Verwendung von Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln mit Vitaminen und Mineralstoffen – Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Verbraucherbefragung

Consumer Acceptance and Market Potential of Iodine-Biofortified Fruit and Vegetables in Germany

Biofortification of food crops with iodine is a novel approach to preventing iodine deficiency in humans. The present study analyses the consumer target groups and the market potential of iodine-biofortified fruit and vegetables in Germany. For this purpose, an online survey of 1016 German fruit and vegetable consumers was conducted to investigate the acceptance of different product categories as well as relevant criteria for the market launch. The results show that iodine-biofortified fruit and vegetables are particularly attractive to consumers who purchase at farmers’ markets, organic food shops, and farm stores. Out of this group, 39% of consumers rate such iodine-rich foods as very appealing. They attach importance to food that naturally contains iodine and prefer produce from integrated domestic cultivation. With their focus on sustainability and naturalness, this group of consumers clearly differs from typical users of dietary supplements, who are primarily concerned with health benefits. However, overall about 85% of respondents would prefer biofortified fruits and vegetables to supplements to improve their iodine supply. The greatest market potential for iodine-biofortified fruit and vegetables is to be expected in supermarkets, as this is the preferred food shopping location for most consumers. A total of 28% of those who buy here rate the biofortified foods presented as very appealing. Nevertheless, a successful market launch requires that the benefits of the new products are communicated according to the potential consumer group needs.

Magnesium Bioavailability and Tolerability Do Not Differ between Two Supplements with Different Release Properties

Magnesium (Mg²⁺) is one of the most frequently supplemented micronutrients. Due to possible gastrointestinal side effects, the European Food Safety Authority and the Institute of Medicine set the upper intake level for Mg²⁺ from supplements to 250 and 350 mg, respectively. Nevertheless, systematic data concerning the tolerability of Mg²⁺ supplements are scarce. The aim of the study was to directly compare the bioavailability and tolerability of two 500 mg Mg²⁺ supplements in a crossover study with duplicate determination. The different release properties were either a direct release (one phase) or a delayed release of the second half (two phases). An open-label, controlled trial with a crossover design, duplicate determination, and one-week washout phases was conducted. The participants ingested the test product after overnight fasting. Blood samples were taken at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours, and urine was collected over a period of 24 hours. The participants were on standardized nutrition during all examination days. There were no significant differences between the test products regarding 24-hour renal Mg²⁺ excretion and area under the curve of serum Mg²⁺ levels for 8 hours. Both test products were well tolerated with a very low frequency of gastrointestinal adverse effects and no significant differences between the test products. The Mg²⁺ bioavailability did not differ between the test products. The supplements examined had the same good tolerability. Both test products are therefore suited to enhance Mg²⁺ supply without relevant side effects.

Use of vitamin and mineral supplements among adolescents living in Germany-Results from EsKiMo II

Dietary supplements may contribute to nutrient intake; however, actual data on dietary supplement use among adolescents living in Germany are rare. The aim of this analysis was to describe the current use of dietary supplements, its determinants, and reasons of use. Changes in supplement use over time were evaluated by comparing the results with those from EsKiMo I (2006). Data from the Eating Study as a KiGGS Module EsKiMo II (2015-2017) were used to analyze supplement intake according to sociodemographic, health characteristics, and physical exercise behavior of 12-17-year-olds (n = 1356). Supplement use during the past four weeks was assessed by a standardized computer assisted personal interview. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the association between supplement use and its determinants. Between 2015-2017, 16.4% (95%-CI: 13.0-19.7%) of the adolescents used dietary supplements, and its use decreased with lower levels of physical exercise and overweight. Most supplement users used only one supplement, often containing both vitamins and minerals. The most frequently supplemented nutrients were vitamin C and magnesium. The main reported reason to use supplements was 'to improve health'. Prevalence of supplement use was slightly lower in 2015-2017 than in 2006 (18.5%; 95%-CI: 15.8-21.2%). The results underline the importance of including nutrient intake through dietary supplements in nutrition surveys.

Characterisation of vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated according to their motives for using supplements: results of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT)

OBJECTIVE

To characterise German vitamin and mineral supplement users differentiated by their motives for supplement use.

DESIGN

Data were obtained from the German National Nutrition Monitoring (2010/11) via two 24 h dietary recalls and a telephone interview. Motive-based subgroups of supplement users were identified by factor and cluster analysis. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, health and dietary characteristics and supplement use were examined. Differences were analysed using χ 2 tests, logistic and linear regression models.

SETTING

Germany, nationwide.

SUBJECTS

Individuals (n 1589) aged 18-80 years.

RESULTS

Three motive-based subgroups were identified: a 'Prevention' subgroup (n 324), characterised by the motive to prevent nutrient deficiencies; a 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup (n 166), characterised by motives to prevent health problems and improve well-being and performance; and a 'Treatment' subgroup (n 136), characterised by motives to treat nutrient deficiencies or diseases. Members of the two prevention subgroups had a higher Healthy Eating Index score and tended to be more physically active than non-users. Those in the 'Prevention and additional benefits' subgroup supplemented with a greater number of micronutrients. Members of the 'Treatment' subgroup tended to be older and have a lower self-reported health status than non-users, and supplemented with a smaller number of micronutrients.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of supplement users take supplements for preventive purposes and they are more health conscious than non-users of supplements due to their concerns about developing health problems. Those supplementing for treatment purposes may have underlying health indications and may be more likely to benefit from supplementation than those supplementing for preventive purposes.

[Nutritional supplements in sports - sense, nonsense or hazard?]

The excessive sale of dietary supplements (DSs) has become a global multi-billion market as more and more people turn to DSs for a healthy lifestyle or for aesthetic reasons. DSs are also increasingly popular among athletes; 50-85% of recreational and 35-100% of competitive athletes report taking DSs, the latter more regularly. Unless pathological deficiencies are detected, the intake of DSs for recreational athletes is not recommended. While it may be advisable for competitive athletes to supplement their diet with certain macronutrients (proteins and carbohydrates), many micronutrients (vitamins, minerals) as well as allegedly performance enhancing DSs may only show minimal impact under specific conditions and for certain sports. However, most products lack proof of their effectiveness. In some cases, DSs may even have negative effects and reduce performance. Furthermore, competitive athletes should be aware of the fact that DSs may lead to positive doping tests, as they bear the risk of being contaminated with banned substances, or components may be banned substances themselves. Every single case of taking DSs should therefore be critically assessed and discussed with experts prior to use. DSs cannot replace a balanced diet and hard practice.