Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Patient Selection, Controversies, and Caveats

Effect of furmonertinib on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban or apixaban in vivo

Furmonertinib, a third generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), is used for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Rivaroxaban and apixaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) used for venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a frequent comorbid with NSCLC. They are substrates of CYP3A4, P-gp and BCRP, whereas furmonertinib is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. This study aimed to disclose the extent of effect of furmonertinib on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban or apixaban. Rats were divided into four groups (n = 6) that received rivaroxaban (group 1), furmonertinib and rivaroxaban (group 2), apixaban (group 3), furmonertinib and apixaban (group 4). The concentrations of drugs were measured by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Furmonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of rivaroxaban by 1.66 and 2.07-fold, whereas decreased the CLz/F by 1.70-fold and Vz/F 1.27-fold. Furthermore, furmonertinib caused similar changes in apixaban pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic results suggest that it is essential to alert the effect of furmonertinib on the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban or apixaban in clinical practice.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

Sulfated Polysaccharides with Anticoagulant Potential: A Review Focusing on Structure-Activity Relationship and Action Mechanism

Thromboembolism is the culprit of cardiovascular diseases, leading to the highest global mortality rate. Anticoagulation emerges as the primary approach for managing thrombotic conditions. Notably, sulfated polysaccharides exhibit favorable anticoagulant efficacy with reduced side effects. This review focuses on the structure-anticoagulant activity relationship of sulfated polysaccharides and the underlying action mechanisms. It is concluded that chlorosulfonicacid-pyridine method serves as the preferred technique to synthesize sulfated polysaccharides. The anticoagulant activity of sulfated polysaccharides is linked to the substitution site of sulfate groups, degree of substitution, molecular weight, main side chain structure, and glycosidic bond conformation. Moreover, sulfated polysaccharides exert anticoagulant activity via various pathways, including the inhibition of blood coagulation factors, activation of antithrombin III and heparin cofactor II, antiplatelet aggregation, and promotion of the fibrinolytic system.

Improvement of thrombosis management in patients with cancer: a practical consensus document of recommendations for cancer-associated thrombosis patients' healthcare in Spain

Cancer patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), its recurrence, but also at risk of bleeding while anticoagulated. In addition, cancer therapies have been associated to increased VTE risk. Guidelines for VTE treatment in cancer patients recommend low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the initial treatment, DOAC for VTE short-term treatment, and LMWH or DOAC for VTE long-term treatment. This consensus article arises from a collaboration between different Spanish experts on cancer-associated thrombosis. It aims to reach an agreement on a practical document of recommendations for action allowing the healthcare homogenization of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients in Spain considering not only what is known about VTE management in cancer patients but also what is done in Spanish hospitals in the clinical practice. The text summarizes the current knowledge and available evidence on the subject in Spain and provides a series of practical recommendations for CAT management and treatment algorithms to help clinicians to manage CAT over time.

Equivalent thrombotic risk with Warfarin, Dabigatran, or Enoxaparin after failure of initial direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy

BACKGROUND

The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now commonly regarded as first line anticoagulants in most cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal choice of subsequent anticoagulant in instances of first line DOAC failure is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and compare outcomes with second line anticoagulants used after DOAC failure.

METHODS

Patients seen at an urban hospital system for an episode of acute VTE initially treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban who experienced a subsequent recurrent thrombosis while on anticoagulation (1st recurrent thrombosis) were included.

RESULTS

In total, 166 patients after apixaban or rivaroxaban failure were included. Following DOAC failure (1st recurrent thrombosis), the subsequent anticoagulant was warfarin in 60 patients (36%), dabigatran in 42 patients (25%), and enoxaparin in 64 patients (39%). Enoxaparin was preferentially prescribed in patients with a malignancy-associated etiology for 1st recurrent thrombosis (p < 0.01). The median follow-up time in our cohort was 16 months. There was no difference in 2nd recurrent thrombosis-free survival (p = 0.72) or risk for major bleeding event (p = 0.30) among patients treated with dabigatran, warfarin, or enoxaparin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of patients failing first line DOAC therapy, rates of 2nd recurrent thrombosis and bleeding did not differ among subsequently chosen anticoagulants. Our study provides evidence that the optimal 2nd anticoagulant is not clear, and the choice of 2nd anticoagulant should continue to balance patient preference, cost, and provider experience.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours"]

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Review by Middle East and North African Experts

Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with active cancer who require anticoagulation treatment. Choice of anticoagulant is based on careful balancing of the risks and benefits of available classes of treatment: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Results from randomized controlled trials have shown the consistent efficacy of DOACs versus LMWH in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, increased major gastrointestinal bleeding was observed for edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, compared with LMWH dalteparin. Most guidelines recommend DOACs for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE in patients without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer, and with considerations for renal impairment and drug-drug interactions. These updates represent a major paradigm shift for clinicians in the Middle East and North Africa. The decision to prescribe a DOAC for a patient with cancer is not always straightforward, particularly in challenging subgroups of patients with an increased risk of bleeding. In patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who are at high risk of major gastrointestinal bleeds, apixaban may be the preferred DOAC; however, caution should be exercised if patients have upper or unresected lower gastrointestinal tumors. In patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and upper or unresected lower gastrointestinal tumors, LMWH may be preferred. Vitamin K antagonists should be used only when DOACs and LMWH are unavailable or unsuitable. In this review, we discuss the overall evidence for DOACs in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE and provide treatment suggestions for challenging subgroups of patients with cancer associated VTE.

Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists, mostly warfarin, for the main indications for oral anticoagulation, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and prevention of embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. While DOACs offer practical, fixed-dose anticoagulation in many patients, specific restrictions or contraindications may apply. DOACs are not sufficiently effective in high-thrombotic risk conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome and mechanical heart valves. Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis may benefit from DOACs, but the bleeding risk, particularly in those with gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, must be carefully weighed. In patients with frailty, excess body weight, and/or moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs must be cautiously administered and may require laboratory monitoring. Reversal agents have been developed and approved for life-threatening bleeding. In addition, the clinical testing of potentially safer anticoagulants such as factor XI(a) inhibitors is important to further optimize anticoagulant therapy in an increasingly elderly and frail population worldwide.

Lung Cancer Related Thrombosis (LCART): Focus on Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication in lung cancer patients. Lung cancer confers an increased risk of thrombosis compared to other solid malignancies across all stages of the disease. Newer treatment agents, including checkpoint immunotherapy and targeted agents, may further increase the risk of CAT. Different risk-assessment models, such as the Khorana Risk Score, and newer approaches that incorporate genetic risk factors have been used in lung cancer patients to evaluate the risk of thrombosis. The management of CAT is based on the results of large prospective trials, which show similar benefits to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in ambulatory patients. The anticoagulation agent and duration of therapy should be personalized according to lung cancer stage and histology, the presence of driver mutations and use of antineoplastic therapy, including recent curative lung surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Treatment options should be evaluated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been shown to impact the thrombotic risk in cancer patients. This review focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, novel predictive scores and management of CAT in patients with active lung cancer, with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Risk Factors for Bleeding Events in Japanese Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer: Data from the Rising-VTE/NEJ037 Study

Despite the occurrence of various hemorrhagic events during advanced lung cancer treatment, few researchers have reported on their risk factors. Moreover, the development of cancer-related thromboembolism indicates anticoagulant use. However, adverse events such as bleeding should be monitored. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the onset of hemorrhagic events in patients with lung cancer. The Rising-VTE/NEJ037 study was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. A total of 1008 patients with lung cancer who were unsuitable for radical resection or radiation were enrolled and followed up for 2 years. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model was performed to compare the outcomes of the time to the onset of hemorrhagic events for 2 years after registration. Hemorrhagic events occurred in 115 patients (11.4%), with 35 (30.4%) experiencing major bleeding. Significant risk factors included venous thromboembolism (VTE) (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.003, p < 0.001) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 1 (HR: 2.476, p < 0.001). Factors that significantly reduced hemorrhagic event risk were female sex (HR: 0.454, p = 0.002) and M1a status (HR: 0.542, p = 0.038). VTE is a risk factor for hemorrhagic events in patients with advanced lung cancer, and risks associated with anticoagulant therapy should be considered.

Risk factors for incident venous thromboembolism in patients with renal tumor and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a principal cause of mortality and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with renal tumor and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (RT-IVCTT). However, the preoperative thrombotic risk factors in these patients remain not fully characterized.

OBJECTIVES

To identify preoperative thrombotic risk factors in patients with RT-IVCTT.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Two hundred fifty-seven consecutive postsurgical patients with RT-IVCTT aged 18-86 years were enrolled between January 2008 and September 2022. Clinicopathological variables were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed. Preoperative hemoglobin, neutrophils, and serum albumin levels were analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables.

RESULTS

VTE was identified in 63 patients (24.5%). On both continuously and categorically coded variables, advanced IVC thrombus (OR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.4-7.0; OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2-6.1), renal sinus fat invasion (OR 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6-7.0; OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.8-7.7), IVC wall invasion (OR 3.6, 95% CI: 1.6-7.9; OR 4.3, 95% CI: 1.9-10.0), IVC blockage status of greater than 75% (OR 5.2, 95% CI: 1.7-15.8; OR 6.1, 95% CI: 1.9-19.7), and higher neutrophils (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.7; OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) were significantly associated with increased VTE risk in patients with RT-IVCTT. Except hemoglobin, categorically coded serum albumin (OR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.75) was validated as an independent risk factor for VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided an insight of risk factors contributing to preoperative VTE in patients with RT-IVCTT, which may be beneficial for optimizing strategies to manage VTE in clinical practice.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct Factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct Factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

The surgical management of diffuse gliomas: Current state of neurosurgical management and future directions

After recent updates to the World Health Organization pathological criteria for diagnosing and grading diffuse gliomas, all major North American and European neuro-oncology societies recommend a maximal safe resection as the initial management of a diffuse glioma. For neurosurgeons to achieve this goal, the surgical plan for both low- and high-grade gliomas should be to perform a supramaximal resection when feasible based on preoperative imaging and the patient's performance status, utilizing every intraoperative adjunct to minimize postoperative neurological deficits. While the surgical approach and technique can vary, every effort must be taken to identify and preserve functional cortical and subcortical regions. In this summary statement on the current state of the field, we describe the tools and technologies that facilitate the safe removal of diffuse gliomas and highlight intraoperative and postoperative management strategies to minimize complications for these patients. Moreover, we discuss how surgical resections can go beyond cytoreduction by facilitating biological discoveries and improving the local delivery of adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapies.

Short- and Long-Term Mortality for Patients With and Without a Cancer Diagnosis Following Pulmonary Embolism in Denmark, 2000 to 2020: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

New treatment regimens have been introduced in the past 20 years, which may influence the short- and long-term prognosis for patients with and without a cancer diagnosis following pulmonary embolism. However, newer studies investigating these trends are lacking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the 30- and 31- to 365-day mortality following pulmonary embolism.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the Danish nationwide registries, patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism between 2000 and 2020 were included. Age- and sex-standardized 30- and 31- to 365-day mortality was calculated and stratified by cancer status. In total, 60 614 patients (29.6% with recent cancer; mean age, 68.2 years) were included. The 30-day mortality for patients with no recent cancer decreased from 19.1% (95% CI, 17.9%-20.4%) in 2000 to 7.3% (95% CI, 6.7%-8.0%) in 2018 to 2020 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.32-0.40]; P<0.001). The 30-day mortality for patients with recent cancer decreased from 32.2% (95% CI, 28.8%-36.6%) to 14.1% (95% CI, 12.7%-15.5%) (HR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.33-0.44]; P<0.001). The 31- to 365-day mortality for patients with no recent cancer decreased from 12.5% (95% CI, 11.4%-13.6%) to 9.4% (95% CI, 8.6%-10.2%) (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.64-0.83]; P<0.001).The 31- to 365-day mortality for patients with recent cancer remained stable: 39.4% (95% CI, 35.1%-43.7%) to 38.3% (95% CI, 35.9%-40.6%) (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.84-1.12]; P=0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2000 to 2020, improvements were observed in 30-day mortality following pulmonary embolism regardless of cancer status. For patients with recent cancer, 31- to 365-day mortality did not improve, whereas a minor improvement was observed for patients without recent cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban versus Dalteparin as a Treatment for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. Anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dalteparin and apixaban, have demonstrated efficacy and safety. However, more comparative research of these drugs is still needed. This study aimed to synthesize evidence on the efficacy of apixaban compared to dalteparin in reducing recurrent VTE, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding associated with cancer. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials databases up to 5 January 2023, for randomized controlled trials comparing apixaban versus dalteparin as treatment for cancer-associated VTE. Five studies were included. Effects according to meta-analyses were reported as relative risks (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: It was found that 33 of 734 (4.5%) patients treated with apixaban and 56 of 767 (7.3%) with dalteparin had recurrent VTE as the efficacy outcome (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.15-1.58, I2 38%). Major bleeding occurred in 25 of 734 patients treated with apixaban (3.4%) and 27 of 767 with dalteparin (3.5%) (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.31-5.27, I2 59%). Likewise, clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 64 of 734 patients treated with apixaban (8.7%) and 46 of 767 (5.9%) with dalteparin (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05-2.19, I2 0%). Conclusions: Apixaban showed a lower risk of recurrent VTE than dalteparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE, albeit with no statistical difference. Statistical significance was observed for no major clinically relevant bleeding but not for major bleeding.

In vivo evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interactions between almonertinib and rivaroxaban, almonertinib and apixaban

Background: Almonertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), is commonly used as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR T790M mutations. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are a selective, direct factor Xa inhibitor used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a frequent complication of NSCLC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban are substrates of CYP3A4, P-gp and BCRP, whereas almonertinib is an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. Rivaroxaban or apixaban are often prescribed together with almonertinib in NSCLC patients, but clear information on pharmacokinetic drug interaction is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to unravel the extent of interactions between almonertinib-rivaroxaban and almonertinib apixaban in rats, and whether the pharmacokinetic interaction can be mitigated by rivaroxaban and apixaban dose adjustment. Methods: Rats were divided into ten groups (n = 6) that received rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 1), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 2), almonertinib (15 mg/kg) (group 3, group 4), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) (group 5), almonertinib with rivaroxaban (1 mg/kg) (group 6), almonertinib with apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) (group 7), almonertinib with apixaban (0.25 mg/kg) (group 8), rivaroxaban (2 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 9), apixaban (0.5 mg/kg) with almonertinib (group 10). The concentrations of drugs were determined by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The levels of messenger RNA were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results and Discussion: The results indicate that almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 2 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 3.30 and 3.60-fold, 1 mg/kg rivaroxaban by 1.28 and 1.90-fold. Almonertinib increased the Cmax and AUC0-t of 0.5 mg/kg apixaban by 2.69 and 2.87-fold, 0.25 mg/kg apixaban by 2.19 and 2.06-fold. In addition, rivaroxaban also increased systemic exposure to almonertinib. The results of qRT-PCR showed that almonertinib reduced the expression of Cyp3a1 in liver and intestine, and Abcb1a, Abcg2 in intestine and kidney. The pharmacokinetic results suggest that it is important to take special care of the interactions of these drugs in clinical applications.

Comparative Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients diagnosed with cancer often experience an abnormal occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its related complications. In order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of both treatment approaches, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis within the realm of cancer-associated thromboembolism. A thorough search was conducted across PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to find studies comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) for the treatment of VTE in patients with malignancy. The analyses utilized the random-effects model. This meta-analysis included 11 studies. The results showed that DOACs were associated with a significantly reduced risk of VTE recurrence (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.81, p<0.0001; I2: 0%) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.86, p<0.0001; I2: 0%) compared to LMWHs. However, there was no significant difference in the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) (RR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.54, 1.06, p=0.11; I2: 11%) between the two groups. The use of DOACs was also associated with a non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding events (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.78, p: 0.26; I2: 49%), while clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) was significantly higher with DOACs (RR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.11, 3.30, p: 0.02; I2: 81%). Secondary outcomes, such as survival rates and fatal PE, did not show significant differences between the two treatment groups. Our analysis indicates that direct oral anticoagulants exhibit a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE recurrence, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism when compared to low molecular weight heparin in cancer-associated thromboembolism. However, it should be noted that DOACs carry a higher risk of CRNMB. Based on these findings, DOACs are recommended as a superior therapeutic option for managing cancer-associated thromboembolism compared to LMWH.

Bridging the Gap in Cancer-Related Stroke Management: Update on Therapeutic and Preventive Approaches

The underlying aetiopathophysiology of cancer-related strokes and thromboembolisms differs from that of noncancer-related strokes, which makes treating cancer-related strokes and thromboembolisms a distinct clinical challenge. This necessitates the development of novel, individualised diagnostic and treatment strategies. However, limited guidelines are available for the management of cancer-related strokes and the prevention of acute strokes or other thromboembolic events in this patient population. In this article, we present an updated overview of the therapeutic and preventive strategies for strokes in cancer settings. These strategies include acute reperfusion therapy, anticoagulant therapy, antiplatelet therapy, and lifestyle management options. We also outline comprehensive pathways and highlight gaps in the evidence-based clinical management of cancer-related strokes or thromboembolisms. Additionally, future recommendations for the management of strokes in cancer patients are provided.

A retrospective evaluation of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) management strategies in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy

Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy is challenging due to changes in renal or hepatic function, thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) attributed to disease or treatment. The purpose of this retrospective cohort analysis was to characterize DOAC management through various interventions and evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC use in this patient population. A total of 58 patients with 97 unique index periods in which a patient was concomitantly on a DOAC and chemotherapy were identified. Several instances were observed in which an intervention should be made based on manufacturer guidance or clinical judgment. Of 37 instances attributed to changes in renal function, the following interventions were employed: dose adjustments (10/37), holding DOAC therapy until renal function improved (held 3/37, restarted 4/37), changing to an alternative anticoagulant (5/37), DOAC discontinuation (2/37), or no change (13/37). One change was made in response to decreased hepatic function (1/15). DOACs were held in the setting of platelet counts below 50 K/mm³ (8/20) and restarted when platelets improved above this threshold (5/20). In patients with CINV, DOAC therapy was continued (26/32) with few changes made. To manage DOAC-chemotherapy DDIs, changes in DOAC agents (4/6) and dose reductions in chemotherapy agents (2/6) were made. Thrombotic and bleeding events did not strongly correlate with renal or hepatic impairment, thrombocytopenia, CINV, or DDIs. Further guidance regarding the use of these agents in this patient population is warranted to address management strategies, efficacy, and safety. Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer on active chemotherapy is challenging due to changes in renal or hepatic function, thrombocytopenia, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) attributed to disease or treatment. The purpose of this retrospective cohort analysis was to characterize DOAC management and evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOAC use in this patient population. A total of 58 patients with 97 unique index periods in which a patient was concomitantly on a DOAC and chemotherapy were identified. Several instances were observed in which an intervention should be made based on manufacturer guidance or clinical judgment. Interventions employed are summarized graphically. Thrombotic and bleeding events did not strongly correlate with renal or hepatic impairment, thrombocytopenia, CINV, or DDIs. CINV chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, DDIs drug-drug interactions, DOAC direct oral anticoagulant, OAC oral anticoagulant.

Primary thromboprophylaxis in not surgically treated intra-luminal gastrointestinal cancer (ILGC) treated with first-line chemotherapy: A single institution preliminary safety report

Occurrence of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients (patients) undergoing chemotherapy is a remarkable concern for the oncologist. In addition, careful attention has to be paid to the possible major bleeding when patients carrying gastrointestinal cancer need antithrombotic therapies. To date some Cancer Associated Thrombosis (CAT) risk scores as Khorana and PROTECHT score have been developed to identify the cancer population at high-risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Consensus guidelines recommend to consider also low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for primary thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients. This is a report on a retrospective case series of 15 intra-luminal not surgically treated gastrointestinal cancer patients deemed high risk for VTE. The patients had a Khorana or PROTECHT score of 2 points or more (at least ≥ 2 points). They were undergoing first line chemotherapy in the absence of endoscopic signs of cancer spontaneous bleeding. A prophylactic dose of LMWH was administered just before starting the chemotherapy session and until 48 hours after its completion. The authors mainly aimed to report occurrence of clinically perceptible gastrointestinal bleeding events. Fifteen patients were administered LMWH - median age: 59 (range: 42-79); gender: male 12 (80%); tumor type: stomach - 13 patients (86%); gastro-esophageal junction: 2 patients (14%). Duration of heparin treatment: the total treatment duration was 228 days; mean 15.2 days (range: 5-45); nadroparin: mean 14.7 days (range: 5-45); enoxaparin: mean 10.1 days (range: 5-20); parnaparin: a total of 5 days. None of the patients experienced perceptible gastrointestinal bleeding. Short-term LMWH thromboprophylaxis appeared to be safe for this series of patients.

Feasibility of edoxaban for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer: ExCAVE study

BACKGROUND

Although initial therapy with a parenteral anticoagulant is required before edoxaban, this strategy is frequently avoided in actual clinical practice because of its complexity. This study assessed the feasibility of edoxaban without initial heparin usage for asymptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in Japanese patients with gastrointestinal cancer (GIC) at high risk of bleeding.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective feasibility study conducted at 10 Japanese institutions, patients with active GIC who developed accidental asymptomatic CAT during chemotherapy were recruited. Edoxaban was orally administered once daily without initial parenteral anticoagulant therapy within 3 days after detecting asymptomatic CAT. The primary outcome was the incidence of major bleeding (MB) or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) during the first 3 months of edoxaban administration.

RESULTS

Of the 54 patients enrolled from October 2017 to September 2020, one was excluded because of a misdiagnosis of CAT. In the remaining 53 patients, the primary outcome occurred in six patients (11.3%). MB occurred in four patients (7.5%), including gastrointestinal bleeding in three patients and intracranial hemorrhage in one patient. CRNMB occurred in two patients (3.8%), including bleeding from the stoma site and genital bleeding in one patient each. There were no deaths attributable to bleeding, and all patients who experienced MB or CRNMB recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of bleeding after edoxaban without heparin pretreatment was acceptable, demonstrating new treatment options for asymptomatic CAT in patients with GIC.

Safe and effective treatment of venous Thromboembolism associated with Cancer: focus on direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian patients

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) poses a significant disease burden and the incidence in Asian populations is increasing. Anticoagulation is the cornerstone of treatment, but can be challenging due to the high bleeding risk in some cancers and the high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with malignancies. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are well established as first-choice treatments for VTE in non-cancer patients, offering a more convenient and less invasive treatment option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Asian patients have exhibited comparable efficacy and safety outcomes with other races in trials of DOACs for VTE in the general population. Although no specific data are available in Asian patients with CAT, results from randomized controlled trials of apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban versus the LMWH, dalteparin, indicate that DOACs are a reasonable alternative to LMWH for anticoagulation in Asian patients with CAT. This is further supported by analyses of real-world data in Asian populations demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs in Asian patients with CAT. Apixaban, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban are recommended in the most recently updated international guidelines as first-line therapy for CAT in patients without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers and at low risk of bleeding. An increased risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding was evident with edoxaban or rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, versus dalteparin in the clinical trials, suggesting that apixaban could be a safe alternative to LMWH in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Determining the optimal anticoagulant therapy for patients with CAT requires careful consideration of bleeding risk, tumor type, renal function, drug-drug interactions, financial costs, and patients' needs and preferences.

[Diagnostics and treatment of clinically relevant paraneoplastic syndromes]

Paraneoplastic syndromes (PS) are rare disorders with often complex clinical manifestations that occur in association with a tumor without being triggered by direct tumor invasion or compression. They arise from tumor secretions of hormones, peptides or cytokines or from immune cross-reactivity between malignant and healthy tissue. They are categorized into endocrine, neurological, dermatological, rheumatological, and hematological PS. The PS most commonly occurs in small cell lung carcinoma but also in association with other respiratory tract tumors, gynecological tumors, and hematological malignancies. The PS can precede a tumor diagnosis, therefore timely diagnosis can improve the prognosis of a malignant disease. The diagnostics are based on the clinical presentation as well as diagnostic methods depending on the underlying pathogenesis. The most important treatment approach involves the best possible treatment of the tumor and a targeted treatment is only sometimes possible. This review focuses on the clinically most frequently encountered PS.

Anticoagulation and bleeding in the cancer patient

Cancer patients have an increased risk of bleeding compared to non-cancer patients with anticoagulant therapy. A bleeding risk assessment before initiation of anticoagulation is recommended. Currently low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the mainstays of treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). Since DOACs are administered orally, they offer some convenience and ease of administration; however, LMWH may be preferred in certain cancers. Given the prevalence of anticoagulant therapies in cancer patients, clinical providers must be able to recognize potentially critical bleeding sites and modalities to reverse major hemorrhage. Reversal agents or antidotes to bleeding may be required when bleeding is persistent or life-threatening. These include vitamin K, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), protamine, prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or andexanet alfa, and idarucizumab. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion can be also considered in those with major bleeding. Evidence for timing and need for re-initiation of anticoagulant therapy after a major bleeding remains sparse, but a multi-disciplinary approach and shared decision-making can be implemented in the interim.

Approach to Thromboprophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in COVID-19: Global Updates and Clinical Insights from India

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) frequently occurs in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and is associated with increased mortality. Several global guidelines recommended prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation rather than intermediate-intensity or therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19-related acute or critical illness without suspected or confirmed VTE. Even though standard doses of thromboprophylaxis are received, many cases of thrombotic complications are reported; hence, appropriate and adequate thromboprophylaxis is critical for the prevention of VTE in COVID-19. In spite of an increased prevalence of VTE in Indian patients, sufficient data on patient characteristics, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach for VTE in COVID is lacking. In this article, we review the available global literature (search conducted up to 31 May 2021) and provide clinical insights into our approach towards managing VTE in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, in this review, we summarize the incidence and risk factors for VTE with emphasis on the thromboprophylaxis approach in hospitalized patients and special populations with COVID-19 and assess clinical implications in the Indian context.

Advanced lung cancer patient with isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A case report

RATIONALE

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a potentially devastating form of drug-induced thrombocytopenia, occurs in patients receiving heparin for thrombosis prevention or treatment. An isolated HIT is characterized by decreased platelet counts without thrombosis, which are atypical and difficult to clinically find.

SYMPTOMS AND CLINICAL FINDINGS

A 33-year-old female patient's admission examination revealed elevated D-dimer levels. After prophylactic anticoagulation using low-molecular weight heparin, her blood platelet counts were rapidly decreased, whereas her D-dimer levels increased, followed by presentations of chest tightness, abdominal pain, and skin itching without thrombosis. After excluding all the other causes of thrombocytopenia, HIT was suspected. Her 4Ts score was 5 points, and enzyme-linked immunoassay for platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies was positive, indicating isolated HIT.

DIAGNOSES, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOMES

The patient was diagnosed with advanced lung cancer presenting with isolated HIT. We immediately stopped low-molecular weight heparin and initiated rivaroxaban for anticoagulation. We administered thrombopoietin (TPO) and avatripopal maleate tablets to increase blood platelet counts, whereas intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was administered to stimulate her immune system. The patient's thrombocytopenia was successfully treated without thrombosis and bleeding complications.

LESSONS

Rivaroxaban is a potential option for tumor preventive anticoagulation and HIT treatment. Early HIT identification is necessary. After identification, the 4Ts score as well as PF4/heparin antibodies should be assessed and appropriate anticoagulants selected based on patients' conditions.

Practical recommendations to combine small-molecule inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The risk for thromboembolisms in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is increased and often requires treatment or prophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Small-molecule inhibitors (SMIs) to treat NSCLC may cause relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with DOACs. Guidance on how to combine these drugs is lacking, leaving patients at risk of clotting or bleeding. Here, we give practical recommendations to manage these DDIs.

METHODS

For all DOACs and SMIs approved in Europe and the USA up to December 2021, a literature review was executed and reviews by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency were analysed for information on DDIs. A DDI potency classification for DOACs was composed and brought together with DDI characteristics of each SMI, resulting in recommendations for each combination.

RESULTS

Half of the combinations result in relevant DDIs, requiring an intervention to prevent ineffective or toxic treatment with DOACs. These actions include dose adjustments, separation of administration or switching between anticoagulant therapies. Combinations of SMIs with edoxaban never cause relevant DDIs, compared to more than half of combinations with other DOACs and even increasing to almost all combinations with rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations of SMIs and DOACs often result in relevant DDIs that can be prevented by adjusting the DOAC dosage, separation of administration or switching between anticoagulants.

Risks, diagnosis, and management of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT): a narrative review

This paper aims to provide a narrative review of the risks, diagnosis, and management of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. There is an established association between cancer and VTE, with cancer being a major risk factor for VTE. A history of VTE, short duration of oral anticoagulation, and a proximal DVT are all associated with increased risk for recurrent VTE. Studies have shown that certain cancers (e.g., metastatic genitourinary, lung, and colorectal cancers) are associated with recurrent VTE. Published literature shows that cancer is prothrombotic, and various mechanisms have been postulated as pathways for increased thrombogenesis and hence recurrent VTE in cancer. The symptoms, signs, laboratory information, and imaging results for the diagnosis of recurrent VTE are similar to those of an initial VTE. Management of recurrent VTE involves using low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are less commonly used.

Effectiveness of managing suspected metastasis using plasma D-dimer testing in gastric cancer patients

Tumor metastasis is closely related to the coagulation system. Tumor metastasis and hypercoagulability promote each other through multiple mechanisms. However, whether coagulation indicators can reflect tumor metastasis remains to be explored. Clinical characteristics of a total of 3447 patients from three tertiary referral centers were collected. Then the diagnostic efficacy of FDP, D-dimer and GC tumor markers [Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and Carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4)] for GC metastases was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. Then we conducted a joint ROC curve analysis. The effects of coagulation parameters and tumor markers on gastric cancer metastasis were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis. 2049 patients were diagnosed with primary GC, 1398 patients with metastatic GC. Based on comparison of AUC, FDP (cutoff, 1.915) had significantly higher diagnostic efficacy than fibrinogen (P<0.001), CEA (P<0.001), CA199 (P<0.001) and CA724 (P<0.001). No significant difference was observed between D-dimer (cutoff, 0.905) and FDP (P=0.158). The AUC of tumor markers combined with coagulation indexes was higher than that without combination (P<0.001). In multiple logistic regression analysis, age, smoking, D-dimer, FDP, CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 were found to be significantly associated with GC metastasis (all P<0.001, except for smoking P=0.004). We conclude that plasma FDP and D-dimer may be novel clinical biomarkers for screening metastases of GC.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Latin American Perspective

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. On the basis of results from randomized controlled trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The decision to use a DOAC requires consideration of bleeding risk, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, the cost-benefit and convenience of oral therapy, and patient preference. While efficacy with apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus dalteparin has been consistent in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, heterogeneity is evident with respect to major GI bleeding, with an increased risk with edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not apixaban. Although cost and accessibility vary in different countries of Latin America, DOACs should be considered for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated VTE in all patients who are likely to benefit. Apixaban may be the preferred DOAC in patients with GI malignancies and LMWH may be preferred for patients with upper or unresected lower GI tumors. Vitamin K antagonists should only be used for anticoagulation when DOACs and low molecular weight heparin are inaccessible or unsuitable.

The clinical significance of preoperative serum fibrinogen levels and platelet counts in patients with gallbladder carcinoma

Background

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) was the most common malignancy of biliary tract. Patients with malignancies frequently present with activated coagulation pathways, which might potentially related to tumor progression and prognosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the clinical significance of preoperative serum fibrinogen levels and platelet counts in GBC patients.

Methods

The preoperative fasting serum fibrinogen levels and platelet counts of 58 patients with GBC were measured by AUV2700 automatic biochemical analyzer, as well as 60 patients with cholesterol polyps and 60 healthy volunteers. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was applied to show the correction between fibrinogen levels and outcome after surgery.

Results

The fibrinogen levels of patients with GBC were significantly higher than healthy gallbladder and cholesterol polyp of gallbladder (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). In GBC, fibrinogen levels were associated with tumor depth (p = 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002), distant metastasis (p < 0.001) and Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage (p < 0.001). The levels in TNM stage IV disease were significantly higher than stage III or stage I + II disease (p = 0.048 and p < 0.001, respectively), and in TNM stage III disease were significantly higher than stage I + II disease (p = 0.002). Furthermore, the overall survival was better in low fibrinogen level group than in high fibrinogen level group (p < 0.001). However, thrombocytosis was not significantly associated with overall survivals (p > 0.05) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The preoperative serum fibrinogen levels and platelet counts might be reliable biomarkers for the occurance of disease, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and advanced TNM stage in patients with GBC. The serum fibrinogen levels might be a prognostic factor to predict outcome for GBC patients suffering from surgery treatment. Anticoagulation therapy might be considered to control cancer progression in future studies.

Burden of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a devastating malignancy with fewer than 10% of patients being alive at 5 years after diagnosis. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs in approximatively 20% of patients with PC, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality and significant health care costs. The management of VTE is particularly challenging in these frail patients. Adequate selection of the most appropriate anticoagulant for each individual patient according to the current international guidelines is warranted for overcoming treatment challenges. The International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer multi-language web-based mobile application (downloadable for free at www.itaccme.com) has been developed to help clinicians in decision making in the most complex situations. In this narrative review, we will discuss the contemporary epidemiology and burden of VTE in PC patients, the performances and limitations of current risk assessment models to predict the risk of VTE, as well as evidence from recent clinical trials for the primary prophylaxis and treatment of cancer-associated VTE that support up-dated clinical practice guidelines.

Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: The dark side of the moon

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer. The risk of emergent VTE is four- to seven-fold higher in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients. Although the therapeutic armamentarium for cancer-associated VTE has been recently implemented, anticoagulant treatment remains challenging because of the increased risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding. Several international societies and expert panels released clinical practice guidelines on VTE treatment which are mostly focused on the general cancer population. Nevertheless, recommendations for the management of VTE in patients with peculiar clinical presentations are inconsistent and remain elusive due to the lack of pertinent evidence. The challenging clinical scenarios include, among others, patients with thrombocytopenia, renal impairment, gastrointestinal cancer, primary or metastatic brain cancer, distal thrombosis of the lower extremities, catheter-related VTE, splanchnic thrombosis, incidental VTE, extreme body weight, recurrent VTE during treatment, as well as the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment in patients with active disease who have received 3 to 6 months of anticoagulation. Herein, we present a critical overview on VTE management in these challenging clinical settings, discuss potential approaches, and include some calls to action for future clinical research.