1
|
Domeisen Benedetti F, Hechinger M, Fringer A. Self-Assessment Instruments for Supporting Family Caregivers: An Integrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1016. [PMID: 38786426 PMCID: PMC11120749 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12101016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Family caregivers take on a variety of tasks when caring for relatives in need of care. Depending on the situation and the intensity of care, they may experience multidimensional burdens, such as physical, psychological, social, or financial stress. The aim of the present study was to identify and appraise self-assessment instruments (SAIs) that capture the dimensions of family caregivers' burdens and that support family caregivers in easily identifying their caregiving role, activities, burden, and needs. We performed an integrative review with a broad-based strategy. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, Google, and mobile app stores in March 2020. After screening the records based on the eligibility criteria, we appraised the tools we found for their usefulness for family care and nursing practice. From a total of 2654 hits, 45 suitable SAIs from 274 records were identified and analyzed in this way. Finally, nine SAIs were identified and analyzed in detail based on further criteria such as their psychometric properties, advantages, and disadvantages. They are presented in multi-page vignettes with additional information for healthcare professionals. These SAIs have proven useful in assessing the dimensions of caregiver burden and can be recommended for application in family care and nursing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franzisca Domeisen Benedetti
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Nursing, ZHAW—Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland (A.F.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuharic M, Mulhern B, Sharp LK, Turpin RS, Pickard AS. Comparison of EQ Health and Well-Being Long and Short With Other Preference-Based Measures Among United States Informal Caregivers. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)00117-7. [PMID: 38492925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Several measures have been used or developed to capture the health and well-being of caregivers, including the EQ Health and Well-being (EQ-HWB) and its short form, EQ-HWB-S. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and construct validity of the EQ-HWB/EQ-HWB-S in a US caregiver population. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 504 caregivers. Eligible participants were 18+ years old, provided unpaid care to a relative/friend aged 18+ in the past 6 months, and spent on average of at least 1 hour per week caregiving. Survey included the following measures: EQ-HWB, Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers-Carer, CarerQol, and EQ-5D-5L. Psychometric properties were assessed using response distributions, floor/ceiling effects, Spearman's correlation for convergent validity, and effect sizes (ES) for known-group validity based on caregiving situations and intensity. RESULTS The average age of caregivers was 49.2 (SD = 15.4), with 57.5% being female. More than half (54.4%) reported high caregiving intensity, and 68.3% lived with the care recipient. The EQ-HWB-S index showed a strong positive correlation with the EQ-5D-5L (rs = 0.72), Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (rs = 0.54), and CarerQol (rs = 0.54) indices. Notably, the EQ-HWB-S index showed the largest ES among measures in differentiating caregiving scenarios with a large ES for caregiver's general health (d = 1.00) and small ES for caregiving intensity (d = 0.39). CONCLUSIONS Results support construct validity of EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S as measures for assessing health and well-being of adult informal caregivers in comparison with other validated instruments. Differing levels of known-group validity across anchors emphasize the importance of selecting appropriate measures for caregivers, depending on research question and/or intervention aims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Kuharic
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa K Sharp
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fischer C, Bednarz D, Simon J. Methodological challenges and potential solutions for economic evaluations of palliative and end-of-life care: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2024; 38:85-99. [PMID: 38142280 PMCID: PMC10798028 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231214124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the increasing demand for palliative and end-of-life care, along with the introduction of costly new treatments, there is a pressing need for robust evidence on value. However, comprehensive guidance is missing on methods for conducting economic evaluations in this field. AIM To identify and summarise existing information on methodological challenges and potential solutions/recommendations for economic evaluations of palliative and end-of-life care. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of publications on methodological considerations for economic evaluations of adult palliative and end-of-life care as per our PROSPERO protocol CRD42020148160. Following initial searches, we conducted a two-stage screening process and quality appraisal. Information was thematically synthesised, coded, categorised into common themes and aligned with the items specified in the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. DATA SOURCES The databases Medline, Embase, HTADatabase, NHSEED and grey literature were searched between 1 January 1999 and 5 June 2023. RESULTS Out of the initial 6502 studies, 81 were deemed eligible. Identified challenges could be grouped into nine themes: ambiguous and inaccurate patient identification, restricted generalisability due to poor geographic transferability of evidence, narrow costing perspective applied, difficulties defining comparators, consequences of applied time horizon, ambiguity in the selection of outcomes, challenged outcome measurement, non-standardised measurement and valuation of costs as well as challenges regarding a reliable preference-based outcome valuation. CONCLUSION Our review offers a comprehensive context-specific overview of methodological considerations for economic evaluations of palliative and end-of-life care. It also identifies the main knowledge gaps to help prioritise future methodological research specifically for this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Fischer
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Damian Bednarz
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Judit Simon
- Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faraji H, Soleymani F, Yaseri M, Sahraian MA, Abdollahiasl A, Meftah A, Nikfar S. Choosing the Best Instrument for Measuring Health Spillover Effect in Caregivers of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 39:49-56. [PMID: 37979543 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To measure the health spillover effect in caregivers of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), we aimed to select the best instrument from 2 common health-related quality of life (QoL) instruments, the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) and the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI-3), by assessing them. METHODS Using consecutive sampling, 452 primary caregivers of patients with MS were asked to fill out a Care-related QoL instrument (CarerQol-7D), EQ-5D-3L, HUI-3, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale between October 2019 and May 2020. Convergent and clinical validity were assessed to measure spillover effect in caregivers of patients with MS. RESULTS A strong correlation of health-utility scores between EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 (r = 0.914, P < .01) was observed. The 95% limit of agreement (LoA) for CarerQol-7D and HUI-3 (-10.6 to 8.2) was narrower than the LoA for CarerQol-7D and EQ-5D-3L (-15.1 to 17.1). Both EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3 proved clinical validity for the QoL of caregivers. The CarerQoL-7D score was significantly lower in female (P < .001), single (P < .014), lower-educated (P < .001), parent's relatives (P < .001), and unemployed (P < .001) caregivers. CONCLUSIONS We found that both, EQ-5D-3L and HUI-3, were appropriate for measuring caregivers' QoL, although HUI-3 was a better choice because of its narrower LoA. Our findings suggest researchers should use HUI-3 to measure the quality-adjusted life-year of caregivers to aggregate with the QoL of patients in the denominator of an economic evaluation equation, such as the cost-effective ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoda Faraji
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Fatemeh Soleymani
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Mehdi Yaseri
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Mohammad Ali Sahraian
- Neurology Department, MS Research Centre, Neuroscience institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Akbar Abdollahiasl
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran
| | - Azin Meftah
- Faculty of Health Sciences Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Finland, Kuopio
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran, Tehran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shield T, Bayliss K, Hodkinson A, Panagioti M, Wearden A, Flynn J, Rowland C, Bee P, Farquhar M, Harris D, Grande G. What factors are associated with informal carers' psychological morbidity during end-of-life home care? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of observational quantitative studies. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023:1-58. [PMID: 37991230 DOI: 10.3310/htjy8442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Background Family carers are central in supporting patients nearing end of life. As a consequence, they often suffer detrimental impacts on their own mental health. Understanding what factors may affect carers' mental health is important in developing strategies to maintain their psychological well-being during caregiving. Aim To conduct a systematic review and thematic evidence synthesis of factors related to carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving. Method Searches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Social Sciences Citation Index, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects 1 January 2009-24 November 2019. We included observational quantitative studies focusing on adult informal/family carers for adult patients at end of life cared for at home considering any factor related to carer mental health (anxiety, depression, distress and quality of life) pre-bereavement. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used. Thematic analysis with box score presentation, and meta-analysis were done where data permitted. Results Findings from 63 included studies underpinned seven emergent themes. Patient condition (31 studies): worse patient psychological symptoms and quality of life were generally associated with worse carer mental health. Patient depression was associated with higher depression in carers (standardised mean difference = 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.87, I2 = 77%). Patients' other symptoms and functional impairment may relate to carer mental health, but findings were unclear. Impact of caring responsibilities (14 studies): impact on carers' lives, task difficulty and general burden had clear associations with worse carer mental health. Relationships (8 studies): family dynamics and the quality of the carer-patient relationship may be important for carer mental health and are worthy of further investigation. Finance (6 studies): insufficient resources may relate to carers' mental health and warrant further study. Carers' psychological processes (13 studies): self-efficacy and preparedness were related to better mental health. However, findings regarding coping strategies were mixed. Support (18 studies): informal support given by family and friends may relate to better carer mental health, but evidence on formal support is limited. Having unmet needs was related to worse mental health, while satisfaction with care was related to better mental health. Contextual factors (16 studies): older age was generally associated with better carer mental health and being female was associated with worse mental health. Limitations Studies were mainly cross-sectional (56) rather than longitudinal (7) which raises questions about the likely causal direction of relationships. One-third of studies had samples < 100, so many had limited statistical power to identify existing relationships. Conclusions and future work Future work must adopt a comprehensive approach to improving carers' mental health because factors relating to carer mental health cover a broad spectrum. The literature on this topic is diverse and difficult to summarise, and the field would benefit from a clearer direction of enquiry guided by explanatory models. Future research should (1) further investigate quality of relationships and finances; (2) better define factors under investigation; (3) establish, through quantitative causal analyses, why factors might relate to mental health; and (4) utilise longitudinal designs more to aid understanding of likely causal direction of associations. Study registration This study is registered as PROSPERO registration 2019 CRD42019130279 at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme HSDR 18/01/01 and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Shield
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kerin Bayliss
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander Hodkinson
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alison Wearden
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jackie Flynn
- Public and Community Involvement and Engagement (PCIE) Panel, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine Rowland
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Penny Bee
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Morag Farquhar
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Danielle Harris
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Greater Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gunn Grande
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bucholc J, McCaffrey N, Ugalde A, Muldowney A, Rand S, Hoefman R, Mihalopoulos C, Engel L. How well do the adult social care outcomes toolkit for carers, carer experience scale and care-related quality of life capture aspects of quality of life important to informal carers in Australia? Qual Life Res 2023; 32:3109-3121. [PMID: 37356076 PMCID: PMC10522516 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03459-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identify aspects of quality of life (QoL) important to Australian informal carers and explore how well the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Care-related Quality of Life instrument and Carer Experience Scale capture these aspects in the Australian context. METHODS Online questionnaires were completed by Australian informal carers. Socio-demographics, open-ended questions: positive/negative aspects of caring and QoL aspects missing from the instruments, and ranking of the instrument domains was used to explore the content of the instruments. Instruments were scored using preference-weighted value sets (reported in another paper). Content analysis was used to analyse the open-ended responses. Chi-squared test looked at differences in domain importance. Descriptive analyses summarised all other information. RESULTS Eight themes were identified: Behaviour-mood of the care recipient, Caring responsibilities, Finances, Health, Own life, Perception of carers, Relationship with care recipient and Support. Many aspects of carer QoL mentioned as missing in the instruments appeared covered by the domains, of which all were reported as important. The highest ranked domain was relationship with the care recipient. The influence of the care recipient specific support, behaviour/mood and health on carer QoL appear absent in all instruments. CONCLUSION The content of the three instruments appears relevant in an Australian setting. The influence of care recipient's health and well-being on carer QoL should be considered, along with spillover effects. A content and/or face validity analysis is required to confirm differences in item interpretation in Australian informal carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bucholc
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Renske Hoefman
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Health Economics Division, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McLoughlin C, Goranitis I, Al-Janabi H. The Feasibility and Validity of Preference-Based Quality of Life Measures With Informal Carers: A Think-Aloud Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:1655-1664. [PMID: 37516197 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A range of preference-based quality of life (QoL) measures have been proposed for use with informal carers. Qualitative evaluation of validity and feasibility of the measures is an important step in understanding whether measures will work as intended. At present, little is known about the performance of different types of preference-based QoL measures with informal carers. The objective of this study was to qualitatively assess the feasibility, content validity (including face validity), and acceptability of 5 QoL measures (the Carer Experience Scale, CarerQoL-7D, ASCOT-C, ICECAP-A, and EQ-5D-5L) with informal carers. METHODS A total of 24 "think-aloud" interviews were conducted with a cross-section of carers of adults in the United Kingdom. This think-aloud process was followed by semistructured discussion to probe issues of validity and feasibility in more detail. The interview data were transcribed, coded to identify the frequency of errors in completing the QoL measures and thematically analyzed to study the validity, feasibility, and acceptability of the measures. RESULTS Few errors (3%-7% per item) were identified in completing each of the measures with little distinct pattern. Most participants found the measures to be concise, clear, and relevant. Challenges included relevance, context, time period, missing items, multiple questions, and response options. Informal carers generally expressed a preference for using a care-related QoL measure. CONCLUSIONS Existing preference-based QoL measures have encouraging validity and feasibility within a mixed sample of informal carers, with minor challenges raised. These challenges ought to be considered, alongside the decision context, when administering QoL measures in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clarijs ME, Oemrawsingh A, Bröker MEE, Verhoef C, Lingsma H, Koppert LB. Quality of life of caregivers of breast cancer patients: a cross-sectional evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:29. [PMID: 35183212 PMCID: PMC8858558 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01930-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the care-related quality of life in caregivers of breast cancer patients, to assess its association with breast cancer patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and to identify its potential predictors. Methods Caregivers of breast cancer patients at six and twelve months follow up were identified through the institutes electronic patient reported outcome measurement collection tool. The Care-related Quality of Life Instrument (CarerQoL) was used to obtain CarerQoL utility scores by applying a pre-existent set of Dutch tariffs and the CarerQoL VAS score, which represented the overall happiness of caregivers. The associations between breast cancer patients’ EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30 scores and caregivers’ CarerQoL scores was determined with Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Associations between log transformed CarerQol scores and patient and caregiver characteristics were analyzed with multivariable linear regression analyses. Results A total of 116 completed CarerQoL questionnaires were analyzed. Most caregivers were male spouses or partners (81.4%) with a mean age of 55.7 ± 16.4. The median CarerQoL utility score was 92.4/100 and median CarerQoL VAS was 8.0/10. We found weak correlations between CarerQoL VAS scores and patients’ EQ-5D-5L utility score (0.301, p = 0.002) and EQ VAS score (0.251, p = 0.009), and between EORTC QLQ-C30 scores and CarerQol VAS (0.339, p < 0.001) and utility score (0.236, p = 0.015). There was a negative association between chemotherapy and log-transformed CarerQoL utility score (B = − 0.063, p = 0.001) and VAS score (B = − 0.044, p = 0.038) at six months follow-up. Conclusions This study provides the first evaluation of the CarerQoL in caregivers of Dutch breast cancer patients. Caregivers’ happiness was associated with breast cancer patients’ HRQoL. Our results can be used as reference values for future care-related quality of life evaluations. Plain English Summary Breast cancer patients face many difficulties during their cancer journey and often need the support of their caregivers. Despite the fact that successfully providing informal care can have positive effects on caregivers’ wellbeing, it may also have a negative impact on their quality of life. Monitoring the quality of life using a standardized questionnaire, such as the CarerQoL questionnaire, may result in early detection of possible quality of life issues. In this study, we evaluated 116 caregivers and found overall high CarerQoL scores. The scores showed a positive relation to the patients’ quality of life. Lower CarerQoL scores at six months after surgery were found in caregivers of patients who received chemotherapy. Our research underlines the importance to include caregivers of breast cancer patients in clinical practice, provides reference values for future research, and the results can be used to manage the caregivers’ expectations prior to treatment.
Collapse
|
9
|
Grande G, Rowland C, Cotterill S, Batistatou E, Hanratty B. Factors associated with carer psychological and physical health during end-of-life caregiving: an observational analysis of a population-based post-bereavement survey of carers of people with cancer. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047275. [PMID: 34716156 PMCID: PMC8559100 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Family caregivers play an essential role in end-of-life care but suffer considerable impact on their own health. A better understanding of main factors related to carers' health is important to inform interventions. The purpose of the study was to test for the first time the potential impact of a comprehensive set of observable variables on carer health during end-of-life caregiving within a population-based carer sample. DESIGN National retrospective, cross-sectional, 4-month post-bereavement postal census survey of family carers of people who died from cancer. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Relatives who registered a death from cancer during a 2-week period in England were identified from death certificates by the Office of National Statistics; response rate was 1504/5271 (28.5%). OUTCOME MEASURES Carers' mental health was measured through General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12; general health was measured through EuroQoL EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS). METHODS Survey questions to measure potential variables associated with carer health were based on past research and covered patients' symptoms and functioning; caregiving activities and hours; informal and formal help received; work hours, other caregiving, volunteering; changes to work, income and expenditure; sleep and relaxation; and demographic variables. Bivariate analyses and ordinary least square regression were performed to investigate these variables' relationship with outcomes. RESULTS Patients' psychological symptoms and functioning, caregiving hours, female gender and self-sought formal help related to worse mental health. General practitioner and social care input and relaxation related to better mental health. Patients' psychological symptoms, caregiving hours and female gender were associated with worse general health, and older age, employment and relaxation were associated with better general health. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in carers' health overall may be made by focusing on potential impacts of patients' psychological symptoms on carers, facilitating respite and relaxation, and paying particular attention to factors affecting female carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunn Grande
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Christine Rowland
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Cotterill
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Evridiki Batistatou
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North East and North Cumbria, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parackal A, Ramamoorthi K, Tarride JE. Economic Evaluation of Palliative Care Interventions: A Review of the Evolution of Methods From 2011 to 2019. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:108-122. [PMID: 34024147 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211011138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life care is a driver of increasing healthcare costs; however, palliative care interventions may significantly reduce these costs. Economic evaluations that measure the incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY) are warranted to inform cost-effectiveness of the intervention relative to a comparator and permit evaluation of investment against other therapeutic interventions. Evidence from the literature up to 2011 indicates a scarcity of cost-utility studies in palliative care research. AIM This literature review evaluates economic studies published between 2011 and 2019 to determine whether the methods of economic evaluations have evolved since 2011. DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES A literature search was completed using CENTRAL, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources for publications between 2011 and 2019. Study characteristics, methodology and key findings of publications that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Quality of studies were assessed using indicators developed by authors of the previous literature review. RESULTS 46 papers were included for qualitative synthesis. Among them only 6 studies conducted formal cost-effectiveness evaluations-of these 5 measured QALYs and 1 employed probabilistic analyses. In addition, with the exception of 1 costing analysis, all other economic evaluations undertook a healthcare payer perspective. Quality of evidence were comparable to the previous literature review published in 2011. CONCLUSION Despite the small increase in the number of cost-utility studies, the methods of palliative care economic evaluations have not evolved significantly since 2011. More probabilistic cost-utility analyses of palliative care interventions from a societal perspective are necessary to truly evaluate the value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Parackal
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Karishini Ramamoorthi
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean-Eric Tarride
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,McMaster Chair, Health Technology Management, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Programs for Assessment to Technology in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rodríguez AA, Martínez Ó, Amayra I, López-Paz JF, Al-Rashaida M, Lázaro E, Caballero P, Pérez M, Berrocoso S, García M, Luna PM, Pérez-Núñez P, Passi N. Diseases Costs and Impact of the Caring Role on Informal Carers of Children with Neuromuscular Disease. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18062991. [PMID: 33803993 PMCID: PMC7999397 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the costs of informal care for children with neuromuscular disease and evaluate how physical and psychological health is associated with socio-demographic variables. A cross sectional design was used with a convenience sample of 110 carers that participated in this study. Participants were recruited from Spanish hospitals and rare diseases organizations. Economic costs and sociodemographic aspects were assessed using the economic costs questionnaire and the sociodemographic questionnaire. Physical and psychological health was evaluated using the CarerQol-7D, PHQ-15, Barthel Index, Zarit Overload Scale and Satisfaction with Life Scale. Carers of children with neuromuscular disease spent a large percentage of their annual income in physical therapy, psychological care and speech therapy. Informal costs differed according to the degree of dependency of the child. These were higher in those caregivers whose child under their care presented low functional independence. The loss of work productivity was related to marital status, use of professional services and the child’s dependency. Finally, carers who were female, single or separated and without a job showed worse physical and psychological health. The results highlighted that carers have to face a number of high costs because of the non-existence of social protection and due to the child’s diagnosis.
Collapse
|
12
|
McCaffrey N, Bucholc J, Rand S, Hoefman R, Ugalde A, Muldowney A, Mihalopoulos C, Engel L. Head-to-Head Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of 3 Carer-Related Preference-Based Instruments. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:1477-1488. [PMID: 33127019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the psychometric properties of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer), the Carer Experience Scale (CES), and the Care-related Quality of Life (CarerQol) to inform the choice of instrument in future studies. METHODS Data were derived from a 2018 online survey of informal carers in Australia. Reliability was assessed via internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, α) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) for respondents who self-reported no change in their quality of life as a carer over 2 weeks. Convergent validity was evaluated via predetermined hypotheses about associations (Spearman's rank correlation) with existing, validated measures. Discriminative validity was assessed based on the ability of the carer-related scores to distinguish between different informal care situations (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance). RESULTS Data from 500 carers were analyzed. The ASCOT-Carer demonstrated a higher degree of internal consistency, possibly due to a unidimensional structure, and test-retest reliability than the CarerQol and CES (α = 0.87, 0.65, 0.59; ICC, 0.87, 0.67, 0.81, respectively). All 3 instruments exhibited convergent validity and detected statistically significant associations between carer-related scores and different informal care situations, except for the CarerQol-7D and sole carer status. CONCLUSIONS The ASCOT-Carer, CarerQol, and CES performed reasonably well psychometrically; the ASCOT-Carer exhibited the best psychometric properties overall in this sample of Australian informal carers. Findings should be used in conjunction with consideration of research goals, carer population, targeted carer-related constructs, and prevailing perspectives on the economic evaluation to inform choice of instrument in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin University, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Jessica Bucholc
- Deakin University, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), Cornwallis Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Renske Hoefman
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Ugalde
- Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Deakin University, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lidia Engel
- Deakin University, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A validation study of the CarerQol instrument in informal caregivers of people with dementia from eight European countries. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:577-588. [PMID: 33113082 PMCID: PMC7886819 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02657-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Informal care constitutes an important part of the total care for people with dementia. Therefore, the impact of the syndrome on their caregivers as well as that of health and social care services for people with dementia should be considered. This study investigated the convergent and clinical validity of the CarerQol instrument, which measures and values the impact of providing informal care, in a multi-country sample of caregivers for people with dementia. METHODS Cross-sectional data from a sample of 451 respondents in eight European countries, collected by the Actifcare project, were evaluated. Convergent validity was analysed with Spearman's correlation coefficients and multivariate correlations between the CarerQol-7D utility score and dimension scores, and other similar quality of life measures such as CarerQol-VAS, ICECAP-O, and EQ-5D. Clinical validity was evaluated by bivariate and multivariate analyses of the degree to which the CarerQol instrument can differentiate between characteristics of caregivers, care receivers and caregiving situation. Country dummies were added to test CarerQol score differences between countries. RESULTS The mean CarerQol utility score was 77.6 and varied across countries from 74.3 (Italy) to 82.3 (Norway). The scores showed moderate to strong positive correlations with the CarerQol-VAS, ICECAP-O, and EQ-5D health problems score of the caregiver. Multivariate regression analysis showed that various characteristics of the caregiver, care receiver and caregiving situation were associated with caregiver outcomes, but there was no evidence of a country-level effect. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the convergent and clinical validity of the CarerQol instrument to evaluate the impact of providing informal care for people with dementia.
Collapse
|
14
|
Validation of the Hungarian version of the CarerQol instrument in informal caregivers: results from a cross-sectional survey among the general population in Hungary. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:629-641. [PMID: 33037979 PMCID: PMC7886830 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02662-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The CarerQol instrument has been designed and validated as an instrument able to measure both the positive and the negative impacts of caregiving on the quality of life of informal caregivers (CarerQol-7D), as well as their general happiness (CarerQol-VAS). The aim of this study was to assess the construct validity of the CarerQol in the Hungarian context. Methods The CarerQol was translated into Hungarian. Subsequently, in a cross-sectional online survey, representative for the general Hungarian population (N = 1000), informal caregivers were identified (N = 149, female 51.2%, mean age 53.2). Clinical, convergent and discriminant validity of the CarerQol were evaluated in relation to the caregivers’ and care recipients’ EQ-5D-5L health status, and caregiving situation characteristics. Results Average CarerQol-7D and CarerQol-VAS scores were 76.0 (SD 16.2) and 6.8 (SD 2.3), respectively. CarerQol-7D and CarerQol-VAS scores were significantly correlated with caregiving time (r = − 0.257; − 0.212), caregivers’ EQ-5D-5L scores (r = 0.453; 0.326) and the CarerQol-7D also with care recipients’ EQ-5D-5L scores (r = 0.247). CarerQol-7D scores differed significantly with relevant caregiving characteristics (e.g. nature and severity of care recipients’ health status, sharing household) and both the CarerQol-7D and CarerQol-VAS with the overall care experience. Conclusion Our findings confirmed the validity of the Hungarian language version of the CarerQol and support the cross-cultural validity of the instrument. CarerQol-7D scores performed better in distinguishing caregiving situation characteristics than the general happiness measure CarerQol-VAS. Care recipients’ health status was only weakly associated with informal caregivers’ care-related quality of life and happiness. Caregivers’ own health and caregiving circumstances were more strongly associated with these scores. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02662-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
15
|
Engel L, Rand S, Hoefman R, Bucholc J, Mihalopoulos C, Muldowney A, Ugalde A, McCaffrey N. Measuring Carer Outcomes in an Economic Evaluation: A Content Comparison of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers, Carer Experience Scale, and Care-Related Quality of Life Using Exploratory Factor Analysis. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:885-896. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20944193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background. To incorporate the spillover effects experienced by carers providing informal care in health policy decisions, new carer-related preference-based measures have been developed for use in economic evaluation, which include the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer), Carer Experience Scale (CES), and Care-Related Quality of Life (CarerQoL). The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which these 3 instruments measure complementary or overlapping constructs. Methods. Data were derived from an online survey undertaken with carers residing in Australia. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to ascertain the underlying latent constructs of the 3 measures. Results. Data from 351 informal carers yielded a 5-factor model describing general quality of life outside caring, problems due to caring, fulfilment from caring, social support with caring, and relationship with the care recipient. Most of the ASCOT-Carer and the CarerQol items loaded onto the first and second factors, respectively. The greatest overlap was observed between CarerQol and CES items loading onto the other 3 shared common factors. Limitations. Online data collection resulted in inconsistent responses, which had to be removed to yield logical data. A convenience sampling approach may have compromised the generalizability of study findings. Conclusion. Although some overlap was observed, the 3 carer-related preference-based measures seem to tap into different constructs of carer-related quality of life and caring experiences and cannot be used interchangeably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidia Engel
- Deakin University, Geelong, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Renske Hoefman
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Jessica Bucholc
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cathrine Mihalopoulos
- Deakin University, Geelong, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Anna Ugalde
- Deakin University, Geelong, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nikki McCaffrey
- Deakin University, Geelong, Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bégo-Le Bagousse G, Jia X, Wolowacz S, Eckert L, Tavi J, Hudson R. Health utility estimation in children and adolescents: a review of health technology assessments. Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36:1209-1224. [PMID: 32345060 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1762553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Health utility estimates for children and adolescents are critical for cost-utility analyses informing health technology assessment (HTA) authorities' decisions governing access to pediatric treatments. However, in a recent review, only 29% of published pediatric cost-utility models used a utility measure validated for children. We examined utility estimates used in pediatric HTAs.Methods: A targeted review of pediatric HTAs was performed, focusing on agencies reporting utility estimate sources and methods.Results: Searches identified 11 HTAs in pediatric indications and five in mixed populations with separate analyses for adults and children. Among 13 appraisals reporting methodological detail, five used pediatric utility estimates (based on the Health Utilities Index [HUI], n = 3; Atopic Dermatitis Quality of Life [ADQoL], n = 1; or mapping, n = 1). Issues were identified with mapping, use of adult data for some health states, and assumptions about ADQoL responses. In the remaining eight appraisals, adult utility estimates were applied. Caregiver utility was included in two of 16 appraisals.Conclusions: Only 38% of pediatric HTAs reviewed used pediatric utility estimates, and HTA authorities raised concerns about these data in many cases; only 12% of HTAs included caregiver utility. Although several preference-based utility measures are available for pediatric populations, limited data and guidance on selection of measures are available. When estimating pediatric utility weights, alternative measures should be reviewed for suitability given the model population and health condition. Pediatric and adult utility estimates should be applied appropriately as patients age over time, and caregiver and/or family member utility should be included, where relevant. Gaps exist in utility measures for children aged <4 years and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaoying Jia
- Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Laurent Eckert
- Health Economics and Value Assessment, Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | - Jules Tavi
- Health Economics, Ivi-Data Life Sciences, Levallois-Perret, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Poolman M, Roberts J, Wright S, Hendry A, Goulden N, Holmes EA, Byrne A, Perkins P, Hoare Z, Nelson A, Hiscock J, Hughes D, O'Connor J, Foster B, Reymond L, Healy S, Lewis P, Wee B, Johnstone R, Roberts R, Parkinson A, Roberts S, Wilkinson C. Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-150. [PMID: 32484432 DOI: 10.3310/hta24250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people who are dying want to be cared for at home, but only half of them achieve this. The likelihood of a home death often depends on the availability of able and willing lay carers. When people who are dying are unable to take oral medication, injectable medication is used. When top-up medication is required, a health-care professional travels to the dying person's home, which may delay symptom relief. The administration of subcutaneous medication by lay carers, although not widespread UK practice, has proven to be key in achieving better symptom control for those dying at home in other countries. OBJECTIVES To determine if carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for common breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home is feasible and acceptable in the UK, and if it would be feasible to test this intervention in a future definitive randomised controlled trial. DESIGN We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised, open pilot trial of the intervention versus usual care, with a 1 : 1 allocation ratio, using convergent mixed methods. SETTING Home-based care without 24/7 paid care provision, in three UK sites. PARTICIPANTS Participants were dyads of adult patients and carers: patients in the last weeks of their life who wished to die at home and lay carers who were willing to be trained to give subcutaneous medication. Strict risk assessment criteria needed to be met before approach, including known history of substance abuse or carer ability to be trained to competency. INTERVENTION Intervention-group carers received training by local nurses using a manualised training package. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quantitative data were collected at baseline and 6-8 weeks post bereavement and via carer diaries. Interviews with carers and health-care professionals explored attitudes to, experiences of and preferences for giving subcutaneous medication and experience of trial processes. The main outcomes of interest were feasibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, attrition and selection of the most appropriate outcome measures. RESULTS In total, 40 out of 101 eligible dyads were recruited (39.6%), which met the feasibility criterion of recruiting > 30% of eligible dyads. The expected recruitment target (≈50 dyads) was not reached, as fewer than expected participants were identified. Although the overall retention rate was 55% (22/40), this was substantially unbalanced [30% (6/20) usual care and 80% (16/20) intervention]. The feasibility criterion of > 40% retention was, therefore, considered not met. A total of 12 carers (intervention, n = 10; usual care, n = 2) and 20 health-care professionals were interviewed. The intervention was considered acceptable, feasible and safe in the small study population. The context of the feasibility study was not ideal, as district nurses were seriously overstretched and unfamiliar with research methods. A disparity in readiness to consider the intervention was demonstrated between carers and health-care professionals. Findings showed that there were methodological and ethics issues pertaining to researching last days of life care. CONCLUSION The success of a future definitive trial is uncertain because of equivocal results in the progression criteria, particularly poor recruitment overall and a low retention rate in the usual-care group. Future work regarding the intervention should include understanding the context of UK areas where this has been adopted, ascertaining wider public views and exploring health-care professional views on burden and risk in the NHS context. There should be consideration of the need for national policy and of the most appropriate quantitative outcome measures to use. This will help to ascertain if there are unanswered questions to be studied in a trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN11211024. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 25. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stella Wright
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Annie Hendry
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Nia Goulden
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Anthony Byrne
- Marie Curie Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Paul Perkins
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.,Sue Ryder Leckhampton Court Hospice, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Annmarie Nelson
- Marie Curie Research Centre, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Julia Hiscock
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Dyfrig Hughes
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Betty Foster
- Public Contributor, North Wales Cancer Patient Forum, North Wales Cancer Treatment Centre, Bodelwyddan, UK
| | - Liz Reymond
- Brisbane South Palliative Care Collaborative, School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Sue Healy
- Metro South Palliative Care Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Penney Lewis
- Centre for Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Bee Wee
- Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Sian Roberts
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
McLoughlin C, Goranitis I, Al-Janabi H. Validity and Responsiveness of Preference-Based Quality-of-Life Measures in Informal Carers: A Comparison of 5 Measures Across 4 Conditions. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:782-790. [PMID: 32540237 PMCID: PMC7532692 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Carer quality-of-life (QoL) effects are recommended for inclusion in economic evaluations, but little is known about the relative performance of different types of QoL measures with carers. This study evaluated the validity and responsiveness of 3 care-related QoL measures (the Carer Experience Scale [CES], CarerQoL-7D, and ASCOT-Carer), 1 health-related QoL measure (the EQ-5D-5L), and 1 generic QoL measure (the ICECAP-A). METHODS Validity and responsiveness were assessed in a UK sample of informal carers of adults with dementia, stroke, mental illness, or rheumatoid arthritis. A questionnaire containing the 5 QoL measures was posted to carers identified through the Family Resources Survey (N = 1004). Hypotheses regarding the anticipated associations between constructs related to the QoL of carers were tested to investigate construct validity and responsiveness. RESULTS Each measure exhibited some level of construct validity. In general, larger effect sizes and stronger associations were detected for the ASCOT-Carer and ICECAP-A measures in the pooled sample and across all conditions. The 5 measures did not exhibit clear responsiveness to changes over a 12-month period in care recipient health status or hours of care provided per week. CONCLUSION The results of this study provide initial evidence of the validity of care-related, health-related, and generic QoL (capability) measures in informal carers of adults with 4 highly prevalent conditions. Care-related measures were not always more sensitive to constructs associated with QoL of carers compared with generic measures. The performance of the ICECAP-A was comparable with that of the best-performing care-related measure, the ASCOT-Carer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol McLoughlin
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK; Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shah KK, Murtagh FEM, McGeechan K, Crail SM, Burns A, Morton RL. Quality of life among caregivers of people with end-stage kidney disease managed with dialysis or comprehensive conservative care. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:160. [PMID: 32366220 PMCID: PMC7199363 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01830-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To measure health-related and care-related quality of life among informal caregivers of older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and to determine the association between caregiver quality of life and care recipient’s treatment type. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Three renal units in the UK and Australia were included. Informal caregivers of people aged ≥75 years with ESKD managed with dialysis or comprehensive conservative non-dialytic care (estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) ≤10 mL/min/1.73m2) participated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using Short-Form six dimensions (SF-6D, 0–1 scale) and care-related quality of life was assessed using the Carer Experience Scale (CES, 0–100 scale). Linear regression assessed associations between care-recipient treatment type, caregiver characteristics and the SF-6D utility index and CES scores. Results Of 63 caregivers, 49 (78%) were from Australia, 26 (41%) cared for an older person managed with dialysis, and 37 (59%) cared for an older person managed with comprehensive conservative care. Overall, 73% were females, and the median age of the entire cohort was 76 years [IQR 68–81]. When adjusted for caregiver sociodemographic characteristics, caregivers reported significantly worse carer experience (CES score 15.73, 95% CI 5.78 to 25.68) for those managing an older person on dialysis compared with conservative care. However, no significant difference observed for carer HRQoL (SF-6D utility index − 0.08, 95% CI − 0.18 to 0.01) for those managing an older person on dialysis compared with conservative care. Conclusions Our data suggest informal caregivers of older people on dialysis have significantly worse care-related quality of life (and therefore greater need for support) than those managed with comprehensive conservative care. It is important to consider the impact on caregivers’ quality of life when considering treatment choices for their care recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan K Shah
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston upon Hull, UK
| | - Kevin McGeechan
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Aine Burns
- Royal Free Hospital, London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rachael L Morton
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Meiers SJ, Eggenberger SK, Krumwiede NK, Deppa B. Measuring Family Members' Experiences of Integrating Chronic Illness Into Family Life: Preliminary Validity and Reliability of the Family Integration Experience Scale:Chronic Illness (FIES:CI). JOURNAL OF FAMILY NURSING 2020; 26:111-125. [PMID: 32202186 DOI: 10.1177/1074840720902129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Measures of family members' experiences of integrating chronic conditions (CC) or chronic illnesses (CI) into family life are needed to optimize family care. This article reports development and psychometric testing of the Family Integration Experience Scale: Chronic Illness (FIES:CI), a measure of family member perceptions of integrating CC or CI into evolving family life. Family Systems Nursing (FSN), the Reintegration Within Families in the Context of Chronic Illness Model, and measurement theory guided the study. Participants were those (N = 328) managing a CC or CI. Concurrent validity (r = +.629; p < .001) and discriminant validity, F(1, 155) = 7.09; p < .05, were demonstrated. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-dimensional model explaining 63.8% variance. Scale internal reliability was α = .70 and .785, and factor reliabilities were α = .798 (Factor 1) and α = .847 (Factor 2). Test-retest item and subscale correlations, while accounting for intra-family correlation, were acceptable. The FIES:CI contributes a valuable new measure of family integration in the context of CC or CI with preliminary validity and reliability as tested in these samples.
Collapse
|
21
|
Krick T, Huter K, Seibert K, Domhoff D, Wolf-Ostermann K. Measuring the effectiveness of digital nursing technologies: development of a comprehensive digital nursing technology outcome framework based on a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:243. [PMID: 32209099 PMCID: PMC7092516 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05106-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital nursing technologies (DNT) comprise an expanding, highly diverse field of research, explored using a wide variety of methods and tools. Study results are therefore difficult to compare, which raises the question how effectiveness of DNT can be adequately measured. Methods currently used might not be sufficient for certain specific nursing contexts. A comprehensive outcome framework that shows the multitude of possible outcome areas could be useful to generate more comparable results. The aim of the present study is to develop an outcome framework for DNT and to indicate which outcome areas have been most frequently evaluated in previous studies and how this has been done. METHODS We combined an inductive and deductive approach to develop the framework. The numerical analysis is based on a scoping review focussing on the effectiveness of DNT for persons in need of care, formal or informal caregivers or care institutions. Nine databases were included in the screening: Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, the Collection of Computer Science Bibliographies, GeroLit and CareLit. Additional literature searches and expert interviews were included. RESULTS The developed framework comprises four outcome target groups and 47 outcome areas. There are considerable differences in the researched outcome areas for the individual outcome target groups. Persons in need of care were by far the most frequently surveyed, particularly with respect to their psychological health. There are much fewer studies on formal and informal caregivers, and it is particularly noticeable that the quality of life of both groups has rarely been investigated. Care process quality was most frequently researched for organisations. CONCLUSION We were able to provide a comprehensive DNT outcome framework, thereby identifying the outcome tools used and the less researched outcome areas. We recommend a detailed investigation of all areas and tools in future research projects with a view to initiating a discussion on the differing importance of existing outcome areas and on a standardisation of outcome tools. We also recommend the development of outcome areas for the macro level of effectiveness assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Krick
- SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 3, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
- High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Kai Huter
- SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 3, 28359, Bremen, Germany
- High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Seibert
- High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Dominik Domhoff
- High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Karin Wolf-Ostermann
- High-profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Grazer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mowforth OD, Davies BM, Kotter MR. Quality of Life Among Informal Caregivers of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Interact J Med Res 2019; 8:e12381. [PMID: 31697240 PMCID: PMC6914271 DOI: 10.2196/12381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common, chronic neurological condition that severely affects individuals by causing a range of disabling symptoms, frequently at a time around the peak of their careers. Subsequently, individuals with DCM often become dependent on informal care arrangements. The significant economic contribution of informal care and its burden on care providers are becoming increasingly recognized. Objective This study aimed to measure the quality of life of DCM informal caregivers and provide preliminary insight into possible contributing factors. Methods Carers of individuals with DCM completed a Web-based survey hosted by Myelopathy.org, an international DCM charity. Carer quality of life was assessed in the form of caregiver happiness and 7 dimensions of carer burden using the Care-Related Quality of Life (CarerQol) instrument. The relationships between patient disease severity, patient pain, and carer quality of life were investigated. Differences in carer quality of life were assessed across patient and carer demographic groups, including between UK and US carers. Results DCM caregivers experienced substantial burden as a result of their caregiving (mean CarerQol-7D=64.1; 95% CI 58.8-69.5) and low happiness (mean CarerQol-VAS [Visual Analog Scale]=6.3; 95% CI 5.7-6.9). Burden was high and happiness was low in DCM carers when compared with a large, mixed-disease study of adult informal carers where CarerQol-7D was 79.1 and CarerQol-VAS was 7.1. No significant relationship was found between DCM carer quality of life and patient disease severity and pain scores. DCM carer quality of life appeared uniform across all patient and carer demographic groups. Conclusions Caring for individuals with DCM is associated with reduced quality of life in the form of significant burden and reduced happiness. Reductions appear greater in DCM than in other diseases investigated. However, no simple relationship was identified between individual patient or carer factors and carer quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Daniel Mowforth
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Marshall Davies
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Reinhard Kotter
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Luckett T, Agar M, DiGiacomo M, Lam L, Phillips J. Health status in South Australians caring for people with cancer: A population‐based study. Psychooncology 2019; 28:2149-2156. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.5200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Luckett
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT)University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT)University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Sydney New South Wales Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Michelle DiGiacomo
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT)University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Lawrence Lam
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT)University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Tung Wah College Hong Kong
| | - Jane Phillips
- Faculty of Health, Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT)University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ratcliffe J, Cameron I, Lancsar E, Walker R, Milte R, Hutchinson CL, Swaffer K, Parker S. Developing a new quality of life instrument with older people for economic evaluation in aged care: study protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028647. [PMID: 31129602 PMCID: PMC6538028 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ageing of the population represents a significant challenge for aged care in Australia and in many other countries internationally. In an environment of increasing resource constraints, new methods, techniques and evaluative frameworks are needed to support resource allocation decisions that maximise the quality of life and well-being of older people. Economic evaluation offers a rigorous, systematical and transparent framework for measuring quality and efficiency, but there is currently no composite mechanism for incorporating older people's values into the measurement and valuation of quality of life for quality assessment and economic evaluation. In addition, to date relatively few economic evaluations have been conducted in aged care despite the large potential benefits associated with their application in this sector. This study will generate a new preference based older person-specific quality of life instrument designed for application in economic evaluation and co-created from its inception with older people. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A candidate descriptive system for the new instrument will be developed by synthesising the findings from a series of in-depth qualitative interviews with 40 older people currently in receipt of aged care services about the salient factors which make up their quality of life. The candidate descriptive system will be tested for construct validity, practicality and reliability with a new independent sample of older people (n=100). Quality of life state valuation tasks using best worst scaling (a form of discrete choice experiment) will then be undertaken with a representative sample of older people currently receiving aged care services across five Australian states (n=500). A multinomial (conditional) logistical framework will be used to analyse responses and generate a scoring algorithm for the new preference-based instrument. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The new quality of life instrument will have wide potential applicability in assessing the cost effectiveness of new service innovations and for quality assessment across the spectrum of ageing and aged care. Results will be disseminated in ageing, quality of life research and health economics journals and through professional conferences and policy forums. This study has been reviewed by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia and has ethics approval (Application ID: 201644).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ratcliffe
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ian Cameron
- Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Emily Lancsar
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Ruth Walker
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rachel Milte
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Claire Louise Hutchinson
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Swaffer
- Dementia Alliance International, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Stuart Parker
- Institute of Health and Society/Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wittenberg E, James LP, Prosser LA. Spillover Effects on Caregivers' and Family Members' Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2019; 37:475-499. [PMID: 30887469 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-019-00768-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing body of research has identified health-related quality-of-life effects for caregivers and family members of ill patients (i.e. 'spillover effects'), yet these are rarely considered in cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to catalog spillover-related health utilities to facilitate their consideration in CEAs. METHODS We systematically reviewed the medical and economic literatures (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EconLit, from inception through 3 April 2018) to identify articles that reported preference-based measures of spillover effects. We used keywords for utility measures combined with caregivers, family members, and burden. RESULTS Of 3695 articles identified, 80 remained after screening: 8 (10%) reported spillover utility per se, as utility or disutility (i.e. utility loss); 25 (30%) reported a comparison group, either population values (n = 9) or matched, non-caregiver/family member or unaffected individuals' utilities (n = 16; 3 reported both spillover and a comparison group); and 50 (63%) reported caregiver/family member utilities only. Alzheimer's disease/dementia was the most commonly studied disease/condition, and the EQ-5D was the most commonly used measurement instrument. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive catalog of utilities showcases the spectrum of diseases and conditions for which caregiver and family members' spillover effects have been measured, and the variation in measurement methods used. In general, utilities indicated a loss in quality of life associated with being a caregiver or family member of an ill relative. Most studies reported caregiver/family member utility without any comparator, limiting the ability to infer spillover effects. Nevertheless, these values provide a starting point for considering spillover effects in the context of CEA, opening the door for more comprehensive analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Wittenberg
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Lyndon P James
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa A Prosser
- Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Poolman M, Roberts J, Byrne A, Perkins P, Hoare Z, Nelson A, Hiscock J, Hughes D, Foster B, O'Connor J, Reymond L, Healy S, Roberts R, Wee B, Lewis P, Johnstone R, Roberts S, Holmes E, Wright S, Hendry A, Wilkinson C. CARer-ADministration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in homebased dying patients (CARiAD): study protocol for a UK-based open randomised pilot trial. Trials 2019; 20:105. [PMID: 30732624 PMCID: PMC6367805 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3179-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the majority of seriously ill people wish to die at home, only half achieve this. The likelihood of someone dying at home often depends on the availability of able and willing lay carers to support them. Dying people are usually unable to take oral medication. When top-up symptom relief medication is required, a clinician travels to the home to administer injectable medication, with attendant delays. The administration of subcutaneous injections by lay carers, though not widespread practice in the UK, has proven key in achieving home deaths in other countries. Our aim is to determine if carer-administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for four frequent breakthrough symptoms (pain, nausea, restlessness and noisy breathing) in home-based dying patients is feasible and acceptable in the UK. Methods This paper describes a randomised pilot trial across three UK sites, with an embedded qualitative study. Dyads of adult patients/carers are eligible, where patients are in the last weeks of life and wish to die at home, and lay carers who are willing to be trained to give subcutaneous medication. Dyads who do not meet strict risk assessment criteria (including known history of substance abuse or carer ability to be trained to competency) will not be approached. Carers in the intervention arm will receive a manualised training package delivered by their local nursing team. Dyads in the control arm will receive usual care. The main outcomes of interest are feasibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, attrition and selection of the most appropriate outcome measures. Interviews with carers and healthcare professionals will explore attitudes to, experiences of and preferences for giving subcutaneous medication and experience of trial processes. The study has obtained full ethical approval. Discussion This study will rehearse the procedures and logistics which will be undertaken in a future definitive randomised controlled trial and will inform the design of such a study. Findings will illuminate methodological and ethical issues pertaining to researching last days of life care. The study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (Health Technology Assessment [HTA] project 15/10/37). Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN 11211024. Registered on 27 September 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3179-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlise Poolman
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK. .,Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.
| | - Jessica Roberts
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Anthony Byrne
- Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University, Bangor, UK.,Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Paul Perkins
- Sue Ryder Leckhampton Court Hospice, Cheltenham, UK.,Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Julia Hiscock
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Dyfrig Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Betty Foster
- North Wales Cancer Network Patient Forum, Bangor, UK
| | | | - Liz Reymond
- Queensland Health Metro South Hospital Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sue Healy
- Queensland Health Metro South Hospital Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Bee Wee
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Penney Lewis
- The Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Sian Roberts
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK
| | - Emily Holmes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Stella Wright
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Annie Hendry
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Clare Wilkinson
- Bangor Institute for Health & Medical Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lin E, Durbin J, Guerriere D, Volpe T, Selick A, Kennedy J, Ungar WJ, Lero DS. Assessing care-giving demands, resources and costs of family/friend caregivers for persons with mental health disorders: A scoping review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2018; 26:613-634. [PMID: 29498120 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
As mental health (MH) care has shifted from institutional settings to the community, families and friends are responsible for providing the majority of the care at home. The substantial literature on the adverse effects experienced by caregivers has focused mainly on psychological morbidity. Less attention has been paid to how caregivers for persons with MH disorders interact with larger social systems and the impacts of factors such as financial strain, lost time from leisure activities, and the availability of health and social services. We conducted a scoping review of MH and other caregiver questionnaires published between 1990 and 2016 to determine whether they addressed four key domains: caregiver work demands, resource needs, resource utilisation and costs. A range of health and social care databases were searched, including MEDLINE and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. After screening for relevance and quality, our search identified 14 instruments addressing elements related to one or more of our domains. Because these instruments covered only a small portion of our domains, we conducted a second targeted search of the general care-giving literature and consulted with experts, identifying an additional 18 instruments. A total of 32 questionnaires were reviewed, 14 specific to care-giving for mental health problems and 18 for other health conditions. Our search identified instruments or items within instruments that assess constructs in each of our domains, but no one instrument covered them completely. Additionally, some constructs were evaluated in detail and others only addressed by single items. While these instruments are helpful for moving measurement beyond the psychological impacts of care-giving, our results serve only as an initial guide. Additional methodological work is needed to more comprehensively measure the impact of care-giving for individuals with MH disorders and to contribute to the development of more meaningful and effective policies and programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Lin
- Provincial System and Support Program, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Janet Durbin
- Provincial System and Support Program, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Denise Guerriere
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tiziana Volpe
- Provincial System and Support Program, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Avra Selick
- Provincial System and Support Program, Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Kennedy
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Donna S Lero
- Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Al-Janabi H, Carmichael F, Oyebode J. Informal care: choice or constraint? Scand J Caring Sci 2017; 32:157-167. [PMID: 28401583 PMCID: PMC5873411 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background ‘Choice’ is increasingly pursued as a goal of social policy. However, the degree to which choice is exercised when entering an informal caring role is open to debate. Aim In this study, we examined the degree of choice and constraint in entering a caring role, and the relationship between choice and carers’ well‐being. Methods Data were derived from 1100 responses to a postal survey conducted in a British city. Statistical tests of association and multivariable regression modelling were applied to study the factors associated with choice in entering a caring role and the association that choice in entering a caring role had with carers’ well‐being. Results We found that informal care was generally perceived to be a free choice, albeit in most cases, a choice was also constrained by duty, financial or social resources. Having a sense of free choice in entering care was strongly and positively associated with the carer's well‐being. Conclusion The study findings are consistent with a view that enabling individuals to have more choice in their caring roles may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jan Oyebode
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|