Grapefruit juice alters the systemic bioavailability and cardiac repolarization of terfenadine in poor metabolizers of terfenadine

Causes and Consequences of Variability in Drug Transporter Activity in Pediatric Drug Therapy

Drug transporters play a key role in mediating the uptake of endo- and exogenous substances into cells as well as their efflux. Therefore, variability in drug transporter activity can influence pharmaco- and toxicokinetics and be a determinant of drug safety and efficacy. In children, particularly in neonates and young infants, the contribution of tissue-specific drug transporters to drug absorption, distribution, and excretion may differ from that in adults. In this review 5 major factors and their interdependence that may influence drug transporter activity in children are discussed: developmental differences, genetic polymorphisms, pediatric comorbidities, interacting comedication, and environmental factors. Even if data are sparse, altered drug transporter activity due to those factors have been associated with clinically relevant differences in drug disposition, efficacy, and safety in pediatric patients. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in drug transporter-encoding genes were the most studied source of drug transporter variability in children. However, in the age group where drug transporter activity has been reported to differ from that in adults, namely neonates and young infants, hardly any studies have been performed. Longitudinal studies in this young population are required to investigate the age- and disease-dependent genotype-phenotype relationships and relevance of drug transporter drug-drug interactions. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approaches can integrate drug- and patient-specific parameters, including drug transporter ontogeny, and may further improve in silico predictions of pediatric-specific pharmacokinetics.

Grapefruit-Drug Interactions: Can Interactions With Drugs Be Avoided?

Grapefruit is rich in flavonoids, which have been demonstrated to have a preventive influence on many chronic diseases, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease. However, since the early 1990s, the potential health benefits of grapefruit have been overshadowed by the possible risk of interactions between drugs and grapefruit and grapefruit juice. Several drugs interacting with grapefruit are known in different drug classes, such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and immunosuppressives. Currently known mechanisms of interaction include the inhibition of cytochrome P450 as a major mechanism, but potential interactions with P-glycoprotein and organic anion transporters have also been reported. This review is designed to provide a comprehensive summary of underlying mechanisms of interaction and human clinical trials performed in the area of grapefruit drug interactions and to point out possible replacements for drugs with a high potential for interactions.

Evaluation of drug interactions in intact hepatocytes: Inhibitors of terfenadine metabolism

Terfenadine has been associated with several adverse drug interactions and it was of interest to develop in vitro systems to explain and predict such interactions. The metabolism of terfenadine was studied using intact hepatocytes from primary human and rat hepatocyte cultures, and the immortalized human hepatoma cell line HepG2. Rates and routes of biotransformation were analysed by HPLC. Terfenadine was extensively metabolized by all three cell culture systems during exposure periods ranging from 4 to 24 hr. Human and rat hepatocytes and HepG2 cells formed products of C-oxidation (an acid metabolite and its precursor alcohol metabolite). Human hepatocytes also formed the N-dealkylation product azacyclonol. Several cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) substrates and inhibitors were evaluated for their ability to inhibit terfenadine biotransformation. In rat hepatocytes, ketoconazole, erythromycin and troleandomycin failed to inhibit; in HepG2 cells, only ketoconazole potently inhibited terfenadine metabolism. In human hepatocytes, ketoconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, troleandomycin, cyclosporin and naringenin inhibited terfenadine metabolism. The results suggest that human hepatocytes may be a useful system for screening for inhibitors of terfenadine metabolism.

Grapefruit-drug interactions

Grapefruit juice and grapefruit product consumption have potential health benefits; however, their intake is also associated with interactions with certain drugs, including calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressants and antihistamines. The primary mechanism through which interactions are mediated is mechanism-based intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition by furanocoumarins resulting in increased bioavailability of administered medications that are substrates. Grapefruit products have also been associated with interactions with P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and uptake transporters (e.g. organic anion-transporting polypeptides [OATPs]). Polyphenolic compounds such as flavonoids have been proposed as the causative agents of the P-gp and OATP interactions. The mechanisms and magnitudes of the interactions can be influenced by the concentrations of furanocoumarins and flavonoids in the grapefruit product, the volume of juice consumed, and the inherent variability of specific enzymes and transporter components in humans. It is therefore challenging to predict the extent of grapefruit product-drug interactions and to compare available in vitro and in vivo data. The clinical significance of such interactions also depends on the disposition and toxicity profile of the drug being administered. The aim of this review is to outline the mechanisms of grapefruit-drug interactions and present a comprehensive summary of those agents affected and whether they are likely to be of clinical relevance.

The effect of grapefruit juice on drug disposition

INTRODUCTION

Since their initial discovery in 1989, grapefruit juice (GFJ)-drug interactions have received extensive interest from the scientific, medical, regulatory and lay communities. Although knowledge regarding the effects of GFJ on drug disposition continues to expand, the list of drugs studied in the clinical setting remains relatively limited.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the in vitro effects of GFJ and its constituents on the activity of CYP enzymes, organic anion-transporting polypeptides (OATPs), P-glycoprotein, esterases and sulfotransferases. The translational applicability of the in vitro findings to the clinical setting is discussed for each drug metabolizing enzyme and transporter. Reported AUC ratios for available GFJ-drug interaction studies are also provided. Relevant investigations were identified by searching the PubMed electronic database from 1989 to 2010.

EXPERT OPINION

GFJ increases the bioavailability of some orally administered drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A and normally undergo extensive presystemic extraction. In addition, GFJ can decrease the oral absorption of a few drugs that rely on OATPs in the gastrointestinal tract for their uptake. The number of drugs shown to interact with GFJ in vitro is far greater than the number of clinically relevant GFJ-drug interactions. For the majority of patients, complete avoidance of GFJ is unwarranted.

Drug interactions

Drugs for allergy are often taken in combination with other drugs, either to treat allergy or other conditions. In common with many pharmaceuticals, most such drugs are subject to metabolism by P450 enzymes and to transmembrane transport. This gives rise to considerable potential for drug-drug interactions, to which must be added consideration of drug-diet interactions. The potential for metabolism-based drug interactions is increasingly being taken into account during drug development, using a variety of in silico and in vitro approaches. Prediction of transporter-based interactions is not as advanced. The clinical importance of a drug interaction will depend upon a number of factors, and it is important to address concerns quantitatively, taking into account the therapeutic index of the compound.

Medicinal importance of grapefruit juice and its interaction with various drugs

Grapefruit juice is consumed widely in today's health conscious world as a protector against cardiovascular diseases and cancers. It has however, been found to be an inhibitor of the intestinal cytochrome P - 450 3A4 system, which is responsible for the first pass metabolism of many drugs. The P - glycoprotein pump, found in the brush border of the intestinal wall which transports many of these cytochrome P - 450 3A4 substrates, has also been implicated to be inhibited by grapefruit juice. By inhibiting these enzyme systems, grapefruit juice alters the pharmacokinetics of a variety of medications, leading to elevation of their serum concentrations. Most notable are its effects on the calcium channel antagonist and the statin group of drugs. In the case of many drugs, the increased serum concentration has been found to be associated with increased frequency of dose dependent adverse effects. In this review, we have discussed the phytochemistry of grapefruit juice, the various drugs involved in the drug - grapefruit juice reaction with their mechanisms of action and have presented the clinical implications of these interactions.

Second-Generation Antihistamines

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.

Herbal modulation of P-glycoprotein

P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is a 170 kDa phosphorylated glycoprotein encoded by human MDR1 gene. It is responsible for the systemic disposition of numerous structurally and pharmacologically unrelated lipophilic and amphipathic drugs, carcinogens, toxins, and other xenobiotics in many organs, such as the intestine, liver, kidney, and brain. Like cytochrome P450s (CYP3A4), Pgp is vulnerable to inhibition, activation, or induction by herbal constituents. This was demonstrated by using an ATPase assay, purified Pgp protein or intact Pgp-expressing cells, and proper probe substrates and inhibitors. Curcumin, ginsenosides, piperine, some catechins from green tea, and silymarin from milk thistle were found to be inhibitors of Pgp, while some catechins from green tea increased Pgp-mediated drug transport by heterotropic allosteric mechanism, and St. John's wort induced the intestinal expression of Pgp in vitro and in vivo. Some components (e.g., bergamottin and quercetin) from grapefruit juice were reported to modulate Pgp activity. Many of these herbal constituents, in particular flavonoids, were reported to modulate Pgp by directly interacting with the vicinal ATP-binding site, the steroid-binding site, or the substrate-binding site. Some herbal constituents (e.g., hyperforin and kava) were shown to activate pregnane X receptor, an orphan nuclear receptor acting as a key regulator of MDR1 and many other genes. The inhibition of Pgp by herbal constituents may provide a novel approach for reversing multidrug resistance in tumor cells, whereas the stimulation of Pgp expression or activity has implication for chemoprotective enhancement by herbal medicines. Certain natural flavonols (e.g., kaempferol, quercetin, and galangin) are potent stimulators of the Pgp-mediated efflux of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene (a carcinogen). The modulation of Pgp activity and expression by these herb constituents may result in altered absorption and bioavailability of drugs that are Pgp substrates. This is exemplified by increased oral bioavailability of phenytoin and rifampin by piperine and decreased bioavailability of indinavir, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, digoxin, and fexofenadine by coadministered St. John's wort. However, many of these drugs are also substrates of CYP3A4. Thus, the modulation of intestinal Pgp and CYP3A4 represents an important mechanism for many clinically important herb-drug interactions. Further studies are needed to explore the relative role of Pgp and CYP3A4 modulation by herbs and the mechanism for the interplay of these two important proteins in herb-drug interactions.

Food-drug interaction: grapefruit juice augments drug bioavailability--mechanism, extent and relevance

More than a decade has passed since it was unintentionally discovered that grapefruit juice interacts with certain drugs. The coadministration of these drugs with grapefruit juice can markedly elevate drug bioavailability, and can alter pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug. The predominant mechanism for this interaction is the inhibition of cytochrome P-450 3A4 in the small intestine, resulting in a significant reduction of drug presystemic metabolism. An additional mechanism is, presumably, the inhibition of P-glycoprotein, a transporter that carries drug from the enterocyte back to the gut lumen, resulting in a further increase in the fraction of drug absorbed. Some calcium channel antagonists, benzodiazepines, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and cyclosporine are the most affected drugs. A single exposure to one glass of the juice can usually produce the maximal magnitude of the interaction. The data available so far, concerning this interaction and its clinical implications, are reviewed in this article. It is likely that more information regarding this interaction will accumulate in the future, and awareness of such is necessary for achieving optimal drug therapy.

Dietary effects on drug metabolism and transport

Metabolic food-drug interactions occur when the consumption of a particular food modulates the activity of a drug-metabolising enzyme system, resulting in an alteration of the pharmacokinetics of drugs metabolised by that system. A number of these interactions have been reported. Foods that contain complex mixtures of phytochemicals, such as fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and teas, have the greatest potential to induce or inhibit the activity of drug-metabolising enzymes, although dietary macroconstituents (i.e. total protein, fat and carbohydrate ratios, and total energy intake) can also have effects. Particularly large interactions may result from the consumption of herbal dietary supplements. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 appears to be especially sensitive to dietary effects, as demonstrated by reports of potentially clinically important interactions involving orally administered drugs that are substrates of this enzyme. For example, interactions of grapefruit juice with cyclosporin and felodipine, St John's wort with cyclosporin and indinavir, and red wine with cyclosporin, have the potential to require dosage adjustment to maintain drug concentrations within their therapeutic windows. The susceptibility of CYP3A4 to modulation by food constituents may be related to its high level of expression in the intestine, as well as its broad substrate specificity. Reported ethnic differences in the activity of this enzyme may be partly due to dietary factors. Food-drug interactions involving CYP1A2, CYP2E1, glucuronosyltransferases and glutathione S-transferases have also been documented, although most of these interactions are modest in magnitude and clinically relevant only for drugs that have a narrow therapeutic range. Recently, interactions involving drug transporters, including P-glycoprotein and the organic anion transporting polypeptide, have also been identified. Further research is needed to determine the scope, magnitude and clinical importance of food effects on drug metabolism and transport.

Prescription of QT-prolonging drugs in a cohort of about 5 million outpatients

Many drugs prolong the QT interval and increase the risk of torsade de pointes. Concurrent use of two or more of these drugs can further increase the risk, but the prevalence of concurrent prescription of QT-prolonging drugs is not known. Using the administrative claims database of a national pharmaceutical benefit manager, we conducted a retrospective cohort study in 4,825,345 subjects aged 18 years or older. After identifying 50 drugs with QT-prolonging potential, and an additional 26 drugs that inhibit the metabolic clearance of QT-prolonging drugs, we measured the frequency of overlapping prescriptions for two or more of these drugs in the outpatient setting in 1999. Nearly 1.1 million subjects (22.8%) filled 4.4 million prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs. Of these, 103,119 subjects (9.4%) filled overlapping prescriptions for two or more of the drugs or for a QT-prolonging drug and another drug that inhibits its clearance; 7249 subjects (0.7%) filled overlapping prescriptions for three or more of these drugs. Twenty-two percent of subjects who filled overlapping prescriptions were aged 65 or older; 74% were women. Antidepressants were involved in nearly 50% of the cases. Concurrent prescription of QT-prolonging drugs is common in the outpatient setting, and antidepressants are involved in half of these cases. Large pharmaceutical claims databases are useful for detecting potentially harmful prescribing behaviors, but better clinical evidence on medication safety is needed before such a system can be implemented fully.

Involvement of CYP2J2 on the intestinal first-pass metabolism of antihistamine drug, astemizole

Orally administered astemizole is well absorbed but undergoes an extensive first-pass metabolism to O-desmethylastemizole. Desmethylastemizole is formed in the human microsomal systems of the small intestine as well as the liver, which suggests the role of cytochromes P450 (P450s) in the first-pass metabolism of astemizole. Human P450s involved in the O-demethylation of astemizole have, however, not been identified, and the involvement of twelve known drug-metabolizing P450s were denied. During the course of the P450 identification study, higher activities of the astemizole O-demethylation in the rabbit small intestine than in the liver (about 3-fold) were found. These data suggest the possible involvement of CYP2J, since P450 included in this subfamily is dominantly expressed in the small intestine of rabbits. Therefore, CYP2J2 cDNA has been isolated from the human cDNA library and expressed in COS-1 cells. A clear activity of astemizole O-demethylation was detected in recombinant CYP2J2 with K(m) = 0.65 microM and V(max) = 1129 pmol/nmol P450/min. Expression of the immunoreactive protein with CYP2J2 antibody was detected in the small intestine and liver. Expression levels of the immunoreactive protein with the CYP2J2 antibody in the small intestine were well correlated with the activities of the astemizole O-demethylation (r = 0.901, n = 5, p < 0.05). The CYP2J2 substrates, arachidonic acid and ebastine, strongly inhibited the microsomal astemizole O-demethylation in the human small intestines and recombinant CYP2J2. These results indicate the involvement of CYP2J2 in the presystemic elimination of astemizole in the human small intestine.

Food-drug interactions

Interactions between food and drugs may inadvertently reduce or increase the drug effect. The majority of clinically relevant food-drug interactions are caused by food-induced changes in the bioavailability of the drug. Since the bioavailability and clinical effect of most drugs are correlated, the bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic effect parameter. However, in order to evaluate the clinical relevance of a food-drug interaction, the impact of food intake on the clinical effect of the drug has to be quantified as well. As a result of quality review in healthcare systems, healthcare providers are increasingly required to develop methods for identifying and preventing adverse food-drug interactions. In this review of original literature, we have tried to provide both pharmacokinetic and clinical effect parameters of clinically relevant food-drug interactions. The most important interactions are those associated with a high risk of treatment failure arising from a significantly reduced bioavailability in the fed state. Such interactions are frequently caused by chelation with components in food (as occurs with alendronic acid, clodronic acid, didanosine, etidronic acid, penicillamine and tetracycline) or dairy products (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin), or by other direct interactions between the drug and certain food components (avitriptan, indinavir, itraconazole solution, levodopa, melphalan, mercaptopurine and perindopril). In addition, the physiological response to food intake, in particular gastric acid secretion, may reduce the bioavailability of certain drugs (ampicillin, azithromycin capsules, didanosine, erythromycin stearate or enteric coated, and isoniazid). For other drugs, concomitant food intake may result in an increase in drug bioavailability either because of a food-induced increase in drug solubility (albendazole, atovaquone, griseofulvin, isotretinoin, lovastatin, mefloquine, saquinavir and tacrolimus) or because of the secretion of gastric acid (itraconazole capsules) or bile (griseofulvin and halofantrine) in response to food intake. For most drugs, such an increase results in a desired increase in drug effect, but in others it may result in serious toxicity (halofantrine).

Evaluation of drug-induced QT interval prolongation: implications for drug approval and labelling

Assessment of proarrhythmic toxicity of newly developed drugs attracts significant attention from drug developers and regulatory agencies. Although no guidelines exist for such assessment, the present experience allows several key suggestions to be made and an appropriate technology to be proposed. Several different in vitro and in vitro preclinical models exist that, in many instances, correctly predict the clinical outcome. However, the correspondence between different preclinical models is not absolute. None of the available models has been demonstrated to be more predictive and/or superior to others. Generally, compounds that do not generate any adverse preclinical signal are less likely to lead to cardiac toxicity in humans. Nevertheless, differences in likelihood offer no guarantee compared with entities with a preclinical signal. Thus, the preclinical investigations lead to probabilistic answers with the possibility of both false positive and false negative findings. Clinical assessment of drug-induced QT interval prolongation is crucially dependent on the quality of electrocardiographic data and the appropriateness of electrocardiographic analyses. An integral part of this is a precise heart rate correction of QT interval, which has been shown to require the assessment of QT/RR relationship in each study individual. The numbers of electrocardiograms required for such an assessment are larger than usually obtained in pharmacokinetic studies. Thus, cardiac safety considerations need to be an integral part of early phase I/II studies. Once proarrhythmic safety has been established in phase I/II studies, large phase III studies and postmarketing surveillance can be limited to less strict designs. The incidence of torsade de pointes tachycardia varies from 1 to 5% with clearly proarrhythmic drugs (e.g. quinidine) to 1 in hundreds of thousands with drugs that are still considered unsafe (e.g. terfenadine, cisapride). Thus, not recording any torsade de pointes tachycardia during large phase III studies offers no guarantee, and the clinical premarketing evaluation has to rely on the assessment of QT interval changes. However, since QT interval prolongation is only an indirect surrogate of predisposition to the induction of torsade de pointes tachycardia, any conclusion that a drug is safe should be reserved until postmarketing surveillance data are reviewed. The area of drug-related cardiac proarrhythmic toxicity is fast evolving. The academic perspective includes identification of markers more focused compared with simple QT interval measurement, as well as identification of individuals with an increased risk of torsade de pointes. The regulatory perspective includes careful adaptation of new research findings.

Strategies to overcome simultaneous P-glycoprotein mediated efflux and CYP3A4 mediated metabolism of drugs

Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), abundant in both the liver and upper intestinal enterocytes, limits the systemic bioavailability of xenobiotics. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the MDR1 gene product, is also known to reduce the oral bioavailability of the drug molecules. High cellular expression of P-gp and CYP3A4 in mature intestinal enterocytes and their similar substrate specificity suggest that the function of these proteins may be complementary and may form a co-ordinated intestinal barrier. Various ongoing preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that the oral bioavailability of various P-gp and/or CYP3A4 substrates can be increased by simultaneous administration of P-gp and/or CYP3A4 inactivators. The current review describes the background and summarises several proposed hypotheses in modifying oral bioavailability by various drug-inhibitor interactions.

Drug-grapefruit juice interactions

Grapefruit juice, a beverage consumed in large quantities by the general population, is an inhibitor of the intestinal cytochrome P-450 3A4 system, which is responsible for the first-pass metabolism of many medications. Through the inhibition of this enzyme system, grapefruit juice interacts with a variety of medications, leading to elevation of their serum concentrations. Most notable are its effects on cyclosporine, some 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, and some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors. In the case of some drugs, these increased drug concentrations have been associated with an increased frequency of dose-dependent adverse effects. The P-glycoprotein pump, located in the brush border of the intestinal wall, also transports many cytochrome P-450 3A4 substrates, and this transporter also may be affected by grapefruit juice. This review discusses the proposed mechanisms of action and the medications involved in drug-grapefruit juice interactions and addresses the clinical implications of these interactions.

Grapefruit: the last decade acquisitions

This review reports the last decade acquisitions on grapefruit. New coumarins and limonoids were isolated and characterised. The bioavailability of many drugs was tested with grapefruit juice (GJ) coadministration; the inhibition on cytochrome P450 seems due to a synergic action between flavonoids and coumarins. Antimicrobial, antifeeding, insecticidal, and antitumour activities were also reported.

Dramatic inhibition of amiodarone metabolism induced by grapefruit juice

AIMS

Grapefruit juice increases blood concentrations of many drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Amiodarone is metabolized by CYP3A to N-desethylamiodarone (N-DEA). The aim of this study was to determine amiodarone kinetics when administrated with and without grapefruit juice.

METHODS

Eleven healthy adult volunteers took part in a single sequence, repeated-measures design study. Each subject, who had been evaluated 6 months previously for amiodarone pharmacokinetics, was given a single oral dose of amiodarone (17 mg kg-1) with three glasses of 300 ml of grapefruit juice on the same day.

RESULTS

Grapefruit juice completely inhibited the production of N-DEA, the major metabolite of amiodarone, in all subjects and increased the area-under-the-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of amiodarone (Cmax) by 50% and 84%, respectively, as compared with the control period during which water had been administrated instead of grapefruit juice (AUC: 35.9 +/- 14.3 vs 23.9 +/- 11.2 microg ml-1 h, P < 0.005 and Cmax: 3.45 +/- 1.7 vs 1.87 +/- 0.6 microg ml-1, P < 0. 02, respectively) (means +/- s.d.). This inhibition of N-DEA production led to a decrease in the alterations caused by amiodarone on PR and QTc intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Grapefruit juice dramatically alters the metabolism of amiodarone with complete inhibition of N-DEA production. These results are in agreement with in vitro data pointing to the involvement of CYP3 A in the metabolism of amiodarone and suggests that this interaction should be taken into account when prescribing this antiarrhythmic drug.

Influence of dietary components on the gastrointestinal metabolism and transport of drugs

There is widespread recognition that the ingestion of a meal is associated with a number of physiologic changes (gastric pH, gastric emptying, hepatic blood flow, etc.) that can significantly alter the rate and extent of drug absorption. It is also well recognized that the components of food can alter drug absorption through alterations in drug solubility. The nutritional status of a patient can also contribute to variability in the pharmacokinetics of certain drugs. The more recent finding that grapefruit juice can increase the bioavailability of certain drugs, by reducing presystemic intestinal metabolism, has led to renewed interest in the area of 'food-drug interactions.' Particular interest has focused on the effects of the grapefruit flavonoid, naringin, and the furanocoumarin, 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin, on the activity of intestinal CYP3A4. The possibility that grapefruit juice might affect drug absorption via an interaction with intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is also being explored. The growing use of herbal extracts and phytopharmaceuticals raises a new challenge-will the use of these products cause changes in the pharmacokinetics of 'conventional' drugs? As a case in point, consider the phytoestrogenic isoflavones, which are being promoted for a number of health benefits. Isoflavones such as genistein and daidzein can inhibit oxidative and conjugative metabolism in vitro and interact with transporters such as P-gp and the canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter. Given that P-gp and canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter are involved in the intestinal absorption and biliary excretion of a wide range of drugs and metabolites, it is reasonable to suspect that isoflavones may alter drug disposition in humans. However, this possibility has not been explored.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition

Drug interactions occur when the efficacy or toxicity of a medication is changed by administration of another substance. Pharmacokinetic interactions often occur as a result of a change in drug metabolism. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 oxidises a broad spectrum of drugs by a number of metabolic processes. The location of CYP3A4 in the small bowel and liver permits an effect on both presystemic and systemic drug disposition. Some interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors may also involve inhibition of P-glycoprotein. Clinically important CYP3A4 inhibitors include itraconazole, ketoconazole, clarithromycin, erythromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir and grapefruit juice. Torsades de pointes, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia associated with QT prolongation, can occur when these inhibitors are coadministered with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride or pimozide. Rhabdomyolysis has been associated with the coadministration of some 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ('statins') and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Symptomatic hypotension may occur when CYP3A4 inhibitors are given with some dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, as well with the phosphodiesterase inhibitor sildenafil. Excessive sedation can result from concomitant administration of benzodiazepine (midazolam, triazolam, alprazolam or diazepam) or nonbenzodiazepine (zopiclone and buspirone) hypnosedatives with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Ataxia can occur with carbamazepine, and ergotism with ergotamine, following the addition of a CYP3A4 inhibitor. Beneficial drug interactions can occur. Administration of a CYP3A4 inhibitor with cyclosporin may allow reduction of the dosage and cost of the immunosuppressant. Certain HIV protease inhibitors, e.g. saquinavir, have low oral bioavailability that can be profoundly increased by the addition of ritonavir. The clinical importance of any drug interaction depends on factors that are drug-, patient- and administration-related. Generally, a doubling or more in plasma drug concentration has the potential for enhanced adverse or beneficial drug response. Less pronounced pharmacokinetic interactions may still be clinically important for drugs with a steep concentration-response relationship or narrow therapeutic index. In most cases, the extent of drug interaction varies markedly among individuals; this is likely to be dependent on interindividual differences in CYP3A4 tissue content, pre-existing medical conditions and, possibly, age. Interactions may occur under single dose conditions or only at steady state. The pharmacodynamic consequences may or may not closely follow pharmacokinetic changes. Drug interactions may be most apparent when patients are stabilised on the affected drug and the CYP3A4 inhibitor is then added to the regimen. Temporal relationships between the administration of the drug and CYP3A4 inhibitor may be important in determining the extent of the interaction.

H1-receptor antagonists: safety issues

Histamine is an important neurotransmitter. Old (first-generation) H1-receptor antagonists such as chlorpheniramine, diphenhydramine, or triprolidine produce histamine blockade at H1-receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) and frequently cause somnolence or other CNS adverse effects. New (second generation) H1-antagonists such as cetirizine, fexofenadine, and loratadine represent an advance in therapeutics; in manufacturers' recommended doses, they enter the CNS in smaller amounts, produce relatively little somnolence or other CNS adverse effects, and do not exacerbate the adverse CNS effects of alcohol or other CNS-active chemicals. Two H1-antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine, have been found to prolong the QTc interval and, rarely, to cause cardiac dysrhythmias after overdose or under other specific conditions. This has led to withdrawal of regulatory approval for them. An H1-antagonist absolutely free from adverse effects under all circumstances is not yet available for use.

Grapefruit juice-drug interactions

The novel finding that grapefruit juice can markedly augment oral drug bioavailability was based on an unexpected observation from an interaction study between the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, felodipine, and ethanol in which grapefruit juice was used to mask the taste of the ethanol. Subsequent investigations showed that grapefruit juice acted by reducing presystemic felodipine metabolism through selective post-translational down regulation of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) expression in the intestinal wall. Since the duration of effect of grapefruit juice can last 24 h, repeated juice consumption can result in a cumulative increase in felodipine AUC and Cmax. The high variability of the magnitude of effect among individuals appeared dependent upon inherent differences in enteric CYP3A4 protein expression such that individuals with highest baseline CYP3A4 had the highest proportional increase. At least 20 other drugs have been assessed for an interaction with grapefruit juice. Medications with innately low oral bioavailability because of substantial presystemic metabolism mediated by CYP3A4 appear affected by grapefruit juice. Clinically relevant interactions seem likely for most dihydropyridines, terfenadine, saquinavir, cyclosporin, midazolam, triazolam and verapamil and may also occur with lovastatin, cisapride and astemizole. The importance of the interaction appears to be influenced by individual patient susceptibility, type and amount of grapefruit juice and administration-related factors. Although in vitro findings support the flavonoid, naringin, or the furanocoumarin, 6',7'-dihydroxybergamottin, as being active ingredients, a recent investigation indicated that neither of these substances made a major contribution to grapefruit juice-drug interactions in humans.

Atorvastatin does not produce a clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of terfenadine

The effect of atorvastatin, a CYP3A4 substrate, on the pharmacokinetics of terfenadine and its carboxylic acid metabolite, fexofenadine, were evaluated. Single 120-mg doses of terfenadine were given 2 weeks apart to healthy volunteers with 80-mg daily doses of atorvastatin administered from 7 days before through 2 days after the second terfenadine dose. Concentrations of terfenadine and fexofenadine were measured for 72 hours after each terfenadine dose. Administration of terfenadine alone or in combination with atorvastatin produced no alterations in the QTc interval. For terfenadine, atorvastatin coadministration produced an 8% decrease in maximum concentration (Cmax), a 35% increase in area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-infinity), and a 2% decrease in elimination half-life (t1/2). For fexofenadine, atorvastatin coadministration produced a 16% decrease in Cmax, a 2% decrease in AUC0-infinity and a 51 % increase in t1/2. None of these changes achieved statistical significance. Coadministration of atorvastatin with terfenadine does not result in a clinically significant drug interaction. Because 80 mg is the highest atorvastatin dose used clinically, drug interactions mediated by CYP3A4 inhibition are unlikely in clinical practice.

Effect of grapefruit juice on clarithromycin pharmacokinetics

To investigate whether grapefruit juice inhibits the metabolism of clarithromycin, 12 healthy subjects were given water or grapefruit juice before and after a clarithromycin dose of 500 mg in a randomized crossover study. Administration of grapefruit juice increased the time to peak concentration of both clarithromycin (82 +/- 35 versus 148 +/- 83 min; P = 0.02) and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (84 +/- 38 min versus 173 +/- 85; P = 0.01) but did not affect other pharmacokinetic parameters.

Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance

Concomitant intake with grapefruit juice increases the concentrations of many drugs in humans. The effect seems to be mediated mainly by suppression of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 in the small intestine wall. This results in a diminished first pass metabolism with higher bioavailability and increased maximal plasma concentrations of substrates of this enzyme. The effect was most pronounced in drugs with a high first pass degradation and in many cases has the clear potential to reach clinical relevance, as shown by an occasional change in drug effects or tolerability. For felodipine, nitrendipine, nisoldipine and saquinavir, the interaction was most marked with median increases of area under the curve (AUC) and/or the maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after single-dose administration (Cmax) values exceeding 70% of respective control periods. Less pronounced, but possibly relevant, concentration increases were found for nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil, cyclosporin, midazolam, triazolam and terfenadine. This list is not complete because many drugs have not been studied yet. The components of grapefruit juice which are the most probable causes of the interactions are psoralen derivatives, but the flavonoid naringenin may also contribute. Concomitant grapefruit juice intake does not generally decrease the variability of drug pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, it is recommended that patients refrain from drinking grapefruit juice when they are taking a drug that is extensively metabolised, unless a lack of interaction has already been demonstrated for the drug. It is also recommended that drugs possibly interacting with grapefruit juice should be appropriately labelled. A place for grapefruit juice as a drug-sparing agent in treatment involving expensive medicine cannot be derived from the information currently available on grapefruit juice interactions.

Drug interactions with grapefruit juice

Some drugs demonstrate a significantly greater (up to 3-fold) mean oral bioavailability on coadministration with grapefruit juice. With some calcium antagonists, the benzodiazepines midazolam and triazolam and the antihistamine terfenadine, changes in bioavailability are accompanied by altered drug action. Study design factors possibly contribute to the magnitude of changes in drug bioavailability; they include the source of the citrus, its intake schedule, drug formulations and individual metabolising capacity. The components of citrus juice that are responsible for clinical drug interactions have yet to be fully determined. Based on the flavonoid naringin's unique distribution in the plant kingdom, abundance in grapefruit and ability to inhibit metabolic enzymes, naringin is likely to be one of the grapefruit components influencing drug metabolism. Other components present in citrus fruit, such as furanocoumarins, may be more potent inhibitors than flavonoids and are under investigation. Conclusions drawn from clinical drug interaction studies should be considered specific to the citrus fruit products evaluated because of the variation in their natural product content. The predominant mechanism for enhanced bioavailability is presumably the inhibition of oxidative drug metabolism in the small intestine. The consistent findings across studies of diverse cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A substrates support the mechanistic hypothesis that 1 or more grapefruit juice components inhibit CYP3A enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract. The evaluation of the need to avoid the concomitant intake of grapefruit products with drugs is best done on an individual drug basis rather than collectively by drug class. Based on the narrow therapeutic range of cyclosporin and research experience in organ transplant recipients, its interaction with grapefruit juice is likely to be clinically significant.

Is my antihistamine safe?

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced its intention to withdraw the approval of terfenadine (Seldane), terfenadine with pseudoephedrine (Seldane D), and generic versions of terfenadine. Before granting approval for the marketing of fexofenadine (Allegra), terfenadine's active metabolite, the FDA determined terfenadine's benefits outweight its risks, despite its, known potential for serious cardiac effects.

Grapefruit juice-terfenadine single-dose interaction: magnitude, mechanism, and relevance

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the single dose-response effects of grapefruit juice on terfenadine disposition and electrocardiographic measurements.

METHODS

Twelve healthy males received 250 ml water or regular- or double-strength grapefruit juice with 60 mg terfenadine in a randomized crossover trial. Plasma concentrations of the cardiotoxic agent terfenadine and the active antihistaminic metabolite terfenadine carboxylate were determined over 8 hours. The QTc interval was monitored.

RESULTS

Terfenadine concentrations were measurable (> 1 ng/ml) in 27 (20%; p < 0.001) and 39 (30%; p < 0.001) samples from individuals treated with regular- and double-strength grapefruit juice, respectively, compared to only four (3%) samples with water. Terfenadine plasma peak drug concentration (Cmax) was also higher. Terfenadine carboxylate area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC), Cmax, and time to reach Cmax (tmax) were increased by both strengths of juice. However, terfenadine carboxylate apparent elimination half-life (t1/2) was not altered. The magnitude of the interaction of terfenadine carboxylate AUC and Cmax ranged severalfold and correlated among individuals for regular-strength (r2 = 0.87; p < 0.0001) and double-strength (r2 = 0.78; p < 0.0001) grapefruit juice. No differences in the pharmacokinetics of terfenadine and terfenadine carboxylate were observed between the two strengths of grapefruit juice. QTc interval was not altered.

CONCLUSIONS

A normal amount of regular-strength grapefruit juice produced maximum single-dose effects on terfenadine and carboxylic acid metabolite pharmacokinetics. The mechanism likely involved reduced presystemic drug elimination by inhibition of more than one metabolic pathway. The extent of the interaction was not sufficient to produce electrocardiographic changes. However, the pharmacokinetic effects were highly variable among individuals. This study further enhances the awareness of the potential for a serious interaction between grapefruit juice and terfenadine.