1
|
Camargo L, Pacheco-Barrios K, Gianlorenço AC, Menacho M, Choi H, Song JJ, Fregni F. Evidence of bottom-up homeostatic modulation induced taVNS during emotional and Go/No-Go tasks. Exp Brain Res 2024; 242:2069-2081. [PMID: 38963558 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06876-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
Bilateral transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) - a non-invasive neuromodulation technique - has been investigated as a safe and feasible technique to treat many neuropsychiatric conditions. such as epilepsy, depression, anxiety, and chronic pain. Our aim is to investigate the effect of taVNS on neurophysiological processes during emotional and Go/No-Go tasks, and changes in frontal alpha asymmetry. We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial with 44 healthy individuals who were allocated into two groups (the active taVNS group and the sham taVNS group). Subjects received one session of taVNS (active or sham) for 60 min. QEEG was recorded before and after the interventions, and the subjects were assessed while exposed to emotional conditions with sad and happy facial expressions, followed by a Go/No-Go trial. The results demonstrated a significant increase in N2 amplitude in the No-Go condition for the active taVNS post-intervention compared to the sham taVNS after adjusting by handedness, mood, and fatigue levels (p = 0.046), significantly reduced ERD during sad conditions after treatment (p = 0.037), and increased frontal alpha asymmetry towards the right frontal hemisphere during the emotional task condition (p = 0.046). Finally, we observed an interesting neural signature in this study that suggests a bottom-up modulation from brainstem/subcortical to cortical areas as characterized by improved lateralization of alpha oscillations towards the frontal right hemisphere, and changes in ERP during emotional and Go/No-Go tasks that suggests a better subcortical response to the tasks. Such bottom-up effects may mediate some of the clinical effects of taVNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Camargo
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1575 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1575 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru
| | - Anna Carolyna Gianlorenço
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1575 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Neurosciences Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - Maryela Menacho
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1575 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Neurosciences Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - Hyuk Choi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Neurive Co., Ltd, Gimhae, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Jun Song
- Neurive Co., Ltd, Gimhae, Republic of Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1575 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, United States of America.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wickemeyer C, Güldenpenning I, Weigelt M. Action inhibition in a sport-specific paradigm: examining the limits of action control in basketball. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s00426-024-02010-2. [PMID: 39096340 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-024-02010-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
To investigate the point where inappropriate defensive movements can no longer be inhibited and to validate suitable stimulus material for constructing a basketball-specific anticipation-response-inhibition task, two experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1, participants without basketball expertise (N = 25) watched a video of a basketball jump shot and were asked to release the space bar at the point when the ball leaves the player's fingertips (go-trials). In 25% of all trials, the video was stopped prematurely and participants should withhold their finger-lift response (stop-trials). A staircase-tracking algorithm was used to adjust the point-in-time when the jump shot was stopped in a way that participants' inhibition rate was at 50% (reflecting the so called "point-of-no-return", PNR). In Experiment 2, the stimulus material was adapted so that stop-trials simulated a pump fake. The PNR in Experiment 1 was located 187 ms and in Experiment 2 177 ms before the point of ball release. Precision performance benefit from practice across blocks and participants delayed their responses after stop-trials in a subsequent go-trial, which reflects strategic post-stop-trial adjustments. Based on the comparable results of previous studies, the given stimulus material is suitable for investigating response inhibition skills in dynamic sport-specific environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolin Wickemeyer
- Department of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
| | - Iris Güldenpenning
- Department of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Matthias Weigelt
- Department of Sport & Health, Paderborn University, Warburger Straße 100, 33098, Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quettier T, Ippolito G, Però L, Cardellicchio P, Battaglia S, Borgomaneri S. Individual differences in intracortical inhibition predict action control when facing emotional stimuli. Front Psychol 2024; 15:1391723. [PMID: 38933575 PMCID: PMC11199899 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Efficient inhibitory control in the context of prepotent actions is vital. However, such action inhibition may be profoundly influenced by affective states. Interestingly, research indicates that action control can be either impaired or improved by emotional stimuli. Thus, a great deal of confusion surrounds our knowledge of the complex dynamics subtending emotions and action control. Here, we aimed to investigate whether negative stimuli, even when non-consciously presented and task-irrelevant, can affect action control relative to neutral stimuli. Additionally, we tested whether individual differences in intracortical excitability may predict action control capabilities. To address these issues, we asked participants to complete a modified version of the Stop Signal Task (SST) in which fearful or neutral stimuli were subliminally presented before the go signals as primes. Moreover, we assessed participants' resting-state corticospinal excitability, short intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Results demonstrated better action control capabilities when fearful stimuli were subliminally presented and interindividual SICI predicted stronger action inhibition capabilities. Taken together, these results shed new light on the intricate dynamics between action, consciousness, and motor control, suggesting that intracortical measures can be used as potential biomarkers of reduced motor inhibition in research and clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Quettier
- Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ippolito
- Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Languages and Literatures, Communication, Education and Society, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Però
- Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy
| | - Pasquale Cardellicchio
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Battaglia
- Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy
- Department of Psychology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sara Borgomaneri
- Center for Studies and Research in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology “Renzo Canestrari”, Cesena Campus, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xia X, Li Y, Song Y, Dong Y, Chen R, Zhang J, Tan X. Modulation of intracortical circuits in primary motor cortex during automatic action tendencies. Brain Struct Funct 2024; 229:909-918. [PMID: 38483581 PMCID: PMC11003908 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-024-02783-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Humans display automatic action tendencies toward emotional stimuli, showing faster automatic behavior (i.e., approaching a positive stimulus and avoiding a negative stimulus) than regulated behavior (i.e., avoiding a positive stimulus and approaching a negative stimulus). Previous studies have shown that the primary motor cortex is involved in the processing of automatic actions, with higher motor evoked potential amplitudes during automatic behavior elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, it is unknown how intracortical circuits are involved with automatic action tendencies. Here, we measured short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation within the primary motor cortex by using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols during a manikin task, which has been widely used to explore approaching and avoiding behavior. Results showed that intracortical facilitation was stronger during automatic behavior than during regulated behavior. Moreover, there was a significant negative correlation between reaction times and intracortical facilitation effect during automatic behavior: individuals with short reaction times had stronger faciliatory activity, as shown by higher intracortical facilitation. By contrast, no significant difference was found for short-interval intracortical inhibition between automatic behavior and regulated behavior. The results indicated that the intracortical facilitation circuit, mediated by excitatory glutamatergic neurons, in the primary motor cortex, plays an important role in mediating automatic action tendencies. This finding further supports the link between emotional perception and the action system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Xia
- School of Social Development and Health Management, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
- School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yansong Li
- School of Physical Education, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Yuyu Song
- School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanjun Dong
- School of Social Development and Health Management, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jian Zhang
- School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoying Tan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, Macao Polytechnic University, Rua de Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macao S.A.R., China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paci M, Cardellicchio P, Di Luzio P, Perrucci MG, Ferri F, Costantini M. When the heart inhibits the brain: Cardiac phases modulate short-interval intracortical inhibition. iScience 2024; 27:109140. [PMID: 38414850 PMCID: PMC10897847 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The phasic cardiovascular activity influences the central nervous system through the systolic baroreceptor inputs, inducing widespread inhibitory effects on behavior. Through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered during resting-state over the left primary motor cortex and across the different cardiac phases, we measured corticospinal excitability (CSE) and distinct indices of intracortical motor inhibition: short (SICI) and long (LICI) interval, corresponding to GABAA and GABAB neurotransmission, respectively. We found a significant effect of the cardiac phase on short-intracortical inhibition, without any influence on LICI. Specifically, SICI was stronger at systole compared to diastole. These results show a tight relationship between the cardiac cycle and the inhibitory neurotransmission within M1, and in particular with GABAA-ergic-mediated motor inhibition. We hypothesize that this process requires greater motor control via the gating mechanism and that this, in turn, needs to be recalibrated through the modulation of intracortical inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Paci
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Pasquale Cardellicchio
- IIT@UniFe Center for Translational Neurophysiology, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiology, Università di Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara, 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Paolo Di Luzio
- Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Mauro Gianni Perrucci
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferri
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marcello Costantini
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University G. D’Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bundt C, Huster RJ. Corticospinal excitability reductions during action preparation and action stopping in humans: Different sides of the same inhibitory coin? Neuropsychologia 2024; 195:108799. [PMID: 38218313 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Motor functions and cognitive processes are closely associated with each other. In humans, this linkage is reflected in motor system state changes both when an action must be prepared and stopped. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation showed that both action preparation and action stopping are accompanied by a reduction of corticospinal excitability, referred to as preparatory and response inhibition, respectively. While previous efforts have been made to describe both phenomena extensively, an updated and comprehensive comparison of the two phenomena is lacking. To ameliorate such deficit, this review focuses on the role and interpretation of single-coil (single-pulse and paired-pulse) and dual-coil TMS outcome measures during action preparation and action stopping in humans. To that effect, it aims to identify commonalities and differences, detailing how TMS-based outcome measures are affected by states, traits, and psychopathologies in both processes. Eventually, findings will be compared, and open questions will be addressed to aid future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Bundt
- Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - René J Huster
- Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Is cortical inhibition in primary motor cortex related to executive control? Cortex 2023; 160:100-114. [PMID: 36791591 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Recent research using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has shown that the speed with which people can stop an action is linked to GABAergic inhibitory activity in the motor system. Specifically, a significant proportion of the variance in stop signal reaction time (SSRT; a widely used measure of inhibitory control) is accounted for by short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI). It is still unclear whether this relationship reflects a broader link between GABAergic processes and executive functions, or a specific link between GABAergic processes and motor stopping ability. The current study sought to replicate the correlation between SSRT and SICI while investigating whether this association generalises to other measures of inhibitory control and working memory, and to long-interval cortical inhibition (LICI). Participants completed a battery of inhibition (Stop-Signal, Stroop, Flanker) and working memory (n-back, Digit Span, and Operation Span) tasks. We replicated the correlation between SICI and SSRT but found no other correlations between behavioural measures of executive control and the two cortical measures of inhibition. These findings indicate that the relationship between SSRT and SICI is specific to a particular property of response inhibition and likely reflects the function of local inhibitory networks mediated by GABAA.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hall A, Jenkinson N, MacDonald HJ. Exploring stop signal reaction time over two sessions of the anticipatory response inhibition task. Exp Brain Res 2022; 240:3061-3072. [PMID: 36239740 PMCID: PMC9587965 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06480-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Various behavioural tasks measure response inhibition encompassing the ability to cancel unwanted actions, evaluated via stop signal reaction time (SSRT). It is unclear whether SSRT is an unchangeable inherent measure of inhibitory network integrity or whether it can improve with repetition. The current study explored if and how SSRT changed over two sessions for the Anticipatory Response Inhibition Task (ARIT), and how this compared with the Stop Signal Task (SST). Forty-four participants repeated the ARIT and SST over two sessions. SSRT and its constituent measures (Go trial reaction time, stop signal delay) were calculated. SSRT reflecting non-selective response inhibition was consistent between sessions in the ARIT and SST (both p > 0.293). Reaction time and stop signal delay also remained stable across sessions in the ARIT (all p > 0.063), whereas in the SST, reaction time (p = 0.013) and stop signal delay (p = 0.009) increased. SSRT reflecting behaviourally selective stopping on the ARIT improved (p < 0.001) over two sessions, which was underpinned by changes to reaction time (p < 0.001) and stop signal delay (p < 0.001). Overall, the maximal efficiency of non-selective inhibition remained stable across two sessions in the ARIT. Results of the SST confirmed that non-selective inhibition can, however, be affected by more than inhibitory network integrity. Behaviourally selective stopping on the ARIT changed across sessions, suggesting the sequential neural process captured by the SSRT occurred more quickly in session two. These findings have implications for future studies that necessitate behavioural measures over multiple sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Hall
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ned Jenkinson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hayley J MacDonald
- Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
He JL, Hirst RJ, Puri R, Coxon J, Byblow W, Hinder M, Skippen P, Matzke D, Heathcote A, Wadsley CG, Silk T, Hyde C, Parmar D, Pedapati E, Gilbert DL, Huddleston DA, Mostofsky S, Leunissen I, MacDonald HJ, Chowdhury NS, Gretton M, Nikitenko T, Zandbelt B, Strickland L, Puts NAJ. OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task. Behav Res Methods 2022; 54:1530-1540. [PMID: 34751923 PMCID: PMC9170665 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01680-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The stop-signal paradigm has become ubiquitous in investigations of inhibitory control. Tasks inspired by the paradigm, referred to as stop-signal tasks, require participants to make responses on go trials and to inhibit those responses when presented with a stop-signal on stop trials. Currently, the most popular version of the stop-signal task is the 'choice-reaction' variant, where participants make choice responses, but must inhibit those responses when presented with a stop-signal. An alternative to the choice-reaction variant of the stop-signal task is the 'anticipated response inhibition' task. In anticipated response inhibition tasks, participants are required to make a planned response that coincides with a predictably timed event (such as lifting a finger from a computer key to stop a filling bar at a predefined target). Anticipated response inhibition tasks have some advantages over the more traditional choice-reaction stop-signal tasks and are becoming increasingly popular. However, currently, there are no openly available versions of the anticipated response inhibition task, limiting potential uptake. Here, we present an open-source, free, and ready-to-use version of the anticipated response inhibition task, which we refer to as the OSARI (the Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition) task.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L He
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Rebecca J Hirst
- The Drug research University of Tasmania Group, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Trinity College School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rohan Puri
- Open Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Coxon
- Sensorimotor Neuroscience and Ageing Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Winston Byblow
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Hinder
- Open Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Department of Exercise Sciences, Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Dora Matzke
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Heathcote
- Department of Psychology, Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corey G Wadsley
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Tim Silk
- School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Christian Hyde
- School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Dinisha Parmar
- School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Ernest Pedapati
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Donald L Gilbert
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David A Huddleston
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stewart Mostofsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Inge Leunissen
- Center for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Movement Sciences, Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium
| | - Hayley J MacDonald
- Department of Movement Sciences, Movement Control & Neuroplasticity Research Group, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, 3001, Heverlee, Belgium
- Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, 6229, ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nahian S Chowdhury
- Department of Exercise Sciences, Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Gretton
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tess Nikitenko
- Open Science Tools (PsychoPy) lab, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bram Zandbelt
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition & Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luke Strickland
- Future of Work Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Nicolaas A J Puts
- Department of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Sackler Institute for Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, Camberwell, London, SE5 8AF, UK
- MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Apšvalka D, Ferreira CS, Schmitz TW, Rowe JB, Anderson MC. Dynamic targeting enables domain-general inhibitory control over action and thought by the prefrontal cortex. Nat Commun 2022; 13:274. [PMID: 35022447 PMCID: PMC8755760 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27926-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, inhibitory control has featured prominently in accounts of how humans and other organisms regulate their behaviour and thought. Previous work on how the brain stops actions and thoughts, however, has emphasised distinct prefrontal regions supporting these functions, suggesting domain-specific mechanisms. Here we show that stopping actions and thoughts recruits common regions in the right dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to suppress diverse content, via dynamic targeting. Within each region, classifiers trained to distinguish action-stopping from action-execution also identify when people are suppressing their thoughts (and vice versa). Effective connectivity analysis reveals that both prefrontal regions contribute to action and thought stopping by targeting the motor cortex or the hippocampus, depending on the goal, to suppress their task-specific activity. These findings support the existence of a domain-general system that underlies inhibitory control and establish Dynamic Targeting as a mechanism enabling this ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dace Apšvalka
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | | | - Taylor W Schmitz
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada
| | - James B Rowe
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK
- Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK
| | - Michael C Anderson
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
- Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paci M, Di Cosmo G, Perrucci MG, Ferri F, Costantini M. Cortical silent period reflects individual differences in action stopping performance. Sci Rep 2021; 11:15158. [PMID: 34312403 PMCID: PMC8313697 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94494-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions, allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop Signal Task, which provides a temporal index of response inhibition, namely the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). At the neural level, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) allows to investigate motor inhibition within the primary motor cortex (M1), such as the cortical silent period (CSP) which is an index of GABAB-mediated intracortical inhibition within M1. Although there is strong evidence that intracortical inhibition varies during action stopping, it is still not clear whether differences in the neurophysiological markers of intracortical inhibition contribute to behavioral differences in actual inhibitory capacities. Hence, here we explored the relationship between intracortical inhibition within M1 and behavioral response inhibition. GABABergic-mediated inhibition in M1 was determined by the duration of CSP, while behavioral inhibition was assessed by the SSRT. We found a significant positive correlation between CSP's duration and SSRT, namely that individuals with greater levels of GABABergic-mediated inhibition seem to perform overall worse in inhibiting behavioral responses. These results support the assumption that individual differences in intracortical inhibition are mirrored by individual differences in action stopping abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Paci
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
| | - Giulio Di Cosmo
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Mauro Gianni Perrucci
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferri
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marcello Costantini
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies - ITAB, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Psychological, Health, and Territorial Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hare SM, Du X, Adhikari BM, Chen S, Mo C, Summerfelt A, Kvarta MD, Garcia L, Kochunov P, Elliot Hong L. Mapping local and long-distance resting connectivity markers of TMS-related inhibition reduction in schizophrenia. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL 2021; 31:102688. [PMID: 33991855 PMCID: PMC8135038 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) is a biomarker for altered motor inhibition in schizophrenia, but the manner in which distant sites influence the inhibitory cortical-effector response remains elusive. Our study investigated local and long-distance resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) markers of SICI in a sample of N = 23 patients with schizophrenia and N = 29 controls. Local functional connectivity was quantified using regional homogeneity (ReHo) analysis and long-range connectivity was estimated using seed-based rsFC analysis. Direct and indirect effects of connectivity measures on SICI were modeled using mediation analysis. Higher SICI ratios (indicating reduced inhibition) in patients were associated with lower ReHo in the right insula. Follow-up rsFC analyses showed that higher SICI scores (indicating reduced inhibition) were associated with reduced connectivity between right insula and hubs of the corticospinal pathway: sensorimotor cortex and basal ganglia. Mediation analysis supported a model in which the direct effect of local insular connectivity strength on SICI is mediated by the interhemispheric connectivity between insula and left sensorimotor cortex. The broader clinical implications of these findings are discussed with emphasis on how these preliminary findings might inform novel interventions designed to restore or improve SICI in schizophrenia and deepen our understanding of motor inhibitory control and impact of abnormal signaling in motor-inhibitory pathways in schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Hare
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
| | - Xiaoming Du
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Bhim M Adhikari
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Shuo Chen
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Chen Mo
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ann Summerfelt
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Mark D Kvarta
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Laura Garcia
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Peter Kochunov
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - L Elliot Hong
- Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ding Q, Cai H, Wu M, Cai G, Chen H, Li W, Lin T, Jing Y, Yuan T, Xu G, Lan Y. Short intracortical facilitation associates with motor-inhibitory control. Behav Brain Res 2021; 407:113266. [PMID: 33794226 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The ability of motor-inhibitory control is important in daily life. Inhibitory control deficits are commonly observed in psychiatric conditions with enhanced impulsivity. The physiological mechanisms underlying the inhibitory control deficits are not well elucidated. We systematically investigated the relationship between resting-state intracortical inhibition or facilitation and inhibitory control (indicated by stop signal reaction time, SSRT) to determine whether reduced intracortical inhibition or increased intracortical facilitation was related to the poorer inhibitory control. Thirty-three healthy subjects (age: 21.46 ± 1.40 years) participated in this study. We used paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation to induce short intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, long intracortical inhibition, and short intracortical facilitation at rest. SSRT was derived from stop signal task. We performed all measurements in two repeat sessions conducted two weeks apart. A negative correlation between short intracortical inhibition and SSRT was only observed in session 1; however, the correlation did not persist after controlling for short intracortical facilitation. Positive correlation between short intracortical facilitation and SSRT was observed in both sessions, indicating that individuals with greater resting-state short intracortical facilitation tend to have less efficient stopping performance. Our results help explain the inconsistency with respect to the relationship between short intracortical inhibition and SSRT in the existing literature. Short intracortical facilitation may be used as a potential physiological biomarker for motor-inhibitory control, which may have clinical implications for disorders associated with inhibitory control deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Ding
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huiting Cai
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Manfeng Wu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guiyuan Cai
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hongying Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wanqi Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tuo Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yinghua Jing
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tifei Yuan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
| | - Guangqing Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Yue Lan
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Peng SY, Shi Z, Zhou DS, Wang XY, Li XX, Liu XL, Wang WD, Lin GN, Pan BX, Voon V, Grace AA, Heilig M, Wong ML, Yuan TF. Reduced motor cortex GABA BR function following chronic alcohol exposure. Mol Psychiatry 2021; 26:383-395. [PMID: 33432190 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-020-01009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The GABAB receptor (GABABR) agonist baclofen has been used to treat alcohol and several other substance use disorders (AUD/SUD), yet its underlying neural mechanism remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate cortical GABABR dynamics following chronic alcohol exposure. Ex vivo brain slice recordings from mice chronically exposed to alcohol revealed a reduction in GABABR-mediated currents, as well as a decrease of GABAB1/2R and G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel 2 (GIRK2) activities in the motor cortex. Moreover, our data indicated that these alterations could be attributed to dephosphorylation at the site of serine 783 (ser-783) in GABAB2 subunit, which regulates the surface expression of GABABR. Furthermore, a human study using paired-pulse-transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) analysis further demonstrated a reduced cortical inhibition mediated by GABABR in patients with AUD. Our findings provide the first evidence that chronic alcohol exposure is associated with significantly impaired cortical GABABR function. The ability to promote GABABR signaling may account for the therapeutic efficacy of baclofen in AUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Yu Peng
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhe Shi
- Division of Stem Cell Regulation and Application, Key Laboratory for Quality Evaluation of Bulk Herbs of Hunan Province, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | | | - Xin-Yue Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xing-Xing Li
- Ningbo Kangning Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiao-Li Liu
- Ningbo Kangning Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| | - Wei-Di Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Guan-Ning Lin
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bing-Xing Pan
- Institute of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Valerie Voon
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anthony A Grace
- Center for Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Markus Heilig
- Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences,, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Ma-Li Wong
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Ti-Fei Yuan
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. .,Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China. .,TianQiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Translational Research, Shanghai, China. .,The State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|