1
|
Low G, Ferguson C, Locas S, Tu W, Manolea F, Sam M, Wilson MP. Multiparametric MR assessment of liver fat, iron, and fibrosis: a concise overview of the liver "Triple Screen". Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2060-2073. [PMID: 37041393 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03887-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a common source of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) serves as a major cause of CLD with a rising annual prevalence. Additionally, iron overload can be both a cause and effect of CLD with a negative synergistic effect when combined with NAFLD. The development of state-of-the-art multiparametric MR solutions has led to a change in the diagnostic paradigm in CLD, shifting from traditional liver biopsy to innovative non-invasive methods for providing accurate and reliable detection and quantification of the disease burden. Novel imaging biomarkers such as MRI-PDFF for fat, R2 and R2* for iron, and liver stiffness for fibrosis provide important information for diagnosis, surveillance, risk stratification, and treatment. In this article, we provide a concise overview of the MR concepts and techniques involved in the detection and quantification of liver fat, iron, and fibrosis including their relative strengths and limitations and discuss a practical abbreviated MR protocol for clinical use that integrates these three MR biomarkers into a single simplified MR assessment. Multiparametric MR techniques provide accurate and reliable non-invasive detection and quantification of liver fat, iron, and fibrosis. These techniques can be combined in a single abbreviated MR "Triple Screen" assessment to offer a more complete metabolic imaging profile of CLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Low
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Craig Ferguson
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Stephanie Locas
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Wendy Tu
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Florin Manolea
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Medica Sam
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada
| | - Mitchell P Wilson
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta Hospital, WMC 2B2.41 8440-112 ST, Edmonton, AB, T6G2B7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reeder SB, Yokoo T, França M, Hernando D, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Alústiza JM, Gandon Y, Henninger B, Hillenbrand C, Jhaveri K, Karçaaltıncaba M, Kühn JP, Mojtahed A, Serai SD, Ward R, Wood JC, Yamamura J, Martí-Bonmatí L. Quantification of Liver Iron Overload with MRI: Review and Guidelines from the ESGAR and SAR. Radiology 2023; 307:e221856. [PMID: 36809220 PMCID: PMC10068892 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Accumulation of excess iron in the body, or systemic iron overload, results from a variety of causes. The concentration of iron in the liver is linearly related to the total body iron stores and, for this reason, quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) is widely regarded as the best surrogate to assess total body iron. Historically assessed using biopsy, there is a clear need for noninvasive quantitative imaging biomarkers of LIC. MRI is highly sensitive to the presence of tissue iron and has been increasingly adopted as a noninvasive alternative to biopsy for detection, severity grading, and treatment monitoring in patients with known or suspected iron overload. Multiple MRI strategies have been developed in the past 2 decades, based on both gradient-echo and spin-echo imaging, including signal intensity ratio and relaxometry strategies. However, there is a general lack of consensus regarding the appropriate use of these methods. The overall goal of this article is to summarize the current state of the art in the clinical use of MRI to quantify liver iron content and to assess the overall level of evidence of these various methods. Based on this summary, expert consensus panel recommendations on best practices for MRI-based quantification of liver iron are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B. Reeder
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Manuela França
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - José María Alústiza
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Yves Gandon
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Claudia Hillenbrand
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Kartik Jhaveri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Musturay Karçaaltıncaba
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Suraj D. Serai
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Richard Ward
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - John C. Wood
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jin Yamamura
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boehm C, Schlaeger S, Meineke J, Weiss K, Makowski MR, Karampinos DC. On the water-fat in-phase assumption for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med 2023; 89:1068-1082. [PMID: 36321543 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To (a) define multi-peak fat model-based effective in-phase echo times for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in water-fat regions, (b) analyze the relationship between fat fraction, field map quantification bias and susceptibility bias, and (c) evaluate the susceptibility mapping performance of the proposed effective in-phase echoes in comparison to single-peak in-phase echoes and water-fat separation for regions where both water and fat are present. METHODS Effective multipeak in-phase echo times for a bone marrow and a liver fat spectral model were derived from a single voxel simulation. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to assess the field map estimation error as a function of fat fraction for the different in-phase echoes. Additionally, a phantom scan and in vivo scans in the liver, spine, and breast were performed and evaluated with respect to quantification accuracy. RESULTS The use of single-peak in-phase echoes can introduce a worst-case susceptibility bias of 0.43 $$ 0.43 $$ ppm. The use of effective multipeak in-phase echoes shows a similar quantitative performance in the numerical simulation, the phantom and in all in vivo anatomies when compared to water-fat separation-based QSM. CONCLUSION QSM based on the proposed effective multipeak in-phase echoes can alleviate the quantification bias present in QSM based on single-peak in-phase echoes. When compared to water-fat separation-based QSM the proposed effective in-phase echo times achieve a similar quantitative performance while drastically reducing the computational expense for field map estimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christof Boehm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Schlaeger
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Marcus R Makowski
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dimitrios C Karampinos
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bray TJP, Bainbridge A, Lim E, Hall-Craggs MA, Zhang H. MAGORINO: Magnitude-only fat fraction and R * 2 estimation with Rician noise modeling. Magn Reson Med 2023; 89:1173-1192. [PMID: 36321525 PMCID: PMC10092287 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnitude-based fitting of chemical shift-encoded data enables proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ estimation where complex-based methods fail or when phase data are inaccessible or unreliable. However, traditional magnitude-based fitting algorithms do not account for Rician noise, creating a source of bias. To address these issues, we propose an algorithm for magnitude-only PDFF and R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ estimation with Rician noise modeling (MAGORINO). METHODS Simulations of multi-echo gradient-echo signal intensities are used to investigate the performance and behavior of MAGORINO over the space of clinically plausible PDFF, R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ , and SNR values. Fitting performance is assessed through detailed simulation, including likelihood function visualization, and in a multisite, multivendor, and multi-field-strength phantom data set and in vivo. RESULTS Simulations show that Rician noise-based magnitude fitting outperforms existing Gaussian noise-based fitting and reveals two key mechanisms underpinning the observed improvement. First, the likelihood functions exhibit two local optima; Rician noise modeling increases the chance that the global optimum corresponds to the ground truth. Second, when the global optimum corresponds to ground truth for both noise models, the optimum from Rician noise modeling is closer to ground truth. Multisite phantom experiments show good agreement of MAGORINO PDFF with reference values, and in vivo experiments replicate the performance benefits observed in simulation. CONCLUSION The MAGORINO algorithm reduces Rician noise-related bias in PDFF and R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ estimation, thus addressing a key limitation of existing magnitude-only fitting methods. Our results offer insight into the importance of the noise model for selecting the correct optimum when multiple plausible optima exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J P Bray
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Imaging, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Bainbridge
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Medical Physics, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Lim
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret A Hall-Craggs
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Medical Physics, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Computer Science and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hosten N, Bülow R, Völzke H, Domin M, Schmidt CO, Teumer A, Ittermann T, Nauck M, Felix S, Dörr M, Markus MRP, Völker U, Daboul A, Schwahn C, Holtfreter B, Mundt T, Krey KF, Kindler S, Mksoud M, Samietz S, Biffar R, Hoffmann W, Kocher T, Chenot JF, Stahl A, Tost F, Friedrich N, Zylla S, Hannemann A, Lotze M, Kühn JP, Hegenscheid K, Rosenberg C, Wassilew G, Frenzel S, Wittfeld K, Grabe HJ, Kromrey ML. SHIP-MR and Radiology: 12 Years of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Single Center. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:33. [PMID: 35052197 PMCID: PMC8775435 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP), a population-based study from a rural state in northeastern Germany with a relatively poor life expectancy, supplemented its comprehensive examination program in 2008 with whole-body MR imaging at 1.5 T (SHIP-MR). We reviewed more than 100 publications that used the SHIP-MR data and analyzed which sequences already produced fruitful scientific outputs and which manuscripts have been referenced frequently. Upon reviewing the publications about imaging sequences, those that used T1-weighted structured imaging of the brain and a gradient-echo sequence for R2* mapping obtained the highest scientific output; regarding specific body parts examined, most scientific publications focused on MR sequences involving the brain and the (upper) abdomen. We conclude that population-based MR imaging in cohort studies should define more precise goals when allocating imaging time. In addition, quality control measures might include recording the number and impact of published work, preferably on a bi-annual basis and starting 2 years after initiation of the study. Structured teaching courses may enhance the desired output in areas that appear underrepresented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Hosten
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
| | - Robin Bülow
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
| | - Henry Völzke
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
| | - Martin Domin
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
| | - Carsten Oliver Schmidt
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
| | - Alexander Teumer
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
| | - Till Ittermann
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
| | - Matthias Nauck
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stephan Felix
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marcus Dörr
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marcello Ricardo Paulista Markus
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Uwe Völker
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Interfaculty Institute of Genetics and Functional Genomics, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Amro Daboul
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.D.); (C.S.); (T.M.); (S.S.); (R.B.)
| | - Christian Schwahn
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.D.); (C.S.); (T.M.); (S.S.); (R.B.)
| | - Birte Holtfreter
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, Endodontology, and Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (B.H.); (T.K.)
| | - Torsten Mundt
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.D.); (C.S.); (T.M.); (S.S.); (R.B.)
| | - Karl-Friedrich Krey
- Department of Orthodontics, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany;
| | - Stefan Kindler
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (S.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Maria Mksoud
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (S.K.); (M.M.)
| | - Stefanie Samietz
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.D.); (C.S.); (T.M.); (S.S.); (R.B.)
| | - Reiner Biffar
- Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Gerodontology and Biomaterials, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.D.); (C.S.); (T.M.); (S.S.); (R.B.)
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Partner Site Rostock/Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Thomas Kocher
- Department of Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology, Endodontology, and Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (B.H.); (T.K.)
| | - Jean-Francois Chenot
- Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (H.V.); (C.O.S.); (A.T.); (T.I.); (W.H.); (J.-F.C.)
| | - Andreas Stahl
- Clinic of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Frank Tost
- Clinic of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (A.S.); (F.T.)
| | - Nele Friedrich
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Stephanie Zylla
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Anke Hannemann
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Greifswald, 10785 Berlin, Germany; (M.N.); (S.F.); (M.D.); (M.R.P.M.); (U.V.); (N.F.); (S.Z.); (A.H.)
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Martin Lotze
- Functional Imaging Unit, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany;
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- Institute and Policlinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical University, Carl-Gustav Carus, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Katrin Hegenscheid
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
| | - Christian Rosenberg
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
| | - Georgi Wassilew
- Clinic of Orthopedics, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany;
| | - Stefan Frenzel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (S.F.); (K.W.); (H.J.G.)
| | - Katharina Wittfeld
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (S.F.); (K.W.); (H.J.G.)
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Site Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Hans J. Grabe
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (S.F.); (K.W.); (H.J.G.)
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock/Greifswald, Site Greifswald, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Kromrey
- Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; (N.H.); (R.B.); (M.D.); (K.H.); (C.R.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weingärtner S, Desmond KL, Obuchowski NA, Baessler B, Zhang Y, Biondetti E, Ma D, Golay X, Boss MA, Gunter JL, Keenan KE, Hernando D. Development, validation, qualification, and dissemination of quantitative MR methods: Overview and recommendations by the ISMRM quantitative MR study group. Magn Reson Med 2021; 87:1184-1206. [PMID: 34825741 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Quantitative MR Study Group, this article provides an overview of considerations for the development, validation, qualification, and dissemination of quantitative MR (qMR) methods. This process is framed in terms of two central technical performance properties, i.e., bias and precision. Although qMR is confounded by undesired effects, methods with low bias and high precision can be iteratively developed and validated. For illustration, two distinct qMR methods are discussed throughout the manuscript: quantification of liver proton-density fat fraction, and cardiac T1 . These examples demonstrate the expansion of qMR methods from research centers toward widespread clinical dissemination. The overall goal of this article is to provide trainees, researchers, and clinicians with essential guidelines for the development and validation of qMR methods, as well as an understanding of necessary steps and potential pitfalls for the dissemination of quantitative MR in research and in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Weingärtner
- Department of Imaging Physics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Kimberly L Desmond
- Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy A Obuchowski
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Bettina Baessler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Emma Biondetti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, D'Annunzio University of Chieti and Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Dan Ma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Xavier Golay
- Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom.,Gold Standard Phantoms Limited, Rochester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A Boss
- Center for Research and Innovation, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Kathryn E Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA
| | - Diego Hernando
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mózes FE, Valkovič L, Pavlides M, Robson MD, Tunnicliffe EM. Hydration and glycogen affect T 1 relaxation times of liver tissue. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2021; 34:e4530. [PMID: 33951228 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
T1 mapping is a useful tool for the assessment of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease but still suffers from a large unexplained variance in healthy subjects. This study aims to characterize the potential effects of liver glycogen concentration and body hydration status on liver shortened modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (shMOLLI) T1 measurements. Eleven glycogen phantoms and 12 healthy volunteers (mean age: 31 years, three females) were scanned at 3 T using inversion recovery spin echo, multiple contrast spin echo (in phantoms), shMOLLI T1 mapping, multiple-echo spoiled gradient recalled echo and 13 C spectroscopy (in healthy volunteers). Phantom r1 and r2 relaxivities were determined from measured T1 and T2 values. Participants underwent a series of five metabolic experiments to vary their glycogen concentration and hydration levels: feeding, food fasting, exercising, underhydration, and rehydration. Descriptive statistics were calculated for shMOLLI T1 , inferior vena cava to aorta cross-sectional area ratio (IVC/Ao) as a marker of body hydration status, glycogen concentration, T2 * and proton density fat fraction values. A linear mixed model for shMOLLI R1 was constructed to determine the effects of glycogen concentration and IVC/Ao ratio. The mean shMOLLI T1 after fasting was 737 ± 67 ms. The mean within-subject change was 80 ± 45 ms. The linear mixed model revealed a glycogen r1 relaxivity in volunteers (0.18 M-1 s-1 , p = 0.03) close to that determined in phantoms (0.28 M-1 s-1 ). A unit change in IVC/Ao ratio was associated with a drop of -0.113 s-1 in R1 (p < 0.001). This study demonstrated a dependence of liver shMOLLI T1 values on liver glycogen concentration and overall body hydration status. Interparticipant variation of hydration status should be minimized in future liver MRI studies. Additionally, caution is advised when interpreting liver T1 measurements in participants with excess liver glycogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc E Mózes
- The Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ladislav Valkovič
- The Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Imaging Methods, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michael Pavlides
- The Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew D Robson
- The Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Perspectum, Gemini One, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth M Tunnicliffe
- The Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moura Cunha G, Navin PJ, Fowler KJ, Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL, Sirlin CB. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for chronic liver disease. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201377. [PMID: 33635729 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) has rapidly increased in prevalence over the past two decades, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Historically, the clinical gold standard for diagnosis, assessment of severity, and longitudinal monitoring of CLD has been liver biopsy with histological analysis, but this approach has limitations that may make it suboptimal for clinical and research settings. Magnetic resonance (MR)-based biomarkers can overcome the limitations by allowing accurate, precise, and quantitative assessment of key components of CLD without the risk of invasive procedures. This review briefly describes the limitations associated with liver biopsy and the need for non-invasive biomarkers. It then discusses the current state-of-the-art for MRI-based biomarkers of liver iron, fat, and fibrosis, and inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Moura Cunha
- Department of Radiology, Liver Imaging Group, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, Liver Imaging Group, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Claude B Sirlin
- Department of Radiology, Liver Imaging Group, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sethi S, Giza SA, Goldberg E, Empey MEET, de Ribaupierre S, Eastabrook GDM, de Vrijer B, McKenzie CA. Quantification of 1.5 T T 1 and T 2 * Relaxation Times of Fetal Tissues in Uncomplicated Pregnancies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:113-121. [PMID: 33586269 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its many advantages, experience with fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited, as is knowledge of how fetal tissue relaxation times change with gestational age (GA). Quantification of fetal tissue relaxation times as a function of GA provides insight into tissue changes during fetal development and facilitates comparison of images across time and subjects. This, therefore, can allow the determination of biophysical tissue parameters that may have clinical utility. PURPOSE To demonstrate the feasibility of quantifying previously unknown T1 and T2 * relaxation times of fetal tissues in uncomplicated pregnancies as a function of GA at 1.5 T. STUDY TYPE Pilot. POPULATION Nine women with singleton, uncomplicated pregnancies (28-38 weeks GA). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE All participants underwent two iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL-IQ) acquisitions at different flip angles (6° and 20°) at 1.5 T. ASSESSMENT Segmentations of the lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, muscle, and adipose tissue (AT) were conducted using water-only images and proton density fat fraction maps. Driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1 (DESPOT1 ) was used to quantify the mean water T1 of the lungs, intraabdominal organs, and muscle, and the mean water and lipid T1 of AT. IDEAL T2 * maps were used to quantify the T2 * values of the lungs, intraabdominal organs, and muscle. STATISTICAL TESTS F-tests were performed to assess the T1 and T2 * changes of each analyzed tissue as a function of GA. RESULTS No tissue demonstrated a significant change in T1 as a function of GA (lungs [P = 0.89]; liver [P = 0.14]; spleen [P = 0.59]; kidneys [P = 0.97]; muscle [P = 0.22]; AT: water [P = 0.36] and lipid [P = 0.14]). Only the spleen and muscle T2 * showed a significant decrease as a function of GA (lungs [P = 0.67); liver [P = 0.05]; spleen [P < 0.05]; kidneys [P = 0.70]; muscle [P < 0.05]). DATA CONCLUSION These preliminary data suggest that the T1 of the investigated tissues is relatively stable over 28-38 weeks GA, while the T2 * change in spleen and muscle decreases significantly in that period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simran Sethi
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie A Giza
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Estee Goldberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sandrine de Ribaupierre
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Brain and Mind Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Health, Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Genevieve D M Eastabrook
- Division of Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Health, Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbra de Vrijer
- Division of Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Health, Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charles A McKenzie
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Health, Children's Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Iron overload is a common clinical problem resulting from hereditary hemochromatosis or secondary hemosiderosis (mainly associated with transfusion therapy), being also associated with chronic liver diseases and metabolic disorders. Excess of iron accumulates in organs like the liver, pancreas and heart. Without treatment, patients with iron overload disorders will develop liver cirrhosis, diabetes and cardiomyopathy. Iron quantification is therefore crucial not only for diagnosis of iron overload but also to monitor iron-reducing therapies. Liver iron concentration is considered the surrogate marker of total body iron stores. Because liver biopsy is invasive and prone to high variability and sampling bias, MR imaging has emerged as a non-invasive method and gained wide acceptance, now being considered the standard of care for assessing iron overload. Nevertheless, there are different MR techniques for iron quantification and there is still no consensus about the best technique or postprocessing tool for hepatic iron quantification, with the choice of imaging technique depending mainly on the local expertise as well on the available equipment and software. Because different methods should not be used interchangeably, it is important to choose one method and use the same one when following up patients over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela França
- Radiology Department - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, I3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.
| | - João Gomes Carvalho
- Radiology Department - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wunderlich AP, Schmidt SA, Mauro V, Kneller L, Kannengießer S, Beer M, Cario H. Liver Iron Content Determination Using a Volumetric Breath‐Hold Gradient‐Echo Sequence With In‐Line
R
2
* Calculation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 52:1550-1556. [DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur P. Wunderlich
- Medical Center, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Ulm University Ulm Germany
| | - Stefan A. Schmidt
- Medical Center, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Ulm University Ulm Germany
| | - Valeria Mauro
- Medical Center, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Ulm University Ulm Germany
| | - Lena Kneller
- Medical Center, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Ulm University Ulm Germany
| | | | - Meinrad Beer
- Medical Center, Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Ulm University Ulm Germany
| | - Holger Cario
- Medical Center, Clinic for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine Ulm University Ulm Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guo Y, Liu Z, Wen Y, Spincemaille P, Zhang H, Jafari R, Zhang S, Eskreis-Winkler S, Gillen KM, Yi P, Feng Q, Feng Y, Wang Y. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the spine using in-phase echoes to initialize inhomogeneous field and R2* for the nonconvex optimization problem of fat-water separation. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 32:e4156. [PMID: 31424131 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of human spinal vertebrae from a multi-echo gradient-echo (GRE) sequence is challenging, because comparable amounts of fat and water in the vertebrae make it difficult to solve the nonconvex optimization problem of fat-water separation (R2*-IDEAL) for estimating the magnetic field induced by tissue susceptibility. We present an in-phase (IP) echo initialization of R2*-IDEAL for QSM in the spinal vertebrae. Ten healthy human subjects were recruited for spine MRI. A 3D multi-echo GRE sequence was implemented to acquire out-phase and IP echoes. For the IP method, the R2* and field maps estimated by separately fitting the magnitude and phase of IP echoes were used to initialize gradient search R2*-IDEAL to obtain final R2*, field, water, and fat maps, and the final field map was used to generate QSM. The IP method was compared with the existing Zero method (initializing the field to zero), VARPRO-GC (variable projection using graphcuts but still initializing the field to zero), and SPURS (simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift using graphcuts for initialization) on both simulation and in vivo data. The single peak fat model was also compared with the multi-peak fat model. There was no substantial difference on QSM between the single peak and multi-peak fat models, but there were marked differences among different initialization methods. The simulations demonstrated that IP provided the lowest error in the field map. Compared to Zero, VARPRO-GC and SPURS, the proposed IP method provided substantially improved spine QSM in all 10 subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihao Guo
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhe Liu
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Yan Wen
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Pascal Spincemaille
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Honglei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Ramin Jafari
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| | - Shun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Sarah Eskreis-Winkler
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Kelly M Gillen
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Peiwei Yi
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qianjin Feng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanqiu Feng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Uhrig M, Mueller J, Longerich T, Straub BK, Buschle LR, Schlemmer HP, Mueller S, Ziener CH. Susceptibility based multiparametric quantification of liver disease: Non-invasive evaluation of steatosis and iron overload. Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 63:114-122. [PMID: 31425813 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) of iron and fat correlates with biopsy results of hepatic steatosis and iron overload, and to compare MR-measurements with room-temperature susceptometer (RTS), ultrasound, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and serum ferritin. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this prospective study, a set of 42 patients out of 47 screened patients with several chronic liver diseases underwent MRI-examination at 1.5 T including R2-measurements by single-voxel high-speed T2-corrected multiecho spectroscopy, additional liver biopsy, abdominal ultrasound, CAP, and RTS. Routine blood and serum parameters were determined, including ferritin. Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and histologically confirmed extent of hepatic steatosis from liver biopsy were used as reference standard. For correlation of R2, RTS, CAP, ferritin, and ultrasound with results of AAS and histologically determined fat fraction of liver biopsy specimen, Spearman's and Pearson's correlation as well as receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis with cut-off values determined by maximizing Youden index was used. RESULTS MRS iron assessment correlated best with AAS, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.715 (p < 0.001), followed by RTS 0.520 (p < 0.001), and serum ferritin 0.213 (p = 0.088, not significant). MRS fat quantification correlated best with the histological confirmed extent of steatosis hepatis with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.836 (p < 0.001), followed by CAP 0.604 (p < 0.001) and sonographically diagnosed steatosis 0.358 (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION MRS by T2-corrected multiecho single-voxel spectroscopy correlated best with histological results of hepatic fat and iron content compared to RTS, CAP, abdominal ultrasound, and ferritin. Non-invasive methods to assess hepatic fat and iron are of clinical interest for follow-up examinations of patients with chronic liver diseases, where repeated biopsy is not indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Uhrig
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Radiology, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Mueller
- Dept. of Medicine, Salem Medical Center and Center for Alcohol Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Longerich
- Dept. of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beate Katharina Straub
- Dept. of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Dept. of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Lukas R Buschle
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Radiology, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Radiology, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Mueller
- Dept. of Medicine, Salem Medical Center and Center for Alcohol Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian H Ziener
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Radiology, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Henninger B, Alustiza J, Garbowski M, Gandon Y. Practical guide to quantification of hepatic iron with MRI. Eur Radiol 2019; 30:383-393. [PMID: 31392478 PMCID: PMC6890593 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06380-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Abstract Our intention is to demystify the MR quantification of hepatic iron (i.e., the liver iron concentration) and give you a step-by-step approach by answering the most pertinent questions. The following article should be more of a manual or guide for every radiologist than a classic review article, which just summarizes the literature. Furthermore, we provide important background information for professional communication with clinicians. The information regarding the physical background is reduced to a minimum. After reading this article, you should be able to perform adequate MR measurements of the LIC with 1.5-T or 3.0-T scanners. Key Points • MRI is widely accepted as the primary approach to non-invasively determine liver iron concentration (LIC). • This article is a guide for every radiologist to perform adequate MR measurements of the LIC. • When using R2* relaxometry, some points have to be considered to obtain correct measurements—all explained in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Henninger
- Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Jose Alustiza
- Osatek, Donostia Universitary Hospital, P. Dr. Beguiristain 109, 20014, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Maciej Garbowski
- Department of Haematology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Paul O'Gorman Bld, 72 Huntley St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Yves Gandon
- CHU Rennes, Inserm, LTSI - UMR_S 1099, University of Rennes, F-35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Triay Bagur A, Hutton C, Irving B, Gyngell ML, Robson MD, Brady M. Magnitude-intrinsic water-fat ambiguity can be resolved with multipeak fat modeling and a multipoint search method. Magn Reson Med 2019; 82:460-475. [PMID: 30874334 PMCID: PMC6593794 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a postprocessing algorithm for multiecho chemical‐shift encoded water–fat separation that estimates proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps over the full dynamic range (0‐100%) using multipeak fat modeling and multipoint search optimization. To assess its accuracy, reproducibility, and agreement with state‐of‐the‐art complex‐based methods, and to evaluate its robustness to artefacts in abdominal PDFF maps. Methods We introduce MAGO (MAGnitude‐Only), a magnitude‐based reconstruction that embodies multipeak liver fat spectral modeling and multipoint optimization, and which is compatible with asymmetric echo acquisitions. MAGO is assessed first for accuracy and reproducibility on publicly available phantom data. Then, MAGO is applied to N = 178 UK Biobank cases, in which its liver PDFF measures are compared using Bland‐Altman analysis with those from a version of the hybrid iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation (IDEAL) algorithm, LiverMultiScan IDEAL (LMS IDEAL, Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd, Oxford, UK). Finally, MAGO is tested on a succession of high field challenging cases for which LMS IDEAL generated artefacts in the PDFF maps. Results Phantom data showed accurate, reproducible MAGO PDFF values across manufacturers, field strengths, and acquisition protocols. Moreover, we report excellent agreement between MAGO and LMS IDEAL for 6‐echo, 1.5 tesla human acquisitions (bias = −0.02% PDFF, 95% confidence interval = ±0.13% PDFF). When tested on 12‐echo, 3 tesla cases from different manufacturers, MAGO was shown to be more robust to artefacts compared to LMS IDEAL. Conclusion MAGO resolves the water–fat ambiguity over the entire fat fraction dynamic range without compromising accuracy, therefore enabling robust PDFF estimation where phase data is inaccessible or unreliable and complex‐based and hybrid methods fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chloe Hutton
- Perspectum Diagnostics Ltd, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mozes FE, Tunnicliffe EM, Moolla A, Marjot T, Levick CK, Pavlides M, Robson MD. Mapping tissue water T 1 in the liver using the MOLLI T 1 method in the presence of fat, iron and B 0 inhomogeneity. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2019; 32:e4030. [PMID: 30462873 PMCID: PMC6492199 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 09/11/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping sequences can be useful in cardiac and liver tissue characterization, but determining underlying water T1 is confounded by iron, fat and frequency offsets. This article proposes an algorithm that provides an independent water MOLLI T1 (referred to as on-resonance water T1 ) that would have been measured if a subject had no fat and normal iron, and imaging had been done on resonance. Fifteen NiCl2 -doped agar phantoms with different peanut oil concentrations and 30 adults with various liver diseases, nineteen (63.3%) with liver steatosis, were scanned at 3 T using the shortened MOLLI (shMOLLI) T1 mapping, multiple-echo spoiled gradient-recalled echo and 1 H MR spectroscopy sequences. An algorithm based on Bloch equations was built in MATLAB, and water shMOLLI T1 values of both phantoms and human participants were determined. The quality of the algorithm's result was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient between shMOLLI T1 values and spectroscopically determined T1 values of the water, and by linear regression analysis. Correlation between shMOLLI and spectroscopy-based T1 values increased, from r = 0.910 (P < 0.001) to r = 0.998 (P < 0.001) in phantoms and from r = 0.493 (for iron-only correction; P = 0.005) to r = 0.771 (for iron, fat and off-resonance correction; P < 0.001) in patients. Linear regression analysis revealed that the determined water shMOLLI T1 values in patients were independent of fat and iron. It can be concluded that determination of on-resonance water (sh)MOLLI T1 independent of fat, iron and macroscopic field inhomogeneities was possible in phantoms and human subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferenc E. Mozes
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Elizabeth M. Tunnicliffe
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Ahmad Moolla
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM)University of Oxford, Churchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Thomas Marjot
- Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM)University of Oxford, Churchill HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Christina K. Levick
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
- Translational Gastroenterology UnitUniversity of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Michael Pavlides
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
- Translational Gastroenterology UnitUniversity of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreOxfordUK
| | - Matthew D. Robson
- The University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang Y, Zhou Z, Wang C, Cheng X, Wang L, Duanmu Y, Zhang C, Veronese N, Guglielmi G. Reliability of measuring the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and paraspinal muscles using MRI mDIXON-Quant sequence. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 24:302-307. [PMID: 30179158 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2018.17323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the reliability of measuring the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and the paraspinal muscles using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) mDIXON-Quant sequence. METHODS Thirty-one healthy volunteers were included. All participants underwent liver mDIXON-Quant imaging on a 3.0 T Philips MRI scanner by observer A. Within two weeks, observer B repeated the scan. After the examination, each observer independently measured the fat content of the third lumbar vertebra (L3), and the psoas (PS), erector spinae (ES), and multifidus (MF) muscles on central L3 axial images. After two weeks, each observer repeated the same measurements. They were blinded to their previous results. Reliability was estimated by evaluating the repeatability and reproducibility. RESULTS The repeatability of the fat content measurements of L3, PS, ES, and MF was high. The intraclass correlation coefficients of the fat content of L3, PS, ES, and MF were 0.997, 0.984, 0.997, and 0.995 for observer A and 0.948, 0.974, 0.963, and 0.995 for observer B, respectively. The reproducibility of the measurement of the fat content of L3, PS, ES, and MF was high, and the interclass correlation coefficients were 0.984, 0.981, 0.977, and 0.998, respectively. CONCLUSION Using mDIXON-Quant imaging to measure the fat content of the lumbar vertebral marrow and paraspinal muscles shows high reliability and is suitable for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuang Zhou
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Beijing Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoguang Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yangyang Duanmu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chenxin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Nicola Veronese
- Aging Branch National Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Guglielmi
- Department of Radiology University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Department of Radiology Scientific Institute "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Curtis WA, Fraum TJ, An H, Chen Y, Shetty AS, Fowler KJ. Quantitative MRI of Diffuse Liver Disease: Current Applications and Future Directions. Radiology 2019; 290:23-30. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- William A. Curtis
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Tyler J. Fraum
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Hongyu An
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Yasheng Chen
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Anup S. Shetty
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Kathryn J. Fowler
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Santarelli MF, Meloni A, De Marchi D, Pistoia L, Quarta A, Spasiano A, Landini L, Pepe A, Positano V. Estimation of pancreatic R2* for iron overload assessment in the presence of fat: a comparison of different approaches. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2018; 31:757-769. [PMID: 30043125 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-018-0695-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To propose a method for estimating pancreatic relaxation rate, R2*, from conventional multi-echo MRI, based on the nonlinear fitting of the acquired magnitude signal decay to MR signal models that take into account both the signal oscillations induced by fat and the different R2* values of pancreatic parenchyma and fat. MATERIALS AND METHODS Single-peak fat (SPF) and multi-peak fat (MPF) models were introduced. Single-R2* and dual-R2* assumptions were considered as well. Analyses were conducted on simulated data and 20 thalassemia major patients. RESULTS Simulations revealed the ability of the MPF model to correctly estimate the R2* value in a large range of fat fractions and R2* values. From the comparison between the results obtained with a single R2* value for water and fat and the dual-R2* approach, the latter is more accurate in both water R2* and fat fraction estimation. In patient's data analysis, a strong concordance was found between SPF and MPF estimated data with measurements done with manual signal correction and from fat-saturated images. The MPF method showed better reproducibility. CONCLUSION The MPF dual-R2* approach improves reproducibility and reduces image analysis time in the assessment of pancreatic R2* value in patients with iron overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonella Meloni
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele De Marchi
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Laura Pistoia
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Anna Spasiano
- UOS Malattie Rare Del Globulo Rosso, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Landini
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessia Pepe
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Positano
- Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio", Via Moruzzi, 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Stojanovska J, Lumeng CN, Griffin C, Hernando D, Hoffmann U, Haft JW, Kim KM, Burant CF, Singer K, Tsodikov A, Long BD, Romano MA, Tang PC, Yang B, Chenevert TL. Water-fat magnetic resonance imaging quantifies relative proportions of brown and white adipose tissues: ex-vivo experiments. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2018; 5:024007. [PMID: 30137870 PMCID: PMC6025480 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.024007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantifying the amount of brown adipose tissue (BAT) within white adipose tissue (WAT) in human depots may serve as a target to combat obesity. We aimed to quantify proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of BAT and WAT in relatively pure and in mixed preparation using water–fat imaging. Three ex-vivo experiments were performed at 3 T using excised interscapular BAT and inguinal/subcutaneous WAT from mice. The first two experiments consisted of BAT and WAT in separate tubes, and the third used mixed preparation with graded quantities of BAT and WAT. To investigate the influence of partial volume on PDFF metrics, low (2.66 mm3) and high spatial resolution (0.55 mm3 acquired voxels) in two orthogonal three-dimensional sections were compared. The low-resolution acquisitions are corrected for T2* and multipeak lipid spectrum, thus considered “quantitative,” whereas the high-resolution acquisitions are not corrected but were performed to better spatially segment BAT from WAT zones. As potential BAT metrics, we quantified the average PDFF and the volume of tissue having PDFF ≤50% (VOLPDFF≤50%) based on the PDFF histogram. In the first experiment, the average PDFF of BAT was 23±6% and 21±7.6% and the average PDFF of WAT was 76±7% and 87±7% using high- and low-resolution techniques, respectively. A similar trend with excellent reproducibility in average PDFF of BAT and WAT was observed in the second experiment. In the third experiment over the four acquisitions, the BAT-dominant tube demonstrated lower PDFF (mean ± SD) of 55±2% than WAT-dominant (69±4%) and WAT-only tubes (88±4%). Estimating VOLPDFF≤50%, the BAT-dominant tube demonstrated higher volume of 0.26 cm3 than WAT-dominant (0.16 cm3) and WAT-only tubes (0.01 cm3). The presence of BAT exhibits a lower PDFF relative to WAT, thus allowing segmentation of low PDFF tissue for quantification of volume representative of BAT. Future studies will determine the clinical relevance of BAT volume within human depots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jadranka Stojanovska
- Michigan Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Carey N Lumeng
- Michigan Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Molecular Physiology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Cameron Griffin
- Michigan Medicine, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Diego Hernando
- University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, Medical Physics Department, Madison, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Udo Hoffmann
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jonathan W Haft
- Michigan Medicine, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Karen M Kim
- Michigan Medicine, Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Kanakadurga Singer
- Michigan Medicine, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Alex Tsodikov
- School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Benjamin D Long
- University of Michigan Medical School, Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Matthew A Romano
- Michigan Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Paul C Tang
- Michigan Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Bo Yang
- Michigan Medicine, Cardiovascular Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- Michigan Medicine, Department of Radiology-MRI, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kistner A, Rydén H, Anderstam B, Hellström A, Skorpil M. Brown adipose tissue in young adults who were born preterm or small for gestational age. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2018; 31:641-647. [PMID: 29729148 DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2017-0547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is present and functions to dissipate energy as heat in young adults and can be assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to estimate the voxel fat fraction, i.e. proton density fat fraction (PDFF). It is hypothesized that subjects born preterm or small for gestational age (SGA) may exhibit disrupted BAT formation coupled to metabolic factors. Our purpose was to assess the presence of BAT in young adults born extremely preterm or SGA in comparison with controls. METHODS We studied 30 healthy subjects (median age, 21 years): 10 born extremely preterm, 10 full term but SGA and 10 full term with a normal birth weight (controls). We utilized an MRI technique combining multiple scans to enable smaller echo spacing and an advanced fat-water separation method applying graph cuts to estimate B0 inhomogeneity. We measured supraclavicular/cervical PDFF, R2*, fat volume, insulin-like growth factor 1, glucagon, thyroid stimulating hormone and the BAT-associated hormones fibroblast growth factor 21 and irisin. RESULTS The groups did not significantly differ in supraclavicular/cervical PDFF, R2*, fat volume or hormone levels. The mean supraclavicular/cervical PDFF was equivalent between the groups (range 75-77%). CONCLUSIONS Young adults born extremely preterm or SGA show BAT development similar to those born full term at a normal birth weight. Thus, the increased risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in these groups is not due to the absence of BAT, although our results do not exclude possible BAT involvement in this scenario. Larger studies are needed to understand these relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kistner
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Phone: +46 8 51770000, Fax: +46 8 51776900, Cell Phone: +46 709 919181
| | - Henric Rydén
- Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Björn Anderstam
- Department of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Hellström
- The Sahlgrenska Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology Research, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Skorpil
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Neuroradiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yan F, He N, Lin H, Li R. Iron deposition quantification: Applications in the brain and liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018; 48:301-317. [PMID: 29897645 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Iron has long been implicated in many neurological and other organ diseases. It is known that over and above the normal increases in iron with age, in certain diseases there is an excessive iron accumulation in the brain and liver. MRI is a noninvasive means by which to image the various structures in the brain in three dimensions and quantify iron over the volume of the object of interest. The quantification of iron can provide information about the severity of iron-related diseases as well as quantify changes in iron for patient follow-up and treatment monitoring. This article provides an overview of current MRI-based methods for iron quantification, specifically for the brain and liver, including: signal intensity ratio, R2 , R2*, R2', phase, susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Although there are numerous approaches to measuring iron, R2 and R2* are currently preferred methods in imaging the liver and QSM has become the preferred approach for imaging iron in the brain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018. J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2018;48:301-317.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Naying He
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Huimin Lin
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruokun Li
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quantifying iron content in magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2018; 187:77-92. [PMID: 29702183 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Measuring iron content has practical clinical indications in the study of diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, ferritinopathies and multiple sclerosis as well as in the quantification of iron content in microbleeds and oxygen saturation in veins. In this work, we review the basic concepts behind imaging iron using T2, T2*, T2', phase and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the human brain, liver and heart, followed by the applications of in vivo iron quantification in neurodegenerative diseases, iron tagged cells and ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles.
Collapse
|
24
|
Evaluation of six-point modified dixon and magnetic resonance spectroscopy for fat quantification: a fat–water–iron phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol 2017; 10:349-358. [DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0410-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
25
|
Kühn JP, Meffert P, Heske C, Kromrey ML, Schmidt CO, Mensel B, Völzke H, Lerch MM, Hernando D, Mayerle J, Reeder SB. Prevalence of Fatty Liver Disease and Hepatic Iron Overload in a Northeastern German Population by Using Quantitative MR Imaging. Radiology 2017; 284:706-716. [PMID: 28481195 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017161228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To quantify liver fat and liver iron content by measurement of confounder-corrected proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* and to identify clinical associations for fatty liver disease and liver iron overload and their prevalence in a large-scale population-based study. Materials and Methods From 2008 to 2013, 2561 white participants (1336 women; median age, 52 years; 25th and 75th quartiles, 42 and 62 years) were prospectively recruited to the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Complex chemical shift-encoded magnetic resonance (MR) examination of the liver was performed, from which PDFF and R2* were assessed. On the basis of previous histopathologic calibration, participants were stratified according to their liver fat and iron content as follows: none (PDFF, ≤5.1%; R2*, ≤41.0 sec-1), mild (PDFF, >5.1%; R2*, >41 sec-1), moderate (PDFF, >14.1%; R2*, >62.5 sec-1), high (PDFF: >28.0%; R2*: >70.1 sec-1). Prevalence of fatty liver diseases and iron overload was calculated (weighted by probability of participation). Clinical associations were identified by using boosting for generalized linear models. Results Median PDFF was 3.9% (range, 0.6%-41.5%). Prevalence of fatty liver diseases was 42.2% (1082 of 2561 participants); mild, 28.5% (730 participants); moderate, 12.0% (307 participants); high content, 1.8% (45 participants). Median R2* was 34.4 sec-1 (range, 14.0-311.8 sec-1). Iron overload was observed in 17.4% (447 of 2561 participants; mild, 14.7% [376 participants]; moderate, 0.8% [20 participants]; high content, 2.0% [50 participants]). Liver fat content correlated with waist-to-height ratio, alanine transaminase, uric acid, serum triglycerides, and blood pressure. Liver iron content correlated with mean serum corpuscular hemoglobin, male sex, and age. Conclusion In a white German population, the prevalence of fatty liver diseases and liver iron overload is 42.2% (1082 of 2561) and 17.4% (447 of 2561). Whereas liver fat is associated with predictors related to the metabolic syndrome, liver iron content is mainly associated with mean serum corpuscular hemoglobin. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens-Peter Kühn
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Peter Meffert
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Christian Heske
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Marie-Luise Kromrey
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Carsten O Schmidt
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Birger Mensel
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Henry Völzke
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Markus M Lerch
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Julia Mayerle
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| | - Scott B Reeder
- From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology (J.P.K., C.H., M.L.K., C.O.S., B.M.), Institute for Community Medicine (P.M., H.V.), and Department of Medicine A, University Medicine (M.M.L., J.M.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald, Berthold-Beitz-Platz, 17495 Greifswald, Germany; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (D.H., S.B.R.); and Department of Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis (S.B.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Voronina N, Lemcke H, Wiekhorst F, Kühn JP, Frank M, Steinhoff G, David R. Preparation and In Vitro Characterization of Magnetized miR-modified Endothelial Cells. J Vis Exp 2017:55567. [PMID: 28518114 PMCID: PMC5565141 DOI: 10.3791/55567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, the available surgical and pharmacological treatments for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are limited and often palliative. At the same time, gene and cell therapies are highly promising alternative approaches for CVD treatment. However, the broad clinical application of gene therapy is greatly limited by the lack of suitable gene delivery systems. The development of appropriate gene delivery vectors can provide a solution to current challenges in cell therapy. In particular, existing drawbacks, such as limited efficiency and low cell retention in the injured organ, could be overcome by appropriate cell engineering (i.e., genetic) prior to transplantation. The presented protocol describes the efficient and safe transient modification of endothelial cells using a polyethyleneimine superparamagnetic magnetic nanoparticle (PEI/MNP)-based delivery vector. Also, the algorithm and methods for cell characterization are defined. The successful intracellular delivery of microRNA (miR) into human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) has been achieved without affecting cell viability, functionality, or intercellular communication. Moreover, this approach was proven to cause a strong functional effect in introduced exogenous miR. Importantly, the application of this MNP-based vector ensures cell magnetization, with accompanying possibilities of magnetic targeting and non-invasive MRI tracing. This may provide a basis for magnetically guided, genetically engineered cell therapeutics that can be monitored non-invasively with MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Voronina
- Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy (RTC), Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rostock
| | - Heiko Lemcke
- Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy (RTC), Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rostock
| | | | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald
| | - Markus Frank
- Electron Microscopy Center, University of Rostock
| | - Gustav Steinhoff
- Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy (RTC), Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rostock
| | - Robert David
- Reference and Translation Center for Cardiac Stem Cell Therapy (RTC), Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Rostock;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Siracusano G, La Corte A, Milazzo C, Anastasi GP, Finocchio G, Gaeta M. On the R 2⁎ relaxometry in complex multi-peak multi-Echo chemical shift-based water-fat quantification: Applications to the neuromuscular diseases. Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 35:4-14. [PMID: 27569370 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Investigation of the feasibility of the R2⁎ mapping techniques by using latest theoretical models corrected for confounding factors and optimized for signal to noise ratio. THEORY AND METHODS The improvement of the performance of state of the art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relaxometry algorithms is challenging because of a non-negligible bias and still unresolved numerical instabilities. Here, R2⁎ mapping reconstructions, including complex fitting with multi-spectral fat-correction by using single-decay and double-decay formulation, are deeply studied in order to investigate and identify optimal configuration parameters and minimize the occurrence of numerical artifacts. The effects of echo number, echo spacing, and fat/water relaxation model type are evaluated through both simulated and in-vivo data. We also explore the stability and feasibility of the fat/water relaxation model by analyzing the impact of high percentage of fat infiltrations and local transverse relaxation differences among biological species. RESULTS The main limits of the MRI relaxometry are the presence of bias and the occurrence of artifacts, which significantly affect its accuracy. Chemical-shift complex R2⁎-correct single-decay reconstructions exhibit a large bias in presence of a significant difference in the relaxation rates of fat and water and with fat concentration larger than 30%. We find that for fat-dominated tissues or in patients affected by extensive iron deposition, MRI reconstructions accounting for multi-exponential relaxation time provide accurate R2⁎ measurements and are less prone to numerical artifacts. CONCLUSIONS Complex fitting and fat-correction with multi-exponential decay formulation outperforms the conventional single-decay approximation in various diagnostic scenarios. Although it still lacks of numerical stability, which requires model enhancement and support from spectroscopy, it offers promising perspectives for the development of relaxometry as a reliable tool to improve tissue characterization and monitoring of neuromuscular disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Siracusano
- Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, V.le F. D'alcontres, 31, 98166, Messina, Italy; Department of Computer Engineering and Telecommunications, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
| | - Aurelio La Corte
- Department of Computer Engineering and Telecommunications, University of Catania, Viale Andrea Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy
| | - Carmelo Milazzo
- Department of Biomedical sciences, Dental and of Morphological and Functional images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pio Anastasi
- Department of Biomedical sciences, Dental and of Morphological and Functional images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Finocchio
- Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Physical Sciences and Earth Sciences, University of Messina, V.le F. D'alcontres, 31, 98166, Messina, Italy; Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Via Vigna Murata 605, 00143, Roma, Italy
| | - Michele Gaeta
- Department of Biomedical sciences, Dental and of Morphological and Functional images, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Krafft AJ, Loeffler RB, Song R, Bian X, McCarville MB, Hankins JS, Hillenbrand CM. Does fat suppression via chemically selective saturation affect R2*-MRI for transfusional iron overload assessment? A clinical evaluation at 1.5T and 3T. Magn Reson Med 2015; 76:591-601. [PMID: 26308155 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2015] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fat suppression (FS) via chemically selective saturation (CHESS) eliminates fat-water oscillations in multiecho gradient echo (mGRE) R2*-MRI. However, for increasing R2* values as seen with increasing liver iron content (LIC), the water signal spectrally overlaps with the CHESS band, which may alter R2*. We investigated the effect of CHESS on R2* and developed a heuristic correction for the observed CHESS-induced R2* changes. METHODS Eighty patients [female, n = 49; male, n = 31; mean age (± standard deviation), 18.3 ± 11.7 y] with iron overload were scanned with a non-FS and a CHESS-FS mGRE sequence at 1.5T and 3T. Mean liver R2* values were evaluated using three published fitting approaches. Measured and model-corrected R2* values were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS At 1.5T, CHESS led to a systematic R2* reduction (P < 0.001 for all fitting algorithms) especially toward higher R2*. Our model described the observed changes well and reduced the CHESS-induced R2* bias after correction (linear regression slopes: 1.032/0.927/0.981). No CHESS-induced R2* reductions were found at 3T. CONCLUSION The CHESS-induced R2* bias at 1.5T needs to be considered when applying R2*-LIC biopsy calibrations for clinical LIC assessment, which were established without FS at 1.5T. The proposed model corrects the R2* bias and could therefore improve clinical iron overload assessment based on linear R2*-LIC calibrations. Magn Reson Med 76:591-601, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel J Krafft
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ralf B Loeffler
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ruitian Song
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Xiao Bian
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.,Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - M Beth McCarville
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jane S Hankins
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Claudia M Hillenbrand
- Department of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Radmard AR, Poustchi H, Dadgostar M, Yoonessi A, Kooraki S, Jafari E, Hashemi Taheri AP, Malekzadeh R, Merat S. Liver enzyme levels and hepatic iron content in Fatty liver: a noninvasive assessment in general population by T2* mapping. Acad Radiol 2015; 22:714-21. [PMID: 25754799 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2014] [Revised: 01/17/2015] [Accepted: 01/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Existing evidence suggests potential contribution of iron in pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to investigate whether hepatic iron content correlates with liver enzyme levels in NAFLD using a noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Subjects from Golestan Cohort Study were randomly selected. Diagnosis of NAFLD was made by combination of ultrasound and MRI. Subjects with NAFLD were divided into two groups with high (H-NAFLD) and low (L-NAFLD) enzyme level according to 95th percentile of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value in normal population. Quantitative T2* maps of entire cross-sectional area of liver were calculated on pixel-by-pixel basis using a semiautomated software. RESULTS A total of 207 subjects were enrolled. Mean T2* values were significantly lower in NAFLD group than controls (P < .001) indicating higher iron content. Male subjects with H-NAFLD had statistically lower T2* values than those with L-NAFLD in multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.95), whereas this was not observed in women. Unlike women, there was significant negative correlation between ALT levels and T2* values in men with H-NAFLD (r = -0.66, P = .01). Every 1-millisecond decrement in T2* value was associated with 6.37 IU/L increase in ALT level (95% CI, 1.8-10.9, P = .01) in men with H-NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS Higher hepatic iron in men with H-NAFLD, estimated by T2* mapping, may support the role of iron in possible progression of simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Lack of such correlation in women could be attributed to relatively lower iron storage or other mechanisms rather than iron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Reza Radmard
- Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Digestive Tract Image Processing Research Group, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Poustchi
- Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Dadgostar
- Digestive Tract Image Processing Research Group, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Electrical Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Yoonessi
- Digestive Tract Image Processing Research Group, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Neuroscience Department, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soheil Kooraki
- Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elham Jafari
- Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran
| | | | - Reza Malekzadeh
- Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran
| | - Shahin Merat
- Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hernando D, Wells SA, Vigen KK, Reeder SB. Effect of hepatocyte-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents on hepatic fat-fraction and R2(⁎). Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 33:43-50. [PMID: 25305414 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/04/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of a hepatocyte-specific gadolinium based contrast agent (GBCA) on quantitative hepatic fat-fraction (FF) and R2* measurements. Fifty patients were imaged at 1.5T, using chemical-shift encoded water-fat MRI with low (5°) and high (15°) flip angles (FA), both before and after administration of a hepatocyte-specific GBCA (gadoxetic acid). Low and high FA, pre- and post-contrast FF and R2* values were measured for each subject. Available serum laboratory studies related to liver disease were also recorded. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to compare measurements. Hepatic FF was unaffected by GBCA at low FA (slope=1.02±0.02, p=0.32). FF was overestimated at high FA pre-contrast (slope=1.33±0.03, p<10(-10)), but underestimated post-contrast (slope=0.81±0.02, p<10(-10)). Hepatic R2* was unaffected by FA (mean difference±95% CI pre-contrast:2.2±4.9s(-1), post-contrast:2.8±3.6s(-1)), but increased post-contrast in patients with total bilirubin <2.5mg/dL (ΔR2*=13.4±12.7s(-1)). Regression analysis of serum values demonstrated a correlation of post-contrast change in R2* with total bilirubin (p<0.01) and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (p≈0.01). In conclusion, GBCA has no effect on hepatic FF at low FA due to a lack of T1-weighting, potentially allowing flexibility for FF imaging with hepatobiliary imaging protocols. Hepatic R2* increased significantly after GBCA administration, particularly in the biliary tree. Therefore, R2* maps should be obtained prior to contrast administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
| | - Shane A Wells
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Karl K Vigen
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kasten A, Grüttner C, Kühn JP, Bader R, Pasold J, Frerich B. Comparative in vitro study on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI tracking of adipose tissue-derived progenitor cells. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108055. [PMID: 25244560 PMCID: PMC4171509 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/16/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using measurement of the transverse relaxation time (R2*) is to be considered as a promising approach for cell tracking experiments to evaluate the fate of transplanted progenitor cells and develop successful cell therapies for tissue engineering. While the relationship between core composition of nanoparticles and their MRI properties is well studied, little is known about possible effects on progenitor cells. This in vitro study aims at comparing two magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle types, single vs. multi-core nanoparticles, regarding their physico-chemical characteristics, effects on cellular behavior of adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ASC) like differentiation and proliferation as well as their detection and quantification by means of MRI. Quantification of both nanoparticle types revealed a linear correlation between labeling concentration and R2* values. However, according to core composition, different levels of labeling concentrations were needed to achieve comparable R2* values. Cell viability was not altered for all labeling concentrations, whereas the proliferation rate increased with increasing labeling concentrations. Likewise, deposition of lipid droplets as well as matrix calcification revealed to be highly dose-dependent particularly regarding multi-core nanoparticle-labeled cells. Synthesis of cartilage matrix proteins and mRNA expression of collagen type II was also highly dependent on nanoparticle labeling. In general, the differentiation potential was decreased with increasing labeling concentrations. This in vitro study provides the proof of principle for further in vivo tracking experiments of progenitor cells using nanoparticles with different core compositions but also provides striking evidence that combined testing of biological and MRI properties is advisable as improved MRI properties of multi-core nanoparticles may result in altered cell functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Kasten
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Greifswald University Medical Center, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Rainer Bader
- Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Juliane Pasold
- Department of Orthopaedics, Biomechanics and Implant Technology Research Laboratory, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernhard Frerich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hernando D, Levin YS, Sirlin CB, Reeder SB. Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and remaining challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 40:1003-21. [PMID: 24585403 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver iron overload is the histological hallmark of hereditary hemochromatosis and transfusional hemosiderosis, and can also occur in chronic hepatopathies. Iron overload can result in liver damage, with the eventual development of cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Assessment of liver iron levels is necessary for detection and quantitative staging of iron overload and monitoring of iron-reducing treatments. This article discusses the need for noninvasive assessment of liver iron and reviews qualitative and quantitative methods with a particular emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Specific MRI methods for liver iron quantification include signal intensity ratio as well as R2 and R2* relaxometry techniques. Methods that are in clinical use, as well as their limitations, are described. Remaining challenges, unsolved problems, and emerging techniques to provide improved characterization of liver iron deposition are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dijkstra H, Handayani A, Kappert P, Oudkerk M, Sijens PE. Clinical implications of non-steatotic hepatic fat fractions on quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver. PLoS One 2014; 9:e87926. [PMID: 24505333 PMCID: PMC3913701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2013] [Accepted: 01/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an important diagnostic tool in the assessment of focal liver lesions and diffuse liver diseases such as cirrhosis and fibrosis. Quantitative DWI parameters such as molecular diffusion, microperfusion and their fractions, are known to be affected when hepatic fat fractions (HFF) are higher than 5.5% (steatosis). However, less is known about the effect on DWI for HFF in the normal non-steatotic range below 5.5%, which can be found in a large part of the population. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the diagnostic implications of non-steatotic HFF on quantitative DWI parameters in eight liver segments. For this purpose, eleven healthy volunteers (2 men, mean-age 31.0) were prospectively examined with DWI and three series of in-/out-of-phase dual-echo spoiled gradient-recalled MRI sequences to obtain the HFF and T2*. DWI data were analyzed using the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model. Four circular regions (ø22.3 mm) were drawn in each of eight liver segments and averaged. Measurements were divided in group 1 (HFF≤2.75%), group 2 (2.75< HFF ≤5.5%) and group 3 (HFF>5.5%). DWI parameters and T2* were compared between the three groups and between the segments. It was observed that the molecular diffusion (0.85, 0.72 and 0.49 ×10−3 mm2/s) and T2* (32.2, 27.2 and 21.0 ms) differed significantly between the three groups of increasing HFF (2.18, 3.50 and 19.91%). Microperfusion and its fraction remained similar for different HFF. Correlations with HFF were observed for the molecular diffusion (r = −0.514, p<0.001) and T2* (−0.714, p<0.001). Similar results were obtained for the majority of individual liver segments. It was concluded that fat significantly decreases molecular diffusion in the liver, also in absence of steatosis (HFF≤5.5%). Also, it was confirmed that fat influences T2*. Determination of HFF prior to quantitative DWI is therefore crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildebrand Dijkstra
- Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Astri Handayani
- Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Kappert
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging - North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul E. Sijens
- Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhong X, Nickel MD, Kannengiesser SAR, Dale BM, Kiefer B, Bashir MR. Liver fat quantification using a multi-step adaptive fitting approach with multi-echo GRE imaging. Magn Reson Med 2013; 72:1353-65. [PMID: 24323332 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2013] [Revised: 10/30/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop a multi-step adaptive fitting approach for liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R(2)* quantification, and to perform an initial validation on a broadly available hardware platform. THEORY AND METHODS The proposed method uses a multi-echo three-dimensional gradient echo acquisition, with initial guesses for the fat and water signal fractions based on a Dixon decomposition of two selected echoes. Based on magnitude signal equations with a multi-peak fat spectral model, a multi-step nonlinear fitting procedure is then performed to adaptively update the fat and water signal fractions and R(2)* values. The proposed method was validated using numeric phantoms as ground truth, followed by preliminary clinical validation of PDFF calculations against spectroscopy in 30 patients. RESULTS The results of the proposed method agreed well with the ground truth of numerical phantoms, and were relatively insensitive to changes in field strength, field homogeneity, monopolar/bipolar readout, signal to noise ratio, and echo time selections. The in vivo patient study showed excellent consistency between the PDFF values measured with the proposed approach compared with spectroscopy. CONCLUSION This multi-step adaptive fitting approach performed well in both simulated and initial clinical evaluation, and shows potential in the quantification of hepatic steatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodong Zhong
- MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kühn JP, Jahn C, Hernando D, Siegmund W, Hadlich S, Mayerle J, Pfannmöller J, Langner S, Reeder S. T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded liver fat-fraction: role of the flip angle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 40:875-83. [PMID: 24243439 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate flip angle (FA)-dependent T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded fat-fraction (FF) and to evaluate a strategy for correcting this bias to achieve accurate MRI-based estimates of liver fat with optimized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-three obese patients, 14 men/19 women, aged 57.3 ± 13.9 years underwent 3 Tesla (T) liver MRI including MR-spectroscopy and four three-echo-complex chemical shift-encoded MRI sequences using different FAs (1°/3°/10°/20°). FF was estimated with R2* correction and multi-peak fat spectral modeling. The FF for each FA with and without T1 correction was compared with spectroscopy as a reference standard, using linear regression. Relative SNR of the magnitude data were assessed for each flip angle. RESULTS The correlation between chemical shift-encoded MRI and spectroscopy was high (R(2) ≈ 0.9). Without T1 correction, the agreement of both techniques showed no significant differences in slope (PFlipAngle1 ° = 0.385/PFlipAngle3 ° = 0.289) using low FA. High FA resulted in significant different slopes (PFlipAngle10 ° = 0.016/PFlipAngle20 ° = 0.014. T1 bias was successfully corrected using the T1 correction strategy (slope:PFlipAngle10 ° = 0.387/PFlipAngle20 ° = 0.440). Additionally, the use of high FA (near the Ernst angle) improved the SNR of the magnitude data (FA1 vs. FA3; respectively FA1 vs. FA10 P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION T1 bias is a strong confounder in the assessment of liver fat using chemical shift imaging with high FA. However, using a larger flip angle with T1 correction leads to higher SNR, and residual error after T1 correction is very small.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens-Peter Kühn
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hernando D, Sharma SD, Kramer H, Reeder SB. On the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded fat quantification. Magn Reson Med 2013; 72:464-70. [PMID: 24123362 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2013] [Revised: 08/10/2013] [Accepted: 08/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded (CSE) fat quantification. METHODS The proton resonance frequency of water, unlike triglycerides, depends on temperature. This leads to a temperature dependence of the spectral models of fat (relative to water) that are commonly used by CSE-MRI methods. Simulation analysis was performed for 1.5 Tesla CSE fat-water signals at various temperatures and echo time combinations. Oil-water phantoms were constructed and scanned at temperatures between 0 and 40°C using spectroscopy and CSE imaging at three echo time combinations. An explanted human liver, rejected for transplantation due to steatosis, was scanned using spectroscopy and CSE imaging. Fat-water reconstructions were performed using four different techniques: magnitude and complex fitting, with standard or temperature-corrected signal modeling. RESULTS In all experiments, magnitude fitting with standard signal modeling resulted in large fat quantification errors. Errors were largest for echo time combinations near TEinit ≈ 1.3 ms, ΔTE ≈ 2.2 ms. Errors in fat quantification caused by temperature-related frequency shifts were smaller with complex fitting, and were avoided using a temperature-corrected signal model. CONCLUSION Temperature is a confounding factor for fat quantification. If not accounted for, it can result in large errors in fat quantifications in phantom and ex vivo acquisitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kühn JP, Hernando D, Meffert PJ, Reeder S, Hosten N, Laqua R, Steveling A, Ender S, Schröder H, Pillich DT. Proton-density fat fraction and simultaneous R2* estimation as an MRI tool for assessment of osteoporosis. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:3432-9. [PMID: 23812246 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2950-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2013] [Revised: 05/20/2013] [Accepted: 06/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate multi-echo chemical shift-encoded MRI-based mapping of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and fat-corrected R2* in bone marrow as biomarkers for osteoporosis assessment. METHODS Fifty-one patients (28 female; mean age 69.7 ± 9.0 years) underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). On the basis of the t score, 173 valid vertebrae bodies were divided into three groups (healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic). Three echo chemical shift-encoded MRI sequences were acquired at 3 T. PDFF and R2* with correction for multiple-peak fat (R2*MP) were measured for each vertebral body. Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis were performed to evaluate differences between groups. Further, the area under the curve (AUC) for each technique was calculated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS On the basis of DXA, 92 samples were normal (53 %), 47 osteopenic (27 %) and 34 osteoporotic (20 %). PDFF was increased in osteoporosis compared with healthy (P = 0.007). R2*MP showed significant differences between normal and osteopenia (P = 0.004), and between normal and osteoporosis (P < 0.001). AUC to differentiate between normal and osteoporosis was 0.698 for R2*MP, 0.656 for PDFF and 0.74 for both combined. CONCLUSION PDFF and R2*MP are moderate biomarkers for osteoporosis. PDFF and R2*MP combination might improve the prediction in differentiating healthy subjects from those with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens-Peter Kühn
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University Greifswald, Sauerbruch-Strasse 1, 17489, Greifswald, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|