Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning

Ethanol→Nicotine & Nicotine→Ethanol drug-sequence discriminations: Conditional stimulus control with two interoceptive drug elements in rats

Self-administration of ethanol (E) and nicotine (N) occurs frequently in tandem orders (i.e., N→E vs. E→N) and thereby produces differing interoceptive profiles of subjective effects in humans. If the interoceptive stimulus characteristics of N→E differ from E→N, it is possible that such differences contribute to their co-dependence. The rationale for the present investigation was to determine whether ethanol, when preceded or followed by nicotine, produces different discriminative stimulus effects in rats. In two experiments, using a one-manipulandum operant drug discrimination procedure, rats were trained to discriminate temporal sequential administrations of ethanol (1.0 g/kg) that was followed or preceded by nicotine (0.3 mg/kg). Sessions alternated between food-reinforcement sessions on a variable interval 30-sec schedule (i.e., SD) and non-reinforcement sessions (i.e., SΔ). In Experiment 1, administrations of ethanol were followed or preceded by a 10-min interval of nicotine. Training sessions took place 10 min following the second drug injection. Four groups of rats were trained to discriminate only one sequence from sequential administrations of saline, and each drug sequence was counterbalanced across groups for their roles as SD or SΔ. There was robust stimulus control. N→E and E→N functioned equally well as SD or SΔ. Experiment 2 used two groups of rats. For one group, the E→N sequence functioned as the SD and the N→E sequence functioned as the SΔ. The drug sequences were counterbalanced for the other group. Brief non-reinforcement tests revealed significantly greater responding during the SD sequence compared to the SΔ sequence for both groups. These results suggest that different drug sequences of ethanol followed or preceded by nicotine established reliable discriminative stimulus control over operant responding, potentially because of characteristic differences in the overlapping pharmacokinetic profiles of the NE compound. The results are discussed in terms of: 1) conditional stimulus control among two interoceptive drug states; and 2) the clinical modulation of human alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol compared to other antipsychotic drugs in C57BL/6 mice

Haloperidol (HAL) was developed in 1958 for the treatment of schizophrenia and is classified as a typical antipsychotic drug (APD). Effective in treating positive symptoms of schizophrenia, it does not treat negative symptoms and produces extrapyramidal motor side-effects. Atypical APDs like clozapine treat both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, have reduced extrapyramidal motor side-effects and possess other clinical advantages. This study used a drug discrimination assay to allow a direct comparison between the subjective effects of HAL and other APDs. Eleven C57BL/6 mice were trained to discriminate 0.05 mg/kg HAL from the vehicle in a two-lever drug discrimination task. The HAL generalization curve (0.001563-0.2 mg/kg) yielded an ED50=0.0024 mg/kg (95% confidence interval: 0.0012-0.0048 mg/kg). The typical APD chlorpromazine produced full substitution at 4.0 mg/kg with 82.7% drug-lever responding (%DLR) with significant rate suppression and partial substitution (73.9% DLR) at 1.0 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD clozapine produced partial substitution at 2.5 mg/kg (64.8% DLR) with significant rate suppression. The atypical APD amisulpride failed to substitute for HAL with a maximum %DLR of 57.9% at 40 mg/kg with no rate suppression. The atypical APD aripiprazole partially substituted with a maximum of 75.9% DLR at 1.25 mg/kg with significant rate suppression. These results demonstrate that HAL can be trained as a discriminative stimulus in C57BL/6 mice, and its discriminative cue appears to be unique and distinct from that of atypical APDs.

Translational Value of Drug Discrimination with Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs

This chapter focuses on the translational value of drug discrimination as a preclinical assay for drug development. In particular, the importance of two factors, i.e., training dose and species, for drug discrimination studies with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine is examined. Serotonin receptors appear to be an important pharmacological mechanism mediating clozapine's discriminative cue in both rats and mice, although differences are clearly evident as antagonism of cholinergic muscarinic receptors is important in rats at a higher training dose (5.0 mg/kg) of clozapine, but not at a lower training dose (1.25 mg/kg). Antagonism of α1 adrenoceptors is a sufficient mechanism in C57BL/6 and 129S2 mice to mimic clozapine's cue, but not in DBA/2 and B6129S mice, and only produces partial substitution in low-dose clozapine discrimination in rats. Dopamine antagonism produces partial substitution for clozapine in DBA/2, 129S2, and B6129S mice, but not in C57BL/6 mice, and partial substitution is seen with D4 antagonism in low-dose clozapine drug discrimination in rats. Thus, it is evident that clozapine has a complex mixture of receptor contributions towards its discriminative cue based on the data from the four mouse strains that have been tested that is similar to the results from rat studies. A further examination of antipsychotic stimulus properties in humans, particularly in patients with schizophrenia, would go far in evaluating the translational value of the drug discrimination paradigm for antipsychotic drugs.

Effectiveness comparisons of G-protein biased and unbiased mu opioid receptor ligands in warm water tail-withdrawal and drug discrimination in male and female rats

One emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis is the development of mu opioid receptor (MOR) ligands that preferentially signal the G-protein vs. β-arrestin pathway. The present study compared the relative potency and effectiveness of two G-protein biased (GPB)-MOR ligands TRV130 and SR-14968 to five unbiased MOR ligands (NAQ, nalbuphine, buprenorphine, morphine, and methadone) on therapeutic-related (e.g. antinociception) and abuse-related (e.g. discriminative stimulus effects) endpoints. Male and female rats were tested in a warm water tail-withdrawal procedure (50 °C) or trained to discriminate fentanyl (0.04 mg/kg, SC) from saline in a two-lever food-reinforced discrimination procedure. TRV130 and SR-14968 were approximately two-fold more potent to produce fentanyl stimulus effects vs. antinociception. Morphine, fentanyl, and methadone were significantly more potent in the fentanyl discrimination vs. tail withdrawal procedure. In addition, maximum antinociceptive and discriminative stimulus effects of fixed-proportion fentanyl/naltrexone mixtures (1:0.018, 1:0.054, 1:0.18, 1:0.3, and 1:0.54) were used to quantify 1) the relative in vivo efficacy of the two GPB-MOR agonists and five unbiased MOR ligands, and 2) potential species differences in MOR ligand effects between rats and monkeys. The efficacy-effect function generated from the fentanyl/naltrexone mixtures stratified the five unbiased ligands consistent with agonist-stimulated GTPγS binding (NAQ = nalbuphine < buprenorphine < morphine < methadone). However, TRV130 and SR-14968 produced greater antinociception and less fentanyl-like stimulus effects than was predicted. Furthermore, there was a significant positive correlation between rat and monkey antinociceptive effects. Overall, these results demonstrate GPB-MOR agonists produce undesirable abuse-related effects, albeit with slightly better potency and efficacy ratios compared to unbiased agonists. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Opioid Neuropharmacology: Advances in treating pain and opioid addiction'.

Effects of sleep deprivation on different phases of memory in the rat: dissociation between contextual and tone fear conditioning tasks

Numerous studies show that sleep deprivation (SD) impacts negatively on cognitive processes, including learning and memory. Memory formation encompasses distinct phases of which acquisition, consolidation and retrieval are better known. Previous studies with pre-training SD induced by the platform method have shown impairment in fear conditioning tasks. Nonetheless, pre-training manipulations do not allow the distinction between effects on acquisition and/or consolidation, interfering, ultimately, on recall of/performance in the task. In the present study, animals were first trained in contextual and tone fear conditioning (TFC) tasks and then submitted to SD with the purpose to evaluate the effect of this manipulation on different stages of the learning process, e.g., in the uptake of (new) information during learning, its encoding and stabilization, and the recall of stored memories. Besides, we also investigated the effect of SD in the extinction of fear memory and a possible state-dependent learning induced by this manipulation. For each task (contextual or TFC), animals were trained and then distributed into control, not sleep-deprived (CTL) and SD groups, the latter being submitted to the modified multiple platform paradigm for 96 h. Subsets of eight rats in each group/experiment were submitted to the test of the tasks, either immediately or at different time intervals after SD. The results indicated that (a) pre- but not post-training SD impaired recall in the contextual and TFC; (b) this impairment was not state-dependent; and (c) in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC), pre-test SD prevented extinction of the learned task. Overall, these results suggest that SD interferes with acquisition, recall and extinction, but not necessarily with consolidation of emotional memory.

Pavlovian discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica)

Pavlovian drug discrimination (DD) procedures demonstrate that interoceptive drug stimuli may come to control behavior by informing the status of conditional relationships between stimuli and outcomes. This technique may provide insight into processes that contribute to drug-seeking, relapse, and other maladaptive behaviors associated with drug abuse. The purpose of the current research was to establish a model of Pavlovian DD in male Japanese quail. A Pavlovian conditioning procedure was used such that 3.0 mg/kg methamphetamine served as a feature positive stimulus for brief periods of visual access to a female quail and approach behavior was measured. After acquisition training, generalization tests were conducted with cocaine, nicotine, and haloperidol under extinction conditions. SCH 23390 was used to investigate the involvement of the dopamine D1 receptor subtype in the methamphetamine discriminative stimulus. Results showed that cocaine fully substituted for methamphetamine but nicotine only partially substituted for methamphetamine in quail. Haloperidol dose-dependently decreased approach behavior. Pretreatment with SCH 23390 modestly attenuated the methamphetamine discrimination suggesting that the D1 receptor subtype may be involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine. The findings are discussed in relation to drug abuse and associated negative health consequences.

The discriminative stimulus effects of the neurotensin NTS1 receptor agonist PD149163 in rats: stimulus generalization testing with dopamine D1 and D2 receptor ligands

Brain-penetrant neurotensin NTS1 receptor agonists produce antipsychotic drug-like effects in animal models, including inhibition of conditioned avoidance responding and reversal of psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity and stereotypy. Allosteric interactions between NTS1 receptors and dopamine D2 receptors may account for some of these antipsychotic effects. In order to determine the role that dopamine receptors may play in the behavioral effects produced by activation of NTS1 receptors, a drug discrimination approach was used in rats to evaluate the potential mediation of NTS1 receptor agonist stimulus effects by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. Rats were trained to discriminate either the NTS1 receptor agonist PD149163, the D1 receptor agonist SKF81297, or the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole from vehicle in a two choice drug discrimination task. Full stimulus generalization occurred from PD149163 to the typical antipsychotic drug and D2 receptor-preferring antagonist haloperidol. However, stimulus generalization did not occur from SKF81297 or quinpirole to PD149163. The discriminative cue for SKF91297 and quinpirole was fully blocked the D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 and the D2/3 receptor antagonist raclopride, respectively. Cross generalization did not occur between SKF91297 and quinpirole. Based on these findings, the stimulus effects of PD149163 may be mediated, in part, through D2 receptor antagonism, but this may only be evident when PD149163 is used as the training drug.

Pharmacological classification of the abuse-related discriminative stimulus effects of trichloroethylene vapor

Inhalants are distinguished as a class primarily based upon a shared route of administration. Grouping inhalants according to their abuse-related in vivo pharmacological effects using the drug discrimination procedure has the potential to provide a more relevant classification scheme to the research and treatment community. Mice were trained to differentiate the introceptive effects of the trichloroethylene vapor from air using an operant procedure. Trichloroethylene is a chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent once used as an anesthetic as well as in glues and other consumer products. It is now primarily employed as a metal degreaser. We found that the stimulus effects of trichloroethylene were similar to those of other chlorinated hydrocarbon vapors, the aromatic hydrocarbon toluene and the vapor anesthetics methoxyflurane and isoflurane. The stimulus effects of trichloroethylene overlapped with those of the barbiturate methohexital, to a lesser extent the benzodiazepine midazolam and to ethanol. NMDA antagonists, the kappa opioid agonist U50,488 and the mixed 5-HT agonist mCPP largely failed to substitute for trichloroethylene. These data suggest that stimulus effects of chlorinated hydrocarbon vapors are mediated at least partially by GABA_A receptor positive modulatory effects.

Abuse liability of novel 'legal high' designer stimulants: evidence from animal models

In the last few years, the variety and recreational use of 'legal high' designer stimulants has increased to unprecedented levels. Since their rapid emergence in drug markets, numerous adverse physical and psychological effects have been extensively reported. However, less is understood about the potential for compulsive use of and addiction to these drugs. Recently, a small collection of scientific studies assessing the abuse liability of these drugs has emerged. This new knowledge has been derived primarily from animal studies using behaviorally based procedures which include intravenous self-administration, conditioned place preference, intracranial self-stimulation, and drug discrimination. In this review we present a brief history of the recent rise in designer stimulant use followed by a short methodological description of the aforementioned procedures. We then review neurochemical and abuse liability studies on designer stimulants that have been examined to date. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of these collective findings, our current understanding of the abuse liability of these drugs in relation to each other and the illicit drugs they are designed to mimic, and recommend future research directions.

Ovarian hormones and chronic administration during adolescence modify the discriminative stimulus effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ⁹-THC) in adult female rats

Marijuana abuse during adolescence may alter its abuse liability during adulthood by modifying the interoceptive (discriminative) stimuli produced, especially in females due to an interaction with ovarian hormones. To examine this possibility, either gonadally intact or ovariectomized (OVX) female rats received 40 intraperitoneal injections of saline or 5.6 mg/kg of Δ⁹-THC daily during adolescence, yielding 4 experimental groups (intact/saline, intact/Δ⁹-THC, OVX/saline, and OVX/Δ⁹-THC). These groups were then trained to discriminate Δ⁹-THC (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) from saline under a fixed-ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation. After a training dose was established for the subjects in each group, varying doses of Δ⁹-THC were substituted for the training dose to obtain dose-effect (generalization) curves for drug-lever responding and response rate. The results showed that: 1) the OVX/saline group had a substantially higher mean response rate under control conditions than the other three groups, 2) both OVX groups had higher percentages of THC-lever responding than the intact groups at doses of Δ⁹-THC lower than the training dose, and 3) the OVX/Δ⁹-THC group was significantly less sensitive to the rate-decreasing effects of Δ⁹-THC compared to other groups. Furthermore, at sacrifice, western blot analyses indicated that chronic Δ⁹-THC in OVX and intact females decreased cannabinoid type-1 receptor (CB1R) levels in the striatum, and decreased phosphorylation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding protein (p-CREB) in the hippocampus. In contrast to the hippocampus, chronic Δ⁹-THC selectively increased p-CREB in the OVX/saline group in the striatum. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) was not significantly affected by either hormone status or chronic Δ⁹-THC. In summary, these data in female rats suggest that cannabinoid abuse by adolescent human females could alter their subsequent responsiveness to cannabinoids as adults and have serious consequences for brain development.

Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review

Drug discrimination has been an important technique in behavioural pharmacology for at least 40 years. The characteristics of drug-produced discriminative stimuli are influenced by behavioural and pharmacological variables, including the doses used to establish discriminations. This review covers studies on the effects of varying the training dose of a drug in a search for general principles that are applicable across different drug classes and methodological approaches. With respect to quantitative changes, relationships between training dose and the rate of acquisition or magnitude of stimulus control were found for most drug classes. Acquisition accelerated with dose up to a point beyond which drug-induced impairments of performance had a deleterious impact. Sensitivity to the training drug as measured by ED(50) values typically increased when the training dose was reduced. Qualitative changes were more complex and appeared to fall into three categories: (a) changes in profiles of generalization between partial and full agonists; (b) reduced specificity of some discriminations at small training doses; and (c) changes in the relative salience of actions mediated through different neurotransmitter systems or from central and peripheral sites. Three-lever discrimination procedures incorporating 'drug versus drug' or 'dose versus dose' contingencies enabled detection of more subtle differences than the simple 'drug versus no drug' approach when applied to the opioid, hallucinogen and barbiturate classes of drugs. These conclusions have implications for the interpretation of data from studies that use either within-subject or between-subject designs for studying the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol, pregnanolone, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in rats administered ethanol or saline as adolescents

Adolescent alcohol use may produce long-term changes in the receptors and neurosteroids that putatively mediate alcohol's effects and consequently contribute to alcohol abuse and dependence as an adult. To test this possibility, ethanol (0.18-1.8 g/kg) and two neurosteroids, pregnanolone (1-10 mg/kg) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA, 1-100 mg/kg), were administered alone and in combination to adult, male Long-Evans rats discriminating 1 g/kg ethanol (15% v/v) under a fixed ratio (FR) 20 schedule of food presentation after adolescent treatment with 15 injections of ethanol (n = 9, 2 g/kg, 20% v/v) or saline (n = 7). When compared as adults, ethanol-treated adolescents (as opposed to saline-treated adolescents) had higher percentages of ethanol-lever responding at doses smaller than the training dose, and higher response rates after both control and ethanol injections. Neither pregnanolone nor DHEA substituted for ethanol in either adolescent-treated group up to doses that substantially decreased response rates. When administered with ethanol, 1 and 3.2 mg/kg of pregnanolone enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses more in saline-treated adolescents than in ethanol-treated adolescents. Unlike pregnanolone, 32 and 100 mg/kg of DHEA attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol modestly in both adolescent-treated groups. These results in adult rats suggest that adolescent ethanol administration can enhance the discriminative stimulus effects of small ethanol doses and affect the capacity of pregnanolone, but not DHEA, to interact with ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects.

Discriminative stimulus properties of atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs: a review of preclinical studies

BACKGROUND

Drug discrimination is an increasingly valuable behavioral assay for the preclinical development of antipsychotic drugs. The majority of studies have used the atypical antipsychotic clozapine because it displays robust discriminative stimulus properties and is the "prototypical" or "gold standard" atypical antipsychotic against which other antipsychotics will undoubtedly be compared for many years.

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacological mechanisms mediating the discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotics used as training drugs and the usefulness of drug discrimination for distinguishing typical and atypical antipsychotics were reviewed.

RESULTS

Clozapine appears to have a compound cue involving antagonism of two or more receptors. While muscarinic receptor antagonism is a prominent factor for mediation of clozapine's cue in rats with a 5.0-mg/kg training dose, there are differences in clozapine's cue with a low training dose and in pigeons and mice. With a low training dose, clozapine has consistently produced full or partial generalization to atypical but not to typical antipsychotics. Although not evaluated as extensively, the atypical antipsychotics quetiapine and ziprasidone also appear to generalize to atypical but not typical antipsychotics. This has not been the case for other antipsychotic drugs (olanzapine, chlorpromazine, haloperidol) used as training drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

There are important differences in discriminative stimulus properties both between and within atypical and typical antipsychotics and across species. While low-dose clozapine discrimination in rats appears to provide a more sensitive behavioral assay for distinguishing atypical from typical antipsychotics, the extent to which clozapine's discriminative stimulus properties are predictive of its antipsychotic effects remains to be determined.

Reduced sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine is associated with increased sensitivity to its discriminative stimulus properties

Outbred Long-Evans rats exhibit wide variation in their locomotor response to cocaine. Here, we investigated the relationship between these individual differences and interoceptive effects of cocaine in low cocaine responder (LCR) and high cocaine responder (HCR) phenotypes. Rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) from saline by repeated pairings of injections with one of two response levers. In subsequent tests for stimulus generalization to other cocaine doses (1.25-15.0 mg/kg), LCRs exhibited partial-to-full generalization at 1.85 and 2.5 mg/kg cocaine, respectively, whereas HCRs did not. When the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (5.0 mg/kg) was coadministered with saline or different cocaine doses, we observed similar upward shifts in dose-response in both phenotypes. In contrast, coadministration of the 5-HT2A/2C agonist (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI; 0.3 mg/kg) led to partial substitution of DOI for cocaine and enhancement of the stimulus properties of 1.25 mg/kg cocaine in LCRs only. Finally, a retest of cocaine-induced locomotion after discrimination testing revealed marked behavioral sensitization in LCRs and modest changes in behavior in HCRs. Taken together, these results suggest that initial sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulant effects of cocaine is inversely related to its interoceptive properties and that differences in 5-HT systems may contribute to the phenotypic differences observed.

Overlapping, but not identical, discriminative stimulus effects of the neuroactive steroid pregnanolone and ethanol

Many behavioral effects of neuroactive steroids are mediated by GABA(A) receptors; however, other receptors might be involved. Ethanol has a complex mechanism of action, and many of the same receptors have been implicated in the effects of neuroactive steroids and ethanol. The goal of this study was to determine whether actions of neuroactive steroids and ethanol at multiple receptors result in similar discriminative stimulus effects. Rats discriminated 5.6 mg/kg of pregnanolone while responding under a fixed-ratio 20 schedule of food presentation. Pregnanolone, flunitrazepam and pentobarbital produced >80% pregnanolone-lever responding. In contrast, neither morphine nor the negative GABA(A) modulator beta-CCE substituted for pregnanolone up to doses that markedly decreased response rates. Ethanol substituted only in some rats; in other rats, ethanol produced <20% pregnanolone-lever responding up to rate-decreasing doses. Thus, substitution of positive GABA(A) modulators, and not morphine or beta-CCE, for pregnanolone in all rats suggests that positive modulation of GABA(A) receptors is important in the discriminative stimulus effects of pregnanolone. Although pregnanolone might have actions at other receptors, in addition to actions at GABA(A) receptors, substitution of ethanol for pregnanolone only in some rats suggests that the mechanisms of action of pregnanolone and ethanol overlap, but are not identical.

Potentiation of olanzapine substitution in rats discriminating clozapine by the D2/3 agonist quinpirole

The D2/3 agonist (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (PHNO) has been reported to enhance the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine and attenuate olanzapine-induced response suppression in monkeys. These data suggest that the relatively marked D2/3 antagonist actions of olanzapine limit its substitution for clozapine. The work reported here replicated and extended these findings. Twelve rats were trained to discriminate clozapine (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) from vehicle in an FR30 quantal food rewarded assay. The substitution curve for olanzapine (0-2.5 mg/kg) was then computed after treatment with either vehicle or a high dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the D2/3 agonist quinpirole. The olanzapine substitution curve was shifted significantly 5.2-fold in parallel to the left by quinpirole. Olanzapine suppressed responding significantly, but this effect was not attenuated or enhanced by quinpirole, which suppressed responding itself. Thus antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors clearly limit the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine. These findings suggest that the clozapine versus vehicle discrimination is probably a bioassay for agents that resemble clozapine but which do not necessarily induce D2/3 antagonism. This discrimination may therefore not specifically detect clozapine-like antipsychotics, although it may be of value in developing such antipsychotics. The low discriminability of antipsychotics in general may be because antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors limit incentive salience in discrimination assays. These data are compatible with recent theorizing that therapeutic actions of antipsychotics in schizophrenia involve D2/3 receptor-mediated attenuation of stimulus salience.

Stimulus properties of nicotine, amphetamine, and chlordiazepoxide as positive features in a pavlovian appetitive discrimination task in rats

Recent experiments from our laboratory have demonstrated that drug states can signal when environmental cues will be followed by rewarding outcomes (ie Pavlovian conditioning). However, little is known about the generality of this approach and whether it can be used for studying the pharmacological properties of drug states. Accordingly, the present experiments tested the pharmacological specificity of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), amphetamine (1 mg/kg), and chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) in this Pavlovian drug discrimination procedure. Following drug administration, presentation of a conditional stimulus (CS) was followed by brief access to sucrose. When saline was administered, the same CS was presented but sucrose was withheld. In substitution tests, rats in each condition received varying doses of all training drugs and caffeine. Anticipatory food seeking developed during the CS on drug sessions but not on saline sessions for all drug features (ie drug state-specific conditional response (CR)). In generalization tests, this CR decreased as a function of decreases in the training dose. Median effective doses (ED50s) were calculated for nicotine (0.054 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.26 mg/kg), and CDP (2.48 mg/kg). No compound tested substituted for the CDP training drug. Partial substitution was evident between nicotine and amphetamine; CDP did not substitute for either of these drug features. Caffeine fully substituted for nicotine (ED50 = 15.45 mg/kg) and amphetamine (ED50 = 3.70 mg/kg), but not for CDP. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that drug states can occasion appetitive Pavlovian CRs in a pharmacologically specific manner.

Discovering risperidone: the LSD model of psychopathology

In the 1970s and 1980s, Janssen Pharmaceutica Research, which had a broad interest in central nervous system disorders and nurtured intellectual freedom, developed original, and at times heretical, concepts. It took decades for the scientific community to endorse some of these concepts. Among them were such notions as an elementary particle of behaviour, the introduction of response quality in receptor theory, and the idea that tolerance does not develop to opioids. These concepts enabled the discovery of the antipsychotic risperidone, a unique full antagonist of the interoceptive effects of LSD.

SL651498, a GABAA receptor agonist with subtype-selective efficacy, as a potential treatment for generalized anxiety disorder and muscle spasms

SL651498 (6-fluoro-9-methyl-2-phenyl-4-(pyrrolidin-1-yl-carbonyl)-2,9-dihydro-1H-pyrido[3,4-b]indol-1-one) was identified as a drug development candidate from a research program designed to discover subtype-selective GABA(A) receptor agonists for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder and muscle spasms. The drug displays high affinity for rat native GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(1) (K(i) = 6.8 nM) and alpha(2) (K(i) = 12.3 nM) subunits, and weaker affinity for alpha5-containing GABA(A) receptors (K(i) = 117 nM). Studies on recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors confirm these findings and indicate intermediate affinity for the alpha(3)beta(2)gamma(2) subtype. SL651498 behaves as a full agonist at recombinant rat GABA(A) receptors containing alpha(2) and alpha(3) subunits, and as a partial agonist at recombinant GABA(A) receptors expressing alpha(1) and alpha(5) subunits. SL651498 produced anxiolytic-like and skeletal muscle relaxant effects qualitatively similar to those of benzodiazepines (BZs) [minimal effective dose (MED): 1 to 10 mg/kg, i.p. and 3 to 10 mg/kg, p.o.]. However, unlike these latter drugs, SL651498 induced muscle weakness, ataxia or sedation at doses much higher than those having anxiolytic-like activity (MED: 30 to 100 mg/kg, i.p. or p.o.). Moreover, in contrast to BZs, SL651498 did not produce tolerance to its anticonvulsant activity or physical dependence. It was much less active than BZs in potentiating the depressant effects of ethanol or impairing cognitive processes in rodents. The differential profile of SL651498 as compared to BZs may be related to its selective efficacy at the alpha(2)- and alpha(3)-containing GABA(A) receptors. This suggests that selectively targeting GABA(A) receptor subtypes can lead to drugs with increased clinical specificity. SL651498 represents a promising alternative to agents currently used for the treatment of anxiety disorders and muscle spasms without the major side effects seen with classical BZs.

Nicotine trace discrimination in rats with midazolam as a mediating stimulus

It was shown previously that effects of drugs present prior to training sessions could serve as discriminative stimuli. Further experiments have aimed to determine whether a second drug can serve as a mediating stimulus that increases the strength of stimulus control by such pre-session drug effects. Rats were trained in a two-lever discrimination procedure with food reinforcers presented on a tandem variable-interval fixed-ratio (VI-FR) schedule. Injections of nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) or saline were followed after 5 min by administration of midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) as a putative mediating stimulus. The nicotine antagonist mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg) was administered 5 min after midazolam, to block effects of nicotine during training sessions, as in previous work on pre-session drug effects. Stimulus control was acquired slowly and to an accuracy of only 75%. Midazolam did not facilitate the acquisition or magnitude of nicotine-induced stimulus control. However, extinction tests showed that the presence of midazolam was required for expression of stimulus control by pre-session effects of the training dose of nicotine. The response to nicotine (0.075-0.6 mg/kg) was dose-related, but the dose-response relationship was not dependent upon the presence of midazolam. In a group of rats trained with nicotine and midazolam as above, but without mecamylamine, stimulus control by nicotine was not dependent upon the presence of midazolam. In all cases, overall rates of responding were very low when tests were carried out without midazolam, suggesting the presence of state-dependent learning. The results imply that under appropriate conditions the discriminative stimulus effects of one drug (nicotine) can be mediated by the action of a second substance (midazolam). This finding can be conceptualized in terms of occasion setting, with nicotine serving as the feature and midazolam as the target stimulus. Furthermore, it appears that even when rates of responding show drug-state dependence, this is not necessarily the case for discriminative stimulus effects.

Chlorpyrifos shares stimulus properties with pentylenetetrazol as evaluated by an operant drug discrimination task

Based on previous data from elevated plus-maze tests suggesting a possible anxiogenic effect of the insecticide chlorpyrifos (CPF), the experiment reported here was designed to determine whether this organophosphate (OP) caused an interoceptive discriminative stimulus (IDS) in rats similar to that produced by the anxiogenic drug pentylenetetrazol (PTZ). Rats were trained to discriminate PTZ (20 mg/kg) from saline, using a drug discrimination procedure. When appropriate lever selection was achieved, generalization tests were performed. Tests of various doses of PTZ showed that the drug exerts dose-dependent discriminative control over response. Two more generalization tests were conducted with 250 mg/kg of CPF and 76.8 mg/kg of LiCl for up to 9 days. Results revealed that CPF (250 mg/kg s.c.) produced a PTZ-like IDS that fully substituted for PTZ 24 h after injection and that subjective effects remain for at least 6 days. However, administration of LiCl did not produce any generalization to PTZ on any of the days tested. These results suggest that CPF shares a site of action, and perhaps functional properties, with PTZ that last for several days, are not due to general malaise and should be taken into account in the use of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of different types of dementia.

Sigma(1) (sigma(1)) receptor antagonists represent a new strategy against cocaine addiction and toxicity

Cocaine is a highly addictive substance abused worldwide. Its mechanism of action involves initially inhibition of neuronal monoamine transporters in precise brain structures and primarily the dopamine reuptake system located on mesolimbic neurons. Cocaine rapidly increases the dopaminergic neurotransmission and triggers adaptive changes in numerous neuronal circuits underlying reinforcement, reward, sensitization and the high addictive potential of cocaine. Current therapeutic strategies focus on counteracting the cocaine effects directly on the dopamine transporter, through post-synaptic D(1), D(2) or D(3) receptors or through the glutamatergic, serotoninergic, opioid or corticotropin-releasing hormone systems. However, cocaine administration also results in the activation of numerous particular targets. Among them, the sigma(1) (sigma(1)) receptor is involved in several acute or chronic effects of cocaine. The present review will first bring concise overviews of the present strategies followed to alleviate cocaine addiction and animal models developed to analyze the pharmacology of cocaine addiction. Evidence involving activation of the sigma(1) receptor in the different aspects of cocaine abuse, will then be detailed, following acute, repeated, or overdose administration. The therapeutic potentials and neuropharmacological perspectives opened by the use of selective sigma(1) receptor antagonists in cocaine addiction will finally be discussed.

Schedule control of quantal and graded dose-effect curves in a drug-drug-saline discrimination

Pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5 mg/kg pentobarbital, 5 mg/kg morphine, and saline when responding was maintained under fixed-interval (FI) or fixed-ratio (FR) reinforcement schedules. After the discrimination was established, other drugs were substituted for the training drugs. After low doses of pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide, responding shifted from the saline key to the pentobarbital key under both FR and FI schedules. After low doses of morphine and methadone, responding shifted from the saline key to the morphine key under both reinforcement schedules. After all doses of d-amphetamine, responding occurred largely on the saline key under both schedules. Responding also was confined largely to the saline key after phencyclidine administration under the FR schedule, but under the FI schedule, responding shifted from the saline key to the pentobarbital key at high doses of phencyclidine. When responding was maintained under the FR schedule, the dose-response curves for drugs that generalized to the training drugs were quantal in shape, while under the FI schedule, the dose-response curves for drugs that generalized to the training drugs were graded. These data extend observations that FR schedules generate quantal dose-response curves, and FI schedules generate graded dose-response curves to complex three-key drug discriminations.

Opiate states of memory: receptor mechanisms

The present studies characterized the receptor mechanisms of morphine-induced states of memory. Morphine (5 mg/kg) produced a state in which rats could learn and retrieve an operant response; retrieval was impaired, however, when the rats were tested in the normal state. Conversely, rats that were trained in the normal state failed to retrieve the response in the morphine state. In either case the mnesic state was dose dependent, commencing at morphine doses as low as 0.8 mg/kg. In rats trained with 5 mg/kg of morphine, retrieval was fully adequate when tested with this same dose but not when tested with either lower or higher doses. Naloxone, but not naltrindole, antagonized the morphine-induced state; heroin and (-)-cyclazocine, but not U50,488H, (+)-cyclazocine and SNC80, produced a state in which retrieval occurred at least partially. Time-effect studies in which injections were made from 0 to 240 min before the sessions indicated that the retrieval in saline-to-morphine and morphine-to-saline conditions occurred along different time courses; a theory of opiate signal transduction suggests that these temporal profiles result from morphine producing two bi-directional mnesic states that may differ as much as the analgesia and hyperalgesia that morphine also induces. It appears that a particular magnitude of mu opiate receptor activation produces a state to which a memory trace can be confined in a highly selective manner. The normal and this particular morphine state are only some of the many mutually inaccessible and molecularly definable states of memory that are likely to exist, thus challenging the unitary concept of an individual organism's memory.

Discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotics

Drug discrimination methodology has been used in a number of ways to analyze the actions of novel and putative novel antipsychotics in vivo. Recent studies suggest (a) in contrast to earlier theorizing, antagonism of the low-dose d-amphetamine stimulus in rats may not be an effective screen for novel antipsychotics; (b) dopamine D2-like agonists and antagonists, some of which are putative antipsychotics, can be studied in vivo as discriminative cues, although there is a pressing need for more selective drugs that differentiate the various members of the D2 family. (c) antagonism of the cue induced by the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK-801, which has been proposed as a possible screen for clozapine-like compounds, may be an unreliable assay; and (d) the clozapine stimulus is probably a compound cue (a drug "mixture"), which can be used to screen for novel clozapine-like antipsychotics, although the precise receptor mechanisms involved in mediating the clozapine stimulus, and its direct relevance to the antipsychotic action of clozapine remains to be proven conclusively.

Strategies for understanding the pharmacological effects of ethanol with drug discrimination procedures

Ethanol appears to produce a stimulus complex, or compound cue, composed of distinct components that are mediated by different receptor systems. In ethanol vs. water discriminations, it appears that ethanol produces a redundant stimulus complex such that separate, receptor-mediated activity can serve as the basis for the discrimination. These discriminations have been termed redundant, because multiple features of the cue could serve as the basis of the discrimination. In ethanol vs. water discriminations, one common feature is the asymmetrical generalizations between components of the ethanol cue and ethanol. There is also evidence for overshadowing of one component by other components of the ethanol stimulus complex. It appears possible to transfer the basis of the ethanol cue from a redundant cue to a conditional cue with specific training procedures. When the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol are juxtoposed with those of one component of the ethanol complex, as in ethanol vs. water vs. pentobarbital discriminations, the ethanol discrimination shifts to a conditional basis. The ability to antagonize an ethanol discrimination may be dependent upon whether the discrimination is based on redundant component stimuli or conditional presence of all component stimuli.

Drug discrimination in neurobiology

Areas of neurobiological interest are identified towards which drug discrimination (DD) studies have made important contributions. DD allows ligand actions to be analyzed at the whole organism level, with a neurobiological specificity that is exquisite and often unrivalled. DD analyses have thus been made of a vast array of CNS agents acting on receptors, enzymes, or ion channels, including most drugs of abuse. DD uniquely offers access to the study of subjective drug effects in animals, using a methodology that also is transposable to humans and has generated unprecedented models of pathology (e.g., chronic pain, opiate addiction). Parametric studies of such independent variables as training dose and reinforcement provide refined insights into the dynamic psychophysiological mechanisms of both drug effects and behavior. Three different mechanisms have been identified by which discriminative, and perhaps other behaviors, can come about. DD also is superbly sensitive to small, partial activation of molecular substrates; this has enabled DD analyses to pioneer the unravelling of molecular mechanisms of drug action (attributing, f.ex., LSD's particular subjective effects to an unusual, partial activation of 5-HT, and perhaps other receptors). DD has both oriented and served as a tool to conduct drug discovery research (e.g., pirenperone-risperidone, loperamide). The DD response arguably constitutes a quantal, rather than graded, variable, and as such allows a comprehension of molecular, pharmacological, and behavioral mechanisms that would have been otherwise inaccessible. Perhaps most important are the following further contributions. One is the notion that particular, different levels of receptor activation are associated with qualities of neurobiological actions that also differ and are unique, this notion arguably constituting the most significant addition to affinity and intrinsic activity since the earliest theoretical conceptions of molecular pharmacology. Another contribution consists of studies that render redundant the notion of tolerance and identify fundamental mechanisms of signal transduction; these mechanisms account for apparent tolerance, dependence, addiction, and sensitization, and appear to operate ubiquitously in a bewildering array of biological systems.

Drug mixtures and ethanol as compound internal stimuli

Drug discrimination methods that entail training with mixtures of drugs may shed light on polydrug abuse and on the actions of single drugs that interact with more than one receptor. In AND-discrimination procedures (drug A + drug B vs. vehicle), mixtures are discriminated primarily on the basis of their component drugs: these discriminations may be useful for testing interactions between component drugs in mixtures. The role of training dose, overshadowing and associative blocking in AND-discriminations have been investigated. For example, after prior training with midazolam, it was possible to demonstrate associative blocking of the nicotine element of the mixture stimulus, and vice versa. Using the AND-OR discriminations (drug A + drug B vs. drug A or drug B) increased pharmacological specificity considerably, and these procedures may be valuable for determining whether the effects of a novel mixture are similar to the combined effects of the training drugs. Ethanol is an example of a single drug that may produce a compound cue; rats trained to discriminate ethanol from water generalize (asymmetrically) to GABA(A) enhancers such as chlordiazepoxide (CDP) or pentobarbitone, to NMDA antagonists such as dizocilpine (MK-801), and to some serotonin agonists, such as trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (5-HT(1B/2C)). In addition, rats trained to discriminate mixtures of either CDP or pentobarbitone plus MK-801 generalize to ethanol. A previous history of training with MK-801 or CDP (prior to ethanol discrimination training) enhanced the MK-801-like and CDP-like effects of ethanol respectively, but associative blocking of proposed elements in the ethanol stimulus was not seen. These studies provide some support for the multielement concept of ethanol discrimination but also suggest that rules governing three-component stimuli (such as those putatively produced by ethanol) may differ from those for the two-component mixtures of drugs studied previously.

Evidence for overshadowing by components of the heterogeneous discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol

The present study used a drug discrimination paradigm to characterize the contribution of separate receptor systems to the stimulus effects of different training doses of ethanol. In a two-lever drug discrimination paradigm two groups of adult male Long-Evans rats (n = 8 per group) were trained to discriminate either 1.0 g/kg ethanol from water or 2.0 g/kg ethanol from water, administered intragastrically (i.g.), 30 min prior to the start of daily sessions in which responding was maintained under a fixed ratio 20 schedule of food presentation. Following training, cumulative dosing substitution tests were conducted with the GABAA positive modulator pentobarbital (1-17 mg/kg, i.p.), the uncompetitive NMDA antagonist dizocilpine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and the 5-HT1B/2C agonist m-trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP 0.17-1.7 mg/kg, i.p.). Next, the rats initially trained at 1.0 g/kg ethanol were retrained to discriminate 2.0 g/kg ethanol from water, and the rats initially trained at 1.0 g/kg were retrained to discriminate 2.0 g/kg ethanol from water. Both groups were then re-tested with the same ligands. Regardless of training history, animals currently discriminating 1.0 g/kg were more sensitive to the ethanol-like effects of TFMPP and pentobarbital compared to rats discriminating 2.0 g/kg ethanol. However, no difference in sensitivity to the ethanol-like effects of dizocilpine based on ethanol training dose was detected. These results support the view that ethanol is a heterogeneous discriminative stimulus comprised of GABAA, NMDA and 5-HT1B/2C receptor-mediated activity. Furthermore, changes in sensitivity to GABAA and 5-HT ligands as a function of training dose could be indicative of overshadowing by other components of ethanol's heterogeneous cue. Finally, it appears that the current profile of ethanol's heterogeneous stimulus effects, rather than an interaction with ethanol training history, determines the substitution pattern of specific receptor ligands.

Behavioral effects of clozapine and dopamine receptor subtypes

The atypical neuroleptic clozapine (CLZ) is an extremely effective antipsychotic that produces relatively few motoric side effects. However, CLZ displays limited antagonism at the dopamine (DA) D2 receptor, the receptor commonly thought to mediate the antipsychotic activity of neuroleptics. The mechanism of action behind the efficacy of CLZ remains to be determined. Miller, Wickens and Beninger [Progr. Neurobiol., 34, 143-184 (1990)] propose a "D1 hypothesis of antipsychotic action" that may explain the antipsychotic effects of CLZ. This hypothesis is built on the interactions between D2, cholinergic and D1 mechanisms in the striatum. These authors assert that although typical neuroleptics block D2 receptors, it is through an indirect action on D1 receptors that their antipsychotic action is manifest. The extra-pyramidal side effects produced by typical neuroleptics are hypothesized to be due to an indirect action on cholinergic receptors. It is argued that the anticholinergic properties of CLZ negate the D2 (motor side effects) action of CLZ, allowing CLZ to diminish psychotic symptoms through a direct action on D1 receptors. Thus, CLZ may function as a D1 receptor antagonist in behavioral paradigms. The current paper reviews and compares the behavioral profile of CLZ to those produced by D2- and D1-selective antagonists with specific reference to unconditioned and conditioned behaviors in order to more fully evaluate the "D1 hypothesis of CLZ action". Although the actions of CLZ remain unique, they do share some striking similarities with D1 receptor antagonists especially in tests of unconditioned behavior, possibly implicating the D1 receptor in the action of this antipsychotic drug.

Reversal of overshadowing in a drug mixture discrimination in rats

Previous studies have suggested that in some circumstances, learning processes such as overshadowing may determine the effects that one drug has upon the response to another. The experiments described here examined overshadowing in rats trained to discriminate mixtures of nicotine plus midazolam in two-lever operant procedures with food reinforcement. After training for 60 sessions, midazolam (0.32 mg/kg SC) overshadowed nicotine (0.32 mg/kg SC) so that the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine seen in control rats trained with nicotine alone was abolished (n = 8-10). In the next phase of the study, the discriminative response to midazolam in one group of mixture-trained rats was devalued by means of an extinction procedure which weakened the relationship between administration of midazolam and the response that was reinforced. Dose-response determinations then showed that the devaluation procedure had indeed attenuated the response to midazolam, whereas the previously overshadowed response to nicotine was restored. Post-session injections of drugs were used to equate the pharmacological histories of the groups and the effects seen were therefore attributable to training with the drugs and not simply to repeated exposure to them. Additionally, in the control rats trained with nicotine only (with midazolam given post-session), midazolam markedly reduced response rates, whereas in the three groups of rats trained with the mixture, midazolam had little response rate-depressant effect; this observation suggests that behaviourally contingent tolerance had developed to the response rate-reducing effect of midazolam. Application of devaluation procedures in studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of single drugs with multiple effects may provide a means for manipulating the characteristics of the discriminations obtained and for identifying individual elements of the drug-produced stimulus complex.

Empirical evidence that the state dependence and drug discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes

The study compared the outcomes generated by the State Dependence and Drug Discrimination paradigms with ethanol in the rat. Food-deprived rats learned to complete a fixed-ratio 10 schedule of bar presses for food within 120 s while treated with 320- to 1250-mg/kg doses of ethanol. Subsequent tests of recall of this response with saline failed to generate any evidence that transfer was hampered following the drug-to-saline state change. In contrast, each of 14 rats learned to discriminate 1250 mg/kg ethanol from saline in a Drug Discrimination procedure that also required the animals to press one of two levers for food according to a fixed- ratio 10 schedule. The results offer the first empirical evidence to demonstrate directly that the State Dependence and Drug Discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes in otherwise identical experimental conditions.

Phenytoin and phenobarbital: a comparison of their state-dependent effects

Two commonly used antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin sodium and phenobarbital sodium, were investigated for state-dependency effects at different doses. Male Wistar strain rats trained to a criterion in an inhibitory avoidance task and a food-motivated T-maze task under varying drug and nondrug states were subjected to retention tests 24 and 48 h, respectively, following acquisition. The treatment instituted at the time of retrieval was either the same as, or different from, that used during training. The results indicated that phenytoin produced state-dependency effects at test doses of 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg in the avoidance task and at test dose of 20 mg/kg in the T-maze task experiments. These state-specific effects were comparable to those of phenobarbital sodium (5 and 10 mg/kg). The reinstitution of the drug state in an additional test session produced approximately equal and significant recovery of conditioned responses in the T-maze paradigm both in phenytoin and phenobarbital groups. These results demonstrate, for the first time, the ability of phenytoin to produce state-dependency effects in a pattern similar to that observed with a widely studied compound such as phenobarbital. Overall, the data provide no support for the view that the degree of discriminability of a drug is an indicator of potential state-dependency effects and is restricted only to the dosage high enough to produce noticeable intoxication.

Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement

Debate continues as to whether drug discrimination in animals is an inherently quantal or continuous process. This issue is important in determining the appropriate interpretation of results from drug discrimination studies designed to assess the nature of drug-induced interoceptive cues. The quantal approach holds that subjects perceive a drug cue in an all-or-none manner, while the continuous view proposes that when appropriate training and testing procedures are used, subjects can discriminate along a continuum of interoceptive cues. Data consistent with the quantal view have consistently been generated by animals trained to respond on schedules of reinforcement having an FR component. Since quantal responding is a characteristic of these schedules, results from drug discrimination studies using training schedules with FR components are of little value in empirically determining whether drug discrimination reflects a quantal or continuous process. Use of variable schedules of reinforcement might be more appropriate because the pattern of responding generated does not preclude results consistent with either of the competing views. Data from the following studies that trained subjects using VI schedules with a concurrent TO for incorrect lever responding were analyzed: Barrett et al. (1982): L-5-hydroxytryptophan versus saline; Smith (1990): diazepam versus pentylenetetrazol; Barrett et al. (1992): amphetamine versus haloperidol; Barrett and Steranka (1983): amphetamine versus haloperidol. In every case, when experimental conditions produced a group mean intermediate to that for the training drugs, the distribution of scores for individual animals was normally rather than bimodally distributed.

Learning of rats under amnesia caused by pentobarbital

Dissociated learning of rats in the normal state and the state of amnesia produced by pentobarbital (15 mg/kg, ip) was carried out. Rats were trained to approach a shelf where they received food reinforcement. In Group 1 the rats were trained under the influence of pentobarbital to run to the same shelf as in the normal state. In Group 2 the rats were trained to approach different shelves in different drug states. It was shown that memory dissociation occurred in both groups. Differences in the parameters of training under the influence of pentobarbital between Groups 1 and 2 were revealed. These findings show that the brain-dissociated state induced by pentobarbital is formed with the participation of the mechanisms of information perception.

Dose-dependent and time-related stimulus properties of LHRH in male but not in female rats

Male and female rats (N = 32) were trained to discriminate 5 micrograms/kg LHRH from saline in a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination procedure with injection-session intervals of 15 min or 45 min. When the interval was 15 min, neither males nor females were able to discriminate the stimulus conditions. With an interval of 45 min, LHRH showed sex-dependent stimulus properties. Male, but not female, rats reliably discriminated LHRH from saline within 50 training sessions. In males, generalization tests showed dose-dependent and time-related stimulus effects of LHRH (doses ranged from 62.5 ng/kg to 8 micrograms/kg, and intervals ranged from -15 min to -120 min). The results indicate that LHRH may be an essential part of the stimulus complex in male rats but could not gain control over operant behavior in female rats.

Aversive and compensatory classical conditioning with diazepam as conditional stimulus

The purpose of the first experiment was to investigate whether diazepam could acquire anxiogenic properties by signalling an aversive event. Rats were trained in an operant chamber in the pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) model of anxiety. Thereafter the animals were divided into groups that received classical diazepam conditioning (Group 1), and conditioning of diazepam + tone (Group 2). In the test phase diazepam was injected prior to placement in the operant chamber. Group 2 selected the PTZ-appropriate lever more often than the other groups, indicating that the tone induced anxiety, and diazepam did not. Tones and shock may therefore be more easily associated than diazepam and shock. The second experiment investigated this. Rats were trained the same way as in the first experiment. Thereafter the experimental group received injections of a small dose of diazepam prior to a second injection of a large dose of diazepam. The hypothesis was that a compensatory anxiogenic conditional response to diazepam's anxiolytic effect should be elicited by the small dose. There were no differences between the groups in lever selection, indicating that a compensatory anxiogenic response was not elicited.

Discriminative stimulus properties of flesinoxan

Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate either 0.3 mg/kg of flesinoxan (N = 13) or 0.1 mg/kg of 8-OH-DPAT (N = 7) from saline in a two-lever operant drug discrimination task using a fixed ratio 10 schedule of reinforcement. Once trained, animals in both groups displayed a dose-related decrease in discriminative performance upon administration of lower doses of the drug used in training. In generalization tests, flesinoxan generalized to 8-OH-DPAT in 8-OH-DPAT-trained animals and 8-OH-DPAT substituted for flesinoxan in flesinoxan-trained animals. Buspirone substituted partially for both the flesinoxan and the 8-OH-DPAT cue. The results of the present study indicate similarity between the discriminative stimulus effects of flesinoxan and the stimulus produced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT. These results, coupled with the finding that flesinoxan has a significant affinity and selectivity for 5-HT1A binding sites, suggest that the stimulus effects of flesinoxan are mediated by a 5-HT1A mechanism.

Quantal vs. graded generalization in drug discrimination: measuring a graded response

In drug discrimination research, detection of drug stimuli by animals is used for investigating various properties of psychoactive drugs. The major issue addressed by this paper is whether detection of drug stimuli by animals is a quantal or graded event. Some data suggest that detection of a drug stimulus by animals is quantal in nature. Thus, variations in drug stimulus substitution may only reflect variations in threshold for detecting the training stimulus rather than the current concept of these data reflecting graded responding to stimulus intensity. Therefore, drug discrimination procedures may have limited utility for detecting quantitative differences in the subjective effects of varying drug doses. In order to examine this problem, a method for measuring continuous response gradients in individual animals is needed. Tests for quantal responding generally use the distribution of responses on two manipulanda as the dependent measure. However, this variable may be inadequate for detecting a graded response, and may actually reflect loss of stimulus control or a deterioration in performance, rather than changes in response magnitude. Most alternative measures utilize response rate. Unfortunately, these measures are influenced by the direct rate-altering properties of some drugs. One possible alternative method is conditioned taste aversion as the discriminative task. This paradigm provides a means for not only ascertaining if graded discriminative responses occur in individual animals, but also more rapidly training a drug discrimination. Thus, using conditioned taste aversion techniques for measuring a drug discrimination may provide better indices for detecting response gradations.

Amnesic trace locked into the benzodiazepine state of memory

Rats were trained in a food-rewarded lever-pressing task until they could complete an FR10 requirement within the first 120 s of the session, and were tested for the retention of this response requirement after having reached this criterion. The pharmacological treatment instituted at the time of tests was either the same as or different from that used during acquisition. In this state-dependency (StD) procedure, saline-to-drug as well as drug-to-saline state changes produced robust failures to transfer with chlordiazepoxide (CDP) and also with yohimbine. Diazepam substituted for, while Ro 15-1788 antagonised, CDP; none of several non-benzodiazepine compounds substituted for CDP. Neither food deprivation nor extensive overtraining after CDP prevented the failure of transfer when animals were tested for drug-to-saline transfer. Another series of experiments evaluated the effects of CDP and diazepam in a rat conflict procedure. The doses at which CDP and diazepam produced anti-conflict effects were similar to those at which failure to transfer occurred in saline-to-drug state changes, and higher than those at which such failure occurred in drug-to-saline state changes. With benzodiazepines, StD of memory retrieval conceivably constitutes a parsimonious explanation of the anxiolytic and untoward (amnesic, drug dependence) actions of these drugs.

Failure of SCH 23390 to function as a discriminative stimulus in rats

Four rats were studied in a two-lever, food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm using the Dl dopamine antagonist SCH 23390 (0.03 mg/kg, IP, 30 minutes prior to the session) and saline as the training stimuli. After at least 100 training sessions there was no evidence of stimulus control over responding by SCH 23390 in 3 of the 4 rats, and only briefly in the fourth. On the other hand, food delivery exerted control over behavior indicating that SCH 23390 did not disrupt control of behavior by the reinforcing stimulus. An increase in training dose to 0.06 mg/kg for an additional 12 sessions did not improve discriminative accuracy although this dose reduced rate of responding to an extent that made further training using 0.06 mg/kg untenable. The results provide no evidence of stimulus control of behavior by SCH 23390 and suggest that SCH 23390 does not function as a discriminative stimulus in rats.

Studies on D1 and D2 dopamine receptor involvement in conditioned taste aversions

This series of studies investigated the ability of compounds selective for either the D1 or D2 dopamine receptor to induce a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in thirsty rats. Neither the D1 antagonist SCH23390 (0.12-0.60 mg/kg) nor the D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.125-0.375 mg/kg) were able to induce CTAs to a saccharin solution. In contrast, the D1 agonist SKF38393 produced a dose-dependent taste aversion which was stereoselective to the (R-) enantiomer. The aversion to (R,S)-SKF38393 was not blocked by pretreatment with either SCH23390 or haloperidol, suggesting that the aversion is not mediated through stimulation of either dopamine receptor subtype. The D2 dopamine receptor agonist quinpirole was also found to produce a dose-dependent CTA. This aversion was blocked by injections of haloperidol and was attenuated following injections of domperidone, suggesting involvement of peripheral dopamine receptors in the aversion. Pretreatment with SCH23390 failed to affect the quinpirole-induced CTA, providing additional evidence that the D1 and D2 dopamine receptor subtypes can function independently of one another in the control of behavior. Finally, it does not appear that the area postrema is importantly involved in these taste aversions since lesions of this brain region did not affect the CTAs induced by either SKF38393 or quinpirole.