Pharmacokinetics of Capecitabine and Four Metabolites in a Heterogeneous Population of Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis

Prebiotic fibre mixtures counteract the manifestation of gut microbial dysbiosis induced by the chemotherapeutic 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in a validated in vitro model of the colon

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is used as an antineoplastic agent in distinct cancer types. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota might modulate 5-FU efficacy and toxicity, potentially affecting the patient's prognosis. The current experimental study investigated 5-FU-induced microbiota alterations, as well as the potential of prebiotic fibre mixtures (M1-M4) to counteract these shifts.

METHODS

A pooled microbial consortium was derived from ten healthy donors, inoculated in an in vitro model of the colon, and treated with 5-FU, with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures for 72 h. Four different prebiotic fibre mixtures were tested: M1 containing short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides (sc GOS), long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (lcFOS), and low viscosity pectin (lvPect), M2 consisting of arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, and resistant starch, M3 which was a mixture of scGOS and lcFOS, and M4 containing arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, resistant starch, and inulin.

RESULTS

We identified 5-FU-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, but not in microbial diversity. Administration of prebiotic fibre mixtures during 5-FU influenced gut microbiota composition and taxa abundance. Amongst others, prebiotic fibre mixtures successfully stimulated potentially beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Anaerostipes, Weissella, Olsenella, Senegalimassilia) and suppressed the growth of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella, Enterobacter) in the presence of 5-FU. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetate increased slightly during 5-FU, but even more during 5-FU with prebiotic fibre mixtures, while propionate was lower due to 5-FU with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures, compared to control. The SCFA butyrate and valerate did not show differences among all conditions. The branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) iso-butyrate and iso-valerate were higher in 5-FU, but lower in 5-FU + prebiotics, compared to control.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that prebiotic fibre mixtures represent a promising strategy to modulate 5-FU-induced microbial dysbiosis towards a more favourable microbiota, thereby possibly improving 5-FU efficacy and reducing toxicity, which should be evaluated further in clinical studies.

Expansion of a bacterial operon during cancer treatment ameliorates drug toxicity

Dose-limiting toxicities remain a major barrier to drug development and therapy, revealing the limited predictive power of human genetics. Herein, we demonstrate the utility of a more comprehensive approach to studying drug toxicity through longitudinal study of the human gut microbiome during colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment (NCT04054908) coupled to cell culture and mouse experiments. 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic sequencing revealed significant shifts in gut microbial community structure during treatment with oral fluoropyrimidines, which was validated in an independent cohort. Gene abundance was also markedly changed by oral fluoropyrimidines, including an enrichment for the preTA operon, which is sufficient for the inactivation of active metabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Higher levels of preTA led to increased 5-FU depletion by the gut microbiota grown ex vivo. Germ-free and antibiotic-treated mice had increased fluoropyrimidine toxicity, which was rescued by colonization with the mouse gut microbiota, preTA+ E. coli, or CRC patient stool with high preTA levels. preTA abundance was negatively associated with patient toxicities. Together, these data support a causal, clinically relevant interaction between a human gut bacterial operon and the dose-limiting side effects of cancer treatment. Our approach is generalizable to other drugs, including cancer immunotherapies, and provides valuable insights into host-microbiome interactions in the context of disease.

Assessment of patients' knowledge of their treatment with capecitabine at the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat

INTRODUCTION

Capecitabine is a molecule of choice in the therapeutic arsenal of anticancer drugs used in Morocco for the treatment of breast cancer and colorectal cancer. Its frequent use imposes a follow-up and a post-prescription monitoring of the treatment modalities as well as the adverse events that may occur following its administration.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the level of knowledge of patients in the day hospital of an oncology facility about their treatment with capecitabine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study conducted over a period of 2 months (January-February 2022) at the day hospital in the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat, and it was conducted using a questionnaire in order to evaluate patients' knowledge about their treatment with capecitabine.

RESULTS

This study involved 95 patients, 76% claimed to have ever received pharmaceutical advice on capecitabine treatment. The main indications were colorectal and breast cancer. Ninety seven percent knew the indication for capecitabine and the action of the molecule on the relevant tumor. Eighty three percent receiving capecitabine therapy reported the occurrence of side effects and hand-foot syndrome was the most reported in 31.2% of the total listed side effects.

DISCUSSION

Capecitabine is an oral treatment of choice for colorectal and breast cancer in Morocco. Therapeutic education happens to be an effective tool in order to guarantee the best effectiveness and manage the possible side effects that can occur during the treatment.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Prediction of 5-FU Pharmacokinetics in Cancer Patients with Hepatic Impairment After 5-FU and Capecitabine Administration

PURPOSE

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrug capecitabine are commonly prescribed anti-tumor medications. We aimed to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of capecitabine-metabolites and 5-FU-metabolites to describe their pharmacokinetics in tumor and plasma of cancer patients with liver impairment.

METHODS

Models including the cancer compartment were developed in PK-Sim® and MoBi® and evaluated by R programming language with 25 oral capecitabine and 18 intravenous 5-FU studies for cancer patients with and without liver impairment.

RESULTS

The PBPK models were constructed successfully as most simulated Cmax and AUClast were within two-fold error of observed values. The simulated alterations of tumor 5-FU Cmax and AUClast in cancer patients with severe liver injury compared with normal liver function were 1.956 and 3.676 after oral administration of capecitabine, but no significant alteration was observed after intravenous injection of 5-FU. Besides, 5-FU concentration in tumor tissue increases with higher tumor blood flow but not tumor size. Sensitivity analysis revealed that dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and other metabolic enzymes' activity, capecitabine intestinal permeability and plasma protein scale factor played a vital role in tumor and plasma 5-FU pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

PBPK model prediction suggests no dosage adaption of capecitabine or 5-FU is required for cancer patients with hepatic impairment but it would be reduced when the toxic reaction is observed. Furthermore, tumor blood flow rate rather than tumor size is critical for 5-FU concentration in tumor. In summary, these models could predict pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in tumor in cancer patients with varying characteristics in different scenarios.

Pharmacokinetics and Comparative Bioavailability of Test or Reference Capecitabine and Discrepant Pharmacokinetics Among Various Tumors in Chinese Solid Cancer Patients

The main objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence of two capecitabine tablets and explore the different PK profiles of various tumors in Chinese patients with cancer. All 76 patients with a confirmed cancer diagnosis were included in this study. A single dose of 2000 mg of test or reference capecitabine (Xeloda, Hoffmann-La Roche) was orally administered postprandially. After 24 hours of washout, the patients were administered the test or the reference capecitabine alternately. PK samples were taken at the time of predose up to 6 hours postdose. Bioequivalence evaluation was performed using the geometric mean ratios of peak concentration in plasma (C_max) , area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 6 h (AUC_0-t) , and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_0-∞ ) for capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, 90% confidence intervals of test/reference mean ratios of C_max , AUC_0-t , AUC_0-∞ of capecitabine and 5-FU were in the range of 80%-125%. Both the test and reference capecitabine regimens were well tolerated in this study. Furthermore, we found that patients with esophageal-gastrointestinal cancers had higher exposure to capecitabine and a shorter time to C_max (T_max) than those with breast cancer. In conclusion, a single oral dose of 2000 mg of test capecitabine tablets after postprandial administration was bioequivalent to the reference drug.

Re-thinking the possible interaction between proton pump inhibitors and capecitabine

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) rank within the top ten most prescribed medications in Europe and USA. A high frequency of PPI use has been reported amongst patients undergoing chemotherapy, to mitigate treatment-induced gastritis or gastro-oesophageal reflux. Several recent, mostly retrospective, observational studies have reported inferior survival outcomes among patients on capecitabine who concomitantly use PPI. Whilst this association is yet to be definitively established, given the prominence of capecitabine as an anti-cancer treatment with multiple indications, these reports have raised concern within the oncological community and drug regulatory bodies worldwide. Currently, the leading mechanism of interaction postulated in these reports has focussed on the pH altering effects of PPI and how this could diminish capecitabine absorption, leading to a decrease in its bioavailability. In this discourse, we endeavour to summarise plausible pharmacokinetic interactions between PPI and capecitabine. We provide a basis for our argument against the currently proposed mechanism of interaction. We also highlight the long-term effects of PPI on health outcomes, and how PPI use itself could lead to poorer outcomes, independent of capecitabine.

Population pharmacokinetic analyses of regorafenib and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (SAKK 41/16 RECAP)

AIM

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is an area of unmet medical need with one third of patients dying from their disease. With response to neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy being a major prognostic factor, trial SAKK 41/16 assessed potential benefits of adding regorafenib to capecitabine-amplified neoadjuvant radiotherapy in LARC patients.

METHODS

Patients received regorafenib at three dose levels (40/80/120 mg once daily) combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m² bidaily and local radiotherapy. We developed population pharmacokinetic models from plasma concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine as well as regorafenib and its metabolites M-2 and M-5 as implemented into SAKK 41/16 to assess potential drug-drug interactions (DDI). After establishing parent-metabolite base models, drug exposure parameters were tested as covariates within the respective models to investigate for potential DDI. Simulation analyses were conducted to quantify their impact.

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of capecitabine, regorafenib and metabolites were characterized by one- and two compartment models and absorption was described by parallel first- and zero-order processes and transit compartments, respectively. Apparent capecitabine clearance was 286 L/h (relative standard error [RSE] 14.9%, interindividual variability [IIV] 40.1%) and was reduced by regorafenib cumulative area under the plasma-concentration curve (median reduction of 45.6%) as exponential covariate (estimate -4.10×10^-4 , RSE 17.8%). Apparent regorafenib clearance was 1.94 L/h (RSE 12.1%, IIV 38.1%). Simulation analyses revealed significantly negative associations between capecitabine clearance and regorafenib exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

This work informs the clinical development of regorafenib and capecitabine combination treatment and underlines the importance to study potential DDI with new anticancer drug combinations.

Response of Leptomeningeal Metastasis of Breast Cancer With a HER2/neu Activating Variant to Tucatinib: A Case Report

Metastatic breast cancer demonstrates HER2/neu amplification approximately 15% of the time. However, HER2 mutations, which often stimulate tumor growth, occur in only 3% to 5% of patients, and are seen more frequently in metastatic versus primary tumors. They are more frequent in lobular carcinoma, including triple-negative lobular cancer. Many of these variants are resistant to trastuzumab and lapatinib. However, neratinib can be efficacious, and recent data suggest that antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan may also be helpful. Laboratory and clinical data raise the possibility that simultaneous treatment with ADCs plus neratinib may be even more efficacious. Tucatinib, which has demonstrated significant activity in the central nervous system, has also been shown in vitro to be active against a number of these HER2 variants. This report describes a patient with metastatic estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-nonamplified breast cancer with an activating HER2 mutation whose tumor became resistant to neratinib as well as capecitabine, but whose subsequent leptomeningeal disease had a dramatically successful response to tucatinib plus capecitabine. As the frequency of HER2 mutations increases during the evolution of metastatic breast cancer, it is important to obtain genomic evaluation on these tumors with either repeat tissue or liquid biopsy as they progress over time.

Effect of the Proton Pump Inhibitor Esomeprazole on the Systemic Exposure of Capecitabine: Results of A Randomized Crossover Trial

Retrospective data suggest that gastric acid reduction by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) impairs the dissolution and subsequent absorption of capecitabine, and thus potentially reduces the capecitabine exposure. Therefore, we examined prospectively the effect of esomeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. In this randomized crossover study, patients with cancer were assigned to 2 sequence groups, each consisting of 3 phases: capecitabine with esomeprazole administration 3 hours before (phase A), capecitabine alone (phase B), and capecitabine concomitant with cola and esomeprazole co-administration 3 hours before (phase C). The primary end point was the relative difference (RD) in exposure to capecitabine assessed by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC_0-inf ) and analyzed by a linear mixed effect model. Twenty-two evaluable patients were included in the analysis. After esomeprazole, there was a 18.9% increase in AUC_0-inf of capecitabine (95% confidence interval (CI) -10.0% to 57.0%, P = 0.36). In addition, capecitabine half-life was significantly longer after esomeprazole (median 0.63 hours vs. 0.46 hours, P = 0.005). Concomitant cola did not completely reverse the effects observed after esomeprazole (RD 3.3% (95% CI -16.3 to 27.4%, P = 1.00). Capecitabine exposure is not negatively influenced by esomeprazole cotreatment. Therefore, altered capecitabine pharmacokinetics do not explain the assumed worse clinical outcome of PPI-cotreated patients with cancer.

Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors With Capecitabine Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Is it Safe?

AIM

Capecitabine (Cape) is routinely used for the neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (NACRT) of locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs). Previous reports have suggested that the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may affect the efficacy of Cape, although the true effect of PPIs when used with Cape as a radiosensitizer for neoadjuvant radiation is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of concurrent PPI use along with fluorouracil (FU) and Cape based NACRT in terms of pathologic and oncological outcomes, in patients with LARC.

METHODS

LARC patients treated at our center with NACRT from 2010 to 2016 were identified. Postoperative pathology and follow-up outcomes were examined for any differences with relation to the use of PPIs concurrently with FU and Cape based NACRT and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

RESULTS

Three hundred four and 204 patients received treatment with FU and Cape based NACRT. No difference in pathologic complete response rate was noted between the 2 arms with the concurrent use of PPIs (25.8% and 25%, respectively, P=0.633); or with and without the use of PPIs in the Cape-NACRT arm specifically (20% and 20.7%, P=0.945). At a median follow-up of 5 years, no statistical difference in local or distant control was noted in the Cape-NACRT patients, with and without concomitant PPI use (P=0.411 and 0.264, respectively).Multivariate analysis showed no association of PPI use and NACRT with Cape, in terms of local control (hazard ratio=0.001, P=0.988) or overall survival (hazard ratio=1.179, confidence interval=0.249-5.579, P=0.835).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that there was no adverse pathologic or oncological outcome with the concurrent use of PPIs along with Cape-NACRT in the treatment of LARC. We report that it may be safe to use PPIs if essential, in this clinical setting, although it would be wise to exercise caution.

Worse capecitabine treatment outcome in patients with a low skeletal muscle mass is not explained by altered pharmacokinetics

Background

A low skeletal muscle mass (SMM) has been associated with increased toxicity and shorter survival in cancer patients treated with capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU). Capecitabine and its metabolites are highly water‐soluble and, therefore, more likely to distribute to lean tissues. The pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with a low SMM could be changed, for example, by reaching higher maximum plasma concentrations. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the association between a low SMM and increased toxicity and shorter survival could be explained by altered PK of capecitabine and its metabolites.

Methods

Previously, a population PK model of capecitabine and metabolites in patients with solid tumors was developed. In our analysis, we included patients from this previous analysis for which evaluable abdominal computed tomography (CT)‐scans were available. SMM was measured on CT‐scans, by single slice evaluation at the third lumbar vertebra, using the Slice‐o‐Matic software. The previously developed population PK model was extended with SMM as a covariate, to assess the association between SMM and capecitabine and metabolite PK.

Results

PK and SMM data were available from 151 cancer patients with solid tumors. From the included patients, 55% had a low SMM. No relevant relationships were found between SMM and the PK parameters of capecitabine and, the active and toxic metabolite, 5‐FU. SMM only correlated with the PK of the, most hydrophilic, but inactive and non‐toxic, metabolite α‐fluoro‐β‐alanine (FBAL). Patients with a low SMM had a smaller apparent volume of distribution and lower apparent clearance of FBAL.

Conclusions

No alterations in PK of capecitabine and the active and toxic metabolite 5‐FU were observed in patients with a low SMM. Therefore, the previously identified increased toxicity and shorter survival in patients with a low SMM, could not be explained by changes in pharmacokinetic characteristics of capecitabine and metabolites.

Issues and limitations of available biomarkers for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy toxicity, a narrative review of the literature

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapies are widely used to treat gastrointestinal tract, head and neck, and breast carcinomas. Severe toxicities mostly impact rapidly dividing cell lines and can occur due to the partial or complete deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) catabolism. Since April 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends DPD testing before any fluoropyrimidine-based treatment. Currently, different assays are used to predict DPD deficiency; the two main approaches consist of either phenotyping the enzyme activity (directly or indirectly) or genotyping the four main deficiency-related polymorphisms associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) toxicity. In this review, we focused on the advantages and limitations of these diagnostic methods: direct phenotyping by evaluation of peripheral mononuclear cell DPD activity (PBMC-DPD activity), indirect phenotyping assessed by uracil levels or UH2/U ratio, and genotyping DPD of four variants directly associated with 5-FU toxicity. The risk of 5-FU toxicity increases with uracil concentration. Having a pyrimidine-related structure, 5-FU is catabolised by the same physiological pathway. By assessing uracil concentration in plasma, indirect phenotyping of DPD is then measured. With this approach, in France, a decreased 5-FU dose is systematically recommended at a uracil concentration of 16 ng/ml, which may lead to chemotherapy under-exposure as uracil concentration is a continuous variable and the association between uracil levels and DPD activity is not clear. We aim herein to describe the different available strategies developed to improve fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy safety, how they are implemented in routine clinical practice, and the possible relationship with inefficacy mechanisms.

A Phase II Study Demonstrates No Feasibility of Adjuvant Treatment with Six Cycles of S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, with ERCC1 as Biomarker for Response to SOX

Simple Summary

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is currently standard of care in esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, prognosis remains dismal. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of administering six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Although six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated patients, mainly due to toxicity, efficacy results were promising compared to a propensity-score matched cohort. Exploratory biomarker analyses demonstrated potential benefit for patients with Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) negative tumor expression. A proteomics biomarker model provided valuable information for prediction of survival and pharmacokinetics of 5-FU showed a correlation with treatment-related toxicity. Although it remains unclear if additional chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity, could potentially benefit from this treatment option based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m²) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m² twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of capecitabine and its metabolites in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

The present study was performed to examine relationships between systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites (5-FU, 5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) and toxicity or clinical response in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model for capecitabine and its three metabolites was built. Typical parameter values, characteristics of random distributions, associated with parameters, and covariates impact were estimated. Area under the curve (AUC) were computed for 5-FU and compared with grades of toxicity. Pharmacokinetic modeling was based on data collected on the first treatment cycle. Toxicity was assessed on the two first treatment cycles.

RESULTS

The study was conducted in 43 patients. The population pharmacokinetic model (a one-compartment model per compound) was able to capture the very complex absorption process of capecitabine. Statistically significant covariates were cytidine deaminase, alkaline phosphatase and dihydrouracilemia (UH2)/uracilemia (U) ratio. UH2/U ratio was the most significant covariate on 5-FU elimination and CDA on the transformation of 5'-DFCR in 5'-DFUR. A trend was observed between 5-FU AUC and thrombopenia toxicity grades, but not with other toxicities. Best clinical response was not linked to systemic exposure of capecitabine metabolites.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we propose a model able to describe, meanwhile, and its main metabolites, with a complex absorption process and inclusion of enzyme activity covariates such as CDA and UH2/U ratio. Trial registration Eudract 2008-004136-20, 2008/11/26.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Intracellular 5-Fluorouridine 5'-Triphosphate and its Relationship with Hand-and-Foot Syndrome in Patients Treated with Capecitabine

Capecitabine is an oral pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil. Patients with solid tumours who are treated with capecitabine may develop hand-and-foot syndrome (HFS) as side effect. This might be a result of accumulation of intracellular metabolites. We characterised the pharmacokinetics (PK) of 5-fluorouridine 5'-triphosphate (FUTP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and assessed the relationship between exposure to capecitabine or its metabolites and the development of HFS. Plasma and intracellular capecitabine PK data and ordered categorical HFS data was available. A previously developed model describing the PK of capecitabine and metabolites was extended to describe the intracellular FUTP concentrations. Subsequently, a continuous-time Markov model was developed to describe the development of HFS during treatment with capecitabine. The influences of capecitabine and metabolite concentrations on the development of HFS were evaluated. The PK of intracellular FUTP was described by an one-compartment model with first-order elimination (k_e,FUTP was 0.028 h^-1 (95% confidence interval 0.022-0.039)) where the FUTP influx rate was proportional to the 5-FU plasma concentrations. The predicted individual intracellular FUTP concentration was identified as a significant predictor for the development and severity of HFS. Simulations demonstrated a clear exposure-response relationship. The intracellular FUTP concentrations were successfully described and a significant relationship between these intracellular concentrations and the development and severity of HFS was identified. This model can be used to simulate future dosing regimens and thereby optimise treatment with capecitabine.

A Genotyping/Phenotyping Approach with Careful Clinical Monitoring to Manage the Fluoropyrimidines-Based Therapy: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature

Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are mainly metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene. FP pharmacogenetics, including four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD-PGx), is recommended to tailor the FP-based chemotherapy. These polymorphisms increase the risk of severe toxicity; thus, the DPYD-PGx should be performed prior to starting FP. Other factors influence FP safety, therefore phenotyping methods, such as the measurement of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) clearance and DPD activity, could complement the DPYD-PGx. We describe a case series of patients in whom we performed DPYD-PGx (by real-time PCR), 5-FU clearance and a dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (as the phenotyping analysis) and a continuous clinical monitoring. Patients who had already experienced severe toxicity were then identified as carriers of DPYD variants. The plasmatic dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)) ranged between 1.77 and 7.38. 5-FU clearance (by ultra-HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry) was measured in 3/11 patients. In one of them, it reduced after the 5-FU dosage was halved; in the other case, it remained high despite a drastic dosage reduction. Moreover, we performed a systematic review on genotyping/phenotyping combinations used as predictive factors of FP safety. Measuring the plasmatic 5-FU clearance and/or dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) ratio could improve the predictive potential of DPYD-PGx. The upfront DPYD-PGx combined with clinical monitoring and feasible phenotyping method is essential to optimising FP-based chemotherapy.

Phase I pharmacological study of continuous chronomodulated capecitabine treatment

Purpose

Capecitabine is an oral pre-pro-drug of the anti-cancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The biological activity of the 5-FU degrading enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS), are subject to circadian rhythmicity in healthy volunteers. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of capecitabine therapy adapted to this circadian rhythm (chronomodulated therapy).

Methods

Patients aged ≥18 years with advanced solid tumours potentially benefitting from capecitabine therapy were enrolled. A classical dose escalation 3 + 3 design was applied. Capecitabine was administered daily without interruptions. The daily dose was divided in morning and evening doses that were administered at 9:00 h and 24:00 h, respectively. The ratio of the morning to the evening dose was 3:5 (morning: evening). PK and PD were examined on treatment days 7 and 8.

Results

A total of 25 patients were enrolled. The MTD of continuous chronomodulated capecitabine therapy was established at 750/1250 mg/m²/day, and was generally well tolerated. Circadian rhythmicity in the plasma PK of capecitabine, dFCR, dFUR and 5-FU was not demonstrated. TS activity was induced and DPD activity demonstrated circadian rhythmicity during capecitabine treatment.

Conclusion

The MTD of continuous chronomodulated capecitabine treatment allows for a 20% higher dose intensity compared to the approved regimen (1250 mg/m² bi-daily on day 1–14 of every 21-day cycle). Chronomodulated treatment with capecitabine is promising and could lead to improved tolerability and efficacy of capecitabine.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11095-020-02828-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.