Clinical characteristics, timing of peak responses and safety aspects of two dosing regimens of the glucagon stimulation test in evaluating growth hormone and cortisol secretion in adults

A 2024 Update on Growth Hormone Deficiency Syndrome in Adults: From Guidelines to Real Life

Background: Adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD) has been recognized since the late 1980s. The clinical manifestations of adult GHD are often nonspecific, and diagnosis relies on GH stimulation tests, which are intricate, costly, time-consuming, and may carry the risk of adverse effects. Diagnosis is further complicated by factors like age, sex, and BMI, which affect GH response during testing. Therefore, GH replacement therapy remains challenging, requiring careful individualized evaluation of risks and benefits. The aim of this review is to provide an update on diagnosing and treating adult GHD, addressing current limitations and challenges based on recent studies. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the diagnosis and management of adult GHD by searching PubMed and EMBASE. Only articles in English were included, and searches were conducted up to August 2024. Results: A review of guidelines and literature up to 2024 highlights the significant heterogeneity in the data and reveals various protocols for managing GHD, covering both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Conclusions: Despite diagnostic and treatment advances, managing adult GHD remains challenging due to variable presentation and the need for personalized GH therapy. Future efforts should aim to improve and standardize diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Once upon a time: the glucagon stimulation test in diagnosing adult GH deficiency

PURPOSE

The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and its diagnosis is established through GH stimulation testing, which is often complex, expensive, time-consuming and may be associated with adverse side effects. Moreover, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the influence of age, gender, and body mass index on GH peak at each test. The insulin tolerance test (ITT), GHRH + arginine test, glucagon stimulation test (GST), and, more recently, testing with macimorelin are all recognized as useful in diagnosing adult GHD. To date GST is still little used, but due to the unavailability of the GHRH all over the world and the high cost of macimorelin, in the next future it will probably become the most widely used test when ITT is contraindicated. The aim of the present review is to describe the current knowledge on GST.

METHODS

Narrative review.

RESULTS

In the last years several studies have suggested some changes in the original GST protocol and have questioned its diagnostic accuracy when the classic GH cut-point of 3 μg/L is used, suggesting to use a lower GH cut-point to improve its sensitivity and specificity in overweight/obese patients and in those with lower pretest GHD probability.

CONCLUSION

This document provides an update on the utility of GST, summarizes how to perform the test, shows which cut-points should be used in interpreting the results, and discusses its drawbacks and caveats referring to the most recent studies.

Growth Hormone Cut-Off Post Glucagon Stimulation Test in an Indian Cohort of Overweight/Obese Hypopituitary Patients for the Diagnosis of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

Obesity has been associated with reduced growth hormone (GH) secretion, which might lead to the over diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) in overweight (OW)/obese hypopituitary patients. Currently, there are no body mass index (BMI)-specific peak GH cut-offs for the glucagon stimulation test (GST) for assessing adult GHD in India, given the BMI cut-offs vary for Asians. The study's main objective was to determine a peak GH cut-off level for the diagnosis of adult GHD in overweight (OW)/obese individuals utilizing the GST. Forty OW/obese subjects were studied in two groups of 20 each. The first group included 20 OW/obese hypopituitary adults and the second group included 20 control subjects. The intervention consisted of a 3 h GST. The main outcome measured was the peak GH level on GST. The mean age of control subjects was lower (33.15 ± 7.67 v/s. 42.10 ± 13.70 years; P = 0.017) in comparison with hypopituitary adults. The mean BMI (27.93 ± 1.63 v/s. 25.81 ± 1.66 kg/m2; P < 0.001), mean IGF1 (272.81 ± 38.57 v/s. 163.75 ± 42.42; P < 0.001, and mean HOMA IR (11.8 ± 9.7 v/s. 6.02 ± 3.14; P = 0.02) was greater in OW/obese controls. The mean GH peak was significantly higher in control subjects (5.41 ± 3.59 ng/mL v/s. 1.49 ± 1.25 ng/mL; P < 0.001) compared to hypopituitary subjects. ROC curve analysis demonstrated a GH cut-off of 3.3 ng/mL with a moderate sensitivity of 70% and high specificity of 95%, with an AUC of 0.838 (P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.710-0.965) for the diagnosis of GHD in overweight/obese hypopituitary adults. This study demonstrates that a cut-off of 3.3 ng/mL would diagnose GHD in Indian overweight/obese hypopituitary adults.

Safety assessment and potential risks of the glucagon stimulation test in the diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Although it takes more time, the glucagon stimulation test (GST) is a reliable measure for assessing growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion. The GST is considered to be a safe test, however, it still has mild side effects and potential risks.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the side effects of the GST while testing adrenal insufficient patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective study in which GST was performed in eighty-one patients (44 men, 37 women, mean age: 35.83±19.62 years) with pituitary disorder. The GST consisted in an intramuscular injection of 1 mg of glucagon. Blood samples were collected at baseline, and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 and 210 min after glucagon injection for cortisol measurements. All patients were asked to report side-effects associated with this test.

RESULTS

The mean peak blood glucose level under GST was 9.01±2.03 mmol/L and the mean glycemic nadir was 4.34±1.75 mmol/L was found most frequently during the 30th minute (p <10-3). During the test, 35 subjects (43.2%) had side effects with a mean age of 42.89 ± 19.75 years. Frequent side effects included: nausea (29.62%), vomiting (27.16%), abdominal cramps (18.51%) and hunger (13.58%). All patients tolerated the test until the end. Adverse effects were significantly more prevalent in patients older than 50 years (p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The GST is a reliable alternative to assess hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis but should be cautiously used especially in the elderly although its minor side effects.

Investigation of the Hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis: a contemporary synthesis

The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is one of the main components of the stress system. Maintenance of normal physiological events, which include stress responses to internal or external stimuli in the body, depends on appropriate HPA axis function. In the case of severe cortisol deficiency, especially when there is a triggering factor, the patient may develop a life-threatening adrenal crisis which may result in death unless early diagnosis and adequate treatment are carried out. The maintenance of normal physiology and survival depend upon a sufficient level of cortisol in the circulation. Life-long glucocorticoid replacement therapy, in most cases meeting but not exceeding the need of the patient, is essential for normal life expectancy and maintenance of the quality of life. To enable this, the initial step should be the correct diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) which requires careful evaluation of the HPA axis, a highly dynamic endocrine system. The diagnosis of AI in patients with frank manifestations is not challenging. These patients do not need dynamic tests, and basal cortisol is usually enough to give a correct diagnosis. However, most cases of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) take place in a gray zone when clinical manifestations are mild. In this situation, more complicated methods that can simulate the response of the HPA axis to a major stress are required. Numerous studies in the assessment of HPA axis have been published in the world literature. In this review, the tests used in the diagnosis of secondary AI or in the investigation of suspected HPA axis insufficiency are discussed in detail, and in the light of this, various recommendations are made.

Growth hormone deficiency in adults with Cushing's disease

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) generally occurs in patients with Cushing's disease (CD) as a consequence of cortisol excess. Mass effect may contribute to the development of GHD in the minority of patients with CD due to corticotroph macroadenomas. Patients with CD in remission are at considerable risk of GH deficiency as a consequence of pituitary surgery or radiation therapy. The purpose of the present review is to summarize data on GH deficiency in adults with CD. Untreated GH deficiency is associated with increased visceral adiposity, decreased lean mass, bone mass, and exercise capacity, impaired linear growth (in children), dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and impaired quality of life. Evaluation and treatment of GHD should be considered in patients with CD in remission. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) can be helpful in the diagnosis of GHD among patients with multiple additional pituitary hormone deficiencies. The diagnosis of GHD generally requires dynamic testing, including insulin, glucagon or macimorelin stimulation. Growth hormone replacement may improve body composition, bone density, linear growth (in children), exercise capacity, dyslipidemia and quality of life. While generally safe, GH replacement requires careful monitoring to assure effectiveness and tolerance in treated patients.

Current concepts of the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency

In adults, growth hormone (GH) deficiency is associated with increased visceral adiposity, decreased lean body mass, bone mineral density and exercise capacity, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, increased cardiometabolic and fracture risk, and impaired quality of life. The aim of the present article is to review the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. To avoid overdiagnosis of GH deficiency, it is critical to evaluate only patients at risk for pituitary dysfunction, including those who have had sellar masses, pituitary surgery, radiation therapy, traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage or childhood onset GH deficiency. Evaluation for GH deficiency should be undertaken after testing and replacement of other pituitary hormone deficits. Since GH secretion is pulsatile, measuring serum GH levels randomly is not helpful in establishing the diagnosis of GH deficiency. Serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels lack substantial diurnal variation but also lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. However, adults with multiple (≥3) additional pituitary hormone deficiencies, risk factors for hypopituitarism and low serum IGF-I levels are very likely to be GH deficient. In most cases, the diagnosis of GH deficiency requires stimulation testing. These tests involve the administration of a pharmacologic agent that normally stimulates GH release from pituitary somatotrophs, including insulin, glucagon, growth hormone releasing hormone-arginine or macimorelin, followed by sampling of serum specimens at regular intervals for GH assay. Patients with a peak GH level that is below a predetermined cutpoint are classified as GH deficient. A systematic approach to the diagnosis of GH deficiency is essential in order to accurately identify adults who may benefit from GH replacement.

Glucagon stimulation test to assess growth hormone status in Prader-Willi syndrome

PURPOSE

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) must be confirmed before starting treatment in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Most studies use the growth-hormone-releasing hormone plus arginine (GHRH-arginine) test. No data are available on the glucagon stimulation test (GST) in PWS. We compared the utility of fixed-dose (1 mg) GST versus GHRH-arginine test in diagnosing GHD.

METHODS

Adults and late adolescents with PWS underwent both tests on separate days. In the GHRH-arginine test, GHD was defined according to body mass index. In the GST, two cutoffs were analyzed: peak GH concentration < 3 ng/mL and < 1 ng/mL. For analyses, patients were divided into two groups according to body weight (≤ 90 kg and > 90 kg).

RESULTS

We analyzed 34 patients: 22 weighing ≤ 90 kg and 12 weighing > 90 kg. In patients weighing ≤ 90 kg, the two tests were concordant in 16 (72.72%) patients (k = 0.476, p = 0.009 with GST cutoff < 3 ng/mL, and k = 0.450, p = 0.035 with GST cutoff < 1 ng/mL). In patients weighing > 90 kg, the two tests were not concordant with GST cutoff < 3 ng/mL, but were concordant in 11 (91.6%) patients (k = 0.833, p = 0.003) with GST cutoff < 1 ng/mL. GH peaks on the two tests correlated (r = 0.725, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Fixed-dose (1 mg) GST using a peak GH cutoff of < 3 ng/mL or < 1 ng/mL promises to be useful for screening for GHD in adults and late adolescents with PWS. However, in those weighing > 90 kg, the < 1 ng/mL cutoff seems better. Larger studies are necessary to establish definitive glucagon doses and cutoffs, especially in extremely obese patients.

Sensitivity and specificity of the macimorelin test for diagnosis of AGHD

OBJECTIVE

The macimorelin test is approved for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) based on its efficacy vs the insulin tolerance test (ITT). Macimorelin has a significant advantage over ITT in avoiding hypoglycemia. Analyses were conducted to determine whether macimorelin performance is affected by age, BMI, or sex, and evaluate its performance vs ITT over a range of GH cutpoints.

DESIGN

Post hoc analyses of data from a previous randomized phase 3 study included participants aged 18-66 years with BMI <37 kg/m2 and high (Group A), intermediate (Group B), or low (Group C) likelihood for AGHD based on pituitary history, and matched controls (Group D).

METHODS

Probability of AGHD was estimated using unadjusted, age-adjusted, BMI-adjusted, and sex-adjusted logistic models. Area under the curve (AUC) of the estimated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (range, 0-1; 1 = perfect) was compared for adjusted vs unadjusted models. Separate analyses evaluated agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for macimorelin and ITT using cutpoints of 2.8, 4.0, 5.1, and 6.5 ng/mL.

RESULTS

For participants in Group A (n = 41) and Group D (n = 29), unadjusted, age-adjusted, BMI-adjusted, and sex-adjusted models had ROC AUCs (95% CIs) of 0.9924 (0.9807-1), 0.9924 (0.9807-1), 0.9916 (0.9786-1), and 0.9950 (0.9861-1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Macimorelin performance was not meaningfully affected by age, BMI, or sex, indicating robustness for AGHD diagnosis. Of the 4 GH cutpoints evaluated, the cutpoint of 5.1 ng/mL provided maximal specificity (96%) and high sensitivity (92%) and was in good overall agreement with the ITT at the same cutpoint (87%).

[The glucagon test in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency after craniospinal irradiation: the feasibility of application, the features of performing the test, and its diagnostic informativity]

BACKGROUND

The glucagon test (GT) is a promising alternative to the insulin hypoglycemia test (IHT) in diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI).

AIM

To study the feasibility of using the GT in patients after craniospinal irradiation and to determine the cut-off value to rule out SAI.

METHODS

A total of 28 patients (14 males and 14 females) with the median age of 19 years (17; 23) who had undergone combination treatment (surgery, craniospinal irradiation (35 Gy) with boost to the tumor bed, and polychemotherapy) of extrapituitary brain tumors no later than 2 years before study initiation and 10 healthy volunteers of matching sex and age were examined. All the subjects underwent the GT and IHT with an interval of at least 57 days. The cortisol, ACTH, and glucose levels were measured.

RESULTS

Twelve out of 28 patients were diagnosed with SAI according to the IHT results. ROC analysis revealed that cortisol release during the GT 499 nmol/L ruled out SAI [100% sensitivity (Se); 62% specificity (Sp)], while the absence of a rise 340 nmol/l verified SAI (Sp 100%; 55% Se). For GT, the area under a curve (AUC) was 93.6%, which corresponds to a very good diagnostic informativity. In 19 patients, the IHT and GT results were concordant (in ten patients, the release of cortisol occurred above the cut-off value in both tests; no release was detected in nine patients). In nine cases, the results were discordant: the maximum cortisol level detected in the GT was 500 nmol/l, but the IHT results ruled out SAI (the GT yielded a false positive outcome). Contrariwise, in three (10.7%) patients the release of cortisol detected in the GT was adequate, while being insufficient in the IHT test. Adverse events (nausea) were reported during the GT test in 9 (25%) subjects; one patient had hypoglycemia (1.8 mmol/l).

CONCLUSION

GT is highly informative and can be used as a first-level stimulation test for ruling out SAI in patients exposed to craniospinal irradiation performed to manage brain tumors. The cortisol level of 500 nmol/L is the best cut-off value for ruling out SAI according to the GT results. The insulin hypoglycemia test is used as the second-level supporting test in patients with positive GT results.

Cortisol Levels in Glucagon Stimulation Test in Children Assessed for Short Stature: Clinical and Laboratorial Correlations

To assess total cortisol levels in children being evaluating for short stature with normal cortisol reserve and to correlate this response to clinical and laboratory data. Children assessed with glucagon test in our department were recruited in this study retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were: i) age>1 year, ii) absence of chronic illness or medication interfering with ACTH-cortisol axis, iii) GH stimulation levels>3ng/mL at least in one provocation test (glucagon or clonidine), iv) absence of multiple pituitary growth hormone deficiencies, v) normal short Synacthen test in cases of low cortisol response in glucagon test.Two hundred and thirty-seven subjects (160 males, 67.5%) with a mean age of 9.02±3.19 years, were finally included in the analysis. Cortisol peak levels but not cortisol AUC were significantly increased in females compared to males (26.83±7.31 μg/dl vs. 24.04±7.20 μg/dl). When linear correlations were studied, both cortisol peak levels and cortisol AUC were linearly but inversely correlated to age (r=-0.234, p<0.001 and r=-0.315, p<0.001, respectively). Finally, cortisol AUC was inversely correlated to weight Z-scores (r=-0.160, p=0.014). When our analysis was limited only to subjects with intact GH response (GH peak> 7 ng/mL), age was still inversely correlated to cortisol AUC (r=-0.312, p<0.001), and cortisol AUC was linearly correlated to GH AUC assessed with clonidine test (r=0.223, p=0.013). Girls, younger and thinner children exhibit higher cortisol response to glucagon test.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY IN ADULTS AND PATIENTS TRANSITIONING FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols. Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH-stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document. LAY ABSTRACT This updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH-stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH-stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH-stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement. Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone-releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor-binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test.

Adult growth hormone deficiency: clinical advances and approaches to improve adherence

Introduction: There have been significant clinical advances in the understanding of the diagnosis and benefits of long-term recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) since its approval in 1996 by the United States Food and Drug Administration.Areas covered: We searched PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsychInfo databases between January 2000 and June 2019 for published studies evaluating adults with GHD. We reviewed the data of the oral macimorelin test compared to the GHRH plus arginine and the insulin tolerance tests that led to its approval by the United States FDA and European Medicines Agency for adult diagnostic testing. We summarize the clinical advances of long-term benefits of rhGH therapy and the potential effects of GH receptor polymorphisms on individual treatment responsiveness. We identify that non-adherence and discontinuation rates are high and recommend strategies to support patients to improve adherence. We also provide an overview of several long-acting GH (LAGH) preparations currently under development and their potential role in improving treatment adherence.Expert opinion: This article summarizes recent clinical advances in rhGH replacement therapy, the biological and molecular aspects that may influence rhGH action, and offers practical strategies to enhance adherence in adults with GHD.

Cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis

Diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency requires evaluation by dynamic stimulation tests. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is accepted as the gold-standard test for the evaluation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis but the test is unpleasant and dangerous. Although it takes more time, glucagon stimulation test (GST) is a good alternative to ITT. The primary aim of this study was to compare the ITT and GSTs in the evaluation of HPA axe in patients with pituitary disorders. We conducted a prospective study in which ITT and GST were performed within 7 days in 81 patients. Serum cortisol was measured. We divided our population in Group 1 (G1): Adrenal Insufficiency (Peak cortisol under ITT <200 ng/mL) and Group 2 (G2): normal response (Peak cortisol under ITT >200 ng/mL). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the thresholds for GST. The mean peak of cortisol under GST was not significantly different from that obtained after ITT in the whole cohort (182.67 ± 89.07 ng/mL vs. 179.75 ± 79.01 ng/mL), and it was significantly reduced in patients of G1 (p < 10^-3). ROC curve analysis showed that the best diagnostic accuracy was obtained with a peak cortisol cut-off to GST of 167 ng/mL (sensitivity, 89%; specificity, 79%). Using this cut-off, 86.4% of the patients were correctly classified. In our prospective series, GST is a potential accurate and safe alternative test for the assessment HPA. Test-specific cut-offs should be applied to avoid misinterpretation.

Macimorelin as a Diagnostic Test for Adult GH Deficiency

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (AGHD) is challenging and often requires confirmation with a GH stimulation test (GHST). The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is considered the reference standard GHST but is labor intensive, can cause severe hypoglycemia, and is contraindicated for certain patients. Macimorelin, an orally active GH secretagogue, could be used to diagnose AGHD by measuring stimulated GH levels after an oral dose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover trial was designed to validate the efficacy and safety of single-dose oral macimorelin for AGHD diagnosis compared with the ITT. Subjects with high (n = 38), intermediate (n = 37), and low (n = 39) likelihood for AGHD and healthy, matched controls (n = 25) were included in the efficacy analysis.

RESULTS

After the first test, 99% of macimorelin tests and 82% of ITTs were evaluable. Using GH cutoff levels of 2.8 ng/mL for macimorelin and 5.1 ng/mL for ITTs, the negative agreement was 95.38% (95% CI, 87% to 99%), the positive agreement was 74.32% (95% CI, 63% to 84%), sensitivity was 87%, and specificity was 96%. On retesting, the reproducibility was 97% for macimorelin (n = 33). In post hoc analyses, a GH cutoff of 5.1 ng/mL for both tests resulted in 94% (95% CI, 85% to 98%) negative agreement, 82% (95% CI, 72% to 90%) positive agreement, 92% sensitivity, and 96% specificity. No serious adverse events were reported for macimorelin.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral macimorelin is a simple, well-tolerated, reproducible, and safe diagnostic test for AGHD with accuracy comparable to that of the ITT. A GH cutoff of 5.1 ng/mL for the macimorelin test provides an excellent balance between sensitivity and specificity.

Evaluation of the specific effects of intranasal glucagon on glucose production and lipid concentration in healthy men during a pancreatic clamp

AIM

To investigate the specific effects of intranasal glucagon (ING) on plasma glucose, endogenous glucose production (EGP) and lipid concentration.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind, randomized, crossover study at our academic investigation unit. Under pancreatic clamp conditions with tracer infusion, 1 mg ING or intranasal placebo (INP) was administered to 10 healthy men. As pilot studies showed that ING transiently increased plasma glucagon, we infused intravenous glucagon for 30 minutes along with INP to ensure similar plasma glucagon concentrations between interventions. The main outcome measures were plasma glucose, EGP, free fatty acid (FFA) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations.

RESULTS

In the presence of similar plasma glucagon concentrations, the increase in plasma glucose under these experimental conditions was attenuated with ING (mean plasma glucose analysis of variance P < .001) with reduction in EGP (P = .027). No significant differences were seen in plasma FFA and TG concentrations.

CONCLUSION

ING raises plasma glucose but this route of administration attenuates the gluco-stimulatory effect of glucagon by reducing EGP. This observation invites speculation about a potential central nervous system effect of glucagon, which requires further investigation. If ING is developed as a treatment for hypoglycaemia, this attenuated effect on plasma glucose should be taken into account.

Chronic endocrine consequences of traumatic brain injury - what is the evidence?

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health problem with potentially debilitating consequences for the individual. Hypopituitarism after TBI has received increasing attention over the past decade; development of the condition as a consequence of TBI was previously hardly mentioned in textbooks on the subject. Hypopituitarism has been reported in more than 25% of patients with TBI and is now thought to be one of the most important causes of treatable morbidity in TBI survivors. However, most clinicians dealing with neuroendocrine diseases and TBI generally do not see such a high incidence of hypopituitarism. This disproportion is not clearly explained, but recent data indicate that diagnostic testing, which is designed for high-risk populations and not for a cohort of patients with, for example, de novo isolated growth hormone deficiency (the predominant finding in TBI), might have overestimated the true risk and disease burden of hypopituitarism. In this Opinion article, we discuss current recommendations for post-traumatic hypopituitarism in light of recent evidence.

Oral glucose-stimulated growth hormone (GH) test in adult GH deficiency patients and controls: Potential utility of a novel test

CONTEXT

The diagnosis of adult GH deficiency requires confirmation with a GH stimulation test. Oral glucose (OG) administration affects GH secretion, initially decreasing and subsequently stimulating GH secretion.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy and safety of a long OG test (LOGT) as a stimulus of GH secretion for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency (AGHD).

DESIGN

Prospective experimental cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at the Endocrinology department of the University Hospital of a Coruña, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

We included 60 (40 women) AGHD patients (15) and controls (45) paired 1:3, of similar age, sex and BMI. The area under the curve (AUC) and peak were calculated for GH. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the different groups. ROC curve analyses were used. p-Values<0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention consisted of orally administering 75g oral glucose administration; GH was obtained every 30min for a total of 300min.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

Peak GH area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) following LOGT.

RESULTS

Peak GH (μg/L) levels were lower in the AGHD patients (0.26±0.09) than in the controls (4.00±0.45), p<0.001. After LOGT, with the ROC plot analysis the best peak GH cut-point was 1.0μg/L, with 100% sensitivity, 78% specificity, ROC-AUC of 0.9089 and 81.82% accuracy. There were no relevant adverse events during any of the LOGT.

CONCLUSIONS

The LOGT could be a cheap, safe, convenient and effective test for the diagnosis of AGHD.

Growth hormone and cortisol secretion in the elderly evaluated using the glucagon stimulation test

OBJECTIVES

The glucagon stimulation test is a reliable alternative test to assess growth hormone and cortisol secretion, but has not been widely used in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to evaluate growth hormone and cortisol secretion using the glucagon stimulation test in an elderly population without known hypothalamic-pituitary disease and to correlate growth hormone and cortisol peaks with age (less than or greater than 80 years) and body mass index.

METHODS

Forty-two subjects (67-88 years) from the geriatric ambulatory unit were submitted and 41 subjects completed the glucagon stimulation test.

RESULTS

Median growth hormone peak was 5.99 μg/L and median cortisol peak was 21.6 μg/dL. Growth hormone peak was >3 µg/L in 73.2%, and cortisol peak was >18 µg/dL in 65.8% of patients. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between the growth hormone peak and the cortisol peak. The cortisol peak was significantly different between subjects stratified by growth hormone peak of < or >3 μg/L (15.7 and 21.8 μg/dL, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in cortisol peak according to age < or > 80 years (22.4 and 18.5 µg/dL, respectively). Considering lower cut-offs recently proposed for growth hormone peak (1.0 μg/L for overweight subjects) and cortisol peak (9.1 μg/dL), only two patients had a growth hormone peak below this value, and all patients had preserved cortisol secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

We did find a positive correlation between growth hormone and cortisol peaks in the glucagon stimulation test in the elderly, confirming the capacity of the glucagon stimulation test to stimulate both axes. According to the new proposed cut-points for growth hormone and cortisol, we had 95% of normal growth hormone and 100% of normal cortisol responses.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY DISEASE STATE CLINICAL REVIEW: UPDATE ON GROWTH HORMONE STIMULATION TESTING AND PROPOSED REVISED CUT-POINT FOR THE GLUCAGON STIMULATION TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADULT GROWTH HORMONE DEFICIENCY

OBJECTIVE

The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and GH stimulation testing is often required to confirm the diagnosis. However, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the episodic and pulsatile GH secretion, concurrently modified by age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

PubMed searches were conducted to identify published data since 2009 on GH stimulation tests used to diagnose adult GHD. Relevant articles in English language were identified and considered for inclusion in the present document.

RESULTS

Testing for confirmation of adult GHD should only be considered if there is a high pretest probability, and the intent to treat if the diagnosis is confirmed. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) are the two main tests used in the United States. While the ITT has been accepted as the gold-standard test, its safety concerns hamper wider use. Previously, the GH-releasing hormone-arginine test, and more recently the GST, are accepted alternatives to the ITT. However, several recent studies have questioned the diagnostic accuracy of the GST when the GH cut-point of 3 μg/L is used and have suggested that a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L improved the sensitivity and specificity of this test in overweight/obese patients and in those with glucose intolerance.

CONCLUSION

Until a potent, safe, and reliable test becomes available, the GST should remain as the alternative to the ITT in the United States. In order to reduce over-diagnosing adult GHD in overweight/obese patients with the GST, we propose utilizing a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L in these subjects. However, this lower GH cut-point still needs further evaluation for diagnostic accuracy in larger patient populations with varying BMIs and degrees of glucose tolerance.

ABBREVIATIONS

AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists BMI = body mass index GH = growth hormone GHD = GH deficiency GHRH = GH-releasing hormone GHS = GH secretagogue GST = glucagon stimulation test IGF = insulin-like growth factor IGFBP-3 = IGF-binding protein 3 ITT = insulin tolerance test ROC = receiver operating characteristic WB-GST = weight-based GST.

Revised GH and cortisol cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test in the evaluation of GH and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axes in adults: results from a prospective randomized multicenter study

CONTEXT

Recent studies suggest using lower GH cut-points for the glucagon stimulation test (GST) in diagnosing adult GH deficiency (GHD), especially in obese patients. There are limited data on evaluating GH and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axes using weight-based dosing for the GST.

OBJECTIVE

To define GH and cortisol cut-points to diagnose adult GHD and secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) using the GST, and to compare fixed-dose (FD: 1 or 1.5 mg in patients >90 kg) with weight-based dosing (WB: 0.03 mg/kg). Response to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) was considered the gold standard, using GH and cortisol cut-points of ≥3 ng/ml and ≥18 µg/dL, respectively.

DESIGN

28 Patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 1-2 (n = 14) or ≥3 (n = 14) pituitary hormone deficiencies, and 14 control subjects matched for age, sex, estrogen status and body mass index (BMI) underwent the ITT, FD- and WB-GST in random order.

RESULTS

Age, sex ratio and BMI were comparable between the three groups. The best GH cut-point for diagnosis of GHD was 1.0 (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 2.0 ng/mL (96 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD- and WB-GST, respectively. Age negatively correlated with peak GH during FD-GST (r = -0.32, P = 0.04), but not WB-GST. The best cortisol cut-point for diagnosis of SAI was 8.8 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity) and 11.2 µg/dL (92 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity) for FD-GST and WB-GST, respectively. Nausea was the most common side effect, and one patient had a seizure during the FD-GST.

CONCLUSION

The GST correctly classified GHD using GH cut-points of 1 ng/ml for FD-GST and 2 ng/ml for WB-GST, hence using 3 ng/ml as the GH cut-point will misclassify some GH-sufficient adults. The GST may also be an acceptable alternative to the ITT for evaluating the HPA axis utilizing cortisol cut-points of 9 µg/dL for FD-GST and 11 µg/dL for WB-GST.

Pegvisomant-primed glucagon stimulation test in assessing GH reserve and GH/IGF kinetics in adults suspected of GH deficiency

PURPOSE

The accuracy of the glucagon stimulation test(GST) in diagnosing adult GH deficiency (GHD) has recently been questioned. Because pegvisomant (PegV)increases endogenous GH secretion, we hypothesized that priming PegV to the GST (PegV-GST) 72 h beforehand would improve the diagnostic accuracy of this test. This pilot study aimed to prospectively compare PegV-GST to two other diagnostic tests for adult GHD.

METHODS

Adults suspected of GHD underwent PegVGST,GST and insulin tolerance test (ITT) in random order.Growth hormone levels (measured by a PegV insensitive assay) during PegV-GST, GST and ITT were compared,and acute effects of PegV on GH/IGF kinetics were assessed.

RESULTS

Ten subjects with hypothalamic-pituitary disease and 1–4 pituitary hormone deficiencies were studied. Basal and peak GH levels with the PegV-GST were comparable to those of the GST and ITT. The five subjects that failed the GST and ITT were the same subjects that failed the PegVGST,using the peak GH cut point of<3 ng/mL for this test. After PegV priming, basal GH and GH binding protein(GHBP) increased (both P<0.01) and total IGF-I and bioactive IGF decreased (both P<0.05), whereas IGF-II and IGFBPs -1, -2 and -3 were unchanged compared to pre-PegV priming. Serum PegV levels correlated positively with basal GH, peak GH, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels, and negatively with D bioactive IGF and DGHBP (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Single dose PegV administration in adults suspected of GHD increased basal GH and GHBP, with concomitant rapid fall in IGF-I levels and bioactive IGF. PegV priming did not appear to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the GST. Further studies involving larger subject numbers are needed to verify the clinical utility of PegV-GST in evaluating adult GHD.

Effects of gender, body weight, and blood glucose dynamics on the growth hormone response to the glucagon stimulation test in patients with pituitary disease

OBJECTIVE

Body weight blunts the growth hormone (GH) response to provocative stimuli. The appropriate GH cut-off to confirm GH deficiency in obese and overweight patients undergoing the glucagon stimulation test (GST) has recently been questioned. We hypothesized that the peak GH would be inversely related to the nadir blood glucose (BG) after glucagon and that this may be a mechanism influencing peak GH in overweight patients. This retrospective study examined effects of gender, body weight, and BG dynamics on GH response to GST in patients evaluated in our Pituitary Center.

DESIGN

Adult patients who underwent GST from September 2009-2014 were included. Continuous variable comparisons were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and categorical data by Fisher's Exact Test. Spearman correlation was used to determine associations between continuous variables.

RESULTS

42 patients (N=28, 66.7% female) had sufficient data for analysis. Obese patients (N=26) had a reduced GH response, summarized as GH area under the curve (AUC) (p=0.03 vs. non-obese patients) and higher BG during GST, summarized as AUC (p<0.01 vs. non-obese patients). Obese women (N=19), in particular, stimulated lower (p=0.03 vs. non-obese women) and had a higher nadir BG (p=0.03 vs. non-obese women). While weight correlated with extent (rs=0.35; p=0.02) and timing (rs=0.31; p=0.05) of nadir BG reached, there was no significant correlation between BG dynamics and the GH response in the total population (N=42). Ten patients (7 with pan anterior hypopituitarism, defined as 3 anterior pituitary deficiencies) had a peak GH≤0.1ng/mL during GST. When these subjects with a negligible peak GH response were excluded from the analysis, weight was associated with GH AUC (rs=-0.45; p=0.01), peak GH response (rs=-0.42; p=0.02) and nadir BG (rs=0.48; p<0.01). Furthermore, the nadir BG achieved during GST was inversely related to GH AUC (rs=-0.38; p=0.03) and peak GH (rs=-0.37; p=0.04) such that patients (N=32) with higher nadir BG had lower peak GH in response to glucagon.

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients, particularly women, do not respond as robustly to glucagon stimulation. These data suggest that there exists an altered BG profile during GST in obese individuals, and that a less robust hypoglycemic stimulus may contribute to an impaired GH response. We suggest measuring BG levels during glucagon stimulation testing to assist with clinical interpretation of GH dynamics. The diagnostic accuracy of the GST in patients with known disorders in glucose metabolism and those taking anti-diabetic medications deserves further study.

Can a glucagon stimulation test characterized by lower GH cut-off value be used for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess diagnostic values of insulin tolerance test (ITT), glucagon stimulation test (GST), and insulin like growth factor-I (IGF-I) level, to find optimal GH cut-off values for GST, and to evaluate efficiencies of patient age, gender, body-mass index (BMI), and additional pituitary hormone deficiencies (PHDs) in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective study involved 216 patients with a pituitary disease and 26 healthy controls. Age, gender, BMI, medical histories, and hormonal data including baseline and stimulated hormone values were evaluated. Three cut-off values for peak GH responses to stimulation tests were evaluated: (a) 3.00 µg/L on ITT, (b) 3.00 µg/L on GST, and (c) 1.07 µg/L on GST.

RESULTS

According to the ITT, GST with 3.00 µg/L cut-off, and GST with 1.07 µg/L cut-off, GHD was present in 86.1, 74.5, and 54.2 % patients, respectively. Patient age, BMI, and number of PHDs, but not gender, were found to be correlated with IGF-I and peak GH concentrations. All patients with an IGF-I concentration ≤95 ng/ml or ≥3 PHD had GHD. None of the patients with adequate GH response to the GST with 1.07 µg/L cut-off, but blunted responses to ITT and GST with 3.00 µg/L cut-off, had ≥3 PHDs. 12 out of 26 (46.2 %) healthy subjects failed the GST with 3.00 µg/L cut-off, but not with 1.07 µg/L cut-off.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient age, IGF-I, BMI, and number of PHDs are efficient factors associated with the diagnosis of GHD. A 4 h GST with a diagnostic GH threshold of 1.07 µg/L seems to be a good diagnostic method for GHD.

Growth hormone deficiency after mild combat-related traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been recognized as a cause of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in civilians. However, comparable data are sparse in veterans who incurred TBI during combat. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of GHD in veterans with a history of combat-related TBI, and its association with cognitive and psychosocial dysfunction.

DESIGN

Single center prospective study.

PATIENTS

Twenty male veterans with mild TBI incurred during combat 8-72 months prior to enrollment.

MEASUREMENTS

GHD was defined by a GH peak <3 μg/L during glucagon stimulation test. Differences in neuropsychological, emotional, and quality of life of the GHD Veterans were described using Cohen's d. Large effect sizes were considered meaningful.

RESULTS

Mean age was 33.7 years (SD 7.8) and all subjects had normal thyroid hormone and cortisol levels. Five (25%) exhibited a subnormal response to glucagon. Sixteen participants (80%) provided sufficient effort for valid neuropsychological assessment (12 GH-sufficient, 4 GHD). There were large effect size differences in self-monitoring during memory testing (d = 1.46) and inhibitory control (d = 0.92), with worse performances in the GHD group. While fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder were comparable, the GHD group reported more depression (d = 0.80) and lower quality of life (d = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found a 25% prevalence of GHD in veterans with mild TBI as shown by glucagon stimulation. The neuropsychological findings raise the possibility that GHD has adverse effects on executive abilities and mood. Further studies are needed to determine whether GH replacement is an effective treatment in these patients.

Potential risks of glucagon stimulation test in elderly people

The glucagon stimulation test (GST) is a reliable measure for assessing growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion. The GST is considered to be a safe test, with few mild side effects, especially in adults and in the elderly in whom underlying co-morbidities may be present.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the side effects of the GST in elderly people.

DESIGN AND SETTING

The study was performed with patients of the geriatric ambulatory of our hospital who were recruited to voluntarily participate in a research study concerning the GH and ACTH axis in the elderly people. Forty-two subjects (n=5 males and 37 females) aged 67-88 years, without hypothalamic-pituitary disease, were submitted to the GST. The GST was performed by intramuscular injection of 1mg of glucagon. Blood samples were collected at baseline, and 90, 120, 150, and 180 min after glucagon injection for GH and cortisol measurements.

RESULTS

During the test, 9 subjects (21.4%) had side effects, which included: nausea (14.2%), indisposition (11.9%), hypotension (9.5%), vomiting (7.1%), sweating (4.7%), and dizziness (2.3%). There were four cases of severe symptomatic hypotension, with inaudible blood pressure in two cases. In one case of severe hypotension, the subject suffered two episodes of generalized tonic seizures. Patients who had side effects at GST had statistically higher peak of cortisol (28.9 ± 6.67 μg/dL) and a statistical trend to higher GH peak (8.74 ± 5.96 μg/L). In the group of patients who did not have side effects, the mean cortisol and GH peak were 19.05 ± 5.36 μg/dL and 5.32 ± 3.52 μg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the GST is a reliable alternative test to the ITT, it should be cautiously used in the elderly because this population may have co-morbidities including vascular and cardiac diseases that could be potentiated with side effects of the test, such as severe hypotension.

A comparison of low-dose ACTH, glucagon stimulation and insulin tolerance test in patients with pituitary disorders

CONTEXT

Diagnosis of secondary adrenal insufficiency and GH deficiency requires evaluation by dynamic stimulation tests in most cases. Although insulin tolerance test (ITT) is accepted as the gold-standard test for the evaluation of both hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and (GH)-IGF-1 axes, the test is cumbersome. In clinical practice, low-dose adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test is a sensitive, safe and easily applicable alternative to ITT. Although it takes more time, glucagon stimulation test (GST) is also a good alternative to ITT and can evaluate both axes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to compare the ITT, low-dose ACTH and GSTs in the evaluation of HPA and GH-IGF-1 axes in patients with pituitary disorders and to evaluate the repeatability of all three tests.

DESIGN

ITT, low-dose ACTH and GSTs were performed in all 129 patients, and the tests were repeated in 66 of these patients.

SETTING

Erciyes University Medical School, Department of Endocrinology.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

One hundred and twenty-nine adult patients (76 women, 53 men) with pituitary disorder were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The cortisol and GH responses of patients to dynamic tests.

RESULTS

Peak cortisol levels obtained during ITT were significantly lower than the values obtained during both low-dose ACTH and GSTs. Peak cortisol levels obtained during the GST were lower than those found during the low dose ACTH stimulation test. Peak GH responses were found to be higher in GST than in ITT. All three tests had good reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Any of 3 tests can be used in the evaluation of the HPA axis and either GST or the ITT can be used in the evaluation of the GH-IGF-1 axis but cut-off levels for the insufficiency of HPA or GH-IGF-1 axis should be individualized for each test.

Overweight/Obese adults with pituitary disorders require lower peak growth hormone cutoff values on glucagon stimulation testing to avoid overdiagnosis of growth hormone deficiency

CONTEXT

Obesity is associated with diminished GH secretion, which may result in the overdiagnosis of adult GH deficiency (GHD) in overweight/obese pituitary patients. However, there are no body mass index (BMI)-specific peak GH cutoffs for the glucagon stimulation test (GST), the favored dynamic test for assessing adult GHD in the United States.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine a peak GH cutoff level for the diagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese individuals using the GST.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at Massachusetts General Hospital and Oregon Health and Science University.

METHODS

A total of 108 subjects with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) were studied: healthy controls (n = 47), subjects with total pituitary deficiency (TPD) (n = 20, ≥ 3 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies), and subjects with partial pituitary deficiency (PPD) (n = 41, 1-2 non-GH pituitary hormone deficiencies).

INTERVENTION

The intervention consisted of a standard 4-hour GST.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measure was peak GH level on GST.

RESULTS

Using the standard peak GH cutoff of 3 ng/mL, 95% of TPD cases (19 of 20), 80% of PPD (33 of 41), and 45% of controls (21 of 47) were classified as GHD. In receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis (controls vs TPD), a peak GH value of 0.94 ng/mL provided the greatest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (94%). Using a peak GH cutoff of 1 ng/mL, 6% of controls (3 of 47), 59% of PPDs (24 of 41), and 90% of TPDs (18 of 20) were classified as GHD. BMI (R = -0.35, P = .02) and visceral adipose tissue (R = -0.32, P = .03) negatively correlated with peak GH levels in controls.

CONCLUSION

A large proportion of healthy overweight/obese individuals (45%) failed the GST using the standard 3 ng/mL GH cutoff. Overweight/obese pituitary patients are at risk of being misclassified as GHD using this cutoff level. A 1-ng/mL GH cutoff may reduce the overdiagnosis of adult GHD in overweight/obese patients.