covered by the nine-valent vaccine in high-grade cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 5220 patients with an HPV infection who were diagnosed and treated in the Department of Gynecology of Shanghai General Hospital between October 2016 and February 2020. In addition, the clinical characteristics of the biopsy results of 470 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 and 205 cases of cervical squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among patients with HPV subtype infection not covered by the nine-valent vaccine, univariate analysis showed that compared with patients with CIN 2-3, age ≥ 50, not using condom and TCT reported as ASC-H were risk factors for cervical squamous cell carcinoma (P < 0.05). The detection rates of HPV subtype not covered by the nine-valent vaccine in CIN 2-3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma patients were 7.23% and 6.34%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CIN 2-3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma, the infection rates of HPV subtype not covered by the nine-valent vaccine were 7.23% and 6.34%, respectively. With the increasing popularity of the vaccine, the infection rates of the corresponding HPV subtype decreased; however, HPV subtype infection not covered by the nine-valent vaccine should not be ignored.

Real-World Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Against Cervical Cancer

BACKGROUND

The primary goal of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination is to reduce morbidity and mortality from HPV-associated disease, especially cervical cancer. We determined the real-world effectiveness of HPV vaccination against cervical cancer.

METHODS

The study included women aged 17-30 years living in Denmark October 2006-December 2019. From nationwide registries, information on HPV vaccination and cervical cancer diagnoses were retrieved. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cervical cancer according to vaccination status were estimated using Poisson regression with HPV vaccination treated as a time-varying variable and stratified by age at vaccination. We adjusted for attained age, education, and ethnicity. To address the effect of prevalent disease, different buffer periods were used, with 1-year buffer period as primary analysis.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 867 689 women. At baseline, 36.3% were vaccinated at age 16 years and younger, and during follow-up, 19.3% and 2.3% were vaccinated at ages 17-19 years and 20-30 years, respectively. For women vaccinated at ages 16 years and younger or 17-19 years, the IRRs of cervical cancer were 0.14 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.53) and 0.32 (95% CI = 0.08 to 1.28), respectively, compared with unvaccinated women. In women aged 20-30 years at vaccination, the incidence rate was higher than among unvaccinated women (IRR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.79) but slightly decreased with increasing buffer period (IRR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.32, with 4-year buffer period).

CONCLUSION

HPV vaccine effectiveness against cervical cancer at the population level is high among girls vaccinated younger than age 20 years. The lack of immediate effect in women vaccinated at age 20-30 years points to the importance of early age at vaccination.

Diagnostic value of high-risk human papillomavirus viral load on cervical lesion assessment and ASCUS triage

This study aims to evaluate HR‐HPV viral load in the cervical lesion assessment and its diagnostic value on the triage of ASCUS. The three‐step protocol for cervical cancer screening was carried out in 5171 patients from June 2017 to August 2019, and 1620 histopathological results were obtained. The positive rate of HR‐HPV and TCT increased with the aggravation of pathological grades of cervical lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of HR‐HPV (DH3) to detect CIN II+ were 91.91% and 84.46%, respectively. In comparison, the corresponding results of the cytology test were 80.51% and 83.12%. HPV16/18 viral load was positively correlated with the grade of cervical lesions (p < 0.001, r = 0.321). The diagnostic efficiency of AUC by applying HPV16/18 viral load was 0.682 for the diagnosis of CIN II+. The optimal HPV16/18 viral load for predicting CIN II+ was 6.80 RLU/CO (relative light units/cut‐off), with corresponding sensitivity of 48.6%, specificity of 79.7%, and Youden index of 0.283. In the ASCUS population, viral loads were statistically different in HPV16/18 and the other 12 HR‐HPV when compared cervicitis group with CIN I group and CIN II+ group (all p < 0.05). Statistical differences were detected concerning HPV16/18 viral load, contact bleeding status, and smoking status when compared cervicitis group with CIN I group and CIN II+ group (p < 0.05), with a corresponding odds ratio of 1.004, 1.533, and 5.513, respectively. Our findings suggest that HR‐HPV viral load can be regarded as a useful tool to predict the grade of cervical lesions for ASCUS triage.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03178136.

Contributions of Liquid-Based (Papanicolaou) Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Testing in Cotesting for Detection of Cervical Cancer and Precancer in the United States

Objectives

Given the recent debate challenging the contribution of cytology in cervical screening, we evaluated results of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in cotesting preceding cervical cancer (CxCa) and precancer diagnoses in a national, heterogeneous population.

Methods

We assessed the results of cotesting, performed by Quest Diagnostics, in 13,633,071 women 30 years and older, tested 2010 to 2018. Cotest results preceding CxCa or precancer diagnoses were analyzed and stratified by histopathology.

Results

Among all screening results, 1,615 cotests preceded 1,259 CxCa diagnoses, and 11,164 cotests preceded 8,048 cervical precancer diagnoses. More women who were subsequently diagnosed with CxCa within 1 year were identified by the LBC result than by the HPV result (85.1%, 1,015/1,193 vs 77.5%, 925/1,193). Among all women with CxCa, the overall rate of nondetection was 13.1% (212/1,615) for cotesting results (LBC negative/HPV negative) and this rate increased substantially when testing exceeded 12 months compared to within 1 year prediagnosis of either CxCa or precancer.

Conclusions

Analysis of 9-year cotest results from a national reference laboratory confirms the value of LBC element in cotesting. This supports that LBC/HPV cotesting enhances screening for the identification of CxCa in women 30 years and older, more so than LBC or HPV alone within cotesting.

Prevalence and distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in China: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Data on type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) are needed to investigate HPV-based screening tests and HPV vaccines. However, Chinese relevant data are insufficient. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to summarize and demonstrate the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and compensate for the shortage of HPV vaccines in China.

METHODS

The Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, as well as references cited in the selected studies, were systematically searched for studies investigating the prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes between January 2000 and April 2019 in China.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies were identified, which comprised 2950 patients with CIN1 and 5393 with CIN2/3. The overall HPV infection rate was 84.37%. The HPV infection rate was significantly higher in the CIN2/3 group (87.00%) than in the CIN1 group (79.56%) (χ2 = 80.095, P < 0.001). The most common HPV types in CIN1 in order of decreasing prevalence were as follows: HPV52 (20.31%), HPV16 (16.81%), HPV58 (14.44%), HPV18 (6.44%), and HPV53 (5.76%). However, in the CIN2/3 group, HPV16 (45.69%) was the predominant type, followed by HPV58 (15.50%), HPV52 (11.74%), HPV33 (9.35%), and HPV31 (4.34%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that HPV16, HPV52, and HPV58 were the top three types of CIN in China. The findings might provide a reference for future HPV-based cervical cancer screening tests, treatment of HPV infection, and application of HPV vaccines in China.

Factors predicting the spontaneous regression of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL/CIN2)

PURPOSE

To determine clinical, pathological and virological factors predicting the spontaneous regression of HSIL/CIN2.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 73 patients with HSIL/CIN2 diagnosed by biopsy between 2012 and 2016 and followed-up without treatment in the department of gynecology at Bordeaux University Hospital. All biopsies sampled inside or outside our department were reviewed and immunolabelled for p16 and Ki67. The response rate was the regression or the disappearance of HSIL/CIN2 as defined by the regression or the disappearance of initial colposcopic findings, cytological and/or histological results.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of CIN2 was confirmed in 63 of 70 biopsies available for review. The Cohen's kappa coefficient was κ = 90%, indicating almost perfect inter-observer agreement. The lesion spontaneously regressed or disappeared in 36 of 60 patients (60%) with confirmed CIN2 during a median follow-up of 20 months (range 6-55). Baseline factors influencing the response rate were colposcopic findings (69% with minor change vs 31% with major change, p = 0.033), cytological results (72% with ASCUS/LSIL vs 28% with ASC-H/HSIL, p = 0.018), and HPV genotyping (71% with HPV not 16 vs 42% with HPV-16, p = 0.027). The other factors (age, smoking, surface area of the lesion, p16 and Ki67 expressions) did not significantly influence the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Colposcopic findings, cytological results, and HPV genotyping were baseline factors predicting spontaneous regression of HSIL/CIN2.

Assessment of Cervical Cancer Molecular-Based Screening Tools; HPV-DNA Detection versus E6/E7 mRNA Testing; First Report of a Prospective Cohort Study among Iranian Women

Background:

Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been found as the most considerable causes of cervical cancer. Recently, several molecular methods have been introduced to increase the accuracy of the screening programs and decrease the mortality rate. Among these methods, mRNA-based methods have more advantages as they assess the expression level of HPV E6 and E7 oncogenic mRNAs. This study aimed to evaluate the results of HPV RNA- and DNA-based methods among Iranian women population with normal cytology results.

Methods:

Overall, 4640 women were enrolled referred to the Gynecology Oncology Ward of Vali-e-Asr Hospital, private and academic clinics, Tehran, Iran from Jan 2016 to Apr 2018. To assess the HPV-DNA infection INNO-LiPA® HPV Genotyping Extra-II kit was used. For HPV-RNA assessment, Aptima HPV Assay and in house HPV-RNA genotyping methods were applied.

Results:

The positivity rates of HPV infection according to DNA- and RNA-based methods were 18.0% and 11.2%, respectively (P<0.001). The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, specificity and sensitivity of DNA-based method in contrast with RNA-based method were 59.2% (56.6–61.6), 99.4% (99.0–99.6), 91.7% (90.8–92.6) and 95.2% (93.0–96.9) respectively.

Conclusion:

At the present study for prognosis of cervical cancer, RNA-based method seemed to be more specific in contrast to DNA-based method. Patient follow up and further studies will be conducted in order to clarify the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the two methods.

Role of human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the well‐established etiologic factor for cervical neoplasia. Cervical conization constitutes an effective treatment for high‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG‐CIN). We conducted an observational study for long‐term outcomes and HPV genotype changes after conization for HG‐CIN. Between 2008 and 2014, patients with newly diagnosed HG‐CIN before conization (surveillance new [SN] group) and those who had undergone conization without hysterectomy (surveillance previous [SP] group) were enrolled. HPV testing and Pap smear were performed periodically for the SN and SP (collectively S) groups. All other patients receiving conization for HG‐CIN during the study period were identified from our hospital database. Those eligible but not enrolled into our study were assigned to the non‐surveillance (non‐S) group. For the S group (n = 493), the median follow‐up period was 74.3 months. Eighty‐four cases had recurrent CIN Grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) (5‐year cumulative rate: 14.8%), of which six had invasive cancer. Among the 84 patients, 65 (77.4%) exhibited type‐specific persistence in the paired HPV results, whereas only 7 (8.3%) harbored new HPV types that belonged to the 9‐valent vaccine types. Among the 7397 non‐S patients, 789 demonstrated recurrent CIN2+, of which 57 had invasive cancer. The stages distribution of those progressed to invasive cancer in the non‐S group were more advanced than the S group (P = .033). Active surveillance might reduce the severity of those progressed to cancer. Because a majority of the patients with recurrent CIN2+ had persistent type‐specific HPV infections, effective therapeutic vaccines are an unmet medical need.

What's new?

High‐grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG‐CIN), a cervical carcinoma precursor, frequently is caused by high‐risk human papillomavirus (hr‐HPV) infection. HG‐CIN can be treated by cervical conization, though the procedure does not eradicate hr‐HPV, potentially enabling CIN recurrence. Here, in Taiwanese patients, investigation of HPV genotype changes in relation to HG‐CIN status after conization shows that 77.4 percent of patients with recurrent CIN 2 grade or worse (CIN2+) after conization had persistent type‐specific HPV infections. Vaccination against the remaining high‐risk HPVs prevented recurrent CIN2+ in only 8.3 percent of patients, revealing an unmet need for effective therapeutic vaccines.

Molecular and pathological basis of HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinoma seen in a global study

International surveys find HPV-negativity in up to 30% of cervical adenocarcinomas. We investigated the pathological diagnosis by expert consensus with immunohistochemistry and the presence of somatic mutations in recognised tumour genes in HPV-positive and negative cervical adenocarcinomas (CADC). A sample was selected of 45 paraffin-embedded cervical blocks diagnosed locally as usual cervical adenocarcinoma from a global study. These represented different diagnoses made at previous diagnostic review and HPV status. All were suitable for analysis for somatic tumour associated gene mutations. Three pathologists examined H/E slides and immunohistochemistry for p16, progesterone receptor and p53 and classified the cases. L1 genes from high-risk HPVs and low-risk HPVs were analysed by SPF10 PCR-DEIA-LiPA25 version 1 in whole tissue sections and microdissected tumour and retested by PCR for E6/E7 genes of hrHPVs if negative. Cases were analysed for microsatellite instability and next-generation sequencing mutation analysis. From the 45 cases, 20 cases of usual CADC were confirmed of which 17 (85%) were HPV-positive in tumour cells. The other 25 cases were reclassified as endometrial, serous, clear-cell and gastric-type adenocarcinomas and all were HPV-negative in tumour cells. Careful retesting for HPV DNA and IHC leads to more accurate identification of HPV-positive usual cervical adenocarcinomas. Endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas, other uterine adenocarcinoma with multiple somatic mutations were important in misclassification of HPV-negative cases locally managed as cervical adenocarcinoma, as was gastric-type adenocarcinoma with germline STK11 mutation in East Asia. Few consensuses confirmed HPV-negative usual cervical adenocarcinomas showed somatic tumorigenic mutations also seen in some HPV-positive usual CADC.

Health disparities in cervical cancer: Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cytologic diagnoses according to race

BACKGROUND

In the United States, the rate of cervical cancer is disproportionally higher in Hispanic and Black women compared with White women. In the current study, the authors compared human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytology results among Black and White women over a 24-month period. They then assessed the rates in young women in 2011 compared with 2017 according to race.

METHODS

The authors searched the gynecologic cytology case files for Black and White women treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital across all ages for a period of 24 months (2017-2019) and compared HPV results and cytologic interpretations. They then compared results among Black and White cohorts of young women (aged 21-29 years) in 2011 versus 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 26,302 specimens from January 2017 to January 2019, including 11,676 Black women and 14,626 White women, were reviewed. The most common HPV genotype(s) detected were non-HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 (non-16/18) high-risk HPV (hrHPV) (84% of positive results). Non-16/18 hrHPV was more common in Black women (1309 women; 15%) compared with White women (1075 women; 9%). Non-16/18 hrHPV was more commonly observed in association with atypical squamous cells, cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and/or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H/HSIL) in HPV-positive Black women compared with White women (P = .007). Black women were found to have higher rates of HPV-positive Papanicolaou results and high-grade lesions, including carcinoma (P < .01). In the 2011 cohort, young Black women were found to have a higher rate of ASC-H/HSIL (P = .003) compared with White women. However, the difference was not noted in the 2017 cohort. There was a decrease in ASC-H/HSIL in 2017 compared with 2011, with a lower incidence of ASC-H/HSIL noted among Black women in 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women appear to have a higher incidence of higher grade lesions, but the difference between Black and White cohorts was not found to be significant in young women in more recent years.

The role of human papillomavirus genotyping for detecting high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer in HPV-positive women with normal cytology: a study from a hospital in northeastern China

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is more sensitive than cytology for detecting cervical cancer and its precursors. This study aimed to analyze the prevalence of high-risk HPV genotypes and evaluate the role of HPV genotyping triage for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, adenocarcinoma in situ and cervical cancer (HSIL+) in HPV-positive women with normal cytology.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed in women who had undergone co-screening at the China Medical University-affiliated Shengjing Hospital between 2012 and 2014.

Results

Of the 34,587 women, 2665 HPV-positive women with normal cytology who had received colposcopy were eligible for analysis. In HSIL+ groups of 204 women, the common genotypes were HPV16, HPV52, HPV58, HPV33, HPV31 and HPV18 in order of prevalence. The proportion of histological HSIL+ in women infected with HPV33 or HPV31 was not significantly different compared to women infected with HPV16 (P = 0.30, P = 0.19, respectively). The odds ratios for histological HSIL+ were 3.26 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.41–4.40) in women with HPV16/18, 4.21 (95% CI: 2.99–5.93) in those with HPV16/18/31/33, and 5.73 (95% CI: 3.30–9.97) in those with HPV16/18/31/33/52/58. Including HPV31/33 genotyping together with HPV16/18 significantly increased the proportion of HSIL+ detection from 63.2 to 77.5% (P = 0.002) without significantly increasing the colposcopy per HSIL+ detection ratio (7.7 to 8.1, P = 0.66).

Conclusions

HPV genotyping played an important role in managing HPV-positive women with normal cytology. Genotyping for HPV31/33 should be added to the previously recommended HPV16/18 genotyping in triaging HPV-positive women in northeastern China.

Impact of the Current US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations for Cervical Cancer Screening in Young Women 21 to 29 Years Old

OBJECTIVES

In 2012, the US Preventive Services Task Force decreased the recommended frequency of cervical cytology screening to once every 3 years and recommended against testing women younger than 21 years regardless of sexual history. We evaluated the impact of this in 21 to 29-year-old women at a tertiary care academic medical center in 2011 and 2017.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed Papanicolaou test results at two time points in 21- to 29-year-old women.

RESULTS

There was a decrease in the number of high-grade lesions in 21- to 25-year-old women (odds ratio [OR], 0.36) from 2011 to 2017. Within the 26- to 29-year-old patient group, there was a trend toward a higher percentage of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in 2017 compared to 2011 on cytology, which did not reach statistical significance (OR, 1.46). However, follow-up histologic specimens showed a higher percentage of HSIL in 2017 compared to 2011 in this age group (OR, 2.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the cervical cancer screening guidelines introduced in 2012 have not had a detrimental impact on the outcomes of cervical cancer screening for 21- to 25-year-old women. However, we need to continue monitoring the effects of decreased screening in 26- to 29-year-old women.

Application of deep learning to the classification of uterine cervical squamous epithelial lesion from colposcopy images combined with HPV types

The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of using deep learning, such as artificial intelligence (AI), to classify cervical squamous epithelial lesions (SILs) from colposcopy images combined with human papilloma virus (HPV) types. Among 330 patients who underwent colposcopy and biopsy performed by gynecological oncologists, a total of 253 patients with confirmed HPV typing tests were enrolled in the present study. Of these patients, 210 were diagnosed with high-grade SIL (HSIL) and 43 were diagnosed with low-grade SIL (LSIL). An original AI classifier with a convolutional neural network catenating with an HPV tensor was developed and trained. The accuracy of the AI classifier and gynecological oncologists was 0.941 and 0.843, respectively. The AI classifier performed better compared with the oncologists, although not significantly. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden's J index and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve ± standard error for AI colposcopy combined with HPV types and pathological results were 0.956 (43/45), 0.833 (5/6), 0.977 (43/44), 0.714 (5/7), 0.789 and 0.963±0.026, respectively. Although further study is required, the clinical use of AI for the classification of HSIL/LSIL by both colposcopy and HPV type may be feasible.

Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Women treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (grade 2 or 3) are at elevated risk for developing cervical cancer. Suggested factors identifying women at highest risk for recurrence post-therapeutically include incomplete lesion excision, lesion location, size and severity, older age, treatment modality, and presence of high-risk human papilloma virus after treatment. This question has been intensively investigated over decades, but there is still substantial debate as to which of these factors or combination of factors most accurately predict treatment failure.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we examine the long-term risk of residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women previously treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 and how this varies according to margin status (considering also location), as well as comorbidity (conditions assumed to interact with high-risk human papilloma virus acquisition and/or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progression), posttreatment presence of high-risk human papilloma virus, and other factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 991 women with histopathologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 who underwent conization in 2000-2007. Information on the primary histopathologic finding, treatment modality, comorbidity, age, and high-risk human papilloma virus status during follow-up, and residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was obtained from the Swedish National Cervical Screening Registry and medical records. Cumulative incidence of residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves, with determinants assessed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

During a median of 10 years and maximum of 16 years of follow-up, 111 patients were diagnosed with residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse. Women with positive/uncertain margins had a higher risk of residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse than women with negative margins, adjusting for potential confounders (hazard ratio, 2.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.81-3.93). The risk of residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse varied by anatomical localization of the margins (endocervical: hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-4.41) and both endo- and ectocervical (hazard ratio, 4.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.85-8.71). The risk did not increase significantly when only ectocervical margins were positive or uncertain. The presence of comorbidity (autoimmune disease, human immunodeficiency viral infection, hepatitis B and/or C, malignancy, diabetes, genetic disorder, and/or organ transplant) was also a significant independent predictor of residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse. In women with positive high-risk human papilloma virus findings during follow-up, the hazard ratio of positive/uncertain margins for recurrent/residual high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse increased significantly compared to that in women with positive high-risk human papilloma virus findings but negative margins.

CONCLUSION

Patients with incompletely excised cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 are at increased risk for residual/recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse. Margin status combined with high-risk human papilloma virus results and consideration of comorbidity may increase the accuracy for predicting treatment failure.

Distribution of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Genotypes and Multiple Infections in Preneoplastic and Neoplastic Cervical Lesions of Unvaccinated Women: A Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the distribution of high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and the role of multiple infection in preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions, according to histology, age, and the number of genotypes per infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine hundred eighty-eight women affected by known HPV-related cervical lesions and attending the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from December 2006 to December 2014, were selected for a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of HPV genotypes was calculated by histology and the number of genotypes per infection. Univariate and multivariable cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 versus CIN 1 risks were estimated by logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, HPV 16 (53.1%), HPV 31 (15.1%), and HPV 58 (6.4%) were the most frequent genotypes in precancerous lesions. At multivariable analysis, HPV 16 (p = .02), 18 (p = .013), and 56 (p = .01) were significantly associated to worsen histology, whereas HPV 39 (p = .03) and 45 (p = .03) were statistically correlated only to the increasing number of genotypes per infections. Human papillomavirus 33 was the only genotype significantly related to both the number of genotypes per infection (p = .005) and age (p = .03). Infections by HR-HPV (odds ratio [OR] = 9.48, 95% CI = 3.77-23.8, p < .001), HPV genotypes covered by current vaccines (OR = 6.28, 95% CI = 4.05-9.75, p < .001), single HPV genotype (OR = 8.13, 95% CI = 4.12-16.0, p < .001), as well as age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07-1.19, p < .001) were significantly associated to higher risk of CIN 2-3.

CONCLUSIONS

The most of CIN 2+ lesions are sustained by HR-HPV genotypes, especially the ones covered by 9-valent vaccine; therefore, the widespread use of prophylactic HPV vaccines could significantly reduce the incidence of preneoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions.

Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18/45 Genotyping-Directed Follow-up of Women With Messenger RNA HPV-Positive, Cytology-Negative Cervical Screening Test Results

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we sought to correlate genotype test results for human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16, 18, and 45 with histopathologic follow-up diagnoses in patients with messenger RNA (mRNA) high-risk HPV-positive, cytology-negative results.

METHODS

We identified 1,157 patients with mRNA HPV-positive, cytology-negative cervical screening test results between June 2015 and June 2018. Reflex HPV 16/18/45 genotype results were documented in 1,018 women aged 30 years or older, 318 of whom had follow-up within 18 months.

RESULTS

Histopathologic findings of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse (CIN2+) were diagnosed in 14 of 122 (11.5%) patients positive for HPV 16/18/45 vs in seven of 196 (3.6%) HPV 16/18/45-negative patients. Three patients with high-risk HPV-positive, cytology-negative cervical screening test results were diagnosed with stage I cervical adenocarcinomas following early colposcopic referral and biopsy after HPV 16/18/45-positive genotype results.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate reflex HPV 16/18/45 genotyping of mRNA HPV-positive, cytology-negative patients led to early colposcopic referral and histopathologic diagnoses of three difficult-to-detect, low-stage, cervical adenocarcinomas and significantly increased overall early detection of CIN2+ lesions.

Alinity m HR HPV Assay Fulfills Criteria for Human Papillomavirus Test Requirements in Cervical Cancer Screening Settings

The Alinity m HR HPV assay (Alinity) is a novel human papillomavirus (HPV) assay that individually identifies genotypes HPV16, HPV18, and HPV45 while reporting on 11 other high-risk HPV (hrHPV) genotypes in two aggregates: HPV31/33/52/58 and HPV35/39/51/56/59/66/68. The clinical performance of Alinity for screening for cervical cancer was evaluated in population-based settings. For women aged ≥30 years, the clinical sensitivity (n = 68) and specificity (n = 3,077) for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) of Alinity were 100.0% and 92.4%, respectively, and were not inferior to those of the Qiagen Digene Hybrid Capture 2 high-risk HPV DNA assay (hc2) (P = 0.0006 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The intralaboratory reproducibility and interlaboratory agreement of Alinity were 96.7% (kappa, 0.92) and 98.7% (kappa, 0.97), respectively. In the group ≥30 years of age, women who were baseline hrHPV negative had a lower risk for CIN2+ at 3 years using Alinity (0.04%) than those with a normal baseline cytology (0.65%) and had a risk comparable to that determined by the Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV assay (0.04%), hc2 (0.08%), or the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV assay (0.04%). High-risk HPV16/18 infection was associated with a significantly higher baseline and 3-year CIN2+ and CIN3+ risk than the absence of HPV16/18 or the presence of hrHPVs at the baseline (all P values were <0.05). The baseline CIN2+ risk was 8.8% for those with HPV31/33/52/58 infection and 2.5% for those with HPV35/39/51/56/59/66/68 infection, while the 3-year CIN2+ risk was 17.0% and 4.9%, respectively (relative risk, 3.4 [P = 0.03] and 3.5 [P = 0.003], respectively), suggesting that extended genotyping by Alinity may be valuable in improving patient risk stratification. Alinity fulfills international consensus guideline criteria for primary cervical cancer screening and can be considered clinically validated, demonstrating safety comparable to that of other clinically validated HPV tests.

Invasive cervical tumors with high and low HPV titer represent molecular subgroups with different disease etiology

Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) with very low titer of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) has worse clinical outcome than cases with high titer, indicating a difference in molecular etiology. Fresh-frozen ICC tumors (n = 49) were classified into high- and low-HPV-titer cases using real-time PCR-based HPV genotyping. The mutation spectra were studied using the AmpliSeq Comprehensive Cancer Panel and the expression profiles using total RNA sequencing, and the results were validated using the AmpliSeq Transcriptome assay. HPV DNA genotyping and RNA sequencing showed that 16.6% of ICC tumors contained very low levels of HPV DNA and HPV transcripts. Tumors with low HPV levels had more mutations with a high allele frequency and fewer mutations with low allele frequency relative to tumors with high HPV titer. A number of genes showed significant expression differences between HPV titer groups, including genes with somatic mutations. Gene ontology and pathway analyses implicated the enrichment of genes involved in DNA replication, cell cycle control and extracellular matrix in tumors with low HPV titer. The results indicate that in low titer tumors, HPVs act as trigger of cancer development whereas somatic mutations are clonally selected and become drivers of the tumor development process. In contrast, in tumors with high HPV titer the expression of HPV oncoproteins plays a major role in tumor development and the many low frequency somatic mutations represent passengers. This putative subdivision of invasive cervical tumors may explain the higher radiosensitivity of ICC tumors with high HPV titer and thereby have consequences for clinical management.