1
|
Wearn A, Shepherd L. Determinants of routine cervical screening participation in underserved women: a qualitative systematic review. Psychol Health 2024; 39:145-170. [PMID: 35296200 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2022.2050230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Routine, population-wide cervical screening programmes reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality. However, socioeconomically deprived communities and ethnic minority groups typically have lower uptake in comparison to the general population and thus are described as 'underserved.' A systematic qualitative literature review was conducted to identify relevant determinants of participation for these groups. METHODS Online databases were searched for relevant literature from countries with well-established, call-recall screening programmes. Overall, 24 articles were eligible for inclusion. Data was synthesized via Framework synthesis. Dahlgren & Whitehead's social model of health was used as a broad a priori coding framework. RESULTS Participation was influenced by determinants at multiple levels. Overall, patient-provider relationships and peer support facilitated engagement. Cultural disparities, past healthcare experience and practical barriers hindered service access and exacerbated negative thoughts, feelings and attitudes towards participation. Complex interrelationships between determinants suggest barriers have a cumulative effect on screening participation. CONCLUSIONS These findings present a framework of psychosocial determinants of cervical screening uptake in underserved women and emphasise the role of policy makers and practitioners in reducing structural barriers to screening services. Additional work, exploring the experience of those living within socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, is needed to strengthen understanding in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Wearn
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lee Shepherd
- Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Northumberland Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Head KJ, Hayes LR, Miller NE, Shakil S, Bales CL, Schneider BP. "How is it going to help?": Exploring Black breast cancer patients' questions about biomarker testing to predict chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100118. [PMID: 37214510 PMCID: PMC10194344 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Many Black breast cancer patients experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Our study assessed Black breast cancer patients' questions about a biomarker test that can predict likelihood of CIPN. Methods Nineteen Black women who were previous/current breast cancer patients participated in focus groups. Researchers briefly explained CIPN and the biomarker test, and then participants were asked what questions they would have about the test and its use in treatment decisions. These participant-voiced questions composed the data for this study and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Participants' questions centered on six themes: reasons for the test, effect on timeline of breast cancer treatment, testing procedure, limits of test (including accuracy), research done to develop this test (including research participants), and concerns about personal information connected to the test (including DNA). Conclusion This study provides an exploratory look at questions that Black breast cancer patients may have about toxicity biomarker testing use in breast cancer treatment decisions. Innovation These findings provide a starting point for developing patient-centered approaches for integrating this precision medicine tool into clinical care. The methodological choice to generate participants' questions (rather than answers to a question) led to robust, actionable data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine J. Head
- Department of Communication Studies, 425 University Blvd, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States
| | - Lisa R. Hayes
- Pink-4-Ever Ending Disparities, 8770 Commerce Park Place F, Indianapolis, IN 46286, United States
| | - Nadia E. Miller
- Pink-4-Ever Ending Disparities, 8770 Commerce Park Place F, Indianapolis, IN 46286, United States
| | - Safia Shakil
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, 425 University Blvd, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Casey L. Bales
- Department of Medicine-Division of Clinical Pharmacology, 950 West Walnut Street, Rm 402 Research Institute II (R2), Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Bryan P. Schneider
- Department of Medicine-Division of Hematology/Oncology, Indiana Cancer Pavilion, 535 Barnhill Drive – 473, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ochoa-Dominguez CY, Garrett E, Navarro S, Toledo G, Rodriguez C, Iyawe-Parsons A, Farias AJ. Health care experiences of Black cancer survivors: A qualitative study exploring drivers of low and high Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems global ratings of care. Cancer 2023; 129:3490-3497. [PMID: 37395291 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of Black patients with cancer in health care by comparing drivers of high and low ratings. METHODS Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 Black patients with cancer recruited from cancer survivorship support groups and Facebook between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews were coded across all transcripts by using a thematic analysis approach before comparing low- and high-rating groups. RESULTS There were three major themes that influenced whether patients rated their care as low or high, which included the patient-provider relationship, health care staff interactions, and cancer care coordination. For example, the high-rating group described good communication with the health care team as physicians listening to their needs, being responsive to their concerns, and providing recommendations on how to address side effects. In contrast, the low-rating group described poor communication with their health care team as their needs being dismissed and being excluded from decision-making processes. Additionally, there were two distinct themes that influenced patients' low ratings: insurance and financial toxicity issues and experiences of health care discrimination. CONCLUSIONS In an effort to promote equitable cancer care experiences for Black patients, it is important that health systems work to prioritize patient interactions with health care providers and staff, comprehensive care management for patients with cancer, and reductions in the financial burden of caring for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Y Ochoa-Dominguez
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Elleyse Garrett
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stephanie Navarro
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gabriela Toledo
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Rodriguez
- Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Albert J Farias
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yakubu RA, Coleman A, Ainyette A, Katyayan A, Enard KR. Shared Decision-Making and Emergency Department Use Among People With High Blood Pressure. Prev Chronic Dis 2023; 20:E82. [PMID: 37733952 PMCID: PMC10516202 DOI: 10.5888/pcd20.230086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Forty-seven percent of all adults in the US have a diagnosis of high blood pressure. Among all US emergency department (ED) users, an estimated 45% have high blood pressure. The success of high blood pressure interventions in reducing ED visits is partially predicated on patients' adherence to treatment plans. One method for promoting adherence to treatment plans is shared decision-making between patients and medical providers. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study using 2015-2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data. We used studies on shared decision-making as a guide to create a predictor variable for shared decision-making. We determined covariates according to the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. ED use was the outcome variable. We used cross tabulation to compare covariates of ED use and multivariable logistical regression to assess the association between shared decision-making and ED use. Our sample size was 30,407 adults. RESULTS Less than half (39.3%) of respondents reported a high level of shared decision-making; 23.3% had 1 or more ED visits. In the unadjusted model, respondents who reported a high level of shared decision-making were 20% less likely than those with a low level of shared decision-making to report 1 or more ED visits (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.86; P <.001). After adjusting for covariates, a high level of shared decision-making was still associated with lower odds of ED use (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; P = .01). CONCLUSION Shared decision-making may be an effective method for reducing ED use among patients with high blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Aver Yakubu
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
- Saint Louis University, Department of Health Management and Policy, 3545 Lafayette Ave, St Louis, MO 63104
| | - Alyssa Coleman
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alina Ainyette
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anisha Katyayan
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kimberly R Enard
- Department of Health Management and Policy, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiao L, Li T, Lin J, Peng M, Miao J, Zhang L. Determinants of cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making based on the COM-B model: A cross-sectional study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107795. [PMID: 37244130 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making is affected by various factors, with the mechanisms not readily understood. This study explores the underlying mechanisms based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model and literature review. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted and 300 cancer patients conveniently recruited from three tertiary hospitals validly completed the self-administered questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to test the hypothesized model. RESULTS The findings generally supported the hypothesized model, which could explain 45% of the variance in cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making. Cancer patients' health literacy and perceived facilitation of involvement from health professionals had direct and indirect effects on their actual involvement, with the total effect β = 0.594, β = 0.223, P < 0.001, respectively. Patients' views of involvement in treatment decision-making had a direct effect on their actual involvement (β = 0.296, P < 0.001) and completely mediated the relationship between self-efficacy and their actual involvement (β = 0.040, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Findings support the COM-B model's explanatory potential in the context of cancer patients' involvement in treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xiao
- School of nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Ting Li
- School of nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingjing Lin
- School of nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meifang Peng
- Department of medical oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital and Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jingxia Miao
- Department of medical oncology, Nanfang hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- School of nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Edmonds MC, Kim SJ, Wells M, Dahman B, Sheppard VB. A Mixed Method Approach to Examine Surveillance Mammography Experiences in Black and White Breast Cancer Survivors. Clin Breast Cancer 2022; 22:801-811. [PMID: 36137937 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of surveillance mammography following a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis is associated with early detection of disease relapse and increased overall survival; yet Black women compared to White women have the lowest surveillance mammography rates, with limited explanation. To further understand this racial disparity the present study examines the association of mammography beliefs, knowledge, and healthcare delivery factors on receipt of surveillance mammography among Black and White breast cancer survivors. METHODS This is a convergent parallel mixed method study design of an online survey and online focus groups among Black and White BC survivors (N = 266) recruited from community engagement. The online focus groups consisted of a series of theory-informed questions via social media platforms (eg Breastcancer.org, Quora, Reddit). An in-depth thematic analysis approach was used to extract themes from online focus group data. Bivariate (χ2) and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted using the survey data to examine associated factors with receipt of a surveillance mammography within 12 months (yes vs. no). RESULTS 76% (n = 177) of women were Black, 62% were <5 years since diagnosis, 98% had health insurance, with an age range from 23 to 79 (mean = 55) years. 72% of the sample received a surveillance mammogram relative to 27%. Women more frequently received a surveillance mammogram if they reported perceived mammography benefits (<.001), underwent lumpectomy (P< .001) and had health insurance (P = .04). Black women without communication about surveillance care with providers had a lower likelihood of receiving a surveillance mammogram (OR:0.09,95% CI: 0.01-0.45, P = .003). Thematic findings from online focus groups included motivators for receipt of surveillance mammograms: physician recommendation, regular physical exams, and knowledge of recommended guidelines. Barriers of non-receipt of surveillance mammograms included: transportation, medical cost/financial barriers, feeling ignored from providers, and medical mistrust. CONCLUSION Women may require more individualized information regarding their surveillance care to support routine guideline concordant follow-up. Patient-provider-communication is an integral part of Black survivors' surveillance care needs. Improving patient-provider communication for Black women's is necessary to address this group cancer care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Edmonds
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| | - Sunny Jung Kim
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Matthew Wells
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Freedman RA, Ko NY, Lederman RI, Gagnon H, Fikre T, Gundersen DA, Revette AC, Odai-Afotey A, Kantor O, Hershman DL, Crew KD, Keating NL. Breast cancer knowledge and understanding treatment rationales among diverse breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:623-633. [PMID: 36220997 PMCID: PMC9552717 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06752-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The degree to which breast cancer survivors know about their tumors and understand treatment rationales is not well understood. We sought to identify information gaps within a diverse sample and explore whether knowledge about breast cancer and treatment may impact care. Methods We conducted a one-time, interviewer-administered survey of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer during 2013–2017 and received care at one of three centers in Boston, MA, and New York, NY. We examined knowledge of breast cancer and treatment rationales, information preferences, and treatment receipt. Results During 2018–2020, we interviewed 313 women (American Association for Public Opinion Research Cooperation Rates 58.4–76.5% across centers) who were 56.9% White, 23.6% Black, 14.1% Hispanic, and 5.4% other. Among the 296 included in analyses, we observed high variability in knowledge of breast cancer and treatment rationales, with a substantial number demonstrating limited knowledge despite feeling highly informed; > 25% actively avoided information. Black and Hispanic (vs. White) women consistently knew less about their cancers. Lack of understanding of treatment rationales for chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy was common but not consistently different by race and ethnicity. Understanding treatment rationale (but not cancer knowledge) was associated with treatment initiation, but small sample sizes limited in-depth examination. Conclusions Our study highlights the need for enhanced informational support for breast cancer survivors, who are challenged with complex information during the decision-making process and beyond. More research is needed to understand how to further educate and empower diverse populations of patients with breast cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06752-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Naomi Y Ko
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ruth I Lederman
- Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Haley Gagnon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tsion Fikre
- Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna C Revette
- Survey and Qualitative Methods Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Olga Kantor
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katherine D Crew
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oppong BA, Bhattacharyya O, Li Y, Obeng-Gyasi S, Sheppard VB. Receipt of breast conservation over mastectomy in Black women- does breast cancer subtype matter? J Natl Med Assoc 2022; 114:298-307. [PMID: 35272849 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy have equivalent survivability. However, perception of surgical benefit may be affected by breast cancer subtypes, impacting procedure choice. We evaluate surgical management among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and White (NHW) breast cancer patients based on subtypes. METHODS Queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) including BCS eligible women with T1 (<2cm) breast cancer between 2011 and 2016. We selected NHB and NHW women and evaluated differences in sociodemographic variables and treatment including surgery. To determine factors associated with receipt of BCS, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed adjusting for age, race, surgery type and breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS Analyzed 390,278 women with 89.7% NHW and 10.3% NHB, of mean age 63 years. 55.4% vs. 53.5% of NHW compared to NHB women had BCS (p<.001) as initial cancer therapy. Statistically significant differences between NHB and NHW in surgery were found on univariate analysis in all breast cancer subtypes except Luminal B. NHB women with TNBC and Luminal A subtypes were more likely to undergo BCS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences are found in the surgical management of breast cancer with Black women more likely to receive BCS, less likely to undergo mastectomy compared to White counterparts even with TNBC or her-2+ subtypes. Understanding surgical decision making and how knowledge of subtype is applied deserves further study in women of diverse racial and ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget A Oppong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Oindrila Bhattacharyya
- Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Department of Economics, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute Inc., The William Tierney Center for Health Services Research, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Yaming Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rivers AS, Sanford K. A special kind of stress: Assessing feelings of decisional distress for breast cancer treatment decisions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:3038-3044. [PMID: 33941423 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women with breast cancer need to make difficult treatment decisions and may experience decisional distress (worry, anxiety, and thought intrusion) associated with these decisions. This study investigated ways that decisional distress was both associated with and distinct from other variables regarding decisional process and life functioning, and it investigated the validity of a decisional distress scale. METHODS A total of 263 women previously or currently diagnosed with breast cancer reported on initial treatment decisions regarding surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, or decisions involving oral endocrine therapy (either currently or retrospectively). Participants completed online measures of decisional distress, alliance and confusion in patient-practitioner relationships, positive and negative interactions in close relationships, financial and general distress, and decision satisfaction. RESULTS Decisional distress demonstrated a unidimensional factor structure invariant across treatment context groups, a wide range of meaningful variation, significant correlations with all hypothesized variables (especially patient confusion), but also key distinctions from other variables. CONCLUSION Decisional distress is a meaningful construct that can be assessed with precision, and important for understanding medical decision-making processes and patient quality of life. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Assessing decisional distress is crucial for evaluating treatment decision outcomes. One key to reducing decisional distress may involve reducing patient confusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keith Sanford
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Anderson JN, Graff C, Krukowski RA, Schwartzberg L, Vidal GA, Waters TM, Paladino AJ, Jones TN, Blue R, Kocak M, Graetz I. "Nobody Will Tell You. You've Got to Ask!": An Examination of Patient-Provider Communication Needs and Preferences among Black and White Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 36:1331-1342. [PMID: 32336140 PMCID: PMC7606266 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1751383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Patient-provider communication is a critical component of healthcare and is associated with treatment quality and outcomes for women with breast cancer. This qualitative study examines similarities and differences in patient perspectives of communication needs between Black and White breast cancer survivors. We conducted four focus groups (N = 28) involving women with early-stage breast cancer on adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET), stratified by race and length of time on AET (< 6 months and >6 months). Each group was moderated by a race-concordant moderator and analyzed by emergent themes. Participants expressed common patient-provider communication needs, namely increased sensitivity from oncologists during the initial cancer diagnosis, personalized information to facilitate treatment decisions, emotional support during the transition from active treatment to maintenance, and rapid provider responses to mobile app-based queries. Communication differences by race also emerged. Black women were less likely than White women to describe having their informational needs met. White women praised longstanding relationships with providers, while Black women shared personal stories of disempowered interactions and noted the importance of patient advocates. White women more often reported privacy concerns about technology use. Unlike White women, Black women reported willingness to discuss sensitive topics, both online and offline, but believed those discussions made their providers feel uncomfortable. Early-stage breast cancer patients on AET, regardless of race, have similar needs for patient-centered communication with their oncologists. However, Black women were more likely to report experiencing poorer communication with providers than White women, which may be improved by technology and advocates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janeane N. Anderson
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Nursing, Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 920 Madison Avenue; Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Carolyn Graff
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Nursing, Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 920 Madison Avenue; Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Rebecca A. Krukowski
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Lee Schwartzberg
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN 38138
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology; 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Gregory A. Vidal
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN 38138
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology; 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Teresa M. Waters
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
- University of Kentucky, College of Public Health, Department of Health Management and Policy, 111 Washington Ave., Lexington, KY 40536
| | - Andrew J. Paladino
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN 38138
| | - Tameka N. Jones
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, 7945 Wolf River Blvd, Germantown, TN 38138
| | - Ryan Blue
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Nursing, Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 920 Madison Avenue; Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Mehmet Kocak
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
| | - Ilana Graetz
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, 66 N. Pauline St., Ste. 633, Memphis, TN 38163
- Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management; 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Conley CC, Otto AK, McDonnell GA, Tercyak KP. Multiple approaches to enhancing cancer communication in the next decade: translating research into practice and policy. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:2018-2032. [PMID: 34347872 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Communicating risk and other health information in a clear, understandable, and actionable manner is critical for the prevention and control of cancer, as well as the care of affected individuals and their family members. However, the swift pace of development in communication technologies has dramatically changed the health communication landscape. This digital era presents new opportunities and challenges for cancer communication research and its impact on practice and policy. In this article, we examine the science of health communication focused on cancer and highlight important areas of research for the coming decade. Specifically, we discuss three domains in which cancer communication may occur: (a) among patients and their healthcare providers; (b) within and among families and social networks; and (c) across communities, populations, and the public more broadly. We underscore findings from the prior decade of cancer communication research, provide illustrative examples of future directions for cancer communication science, and conclude with considerations for diverse populations. Health informatics studies will be necessary to fully understand the growing and complex communication settings related to cancer: such works have the potential to change the face of information exchanges about cancer and elevate our collective discourse about this area as newer clinical and public health priorities emerge. Researchers from a wide array of specialties are interested in examining and improving cancer communication. These interdisciplinary perspectives can rapidly advance and help translate findings of cancer communication in the field of behavioral medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire C Conley
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Amy K Otto
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Glynnis A McDonnell
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kenneth P Tercyak
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kelly EP, Myers B, Henderson B, Sprik P, White KB, Pawlik TM. The Influence of Patient and Provider Religious and Spiritual Beliefs on Treatment Decision Making in the Cancer Care Context. Med Decis Making 2021; 42:125-134. [PMID: 34196249 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x211022246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Providers often underestimate the influence of patient religious and spiritual (R&S) needs. The current study sought to determine the influence of R&S beliefs on treatment decision making among patients and providers in the context of cancer care. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature using web-based search engines and discipline-specific databases. Search terms included a combination of the following Medical Subject Headings and key terms: "cancer,""spirituality,""religion," and "decision making." We used Covidence to screen relevant studies and extracted data into Microsoft Excel. RESULTS Among 311 screened studies, 32 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most studies evaluated the patient perspective (n = 29), while 2 studies evaluated the provider perspective and 1 study examined both. In assessing patient R&S relative to treatment decision making, we thematically characterized articles according to decision-making contexts, including general (n = 11), end-of-life/advance care planning (n = 13), and other: specific (n = 8). Specific contexts included, but were not limited to, clinical trial participation (n = 2) and use of complementary and alternative medicine (n = 4). Within end-of-life/advance care planning, there was a discrepancy regarding how R&S influenced treatment decision making. The influence of R&S on general treatment decision making was both active and passive, with some patients wanting more direct integration of their R&S beliefs in treatment decision making. In contrast, other patients were less aware of indirect R&S influences. Patient perception of the impact of R&S on treatment decision making varied relative to race/ethnicity, being more pronounced among Black patients. CONCLUSION Most articles focused on R&S relative to treatment decision making at the end of life, even though R&S appeared important across the care continuum. To improve patient-centered cancer care, providers need to be more aware of the impact of R&S on treatment decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian Myers
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Petra Sprik
- Department of Supportive Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Kelsey B White
- Department of Health Management & System Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anderson JN, Krukowski RA, Paladino AJ, Graff JC, Schwartzberg L, Curry AN, Vidal GA, Jones TN, Waters TM, Graetz I. THRIVE intervention development: using participatory action research principles to guide a mHealth app-based intervention to improve oncology care. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 5. [PMID: 34308256 PMCID: PMC8302021 DOI: 10.21037/jhmhp-20-103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background: Women with hormone receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer who adhere to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality. AET, however, is associated with adverse symptoms that often result in poor adherence. We applied participatory action research (PAR) principles to conduct focus groups and interviews to refine and enhance a web-enabled app intervention that facilitates patient-provider communication about AET-related symptoms and other barriers to adherence. Methods: We conducted four focus groups with women with early-stage breast cancer on AET (N=28), stratified by race (Black and White) and length of time on AET (<6 months and >6 months), to determine preferences and refine the app-based intervention. A fifth mixed-race focus group was convened (N=6) to refine THRIVE app content using high-fidelity mock-ups and to develop new, tailored feedback messages. We also conducted interviews with oncology nurses (N=5) who participated in the THRIVE randomized controlled trial. Results: Participants reported preferences for weekly reminder messages to use the THRIVE app, a free-text option to write in AET-related symptoms, and app aesthetics. Other requested app features included: a body map for identifying pain, sleep and dental problems on the symptom list, a dashboard, tailored feedback messages, and information about social support resources. Participants also developed new intervention messages, decided which messages to keep, and edited language for appropriateness and sensitivity. They also discussed the type of electronic pill monitor and incentive plan to be used in the intervention. Nurses reported THRIVE alerts integrated seamlessly into their clinical workflow and increased patient-provider communication, facilitating quicker response to patients’ reported symptoms. Nurses reported no negative feedback or usability concerns with the app. Conclusions: THRIVE app content reflects researchers’ partnership with a racially diverse sample of breast cancer survivors and healthcare providers and adherence to participatory design by incorporating patient-requested app features, app aesthetics, and message content. The app has the potential to improve AET adherence and quality of life among breast cancer survivors and reduce disparities in mortality rates for Black women by facilitating communication with healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janeane N Anderson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.,Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Rebecca A Krukowski
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew J Paladino
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - J Carolyn Graff
- Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, College of Nursing, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Lee Schwartzberg
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrea N Curry
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Gregory A Vidal
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tameka N Jones
- West Cancer Center Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA.,Baylor Scott & White McClinton Cancer Center, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Teresa M Waters
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.,Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ilana Graetz
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Understanding health-seeking and adherence to treatment by patients with esophageal cancer at the Uganda cancer Institute: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:159. [PMID: 33602201 PMCID: PMC7890846 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06163-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the low- and middle-income countries, most patients with esophageal cancer present with advanced stage disease and experience poor survival. There is inadequate understanding of the factors that influence decisions to and actual health-seeking, and adherence to treatment regimens among esophageal cancer patients in Uganda, yet this knowledge is critical in informing interventions to promote prompt health-seeking, diagnosis at early stage and access to appropriate cancer therapy to improve survival. We explored health-seeking experiences and adherence to treatment among esophageal cancer patients attending the Uganda Cancer Institute. METHODS We conducted an interview based qualitative study at the Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI). Participants included patients with established histology diagnosis of esophageal cancer and healthcare professionals involved in the care of these patients. We used purposive sampling approach to select study participants. In-depth and key informant interviews were used in data collection. Data collection was conducted till point of data saturation was reached. Thematic content analysis approach was used in data analyses and interpretations. Themes and subthemes were identified deductively. RESULTS Sixteen patients and 17 healthcare professionals were included in the study. Delayed health-seeking and poor adherence to treatment were related to (i) emotional and psychosocial factors including stress of cancer diagnosis, stigma related to esophageal cancer symptoms, and fear of loss of jobs and livelihood, (ii) limited knowledge and recognition of esophageal cancer symptoms by both patients and primary healthcare professionals, and (iii) limited access to specialized cancer care, mainly because of long distance to the facility and associated high transport cost. Patients were generally enthused with patient - provider relationships at the UCI. While inadequate communication and some degree of incivility were reported, majority of patients thought the healthcare professionals were empathetic and supportive. CONCLUSION Health system and individual patient factors influence health-seeking for symptoms of esophageal cancer and adherence to treatment schedule for the disease. Interventions to improve access to and acceptability of esophageal cancer services, as well as increase public awareness of esophageal cancer risk factors and symptoms could lead to earlier diagnosis and potentially better survival from the disease in Uganda.
Collapse
|
15
|
Edmonds MC, Sutton AL, He J, Perera RA, Sheppard VB. Correlates of Adjuvant Therapy Attitudes in African American Breast Cancer Patients. J Natl Med Assoc 2020; 112:167-175. [PMID: 32197898 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Black breast cancer patients delay and underutilize adjuvant breast cancer therapies; yet, very few studies have specifically examined Black women's attitudes toward breast cancer therapy. This study observed the influence of self-reported interpersonal processes of care (e.g. self-efficacy) clinical and sociodemographic factors and sociocultural (e.g. religiosity), related to Black breast cancer patients' attitudes toward radiation and systemic therapies (chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy - "AET"). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of data from the Narrowing Gaps in Adjuvant Therapy Study (2006-2011). The analysis included 210 Black women who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Bivariate and multiple regression analyses were performed between independent variables (e.g., demographics) and three outcome variables (chemotherapy, AET, and radiation therapy) to asses women's perceptions of therapy type. The lasso method was used to select variables correlated with therapy attitudes. RESULTS Most women reported negative attitudes toward AET (56%) and radiation (54%); fewer negative attitudes were observed toward chemotherapy (47%). Higher education and greater perceived susceptibility of a recurrence were associated with more positive attitudes toward chemotherapy. Regarding radiation therapy, women with greater patient satisfaction were more likely to have more positive attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Our study findings may aid in the development of behavioral interventions targeted to mitigate Black women breast cancer treatment disparities. We found modifiable factors (e.g. communication, satisfaction ratings) that support opportunities for clinicians to better address Black women's needs regarding adjuvant treatment options. The development of tailored interventions for newly diagnosed Black breast cancer patients on patient related factors in health care are warranted for Black women with lower educational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Edmonds
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, USA; VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, 830 East Main Street, 9th Floor, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, USA; VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, 830 East Main Street, 9th Floor, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA
| | - Jun He
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert A Perera
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, USA; VCU Massey Cancer Center Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, 830 East Main Street, 9th Floor, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Snead F, Slade AN, Oppong BA, Sutton AL, Sheppard VB. Narrowing Racial Gaps in Breast Cancer: Factors Affecting Probability of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:17-26. [PMID: 32051886 PMCID: PMC7004948 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant radiation therapy has historically been underused by black patients with breast cancer compared with white patients. We prospectively investigated factors, including sociocultural, psychosocial, and health care factors, that may be associated with the use or omission of adjuvant radiation therapy by both racial groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS Women with primary invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were recruited from hospitals and through community outreach efforts in the Washington, DC, and Detroit, Michigan, areas between July 2006 and April 2011. Data were collected via telephone interviews regarding psychosocial (eg, self-efficacy) and health care factors (eg, communication) at the time they received a diagnosis. Clinical data were extracted from their medical charts after the completion of treatment. We examined the association among multiple demographic, socio-cultural, healthcare process factors and the use of radiotherapy. Logistic multivariable regression models identified associations with radiotherapy receipt. RESULTS Among 395 eligible and consenting women, 315 had complete baseline data, and 217 were in the final analytical sample, having met criteria for adjuvant breast or chest wall radiation therapy after breast conservation surgery or mastectomy. Among women eligible for radiation, all were insured, 59% were black, the mean age was 55.4 years, and the majority had stage I or II disease. Overall, approximately 70% percent of women received adjuvant radiation therapy. On multivariable analyses, the likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiation therapy was higher for those who were black with any level of indication for radiation therapy (odds ratio 2.21; P < .01), those for whom comorbidities were present, and those who demonstrated positive sociocultural factors such as self-efficacy and high reported rates of provider communication about radiation therapy (odds ratio 1.20; P < .05). Among women with strong indications for radiation therapy, there was no significant association with race on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that among women with any indication for radiation therapy, black patients were more likely to receive radiation therapy compared with white patients. Furthermore, data suggest improved provider communication and self-efficacy are important predictors of receipt of radiation therapy. Further studies exploring the effects of provider communication and sociocultural factors to diverse patient populations may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicia Snead
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thomas TH, McLaughlin M, Hayden M, Shumaker E, Trybus J, Myers E, Zabiegalski A, Cohen SM. Teaching Patients with Advanced Cancer to Self-Advocate: Development and Acceptability of the Strong Together™ Serious Game. Games Health J 2019; 8:55-63. [DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2018.0021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Hagan Thomas
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mary McLaughlin
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Passavant, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Margaret Hayden
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Passavant, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth Shumaker
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Passavant, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica Trybus
- Simcoach Games, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Entertainment Technology Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eben Myers
- Simcoach Games, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Susan M. Cohen
- Department of Health Promotion & Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reeder-Hayes KE, Wheeler SB, Baggett CD, Zhou X, Meng K, Roberts MC, Carey LA, Meyer AM. Influence of provider factors and race on uptake of breast cancer gene expression profiling. Cancer 2018; 124:1743-1751. [PMID: 29338090 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene expression profiling (GEP) has been rapidly adopted for early breast cancer and can aid in chemotherapy decision making. Study results regarding racial disparities in testing are conflicting, and may reflect different care settings. To the authors' knowledge, data regarding the influence of provider factors on testing are scarce. METHODS The authors used a statewide, multipayer, insurance claims database linked to cancer registry records to examine the impact of race and provider characteristics on GEP uptake in a cohort of patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer between 2005 and 2012. Incidence proportion models were used to examine the adjusted likelihood of testing. Models were stratified by lymph node status (N0 vs N1). RESULTS Among 11,958 eligible patients, 23% of black and 26% of non-Hispanic white patients received GEP. Among patients with N0 disease, black individuals were 16% less likely to receive testing after adjustment for clinical factors and the provider's specialty and volume of patients with breast cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.93). Adjustment for provider characteristics did not attenuate the effect of race on testing. Patients of middle-volume providers were more likely to be tested compared with those with either high-volume or low-volume providers, whereas patients seeing a medical oncologist were more likely to be tested compared with those whose only providers were from surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS Provider volume and specialty were found to be significant predictors of GEP use, but did not explain racial disparities in testing. Further research concerning the key contributors to lagging test use among black women is needed to optimize the equitable use of GEPs and support personalized treatment decision making for all patients. Cancer 2018;124:1743-51. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Christopher D Baggett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Xi Zhou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Ke Meng
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Megan C Roberts
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anne-Marie Meyer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hagan TL, Cohen SM, Rosenzweig MQ, Zorn K, Stone CA, Donovan HS. The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale: A validation study. J Adv Nurs 2017; 74:976-987. [PMID: 29117439 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To develop and psychometrically test the validity of the Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale. BACKGROUND Female cancer survivors need to self-advocate to overcome challenges associated with cancer yet no valid measure of self-advocacy exists. DESIGN Instrument development. Mixed-mode cross-sectional survey design. PARTICIPANTS We recruited adult females (18+ years; N = 317) with a history of invasive cancer from local and national tumour registries and advocacy organizations to complete online or paper questionnaires. METHODS Between July 2014 - March 2015 to evaluate the construct validity based on evidence of the scale's: (1) internal structure consistent with the underlying model of self-advocacy; (2) sensitivity to differences between groups known to differ in self-advocacy skills; (3) relationships between self-advocacy and key potential predictors (openness and conscientiousness; information engagement; social support) and outcomes (symptom burden and healthcare utilization); (4) relationships between self-advocacy and related concepts (patient activation; self-advocacy within another patient population); and (5) relationships between self-advocacy and criterion measures. Analyses included an exploratory factor analysis, t tests, and bivariate correlations using validated, reliable measures for constructs. RESULTS Evidence from all five hypotheses supported the construct validity of the Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale. The factor analysis confirmed the three underlying dimensions of self-advocacy resulting in a 20-item measure with strong internal consistency that explained almost half of response variance. CONCLUSION The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale is a valid, reliable measure of how well adult female cancer survivors can get their needs met in the face of adversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa L Hagan
- Center for Psychiatric Oncology and Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan M Cohen
- Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Margaret Q Rosenzweig
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kristin Zorn
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Clement A Stone
- Department of Psychology in Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Education, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heidi S Donovan
- Department of Health & Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Freedman RA, Revette AC, Hershman DL, Silva K, Sporn NJ, Gagne JJ, Kouri EM, Keating NL. Understanding Breast Cancer Knowledge and Barriers to Treatment Adherence: A Qualitative Study Among Breast Cancer Survivors. Biores Open Access 2017; 6:159-168. [PMID: 29282433 PMCID: PMC5743034 DOI: 10.1089/biores.2017.0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Disparities in breast cancer treatment receipt are common and multifactorial. Data are limited on how knowledge about one's breast cancer and understanding treatment rationales may impact treatment completion. In this qualitative analysis, we explored barriers to care with a focus on knowledge. We conducted 18 in-depth interviews with women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds who were treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (n = 12; Boston, MA) and Columbia University Medical Center (n = 6; New York, NY) and had undergone neo/adjuvant breast cancer treatment within the prior 3 years. Interviews focused on treatments received, adherence, barriers experienced, and questions related to breast cancer knowledge and treatment rationales. We analyzed transcribed interview recordings in N'Vivo using a two-stage coding process that allowed for both preconfigured and emergent themes. Answers for breast cancer knowledge were confirmed using medical records. In our analysis, over one-third of women reported incomplete therapy, including never initiating treatment, stopping treatment prematurely, or missing/delaying treatments due to logistical reasons (childcare, transportation) or patient preferences. Others reported treatment modifications because of provider recommendations. Nearly all women were able to accurately describe the rationale for recommended treatments. Among 17 women for whom medical records were available, women correctly reported 18–71% of their tumor characteristics; incorrect reporting was not consistently associated with treatment incompletion. In conclusion, logistical issues and patient preferences were the main reasons for incomplete therapy in our study. Understanding of treatment rationale was high, but breast cancer knowledge was variable. Further assessment of how knowledge may impact cancer care is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna C Revette
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Silva
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nora J Sporn
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joshua J Gagne
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elena M Kouri
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Phillips CR, Haase JE, Broome ME, Carpenter JS, Frankel RM. Connecting with healthcare providers at diagnosis: adolescent/young adult cancer survivors' perspectives. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2017; 12:1325699. [PMID: 28617094 PMCID: PMC5510205 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1325699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable and underserved population. AYAs' cancer survivorship is complicated by physical and psychosocial late effects which requires long-term follow-up. Connectedness with healthcare providers (HCPs) is a protective factor that may improve long-term follow-up behaviours of AYAs. However, little is known about AYAs' experiences connecting with HCPs. The purpose of this study was to describe AYA cancer survivors' experiences connecting with HCPs. This empirical phenomenological study interviewed nine AYA cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence. Individual interviews were conducted and analysed using an adapted Colaizzi approach. The essential structure reveals that AYAs begin their experience of connectedness with a sense of disconnectedness prior to treatment. The diagnosis is a period of confusion and emotional turmoil that interfere with the AYAs' ability to connect. When AYAs come to accept their illness and gain familiarity with the environment, they then put forth an effort to connect with HCPs. Although it takes time for AYAs to reciprocate efforts to connect, HCPs should be aware that AYAs carefully assess and make judgments about whether or not HCPs can be trusted. Findings raise awareness of the actions and behaviours of HCPs that hinder connectedness, and targeted in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste R. Phillips
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Joan E. Haase
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Marion E. Broome
- Division of Healthcare of Women and Children, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Janet S. Carpenter
- Department of Science Nursing Care, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Richard M. Frankel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University, School of Medicine Indianapolis, INUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chawla N, Blanch-Hartigan D, Virgo KS, Ekwueme DU, Han X, Forsythe L, Rodriguez J, McNeel TS, Yabroff KR. Quality of Patient-Provider Communication Among Cancer Survivors: Findings From a Nationally Representative Sample. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e964-e973. [PMID: 27221992 PMCID: PMC5455584 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.006999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although patient-provider communication is an essential component of health care delivery, little is known about the quality of these discussions among patients with cancer. METHODS Data are from the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Experiences with Cancer survey among 1,202 adult cancer survivors. We evaluated discussions with any provider after a cancer diagnosis about: (1) follow-up care; (2) late or long-term treatment effects; (3) lifestyle recommendations, such as diet, exercise, and quitting smoking; and (4) emotional or social needs. Using a response scale ranging from "did not discuss" to "discussed in detail," a summary score was constructed to define communication quality as high, medium, or low. Patient factors associated with the quality of provider discussions were examined using multivariable polytomous logistic regression analyses. RESULTS At the time of the survey, approximately one half of the patients (46%) were either within 1 year (24.1%) or between 1 and 5 years (22.0%) of treatment. More than one third of cancer survivors reported that they did not receive detailed communication about follow-up care, and more than one half reported that they did not receive detailed communication regarding late or long-term effects, lifestyle recommendations, or emotional and social needs. Only 24% reported high-quality communication for all four elements, indicating that the vast majority experienced suboptimal communication. In multivariable analysis, survivors reporting a high communication quality with providers included those who were within 1 year of treatment, between the ages of 18 and 64 years, non-Hispanic black or other ethnicity, and married. CONCLUSION Study findings demonstrate gaps in the communication quality experienced by cancer survivors in the United States and help identify survivors for targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neetu Chawla
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Danielle Blanch-Hartigan
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Katherine S Virgo
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Donatus U Ekwueme
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Xuesong Han
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Laura Forsythe
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Juan Rodriguez
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - Timothy S McNeel
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Information Management Services, Rockville, MD; Bentley University, Waltham, MA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA; and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Davis CM, Nyamathi AM, Abuatiq A, Fike GC, Wilson AM. Understanding Supportive Care Factors Among African American Breast Cancer Survivors. J Transcult Nurs 2016; 29:21-29. [PMID: 27694287 DOI: 10.1177/1043659616670713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comprehensive breast cancer care includes not only diagnosis, staging, and treatment of cancer but also assessment and management of the physical, psychological, social, and informational needs, collectively known as supportive care. Several studies have documented the importance of addressing supportive care factors among breast cancer survivors. However, there appears to be a paucity of research concerning African American breast cancer survivors (AABCS). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to describe and understand the patient-centered supportive care factors among self-identified AABCS. METHOD Using a qualitative descriptive approach, an open-ended question explored supportive care factors that were used by N = 155 AABCS. RESULTS Four supportive care factors were identified: faith, supportive structures, optimism, and access to information. DISCUSSION An understanding of these factors might facilitate discussion between survivors and the health care team. The resultant effect could also inform and promote the delivery of culturally specific health care to address the supportive care needs among these women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia M Davis
- 1 California State University San Bernardino, CA, USA.,2 Center for the Promotion of Health Disparities Research and Training, San Bernardino, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anna M Wilson
- 1 California State University San Bernardino, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ben-Arye E, Shavit E, Wiental H, Schiff E, Agour O, Samuels N. Overcoming communication challenges in integrative supportive cancer care: The integrative physician, the psycho-oncologist, and the patient. Complement Ther Med 2016; 29:9-15. [PMID: 27912963 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 06/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complementary/integrative medicine (CIM) services are increasingly being integrated into conventional supportive cancer care, presenting a number of challenges to communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs). The purpose of the present study was to explore the impact of the communication between integrative physicians (IPs) trained in CIM and social workers (SWs) working as psycho-oncologists in the same oncology setting. We examine whether IP-SW communication correlates with the number of patient-SW sessions, as provided within the oncology department. METHODS SW-IP communication, defined as a summary of the IP consultation sent to the patient's SW, was compared to SW-patient communication, defined as the number of psycho-oncology treatment sessions. RESULTS Of 344 patients referred by their oncology HCP for IP consultation, 91 were referred by an SW and 253 by an oncologist or nurse. IP-to-SW summaries were provided for 150 patients referred by a non-SW HCP (43.6%), and for 91 of SW-referred patients (26.5%). In all, 32 patients referred to the IP had no psycho-oncology interaction with an SW; 58 only one meeting; and 254 with ≥2 interactions, with 119 having >6 sessions. SW-patient interactions were greater with higher rates of IP-SW communication, for both patients referred by an SW (79.1%) and those referred by a non-SW HCP (77.3%) when compared to patients for whom no summary was provided (64.1%; p= 0.02). CONCLUSION A greater level of IP-SW communication, measured by the provision of an IP summary to the patient's SW, was found to correlate with a higher rate of SW-patient interactions. The use of a structured two-way referral-summary between IPs and SWs has the potential to advance the SW-patient psycho-oncology interaction, within an integrative supportive cancer care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eran Ben-Arye
- Integrative Oncology Program, The Oncology Service, Lin Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel; Complementary and Traditional Medicine Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel.
| | - Efrat Shavit
- Social-Work Service, The Oncology Service and Lin Medical center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel
| | - Haya Wiental
- Social-Work Service, The Oncology Service and Lin Medical center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel
| | - Elad Schiff
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bnai-Zion Hospital, Haifa, Israel; The Department for Complementary/Integrative Medicine, Law and Ethics, The International Center for Health, Law and Ethics, Haifa University, Israel
| | - Olga Agour
- Integrative Oncology Program, The Oncology Service, Lin Medical Center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel; Social-Work Service, The Oncology Service and Lin Medical center, Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee District, Israel
| | - Noah Samuels
- Tal Center for Integrative Medicine, Institute of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Davis C, Darby K, Moore M, Cadet T, Brown G. Breast care screening for underserved African American women: Community-based participatory approach. J Psychosoc Oncol 2016; 35:90-105. [PMID: 27662263 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1217965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Traditional health promotion models often do not take into account the importance of shared cultural backgrounds, beliefs, and experiences unique to underserved African American women when designing community-based cancer screening and prevention programs. Thus, the purpose of this study was the development, implementation, and evaluation of a community-based participatory research (CBPR) program designed to increase breast cancer screening awareness in an underserved African American population by providing culturally appropriate social support and information. The study includes 357 African American women who participated in the program and completed the 6-month follow-up questionnaire. The program consisted of a 45-minute play, using community members and storytelling to honor and incorporate five different cultural experiences (skits) with breast care and cancer. Overall, findings indicate that the educational intervention was effective. In addition, these findings are consistent with the literature that suggests that educational interventions that include knowledge to alleviate concerns, dispel myths, and create awareness can increase breast cancer screening participation rates. Furthermore, these findings confirm the importance of CBPR in health promotion activities in reducing health and cancer disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Davis
- a Faculty of Arts and Business , University of the Sunshine Coast , Sippy Downs , Queensland , Australia
| | - Kathleen Darby
- b Middle Tennessee State University , Murfreesboro , TN , USA
| | - Matthew Moore
- c College of Social Work , University of Tennessee , Knoxville , TN , USA
| | - Tamara Cadet
- d Simmons College of Social Work , Boston , MA , USA
| | - Gwendolynn Brown
- e Urban Health Education & Support Services Foundation , Memphis , TN , USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Freedman RA, Viswanath K, Vaz-Luis I, Keating NL. Learning from social media: utilizing advanced data extraction techniques to understand barriers to breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 158:395-405. [PMID: 27339067 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3872-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Past examinations of breast cancer treatment barriers have typically included registry, claims-based, and smaller survey studies. We examined treatment barriers using a novel, comprehensive, social media analysis of online, candid discussions about breast cancer. Using an innovative toolset to search postings on social networks, message boards, patient communities, and topical sites, we performed a large-scale qualitative analysis. We examined the sentiments and barriers expressed about breast cancer treatments by Internet users during 1 year (2/1/14-1/31/15). We categorized posts based on thematic patterns and examined trends in discussions by race/ethnicity (white/black/Hispanic) when this information was available. We identified 1,024,041 unique posts related to breast cancer treatment. Overall, 57 % of posts expressed negative sentiments. Using machine learning software, we assigned treatment barriers for 387,238 posts (38 %). Barriers included emotional (23 % of posts), preferences and spiritual/religious beliefs (21 %), physical (18 %), resource (15 %), healthcare perceptions (9 %), treatment processes/duration (7 %), and relationships (7 %). Black and Hispanic (vs. white) users more frequently reported barriers related to healthcare perceptions, beliefs, and pre-diagnosis/diagnosis organizational challenges and fewer emotional barriers. Using a novel analysis of diverse social media users, we observed numerous breast cancer treatment barriers that differed by race/ethnicity. Social media is a powerful tool, allowing use of real-world data for qualitative research, capitalizing on the rich discussions occurring spontaneously online. Future research should focus on how to further employ and learn from this type of social intelligence research across all medical disciplines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Kasisomayajula Viswanath
- Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Society and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Freedman RA, Kouri EM, West DW, Lii J, Keating NL. Association of Breast Cancer Knowledge With Receipt of Guideline-Recommended Breast Cancer Treatment. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e613-25. [PMID: 27165488 PMCID: PMC4957257 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.008508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Knowledge about one's breast cancer characteristics is poor, but whether this knowledge affects treatment is uncertain. Among women with breast cancer, we examined whether tumor knowledge was associated with adjuvant treatment receipt. METHODS We surveyed a population-based sample of women in Northern California with stage 0 to III breast cancer diagnosed during 2010 to 2011 (participation rate, 68.5%). Interviews were conducted between 4 months and 3 years after diagnosis. Among 414 respondents with stage I to III disease, we examined receipt of guideline-recommended chemotherapy, radiation, and hormonal therapy by reporting correct information about one's tumor, including stage, estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade (using registry data for confirmation). We performed multivariate logistic regression to assess the probability of receiving each treatment in relevant patient groups, adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, and examined the impact of reporting correct tumor information on treatment receipt. RESULTS Among relevant treatment-eligible groups, 81% received chemotherapy, 91% received radiation, and 83% received hormonal therapy. In adjusted analyses, having correct (v incorrect) information for stage and HER2 were associated with chemotherapy receipt (odds ratio [OR], 4.45; 95% CI, 1.50 to 12.50 for stage; OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.02 to 7.18 for HER2). Correctly reporting estrogen receptor status was associated with hormonal therapy receipt (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.73 to 8.86), and correctly reporting stage was associated with radiation receipt (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.03 to 7.40). CONCLUSION Knowledge about one's tumor characteristics was strongly associated with receipt of recommended therapies. Interventions to improve patients' knowledge and understanding of their cancers should be tested as a strategy for improving receipt of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| | - Elena M Kouri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| | - Dee W West
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| | - Joyce Lii
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| | - Nancy L Keating
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Harvard Medical School; and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and Public Health Institute, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reducing Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer Survivors' Ratings of Quality Cancer Care. J Healthc Qual 2016; 38:143-63. [DOI: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Paternotte E, van Dulmen S, van der Lee N, Scherpbier AJJA, Scheele F. Factors influencing intercultural doctor-patient communication: a realist review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:420-45. [PMID: 25535014 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Revised: 10/23/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Due to migration, doctors see patients from different ethnic backgrounds. This causes challenges for the communication. To develop training programs for doctors in intercultural communication (ICC), it is important to know which barriers and facilitators determine the quality of ICC. This study aimed to provide an overview of the literature and to explore how ICC works. METHODS A systematic search was performed to find literature published before October 2012. The search terms used were cultural, communication, healthcare worker. A realist synthesis allowed us to use an explanatory focus to understand the interplay of communication. RESULTS In total, 145 articles met the inclusion criteria. We found ICC challenges due to language, cultural and social differences, and doctors' assumptions. The mechanisms were described as factors influencing the process of ICC and divided into objectives, core skills and specific skills. The results were synthesized in a framework for the development of training. CONCLUSION The quality of ICC is influenced by the context and by the mechanisms. These mechanisms translate into practical points for training, which seem to have similarities with patient-centered communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Training for improving ICC can be developed as an extension of the existing training for patient-centered communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Paternotte
- Department of Healthcare Education, Sint Lucas Andreas hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Faculty of Health Sciences, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Nadine van der Lee
- Department of Healthcare Education, Sint Lucas Andreas hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Albert J J A Scherpbier
- Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Fedde Scheele
- Medical School of Sciences, Vu University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Luo T, Spolverato G, Johnston F, Haider AH, Pawlik TM. Factors that determine cancer treatment choice among minority groups. J Oncol Pract 2015; 11:259-61. [PMID: 25736381 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.003640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Minority cancer outcomes and treatment satisfaction can only be improved if physicians are knowledgeable about cultural differences and work to improve patient-physician communication and patient engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianqi Luo
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Fabian Johnston
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Adil H Haider
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Freedman RA, Kouri EM, West DW, Keating NL. Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about one's breast cancer characteristics. Cancer 2015; 121:724-32. [PMID: 25624186 PMCID: PMC4946569 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2014] [Revised: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 07/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding tumor characteristics is likely important, but little is known about breast cancer patients' knowledge of their own disease. The authors assessed women's knowledge about their tumor characteristics, whether racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge exist, and whether education and health literacy influence associations. METHODS A population-based cohort of women in Northern California with stage 0 through III breast cancers diagnosed from 2010 to 2011 (participation rate 68.5%) was surveyed. Among 500 respondents (222 non-Hispanic white women, 142 non-Hispanic black women, and 136 Hispanic women), racial/ethnic differences in knowledge about tumor characteristics (estrogen receptor [ER] status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] status, stage, grade) and correctness of tumor information (with California Cancer Registry data for confirmation) were examined. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the probability of: 1) knowing tumor stage, receptor status, and grade; and 2) correctly answering questions about tumor information by race/ethnicity. The impact of education and health literacy on findings was examined in sequential models. RESULTS Overall, 32% to 82% of women reported knowing each of the 4 tumor characteristics of interest, and 20% to 58% correctly reported these characteristics. After adjustment, black and Hispanic women were less likely than white women to know and have correct responses for stage, ER status, and HER2 status (all P<.05). Education and health literacy were significantly associated with knowing and having correct information about some characteristics, but these variables did not eliminate most of the racial/ethnic differences observed. CONCLUSIONS Patient's knowledge about their own breast cancer was generally poor, particularly for minority women. Further study of how this knowledge may impact receipt of care and outcomes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sheppard VB, O'Neill SC, Dilawari A, Horton S, Hirpa FA, Isaacs C. Patterns of 21-gene assay testing and chemotherapy use in black and white breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2014; 15:e83-92. [PMID: 25555816 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2014] [Revised: 11/20/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In women with early stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR(+)) breast cancer, the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies recurrence risk and predicts chemotherapy responsiveness. Recent data suggest that not all women with early-stage, HR(+) disease receive this testing. We examined sociodemographic, clinical, and attitudinal factors associated with RS testing receipt and the RS testing effect on chemotherapy use in black and white patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Women with newly diagnosed invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer were recruited and interviewed to collect sociocultural and health care process data; clinical data were collected from charts. Of the sample (n = 359), 270 had HR(+) disease. Primary analysis focused on those with HR(+) node-negative disease (n = 143); secondary analyses included node-positive women. Logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with receipt of RS testing and chemotherapy. RESULTS Among women eligible for the 21-gene assay, 62 patients [43%] received RS testing. In multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio, 1.04 per 1 year increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.08) was associated with RS testing after adjustment for covariates. Chemotherapy use was 23%. In multivariable analysis, positive attitudes about chemotherapy and greater risk of recurrence were associated with chemotherapy use (P < .05). CONCLUSION Patterns of genomic testing might vary according to age. Efforts to understand factors associated with low testing rates will be important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Asma Dilawari
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Sara Horton
- Department of Oncology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Fikru A Hirpa
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Breast Cancer Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Departments of Oncology and Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vanderpool RC, Swanberg JE, Chambers MD. A Narrative Review of the Confluence of Breast Cancer and Low-wage Employment and Its Impact on Receipt of Guideline-recommended Treatment. Glob Adv Health Med 2014; 2:75-85. [PMID: 24416698 PMCID: PMC3833560 DOI: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer among women in the United States, costing the healthcare system, employers, and society billions of dollars each year. Despite improvements in screening and treatment, significant breast cancer treatment and survivorship disparities exist among various groups of women. One variable that has not been explored extensively as a possible contributor to breast cancer treatment disparities is employment. This is concerning, given the changing economic and employment trends in the United States favoring low-wage employment. Currently, one-quarter to one-third of all US workers are considered to be working poor, and women are disproportionally represented in this group. Characteristics of low-wage work-limited paid time off, minimal health benefits, schedule inflexibility, and economic insecurity-may become even more significant in the event of a breast cancer diagnosis. To date, there has been limited research into how job conditions inherent to low-wage work may influence working poor survivors' receipt of guideline-recommended breast cancer treatment. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review was to critically examine the current literature to further our understanding of how employment context may impact treatment decisions and adherence-and therefore receipt of guideline-recommended care-among newly diagnosed, working poor breast cancer survivors. After undertaking a comprehensive review, we failed to identify any published literature that explicitly addressed low-wage employment and receipt of guideline-recommended breast cancer treatment. Four articles reported circumstances where women delayed, missed, or quit treatments due to work interference, or alternatively, developed strategies that allowed them to continue to work and obtain their breast cancer treatment concurrent with medical and economic challenges. An additional five articles, while focused on other cancer and employment outcomes, described the need for increased patient-provider communication about the influence of work on treatment decisions and the development of alternative treatment plans. Due to the paucity of research in this area, future policy, practice, and research efforts should focus on the employment context of working poor breast cancer survivors as a potential contributor to cancer disparities. Engagement of women, employers, oncology providers, healthcare systems, and interdisciplinary researchers is warranted to improve cancer outcomes among this disparate population of working women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin C Vanderpool
- University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior, Lexington, United States
| | | | - Mara D Chambers
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Markey Cancer Center, Comprehensive Breast Care Center, Lexington, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sheppard VB, Faul LA, Luta G, Clapp JD, Yung RL, Wang JHY, Kimmick G, Isaacs C, Tallarico M, Barry WT, Pitcher BN, Hudis C, Winer EP, Cohen HJ, Muss HB, Hurria A, Mandelblatt JS. Frailty and adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in older women with breast cancer: CALGB protocol 369901. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2318-27. [PMID: 24934786 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.51.7367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Most patients with breast cancer age ≥ 65 years (ie, older patients) are eligible for adjuvant hormonal therapy, but use is not universal. We examined the influence of frailty on hormonal therapy noninitiation and discontinuation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective cohort of 1,288 older women diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic breast cancer recruited from 78 sites from 2004 to 2011 were included (1,062 had estrogen receptor-positive tumors). Interviews were conducted at baseline, 6 months, and annually for up to 7 years to collect sociodemographic, health care, and psychosocial data. Hormonal initiation was defined from records and discontinuation from self-report. Baseline frailty was measured using a previously validated 35-item scale and grouped as prefrail or frail versus robust. Logistic regression and proportional hazards models were used to assess factors associated with noninitiation and discontinuation, respectively. RESULTS Most women (76.4%) were robust. Noninitiation of hormonal therapy was low (14%), but in prefrail or frail (v robust) women the odds of noninitiation were 1.63 times as high (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.40; P = .013) after covariate adjustment. Nonwhites (v whites) had higher odds of noninitiation (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.80; P = .033) after covariate adjustment. Among initiators, the 5-year continuation probability was 48.5%. After adjustment, the risk of discontinuation was higher with increasing age (P = .005) and lower for stage ≥ IIB (v stage I) disease (P = .003). CONCLUSION Frailty is associated with noninitiation of hormonal therapy, but it does not seem to be a major predictor of early discontinuation in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Leigh Anne Faul
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - George Luta
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jonathan D Clapp
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rachel L Yung
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Judy Huei-Yu Wang
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Gretchen Kimmick
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Michelle Tallarico
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - William T Barry
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Brandelyn N Pitcher
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Clifford Hudis
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Arti Hurria
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Vanessa B. Sheppard, Leigh Anne Faul, George Luta, Jonathan D. Clapp, Judy Huei-yu Wang, Claudine Isaacs, Michelle Tallarico, and Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Georgetown University Medical Center and Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Rachel L. Yung and Eric P. Winer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Gretchen Kimmick, William T. Barry, Brandelyn N. Pitcher, and Harvey J. Cohen, Duke University Medical Center; William T. Barry and Brandelyn N. Pitcher, Cancer and Leukemia Group B Statistical Center, Durham; Hyman B. Muss, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Clifford Hudis, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sheppard VB, Graves KD, Christopher J, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Talley C, Williams KP. African American women's limited knowledge and experiences with genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:311-22. [PMID: 24186304 PMCID: PMC4255465 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9663-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Accepted: 10/02/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast cancer have the potential benefit of early detection and early interventions in African American women. However, African American women have low use of these services compared to White women. We conducted two focus groups with African American women diagnosed with breast cancer (affected group, n = 13) and women with at least one first-degree relative with breast/ovarian cancer (unaffected group, n = 8). A content analysis approach was employed to analyze interview data. Breast cancer survivors had more knowledge about genetic counseling and testing than participants who were unaffected with cancer. However, knowledge about genetic counseling was limited in both groups. Barriers to pursuing genetic counseling and testing included poor understanding of the genetic counseling and testing process, fear of carrying the mutation, concerns about discrimination, and cost. Motivators to participate in genetic counseling and testing included desire to help family members, insurance coverage, and potential of benefiting the larger African American community. Education efforts are needed to increase genetic counseling and testing awareness in the African American community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Breast Cancer Program, Lombardi Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care: a qualitative study of low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women. J Community Health 2014; 38:707-15. [PMID: 23553683 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-013-9668-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
To explore patient perceptions of patient-provider communication in breast and cervical cancer-related care among low-income English- and Spanish-speaking women, we examined communication barriers and facilitators reported by patients receiving care at safety net clinics. Participants were interviewed in English or Spanish after receiving an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test or cancer diagnosis. Following an inductive approach, interviews were coded and analyzed by the language spoken with providers and patient-provider language concordance status. Of 78 participants, 53 % (n = 41) were English-speakers and 47 % (n = 37) were Spanish-speakers. All English-speakers were language-concordant with providers. Of Spanish-speakers, 27 % (n = 10) were Spanish-concordant; 38 % (n = 14) were Spanish-discordant, requiring an interpreter; and 35 % (n = 13) were Spanish mixed-concordant, experiencing both types of communication throughout the care continuum. English-speakers focused on communication barriers, and difficulty understanding jargon arose as a theme. Spanish-speakers emphasized communication facilitators related to Spanish language use. Themes among all Spanish-speaking sub-groups included appreciation for language support resources and preference for Spanish-speaking providers. Mixed-concordant participants accounted for the majority of Spanish-speakers who reported communication barriers. Our data suggest that, although perception of patient-provider communication may depend on the language spoken throughout the care continuum, jargon is lost when health information is communicated in Spanish. Further, the respective consistency of language concordance or interpretation may play a role in patient perception of patient-provider communication.
Collapse
|
37
|
Friedman DB, Freedman DA, Choi SK, Anadu EC, Brandt HM, Carvalho N, Hurley TG, Young VM, Hebert JR. Provider communication and role modeling related to patients' perceptions and use of a federally qualified health center-based farmers' market. Health Promot Pract 2014; 15:288-97. [PMID: 23986503 PMCID: PMC3871943 DOI: 10.1177/1524839913500050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Farmers' markets have the potential to improve the health of underserved communities, shape people's perceptions, values, and behaviors about healthy eating, and serve as a social space for both community members and vendors. This study explored the influence of health care provider communication and role modeling for diabetic patients within the context of a farmers' market located at a federally qualified health center. Although provider communication about diet decreased over time, communication strategies included: providing patients with "prescriptions" and vouchers for market purchases; educating patients about diet; and modeling healthy purchases. Data from patient interviews and provider surveys revealed that patients enjoyed social aspects of the market including interactions with their health care provider, and providers distributed prescriptions and vouchers to patients, shopped at the market, and believed that the market had potential to improve the health of staff and patients of the federally qualified health center. Provider modeling of healthy behaviors may influence patients' food-related perceptions and dietary behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela B. Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior,
University of South Carolina, Columbia SC
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| | - Darcy A. Freedman
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
- College of Social Work, University of South Carolina,
Columbia SC
| | - Seul Ki Choi
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior,
University of South Carolina, Columbia SC
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| | | | - Heather M. Brandt
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior,
University of South Carolina, Columbia SC
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| | - Natalia Carvalho
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| | - Thomas G. Hurley
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| | - Vicki M. Young
- South Carolina Primary Heath Care Association, Columbia
SC
| | - James R. Hebert
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University
of South Carolina, Columbia SC
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics,
University of South Carolina, Columbia SC
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Granado MN, Guell C, Hambleton IR, Hennis AJ, Rose AM. Exploring breast cancer screening barriers among Barbadian women: a focus group study of mammography in a resource-constrained setting. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2013. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2013.855704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
39
|
Sheppard VB, Wallington SF, Willey SC, Hampton RM, Lucas W, Jennings Y, Horton S, Muzeck N, Cocilovo C, Isaacs C. A peer-led decision support intervention improves decision outcomes in black women with breast cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2013; 28:262-9. [PMID: 23576067 PMCID: PMC4180493 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-013-0459-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Previous reports suggest that Black breast cancer patients receive less patient-centered cancer care than their White counterparts. Interventions to improve patient-centered care (PCC) in Black breast cancer patients are lacking. Seventy-six women with histologically confirmed breast cancer were recruited from the Washington, DC area. After a baseline telephone interview, women received an in-person decision support educational session led by a trained survivor coach. The coach used a culturally appropriate guidebook and decision-making model-TALK Back!(©) A follow-up assessment assessed participants' acceptability of the intervention and intermediate outcomes. After the intervention, participants reported increased: self-efficacy in communicating with providers (70 %) and self-efficacy in making treatment decisions (70 %). Compared to baseline scores, post-intervention communication with providers significantly increased (p= .000). This is the first outcome report of an intervention to facilitate PCC in Black breast cancer patients. Testing this intervention using RCTs or similar designs will be important next steps.
Collapse
|
40
|
Sheppard VB, Isaacs C, Luta G, Willey SC, Boisvert M, Harper FWK, Smith K, Horton S, Liu MC, Jennings Y, Hirpa F, Snead F, Mandelblatt JS. Narrowing racial gaps in breast cancer chemotherapy initiation: the role of the patient-provider relationship. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 139:207-16. [PMID: 23588954 PMCID: PMC3662254 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2520-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy improves breast cancer survival but is underused more often in black than in white women. We examined associations between patient-physician relationships and chemotherapy initiation and timeliness of initiation among black and white patients. Women with primary invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited via hospitals (in Washington, DC and Detroit) and community outreach between July 2006 and April 2011. Data were collected via telephone interviews and medical records. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between chemotherapy initiation and independent variables. Since there were race interactions, analyses were race-stratified. Factors associated with time from surgery to chemotherapy initiation and delay of ≥90 days were evaluated with linear and logistic regressions, respectively. Among eligible women, 82.8 % were interviewed and 359 (90.9 %) of those had complete data. The odds of initiating chemotherapy were 3.26 times (95 % CI: 1.51, 7.06) higher among black women reporting greater communication with physicians (vs. lesser), after considering covariates. In contrast, the odds of starting chemotherapy were lower for white women reporting greater communication (vs. lesser) (adjusted OR 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.07, 0.73). The opposing direction of associations was also seen among the sub-set of black and white women with definitive clinical indications for chemotherapy. Among those initiating treatment, black women had longer mean time to the start of chemotherapy than whites (71.8 vs. 55.0 days, p = 0.005), but race was not significant after considering trust in oncologists, where initiation time decreased as trust increased, controlling for covariates. Black women were also more likely to delay ≥90 days than whites (27 vs. 8.3 %; p = 0.024), but this was not significant after considering religiosity. The patient-physician dyad and sociocultural factors may represent leverage points to improve chemotherapy patterns in black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Breast Cancer Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven St. NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sheppard VB, Llanos AA, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Taylor TR, Adams-Campbell LL. Correlates of depressive symptomatology in African-American breast cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv 2013; 7:292-9. [PMID: 23471730 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-013-0273-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2012] [Accepted: 02/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the levels of depressive symptomatology in African-American women with breast cancer compared to those of women without breast cancer and examined demographic, psychosocial, and clinical factors correlated with depression. METHODS A total of 152 African-American women were recruited from Washington, DC and surrounding suburbs. Breast cancer patients (n = 76 cases) were recruited from a health care center and women without cancer were recruited from health fairs (n = 76 comparison). We assessed depression, psychosocial variables (ego strength and social support), and sociodemographic factors from in-person interviews. Stage and clinical factors were abstracted from medical records. Independent sample t test, chi square test, analyses of variance, and multiple regression models were used to identify differences in depression and correlates of depression among the cases and comparison groups. RESULTS Women with breast cancer reported significantly greater levels of depression (m = 11.5, SD = 5.0) than women without breast cancer (m = 3.9, SD = 3.8) (p < 0.001). Higher cancer stage (beta = 0.91) and higher age (beta = 0.11) were associated with depression in the breast patients, explaining 84 % of the variance. In the comparison group, ego strength and tangible support were inversely associated with depressive symptoms, accounting for 32 % of the variance. CONCLUSIONS Women with more advanced disease may require interdisciplinary approaches to cancer care (i.e., caring for the whole person). IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Depression is often underrecognized and undertreated in African-American breast cancer patients. Understanding the factors related to depression is necessary to integrate psychosocial needs to routine cancer care to improve survivors' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3300 Whitehaven St. NW, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Davis JL, Bynum SA, Katz RV, Buchanan K, Green BL. Sociodemographic differences in fears and mistrust contributing to unwillingness to participate in cancer screenings. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2012; 23:67-76. [PMID: 23124501 PMCID: PMC3786428 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Effective provider-patient relationships are vital for positive patient health outcomes. This analysis assessed sociodemographic differences in fears and mistrust related to the provider-patient relationship, which may contribute to unwillingness to participate in cancer screenings (CSs). The data are from a stratified, random-digit dial telephone questionnaire of non-institutionalized households in New York, Maryland, and Puerto Rico. Statistically significant results indicate that Hispanics, compared with Whites, were nearly two times more likely to report that fear of being a "guinea pig" and lacking trust in medical people would make them unwilling to participate in CSs. Additionally, those with less education were over two times more likely to indicate a fear of being embarrassed during the screening would make them unwilling to participate in CSs. These results highlight areas where health professionals can improve interactions with their patients and be attentive to their fears and/or mistrusts to promote CSs utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna L Davis
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior at Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pieterse AH, Jager NA, Smets EMA, Henselmans I. Lay understanding of common medical terminology in oncology. Psychooncology 2012; 22:1186-91. [PMID: 22573405 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2011] [Revised: 03/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/03/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend an earlier study carried out in the UK of lay understanding of cancer-related terms in a Dutch sample, by (i) examining understanding of common terms relating to diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and (ii) experimentally exploring the effect of medical jargon versus plain language use on individuals' perceived efficacy in interacting with oncologists, participating in medical decision making, and interpersonal trust. METHODS One hundred ninety-four lay people completed a questionnaire assessing (i) understanding, confidence in understanding, and worry after reading 10 scenarios presenting cancer-related terms and (ii) perceived communication efficacy, decision-making efficacy, and trust following a vignette portraying an oncologist using either jargon or plain language. RESULTS On average, participants understood a majority (6.8 ± 1.6) of cancer-related terms, yet only 2.2% understood all 10 terms correctly. Compared with incorrect understanding, correct understanding was generally related to higher confidence in understanding and to worry levels that better matched the scenarios. Language complexity did not significantly affect measures of perceived efficacy or trust. Overall confidence in understanding was significantly related to measures of perceived efficacy (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Similar to the earlier UK study these results suggest that lay people's understanding of commonly-used terms in oncology is suboptimal. Moreover, confidence in understanding was related to perceived efficacy in participating in the consultation. Oncologists should attempt to correct patient misunderstanding to alleviate unnecessary worry and potentially facilitate patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arwen H Pieterse
- Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|