1
|
Ledda RE, Funk GC, Sverzellati N. The pros and cons of lung cancer screening. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10939-6. [PMID: 39014085 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10939-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Several trials have shown that low-dose computed tomography-based lung cancer screening (LCS) allows a substantial reduction in lung cancer-related mortality, carrying the potential for other clinical benefits. There are, however, some uncertainties to be clarified and several aspects to be implemented to optimize advantages and minimize the potential harms of LCS. This review summarizes current evidence on LCS, discussing some of the well-established and potential benefits, including lung cancer (LC)-related mortality reduction and opportunity for smoking cessation interventions, as well as the disadvantages of LCS, such as overdiagnosis and overtreatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Different perspectives are provided on LCS based on the updated literature. KEY POINTS: Lung cancer is a leading cancer-related cause of death and screening should reduce associated mortality. This review summarizes current evidence related to LCS. Several aspects need to be implemented to optimize benefits and minimize potential drawbacks of LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georg-Christian Funk
- Department of Medicine II with Pneumology, Karl Landsteiner Institute for Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nicola Sverzellati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McInnerney D, Simmonds I, Hancock N, Rogerson S, Lindop J, Gabe R, Vulkan D, Marshall C, Crosbie PAJ, Callister MEJ, Quaife SL. Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST) pathway navigation study: a protocol for a nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a pathway navigation intervention on lung cancer screening uptake. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e084577. [PMID: 38986555 PMCID: PMC11243133 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death globally. In 2022 the UK National Screening Committee recommended the implementation of a national targeted lung cancer screening programme, aiming to improve early diagnosis and survival rates. Research studies and services internationally consistently observe socioeconomic and smoking-related inequalities in screening uptake. Pathway navigation (PN) is a process through which a trained pathway navigator guides people to overcome barriers to accessing healthcare services, including screening. This nested randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether a PN intervention results in more individuals participating in lung cancer screening compared with the usual written invitation within a previous non-responder population as part of the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST). METHODS AND ANALYSIS A two-arm randomised controlled trial and process evaluation nested within the YLST. Participants aged 55-80 (inclusive) who have not responded to previous postal invitations to screening will be randomised by household to receive PN or usual care (a further postal invitation to contact the screening service for a lung health check) between March 2023 and October 2024. The PN intervention includes a postal appointment notification and prearranged telephone appointment, during which a pathway navigator telephones the participant, following a four-step protocol to introduce the offer and conduct an initial risk assessment. If eligible, participants are invited to book a low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening scan. All pathway navigators receive training from behavioural psychologists on motivational interviewing and communication techniques to elicit barriers to screening attendance and offer solutions. COPRIMARY OUTCOMES The number undergoing initial telephone assessment of lung cancer risk. The number undergoing an LDCT screening scan.Secondary outcomes include demographic, clinical and risk parameters of people undergoing telephone risk assessment; the number of people eligible for screening following telephone risk assessment; the number of screen-detected cancers diagnosed; costs and a mixed-methods process evaluation.Descriptive analyses will be used to present numbers, proportions and quantitative components of the process evaluation. Primary comparisons of differences between groups will be made using logistic regression. Applied thematic analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data within a conceptual framework based on the COM-B framework. A health economic analysis of the PN intervention will also be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (18-NW-0012) and the Health Research Authority following the Confidentiality Advisory Group review. Results will be shared through peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and on the YLST website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS ISRCTN42704678 and NCT03750110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisy McInnerney
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Irene Simmonds
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Neil Hancock
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Suzanne Rogerson
- Department of Research and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Jason Lindop
- Department of Research and Innovation, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Rhian Gabe
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - Daniel Vulkan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | | | - Philip A J Crosbie
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK
| | - Matthew E J Callister
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Samantha L Quaife
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lu X, Chen Y, Li Y, Tang M, Zheng X. Different clinicopathological features between young and older patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma and ground-glass opacity. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15679. [PMID: 38977890 PMCID: PMC11231279 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66910-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
After the recommendation of computed tomography as a routine procedure for lung cancer screening, an increasing number of young adults have been diagnosed with pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO). Up to 63% of pulmonary nodules with a GGO component can be malignant. Since young cancer patients have limited exposure to environmental mutagens, they have special characteristics and needs. This study sought to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of young and old patients with GGO-associated lung adenocarcinoma (GGO-LUAD). Clinicopathological data from 203 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery between January 2018 and April 2020 for pulmonary GGO component nodules were reviewed. Lung nonmucinous adenocarcinoma patients younger than 40 years old and older than 40 years old were enrolled: 103 patients ≤ 40 years old and 100 patients > 40 years old. The relevant clinicopathological features, including sex, smoking status, tumor size, pathological characteristics, radiographic features and prognosis of pulmonary nodules, were evaluated. Univariate analyses were applied for comparisons between groups. The differences in baseline characteristics (sex, smoking status, tumor location) between the different age groups were not significant. Young patients were more likely to have tumors < 1 cm in size, while older patients predominantly had tumors > 2 cm in size. The mean percentage of invasive adenocarcinoma was greater in the elderly group. Young and older patients seemed to have similar subtypes of adenocarcinoma (p > 0.05) but had different degrees of differentiation (p < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the young group were 100% and 99.03%, respectively, while the 3-years OS and RFS of the older group were 99% and 98%, respectively. Our work revealed that young patients with malignant pulmonary nodules and GGOs have distinct pathological subtypes. Patients with GGOs of different ages have different clinicopathological characteristics. The 3-year prognosis of young patients with malignant pulmonary nodules with GGOs is satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingbing Lu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuzuo Chen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuxiao Li
- West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Mengli Tang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xi Zheng
- Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxue Lane 37, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Behr C, Koffijberg H, IJzerman M, Kauczor HU, Revel MP, Silva M, von Stackelberg O, van Til J, Vliegenthart R. Willingness to participate in combination screening for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease in four European countries. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:4448-4456. [PMID: 38060003 PMCID: PMC11213747 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10474-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lung cancer screening (LCS), using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), can be more efficient by simultaneously screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the Big-3 diseases. This study aimed to determine the willingness to participate in (combinations of) Big-3 screening in four European countries and the relative importance of amendable participation barriers. METHODS An online cross-sectional survey aimed at (former) smokers aged 50-75 years elicited the willingness of individuals to participate in Big-3 screening and used analytical hierarchy processing (AHP) to determine the importance of participation barriers. RESULTS Respondents were from France (n = 391), Germany (n = 338), Italy (n = 399), and the Netherlands (n = 342), and consisted of 51.2% men. The willingness to participate in screening was marginally influenced by the diseases screened for (maximum difference of 3.1%, for Big-3 screening (73.4%) vs. lung cancer and COPD screening (70.3%)) and by country (maximum difference of 3.7%, between France (68.5%) and the Netherlands (72.3%)). The largest effect on willingness to participate was personal perceived risk of lung cancer. The most important barriers were the missed cases during screening (weight 0.19) and frequency of screening (weight 0.14), while diseases screened for (weight 0.11) ranked low. CONCLUSIONS The difference in willingness to participate in LCS showed marginal increase with inclusion of more diseases and limited variation between countries. A marginal increase in participation might result in a marginal additional benefit of Big-3 screening. The amendable participation barriers are similar to previous studies, and the new criterion, diseases screened for, is relatively unimportant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Adding diseases to combination screening modestly improves participation, driven by personal perceived risk. These findings guide program design and campaigns for lung cancer and Big-3 screening. Benefits of Big-3 screening lie in long-term health and economic impact, not participation increase. KEY POINTS • It is unknown whether or how combination screening might affect participation. • The addition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease to lung cancer screening resulted in a marginal increase in willingness to participate. • The primary determinant influencing individuals' engagement in such programs is their personal perceived risk of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Behr
- Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik Koffijberg
- Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center, Member of the German Lung Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie-Pierre Revel
- Service de radiologie, Université de Paris, Assistance Publique des hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 85 boulevard Saint-Germain, 75006, Paris, France
- Inserm U1016, Institut Cochin, 22 rue Méchain, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Mario Silva
- Scienze Radiologiche, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, Ospedale Universitario di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Oyunbileg von Stackelberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center, Member of the German Lung Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Janine van Til
- Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu J, Li R, Zhang H, Zheng Q, Tao W, Yang M, Zhu Y, Ji G, Li W. Screening for lung cancer using thin-slice low-dose computed tomography in southwestern China: a population-based real-world study. Thorac Cancer 2024; 15:1522-1532. [PMID: 38798230 PMCID: PMC11219290 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors threatening human life and health. At present, low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for the high-risk population to achieve early diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer has become the first choice recommended by many authoritative international medical organizations. To further optimize the lung cancer screening method, we conducted a real-world study of LDCT lung cancer screening in a large sample of a healthy physical examination population, comparing differences in lung nodules and lung cancer detection between thin and thick-slice LDCT scanning. METHODS A total of 29 296 subjects who underwent low-dose thick-slice CT scanning (5 mm thickness) from January 2015 to December 2015 and 28 058 subjects who underwent low-dose thin-slice CT scanning (1 mm thickness) from January 2018 to December 2018 in West China Hospital were included. The positive detection rate, detection rate of lung cancer, pathological stage of lung cancer, and mortality rate of lung cancer were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The positive rate of LDCT screening in the thin-slice scanning group was significantly higher than that in the thick-slice scanning group (20.1% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001). In addition, the lung cancer detection rate in the thin-slice LDCT screening positive group was significantly higher than that in the thick-slice scanning group (78.0% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The screening positive rate of low-dose thin-slice CT scanning is higher and more early-stage lung cancer (IA1 stage) can be detected in the screen-positive group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxuan Wu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China HospitalChengduChina
- Institute of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Ruicen Li
- Health Management Center, General Practice Medical CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Huohuo Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China HospitalChengduChina
- Institute of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Qian Zheng
- West China Clinical Medical CollegeSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Wenjuan Tao
- Institute of Hospital ManagementWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Ming Yang
- National Clinical Research Center for GeriatricsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Center of Gerontology and GeriatricsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yuan Zhu
- Health Management Center, General Practice Medical CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Guiyi Ji
- Health Management Center, General Practice Medical CenterWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Weimin Li
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China HospitalChengduChina
- Institute of Respiratory Health and MultimorbidityWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Institute of Respiratory Health, Frontiers Science Center for Disease‐related Molecular NetworkWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- Precision Medicine Center, Precision Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan ProvinceWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
- The Research Units of West China, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesWest China HospitalChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gao S, Xu Z, Kang W, Lv X, Chu N, Xu S, Hou D. Artificial intelligence-driven computer aided diagnosis system provides similar diagnosis value compared with doctors' evaluation in lung cancer screening. BMC Med Imaging 2024; 24:141. [PMID: 38862884 PMCID: PMC11165751 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01288-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the consistency between doctors and artificial intelligence (AI) software in analysing and diagnosing pulmonary nodules, and assess whether the characteristics of pulmonary nodules derived from the two methods are consistent for the interpretation of carcinomatous nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study analysed participants aged 40-74 in the local area from 2011 to 2013. Pulmonary nodules were examined radiologically using a low-dose chest CT scan, evaluated by an expert panel of doctors in radiology, oncology, and thoracic departments, as well as a computer-aided diagnostic(CAD) system based on the three-dimensional(3D) convolutional neural network (CNN) with DenseNet architecture(InferRead CT Lung, IRCL). Consistency tests were employed to assess the uniformity of the radiological characteristics of the pulmonary nodules. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Logistic regression analysis is utilized to determine whether the two methods yield the same predictive factors for cancerous nodules. RESULTS A total of 570 subjects were included in this retrospective study. The AI software demonstrated high consistency with the panel's evaluation in determining the position and diameter of the pulmonary nodules (kappa = 0.883, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.809, p = 0.000). The comparison of the solid nodules' attenuation characteristics also showed acceptable consistency (kappa = 0.503). In patients diagnosed with lung cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) for the panel and AI were 0.873 (95%CI: 0.829-0.909) and 0.921 (95%CI: 0.884-0.949), respectively. However, there was no significant difference (p = 0.0950). The maximum diameter, solid nodules, subsolid nodules were the crucial factors for interpreting carcinomatous nodules in the analysis of expert panel and IRCL pulmonary nodule characteristics. CONCLUSION AI software can assist doctors in diagnosing nodules and is consistent with doctors' evaluations and diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Gao
- Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zexuan Xu
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wanli Kang
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xinna Lv
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Naihui Chu
- Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Shaofa Xu
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Dailun Hou
- Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yue T, Wong LY, Jani C, Agarwal L, Al Omari O, Aghagoli G, Ahmed A, Bhatt P, Lee A, Lotz M, Marmor H, Paliotti G, Pories S, Richmond J, Shula L, Sandler KL, Conley Thomson C, Backhus LM. Combined Breast and Lung Cancer Screening Among Dual-Eligible Women: A Descriptive Study. J Surg Res 2024:S0022-4804(24)00284-1. [PMID: 38862305 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lung cancer is consistently the leading cause of cancer death among women in the United States, yet lung cancer screening (LCS) rates remain low. By contrast, screening mammography rates are reliably high, suggesting that screening mammography can be a "teachable moment" to increase LCS uptake among dual-eligible women. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a prospective survey study conducted at two academic institutions. Patients undergoing screening mammography were evaluated for LCS eligibility and offered enrollment in a pilot dual-cancer screening program. A series of surveys was administered to characterize participants' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes about LCS before and after undergoing dual screening. Data were descriptively summarized. RESULTS Between August 2022 and July 2023, 54 LCS-eligible patients were enrolled. The study cohort was 100% female and predominantly White (81%), with a median age of 57 y and median of 36 pack-y of smoking. Survey results showed that 98% felt they were at risk for lung cancer, with most (80%) motivated by early detection of potential cancer. Regarding screening barriers, 58% of patients lacked knowledge about LCS eligibility and 47% reported concerns about screening cost. Prior to undergoing LCS, 87% of patients expressed interest in combined breast and lung screening. Encouragingly, after LCS, 84% were likely or very likely to undergo dual screening again and 93% found the shared decision-making visit helpful or very helpful. CONCLUSIONS Pairing breast and LCS is a feasible, acceptable intervention that, along with increasing patient and provider education about LCS, can increase LCS uptake and reduce lung cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Yue
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Chinmay Jani
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lipisha Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Omar Al Omari
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ghazal Aghagoli
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Alaaeldin Ahmed
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Padmanabh Bhatt
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Angela Lee
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Margaret Lotz
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hannah Marmor
- Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
| | - Giulia Paliotti
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Susan Pories
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Richmond
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Laura Shula
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kim L Sandler
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Carey Conley Thomson
- Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leah M Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California; VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aguiar WWS, Bonomi DO, Martins F, Peres CDAP, Sena ADS. Lung cancer screening: a mini review of the major trials and guidelines. REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2024; 70:e2024S111. [PMID: 38865531 PMCID: PMC11164284 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2024s111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
|
9
|
MacRosty CR. Eliminating Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: A Shared Responsibility. Chest 2024; 165:1291-1292. [PMID: 38852964 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christina R MacRosty
- McKenzie Pulmonary Care Center, Springfield, OR; McKenzie-Willamette Medical Center, Springfield, OR.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wong LY, Yue T, Aghagoli G, Baiu I, Shula L, Lee A, Lui NS, Backhus LM. Harnessing Opportunity: Pilot Intervention to Improve Lung Cancer Screening for Women Undergoing Breast Screening Mammography. JTO Clin Res Rep 2024; 5:100671. [PMID: 38799132 PMCID: PMC11126926 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The screening mammogram could be a "teachable moment" to improve lung cancer screening (LCS) uptake. The aim of our project was to combine patient self-referral with eligibility identification by providers as a two-pronged approach to increase rates of LCS among eligible women. Methods LCS education materials were created to stimulate patient education and encourage self-referral. Chart review of patients scheduled for screening mammography was performed to identify patients who met LCS criteria. The primary outcome was rate of acceptance of targeted interventions as measured by qualitative survey material and rate of LCS uptake. Results Between August 2022 and August 2023, 116 patients were identified by providers for potential eligibility for LCS and 34 patients (29.3%) deemed eligible based on the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force 2021 guidelines. There were 19 patients (56%) who completed LCS with three patients (16%) with screen-detected nodules that led to further workup. Post-implementation qualitative survey results reveal that 100% of the participants rated their shared decision-making visit experience as "very helpful" and 67% responded "very likely" to seek simultaneous breast and LCS in the future. Informational materials were rated as 80% favorable among all respondents; however, the rate of self-referral alone was 0%. The combined rates of eligible patients lost to follow-up or refusal was 24%. Conclusion The self-referral aspect of the intervention revealed that patients are unlikely to self-refer for LCS. Nevertheless, patients undergoing screening mammograms individually identified for LCS were very responsive to learning more about dual screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lye-Yeng Wong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Tiffany Yue
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ghazal Aghagoli
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Ioana Baiu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Laura Shula
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Angela Lee
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Natalie S. Lui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Leah M. Backhus
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kondrashova R, Vogel-Claussen J. [Lung cancer screening: new frontiers]. RADIOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 64:456-462. [PMID: 38772915 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-024-01322-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In early, asymptomatic stages, curative treatment is possible, but the disease is often diagnosed too late. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS Lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps to detect potentially malignant lesions in early stages and to reduce lung cancer mortality. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS The application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms enables a more precise analysis of LDCT scans. PERFORMANCE A meta-analysis of eight LCS studies revealed a statistically significant 12% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality. ACHIEVEMENTS Based on strong scientific evidence, a recommendation for a structured lung cancer screening program using LDCT for the high-risk population in Germany was issued. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS The holistic LCS program requires a clear definition of the high-risk population, individual risk assessment, qualified personnel for conducting and reading examinations, verification of all diagnostic and therapeutic steps, central documentation and quality assurance, as well as the integration of tobacco cessation programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rimma Kondrashova
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Deutschland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Glandorf J, Vogel-Claussen J. Incidental pulmonary nodules - current guidelines and management. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024; 196:582-590. [PMID: 38065544 DOI: 10.1055/a-2185-8714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the greater use of high-resolution cross-sectional imaging, the number of incidental pulmonary nodules detected each year is increasing. Although the vast majority of incidental pulmonary nodules are benign, many early lung carcinomas could be diagnosed with consistent follow-up. However, for a variety of reasons, the existing recommendations are often not implemented correctly. Therefore, potential for improvement with respect to competence, communication, structure, and process is described. METHODS This article presents the recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules from the current S3 guideline for lung cancer (July 2023). The internationally established recommendations (BTS guidelines and Fleischner criteria) are compared and further studies on optimized management were included after a systematic literature search in PubMed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In particular, AI-based software solutions are promising, as they can be used in a support capacity on several levels at once and can lead to simpler and more automated management. However, to be applicable in routine clinical practice, software must fit well into the radiology workflow and be integrated. In addition, "Lung Nodule Management" programs or clinics that follow a high-quality procedure for patients with incidental lung nodules or nodules detected by screening have been established in the USA. Similar structures might also be implemented in Germany in a future screening program in which patients with incidental pulmonary nodules could be included. KEY POINTS · Incidental pulmonary nodules are common but are often not adequately managed. · The updated S3 guideline for lung cancer now includes recommendations for incidental pulmonary nodules. · Competence, communication, structure, and process levels offer significant potential for improvement. CITATION FORMAT · Glandorf J, Vogel-Claussen J, . Incidental pulmonary nodules - current guidelines and management. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 582 - 590.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Glandorf
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
| | - Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Song L, Irajizad E, Rundle A, Sesso HD, Gaziano JM, Vykoukal JV, Do KA, Dennison JB, Ostrin EJ, Fahrmann JF, Perera F, Hanash S. Validation of a Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel for a Risk Assessment of Lethal Lung Cancer in the Physicians' Health Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2070. [PMID: 38893188 PMCID: PMC11171146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess a four-marker protein panel (4MP)'s performance, including the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19, for predicting lung cancer in a cohort enriched with never- and ever-smokers. Blinded pre-diagnostic plasma samples collected within 2 years prior to a lung cancer diagnosis from 25 cases and 100 sex-, age-, and smoking-matched controls were obtained from the Physicians' Health Study (PHS). The 4MP yielded AUC performance estimates of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61-0.92) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56-0.82) for predicting lung cancer within one year and within two years of diagnosis, respectively. When stratifying into ever-smokers and never-smokers, the 4MP had respective AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63-0.92) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.17-1.00) for a 1-year risk of lung cancer. The AUCs of the 4MP for predicting metastatic lung cancer within one year and two years of the blood draw were 0.95 (95% CI: 0.87-1.00) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.62-0.94), respectively. Our findings indicate that a blood-based biomarker panel may be useful in identifying ever- and never-smokers at high risk of a diagnosis of lung cancer within one-to-two years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lulu Song
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.S.); (E.I.); (K.-A.D.)
| | - Ehsan Irajizad
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.S.); (E.I.); (K.-A.D.)
| | - Andrew Rundle
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Howard D. Sesso
- Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (H.D.S.); (J.M.G.)
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - John Michael Gaziano
- Divisions of Preventive Medicine and Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA; (H.D.S.); (J.M.G.)
- Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center (MAVERIC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Jody V. Vykoukal
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.V.V.); (J.F.F.)
| | - Kim-Anh Do
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (L.S.); (E.I.); (K.-A.D.)
| | - Jennifer B. Dennison
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.V.V.); (J.F.F.)
| | - Edwin J. Ostrin
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Johannes F. Fahrmann
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.V.V.); (J.F.F.)
| | - Frederica Perera
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA;
| | - Samir Hanash
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.V.V.); (J.F.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dai JY, Georg Luebeck E, Chang ET, Clarke CA, Hubbell EA, Zhang N, Duffy SW. Strong association between reduction of late-stage cancers and reduction of cancer-specific mortality in meta-regression of randomized screening trials across multiple cancer types. J Med Screen 2024:9691413241256744. [PMID: 38797981 DOI: 10.1177/09691413241256744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late-stage cancer incidence has been proposed as an early surrogate for mortality in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of cancer screening; however, its validity has not been systematically evaluated across screening RCTs of different cancers. METHODS We conducted a meta-regression analysis of cancer screening RCTs that reported both late-stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality. Based on a systematic literature review, we included 33 RCTs of screening programs targeting seven cancer types, including lung (n = 12), colorectal (n = 8), breast (n = 5), and prostate (n = 4), among others. We regressed the relative reduction of cancer mortality on the relative reduction of late-stage cancer incidence, inversely weighted for each RCT by the variance of estimated mortality reduction. RESULTS Across cancer types, the relative reduction of late-stage cancer incidence was linearly associated with the relative reduction of cancer mortality. Specifically, we observed this association for lung (R2 = 0.79 and 0.996 in three recent large trials), breast (R2 = 0.94), prostate (R2 = 0.98), and colorectal cancer (R2 = 0.75 for stage III/IV cancers and 0.93 for stage IV cancers). Trials with a 20% or greater reduction in late-stage cancers were more likely to achieve a significant reduction in cancer mortality. Our results also showed that no reduction of late-stage cancer incidence was associated with no or minimal reduction in cancer mortality. CONCLUSIONS Meta-regression of historical screening RCTs showed a strong linear association between reductions in late-stage cancer incidence and cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stephen W Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang H, Zhu H, Ding L, Yang K. Attention pyramid pooling network for artificial diagnosis on pulmonary nodules. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302641. [PMID: 38753596 PMCID: PMC11098435 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The development of automated tools using advanced technologies like deep learning holds great promise for improving the accuracy of lung nodule classification in computed tomography (CT) imaging, ultimately reducing lung cancer mortality rates. However, lung nodules can be difficult to detect and classify, from CT images since different imaging modalities may provide varying levels of detail and clarity. Besides, the existing convolutional neural network may struggle to detect nodules that are small or located in difficult-to-detect regions of the lung. Therefore, the attention pyramid pooling network (APPN) is proposed to identify and classify lung nodules. First, a strong feature extractor, named vgg16, is used to obtain features from CT images. Then, the attention primary pyramid module is proposed by combining the attention mechanism and pyramid pooling module, which allows for the fusion of features at different scales and focuses on the most important features for nodule classification. Finally, we use the gated spatial memory technique to decode the general features, which is able to extract more accurate features for classifying lung nodules. The experimental results on the LIDC-IDRI dataset show that the APPN can achieve highly accurate and effective for classifying lung nodules, with sensitivity of 87.59%, specificity of 90.46%, accuracy of 88.47%, positive predictive value of 95.41%, negative predictive value of 76.29% and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.914.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongfeng Wang
- School of Network Engineering, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou, China
| | - Hai Zhu
- School of Network Engineering, Zhoukou Normal University, Zhoukou, China
| | - Lihua Ding
- College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Kaili Yang
- Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Li M, Ni P, Zuo T, Liu Y, Zhu B. Cancer literacy differences of basic knowledge, prevention, early detection, treatment and recovery: a cross-sectional study of urban and rural residents in Northeast China. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1367947. [PMID: 38807994 PMCID: PMC11130368 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1367947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer literacy as a potential health intervention tool directly impacted the success of cancer prevention and treatment initiatives. This study aimed to evaluate the cancer literacy in Northeast China, and explore the factors contributing to urban-rural disparities. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 14 cities across Liaoning Province, China, from August to October 2021, using the multistage probability proportional to size sampling (PPS) method. The survey comprised 4,325 participants aged 15-69 and encompassed 37 core knowledge-based questions spanning five dimensions. Associations between sociodemographic factors and the cancer literacy rate were evaluated using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression model. Results The overall cancer literacy rate was 66.9% (95% CI: 65.6-68.2%). In the primary indicators, cancer literacy were highest in treatment (75.8, 95% CI: 74.2-77.4%) and early detection (68.2, 95% CI: 66.8-69.6%), followed by basic knowledge (67.2, 95% CI: 65.8-68.6%), recovery (62.6, 95% CI: 60.7-64.5%) and prevention (59.7, 95% CI: 58.2-61.3%). Regarding secondary indicators, the awareness rates regarding cancer-related risk factors (54.7, 95% CI: 52.8-56.5%) and early diagnosis of cancer (54.6, 95% CI: 52.7-56.6%) were notably inadequate. Rural participates exhibited lower cancer literacy across all dimensions compared to urban. Multi-factor analysis showed that factors such as advanced age, limited education or low household income were barriers to health literacy in rural areas. Conclusion Strengthening awareness concerning prevention and early detection, particularly among key populations, and bridging the urban-rural cancer literacy gap are imperative steps toward achieving the Healthy China 2030 target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengdan Li
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Ping Ni
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Tingting Zuo
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yunyong Liu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Bo Zhu
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kerpel-Fronius A, Megyesfalvi Z, Markóczy Z, Solymosi D, Csányi P, Tisza J, Kecskés A, Baranyi B, Csánky E, Dóka A, Gálffy G, Göcző K, Győry C, Horváth Z, Juhász T, Kállai Á, Kincses ZT, Király Z, Király-Incze E, Kostyál L, Kovács A, Kovács A, Kuczkó É, Makra Z, Maurovich Horvát P, Merth G, Moldoványi I, Müller V, Pápai-Székely Z, Papp D, Polgár C, Rózsa P, Sárosi V, Szalai Z, Székely A, Szuhács M, Tárnoki D, Tavaszi G, Turóczi-Kirizs R, Tóth L, Urbán L, Vaskó A, Vigh É, Dome B, Bogos K. HUNCHEST-II contributes to a shift to earlier-stage lung cancer detection: final results of a nationwide screening program. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3462-3470. [PMID: 37921926 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10379-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The introduction of low-dose CT (LDCT) altered the landscape of lung cancer (LC) screening and contributed to the reduction of mortality rates worldwide. Here we report the final results of HUNCHEST-II, the largest population-based LDCT screening program in Hungary, including the screening and diagnostic outcomes, and the characteristics of the LC cases. METHODS A total of 4215 high-risk individuals aged between 50 and 75 years with a smoking history of at least 25 pack-years were assigned to undergo LDCT screening. Screening outcomes were determined based on the volume, growth, and volume doubling time of pulmonary nodules or masses. The clinical stage distribution of screen-detected cancers was compared with two independent practice-based databases consisting of unscreened LC patients. RESULTS The percentage of negative and indeterminate tests at baseline were 74.2% and 21.7%, respectively, whereas the prevalence of positive LDCT results was 4.1%. Overall, 76 LC patients were diagnosed throughout the screening rounds (1.8% of total participants), out of which 62 (1.5%) patients were already identified in the first screening round. The overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. Most screen-detected malignancies were stage I LCs (60.7%), and only 16.4% of all cases could be classified as stage IV disease. The percentage of early-stage malignancies was significantly higher among HUNCHEST-II screen-detected individuals than among the LC patients in the National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology's archive or the Hungarian Cancer Registry (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS HUNCHEST-II demonstrates that LDCT screening for LC facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic LC screening in Hungary. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT HUNCHEST-II is the so-far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. A positive test's overall positive predictive value was 58%, and most screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lesions. These results pave the way for expansive systematic screening in the region. KEY POINTS • Conducted in 18 medical facilities, HUNCHEST-II is the so far largest population-based low-dose CT screening program in Hungary. • The vast majority of screen-detected malignancies were early-stage lung cancers, and the overall positive predictive value of a positive test was 58%. • HUNCHEST-II facilitates early diagnosis, thus arguing in favor of introducing systematic lung cancer screening in Hungary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zsolt Megyesfalvi
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Semmelweis University and National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zsolt Markóczy
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Diana Solymosi
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Csányi
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Judit Tisza
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anita Kecskés
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Eszter Csánky
- Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital - Semmelweis Member State Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Adrienn Dóka
- Vas County Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary
| | | | - Katalin Göcző
- Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Csilla Győry
- Petz Aladár University Teaching Hospital, Győr, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Horváth
- Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Tünde Juhász
- Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
| | - Árpád Kállai
- Hódmezővásárhely- Makó Healthcare Services Center, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary
| | - Zsigmond T Kincses
- Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Király
- Pulmonological Institute of Veszprém County, Farkasgyepű, Hungary
| | - Enikő Király-Incze
- Fejér County Szent György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - László Kostyál
- Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Hospital and University Teaching Hospital - Semmelweis Member State Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Anita Kovács
- Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Center, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - András Kovács
- Medical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Éva Kuczkó
- Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Makra
- Hódmezővásárhely- Makó Healthcare Services Center, Hódmezővásárhely, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | - Zsolt Pápai-Székely
- Fejér County Szent György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Dávid Papp
- Somogy County Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgár
- National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Rózsa
- Medical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
- MediConcept, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Veronika Sárosi
- Medical School and Clinical Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | | | | | - Marianna Szuhács
- Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg County Hospitals and University Teaching, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
| | | | - Gábor Tavaszi
- Törökbálint Institute of Pulmonology, Törökbálint, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | - Éva Vigh
- Vas County Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary
| | - Balazs Dome
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Semmelweis University and National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Krisztina Bogos
- National Koranyi Institute of Pulmonology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Coschi CH, Dodbiba L, Guerry D. Oncology: What You May Have Missed in 2023. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:S57-S70. [PMID: 38621244 DOI: 10.7326/m24-0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in oncology treatment methods have improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. However, care of these patients can be complex, and the contribution of physicians from different specialties is crucial. This article highlights important publications from 2023 on topics across a wide spectrum relating to the management of oncology patients. The literature was screened for significant new evidence that is relevant to internal medicine specialists and subspecialists whose focus is not oncology. Two articles address the importance of social interventions targeting end-of-life care for low-income and minority patients and the well-being of caregivers. Two additional articles address screening considerations in patients at risk for colorectal and lung cancer. Two more articles address safe use of hormone-related therapies to treat symptoms of menopause and prevent disease recurrence or progression in patients diagnosed with noninvasive breast neoplasia. Finally, several articles were included on topics related to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer, use of cannabinoids for cancer pain control, chronic autoimmune adverse effects related to use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the incidence of second primary neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Coschi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - Lorin Dodbiba
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - DuPont Guerry
- Associate Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kratzer TB, Bandi P, Freedman ND, Smith RA, Travis WD, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Lung cancer statistics, 2023. Cancer 2024; 130:1330-1348. [PMID: 38279776 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
Despite decades of declining mortality rates, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. This article examines lung cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, survival, and mortality using population-based data from the National Cancer Institute, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Over the past 5 years, declines in lung cancer mortality became considerably greater than declines in incidence among men (5.0% vs. 2.6% annually) and women (4.3% vs. 1.1% annually), reflecting absolute gains in 2-year relative survival of 1.4% annually. Improved outcomes likely reflect advances in treatment, increased access to care through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and earlier stage diagnosis; for example, compared with a 4.6% annual decrease for distant-stage disease incidence during 2013-2019, the rate for localized-stage disease rose by 3.6% annually. Localized disease incidence increased more steeply in states with the highest lung cancer screening prevalence (by 3%-5% annually) than in those with the lowest (by 1%-2% annually). Despite progress, disparities remain. For example, Native Americans have the highest incidence and the slowest decline (less than 1% annually among men and stagnant rates among women) of any group. In addition, mortality rates in Mississippi and Kentucky are two to three times higher than in most western states, largely because of elevated historic smoking prevalence that remains. Racial and geographic inequalities highlight longstanding opportunities for more concerted tobacco-control efforts targeted at high-risk populations, including improved access to smoking-cessation treatments and lung cancer screening, as well as state-of-the-art treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler B Kratzer
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Priti Bandi
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Neal D Freedman
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert A Smith
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - William D Travis
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca L Siegel
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Henschke C, Huber R, Jiang L, Yang D, Cavic M, Schmidt H, Kazerooni E, Zulueta JJ, Sales Dos Santos R, Ventura L. Perspective on Management of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Findings on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Examinations for Lung Cancer Screening. From the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Early Detection and Screening Committee. J Thorac Oncol 2024; 19:565-580. [PMID: 37979778 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) carefully implemented has been found to reduce deaths from lung cancer. Optimal management starts with selection of eligibility criteria, counseling of screenees, smoking cessation, selection of the regimen of screening which specifies the imaging protocol, and workup of LDCT findings. Coordination of clinical, radiologic, and interventional teams and ultimately treatment of diagnosed lung cancers under screening determine the benefit of LDCT screening. Ethical considerations of who should be eligible for LDCT screening programs are important to provide the benefit to as many people at risk of lung cancer as possible. Unanticipated diseases identified on LDCT may offer important benefits through early detection of leading global causes of death, such as cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as the latter may result from conditions such as emphysema and bronchiectasis, which can be identified early on LDCT. This report identifies the key components of the regimen of LDCT screening for lung cancer which include the need for a management system to provide data for continuous updating of the regimen and provides quality assurance assessment of actual screenings. Multidisciplinary clinical management is needed to maximize the benefit of early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Different regimens have been evolving throughout the world as the resources and needs may be different, for countries with limited resources. Sharing of results, further knowledge, and incorporation of technologic advances will continue to accelerate worldwide improvements in the diagnostic and treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
| | - Rudolf Huber
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Munich - Campus Innenstadt, Ziemssenstrabe, Munich, Germany
| | - Long Jiang
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dawei Yang
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Critical Care, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Milena Cavic
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Heidi Schmidt
- Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ella Kazerooni
- Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Javier J Zulueta
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, New York
| | - Ricardo Sales Dos Santos
- Department of Minimally Invasive Thoracic and Robotic Surgery, Albert Einstein Israeli Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luigi Ventura
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Winter H, Eichhorn M, Eichhorn F, Grott M. [Modern individualized diagnostics and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 95:280-287. [PMID: 38376521 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Approximately one half of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at resectable tumor stages (I-IIIA), which can potentially be curatively treated. In the early tumor stages (tumor diameter ≤2 cm) sublobar resection (segmentectomy or atypical wedge resection) leads to a 5‑year long-term survival comparable to lobectomy. The use of immunotherapy, especially within the framework of neoadjuvant treatment, is anticipated to change the surgical treatment of NSCLC in the future. With the introduction of lung cancer screening for certain risk groups in Germany planned for 2024, lung tumors can be expected to be diagnosed at earlier stages and more frequently curatively treated. This article provides an overview of the potential impact of lung cancer screening, modern minimally invasive surgical techniques and neoadjuvant treatment concepts for the surgical treatment of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Winter
- Thoraxchirurgie, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Martin Eichhorn
- Thoraxchirurgie, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Florian Eichhorn
- Thoraxchirurgie, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Grott
- Thoraxchirurgie, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstraße 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cortés-Ibáñez FO, Johnson T, Mascalchi M, Katzke V, Delorme S, Kaaks R. Cardiac troponin I as predictor for cardiac and other mortality in the German randomized lung cancer screening trial (LUSI). Sci Rep 2024; 14:7197. [PMID: 38531926 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57889-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) could be used to identify individuals at elevated risk of cardiac death in lung cancer (LC) screening settings. In a population-based, randomized LC screening trial in Germany ("LUSI" study) serum cTnI was measured by high-sensitivity assay in blood samples collected at baseline, and categorized into unquantifiable/low (< 6 ng/L), intermediate (≥ 6-15 ng/L), and elevated (≥ 16 ng/L). Cox proportional-hazard models were used to estimate risk of all-cause and cardiac mortality with cTnI levels. After exclusion criteria, 3653 participants were included for our analyses, of which 82.4% had low, 12.8% intermediate and 4.8% elevated cTnI, respectively. Over a median follow up of 11.87 years a total of 439 deaths occurred, including 67 caused by cardiac events. Within the first 5 years after cTnI measurement, intermediate or elevated cTnI levels showed approximately 1.7 (HR = 1.69 [95% CI 0.57-5.02) and 4.7-fold (HR = 4.66 [1.73-12.50]) increases in risk of cardiac death relative to individuals with unquantifiable/low cTnI, independently of age, sex, smoking and other risk factors. Within this time interval, a risk model based on age, sex, BMI, smoking history and cTnI showed a combined area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 73.6 (58.1-87.3), as compared to 70.4 (53.3-83.5) for a model without cTnI. Over the time interval of > 5-10 years after blood donation, the relative risk associations with cTnI and were weaker. cTnI showed no association with mortality from any other (non-cardiac) cause. Our findings show that cTnI may be of use for identifying individuals at elevated risk specifically of short-term cardiac mortality in the context of LC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco O Cortés-Ibáñez
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology (C020), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), The German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Theron Johnson
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology (C020), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mario Mascalchi
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology (C020), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical and Experimental, Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Study, PRevention and netwoRk in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology (C020), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Delorme
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology (C020), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), The German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pereira LFF, dos Santos RS, Bonomi DO, Franceschini J, Santoro IL, Miotto A, de Sousa TLF, Chate RC, Hochhegger B, Gomes A, Schneider A, de Araújo CA, Escuissato DL, Prado GF, Costa-Silva L, Zamboni MM, Ghefter MC, Corrêa PCRP, Torres PPTES, Mussi RK, Muglia VF, de Godoy I, Bernardo WM. Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging. J Bras Pneumol 2024; 50:e20230233. [PMID: 38536982 PMCID: PMC11095927 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Although lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common and lethal tumors, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Smoking is still responsible for more than 85% of cases. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC-related mortality by 20%, and that reduction reaches 38% when LCS by LDCT is combined with smoking cessation. In the last decade, a number of countries have adopted population-based LCS as a public health recommendation. Albeit still incipient, discussion on this topic in Brazil is becoming increasingly broad and necessary. With the aim of increasing knowledge and stimulating debate on LCS, the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, the Brazilian Thoracic Association, and the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging convened a panel of experts to prepare recommendations for LCS in Brazil. The recommendations presented here were based on a narrative review of the literature, with an emphasis on large population-based studies, systematic reviews, and the recommendations of international guidelines, and were developed after extensive discussion by the panel of experts. The following topics were reviewed: reasons for screening; general considerations about smoking; epidemiology of LC; eligibility criteria; incidental findings; granulomatous lesions; probabilistic models; minimum requirements for LDCT; volumetric acquisition; risks of screening; minimum structure and role of the multidisciplinary team; practice according to the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System; costs versus benefits of screening; and future perspectives for LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Fernando Ferreira Pereira
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Ricardo Sales dos Santos
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Daniel Oliveira Bonomi
- . Departamento de Cirurgia Torácica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Juliana Franceschini
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Fundação ProAR, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Ilka Lopes Santoro
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Medicina, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - André Miotto
- . Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Departamento de Cirurgia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitário Alcides Carneiro, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG - Campina Grande (PB) Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Caruso Chate
- . Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- . Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville (FL) USA
| | - Artur Gomes
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió, Maceió (AL) Brasil
| | - Airton Schneider
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital São Lucas, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - César Augusto de Araújo
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Departamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia - UFBA - Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Dante Luiz Escuissato
- . Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR - Curitiba (PR) Brasil
| | | | - Luciana Costa-Silva
- . Serviço de Diagnóstico por Imagem, Instituto Hermes Pardini, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Mauro Musa Zamboni
- . Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil
- . Centro Universitário Arthur Sá Earp Neto/Faculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis -UNIFASE - Petrópolis (RJ) Brasil
| | - Mario Claudio Ghefter
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | | | | | - Ricardo Kalaf Mussi
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP) Brasil
| | - Valdair Francisco Muglia
- . Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Oncologia e Hematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | - Irma de Godoy
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wei H, Wang Y, Li J, Wang Y, Lu L, Sun J, Wang X. Diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral lung lesions based on a feature model constructed by the random forest algorithm for grayscale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1352028. [PMID: 38529369 PMCID: PMC10961397 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1352028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale and objectives To construct a predictive model for benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) using a random forest algorithm based on grayscale ultrasound and ultrasound contrast, and to evaluate its diagnostic value. Materials and methods We selected 254 patients with PPLs detected using chest lung computed tomography between October 2021 and July 2023, including 161 malignant and 93 benign lesions. Relevant variables for judging benign and malignant PPLs were screened using logistic regression analysis. A model was constructed using the random forest algorithm, and the test set was verified. Correlations between these relevant variables and the diagnosis of benign and malignant PPLs were evaluated. Results Age, lesion shape, size, angle between the lesion border and chest wall, boundary clarity, edge regularity, air bronchogram, vascular signs, enhancement patterns, enhancement intensity, homogeneity of enhancement, number of non-enhancing regions, non-enhancing region type, arrival time (AT) of the lesion, lesion-lung AT difference, AT difference ratio, and time to peak were the relevant variables for judging benign and malignant PPLs. Consequently, a model and receiver operating characteristic curve were constructed with an AUC of 0.92 and an accuracy of 88.2%. The test set results showed that the model had good predictive ability. The index with the highest correlation for judging benign and malignant PPLs was the AT difference ratio. Other important factors were lesion size, patient age, and lesion morphology. Conclusion The random forest algorithm model constructed based on clinical data and ultrasound imaging features has clinical application value for predicting benign and malignant PPLs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiaolei Wang
- In-Patient Ultrasound Department, The second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Surgeons’ Hall, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhou J, Yu B, Guo P, Wang S. The insufficiency of CT examination in early detection of central lung squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:299. [PMID: 38443800 PMCID: PMC10916110 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12052-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CT examination for lung cancer has been carried out for more than 20 years and great achievements have been made in the early detection of lung cancer. However, in the clinical work, a large number of advanced central lung squamous cell carcinoma are still detected through bronchoscopy. Meanwhile, a part of CT-occult central lung squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions are also accidentally detected through bronchoscopy. METHODS This study retrospectively collects the medical records of patients in the bronchoscopy room of the Endoscopy Department of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2014 to December 2018. The inclusion criteria for patients includes: 1.Patient medical records completed, 2.Without history of lung cancer before the diagnosis and first pathological diagnosis of primary lung cancer, 3.Have the lung CT data of the same period, 4.Have the bronchoscopy records and related pathological diagnosis, 5.The patients undergoing radical surgical treatment must have a complete postoperative pathological diagnosis. Finally, a total of 10,851 patients with primary lung cancer are included in the study, including 7175 males and 3676 females, aged 22-98 years. Firstly, 130 patients with CT-occult lesions are extracted and their clinical features are analyzed. Then, 604 cases of single central squamous cell carcinoma and 3569 cases of peripheral adenocarcinoma are extracted and compares in postoperative tumor diameter and lymph node metastasis. RESULTS 115 cases of CT-occult central lung squamous cell carcinoma and 15 cases of squamous epithelial precancerous lesions are found. In the total lung cancer, the proportion of CT-occult lesions is 130/10,851 (1.20%). Meanwhile, all these patients are middle-aged and elderly men with a history of heavy smoking. There are statistically significant differences in postoperative median tumor diameter (3.65 cm vs.1.70 cm, P < 0.0001) and lymph node metastasis rate (50.99% vs.13.06%, P < 0.0001) between 604 patients with operable single central lung squamous cell carcinoma and 3569 patients with operable peripheral lung adenocarcinoma. Of the 604 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 96.52% (583/604) are male with a history of heavy smoking and aged 40-82 years with a median age of 64 years. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that the current lung CT examination of lung cancer is indeed insufficiency for the early diagnosis of central squamous cell carcinoma and squamous epithelial precancerous lesions. Further bronchoscopy in middle-aged and elderly men with a history of heavy smoking can make up for the lack of routine lung CT examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaming Zhou
- Department of Endoscopy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Bijun Yu
- Department of Endoscopy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peng Guo
- Department of Endoscopy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shi Wang
- Department of Endoscopy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hinsen M, Nagel AM, May MS, Wiesmueller M, Uder M, Heiss R. Lung Nodule Detection With Modern Low-Field MRI (0.55 T) in Comparison to CT. Invest Radiol 2024; 59:215-222. [PMID: 37490031 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of modern low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for lung nodule detection and to correlate nodule size measurement with computed tomography (CT) as reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between November 2020 and July 2021, a prospective clinical trial using low-field MRI at 0.55 T was performed in patients with known pulmonary nodules from a single academic medical center. Every patient underwent MRI and CT imaging on the same day. The primary aim was to evaluate the detection accuracy of pulmonary nodules using MRI with transversal periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction in combination with coronal half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo MRI sequences. The secondary outcome was the correlation of the mean lung nodule diameter with CT as reference according to the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were applied to analyze the results. RESULTS A total of 46 participants (mean age ± SD, 66 ± 11 years; 26 women) were included. In a blinded analysis of 964 lung nodules, the detection accuracy was 100% for those ≥6 mm (126/126), 80% (159/200) for those ≥4-<6 mm, and 23% (147/638) for those <4 mm in MRI compared with reference CT. Spearman correlation coefficient of MRI and CT size measurement was r = 0.87 ( P < 0.001), and the mean difference was 0.16 ± 0.9 mm. CONCLUSIONS Modern low-field MRI shows excellent accuracy in lesion detection for lung nodules ≥6 mm and a very strong correlation with CT imaging for size measurement, but could not compete with CT in the detection of small nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Hinsen
- From the Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany (M.H., A.M.N., M.S.M., M.W., M.U., R.H.); and Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (A.M.N.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pirzadeh M, Lagina M, Wood C, Valley T, Ramnath N, Arenberg D, Deng JC. Barriers to Timely Lung Cancer Care in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Impact on Patient Outcomes. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:135-143. [PMID: 37981476 PMCID: PMC10922667 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal time to treatment for early-stage lung cancer is uncertain. We examined causes of delays in care for Veterans who presented with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and whether workup time was associated with increased upstaging or all-cause mortality. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of Veterans referred to our facility with radiographic stage I or II NSCLC between January 2013 to December 2017, with follow-up through October 2021. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, time intervals of care, and reasons for delays were collected. Guideline concordance (GC) was defined as treatment within 14 weeks of abnormal image. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine association between delays in care, survival, and upstaging. RESULTS Data from 203 Veterans were analyzed. Median time between abnormal imaging to treatment was 17.7 weeks (IQR 12.7-26.6). Only 33% of Veterans received GC care. Most common patient-related delays were: intercurrent hospitalization/comorbidity (23%), no-shows (16%) and inability to reach Veteran (17%). Most common system-related delay: lack of scheduling availability (25%). Delays associated with upstaging: transportation issues, request for coordination of appointments, and unforeseen appointment changes. Rates of upstaging did not differ between GC and discordant groups (P = .6). GC care was not an independent predictor of mortality. Post-hoc, treatment within 8 weeks was associated with lower rates of upstaging (P = .05). CONCLUSION Although GC care did not impact survival or upstaging for early-stage NSCLC, shorter timeframes may be beneficial. Modifiable delays in care exist which may be addressed at an institutional level to improve timeliness of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Pirzadeh
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Madeline Lagina
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Cameron Wood
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Thomas Valley
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Nithya Ramnath
- Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Douglas Arenberg
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jane C Deng
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yu Z, Ni P, Yu H, Zuo T, Liu Y, Wang D. Effectiveness of a single low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A population-based perspective cohort study in China. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:659-669. [PMID: 37819155 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this perspective cohort study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening for lung cancer in China. This study was conducted under the China Urban Cancer Screening Program (CanSPUC). The analysis was based on participants aged 40 to 74 years from 2012 to 2019. A total of 255 569 eligible participants were recruited in the study. Among the 58 136 participants at high risk of lung cancer, 20 346 (35.00%) had a single LDCT scan (defined as the screened group) and 37 790 (65.00%) not (defined as the non-screened group). Overall, 1162 participants were diagnosed with lung cancer at median follow-up time of 5.25 years. The screened group had the highest cumulative incidence of lung cancer and the non-screened group had the highest cumulative lung cancer mortality and all-cause cumulative mortality. We performed inverse probability weighting (IPW) to account for potential imbalances, and Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the weighted association between mortality and LDCT scans. After IPW adjusted with baseline characteristics, the lung cancer incidence density was significantly increased (37.0% increase) (HR1.37 [95%CI 1.12-1.69]), lung cancer mortality was decreased (31.0% decrease) (HR0.69 [95%CI 0.49-0.97]), and the all-cause mortality was significantly decreased (23.0% lower) (HR0.77 [95% CI 0.68-0.87]) in the screened group. In summary, a single LDCT for lung cancer screening will reduce the mortality of lung cancer and all-cause mortality in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhifu Yu
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Control and Research, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ping Ni
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Control and Research, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Huihui Yu
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Control and Research, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Tingting Zuo
- Liaoning Office for Cancer Control and Research, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yunyong Liu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Danbo Wang
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hoffmann H, Kaaks R, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG. [Statement Paper on the Implementation of a National Organized Program in Germany for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer in Risk Populations Using Low-dose CT Screening Including Management of Screening Findings]. Zentralbl Chir 2024; 149:96-115. [PMID: 37816386 DOI: 10.1055/a-2178-5907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present concrete cornerstones for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hanover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Kaaks R, Hoffmann H. [Statement paper on the implementation of a national organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in risk populations using low-dose CT screening including management of screening findings]. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2024; 196:134-153. [PMID: 37816377 DOI: 10.1055/a-2178-2846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on the early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present key points for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process. CITATION FORMAT: · Vogel-Claussen J, Blum TG, Andreas S et al. Position paper on the implementation of a nationally organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in high-risk populations using low-dose CT screening including the management of screening findings requiring further workup. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: DOI 10.1055/a-2178-2846.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Song F, Yang Q, Gong T, Sun K, Zhang W, Liu M, Lv F. Comparison of different classification systems for pulmonary nodules: a multicenter retrospective study in China. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:15. [PMID: 38254185 PMCID: PMC10801946 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00634-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the diagnostic performance of Lung-RADS (lung imaging-reporting and data system) 2022 and PNI-GARS (pulmonary node imaging-grading and reporting system). METHODS Pulmonary nodules (PNs) were selected at four centers, namely, CQ Center (January 1, 2018-December 31, 2021), HB Center (January 1, 2021-June 30, 2022), SC Center (September 1, 2021-December 31, 2021), and SX Center (January 1, 2021-December 31, 2021). PNs were divided into solid nodules (SNs), partial solid nodules (PSNs) and ground-glass nodules (GGNs), and they were then classified by the Lung-RADS and PNI-GARS. The sensitivity, specificity and agreement rate were compared between the two systems by the χ2 test. RESULTS For SN and PSN, the sensitivity of PNI-GARS and Lung-RADS was close (SN 99.8% vs. 99.4%, P < 0.001; PSN 99.9% vs. 98.4%, P = 0.015), but the specificity (SN 51.2% > 35.1%, PSN 13.3% > 5.7%, all P < 0.001) and agreement rate (SN 81.1% > 74.5%, P < 0.001, PSN 94.6% > 92.7%, all P < 0.05) of PNI-GARS were superior to those of Lung-RADS. For GGN, the sensitivity (96.5%) and agreement rate (88.6%) of PNI-GARS were better than those of Lung-RADS (0, 18.5%, P < 0.001). For the whole sample, the sensitivity (98.5%) and agreement rate (87.0%) of PNI-GARS were better than Lung-RADS (57.5%, 56.5%, all P < 0.001), whereas the specificity was slightly lower (49.8% < 53.4%, P = 0.003). CONCLUSION PNI-GARS was superior to Lung-RADS in diagnostic performance, especially for GGN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feipeng Song
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 YouYi Road, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Qian Yang
- Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Tong Gong
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai Sun
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Wenjia Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Mengxi Liu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 YouYi Road, Chongqing, 400010, China
| | - Fajin Lv
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 YouYi Road, Chongqing, 400010, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhang X, Ji L, Liu M, Li J, Sun H, Liang F, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Yang T, Wang Y, Si Q, Du R, Dai L, Ouyang S. Integrative Multianalytical Model Based on Novel Plasma Protein Biomarkers for Distinguishing Lung Adenocarcinoma and Benign Pulmonary Nodules. J Proteome Res 2024; 23:277-288. [PMID: 38085828 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Given the pressing clinical problem of making a decision in diagnosis for subjects with pulmonary nodules, we aimed to discover novel plasma protein biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and benign pulmonary nodules (BPNs) and then develop an integrative multianalytical model to guide the clinical management of LUAD and BPN patients. Through label-free quantitative plasma proteomic analysis (data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD046731), 12 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in LUAD and BPN were screened. The diagnostic abilities of DEPs were validated in two independent validation cohorts. The results showed that the levels of three candidate proteins (PRDX2, PON1, and APOC3) were lower in the plasma of LUAD than in BPN. The three candidate proteins were combined with three promising computed tomography indicators (spiculation, vascular notch sign, and lobulation) and three traditional markers (CEA, CA125, and CYFRA21-1) to construct an integrative multianalytical model, which was effective in distinguishing LUAD from BPN, with an AUC of 0.904, a sensitivity of 81.44%, and a specificity of 90.14%. Moreover, the model possessed impressive diagnostic performance between early LUADs and BPNs, with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.868, 65.63%, 90.14%, and 82.52%, respectively. This model may be a useful auxiliary diagnostic tool for LUAD and BPN by achieving a better balance of sensitivity and specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Zhang
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Longtao Ji
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Man Liu
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Jiaqi Li
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Hao Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Feifei Liang
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Yutong Zhao
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Zhi Wang
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Yulin Wang
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Qiufang Si
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Renle Du
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
| | - Liping Dai
- Henan Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences & Henan Key Medical Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Biomarkers, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- BGI College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001 Henan, China
- Henan Key Laboratory of Tumor Epidemiology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| | - Songyun Ouyang
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052 Henan, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Blum TG, Vogel-Claussen J, Andreas S, Bauer TT, Barkhausen J, Harth V, Kauczor HU, Pankow W, Welcker K, Kaaks R, Hoffmann H. [Statement paper on the implementation of a national organized program in Germany for the early detection of lung cancer in risk populations using low-dose CT screening including management of screening findings]. Pneumologie 2024; 78:15-34. [PMID: 37816379 DOI: 10.1055/a-2175-4580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
The process of implementing early detection of lung cancer with low-dose CT (LDCT) in Germany has gained significant momentum in recent years. It is expected that the ordinance of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection (BMUV) on early detection of lung cancer, which has been commented on by the professional societies, will come into effect by the end of 2023. Based on this regulation, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) will set up a program for early lung cancer detection with LDCT in the near future. In this position paper, the specialist societies involved in lung cancer screening present concrete cornerstones for a uniform, structured and quality-assured early detection program for lung cancer in Germany to make a constructive contribution to this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
- Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jens Vogel-Claussen
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
- Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Stefan Andreas
- Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen, Deutschland
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Deutschland
- Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Gießen, Deutschland
| | - Torsten T Bauer
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jörg Barkhausen
- Klinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Volker Harth
- Zentralinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin und Maritime Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Deutschland
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
| | - Wulf Pankow
- Taskforce Tabakentwöhnung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katrin Welcker
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der RWTH Aachen, Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, Deutsches Zentrum für Lungenforschung, Deutschland
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Hans Hoffmann
- Sektion Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wolf AMD, Oeffinger KC, Shih TYC, Walter LC, Church TR, Fontham ETH, Elkin EB, Etzioni RD, Guerra CE, Perkins RB, Kondo KK, Kratzer TB, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Dahut WL, Smith RA. Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:50-81. [PMID: 37909877 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality and person-years of life lost from cancer among US men and women. Early detection has been shown to be associated with reduced lung cancer mortality. Our objective was to update the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2013 lung cancer screening (LCS) guideline for adults at high risk for lung cancer. The guideline is intended to provide guidance for screening to health care providers and their patients who are at high risk for lung cancer due to a history of smoking. The ACS Guideline Development Group (GDG) utilized a systematic review of the LCS literature commissioned for the US Preventive Services Task Force 2021 LCS recommendation update; a second systematic review of lung cancer risk associated with years since quitting smoking (YSQ); literature published since 2021; two Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network-validated lung cancer models to assess the benefits and harms of screening; an epidemiologic and modeling analysis examining the effect of YSQ and aging on lung cancer risk; and an updated analysis of benefit-to-radiation-risk ratios from LCS and follow-up examinations. The GDG also examined disease burden data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Formulation of recommendations was based on the quality of the evidence and judgment (incorporating values and preferences) about the balance of benefits and harms. The GDG judged that the overall evidence was moderate and sufficient to support a strong recommendation for screening individuals who meet the eligibility criteria. LCS in men and women aged 50-80 years is associated with a reduction in lung cancer deaths across a range of study designs, and inferential evidence supports LCS for men and women older than 80 years who are in good health. The ACS recommends annual LCS with low-dose computed tomography for asymptomatic individuals aged 50-80 years who currently smoke or formerly smoked and have a ≥20 pack-year smoking history (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). Before the decision is made to initiate LCS, individuals should engage in a shared decision-making discussion with a qualified health professional. For individuals who formerly smoked, the number of YSQ is not an eligibility criterion to begin or to stop screening. Individuals who currently smoke should receive counseling to quit and be connected to cessation resources. Individuals with comorbid conditions that substantially limit life expectancy should not be screened. These recommendations should be considered by health care providers and adults at high risk for lung cancer in discussions about LCS. If fully implemented, these recommendations have a high likelihood of significantly reducing death and suffering from lung cancer in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M D Wolf
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute Center for Onco-Primary Care, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Tina Ya-Chen Shih
- David Geffen School of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Louise C Walter
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Timothy R Church
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Elizabeth T H Fontham
- Health Sciences Center, School of Public Health, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elena B Elkin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ruth D Etzioni
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Carmen E Guerra
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca B Perkins
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karli K Kondo
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tyler B Kratzer
- Cancer Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Robert A Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van den Broek D, Groen HJM. Screening approaches for lung cancer by blood-based biomarkers: Challenges and opportunities. Tumour Biol 2024; 46:S65-S80. [PMID: 37393461 DOI: 10.3233/tub-230004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) is one of the leading causes for cancer-related deaths in the world, accounting for 28% of all cancer deaths in Europe. Screening for lung cancer can enable earlier detection of LC and reduce lung cancer mortality as was demonstrated in several large image-based screening studies such as the NELSON and the NLST. Based on these studies, screening is recommended in the US and in the UK a targeted lung health check program was initiated. In Europe lung cancer screening (LCS) has not been implemented due to limited data on cost-effectiveness in the different health care systems and questions on for example the selection of high-risk individuals, adherence to screening, management of indeterminate nodules, and risk of overdiagnosis. Liquid biomarkers are considered to have a high potential to address these questions by supporting pre- and post- Low Dose CT (LDCT) risk-assessment thereby improving the overall efficacy of LCS. A wide variety of biomarkers, including cfDNA, miRNA, proteins and inflammatory markers have been studied in the context of LCS. Despite the available data, biomarkers are currently not implemented or evaluated in screening studies or screening programs. As a result, it remains an open question which biomarker will actually improve a LCS program and do this against acceptable costs. In this paper we discuss the current status of different promising biomarkers and the challenges and opportunities of blood-based biomarkers in the context of lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel van den Broek
- Department of laboratory Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Trulson I, Klawonn F, von Pawel J, Holdenrieder S. Improvement of differential diagnosis of lung cancer by use of multiple protein tumor marker combinations. Tumour Biol 2024; 46:S81-S98. [PMID: 38277317 DOI: 10.3233/tub-230021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in hospitalized patients is crucial for appropriate treatment choice. OBJECTIVE To investigate the relevance of serum tumor markers (STMs) and their combinations for the differentiation of NSCLC and SCLC subtypes. METHODS Between 2000 and 2003, 10 established STMs were assessed retrospectively in 311 patients with NSCLC, 128 with SCLC prior systemic first-line therapy and 51 controls with benign lung diseases (BLD), by automatized electrochemiluminescence immunoassay technology. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of both individual and multiple STMs with corresponding sensitivities at 90% specificity. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD guidelines) were followed. RESULTS CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin-19 fragment), CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) and NSE (neuron specific enolase) were significantly higher in all lung cancers vs BLD, reaching AUCs of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87), 0.78 (0.73-0.84), and 0.88 (0.84-0.93), respectively. By the three marker combination, the discrimination between benign and all malignant cases was improved resulting in an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96). In NSCLC vs. BLD, CYFRA 21-1, CEA and NSE were best discriminative STMs, with AUCs of 0.86 (95% CI 0.81-0.91), 0.80 (0.74-0.85), and 0.85 (0.79-0.91). The three marker combination also improved the AUC: 0.92; 95% CI 0.89-0.96). In SCLC vs. BLD, ProGRP (pro-gastrin-releasing peptide) and NSE were best discriminative STMs, with AUCs of 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) and 0.96 (0.93-0.98), respectively, and slightly improved AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99) when in combination. Finally, discrimination between SCLC and NSCLC was possible by ProGRP (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.91), NSE (AUC 0.83; 0.78-0.88) and CYFRA 21-1 (AUC 0.69; 0.64-0.75) and by the combination of the 3 STMs (AUC 0.93; 0.91-0.96), with a sensitivity of 88% at 90% specificity. CONCLUSIONS The results confirm the power of STM combinations for the differential diagnosis of lung cancer from benign lesions and between histological lung cancer subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Trulson
- Munich Biomarker Research Center, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Klawonn
- Ostfalia University, Department of Computer Science, Wolfenbüttel, Germany
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Biostatistics, Braunschweig, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Holdenrieder
- Munich Biomarker Research Center, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Deck W, Hanley JA. Deaths averted: An unbiased alternative to rate ratios for measuring the performance of cancer screening programs. J Med Screen 2023:9691413231215963. [PMID: 37990538 DOI: 10.1177/09691413231215963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening trials and meta-analyses emphasize the ratio of cancer death rates in screening and control arms. However, this measure is diluted by the inclusion of deaths from cancers that only became detectable after the end of active screening. METHODS We review traditional analysis of cancer screening trials and show that ratio estimates are inevitably biased to the null, because follow-up (FU) must continue beyond the end of the screening period and thus includes cases only becoming detectable after screening ends. But because such cases are expected to occur in equal numbers in the two arms, calculation of the difference between the number of cancer deaths in the screening and control arms avoids this dilutional bias. This difference can be set against the number of invitations to screening; we illustrate by reanalyzing data from all trials of tomography screening of lung cancer (LC) using this measure. RESULTS In nine trials of LC screening from 2000 to 2013, a total of 94,441 high-risk patients were invited to be in screening or control groups, with high participation rates (average 95%). In the older trials comparing computed tomography to chest X-ray, 88,285 invitations averted 83 deaths (1068 per death averted (DA)). In the six more recent trials with no screening in the control group, 69,976 invitations averted 121 deaths (577 invitations per DA). DISCUSSION Screens per DA is an undiluted measure of screening's effect and it is unperturbed by the arbitrary duration of FU. This estimate can be useful for program planning and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilber Deck
- Direction de santé publique, Gaspé, Quebec, Canada
| | - James A Hanley
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ruggirello M, Valsecchi C, Ledda RE, Sabia F, Vigorito R, Sozzi G, Pastorino U. Long-term outcomes of lung cancer screening in males and females. Lung Cancer 2023; 185:107387. [PMID: 37801898 PMCID: PMC10788694 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study explored female and male overall mortality and lung cancer (LC) survival in two LC screening (LCS) populations, focusing on the predictive value of coronary artery calcification (CAC) at baseline low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). METHODS This retrospective study analysed data of 6495 heavy smokers enrolled in the MILD and BioMILD LCS trials between 2005 and 2016. The primary objective of the study was to assess sex differences in all-cause mortality and LC survival. CAC scores were automatically calculated on LDCT images by a validated artificial intelligence (AI) software. Sex differences in 12-year cause-specific mortality rates were stratified by age, pack-years and CAC score. RESULTS The study included 2368 females and 4127 males. The 12-year all-cause mortality rates were 4.1 % in females and 7.7 % in males (p < 0.0001), and median CAC score was 8.7 vs. 41 respectively (p < 0.0001). All-cause mortality increased with rising CAC scores (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) for both sexes. Although LC incidence was not different between the two sexes, females had lower rates of 12-year LC mortality (1.0 % vs. 1.9 %, p = 0.0052), and better LC survival from diagnosis (72.3 % vs. 51.7 %; p = 0.0005), with a similar proportion of stage I (58.1 % vs. 51.2 %, p = 0.2782). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that female LCS participants had lower rates of all-cause mortality at 12 years and better LC survival than their male counterparts, with similar LC incidence rates and stage at diagnosis. The lower CAC burden observed in women at all ages might contribute to explain their lower rates of all-cause mortality and better LC survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Ruggirello
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Valsecchi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Eufrasia Ledda
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Federica Sabia
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Vigorito
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Sozzi
- Tumour Genomics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo Pastorino
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Lung cancer represents a large burden on society with a staggering incidence and mortality rate that has steadily increased until recently. The impetus to design an effective screening program for the deadliest cancer in the United States and worldwide began in 1950. It has taken more than 50 years of numerous clinical trials and continued persistence to arrive at the development of modern-day screening program. As the program continues to grow, it is important for clinicians to understand its evolution, track outcomes, and continually assess the impact and bias of screening on the medical, social, and economic systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai V N Salfity
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way Suite 2472, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
| | - Betty C Tong
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3531 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Madison R Kocher
- Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Tina D Tailor
- Division of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3808 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mimae T, Okada M. Asian Perspective on Lung Cancer Screening. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33:385-400. [PMID: 37806741 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2023.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Japan and worldwide. Early detection of lung cancer is an important strategy for decreasing mortality. Advances in diagnostic imaging have made it possible to detect lung cancer at an early stage in medical practice. Conversely, screening of asymptomatic healthy populations is recommended only when the evidence shows the benefits of regular intervention. Due to a variety of evidence and racial differences, screening methods vary from country to country. This article focused on the perspective of lung cancer screening in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Mimae
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Revel MP, Chassagnon G. Ten reasons to screen women at risk of lung cancer. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:176. [PMID: 37857978 PMCID: PMC10587052 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01512-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
This opinion piece reviews major reasons for promoting lung cancer screening in at-risk women who are smokers or ex-smokers, from the age of 50. The epidemiology of lung cancer in European women is extremely worrying, with lung cancer mortality expected to surpass breast cancer mortality in most European countries. There are conflicting data as to whether women are at increased risk of developing lung cancer compared to men who have a similar tobacco exposure. The sharp increase in the incidence of lung cancer in women exceeds the increase in their smoking exposure which is in favor of greater susceptibility. Lung and breast cancer screening could be carried out simultaneously, as the screening ages largely coincide. In addition, lung cancer screening could be carried out every 2 years, as is the case for breast cancer screening, if the baseline CT scan is negative.As well as detecting early curable lung cancer, screening can also detect coronary heart disease and osteoporosis induced by smoking. This enables preventive measures to be taken in addition to smoking cessation assistance, to reduce morbidity and mortality in the female population. Key points • The epidemiology of lung cancer in European women is very worrying.• Lung cancer is becoming the leading cause of cancer mortality in European women.• Women benefit greatly from screening in terms of reduced risk of death from lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pierre Revel
- Université Paris Cité, 85 Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris, 75006, France.
- Department of Radiology, Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris, 75014, France.
| | - Guillaume Chassagnon
- Université Paris Cité, 85 Boulevard Saint-Germain, Paris, 75006, France
- Department of Radiology, Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris, 75014, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schütte W, Gütz S, Nehls W, Blum TG, Brückl W, Buttmann-Schweiger N, Büttner R, Christopoulos P, Delis S, Deppermann KM, Dickgreber N, Eberhardt W, Eggeling S, Fleckenstein J, Flentje M, Frost N, Griesinger F, Grohé C, Gröschel A, Guckenberger M, Hecker E, Hoffmann H, Huber RM, Junker K, Kauczor HU, Kollmeier J, Kraywinkel K, Krüger M, Kugler C, Möller M, Nestle U, Passlick B, Pfannschmidt J, Reck M, Reinmuth N, Rübe C, Scheubel R, Schumann C, Sebastian M, Serke M, Stoelben E, Stuschke M, Thomas M, Tufman A, Vordermark D, Waller C, Wolf J, Wolf M, Wormanns D. [Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]. Pneumologie 2023; 77:671-813. [PMID: 37884003 DOI: 10.1055/a-2029-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Schütte
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Krankenhaus Martha Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle (Saale)
| | - Sylvia Gütz
- St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Leipzig, Abteilung für Innere Medizin I, Leipzig
| | - Wiebke Nehls
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin und Geriatrie, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring
| | - Torsten Gerriet Blum
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | - Wolfgang Brückl
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 3, Schwerpunkt Pneumologie, Klinikum Nürnberg Nord
| | | | - Reinhard Büttner
- Institut für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie, Uniklinik Köln, Berlin
| | | | - Sandra Delis
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Nikolas Dickgreber
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thoraxonkologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Klinikum Rheine
| | | | - Stephan Eggeling
- Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Klinikum Neukölln, Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Berlin
| | - Jochen Fleckenstein
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes und Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg
| | - Michael Flentje
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg
| | - Nikolaj Frost
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Infektiologie/Pneumologie, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - Frank Griesinger
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg
| | | | - Andreas Gröschel
- Klinik für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Clemenshospital, Münster
| | | | | | - Hans Hoffmann
- Klinikum Rechts der Isar, TU München, Sektion für Thoraxchirurgie, München
| | - Rudolf M Huber
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum Munchen
| | - Klaus Junker
- Klinikum Oststadt Bremen, Institut für Pathologie, Bremen
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Klinikum der Universität Heidelberg, Abteilung Diagnostische Radiologie, Heidelberg
| | - Jens Kollmeier
- Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Klinik für Pneumologie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Berlin
| | | | - Marcus Krüger
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Halle-Dölau
| | | | - Miriam Möller
- Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Dölau, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Halle-Dölau
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Kliniken Maria Hilf, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Mönchengladbach
| | | | - Joachim Pfannschmidt
- Klinik für Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin
| | - Martin Reck
- Lungeclinic Grosshansdorf, Pneumologisch-onkologische Abteilung, Grosshansdorf
| | - Niels Reinmuth
- Klinik für Pneumologie, Thorakale Onkologie, Asklepios Lungenklinik Gauting, Gauting
| | - Christian Rübe
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Homburg
| | | | | | - Martin Sebastian
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt
| | - Monika Serke
- Zentrum für Pneumologie und Thoraxchirurgie, Lungenklinik Hemer, Hemer
| | | | - Martin Stuschke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | - Michael Thomas
- Thoraxklinik am Univ.-Klinikum Heidelberg, Thorakale Onkologie, Heidelberg
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik V, Thorakale Onkologie, LMU Klinikum München
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle
| | - Cornelius Waller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg
| | | | - Martin Wolf
- Klinikum Kassel, Klinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kassel
| | - Dag Wormanns
- Evangelische Lungenklinik, Radiologisches Institut, Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lam DCL, Liam CK, Andarini S, Park S, Tan DSW, Singh N, Jang SH, Vardhanabhuti V, Ramos AB, Nakayama T, Nhung NV, Ashizawa K, Chang YC, Tscheikuna J, Van CC, Chan WY, Lai YH, Yang PC. Lung Cancer Screening in Asia: An Expert Consensus Report. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:1303-1322. [PMID: 37390982 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence and mortality of lung cancer are highest in Asia compared with Europe and USA, with the incidence and mortality rates being 34.4 and 28.1 per 100,000 respectively in East Asia. Diagnosing lung cancer at early stages makes the disease amenable to curative treatment and reduces mortality. In some areas in Asia, limited availability of robust diagnostic tools and treatment modalities, along with variations in specific health care investment and policies, make it necessary to have a more specific approach for screening, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with lung cancer in Asia compared with the West. METHOD A group of 19 advisors across different specialties from 11 Asian countries, met on a virtual Steering Committee meeting, to discuss and recommend the most affordable and accessible lung cancer screening modalities and their implementation, for the Asian population. RESULTS Significant risk factors identified for lung cancer in smokers in Asia include age 50 to 75 years and smoking history of more than or equal to 20 pack-years. Family history is the most common risk factor for nonsmokers. Low-dose computed tomography screening is recommended once a year for patients with screening-detected abnormality and persistent exposure to risk factors. However, for high-risk heavy smokers and nonsmokers with risk factors, reassessment scans are recommended at an initial interval of 6 to 12 months with subsequent lengthening of reassessment intervals, and it should be stopped in patients more than 80 years of age or are unable or unwilling to undergo curative treatment. CONCLUSIONS Asian countries face several challenges in implementing low-dose computed tomography screening, such as economic limitations, lack of efforts for early detection, and lack of specific government programs. Various strategies are suggested to overcome these challenges in Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chi-Leung Lam
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Chong-Kin Liam
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Sita Andarini
- Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Persahabatan Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Samina Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel S W Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Navneet Singh
- Lung Cancer Clinic, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Seung Hun Jang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Varut Vardhanabhuti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Antonio B Ramos
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Anesthesia, Lung Center of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Tomio Nakayama
- Division of Screening Assessment and Management, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control, Japan
| | - Nguyen Viet Nhung
- Vietnam National Lung Hospital, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, VNU Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Kazuto Ashizawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yeun-Chung Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jamsak Tscheikuna
- Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Wai Yee Chan
- Imaging Department, Gleneagles Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Jalan Ampang, 50450 Kuala Lumpur; Department of Biomedical Imaging, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Yeur-Hur Lai
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pan-Chyr Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan & National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Caballeros Lam M, Pujols P, Ezponda Casajús A, Guillén Valderrama F, García Velloso MJ, Wyss A, García Del Barrio L, Larrache Latasa J, Pueyo Villoslada J, Lozano Escario MD, de-Torres JP, Alcaide Ocaña AB, Campo Ezquibela A, Seijo Maceiras L, Montuenga Badía L, Zulueta J, Iñarrairaegui Bastarrica M, Herrero Santos I, Bastarrika Alemañ G. Lung cancer screening using low-dose CT and FDG-PET in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1100-1108. [PMID: 36929835 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
To address the feasibility of implementing a lung cancer screening program in liver transplant recipients (LTR) targeted to detect early-stage lung cancer one hundred twenty-four LTR (89% male, 59.8+/-8.8 y old), who entered the lung cancer screening program at our hospital were reviewed. The results of the diagnostic algorithm using low-dose CT and F-18-fluorodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) were analyzed. Lung cancer was detected in 12 LTR (9.7%), most of which corresponded to the non-small cell subtype. Two of the 12 lung cancers were detected in the baseline study (prevalence of 1.6%), whereas 10 patients were diagnosed with lung cancer in the follow-up (incidence of 8.1%). Considering all cancers, 10 of 12 (83.3%) were diagnosed at stage I, one cancer was diagnosed at stage IIIA, and another one at stage IV. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of F-18-fluorodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography to detect malignancy in our cohort were 81.8%,100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. A carefully followed multidisciplinary lung cancer screening algorithm in LTR that includes F-18-fluorodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography and low-dose CT allows lung cancer to be diagnosed at an early stage while reducing unnecessary invasive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Pujols
- School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Alejandra Wyss
- Department of Geological and Mining Engineering. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
| | | | | | | | | | - Juan P de-Torres
- Department of Pulmonary, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Luis Montuenga Badía
- Solid tumors and biomarkers program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Javier Zulueta
- Department of Pulmonary, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Feng X, Wu WYY, Onwuka JU, Haider Z, Alcala K, Smith-Byrne K, Zahed H, Guida F, Wang R, Bassett JK, Stevens V, Wang Y, Weinstein S, Freedman ND, Chen C, Tinker L, Nøst TH, Koh WP, Muller D, Colorado-Yohar SM, Tumino R, Hung RJ, Amos CI, Lin X, Zhang X, Arslan AA, Sánchez MJ, Sørgjerd EP, Severi G, Hveem K, Brennan P, Langhammer A, Milne RL, Yuan JM, Melin B, Johansson M, Robbins HA, Johansson M. Lung cancer risk discrimination of prediagnostic proteomics measurements compared with existing prediction tools. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:1050-1059. [PMID: 37260165 PMCID: PMC10483263 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to develop a proteomics-based risk model for lung cancer and evaluate its risk-discriminatory performance in comparison with a smoking-based risk model (PLCOm2012) and a commercially available autoantibody biomarker test. METHODS We designed a case-control study nested in 6 prospective cohorts, including 624 lung cancer participants who donated blood samples at most 3 years prior to lung cancer diagnosis and 624 smoking-matched cancer free participants who were assayed for 302 proteins. We used 470 case-control pairs from 4 cohorts to select proteins and train a protein-based risk model. We subsequently used 154 case-control pairs from 2 cohorts to compare the risk-discriminatory performance of the protein-based model with that of the Early Cancer Detection Test (EarlyCDT)-Lung and the PLCOm2012 model using receiver operating characteristics analysis and by estimating models' sensitivity. All tests were 2-sided. RESULTS The area under the curve for the protein-based risk model in the validation sample was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 0.81) compared with 0.64 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.70) for the PLCOm2012 model (Pdifference = .001). The EarlyCDT-Lung had a sensitivity of 14% (95% CI = 8.2% to 19%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI = 81% to 92%) for incident lung cancer. At the same specificity of 86%, the sensitivity for the protein-based risk model was estimated at 49% (95% CI = 41% to 57%) and 30% (95% CI = 23% to 37%) for the PLCOm2012 model. CONCLUSION Circulating proteins showed promise in predicting incident lung cancer and outperformed a standard risk prediction model and the commercialized EarlyCDT-Lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoshuang Feng
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Wendy Yi-Ying Wu
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | | | - Zahra Haider
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - Karine Alcala
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Hana Zahed
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Florence Guida
- Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Renwei Wang
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Julie K Bassett
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria Stevens
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ying Wang
- American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stephanie Weinstein
- Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Neal D Freedman
- Metabolic Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Chu Chen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lesley Tinker
- Women’s Health Initiative Clinical Coordinating Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Therese Haugdahl Nøst
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Muller
- Division of Genetic Medicine, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK
| | - Sandra M Colorado-Yohar
- Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Regional Health Council, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Research Group on Demography and Health, National Faculty of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Hyblean Association for Epidemiological Research, AIRE ONLUS Ragusa, Ragusa, Italy
| | - Rayjean J Hung
- Prosserman Centre for Population Health Research, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xihong Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xuehong Zhang
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan A Arslan
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria-Jose Sánchez
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP), Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ib, Granada, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Elin Pettersen Sørgjerd
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | | | - Kristian Hveem
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
| | - Paul Brennan
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Arnulf Langhammer
- HUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
- Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Beatrice Melin
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - Mikael Johansson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden
| | - Hilary A Robbins
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Mattias Johansson
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leiter A, Veluswamy RR, Wisnivesky JP. The global burden of lung cancer: current status and future trends. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:624-639. [PMID: 37479810 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00798-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 93.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. However, lung cancer incidence and mortality rates differ substantially across the world, reflecting varying patterns of tobacco smoking, exposure to environmental risk factors and genetics. Tobacco smoking is the leading risk factor for lung cancer. Lung cancer incidence largely reflects trends in smoking patterns, which generally vary by sex and economic development. For this reason, tobacco control campaigns are a central part of global strategies designed to reduce lung cancer mortality. Environmental and occupational lung cancer risk factors, such as unprocessed biomass fuels, asbestos, arsenic and radon, can also contribute to lung cancer incidence in certain parts of the world. Over the past decade, large-cohort clinical studies have established that low-dose CT screening reduces lung cancer mortality, largely owing to increased diagnosis and treatment at earlier disease stages. These data have led to recommendations that individuals with a high risk of lung cancer undergo screening in several economically developed countries and increased implementation of screening worldwide. In this Review, we provide an overview of the global epidemiology of lung cancer. Lung cancer risk factors and global risk reduction efforts are also discussed. Finally, we summarize lung cancer screening policies and their implementation worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Leiter
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Rajwanth R Veluswamy
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Juan P Wisnivesky
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jani CT, Singh H, Abdallah N, Mouchati C, Arora S, Kareff S, Salciccioli J, Thomson CC, Velcheti V. Trends in Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality (1990-2019) in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis of Gender and State-Level Disparities. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2300255. [PMID: 38127772 PMCID: PMC10752493 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. This study aims to analyze lung cancer incidence, mortality, and related statistics from 1990 to 2019, focusing on national- and state-level trends and exploring potential disparities between sexes. METHODS The Global Burden of Disease database was used to extract tracheal, bronchus, and lung cancer mortality data from 1990 to 2019 for both males and females and across all states of the United States. Age-standardized incidence rates, age-standardized mortality rates, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and mortality-to-incidence indices (MIIs) were studied to assess for gender-based, geographic, and temporal disparities. Joinpoint regression analysis was performed to further evaluate trends. RESULTS The incidence of these cancers in the United States decreased between 1990 and 2019 by 23.35%, with a more significant decline in males (37.73%) than females (1.41%). Similarly, for mortality, a decrease was observed for both sexes combined (26.83%), but much more significantly for males (40.23%) than females (6.01%). The MIIs decreased overall, but there were variations across states. DALYs decreased for both sexes combined, with males experiencing a larger reduction, but an increase was noted in some states for females. CONCLUSION This analysis reveals diverse trends pertaining to the incidence, mortality, and disability burden associated with lung cancer by sex and states in the United States, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to reduce disparities. These findings contribute to our understanding of the current landscape of lung cancer and can inform future strategies for prevention, early detection, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinmay T. Jani
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Miami, Miami, FL
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA
| | - Harpreet Singh
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Nour Abdallah
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Christian Mouchati
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shreya Arora
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA
| | - Samuel Kareff
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Justin Salciccioli
- MDR Collaborative Group, London, United Kingdom
- Brigham and Women's Hospital—Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gnanaraj J, Ijaz SH, Khaliq W. Prevalence of hospitalized women at high-risk for developing lung cancer. Postgrad Med 2023; 135:750-754. [PMID: 37773631 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2023.2265987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening with low-dose computer tomography (CT) has been shown to reduce the lung cancer mortality in high-risk individuals by 20%. Despite the proven mortality benefit, the utilization of lung cancer screening among high-risk populations remains low. OBJECTIVE This study explores the prevalence of high-risk population for developing lung cancer among hospitalized women and evaluates the screening behavior toward other common cancers during a hospital stay. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study in which 248 cancer-free hospitalized women aged 50-75 years who reported current or prior smoking were enrolled during hospital admission at an academic center. A bedside survey was conducted to collect socio-demographic, cancer screening behavior, and medical comorbidities for the study patients. Unpaired t-test and Chi-square tests were used to compare characteristics and common cancer screening behavior by lung cancer risk stratification. RESULTS Forty-three percent of the hospitalized women were at intermediate to high-risk for developing lung cancer risk. Intermediate to high-risk women were more likely to be older, Caucasian, retired, or with a disability, and had higher comorbidity burden as compared to the low-risk group. Women at low and intermediate to high risk were equally non-adherent with breast (35% vs 31%, p = 0.59) and colorectal (32% vs 24%, p = 0.20) cancers screening guidelines. Only 38% of women from the intermediate to the high-risk group had a CT chest within the last year. CONCLUSION The study's findings suggest that almost half of the hospitalized women who report current or past smoking are at high-risk for developing lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Gnanaraj
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sardar H Ijaz
- Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Waseem Khaliq
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Doncic N, Zech CJ, Wild D, Bachmann H, Mallaev M, Tsvetkov N, Hojski A, Takes MTL, Lardinois D. CT-guided percutaneous marking of small pulmonary nodules with [ 99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb is very accurate and allows minimally invasive lung-sparing resection: a single-centre quality control. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023:10.1007/s00259-023-06410-1. [PMID: 37650931 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06410-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The detection of small lung nodules in thoracoscopic procedure is difficult when the lesions are not located within the outer border of the lung. In the case of ground-glass opacities, it is often impossible to palpate the lesion. Marking lung nodules using a radiotracer is a known technique. We analysed the accuracy and safety of the technique and the potential benefits of operating in a hybrid operating room. METHODS 57 patients, including 33 (58%) females with a median age of 67 years (range 21-82) were included. In 27 patients, we marked and resected the lesion in a hybrid room. In 30 patients, the lesion was marked at the department of radiology the day before resection. [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb (Pulmocis®) was used at an activity of 1 MBq in the hybrid room and at an activity of 3 MBq the day before to get technical feasible results. Radioactivity was detected using the Neoprobe® detection system. RESULTS Precise detection and resection of the nodules was possible in 95% of the lesions and in 93% of the patients. Complete thoracoscopic resection was possible in 90% of the patients. Total conversion rate was 10%, but conversion due to failure of the marking of the nodule was observed in only 5% of the patients. Histology revealed 28 (37%) primary lung cancers, 24 (32%) metastases and 21 (28%) benign lesions. In 13 (23%) patients, minor complications were observed. None of them required additional interventions. CONCLUSION The radio-guided detection of small pulmonary nodules is very accurate and safe after CT-guided injection of [99mTc]Tc-Macrosalb. Performing the operation in a hybrid room has several logistic advantages and allows using lower technetium-99m activities. The technique allows minimally invasive lung sparing resection and prevents overtreatment of benign and metastatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikola Doncic
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph J Zech
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Damian Wild
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Helga Bachmann
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Makhmudbek Mallaev
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nikolay Tsvetkov
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Aljaz Hojski
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin T L Takes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Didier Lardinois
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cellina M, Cacioppa LM, Cè M, Chiarpenello V, Costa M, Vincenzo Z, Pais D, Bausano MV, Rossini N, Bruno A, Floridi C. Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer Screening: The Future Is Now. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4344. [PMID: 37686619 PMCID: PMC10486721 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer has one of the worst morbidity and fatality rates of any malignant tumour. Most lung cancers are discovered in the middle and late stages of the disease, when treatment choices are limited, and patients' survival rate is low. The aim of lung cancer screening is the identification of lung malignancies in the early stage of the disease, when more options for effective treatments are available, to improve the patients' outcomes. The desire to improve the efficacy and efficiency of clinical care continues to drive multiple innovations into practice for better patient management, and in this context, artificial intelligence (AI) plays a key role. AI may have a role in each process of the lung cancer screening workflow. First, in the acquisition of low-dose computed tomography for screening programs, AI-based reconstruction allows a further dose reduction, while still maintaining an optimal image quality. AI can help the personalization of screening programs through risk stratification based on the collection and analysis of a huge amount of imaging and clinical data. A computer-aided detection (CAD) system provides automatic detection of potential lung nodules with high sensitivity, working as a concurrent or second reader and reducing the time needed for image interpretation. Once a nodule has been detected, it should be characterized as benign or malignant. Two AI-based approaches are available to perform this task: the first one is represented by automatic segmentation with a consequent assessment of the lesion size, volume, and densitometric features; the second consists of segmentation first, followed by radiomic features extraction to characterize the whole abnormalities providing the so-called "virtual biopsy". This narrative review aims to provide an overview of all possible AI applications in lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Cellina
- Radiology Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milano, Italy;
| | - Laura Maria Cacioppa
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cè
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Vittoria Chiarpenello
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Marco Costa
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Zakaria Vincenzo
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Daniele Pais
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Maria Vittoria Bausano
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (V.C.); (M.C.); (Z.V.); (D.P.); (M.V.B.)
| | - Nicolò Rossini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Floridi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy; (L.M.C.); (N.R.); (A.B.)
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Division of Radiology, Department of Radiological Sciences, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|