1
|
Conti M, Bovenzi R, Palmieri MG, Placidi F, Stefani A, Mercuri NB, Albanese M. Early effect of onabotulinumtoxinA on EEG-based functional connectivity in patients with chronic migraine: A pilot study. Headache 2024; 64:825-837. [PMID: 38837259 DOI: 10.1111/head.14750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this pilot prospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate, using high-density electroencephalography (HD-EEG), the longitudinal changes in functional connectivity (FC) in patients with chronic migraine (CM) treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (OBTA). BACKGROUND OBTA is a treatment for CM. Several studies have shown the modulatory action of OBTA on the central nervous system; however, research on migraine is limited. METHODS This study was conducted at the Neurology Unit of "Policlinico Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy, and included 12 adult patients with CM treated with OBTA and 15 healthy controls (HC). Patients underwent clinical scales at enrollment (T0) and 3 months (T1) from the start of treatment. HD-EEG was recorded using a 64-channel system in patients with CM at T0 and T1. A source reconstruction method was used to identify brain activity. FC in δ-θ-α-β-low-γ bands was analyzed using the weighted phase-lag index. FC changes between HCs and CM at T0 and T1 were assessed using cross-validation methods to estimate the results' reliability. RESULTS Compared to HCs at T0, patients with CM showed hyperconnected networks in δ (p = 0.046, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC: 0.76-0.98], Cohen's κ [0.65-0.93]) and β (p = 0.031, AUC [0.68-0.95], Cohen's κ [0.51-0.84]), mainly involving orbitofrontal, occipital, temporal pole and orbitofrontal, superior temporal, occipital, cingulate areas, and hypoconnected networks in α band (p = 0.029, AUC [0.80-0.99], Cohen's κ [0.42-0.77]), predominantly involving cingulate, temporal pole, and precuneus. Patients with CM at T1, compared to T0, showed hypoconnected networks in δ band (p = 0.032, AUC [0.73-0.99], Cohen's κ [0.53-0.90]) and hyperconnected networks in α band (p = 0.048, AUC [0.58-0.93], Cohen's κ [0.37-0.78]), involving the sensorimotor, orbitofrontal, cingulate, and temporal cortex. CONCLUSION These preliminary results showed that patients with CM presented disrupted EEG-FC compared to controls restored by a single session of OBTA treatment, suggesting a primary central modulatory action of OBTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Conti
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Bovenzi
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Placidi
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Stefani
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Albanese
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Regional Referral Headache Center, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caliskan EB, Bingel U, Kunkel A. Translating knowledge on placebo and nocebo effects into clinical practice. Pain Rep 2024; 9:e1142. [PMID: 38533458 PMCID: PMC10965200 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Positive and negative treatment expectations are powerful modulators of health and treatment outcomes. A substantial part of treatment success is due to contextual factors modulating patient's expectations towards a treatment. Consequently, treatment expectations should be a target of therapeutic interventions themselves. Objectives This article highlights the neurobiological underpinnings of treatment expectations as well as strategies to modulate contextual factors to optimize treatment outcomes in daily clinical settings. Methods This clinical update aligns with the 2022 IASP Global Year Translating Pain Knowledge into Practice and selectively reviews the best available evidence and practice. Results The effects of treatment expectations, also known as placebo and nocebo effects, are observed in various clinical conditions and physiological systems. However, most of our knowledge comes from the field of pain, where expectation effects substantially contribute to overall analgesic treatment outcomes. Experimental placebo analgesia paradigms provide the best illustration of how analgesic effects can be attributed not only to a pharmacological or specific treatment, but instead are the result of the expectation towards the treatment. The impact of expectations on treatment outcome is highly variable between individuals, and the identification of factors predicting an individual's response has proven to be challenging. Further research is required to provide personalized treatment strategies for the daily clinical practice. Conclusion Patient's previous experiences and expectations are powerful modulators of treatment efficacy, tolerability, and adherence. By providing a comprehensive overview of recent advances in this field, this review offers valuable insights for clinicians and researchers seeking to improve patient-clinician interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Buse Caliskan
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Bingel
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Angelika Kunkel
- Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Irimia P, Santos-Lasaosa S, Pozo-Rosich P, Leira R, Pascual J, Láinez JM. Eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine: a narrative review. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1355877. [PMID: 38523607 PMCID: PMC10959239 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1355877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Eptinezumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), was recently approved in Europe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults who have at least four migraine days a month. Eptinezumab is administered by intravenous infusion every 12 weeks. During recent months, a considerable amount of evidence from eptinezumab trials has been published. The aim of this review is to describe the existing evidence on the tolerability, safety and efficacy of eptinezumab in patients with migraine. Data from randomized (PROMISE-1, PROMISE-2, RELIEF and DELIVER) and open-label (PREVAIL) phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated the favorable effect of eptinezumab in migraine symptoms from first day of treatment. These studies showed that eptinezumab results in an overall reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), increases in the ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) and improvements in patient-reported outcome measures in both patients with episodic migraine (EM) and with chronic migraine (CM), including patients who failed previous preventive treatments. The RELIEF trial also showed that eptinezumab, within 2 h of administration, reduced headache pain, migraine-associated symptoms and acute medication use when administered during a migraine attack. Eptinezumab benefits manifested as early as day 1 after dosing and with the subsequent doses lasted up to at least 2 years. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported by ≥2% of patients included upper respiratory tract infection and fatigue. Current evidence demonstrates that eptinezumab has a potent, fast-acting, sustained migraine preventive effect in patients with EM and CM. Eptinezumab has also shown to be well tolerated, supporting its use in the treatment of patients with migraine and inclusion in the current migraine therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sonia Santos-Lasaosa
- Aragon Institute for Health Research (IIS Aragon), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, VHIR, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rogelio Leira
- Department of Neurology, Headache Unit, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Clinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - José Miguel Láinez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Basedau H, Ornello R, Matteis ED, Davaasuren B, Kadyrova B, Vuralli D, Bozhenko M, Azizova I, Bitsadze N, Eralieva E, Ashina M, Mitsikostas D, Puledda F. Placebo and nocebo in the treatment of migraine: How much does real world effectiveness depend on contextual effects? Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231218392. [PMID: 38041833 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231218392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatments in medicine impact individuals beyond their intended effects, due to phenomena such as the placebo and nocebo effects. The placebo effect arises from the positive expectation of a treatment being beneficial, while the nocebo effect stems from the negative expectation of a treatment causing harm. Both in real-world practice and clinical trials, treatments can lead to outcomes unrelated to their intended mechanism of action, which we categorize as placebo and nocebo responses. These responses, combined with the inherent fluctuation in a condition's natural progression, regression to the mean, and random comorbidities, make up a significant part of the therapeutic experience. Particularly in pain management, placebo and nocebo effects play a substantial role. By addressing modifiable contextual factors such as patient expectations, lifestyle choices, and the therapeutic relationship, healthcare providers can enhance the effectiveness of migraine treatments, paving the way for a more comprehensive, individualized approach to patient care. We must also consider non-modifiable factors like personal experiences, beliefs, and information from social media and the internet. CONCLUSION This review offers a summary of our current understanding of the placebo and nocebo effects in migraine management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hauke Basedau
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Raffaele Ornello
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Eleonora De Matteis
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | - Begimai Kadyrova
- Department of Special Clinical Disciplines, International School of Medicine of International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
| | - Doga Vuralli
- Department of Neurology and Algology, Neuropsychiatry Center, Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence (NÖROM), Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Myroslav Bozhenko
- Department of Neurology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Ilaha Azizova
- Neurological Clinic "New Medical Technologies", Baku, Azerbaijan
| | | | | | - Messoud Ashina
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dimos Mitsikostas
- Department of Neurology Α, Aegintion Hospital, National and Kapidistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Francesca Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRC, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mollan SP, Fraser CL, Digre KB, Diener HC, Lipton RB, Juhler M, Miller NR, Pozo-Rosich P, Togha M, Brock K, Dinkin MJ, Chan CKM, Tassorelli C, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt GM, Jensen RH. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for Controlled Clinical Trials in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Cephalalgia 2023; 43:3331024231197118. [PMID: 37661711 DOI: 10.1177/03331024231197118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
The quality of clinical trials is essential to advance treatment, inform regulatory decisions and meta-analysis. With the increased incidence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and the emergence of clinical trials for novel therapies in this condition, the International Headache Society Guidelines for Controlled Clinical Trials in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension aims to establish guidelines for designing state-of-the-art controlled clinical trials for idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Mollan
- Neuro-ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Translational Brain Science, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Clare L Fraser
- Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathleen B Digre
- Neuro-ophthalmology Division, John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie undEpidemiologie (IMIBE), Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Richard B Lipton
- The Saul R. Korey Department of Neurology, and the Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil R Miller
- Wilmer Eye Institute and Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mansoureh Togha
- Headache Department, Iranian Centre of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Headache Department, Neurology Ward, Sina Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kristian Brock
- Cancer Research Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marc J Dinkin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, NY Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carmen K M Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Unit of Translational Neurovascular Research, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, 27100, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alex J Sinclair
- Translational Brain Science, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gisela M Terwindt
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
D'Alessandro G, Ruffini N, Iacopini A, Annoni M, Kossowsky J, Cerritelli F. Five challenges for manual therapies trials with placebo controls: A proposal. INT J OSTEOPATH MED 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
7
|
Qureshi AI, Pfeiffer K, Babar S, Huang W, Lobanova I, Ishfaq MF, French BR, Siddiq F, Gomez CR. Intra-arterial injection of lidocaine into middle meningeal artery to treat intractable headaches and severe migraine. J Neuroimaging 2021; 31:1126-1134. [PMID: 34388298 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We report the results of intra-arterial injection of lidocaine in the middle meningeal artery in patients with intractable headache or status migrainosus. METHODS We treated four patients with intra-arterial lidocaine (2 mg/ml) in doses up to 50 mg in each middle meningeal artery via a microcatheter bilaterally (except in one patient). In two patients with intractable headache, the daily maximum intensity of headache (graded by 11-point numeric rating scale) was recorded for 7 days postprocedure. In two patients with status migrainosus, migraine-related disability 3 months prior and after treatment using MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) questionnaire was recorded. RESULTS Intra-arterial lidocaine reduced the headache intensity from 8/10 and 10/10 to 0/10 in the two patients with intractable headaches for 2 days (day 0 and day 1) postprocedure. Despite recurrence of headache on day 2, the intensity was less than preprocedure intensity up to the last day recorded (by 3 and 2 points on day 7). In the two patients with status migrainosus, there was immediate reduction in headache intensity following intra-arterial lidocaine. The post treatment 3-month MIDAS score was lower in both patients compared with pretreatment 3-month score; 3 versus 30 and 55 versus 90. Severe disability preprocedure by MIDAS was reduced to little or no disability postprocedure in one patient. CONCLUSIONS Intra-arterial lidocaine resulted in amelioration of headache in patients with intractable headache and those with status migrainosus with improvement lasting longer than the short half-life of lidocaine possibly related to central desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan I Qureshi
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.,Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institutes
| | - Kimberley Pfeiffer
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Sehar Babar
- Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.,Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institutes
| | - Iryna Lobanova
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.,Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institutes
| | - Muhammad F Ishfaq
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Brandi R French
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Farhan Siddiq
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| | - Camilo R Gomez
- Department of Neurology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schiller J, Karst M, Kellner T, Zheng W, Niederer D, Vogt L, Eckhardt I, Beissner F, Korallus C, Sturm C, Egen C, Gutenbrunner C, Fink MG. Combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy on tension type headache: Results of a randomised controlled pilot study. Cephalalgia 2021; 41:879-893. [PMID: 33563049 PMCID: PMC8217893 DOI: 10.1177/0333102421989620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the effects of acupuncture and medical training therapy alone and in combination with those of usual care on the pain sensation of patients with frequent episodic and chronic tension-type headache. DESIGN This was a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial with four balanced treatment arms. The allocation was carried out by pre-generated randomisation lists in the ratio 1:1:1:1 with different permutation block sizes. SETTING The study was undertaken in the outpatient clinic of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Hannover Medical School.Participants and interventions: Ninety-six adult patients with tension-type headache were included and randomised into usual care (n = 24), acupuncture (n = 24), medical training (n = 24), and combination of acupuncture and medical training (n = 24). One patient was excluded from analysis because of withdrawing her/his consent, leaving 95 patients for intention to treat analysis. Each therapy arm consisted of 6 weeks of treatment with 12 interventions. Follow-up was at 3 and 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pain intensity (average, maximum and minimum), frequency of headache, responder rate (50% frequency reduction), duration of headache and use of headache medication.Clinical results: The combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy significantly reduced mean pain intensity compared to usual care (mean = -38%, standard deviation = 25%, p = 0.012). Comparable reductions were observed for maximal pain intensity (-25%, standard deviation = 20%, 0.014) and for minimal pain intensity (-35%, standard deviation = 31%, 0.03). In contrast, neither acupuncture nor medical training therapy differed significantly from usual care. No between-group differences were found in headache frequency, mean duration of headache episodes, and pain medication intake. At 3 months, the majority of all patients showed a reduction of at least 50% in headache frequency. At 6 months, significantly higher responder rates were found in all intervention groups compared to usual care. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to monotherapy, only the combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy was significantly superior in reduction of pain intensity compared to usual care.Trial registration: Registered on 11 February 2019. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00016723.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joerg Schiller
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Karst
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tim Kellner
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wen Zheng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Daniel Niederer
- Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lutz Vogt
- Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Isabelle Eckhardt
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Florian Beissner
- Somatosensory and Autonomic Therapy Research, Institute for Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Korallus
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Sturm
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Egen
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Georg Fink
- Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, Costa CM, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Favoni V, Pierangeli G, Lovati C, Aguggia M, d'Onofrio F, Doretti A, Di Fiore P, Finocchi C, Rao R, Bono F, Ranieri A, Albanese M, Cevoli S, Barbanti P. Galcanezumab for the prevention of high frequency episodic and chronic migraine in real life in Italy: a multicenter prospective cohort study (the GARLIT study). J Headache Pain 2021; 22:35. [PMID: 33941080 PMCID: PMC8091153 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01247-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical benefit of galcanezumab, demonstrated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), remains to be quantified in real life. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of galcanezumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) in a real-life setting. Methods This multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted between November 2019 and January 2021 at 13 Italian headache centers. Consecutive adult HFEM and CM patients clinically eligible were enrolled and treated with galcanezumab subcutaneous injection 120 mg monthly with the first loading dose of 240 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHDs) in CM patients after 6 months of therapy (V6). Secondary endpoints were the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), monthly painkiller intake (MPI), HIT-6 and MIDAS scores changes, ≥50% responder rates (RR), the conversion rate from CM to episodic migraine (EM) and Medication Overuse (MO) discontinuation. Results One hundred sixty-three patients (80.5% female, 47.1 ± 11.7 years, 79.8% CM) were included. At V6, MMDs reduced by 8 days in HFEM and MHDs by 13 days in CM patients (both p < .001). NRS, MPI, HIT-6 and MIDAS scores significantly decreased (p < .001). Ten patients (6.1%) dropped out for inefficacy and classified as non-responders. Patients with ≥50%RRs, i.e. responders, were 76.5% in the HFEM and 63.5% in the CM group at V6. Among CM patients, the V6 responders presented a lower body mass index (p = .018) and had failed a lower number of preventive treatments (p = .013) than non-responders. At V6, 77.2% of CM patients converted to EM, and 82.0% ceased MO. Adverse events, none serious, were reported in up to 10.3% of patients during evaluation times. Conclusions Galcanezumab in real life was safe, well tolerated and seemed more effective than in RCTs. Normal weight and a low number of failed preventives were positively associated with galcanezumab effectiveness in CM patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.govNCT04803513.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Claudia Altamura
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Brunelli
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Carmelina Maria Costa
- Headache and Neurosonology Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Cinzia Aurilia
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Egeo
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Fofi
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Favoni
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Pierangeli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Lovati
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, University Hospital L. Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Aguggia
- Neurology and Stroke Unit, Asti Hospital, Asti, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Doretti
- Department of Neurology, Stroke Unit and Laboratory of Neuroscience, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Di Fiore
- Headache Center, Neurology and Stroke Unit, S. Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Renata Rao
- Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Bono
- Center for Headache and Intracranial Pressure Disorders, Neurology Unit, A.O.U. Mater Domini, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Angelo Ranieri
- Headache Centre, Neurology and Stroke Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Albanese
- Headache Center, Neurology Unit, Tor Vergata University Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana, Rome, Italy.,San Raffaele University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stubberud A, Linde M, Brenner E, Heier M, Olsen A, Aamodt AH, Gravdahl GB, Tronvik E. Self‐administered biofeedback treatment app for pediatric migraine: A randomized pilot study. Brain Behav 2020. [PMCID: PMC7882181 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect size, safety, and tolerability of a therapist‐independent biofeedback treatment app among adolescent with migraine. Materials and Methods This was a prospective, 3:1 ratio randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blind, pilot study with 16 adolescents diagnosed with migraine randomized to eight weeks of biofeedback treatment (n = 12) or sham biofeedback (n = 4), carried out at two university hospitals in Norway. The prespecified and primary objective of the study was to observe changes in outcomes within the active treatment group. The sham control group was included in a minor ratio primarily to evaluate its feasibility. The primary outcome was change in headache frequency. A modified intention to treat analysis was performed, including participants completing at least seven biofeedback sessions in weeks 1–4 (n = 12 vs. n = 4) and weeks 5–8 (n = 7 vs. n = 2). Results Adherence was poor with 40% (136/336) of planned biofeedback sessions completed during weeks 5–8. Within the biofeedback group, a not statistically significant reduction in headache frequency was observed at weeks 1–4 (2.92 days/month, 95% CI −1.00 to 6.84, p = .145) and weeks 5–8 (1.85 days/month, 95% CI −2.01 to 5.72, p = .395). The biofeedback group experienced a median of one fewer headache days/month versus sham that did not reach significance (95% CI −4.0 to 9.0, p = .760). Conclusions We observed a small reduction in headache frequency in the active treatment group. Findings were likely undermined by low adherence and underpowered analyses but indicate that a therapist‐independent biofeedback treatment app has the potential to be an effective, tolerable, and inexpensive treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anker Stubberud
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Mattias Linde
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Department of NeurologySt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Eiliv Brenner
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Department of NeurologySt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Martin Heier
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience for ChildrenOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Department of PsychologyNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationSt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | | | - Gøril B. Gravdahl
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Department of NeurologySt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway
| | - Erling Tronvik
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Department of NeurologySt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eptinezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Sustained Effect Through 1 Year of Treatment in the PROMISE-1 Study. Clin Ther 2020; 42:2254-2265.e3. [PMID: 33250209 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Prevention of Migraine via Intravenous ALD403 Safety and Efficacy 1 (PROMISE-1) study was a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic properties of repeat intravenous (IV) doses of the calcitonin gene-related peptide‒targeted monoclonal antibody eptinezumab (ALD403) for migraine prevention in adults with episodic migraine. Here we present the results of PROMISE-1 through 1 year of treatment (up to 4 doses). METHODS Patients received up to 4 IV administrations of eptinezumab 30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo every 12 weeks. Patients recorded migraine and headache in an electronic diary daily. Additional assessments, including the patient-reported outcomes, were performed at regularly scheduled clinic visits throughout the 56-week study period. FINDINGS A total of 888 adults (mean age, 39.8 years; 84.3% female; 83.8% white) received treatment: eptinezumab 30 mg, n = 219; eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 223; eptinezumab 300 mg, n = 224; and placebo, n = 222. During the primary 12-week study evaluation period, single doses of eptinezumab 100 mg and 300 mg led to significant reductions in mean monthly migraine-days versus placebo, beginning as early as the first day after the initial dose. The reduction in mean monthly migraine-days was maintained throughout the study (100 mg, -3.9, -4.5, -4.7, and -4.5 days; 300 mg, -4.3, -4.8, -5.1, and -5.3 days; and placebo, -3.2, -3.8, -4.0, and -4.0 days during weeks 1-12, 13-24, 25-36, and 37-48, respectively). Overall, the number of patients with a ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in migraine for each 12-week interval during the entire study was consistently numerically higher in the eptinezumab groups than in the placebo group. The proportions of patients with ≥50% reduction in migraine were similar across the eptinezumab groups. Eptinezumab was well tolerated throughout the study. Adverse events were similar across dosing periods, and there were no serious tolerability signals identified with continued dosing. IMPLICATIONS IV eptinezumab administered every 12 weeks for up to 4 doses was associated with early and sustained migraine-preventive effects and a favorable safety profile in adults with episodic migraine. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02559895.
Collapse
|
12
|
Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Florencio LL, Plaza-Manzano G, Arias-Buría JL. Clinical Reasoning Behind Non-Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Headaches: A Narrative Literature Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17114126. [PMID: 32527071 PMCID: PMC7312657 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17114126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Headache is the clinical syndrome most commonly observed by neurologists in daily practice. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are commonly used for the management of headaches; however, the clinical reasoning behind these interventions is not properly applied. We conducted a narrative literature review using as data sources for academic PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, EBSCO, PEDro, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Collaboration Trials Register, and SCOPUS. This narrative literature review mainly considered systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised clinical trials, and expert opinions published after the year 2000 discussing clinical reasoning for application of non-pharmacological interventions in individuals with tension-type, migraine, and cervicogenic headaches. After the data extraction, we organized the literature thematically as follows: (1) mapping of theoretical aspects of non-pharmacological interventions; (2) summarizing most updated literature about effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions grouped by targeted tissue and headache; (3) identifying research gaps in the existing literature and proposing hypotheses for better understanding of current clinical reasoning. We found that there are many non-pharmacological treatment strategies used for headaches, including beyond the tissue-based impairment treatments (bottom-up) and strategies targeting the central nervous system (top down). Bottom-up strategies include joint-biased, soft-tissue biased, or needling interventions, whereas top-down strategies include exercise and cognitive interventions. Evidence shows that the effectiveness of these interventions depends on the application of proper clinical reasoning, since not all strategies are effective for all headaches. For instance, evidence of non-pharmacological interventions is more controversial for migraines than for tension-type or cervicogenic headaches, since migraine pathogenesis involves activation of sub-cortical structures and the trigemino- vascular system, whereas pathogenesis of tension-type or cervicogenic headaches is most associated to musculoskeletal impairments of the cervical spine. We conclude that current literature suggests that not all non-pharmacological interventions are effective for all headaches, and that multimodal, not isolated, approaches seem to be more effective for patients with headaches. Most published studies have reported small clinical effects in the short term. This narrative literature review provides some hypotheses for discrepancies in the available literature and future research. Clinical reasoning should be applied to better understand the effects of non-pharmacological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain; (L.L.F.); (J.L.A.-B.)
- Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia, Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence:
| | - Lidiane L. Florencio
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain; (L.L.F.); (J.L.A.-B.)
- Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia, Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain
| | - Gustavo Plaza-Manzano
- Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain;
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - José L. Arias-Buría
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain; (L.L.F.); (J.L.A.-B.)
- Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia, Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ots T, Kandirian A, Szilagyi I, DiGiacomo SM, Sandner-Kiesling A. The selection of dermatomes for sham (placebo) acupuncture points is relevant for the outcome of acupuncture studies: a systematic review of sham (placebo)-controlled randomized acupuncture trials. Acupunct Med 2020; 38:211-226. [PMID: 32026725 DOI: 10.1177/0964528419889636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture reveal no significant differences between acupuncture and so-called placebo acupuncture. There is a strong tendency to replace the term "placebo" by the term "sham," because any needling stimulates a certain physiological response. However, neither concept accounts for the great diversity of results in RCTs comparing verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture. Some trials have shown little or no difference, while other studies have found statistically significant differences. OBJECTIVE Verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture may achieve similar results to the extent that they share active constituents. We identified these common active constituents as dermatomes: the segmental structure of the human body. In our study, we tested the hypothesis that the more verum and sham (placebo) acupuncture share the same dermatomes, the closer the clinical outcomes will be, and vice versa. METHODS All major databases were searched for RCTs that tested acupuncture versus sham (placebo) acupuncture. The dermatome charts of Hansen and Schliack were used to verify verum and sham (placebo) needling locations. Reported clinical outcomes were assessed in relation to the percentage of overlap between the dermatomes stimulated by acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture. RESULTS Our literature search yielded a total of 1738 references. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The effects of sham (placebo) acupuncture varied according to the dermatomes stimulated: high overlap with those stimulated by verum acupuncture resulted in almost identical efficacy, while low overlap resulted in significant differences in efficacy. Clinical outcomes were similar when verum acupuncture and sham (placebo) acupuncture shared the same dermatomes (p < 0.01). DISCUSSION The findings of this review confirm our hypothesis. Acupuncture studies that employed verum and sham locations on overlapping dermatomes helped to create a mediocre to negative picture of acupuncture's efficacy. The segmental structure of the body with its interconnected reflex system offers an additional neurophysiological explanation for the effectiveness of acupuncture applied to structures segmentally innervated by the spinal and visceral nervous system. Further comparative acupuncture studies should be based on knowledge of segmental anatomy. In testing verum acupuncture versus sham acupuncture, the chosen sham acupuncture needling locations should be situated on non-overlapping dermatomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Ots
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Asal Kandirian
- Department of Neurology, Vivantes Klinikum Spandau, Berlin, Germany
| | - Istvan Szilagyi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Susan M DiGiacomo
- Department of Anthropology, Philosophy and Social Work, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.,Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Andreas Sandner-Kiesling
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klausen SH, Rønde G, Tornøe B, Bjerregaard L. Nonpharmacological Interventions Addressing Pain, Sleep, and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Primary Headache: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res 2019; 12:3437-3459. [PMID: 31920368 PMCID: PMC6939407 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s216807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Children and adolescents with primary headache are at risk of persistent somatic symptoms and reduced quality of life (Qol) due to pain and pain-related behaviors, such as avoiding school and activities. Sleep is essential to health, and children and adolescents with primary headaches have more sleep complaints than do healthy controls. A treatment approach that addresses multifactorial causes is likely important. Nonpharmacological interventions seem promising. However, knowledge about effective strategies is limited. The objective of this review is to assess the effect of nonpharmacological interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among children and adolescents with primary headache in order to identify useful strategies. Patients and methods Outcome measures are pain, sleep, Qol, and coping versus no intervention or control intervention. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for eligible trials. ClinicalTrials.gov. was searched for ongoing trials. Initial searches yielded 2588 publications. After initial screening and subsequent full-text review and quality assessment, 13 RCTs reported in 15 articles were selected for review. All reviewers independently assessed study quality using the CONSORT criteria for nonpharmacological interventions. Results Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), including education on pain-related topics, sleep, coping, and stress management, is an effective strategy for reducing headache and pain within groups over time. Fifteen studies assessed pain, 3 studies assessed sleep, 6 studies assessed Qol, and 11 studies assessed coping. Conclusion Strategies identified as useful were parts of CBT interventions. However, it was not possible to identify a single effective intervention addressing pain, sleep, Qol, and coping in children and adolescents with headache, primarily because sleep was infrequently addressed. Various aspects of Qol and coping strategies were assessed, rendering comparison difficult. Strategies for future interventions should include descriptions of theory-driven CBT interventions, depending on clinical setting and based on local resources, to promote a solid evidence base for nonpharmacological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gitte Rønde
- Department of Pediatrics, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Birte Tornøe
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lene Bjerregaard
- Open Patient Data Explorative Network (OPEN), University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Background and Purpose—
While unruptured intracranial aneurysms may be discovered incidentally in the workup of chronic headache, it remains unclear whether their treatment ultimately impacts headache severity. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing headache severity after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm.
Methods—
MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically reviewed.
Results—
Data from 7 studies met inclusion criteria (309 nonduplicated patients). The standard mean difference in pre- and post-intervention headache severity was estimated at −0.448 (95% CI, −0.566 to −0.329) under a random effects model. No significant heterogeneity was noted nor was any significant publication bias demonstrated.
Conclusions—
This is the first systematic review assessing postoperative headache severity following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm. While a significant reduction in headache severity was observed, further investigation into this phenomenon is recommended before it influences clinical practice. Future study should stratify headache outcomes by aneurysm size, location, and treatment modality.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bravaccio C, Terrone G, Rizzo R, Gulisano M, Tosi M, Curatolo P, Emberti Gialloreti L. Use of nutritional supplements based on melatonin, tryptophan and vitamin B6 (Melamil Tripto®) in children with primary chronic headache, with or without sleep disorders: a pilot study. Minerva Pediatr 2019; 72:30-36. [PMID: 31621274 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4946.19.05533-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Headache is one of the main complaints in pediatric neurology. Exogenous melatonin has been shown to be useful and safe in improving sleep-wake cycles and sleep quality in children. Tryptophan as well plays a key role in sleep regulation. So far, no studies tried to analyze the effects of a combination of both melatonin and tryptophan in treating chronic headache in children affected also by night-time awakenings. METHODS Thirty-four children with a diagnosis of chronic headache (with or without sleep disorders) have been enrolled. The study was articulated in two steps: 1) each child was observed for one month without any intervention; 2) children have been then randomized into two groups: the "ME-group", which received the nutritional supplement melatonin for two months and the "MET-group", which received the nutritional supplements melatonin, tryptophan, and vitamin B6 for two months. RESULTS In terms of changes in number of headache events, responders in the ME-group were 91.7% and those in the MET-group were 66.7% (P=0.113). In terms of changes in number of night awakenings, in the ME group, mean number at baseline, after 30 days, and after 60 days were 3.6±3.2, 3.2±3.5, and 2.7±3.4 (P=0.495). In the MET group, mean number of night awakenings was 7.4±8.1, 4.0±4.4, and 3.3±2.9 (P=0.041). CONCLUSIONS Using either nutritional supplement for two months can help in decreasing the monthly number of headache episodes and night awakenings. The addition of tryptophan and vitamin B6 appears to have stronger influence on night awakenings reduction than melatonin only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela Bravaccio
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Terrone
- Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Renata Rizzo
- Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Mariangela Gulisano
- Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Michele Tosi
- Division of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Curatolo
- Division of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, University Hospital of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Diener HC, Tassorelli C, Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Ashina M, Becker WJ, Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Pozo-Rosich P, Wang SJ, Mandrekar J. Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition. Cephalalgia 2019; 39:687-710. [PMID: 30806518 PMCID: PMC6501455 DOI: 10.1177/0333102419828967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The quality of clinical trials is an essential part of the evidence base for the treatment of headache disorders. In 1991, the International Headache Society Clinical Trials Standing Committee developed and published the first edition of the Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine. Scientific and clinical developments in headache medicine led to second and third editions in 2000 and 2012, respectively. The current, fourth edition of the Guidelines retains the structure and much content from previous editions. However, it also incorporates evidence from clinical trials published after the third edition as well as feedback from meetings with regulators, pharmaceutical and device manufacturers, and patient associations. Its final form reflects the collective expertise and judgement of the Committee. These updated recommendations and commentary are intended to meet the Society's continuing objective of providing a contemporary, standardized, and evidence-based approach to the conduct and reporting of randomised controlled trials for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- 2 Headache Science Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.,3 Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - David W Dodick
- 4 Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Richard B Lipton
- 6 Montefiore Headache Center, Department of Neurology and Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Messoud Ashina
- 7 Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Werner J Becker
- 8 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,9 Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Michel D Ferrari
- 10 Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- 11 National Institute for Health Research Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, England
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- 12 Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Shuu-Jiun Wang
- 13 Headache & Craniofacial Pain Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.,14 Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jay Mandrekar
- 15 Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Placebo hypoalgesia provides pain relief for individuals via the expectation of a beneficial or therapeutic outcome, while nocebo hyperalgesia results in increased pain in response to anxious anticipation of harmful outcomes. These forms of placebo pain modulation can be induced through repeated associations, verbal cues, and social interactions. Understanding these methods of pain modulation can provide greater insight into the psychosocial contexts of pain modulation, as well as develop novel approaches to pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chika Okusogu
- Department of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.,Departments of Anesthesiology and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.,Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Melis M, Di Giosia M, Colloca L. Ancillary factors in the treatment of orofacial pain: A topical narrative review. J Oral Rehabil 2018; 46:200-207. [PMID: 30326154 DOI: 10.1111/joor.12736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Ancillary factors, not directly related to treatment, often play a significant role by affecting therapeutic outcome. A search of the literature was conducted including words related to the placebo phenomenon and orofacial diseases. Therefore, critical factors have been grouped into three major categories: (a) the natural course of the diseases; (b) the regression of the symptoms to their mean intensity; and (c) placebo response. This topical narrative review describes the elements mentioned above, provides an up-to-date overview of the hot topics and gaps in the field and indicates developing and future research direction of the orofacial pain field. Such a knowledge might be positively used during daily clinical practice to optimise the management of orofacial pain diseases, as well as in conducting future clinical trials for validating new interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Melis
- Private practice, Cagliari, Italy.,School of Dentistry, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Di Giosia
- Orofacial Pain Clinic, Department of Endodontics, Center for Pain Research and Innovation, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Luana Colloca
- Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science & Department of Anesthesiology, School of Nursing/School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Tommaso M, Delussi M. Nociceptive blink reflex habituation biofeedback in migraine. FUNCTIONAL NEUROLOGY 2018; 32:123-130. [PMID: 29042000 DOI: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.3.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Reduced habituation of the nociceptive blink reflex (NBR) is considered a trait marker for genetic predisposition to migraine. In this open-label randomized controlled study, we aimed to test the efficacy of a biofeedback training based on learning of habituation of the NBR (NBR biofeedback) compared with pharmacological (topiramate) treatment and NBR biofeedback plus topiramate treatment in a cohort of migraine without aura patients eligible for prophylaxis. Thirty-three migraine patients were randomly assigned to three months of treatment with: 1) NBR biofeedback, 2) NBR biofeedback plus topiramate 50 mg (b.i.d.), or 3) topiramate 50 mg (b.i.d.). Frequency of headache and disability changes were the main study outcomes. Anxiety, depression, sleep, fatigue, quality of life, allodynia and pericranial tenderness were also evaluated. NBR biofeedback reduced the R2 area, without improving R2 habituation. However, it reduced the frequency of headache and disability, similarly to the combined treatment and topiramate alone. Reduced habituation of the NBR is a stable neurophysiological pattern, scarcely modifiable by learning procedures. Training methods able to act on stress-related responses may modulate cortical mechanisms inducing migraine onset and trigeminal activation under stressful trigger factors.
Collapse
|
21
|
D’Ippolito M, Tramontano M, Buzzi MG. Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy on Pain and Mood Disorders in Patients With High-Frequency Migraine. J Osteopath Med 2017; 117:365-369. [DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2017.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Context
The substantial functional impairment associated with migraine has both physical and emotional ramifications. Mood disorders are often comorbid in patients with migraine and are known to adversely affect migraine activity.
Objectives
To explore the effects of osteopathic manipulative therapy (OMTh; manipulative care provided by foreign-trained osteopaths) on pain and mood disorders in patients with high-frequency migraine.
Methods
Retrospective review of the medical records of patients with high-frequency migraine who were treated with OMTh at the Headache Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Fondazione Santa Lucia from 2011 to 2015. Clinical assessments were made using the Headache Disability Inventory (HDI), the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) forms X-1 and X-2.
Results
Medical records of 11 patients (6 women; mean age, 47.5 [7.8] years) with a diagnosis of high-frequency migraine who participated in an OMTh program met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. When the questionnaire scores obtained at the first visit (T0) and after 4 OMTh sessions (T1) were compared, significant improvement in scores were observed on STAI X-2 (T0: 43.18 [2.47]; T1: 39.45 [2.52]; P<.05), HIT-6 (T0: 63 [2.20]; T1: 56.27 [2.24]; P<.05), and HDI (T0: 58.72 [6.75]; T1: 45.09 [7.01]; P<.05).
Conclusion
This preliminary study revealed that patients with high-frequency migraine and comorbid mood disorders showed significant improvement after four 45-minute OMTh sessions. Further investigation into the effects of OMTh on pain and mood disorders in patients with high-frequency migraine is needed.
Collapse
|
22
|
Testa M, Rossettini G. Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 24:65-74. [PMID: 27133031 DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Placebo and nocebo represent complex and distinct psychoneurobiological phenomena in which behavioural and neurophysiological modifications occur together with the application of a treatment. Despite a better understanding of this topic in the medical field, little is known about their role in physiotherapy. PURPOSE The aim of this review is: a) to elucidate the neurobiology behind placebo and nocebo effects, b) to describe the role of the contextual factors as modulators of the clinical outcomes in rehabilitation and c) to provide clinical and research guidelines on their uses. IMPLICATIONS The physiotherapist's features, the patient's features, the patient-physiotherapist relationship, the characteristics of the treatment and the overall healthcare setting are all contextual factors influencing clinical outcomes. Since every physiotherapy treatment determines a specific and a contextual effect, physiotherapists should manage the contextual factors as a boosting element of any manual therapy to improve placebo effects and avoid detrimental nocebo effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Testa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Italy.
| | - Giacomo Rossettini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sanches ML, Juliano Y, Novo NF, Guimarães AS, Rodrigues Conti PC, Alonso LG. Correlation between pressure pain threshold and pain intensity in patients with temporomandibular disorders who are compliant or non-compliant with conservative treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 120:459-68. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/22/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
24
|
Bot GM, Constantini S, Roth J. Conservative treatment of cysts of the cavum septum pellucidum presenting in childhood: report of 3 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015; 16:283-6. [PMID: 26090550 DOI: 10.3171/2015.3.peds14714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) cysts are relatively rare. The most common presenting symptom is headache, which is thought to be secondary to elevated intracranial pressure. Many CSP cysts are treated surgically; conservative treatment is seldom recommended. The authors describe 3 cases of pediatric CSP cysts that were managed without surgery. The patients ranged in age from 5 months to 8 years old. Two presented with headaches, which were associated with mild ventricular enlargement in 1 case. Over the course of 5-15 months, 2 cysts became markedly reduced in size, and in one of these 2 cases a substantial reduction in ventricle size was also observed. At last follow-up, all 3 children were asymptomatic. The authors note that CSP cysts are often associated with headaches. In the absence of hydrocephalus, they recommend conservative management with clinical and radiological follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyang Markus Bot
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Shlomi Constantini
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Jonathan Roth
- Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Myofascial trigger point-focused head and neck massage for recurrent tension-type headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain 2015; 31:159-68. [PMID: 25329141 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are focal disruptions in the skeletal muscle that can refer pain to the head and reproduce the pain patterns of tension-type HA (TTH). The present study applied massage focused on MTrPs of patients with TTH in a placebo-controlled, clinical trial to assess efficacy on reducing headache (HA) pain. METHODS Fifty-six patients with TTH were randomized to receive 12 massage or placebo (detuned ultrasound) sessions over 6 weeks, or to wait-list. Trigger point release massage focused on MTrPs in cervical musculature. HA pain (frequency, intensity, and duration) was recorded in a daily HA diary. Additional outcome measures included self-report of perceived clinical change in HA pain and pressure-pain threshold at MTrPs in the upper trapezius and suboccipital muscles. RESULTS From diary recordings, group differences across time were detected in HA frequency (P=0.026), but not for intensity or duration. Post hoc analysis indicated that HA frequency decreased from baseline for both massage (P<0.0003) and placebo (P=0.013), but no difference was detected between massage and placebo. Patient report of perceived clinical change was greater reduction in HA pain for massage than placebo or wait-list groups (P=0.002). Pressure-pain threshold improved in all muscles tested for massage only (all P's<0.002). DISCUSSION Two findings from this study are apparent: (1) MTrPs are important components in the treatment of TTH, and (2) TTH, like other chronic conditions, is responsive to placebo. Clinical trials on HA that do not include a placebo group are at risk for overestimating the specific contribution from the active intervention.
Collapse
|
26
|
Cerritelli F, Ginevri L, Messi G, Caprari E, Di Vincenzo M, Renzetti C, Cozzolino V, Barlafante G, Foschi N, Provinciali L. Clinical effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in chronic migraine: 3-Armed randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med 2015; 23:149-56. [PMID: 25847552 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2014] [Revised: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of OMT on chronic migraineurs using HIT-6 questionnaire, drug consumption, days of migraine, pain intensity and functional disability. DESIGN 3-Armed randomized controlled trial setting: all patients admitted in the Department of Neurology of Ancona's United Hospitals, Italy, with a diagnosis of migraine and without chronic illness, were considered eligible for the study. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly divided into three groups: (1) OMT+medication therapy, (2) sham+medication therapy and (3) medication therapy only. Patients received 8 treatments in a study period of 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changing from baseline HIT-6 score. RESULTS 105 subjects were included. At the end of the study, ANOVA showed that OMT significantly reduced HIT-6 score (mean change scores OMT-conventional care: -8.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.96 to -4.52; p<0.001 and OMT-sham: -6.62; 95% CI -10.85 to -2.41; p<0.001), drug consumption (OMT-sham: RR=0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.40; OMT-control: RR=0.20, 95% CI 0.10-0.36), days of migraine (OMT-conventional care: M=-21.06; 95% CI -23.19 to -18.92; p<0.001 and OMT-sham: -17.43; 95% CI -19.57 to -15.29; p<0.001), pain intensity (OMT-sham: RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.69; OMT-control: RR=0.31, 95% CI 0.19-0.49) and functional disability (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that OMT may be considered a valid procedure for the management of migraineurs. The present trial was registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01851148).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cerritelli
- Clinical-based Human Research Department, C.O.ME. Collaboration, Pescara, Italy; Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy.
| | - Liana Ginevri
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | - Gabriella Messi
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | - Emanuele Caprari
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | | | - Cinzia Renzetti
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cozzolino
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | - Gina Barlafante
- Research Department, Accademia Italiana Osteopatia Tradizionale, Pescara, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Foschi
- Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cady RK, McAllister PJ, Spierings ELH, Messina J, Carothers J, Djupesland PG, Mahmoud RA. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of breath powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder (AVP-825) in the treatment of acute migraine (The TARGET Study). Headache 2014; 55:88-100. [PMID: 25355310 PMCID: PMC4320758 DOI: 10.1111/head.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of AVP-825, a drug–device combination of low-dose sumatriptan powder (22 mg loaded dose) delivered intranasally through a targeted Breath Powered device vs an identical device containing lactose powder (placebo device) in the treatment of migraine headache. Background Early treatment of migraine headaches is associated with improved outcome, but medication absorption after oral delivery may be delayed in migraineurs because of reduced gastric motility. Sumatriptan powder administered with an innovative, closed-palate, Bi-Directional, Breath Powered intranasal delivery mechanism is efficiently absorbed across the nasal mucosa and produces fast absorption into the circulation. Results from a previously conducted placebo-controlled study of AVP-825 showed a high degree of headache relief with an early onset of action (eg, 74% AVP-825 vs 38% placebo device at 1 hour, P < .01). Methods In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in adults with a history of migraine with or without aura, participants were randomized via computer-generated lists to AVP-825 or placebo device to treat a single migraine headache of moderate or severe intensity. The primary endpoint was headache relief (defined as reduction of headache pain intensity from severe or moderate migraine headache to mild or none) at 2 hours post-dose. Results Two hundred and thirty patients (116 AVP-825 and 114 placebo device) were randomized, of whom 223 (112 and 111, respectively) experienced a qualifying migraine headache (their next migraine headache that reached moderate or severe intensity). A significantly greater proportion of AVP-825 patients reported headache relief at 2 hours post-dose compared with those using the placebo device (68% vs 45%, P = .002, odds ratio 2.53, 95% confidence interval [1.45, 4.42]). Between-group differences in headache relief were evident as early as 15 minutes, reached statistical significance at 30 minutes post-dose (42% vs 27%, P = .03), and were sustained at 24 hours (44% vs 24%, P = .002) and 48 hours (34% vs 20%, P = .01). Thirty-four percent of patients treated with AVP-825 were pain-free at 2 hours compared with 17% using the placebo device (P = .008). More AVP-825 patients reported meaningful pain relief (patient interpretation) of migraine within 2 hours of treatment vs placebo device (70% vs 45%, P < .001), and fewer required rescue medication (37% vs 52%, P = .02). Total migraine freedom (patients with no headache, nausea, phonophobia, photophobia, or vomiting) reached significance following treatment with AVP-825 at 1 hour (19% vs 9%; P = .04). There were no serious adverse events (AEs), and no systemic AEs occurred in more than one patient. Chest pain or pressure was not reported, and only one patient taking AVP-825 reported mild paresthesia. No other triptan sensations were reported. Conclusions Targeted delivery of a low-dose of sumatriptan powder via a novel, closed-palate, Breath Powered, intranasal device (AVP-825) provided fast relief of moderate or severe migraine headache in adults that reached statistical significance over placebo by 30 minutes. The treatment was well tolerated with a low incidence of systemic AEs.
Collapse
|
28
|
Chouchou F, Lavigne GJ. [Placebo analgesia and sleep]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 62:270-5. [PMID: 25113307 DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The placebo response is a psychobiological phenomenon for clinical benefits following the administration of an inert substance whatever its form. This phenomenon can be attributed to a wide range of neurobiological processes, such as expectations of relief, the Pavlovian conditioning and learning, emotional regulation, and reward mechanisms, which are themselves under the influence of processes that take place during sleep. The study of placebo analgesia in healthy from a placebo conditioning associated with analgesic suggestions has highlighted a relationship between sleep, expectations of relief and placebo analgesia: when the induction is persuasive before sleep, expectations of relief modulate placebo response the next morning and paradoxical sleep correlates negatively with both expectations and the placebo response. When the analgesic experience before sleep is less persuasive, expectations of relief are still present but no longer interact with placebo analgesia while paradoxical sleep no longer correlates with the analgesic placebo response. Sleep-processes especially during paradoxical sleep seem to influence the relationship between expectations of relief and placebo analgesia. In this review, we describe the relationship between sleep and placebo analgesia, the mechanisms involved in the placebo response (e.g., conditioning, learning, memory, reward) and their potential link with sleep that could make it a special time for the building placebo response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Chouchou
- Facultés de médecine dentaire et de médecine, université de Montréal, pavillon Roger-Gaudry - entrée B-1, 2900, boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche avancée en médecine du sommeil, hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, 5400, boulevard Gouin Ouest, Montréal H4J 1C5, Québec, Canada; Inserm U1028 - CNRS UMR 5292, unité NeuroPain, intégration centrale de la douleur chez l'homme, centre de recherche en neurosciences de Lyon, hôpital neurologique unité hypnologie, RdJ, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron cedex, France.
| | - G-J Lavigne
- Facultés de médecine dentaire et de médecine, université de Montréal, pavillon Roger-Gaudry - entrée B-1, 2900, boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche avancée en médecine du sommeil, hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, 5400, boulevard Gouin Ouest, Montréal H4J 1C5, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sodium valproate in migraine without aura and medication overuse headache: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014; 24:1289-97. [PMID: 24862255 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2013] [Revised: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sodium valproate (800mg/die) compared with placebo in medication-overuse headache patients with a history of migraine without aura. METHODS This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled medication-overuse headache patients for a 3-month treatment period with sodium valproate (800mg/day) or placebo after a 6 day outpatient detoxification regimen, followed by a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was defined by the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in the number of days with headache per month (responders) from the baseline to the last 4 weeks of the 3-month treatment. Multivariate logistic regression models were used on the primary endpoint, adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, comorbidity and surgery. The last-observation-carried-forward method was used to adjust for missing values. RESULTS Nine sites enrolled 130 patients and, after a 6-day detoxification phase, randomized 88 eligible patients. The 3-month responder rate was higher in the sodium valproate (45.0%) than in the placebo arm (23.8%) with an absolute difference of about 20% (p=0.0431). Sodium valproate had safety and tolerability profiles comparable to placebo. CONCLUSIONS The present study supports the efficacy and safety of sodium valproate in the treatment of medication overuse headache with history of migraine after detoxification.
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
Murray D, Stoessl AJ. Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of the placebo effect in neurological and psychiatric conditions. Pharmacol Ther 2013; 140:306-18. [PMID: 23880289 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The power of a placebo to effect clinically meaningful neurobiological change comparable to pharmacological therapies has been demonstrated, although the mechanisms are not fully understood. Predicting placebo responsiveness has only recently received more attention, but psychological disposition, contextual and biological factors are now known to dramatically affect a person's susceptibility to the placebo effect. The placebo effect depends upon expectancies that can be modified in a number of ways, including conditioning through explicit or implicit learned associations. Based on the dopaminergic response to anticipation of benefit in Parkinson's disease, it was suggested that the placebo effect can be seen as analogous to the expectation of reward. Dopaminergic pathways have since been implicated in the placebo response in pain and depression. Additionally, endogenous opioid release is known to mediate many forms of placebo analgesia. We provide an overview of the mechanisms and the therapeutic implications of the placebo effect in neurological and psychiatric conditions. We include evidence for detrimental effects arising from seemingly inert interventions, termed the 'nocebo effect.' Neuroimaging has critically advanced the study of the placebo effect and provides some of the strongest evidence for the mechanisms of this phenomenon prevalent across an array of human health-related circumstances. This review specifically focuses on mechanisms of the placebo effect in the three conditions that have most significantly demonstrated this effect and for which a plausible physiological basis can be identified: pain, PD and depression. Other neurological and psychiatric diseases reviewed include multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease, Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Murray
- Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre and Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia & Vancouver Coastal Health, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Koenig J, Oelkers-Ax R, Kaess M, Parzer P, Lenzen C, Hillecke TK, Resch F. Specific music therapy techniques in the treatment of primary headache disorders in adolescents: a randomized attention-placebo-controlled trial. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2013; 14:1196-207. [PMID: 23876282 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2013] [Revised: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 05/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Migraine and tension-type headache have a high prevalence in children and adolescents. In addition to common pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, music therapy has been shown to be efficient in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of specific music therapy techniques in the treatment of adolescents with primary headache (tension-type headache and migraine). A prospective, randomized, attention-placebo-controlled parallel group trial was conducted. Following an 8-week baseline, patients were randomized to either music therapy (n = 40) or a rhythm pedagogic program (n = 38) designed as an "attention placebo" over 6 sessions within 8 weeks. Reduction of both headache frequency and intensity after treatment (8-week postline) as well as 6 months after treatment were taken as the efficacy variables. Treatments were delivered in equal dose and frequency by the same group of therapists. Data analysis of subjects completing the protocol showed that neither treatment was superior to the other at any point of measurement (posttreatment and follow-up). Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no impact of drop-out on these results. Both groups showed a moderate mean reduction of headache frequency posttreatment of about 20%, but only small numbers of responders (50% frequency reduction). Follow-up data showed no significant deteriorations or improvements. PERSPECTIVE This article presents a randomized placebo-controlled trial on music therapy in the treatment of adolescents with frequent primary headache. Music therapy is not superior to an attention placebo within this study. These results draw attention to the need of providing adequate controls within therapeutic trials in the treatment of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Koenig
- School of Therapeutic Sciences, SRH University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Psychological issues in the evaluation and treatment of tension-type headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013; 16:545-53. [PMID: 23054980 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-012-0301-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Tension-type headache is the most common headache disorder, affecting approximately 40 % of Americans within a one-year span. Although the most common form, episodic tension-type headache, is rarely impairing, more frequent tension-type headache can occur with significant disability and psychological comorbidity. Appreciating the psychological impact, assessing the associated biopsychosocial issues, and understanding patients' coping styles are important in forming an appropriate treatment plan and maximizing treatment outcomes. A range of psychological therapies including relaxation training, cognitive behavioral therapy, biofeedback and mindfulness have demonstrated utility in treating chronic pain conditions and reducing the associated disability. This may be particularly applicable to special populations, including pediatric patients, pregnant patients and geriatric. Psychological assessment and treatment may be done conjointly with medication management and expands treatment options. There is great need to continue researching the effects of psychological treatments, standardizing interventions and making them available to the wider population.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lionetto L, Negro A, Palmisani S, Gentile G, Fiore MRD, Mercieri M, Simmaco M, Smith T, Al-Kaisy A, Arcioni R, Martelletti P. Emerging treatment for chronic migraine and refractory chronic migraine. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2012; 17:393-406. [DOI: 10.1517/14728214.2012.709846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
35
|
CONTI PCR, De ALENCAR EN, Da MOTA CORRÊA AS, LAURIS JRP, PORPORATTI AL, COSTA YM. Behavioural changes and occlusal splints are effective in the management of masticatory myofascial pain: a short-term evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39:754-60. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02327.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
36
|
|